conversation_id
int64
1
206k
help_channel
stringlengths
6
7
__rowid__
stringlengths
32
32
author_id
int64
62,061,868B
1,071,443,446B
author_name
stringlengths
2
32
timestamp
stringlengths
19
19
content
stringlengths
0
3.97k
reference.messageId
stringclasses
3 values
reference.channelId
stringclasses
3 values
reference.guildId
stringclasses
1 value
url
stringlengths
0
591
fileName
stringlengths
0
513
student
int64
0
1
helper
int64
0
1
references.id
float64
62,061,868B
1,071,056,124B
⌀
references.name
stringlengths
2
32
⌀
references.discriminator
stringlengths
4
4
⌀
references.nickname
stringlengths
1
32
⌀
references.isBot
bool
2 classes
825
help-10
727c980b9df24fba9a83ceaa20dda918
748,029,603,087,384,700
Yours truly
02/22/2022 10:16:32
Yeah
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
825
help-10
727c980b9df24fba9a83ceaa20dda918
748,029,603,087,384,700
Yours truly
02/22/2022 10:16:34
I think.
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
825
help-10
727c980b9df24fba9a83ceaa20dda918
748,029,603,087,384,700
Yours truly
02/22/2022 10:17:17
But, if some letter were repeated then you'd divide the answer with x! (Where x is the number of times a certain letter is repeated) alright?
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
825
help-10
727c980b9df24fba9a83ceaa20dda918
691,652,908,206,522,400
souii
02/22/2022 10:17:42
yes. I have read about that
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
825
help-10
727c980b9df24fba9a83ceaa20dda918
748,029,603,087,384,700
Yours truly
02/22/2022 10:18:01
FOOL for example, it would be (3!×2!)÷2! As there are two O.
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
825
help-10
727c980b9df24fba9a83ceaa20dda918
691,652,908,206,522,400
souii
02/22/2022 10:18:57
I see. that makes a lot of sense. thank you :))
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
825
help-10
727c980b9df24fba9a83ceaa20dda918
748,029,603,087,384,700
Yours truly
02/22/2022 10:19:14
Yw.
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
825
help-10
727c980b9df24fba9a83ceaa20dda918
691,652,908,206,522,400
souii
02/22/2022 10:19:24
.close
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
826
help-10
1abb87e9824e4b6aab7a06193abcab66
273,579,527,534,280,700
milly
02/22/2022 10:26:40
@s_chanch
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
826
help-10
1abb87e9824e4b6aab7a06193abcab66
273,579,527,534,280,700
milly
02/22/2022 10:34:58
.close
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
292,646,273,197,015,040
X Æ A-12
02/22/2022 11:39:53
if x~ is the median why is the sum minimal?
https://cdn.discordapp.c…7390/unknown.png
unknown.png
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 11:46:38
First you show that sum of absolute values being minimal implies sum of squares being minimal:
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 11:47:18
If positive real numbers r_1,…,r_n s_1,…,s_n such that Σr_j<Σs_j
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 11:47:38
Then Σs_j^2-Σr_j^2=
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 11:48:34
Σ(s_j+r_j)(s_j-r_j)>=M(Σs_j-Σr_j)>0
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 11:49:03
Where M is min{s_j+r_j :j}>0
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 11:49:17
Now sum of square you can calculate its derivative
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 11:49:20
The rest is clear
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 11:50:13
Wait a second some error
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
292,646,273,197,015,040
X Æ A-12
02/22/2022 11:54:24
ok thx
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 11:54:36
Wait huge error, fixing
0
1
701,895,792,763,600,900
s_chanch
2633
s_chanch
false
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 12:07:33
Oh you let x_1<=x_2<=…<=x_n
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 12:08:23
|x-x_k|+|x-x_(n-k)| is minimal when x is contained in [x_k, x_(n-k)]
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 12:09:00
So such x must be contained in the intersection of all [x_k , x_ (n-k)]
0
1
292,646,273,197,015,040
X Æ A-12
2866
X Æ A-12
false
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 12:11:38
Median value satisfies that right? I think
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 12:15:47
Oh yes Any point x such that that sum is smallest must be contained in the intersection of all [x_k, x_ (n-k)] and median value is one of them you can check the details
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
827
help-10
4debc02a358c48a7a499a702fe86b0a2
292,646,273,197,015,040
X Æ A-12
02/22/2022 12:16:09
ah ok
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
828
help-10
b693a1fe26ca4cf897da663fce0739a6
349,010,029,686,292,500
Lil Chris
02/22/2022 12:41:36
https://cdn.discordapp.c…2416/unknown.png
unknown.png
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
828
help-10
b693a1fe26ca4cf897da663fce0739a6
945,715,302,497,402,900
mint
02/22/2022 12:41:36
can anyone help me understand how to solve this? im so confused
https://cdn.discordapp.c…3370/unknown.png
unknown.png
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
828
help-10
b693a1fe26ca4cf897da663fce0739a6
349,010,029,686,292,500
Lil Chris
02/22/2022 12:41:58
Sorry @mint
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
828
help-10
b693a1fe26ca4cf897da663fce0739a6
349,010,029,686,292,500
Lil Chris
02/22/2022 12:42:05
.close
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
829
help-10
df62cda3204541c08c9702a06212f4a3
349,010,029,686,292,500
Lil Chris
02/22/2022 12:42:13
.reopen
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
829
help-10
df62cda3204541c08c9702a06212f4a3
349,010,029,686,292,500
Lil Chris
02/22/2022 12:44:15
Topic: Applied Read Analysis Does this look accurate for the Fourier coefficient a0? My professor has the denominator as 2pi instead of just pi.
https://cdn.discordapp.c…0996/unknown.png
unknown.png
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
829
help-10
df62cda3204541c08c9702a06212f4a3
349,010,029,686,292,500
Lil Chris
02/22/2022 12:44:41
By the way, the screenshot is from a website: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierSeries.html
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
829
help-10
df62cda3204541c08c9702a06212f4a3
349,010,029,686,292,500
Lil Chris
02/22/2022 12:50:27
.close
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
830
help-10
fe53065d788142488feda294f5fe4189
753,125,620,719,943,700
Daniel_The_Maniel
02/22/2022 12:53:05
https://cdn.discordapp.c…944/IMG_4870.jpg
IMG_4870.jpg
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
830
help-10
fe53065d788142488feda294f5fe4189
753,125,620,719,943,700
Daniel_The_Maniel
02/22/2022 12:53:44
So if velocity is displacement over change in time, shouldn’t all racers have an average velocity of 0?
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
830
help-10
fe53065d788142488feda294f5fe4189
551,269,104,800,104,450
EndTimes
02/22/2022 12:53:51
No
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
830
help-10
fe53065d788142488feda294f5fe4189
753,125,620,719,943,700
Daniel_The_Maniel
02/22/2022 12:53:55
Since their displacement is all 0
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
830
help-10
fe53065d788142488feda294f5fe4189
551,269,104,800,104,450
EndTimes
02/22/2022 12:54:10
Haha
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
830
help-10
fe53065d788142488feda294f5fe4189
551,269,104,800,104,450
EndTimes
02/22/2022 12:54:12
I agree
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
830
help-10
fe53065d788142488feda294f5fe4189
551,269,104,800,104,450
EndTimes
02/22/2022 12:54:21
The question should ask for speed not velocity
0
1
945,715,302,497,402,900
mint
9515
mint
false
830
help-10
fe53065d788142488feda294f5fe4189
800,622,149,903,056,900
Shen
02/22/2022 12:55:16
@Daniel_The_Maniel You're right - you should argue against whoever made it to get points back
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
830
help-10
fe53065d788142488feda294f5fe4189
800,622,149,903,056,900
Shen
02/22/2022 12:55:19
(If applicable)
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
830
help-10
fe53065d788142488feda294f5fe4189
753,125,620,719,943,700
Daniel_The_Maniel
02/22/2022 12:57:01
Ok cool thx
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
830
help-10
fe53065d788142488feda294f5fe4189
753,125,620,719,943,700
Daniel_The_Maniel
02/22/2022 12:57:03
.close
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 13:11:41
what does it mean to expand around $z=\pi i$ within a taylor/laurent expansion for $e^z +1$? We've got \begin{align} e^z +1 = 1 + \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{z^n}{n!} \end{align} Does this mean replacing $z$ with the variable $w$ where $w=z-\pi i$?
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
510,789,298,321,096,700
TeXit
02/22/2022 13:12:13
**madlor**
https://cdn.discordapp.c…364681674753.png
163892364681674753.png
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 13:13:08
It means you write e^z+1 in the form Σa_k(z-πi)^k
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 13:13:53
so \begin{align} \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_k (z-\pi i)^n \end{align}
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
510,789,298,321,096,700
TeXit
02/22/2022 13:14:11
**madlor**
https://cdn.discordapp.c…364681674753.png
163892364681674753.png
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 13:14:19
Yes
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 13:14:35
Or from negative infinity to positive infinity
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
826,318,983,413,366,800
Cogwheels of the mind
02/22/2022 13:14:53
Depends on what kind of expansion
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 13:14:55
right
1
0
753,125,620,719,943,700
Daniel_The_Maniel
9564
Daniel_The_Maniel
false
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 13:15:04
i am looking to do a Laurent expansion specifically yeah
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 13:15:41
quite honestly not sure how to start, but i will try some things
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 13:16:44
but i solve the bottom expression? \begin{align} e^{z} + 1 =\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty c_n (z-\pi i)^n \end{align}
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
510,789,298,321,096,700
TeXit
02/22/2022 13:16:47
**madlor**
https://cdn.discordapp.c…364681674753.png
163892364681674753.png
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 13:17:56
oh. i do feel a little bit silly now, ive already done the taylor expansion, but i did it for z_0 = 0.
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
831
help-10
413e09ee1ef944c48cfd5743829aa998
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 13:36:22
Not resolved but moving on
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
207,967,378,267,439,100
heisenberg
02/22/2022 13:38:32
Hi! I'm working on some arithmetic sequences and noticing factorizing isn't my strong side. In the problem, T2 can be expressed as T2 = T1 * 0.95 + 600 or upon inserting T1 T2 = (8200 * 0.95 + 600)0.95 + 600 Could someone walk me through how that is factorized into 8200 * 0.95^2 + 600(0.95 + 1)?
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
828,645,428,765,524,000
piang
02/22/2022 13:53:45
If you open brackets, then first you will multiply $8200*0.95*0.095$ then you multiplied 0.95 with 600. We ddint do anything apart from opening brackets. And last two terms, 600*0.95 + 600 have 600 as common factor so we took it out.
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
510,789,298,321,096,700
TeXit
02/22/2022 13:53:48
**hoi**
https://cdn.discordapp.c…428765523981.png
828645428765523981.png
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
207,967,378,267,439,100
heisenberg
02/22/2022 13:57:36
I understand I multiply the two 0.95 and that I can factor out the 600, but what happens to multiplying 8200(0.95)?
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
828,645,428,765,524,000
piang
02/22/2022 13:59:17
Nothing happened here afaik
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
828,645,428,765,524,000
piang
02/22/2022 13:59:40
One more 0.95 is multiplied and hence it's square there
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
207,967,378,267,439,100
heisenberg
02/22/2022 14:01:20
Maybe I'm being really stupid and not seeing something but what I can't wrap my head around is why there's no effect on the 8200 if 0.95 is supposed to multiply with every term. because I see 0.95 is multipled and hence squared as you said and 600 just factored
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
828,645,428,765,524,000
piang
02/22/2022 14:03:16
What effect are you talking about, the only thing that will happen is multiplication of 0.95. Are you asking why isn't it in calculated form?
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
207,967,378,267,439,100
heisenberg
02/22/2022 14:05:03
Why isn't it 8200(0.95) * 0.95(0.95) + 600(0.95) + 600 8200(0.95) * 0.95^2 + 600(0.95+1) What mistake am I doing in the above factorization?
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
828,645,428,765,524,000
piang
02/22/2022 14:07:16
Okay you know that we use distributive property while multiplying? Which is multiplying number outside of brackets, to each term individually and putting ± signs in between
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
828,645,428,765,524,000
piang
02/22/2022 14:08:29
If you know, then you must be knowing there won't be extra 0.95 with 8200×0.95 there
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
207,967,378,267,439,100
heisenberg
02/22/2022 14:10:52
So I percieve 8200 x 0.95 as a unique term basically?
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
207,967,378,267,439,100
heisenberg
02/22/2022 14:11:12
How the fuck did I get so far without being aware of this.
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
828,645,428,765,524,000
piang
02/22/2022 14:13:32
Okay, lemme state again, multiplication is distributive over addition not multiplication itself. $\implies (a+b)c= ac+ab$ and if you have (ab)c you won't do ac*ab.
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
510,789,298,321,096,700
TeXit
02/22/2022 14:13:35
**hoi**
https://cdn.discordapp.c…428765523981.png
828645428765523981.png
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
828,645,428,765,524,000
piang
02/22/2022 14:14:11
It will be $abc$ only
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
510,789,298,321,096,700
TeXit
02/22/2022 14:14:13
**hoi**
https://cdn.discordapp.c…428765523981.png
828645428765523981.png
0
1
207,967,378,267,439,100
heisenberg
8360
heisenberg
false
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
207,967,378,267,439,100
heisenberg
02/22/2022 14:15:24
Alright. I understand now and once again, I'm confused how I did not know this by heart.
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
207,967,378,267,439,100
heisenberg
02/22/2022 14:15:26
Thanks a lot.
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
832
help-10
c6ed0f4dc2ff40ad9dbede4ffe67f208
207,967,378,267,439,100
heisenberg
02/22/2022 14:15:29
.close
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
415,684,042,235,576,300
TheBest
02/22/2022 14:33:12
How can I get a non-e number when trying to reduce an imaginary number like i^21 on a ti-84
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
415,684,042,235,576,300
TheBest
02/22/2022 14:35:05
for example our teacher said i can be i, -1, -i, or 1
1
0
207,967,378,267,439,100
heisenberg
8360
heisenberg
false
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
415,684,042,235,576,300
TheBest
02/22/2022 14:35:11
but calculator spits back an E number
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
740,938,819,125,248,100
idioticbaka1824
02/22/2022 14:35:25
What's the exact number it spits back?
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
740,938,819,125,248,100
idioticbaka1824
02/22/2022 14:35:59
(idk if I can help you, I'm just curious about this calculator lol)
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 14:37:25
$i^{21}$?
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
510,789,298,321,096,700
TeXit
02/22/2022 14:37:28
**madlor**
https://cdn.discordapp.c…364681674753.png
163892364681674753.png
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
415,684,042,235,576,300
TheBest
02/22/2022 14:37:48
-1E-13+i
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 14:37:52
is it required to do this on the calculator?
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
415,684,042,235,576,300
TheBest
02/22/2022 14:37:54
I'm in a+bi mode
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
415,684,042,235,576,300
TheBest
02/22/2022 14:38:06
no but I figure it's easier on a ti-84
1
0
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 14:38:09
so this is a numerical error
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 14:38:19
-1E-13 is a tiiiiny number
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 14:38:21
its basically 0
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 14:38:47
your calculator cant compute things perfectly, i think this one is unavoidable
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 14:39:16
does this seem logical?
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
163,892,364,681,674,750
madlor
02/22/2022 14:39:52
$-1E-13 = -1\cdot 10^{-13}$
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
510,789,298,321,096,700
TeXit
02/22/2022 14:40:16
**madlor**
https://cdn.discordapp.c…364681674753.png
163892364681674753.png
0
1
null
null
null
null
null
833
help-10
d73dc8857847475b9fcd0d6f7c55fd03
415,684,042,235,576,300
TheBest
02/22/2022 14:40:47
our teacher told us to break it in fours so wouldn't it be like i^20 and then whatever i^1 is or something, I forget
1
0
null
null
null
null
null