conversation_id int64 1 206k | help_channel stringlengths 6 7 | __rowid__ stringlengths 32 32 | author_id int64 62,061,868B 1,071,443,446B | author_name stringlengths 2 32 | timestamp stringlengths 19 19 | content stringlengths 0 3.97k | reference.messageId stringclasses 3
values | reference.channelId stringclasses 3
values | reference.guildId stringclasses 1
value | url stringlengths 0 591 | fileName stringlengths 0 513 | student int64 0 1 | helper int64 0 1 | references.id float64 62,061,868B 1,071,056,124B ⌀ | references.name stringlengths 2 32 ⌀ | references.discriminator stringlengths 4 4 ⌀ | references.nickname stringlengths 1 32 ⌀ | references.isBot bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 07:56:52 | And visually what we are doing as x is growing | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 07:58:20 | unknown.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 07:58:21 | so with 1 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 07:58:24 | we'd have infinitely many aps | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 07:58:32 | because 1*x (x in R) never hits a multiple pi? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 07:58:48 | as pi is irrational | 1 | 0 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 0796 | TeXit | true | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 07:58:50 | ? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 07:59:51 | well it does | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 07:59:54 | cus x is real | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 07:59:56 | not integer | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:00:09 | But that doesn't matter, because we will keep spinning around the circle | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:00:21 | I always confuse things lol | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:00:25 | I thought x is rational for a second | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:00:29 | Thats partially my bad | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:00:41 | You will hit every point on the unit circle a infinite number of times | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:00:43 | Since x is real | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:00:51 | So they are definitely AP for sure. | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:01:21 | One way to think of this is **b** describes the speed at which you spin | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:01:47 | If **b** is positive, then you spin anticlockwise
If **b** is negative, clockwise | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:02:04 | Let's say your **x** is increasing at a constant rate (let's say 1 per second) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:02:34 | **b** = 1 vs **b** = 2 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:02:45 | You spin twice as fast with **b** = 2 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:03:05 | Handwavy explanation for the visualisation | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:04:39 | 0 | 1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 9525 | a μ-er | false | ||||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:05:04 | `b = 1, 2.5, -1` for those examples | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:06:19 | You can see those dots will never converge to any point as `a` (a in desmos, x in your question) goes to infinity | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:06:52 | The only case they could converge is when your spinning speed is 0 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:08:24 | so the limit is non determinate | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:09:32 | doesnt exist yes | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:09:36 | $$\lim_{x\to\infty}\frac{1}{x}e^{ix}$$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 02/19/2022 08:09:48 | **Shuri2060** | 321445119171756033.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:09:53 | Can you imagine what this will look like? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:10:03 | 0? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:10:11 | right, but whats the path you are taking | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:10:16 | As x is growing | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:10:54 | $$\lim_{x\to\infty}\frac{1}{x}e^{ix} = \lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{1}{x} \cdot \lim_{x\to\infty} e^{ix} = 0 \cdot n = 0$$ | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 214,429,100,880,691,200 | MallocSamuel | 02/19/2022 08:10:55 | how is that 0? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:11:08 | Sure that's how to work it out algebraically | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 02/19/2022 08:11:12 | **illuminator3** | 391270706186420224.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:11:17 | But there is something to visualize too | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:11:23 | hm | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:11:25 | also thats not 0 . n | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:11:36 | lim x -> infty e^ix
is not convergent (as we just worked out now) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:11:44 | oh | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:11:44 | right | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 214,429,100,880,691,200 | MallocSamuel | 02/19/2022 08:11:57 | this is not 0 man | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:12:03 | it **is** 0 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:12:08 | But not in the way you worked out - you don't split the product | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 214,429,100,880,691,200 | MallocSamuel | 02/19/2022 08:12:10 | e is exponential | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:12:16 | @MallocSamuel you're not being helpful. shuri is already helping me | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:12:21 | 😂 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:12:30 | no no | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:12:34 | e is exponential yes | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:12:43 | but are you familiar with complex exponential | 0 | 1 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 0796 | TeXit | true | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:12:52 | i is sqrt -1, so this is different | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:13:08 | So algebraically, this is a slight pain | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:13:21 | You might justify it by saying the modulus goes to 0 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:13:30 | therefore, the limit must be 0 regardless of what the argument is doing | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:13:38 | 321445119171756033.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:13:52 | But you can also visualize what this is doing as x changes | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:14:03 | in the same way as we did here | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:15:17 | so it's like a spiral | 1 | 0 | 214,429,100,880,691,200 | MallocSamuel | 6528 | MallocSamuel | false | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:15:23 | that goes inward as x increases | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:16:42 | yes exactly | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:16:49 | 0 | 1 | 214,429,100,880,691,200 | MallocSamuel | 6528 | MallocSamuel | false | ||||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:16:57 | And we see the only accumulation point is 0 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:17:39 | never really thought about solving problems visually hm | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:17:41 | Where possible, it is usually helpful to try thinking about these limits geometrically | 0 | 1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 0001 | illuminator3 | false | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:17:46 | yeah | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 321,445,119,171,756,000 | Shuri2060 | 02/19/2022 08:17:50 | Sometimes you get an ugly expression and you can't, ofc | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:28:43 | alright thanks for the help | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
770 | help-10 | 07fac3c5fb2449ab82562d5b132c3ff1 | 391,270,706,186,420,200 | illuminator3 | 02/19/2022 08:28:44 | .close | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 608,759,106,945,417,200 | veganlatina | 02/19/2022 08:31:20 | Hello | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 608,759,106,945,417,200 | veganlatina | 02/19/2022 08:34:31 | Let $h: \mathbb{R}^4 \to \mathbb{R}$ be a function with the following properties: the domain of h is $\mathbb{R}^4$ and all partial derivatives of h from of 2 or lower exist and have the same domain as h. Let $H: \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}$ be a function defined by $H(x,y) = h(-3, e^{xy}, x^2 + y^2, y-x)$. | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 608,759,106,945,417,200 | veganlatina | 02/19/2022 08:35:41 | How can I prove that the partial derivative $\frac{\partial H}{\partial x}$ exists? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 02/19/2022 08:36:54 | **veganlatina** | 608759106945417258.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 608,759,106,945,417,200 | veganlatina | 02/19/2022 08:38:00 | My idea was to prove $\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{H(x+h,y) - H(x,y)}{h}$ exists, but I don't know how I can prove this limit exists | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 02/19/2022 08:38:03 | **veganlatina** | 608759106945417258.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 02/19/2022 08:41:00 | **veganlatina** | 608759106945417258.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 608,759,106,945,417,200 | veganlatina | 02/19/2022 08:44:49 | @Helpers | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 608,759,106,945,417,200 | veganlatina | 02/19/2022 09:03:09 | @Helpers anyone? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 692,654,133,785,657,300 | Alexander42 | 02/19/2022 09:10:55 | use the chain rule | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 608,759,106,945,417,200 | veganlatina | 02/19/2022 09:14:37 | But how? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 692,654,133,785,657,300 | Alexander42 | 02/19/2022 09:19:09 | write H as the composite of two partial differentiable function, then H has also a partial derivative ||one is the two functions is h|| | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 608,759,106,945,417,200 | veganlatina | 02/19/2022 09:25:57 | So something like $\frac{ \partial H}{\partial x} = \frac{ \partial H}{\partial h} \frac{\partial h}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial H}{\partial ?} \frac{\partial ?}{\partial x}$? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 02/19/2022 09:25:59 | **veganlatina** | 608759106945417258.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 692,654,133,785,657,300 | Alexander42 | 02/19/2022 09:30:31 | if H(x,y)=h(g(x,y)) with $g(x,y)=(g_1(x,y),g_2(x,y),g_3(x,y),g_4(x,y))$, then $\frac{ \partial H}{\partial x} = \frac{ \partial h}{\partial g_1} \frac{\partial g_1}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial h}{\partial g_2} \frac{\partial g_2}{\partial x}+\frac{ \partial h}{\partial g_3} \frac{\partial g_3}{\partial x} + \frac{\pa... | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 02/19/2022 09:30:34 | **Alexander42** | 692654133785657375.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 608,759,106,945,417,200 | veganlatina | 02/19/2022 09:31:19 | ooooh | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 608,759,106,945,417,200 | veganlatina | 02/19/2022 09:31:27 | thank you so much! | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
771 | help-10 | 0d8f75a4686f4d7ab4b4c2fc3ff47e71 | 608,759,106,945,417,200 | veganlatina | 02/19/2022 09:59:52 | .close | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
772 | help-10 | 7cd4655a7b264a6d94c1af9ad5e18c14 | 720,651,983,643,738,100 | DeltzX | 02/19/2022 10:25:17 | not quite sure why q = f(p) | WIN_20220219_10_23_12_Pro.jpg | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
772 | help-10 | 7cd4655a7b264a6d94c1af9ad5e18c14 | 411,882,877,933,060,100 | Herels | 02/19/2022 10:27:19 | P is a point of the curve of f | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
772 | help-10 | 7cd4655a7b264a6d94c1af9ad5e18c14 | 411,882,877,933,060,100 | Herels | 02/19/2022 10:27:42 | so it's obvious that his coordinate verify q = f(p) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
772 | help-10 | 7cd4655a7b264a6d94c1af9ad5e18c14 | 720,651,983,643,738,100 | DeltzX | 02/19/2022 10:30:29 | ok | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
772 | help-10 | 7cd4655a7b264a6d94c1af9ad5e18c14 | 720,651,983,643,738,100 | DeltzX | 02/19/2022 10:30:40 | .close | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
773 | help-10 | d0ef48004630404188fa0844059ae384 | 735,546,509,986,234,400 | dan can | 02/19/2022 10:32:42 | I'm trying to understand the derivation of the Length of the spiral formed within a regular polygon https://mathworld.wolfram.com/PolygonalSpiral.html. Does the equation of the total length of the spiral $L=\frac{1 }{ 2}s\sum_k \cos^k(\pi/n)$ immediately follow from the previous step on the ratio $r/R$? Or are there v... | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
773 | help-10 | d0ef48004630404188fa0844059ae384 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 02/19/2022 10:32:45 | **tuturuuu** | 735546509986234418.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
773 | help-10 | d0ef48004630404188fa0844059ae384 | 376,014,466,585,722,900 | Arthek | 02/19/2022 11:36:36 | **Problem 1 :**
The input is 2 values, that can be in a scale between [-3.89, 10.66]
And i need to compare the difference between an oldValue (A) and a newValue (B).
So i want to create a variable that express this difference.
Let say :
```
A = -2
B = 3
diff = ?
```
If i do a simple substraction it doesn't ca... | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
773 | help-10 | d0ef48004630404188fa0844059ae384 | 376,014,466,585,722,900 | Arthek | 02/19/2022 11:36:43 | idp.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.