conversation_id int64 1 206k | help_channel stringlengths 6 7 | __rowid__ stringlengths 32 32 | author_id int64 62,061,868B 1,071,443,446B | author_name stringlengths 2 32 | timestamp stringlengths 19 19 | content stringlengths 0 3.97k | reference.messageId stringclasses 3
values | reference.channelId stringclasses 3
values | reference.guildId stringclasses 1
value | url stringlengths 0 591 | fileName stringlengths 0 513 | student int64 0 1 | helper int64 0 1 | references.id float64 62,061,868B 1,071,056,124B ⌀ | references.name stringlengths 2 32 ⌀ | references.discriminator stringlengths 4 4 ⌀ | references.nickname stringlengths 1 32 ⌀ | references.isBot bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:17:12 | it's wordy, yes, but it's also mathematical | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:18:39 | ah ok so you dont think its bad if I write it like that? Since we havent seen many properly written proofs I thought that writing it like this would be okay but idk then I thought maybe it needs to look more mathematical hahaha | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:18:55 | well, when it comes to proofs, there are often a lot of words | 0 | 1 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 0796 | TeXit | true | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/28/2022 06:19:29 | in the end it's all about logic, so as long as you express the logic properly, with the right words (i.e. you don't misuse terms), it counts as a proof | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:20:38 | I see. Thank you so much sir! Logic and proofs are slowly starting to make sense haha | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
339 | help-10 | 93a6dbae91974b8aaca6a30eb6987bfb | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:20:51 | .close | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 150,414,892,225,134,600 | RokettoJanpu | 01/28/2022 06:21:38 | w/e u do, pls dont write a sea of quantifiers /s | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:27:52 | Ok so I've got a similar question to my previous one | Screen_Shot_2022-01-25_at_12.03.25.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:28:32 | so for i. the proof is wrong because:
the proof asserts "M=1 is a non-example of a strict upper bound for [0,1], therefore Belle cannot like it!"
conveniently sweeping under the rug that Belle may well like it, but with a different strict upper bound
Cinderella likes sets with a nonstrict upper bound and Belle ... | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:29:14 | however for ii. I'm struggling to first paraphrase what I'm trying to say | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:29:41 | Idk how to put it into 'mathematical language' | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:29:56 | oh and also, is my answer for i correct? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 06:45:47 | @Helpers | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 07:01:25 | @Helpers | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 265,853,506,664,136,700 | ScapeProf | 01/28/2022 07:11:57 | what are all those weird symbols in your text? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 265,853,506,664,136,700 | ScapeProf | 01/28/2022 07:13:22 | but yes sounds fine | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 265,853,506,664,136,700 | ScapeProf | 01/28/2022 07:13:59 | for ii) you want to show there is an upper bound in the set if and only if there is an upper bound not in the set | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 265,853,506,664,136,700 | ScapeProf | 01/28/2022 07:15:21 | I'm assuming some information is missing, for example [0,1) doesn't have this property (posting full questions are a good idea) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 01/28/2022 07:21:39 | all of this is copied from things i said with minimal alterations | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
340 | help-10 | 3f751f695fa24203bcd7417cb93f63e5 | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 01/28/2022 07:34:13 | Yeah but I needed help trying to paraphrase it cuz we haven’t learnt how to actually write proofs u know | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
341 | help-10 | 8d9f83d9a72947e2979e97b93fb91d63 | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 01/28/2022 07:47:25 | IMG_20220128_134656.jpg | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
341 | help-10 | 8d9f83d9a72947e2979e97b93fb91d63 | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 01/28/2022 07:48:15 | how many sections are in parallel | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
341 | help-10 | 8d9f83d9a72947e2979e97b93fb91d63 | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 01/28/2022 07:48:50 | pairs | 1 | 0 | 715,915,261,634,674,800 | cdat.icp ∞ | 5012 | cdat.icp ∞ | false | |||||
341 | help-10 | 8d9f83d9a72947e2979e97b93fb91d63 | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 01/28/2022 08:35:00 | nobody wants to help | 1 | 0 | 265,853,506,664,136,700 | ScapeProf | 9427 | ScapeProf | false | |||||
341 | help-10 | 8d9f83d9a72947e2979e97b93fb91d63 | 816,496,096,771,178,600 | tyunz | 01/28/2022 09:16:42 | it should be 4 pairs | 0 | 1 | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 0413 | Ann | false | |||||
341 | help-10 | 8d9f83d9a72947e2979e97b93fb91d63 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/28/2022 09:50:30 | What you confused about? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
341 | help-10 | 8d9f83d9a72947e2979e97b93fb91d63 | 706,934,233,012,371,600 | Ansh_ | 01/28/2022 09:50:39 | What's the issue with the question? I don't see | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 417,761,715,179,094,000 | Waahli | 01/28/2022 10:39:59 | hello | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 417,761,715,179,094,000 | Waahli | 01/28/2022 10:40:04 | i need some help | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 417,761,715,179,094,000 | Waahli | 01/28/2022 10:40:19 | unknown.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 417,761,715,179,094,000 | Waahli | 01/28/2022 10:40:39 | can someone help me find a sine and cos equation for this trig function? | 1 | 0 | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 1889 | miloch | false | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 417,761,715,179,094,000 | Waahli | 01/28/2022 10:41:01 | @here | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 348,696,743,388,381,200 | A Lonely Bean | 01/28/2022 10:50:59 | You can solve for the amplitude, period and initial angle using the graph | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 348,696,743,388,381,200 | A Lonely Bean | 01/28/2022 10:51:08 | By recalling their visual definitions | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 01/28/2022 11:06:20 | not 6? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 01/28/2022 11:06:54 | not F E and D C | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 01/28/2022 11:06:56 | ? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 485,903,210,272,391,200 | dldh06 | 01/28/2022 11:07:16 | FYI, this isn't your channel anymore | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 485,903,210,272,391,200 | dldh06 | 01/28/2022 11:07:21 | You need to open a new one | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 01/28/2022 11:07:30 | why tf it closed | 0 | 1 | 816,496,096,771,178,600 | tyunz | 1366 | tyunz | false | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 01/28/2022 11:07:57 | i didnt get help lol | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 485,903,210,272,391,200 | dldh06 | 01/28/2022 11:08:23 | And it's too late to reopen since someone took the channel | unknown.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 01/28/2022 11:08:34 | bruh | 0 | 1 | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 1889 | miloch | false | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 01/28/2022 11:08:43 | alright then | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 01/28/2022 11:08:52 | that shouldn't work like that | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
342 | help-10 | 91cfd637970d45e597cbe56e6d53a5eb | 485,903,210,272,391,200 | dldh06 | 01/28/2022 11:10:47 | The bot gave you another chance to keep it open, but you never reacted to it, so it closed, eventually | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:44:03 | hey | 1 | 0 | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 1889 | miloch | false | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:44:04 | List the squares:
0, 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, …
Then take their successive differences:
1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, …
Then take their successive differences again:
2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, …
So the 2nd successive differences are constant(!) and equal to 2.
OK, now list the cubes, and in a similar way, keep taking successive... | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:44:15 | i was reading about successive differences | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:44:39 | and i was intrigued about the statement:"Aren’t derivatives similar to differences? What do you think happens when you take the n-th derivative of xn?" | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:44:46 | is it really true? | 1 | 0 | 689,189,968,513,335,300 | miloch | 1889 | miloch | false | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:44:56 | because i was not able to give a concrete answer to it | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:45:01 | and if it is true | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:45:04 | how is it true | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:45:07 | please some one help me | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:45:29 | What's the first derivative of x^n? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:45:43 | n times x^n-1 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:45:54 | what's the second derivative | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:46:06 | ik where you are going, at the end we will get a constant | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:46:14 | when i take the nth derivative | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:46:23 | of x^n | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:46:43 | specifically n-factorial or "n!" | 0 | 1 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 5611 | Zybikron | false | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:47:08 | but isnt like n! different from n^ something | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:47:23 | very different, yes.... I guess not 'very' different, but they are definitely not the same | 0 | 1 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 5611 | Zybikron | false | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:47:58 | and my major question is how can i say derivatives are similar to differences, atleast in this situation | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:51:14 | ok, so you're taking the difference of $x^n$ over an interval of length 1. So you're finding the average rate of change. The derivative is 'instantaneous rate of change' | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/28/2022 11:51:17 | **Zybikron** | 334482942506041345.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:51:58 | yes, but if i take a normal polynomial, are the results of the average rate of change gonna be similar to instantaneous rate of change | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:53:06 | yes, the instantaneous rate of change is the limit of average rate of change | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:53:14 | yes | 1 | 0 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 5611 | Zybikron | false | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:53:19 | so in all the cases it wont be same right | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:53:48 | And the mean value theorem says on a given interval the average rate of change is equal to the derivative for some value in that interval | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:54:04 | ok | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:54:43 | what is that some value | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:55:13 | changes depending on the function | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:55:22 | and the interval | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:55:31 | ok | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:55:48 | i will try to check it out by finding some average rate of changes and | 1 | 0 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 5611 | Zybikron | false | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:55:55 | differentiate some polynomials | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:56:03 | and see how similar can they be | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:56:10 | So, what is happening here (i think) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:57:43 | for x^2, the integer values are where the derivative and average rate of change are the same | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:58:10 | ok | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:58:25 | when you take the derivative of x^3, that's just x^2 times a constant | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:58:30 | but there are some other methods that i read and vaguely remember that involve something like 3! or something | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:58:53 | like to find the terms of the polynomial describing the sum | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:59:07 | i mean the co-efficients of the terms | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:59:14 | yeah, $\sum_{k=1}^n 2k-1 = n^2$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/28/2022 11:59:16 | **Zybikron** | 334482942506041345.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 11:59:31 | sum of n odd numbers in n^2 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 11:59:58 | yup | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 12:00:14 | but for adding up | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 334,482,942,506,041,340 | Zybikron | 01/28/2022 12:00:16 | there's a similar one for cubes, but I don't remember | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 12:00:21 | a series of | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 12:00:23 | odd numbers | 1 | 0 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 0796 | TeXit | true | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 12:00:30 | they have a common difference | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 12:00:39 | where as for sums of cubes or squares or so one | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 12:00:41 | on | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 12:01:07 | the rate of changes are variable until a certain successive differnce | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
343 | help-10 | cb6d002ea2f245b89e983001acb3f6a9 | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/28/2022 12:01:44 | for n^3 it is (n(n+1)/2)^2 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.