conversation_id int64 1 206k | help_channel stringlengths 6 7 | __rowid__ stringlengths 32 32 | author_id int64 62,061,868B 1,071,443,446B | author_name stringlengths 2 32 | timestamp stringlengths 19 19 | content stringlengths 0 3.97k | reference.messageId stringclasses 3
values | reference.channelId stringclasses 3
values | reference.guildId stringclasses 1
value | url stringlengths 0 591 | fileName stringlengths 0 513 | student int64 0 1 | helper int64 0 1 | references.id float64 62,061,868B 1,071,056,124B ⌀ | references.name stringlengths 2 32 ⌀ | references.discriminator stringlengths 4 4 ⌀ | references.nickname stringlengths 1 32 ⌀ | references.isBot bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:20:43 | IMG_3108.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:20:56 | im not sure if i should put the negative outside or inside the radical | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:21:26 | inside , (remember that g is also inside the radical) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:21:49 | this | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:22:17 | IMG_3109.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:23:34 | almost there!, remember that $2y+2y_{0}$ is not equal to $2y-2y_{0}$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/07/2021 16:23:36 | **BillyElKid** | 738072502881878148.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:24:26 | unknown.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:25:28 | Ohhhh I think because the - mistake earlier on the t squared I put it into the +2yo xD | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:26:06 | Here!! | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:26:57 | IMG_3111.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:27:30 | yeeeeeeeeep 👍 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:29:15 | I have another question, instead of multiplying the 2 to both sides, is it okay if I multiply -2 instead and the right side would be = gt^2? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:29:36 | Will that be more complex since it involves a negative sign? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:30:56 | no, you are right, will be exactly the same, in that case you would have this | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:32:01 | unknown.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:32:17 | that is exacly the same because of this | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:32:31 | this | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:34:31 | Would it be like this ? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:34:34 | IMG_3113.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:36:53 | nono, because $$-(a-b)=-a-(-b)=-a+b$$ and not $$-(a-b) \neq (a+b)$$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/07/2021 16:36:56 | **BillyElKid** | 738072502881878148.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:41:56 | Ohhhh | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:42:20 | But when the the rule of negative and negative equals positive rule apply? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:43:47 | when you have ONLY a product between numbers, in this case you have a product AND a sum so you have to use the distributive property | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:43:48 | unknown.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:44:29 | then you can use the rule 🙂 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:44:41 | Ahh the a in the product? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:44:48 | with $ab$ and $ac$ separately | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:44:49 | Is* | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/07/2021 16:44:50 | **BillyElKid** | 738072502881878148.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:45:02 | yees | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:45:11 | is usual notation | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:45:26 | $a \cdot (b+c)=a(b+c)$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/07/2021 16:45:28 | **BillyElKid** | 738072502881878148.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:47:17 | I’m making sure so I’m making an example to see if I understand | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:48:11 | IMG_3116.jpg | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:48:19 | Is this correct ? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:48:32 | the first one is correct | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:48:53 | I’m a bit confused with the second one when there is no product outside the bracket :/ | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:49:07 | oooooh i see your confusion now | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:49:12 | i will tell you a secret | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:49:21 | Okay! :D | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:49:47 | unknown.png | 0 | 1 | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 5555 | pandora ୨୧ | false | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:50:05 | Ohhhhhh | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:50:15 | Okay let me try again this time | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:50:54 | IMG_3117.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:50:56 | Yes? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:51:04 | yeeeeeeeeeeeeeees | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:51:09 | Yayyyyy | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:51:59 | So it should stay negative because | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:52:28 | Originally the formula was already negative? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:54:07 | It shouldn’t affect the things inside the parentheses | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:55:21 | I think I get what you mean | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:55:30 | yep it should stay negative because is in this form yet $$a(b-c)$$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/07/2021 16:55:33 | **BillyElKid** | 738072502881878148.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:56:31 | if you want to cancel the negatives then you have to expand it like this $$ab-ac$$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:56:35 | But I notice here you write it this way = -2(y-yo)/g , as opposed to mine which was 2y-yo/g | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:56:46 | Here | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/07/2021 16:56:50 | **BillyElKid** | 738072502881878148.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:57:55 | nice catch, that is because i wrote it like this $$a(b-c)$$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/07/2021 16:57:58 | **BillyElKid** | 738072502881878148.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:58:04 | and you like this $$ab-ac$$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/07/2021 16:58:07 | **BillyElKid** | 738072502881878148.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:58:10 | You can cancel by multiplying with the things inside the parentheses? Ex: -(2a-6) > -2a+6 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 16:58:28 | yes, that is the distributive property | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 16:58:58 | For easier calculation, would you say it’s better using a specific way? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:00:31 | notice that yours was 2y-yo/ -g , the minus - in g is important | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:01:25 | Yes | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:02:40 | depends on the context, in some situations $ab-ac$ will lead you to simplified expressions usually respect to sums, and $a(b-c)$ too but respect to products. | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/07/2021 17:02:43 | **BillyElKid** | 738072502881878148.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:02:55 | But I think it’s easier to solve later when you plug in the numbers into the y and yo compared to 2y-2yo | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:03:22 | What is this thing called ? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:03:38 | what thing? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:04:07 | From 2y-2yo to -2(y-yo) | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:04:20 | aa distributive property | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:04:40 | I thought it’s the opposite ? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:04:58 | aaaa | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:05:00 | Wouldn’t the answer for distributive property become more “open”? | 1 | 0 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 0796 | TeXit | true | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:05:17 | ok ok, not really the distributive property is an equality so | 0 | 1 | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 5555 | pandora ୨୧ | false | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:05:20 | Like this? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:05:39 | doesn't have order | 0 | 1 | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 5555 | pandora ୨୧ | false | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:05:46 | It looks more simplified for the one that you did, is it simplyfacation ? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:07:08 | but when you go from this (2y-2yo) to this -2(yo-y) (using the distributive property) you are factorizing, but when you go from this -2(yo-y) to (2y-2yo) (again using the distributive property) you are expanding. | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:07:51 | Yesss that’s what I was trying to say | 1 | 0 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 0796 | TeXit | true | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:08:06 | It’s called factoring? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:08:21 | yep= more compact = factoring | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:08:53 | I see I see | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:09:05 | If I want to use calculator to find the answer for this | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:09:10 | IMG_3118.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:09:15 | Wait | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:09:28 | Not for that because it’s expanded version | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:10:38 | Is it okay to not distribute it on line 3 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:10:42 | IMG_3120.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:11:22 | Would that be called as factorized form/not expandable form? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:11:30 | yes if you don't want to do it, just simply not | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:12:34 | yes | unknown.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 611,787,651,661,561,900 | pandora ୨୧ | 11/07/2021 17:14:09 | I thought you have to expand every time there is a parenthesis in front of the product | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:14:50 | not necessarily, in some cases that is literally suicide | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
868 | help-10 | f0b0029cde9b49dea1985582cb6b7abb | 738,072,502,881,878,100 | BillyElKid | 11/07/2021 17:15:16 | for example look at this , what expression looks more friendly to you? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.