conversation_id int64 1 206k | help_channel stringlengths 6 7 | __rowid__ stringlengths 32 32 | author_id int64 62,061,868B 1,071,443,446B | author_name stringlengths 2 32 | timestamp stringlengths 19 19 | content stringlengths 0 3.97k | reference.messageId stringclasses 3
values | reference.channelId stringclasses 3
values | reference.guildId stringclasses 1
value | url stringlengths 0 591 | fileName stringlengths 0 513 | student int64 0 1 | helper int64 0 1 | references.id float64 62,061,868B 1,071,056,124B ⌀ | references.name stringlengths 2 32 ⌀ | references.discriminator stringlengths 4 4 ⌀ | references.nickname stringlengths 1 32 ⌀ | references.isBot bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:31:07 | you need to account for the initial value f(0) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 307,070,375,735,459,840 | abs_0 | 01/30/2022 04:31:44 | What’s theta and delta tho | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 04:31:58 | there's no delta -_- delta(z) is the change in "z" | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 04:32:59 | theta is well defined above ^ I suppose.. the angle between the +ve x-axis and the secant | 0 | 1 | 307,070,375,735,459,840 | abs_0 | 8527 | a.b.s._.0. | false | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 307,070,375,735,459,840 | abs_0 | 01/30/2022 04:33:25 | Well like | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 307,070,375,735,459,840 | abs_0 | 01/30/2022 04:33:34 | The slope of the secant is delta y over delta x | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 307,070,375,735,459,840 | abs_0 | 01/30/2022 04:33:44 | So then delta y = that stuff | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 307,070,375,735,459,840 | abs_0 | 01/30/2022 04:33:49 | Oh that is what you’re saying | 0 | 1 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 3502 | Arya | false | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 307,070,375,735,459,840 | abs_0 | 01/30/2022 04:33:56 | Lol | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:34:47 | maybe someone can draw and illustrate with a piecewise linear function and its derivative | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 04:35:06 | Shuri ...:bearlain: | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:35:08 | i'm out of paper space | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 04:35:46 | Camilleone? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:35:48 | i use three colours to use the same paper three times, but i doubt it'll be clear in any sense of the word to anyone | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:36:50 | yeah, you can use this, it's effectively the same argument but imo viewed from a slightly different angle | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:36:55 | it ends up the same anyhow | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 04:37:12 | wdym | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 04:37:27 | so after adding these all up, what should you get..? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 04:38:06 | nothing >_< lmaooo, abs added something later | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 04:39:15 | by ftc2, it should be f(b) - f(a), right..? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:39:27 | you're adding up the _infinitesimal_ increments at each point, and you get f(b) - f(a), or the increase of f from a to b | 0 | 1 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 3502 | Arya | false | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 04:39:42 | the expression of adding these up is integral of f’(x) from a to b | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 04:39:49 | why | 1 | 0 | 307,070,375,735,459,840 | abs_0 | 8527 | a.b.s._.0. | false | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 04:39:55 | i don’t see how that’s intuitive | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:40:05 | that's perfectly intuitive | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 04:40:09 | not to me lol | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:40:09 | take a rectangle | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:40:26 | height c from 0 to 1 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 307,070,375,735,459,840 | abs_0 | 01/30/2022 04:40:36 | Oops sorry yeah that was a bad explanation | 0 | 1 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 1596 | Camilleone | false | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:40:40 | (you can replace 0 and 1 with arbitrary values but not the point) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:41:48 | do you agree that this rectangle, which is really a function y = c from 0 to 1, makes its antiderivative increase by c between 0 and 1? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 04:43:00 | not really | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 04:43:14 | makes sense but only after evaluation | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 04:43:22 | not intuition | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 307,070,375,735,459,840 | abs_0 | 01/30/2022 04:44:15 | Good way of putting it | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:44:21 | and this is where acceleration and velocity makes it dead useful to understand intuitively, and we're back to physics intuition | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 307,070,375,735,459,840 | abs_0 | 01/30/2022 04:44:28 | Lol | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:45:26 | you accelerate at rate c for all of one second, which means you end up with an increase of velocity by c at the end of that one second | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:45:35 | but okay, since you hate physics | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:45:52 | and sometimes after my physics class i can't blame you for it | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 04:46:56 | the idea is that the antiderivative changes at a constant rate of c per unit over one unit, and so over that same one unit must increase by a value of c | 0 | 1 | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 2633 | s_chanch | false | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 04:54:01 | wdym | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 05:04:05 | the rate of change is c per unit | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 05:04:13 | it literally means over one unit, the increment is c | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 05:04:17 | this is by definition | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
365 | help-10 | d8b842f4e0a64afb952cef54909e6d8e | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 05:09:30 | (i’ll come back later) | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 855,254,553,179,717,600 | yue | 01/30/2022 05:29:16 | how would i take the laplace G(s) of this thing? | unknown.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 05:39:50 | You mean, it's Laplace transform? | 0 | 1 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 1596 | Camilleone | false | |||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 855,254,553,179,717,600 | yue | 01/30/2022 05:40:30 | yes | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 05:47:15 | Let $f(t) = t \sin(40t)$, then by IBP, you'll have \\ $\mathcal{L}\{g(t)\} = \mathcal{L}\{f"(t)\} = s^2\mathcal{L}\{f(t)\} - sf(0) -f'(0)$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/30/2022 05:47:28 | **Ansh** | 706934233012371577.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 05:48:16 | https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Differential_Equations/Book%3A_Differential_Equations_for_Engineers_(Lebl)/6%3A_The_Laplace_Transform/6.2%3A_Transforms_of_derivatives_and_ODEs | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 05:48:20 | :this: | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 755,831,671,588,126,700 | RepliedPencil | 01/30/2022 05:48:31 | Yes ^^ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 05:48:39 | You could also totally differentiate it twice, and then do the transform | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 755,831,671,588,126,700 | RepliedPencil | 01/30/2022 05:48:51 | It would be a lot complicated tho | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 05:48:58 | Exactly | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 411,882,877,933,060,100 | Ｈｅｒｅｌｓ | 01/30/2022 05:48:59 | pain | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 755,831,671,588,126,700 | RepliedPencil | 01/30/2022 05:50:14 | Like you get g(t) as 40(sin(40t) - 40cos(40t))
And doing Laplace Transform of this is.... Just no | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
366 | help-10 | a4df4381742f40f7add426a3c996ade1 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 05:57:00 | kek | 0 | 1 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 0796 | TeXit | true | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 05:59:00 | Hello! | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 05:59:11 | Would anyone happen to have a clue if I did this question correctly? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 05:59:12 | unknown.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 05:59:41 | IMG_3111.jpg | 1 | 0 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 3502 | Arya | false | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 06:00:01 | unknown.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 06:00:47 | I just don't know if for part b, I used the right n. Like if n should be 4 because I used the first four terms of the series | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 318,162,663,131,709,440 | Sparky | 01/30/2022 06:17:18 | if this is your result for a it is not correct. you need to a partial fracture disassembly i guess. | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 06:27:14 | Oh okay | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 06:27:36 | I've never heard of a partial fracture disassembly before | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 07:07:06 | :p A partial fracture disassembly, although probably not even a proper English term, should be referring to disassembling of a bone that's partially been fractured( the crack hasn't reached across the width of the bone ), maybe for some medical purposes, like reassembling when misconfigured... or stuff
Anyways | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 07:07:38 | For your question, if you're interested in R4, you should stick to the formula and plug n = 4, to both sides of the inequality | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:08:19 | Hiiiiiii | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:08:23 | Thank you for helping | 1 | 0 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 6349 | CherokeesMum | false | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 07:08:33 | So your inequality would look like $|R_4| < \qty|\frac{(-1)^{5+1}}{4(5)^2 -3}|$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/30/2022 07:08:35 | **Ansh** | 706934233012371577.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:08:35 | I’m not sure if it’s n=4 or 5 that I should use | 1 | 0 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 6349 | CherokeesMum | false | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:08:47 | Oh | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:08:53 | I did the RHS wrong | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:09:57 | Thank you, that was very helpful | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:10:06 | Though what do you think of part a? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:10:16 | Sparky said it was incorrect earlier | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:10:21 | I thought it was okay | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:10:38 | Don’t you just find each of the four terms individually then add them up? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 07:13:56 | https://youtu.be/H8lHvQashkE | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 07:14:04 | :this: watch once and you'll know | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:18:12 | Yup | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:18:14 | Thank you | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:18:29 | I can see that the method I was doing was wrong | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 07:18:34 | mmm | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:18:35 | Wow that really opened my eyes | 1 | 0 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 6349 | CherokeesMum | false | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:18:48 | I wish that was stated clearer in my lecture notes | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:19:05 | I'm going to see if it said it any where | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:21:55 | This is the closest I could get | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:21:57 | unknown.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 07:25:34 | :catThink: | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 07:27:31 | She also just added them, up to 6 terms, no? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 07:28:04 | Like .1 - .04 + .009 - .0016 + .00025 - .000036 is what she did in the video | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/30/2022 07:29:19 | there's nothing wrong with your first part.. and logically, since the sum is convergent, and as n increases, each successive S_n value should be converging to the limiting value, S_4 is indeed what you want tbh | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 701,895,792,763,600,900 | s_chanch | 01/30/2022 07:29:20 | (ansh, could you verify my statement in math discussion after helping janet?) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
367 | help-10 | 6692c4aeb81d402fa444aba3e1294e81 | 819,940,147,013,222,400 | CherokeesMum | 01/30/2022 07:31:12 | Okay so what I did was okay? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.