ppmi-mini / README.md
zndr27's picture
Document SBR, SAA and recruitment covariate columns
fe15f5d verified
|
Raw
History Blame
6.22 kB
metadata
title: PPMI Mini
tags:
  - medical-imaging
  - mri
  - nifti
  - parkinsons
  - ppmi

PPMI Mini

A 1,000-subject PPMI sMRI evaluation subset derived from local BIDS T1w images and PPMI subject-characteristics metadata.

Cohort

  • 1,000 subjects / 1,000 scans
  • One T1w scan per subject
  • Sex: 431 Female / 569 Male
  • Diagnosis: CN 226 / PD 357 / Prodromal 356 / SWEDD 61

Features

The dataset has a single eval split with embedded NIfTI image bytes in nifti. Brain masks and SynthSeg volumes are intentionally omitted for v0.1.

Clinical targets

clinical/ppmi_mini_clinical.parquet holds derived clinical targets for the same 1,000 scans, joined from PPMI LONI study data. It is a sidecar table rather than extra columns on the split, so the imaging is untouched.

from datasets import load_from_disk
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download, hf_hub_download
import pandas as pd

data = load_from_disk(snapshot_download("medarc/ppmi-mini", repo_type="dataset"))["eval"]
clinical = pd.read_parquet(
    hf_hub_download("medarc/ppmi-mini", "clinical/ppmi_mini_clinical.parquet", repo_type="dataset")
).set_index("sample_id")
clinical = clinical.loc[list(data["sample_id"])]   # aligned to the split

Keys

Column Meaning
sample_id Joins to the split. One row per scan.
participant_id Subject, sub-<PATNO>. Use it to group by subject in cross-validation.

The raw PPMI PATNO is not included; participant_id already encodes it.

Longitudinal targets

Each instrument below yields three columns: <prefix>_baseline, the score measured nearest the scan; <prefix>_slope_48m, the annualized OLS slope over visits in a −0.25 to 4.0 year window relative to the scan, requiring at least 2 visits at distinct dates; and <prefix>_n_visits, how many visits fed the fit. A slope is null where the participant has too few visits in the window.

Prefix Instrument Range Direction n (baseline / slope)
np3tot_off MDS-UPDRS Part III motor exam, OFF-medication and untreated exams only 0–132 higher = worse 810 / 765
np3tot_all MDS-UPDRS Part III, all medication states 0–132 higher = worse 992 / 953
nhy_off Hoehn & Yahr stage, OFF-medication and untreated 0–5 ordinal higher = worse 809 / 763
nhy_all Hoehn & Yahr stage, all medication states 0–5 ordinal higher = worse 991 / 951
np2ptot MDS-UPDRS Part II, patient-reported motor experiences of daily living 0–52 higher = worse 998 / 971
mseadlg Modified Schwab & England ADL, percent independence 0–100 higher = better 849 / 812
mcatot Montreal Cognitive Assessment 0–30 higher = better 992 / 921
cogcomp Cognitive composite, see below SD units higher = better 987 / 930
sbr_striatum DAT-SPECT striatal binding ratio, whole striatum, referenced to occipital white matter continuous lower = more dopaminergic loss 712 / 440
sbr_putamen Same, putamen, where loss appears earliest in PD continuous lower = more loss 712 / 440
sbr_caudate Same, caudate continuous lower = more loss 712 / 440

MDS-UPDRS Part III is scored either ON or OFF dopaminergic medication, and ON scores are drug-suppressed, so the _off and _all variants are both provided: _off is the cleaner target, _all has the larger sample.

cogcomp is the mean z-score across five full-length neuropsychological tests — HVLT-R total recall, Symbol Digit Modalities, Benton Judgement of Line Orientation, Letter–Number Sequencing and semantic (animal) fluency — requiring at least 3 of the 5 present at a visit. Each test is z-scored across all study visits before averaging. Raw totals are used rather than PPMI's derived age-normed T-scores, so that age is not silently removed from the target.

It is provided because MoCA ceilings in this cohort: 66.7% of participants score ≥27/30 and 12.2% sit at exactly 30, so MoCA cannot resolve variation in the normal range.

Cross-sectional targets

Column Meaning Range Direction n
upsit_baseline University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, 40 items 0–40 higher = better 386
rbdsq_baseline REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder Screening Questionnaire 0–13 higher = more symptoms 990
saa_positive CSF alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay 1 = positive 910
prs_meta5 PD polygenic risk score, META5 continuous higher = more risk 827
prs_meta5_excl_lrrk2_gba Same score with the LRRK2 and GBA loci removed continuous higher = more risk 827

saa_positive has no specimen collection date in the source, only a visit code and an assay run date, so unlike every other column it is not time-aligned to the scan. One status per subject is taken, preferring the baseline visit. Inconclusive results are dropped rather than coerced. Positivity by group is CN 5.6%, Prodromal 51.3%, PD 90.3%, so it is close to a diagnosis label.

PPMI ships the RBDSQ as individual items rather than a total, so rbdsq_baseline sums items 1–12 and adds 1 for item 13 if any neurological condition is present; note that PTCGBOTH in that source file is not a score but a record of whether the participant, the caregiver or both completed the form. And NHY values of 101 in the source are an out-of-range "not assessed" sentinel, mapped to null here.

Recruitment covariates

Column Meaning
enrolled_genetic_cohort 1 if enrolled via LRRK2, GBA, SNCA, PINK1 or PRKN carrier status (149 of 1000)
enrolled_hyposmia 1 if enrolled via the hyposmia pathway (197)
enrolled_rbd 1 if enrolled via the RBD pathway (77)

These are covariates, not targets. PPMI recruits genetic carriers through a dedicated cohort, and that membership correlates with PD polygenic risk at r = 0.58 by construction, so any target that might vary with recruitment should be checked against these. The two PRS variants are shipped together for the same reason, to separate cohort enrichment from the rest of the polygenic signal.