ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_1774 | 0 | Criminal Revision Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present: The Honourable Justice Bibek Chaudhuri, Criminal Revision Petition No. 1815 of 2023, Suvendu Adhikari, State of West Bengal, for the petitioner: Mr. Sekhar Kumar Basu, Senior Advocate, Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Mr. Rajdeep Mazumdar, Mr. Mayukh Mukherjee, Mr. Soumya Na... |
id_1779 | 0 | This petition is filed under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, by accused No.1, praying to enlarge her bail in Crime No. 134/2022 of Yeshwanthapura Police Station. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent State and perused the material on record... |
id_178 | 0 | Reserved Appellant: State of Uttar Pradesh. Respondent: Mukhtar Ansari. Counsel for Appellant: Government Advocate. Counsel for Respondent: Abhishek Misra, Karunesh Singh, Satendra Kumar (Singh). Honourable Dinesh Kumar Singh, J., Present appeal has been filed under Section 378 Criminal Procedure Code with an applicati... |
id_178 | 1 | He in support of the aforesaid submission has placed reliance on the judgment in the case of Dhanapal vs State by Public Prosecutor, Madras (2009) 10 Supreme Court Cases 401 wherein the Supreme Court of India has culled out the principle for dealing with the judgment of acquittal of a trial court by an appellate court ... |
id_178 | 2 | To get rid of the evil of perjury, the Supreme Court of India should resort to the use of the provisions of law as contained in Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure., The Supreme Court of India in paragraph 7 of Radha Mohan Singh @ Lal Saheb v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2006) 2 SCC 450 held: “It is well settled... |
id_1780 | 0 | Standard Operating Procedure for hearing of matters through Virtual Mode at the Principal Seat, Bombay High Court (effective from 11 January 2022) is issued in partial modification of the Standard Operating Procedure dated 3 January 2021. It is notified for the information of advocates and parties appearing in person t... |
id_1781 | 0 | Dated this the 9th day of November, 2022 A. Muhamed Mustaque, Judge. What God has joined together, let no one separate is the sublime ideal read in the Bible (Matthew 19:6, Mark 10:9). Do spouses in that union have the right to separate their marriage, mutually, before the aura of the marriage period of one year vanish... |
id_1783 | 0 | Walls of prison, however high they may be, the foundation of a prison is laid on the rule of law ensuring the rights of its inmates enshrined in the Constitution of India. The violation of these constitutional rights of Ankit Gujjar, who lost his life to custodial violence in Tihar Jail, compelled the petitioners Geeta... |
id_1785 | 0 | Reportable Criminal Appeal Nos. 833-834 of 2022 (Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos. 10039-10040 of 2016) A.G. Perarivalan, Appellant, versus State, through Superintendent of Police, Respondents. Criminal Appeal No. 835 of 2022 (Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 2363 of 2021) – leave granted., Appellant A.G. Per... |
id_1785 | 1 | Mister Sankaranarayanan has submitted a list of cases wherein the Supreme Court of India, in the specific facts and circumstances of those cases, has directed release of the prisoner convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code simpliciter or along with other offences, taking note of the prolonged period of inc... |
id_1788 | 0 | Versus Writ Petition (Criminal) No.304/2020, Writ Petition (Criminal) No.308/2020, Writ Petition (Criminal) No.314/2020, Writ Petition (Criminal) No.316/2020. The petitioners and all the intervening applicants in these matters have raised concern with regard to Writ Petition (Criminal) No.296/2020 regarding the manner ... |
id_179 | 0 | EP No. 1 of 2021 I A No. GA 1 of 2021 Versus Date: July 07, 2021 Appearance: Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Senior Advocate; Mr. S.N. Mookherjee, Senior Advocate; Mr. Sanjay Basu, Advocate; Mr. Samik K. Chakraborty, Advocate; Mr. Piyush Agrawal, Advocate; Ms. Utsha Dasgupta, Advocate; Mr. Aman Sharma, Advocate; Mr. Amit Bh... |
id_1790 | 0 | Petitioner is before the High Court of Karnataka calling into question the proceedings in Crime No. 347/2021 registered for offences punishable under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 (the Act) and Section 370 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, S... |
id_1791 | 0 | Reportable Civil Appeal No. 8129 of 2022 Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited (appellant) versus Union of India and others (respondents). Civil Appeal No. 8130 of 2022 and Civil Appeal No. 8131 of 2022 are also involved. Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Chief Justice of India. This judgment consists of the following sections: Re... |
id_1791 | 1 | On 28 February 2020, a show cause notice was issued by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting alleging a violation of the Cable Television Network Rules 1994 and Programme Code of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act 1995 while telecasting reports on the violence which took place in North-East Delhi dur... |
id_1791 | 2 | The nature of the right infringed, the underlying purpose of the restrictions imposed, the extent and urgency of the evil sought to be remedied thereby, the disproportion of the imposition, the prevailing conditions at the time, all provide the basis for considering the reasonableness of a particular provision. The pro... |
id_1791 | 3 | On a perusal of the evidence, it was held that work at the headquarters involved matters of grave national security, and that if the employees and trade unions were consulted before the decision then the security would have been compromised. Lord Scarman observed that the Minister did not consult the employees because ... |
id_1791 | 4 | The relevant extract of the response of Ministry of Home Affairs is extracted below: Since the Ministry of Home Affairs has not withdrawn security clearance of existing News and Current Affairs TV channel Media One, it is Ministry of Information and Broadcasting which has to justify its action of issuing show-cause not... |
id_1791 | 5 | A valid claim for privilege made under Section 123 proceeds on the basis of the theory that the production of the document in question would cause injury to public interest, and that, where a conflict arises between public interest and private interest, the latter must yield to the former. No doubt the litigant whose c... |
id_1791 | 6 | Identifying the relevancy of the document even before the state is required to discharge the burden of proving public interest introduces a fundamental misconception in the application of public interest immunity which is an exception to the production of documents. Furthermore, at an elementary level, it would be impo... |
id_1791 | 7 | Even if the disclosure would conceivably injure public interest, the courts may still dismiss the claim of public interest immunity if the non-disclosure would render the issue non-justiciable, and on the facts of the case it is decided that the injury due to non-disclosure overweighs the injury due to disclosure. The ... |
id_1792 | 0 | Date of decision: 21st November 2023. Civil Suit (Commercial) 833/2023, Interim Application 23077/2023, 23078/2023. Through: Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Ms. Suhasini Raina, Ms. R. Ramya, Ms. Mehr Sidhu and Mr. Raghav Goyal, Advocates (M - 9845057887)., The hearing was conducted in hybrid mode. Interim Application 23078/2... |
id_1792 | 1 | Moreover, as is clear from a viewing of one of the infringing websites, coolmoviez.cloud, the clear position that emerges is that serious illegalities are also sought to be committed by these websites and unlawful activities are also being encouraged as is clear from the following screenshots. Under these circumstances... |
id_1795 | 0 | Reserved on 17 November 2023. Pronounced on 4 January 2024. Sukhpal Singh Khaira, Petitioner v. State of Punjab, Respondent. Present: Mr. Vikram Chaudhri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Keshavam Chaudhri, Advocate; Mr. Parvez Chaudhary, Advocate; Ms. Hargun Sandhu, Advocate; Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate; and Mr. Rishab Tiwar... |
id_1795 | 1 | Gurdev Singh was working as per the dictates of his handler operating from the United Kingdom. Apart from this the members of the international drug cartel, Sukhpal Singh Khaira and Gurdev Singh had close association with Ranjit Singh alias Dara, a resident of Muthada, who is absconding in cases registered against him ... |
id_1795 | 2 | At this stage, it is neither necessary nor desirable to weigh the evidence meticulously to arrive at a position finding as to whether or not the accused has committed an offence under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. What is to be seen is whether there is reasonable ground for believing that the accu... |
id_1795 | 3 | After the arrest of absconding accused Anil Kumar alias Neelu, a chargesheet was presented against him on 31 August 2019, in which his name was mentioned along with the fact that, in the meantime, the Supreme Court of India exercised power under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure based on evidence recorded i... |
id_1796 | 0 | Chanda Kochhar, age 61 years, having address at 45, CCI Chambers, Churchgate, Mumbai 400020, is the petitioner. The respondents are: Central Bureau of Investigation, B.S. & F.C., 3rd & 4th Floor, Plot No. C-35A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC), Near MTNL Exchange, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400098; and the State of Maha... |
id_1796 | 1 | As regards the legality of the remand order, the co‑ordinate bench of the High Court has observed that the concerned Judge authorising detention ought to have recorded his own satisfaction, perhaps in brief, but the satisfaction must be reflected in his order. It was observed that the order of remand does not comply wi... |
id_1798 | 0 | CRWP No.1493 of 2022 Date of Decision: 18.02.2022 Jai Nrain and another Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others Respondents Present: Mr. Vishneet Singh Kathpal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rehatbir Singh Mann, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. (Through Video Conferencing) Fearing for their lives and liberty ... |
id_1799 | 0 | Date: 11-11-2022. This petition was called for hearing today. Parties: Mr. Amit Pai, Advocate on Record (for petitioner in the Civil Procedure) of the Orissa High Court; Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Senior Advocate of Orissa; Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra, Advocate on Record; Mr. Umakant Misra, Advocate; Mr. Niranjan Sahu, Advocate; ... |
id_18 | 0 | Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No(s). 9445/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24-08-2022 in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 1/2022 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) Date: 10-05-2023. This petition was called on for orders/hearing today., For petitione... |
id_180 | 0 | (SHRI ANAND SONI, LEARNED ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR THE RESPONDENT/STATE) This petition coming on for admission this day, Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari passed the following: ORDER Heard finally, with the consent of both the parties. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been... |
id_1804 | 0 | Suresh Dattaram Pawar, through his wife Sheela Suresh Pawar, aged 62 years, occupation: Nil, Applicant; The State of Maharashtra (at the instance of Mahim police station), Respondent. Appearances: Mr. A. Karim Patil, Learned Advocate for applicant; Mr. Prabhakar Tarange, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respond... |
id_1805 | 0 | Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) is Applicant/Original Respondent No. 2 in the matter between Mohan Yeshwant Padawe & Ors Applicants versus the State of Maharashtra through the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development and Ors Respondents. Mr. Anoop Patil, with Sagar Patil in behalf of Arauna Savla, appea... |
id_1806 | 0 | Reportable Civil Appeal No 2874 of 2024, Special Leave Petition (Civil) No 2998 of 2024, Kuldeep Kumar Appellant versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others Respondents. Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Chief Justice of India. Leave granted., The present appeal arises from an interim order of a Division Bench of the Pu... |
id_1806 | 1 | Further, we are of the considered view that a fit and proper case is made out for invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in respect of the conduct of Shri Anil Masih, the Presiding Officer. In paragraph 2 of the order dated 19 February... |
id_1807 | 0 | Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 79 of 2021 Manoj Kumar Arya, Applicant, versus State of Uttarakhand and another Respondent. Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. T.C. Agarwal, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Pankaj Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for Respondent No.2. ... |
id_1810 | 0 | Versus Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Leave granted. The above two petitions have been filed before the Supreme Court of India by the State of Jharkhand through the Resident Commissioner, challenging the orders dated 03.06.2022 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Jharkhand, where the High Court has ordered that the... |
id_1810 | 1 | The Courts before entertaining the Public Interest Litigation should ensure that the Public Interest Litigation is aimed at redressal of genuine public harm or public injury. The Supreme Court of India should also ensure that there is no personal gain, private motive or oblique motive behind filing the Public Interest ... |
id_1811 | 0 | Bail Applications No.5/2022 and 11/2022: FIR No. RC No.2182021A0007. Bail Matters No.5/2022 & 11/2022 (Bail Applications of Mahim Pratap Singh Tomar (A-3) and Sunil Kumar Verma (A-6)) under sections 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Present: Shri ... |
id_1813 | 0 | In the Civil Judge (Special District) Fast Track Court, Varanasi, Original Suit No. 712/2022, Bhagwan Adi Vishweshwar Virajman and others versus State of Uttar Pradesh through Secretary and others, Mahendra Kumar Pandey, Joint Officer, Code UP2271, dated 17 November 2022, the court disposed of application paper No. 37C... |
id_1813 | 1 | In the instant case it is clear that from time immemorial the land and property belong to the deity and therefore there can be no mosque thereat. The learned counsel of the plaintiff has further stated that the Waqf Board before registering any property as waqf is required to make an enquiry and give notice to all pers... |
id_1813 | 2 | After 1993, they were allowed to worship the above mentioned Gods only once in a year under the regulatory of State of Uttar Pradesh. Thus, according to plaintiffs, they worshipped Maa Sringar Gauri, Lord Hanuman at the disputed place regularly even after 15th August, 1947. So in the light of above contentions it is do... |
id_1814 | 0 | (Arising from Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 9657-9658 of 2022) Leave granted. We have heard Shri M. R. Shamshad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Shri Vinod Diwakar, Additional Advocate General for the State and Shri Pramod Kumar Dubey, Senior Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in Special ... |
id_1816 | 0 | The office of the Chief Justice of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh is vacant, consequent upon the retirement of Mister Justice Amjad A Sayed. Appointment to that office is required to be made. Mister Justice M S Ramachandra Rao was appointed as a Judge of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh on 29 June 2012. On the bifu... |
id_1817 | 0 | IR No. 98/21 Police Station: Kotwali (Crime Branch) Sandeep Singh Sidhu @ Deep Sidhu Vs. State (the NCT of Delhi) under sections 147, 148, 149, 153, 452, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 25, 27 of the Arms Act, 3, 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 2 of the PINH Act, 30A, 30B dated 26.04.2021 Vide Office... |
id_1818 | 0 | Judgment reserved on : 01.12.2023 Judgment pronounced on: 27.02.2024 Through: Mr Praveen Kumar Aggarwal and Mr Abhishek Grover, Advocates. Versus Through: Mr Ajay Brahme, Advocate., In a State like Delhi, majority of Delhites have one dream i.e. to own a property in their name. It is not easy for the middle and lower i... |
id_1819 | 0 | D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13535/2020\nPetitioner: Deepesh Singh Beniwal, son of Late Shri Yashpal Singh Choudhary, aged about 42 years, resident of 31, Guru Pratap, Air Force Road, Bhagat Ki Kothi, Jodhpur.\nVersus:\n1. Union of India, through its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India... |
id_1819 | 1 | It is submitted that if the bank accounts of the respondent institutions are requisitioned, it will make abundantly clear that they are charging huge amount from the students towards the advance fee in addition to the amount of fee to be deposited for first year of MBBS Course. On the other hand, Mr. Manish Vyas, Addit... |
id_1819 | 2 | After the decision in T.M.A. Pai Foundation case (supra), the issue regarding the extent of autonomy in fixing the fee structure came up for consideration before the Supreme Court of India in Islamic Academy (supra). The Court noticed that some educational institutions were collecting in advance the fees for the entire... |
id_1819 | 3 | It is not in dispute that the Honourable Supreme Court of India, with reference to the issue of fixation of fee structure to various professional courses in the country including the Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery and Bachelor of Dental Surgery courses, directed all the States to fix fee structure through... |
id_182 | 0 | Court Case 3/2023 CNR No. DLCT12-000039-2023 Gajendra Singh Shekhawat Vs. Ashok Gehlot 19.09.2023 Vide this order, I shall decide the application under section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed on behalf of the accused Shri Ashok Gehlot (hereinafter referred to as the accused), seeking acquittal in the matter at... |
id_1820 | 0 | Leave granted., These appeals involving inter-related issues and the same set of contesting parties have been considered together and are taken up for disposal by this common judgment., Before embarking upon the requisite details, a few preliminary comments and a brief outline shall be apposite., The matters in issue e... |
id_1820 | 1 | For a permanent injunction restraining the Defendants or any other office bearer of the party from convening the General Council meeting on 11 July 2022 or any other date without giving its members a 15‑day notice in advance as contemplated in the rules of the first Defendant party., In Original Application No. 370 of ... |
id_1820 | 2 | It cannot be said as a general rule that the requisitioners have no option but to go to Court if the leaders do not call for a meeting. Such a statement would be undemocratic and illegal. When the Interim General Secretary could not act in the year 2017, the Office Bearers stepped in to convene the meeting on 12.09.201... |
id_1820 | 3 | Furthermore, on the issue of grant of interim injunction as a discretionary measure, balance of convenience and prima facie case, the learned counsel for the appellants have relied upon the decisions of the Supreme Court of India in Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Chandan Nagar, West Bengal versus Dunlop India L... |
id_1820 | 4 | The Supreme Court of India observed that in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136, it would not ordinarily interfere with the exercise of discretion in the matter of grant of temporary injunction by the High Court and the trial court and substitute its own discretion, except where the discretion has been shown to ... |
id_1820 | 5 | It is the case of the respondents that in the said meeting the proposed agenda items could not be taken up and hence the proposal for continuance of Coordinator and Joint Coordinator lapsed. The appellant would submit various reasons for which the said meeting dated 23.06.2022 was nothing but a faux pas and, in any cas... |
id_1821 | 0 | Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 880 of 2023 arising out of Police Station Case No. 7 Year 2022, Thana Salimpur, District Patna. The petitioner is a 23‑year‑old male, son of late Ram Pravesh Ram, resident of Village Rupas Mahaji, Police Station Salimpur, District Patna., Petitioner(s) versus: 1. The State of Bihar t... |
id_1821 | 1 | WJC No.880 of 2023 dated 16-01-2024 cases where the girl does not marry with her choice then there is an apprehension that she may be forced to get married to any other person by her parents, steps which are required to be taken in that eventuality is to protect the girl by keeping her in a safe custody rather than per... |
id_1822 | 0 | The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the respondents to adhere to the Standard Operating Procedure dated 23.11.2016 issued by the Ministry of Wo... |
id_1822 | 1 | The missing child was last seen. The Investigating Officer must collect the details of suspects and question them without any loss of time. He must also interrogate the persons at the last workplace, school, tuition place, etc., within twelve hours. While questioning children less than eighteen years of age, the releva... |
id_1824 | 0 | Reserved on 02 June 2021 and pronounced on 10 June 2021. The parties are: Mister Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mister Varun Singh, Miss Deepika Kalia, Mister Akshay Dev and Miss Sammridhi Bendbhar, Advocates for the Plaintiff; versus Mister Hiren Kamod, Mister Bhushan M Oza, Mister Anand Mishra and Mister Anees Pat... |
id_1824 | 1 | Relief is sought regarding, inter alia, passing off; infiltration of personality rights by such unauthorized use; misrepresentation and causing deception in the minds of the public leading to passing off; violation of the right to a fair trial of the plaintiff under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and other ancil... |
id_1824 | 2 | On this issue, firstly, as discussed above, we must not lose sight that the Defendants claim of the film being a fictional rendition of true events surrounding the lives of film/TV personalities, including Plaintiff's son, who has reportedly passed away due to unnatural causes. They have firmly stated that nowhere has ... |
id_1825 | 0 | Proceedings of the meeting of the Search Committee held via video conferencing on Monday, 09 August 2021 at 7.00 pm regarding elevation of Supreme Court lawyers to the High Courts. The Search Committee was constituted to facilitate the process of identifying deserving and meritorious Supreme Court practitioners for ele... |
id_1828 | 0 | Writ Petition Nos. 13203, 13204, 13205, 13521, 13645, 13665, 13666, Public Interest Litigation Nos. 184, 185, 200, 201, 208, 209, 215, 217, 230, 235, Writ Petition Nos. 13206, 16634 of 2020; Writ Petition Nos. 9154, 9528, 10700 of 2020; Public Interest Litigation No. 179 of 2019; Public Interest Litigation Nos. 8, 24, ... |
id_1828 | 1 | |
id_1828 | 2 | Therefore, the Power Purchase Agreements can be regarded as statutory only to the extent that they contain provisions regarding determination of tariff and other statutory requirements of Section 43A(2). In E.I.D. Parry (I) Ltd and others v. State of Tamil Nadu, the Madras High Court held that the Power Purchase Agreem... |
id_1828 | 3 | The existence of a legitimate expectation may have a number of different consequences; it may give locus standi to seek leave to apply for judicial review; it may mean that the authority ought not to act so as to defeat the expectation without some overriding reason of public policy to justify its doing so; or it may m... |
id_1828 | 4 | At the same time, in view of the irrevocability of the authorization executed in favour of Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority by these petitioners, that is, Development Agreement cum Irrevocable General Power of Attorney in Form 9.14, the State or Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority is ... |
id_1828 | 5 | But even where there is no such overriding public interest, it may still be competent for the Government to resile from the promise \on giving reasonable notice, which need not be a formal notice, giving the promisee a reasonable opportunity of resuming his position\ provided, of course, it is possible for the promisee... |
id_1828 | 6 | In the absence of a definitive pronouncement by the House of Lords holding that promissory estoppel can be a cause of action, a difficulty was expressed in stating with certainty that English law has evolved from the traditional approach of treating promissory estoppel as a shield instead of a sword. By contrast, the l... |
id_1828 | 7 | At the same time, in State of Jharkhand and others vs. Brahmputra Metallics Limited, the Supreme Court of India held that the Court can interfere if there is arbitrariness or any abuse of power or violation of principles of natural justice. In Ghaziabad Development Authority vs. Delhi Auto & General Finance Private Lim... |
id_1828 | 8 | To earn a livelihood, there must be job or employment opportunities available in the Capital City Area. Otherwise, the residents of the capital area will be forced to migrate great distances and get displaced. The following actions by the respondent State violate the fundamental rights of the petitioners to livelihood ... |
id_1828 | 9 | Thus, the respondents State and Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority violated the Right to the City and proposed to violate the right to city, which is not only a Human Right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, but also a Fundamental Right guaranteed under Article 300‑A of the Constitution of ... |
id_1828 | 10 | In M.I. Builders Private Limited versus V. Radhey Shyam Sahu and Others, while dealing with a similar issue, the Supreme Court of India held that a Mahapalika, being a continuing body, can be estopped from changing its stand in a given case, but where, after holding enquiry, it concluded that action was not in conformi... |
id_1828 | 11 | Jalgaon Municipal Corporation and Others, it has been ruled that one of the principles of good governance in a democratic society is that smaller interest must always give way to larger public interest in case of conflict., One of the contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that when a huge amount is ... |
id_1828 | 12 | It was further held that the power to release land from acquisition has to be exercised consistent with the doctrine of public trust and not arbitrarily. In view of our foregoing discussion, the State or the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority cannot abandon the partly completed projects, development an... |
id_1828 | 13 | He relies upon the case law to argue that the Supreme Court of India should not decide academic questions of law and should only decide the disputed questions. Alternatively, on merits and without prejudice, the learned Advocate General submits that the interpretation placed by the learned senior counsel and others on ... |
id_1828 | 14 | Writ petition in the form of public interest litigation (PIL No. 59 of 2015) was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for constitution of two High Courts i.e., State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh. The Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature disposed of the said writ petition recordin... |
id_1828 | 15 | When a right is yet to be violated, but is threatened with violation can the citizen move the Supreme Court of India for protection of the right? The protection of the right is to be distinguished from its restoration or remedy after violation. When right to personal liberty is guaranteed and the rest of the society, i... |
id_1828 | 16 | In the last-mentioned case it was held: Where a law passed by the State Legislature while being substantially within the scope of the entries in the State List entrenches upon any of the entries in the Central List, the constitutionality of the law may be upheld by invoking the doctrine of pith and substance if, on an ... |
id_1828 | 17 | Although in India, a very rare expression was given to the Doctrine of Living Tree, the framers of the Constitution of India were aware of the need to make a flexible Constitution to cater to the needs of changing times in the future, for which they included Article 368 of the Constitution of India which empowers the l... |
id_1829 | 0 | ITEM NO.5 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION X Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 555/2020 Date: 03-09-2021. This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioners: Mr. V. Chidambresh, Senior Advocate; Mr. Aakash Sirohi, Advocate on Record. For Respondents: Union of India, State of Telangana and Registrar (Vigil... |
id_183 | 0 | The appellants before us assail two judgments of the Bombay High Court rejecting, in substance, their prayers for bail. Both the applications were filed on 27 October 2018 after the Special Judge, Pune, under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) had dismissed their bail plea. The decisions of the Bomba... |
id_183 | 1 | Whoever organises or causes to be organised any camp or camps for imparting training in terrorism shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than five years but which may extend to imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine. Punishment for recruiting any person for a terrorist... |
id_183 | 2 | In absence of any form of corroboration at the prima facie stage it cannot be presumed that it was the same Arun (that is, Arun Ferreira) who had received money from Darsu. The prosecution has also not produced any material to show that actual money was transmitted. The communication dated 5th November 2017 (R‑5), purp... |
id_1830 | 0 | Criminal Revision Jurisdiction. Present: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhendu Samanta. Case No. 2018 C.R.R. 1858 of 2018. Mrs. Nandita Sarkar, Tilak Sarkar & Ors. for the petitioner: Subir Banerjee, Sandip Bandyopadhyay, Advocate, Ms. Ruxmini Basu Roy. For the opposite party: Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocate, Mr. Abhisekh Bagal, Adv... |
id_1830 | 1 | Decision on Point No. 1. Learned Advocate for the opposite party submitted that the application under section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act was filed by the petitioner after two years from the alleged date when she left her matrimonial home. He further argued that the petition does not disclo... |
id_1831 | 0 | CIS No. 930/2021 23.11.2021 Present: Shri Mohd. Irshad, Learned Counsel for complainant. Matter was listed for clarifications/orders on application under section 156(3) Criminal Procedure Code. No clarifications are required. Vide this order, I shall dispose of an application under section 156(3) Criminal Procedure Cod... |
id_1832 | 0 | Date of Decision: 09.09.2021 Through: Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Senior Advocate with Mr. Praveen Gaur, Advocate versus Through Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Assistant Secretary, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi., The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by an Indian coup... |
id_1833 | 0 | Judgment delivered on 22 September 2020. Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Ms. Ashima Obhan, Mr. Naveen Nagarjuna, Ms. Akanksha Dua, Mr. Adit Subramaniam Pujari, Mr. Essenese Obhan and Mr. Raghav Tankha, Advocates. Versus Through: Mr. Devadutt Kamat, Senior Advocate with Mr. Naman Joshi... |
id_1833 | 1 | Copy of the Printout from Defendant No. 3's Facebook accounts are enclosed as documents along with the plaint. Copy of the articles publicising the Book published by Akash Gupta (Twitter handle @TheDeshBhakt) are enclosed as documents along with the said plaint. Copy of the promotion done by Defendant No. 3 on their we... |
id_1833 | 2 | It undoubtedly creates an impact on the viewers. Is it not likely that in spite of these disclaimers the impression that the viewers will carry will be that the petitioner and all the persons concerned are the perpetrators of the crime? Does it therefore not amount to their defamation? Mister Sebastian, therefore, righ... |
id_1835 | 0 | In the Court of District Judge, Mathura, the matter titled Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman versus Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board is presented. The revisionists are: Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman, residing at Katra Keshav Dev, Khewat No. 255, Maujja Mathura Bazaar, District Mathura, represented by next friend Ms. Ra... |
id_1835 | 1 | Counsel for the Revisionists/Plaintiffs relying upon the findings of the Honourable Supreme Court of India in the famous Ayodhya case, M. Siddiq vs. Mahant Suresh Das & Ors., 2020 (1) Supreme Court Cases 1 (paragraphs 443 to 458), wherein it has been held that the worshipper has the right to file the suit. In the case ... |
id_1836 | 0 | Wednesday, the 9th day of February 2022 (20th Magha, 1943). This contempt of court case (civil) having come up for orders on 09.02.2022, the Kerala High Court on the same day passed the following., The petitioners, who are the President and Secretary respectively of All Kerala Truck Owners Association, have filed this ... |
id_1836 | 1 | Case (C) No. 1728 of 2021 Respondents 4 are in violation of the statutory provisions referred to hereinbefore and also the directions contained in the judgment of the Supreme Court of India in Anoop K. A., which requires serious consideration by the Supreme Court of India. Similarly, any interference with the enforceme... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.