conversation_id int64 1 206k | help_channel stringlengths 6 7 | __rowid__ stringlengths 32 32 | author_id int64 62,061,868B 1,071,443,446B | author_name stringlengths 2 32 | timestamp stringlengths 19 19 | content stringlengths 0 3.97k | reference.messageId stringclasses 3
values | reference.channelId stringclasses 3
values | reference.guildId stringclasses 1
value | url stringlengths 0 591 | fileName stringlengths 0 513 | student int64 0 1 | helper int64 0 1 | references.id float64 62,061,868B 1,071,056,124B ⌀ | references.name stringlengths 2 32 ⌀ | references.discriminator stringlengths 4 4 ⌀ | references.nickname stringlengths 1 32 ⌀ | references.isBot bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 209,767,680,100,663,300 | Kaisheng21 | 10/29/2021 09:11:31 | and 3 * -1 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 209,767,680,100,663,300 | Kaisheng21 | 10/29/2021 09:11:33 | so it doesn't work | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 507,116,799,284,740,100 | EpicGuy4227 | 10/29/2021 09:11:56 | b = 0 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 507,116,799,284,740,100 | EpicGuy4227 | 10/29/2021 09:12:26 | RHS becomes 0 so try like b = 1 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 209,767,680,100,663,300 | Kaisheng21 | 10/29/2021 09:12:32 | what | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 507,116,799,284,740,100 | EpicGuy4227 | 10/29/2021 09:12:35 | and c = -2 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 209,767,680,100,663,300 | Kaisheng21 | 10/29/2021 09:12:35 | what are you on about | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 209,767,680,100,663,300 | Kaisheng21 | 10/29/2021 09:12:44 | wait fuck | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 209,767,680,100,663,300 | Kaisheng21 | 10/29/2021 09:12:45 | yes | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 209,767,680,100,663,300 | Kaisheng21 | 10/29/2021 09:12:46 | you're right | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 209,767,680,100,663,300 | Kaisheng21 | 10/29/2021 09:12:50 | ok | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 373,980,725,721,956,350 | DEOG | 10/29/2021 09:13:21 | thanks | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 209,767,680,100,663,300 | Kaisheng21 | 10/29/2021 09:13:28 | wait | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
335 | help-10 | 5781eaee71324a4e9b78c3e1e943e668 | 373,980,725,721,956,350 | DEOG | 10/29/2021 09:13:28 | .close | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 507,977,331,722,289,150 | KentyMcDclr8 | 11/05/2021 04:18:47 | i'm kinda stuck on how to find the sum of this, i've proven that it is convergent using the alternating series test. to find the sum, i made it into a telescoping series but it's alternating and that's been messing with me. | unknown.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 507,977,331,722,289,150 | KentyMcDclr8 | 11/05/2021 04:34:22 | @Helpers any kind souls wanna nudge me in the right direction here? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 04:36:03 | may i suggest grouping the terms into pairs? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 04:36:16 | your series is absolutely convergent, so grouping will not mess anything up | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 04:36:50 | the general idea is that $\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} (-1)^n a_n = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} (a_{2k} - a_{2k+1})$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/05/2021 04:36:53 | **Ann** | 183668144404037632.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 04:37:11 | it might be a good idea to decompose 3/(n^2 + n - 2) into partial fractions first, just in case | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 507,977,331,722,289,150 | KentyMcDclr8 | 11/05/2021 04:41:12 | ah ok, so i should group the even and odd terms and then see what i get? i'll try that | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 507,977,331,722,289,150 | KentyMcDclr8 | 11/05/2021 04:49:49 | even with the grouping, either i'm doing something severely wrong, or using the wrong method, none of my terms cancel out | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 507,977,331,722,289,150 | KentyMcDclr8 | 11/05/2021 04:53:19 | $\frac{3}{n^2+n-2}=\frac{1}{n-1}-\frac{1}{n+2}$ | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/05/2021 04:53:32 | **KentyMcDclr8** | 507977331722289176.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 507,977,331,722,289,150 | KentyMcDclr8 | 11/05/2021 04:55:23 | i get this but can't seem to go further | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 04:56:32 | well now you have $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2k-1} - \frac{1}{2k+2} - \paren{\frac{1}{2k+1-1} - \frac{1}{2k+1+2}}$$ in accordance with that formula i wrote earlier | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/05/2021 04:56:35 | **Ann** | 183668144404037632.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 507,977,331,722,289,150 | KentyMcDclr8 | 11/05/2021 05:04:32 | what would be the continuation of that because i'm still stuck even after making the last 2 denominators 2k and 2k + 3? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:16:05 | $\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2k-1} + \frac{1}{2k+3} - \frac{1}{2k+2} - \frac{1}{2k}$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/05/2021 05:16:07 | **Ann** | 183668144404037632.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:16:08 | hmm | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:16:18 | i think i might've painted us into a bit of a corner here | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:16:20 | :thonk: | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 507,977,331,722,289,150 | KentyMcDclr8 | 11/05/2021 05:18:39 | nothing cancels out =/ | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:23:16 | hence my last remark. | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:23:27 | full disclosure, i did not quite see this coming. | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 507,977,331,722,289,150 | KentyMcDclr8 | 11/05/2021 05:34:46 | haha, all good | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:35:32 | let's throw this into WA | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:35:42 | ,w sum[n=2, infty] (-1)^n * 3/(n^2 + n - 2) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/05/2021 05:35:47 | Results provided by WolframAlpha | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:35:49 | :thonk: | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:35:50 | log | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:35:52 | :thonk::thonk: | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:36:08 | hm | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:36:11 | what if... | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:36:33 | what if we consider $f(x) = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{3x^n}{(n+2)(n-1)}$? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 11/05/2021 05:36:36 | **Ann** | 183668144404037632.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 11/05/2021 05:37:05 | then our series will be the value of f(-1), and maybe we can glean some information about the function this way... | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
336 | help-10 | e555fcd0c22246998f0a20da6220c15d | 507,977,331,722,289,150 | KentyMcDclr8 | 11/05/2021 05:41:30 | hmm | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 582,935,438,260,699,100 | 𝙨𝙖𝙙 𝙗𝙤𝙞 | 01/28/2022 05:15:35 | how did it become that? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 582,935,438,260,699,100 | 𝙨𝙖𝙙 𝙗𝙤𝙞 | 01/28/2022 05:15:36 | 6F1DA09F-5467-4C26-815F-D7A487244233.jpg | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 582,935,438,260,699,100 | 𝙨𝙖𝙙 𝙗𝙤𝙞 | 01/28/2022 05:15:53 | Can someone give me the step by step explanation please | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/28/2022 05:18:53 | You know about De Moivre's theorem? or roots of sin x > 1 existing in complex numbers in general? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/28/2022 05:19:06 | Or are you just curious about it :o | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 582,935,438,260,699,100 | 𝙨𝙖𝙙 𝙗𝙤𝙞 | 01/28/2022 05:20:54 | curious | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/28/2022 05:21:58 | https://brilliant.org/wiki/de-moivres-theorem/ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/28/2022 05:22:03 | A good short read imo | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 582,935,438,260,699,100 | 𝙨𝙖𝙙 𝙗𝙤𝙞 | 01/28/2022 05:22:20 | thank you so much | 1 | 0 | 582,935,438,260,699,100 | 𝙨𝙖𝙙 𝙗𝙤𝙞 | 9609 | 𝙨𝙖𝙙 𝙗𝙤𝙞 | false | |||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/28/2022 05:23:59 | From there, you can directly write $[e^{ix} - e^{-ix}] = 2i \sqrt{\frac{4}{3}}$ and solve using the normal methods | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/28/2022 05:24:25 | **Ansh** | 706934233012371577.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 582,935,438,260,699,100 | 𝙨𝙖𝙙 𝙗𝙤𝙞 | 01/28/2022 05:24:59 | thanks so much | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
337 | help-10 | 7e5073d6036d4aa49aa0207716df6229 | 582,935,438,260,699,100 | 𝙨𝙖𝙙 𝙗𝙤𝙞 | 01/28/2022 05:25:02 | .close | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 765,399,107,199,041,500 | Pratik Saha | 01/28/2022 05:43:16 | @Helpers | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 755,831,671,588,126,700 | RepliedPencil | 01/28/2022 05:50:53 | What I always do is extract as much data as possible from the given question, and work around with the data. | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 755,831,671,588,126,700 | RepliedPencil | 01/28/2022 05:51:05 | We know $x, y \in \bN$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/28/2022 05:51:07 | **Pencil** | 755831671588126784.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 755,831,671,588,126,700 | RepliedPencil | 01/28/2022 05:51:38 | @Pratik Saha read the question and say what happens next | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 765,399,107,199,041,500 | Pratik Saha | 01/28/2022 05:52:22 | If we divide by 4 remains a remainder | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 765,399,107,199,041,500 | Pratik Saha | 01/28/2022 05:52:38 | If we divide with 7 remains a remainder | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 755,831,671,588,126,700 | RepliedPencil | 01/28/2022 05:52:52 | It **leaves** a remainder* | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 765,399,107,199,041,500 | Pratik Saha | 01/28/2022 05:53:06 | What is the largest value of **A+B** | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 755,831,671,588,126,700 | RepliedPencil | 01/28/2022 05:53:08 | Can you write it in terms of x and a for this | 0 | 1 | 765,399,107,199,041,500 | Pratik Saha | 5086 | Pratik Saha | false | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 755,831,671,588,126,700 | RepliedPencil | 01/28/2022 05:53:19 | And in terms of y and b for this | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 755,831,671,588,126,700 | RepliedPencil | 01/28/2022 05:54:02 | @Pratik Saha | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 869,532,694,688,706,600 | EpsilonNought | 01/28/2022 05:54:34 | @Pratik Saha I suggest using modular arithmetic for this | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 150,414,892,225,134,600 | RokettoJanpu | 01/28/2022 05:55:13 | i muted this for the remaning duration too | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
338 | help-10 | f0e4860627834800866c1a42b308eb81 | 150,414,892,225,134,600 | RokettoJanpu | 01/28/2022 05:55:16 | .close | 0 | 1 | 765,399,107,199,041,500 | Pratik Saha | 5086 | Pratik Saha | false | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/28/2022 05:55:43 | Sorry for the confusion Jintaro ^^" | 1 | 0 | 765,399,107,199,041,500 | Pratik Saha | 5086 | Pratik Saha | false | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:07:48 | Hi! The problem Im struggling is in the picture. I've done thins until now and I think its correct: | Screen_Shot_2022-01-25_at_11.59.38.png | 0 | 1 | 765,399,107,199,041,500 | Pratik Saha | 5086 | Pratik Saha | false | ||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:07:59 | i. the reason it's wrong is that the author assumes that A and B are "served" by the same upper bound - which they might not be
a value of M that works as a bound for A may not work for B
you need to have two different bounds, one for A and one for B, and to then take their maximum for the upper bound of A \cup B | 0 | 1 | 765,399,107,199,041,500 | Pratik Saha | 5086 | Pratik Saha | false | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:08:04 | however for ii | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:08:34 | I havent been thought how to write proofs yet and this is my first assignment so I'm scared to mess it up | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:08:47 | how would I write it correctly if my answer for i is correct? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:10:06 | sounds like a troll | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:10:12 | anyway | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:10:15 | back to this question | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:10:18 | oh ok | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:10:34 | you're right, A and B might have different bounds | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:10:39 | say, M_1 and M_2 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:11:14 | and you also rightly said you should take the maximum for the UB of A\cup B | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:11:45 | so, that's $M = \max\{M_1, M_2\}$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/28/2022 06:11:47 | **Camilleone** | 569167697925898261.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:12:29 | can you see how to continue? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:13:47 | Well i mean once I know this I can write why this would make the proof wrong but the problem is idk how to put it into 'math language' | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:14:20 | ah i see, so you need help rephrasing (i)? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:14:37 | yes exactly! | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:14:57 | this helps thought to start. I hadnt even thought about writing it this way | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:16:17 | well, you can do something like saying that the definition of Cinderella liking a set only means that there exists such an M such that (copy the definition), but this M may differ for each set | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:16:49 | so there is no reason to assume that the same value of M will work for both sets A and B simultaneously | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.