document
stringlengths
29
1.23k
summary
stringlengths
19
538
There is a limited supply. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| This includes some of our natural resources we depend on.
Is oil a renewable or non renewable resource and when is it expected to be used up Oil is a non renewable resource and will be used up in a few decades
Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| Good thing you have more to refill your glass. ||||| Now think about what really happens.
Is oil a renewable or non renewable resource and when is it expected to be used up Oil is a non renewable resource and will be used up in a few decades
Things like oil will not last forever. ||||| There is a limited supply. ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades.
Is oil a renewable or non renewable resource and when is it expected to be used up Nonrewable
There is a limited supply. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| This includes some of our natural resources we depend on.
Is oil a renewable or non renewable resource and when is it expected to be used up Nonrewable
Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| Good thing you have more to refill your glass. ||||| Now think about what really happens.
Is oil a renewable or non renewable resource and when is it expected to be used up Nonrewable
Things like oil will not last forever. ||||| There is a limited supply. ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades.
Is oil a renewable or non renewable resource and when is it expected to be used up Oil is a non-renewable resource. It will be used up in a few decades
There is a limited supply. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| This includes some of our natural resources we depend on.
Is oil a renewable or non renewable resource and when is it expected to be used up Oil is a non-renewable resource. It will be used up in a few decades
Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| Good thing you have more to refill your glass. ||||| Now think about what really happens.
Is oil a renewable or non renewable resource and when is it expected to be used up Oil is a non-renewable resource. It will be used up in a few decades
Things like oil will not last forever. ||||| There is a limited supply. ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades.
Is oil a renewable or non renewable resource and when is it expected to be used up Few decades
There is a limited supply. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| This includes some of our natural resources we depend on.
Is oil a renewable or non renewable resource and when is it expected to be used up Few decades
Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| Good thing you have more to refill your glass. ||||| Now think about what really happens.
Is oil a renewable or non renewable resource and when is it expected to be used up Few decades
You take a drink and there is less in the glass. ||||| You keep drinking and soon it is all gone. ||||| Good thing you have more to refill your glass.
How would a glass of your favorite drink never become empty If it was renewable
You keep drinking and soon it is all gone. ||||| There is a limited supply. ||||| Things like oil will not last forever.
How would a glass of your favorite drink never become empty If it was renewable
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Imagine a glass of your favorite drink that never became empty. ||||| There is a limited supply.
How would a glass of your favorite drink never become empty If it was renewable
You take a drink and there is less in the glass. ||||| You keep drinking and soon it is all gone. ||||| Good thing you have more to refill your glass.
How would a glass of your favorite drink never become empty By imagining it
You keep drinking and soon it is all gone. ||||| There is a limited supply. ||||| Things like oil will not last forever.
How would a glass of your favorite drink never become empty By imagining it
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Imagine a glass of your favorite drink that never became empty. ||||| There is a limited supply.
How would a glass of your favorite drink never become empty By imagining it
This includes some of our natural resources we depend on. ||||| At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Its too bad that many things here on Earth will run out.
Does the Earth have other none renewable resources we depend on other than oil Coal
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Now you know the difference between renewable and non-renewable. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what?
Does the Earth have other none renewable resources we depend on other than oil Coal
Good thing you have more to refill your glass. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades.
Does the Earth have other none renewable resources we depend on other than oil Coal
This includes some of our natural resources we depend on. ||||| At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Its too bad that many things here on Earth will run out.
Does the Earth have other none renewable resources we depend on other than oil Yes
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Now you know the difference between renewable and non-renewable. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what?
Does the Earth have other none renewable resources we depend on other than oil Yes
Good thing you have more to refill your glass. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades.
Does the Earth have other none renewable resources we depend on other than oil Yes
This includes some of our natural resources we depend on. ||||| At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Its too bad that many things here on Earth will run out.
Does the Earth have other none renewable resources we depend on other than oil Yes, the other resource mentioned is coal
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Now you know the difference between renewable and non-renewable. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what?
Does the Earth have other none renewable resources we depend on other than oil Yes, the other resource mentioned is coal
Good thing you have more to refill your glass. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades.
Does the Earth have other none renewable resources we depend on other than oil Yes, the other resource mentioned is coal
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades.
What are some non-renewable resources Coal
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Now you know the difference between renewable and non-renewable.
What are some non-renewable resources Coal
Good thing you have more to refill your glass. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what?
What are some non-renewable resources Coal
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades.
What are some non-renewable resources Oil
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Now you know the difference between renewable and non-renewable.
What are some non-renewable resources Oil
Good thing you have more to refill your glass. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what?
What are some non-renewable resources Oil
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades.
What are some non-renewable resources Petroleum and coal
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Now you know the difference between renewable and non-renewable.
What are some non-renewable resources Petroleum and coal
Good thing you have more to refill your glass. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what?
What are some non-renewable resources Petroleum and coal
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades.
What are some non-renewable resources Petroleum
At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Now you know the difference between renewable and non-renewable.
What are some non-renewable resources Petroleum
Good thing you have more to refill your glass. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what?
What are some non-renewable resources Petroleum
This includes some of our natural resources we depend on. ||||| At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades. ||||| Its too bad that many things here on Earth will run out.
What are some examples of resources that will run out Coal
This includes some of our natural resources we depend on. ||||| What would you do? ||||| Now you know the difference between renewable and non-renewable. ||||| There is a limited supply.
What are some examples of resources that will run out Coal
Now think about what really happens. ||||| You take a drink and there is less in the glass. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| Imagine a glass of your favorite drink that never became empty.
What are some examples of resources that will run out Coal
This includes some of our natural resources we depend on. ||||| At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades. ||||| Its too bad that many things here on Earth will run out.
What are some examples of resources that will run out Oil, coal and petroleum
This includes some of our natural resources we depend on. ||||| What would you do? ||||| Now you know the difference between renewable and non-renewable. ||||| There is a limited supply.
What are some examples of resources that will run out Oil, coal and petroleum
Now think about what really happens. ||||| You take a drink and there is less in the glass. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| Imagine a glass of your favorite drink that never became empty.
What are some examples of resources that will run out Oil, coal and petroleum
This includes some of our natural resources we depend on. ||||| At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades. ||||| Its too bad that many things here on Earth will run out.
What are some examples of resources that will run out Petroleum
This includes some of our natural resources we depend on. ||||| What would you do? ||||| Now you know the difference between renewable and non-renewable. ||||| There is a limited supply.
What are some examples of resources that will run out Petroleum
Now think about what really happens. ||||| You take a drink and there is less in the glass. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| Imagine a glass of your favorite drink that never became empty.
What are some examples of resources that will run out Petroleum
This includes some of our natural resources we depend on. ||||| At current rates of use, coal will last about 300 years. ||||| Petroleum will be used up in just a few decades. ||||| Its too bad that many things here on Earth will run out.
What are some examples of resources that will run out Natural gas
This includes some of our natural resources we depend on. ||||| What would you do? ||||| Now you know the difference between renewable and non-renewable. ||||| There is a limited supply.
What are some examples of resources that will run out Natural gas
Now think about what really happens. ||||| You take a drink and there is less in the glass. ||||| Someday, we will run out, so then what? ||||| Imagine a glass of your favorite drink that never became empty.
What are some examples of resources that will run out Natural gas
One result had been the creation of an NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing. ||||| On its recommendation, the President had designated Bin Laden and al Qaeda as subject to sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Who recommended that the President designate Bin Laden and al Qaeda as subject to sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act The NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing
On its recommendation, the President had designated Bin Laden and al Qaeda as subject to sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. ||||| Any terrorist-financing intelligence appeared to have been collected collaterally, as a consequence of gathering other intelligence.
Who recommended that the President designate Bin Laden and al Qaeda as subject to sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act The NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing
Attacking the funds of an institution, even the Taliban, was easier than finding and seizing the funds of a clandestine worldwide organization like al Qaeda. ||||| Neither this designation nor UN sanctions had much additional practical effect; the sanctions were easily circumvented, and there were no multilateral mechanisms to ensure that other countries' financial systems were not used as conduits for terrorist funding.
Who recommended that the President designate Bin Laden and al Qaeda as subject to sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act The NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing
Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations. ||||| Any terrorist-financing intelligence appeared to have been collected collaterally, as a consequence of gathering other intelligence.
Why did most of the intelligence about terrorist funding come from gathering other intelligence Because transactions themselves don't simply reveal the details of their plans
Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations. ||||| This gave theTreasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) the ability to search for and freeze any Bin Laden or al Qaeda assets that reached the U.S. financial system.
Why did most of the intelligence about terrorist funding come from gathering other intelligence Because transactions themselves don't simply reveal the details of their plans
But since OFAC had little information to go on, few funds were frozen. ||||| After October 1999, when the State Department formally designated al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," it became the duty of U.S. banks to block its transactions and seize its funds.
Why did most of the intelligence about terrorist funding come from gathering other intelligence Because transactions themselves don't simply reveal the details of their plans
Another $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits, all belonging to the Afghan central bank and held by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, were also frozen. ||||| In July 1999, the President applied the same designation to the Taliban for harboring Bin Laden. ||||| It blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks.
How much money was frozen after the President applied the same designation to the Taliban $34 million in Taliban assets in U.S. banks, another $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits
It blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks. ||||| Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations. ||||| This attitude may have stemmed in large part from the chief of this unit, who did not believe that simply following the money from point A to point B revealed much about the terrorists' plans and intentions.
How much money was frozen after the President applied the same designation to the Taliban $34 million in Taliban assets in U.S. banks, another $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits
After October 1999, when the State Department formally designated al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," it became the duty of U.S. banks to block its transactions and seize its funds. ||||| Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations. ||||| One result had been the creation of an NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing.
How much money was frozen after the President applied the same designation to the Taliban $34 million in Taliban assets in U.S. banks, another $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits
Another $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits, all belonging to the Afghan central bank and held by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, were also frozen. ||||| In July 1999, the President applied the same designation to the Taliban for harboring Bin Laden. ||||| It blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks.
How much money was frozen after the President applied the same designation to the Taliban $251 million
It blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks. ||||| Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations. ||||| This attitude may have stemmed in large part from the chief of this unit, who did not believe that simply following the money from point A to point B revealed much about the terrorists' plans and intentions.
How much money was frozen after the President applied the same designation to the Taliban $251 million
After October 1999, when the State Department formally designated al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," it became the duty of U.S. banks to block its transactions and seize its funds. ||||| Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations. ||||| One result had been the creation of an NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing.
How much money was frozen after the President applied the same designation to the Taliban $251 million
Another $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits, all belonging to the Afghan central bank and held by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, were also frozen. ||||| In July 1999, the President applied the same designation to the Taliban for harboring Bin Laden. ||||| It blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks.
How much money was frozen after the President applied the same designation to the Taliban It blocked $34 million of Taliban assets, $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits
It blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks. ||||| Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations. ||||| This attitude may have stemmed in large part from the chief of this unit, who did not believe that simply following the money from point A to point B revealed much about the terrorists' plans and intentions.
How much money was frozen after the President applied the same designation to the Taliban It blocked $34 million of Taliban assets, $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits
After October 1999, when the State Department formally designated al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," it became the duty of U.S. banks to block its transactions and seize its funds. ||||| Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations. ||||| One result had been the creation of an NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing.
How much money was frozen after the President applied the same designation to the Taliban It blocked $34 million of Taliban assets, $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits
This attitude may have stemmed in large part from the chief of this unit, who did not believe that simply following the money from point A to point B revealed much about the terrorists' plans and intentions. ||||| As a result, the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing.
What was the result of following terrorist money flowing from point A to point B Knowledge of how al Qaeda raised money
As a result, the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing. ||||| After October 1999, when the State Department formally designated al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," it became the duty of U.S. banks to block its transactions and seize its funds.
What was the result of following terrorist money flowing from point A to point B Knowledge of how al Qaeda raised money
Neither this designation nor UN sanctions had much additional practical effect; the sanctions were easily circumvented, and there were no multilateral mechanisms to ensure that other countries' financial systems were not used as conduits for terrorist funding. ||||| Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations.
What was the result of following terrorist money flowing from point A to point B Knowledge of how al Qaeda raised money
This attitude may have stemmed in large part from the chief of this unit, who did not believe that simply following the money from point A to point B revealed much about the terrorists' plans and intentions. ||||| As a result, the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing.
What was the result of following terrorist money flowing from point A to point B CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing
As a result, the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing. ||||| After October 1999, when the State Department formally designated al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," it became the duty of U.S. banks to block its transactions and seize its funds.
What was the result of following terrorist money flowing from point A to point B CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing
Neither this designation nor UN sanctions had much additional practical effect; the sanctions were easily circumvented, and there were no multilateral mechanisms to ensure that other countries' financial systems were not used as conduits for terrorist funding. ||||| Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations.
What was the result of following terrorist money flowing from point A to point B CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing
This attitude may have stemmed in large part from the chief of this unit, who did not believe that simply following the money from point A to point B revealed much about the terrorists' plans and intentions. ||||| As a result, the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing.
What was the result of following terrorist money flowing from point A to point B Little emphasis was placed on terrorist financing
As a result, the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing. ||||| After October 1999, when the State Department formally designated al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," it became the duty of U.S. banks to block its transactions and seize its funds.
What was the result of following terrorist money flowing from point A to point B Little emphasis was placed on terrorist financing
Neither this designation nor UN sanctions had much additional practical effect; the sanctions were easily circumvented, and there were no multilateral mechanisms to ensure that other countries' financial systems were not used as conduits for terrorist funding. ||||| Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations.
What was the result of following terrorist money flowing from point A to point B Little emphasis was placed on terrorist financing
Attacking the funds of an institution, even the Taliban, was easier than finding and seizing the funds of a clandestine worldwide organization like al Qaeda. ||||| But since OFAC had little information to go on, few funds were frozen.
Why did the OFAC have little information about the financing of al Qaeda Al Qaeda was a clandestine worldwide organization
Attacking the funds of an institution, even the Taliban, was easier than finding and seizing the funds of a clandestine worldwide organization like al Qaeda. ||||| It blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks.
Why did the OFAC have little information about the financing of al Qaeda Al Qaeda was a clandestine worldwide organization
After October 1999, when the State Department formally designated al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," it became the duty of U.S. banks to block its transactions and seize its funds. ||||| Any terrorist-financing intelligence appeared to have been collected collaterally, as a consequence of gathering other intelligence.
Why did the OFAC have little information about the financing of al Qaeda Al Qaeda was a clandestine worldwide organization
The second major point on which the principals had agreed on March 10 was the need to crack down on terrorist organizations and curtail their fund-raising. ||||| One result had been the creation of an NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing.
One of the results of March 10th meeting was The creation of an NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing
The second major point on which the principals had agreed on March 10 was the need to crack down on terrorist organizations and curtail their fund-raising. ||||| Neither this designation nor UN sanctions had much additional practical effect; the sanctions were easily circumvented, and there were no multilateral mechanisms to ensure that other countries' financial systems were not used as conduits for terrorist funding.
One of the results of March 10th meeting was The creation of an NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing
Attacking the funds of an institution, even the Taliban, was easier than finding and seizing the funds of a clandestine worldwide organization like al Qaeda. ||||| As a result, the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing.
One of the results of March 10th meeting was The creation of an NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing
Another $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits, all belonging to the Afghan central bank and held by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, were also frozen. ||||| Here, OFAC had more success. ||||| It blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks.
Who blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks, and froze $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits belonging to the Afghan central bank OFAC
Here, OFAC had more success. ||||| Neither this designation nor UN sanctions had much additional practical effect; the sanctions were easily circumvented, and there were no multilateral mechanisms to ensure that other countries' financial systems were not used as conduits for terrorist funding. ||||| Nevertheless, the CIA obtained a general understanding of how al Qaeda raised money.
Who blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks, and froze $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits belonging to the Afghan central bank OFAC
Any terrorist-financing intelligence appeared to have been collected collaterally, as a consequence of gathering other intelligence. ||||| As a result, the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing. ||||| Neither this designation nor UN sanctions had much additional practical effect; the sanctions were easily circumvented, and there were no multilateral mechanisms to ensure that other countries' financial systems were not used as conduits for terrorist funding.
Who blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks, and froze $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits belonging to the Afghan central bank OFAC
After October 1999, when the State Department formally designated al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," it became the duty of U.S. banks to block its transactions and seize its funds. ||||| Neither this designation nor UN sanctions had much additional practical effect; the sanctions were easily circumvented, and there were no multilateral mechanisms to ensure that other countries' financial systems were not used as conduits for terrorist funding.
Practical effects of designating al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," resulted in small achievement after what date October 1999
Neither this designation nor UN sanctions had much additional practical effect; the sanctions were easily circumvented, and there were no multilateral mechanisms to ensure that other countries' financial systems were not used as conduits for terrorist funding. ||||| Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations.
Practical effects of designating al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," resulted in small achievement after what date October 1999
As a result, the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing. ||||| One result had been the creation of an NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing.
Practical effects of designating al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," resulted in small achievement after what date October 1999
Attacking the funds of an institution, even the Taliban, was easier than finding and seizing the funds of a clandestine worldwide organization like al Qaeda. ||||| Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations.
Why was it easier to attack the funds of an institution, even the Taliban, than to find and seize the funds of a clandestine worldwide organization like al Qaeda Because the CIA's Bin Laden Unit had very little if any experience in financial investigations
Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations. ||||| The embassy bombings of 1998 had focused attention on al Qaeda's finances.
Why was it easier to attack the funds of an institution, even the Taliban, than to find and seize the funds of a clandestine worldwide organization like al Qaeda Because the CIA's Bin Laden Unit had very little if any experience in financial investigations
Another $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits, all belonging to the Afghan central bank and held by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, were also frozen. ||||| This gave theTreasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) the ability to search for and freeze any Bin Laden or al Qaeda assets that reached the U.S. financial system.
Why was it easier to attack the funds of an institution, even the Taliban, than to find and seize the funds of a clandestine worldwide organization like al Qaeda Because the CIA's Bin Laden Unit had very little if any experience in financial investigations
This gave theTreasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) the ability to search for and freeze any Bin Laden or al Qaeda assets that reached the U.S. financial system. ||||| But since OFAC had little information to go on, few funds were frozen.
The OFAC tried to freeze which terrorist organizations funding Al Qaeda
This gave theTreasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) the ability to search for and freeze any Bin Laden or al Qaeda assets that reached the U.S. financial system. ||||| Neither this designation nor UN sanctions had much additional practical effect; the sanctions were easily circumvented, and there were no multilateral mechanisms to ensure that other countries' financial systems were not used as conduits for terrorist funding.
The OFAC tried to freeze which terrorist organizations funding Al Qaeda
One result had been the creation of an NSC-led interagency committee on terrorist financing. ||||| It blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks.
The OFAC tried to freeze which terrorist organizations funding Al Qaeda
Although the CIA's Bin Laden unit had originally been inspired by the idea of studying terrorist financial links, few personnel assigned to it had any experience in financial investigations. ||||| This attitude may have stemmed in large part from the chief of this unit, who did not believe that simply following the money from point A to point B revealed much about the terrorists' plans and intentions. ||||| As a result, the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing.
What are two reasons the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing The chief of the CIA's Bin Laden unit did not believe that tracing money from point A to point B revealed much about the terrorists' plans and intentions, and few personnel assigned to the unit had any experience in financial investigations
As a result, the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing. ||||| Another $215 million in gold and $2 million in demand deposits, all belonging to the Afghan central bank and held by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, were also frozen. ||||| Here, OFAC had more success.
What are two reasons the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing The chief of the CIA's Bin Laden unit did not believe that tracing money from point A to point B revealed much about the terrorists' plans and intentions, and few personnel assigned to the unit had any experience in financial investigations
Attacking the funds of an institution, even the Taliban, was easier than finding and seizing the funds of a clandestine worldwide organization like al Qaeda. ||||| It blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks. ||||| On its recommendation, the President had designated Bin Laden and al Qaeda as subject to sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
What are two reasons the CIA placed little emphasis on terrorist financing The chief of the CIA's Bin Laden unit did not believe that tracing money from point A to point B revealed much about the terrorists' plans and intentions, and few personnel assigned to the unit had any experience in financial investigations
On its recommendation, the President had designated Bin Laden and al Qaeda as subject to sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. ||||| This gave theTreasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) the ability to search for and freeze any Bin Laden or al Qaeda assets that reached the U.S. financial system.
What gave the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) the ability to search for and freeze any Bin Laden or al Qaeda assets that reached the U.S. financial system Sanctioning Bin Laden
On its recommendation, the President had designated Bin Laden and al Qaeda as subject to sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. ||||| Neither this designation nor UN sanctions had much additional practical effect; the sanctions were easily circumvented, and there were no multilateral mechanisms to ensure that other countries' financial systems were not used as conduits for terrorist funding.
What gave the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) the ability to search for and freeze any Bin Laden or al Qaeda assets that reached the U.S. financial system Sanctioning Bin Laden
It blocked more than $34 million in Taliban assets held in U.S. banks. ||||| This attitude may have stemmed in large part from the chief of this unit, who did not believe that simply following the money from point A to point B revealed much about the terrorists' plans and intentions.
What gave the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) the ability to search for and freeze any Bin Laden or al Qaeda assets that reached the U.S. financial system Sanctioning Bin Laden
After October 1999, when the State Department formally designated al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," it became the duty of U.S. banks to block its transactions and seize its funds. ||||| Neither this designation nor UN sanctions had much additional practical effect; the sanctions were easily circumvented, and there were no multilateral mechanisms to ensure that other countries' financial systems were not used as conduits for terrorist funding.
Why was it difficult for U.S. banks to block the transactions of and seize the funds of al Qaeda despite it being designated a "foreign terrorist organization" There were no multilateral mechanisms to prevent other countries' financial systems from being used to circumvent the sanctions
After October 1999, when the State Department formally designated al Qaeda a "foreign terrorist organization," it became the duty of U.S. banks to block its transactions and seize its funds. ||||| On its recommendation, the President had designated Bin Laden and al Qaeda as subject to sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Why was it difficult for U.S. banks to block the transactions of and seize the funds of al Qaeda despite it being designated a "foreign terrorist organization" There were no multilateral mechanisms to prevent other countries' financial systems from being used to circumvent the sanctions