ppmi-mini / README.md
zndr27's picture
Document SBR, SAA and recruitment covariate columns
fe15f5d verified
|
Raw
History Blame
6.22 kB
---
title: PPMI Mini
tags:
- medical-imaging
- mri
- nifti
- parkinsons
- ppmi
---
# PPMI Mini
A 1,000-subject PPMI sMRI evaluation subset derived from local BIDS T1w images
and PPMI subject-characteristics metadata.
## Cohort
- 1,000 subjects / 1,000 scans
- One T1w scan per subject
- Sex: 431 Female / 569 Male
- Diagnosis: CN 226 / PD 357 / Prodromal 356 / SWEDD 61
## Features
The dataset has a single `eval` split with embedded NIfTI image bytes in `nifti`.
Brain masks and SynthSeg volumes are intentionally omitted for v0.1.
## Clinical targets
`clinical/ppmi_mini_clinical.parquet` holds derived clinical targets for the same
1,000 scans, joined from PPMI LONI study data. It is a sidecar table rather than
extra columns on the split, so the imaging is untouched.
```python
from datasets import load_from_disk
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download, hf_hub_download
import pandas as pd
data = load_from_disk(snapshot_download("medarc/ppmi-mini", repo_type="dataset"))["eval"]
clinical = pd.read_parquet(
hf_hub_download("medarc/ppmi-mini", "clinical/ppmi_mini_clinical.parquet", repo_type="dataset")
).set_index("sample_id")
clinical = clinical.loc[list(data["sample_id"])] # aligned to the split
```
### Keys
| Column | Meaning |
|:---|:---|
| `sample_id` | Joins to the split. One row per scan. |
| `participant_id` | Subject, `sub-<PATNO>`. Use it to group by subject in cross-validation. |
The raw PPMI `PATNO` is not included; `participant_id` already encodes it.
### Longitudinal targets
Each instrument below yields three columns: `<prefix>_baseline`, the score
measured nearest the scan; `<prefix>_slope_48m`, the annualized OLS slope over
visits in a −0.25 to 4.0 year window relative to the scan, requiring at least 2
visits at distinct dates; and `<prefix>_n_visits`, how many visits fed the fit.
A slope is null where the participant has too few visits in the window.
| Prefix | Instrument | Range | Direction | n (baseline / slope) |
|:---|:---|:---|:---|:---|
| `np3tot_off` | MDS-UPDRS Part III motor exam, OFF-medication and untreated exams only | 0–132 | higher = worse | 810 / 765 |
| `np3tot_all` | MDS-UPDRS Part III, all medication states | 0–132 | higher = worse | 992 / 953 |
| `nhy_off` | Hoehn & Yahr stage, OFF-medication and untreated | 0–5 ordinal | higher = worse | 809 / 763 |
| `nhy_all` | Hoehn & Yahr stage, all medication states | 0–5 ordinal | higher = worse | 991 / 951 |
| `np2ptot` | MDS-UPDRS Part II, patient-reported motor experiences of daily living | 0–52 | higher = worse | 998 / 971 |
| `mseadlg` | Modified Schwab & England ADL, percent independence | 0–100 | higher = better | 849 / 812 |
| `mcatot` | Montreal Cognitive Assessment | 0–30 | higher = better | 992 / 921 |
| `cogcomp` | Cognitive composite, see below | SD units | higher = better | 987 / 930 |
| `sbr_striatum` | DAT-SPECT striatal binding ratio, whole striatum, referenced to occipital white matter | continuous | lower = more dopaminergic loss | 712 / 440 |
| `sbr_putamen` | Same, putamen, where loss appears earliest in PD | continuous | lower = more loss | 712 / 440 |
| `sbr_caudate` | Same, caudate | continuous | lower = more loss | 712 / 440 |
MDS-UPDRS Part III is scored either ON or OFF dopaminergic medication, and ON
scores are drug-suppressed, so the `_off` and `_all` variants are both provided:
`_off` is the cleaner target, `_all` has the larger sample.
`cogcomp` is the mean z-score across five full-length neuropsychological tests —
HVLT-R total recall, Symbol Digit Modalities, Benton Judgement of Line
Orientation, Letter–Number Sequencing and semantic (animal) fluency — requiring
at least 3 of the 5 present at a visit. Each test is z-scored across all study
visits before averaging. Raw totals are used rather than PPMI's derived
age-normed T-scores, so that age is not silently removed from the target.
It is provided because MoCA ceilings in this cohort: 66.7% of participants score
≥27/30 and 12.2% sit at exactly 30, so MoCA cannot resolve variation in the
normal range.
### Cross-sectional targets
| Column | Meaning | Range | Direction | n |
|:---|:---|:---|:---|:---|
| `upsit_baseline` | University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, 40 items | 0–40 | higher = better | 386 |
| `rbdsq_baseline` | REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder Screening Questionnaire | 0–13 | higher = more symptoms | 990 |
| `saa_positive` | CSF alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay | 1 = positive | — | 910 |
| `prs_meta5` | PD polygenic risk score, META5 | continuous | higher = more risk | 827 |
| `prs_meta5_excl_lrrk2_gba` | Same score with the *LRRK2* and *GBA* loci removed | continuous | higher = more risk | 827 |
`saa_positive` has no specimen collection date in the source, only a visit code
and an assay run date, so unlike every other column it is not time-aligned to
the scan. One status per subject is taken, preferring the baseline visit.
Inconclusive results are dropped rather than coerced. Positivity by group is
CN 5.6%, Prodromal 51.3%, PD 90.3%, so it is close to a diagnosis label.
PPMI ships the RBDSQ as individual items rather than a total, so
`rbdsq_baseline` sums items 1–12 and adds 1 for item 13 if any neurological
condition is present; note that `PTCGBOTH` in that source file is not a score
but a record of whether the participant, the caregiver or both completed the
form. And `NHY` values of `101` in the source are an out-of-range "not assessed"
sentinel, mapped to null here.
### Recruitment covariates
| Column | Meaning |
|:---|:---|
| `enrolled_genetic_cohort` | 1 if enrolled via *LRRK2*, *GBA*, *SNCA*, *PINK1* or *PRKN* carrier status (149 of 1000) |
| `enrolled_hyposmia` | 1 if enrolled via the hyposmia pathway (197) |
| `enrolled_rbd` | 1 if enrolled via the RBD pathway (77) |
These are covariates, not targets. PPMI recruits genetic carriers through a
dedicated cohort, and that membership correlates with PD polygenic risk at
r = 0.58 by construction, so any target that might vary with recruitment should
be checked against these. The two PRS variants are shipped together for the same
reason, to separate cohort enrichment from the rest of the polygenic signal.