ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_409 | 0 | Judgment Central Bureau of Investigation Special Case No. 35/2008 CNR No. MHCC02-002359-2008 Date of Institution/Filing 08/07/2008 Date of Registration 08/07/2008 Date of Judgment 03/11/2023 Duration 15 years 3 months 26 days Exhibit No.137 The Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti Corruption Bureau, Mumbai. Prosecutio... |
id_409 | 1 | Milind Gaikwad (Party Witness 4), complainant Ketan Tirodkar (Party Witness 5) and Jayesh Shirsath (Party Witness 7) identified the voice in the Supreme Court of India when the CD was played. The transcription shows cheating by personation and demand from the accused. According to the Learned Senior Public Prosecutor, ... |
id_409 | 2 | The complainant has also identified the voice from the conversation when CD Article‑4/1 was played before the Bombay High Court. It has come in the cross‑examination of complainant Ketan Tirodkar (Witness 5) that in the year 2002 he met Daya Nayak and Daya Nayak was taking money from gangsters abroad to favour their he... |
id_409 | 3 | Exhibit 97 records that the seal, after use, was handed over to Shri Jayesh Shirsath with direction to keep it and produce it when required by the Special Judge, Central Bureau of Investigation Court or the Central Bureau of Investigation on any subsequent date. The entire evidence of Witness Jayesh Shirsath (Witness 7... |
id_41 | 0 | Through: Ms. Shwetasree Majumder, Ms. Diva Arora Menon, Ms. Devyani Nath, Ms. Aiswarya Debadarshini and Mr. Shiv Mehrotra, Advocates. Versus: None. Interim Application 1233/2024 (seeking exemption from filing originals, translation of documents in vernacular language, clear copies and documents with proper margins) Exe... |
id_410 | 0 | Decided on: 11 May 2022. Surinder Kumar, Petitioner; State of Haryana and others, Respondents. Present: Mr. Arpandeep Narula, Advocate for the petitioner; Ms. Sheenu Shura, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents; Justice Pankaj Jain (Oral). By way of the present petition, the petitioner is seeking quashi... |
id_412 | 0 | Writ Petition (Civil) No. 284 of 2015 and Civil Miscellaneous No. 54 525‑26/2018 were heard by a bench comprising Ms. Karuna Nundy, Mr. Mukesh Sharma and Mr. Raghav Awasthy, Advocates, versus Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General and Mr. Chetan Sharma, Additional Solicitor General, with Ms. Monika Arora, Chief Government... |
id_412 | 1 | A sexual offence committed by a person who is not a spouse or is a stranger attracts the provisions of Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code. Likewise, gang rape attracts the provisions of Section 376D. Sexual offences committed by persons in a position of authority are covered by Section 376. Unnatural offences without... |
id_412 | 2 | In support of this proposition, submissions were advanced by Mr Colin Gonsalves, Ms Karuna Nundy and the two amici appointed by the Delhi High Court i.e., Mr Rajshekhar Rao and Ms Rebecca John, Senior Advocates., Mr Colin Gonsalves broadly made the following submissions. He began by alluding to the journey that the mat... |
id_412 | 3 | The distinction drawn between forced sexual intercourse by the husband and persons other than a husband is legally untenable as it has no rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved by Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code. [See Independent Thought at paragraph 75.], What is ironic is while Marital Rape Excepti... |
id_412 | 4 | Resultantly, while Section 375 criminalizes sexual acts committed without the consent of a woman, it exempts husbands from being prosecuted only on account of their marital relationship with the victim. The Marital Rape Exception infringes the fundamental rights of a married woman. The validity of the Marital Rape Exce... |
id_412 | 5 | A husband cannot be guilty of a rape committed by himself upon his lawful wife, for by their mutual matrimonial consent and contract the wife has given up herself in this kind unto her husband, which he cannot retract. This formulation came to light with the publication of the book authored by John Frederick Archbold t... |
id_412 | 6 | Thus, unlike the United States Constitution, our Constitution is not based on rigid separation of powers, although it provides for a separate Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary. Illustratively, the Supreme Court of India has advisory jurisdiction under Article 143 of the Constitution and likewise, legislative... |
id_412 | 7 | The problem with the classification test is that what constitutes a reasonable classification is reduced to a mere formula: the quest for an intelligible differentia and the rational nexus to the object sought to be achieved. In doing so, the test of classification risks elevating form over substance. The danger inhere... |
id_412 | 8 | To establish the untenability of the objection and for the sake of brevity, let me straight away extract some parts of the said report, as they are not only wholesome but are also based on robust common sense. 4.51 We are likewise unaware of any evidence to suggest that there would be significantly more problems of pro... |
id_412 | 9 | But, as I have said, the criminal law is applicable between husband and wife wherever the facts are such as to bring the case within the terms of the Indian Penal Code. I am not aware that there has occurred any case in this country in recent years in which such a matter has come under the consideration of the Supreme ... |
id_412 | 10 | The Supreme Court of India went on to rule that since norms and values in criminal law had to keep pace with time, that gap was required to be filled. Consequently, while the writ petition was quashed (a procedure peculiar to Nepal) holding that the impugned definition of rape was not inconsistent with the Constitution... |
id_412 | 11 | In the facts of the case, the court noted that the workmen were employed pursuant to an agitation by the union and on compassionate grounds; and not via a regular mode. It is in these circumstances that the valid court held that the directions issued for continuing the workmen in service would defeat the constitutional... |
id_412 | 12 | Thus, merely because the consequential steps that should be taken upon triple talaq being struck down were not up for consideration before the Supreme Court of India, would not have me conclude that the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court of India concerning Article 14 cannot be taken recourse to in the instant ... |
id_412 | 13 | With her consent, when at the time of giving such consent, by reason of unsoundness of mind, intoxication, or the administration by him personally or through another of any stupefying or unwholesome substance, she is unable to understand the nature and consequences of what she consents to. With or without her consent, ... |
id_412 | 14 | Regarding the first submission, i.e., that the impugned Exception nullifies the object of rape laws, she relies on the principle that an exception or a proviso cannot nullify or set at naught the real object of the main enactment, for which she relies on S. Sundaram Pillai v. V.R. Pattabiraman and Director of Education... |
id_412 | 15 | This problem, she submits, however, would apply to all cases of rape and, if the argument of the disproportionate nature of the sentence envisaged by Section 376 is to be taken as a defence by votaries of the impugned Exception, she submits that Section 375 would become vulnerable to being struck down in its entirety. ... |
id_412 | 16 | If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine., Unnatural offences. Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, wom... |
id_412 | 17 | It is practically impossible to establish the absence of consent if the issue arises within the peripheries of a marital relationship, given the nature of intimacy associated with the institution of marriage and the absence of eyewitness accounts. It is for this reason, submits Mr. Sai Deepak, that absence of consensua... |
id_412 | 18 | The submission completely consigns, to the backdrop, the marriage that took place between the man and the woman during the momentous ten minutes between the second and the third instance. It is this fundamental error of perception that colours nearly all the submissions advanced by those who seek to oppose the continua... |
id_412 | 19 | The four, together, assimilate into what a statute regards as a particular offence. It is not possible to vivisect the offence, as a statutory conception of the legislature, and start viewing these four indicia as individual components unrelated to each other. An act cannot be divorced from its actor. Offences are not ... |
id_412 | 20 | If there is a classification, the Supreme Court of India will not hold it invalid merely because the law might have been extended to other persons who in some respects might resemble the class for which the law was made, for the legislature is the best judge of the needs of the particular classes and to estimate the de... |
id_412 | 21 | Supreme Court of India, after referring to the observations of Kania, Chief Justice, in A.K. Gopalan case and noting that they were approved by the Full Court in Ram Singh case, pointed out that the object of the impugned order was to give protection to the witness in order to obtain true evidence in the case with a vi... |
id_412 | 22 | The submission, according to me, merits rejection outright. As learned Counsel for the petitioners stated, the aspect of want of consent is one of the necessary ingredients of the offence of rape, as defined in Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code. It is not possible, therefore, for a Court to deal with the provision, ... |
id_412 | 23 | According to the common law of coverture, a wife was deemed to have consented at the time of the marriage to have intercourse with her husband at his whim. Moreover, this consent could not be revoked. As far back as 1736, Sir Matthew Hale declared: The husband cannot be guilty of rape committed by himself upon his lawf... |
id_412 | 24 | Further, the afore‑extracted passages from Independent Thought 1 confirm and clarify that Courts must show due deference to the legislative process, Courts should interfere only when the statute clearly violates the fundamental rights guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution of India, or where the provision is bad fo... |
id_413 | 0 | Through Mr. Vipul Lamba, Advocate versus Through Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State with Warrant Officer/Station Inspector Vinod Kapoor, Police Station Delhi Cantt. This petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is for quashing FIR No. 275/2019 dated 30.10.2019 registered at... |
id_414 | 0 | Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 5764 of 2023 Pradeep Rameshwar Sharma, Appellant(s) versus National Investigating Agency & Another, Respondent(s). Leave granted. The appellant is Accused No.10 in connection with NIA RC 01/2021/NIA/MUM (NIA Special Case No. 1090/2021) registered for the alleged offe... |
id_415 | 0 | Through: Ms. Tara Narula, Ms. Nupur and Ms. Aparajita Sinha, Advocates versus Mr. Amit Prasad, Special Public Prosecutor for the State. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 14 174-75/2020., Exemption was allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications st... |
id_417 | 0 | No. HHC/GAZ/14-52/74-VII- Dated Shimla, January 2021., In the interest of administration, the following transfers and postings of the members of the Himachal Pradesh Judicial Service in the cadres of District Judges, Additional District Judges and Civil Judges are hereby ordered with immediate effect: Sh. Parkash Chand... |
id_419 | 0 | W.P.(C) No. 5319 of 2023 Vikash Kumar Dubey, Petitioner(s) versus The Jharkhand State Bar Council, Ranchi; Bar Council of India, New Delhi; Sarawan Kumar alias Shrawan Ram, Respondent(s). For the Petitioner(s): M/s. Sheo Kr. Singh & R.N. Chatterjee, Advocates. For the Bar Council: Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, Advocate. For Respo... |
id_421 | 0 | The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector, Mumbai Suburban District, Mumbai, is the applicant. The matter is between Adarsh Water Parks and Resort Private Limited, the plaintiff, and the following defendants: Abdul Rashid Abdul Rehman Yusuf (deleted), Farooq Abdul Rashid Yusuf, Nishta Developers Private Limited (... |
id_421 | 1 | He has invited my attention to the averments of the applicant in paragraph 12 of the Interim Application and submitted that there is no question of any fraud being played on the State Government or on the Honourable Court. He submits that the State was not a party to the suit at all and in the absence of the State, the... |
id_421 | 2 | Supreme Court of India found that the High Court judgment, which had negated a trial court finding that a decree was obtained by playing fraud on the Dixit court and was a nullity, was set aside. Setting aside the judgment of the High Court, the Supreme Court of India observed as follows: A litigant who approaches the ... |
id_424 | 0 | Chanda Deepak Kochhar, aged 61 years, having address at 45, CCI Chambers, Churchgate, Mumbai 400020, petitioner/applicant, versus Central Bureau of Investigation, BS & FC, 3rd & 4th Floor, Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC), Near MTNL Exchange, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400098, respondent; Deepak Virendra Kochhar, aged 61 years, h... |
id_424 | 1 | We reiterate that the directions aforesaid must be complied with in letter and spirit by the investigating agencies and prosecuting agencies, while the view expressed by us on the non‑compliance of Section 41 and the consequences that flow from it has to be kept in mind by the Supreme Court of India, which is expected ... |
id_424 | 2 | For the reasons set out hereinabove, the petitioners are entitled to be released on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal of the aforesaid petitions, on the following terms and conditions: The petitioners Chanda Kochhar and Deepak Kochhar be released on cash bail in the sum of Rupees 1,00,000 each, for a period ... |
id_425 | 0 | Raj M. Ahuja and Jain M. Ahuja, Petitioners, versus the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through the Municipal Commissioner and the Executive Engineer (Building Proposals), Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Respondents. M/s. Mangal Buildhome Private Limited, Petitioner, versus the State of Maharashtra and... |
id_425 | 1 | Therefore, for exercising powers under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act of 1888 from the date of this Judgment, the Municipal Commissioner shall follow its own policy guidelines as the interim directions are not longer operative. We also make it clear that we have not examined the issue of legality a... |
id_426 | 0 | Through: Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Senior Advocate and Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Amit Choudhary, Mr. Sarthak Mannan, Mr. Aman Dhyani, Ms. Kanika Mitra, Ms. Kanchan Semwal, Mr. Agnivesh Singh, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Senior Advocate with Mr. Santanam Swaminadha,... |
id_427 | 0 | Tikam 1/2 NOB- WPL 27400 of 2022 Deepak Vithal Adhav and Others, Petitioners; The State of Maharashtra and Others, Respondents. Mr. Vishal Raman as well as Simil Purohit as well as Bhushan Deshmukh in behalf of Arjun V. Lingalod for Petitioners. Coram: Justice Sandeep K. Shinde, Maharashtra High Court. Dated: 26 August... |
id_43 | 0 | This Miscellaneous Civil Application has been filed to recall or review the judgment and order dated 09.03.2020 passed in Special Civil Application No.13041 of 2019 and the order dated 23.12.2020 passed in Miscellaneous Civil Application (For Direction) No.1 of 2020 in the aforesaid petition., Special Civil Application... |
id_43 | 1 | Thus, it is only after June 2010 that the transactions of sale have fallen foul of the Act. While the petitioner had submitted the instruments of sale of various flats in Mevawala Flats from 29 July 2010 to 25 November 2010, there was protest by a Committee comprising the applicants in the civil applications made herei... |
id_430 | 0 | CRM-15328-2021 Date of Decision: 12.7.2021 Nishant @ Nishu Petitioner versus State of Haryana Respondent. Present: Mr. H. P. S. Ishar, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner; Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Case taken up through video conferencing., This application under Section 482 of the Code... |
id_432 | 0 | CRM-M-30950 of 2019 Date of decision: 02.12.2020 Raj Kumar Saini Petitioner Sant Kanwar Respondent Present: Mr. Vinod Ghai, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Kanika Ahuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondent. Sanjay Kumar, Judge. By this petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, ... |
id_435 | 0 | ARG Outlier Media Private Ltd. & Anr. Petitioners Union of India and Ors. Respondents Mr. Nikhil Sakhardande, Senior Advocate appearing with Pralhad Paranjpe appearing with Saket Shukla appearing with Mrinal Ojha appearing with Debashri Dutta, Vasanth Rajasekaran appearing with Rajat Pradhan appearing with Sanjeev Samb... |
id_438 | 0 | Reserved on: September 15, 2022; Pronounced on: October 11, 2022. Reference for Appeal (Original Suit) 15/2022 and Case Memo No. 34279/2022. Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gagan Mathur, Ms. Madhu Sehgal and Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Senior Advocate with Mr.... |
id_438 | 1 | Coming next to paragraph 5, what we have stated in regard to paragraph 2 and the use of the expression \belonging to me\ occurring there would in our opinion apply equally to the use of the word 'owner' in this paragraph. Having held so, let us now advert to the position of law qua absolute bequest and also when there ... |
id_439 | 0 | Supplementary gd/ssd/cm/ Debajyoti /Kole/ Tanmoy (Through Video Conference) Writ Petition (Arbitration) 10504 of 2021 Shri Firhad Hakim @ Bobby Hakim & Ors. Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General of India; Mr. Y.J. Dastoor, Additional Solicitor General of India; Mr. Samrat Goswami, Advocate for the petitioner and Applican... |
id_44 | 0 | Writ Petition (Civil) No. ___ of 2021 filed by Sanser Pal Singh, Petitioner, versus Union of India and Another, Respondents., The petitioner submits the accompanying petition as urgent, seeking issuance of direction and action against erring court officers and staff., The petitioner requests that the petition be listed... |
id_44 | 1 | Case Number Register DLNT020017092016 – North Rohini Court Complex (Metropolitan Magistrate Court). Filing Number 12724/2016, Filing Date 14‑03‑2016, Registration Number 5294437/2016, Registration Date 07‑11‑2016. First Hearing Date 17‑March‑2016, Next Hearing Date 21‑January‑2021. Stage of case: Prosecution Evidence. ... |
id_44 | 2 | Filing Date: 23 September 2014. Registration Number: 525692/2016. Registration Date: 29 September 2014. CNR Number: OLCT020051832014 (Note the CNR number for future reference). First Hearing Date: 15 November 2014. Next Hearing Date: 24 December 2020. Court: Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Case Number 790. Respondent an... |
id_44 | 3 | It is impressed upon all judicial officers that it is their prime responsibility to ensure that the cause lists, daily orders and judgments of their court are timely sent on the server by the staff posted in their court on a daily basis. The cause list must be sent at least three days in advance. Daily orders must be s... |
id_441 | 0 | Case No. RC-10 of 2017, Order No. 59 dated 17 May 2021. The accused Firhad Hakim (also known as Bobby Hakim), Subrata Mukherjee, Madan Mitra and Sovan Chatterjee have been arrested in connection with the present case and detained in the Nizam Palace, the regional headquarters of the Central Bureau of Investigation. On ... |
id_443 | 0 | Date of decision: 07 May 2023. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Prateek Goswami, Advocate, Mr. Neeraj Gupta and Mr. Rajat Asija, Advocates, versus the respondent, represented by Mr. Shailender Dahiya, Advocate., The present petition, preferred by the estranged wife who is the respondent in HMA No. 711/2019, seeks to ... |
id_444 | 0 | Arising out of Police Station Case No. 758 of 2019, Thana Forbesganj, District Araria, the State of Bihar (Petitioner) versus Amar Kumar (Respondent). Appearance for the petitioner: Mr. Krishna Chandra, Advocate. Appearance for the respondent: Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor. Appearance for the appel... |
id_446 | 0 | Leave granted., After the Scheduled Offence went through an elongated judicial journey, it is the turn of the Enforcement Case Information Report under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002). What is under challenge before us are the orders... |
id_446 | 1 | Section 19, as amended from time to time, reads thus (emphasis supplied). In light of the aforesaid discussion, an Authorized Officer under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is not duty bound to follow the rigor of Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as against the binding conditions under Se... |
id_446 | 2 | The Magistrate to whom an accused person is forwarded under this section may, whether he has or has not jurisdiction to try the case, from time to time, authorise the detention of the accused in such custody as such Magistrate thinks fit, for a term not exceeding fifteen days in the whole; and if he has no jurisdiction... |
id_446 | 3 | Lord Buckmaster in Montreal Street Railway Co. v. Normandin, 1917 AC 170 (Privy Council) stated: All rules of court are nothing but provisions intended to secure the proper administration of justice. It is, therefore, essential that they should be made to serve and be subordinate to that purpose., Supreme Court of Indi... |
id_446 | 4 | Gupta and M.K.S. Abu Bucker and also of the Kerala High Court and Gujarat High Court is the logical and correct view and we approve the same for the reasons we have given in the preceding part of this judgment., We, indeed, see no imponderability in construing Section 35(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and Se... |
id_446 | 5 | As it is a reasoned and speaking order, the appellant ought to have questioned it before the appropriate forum. We are only concerned with the remand in favour of the respondents. Therefore, even on that ground we hold that a writ of Habeas Corpus is not maintainable as the arrest and custody have already been upheld b... |
id_447 | 0 | Petitioner: Abhishek Tiwari. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh through Additional Chief Secretary, Home, Lucknow, and others. Counsel for petitioner: Anand Mani Tripathi, Himanshu Shukla. Counsel for respondent: Chief Secretary, Honourable Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh, Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh (Deliv... |
id_449 | 0 | The instant appeal, by way of special leave, is directed against order dated 06.10.2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 885-SB of 1999 whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein., Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellan... |
id_45 | 0 | Reportable Writ Petition (C) No.916 of 2020 Bandhua Mukti Morcha Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents Ashok Bhushan, J., The worldwide pandemic COVID-19 engulfed this country in March 2020 and continues to date, changing its face from time to time. Different mutations in the virus have made it dangerous ... |
id_45 | 1 | Learned counsel appearing for Delhi submits that the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi has implemented the One Nation One Ration Card Scheme. Shri Tushar Mehta's submission is that the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi has not implemented the scheme fully and only in one circle, ... |
id_45 | 2 | It is further submitted that directions have been issued to Officers in the State by Labour Commissioner, Jharkhand vide letter No.557 dated 28.05.2021 and letter No.577 dated 08.06.2021 to complete the process of registration of unorganised workers in the area under their jurisdictions and the following steps have bee... |
id_450 | 0 | By presenting this petition under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the petitioner-wife seeks transfer of proceedings instituted by the respondent-husband under Section 25 of the Guardianship Act, 1890, from the Family Court, West District, New Delhi or any other court of competent jurisdiction at New De... |
id_451 | 0 | The petitioner in this writ petition is seeking the following reliefs: a) issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order or direction the Respondent No.1 and 2 to follow representation of the Petitioner at Annexure-L dated 29.08.2013 and release the funds that are kept aside by the Respondent No.2 Bank Branch. b) ... |
id_452 | 0 | In the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Dindigul. Present: Thirumathi J. Mohana, M.L., Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act Cases (Chief Judicial Magistrate), Dindigul. Tuesday, the 06th day of February 2024. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1587/2024... |
id_453 | 0 | High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench. Civil Writ Petition No. 8155 of 2016. Phoolmati, wife of Shri Avdhesh, aged about 21 years, Petitioner versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through Principal Health Secretary, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur; 2. Director, Child Health, Directorat... |
id_453 | 1 | The said amount will be deposited in a Fixed Deposit in the name of the petitioner for a period of three years in an account to be opened in a nearby nationalised bank with the facility of transferring the interest accrued thereon every quarter to her savings account, which can be withdrawn by her. The petitioner will ... |
id_454 | 0 | Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 257 of 2012. Petitioners: Umesh Kumar, Deepti Srivastava, G. C. Sinha (Gopal Chandra Sinha), Archna Sinha. Opposite Parties: The State of Jharkhand, Monika Srivastava., For the Petitioners: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For Opposite Party No. 2: Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the... |
id_455 | 0 | Reserved on : 20.09.2023 Pronounced on : 06.10.2023 These contempt petitions (criminal) having been heard and reserved for orders, coming on for pronouncement this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice Vishal Mishra passed the following:, These suo motu contempt proceedings have been initiated against respondent Narinder Singh Poo... |
id_456 | 0 | Petitioner who joined the Five Year Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Laws (Honours) Course in the respondent University from the Academic Year 2017‑18 is declared to have secured F Grade in Child Rights Law examination held on 13 March 2020 since he was not given any mark because of alleged plagiarism of the Project Wo... |
id_457 | 0 | Date of institution: 13 May 2022. Date of order: 18 May 2022. In the case of Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, through Traffic Police, Srinagar, through Assistant Public Prosecutor Ms. Nighat Maqbool versus Zahid Iqbal Wani, son of Mohammad Iqbal Wani, resident of Shalimar, Srinagar (the violator), through Advocate... |
id_459 | 0 | 9 March 2023\nPresident and Office Bearers\nNew Delhi Bar Association\nPatiala House Courts\nNew Delhi\nEmail: info@ndba.co\nCarbon Copy: Bar Council of Delhi\n2/6, Siri Fort Institutional Area, Khel Gaon Marg, New Delhi -49, Sirs,\nRe: Objectionable Holi Milan celebrations\nAt the outset, we wish you a happy Holi. We ... |
id_460 | 0 | Reportable Criminal Appeal No 697 of 2021 @ Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No 4009 of 2021 The State of Kerala Petitioner Versus K. Ajith & Others Respondents And With Criminal Appeal No 698 of 2021 @ Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No 4481 of 2021 Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J, This judgment has been divided int... |
id_460 | 1 | We mentioned earlier that the Public Prosecutor may withdraw from the prosecution of a case not merely on the ground of paucity of evidence but also in order to further the broad ends of public justice, and that such broad ends of public justice may include appropriate social, economic and political purposes. It is now... |
id_460 | 2 | In the later twentieth century, the House of Commons came to a significant conclusion about the limits of the phrase and the protection afforded to proceedings in Parliament. The privileges of the British House of Commons at the commencement of the Constitution as embodied in clause (3) of Article 194 as it then stood ... |
id_460 | 3 | The expression mischief is defined in Section 2(a) to have the meaning ascribed to it in Section 425 of the Indian Penal Code (1860). The ingredients of Section 425 are: (a) causing destruction of any property with an intent to cause, or knowing the likelihood of causing, wrongful loss or damage to the public or to any... |
id_460 | 4 | When no provisions warranting the sanction of the Speaker—either specific to the offence (such as the Prevention of Corruption Act) or specific to the class (such as the Maharashtra Amendment Act, 2015)—are enacted, the argument of the appellant stands on fragile grounds. For the above‑mentioned reasons, the contention... |
id_461 | 0 | [2023/RJJD/012727] (1 of 6) [CW-1845/2023] S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1845/2023 Bhagirath son of Poonma Ram, aged about 39 years, resident of Poonma Ram, Jogau, Jalore, Rajasthan. Petitioner versus State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur; Director, Secondary... |
id_464 | 0 | 6th Floor, Block-3, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003. Dated: 31st December 2021., In partial modification of the earlier notifications, guidelines and circulars issued by the National Company Law Tribunal regarding the functioning of the NCLT benches across the country during the Covid‑19 pandemic period, and ... |
id_465 | 0 | Appearance: Mr Masoom K. Shah (Counsel No. 6516) for the applicant; Ms Mohini K. Shah (Counsel No. 775) for the applicant; Opponent No. 2; Opponent No. 1; Date: 09 August 2021., By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed in public interest, the writ‑applicant has prayed for the follow... |
id_466 | 0 | April 26, 2022, Supplementary List Item No. 1, Writ Petition (Civil) 91 of 2022, Soumendu Adhikari v. The State of West Bengal and Others (Through Video Conference). Learned Senior Advocate Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Mr. Rajdeep Majumdar, Mr. Srijib Chakraborty, Ms. Harshika Varma, Mr. Sayak Chakraborti, Mr. Moyukh Mukhe... |
id_467 | 0 | Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 9032 of 2021 – Leave granted. The respondent No. 2, by his order dated 15 December 2020, exercised the powers under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. By that order, the appellant, a resident of Mandeolgaon, Taluka Badnapur, District Jalna, was directed to rem... |
id_47 | 0 | Judgment reserved on 10 January 2022 and judgment delivered on 19 May 2022. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2037 of 2021 and Civil Miscellaneous Nos. 5977 of 2021, 11265 of 2021 were filed through Mr. Visheshwar Shrivastav, Advocate, versus through Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Mr. Rahul Mehra, Senior Advocates, with Mr. Gau... |
id_47 | 1 | He submits that the National Food Security Act nowhere contemplates the doing away with the existing Fair Price Shop structure, and replacing the same with a wholly new set of Fair Price Shops as envisaged under the Request for Proposal/ Notice Inviting Bids dated 06.01.2021 and the impugned Scheme. Even Section 22 of ... |
id_47 | 2 | Chapter VIII of the National Food Security Act deals with the obligations of the Central Government, wherein the Central Government, in order to ensure the regular supply of foodgrains to persons belonging to eligible households, shall allocate from the central pool the required quantity of foodgrains to the State Gove... |
id_47 | 3 | The data with respect to the distribution of the foodgrains have to be collected, maintained, shared and audited regularly. The State Governments are at liberty to provide any other welfare based entitlements, without disturbing or destroying the mandate of the National Food Security Act. The State Government, in view ... |
id_47 | 4 | This power cannot be exercised mechanically, but only in exceptional circumstances and keeping in view the principles of constitutional trust and morality. Dr. Singhvi submits that the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Act, 2021 came to be notified on 27.04.2021. The provisions of the GNCT (... |
id_47 | 5 | Accordingly the interpreter is to make allowances for any relevant changes that have occurred since the National Food Security Act's passing, in law, social conditions, technology, the meaning of words, and other matters. Just as the United States Constitution is regarded as a living Constitution, so an ongoing British... |
id_47 | 6 | As a response to the food shortages of the time, the first structured public distribution system through the rationing system, for sale of a fixed quantity of ration to entitled families in specified cities/towns, was then introduced. Post‑independence, India retained the public distribution of foodgrains as a delibera... |
id_47 | 7 | Clause 2(j) defines “fair price shop owner” to mean a person and includes a cooperative society, a body corporate, a company of a State Government, a Gram Panchayat, or any other body in whose name a shop has been licensed to distribute essential commodities under the Targeted Public Distribution System. The Food Secur... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.