ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_267 | 0 | Reportable Writ Petition (Civil) No. 640 of 2022 Supreme Court Bar Association v. Ministry of Urban Development and Others. With Writ Petition (Civil) No. 817 of 2022. Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Chief Justice of India., The Supreme Court Bar Association has invoked jurisdiction of Supreme Court of India under Artic... |
id_268 | 0 | Both the above appeals arise out of the judgment and order dated 08.08.2007 passed by the Rajasthan High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 976 of 2002, whereby all the accused who stood convicted by the Trial Court for the offences under Sections 302, 307, 323, 324, 325, 447, 147/148 read with Section 149 of the Indian Pena... |
id_273 | 0 | Siddharth Pithani, Applicant, versus Union of India and another, Respondents. Mr. Tariq Sayed in behalf of Advait Tamhankar appears for the applicant. Mr. Shriram Shirsat along with Amandeep Singh Sra appears for respondent 1. The applicant was arrested by the Narcotics Control Bureau on 26 May 2021 in Criminal Referen... |
id_274 | 0 | Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 13013/2022, arising out of the impugned final judgment and order dated 10 June 2022 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 9475/2022 passed by the Delhi High Court at New Delhi, dated 09 September 2022. The petition was called on for hearing on that date. The petitioner appeared i... |
id_275 | 0 | This appeal is at the instance of the State of Jammu and Kashmir (now Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir) and is directed against the order passed by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu dated 11 October 2019, by which the High Court rejected Criminal Revision Application No. 27 of 2018 filed by the appellant... |
id_275 | 1 | In cross‑examination, the witness deposed that the incumbent Executive Officer ensures signatures of any application on the birth register in his presence; that with regard to place of birth of a newborn, entry is made on the basis of information given by an applicant and no verification is made because entry is made o... |
id_275 | 2 | However, what is relevant to note is that in both the Sections i.e., Section 8 as well as Section 48 the word 'shall' has been used., It is the High Court that passed the order dated 21 February 2018, directing the Special Investigation Team to take steps for ascertaining the age of the respondent. Pursuant to those di... |
id_275 | 3 | The above‑noted observations in Ramdeo Chauhan alias Raj Nath (supra) no doubt were recorded by the learned Judges of the Supreme Court of India while considering the imposition of death sentence on the accused who claimed to be a juvenile; nevertheless the views expressed therein clearly lend weight for resolving an i... |
id_276 | 0 | WP.No.181 of 2021 & WM P.Nos.245 & 248 of 2021. If the allegations made in the affidavit filed in support of the petition were to be accepted on their face value, then it only exposes the callousness with which the authorities in this district deal with the right to properties of the citizens., Some 16 years back, to b... |
id_28 | 0 | The instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the petitioner praying for the following reliefs: to set aside the order dated 04.03.2020 along with the Auditor memo No. 08 dated 20.01.2020; to direct the respondent to pay the complete salary along with the arrea... |
id_28 | 1 | In the backdrop of the facts, the settled law as well as the statute governing the present petition, it is crystal clear that an individual will only be suspended when the approval for the said suspension has been granted by the Vice‑Chancellor. The Governing Body may only recommend the suspension of the individual, bu... |
id_280 | 0 | W.P (MD) No. 21747 of 2022 Arulmigu Kalasalingam College of Education, represented by the Secretary Dr. K. Sridharan, Petitioner versus 1. The Appeal Committee, National Council for Teacher Education, represented by its Chairperson, G‑7, Sector 10, Dwarka, New Delhi 110075; 2. The Regional Director, Southern Regional C... |
id_281 | 0 | Date of decision: 01 February 2022. Through Mr. Sanjiv Dagar and Mr. Yogesh Verma, Advocates, versus Mr. Amit Prasad, Special Public Prosecutor for the State with Mr. Ayodhya Prasad, Advocate and Sub‑Inspector Santosh Gupta, Crime Branch., The petitioner seeks bail in FIR No. 70/2020 dated 27.02.2020 registered at Bhaj... |
id_281 | 1 | The Petitioner is directed to continue to reside at the same address. In case there is any change in the address, the Petitioner is directed to intimate the same to the Investigating Officer. The Petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, tamper with evidence or try to influence the witnesses. Violation of any of th... |
id_283 | 0 | The petitioners claiming to be social activists have filed the present petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking various directions against the States and Union Territories to formulate a scheme to implement the concept of Community Kitchens to combat hunger, malnutrition and starvation and the dea... |
id_284 | 0 | Reportable Civil Appeal Number 2600 of 2022 (Special Leave Petition (Civil) Number 19574 of 2021) Appellant(s) versus Respondent(s). Civil Appeal Number 2601 of 2022 (Special Leave Petition (Civil) Number 19378 of 2021). Civil Appeal Number 2602 of 2022 (Special Leave Petition (Civil) Number 19916 of 2021). Civil Appea... |
id_284 | 1 | He cited Janapada Sabha Chhindwara v. Central Provinces Syndicate Ltd. and a judgment of the United States Supreme Court in Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm Inc., amongst others, to elaborate on the limitations on the power of the Legislature to clarify an interpretation of law rendered by the Supreme Court of India. He furth... |
id_284 | 2 | Assuming that the State Legislature carried out an amendment to the 1994 Act, the said amendment would not have received the protection under Article 31-B. The question that remains to be answered is whether the determination of internal reservation for already identified communities by a separate legislation can be sa... |
id_284 | 3 | We are in agreement with the objection of the Respondents, that there was no contemporaneous data available to Justice Thanikachalam or even Justice Janarthanam, on the basis of which recommendations for internal reservation could have been made. It is observed that the proportion of the population of the Vanniakula Ks... |
id_286 | 0 | April 12, 2022 Writ Petition (Civil) 157 of 2022 Shaista Afreen and Others vs. State of West Bengal and Others. Writ Petition (Civil) 154 of 2022 Anindya Sundar Das vs. State of West Bengal and Others. Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee, Mr. Sayan Banerjee, Ms. Debolina Sarkar, Advocates for the intervenor. Ms. Susmita Saha Dut... |
id_288 | 0 | Petitioner: Surya Pratap Singh. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary Home and Others. Counsel for Petitioner: Amrendra Nath Tripathi, Abhinav Nath Tripathi. Counsel for Respondent: G.A. Honourable Ramesh Sinha, J., Honourable Jaspreet Singh, J., Allahabad High Court has convened through video ... |
id_292 | 0 | Non-Reportable Civil Appeal No. 3123 of 2020 Dr. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil, Appellant(s) versus The Chief Minister & Another, Respondent(s). Civil Appeal No. 3124 of 2020 [Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 15701 of 2019]. Civil Appeal No. 3127 of 2020 [Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 16550 of 2019]. Civil Appeal No. ... |
id_293 | 0 | The State of Madhya Pradesh Appellant(s) versus Nandu @ Nandua Respondent(s). Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 219 of 1995, by which the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur has partly allowed the appeal... |
id_294 | 0 | 25 January 2024. Supplementary Item No. 1 in W.P.A. No. 1790 of 2024 Sanjib Kumar Sau versus the State of West Bengal and others. Mr. Rajdeep Majumder, Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, Mr. Pritam Roy, Ms. Sagrika Banerjee for the petitioner. Mr. Kishore Datta, learned Advocate General, Mr. Amal Kumar Sen, Additional Government Pl... |
id_295 | 0 | Item No. 19, 20, 21, 22 & 23, Court No. 1 (Video Conferencing), Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 1118/2020 (C) No. 1118/2020, Date: 12-01-2021. These matters were called on for orders/hearing today. For Petitioners: Mr. K. Parameshwar, Advocate on Record Mr. V. Mukunda, Advocate Ms. A. Sregurupriya, Advocate Mr. Sukumar... |
id_296 | 0 | Dated this the 25th day of July 2022. Mohammed Nias, C.P., J. The above appeals arise from the judgment of the learned single Judge in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 30638 of 2021 dated 6 June 2022., The facts leading to these writ appeals are as follows: The second respondent, National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. (NTPC ... |
id_297 | 0 | Miss Shabnamjahan, daughter of Moinuddin Ansari, Applicant; Mr. Shaikh Salim Maimuddin, Applicant; Mrs. Kaiserjahan, wife of Shaikh Salim, Applicant; versus The State of Maharashtra, Respondent; Mr. N.S. Shah and Mr. S.S. Patil, Advocate for Applicants; Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, Additional Government Pleader for the Respond... |
id_299 | 0 | Present: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 811 of 2024 Kalighat Bahumukhi Seva Samiti versus State of West Bengal and others. For the petitioner: Mr. Tarunjyoti Tewari. For the State: Mr. Amitesh Banerjee, Mr. Rudrajit Sarkar, Mr. Suddhadev Adak. For the Kolkata Municipal Corporation: Mr. Alak Kumar Ghose, Mr. Arijit Dey. Hear... |
id_3 | 0 | |
id_30 | 0 | Youth For Equality, P-21, South Extension Part -II, New Delhi 110049, through its Secretary Shri Subham Kumar aged about 33 years, Male, Son of Amrendra Kumar Singh, Rajeev Nagar, P.O, Keshri Nagar, Patna; Dr. Bhurelal, Son of Shri Rajaram, Resident of Sector 128, Noida, Augusta Gold Apartments-005, PIN-201304; Profess... |
id_30 | 1 | It is submitted that the law has to be applied on facts and there is no material produced by the petitioners to demonstrate a compulsion or coercion to disclose details in the survey carried out. It is pointed out that 80% of the survey is over and there is not even one instance of an objection from the subjects of sur... |
id_30 | 2 | Reading the definition of State along with Article 13(3)(a) and the definition of law, it was held that a provision as contemplated under Article 16(4) can be provided not only by the Parliament or Legislature but also by the Executive in respect of Central or State services and by the local bodies and other authoritie... |
id_30 | 3 | It is trite that in matters of economic policy decisions the scope of judicial review is limited and circumscribed. If the executive authority is within its competence to frame a policy for better administration of the State, unless the policy is absolutely capricious, not informed by any reason, and can be clearly hel... |
id_30 | 4 | The boundaries that people establish from others in society are not only physical but also informational. There are different kinds of boundaries in respect to different relations. Privacy assists in preventing awkward social situations and reducing social frictions. Most of the information about individuals can fall u... |
id_300 | 0 | Versus Appearance: Mr. A. J. Yagnik (advocate) for the Applicant No. 1; Mr. Param R. Buch (advocate) for the Respondent No. 2. Date: 30 November 2022., The applicant, by way of this application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeks regular bail in connection with the FIR being Crime Report No... |
id_302 | 0 | The State of Uttarakhand, Appellant, versus Sachendra Singh Rawat, Respondent. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 11 December 2018 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No. 110 of 2016, by which the High Court has allowed the appeal preferred b... |
id_302 | 1 | The impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of the respective State is unsustainable both on facts as well as on law., The impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of the respective State altering the finding of murder to one of culpable homicide not amounting to murder and consequently convert... |
id_303 | 0 | Decided on: 11.08.2023 Through: Mr. Amit Khanna, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Assistant Sub-Inspector Sukhvir Singh, Police Station Ranjit Nagar. The instant application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed on behalf of the peti... |
id_305 | 0 | Petitioners are engaged in the business of crackers and fireworks items, with the special permissions and Trade Licenses obtained from competent authorities. They claim to have been in the business for many years. They are grieving before the Karnataka High Court against the order dated 27 September 2013 whereby the se... |
id_306 | 0 | Arising out of Police Station Case Number 93 Year 2019, Thana Barsoi, District Katihar, Navjot Singh Sidhu, a petitioner, versus the State of Bihar and Rajeev Ranjan, opposite parties. Appearance: For the petitioner – Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Senior Advocate; Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate; Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Adv... |
id_309 | 0 | Through: Mr. Taranpreet Singh, Advocate with Mr. Dharm Prakash and Mr. Mohd. Shameem, Advocates. Versus: Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Advocate with Mr. Jeet Chakravarti and Ms. Rituparna Sahoo, Advocates; Ms. Monika Arora, Central Government Solicitor with Mr. Subrodeep Saha and Ms. Prakriti Bandhan, Advocates for Union of In... |
id_310 | 0 | These petitions were called on for hearing on 11 June 2021 before the Supreme Court of India (Video Conferencing). For the petitioners: Ms. Pallavi Pratap, Advocate on Record Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde, Senior Advocate Mr. Chandrashekhar A. Chakalabbi, Advocate Mr. Awanish Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shiv Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. A... |
id_311 | 0 | Through: Mr. Sanjay Ghose, Senior Advocate with Ms. Urvi Mohan, Mr. Kunal Khanna and Mr. Kanishka Khurana, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Rohan Rohatgi, Ms. Aditi Khullar and Mr. Abhinav Garg, Advocates (M-9811867909). This hearing has been done through hybrid mode., Interim Application 8948/2022 (for exemption) is an a... |
id_312 | 0 | D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 613/2023 Petitioner versus State of Rajasthan, Department of Home, Jaipur; District Collector, Jodhpur; Superintendent, Central Jail, Jodhpur (Respondents). Petitioners: Mr. Kalu Ram Bhati, Mr. S. D. Chavariya, Mr. Lalit Kishore Sen. Respondents: Mr. Anil Joshi, Government Advocate cum A... |
id_316 | 0 | Reserved on 10 January 2024 and pronounced on 5 February 2024. Through Mister Manish Vashishth, Senior Advocate, with Mister Karan Sharma, Mister Rishabh Sharma, Mister Vedanth Vashishth, Mohd. Irshad and Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Advocates, versus through Mister Manoj Pant, appellant for the State, Mister Raghav Awasthi,... |
id_316 | 1 | Arvind Kejriwal is granted liberty to file the same before the appropriate Court of competent jurisdiction. I may be permitted for the same. Further, on the same day, the following order was passed by the learned Magistrate: the complainant submits that he wishes to withdraw his complaint against alleged No. 3 Shri Arv... |
id_316 | 2 | It has to be noted that a person retweeting a defamatory content, which has the potential of causing reputational injury to a person, cannot wriggle out of his responsibility by merely contending that it was a retweet and not the original tweet. Accepting this view as canvassed by the petitioner would amount to permitt... |
id_318 | 0 | Arising out of Police Station case number 1551, year 2019, Thana Patna, Complaint Case, District Patna. Mr Rahul Gandhi, Petitioner, versus the State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Home, Old Secretariat, Patna (Bihar) and others., Appearances: For the petitioner – Mr Ansul, Advocate. For the State – Mr P... |
id_319 | 0 | By way of present appeal, the appellant Union of India has challenged the judgment and order dated 02.08.2010 passed by the Delhi High Court, in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1006 of 2008, whereby the Delhi High Court had dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the appellant and confirmed the judgment and order dated 08.06.20... |
id_32 | 0 | Mr. Manoj Kumar M R, son of M R Ranganath, aged about 31 years, residing at No. 39/1, 2nd Cross, Near SBI Bank, Kamakshipalya, Bangalore (now in judicial custody, Central Prison Bangalore). Appellant (by Sri Hasmath Pasha, Senior Advocate for Sri Nasir Ali, Advocate). State of Karnataka, Byatarayanapura Police Station,... |
id_320 | 0 | Judgment Reserved on 08 February 2023 and Judgment Delivered on 13 February 2023. Applicant: Suneeta Pandey. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh and Another. Counsel for Applicant: Ravindra Prakash Srivastava. Counsel for Opposite Party: Government Advocate Honourable Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav., The learned counse... |
id_323 | 0 | Nikhil H. Malkan and others, Petitioners, versus Standard Chartered Investment and Loans (India) Limited, Respondent. Mr. Firoz Bharucha in behalf of the Petitioners. Mr. S. M. Algaus, Mr. Murtaza Kachwalla, Mr. Palash Moolcha in behalf of Argus Partners, for the Respondent., By this petition filed under Section 29A of... |
id_324 | 0 | Through Mr Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate, together with Mr Simran Jyot Singh Khandpur, Mr Varun Singh, Mr Kamlesh Anand, Mr Sumer Boparai, Ms Ruchika Wadhawan and Ms Raavi Sharma, Advocate, versus Through Mr P L Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, Sub‑Inspector Nazma, Police Station Mehrauli. The hearing... |
id_326 | 0 | CRLMC No.2636 of 2021 Ajay Pattanaik @ Ajaya Kumar Pattanayak and Another. Petitioners Mr. Deepak Ranjan Sundaray, Advocate. Versus State of Odisha and Another. Opposite Parties Mr. Soumya Ranjan Mohanty, Advocate for the opposite party., Instant petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is filed by the... |
id_327 | 0 | Arising Out of Police Station Case Number 7 Year 2022 Thana Darbhanga Rail Police Station District Samastipur. Akhilesh Pandey, son of Mahendra Pandit, resident of Village Ahkta, Police Station Suppi, District Sitamarhi, Bihar, 843351. Lalit Kumar, son of Ramekwal Sahni, resident of Nonahi, Police Station Parihar, Dist... |
id_329 | 0 | Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present: The Honourable Justice Bibek Chaudhuri. Criminal Revision Appeal 269 of 2019 Subrata Pradhan, State of West Bengal & Anr. Criminal Revision Appeal 270 of 2019 Prasanta Das & Anr., State of West Bengal & Anr. For the Appellant: Mr. Phiroze Edulji, Mr. Ajit Kumar Mi... |
id_330 | 0 | Rajesh, son of Panditrao Pawar, age 45 years, occupation Agriculture, resident of Pokharni, Taluka Palam, District Parbhani. Dnyanoba, son of Marotrao Pote, age 54 years, occupation Agriculture. Godavaribai, wife of Dnyanoba Pote, age 48 years, occupation Household, appellants number 2 and 3, resident of Deothana, Talu... |
id_332 | 0 | 03.03.2022 Present: Shri Sachin Anand, Learned Counsel for the revisionist. Shri Nischal Singh, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 1. Learned Counsel for respondent No. 2. Heard arguments as advanced by Learned Counsel for the revisionist, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Lear... |
id_335 | 0 | This reference to the larger bench of five judges arises out of the writ petitions filed challenging Notification No. 3407(E) dated 8 November 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned Notification), issued by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by sub‑section (2) of Section 26 of the Reserve... |
id_335 | 1 | He submits that, in any case, they have failed to take into consideration the relevant factors which were required to be taken into consideration and have taken into consideration those factors which were false from the very inception and have subsequently been proved to be so. He, therefore, submits that the Supreme C... |
id_335 | 2 | It is submitted that out of the total cases, 20,343 cases were rejected due to various reasons. The learned Attorney General submits that it will not be permissible for the Supreme Court of India to devise a norm which would result in altering the essential character of the enactment. In support of this submission, he ... |
id_335 | 3 | But, argues Mister Pathak, granting that this is so, it must be held that when the phrase any one is used with the preposition of, followed by a word denoting a number of persons, it never means every one. The extract from the Oxford Dictionary, it is interesting to notice, speaks of an assertion concerning a being or ... |
id_335 | 4 | Supreme Court of India has generally taken the view that ascertainment of legislative intent is a basic rule of statutory construction and that a rule of construction should be preferred which advances the purpose and object of a legislation and that though a construction, according to plain language, should ordinarily... |
id_335 | 5 | It was argued that Section 150(1) delegates completely unguided power to the Corporation in the matter of optional taxes and suffers from the vice of excessive delegation and, therefore, is unconstitutional. This Court, after considering various earlier cases including Hamdard Dawakhana (Wakf) Lal Kuan, Delhi and anoth... |
id_335 | 6 | Therefore, anything that may pose a threat to or have an impact on the financial system of the country can be regulated or prohibited by the Reserve Bank of India, despite the activity not forming part of the credit system or payment system. The expression 'management of the currency' appearing in Section 3(1) need not... |
id_335 | 7 | As already discussed hereinabove, the record would reveal that the matter was under active consideration for a period of six months between the Reserve Bank of India and the Central Government. As such, merely because the Central Government has advised the Central Board to consider recommending demonetisation and that ... |
id_335 | 8 | It held that, having regard to the malpractices which are noticed in the Common Entrance Test conducted by such private institutions themselves, it is, undoubtedly, in the larger interest and welfare of the student community to promote merit and excellence and to curb malpractices. Supreme Court of India held that the ... |
id_335 | 9 | Insofar as the suggestion to frame a scheme and provide a window for a limited period so as to enable citizens having genuine reasons to exchange the notes is concerned, we do not find that it will be appropriate for us, in the absence of any expertise in economic, monetary and fiscal matters, to frame such a scheme. I... |
id_335 | 10 | The procedure envisaged under sub‑section (2) of Section 26 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, requires a recommendation by the Central Board of the Reserve Bank of India before the Central Government may issue a notification in the Gazette of India to demonetise bank notes. On 8 November 2016, the Government issu... |
id_335 | 11 | The specified bank notes held by a person other than a banking company referred to in sub-paragraph (1) of paragraph 1 or Government Treasury may be exchanged at any Issue Office of the Reserve Bank of India or any branch of public sector banks, private sector banks, foreign banks, Regional Rural Banks, Urban Cooperati... |
id_335 | 12 | Considerations which could guide the Bank's recommendation are limited or narrow in compass. Other aspects of governance. Considerations which could guide the Central Government's proposal to carry out demonetisation are broad or wide., Process/Route to be followed to carry out demonetisation: Issuance of a Notificatio... |
id_335 | 13 | In such a situation, as already held, the Central Government would have to resort to the legislative process by initiating a plenary legislation in Parliament. What is being emphasised is that the Central Government cannot act in isolation in such matters. The Central Government has to firstly take the opinion of the C... |
id_335 | 14 | On a close reading of the Notification dated 8th November 2016, in juxtaposition with the records, the following aspects emerge: One aspect that emerges with no ambiguity is that the proposal for demonetisation originated from the Central Government, by way of its letter addressed to the Reserve Bank of India, dated 7t... |
id_335 | 15 | However, having regard to the fact that the impugned notification dated 8th November 2016 and the Act have been acted upon, the declaration of law made herein would apply prospectively and would not affect any action taken by the Central Government or the Bank pursuant to the issuance of the Notification dated 8th Nove... |
id_336 | 0 | Friday, the 19th day of May 2023 / 29th Vaisakha, 1945. The petitioner filed a Writ Petition (Civil) praying that, in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed along with the Writ Petition (Civil), the Kerala High Court be pleased to direct the respondents to terminate the pregnancy of the victim girl in Crime No... |
id_338 | 0 | Applicant: Khajan Singh and another. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh and another. Counsel for Applicant: Pankaj Sharma, Prashant Sharma. Counsel for Opposite Party: G.A. Honourable Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan, J. On 05 October 2020, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 was directed to file a short counter affidav... |
id_339 | 0 | Criminal Original Petition (Madras) No. 15546 of 2017 and Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (Madras) Nos. 10350 & 11272 of 2017. Balamurugan @ Bala – Petitioner. State Representative by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli (Crime No. 21 of 2017). N. Sandeep, the District Collector, Office of the Di... |
id_340 | 0 | Number HHC/VIG/Misc. Instructions/93-V-W-33 dated Shimla, 3 June 2022. From the Registrar (Vigilance), High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla 171001. To all the Judicial Officers in Himachal Pradesh. Subject: Issuance of instructions regarding acceptance of downloaded copies of bail orders and interim orders passed by ... |
id_343 | 0 | Preface: Whereas to imbue greater transparency, inclusivity, and foster access to justice, it is expedient to set up infrastructure and the framework to enable live streaming and recording of proceedings. These rules are framed by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh in the exercise of powers under Article 22... |
id_344 | 0 | Reserved on: 21.12.2022 Pronounced on: 05.01.2023 Through: Ms. Gayatri Nandwani Sharda, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, Appellant for the State with Sub Inspector Sandeep Yadav, Police Station Malviya Nagar., The present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374 read with Section 482 of... |
id_344 | 1 | It is to be remembered that in India, the absence of fair and proper trial is not only a violation of fundamental principles of judicial procedure and constitutional mandate, but also a violation of mandatory provisions of Section 304 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The assistance of a legal counsel, in a meaningful wa... |
id_345 | 0 | Shiv Rahul Uttam Phadtare Applicant Sarika Rahul Phadtare Respondent Sarika Rahul Phadtare Applicant. Rahul Uttam Phadtare Respondent. Ms. Sangeeta Salvi for the Applicant in Miscellaneous Civil Application No.284/2022 and for the Respondent in Miscellaneous Civil Application No.191/2022. Mr. Akshay Kapadia for the Res... |
id_346 | 0 | Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 327 of 2024 Ravi Kumar Appellant versus Chevrox Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Another Respondents. Present: For Appellant: Mr. Abhijit Sinha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nakul Mohta, Mr. Gursharan H. Virk, Ms. Riya Dhingra, Advocates. For Respondents: Mr. Malak Bhatt, Mr. Munjaal Bhatt, Ms.... |
id_347 | 0 | Sarabjit Kaur, Appellant, versus the State of Punjab & Another. Justice Rajesh Bindal. The Appellant, having failed before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, has filed the present appeal. A prayer was made for quashing of First Information Report No. 430 dated 16 October 2017 under Sections 420, 120B and 506 of the Ind... |
id_348 | 0 | Through Video Conferencing Present: Mister Jamshed Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioners. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to respondents No.... |
id_349 | 0 | Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 509/2021 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the following reliefs: (i) to entrust the investigation of Crime No. 1989 of 2021 of Palakkad Town South Police Station and Crime No. 457 of 2020 of Palakkad Kasba Police Station with the Central Bureau of Investigation for fur... |
id_349 | 1 | As pointed out by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, the State of Kerala had even recently handed over a case allegedly committed under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code for investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation. No doubt, the Social Democratic Party of India and the Popular Front of India... |
id_35 | 0 | Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Archana Chakar, Mr. Kumar Abhishek and Mr. Shivang Sharma, Advocates versus Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, Mr. Gurjas Singh Narula and Mr. Mohit Joshi, Advocates. Interim Application No. 2023 (to be numbered). Registry is directed to number the aforesaid application. Considering th... |
id_350 | 0 | Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Bar Association and Anr. Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India and Anr. Respondent(s) Justice Hrishikesh Roy, J., Through this writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners who are the Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Bar Association and the Dist... |
id_350 | 1 | On this aspect it needs to be observed that even when a direct appeal to the Supreme Court of India is provided by a statute against the decision of a tribunal, the remedy under Article 226 or Article 227 before the High Court remains unextinguished. Moreover, the appeal under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal ... |
id_352 | 0 | Re: Filling up vacancies of judges in the Supreme Court of India. The Supreme Court of India has a sanctioned strength of thirty four Judges and is presently functioning with twenty seven Judges. Thus, there are seven clear vacancies. On 13 December 2022, the Collegium recommended five names for appointment as Judges o... |
id_353 | 0 | Writ Petition (Civil) No. 27982 of 2022 dated this the 1st day of September 2022. This writ petition is filed by a District and Sessions Judge challenging Exhibit P2 order of transfer in so far as it transfers him as Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kollam. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that... |
id_354 | 0 | Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1011/2022 Date: 25-11-2022. This petition was called for hearing today. For Petitioners: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate; Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Senior Advocate; Ms. Tahira Karanjawala, Advocate; Ms. Niharika Karanjawala, Advocate; Mr. Vardaan Wanchoo, Advocate; Mr. Shreyas Maheshwari, Advocat... |
id_356 | 0 | Special Leave Petition (C) No.11059 of 2020 is a writ petition filed in public interest under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. It questions the admission notification dated 03 September 2020 issued by National Law School of India University, Bengaluru for conducting a separate admission entrance examination, th... |
id_356 | 1 | He submits that due to judicial interventions and considerable time and effort from all the stakeholders, the different Universities have come together to form the Consortium, whose primary objective is to conduct the Common Law Admission Test for the benefit of admissions of all its members., The Consortium and all th... |
id_356 | 2 | We find substance in the submission of Shri Datar that power under Section 13 empowering the Executive Council to frame regulations and power under Section 10 to administer, manage and control the school are two separate powers and even though the regulations have not been framed under Section 13 regarding admission of... |
id_356 | 3 | He submits that 210 days is for teaching in all three semesters, 36 days shall be three Sundays in each three months term, 24 days for Government holidays, etc., in three months and 15 days for evaluation and assessment, totalling to 285 days. It is true that respondent No.1 University follows a unique system of Trimes... |
id_359 | 0 | W.P.(C) 11855/2022 and C.M. No. 35370/2022 Through: Mr. Rudra Vikram Singh & Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. Rishav Dubey, Mr. Sahaj Garg, Mr. Kunjala Bhardwaj, Mr. Madhav Bajaj & Mr. Saurabh Tri... |
id_360 | 0 | 14 January 2022 Writ Petition (Civil) 14 of 2022 Pratik Maitra versus The State of West Bengal and Others (Through Video Conference). Mr. Rajnil Mukherjee, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr. Samrat Sen, Additional Advocate General; Mr. Raja Saha, Mr. Debasish Ghosh, Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, Advocates for the State., By t... |
id_362 | 0 | Through: Mr. Anant Kumar Hajelay, Advocate (Through Vice Chancellor) along with Petitioner No. 1 versus Through: Dr. Amit George with Mr. Rayadurgam Bharat, Mr. Shashwat Kabi, Mr. Adhishwar Suri, Mr. Arkaneil Bhaumik and Mr. Piyo Harold Jaimon, Advocates for Respondent 1, with Ms. Arshya Singh, Mr. Aakash Dahiya and Mr... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.