ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_1837 | 0 | Criminal Original Petition No. 7664 of 2021 is filed by the petitioners Vilkrishnan, son of Raji, and Vediyappan, son of Kulanthai, against the State represented by the Inspector of Police, Deevattipatty Police Station, Salem District, in Crime No. 14 of 2020. The petition seeks bail under Section 439 of the Criminal P... |
id_1839 | 0 | Petitioner: Bhola Singh and another. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh and five others. Counsel for petitioner: Dharam Veer Singh. Counsel for respondent: G. A. Honourable Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, Judge., This is a habeas corpus petition alleging that the corpus is the wife of petitioner No. 1. To prove that they were... |
id_184 | 0 | Mister Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mister Atif Shamim, Advocate versus Central Bureau of Investigation. Respondent through Mister Mridul Jain, Special Police Prosecutor for Central Bureau of Investigation. Judgment reserved on 01 September 2020, date of decision 15 September 2021. The appellant, by the present ... |
id_184 | 1 | A pending with him and which admittedly had not been filed by him despite the knowledge that the marriage between Alka and Surinder with the consent of Petitioner Witness 7 (i.e. Shri Bal Krishan Aggarwal) had already taken place on 08.06.1996 which date is prior to that of the trap, i.e., 15.06.1996. The learned Trial... |
id_184 | 2 | On behalf of the appellant it was submitted that Witness 6 Raj Kamal, in his examination‑in‑chief, stated that he was directed to search and recover the money but was unable to recover any money on the first attempt. He later said he was again directed to search and recovered the money from the cavity of the table. The... |
id_184 | 3 | Reliance was also placed on behalf of the Central Bureau of Investigation on the verdict of the Honourable Supreme Court of India in M. W. Mohiuddin vs. State of Maharashtra (21 March 1995, Supreme Court) MANU/SC/0690/1995, wherein it was held to the effect: “Therefore whether there was an acceptance of what is given a... |
id_1840 | 0 | Shailaja Saurabh Raju @ Rajendra Dhage, Applicant; The State of Maharashtra, Respondent. Mr. Aniket Nikam on behalf of Mr. Aashish Satpute, Mr. Piyush R. Toshnival and Mr. Vivek Arote, for Applicant. Mr. Amit A. Palkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for Respondent-State. Date: 4th August 2022., By this application unde... |
id_1841 | 0 | Supreme Court No. 54-2021 First Information Report No. 116/2020 Police Station Jafrabad State versus Md. Juber and Others State Prosecution versus (1) Md. Juber Son of Rizwan Resident of House No. 5B/26, Gali No.6, Guruwara Mohalla, Maujpur, Delhi. (2) Md. Aamir Son of Shri Suwale Resident of House No. C-6, Gali No.20,... |
id_1842 | 0 | Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 6199 of 2023 versus Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 6200 of 2023. Leave granted. The present appeals by way of special leave arise from the order dated 06 April 2023 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench in the second ba... |
id_1844 | 0 | An application under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed on behalf of the State/Appellant seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 15 November 2016 whereby the respondent has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code., Th... |
id_1845 | 0 | Applicant: Suraj. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary, Home, Lucknow, and others. Counsel for Applicant: Ram Pukar Singh. Counsel for Opposite Party: Government Advocate, Shiv Charitra Tiwari. Honourable Justice Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J., Heard Sri Ram Pukar Singh, learned counsel for the ... |
id_1846 | 0 | Mahesh Kariman Tirki, about 22 years old, Agriculturist, resident of Murewada, Taluka Etapalli, District Gadchiroli; Pandu Pora Narote, about 27 years old, Agriculturist, resident of Murewada, Taluka Etapalli, District Gadchiroli; Hem Keshavdatta Mishra, about 32 years old, Education, resident of Kunjbargal, Post Nagar... |
id_1846 | 1 | The learned Sessions Judge observed that the sanction order clearly demonstrates that the sanctioning authority did consider the investigation papers and the recommendation of the authority making independent review, and that the sanctioning authority did refer to the documents on the basis of which the satisfaction of... |
id_1846 | 2 | It would seem that the rule is adopted in Canada and Australia – see Craies on Statute Law, 5th Edition, page 122. The English view which negated the admissibility of Parliament debates as an extrinsic aid for construction of a statute, in due course, gave way to the school of thought that a limited use may be made of ... |
id_1846 | 3 | Subsection (1) of Section 20-A of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) provides that, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, no information about the commission of an offence under TADA shall be recorded by the police without the prior approval of the District S... |
id_1846 | 4 | In a situation where under both the enactments any error, omission or irregularity in the sanction, which would also include the competence of the authority to grant sanction, does not vitiate the eventual conclusion in the trial including the conviction and sentence, unless of course a failure of justice has occurred,... |
id_1846 | 5 | The sequel of the discussion supra, is that the accused shall have to be discharged from Crime 3017/2013 for offences punishable under Sections 13, 18, 20, 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Verily, terrorism poses an ominous threat to national securi... |
id_1847 | 0 | Bail Application No. 5831 of 2020, Crime No. 1017/2020 of Njarakkal Police Station, Ernakulam (Crime No. 751/2020 of Munambam Police Station). Dated 17 September 2020. Application filed under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code was heard through video conference., Petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 1017/2020... |
id_1848 | 0 | Date of Decision: 4.11.2022. Pranjil Batra Petitioner versus Directorate of Enforcement Respondent. Present: Mister Vikram Chaudhri, Senior Advocate, with Mister Sajal Bansal, Miss Hargun Sandhu and Mister Kunal Sharma, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mister Satya Pal Jain, Assistant Solicitor General of India with Mist... |
id_1850 | 0 | Honourable Ritu Raj Awasthi, Judge; Honourable Dinesh Kumar Singh, Judge. We have to deal with a very unpleasant situation due to outrageous and utterly contemptuous behaviour of Advocate Sri Asok Pande inside the Allahabad High Court today in the morning. The facts which led to drawing these contempt proceedings are t... |
id_1850 | 1 | Another unfortunate part is that in the name or pretext of harmony and smooth functioning of the Institution, by possession an attitude, not to become a party to any controversy or conflict, those responsible to manage the entire institution keep such instances under the carpet and avoid taking appropriate action, forg... |
id_1851 | 0 | Reserved on: 5th October 2023 Pronounced on: 01st March 2024 Through: Ms. Naina Kejriwal, Advocate with Ms. Shoma, Advocate versus Through: Mr. S. Janani & Ms. Sharika Rai, Advs. with Respondent in person., Marital bonds are delicate emotional human relationships and involvement of any third person could result in comp... |
id_1852 | 0 | Versus Appearance: for the Petitioners for the Respondent(s) No. 1 Date: 02/09/2022, The petitioners are challenging the Agenda/Minute No.2 (Item No.2) of the Resolution passed by the Standing Committee of the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, Ahmedabad in its Meeting dated 18.08.2022, which is for closure of slaughter ... |
id_1852 | 1 | It is still more revolting if the grounds upon which it was laid down have vanished long since, and the rule simply persists from blind imitation of the past. It is the readiness of the judges to discard that which does not serve the public which has contributed to the growth and development of law (the same source, pa... |
id_1853 | 0 | The petitioner is before the Supreme Court of India seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the second respondent, Kotak Mahindra Bank, to de‑freeze the account of the petitioner/company held with the bank., Sri Siddharth Suman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Smt... |
id_1855 | 0 | All Manipur Tribal Union, represented by its President Mr. R. K. Ajin, aged about 64 years, son of the late R. K. Lungtung, having its office at Langol Tarung Village, Post Office and Police Station Lamphelpat, Imphal West District, Manipur - 795004. All Tribal Disabled Union (Government Registration No. 259/M/SR/07), ... |
id_1856 | 0 | W.P.(C).No.9162 of 2015 dated 10 January 2024. A Muslim marriage is conducted in accordance with their personal law and thereafter registered under the Kerala Registration of Marriages (Common) Rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as Rules 2008). Subsequently, if the husband pronounces talaq in accordance with his pers... |
id_1858 | 0 | PCR No.28/2020 c/w. PCR No.29/2020 and Common Complainant: India Awake for Transparency, 24 Desika Road, Mylapore, Chennai 600004, represented by P. Sadanand Goud (by Sri R. Subramanian, Advocate). Common Accused: 1. Azim Hasham Premji, Survey No.75, 133, 135/1, 136/1 No.574 Doddakannelli village, Sarjapur Road, Bengal... |
id_1859 | 0 | Reserved on 20 July 2023 and pronounced on 22 August 2023. The appellant, through Mister Ranjit Kumar Dubey and Mister Piyush Nagpal, Advocates, versus the respondent, through Mister Praduman Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate., The appellant husband filed the present appeal against the judgment dismissing his divorce petition o... |
id_186 | 0 | (Judgment reserved on 20.06.2023) (Judgment delivered on 13.07.2023) Family Court of Raipur No. 300 of 2018 Smt. Priya Sharma, Wife of Sanjit Sharma, aged about 22 years, Resident of Care of Mahendra Sharma, Professor Colony, Sector‑3, Sadak No. 3, near New Golden Public School, Raipur, Tehsil and District Raipur, Chha... |
id_1861 | 0 | Criminal Original Petition No. 18261 of 2021 and Criminal Miscellaneous Petition Nos. 10016 and 10017 of 2021 M. R. Sivaramakrishnan, Petitioner; State represented by Sub Inspector of Police G3, Kilpauk Police Station, Kilpauk, Chennai-600010; Thi Lagavathy, Respondents., Criminal Original Petition filed under Section ... |
id_1862 | 0 | Full text of the keynote address delivered by the Honorable Chief Justice of India Shri Justice N V Ramana at the presentation of Red Ink Awards by the Mumbai Press Club, Wednesday, 29 December 2021, online, 19:30 hours. Shri Gurbir Singh, Chairman, Mumbai Press Club; Shri Siddharth Bhatia, President, Mumbai Press Club... |
id_1863 | 0 | Vimal Umeshchandra Jha, Applicant, versus State of Maharashtra, Respondent. Navnath Narayan Gole, Intervenor. Vimal Umeshchandra Jha, Applicant, versus State of Maharashtra, Respondent. Mr. Subhash Jha, in behalf of Law Global Advocate, Advocate for Applicant. Shrimati J. S. Lohokare, Additional Public Prosecutor for t... |
id_1865 | 0 | Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 20918 of 2022. Leave granted. The appellant No. 1 is the husband, and appellant Nos. 2 and 3 are the daughter and son, respectively, of the deceased Smt. Sushma Pandey. She was admittedly around 50 years old on 26 June 2006 when she was travelling with the respondents i... |
id_1867 | 0 | MC(El. Pet.) No. 172 of 2022 Ref: El. Pet. No. 14 of 2022 Shri Thounaojam Shyamkumar, Applicant Versus Shri Lourembam Sanjoy Singh, Respondent MC(El. Pet.) No. 173 of 2022 Ref: El. Pet. No. 25 of 2022 Shri Thounaojam Shyamkumar, aged Applicant Versus Lourembam Sanjit Singh, Respondent. For the applicants: Mr. M. Gunedh... |
id_1867 | 1 | In Ponnala Lakshmaiah v. Kommuri Pratap Reddy and others, (2012) 7 SCC 788, the Honourable Supreme Court of India held that there is no denying the fact that courts are competent to dismiss petitions not only on the ground that the same do not comply with provisions of Sections 81, 82 and 117 of the Representation of P... |
id_1868 | 0 | Appeal No. 1119 of 2015 dated 21 January 2022. Sophy Thomas, Judge., The appellant and respondent, a Christian couple, were married according to Christian rites on 23 October 1988. Both are well‑educated and hail from respectable families. They have two daughter children. The husband, an engineer and yoga trainer, file... |
id_1868 | 1 | Appeal No. 1119 of 2015. In the result, this appeal fails and hence dismissed, confirming the impugned judgment and decree. The parties shall suffer their respective costs. |
id_1869 | 0 | The Civil Court, Senior Division, Varanasi Regular Civil Suit No. of 2021 (Twenty Twenty One) is filed by the following plaintiffs: Goddess Maa Shringar Gauri through next friend and devotee Ranjana Agnihotri, daughter of Late Rajendra Kant Agnihotri, residing at 512/695 Balda Road, Nishatganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 2... |
id_1869 | 1 | The Muslim engineers utilized structurally the central shrine of Vishwanath and the adjoining halls to its north and south; they converted the sanctuary of Vishwanath, which was thirty‑two square feet, into the central hall of the new construction. This hall is of the same dimension. Adjoining the central sanctuary, an... |
id_1869 | 2 | In the former suit witnesses deposed that there are special forms of idol, including hidden forms where the idol is inside the ground. There are Gyan Mandap, Mukti Mandap, Varoj Mandap, Sobha Mandap and Sringar Mandap; these five together are called Panch Mandap, which exists within Khandhar., Avi Mukteshwar is worship... |
id_1869 | 3 | Signed and verified this 17 seventeenth day of February, 2021 (Two Thousand and Twenty One) within Civil Court Compound Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. |
id_187 | 0 | Should the irretrievable breakdown of marriage necessarily result in dissolution of marriage in exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, when such is not a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act 1955?, The appellant is a qualified doctor and retired Wing Commander of the Indian Air Fo... |
id_1870 | 0 | Case No. 111/N Date of Institution: 31.12.2020 CNR No: JKSG020052792020 Irzan Kounsar Khan son of Kounsar Ahmad Khan residing at Gulberg Colony, Hyderpora, Srinagar, through his brother Ilhan Kounsar Khan son of Kounsar Ahmad Khan residing at Gulberg Colony, Hyderpora, Srinagar (Plaintiff), through Advocate Mr. Hazim Q... |
id_1871 | 0 | Uday Pratap Singh, Union of India and others. Present: Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, Advocate petitioner in person; Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate petitioner in person; Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Additional Solicitor General of India, with Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Senior Panel Counsel, Union of India; Mr. Gurminder Singh, Advocate General, Punj... |
id_1872 | 0 | This batch of appeals arise from judgments delivered by the High Court of Telangana, the High Court of Gujarat and the High Court of Bombay. The concerned states of Telangana and Gujarat have appealed aggrieved by the judgments. The assessee petitioners are appellants, and are aggrieved by the judgments of the High Cou... |
id_1872 | 1 | Learned counsel highlighted that the ordinance, in terms of the several judgments of the Supreme Court of India, especially A.K. Roy v. Union of India (hereafter, AK Roy) and the seven‑judge decision in Krishna Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar (hereafter, Krishna Kumar Singh), have declared that there is no difference bet... |
id_1872 | 2 | Section 19 is pari materia to Article 243 ZF and must be given the above interpretation in accordance with Bondu Ramaswamy v. Bangalore Development Authority (hereafter, \Bondu Ramaswamy\). Further, the words \shall come into force\ in Section 1(2) will have no meaning if Section 19 is interpreted to mean that the oper... |
id_1872 | 3 | Having said so, the Supreme Court of India observed how this limited legislative authority could be exercised: the effect of the provision of the Constitution would be to enable the continuance of the power to levy the tax but this does not alter the fact that the provision by its implication confers a limited legislat... |
id_1872 | 4 | The reassembling of the legislature defines the outer limit for the validity of the Ordinance promulgated during its absence in session. Within that period, a legislature has authority to disapprove the Ordinance. The requirement of laying an Ordinance before the legislative body subserves the constitutional purpose of... |
id_1872 | 5 | Therefore, for the same reasons, as in the other cases, the amendments to the Maharashtra VAT Act cannot survive. Conclusions. In view of the foregoing discussion and conclusions, the findings of the court in these cases are: Section 19 of the Constitution (101st Amendment) Act, 2016 and Article 246A enacted in exercis... |
id_1873 | 0 | Case: Bail No. 13576 of 2021. Applicant: Salman @ Arman Chaudhary. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for Applicant: Mohammad Alishah Faruqi, Mohammad Suhai, Razi Ahmad. Counsel for Opposite Party: Additional Government Advocate Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia, Judge., Learned counsel for the applicant, learned Addi... |
id_1874 | 0 | Standard Operating Procedure for hybrid physical hearing before Honourable Supreme Court of India. In continuation of directions already notified regarding functioning of the Supreme Court of India, in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, more particularly through Circulars dated 14 March 2020, 23 March 2020 and 30 Augus... |
id_188 | 0 | Applicant: Bhanwar Singh @ Karamvir; Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for Applicant: Bratendra Singh. Counsel for Opposite Party: Government Advocate. Applicant: Madan Lal Harijaan; Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for Applicant: Satish Sharma. Counsel for Opposite Party: Government Advoca... |
id_1880 | 0 | $6 to 8 + CONT.CAS(C) 224/2016 & CM APPL s. 15444/2017, 34709/2019 & Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Dixit, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Anil Soni, Chief Government Solicitor for Union of India; Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Additional Solicitor General for Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi with Ms. Ayushi Bansal, ... |
id_1881 | 0 | The State of Maharashtra Applicant Versus Samir Vishnu Gaikwad Respondent Ms P. P. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Applicant-State. Mr. Sanjiv Punalekar for the Respondent. Mr. Somnath Shendge, Assistant Public Prosecutor, Additional Trial Sessions, present., By this application filed under Section 439(2) ... |
id_1882 | 0 | Writ Petition (Madras) No. 18485 of 2023 and Writ Petition (Miscellaneous) Nos. 15322, 17344 and 18152 of 2023 D. Senthilkumar (Petitioner) 1. Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2. The Commissioner, Hindu... |
id_1882 | 1 | The classes of persons mentioned hereunder shall not be entitled to enter or offer worship in a temple or bathe in or use the waters of any sacred tank, well, spring or water‑course appurtenant to the temple, whether situated within or outside the precincts thereof, or any sacred place including a hill or hillock or a ... |
id_1883 | 0 | 801 of 2020\n\nPetitioner: Nageshwar Mishra\n\nRespondents: Union of India and two others\n\nCounsel for Petitioner: Shailesh Kumar Tripathi\n\nCounsel for Respondents: Additional Solicitor General of India, Arvind Agrawal; Honourable Shashi Kant Gupta, Judge; Honourable Shamim Ahmed, Judge., The present writ petition ... |
id_1884 | 0 | The Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd., a company limited by guarantee and deemed to be incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Race Course, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai 400034, and N.H.S. Mani of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitant, the Administrative Officer of The Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd., h... |
id_1884 | 1 | Therefore, there is considerable force in the submission made by Mr. Easwar, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee. Unless such internet charges or online booking charges are uniformly charged to all customers for having entry into the cinema hall, such extra service charges taken by the cinema own... |
id_189 | 0 | Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 50808 of 2022 is filed by the applicant Raheem against the State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for the applicant is Dileep Singh Yadav and counsel for the opposite party is Government Advocate Honourable Surendra Singh I, J. A copy of the order dated 15 September 2022 relating to... |
id_190 | 0 | Kasturi Sushma Khandekar, Petitioner; State of Maharashtra and Others, Respondents; Mr. Makrand Kale as well as Mr. S.R. Ghanavat for the Petitioner; Mr. N.C. Walimbe, Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent – State. Oral Judgment (Per Justice Sunil Shukre)., Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The rule... |
id_191 | 0 | Revisionist: Smt. Laxmi Devi and three others. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary (Civil Section), Lucknow and five others. Counsel for Revisionist: Prabhash Pandey, Vishnu Shankar Jain. Counsel for Opposite Party: C.S.C., Amitabh Trivedi, Fatima Anjum, Manoj Kumar Singh, Saurabh Tiwari,... |
id_193 | 0 | New Delhi, 09 December 2021 – I am very happy to address this gathering on the occasion of the Eighth Convocation. Before I begin my address, I would like to congratulate the students who are graduating today. It marks the culmination of a phase of learning. Let me also congratulate you on becoming part of an immensely... |
id_194 | 0 | Petitioner: Brahma Shanker Shashtri. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh through Secretary, Basic Education, Lucknow and others., Counsel for Petitioner: In Person. Counsel for Respondent: Chief Standing Counsel. Honourable Judge Pankaj Mithal, Honourable Judge Saurabh Lavania., Heard Mr. Brahma Shanker Shashtri, petiti... |
id_196 | 0 | |
id_199 | 0 | Petitioner: Haji Yaqub Qurashi and Another. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. Counsel for Petitioner: Rajan Upadhyay, Senior Advocate. Counsel for Respondent: Government Advocate Munesh Kumar, Honourable Ashwani Kumar Mishra, Judge, Honourable Rajnish Kumar, Judge. This petition has been filed with a p... |
id_200 | 0 | WP (Criminal) No. 52 of 2023, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3187 of 2023. Anshul Garg and others, Petitioners/Appellants, through Mr. Sakal Bhushan and Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocates, and Mr. Bhavesh Bhushan, Advocate, versus State of Punjab and others, Respondents., The petitioners, by way of this writ petition under Articl... |
id_203 | 0 | January 12, 2021 Except in the following seven districts that is Bengaluru Urban, Bengaluru Rural, Chikkaballapura, Dakshina Kannada Mangaluru, Mysuru, Shivamogga and Tumakuru, the rest of the districts in Karnataka have had less than 200 COVID-19 active cases for the last about ten days. Therefore, the normal function... |
id_204 | 0 | The Special Leave Petition has been filed with a delay of 663 days. The explanation given in the application for condonation of delay is set out in paragraphs 3 and 4., We are constrained to pen down a detailed order as it appears that all our counseling to Government and Government authorities have fallen on deaf ears... |
id_205 | 0 | In Chamber Petitioner: In Re Respondent: Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for Petitioner: Suo Moto Honourable Pritinker Diwaker, Chief Justice Honourable Mahesh Chandra Tripathi. Order on Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 1 of 2023: On a mention made by Sri Anoop Trivedi, learned Senior Counsel, along with Sri S... |
id_206 | 0 | Jitendra Narain versus The State (Union Territory of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands). Learned counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Deep Chaim Kabir and Mr. S. Ajith Prasad. Learned counsel for the State: Mr. Sumit Karmakar. Learned counsel for the victim: Mr. Arul Prasanth., The petitioner is implicated in offences punisha... |
id_208 | 0 | W.P. No. 4150 of 2022 L. Ponnammal, Petitioner versus Union of India, represented by its Secretary, Department of Investment and Public Asset Management, Ministry of Finance, Block 14, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-11; Union of India, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, 4th Floor A‑Wing, Sha... |
id_208 | 1 | Sections 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5E and 5F have been inserted in the Life Insurance Corporation of India Act of 1956 by way of Section 131 of the Life Insurance Corporation of India Act of 2021 to provide respectively for transferability of shares, voting rights, maintenance of register of members, declaration in respect of be... |
id_208 | 2 | Indeed, a few cases including Pawan Pratap Singh, (2011) 3 SCC 267, were decided even after the issue raised in Asis Kumar Samanta, (2007) 5 SCC 800, was referred to a larger Bench. We, therefore, do not feel constrained or precluded from taking a view in the matter., In view of the aforesaid, the judgments of the Supr... |
id_209 | 0 | Naresh Baliyan Vs M/s Times Now Navbharat 06.09.2023 Present : Shri N.C. Sharma, Shri Joginder Sehrawat, Miss Anjali Vashist, Miss Varnika Sharma, Mister Pulak Kathpalia, Learned counsel for plaintiff. Shri Balbir Singh Jakhar, Shri Vikram Singh Jakhar, Shri Neeraj Jakhar, Shri Jitender Sapra, Shri Akshayveer Sehrawat,... |
id_21 | 0 | The State of Assam and others (Appellants) versus Binod Kumar and others (Respondents). By judgment dated 05.12.2017, the Gauhati High Court allowed Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4752 of 2015 and held Rule 63(iii) of the Assam Police Manual invalid on the ground that it is in direct conflict with Section 14(2) of the Assam... |
id_210 | 0 | The petitioner is before the High Court of Karnataka calling in question proceedings in Criminal Case Number 2108 of 2022 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class (III Court), Mangaluru arising out of charge sheet in Crime No. 78 of 2021 of Mangalore Women Police Station registered for offences punishable und... |
id_210 | 1 | I asked him if he had done something similar to anyone else and he said he had never done this to anyone. I told him that I would go to his house, Sharvaree, and inform his wife about him. I told him that he had two daughters and how could he behave like that. At last I told him not to call me again and that this was a... |
id_210 | 2 | The petitioner pulled the hands of the complainant, kissed her, held her tight, forcefully made her sit on his lap, pressed against her chest, whispered in her ear 'love you and want to have you', grabbed her face, removed her spectacles, forcibly tried to undress her, grabbed her breasts, pressed his buttocks and touc... |
id_210 | 3 | However, when it is specifically stated in the First Information Report that Munni Devi has executed the power of attorney and thereafter the investigating officer has conducted the investigation and has recorded the statement of the complainant, accused and the independent witnesses, thereafter whether the complainant... |
id_212 | 0 | Shrimati Mayawati, daughter of Prabhu Dayal, former Chief Minister and President of the Bahujan Samaj Party, aged about 58 years, resident of No. 3, Tyag Raj Marg, New Delhi. Mr. Sathish Chandra Mishra, son of the late Justice T. S. Misra, aged 61 years, National General Secretary and Member of Parliament of the Bahuja... |
id_215 | 0 | This appeal is preferred by the appellant being aggrieved by the judgment dated 28 October 2013 passed by the learned Special Sessions Judge (Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases) cum Additional District Judge, Warangal, in Special Court Number 48 of 2009 wherein the appellant was convic... |
id_216 | 0 | The State of Maharashtra (Appellant) versus Kuldeep Subhash Pawar, resident of Bambawade, Taluka Tasgaon, District Sangli (Respondent). Mr. N. B. Patil, Advocate appearing for the Appellant-State. Mr. Aashish Satpute, appointed as amicus curiae for the Respondent., The Respondent was acquitted by the Judicial Magistrat... |
id_217 | 0 | Subordinate Courts COVID-19 pandemic Functioning of Subordinate Courts in full capacity in the State of Tamil Nadu and Union Territory of Puducherry. Instructions issued regarding reference Madras High Court Official Memorandum in ROC No. 1363/2020/RG/Subordinate Courts, dated 1 September 2020 and 24 September 2020. In... |
id_218 | 0 | Reportable Criminal Appeal No 561 of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No 1788 of 2022) Mallada K Sri Ram Appellant(s) Versus State of Telangana & Ors Respondent(s) Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J, Leave granted. This appeal arises from a judgment dated 25 January 2022 of a Division Bench of the Hig... |
id_219 | 0 | Case No.: Bail Application 1623/2021. Advocate for the Petitioner: Mr. K N Choudhury. Advocate for the Respondent: Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. Hearing held on 13 August 2021 through virtual mode. Heard Mr. K N Choudhury, learned Senior counsel appearing for the accused petitioner, as well as Mr D Das, learned ... |
id_22 | 0 | Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 154 of 2020 Vinod Dua vs. Union of India & Others. This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India prays for the following principal reliefs: (a) Quash First Information Report No. 0053 dated 06.05.2020 registered at Police Station Kumarsain, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. (... |
id_22 | 1 | In this context, it is imperative that all State Governments and Union Territory Administrations take necessary steps to suitably publicise through all available means that food, medical and civil supplies, and other essential services will be maintained and that adequate supplies are available in the country. It is al... |
id_22 | 2 | This is an act of instigating violence against the Government and the Prime Minister. It was also stated, the petitioner creates panic amongst the public and disturbs public peace by trying to spread false information, such as the Government does not have enough testing facilities which is absolutely false. According t... |
id_22 | 3 | Supreme Court of India, as the custodian and guarantor of the fundamental rights of the citizens, has the duty cast upon it of striking down any law which unduly restricts the freedom of speech and expression with which we are concerned in this case. But the freedom has to be guarded against becoming a licence for vili... |
id_22 | 4 | In the case of Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Private Ltd. & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., the Supreme Court of India observed: The freedom of press, as one of the members of the Constituent Assembly said, is one of the items around which the greatest and the bitterest of constitutional struggles have been waged i... |
id_22 | 5 | It was not even the case of the respondents that these two statements were factually incorrect. Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 154 of 2020 Vinod Dua vs. Union of India & Ors. With regard to the third statement, the contention of the respondents was that the ban on export was imposed on 19 March 2020 and the said statemen... |
id_22 | 6 | He should have such an awareness as an ordinarily competent practitioner would have of the deficiencies in his knowledge and the limitations on his skill. He should be alert to the hazards and risks in any professional task he undertakes to the extent that other ordinarily competent members of the profession would be a... |
id_22 | 7 | The direction that an arrest of a public servant could be effected only after approval of the appointing authority and that of a non‑public servant could be effected only after approval by the Special Superintendent of Police; that the reasons for arrest could be scrutinised by the Magistrate for permitting further det... |
id_220 | 0 | Reportable Curative Petition (C) No. 44 of 2023, Review Petition (C) No. 704 of 2021, Civil Appeal No. 1599 of 2020 and Arbitration Petition No. 25 of 2023 were filed by Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Chief Justice of India. The consequences of the failure to stamp an instrument under Section 35 of the Stamp Act render... |
id_220 | 1 | State of Uttar Pradesh. Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer, speaking for the Constitution Bench, observed that the legislative policy in the country must accept as final the pronouncements of this Court by a Constitution Bench unless the subject be of such fundamental importance to national life or the reasoning is so plainly ... |
id_220 | 2 | Section 10 of the Contract Act also stipulates that the aforesaid requirements shall not affect any law in force in India (and not expressly repealed) by which a contract is required to be made in writing, in the presence of witnesses or any law relating to registration of documents. Thus, an arbitration agreement shou... |
id_220 | 3 | An arbitration agreement is the foundation of arbitration as it records the consent of the parties to submit their disputes to arbitration. In Bihar State Mineral Development Corporation v. Encon Builders, the Supreme Court of India enlisted the essential elements of an arbitration agreement as follows: there must be a... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.