thread_id
stringlengths 37
43
| source_file
stringlengths 35
37
| subject
stringlengths 0
231
⌀ | messages
stringlengths 88
34.9k
| message_count
int64 1
42
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030781.txt_5624
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030781.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Understood but there is an office of terroism finance at treasury that has thought about tax"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Treasury not driving nsc is"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Remember if you bought bitcoin at 1000 dollars and after it went to 10000. You then buy furniture at overstock. You have a 9000 GAIN to pay tax on in real dollars . At some point treasury should put forth a voluntary disclosure program and fuck all the bad guys . Don’t disclose . Tax evasion"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did you ask him for Hillary’s emails ;)"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "NSA has em"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/26/2018 5:01:50 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "fun. have you come across lisa monaco yet. obama counter terroism girl. ? our cripto coin issues are us based. tax predominately. , regualtion, disclosure etc. world wide , a whole different bag. . debit cards. usb , some bad shit . very bad."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, 26 Feb 2018 04:33:00 +0000", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will treasury respond to you re crypto or do we need another way in for advice"}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027035.txt_5653
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027035.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "does the 23 work in cambridge"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/5/2013 5:59:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Absolutely. 23rd is great. I teach my seminar that day at 1 but could tape in the morning or after class--in my\noffice (very private), or at the Harvardx studios (less) or in the Woodberry poetry room (the nicest place). . If\nWoody wanted, we could bring some students into the taping or just do the two of us...\n\nWoody is absolutely welcome to come to the seminar, of course\n\nJohn McCain, Tony Kushner, Al Gore have all signed on the last 2 days...crazy\n\nLisa"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030795.txt_5660
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030795.txt
|
Re: The Anatomy of a Crisis: A Strong Dollar and Disappearing Liquidity | Zero Hedge | Zero Hedge
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "8/18/2018 4:54:58 PM", "subject": "Re: The Anatomy of a Crisis: A Strong Dollar and Disappearing Liquidity | Zero Hedge | Zero Hedge", "body": "In recent weeks, prosecutors with the Justice Department’s public integrity section — which examines possible\npolitical and government corruption — have sought documents related to Broidy’s business dealings.\n\nAmong the information sought by investigators are details about Broidy’s work on behalf of and interactions\nwith the Chinese and Malaysian officials, according to two people familiar with the document requests.\n\nAs part of their efforts, prosecutors have subpoenaed casino magnate Steve Wynn, the former RNC finance\nchairman and longtime Trump friend, for copies of records and communications related to Broidy.\n\nAn attorney for Wynn, Reid Weingarten, declined to comment, saying only that Wynn is cooperating with the\nJustice Department.\n\n“Steve Wynn is completely cooperating with the investigation and he certainly has no reason to believe that\nanyone acted improperly in anything he knew about or was involved in,” Weingarten said in a statement."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 12:28 PM", "subject": "Re: The Anatomy of a Crisis: A Strong Dollar and Disappearing Liquidity | Zero Hedge | Zero Hedge", "body": "Wow: decent ; from a guy I have a ton of respect for"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 18, 2018, at 12:27 PM", "subject": "Re: The Anatomy of a Crisis: A Strong Dollar and Disappearing Liquidity | Zero Hedge | Zero Hedge", "body": "this means that you should ignore advice not given by jews. :) itisnonsense. each one of these guys\n\ndecides to put in pin the carousel and say the horse is up , the horse isgoing down or the horse is going\n\nup. strong dollars make it easier to invest in emerging markets , as their currency is really worth shit and\n\nneeds to be adequately priced, but in the mean time. there is apple inthe us and maduro in venezuela.\nwhat do you expect from the currencies. :)"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 10:29 AM", "subject": "Re: The Anatomy of a Crisis: A Strong Dollar and Disappearing Liquidity | Zero Hedge | Zero Hedge", "body": "https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-08-16/anatomy-crisis-strong-dollar-and-disappearing-liquidit\n\neven though ari is gay, hard to watch steve rape him.\n\nWat does this mean\n\nReid weingarten review of msnbc"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019326.txt_5674
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019326.txt
|
Re: Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/19/2016 10:39:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America", "body": "bamnaby is no longer there. He is at Institue for Advanced Studies... That being said, let me ask him if he can shepard you through Templeton"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America", "body": "Dear Jeffrey (and please see note at bottom),\n\nThis end-of-the-year letter is to catch you up on developments and to report progress made in 2016 by Poetry in America, by its associated non-profit production company, Verse Video Education, and by (and with) our new Harvard partner, the Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning. Whether you are a longstanding adviser and supporter of Poetry in America, or you’ve more recently joined our circle of proponents, your contributions, thought partnership and enthusiasm have made this year’s successes possible.\n\nLast fall, I knew this would be a crucial year. Goals for 2016 included moving our co-produced television series, Poetry in America, toward a concrete release date (now entering post-production, we launch nationwide in April 2018), converting our six HarvardX MOOC modules into for-credit courses (now complete and being offered by Harvard’s Division of Continuing Education), and getting the word out on our first course developed especially for K-12 educators, Poetry in America for Teachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop. With a mission of creating and distributing the highest-quality humanities content for a wide variety of learners, our projects now rely on a salaried production staff of five, a rotating corps of part timers and contractors, and a growing cohort of Harvard graduate students, undergraduates and interns whom we train in the public-facing humanities. Growing fast, in 2016 we more firmly established Verse Video Education as a nimble and stable producer of humanities-based content (now including an archive of over 120 separate interviews with distinguished discussants), while also defining a forward-looking partnership and growth strategy with Harvard. As 2016 draws to a close, I have much progress to report.\n\nVerse Video Education: Independent 501c3\n\nIn April 2016, Verse Video Education, the fledgling production company I'd founded in 2014, received IRS approval and became a 501c3. Now capable of accepting philanthropic contributions, Verse Video Education has also begun to generate revenue by producing high-quality educational media for other institutions. Clients within our first year included Greenwich Country Day School, YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, Schlesinger Library, Harvard Institute for Global Health, and Project Zero. While philanthropic donations remain essential, work for clients allows us to amplify the impact of philanthropic donations, not only permitting additional investment in our flagship partnerships with WGBH and Harvard, but also fostering development of new partnerships and projects. These include a video series on poetry and science now running with award-winning magazine Nautilus, a collaboration with distinguished poet Robert Pinsky and his Favorite Poem Project, and an expansion of our poetry film series with partners at The Nantucket Project. Advised by a stellar and diversely talented board, Verse Video Education is looking toward sustainability. We are now discussing distribution of new content with a variety of stakeholders, including media providers in China."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028593.txt_5677
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028593.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off to europe , tomorrow."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 4:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Then I am going to have to make change the world decisions without you...(I am in london tomorrow-friday but I assume you are going to paris)"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What number are you on? I won’t talk sensitive, i want to tell you google"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At cheryl's...sitting with her...watching trump shit...is Google going to happen?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ihave two more bidders"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesusfuckingchrist....give me one of them....ready for a change"}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027034.txt_5685
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027034.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/17/2013 8:55:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "23rd -yes. 24th probably but early. I have Clinton GI on 9am and fly to Singapore on 3pm. Lets discuss it tomorrow. Best EB"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 16, 2013, at 21:55", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can you do breakfast with ariane rothscild on morinig of 23. and if you wnat kissinger china guy at brakfast 24."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031724.txt_5687
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031724.txt
|
Gloria Allred Says More Women Are Contacting Her About Trump Misconduct: Gothamist
|
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2016 9:07:47 PM", "subject": "Gloria Allred Says More Women Are Contacting Her About Trump Misconduct: Gothamist", "body": "http://gothamist.com/2016/10/10/gloria allred trump .php"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026258.txt_5689
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026258.txt
|
Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO
|
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-michael-flynn-trump-423437"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:13:08 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "coin issues. : receive coins, distribute coins, pay in coins, coin cooperative, prohibitions foreign donor.? need to understand flow of funds. . donor to campiagn c?s. does it have to go to campaign first. . does it have to go there at all etc."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "On it"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:20:46 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "do you have coin guys. brocks people . or should we find? some of the lefty crpto guys , might find it difficult to join, but they said bringing tech to discourse is on a higher plane"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 1:23:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration 'justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "I think I have the most solid guy on the right--tied into the 'swiss' guys Named jeffrey wernick--going thru due diligence now ---ive known him a while as I've studied this--he can walk u thru the deal"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029854.txt_5692
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029854.txt
|
Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel
|
[{"sender": "Parker, Ashley", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 3:19 PM", "subject": "WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Hi Reid,\n\nAshley Parker here at the Washington Post. I cover the White House and am emailing because my colleague,\nBob Costa, and I getting ready to post a story about President Trump’s decision to move ahead with retaining\noutside counsel, and we understand you’re one of the finalists for the role, and have already spoken with senior\nWhite House officials. I just wanted to let you know that we plan to mention your name (and of course see if\nyou want to comment), and I also wanted to check and see if you were open to chatting totally off the record\njust in case there is any nuance or guidance you’d like to provide.\n\nThanks,\nAshley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "do you want it? or jared?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 9:28:04 PM", "subject": "Re: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Do | have the choice? And if so, your view?"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028513.txt_5693
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028513.txt
|
Last Remaining Tickets: Mark Zuckerberg On Trial – Will He Be Held Accountable?
|
[{"sender": "info@intelligencesquared.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/12/2019 11:23:58 AM", "subject": "Last Remaining Tickets: Mark Zuckerberg On Trial – Will He Be Held Accountable?", "body": "Last Remaining Tickets: Mark Zuckerberg On Trial – Will He Be Held Accountable?\n\nMark Zuckerberg on Trial:\nFacebook is Damaging Society\n\nTUESDAY 18TH JUNE, 7PM\nEMMANUEL CENTRE\nFeaturing Damian Collins, Nina Schick, Torricke-Barton, Ed Vaizey, Helen Lewis\n\nBUY TICKETS\n\nZuck sucks. According to his critics, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, presides over a company which is undermining our basic freedoms. It was complicit in the spread of fake news and foreign interference in our elections, and is partly to blame for the rise of political polarisation through its echo chambers and filter bubbles. The company has been selling the private data of millions of users around the world to select companies – most notoriously Cambridge Analytica, who used the information to meddle in the US presidential elections and Britain's EU referendum. And Facebook was accused of behaving like 'digital gangsters' by the House of Commons Digital Select Committee, led by Damian Collins MP, who claimed Zuckerberg has willfully misled lawmakers over fake news and data malpractice. Facebook is built on an essentially unethical business model, and the buck stops with Zuck.\n\nThat's the case against Mark Zuckerberg. But let's keep things in perspective, say his defenders. Facebook has done more than any other organisation in the world to connect people through technology, allowing more than 2.2 billion users so far – that's 30 percent of the world's population – to share their lives with friends and family around the world – all for free. And let's not forget that Facebook has been a vital tool for social and political organisation, from the Arab Spring to Obama's presidential campaign. The world is a complex and messy place and while it's convenient to scapegoat a single CEO for our polarised politics, the fact is there were multiple causes for Brexit and Trump. Of course, there are problems at Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg is keenly aware of them. In January 2018, he made a promise to fix Facebook, admitting that the organisation makes too many errors and listing his priorities as 'protecting our community from abuse and hate, defending against interference by nation states, or making sure that time spent on Facebook is time well spent'. Much of what we are reading about Facebook is old news. Zuckerberg is essentially an idealist and we should at least give him the benefit of the doubt as he seeks to rebuild the world's trust in Facebook.\n\nThat's the argument of Zuckerberg's defenders. But are they right? Join us on June 18, hear the arguments and decide for yourself."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028592.txt_5694
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028592.txt
|
Re: Civil or crime
|
[{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im told southern District trying yo get out a rico claim against the org"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you nuts. im a cowardly warm blooded jew. call ni"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "will at some point....what time do you leave tomorrow"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 8:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Turns out you were right about sdny but they are \"going to wait their turn\"..."}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026005.txt_5695
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026005.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 12, 2016 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "August 11, 2016\n\nA federal jury decided Thursday that one of the Middle East’s most prominent banks did not commit fraud and\nsteal technology from an Irvine firm that sued it for half a billion dollars in damages after their partnership\ncollapsed.\n\nOrange County company InfoSpan had alleged that Emirates NBD ended a partnership for a mobile payment\nsystem because it didn’t want to share revenue and stole InfoSpan’s technology to launch its own service.\n\nThe Dubai-based bank, in turn, denied it stole or ever used InfoSpan’s technology. It argued that it cancelled the\npartnership because InfoSpan couldn’t produce a working product and misled it into thinking it was an\nestablished company, not one with little to no track record.\n\nAfter deliberating for a day, the jury unanimously decided that InfoSpan did not prove its case of fraud and theft\nof trade secrets.\n\nInfoSpan had asked for $540 million in damages. An attorney for InfoSpan declined to comment on the\npossibility of an appeal.\n\nThe verdict capped a two-week trial that involved dueling accusations of fraud levied by high-profile attorneys\non both sides, including the former White House counsel to President Obama.\n\nAt the center of the high-stakes battle was San Juan Capistrano resident and entrepreneur Farooq Bajwa and a\nmobile payment system that he said would allow migrant workers in the Middle East to send remittances back\nhome through text messages.\n\nBajwa contended that InfoSpan, with support from outside investors, spent $87 million developing the business\nand technology.\n\nTo launch the system, known as SpanCash, Bajwa partnered in 2007 with Emirates Bank, which is controlled\nby the United Arab Emirates’ sovereign wealth fund.\n\nIt seemed the ideal collaboration for the Pakistani immigrant, who earned millions operating another Irvine\ncompany that manufactured computer components in the 1980s and 1990s\n\nThe Gulf States rely heavily on migrants to work construction and other low-wage jobs, offering a ready-made\nmarket for SpanCash. InfoSpan aimed to allow migrants to transfer money back home far more cheaply than\nWestern Union or hawala, a traditional Middle Eastern broker-to-broker money transfer system.\n\nA study from McKinsey & Co., cited in court records, projected annual revenue of $3.5 billion by the deal’s\nfifth year, with InfoSpan receiving more than $2.8 billion in fees.\n\nBut the relationship between InfoSpan and Emirates Bank soured and the bank cancelled the deal in 2009.\n\nA few days later, Emirates filed a criminal complaint in Dubai against Bajwa and a partner alleging that they\ndefrauded the bank and misrepresented InfoSpan as an established business with a working technology.\n\nTwo years later, InfoSpan sued in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana and alleged that its technology was working\nand that it delivered its source code to the bank on servers. Emirates ended the deal, InfoSpan said, to launch its\nown mobile payment system after stealing InfoSpan’s technology.\n\nIn court, an attorney for InfoSpan argued that Emirates torpedoed the InfoSpan relationship because it abhorred\nhow much money it would have to share with the Irvine firm."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/12/2016 1:58:39 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "This is a big deal"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021400.txt_5702
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021400.txt
|
Re: Fw:
|
[{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033025.txt_5710
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033025.txt
|
Re: science in Trump time
|
[{"sender": "i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 4:46 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "Startup idea - marketplace where a scientist can find a donor. I realize what we've started. We've started a new\nPR campaign to engage donors to support science during Trump's time.\n\nIt can be massive. And you can be a face of if it doesn't sound scary for you © But what I really like it's\nactually important and we are the first one who started thinking about it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["i"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 3:50 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "yes akickstarter with no return, you forma 501 c3 charity , that can accept donations. and give them out\nto scientists.. it s avery clever idea. good work!"}, {"sender": "ii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:39 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "I'll think how to execute on it. I'm very focused on my fund but I want it to exist, will find a way"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ees"], "timestamp": "9/10/2017 9:01:16 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "yes, it could be great. ."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030794.txt_5711
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030794.txt
|
Re: ‘You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,’ Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President’s Grip on GOP
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "7/20/2018 2:32:16 PM", "subject": "Re: ‘You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,’ Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President’s Grip on GOP", "body": "http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/19/counterprotesters-burn-american-fla\n-outside-office-maxine-\nwaters.html"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:16 AM", "subject": "Re: ‘You Are Either With Trump or You Are Against Him,’ Says Bannon, as Putin Mayhem Tests President’s Grip on GOP", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/you-are-either-with-trump-or-you-are-against-him-says-bannon-as-putin-\nmayhem-tests-presidents-grip-on-gop?ref=home"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030958.txt_5719
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030958.txt
|
Re: Alex Acosta update | Power Line
|
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "12/6/2018 10:25:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Alex Acosta update | Power Line", "body": "https://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article222705765.html"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Alex Acosta update | Power Line", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Robert Grusky", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "December 6, 2018 at 3:52:15 PM EST", "subject": "Alex Acosta update | Power Line", "body": "https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/12/alex-acosta-update.ph\n\nAlex Acosta update\n\nEarlier this week, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein bought his way out of a lawsuit that would\nhave given some of his victims the opportunity to testify about his predatory and criminal\nconduct. Victims never got that opportunity when Epstein faced criminal charges, because\nAlex Acosta — then the lead prosecutor, now the Secretary of Labor — let Epstein off with\na ridiculously lenient sentence. Despite having committed hideous sex offenses with dozens\nof minors, Epstein received a sentence of 13 months in jail, during which he was often free\nduring the day.\n\nEpstein’s decision to buy his out of the civil lawsuit, one that he had the nerve to initiate,\nbenefits Acosta. The trial would have provided non-stop headlines, coupled with frequent\nreferences to the sweetheart deal Acosta gave him. As Randy Schultz puts it, the trial would\nhave been the occasion for a long overdue public shaming of Acosta. Now, he avoids this\nconsequence.\n\nBut this doesn’t mean Acosta is out of the woods. He faces calls for his ouster from the\nTrump cabinet.\n\nSome calls are from the usual suspects. Michelle Goldberg of the New York Times has\nwritten a piece so obnoxious that it almost makes me want to see Acosta ride out the storm.\n\nBut some conservatives are also advocating Acosta’s departure. Concerned Women for\nAmerica 1s a stalwart conservative organization. It describes itself, accurately, as “focus[ed]\""}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022994.txt_5723
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022994.txt
|
Fwd: Maxwell (
|
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/26/2016 3:18:43 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Maxwell (", "body": "Hi\n\nAnswer to questions asked.\n\nNo response received\n\nRegards\nMiles Alexander\nOperations Manager"}, {"sender": "Miles Alexander", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 18, 2016 05:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Maxwell", "body": "Hi\n\nCathy and I have discussed your questions. At this stage we do not feel it is beneficial and may negatively impact our privacy to answer the questions.\n\nPlease respect our request not to assist.\n\nRegards"}, {"sender": "Brad Edwards", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "18 May 2016, at 16:01", "subject": "Re: Maxwell", "body": "Thank you for your response. My initial questions are fairly general I believe.\n\nWas Former Pres Clinton ever a guest on the island?\nWas George Mitchell a guest?\nWould any of the guests get massages from the girls brought by Mr. Epstein or Ms. Maxwell?\nDo you remember\nWhat was her interaction with Ms. Maxwell?\nHow many massages would Mr. Epstein get per day? I understand that the massages happened in a location where, based on the article I read, Ghislaine instructed you to never go while in use. But I am curious knowing - were the massages done by the various young girls brought to the island? Did they appear to be massage therapists? I think I know that answer based again on the previous article I read.\nWere you aware of Ghislaine flying a helicopter? Flying girls to the island? Flying guests to the island?\nWhat did you understand Ghislaine's role to be? How did she describe herself or act while there? If she was the \"queen bee\" girlfriend, then what was her explanation of the presence of the other younger girls? And what interaction did Ghislaine have with those girls? It is our understanding that one of her primarily \"jobs\" was to find the girls to bring to Mr. Epstein but we do not yet have a firm understand where she found them or what interaction she personally had with each of them while on the island. I was hoping you could provide some clarity based on things you heard or observations you made.\n\nAgain, thank you for any clarification you can provide. I am interested in the facts, including any inaccuracies that have been reported in the past which may have given us a misunderstanding of anything.\n\nSincerely,\nBrad"}, {"sender": "Miles Alexander", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 18, 2016, at 4:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Maxwell", "body": "Greetings\n\nThank you for your letter and sentiments contained there in.\n\nCathy and I have read a number of articles that have appeared in the press over the past few years. In the cases where statements are credited to I can honestly say that we cannot agree to the statements made and therefore do not see what further info you need. For example, the notion that we served or witnessed the stated alleged acts or parties are untrue.\n\nIf you wish to take this further, please supply a list of questions you think are pertinent and we will then decide if any need answering.\n\nRegards"}, {"sender": "Brad Edwards", "recipients": ["Miles and Kathy Alexander"], "timestamp": "2016-05-17 07:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Maxwell", "body": "Dear Miles and Kathy Alexander,\n\nI, along with several other attorneys, represent_____________________ She needs your help and we are hoping for your assistance. She doesn't need much. In fact, all she needs are some good, honest people who are willing to just tell the truth. That seems like a simple request that any compassionate person would accommodate; however, for some reason many people have instead decided to stay out of it and allow to continue to suffer. A small number of good people have stood up for what is right and told the truth. We do not currently know where you stand but we know that you have helpful information and are hopeful that you will cooperate in sharing that information with us.\n\nI have investigated various related aspects of this unfortunate story for 8 years now. is one of numerous clients I have represented in related matters. And only wants one thing - for the truth to be known and for her story to protect others. She was a teenager when she was recruited to travel with Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. After 2 years she escaped that life and lived in hoping to forget what she had been through. After Mr. Epstein was arrested for doing similar things to other girls that he had done to her, decided to speak out about what really had transpired while traveling with Maxwell and Epstein, including events that occurred on Little St. James.\n\nShe remembers you and your wife fondly. We read the interview you gave a few years back. There can be no doubt that we absolutely appreciate the probably unwanted media attention that your previous interview drew. We are not at all looking for a second round of that. We are not the media. We do not need any public interview. We are not concerned with anything other than the facts, from your own observations or what you heard while working on the island. We just want to speak with you.\n\ncame back to the United States to help others similarly victimized. Specifically, she started a non-profit charity to help sex abuse victims. She very bravely told her story with the goal of starting a new life helping others. Unfortunately, Ms. Maxwell told the world that was lying, which has thus far had the impact of destroying 's charity. We are in litigation with Ms. Maxwell where we have to prove something that should be very simple - that is in fact telling the truth in her story of being recruited by Ms. Maxwell to travel and \"work\" for Mr. Epstein. We know she is being truthful. We also know that there are numerous witnesses who also know she is. But many of the witnesses still work for Mr. Epstein or cannot be located.\n\n- as well as any others similarly situated - deserves the truth. And that is all we are trying to capture for her. We promise not to let anyone in the media know we are talking to you. We are not looking to drag you into anything. We are not looking for anything at all more than the truth, and Virginia has told us that of all the people who worked for Mr. Epstein you were the most likely to help.\n\nI hope this email finds you well. I apologize for emailing you at an address that appears to be a work address. It is all I had. If there is a time when you would be so kind as to talk with me, I would be most grateful. You can email me. Call me. Set up a time for me to call you. Whatever is most convenient for you. Thank you for anything you are able to do.\n\nSincerely,\nBrad Edwards"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030348.txt_5730
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030348.txt
|
NYTimes: Donald Trump News Conference Gets the `S.N.L.' Treatment
|
[{"sender": "Glenn Dubin", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 15 2017 02:10 PM", "subject": "NYTimes: Donald Trump News Conference Gets the `S.N.L.' Treatment", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/15/arts/donald-trump-saturday-night-live.html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share\n\nThe actor Alec Baldwin, in a parody of Mr. Trump's first news conference as president-elect, began by vowing to answer what he said was \"the question that's on everyone's mind.\""}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028507.txt_5731
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028507.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:23:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "explain"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am seeing Heidi a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030406.txt_5752
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030406.txt
|
Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon I Nieuwsuur
|
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 1:21 PM", "subject": "Het hele interview met Steve Bannon I Nieuwsuur", "body": "https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/video/2240261-het-hele-interview-met-steve-bannon.html"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 7, 2018, at 10:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon I Nieuwsuur", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 8:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon I Nieuwsuur", "body": "This drives me Ping crazy. \nSimple question for your boy: Did Donald Trump actively promote the theory that Barak Obama was not born \nin the US and was therefore not a legitimate President? \nAnswer: Yes. \nHe should not defend that shit. He can defend populist/nationalism all he wants, but when he bullies people \ndefending obvious Trump lies, he loses credibility."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "7/8/2018 9:51:20 AM", "subject": "Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon I Nieuwsuur", "body": "agreed. ill pass it on:)"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030970.txt_5761
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030970.txt
|
Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill
|
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 3:44:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "no, mnuchin is ok. . its simple , 15 yrs ago. the geriatrics understood that the internet was\n\nlike telephones. connections only, then my nerds taught them thaat cyber isa weapon. , same with the\nfed. . its a weapon to be used with sophistication. . inflation is a concept from the 50s , before the internet set\ninstantaneious info around the world.. soooo dumb"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "Can u get rid of Powell or really get rid of mnuchin"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018, at 10:35 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "getting rid of powell much more important than syria /mattis. . I guess pompeo , only one left. . unless\nambassador heather has a brilliant idea. - a first.. jared and ivanka, need to go. !!!"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "LMAO\nPerfect mnuchin hit"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018 at 9:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "In 1993, Powell began working as a managing director for Bankers Trust, but he quit in 1995 after the bank\ngot into trouble when several customers suffered large losses due to derivatives. He then went back to work\nfor Dillon, Read & Co!\n\nhe didnt understand the markets 25 years ago. obama appointed him to the board. what else do you guys need to know"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "https://thehill.com/policy/finance/422577-trump-considering-firing-federal-reserve-chief-after-latest-interest-\nrate-hike"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033019.txt_5764
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033019.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "White House this week?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Probably won't know until tomorrow. Waiting on both Jared and Trump. Can you chat? have something to ask."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "9/3/2017 5:02:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes cell 212-533-3739"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032903.txt_5772
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032903.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 12:18:00 PM", "subject": null, "body": "in paris today, headed for new york. . trump gives many new things to do"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030374.txt_5773
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030374.txt
|
RE:
|
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Karp, Brad S"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 21, 2019 10:51 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/430906-senate-investigators-want-to-question-russia-based-businessman-tied-to-trump"}, {"sender": "Karp, Brad S", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 4:12:19 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Very interesting. \nHow are you? \nBrad S. Karp I Chairman \nPaul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP \n1285 Avenue of the Americas I New York, NY 10019-6064 \nI www.paulweiss.com"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029625.txt_5775
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029625.txt
|
Jeffrey Epstein, Jew Billionaire Pedophile, Child Trafficker Goes Free..WoW! 20 year old Hearsay is enough to destroy catholic priest. What happened here to the justice system?
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 3 2011 08:44 PM", "subject": "Jeffrey Epstein, Jew Billionaire Pedophile, Child Trafficker Goes Free..WoW! 20 year old Hearsay is enough to destroy catholic priest. What happened here to the justice system?", "body": ""}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022770.txt_5778
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022770.txt
|
Help!
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016 11:39 PM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Because you were not available to meet me in person last year and at this point I don't need to be seen. I can not have press, media, \nprivate investigators, film companies, etc. contacting me or my parents and sisters at home or on cell/texts and or by mail. I realize \nyou don't have much control over this, but you can at least help me to move. I can't just get up and go like you. I left the city to \nescape, make a better life and I am devastated these people found me and brought to light an association of that I would rather them \nnever to know. People think I was involved with something really bad and I lost a boyfriend of great potential over this shit. I am still \nin debt over all these years, been working my ass off trying to get ahead, which you could never understand I was even surviving off \nthe pay I was getting. Well, its not any better. I dropped out of college because of you (and GM's) advice. Started working for a \ncompany you wanted me to and basically my life has has become hell since then. \nI have been your supporter for 16 years, the media explosion with Clinton, Trump and Cosby is affecting me. I'm not prepared for \nthis."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021428.txt_5780
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021428.txt
|
URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "pass her regards along to my wife and vice versa. When the University informed me of the complaint | was shocked and\n\nconcerned. When | spoke to the human resources person, including relating my concerns and providing the emails in question, | was\ntold that no formal complaint of sexual harassment was deemed to be warranted in this case, and that the young woman in question\nhad agreed to that. By that time | learned of the complaint | had already announced my intentions to leave Case to accept an offer at\nASU—a very difficult decision for me because of my long-standing attachment to the University, and the excellent relations | had with\nmy colleagues there, both among the faculty and among the administration. Because | was already in Arizona at the time | was asked\nnot to have any further interaction with the student | agreed to that request because it was basically moot. | was also told that\nbecause it was being handled informally, that (a) it should remain confidential, which |, at least abided by, and (b) if no further\ncomplaints were lodged in that case, that the University would remove the allegation from my record after 5 years, which makes me\nsurprised that someone violated that written agreement with you.\n\nRe item 6: You report on ASU’s response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specifically stated there were never\nany allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and the outside complaints were in fact related\nspecifically to your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that this complaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual\nwho was allegedly harassed, who never lodged a complain, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged transgression. |\nwas surprised and dismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both Universities that\nbecause of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated to the University would be\ninvestigated. The complaint was investigated throughly by both ASU and ANU and both came to the conclusion that it was not\ncredible and no university policies had been violated. . In addition ANU’s investigation, which took a full month found significant\ninconsistencies in the allegation, suggesting distortion and fabrication, | will quote from the ANU report. The initial complaint, which in\nfact resulted in a temporary suspension by ANU outlined the claim you made in the words you quoted in your note to me, along with\nthe statement made in the complaint that\n\n\"It is the University’s understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the time of the incident.\"\n\nAfter the investigation, the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistent with the original claim\nand apparent later claims as follows:\n\n“The allegations were made by an observer to the incident.\n\n- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched in\n\nan unwelcome manner.\n\n- The conference attendee who took the ‘selfie’ photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers\nat the time of the incident (November 2016).\n\n- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers\nat the time of the incident (November 2016).\n\nThe photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact.\n\n- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who took\nthe ‘selfie’ photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was requested\nin the course of the investigation.”\n\n(And for the record | often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as | specifically request selfies not to include flashes,\nso that | don’t end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour)\n\nWhat makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that | get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come\nup to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. | am particularly proud of the way | attempt to make all\npeople feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what | am about, which is to\nacknowledge fans in a way that makes them feel appreciated. As | understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take\nselfies at the CFl conference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, | am proud of the\ninteractions | have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff. | have had numerous female graduate students,\npostdocs, employees, and colleagues, and as ASU attested to you, none of these have ever complained of harassment. Quite the\ncontrary in fact, as | have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and treat them with respect. | treat others as responsible adults,\nand | expect to be treated equally."}, {"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "As you know, I’m a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations\nagainst you. As we've already discussed by email, I’d very much like to interview you about these allegations\nin detail."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524.txt_5784
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524.txt
|
Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’
|
[{"sender": "Thomas D. Williams", "recipients": ["Oliver Lane", "Raheem Kassam", "Frances Martel", "Alexander Marlow"], "timestamp": "March 11, 2018 at 5:13:03 PM GMT+1", "subject": "Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Germans get it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "luv it"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Pretty powerful"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 11 Mar 2018 21:03:53 +0100", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Unfortunately I just spoke to one of the country leaders that we discussed, , I will fly there tomorw night now and then to new york wednesday night. sorry. will be in new york thurs and friday. we should lay outa strategy plan.. how much fun... travel safe."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Sean Bannon"], "timestamp": "3/12/2018 1:04:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "K"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026270.txt_5793
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026270.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-michael-flynn-trump-423437 \ndo you think Bill Clinton would like to join you me ehud and steve.? could be very funny, all off the record."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-) \nAre you feeling better today?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "but maybe with the right amount of shoes his lawyer might change her mind:)"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 10:05:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029143.txt_5794
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029143.txt
|
Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs
|
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Hi: When are you back in NY?\nAttached is the complete Preproduction Book for Radical Breakthroughs - now including Misha Gromov!\nLove your feedback, suggestions.\nAlso attached is the budget and timing of funding, as presented originally, now updated for the completion of preproduction (phase I). We are ready to go into production (phase II). See Budget, p. 4. Committed and excited.\nWhen to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2017, at 7:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "great work , but needs some editing, did not like multi verse and sensience. seems more blahblah"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "`Blahblahs' forbidden in 'Radical Breakthroughs'. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science and Rare Sentience).\nInitial ideas:\n* Expand the first episode \"Mathematics and Truth\" into two or likely three episodes. I'm intrigued by this because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner's 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)', astrophysics, cosmology, biology, general systems theory. I've felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think three episodes could work - if you agree, I'll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3 parts. Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277 episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the series.\n* Integrated Information Theory - quantifying and explaining consciousness (Giulio Tononi, Un of Wisconsin-Madison), plus supporters and critics. New controversial, science-based radical theory.\n* Evolutionary Dynamics - your program at Harvard - mathematical models. This is not an area of my expertise, but it could well fit Closer To Truth in general and Radical Breakthroughs in particular. But you need to tell me if you would like to include this.\n* Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and especially psychological research - the scandal in recent years. See links and attachments.\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis\nhttps://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248\nhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716\n\"Replicability vs. Reproducibility\" - http://www.replicability.tau.ac.il/index.php/replicability-in-science/replicability-vs-reproducibility.html\nFive Ways to Fix Statistics - Nature [attached].\n* Other possibile areas you suggest\nWe would like to set a mutually agreed schedule so we can confirm and reserve the Closer To Truth 'season' of 13 episodes for 'Radical Breakthroughs', which we need to plan well in advance - especially as we begin 2018.\nSee you Jan. 5 - Looking forward to brainstorming.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "lets talk today. I went through the candidates in math. . we should talk, I have great hopes for this and am sure you woudl want to get it right though some of the math people write well , their speakinn style and presence is less than A , and probaby closer to a C +/ Im around today or hte weekend if you would like to chat.\nweekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 30, 2017, at 8:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "guest s here until 4. after good"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "After 4 good.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 5:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "either"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 4:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Ready when you are - let me know and I can call.\nSkype =\nFaceTime = email."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "5 min"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn W", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 4:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "OK"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 9:35:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "I'll call in 5"}]
| 12
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030412.txt_5795
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030412.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31 2019 11:22 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/3556604/teen- sex-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-donald-trump-mara-lago-resort/"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032056.txt_5803
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032056.txt
|
RE:
|
[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 8:17:01 PM", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "I know...I just saw that and almost threw up....also have to decide today whether or not to take flynn"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:14 PM", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/alexander-acosta-trump-jeffrey-epstein-plea-235096"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025792.txt_5805
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025792.txt
|
Is Denmark going bankrupt?
|
[{"sender": "digest-noreply@quora.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/14/2019 7:03:52 PM", "subject": "Is Denmark going bankrupt?", "body": "Answer: If you watch Fox News? Yup. . . Choked under the weight of burdensome. . . .\n\nJeffrey's Digest\nTop Stories For You\n\nIs Denmark going bankrupt?\n\nErik Callaway, lives in Denmark (2014-present)\nWritten Feb 11\n\nIf you watch Fox News? Yup. . . Choked under the weight of burdensome taxes, over-regulation, and society’s leaches, Denmark is primed to implode.\n\nIf you look at any quality...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhen my father was 32 I was 9. Now he is twice as old as me. How old am I?\n\nParth Parulekar, Software Engineering Intern at Avalara\nWritten Tue\n\nYou are 23 years old.\n\nTo answer this question, you must form the equation below:\n\n2(9+x) = 32+x\n\nwhere x is the number of years passed since the father was 32.\n\n... Read More »\n\nWhy do you think the reason behind Trump abruptly canceling Pence’s New Hampshire trip?\n\nJill Grant, voting for over fifty years\nWritten Jul 6\n\nHe wanted Pence in the background for the pictures on July Fourth.\n\nThere isn’t any other reason unless he’s going in for surgery, the New Hampshire police found out at the l...\n\nRead More »\n\nDo French understand us if we speak French as it's written?\n\nEric Dec, knows French\nWritten May 25\n\nNo, we don't. Because French has too many diphtongs and silent letters.\n\nTry to pronounce oiseau (bird) as it's written. It might sound like oy-see-ay-oo. But no French speak...\n\nRead More »\n\nMy 10-year-old biological son keeps telling my adopted 12 year old that she’s “not really family.” I’ve tried to explain how that upsets her but he doesn’t stop. How can make him understand?\n\nFelicia Marie Hippler, mother of 3 one with Down Syndrome\nWritten Jul 5\n\nI was adopted.. I went through this too not just from my sister's but from cousins that were very close in age but my mom always told me something that really stuck with me...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhy is Trump’s trade war the wrong way to compete with China?\n\nIsaac Yeung, Christian Economist (2008-present)\nWritten Wed\n\nDonald Trump has a nickname in China, known as Chuan Jian Kuo (川建國). Chuan means Trump. Jian means building. Kuo means the country. While Trump pledges to make America grea...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhat are signs of a high IQ in an individual, both positive and negative?\n\nMichael Wellen\nWritten May 11\n\n1.\tTendency to jump around in conversation.\n2.\tA certain distance. Like they’re not entirely there with you.\n3.\tThey collect interesting ‘friends’.\n4.\tKindness....\n\nRead More »\n\nI heard Israeli satellites orbit Earth in the opposite direction due to various launch restrictions. Does the IDF get any advantages from this?\n\nMaayan Stern, lives in Israel (2009-present)\nWritten May 14\n\nThe reason we launch satellites to the west isn’t an advantage- in fact, it’s a disadvantage because we can’t take advantage of the Earth’s rotation. We do it because our e...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhy do most of people love Canada but not so many houses and buildings hang the national flag not like the US?\n\nRoss Driedger, VP of Technology (2017-present)\nWritten Jul 2\n\nDriving through the USA, I see an American flag waving in the wind above some random house, then another, and another, and yet another, and so on.\n\nYes, I know I am in your c...\n\nRead More »\n\nIs Tinder right for me?\n\nTomas Rauhala, Musician, Bartender, Sound Engineer\nWritten Jul 4\n\nThat depends…\n\n1.\tAre you a woman? (If you are, go ahead. Women can always score.)\n2.\tIf you’re a man, are you at least 6 feet tall?\n3.\tIf not… Are you unusually good-looking (like a mo...\n\nRead More »"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022943.txt_5809
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022943.txt
|
boies
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 10:35:08 AM", "subject": "boies", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ \nright on time, i didnt know. boies is his co counsel. . represents that claims that al gore, \nand clinton were both on the island. he knows its not true, or could clearly ask hif former clients."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030757.txt_5812
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030757.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "bring me up to speed."}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016 at 9:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Moving (small places in Raleigh and Bellevue), wrapping up taxes, wrapping up fire claim, trying to figure out if technologies that soothe the nervous system (that offer the positive effects that meditation or massage might offer) are worth working on....\n\nAnd wondering if the fact that so many people are on anti-depressant, adhd, and other drugs, is what makes trump appealing and his flaws invisible...\n\nWill you have a cabinet position?\nHow are you?\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he can win?"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016 at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "SPEAK! Please. What do you think?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016, at 2:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "too far to tell, we will know much more come oct 15"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 26, 2016 at 1:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "How's that?\n\nWhich team you pulling for?\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["—"], "timestamp": "9/26/2016 11:34:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "none"}]
| 7
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032730.txt_5819
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032730.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/4/2018 2:26:09 PM", "subject": null, "body": "went to the trump mar a lago speech trump gave Saturday he isn't kidding about a trade war he said we \nhave nothing to loose because we are already loosing he used the example of Indian motorbikes coming into \nthe us and India charges 125 percent for Harley's quite frankly I wouldn't ride an Indian motorbike if \nyou paid me and 99 .9 percent of Indians can't afford a Harley belt buckle .last night went to James \ncohens house a palace he is s nice guy we had a long talk he sold Hudson news and now into multi family \nhousing we should get together for lunch I am going to get to know him better best stay well jonathan"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030743.txt_5831
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030743.txt
|
Re: privieged
|
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "lots of reporters inquiries. !. doithink that trump set me up? what do i know about his dealings? . did i speak to you? suggestion. all public record, house bought out of a bankruptcy proceding . I was the stalking horse bid.. never before was there a prosecution of erotic massage by women for money in someones home. every girl got money. returned . most interviewed by police over 21. all public record. some concern on my team that i will get a cong subpoena. doi have to wear a tie?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:13 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "Again! Why you need a team in place! Where are you with Ollie?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:17 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "hes great. he needs to get the documents from the law firms that are wholly focused on this submission to the judge. . BTW He asked for Imilllion per month . for a year. ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 11:24:24 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "Expensive. But... In a way this new round of calls is an opportunity: reporters suddenly thinking they don’t know something or that there is a new angle—now would be a good moment to hit them with a better prepared set of responses. Somebody, Ollie or otherwise, should get started on this."}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012102.txt_5843
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012102.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "5/7/2019 4:29:00 AM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/06/us/politics/trump-inauguration-stephanie-winston-wolkoff.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031313.txt_5844
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031313.txt
|
Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "8/18/2016 2:47:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Importance: — High"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "Michael, Charles", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "August 17, 2016 at 10:56:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021399.txt_5845
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021399.txt
|
Fwd: From Alexandra Wolfe
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg Esq ED", "Darren Indyke (Sah"], "timestamp": "3/3/2011 5:54:10 PM", "subject": "Fwd: From Alexandra Wolfe", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Peggy Sicgal", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "March 2, 2011 3:19:39 PM PST", "subject": "From Alexandra Wolfe", "body": "Here are some questions. Thanks again for your help! Would love to talk to him, or travel to meet with him if that would be possible.\n\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? Could he talk about his\ninterest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same clients or new ones? Is it\nstill at $15 billion?\n\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising?\n\n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell? Someone said she lives with him (but that doesn't sound right)?\n\n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n\n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n\n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025295.txt_5846
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025295.txt
|
Fwd: Game On paper from Dr. Laffer
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 5:32:04 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Game On paper from Dr. Laffer", "body": "These old school supply siders supposedly have DT's ear. Your old pal Larry Kudlow/Laffer/Steve Moore. I think they basically wrote his tax plan. Steve Forbes for Treasury Secretary??:):)"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Drinkwater", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas, Jr."], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:38 AM", "subject": "Game On paper from Dr. Laffer", "body": "Dear Landon,\nPlease see the attached paper from Dr. Laffer.\n\nBest,\nNick"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030444.txt_5847
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030444.txt
|
Fw: Fwd: APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack
|
[{"sender": "Comms Alert <CommsAlert@gop.com>", "recipients": ["undisclosed-recipients:;"], "timestamp": "May 5, 2018 at 1:19:54 PM EDT", "subject": "APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack", "body": "APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack\nAssociated Press\n\nTom LoBianco\n\nMay 5, 2018\n\nhttos://aonews.com/6dd33b4234634079821e5825f1 12e85b?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=T\nwitter\n\nWASHINGTON (AP) — The Associated Press has learned that investigators working with special counsel Robert Mueller\nhave interviewed Tom Barrack, a close friend and confidant of President Donald Trump.\n\nThree people familiar with the probe tell the AP that Barrack met with federal investigators working on the Russia inquiry.\nThe people spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations.\n\nBarrack’s spokeswoman, Lisa Baker, declined to comment.\n\nBarrack has known Trump for decades. He’s been one of Trump’s closest advisers through the 2016 campaign and into the\nadministration. Barrack also is a leading fundraiser for the president and oversaw the fundraising for the inauguration.\n\nBarrack has a longstanding relationship with Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and Manafort’s onetime\ndeputy, Rick Gates.\n\nGates agreed to begin cooperating with Mueller’s investigators in February."}, {"sender": "Jason Miller", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 5 May 2018 13:43:02 -0400", "subject": "Fwd: APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack", "body": "Gates."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/6/2018 1:54:36 AM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: APNewsBreak: Mueller team questions Trump friend Tom Barrack", "body": "Gates served this brother up"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033374.txt_5849
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033374.txt
|
Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem
|
[{"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Thank you for the introduction. Do you have a better sense of what he needs? Also, what's his WhatsApp/mobile so I can confirm details for today? \nWhen's best on Friday for me to visit with you? \nBibi's speech was a bit of a dead letter on Europe."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 2, 2018, at 11:05", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "he is chairman of dubai world ports. african ports a new focus he built the palm islands. is totally trustworthy"}, {"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/3/2018 6:30:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Unfortunately, bin Sulayem and I did not meet. I was stuck at the White House and he had a narrow window before heading to Cyprus. I just sent him the following note: \n\"Good Morning, I hope your travels to Cyprus were smooth. \nOkey Enelamah, Nigeria's trade minister, stopped by my home this evening as he was still in town after Buhari's visit with Trump. He mentioned his discussions with you at WEF and afterwards. Separately, I spoke earlier with the Vice President. \nWhenever we meet, I have some thoughts that may be helpful to you.\""}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033412.txt_5856
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033412.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ugly.. very ugly"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2018, at 8:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "smells like something bigger to me. I wouldnt be surprised if MBZ set him up."}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "mmmmmm"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Oct 12, 2018, at 10:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought s?"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/12/2018 7:46:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dificult to tell as of today.. leaks are done in a very smart way and.. fast.. very fast. No question Qatar scoring big. It is a media war now. I think saudis are loosing Trump if they dont start defending. Best defense is the truth even if ugly, in my opinion. Turkey is having fun, the saudis need to act. This will not go away. And, yes, Canada wins"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031475.txt_5860
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031475.txt
|
RE: Audio recording
|
[{"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["Keough, Michael", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman", "David Marin", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Thank you, Michael.\n\nReuters story just posted:\nhttp://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-security-gulen-idUSKCN10G1P8?il=0\n\nWorld | Fri Aug 5, 2016 1:07pm EDT\nRelated: WORLD"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028579.txt_5872
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028579.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Turns out you were right about sdny but they are \"going to wait their turn\"..."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Civil or crime"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Crim"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Still have to figure out what my role is in all this shit..."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you seemed to imply that your new guy could only shoot blanks? ifthats so. its an easy decision. ,\nif not. oy"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033360.txt_5875
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033360.txt
|
Michael Wolff Launch Party
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/28/2019 8:51:55 PM", "subject": "Michael Wolff Launch Party", "body": "Assistant Editor\nHenry Holt\n175 5th Ave.\nNew York, NY loom\nStephen Rubin\ninvites you to celebrate\nMICHAEL WOLFF\nupon the publication of\nSIEGE\nTrump Under Fire\nRSVP:\nJune 3, 6-8PM\n15 West 67th Street\n**Due to space, we cannot allow plus ones.\n**This may be a duplicate invitation because we were worried the\noriginal invitation went to your spam folder!"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029180.txt_5879
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029180.txt
|
Fwd: October 19, Heidelberg
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 6:06:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. so, here is the event I am still invited to give in Germany. It is Oct 19th. I was previously invited to give a \nmajor lecture in Heidelberg Oct 14 but they had to cancel it after the university determination re australia was \npublicized by the bitch. That air ticket, which they had paid fo, was about 5250 euros. There is a $900 \ncancellation fee, and they have agreed to let me keep the ticket if I pay them 4500 euros. I offered that to the \nother place but they only have $5K USD total, which includes the $4K fee they originally offered me. I am \ngoing to check other tickets now, but wanted to know if you might be flying to europe around then and could \ntake a hitchhiker. :)"}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "August 29, 2018 at 4:49:53 AM PDT", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence, \njust back from a long tour ,,on origins\". \nAs promised you will get my message promptly. \nAs you may understand, before we start recruiting for the Festival our budget \nimplies more freedom. Now I simply do not have the flexibility to decide so easily \non amounts in „kilos\". (especially as a prominent Nobel laureate shortly before \ndeadline agreed to come and implied a pretty large sum). \nWhat I can offer you is 5k as a lump sum. This is the ultimate at the moment. \nI deeply regret these limitations but I cannot ignore redlines. \nSo please let me know if you can or cannot come."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 26.08.2018 um 22:04", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. update.. noam cannot do anything anyway.. nor UK that week.. So, I have been able confirm I can get the \nticket for the discounted amount of 4500 Euros.. Are you game with my proposal? I have until end of Sept to \nbuy out the old ticket before they cancel it."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2018, at 9:34 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Well it depends on UK.. if they can't do it, then alas, it would be the whole thing.. I could check for a discount \nticket of course.. and maybe even economy class... There is also a small chance that I might do the event in UK \nwith Noam Chomsky, and I am wondering whether, if I could convince him to join me in a dialogue at your \nplace whether that might change the dynamics of the event for you, and free up some more money perhaps.."}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2018, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence \nyour mail meets me on the way out to a week abroad. \nI need my financial colleague to decide. So, I shall be \nback at the end of this month. \nWhat would our share be?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 17.08.2018 um 16:37", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Jakob \nThere has been a complication. The Gottingen event had to be cancelled so that means I now do not have an air ticket to Germany. I \nam going to check whether I can arrange anything in the Uk which might cover part of the cost for a new ticket. In the meantime I \nthought I should let you know and ask whether it is possible to cover part or all of the cost for a ticket."}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 19, 2018, at 5:52 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Dear Lawrence \nmy colleague is waiting for two sentences on your planned topic... \nCould you save him?..."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 07.06.2018 um 17:40", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Will do."}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 7, 2018, at 1:04 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence, \nI think we take Journey to the Beginning of Time. \nCould you write two sentences for my colleague to \nmake clear where your talk will go for.. \nThis may well lay the groundwork for next year's major focus \non ORIGINES. \nI do look forward to having you here again! \nP.S cc Michael!"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 06.06.2018 um 19:13", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. I hadn't thought of it. I don't know what Jakob would prefer. I could give a science talk.. on, say: Journey to the Beginning of \nTime.. or I could speak about \nScience in the Trump Era.. am cc'ing him here.. Jakob, which would you prefer?"}, {"sender": "Michael Braun", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 6, 2018, at 2:15 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Dear Lawrence Kraus, \nmy name is Michael Braun and I am working on the DAI Heidelberg's fall program brochure. \nMay I ask you if you settled on a topic for your Heidelberg talk? \nIf so, could you send me title and a short abstract for me to include in the brochure and on our website?"}]
| 11
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031307.txt_5881
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031307.txt
|
Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF
EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "8/17/2016 4:11:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF\nEPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\n\ni Oa SPT Pn TS PRESTR TL TR eT PI PTL TL ret reiterate 4"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2016, at 11:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF\nEPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033227.txt_5886
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033227.txt
|
US idiocy
|
[{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/13/2017 1:36:48 PM", "subject": "US idiocy", "body": "re your comment on predicting Trump, there is HL Mencken's famous phrase:\n\n\"It is IMPOSSIBLE to underestimate the intelligence of the American people.\"\n\nand then from Richard Hofstadter's 1964 book on Ant-intellectualism in American Life:\n\"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has\n\nbeen a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that\ndemocracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.\"\n\nOnly thing stupefying me about Trump so far is that all his EPA appointees come from the great wasteland called\nOklahoma—lInhofe et al, climate change deniers to the last, but climate change is inescapable and by going back to\nour old way of doing things, it will merely come all the quicker\n\nall best"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030596.txt_5887
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030596.txt
|
Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 5:54:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "January 30, 2015, 12:00:34 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\n\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to\nwhich he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his\nresponse by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian\nKings Place\n90 York Way\nLondon\n\nN1 9GU"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "29 January 2015 at 16:49", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nI write further to an email sent to you earlier this month, concerning an article we are preparing for publication\nin which you may be mentioned."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025235.txt_5893
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025235.txt
|
J.P. Morgan Eye on the Market, April 9, 2012
|
[{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "4/9/2012 2:11:03 PM", "subject": "J.P. Morgan Eye on the Market, April 9, 2012", "body": "Eye on the Market, April 9, 2012 (attached pdf is easier to read this week)\n\nTopics: Q&A on the USA, with a watchful eye on the risk of giant man-eating plants; Spain\n\nOur view for 2012 was that economic and equity market conditions in the US and Asia ex-Japan would be better than in Europe. So far, that view is on track. Spain in particular is in difficult shape (see page 5); its banks and government may have to borrow 1.5 trillion Euros over the next 12 months while in recession. Both the ECB and EU will need to keep the spigot open to prevent Spain from becoming a bigger problem. This week, some Q&A on the US recovery, flows into bonds and stocks, profits and P/E multiples, municipal bonds, and the long-term US fiscal situation. \n\nThe Fed appears to be saying that no additional monetary easing is needed unless the economy worsens further. Are there any signs that the US recovery is becoming self-reinforcing?\n\nDurable goods consumption, equipment & software spending, vehicle sales, bank loans to companies, manufacturing payrolls (even after Friday’s disappointing report) and housing stats (building permits, multifamily housing starts) have improved over the last few months. While delinquency rates are in better shape (credit card delinquencies are back to 2007 levels), household credit growth is still weak. However, homebuilders are seeing stronger demand, and nationwide remodeling continues to rise. We see opportunities in retailing and building products companies that may benefit from a continuation in these trends.\n\nHas the data really been that good? I heard better US economic data has a lot to do with the weather.\n\nParts of the US experienced the warmest March in recorded history. Measured from December to February, the winter was the 4th warmest on record. I don’t think there are reliable models to estimate the impact of demand being pulled forward, so we will have to see how consumer spending, housing and payrolls behave in the months ahead. As our Chief Economist Michael Vaknin reminds me, other distortions come from the “catch-up” effect from Japan’s tsunami. As shown below, some strength in auto sales came from pent-up demand for Japanese cars, a process which now seems complete.\n\nSo where does that leave the US payroll and growth picture?\n\nThe weakness in the payroll report was almost entirely concentrated in retailing. Net of distortions and seasonal adjustments, it looks like payroll growth is running at 150-175k per month, and GDP growth is running at a 2.25% trend pace, both below prior recoveries. While 2.25% is a barn-burner compared to Europe, it only corresponds to a modest improvement in employment. That’s why 2013 US fiscal policy is so important: this is not a recovery that can withstand much tighter fiscal conditions.\n\nSo, how tight is US fiscal policy supposed to get next year?\n\nVery, if you look at what is supposed to happen according to current law. In the chart, we show the annual change in the budget deficit over the last 25 years. The impact of all provisions scheduled to expire and kick in during 2013 would be very large. But if Congress and the President elect to extend current tax rates, retain lower payroll tax rates and extended jobless benefits, etc, the adjustment would not be as big, and only reflect expiration of Recovery Act provisions, the recently passed Budget Control Act, and some other smaller provisions. There are of course plenty of permutations in between.\n\nWhat direction is the Congress heading, and what did Larry Summers and Brad DeLong have to say about this recently?\n\nPolitical outcomes this fall will affect what Congress does, but I get the sense that they will punt fiscal adjustments into the future if they can, and impose austerity of no more than 1% of GDP in 2013. If so, Congress can point to a March 2012 paper by Summers and DeLong as justification. The bottom line from the paper: don’t tighten fiscal policy when interest rates are near zero. The authors assert that (a) additional government spending can ease the long-term budget constraint in conditions similar to today’s, and (b) tightening policy now would risk permanent loss of human capital, lower labor productivity growth and lower trend growth. They have held these views for a while; the paper appears designed to convince others.\n\nAdvocates for more fiscal and monetary stimulus often point to the charts below. Rising Federal debt has not resulted in higher interest rates, so why not keep borrowing more? As for the Fed, balance sheet expansion prevented deflation and hasn’t resulted in an inflationary surge (core inflation measured over 3 months just came in below 2%), so why not keep doing it? Aren’t these charts amazing?\n\nThey are amazing, but no one knows how long they can be sustained. Even Summers and DeLong concede that “even if it is granted that the stimulus can be both timely and temporary, the question of how large it can be while preserving these attributes remains for future research”. If one of these trends could not be sustained, my guess is that it would be fiscal constraints rather than monetary ones. While it’s great to see rising Federal debt not adversely affecting Treasury markets, the chart on the left reminds me of The Day of the Triffids.\n\nWhat is The Day of the Triffids?\n\nIt’s a 1951 science fiction novel. There’s a meteor shower, and most people go outside to look at it. The next morning, everyone who looked at the meteor shower ends up blind, and Earth is taken over by giant man-eating venomous plants. The point: some amazing events which look benign have unforeseen consequences. Will a pact of going for growth pay the freight of higher Federal debt in the long run? Hard to say; there are not a lot of examples to draw from. Economic theories and their associated debt bubbles don’t always work out as planned [a]. After WWII, the US also faced a debt ratio of 80% of GDP. Austerity was not the answer back then; government receipts and outlays as a % of GDP did not change much during the 1950’s, and net debt was flat. So how did US debt/GDP fall from 80% to 46% in just ten years? Robust annualized real growth of more than 4.0%, and 2.0% inflation. However, unique economic conditions and productivity gains of the 1950’s (e.g., interstate highway, rebuilding of Europe and Japan) may not be repeated, and the country was not headed into an entitlement time bomb. If the US does not experience a growth/productivity boom, the burden of higher debt could last for a generation or more. A pro-growth Administration would probably help, but the difficulty lay in defining exactly what that means. \n\nAre there debt vs austerity parallels at the state and local level?\n\nYes and no. At the state and local level, over last decade, more than 1 trillion in unfunded pension and healthcare (OPEB) related liabilities were recognized (they were accrued over a longer period). Even these “as-reported” estimates, which come from the states, may be underestimated. A 2011 analysis by the Joint Economic Committee shows that lower portfolio return assumptions on pension assets sharply increase the magnitude of underfunded pensions (see chart, right).\n\nHowever, there’s more of an effort at the state/local level to address this issue than at the Federal level. More than 40 states lowered pension benefit liabilities over the last 3 years according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Measures taken include raising employee contributions (while lowering employer payments), raising minimum retirement ages, cutting post-employment healthcare benefits and in some cases, switching to defined contribution from defined benefit plans.\n\nThe good news, to paraphrase Mark Twain, is that reports of municipal bonds’ demise have been greatly exaggerated. From 1970 through to the end of 2011, municipal bonds rated by Moody’s experienced a grand total of 71 defaults among 17,700 issuers (11 of which occurred during 2010 and 2011). General obligation bonds accounted for 5 defaults; 29 were related to housing; 22 for hospitals and healthcare; 3-4 each for education and infrastructure. Utilities and cities registered 2 each, while counties, special districts, and water & sewer and experienced 1 each. The average recovery for defaulted munis was 65%, compared to 49% on corporate senior unsecured bonds. Last comment on municipals: while local tax collections are weak due to the collapse in home prices, state tax collections have been increasing for 7 quarters in a row.\n\nOK, so the US economy is improving, but is still heavily dependent on monetary and fiscal stimulus to grow; and the only belt-tightening one can find is at the state and local level. Since 2009, after equities collapsed and bond prices rose, how have many investors reacted?\n\nBy selling more equities and buying a lot more bonds. See chart above (a global version of this chart looks roughly the same). \n\nHave investors been positioning this way since stocks are expensive?\n\nNot really. Insert a giant martini glass on the chart below from 1998 to 2001 (I hate using simple averages which include periods when the market had lost its collective mind). The current P/E multiple is in the middle of the ex-bubble range of the last 25 years. Some bank stocks look interesting, even after accounting for reliance on shrinking loan loss reserves to drive income, and ongoing regulatory uncertainty. Most US banks are at or close to Basel 3 funding needs, have considerably fewer capital adequacy questions than their European counterparts, and do not rely on wholesale funding to finance loan portfolios.\n\nNow that P/E multiples have risen off the bottom, what’s the outlook for P/E multiples and earnings from here?\n\nThe return on the S&P this year has been a function of P/E multiples rising (from 11.3x to 12.9x), a big part of which has been Apple (3% of the S&P index, 15% of S&P’s YTD returns). As shown below, earnings revisions have been negative for 2012, but analysts are still optimistic about 2013. According to Morgan Stanley, analysts are forecasting the highest percentage of companies posting 2013 margin expansion since 1970, and by a very wide margin. In our view, it will be difficult for multiples to rise further unless earnings outperform expectations, particularly if Europe’s structural problems take center stage again. \n\nThe place that worries me the most: Spain. It ranks at or close to the bottom in a lot of categories (see table), and its growth outlook is poor. Historically, this kind of thing has not ended well. Spain has defaulted 13 times since 1500 AD; it’s probably going to take a lot of bilateral aid and ECB financing to prevent another one.\n\nMichael Cembalest\n\nChief Investment Officer\n\n[a] Example: here’s a link to a 2007 article by Austan Goolsbee, former Chairman of the Council of Economic advisors and a member of the Obama Cabinet. Goolsbee praises the benefits of subprime lending and related affordable housing policies, mocks Congress for holding hearings on the subject and cites Federal Reserve papers in saying that the “mortgage market has become more perfect, not more irresponsible”. Some things are only clear in hindsight. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/29/business/29scene.html?_r=2"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031688.txt_5894
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031688.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 4:57:57 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Bill Siegel thought you might find this of interest:\nhttp://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.8911/pub_detail.asp\nMarch 8, 2011\n\nDenis McDhimmi\nWhite House National Security Adviser Speaks to Hamas-Linked Group\n\nBill Siegel\n\nOn March 6, in anticipation of Congressional hearings on domestic radicalization, Deputy National Security Adviser\nDenis McDonough stated the following:\n\n“President Obama recognizes that through our words and deeds we can either play into al Qaeda’s narrative and\nmessaging or we can challenge it and thereby undermine it. We’re determined to undermine it. For example, we\nknow there are many different reasons why individuals—from many different faiths—succumb to terrorist\nideologies. And there is no one easy profile of a terrorist. But based on extensive investigations, research and\nprofiles of the violent extremists we’ve captured or arrested, and who falsely claim to be fighting in the name of\nIslam, we know that they all share one thing—they all believe that the United States is somehow at war with\nIslam, and that this justifies violence against Americans. So we are actively and aggressively undermining that\nideology. We’re exposing the lie that America and Islam are somehow in conflict. That is why President Obama\nhas stated time and again that the United States is not and never will be at war with Islam.”\n\nThis statement encapsulates so much of what this writer has identified as the “Control Factor:” that function of\nour minds which will distort our perceptions so as not to present ourselves with the ever so fearful reality that\nconfronts us under the banner of Islam today. That is, rather than to clearly see, focus upon, and set about to\ncreate strategies to properly confront the threat which we currently face- a threat that by definition we do not\ncontrol and see little way over which to regain control- our minds essentially collude to reconstruct in a manner\nwhich deludes us with the sense that we are in control.\n\n1. The statement essentially reduces the threat we face to that of terrorism caused by al-Qaeda. By defining and\nlimiting the threat to a band of “radical extremists” who have distorted the doctrine of a great religion, we buy\ninto the sense that our military might and criminal detection methods will ultimately save the day. The fantasy is\nthat this is a problem that we can get our arms around because under our Constitutional principles, terrorism is a\nviolation that we are permitted to fight against."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032381.txt_5898
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032381.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Dangene and Jennie Enterprise", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/27/2016 7:05:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "HAPPY thanksgiving weekend\nSOMADOME"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 27, 2016, at 12:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "really fun, im in palm with the trump crowd"}, {"sender": "Dangene and Jennie Enterprise", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 12:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "soma dome ....How was your thanksgiving ? Love u"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 27, 2016, at 12:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What is the relaxation machine in waiting area"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033189.txt_5906
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033189.txt
|
Fwd: Responding to yesterday's election
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:55:01 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Responding to yesterday's election", "body": "Look what has happened to your borough.."}, {"sender": "Dr. Bruce L. Dennis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Responding to yesterday's election", "body": "Dear Packer Families, \nLike many of you, I am writing this message on very little sleep. Last night was like no other in our \npolitical memory, defying the predictions of the most erudite pundits and political \nprognosticators. \nToday, we are spending a great deal of time unpacking the election results with our students \nacross the three divisions — during morning meeting and throughout the day in Lower School \nclassrooms, in Middle School advisories, during Upper School Community time, as well as in \nmany individual classroom conversations. I write to assure you that we will do our best to handle \nthese discussions with balance, sensitivity, and fairness. \nGiven that last week's mock election among Packer's Upper School students showed that over \n8o% favored Secretary Clinton, I don't think it's a huge leap to assume that there was more \ndisappointment than joy in Packer households as results unfolded last night. At the same time, \nthere are certainly Packer families who support Mr. Trump and are pleased with this outcome. As \na school community, we have an obligation to recognize that there will be a broad array of feelings \ngenerated by the election results, and it is our responsibility as a school to make space for these \nfeelings to be expressed thoughtfully and compassionately, as well as to model the tolerance and \nacceptance of difference that are among our core values. No doubt, we have our work cut out for \nus, but I am confident in the good that we can do as a community. \nThere are abundant lessons to be learned from this election: that experts can be wrong; that our \ncountry is even more deeply divided than many of us had thought; and that abundant numbers of \nour fellow Americans feel a deep sense of despair and disaffection with the status quo of \ngovernment. For us here at school, we will use this as an opportunity to talk with your children in \nage-appropriate ways about demographics, the economy, social policy, our democratic system, \nand the rule of law. We will also talk about the world's response to yesterday's election results, our \nindividual responsibilities as citizens to continue to give voice to our beliefs, and appropriate \nchannels of political activism. On a more basic level, we will stress the importance of not being a \ngloating winner or a sore loser, and about the strength of our nation, its history of responding to \ndramatic political change, and the hopefulness of the future. \nAs for you, our families, I offer two resources. Last week at a NYSAIS heads-of-school conference \nthat I attended, the University of Pennsylvania educator Ali Michael spoke about advancing our \nnational dialogue about race. This morning Dr. Michael wrote a Huffington Post piece, \"What Do \nWe Tell the Children?\", a moving yet direct reminder of how we, as adults, can model our \nresponses for the young people around us. Next Wednesday, November 16, from 6:3o to 8 \np.m., Semeka Smith-Williams and the PA Diversity Committee are holding a \"Post-\nElection Healing\" evening here at Packer. \nPlease reach out if you have questions, suggestions, or simply would like to share your thoughts, \nand take good care."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031526.txt_5908
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031526.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Got it.\nNow remember\nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the\nhillary says you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner, its\ndisgraceful, but. here we are"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 3:24:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "What number"}]
| 7
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032297.txt_5909
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032297.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "dimanche 25 septembre 2016 21:04", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Im in paris all week, hope to see you and family"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey \nWould you like to go with my father at the inauguration of the exhibition on Herge, the father of « Tintin » , a \nhuge celebrity here, at le Grand Palais at 6.30 pm?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "lundi 26 septembre 2016 12:11", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, great. how are you?"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Well what about you ? \nTell me when you are free to see each other \nYou can meet my father in front of the Grand Palais \nI will send you an email if may father decides to go at 6 pm."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "lundi 26 septembre 2016 17:04", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "can my two assistnats join, or should i go alone?"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, 26 September 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Alone, a lot of officials will be there Ministers..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "lundi 26 septembre 2016 18:07", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "Monday, 26 September 2016 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can I have Castro number, I'm outside gran palais"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "mardi 27 septembre 2016 12:19", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "thanks for organizing last night. you father did not appear very well. everything ok?"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/27/2016 10:48:58 AM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "He is tired \nAnd also depressed by the presidential campaign, I will tell you more when we see each other \nI saw the Clinton/Trump debate; she was really good"}]
| 10
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025547.txt_5925
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025547.txt
|
Fwd: US Saudi Arms deal but Note Blackstone Infrastructure Fund with SAMA
|
[{"sender": "Richard John Nawrot", "recipients": ["Terje Rod-Larsen", "Andreas Kraus", "George Henderson"], "timestamp": "May 23, 2017 at 15:13:12 GMT+4", "subject": "US Saudi Arms deal but Note Blackstone Infrastructure Fund with SAMA", "body": "Terje, the attached article appeared in todays FT, I have removed the defence part related to the US$110bn arms\ndeal but highlighted the separate deal done with Blackstone to establish a fund for US infrastructure this is akin\n/ precedent to what we seek to achieve with SAMA focused on global investment fund in Airport Infrastructure\n— Best Richard."}, {"sender": "Terje Rod-Larsen", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/27/2017 11:19:59 AM", "subject": "Fwd: US Saudi Arms deal but Note Blackstone Infrastructure Fund with SAMA", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032395.txt_5938
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032395.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Ken Star", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/25/2016 5:46:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hope Santa (swim trunks donned), reindeer and sleigh successfully made it southward. Yuletide hugs, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 18, 2016, at 5:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if trump fully supports jasta , does that make the consitutional challenge moot?"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028784.txt_5939
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028784.txt
|
2 Seminars-MONEY & POWER possible Invite List
|
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein", "CC <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 19 2012 05:59 PM", "subject": "2 Seminars-MONEY & POWER possible Invite List", "body": "Seminar-MONEY\n\nMarc Andreesen\nPaul Batista (Not sure this is who you mean)\nJeff Bezos\n\nSergey Brin\n\nBill Gates\n\nDanny Hillis\nDanny Kahneman\nJaron Lanier\n\nDick Merkin (?)\nMichael Milken (?)\nNathan Myhrvold\nBoris Nikolic\nLarry Page\n\nTom Pritzker\n\nEric Schmidt\n\nJim Simons\n\nJes Staley\n\nPeter Thiel\n\nIan Osborne (add Ian to both seminar lists?)"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033233.txt_5944
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033233.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Thorbjgn Jagland", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 3:04:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Hope you recover quickly. We have had wonderful days. Tell me when you are coming to Paris so that we can\ntalk. I really don't understand Trump. Today I have to deal with the referendum in Turkey. Endogan is another\ndifficult to understand"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023448.txt_5948
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023448.txt
|
Re: Highlight
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments\n\nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my\nboyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or , getting creamed on\nmy producer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be\nsomeone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there .\nWhen do we do Whitman's \"Song of Myself\" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready .\n\nA few other follow ups :\n\nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget .\nNo writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance , no\nactors , no travel beyond the one location , certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or\ndavid brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said , I think If were hiring the crew id do it for\nless -- probably 1, 250,000 all in . But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David has . That has value too. As does\nWebh . But I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to be much more prepared for\ntempleton, so thank you .\n\nT really liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff , but in googling him I noticed that we have the\nsame birthday! May I have his email?\n\nYou are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? I'll improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep\nreading ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 23, 2014", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "clinton woody kagan , do not add one penny to budget"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "Fab! And tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/24/2014 12:07:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "not sure yet talk in momig"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.txt_5957
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.txt
|
Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)
|
[{"sender": "Moshe Hoffman", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/3/2016 4:51:28 PM", "subject": "Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)", "body": "Hi Jeff,\n\nThanks again for making the time for me last time you were in town. And for your introductions to Brockman\nand Ehud. I have enjoyed all the conversations and been learning a lot. Hopefully, a book or two will come out\n\nof it eventually as well. Means a lot to me.\n\nMartin mentioned that you are thinking about the top questions in various fields and suggested I might think of\nsome of my own and pass them on to you.\n\nIn case you are interested, I list below the five biggest questions that keep me up at night, motivate my life's\nwork, and which I think ought to keep up every social scientist. Happy to discuss with you, if and when you are\n\ninterested.\n\n-Moshe\n\n1) Where do our moral and political views come from?\n\nThe bull shit answers most people accept clearly don't fit the facts; we are not discovering moral truths through\nreason, and our political views are not motivated by a desire to achieve the best policy outcomes. So what does\ndrive these beliefs? And what causes them to have the weird puzzling features they do (e.g., why is a lie of\ncommission so much worse than a lie of omission)? And what causes them to change over time (e.g., slavery\nhas been accepted as moral at many points in history)? And differ across cultures (e.g., ISIS versus the U.S.)?\nAnd across person and context (e.g., Trump vs. Bernie supporters)?\n\nMore generally, we believe and argue all sorts of crap (your vote can make a difference, Jesus loves you, all\nmen are created equal). How do these beliefs and arguments work? Are they just random ideas propagated by\nan amorphous culture, viruses taking advantage of our own psychology for their benefit, ideas that get us to do\nthe bidding of their cynical designers?\n\n2) Similarly, where do our tastes come from? Like the art we like? Or the music?\n\nSome tastes are kinda obvious. E.g., we evolved to like young curvy women because they are the most fertile.\nAnd maybe we like art that reminds us of this or of landscapes that are safe or what not. But there are many\naspects of art and music (e.g. modern art, rap) that are not universally pleasing. So what makes people like these\nthings? What properties do they need to succeed? What role does the artist or the history of the piece play in\nwhat we like? Of course, this question isn't just about art and music, but about all of our peculiar, culturally\nspecific tastes. How does culture shape our tastes? Is it completely arbitrary or is there some logic to its\ninfluence?\n\n3) Where do our political and economic institutions come from and what causes them to have the peculiar\nstructure they have?"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029433.txt_5959
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029433.txt
|
Fwd: Ruberto, Israel & Weiner Trusts & Estates Alert: Estate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 11:00:51 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Ruberto, Israel & Weiner Trusts & Estates Alert: Estate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ruberto Israel & Weiner <info@riw.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "January 3, 2018 at 4:02:49 PM EST", "subject": "Ruberto, Israel & Weiner Trusts & Estates Alert: Estate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act", "body": "January 2018\nEstate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act\nOn December 22, 2017, President Trump signed the \"Tax Cuts and Jobs Act\" into law. The new legislation represents a compromise between House and Senate Republicans on their respective tax overhaul proposals, and is the most significant tax reform legislation to be enacted in over thirty years. Although the inherent complexities of the new legislation, combined with the whirlwind pace of its passage, poses many questions for analysts and tax practitioners alike as they begin to navigate the new tax system, we do have an understanding of what the new law will mean for high net worth individuals interested in advancing their estate planning goals.\nMost of the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the \"Act\") became effective on January 1st, and will sunset (or default to prior law) after December 31, 2025, absent further congressional action. In addition to extensive income tax related changes, including modifications to the individual and corporate income tax rates, doubling of the standard income tax deduction, capping of the state and local tax deduction, elimination of the personal income tax exemption, increase in the exemption for the alternative minimum tax, and decrease in the mortgage interest deduction, the Act temporarily doubles the federal estate, generation-skipping transfer (\"GST\") and gift tax exemption amounts, thereby offering high net worth families enhanced planning opportunities.\nFull Alert\n="}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016465.txt_5960
|
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016465.txt
|
RE: request
|
[{"sender": "Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>", "recipients": ["Susan Edelman <sedelman@nypost.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:27 PM", "subject": "RE: request", "body": "Hi Sue,\n\nRegarding your first question: pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-b, our office’s practice in appellate sex\ncrimes matters is to file documents under seal. This is not particular to People v. Epstein; it is routine\nacross our appellate filings. My understanding is that it is also the Appellate Division’s (the court's)\npractice to maintain such seal.\n\nThat being said, | have discussed your second question with our attorneys. If the Post petitions the\ncourt, and the court asks the People for our positon, we will not oppose the petition for a redacted brief.\n\nThanks.\n\nDanny Frost\nDirector of Communications\nManhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, Jr.\n\n212-335-9400 // @ManhattanDA"}, {"sender": "Susan Edelman <sedelman@nypost.com>", "recipients": ["Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 6, 2018 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "Hi Dan,\n\nPlease explain why the DA's office didn't file a redacted brief, but rather covered up all the facts.\nIf we filed a petition for a redacted brief, would the DA's office fight it or cooperate?\n\nThank you,\n\nSue\n\nSusan Edelman"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026672.txt_5962
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026672.txt
|
Did you see that Trump retweeted my story?
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/17/2017 4:29:23 PM", "subject": "Did you see that Trump retweeted my story?", "body": "I think my wife is going to change the lock on the door tonight.\nhttps://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/842739155230740481"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032663.txt_5969
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032663.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["??"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "?\n??"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of courses"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Unknown"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are welcome at my house always . And more private"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. just send me the address again and the code to the door so i can get to the second floor? and send\nme the day and time.\nthnx"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Unknown"], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "10pm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry that is 2512 for the gate &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Unknown"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i mat the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your housee@©Q"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Unknown"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no come now !!!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/9/2017 7:00:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i forget to ask .. is there any new update about the saudi project that i sent you??"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]
| 11
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022214.txt_5988
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022214.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Apparently Brazil is a hot investment place now (?) It is more about the offset part than the jet deal. France, Sweden and USA are all lobbying to get the jet deal as aviation is tied into potentially big tourism deals. (36 planes) I was just on a call with a guy in Sweden who is dealing with this... I never know if the stories are real, but he claims to work with the Brazilian president, Obama, Warren Buffet etc.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brazil, has tried to buy fighters, in the past, they don't have a lot of money,"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, one of the most complex negotiations they re very strange. Someone buys fighters but with the fighter money, some must be used for specific third party items. I will buy your pussy for 10k, but with 2 of the 10 you have to buy me food. And to make matter worse I need to borrow thev10 from you."}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 31, 2013", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you understand offset agreements? I got asked to be involved in negotiating some of the deals between Brazil and other countries in regards to the purchase of new fighter jets.. What is an offset service provider?"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023312.txt_5991
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023312.txt
| null |
[{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "on the returns. a cashflow that is misleading helped prepare financial statements ( april ) Oversight on new\ngrats- first at 22 and then at 19 that were done without my consultation and were \"resolved\" soley as a result\nof my last minute intervention. . 600 million in after tax savings was just accomplished. (BTW- for some\nreason you left the 30 million outstanding that I had said should only be done\" if” that was my additional\n\nfee. and not used for non biz purposes and not art.\n\nSorry but .,\n\nin June and then again Sept, we both agreed to a 50% of phaidon payout first projected at 20 . but less when\nartspace and debt taken out, - then only after weeks, when you delayed any detailed discussion of money\nwanting to give the issue a thoughtful response ( which I fully understand ) . you unilaterally changed our\nagreement.. 5m would be reserved for the future ? . and out of the remaining 15m ,? 1 would receive only a\nthird. (note: I'm confident that both the debt , and the art space investment will also lead to a write- off of\nanother 30 m. plus ) In my dining room ,you were surprised when I said that i require most people to pay\ntheir advisory fee up front so that I am assured that I will be properly compensated for my work when\nstrategies are implemented . you may recall that you appeared offended and said \" are you suggesting that 1\nwould go back on my word \" I said no , of course not ! you are my closest of friends ,but my experience is\nthat when amounts get large, people tend to get unhappy when it actually comes time for them to pay.\n\nI include below the email i sent to you on April 15, the day i was examining your returns It laid out my\nunderstanding of the compensation agreed for a transaction of the magnitude to the penny of the one just\ncompleted.ic 600m When it appeared that the transcation would and could go foward I was the first to point\nout that our agreement would cost you too much money, therefore\n\nmore details\n\nFrom day one I proposed to discount our agreement toa 50-60 million range. An extremely fair price for\nall the transactions just completed . including Phaidon. - I was never told that this was out of range. in\nfact, alternative methods of payment .ie my plane, or an -in-kind payment were discussed (\n\nie including keeping the 30m portion of the fee outstanding till March ) ,I provided , only because you\nspecifically requested a detailed step by step execution plan and reviewed all documents that 1 was given\naccess to. ( Phaidon was never forthcoming ) in order to make my many corrections . ( as i said more needed\non phaidon ). Iwas then told that Alans involvement warranted a discount. Even in the best of light ,\nthough it is beyond question that not one time in the three years of his retainer has he ever proposed a\nunique idea. (including any way to deal with the use issue on debras death ,or even the most basic review of\nyour largest asset by far , the BRH agreement. ) O.K. - lets say he made a contribution to the plan and stretch\nreality beyond the pale and say it was 50 %. though no one could posit such a large amount unless they were\nwearing a clown suit. , the payment and our formula of 37 percent associated with the deal was known . It\nhad both sent in writing and spoken about on the phone numerous times , a detailed execution plan was\nprovided . then and only then, after the entire transaction was laid out for the group to follow You told\n\nme that after a number of conversations with brad karp that a total of only 20m would be paid , (and even that\nwas more than you originally contemplated ) for both transactions . Leon I feel It was remarkably unfair. Did\nbrad even knew of our prior agreements.? ?, I would ask that you I and Brad karp sit together if you think it\nwould be helpful. . I would like to send him this email, with your consent of course. Ifthe transactions were\nnever consummated , i would not be owed a dime, however , the expected fee was known up front. , the\ndetailed step by step plan was followed and overseen by me, the amount that I had requested before the\ntransaction had even begun, had already been heavily discounted, out of friendship, . I believe the decision re\nonly paying 20m has frankly , left me felling quite uneasy. and colors the view about the Athene or\nRothschild transaction.\n\nyou've agreed that"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016677.txt_6000
|
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016677.txt
|
Town Sewage Effluent
|
[{"sender": "Jim Bowser", "recipients": ["Patricia Gayle-Gordon"], "timestamp": "01/22/2009 01:54 PM", "subject": "Town Sewage Effluent", "body": "Pat, I believe one of the questions asked was what was the sewage flows to West Palm Beach. Here is an email to Peter sent on 1/9/09."}, {"sender": "Jim Bowser/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Peter B Elwell/PalmBeach@PalmBeach"], "timestamp": "01/09/2009 10:36 AM", "subject": "Town Sewage Effluent", "body": "Peter, as requested, attached is sewage flow data from our Lake Worth Billings and ECRWRF monthly report. I am seeking the peak daily flows, but that is going to take additional time.\n\nBase upon the monthly flows, here is the average daily flow for each entity in Fiscal Year 2008 expressed as million gallons a day:\n\nMonth WPB LW\nOct 2.70 0.654\nNov 2.39 0.593\nDec 2.23 0.627\nJan 2.33 0.668\nFeb 2.36 0.691\nMar 2.23 0.672\nApr 2.12 0.561\nMay 2.02 0.408\nJun 2.09 0.389\nJul 2.22 0.552\nAug 2.33 0.537\nSep 2.54 0.563\nYearly Ave 2.30 0.563\n\nTotal average daily flow from Town to ECRWRF 2.863 million gallons a day.\n\nabe\n\nSewage Flows WPB and Ly Fy 2008. pdf"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028960.txt_6004
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028960.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "This is the program David Marr initiated, developed by Shimon Ullman and others. Makes sense, and there are some interesting results. David was a friend, and we often discussed these topics. In fact, his famous three levels adapted a model from generative grammar. But there was always the fundamental problem I mentioned. Vision is an input system, crafting coherent images from lines, points of light, etc. Language is used for that purpose too, but it’s not what language is.\n\nThat fundamental difference, along with the fact that the principles involved seem quite different, has always been a stumbling block to seeking any link."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "thought you might be interested in a new version of the percentage agreement between stalin and\n\nchurchill. Saudi and Iran doing the same , dividing spheres of influence... it seems few people paying\nattention to palestinians . maybe next generation. - israel going further right it appears. I find that media\ninduced fear is driving world markets. . very odd. gas prices down nobody shopping, . hotel prices down less\ntravel. commodity prices way down, little building. luxury market decimated. no russians or chinese\n\nplayers. . still virtually zero interest rates. . borrowing not up, fear and paralysis. , (Iadd these topics as to\nthese at least, i can speak with a modicum of knowledge )"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2015 5:37:14 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Very interesting topics. Would like to hear more from you about them, when we have a chance. Is it worldwide, or\nmostly here?\n\nMy impression is that the fear is mostly in the US. There’s nothing in (much more vulnerable) Europe comparable to the\nVisa Waiver program (insanely targeting Iran, which has not been involved in terrorism, while exempting Saudi Arabia,\nthe source of almost all jihadi terrorism). Or Trump-style ban them all. Or Cruz-style carpet-bomb them. For a long\ntime, probably back to colonial days, this has been a very frightened country, maybe the safest in the world but also the\nmost frightened. Impressions.\n\nSometimes it’s quite weird. By accident, I took the first flight PanAm 103 after the Lockerbie bombing, together with an\nold friend, a veteran Middle East correspondent. It must have been the safest flight in human history. The plane was\nempty. We were bumped up to first class because there was no one there."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016471.txt_6007
|
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016471.txt
|
request
|
[{"sender": "Susan Edelman", "recipients": ["Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, December 4, 2018 6:34 PM", "subject": "request", "body": "Hi Danny,\n\nFollowing up on the Epstein case:"}, {"sender": "Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>", "recipients": ["Susan Edelman <sedelman@nypost.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:28 PM", "subject": "request", "body": "Hi Sue — I’ve confirmed that the brief is filed under seal. It contains the following header on the cover\npage: “Pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-b, the identities of the victims, who are the victims of sex\noffenses, shall be confidential, and this document shall not be made available for public inspection.”\n\nAccordingly we must decline your request. Thanks."}, {"sender": "Susan Edelman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "request", "body": "Thanks. Can you send me a POF of the cover page?\n\nWho issued that order?\n\nWe always get such court documents -- with the names and ID of victims redacted.\nThe whole document is not withheld."}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032342.txt_6010
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032342.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Kraus"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:59:45 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021090.txt_6011
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021090.txt
|
RE: Daily Beast
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Peter Green"], "timestamp": "03 April 2011 12:36", "subject": "Re: Daily Beast", "body": "I cant open anything that is not underlined in blue sorry Peter i am not good at computer stuff.When are you coming here so i can call Catherine Crier please nothing to maryanne about thsi jonathan"}, {"sender": "Peter Green", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 3 2011 03:49 PM", "subject": "RE: Daily Beast", "body": "You are mentioned !\nJeffrey Epstein's Society Friends Close Ranks\nby Alexandra Wolfe"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032532.txt_6012
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032532.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am seeing a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "worse"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:29:13 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey please help me here is she a hooker"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021819.txt_6022
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021819.txt
|
Re: we'll see
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@mail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Apparently...\n\nThey are now asking how my parents bought a building in town...implying it was all the money they got for selling me :)\nGetting ugly.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@mail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "only met Jeffrey Epstein, after | was adult. ( over 18). | was never, ever, his \"sex slave \"\n\n. obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization. which in my opinion could only have been\n\nmade by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to\nme . These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger\nplace and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at\nthe beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would\nhave been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to\nas allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the\nCaribean Island, How he arrived . ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a\n\n21st century tale of power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe ,\nfabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel\nrecords of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously sucha\npreposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he\nbelieved her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging\nin satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. |am currenty a\nprofessional pilot with a spotless record. | have a checklist that | follow before every flight to verify\nthat things are what they are supposed to be , checking her story which the presss has refused to\ndo would serve the public well. In this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the\ntruth ,"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033582.txt_6024
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033582.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:29:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yikes your birthday coming up next month"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well | think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in this\nmarket it's been a trump triumph | gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032254.txt_6025
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032254.txt
|
Re: Are you around?
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Are you around?", "body": "paris 011 331 441 70210"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Are you around?", "body": "Any news?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Are you around?", "body": "none.. trump lawsuit thrown quickly out.."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 11, 2016 2:52:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Are you around?", "body": "all bizarre."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032424.txt_6027
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032424.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to negotiate with developer on your behalf. . or just give your talking points. allowances\n. commisions fees. free maintence etc"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What if I get it and can't resell?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "On Jan 12, 2017, at 9:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iunderstand the fear. thats why we will condition the close on how the others sell"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 2:14:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "That's smart. :-)"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030823.txt_6028
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030823.txt
|
Fw: Little Hodiaki [I]
|
[{"sender": "Steven Elkman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/23/2011 5:29:30 PM", "subject": "Fw: Little Hodiaki [I]", "body": "Regards,\njac\nwww.carbonacapital.com"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030837.txt_6033
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030837.txt
|
J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: "Post-election insight: The road ahead"
|
[{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "11/6/2012 10:24:50 PM", "subject": "J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: \"Post-election insight: The road ahead\"", "body": "We are pleased to invite you to an exclusive J.P. Morgan Private Bank conference call, “Post-election insights: The road ahead,” on Thursday, November 8 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. \n\nThe call will feature Peter Scher, Head of Corporate Responsibility for JPMorgan Chase. Peter is an undisputed expert in political matters, having spent nearly a decade in government service as U.S. Special Trade Negotiator and Ambassador in the Clinton administrations. The discussion will take a closer look at the election results, focusing on the political and fiscal implications and what they mean for our clients globally. \n\nThe invitation below contains full details of the event. \n\nYou are invited to participate in an exclusive conference call\n\nPost-election insights: The road ahead \n\nThursday, November 8, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time\n\nHosted by\n\nJohn Duffy, Chief Executive Officer, J.P. Morgan U.S. Private Bank\n\nFeaturing\n\nPeter Scher, Head of Corporate Responsibility, JPMorgan Chase & Co.\n\nAs the new political landscape begins to take shape, join us to hear Peter discuss:\n\n* Global implications of election results \n\n* Impact on regulatory and “fiscal cliff” legislation\n\n* Bipartisanship in the new environment\n\nTO LISTEN TO THE CALL\n\nToll-free: 877.804.2965\n\nInternational Toll: 706.902.2073\n\nConference ID: 68693542\n\nABOUT PETER L. SCHER\n\nPeter L. Scher is the Executive Vice President and Head of Corporate Responsibility for JPMorgan Chase & Co and a member of the firm’s Executive Committee. Scher oversees Global Government Relations and Public Policy, Global Philanthropy, the Office of Environmental Affairs, and the firm’s Social Finance business, which provides financial services to the impact investing market. He led the firm’s development of the Brookings-JP Morgan Chase Global Cities Initiative, a five-year effort to help the 100 largest U.S. metropolitan areas become more competitive in the global economy. \n\nPrior to joining JPMorgan Chase in June of 2008, Scher was the Managing Partner of the Washington, D.C. office of Mayer Brown LLP, where he had been a partner since 2000 and earlier served as the chairman of the firm's Government and Global Trade Practice, overseeing that practice in the United States, Europe and Asia. \n\nScher spent nearly a decade in government service. Nominated by President Clinton and confirmed by the United States Senate, he served as the U.S. Special Trade Negotiator, with the rank of Ambassador from 1997-2000. In his service as U.S. Special Trade Ambassador, he was one of the lead U.S. negotiators on China's entry into the World Trade Organization, as well as negotiations on trade issues with countries in Europe, Asia and Latin America. He earlier served as the Chief of Staff in the Office of the United States Trade Representative and in the same position at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Scher previously served on Capitol Hill as the majority staff director for the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, and as the Chief of Staff to U.S. Senator Max Baucus.\n\nScher has been active in civic and political activities throughout his career. He served on the staff for the Clinton-Gore campaigns of 1992 and 1996, as well as the Kerry-Edwards campaign of 2004. He has been a member of the Atlantic Council of the United States Working Group on U.S.–European Union Trade and Regulatory Issues and the Asia Task Force for the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 2009, Scher was appointed by the White House to serve as U.S. Representative to the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum (APEC) Business Advisory Council. \n\nScher serves on the Board of Trustees of American University and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He received his B.A. from American University in 1983 and his J.D. from AU's Washington College of Law in 1987."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032430.txt_6034
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032430.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 3:00:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'm going 2/13-2/17. Good news on biz. Do I have to wear a head scarf??"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when are you going ? bizis ok. my guy is flying from new york dubai on the 20th , his plane. i will organzie fun time there for you"}, {"sender": "Kathy Konmnes", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When I go to Dubai on Emirates, do I need to go first or is business class good enough given that I only care about slepeping?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "nice"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got hired by Apple this week to do a patent trial."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iunderstand the fear. thats why we will condition the close on how the others sell"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What if I get it and can't resell?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to negotiate with developer on your behalf. . or just give your talking points. allowances . commisions fees. free maintence etc"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032850.txt_6039
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032850.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon Po"], "timestamp": "2/10/2016 7:07:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Wow"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 10 February 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Its getting scary. The stories you could tell..."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033596.txt_6040
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033596.txt
|
Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft
|
[{"sender": "Eric Roth qq", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Jeffrey-\n\nI need to start off by stating that it is not my intent to go around Shawn Lancaster on this — Shawn is a friend.\nThis being said, I have received e-mails from both you and Larry this weekend.\nI called Larry and he said I should send you an e-mail.\n\nI called a close friend of mine inquiring about the GV market and aircraft that are “not published”. As of today, there are\neight (8) of these aircraft that are not yet on the market.\n\nLet me know if you would like to speak with him and by what means (you call him, he call you, call Larry?....whatever).\n\nBy the way, his company sold Trumps 727 and got Trump a very attractive number for an aircraft that was on it’s way to\na museum.\n\nHope all is well.\nSincerely,\n\nEric Roth\n\nPresident\n\nInternational Jet Interiors\n2221 Smithtown Avenue\n\nLong Island MacArthur Airport\nRonkonkoma, NY 11779"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Eric Rot"], "timestamp": "6/27/2011 4:45:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "of course i will speak send me his number , or have him call 212 750 9895"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032688.txt_6042
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032688.txt
|
RE:
|
[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:11:02 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trtump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025901.txt_6048
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025901.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2015 7:48 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Only go to Greece if you feel well , I just had to send my plane to bring another lefty friend back from\n\nAthens to see a Jew doctor in New York ."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012019.txt_6052
|
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012019.txt
|
RE: New York
|
[{"sender": "Jeff Fuller", "recipients": ["Jean Lue Brunel"], "timestamp": "11/12/2014 11:49 (GMT-05:00)", "subject": "RE: New York", "body": "fean Lue,\n\nlam really sorry you feel so bad and { know it has been a mental and psychological frustration. As you\nknow | chose to partner with you due to your reputation in the business for being a top scout and\ndeveloping a couple world class agencies in the past. | knew what you could bring and | knew what |\ncould bring and contribute and | thought it would be a great partnership. Clearly, | never expected to\nhave the level of challenges we have had recruiting new models over the last several years. | could have\nnever foreseen the problem of your friendship with Jeffrey Epstein turning into the situation it has\nwhere you are seen as guilty by association when you have never done anything or even been convicted\nofacrime. Frankly, | don’t understand the necessity for Conchita Sarnoff or anyone else to continue to\ndefame your name and MC? by asscciation.\n\nIt is true that we constantly have to justify ourselves when recruiting new models. The industry is\nextremely competitive and as a parent myself if faced by the same information and having to make a\ntough decision between too agencies | would not pick MC2 if | saw the article online about you. You\nhave to read closely to see there is not a charge against you but the implication is strong and of course\nnow days everyone believes everything they read online even more than the traditional newspapers of\nthe past.\n\n| know you are now feeling like a liability to MC2. But you personally are not a liability to MC2 but this\npublished information online is a liability. We are not a large enough company, nor do we have the\ncapacity to fight this on a global level. On a google search in America we have put enough information\nonline to not have it popping up so blatantly but we have no controls over the rest of the world or the\nfinances to control this situation and we are affected as every major model agency recruits it’s best\nmodels from all the various countries abroad. This has stunted our growth and our billing over the past\n6 or 7 years. In fact, we do not even know who avoids us based on finding this information. | have been\nsurprised how challenging it is for us to grow due to this problem.\n\n| have also had a tremendous amount of worries from our clients that we are vendors for that are large\nAmerican corporations likes Kohls, JC Penney, Sears, Nordstrom, Target, Neiman Marcus, Macys, Saks,\nBelk, and so forth that require vendor agreements and for us to be considered an upstanding\ncompany. It really worries me as some of those companies have disassociated themselves from what"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032526.txt_6059
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032526.txt
|
Re: SIT Customs
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:57 AM", "subject": "Re: SIT Customs", "body": "Jeffrey \nDue to Staffing issues customs cannot use North Ramp only PreClear in main building. \nTrump is suppose to depart 4pm. Latest 4:30pm \nFlight time: 2+25min \nDo you want PBI customs or PreClear STT? \nThx \nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 16, 2017, at 11:58 AM", "subject": "Re: SIT Customs", "body": "pre clear. heli at 2. thanks"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 4:12:22 PM", "subject": "Re: SIT Customs", "body": "Ok 2pm heli \nPreClear"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025929.txt_6061
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025929.txt
|
Fwd: Gingrich view of Trump
|
[{"sender": "Kenny Shirley [nailitiii@?]", "recipients": ["Danny Shurden", "Brad Bowen"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 12:11 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 9, 2016 at 9:26:23 AM CST", "subject": "Fwd: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "SUBJECT; GINGRICH VIEW OF TRUMP\n\nUnderstanding Donald Trump The Washington Times January 8, 2016 by Newt Gingrich\n\nDonald Trump is a genuine phenomenon. He may or may not become the Republican nominee for president. He may or may not win the presidency even if he becomes the nominee. Yet it is clear that he is a phenomenon and that any history of the 2016 presidential race will have to spend a good bit of time analyzing Trump and his impact.\n\nFrom the time he announced on June 16, Trump has dominated social and mainstream media. He dominates the conversation despite the lack of paid advertising. Trump says outrageous things and his supporters shrug it off. At every turn, his poll numbers continue to rise.\n\nAs a step toward understanding this amazing performance, I spent part of the Christmas break reading his first bestseller, ‘The Art of the Deal’. Written in 1987, this book is a classic among American business books and has influenced a generation of entrepreneurs. Trump wrote ‘The Art of the Deal’ when he was 41 years old and having a successful run. The book’s popularity contributed to Time Magazine’s decision to feature Donald Trump on its cover in January 1989.\n\nThe portrait that emerges from this easy-to-read and remarkably interesting book is of an aggressive, ambitious person who is constantly pushing, constantly learning, and always seeking the next challenge. Reporters and analysts who are trying to understand Trump would be well served by slowing down and reading this nearly three-decade-old bestseller."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028936.txt_6072
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028936.txt
|
an article you may both hate. or like.
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/10/2015 8:09:42 PM", "subject": "Fwd: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "September 10, 2015 at 12:01:39 PM MST", "subject": "RE: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Then we're in complete agreement.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 2:46 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I couldn't agree more. Re ridicule. I never suggest ridiculing people. However by pointing out the inconsistency,\nor contravening evidence associated with various ideas, including for example American exceptionalism, then\nwe are essentially subjecting ideas to ridicule. That is what I meant."}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sep 10, 2015, at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total.\n\nOn confronting dogma, I of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are\nmuch more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find\ndismantling myths of \"American exceptionalism\" or \"Israeli self-defense\" or Obama's mass murder campaign, etc.,\noffensive — so be it.\n\nBut I don't see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while\nrecognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their\nbeliefs are confronted with evidence. I also don't see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as I don't think we\nshould ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with argument\nand evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular dogma)\nare people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For example, when\nthe icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that the US, unlike\nother countries, has a \"transcendental purpose,\" and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to its purpose\ndoesn't matter because the facts are just \"abuse of history\" while real history is \"the evidence of history as our minds\nreflect it,\" then it's hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There's no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR profession\nand the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters.\n\nOn Davis, I frankly think that's a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment\nrequire (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nLawrence\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032268.txt_6073
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032268.txt
|
Re: Oh boy!
|
[{"sender": "Heather Mann", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Oh boy!", "body": "So the last few days have been very interesting over here - what do you think!? Xx"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "28 Jun 2016, at 19:00", "subject": "Re: Oh boy!", "body": "uncertainty ahead. thats all anyone can responsbliy say"}, {"sender": "Heather Mann", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "6/28/2016 6:38:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Oh boy!", "body": "Trump or Hilary?"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033176.txt_6078
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033176.txt
|
FW: Emailing - Trump 1_trump.pdf
|
[{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/13/2016 10:36:57 PM", "subject": "FW: Emailing - Trump 1_trump.pdf", "body": "Attachments: Trump 1_trump.pdf\nImportance: High"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:36 PM", "subject": "Emailing - Trump 1_trump.pdf", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032878.txt_6080
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032878.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 14, 2016 4:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dont know how well you know tom barrack he is great."}, {"sender": "Peter Thiel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:58 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Who is that?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "7/14/2016 12:01:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He will be a speaker at the convention. he runs colony capital. solid, great real estate\njudgement. . donalds fund raiser. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-05-3 1/tom-barrack-the-\ndonald-trump-i-know"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031775.txt_6085
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031775.txt
|
Mueller's Star Witness Against Trump Once Arrested For Child Porn, Hung Out With Pedos Clinton And Epstein (Photo) —Tea Party Pac
|
[{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/22/2019 12:11:49 PM", "subject": "Mueller's Star Witness Against Trump Once Arrested For Child Porn, Hung Out With Pedos Clinton And Epstein (Photo) —Tea Party Pac", "body": "This nut site today has you as an informant for mueller and as being friends with another informant,\nNadler. I assume they don't realize they are undercutting their friend in the white House as well Re: \nAcosta and the Prez himself. I ordinarily would not send a whacko site but this one gets a lot of play.\nhttps://teapartypac.org/muellers-star-witness-against-trump-once-arrested-for-child-porn-hung-out-with-\npedos-clinton-and-epstein-photos/"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033162.txt_6089
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033162.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/19/2012 5:57:05 AM", "subject": null, "body": "I'm in Istanbul, private meeting of asian, middle eastern + north african families. \nApparently Donald Trump is also in town today to open the Trump Tower Istanbul."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033353.txt_6105
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033353.txt
|
trump praising dershowitz..
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn [a", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/29/2019 9:59:45 PM", "subject": "trump praising dershowitz..", "body": "http://www.newshounds.us/trump attacks fox judge napolitano opining obstructed justice deserves impeac hment 042819"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032485.txt_6110
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032485.txt
|
Fwd: production: 16db-stocks published
|
[{"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 1:36:00 AM", "subject": "Fwd: production: 16db-stocks published", "body": "Channeling you! Maybe even the big guy gives it a read. What? This? From the failing NYT?"}, {"sender": "Scoop Notifications <scoop-notifications@nytimes.com>", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "February 15, 2017 at 8:25:29 PM EST", "subject": "production: 16db-stocks published", "body": "Hi Landon Thomas Jr. - \n16db-stocks has been published. \nThe URL is: http://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/business/dealbook/stock-market-investment-trump.html \nPlease consider sharing the article on social platforms. \nThank you!"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031452.txt_6114
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031452.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl\nlauren petrella"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 10:17:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Do you mind if I pass Petrella's contact on to a political reporter? I won't do it unless you say OK because after that I would have no say as to where story goes. Let me know -- its not a big deal for me either way. But at some point this stuff will come out -- as long he continues to top polls."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033435.txt_6116
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033435.txt
|
Re: Call from New Yorker.
|
[{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 8:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Ok. Best to make reversible errors\nI’ve written note for exit strategy 1. Not going to send for few days.\n\nGoing to treat it all as a game till I maybe see her in Beijing and out of character ignore and look past her bad\nbehavior."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "unclear if you meant you ve written notes to yourself re exit or a note you were thinking of sending - BAD\nFORM if latter. you both have still not agreed the rules of the game. so difficult to play . you have laid out\n- this is whati want. . but actually , how it would work , and what her freedoms are. could be . yours.. are\nessential to the plan. I think much of this is your uncertainty and not hers. sorry. and yours is infectious"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers <a", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 9:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "It was latter. Why bad form. Supposed to be face to face?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 9:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "this is only the first quarter of the game. if you call atime out, its on the field and done with dignity, you cant\nretreat into the locker room and send a note to the opposing side. _in the next quarter she will appreciate\nwhatever you've said with respect and founded on strength. you care very much for this person. you might\nwant to demonstrate that. a note does the very opposite. . its like trump firing comey. :)"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 1:45:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Hmmm.\nI think sometimes written communication shows seriousness of thought but see your point"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023056.txt_6117
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023056.txt
|
Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
|
[{"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmaxl@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe, \nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine \nMaxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend. \nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon \ntomorrow. My telephone numbers are_______________________________________\n\n1. says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was \naged 15. Ms Maxwell led Virginia upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was \nnaked on massage table. \nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein \nand directed to copy her. \nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint. \n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant \nand Mr Epstein. \n3. Ms Maxwell kept sex toys and costumes in the Palm Beach mansion and dressed prior to sex \nsessions with Mr Epstein. S Maxwell herself wore black vinyl during sex sessions with Mr Epstein. \n4. Mia. was paid between US $200 and $ 5000 US sex, depending on whether it involved travel and other \nmen. \n5, Virginia was required to have sex with friends of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, including Glenn Dubin, Les \nWexner, Ehud Barak, former Senator George Mitchell and Stephen Kosslyn. \n6. Ms Maxwell introduced to Prince Andrew in 2001 at Ms Maxwell's London house where \nhad sex with him. subsequently was directed to meet him at Mr Epstein's New York house IL.. \nMaxwell directed to sit on Andrew's knee with Johanna Sjoberg. Andrew groped both girls. Ms \nMaxwell directed after this to have sex with Andrew. \nMs Maxwell and Mr Epstein subsequently travelled with IMPto Little St James where she was directed \nto stage an orgy for Andrew and Mr Epstein during which she performed oral sex on \nthem. \n7. was paid extra by Mr Epstein or his employees for these sexual encounters. \n8. Ms Maxwell knewEns age and laughed about it when she introduced her to Andrew. \n9. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein tried to persuade to bear his child. \n10. After sexual encounters with male friends of Mr Epstein and/or Ms Maxwell, Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein \nwould ask explicit questions about what went on. \n11. Mr Epstein's residences in Florida and New York had surveillance cameras that taped the sex sessions and \ntaped Virginia even in the bathroom. \n12. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein arranged for Ehud Barak to have sex with several girls, often at Mr Epstein's \nPalm Beach house. \n13. Ms Maxwell piloted President Bill Clinton in a helicopter to a dinner on Little St James where two \nbrunettes Ms Maxwell, and Mr Epstein were at the table. \n14. Mr Epstein bought Ms Maxwell the helicopter, homes in New York and London and a Mercedes. \n\nAnnette Witheridge \nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday"}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmaxl@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:31:26 2011", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "The Duke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "just got it two minutes ago.. I ye asked g lawyers to send a letter. Not sure„ it is so salcisous and ridiculous, im \nnot sure how to respond„ the only person she didn't have sex with was Elvis"}]
| 6
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.