thread_id
stringlengths 37
43
| source_file
stringlengths 35
37
| subject
stringlengths 0
231
⌀ | messages
stringlengths 88
34.9k
| message_count
int64 1
42
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348.txt_6122
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348.txt
|
Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!
|
[{"sender": "Justin Blackhall", "recipients": ["William L. Blum <EIMIIMI>", "Robert A. Solomon"], "timestamp": "February 29, 2012 10:06:39 PM EST", "subject": "front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": "http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/29/obama-bundler-works-Ts-virgin-islands-tax-adviser/"}, {"sender": "William L. Blum", "recipients": ["Erika Kellerhals", "Edward B. Reynolds, Jr."], "timestamp": "February 29, 2012 10:26:26 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": "Did you guys see this?\nBill"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["W"], "timestamp": "February 29, 2012 10:41:17 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren lndyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/1/2012 3:54:12 AM", "subject": "Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031826.txt_6126
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031826.txt
|
Re: You should see this movie/documentary
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/6/2011 11:18:44 AM", "subject": "Re: You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "I have \nimage001.jpg"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030980.txt_6134
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030980.txt
|
Fwd: Wolff Book
|
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 10:38:12 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Wolff Book", "body": "the public records show i was the stalking horse in the bankruptcy, not 55 million but I had bid 36 m"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 29, 2019 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Wolff Book", "body": "i am sure you read attached articles already on internet..\nhttps://www.rawstory.com/2019/05/new-book-paints-sordid-picture-of-trump-real-estate-deal-involving-russian-oligarch-and-jeffrey-epstein/"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029288.txt_6137
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029288.txt
|
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Summers Te", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press.\nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster.\nThis is a staggering shit show."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers (a"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 2:50:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "saudi?"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029209.txt_6138
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029209.txt
|
Re: Reminder Ed Boyden
|
[{"sender": "Neil Gershenfeld", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2013, at 12:32 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Confirming lunch noon Friday at my office, E15-401. Sunglasses and beach balls optional, hopefully this will be a warm-up for meeting in more entertaining venues."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Neil Gershenfeld"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:08 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Good morning Neil.. .1 am afraid Jeffrey must cancel his trip up today...he is sick in bed and not well. I am so very sorry to do this last minute. Hopefully we can circle back to this soon."}, {"sender": "Ed Boyden <1.>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "July 14, 2014, 4:50:47 AM EDT", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Sorry again for that last minute cancellation in the Spring -- alas, the perils of running a new center, that I no longer control my schedule like in the good old days. But the Obama BRAIN Initiative is running strong, and MIT has a good bid for a seat at the table, so that is good. Want to revisit a time for a chat? My schedule is now much more free, thanks to these BRAIN initiative activities launching..."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 17, 2014", "subject": "Re: Reminder Ed Boyden", "body": "Reminder: Would you like me to set up a call for you with Ed Boyden?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "7/17/2014 1:47:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Reminder Ed Boyden", "body": "Today or tomorowb"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031320.txt_6142
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031320.txt
|
Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
|
[{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hello Jeffrey — \nI hope all is well with you. As per Peggy Siegal's office, I have included here the invitation to the IFP Gotham Awards \nceremony, which will be held on Monday, November 27 at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City. \nThis year's ceremony is going to be another successful event. We couldn't be more thrilled with this year's impressive \ngroup of Tributees. The Actress Tribute will go to Nicole Kidman and the Actor Tribute to Dustin Hoffman. The \nDirector Tribute will be given to Sofia Coppola, with the Cinematographer Tribute going to Ed Lachman. With the \nIndustry Tribute, we will be honoring Jason Blum, founder of Blumhouse Productions. And we simply couldn't be more \npleased to honor Vice President Al Gore with this year's special Humanitarian Tribute. With nominees this year \nranging from Willem Dafoe, Adam Sandler and Robert Pattison to Margot Robbie, Lois Smith and Mary J. Blige, this \nyear's ceremony looks to be the most star studded ever. \nPlease let me know if you have any questions."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey — \n1). \nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I \ncan send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs. \nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable): \nCONTACT NAME: \nADDRESS LINE 1: \nADDRESS LINE 2: \nMany thanks."}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer"], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "The foundation that will be making this contribution is: \nGratitude America Ltd. \n6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 \nSt Thomas, USVI 00802 \nplease send all correspondence including invoice to me via email"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Richard"], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, 11:38 AM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Dear Richard, \nThanks so much for providing this information. I'm offsite today at \nthe ceremony venue, but I will be sure to send everything over to \nyou via email on Monday."}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer"], "timestamp": "Nov 20, 2017, 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "please send info tomorrow as i will be out the remainder of the week"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "November 20, 2017 at 8:48:00 PM EST", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Richard - \nI certainly will. But perhaps you can clarify something for me before I put all this together for the donation. \nJeffrey Epstein had asked to submit the letter and invoice to Peggy Siegal instead, and she had supplied \ndifferent information than below. \nPlease advice how best to proceed."}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Nov 21, 2017 8:29 AM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "is gratitude paying for IFP or peggy?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "11/21/2017 1:44:04 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "gratitude"}]
| 9
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032491.txt_6143
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032491.txt
|
Fwd: update
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 fevrier 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "going to artists studio s much more appropriate , i think"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen\nI hope you are having a great week.\nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on?\nIf not yet, when please"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 fevrier 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Feb 14, 2017, at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in fact, it has started)\nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "mercredi 15 fevrier 2017 13:00:07", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": "There is $1mm in the bank account. We can prepare checks or wires for you to sign upon request. This way book keeping gets done at same time. Just send back up with each request. How does that sound?"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "mercredi 15 fevrier 2017 18:15", "subject": "RE: TR: update", "body": "Thanks Darren\nGood news!\nI'm under the impression that checks will be exceptional (they are more cumbersome to handle), and we will use mostly wires.\nConsidering the time difference, my heavy travel and my own propension to do things at night and on week-ends I would much prefer having an internet code and be able to organize everything online when I need to.\nWhen I use Interaudi (my US bank), they can do that, store the recurring beneficiaries, and do wires in multiple currencies, but I am not familiar with DB.\nOf course, you could also have the same access and help me when needed.\nAlso, your point about bookkeeping is mitigated by the fact that, in any case, I will also need to have someone keeping track of the receipts and inventory, before shipping proofs to you. In any case there will be need for some work on my side before final filing is done.\nOn the other hand, if there is a \"checks and balances\" control issue, there could be a cap to my wiring powers (like the 10 K we discussed), that would be absolutely fine for me if this is the intent.\nPlease do let me know.\nWe can also talk about it (in Hawai now, free after 2 PM your time)\nIn any case, this is good and happy news. I'll review the first list of payments over the week-end."}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant <etienne.binant@example.com>", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 16, 2017 at 9:29:08 PM EST", "subject": "TR: TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nI hope all is well\ncan you let me know if the below modus operandi works for you?\nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/17/2017 7:00:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: update", "body": ""}]
| 8
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030097.txt_6157
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030097.txt
|
Re: Kenya
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/19/2009 8:25:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kenya", "body": "you will be amazed by the aroma"}, {"sender": "Peggy Sicgal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 3:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Kenya", "body": "We are sitting in the Amsterdam airport about to take off for Nair. Headed to Cottar's Camp in the Masai Mara....got Mattie in\ntow...she is dressed as a runaway in ripped jeans and a hoodie and sits on the floor of every airport repacking her knapsack. She is\nnow passed out, like the homeless. Will take photos and send.\n\nWe are going to photograph ourselves with the Masai in the mud huts and say we crashed the winter White house and are posing\nwith Obama's relatives. Miss you. Keep you posted.\n\nDid you see Sarah, the D on tv or speak to her?\n\nxoxo Peg\n\nDe ee ee ee ee ee ee i"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026674.txt_6158
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026674.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/22/2017 5:46:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Plus: my senior Chinese friends tell me the top gave Trump the go ahead to take on North Korea. \nNo idea if it's real."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "22 Apr 2017, at 18:23", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When can I call you ?"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023272.txt_6175
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023272.txt
| null |
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:25 PM", "subject": null, "body": "ahead today than my nov memo layed out = no real candidates. etc .. Ill redo the art partnership under new restrictions of course at no charge, and review the work done by tom/ joslin.\n\njoslin you and I should sit. you won't like it. AT ALL> he is afraid of telling you the story, as he belives brad is your guy and does not want to get fired. ada still refusing to share income tax opinions based on privilege , not under control at all. ? ? joslin said that murphy is not the cfo, as you told me but the coo. and the cfo is the same guy that reported to andrew, mistakes after mistakes not picked up by murphy who joslin described as a kind buffoon . he suggested a new ceo or coo who can make decisions. someone with some financail experience. he asked for a chief decision maker. 50 for year roll in money owed . 30 till july , most up front needed\n\nNov of 13 : I told youtom Eileen and Ralph were not up to the job, you disagreed very vocally and strongly , \" Ralph wrote the book, Tom has been doing it for 15 years and Eileen ran the trading desk at Morgan Stanley. \" Ada who had been working on all your documents for years while at the bank had been brought in- house but created more issues that didn't exist. and phaidon was its own animal\n\nDec 13. you were again annoyed that i said that they needed to be replaced and said \"1 was talking out of both sides of my mouth.\" first time ( email available)\n\nJan 14, you decided that no third year was necessary for my help. andi told you i thought that unwise and even suggested giving you an option at 40 m so there would be no tension\n\nMar 14, I told you that to do the job right , my team would need to do it. not yours it would not be inexpensive, but it would get done properly, you chose not to do itand said lets wait and see\n\nApril 14. We agreed to clean up various past mess.with the end of my work OCT 15th only then would i get paid.. urged JPM ( first of 14 reminders) GS and db accounts to be set up in order to bring your financial structure into the 21 century\n\nJuly 26 , I came to bens party, said new people needed to be hired, keep Eileen till end of year, and Ada till march, you suggested getting ada out earlier\n\noct structured the art partnership , but you wanted to wait until you fully understood ramifications formed the doc in dec to have it in 14,\n\nnov/ dec 14 I told you I considered my work complete separate from art partnership. gave list of things to do.\n\nthree months of you and your high school friend , trying to build a house with little of the relenavt experience. its silly . still no accurate numbers accounting , charts, etc\n\njan 15, I told you joslin cannot hire people, has not so for more than 5 years, former job in a public accounting firm.\n\napril 15 . no senior accountant even in the wings. joslin talking about reaching out to hire the only person he knew( worked in the past with dagazsitno ) and i interviewed 15 months ago. and rejected."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029221.txt_6178
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029221.txt
|
Re: writing up proposal
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New <________>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "writing up proposal", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \n\nLarry has told me that you and a friend would like to contribute to my project (hallelujah and thank you a million times, Jeffrey) and that I ought to write up a proposal asking for 500,000. This is wonderful. If this comes to pass, the best way for that money to come, I think, is as a gift to Poetry in America, an initiative at EdLabs at Harvard University. This will give me discretion over its disbursement to HarvardX and WGBH, but this will be absolutely be a Harvard gift that will count as Campaign success and from which Harvard will take some (but not as much)overhead. . So far the best finance people I've met are at EdLabs and they are happy to manage these funds for me. There are other ways to give me this money that leave Harvard out, but my understanding is that your friend would like this to be a Harvard gift. \n\nHere's a draft of what I'd like to do with that money. \n\nI'd like 500,000 to do post-production and distribution of a whole historical period of American poetry (1914-1945 is what I'm thinking—Modernism) and including three episodes of tv. \n\nThe raw materials for that period include interviews with Bill Clinton (including footage not yet used by WGBH), Peter Gallison, Walter Isaacson, Lena Dunham, Woody Allen (whose lawyers didn't like our release a while ago, but we're hoping will soften over time), Harrison Ford (still a maybe), Robert Polito, Sarah Kay, Al Filreis, Rafael Campo, Susan Howe, kids from Nantucket High School, kids from Brookline High School, Alfre Woodard, Jane Pickering, Jay Parini, Ray Dalio, Leon Wieseltier, Richard Dawkins and others; and footage shot in Harlem, Greenwich Village, midtown, Chicago, London (if I have the money to hire a crew there; don't now ), at museums including the Fogg, Harvard Museum of Natural History, Frost's house in Ripton Vermont and more. \n\nThis allows the donor to give to a big Harvard Campaign priority, Teaching and Learning , by supporting Poetry in America, allowing me to produce the crucial segment of the online course with the highest (TV quality) production values and so also supplying higher quality video to WGBH as a way also to cut their costs. \n\nCurrently, HarvardX skimps (on lighting, for instance--see the Bill Clinton interview) and while WGBH ladles money raised by others into everything. I have been pounding away at my friends at WGBH and I know that WGBH producer will work with HarvardX if they can give him footage of the right quality. . That is, we'll use HarvardX as the backlot for WGBH so as to squeeze three episodes out for 250. \n\nThis proposal does not include experiments in schools or the curricular development into courses for teachers that you've seen in other (million dollar ) proposals. But the courses for teachers can't happen before the footage is developed, and these courses will have as their centerpiece the WGBH episodes, and so this funding will make all the rest possible. \n\nI can polish this narrative and or edit it, if there are things you think I have wrong. \n\nAnd I can attach a draft budget based on real Harvard numbers (what my Harvard video editor, producer, media manager cost) as well as a draft WGBH budget I'll now go an negotiate with them. Or we can do that at a second stage. \n\nLet me know what you think? And when are we reading Whitman together. Why don't we set a date for Feb when Poetry in America 3: Whitman is running online and we could screen a little video and then have a discussion around your table with you and some friends?\n\nLisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa Ne"], "timestamp": "10/27/2014 3:53:38 PM", "subject": "Re: writing up proposal", "body": "I think the proposal for 500k is optimistic but can't hurt. ."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030770.txt_6180
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030770.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Looks like I can't get away. But will be back in NYC on Sunday. Let me know when you're back too. I have a bad feeling about this new Woody round. It could pull him into the general Harvey pool of the despised and shunned. Clearly what Ronan and company are hoping for. I think Bannon may be right. This is not going to end until Trump goes down."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 4:52:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Strange time I have two more friends up to bat"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026106.txt_6184
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026106.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You can come earlier if you like?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 29, 2017 at 8:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can you call my cell"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/2/2017 11:22:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At wake now. Is AM ok - what is #"}]
| 12
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030764.txt_6185
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030764.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/19/2017 10:17:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is best for you? no worry, I ve hardly had a moment. everyone in govt wanting an explanation of trump. SO MUCH FUN"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 10:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sorry Jeff, had put my phone in a corner and didn t think you would come in the end \nHow long are you staying? I'm I'm Megeve with guests today \nI can come after any day after \nAriane de Rothschild"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "17 Feb 2017, at 21:28", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when?"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025134.txt_6187
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025134.txt
|
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Summers <lhsummers@harvard.edu>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press.\n\nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers <lhsummers@harvard.edu>"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 27, 2017 6:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "saudi?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Was there. Spoke well. Spent time w Softbank deputy Najeev or some such PIF guy too.\nFlying back.\n\nHow is life among the lucrative and louche?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "anyone stand out. . ? when we meet I will endeavor to mesmerize you with stories of\nD.C. so wild. !!!."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "War seems more likely than I used to think\n\nDjT is world s luckiest guy in terms of opposition, economy etc. still think his world will collapse.\n\nI’m trying to figure why American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be\nirrelevant to your admission to Harvard, but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can’t work at a network\nor think tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023266.txt_6189
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023266.txt
|
Valuation Discount
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "I ve have always given you my best advice, If you reflect on your financial life , you have been kept safe ,\nhad remarkable results and no disasters. I have repeatedly urged you to get rid of the people in your\noffice. , you have repeatedly chosen to ignore my advice , you told me last week that the emotional\nreason was in order to be weaned off my group and not have to pay my high fees. ( though ignoring\nthe benefit of between 1.5 and 2b to the better. ). and no explosions. | You have email after email\n,where i remind you that I am not your bookkeeper or accountant (in brads corporate speak his\" finance\ndebt ??!!) that it should be redone .I have reviewed a multitude of the silly reports given to you and\nhave pointed out the continued numerous inaccuracies. your question \" so what if the numbers are off ,\nso what if the categories are off. whats the big deal??. I suggest you de risk you finances and make the\ntough decisions necessary - pay the right amounts ( high) to get the work done properly or , you are , Im\nafraid, certain to get an unhappy answer.. tom will be back from vacation. this week."}, {"sender": "Halperin, Alan", "recipients": ["\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:16 PM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "I am attaching a draft response frong Empire Valuation as to why it arrived at a valuation discount on the\nlow end. Let’s discuss the response and next steps. Thanks. Alan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spin", "Leon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:20 AM", "subject": "Valuation Discount", "body": "Yesterday , I again spent hours upon hours of my time with your office. ,( speak to brad to get\nflavor) and you and 1 will discuss the results in gory gruesome detail on Friday. it mirrored many other\nweeks spent doing the things that I don;t have the time to do.\n\nIn order to keep things in perspective, maybe reviewing an analogy I have used before with you,\n\nmight be helpful. You and your family are a 6 billion dollar corp. with an income between 250 -500\nmillion dollars per year. It contains a few operating biz's , a large wide array of existing investments,\nin various categories ,a desire to enter into others. A panoply of loans, notes. purchases, wide range\nof all types of taxes. , planes. boats homes. . trusts ,grats. a crazy number of bank accts. ( with no\noversight ) . law firms, acct firms, 800 page tax returns, foreign firms. art consultants.\nconstruction consultants bill payers, home mgmt.,vast multitude of Ilc's , including foreign, and with\nall that you only have a combined overhead of less that 3 million dollars.\n\nI have previously sent you the very same note that i have enclosed again below ,this time with\nhighlights . I wrote it to you over a year ago. As my acute disability ( selective memory) seems to\nhave been raised as one of your concerns , as aruleI try to memorialize things in writing in an\nattempt to lay out issues that I fear may later turn out to be a problem. ie what 1 would and wouldn't\ndo , - my responsibilities. ete and those things that are not. below you will find details of things that I\nthought needed to be done, so that you wouldn't find yourself in the very place where you currently\nfind yourself. however ,you chose to defer many of my suggestions- see below -,until only weeks ago.\n! you chose to defer the jpm acct. the art partnership on and on - into this year. and though the 60- 50"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032703.txt_6192
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032703.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 2:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As usual you nailed it....tomorrow will be an interesting day"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 8:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 3:37:00 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Call ne."}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025652.txt_6194
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025652.txt
|
an article you may both hate. or like.
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss <lkrauss@asu.edu>", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky <noam@gmail.com>", "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total.\n\nOn confronting dogma, I of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. —\nare much more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics\nfind dismantling myths of “American exceptionalism” or “Israeli self-defense” or Obama’s mass murder campaign,\netc., offensive — so be it.\n\nBut I don’t see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology,\nwhile recognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while\ntheir beliefs are confronted with evidence. I also don’t see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as I don’t\nthink we should ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief\nwith argument and evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of\nsecular dogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard\n\nsometimes. For example, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International\nAffairs informs us that the US, unlike other countries, has a “transcendental purpose,” and the fact that it constantly\nacts in contradiction to its purpose doesn’t matter because the facts are just “abuse of history” while real history is\n“the evidence of history as our minds reflect it,” then it’s hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There’s no point\nridiculing virtually the entire IR profession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads\nto major human disasters.\n\nOn Davis, I frankly think that’s a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment\nrequire (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I think religion plays a major positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030002.txt_6199
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030002.txt
|
Re: ICYMI
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Reid Hoffman"], "timestamp": "7/5/2015 9:30:29 PM", "subject": "Re: ICYMI", "body": "heyy it looks like your diet program has worked"}, {"sender": "Reid Hoffman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:03 AM", "subject": "ICYMI", "body": "My occasional roundup of interesting links and writing I've shared — in case you missed them. :)\n\nNew and Notable\n• We are thrilled to welcome Sarah Tavel to Greylock Partners. LINK\n• And also very excited to welcome lynda.com to the LinkedIn team! LINK\n• Change.org celebrates its 100 million users milestone. Emily Chang discuss this and more with CEO Ben Rattray on Bloomberg West: LINK\n• Byron Auguste launched Opportunity@Work, a new civic enterprise aimed at \"rewiring the U.S. labor market.\" Tom Friedman's post: LINK\n• Mimi Ito launched Connected Camps, a summer online coding camp using Minecraft. LINK\n\nWorthwhile Reads\n• Jeff Weiner: How Linkedln is Helping Power the President's Tech Jobs Initiative LINK\n• The New Yorker: RU There? - Nancy Lublin and Crisis Text Line LINK\n• Fast Company: Inside Obama's Stealth Startup LINK\n• Jerry Chen: The Age of Developer-Defined Infrastructure LINK\n• Sheryl Sandberg's powerful tribute to Dave Goldberg. LINK\n\nSome of My Recent Essays\n• Wired: Why the block chain matters LINK\n• Financial Times: Acquiring proven entrepreneurs is a smart way to innovate LINK\n• Press Start to Continue: One More Role of Founders LINK\n\nTo Watch\n• My conversation with Peter Thiel at CEIBS LINK\n• I enjoyed participating in this fun video by Founders Forum imagining what life would be like for tech entrepreneurs if the World Wide Web had never been invented. LINK\n\nInterviews\n• Vox: My discussion with Ezra Klein on the biggest lie employers tell employees LINK\n• Entrepreneur: Why I'm betting big on Bitcoin LINK\n• HuffPo: My discussion with Dawn Nakagawa in advance of the World Post conference LINK"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029553.txt_6201
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029553.txt
|
Re: Keating Interview
|
[{"sender": "Katherine Keating <katherine.keating@unknown>", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/28/2011 12:36 AM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Paul Keating explains as never before"}, {"sender": "jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "10/28/2011 12:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Are you here\n\nSorry for all the typos. Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/28/2011 4:33:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Yes. Just arrived back from San Fran."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032446.txt_6208
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032446.txt
|
Re: Kuhn
|
[{"sender": "Robert L. Kuhn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Jan 11, 2017, at 2:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Dear Jeffrey:\nAttached, as promised, is our proposal for Closer To Truth to produce the definitive television series on \"The Science of Sleep and Dreams\" - 13 episodes, a full season, on —200 PBS stations, plus extensive web videos. Contemporary advances in sleep/dream research makes timing propitious.\nThree documents:\n1) Proposal (12 pages)\n2) Budget (line item)\n3) Schedule (weekly)\nPlease confirm receipt.\nI'll be in New York from January 19 until about February 8. Love to meet - on Sleep/Dreams and all sorts of fun stuff to cheer our 2017.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Just got to New York - love to meet, brainstorm.\nFrom Washington, my inauguration-day commentary and conversation with Chinese experts on Sino-US relations under Trump - https://youtu.be/OGdulpmeVNM?list=PLt-M8o1W GdSZbSuplmsSS5JZzlhIWpGb\nEarlier interview on BBC \"What Chinese think of Trump\" - two minute excerpt\n- http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04m9b4\nLooking forward, Robert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Jan 22, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/25/2017 7:26:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "When's good to meet?"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032236.txt_6210
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032236.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon Po", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/10/2016 7:13:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Actually I don't think he/voters would care. Being effectively shameless is a pretty powerful weapon\n\nfor a presidential candidate.\n\nhttp://www.vox.com/2016/2/10/10956978/donald-trump-terrifying"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Wow"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Lando", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 10 February 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Its getting scary. The stories you could tell..."}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033390.txt_6215
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033390.txt
|
Re: Maybe you can answer this question...
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas"], "timestamp": "5/11/2018 8:31:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Maybe you can answer this question...", "body": "nixon adage-- follow the.."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Maybe you can answer this question...", "body": "https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/05/11/alan-dershowitz-donald-trump-what-happened-218359\n\nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\n\nhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon%20jr%20thomas/index.html"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030957.txt_6230
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030957.txt
|
Re: Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times
|
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times", "body": "https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/politics/trump-hush-payment-stormy-daniels.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 5, 2018 at 1:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times", "body": "Good catch and yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "5/5/2018 10:07:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times", "body": "Once you know the code it's all clear"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031491.txt_6231
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031491.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/10/2016 12:45:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it. \nNow remember \nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the hillary \nsays you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner, its \ndisgraceful, but. here we are"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032320.txt_6232
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032320.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 29, 2016, at 2:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/31/technology/peter-thiel-defends-his-most-contrarian-move-yet-supporting-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/29/2016 9:04:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Peter is looking smarter each day... \nHeading to Lynn wake tonight. \nI believe Lesley Bella Bebe went this afternoon."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032334.txt_6237
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032334.txt
|
Re: told you
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/5/2016 11:56:17 AM", "subject": "Re: told you", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\nSent from my iPad"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.gov"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 04, 2016 5:59 PM", "subject": "Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal", "body": "This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.\n\n***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.\n\nU.S. District Court\nSouthern District of New York\n\nNotice of Electronic Filing\nThe following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on 11/4/2016\nCase Name: Doe v. Trump et al\nCase Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA\nFiler: Jane Doe\nDocument Number: 15\nDocket Text:\nNOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas)\n\n1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to:"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023299.txt_6240
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023299.txt
|
Fwd:
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella", "Leon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:20 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Yesterday , | again spent hours upon hours of my time with your office. ,( speak to brad to get flavor) and you and i will discuss the results in gory gruesome detail on Friday. it mirrored many other weeks spent doing the things that I don;t have the time to do.\n\nIn order to keep things in perspective, maybe reviewing an analogy I have used before with you, might be helpful. You and your family are a 6 billion dollar corp. with an income between 250 -500 million dollars per year. It contains a few operating biz's , a large wide array of existing investments, in various categories ,\n\na desire to enter into others. A panoply of loans, notes. purchases, wide range of all types of taxes. _, planes.\nboats homes. . trusts ,grats. a crazy number of bank accts. ( with no oversight ) . law firms, acct firms, 800\npage tax returns, foreign firms. art consultants. construction consultants bill payers,\nhome mgmt.,vast multitude of Ilc's , including foreign, and with all that you only have a combined overhead\nof less that 3. million dollars.\n\nI have previously sent you the very same note that i have enclosed again below ,this time with highlights\n\n. I wrote itto you over a year ago. As my acute disability ( selective memory) seems to have been raised\nas one of your concerns , asa rule I try to memorialize things in writing in an attempt to lay out issues that I\nfear may later turn out to be a problem. ie what i would and wouldn't do , - my responsibilities. ete and those\nthings that are not. below you will find details of things that I thought needed to be done, so that you\nwouldn't find yourself in the very place where you currently find yourself. however ,you chose to defer\nmany of my suggestions- see below -,until only weeks ago. ! you chose to defer the jpm acct. the art\npartnership on and on - into this year. and though the 60- 50 40 timber emails all carried with it a clear warning\nthat you needed to do something re personnel if it were to stabilize,- you chose to wait.\n\nONE YEAR AGO\nFeb 17 2014 i wrote:\n\nWith regard the more pressing issue I am uncertain of just how to proceed. I am torn, as my very strong\ninclination is not to be involved at all. It is extremely time consuming, delicate, fraught with many pitfall many\nthat will make you very upset and a major pain in the ass. I wrote you months ago that the quality of the people\ninvolved need to be upgraded. ( lucky for me these last issues arose way before the beginning of my\ninvolvement ) Iam also aware however of my overarching friendship obligations of ok, -given all the\ncomplexities who else can do it? problem.\n\nYour family office needs a daddy. children with good intentions are running around , sniping , nitpicking with"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:16 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "will continue to say so , and you obviously decide. but I will reiterrate even in the face of your \"nobody is\ngood enough argument.\" keeping foremost in my mind that you and I have only beeen shown a very tiny\nhandful of people. 4. I find the friction over fees , counterproductive. in an attempt to avoid it I had\nsuggested a multi year deal early on. you rejected it. I then suggested, and urged you to have an option at a\nfixed fee , you also rejected that .you wanted the fee payment only at the end I argued but ,conceded. I\nsuggested a structure that tom didn't like. you rejected it. 5 I suggest you make a fair proposal.- that 1 can\neither accept or reject. some payment up front this time is a requirement. I am willing to modify any outstanding\nobligations. - there are creative ways to assure you of your desired characterization of those payments. 6 you\nshould open accts at Deutsh . and goldman. I am told that eilleen has set up over one hundred bank acccts for\nyou???!!. few relevant 7 you should immediatly demand a list of all her acct authorites , exec poistions\n\n. director etc. bank authorizsations. etc. talk later or over the weekend if you like\n\nkkkyjkjjjkjjyou said"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032924.txt_6242
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032924.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you are always welcome. if you would like to visit caribean , ican organize. anytime with wife your\ncall. otherwise new york dec.6-9? \\\n\ninteresting times. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-\nuse-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016 at 11:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Darn. On a cruise in the aforementioned Caribbean that week. Weekly Standard post-election\ncruise. Bad timing on our part.\n\nWe'll try for January-February in warm climate, or NY when you're next there.\nMany thanks."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you going to stop in st thomas on your cruise?"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 19, 2016 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Greetings! Just got my hands on the itinerary. Alas, no St. Thomas. Back to the drawing board.\n\nHope you're well. Best, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 19, 2016 at 7:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope thanksgiving is peaceful . miss talking to you"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 19, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And to you as well. We'll be at the Breakers en famille as of Tuesday evening.. Any chance to see you in\nthe Sunshine State?\n\nHugs, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 19, 2016 at 11:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'll be there wed"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 20, 2016 at 2:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fabulous! May I buy you lunch?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "11/20/2016 6:53:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "great great anytime at your convenience or you can come to the house ,"}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033384.txt_6244
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033384.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 25, 2011 8:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "donald attnny?"}, {"sender": "Jack Goldberger", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 25, 2011 9:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Looking for his name. haven't located yet"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 25, 2011 9:36 am", "subject": "Re:", "body": "was it Rampell."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/25/2011 3:00:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Paul Rampell does act as Donald Trump's attorney for some personal, real estate and Town of PB matters. James Green\nof WPB also does work for Trump (like the American flag matter) usually through Rampell. I think another firm was doing\nthe airport flight path and expansion matter."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022839.txt_6246
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022839.txt
|
Re: How are you holding up?
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "1/16/2015 7:52:31 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "it is the begining world currencies are out of balance. brazil, etc"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "I think the big issue is separating yourself from Andrew. I mean I can see why a statement might help in some way -- but its Andrew (not clinton and the rest) that is keeping the story alive. Until you are able to come forward and address that the story lives on. I mean in the end he had consensual sex with And {worked for you. The rest is atmospherics. You have moved on! People don't know that and cant accept that unless you say as much.\n\nDoes franc drama worry you? Am writing on it now..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned , or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire [I time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere. each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers J “She never saw anything that {J claims. She can confirm 1. Iwas never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained , not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship , I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. .7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. (no sex _).. they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, ..8 . J answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025875.txt_6248
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025875.txt
|
fact checking questions for New York Magazine story
|
[{"sender": "Alex Yablon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 31 2015 03:23 PM", "subject": "fact checking questions for New York Magazine story", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nSorry for the phone tag. In case it's easier to respond by email, I have put my questions below. I'm at my desk and should be here until 5, and should be free on my cell phone after 6:30.\n\nBest,\n\nAlex\n\n-what is the square footage of your Manhattan home?\n\n-do you work on alaptop from your dining room, with a large white board for notes and several pairs of reading glasses close at hand? Is the dining room windowless?\n\n-do paparazzi often camp outside your home?\n\n-did Michael once visit on the same day as a head of state who'd had a police escort?\n\n-did you tell Michael about a dinner you'd hosted for six tech entrepreneurs who had a combined worth of several hundred billion dollars? When was this meal?\n\n-Do you believe that there are now more people who possess Roosevelt or Carnegie-levels of wealth, the sort that can rival governments in influence? That these people face unusual challenges when entering philanthropy due to the sheer size of their fortunes? That the rich may know the business that made them rich, but not money itself?\n\n-are you interested in what will happen to the $4.2 trillion possessed by the super-rich in 40-odd years once they have mostly died?\n\n-Do you believe no superrich people want to give their entire fortunes to their children for fear of how it might affect them?\n\n-do you advise the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on how to convince other billionaires to join their initiatives?\n\n-did you volunteer to invest $20 million dollars in Michael's attempt to buy New York Magazine in 2004?\n\n-do you believe the recent claims about Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew in relation to you are \"ludicrous\" ?\n\n-When you met Michael for lunch in the West Village, was it the first time in 10 years you'd gone to lunch at a restaurant?\n\n-Do you have a support staff of young women in their 20s and 30s? Have some of them worked for you for many years, through their own marriages and as they raise families? Have any of these employees been romantically involved with you? When Michael came to your home, had one of these women recently gone on an around the world honeymoon, which you arranged? Do they often travel with you to your other homes — in New Mexico, Paris, Palm Beach, and in the Caribbean? Do you maintain there is no quid-pro-quo in the relationships with these women? Do these women often socialize with the policy makers and businessmen with whom you often meet?\n\n-Is your current girlfriend a dental student you met four years ago at a dinner party in New York?\n\n-Did you date Eva Andersson Dubin? Have you known her for 30 years? Did you pay for her to go to medical school?\n\n-when you take meetings in your Manhattan dining room, do you take your guests out to a Sabrett hot dog cart? Will the women who work for you accompany you?\n\n-Did you invite Michael to sit inon a presentation by a group of quants? Are you looking for a group of quants who have developed promising investing algorithms, and do you plan to invest $5 million with each?\n\n-during U.N. Week in late September, did you host a Sunday night discussion with Bill Gates, Mort Zuckerman, and Peter Thiel? Was anyone else in attendance? Were you discussing a possible Gates Foundation donor advised fund?\n\n-Did you host Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim and several others from Qatar? Do you know if the Sheikh has ahome across the street from you in Manhattan? Did they talk to you about bribery compromising their bid for the World Cup? When was this? Did they bring a gift of chocolate made with pistachios grown on the Sheikh's farm?\n\n-The morning after the Qataris came over, did you have a9 AM breakfast with the attorney Reid Weingarten? Did you discuss his defense of CT governor John Rowland, the Qatari visit, and who controls ISIS? Did Weingarten believe Turkey was using ISIS as a proxy against the Kurds?\n\n-After this, did you meet with Brock Pierce to discuss bitcoin? Did Larry Summers join this meeting?\n\n-That evening, did you host Australian PM Kevin Rudd and Thorborn Jagland for a cocktail party? Did Jagland critique US foreign policy? Did you offer to fly him back to Europe on your jet?"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026935.txt_6249
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026935.txt
|
Trump's ex-lawyer Michael Cohen will testify at House Oversight Committee before entering prison
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn [i", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2019 8:23:40 PM", "subject": "Trump's ex-lawyer Michael Cohen will testify at House Oversight Committee before entering prison", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/10/ex-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-to-testify-to-house-oversight-committee.html\n\nImportance: High"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032222.txt_6250
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032222.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 1:28:50 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Trump is living proof of the adage that it is better to be lucky than smart."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029505.txt_6261
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029505.txt
|
Middle Eastern Monarchs Look at the Trumps and See Themselves — Foreign Policy
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/28/2018 10:56:02 PM", "subject": "Middle Eastern Monarchs Look at the Trumps and See Themselves — Foreign Policy", "body": "http://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/28/middle-eastern-monarchs-look-at-the-trumps-and-see-themselves/amp/\n\nMiddle Eastern Monarchs Look at the\nTrumps and See Themselves\n\nAmerica's Arab allies have always wanted to buy direct access\nto U.S. foreign policy, and they finally found a seller.\nMay 28, 2018\n\nIvanka Trump andJared Kushner at the presentation of the Order of Abdulaziz al-Saud\nmedal at the Saudi Royal Court in Riyadh on May 20, 2017..MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty\nImages)\n\nAlmost 20 years ago when I was a graduate student living in Cairo, I published an article in\na Washington-based journal called Middle East Insight. The magazine had a solid\nreputation, with a knack for scoring interviews with important people. (In the same edition\nas my piece, titled “Egypt’s Next Generation,” there was an interview with Gamal Mubarak,\nson of long-term Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, who had already begun his rise —\nthough not yet his eventual fall — as heir apparent.) A few years later, Middle East Insight\ndisappeared. When I heard the news, I figured the magazine was too niche for an expanding\nmedia environment, shrugged my shoulders, and went on with life.\n\nI hadn’t thought about Middle East Insight until its onetime publisher, George Nader,\nrecently exploded into the news as an international man of mystery at the center of an\napparent attempt to covertly influence the outcome of the last American presidential\nelection. It seems that in the span of not quite two decades, the guy who ran a small, likely\nnot profitable, but influential policy magazine become a conduit between Crown Prince\nMohammed bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan of the Abu Dhabi, Saudi Crown Prince\nMohammed bin Salman, and Donald Trump’s closest inner circle, both after, and —\ncrucially for special counsel Robert Mueller’s ongoing criminal investigation — before\nTrump’s election as U.S. president."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019321.txt_6268
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019321.txt
|
Re: Fw:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 01:51:58 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "9th circle"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Hicks?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 02:02:16 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "If you are going to play here , you'll have to spend time, europe by remote doesn't work . Lots and lots of face time and hand holding"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 6:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "its doable , but time consuming, there are many leaders of countries we can organize for you to have one on ones. however. you will have to come , stay 8 -10 days. , then no more than two weeks later. the same. The fear is that you gin up their hopes and emotions and then abandon them. I think you want to be an insider, not an outsider flying in and out. did you get the first cut of american carnage?.?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Agree 100%\nHow do I do that???\nAmerican Carnage amazing -- An Emmanual financed it and he loves it---Erolls besties tell him it will end his career because he gave a platform to a monster\nOfficially in Venice, Toronto and New York Film Festival\nSkipping telluride"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 23, 2018, at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "We can talk about at your convenience"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/23/2018 1:50:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": ""}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032918.txt_6274
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032918.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any new york plans"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thanks for checking in. I'll make some. What timing would work for you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you are always welcome. if you would like to visit caribean , ican organize. anytime with wife your call. otherwise new york dec.6-9? interesting times. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Darn. Ona cruise in the aforementioned Caribbean that week. Weekly Standard post-election cruise. Bad timing on our part.\n\nWe'll try for January-February in warm climate, or NY when you're next there.\nMany thanks."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you going to stop in st thomas on your cruise?"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Greetings! Just got my hands on the itinerary. Alas, no St. Thomas. Back to the drawing board.\nHope you're well. Best, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "11/20/2016 1:48:58 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope thanksgiving is peaceful . miss talking to you"}]
| 7
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033016.txt_6277
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033016.txt
|
Re: I look forward to hearing from you
|
[{"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:11 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\ncan you please tell me about your interest in the vagus nerve? Why is the vagus nerve important to you? Perhaps you can refer me to web site where I can learn more about your take on it.\n\nbest wishes,\nStanley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 3:22 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/private-donor-helps-fund-scientists-after-trumps-proposed us 599f532ae4b0dOef9f1c129d\n\nPrivate Donor Helps Fund Scientists After\nTrump's Proposed \"Anti-Science\" Budget\nCuts\nwww.huffingtonpost.com\nThe famous American Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson, once\nsaid, \"The good thing about science is that it's true, whether or\nnot you believe in ..."}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg < >", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 2:56 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "What nice coverage in the Huffington Post.\n\nLiving in Europe, I was not aware that Trump's proposed cuts will be so devastating to the scientific\ncommunity.\n\nYou asked me if I would be in New York September 18. Did you have something in mind?\nI am 77 and do not travel so well. I have cut back on my plans to travel. I can consider coming to New York,\nSeptember has anything to do specifically with the vagus nerve - and if it cannot be done with a conference\ncall on Skype.\nI will be able to stop in NYC on a future trip.\n\nLinda Stone was the person who I met with years ago. It was Linda who suggested that I contact you.\n\nbest wishes,\nStanley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "25 Aug 2017, at 09.49", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "I recall. Let's skype or phone"}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg < >", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:13 AM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "I am free today after 8 o'clock a. m. EST until 3 p.)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "8/25/2017 12:11:54 PM", "subject": "Re: I look forward to hearing from you", "body": "now?"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032308.txt_6280
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032308.txt
|
Since you are super well connected...
|
[{"sender": "Gianni Serazzi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 5:53:22 AM", "subject": "Since you are super well connected...", "body": "A small point on the election that maybe you think might have some value for HC \n1-In Europe a LOT of citizens start becoming very angry and voting for populist parties \n2-A major reason is that the interconnected world shows them every minute on their smartphones how rich \npeople are living and envy sets in (especially with raising inequality that is perfectly normal when financial \nreturns of rich people are exponential and work returns are linear) \n3-They want change and risk electing completely wrong people (Italy 5stelle, France LePen might be next, \nHungary, Greece already lost, Brexit and anti-trade another example) \n4-US election is over, Trump has destroyed himself as expected (I was in Wharton with Donald Jr, 3.95GPA vs. \n2.5 GPA but he thought he was a god... what a family) \nthe message: \n5-Maybe HC can use the last debates to create weapons for change. She could acknowledge that she \nunderstands that people want change, and ask for a clear majority in the senate thinking abou that instead of \npresidential elections. Then if she does bad in 4 years she is out, but she could make the public understand that \nsenate is key to show what a president can do. \nBut again, I know 0.001% of what you or them understands about politics, I am however worried that europe is \njust 5 or 10 years ahead on this trend compared to the US in anti-establishment feelings and I have seen with \nfriends how irrational and influenceable masses can become in voting when they are frustrated (Hitler was \nelected after all...) \nHope to see you soon!!!"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029277.txt_6281
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029277.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Jeff\n\nHow plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?\nL"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>"], "timestamp": "On Oct 2, 2016, at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "can somoene from the development office show rothschild around harvard sat.?"}, {"sender": "LHS <>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "On Sunday, 2 October 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes. Let's briefly discuss. Can u have her write me."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS <>"], "timestamp": "On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "LHS ~~ 0 i sss—‘“isSCSsS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "On Sunday, 2 October 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What number r u at?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["1S"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 9:00:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": ""}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029590.txt_6282
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029590.txt
|
Re: invitation
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New <lisanew@harvard.edu>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next time\nyou're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar themes to\nLolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young girl.\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\"\nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you were\nso kind to make it happen.\nLisa"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/25/2018 11:30:39 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\nHow's this"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028856.txt_6285
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028856.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional, emotional. and financial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"girls?„ careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any.....also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me... .just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "train? yes , i will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" well' -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 6:57:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022805.txt_6295
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022805.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon (iii", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 2:26:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iam more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents || who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients. he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife.\n\nboies is going to be in the firiing line. from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG, , his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. -- ... phone only"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032529.txt_6301
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032529.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if you and or your uncle want to come to visit after art shopping to talk more about trump middle east trip at the end of the month, let me know, thx great fun today"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y. ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/6/2017 7:02:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We still have not finished our tour yet. If we are left with any energy will try to pass by. If not next time. I'll call you if we are coming."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012666.txt_6308
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012666.txt
|
Fw: Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Oosterbaan, Andrew", "recipients": ["Oosterbaan, Andrew"], "timestamp": "02/27/2008 09:45 PM", "subject": "Fw: Epstein", "body": "Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Sloman", "recipients": ["Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)"], "timestamp": "Wed Feb 27 21:37:02 2008", "subject": "Epstein", "body": "Jay,\n\nYou have renewed your request for certain information which this Office does not generally make available in similar pre-indictment situations. After carefully considering your request, I have decided, in my capacity as the First Assistant U.S. Attorney, not to make an exception here.\n\nRegarding the Landon Thomas matter, Mr. Thomas was given, pursuant to his request, non-case specific information concerning specific federal statutes.\n\nRegarding the offer to extend the current deadline of March 3, 2008 contained in my February 25th email. That offer was based on counsel for Mr. Epstein meeting with CEOS the week of March 3rd. You indicate that you are unavailable. It is hard to imagine that some or all of the other attorneys representing Mr. Epstein cannot serve this function. After all, Mr. Epstein is also represented by Dean Kenneth Starr, Martin Weinberg, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, Lily Ann Sanchez, and Guy Lewis.\n\nThat being said, the Southern District of Florida will only renew the offer to extend the current deadline if you and the CEOS Section Chief mutually agree on a timetable by close of business on Friday, February 29, 2008 to meet and complete presentations no later than March 19, 2008. Given that CEOS is ready to proceed immediately, this seems like more than ample time. As I indicated in my previous email, if CEOS subsequently decides that a federal prosecution should not be undertaken against Mr. Epstein, this Office will close its investigation. However, should CEOS disagree with Mr. Epstein’s position, Mr. Epstein shall have one week to abide by the terms and conditions of the September 24, 2007 Agreement as amended by letter from United States Attorney Acosta."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027032.txt_6310
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027032.txt
|
Fwd: Summers withdraws from Fed race
|
[{"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2013 11:12:33 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Summers withdraws from Fed race", "body": "A major blow to a friend. Lest BO takes him to replace JL. \nNow he'll probably be free in the next few days. EB"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029779.txt_6316
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029779.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/14/2013 8:47:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": ""}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032687.txt_6317
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032687.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:08:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I know -- have been reading it. Good old MW. You still talk to him?"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031136.txt_6318
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031136.txt
|
FW: Warning: The smart money is fleeing U.S. stocks
|
[{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2016 5:45:03 PM", "subject": "FW: Warning: The smart money is fleeing U.S. stocks", "body": "May 18, 2016 \nWarning: The Smart Money \nIs Fleeing U.S. Stocks \nBY BILL BONNER, CHAIRMAN, BONNER & PARTNERS \nDUBLIN — The Dow dropped 180 points yesterday — or \nabout 1%. \nAnd another clever billionaire says he is looking elsewhere \nfor profits. Reuters: \nActivist investor Carl Icahn on Monday said there was a chance the stock \nmarket could suffer a big decline, saying valuations are rich and earnings at \nmany companies are fueled more by low borrowing costs than management's \nefforts to boost results. \n\"I am very cautious on equities today. This market could easily have a big \ndrop,\" Icahn said. \nYes, dear reader, the smart money is getting out of U.S. stocks. And here's our \nold friend Rob Marstrand explaining why: \nRight now, every measure that analyzes the S&P 500 says it's expensive. Prices \nare high relative to earnings, net assets, sales, and cash flow. \nWhat's more, there's plenty of evidence that the main thing propping up the \nstock prices is heavy buying by the companies themselves [via share \nrepurchases]. \nAnd now, that prop is getting kicked out from under the stock market. \nBloomberg: \nAfter snapping up trillions of dollars of their own stock in a five-year \nshopping binge that dwarfed every other buyer, U.S. companies from Apple \nInc. to IBM Corp. just put on the brakes. \nAnnounced repurchases dropped 38% to $244 billion in the last four months, \nthe biggest decline since 2009... \nRecommended Links \nRickards: \"Warning, I've Changed My Thesis On Gold\" \nI firmly believe we're at the beginning of the BIGGEST move the world \nhas ever seen in gold. \"Simple math\" says $10,000 gold is all but certain. But, you're \nnot going to believe what I have to say next... BEFORE you buy a single ounce of \ngold, read this important message. \nLast Chance: VIP Access To Doug Casey's Shocking 2016 \nForecast \nCasey fears a severe crisis is brewing. Not a currency collapse or stock market crash. \nA specific threat that could wreak more havoc than the Great Depression. That's why \ntomorrow, in an urgent broadcast event, Doug's pulling back the curtain on his \nshocking warning. And revealing how to profit from it in the months ahead, in a big \nway. Last chance to get VIP access ends tonight. Click here now for full details. \nPareto's \"Foxes\" \nAlthough the bull market in U.S. stocks is probably near its end, the bull \nmarket in the Deep State shows no sign of weakening. \nYear after year, the power of the \"foxes\" grows. \nIt was the great Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto who noticed — among other \nthings — that no matter what kind of government you think you have, there are \nalways some crafty insiders, the \"foxes,\" who take control of it. \nPolicies are set, programs are started... decisions are made... with no consent \nof the people or their elected officials; the foxes work the angles. \nOver time, the forces of law and order become more and more corrupt.., as the \nfoxes bend the entire system to do their bidding. \nWars are started with no plan or intention to win them. Money is handed out \nfor no better reason than this: They can get away with it. \nAnd best of all, most people are none the wiser; they believe the myths... and \nattack anyone who challenges them. \nRip-Off \nPerhaps the biggest rip-off of all time has taken place over the last eight years \n— and in plain sight of everybody. \nVia the magic of ultra-low rates, the Fed — a nest for the wiliest and most \ncunning of the foxes — took roughly $8 trillion out of the pockets of savers and \nretirees and handed it to borrowers. \nWho is the world's biggest borrower? \nYes... it's the Deep State itself. \nThe Fed claimed to be helping to \"stimulate\" the economy. But you can't really \nstimulate an economy by stealing from the people who produce wealth and \nprovide it with capital. \nNot surprisingly, growth has stalled. Wages have fallen. Productivity has \nstagnated. \nFor 95% of the male population, real earnings are lower today than they were \nin 1973. \nIs there any wonder many of these men vote for Donald Trump — a \"strong \nman\" who promises to do something about it? \nBut the top 5% — where the foxes are — gained income. Their wages are up \nmore than 50% over the same time. \nWhy? \nBecause they take more and more money from the rest of us. \nMore tomorrow... on a new Rebellion in Gualfin... and a measure of how big \nthe Deep State has become... \nRegards, \nBill \nFurther Reading: The Deep State already controls just about every aspect of \nAmerican life. From health care to education to the food on our tables to the \nnever-ending war on terror, this cadre of cronies is pulling the strings. \nIn his latest online presentation, Bill exposes how the Deep State has now \npushed the world to the brink of an irreversible disaster. Learn more here as \nhe reveals how it will all unfold... and, more importantly, how it'll change your \nlife forever. \nMarket Insight \nBY CHRIS LOWE, EDITOR AT LARGE \nGeorge Soros is betting big on gold. \nAs Bill reported yesterday, the billionaire speculator cut his \nfirm's investments in U.S. stocks by more than one-third. \nSoros has also disclosed a new stake in the world's biggest \ngold miner, Barrick Gold (ABX). \nSoros Fund Management, his investment vehicle, bought a 1.7% of Barrick. \nThis makes it Soros' biggest listed holding. \nAs today's chart shows, Barrick has skyrocketed so far in 2016. \nThe company's stock is up a jaw-dropping 156% year to date. \nRecommended Links \nRead this BEFORE you buy gold or gold stocks \nDr. Steve Sjuggerud Reports: Most investors don't know this, but \nthere s a \"Magic Number\" that appears before EVERY big move in gold and EVERY \nbig move in gold stocks. What is it and is now the time to buy? Details here... \nFeatured Reads \nGold Price to Soar More Than 650%? \nOne currencies expert says a \"super spike\" in gold prices is headed our way. \nHere, he explains what will cause it and, more importantly, how you can \nposition yourself to profit. \nShare Buybacks Fall Most Since 2009 \nU.S. share buybacks have fallen back to levels last seen in 2099. The news \ncomes amid the worst profit slump since the financial crisis.., and when \nvaluations sit near 14-year highs. \nWhy \"Money Helicopters\" Are Not the Answer \nAlthough \"helicopter money\" — code for handing out free money — is now \nbeing seriously discussed... what's really needed to boost growth are major \nstructural reforms. The fate of the world depends on it. \nRecommended Links \nExperience the Greatest Innovation in Shaving...for Free \nYou only have 9 days left to enjoy the best shave of your life for free. \nJoin thousands of men from around the world who are experiencing \nthe unrivaled performance OneBlade technology offers. Don't miss \nout. Act now. \nOneBlade — Rethought. Retooled. Rebuilt. \nMailbag \nReaders continue to weigh in on the state of U.S. politics. Here are more \nresponses to Monday's issue, \"Trump's Biggest Deal.\" \nSarah Palin will be the V.P. with Trump, and you may be surprised that they \nwill have a balance budget within three years. And with Obamacare repealed, \njob killing regulations eliminated, and corporate tax rates cut, it will make the \nU.S. more business friendly. \n— Christopher F. \nGood God! Anything is better than just giving it to Hilary and her \ndespicable husband. \n— Judy P. \nThanks for including Jefferson and von Mises, my favorite Galician, in \nthe list of good guys. Our economy cannot be repaired without \ndismantling the Fed. As you often point out, our monetary system is \nrotten at the core, as it is based on credit. \nI read in one of these letters from a libertarian source that Jefferson \nwrote, already in 1810 or so, that he had failed to set up a free country \nas he envisioned.., and that was still more than too years before the \nFederal Reserve Act. \nOn the other hand, even today, I strongly believe that if we just followed \nthe Constitution, we would be okay — especially the loth amendment. I \nthink that is the most important of all. \n— Chaim K. \nIn the words of Warren Zevon, \"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the s---\nhas hit the fan.\" \nThe Democratic Party is electing a known criminal, and they don't care, \nas long as it's their criminal. They just assume all politicians are \ncriminal, and the really good ones get their districts what they need. \nWould anyone let Harry Reid babysit their children? The Republican \nParty is electing anybody who is not a politician. Donald Trump just \nhappens to be the best known, \"anybody\" who is running. \n— Wayde L. \nAll I can say about Bill's message on Monday is: \"Amen, brother! Amen!\" \nHe hit every nail right on the head. \nTo those self-deluding worthies who think that a Donald Trump \npresidency will solve all of America's problems I say, \"Get your heads \nout of your collective a***s, because it ain't gonna happen.\" \nTrump will continue the policies (if we can laughably call them such) of \nthe Deep State... with a dash of Adolph Hitler thrown in for good \nmeasure. Clinton will be no better, if not worse. \nI'm with Bill — a vote for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil. \nHowever, unlike him, I will vote, but for a third-party candidate who \ndoesn't have a snowball's chance of winning. A \"wasted\" vote is better \nthan a vote for Trump or Hillary. \n— Dale A. \nI think you are correct in your assessment of the Deep State. I disagree \nin how to deal with it. \nIt seems easy for the rich or the poor to walk away and state it doesn't \nmatter. The poor because they do not have a choice; the rich because \nthey do. For those of us in the middle we need to deal with it, lest we \nend up in the poor camp. For me, a decision that includes a less bad \nscenario is still a decision worth pursuing. \n— Rudy R. \nIn Case You Missed It... \nThe third part of Doug Casey's \"virtual workshop\" on how to turn crises into \nwildly profitable investments goes live today. \nIn it, Doug pulls back the curtain on his shocking forecast for America in \n2016. And how he believes you could set yourself up to profit from it in a big \nway... with just one decisive move. \nGo here to reserve your spot. \nE"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033599.txt_6319
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033599.txt
|
Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2011, at 7:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "eric, price for a re-rag , new seats , g-v , paint and interior, plus approx time after choosing fabrics etc."}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Any photos? Serial number?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2011 12:29 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "not yet"}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/27/2011 4:17:37 PM", "subject": "Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Jeffrey-\n! need to start off by stating that it is not my intent to go around Shawn Lancaster on this — Shawn is a friend. \nThis being said, I have received e-mails from both you and Larry this weekend. \nI called Larry and he said I should send you an e-mail. \nI called a close friend of mine inquiring about the GV market and aircraft that are \"not published\". As of today, \nthere are eight (8) of these aircraft that are not yet on the market. \nLet me know if you would like to speak with him and by what means (you call him, he call you, call \nLarry ....whatever). \nBy the way, his company sold Trumps 727 and got Trump a very attractive number for an aircraft that was on \nit's way to a museum. \nHope all is well."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033151.txt_6326
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033151.txt
|
now look what youve done
|
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "6/1/2019 10:59:01 PM", "subject": "now look what youve done", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/44649 1 -trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-\n\nemmet-flood"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033145.txt_6336
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033145.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid [as"], "timestamp": "5/19/2019 10:39:32 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-19/the-world-agrees-with-trump-on-one-thing-when-it-comes-to-iran"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026165.txt_6344
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026165.txt
|
Re: Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Aug 25, 2017, at 00:57", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic <q@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Great. I am back from LA thursday"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 6:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Private Donor Helps Fund Scientists After\nTrump's Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget\nCuts\n\nwww.huffingtonpost.com\n\nThe famous American Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson,\nonce said, “The good thing about science is that it's true,\nwhether or not you believe in ..."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/25/2017 11:27:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: Re:", "body": "Great!\n\nCan you get a bigger coverage (beside Huff post)??\nBill and others should join!\n\nB"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030572.txt_6360
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030572.txt
|
basketball player
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 2 2011 08:40 PM", "subject": "basketball player", "body": "obama was scheduled to sign the debt bill late yesterday, just hours before the midnight Treasury deadline that could have seen the US default on its debts, a national humiliation likely to have had a huge impact on markets and the global economy."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026310.txt_6361
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026310.txt
|
Bannon on How 2008 Planted the Seed for the Trump Presidency
|
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/11/2018 2:23:22 AM", "subject": "Bannon on How 2008 Planted the Seed for the Trump Presidency", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/steve-bannon-on-how-2008-planted-the-seed-for-the-trump-\npresidency.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032515.txt_6365
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032515.txt
|
Re: Meeting
|
[{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Meeting", "body": "Meeting this professor who studies quantum entanglement in brains"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Deepak Chopra"], "timestamp": "Sunday, March 5, 2017 10:16:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Meeting", "body": "physical processes , not intersting"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030804.txt_6377
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030804.txt
|
Re: privieged
|
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "lots of reporters inquiries. !. doithink that trump set me up? what do i know about his dealings? . did\ni speak to you? suggestion. all public record, house bought out of a bankruptcy proceding . I was the\nstalking horse bid.. never before was there a prosecution of erotic massage by women for money in\nsomeones home. every girl got money. returned . most interviewed by police over 21. all public\nrecord. .some concern on my team that i will get a cong subpoena. doi have to wear a tie?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:13 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "Again! Why you need a team in place! Where are you with Ollie?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:17 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "hes great. he needs to get the documents from the law firms that are wholly focused on this submission to\nthe judge. . BTW He asked for Imilllion per month . for a year. ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:24 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "Expensive. But... In a way this new round of calls is an opportunity: reporters suddenly thinking they don’t\nknow something or that there is a new angle—now would be a good moment to hit them with a better prepared\nset of responses. Somebody, Ollie or otherwise, should get started on this."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 11:46:19 AM", "subject": "Re: privieged", "body": "https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/saudi-arabias-mohammed-bin-salman-16208376 russian oligarch\n\nsame as pb house"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030295.txt_6383
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030295.txt
|
Fw:
|
[{"sender": "G Maxwell", "recipients": ["J Jep [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/11/2015 1:25:56 PM", "subject": "Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Philip Barden", "recipients": ["<a"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 11 January 2015 05:27", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Saying nothing is reputational suicide. Even iff is discredited by i people will know JE paid her off and\nbelieve G was complicate absent a credible denial.\n\nNow it is reported that G engaged in direct abuse - as I feared would happen. Next reports to the authorities will\nbe made.\n\nIt is necessary from a litigation, investigatory and reputational reason to issue a cogent denial.\n\nI can see why JE doesn't want this as it may not suit him but he is already toast.\n\nPhilip"}, {"sender": "Ross", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "10 Jan 2015, at 18:42", "subject": "Fw:", "body": "Had Geordie on the phone half a dozen times today.\nHe would have give us a better hearing than most I figure.\n\nStrongly believe saying nothing is the wrong thing - especially as Dershowitz has a big piece coming in The\nTimes on Monday.\n\nRest up and speak Monday\n\nBest\n\nRoss"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030214.txt_6384
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030214.txt
|
Fwd:
|
[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/7/2017 7:12:15 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "James Drougas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Hi Paul. I've been spending lots of time with Irwin Corey and his family past two weeks especially. He was in hospital until the last week and then He died a few hours ago peacefully at home in bed. Last night he told me Trump will be assassinated soon. He was eager to learn the news each day. I asked him if he would join the anti Trump rallies when he gains strength. Doctors thought he might live many months. Alas he was laughing and smiling till the end and frowning about Trump. Warm and loving regards Jim Drouaas My friend Alana, a young comedian, was here with him most nights. Irwin used to say he will live to 147. Alana explained that 102 is 147 in comedian years."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026159.txt_6389
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026159.txt
|
RE:
|
[{"sender": "Lang, Caroline", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jack Lang PF"], "timestamp": "7/11/2017 9:40:01 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Yes, I saw the news"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "lundi 10 juillet 2017 23:17", "subject": "RE:", "body": "retrump. asi said they will first go after his family"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030200.txt_6391
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030200.txt
|
Indicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The Complex History - Lawfare
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/19/2018 5:30:40 PM", "subject": "Indicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The Complex History - Lawfare", "body": "https://www.lawfareblog.com/indicting-president-not-foreclosed-complex-history\n\nIndicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The Complex History\n\nCan a sitting president be indicted? Often, in answering this question, commentators point to Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinions answering in the contrary. To whatever extent the writer agrees or disagrees with the opinions' conclusion, the government's position on the matter is usually presented as a long-standing and clear \"no.\"\n\nThe reality is more complicated. The United States has addressed this question six times in both internal memos and briefs filed in litigation. And a review of these documents shows that it is far from clear what criminal prosecution steps are (or should be) precluded—and that there is no \"longstanding policy\" against indictment of the president. Consider the 1973 OLC memo stating that a sitting president should not be indicted. Far from being authoritative, it was essentially repudiated within months by the Justice Department in the United States' filing in the Supreme Court in United States v. Nixon.\n\nLikewise, the most recent opinion—an OLC memo written in 2000—includes brief statements that a sitting president should not be indicted even if all further proceedings are postponed. But far from being definitive, this is a matter that could be reconsidered by the department. Moreover, of course, OLC opinions are not binding on state prosecutors (though state charges could raise federalism questions as well). The complex history of criminal proceedings against presidents and vice presidents suggests that these issues are not foreclosed.\n\nPerhaps the most important point that emerges from a review of all the opinions is this: only once has the United States addressed the question of whether a president can be an unindicted co-conspirator. The conclusion was an unequivocal yes. Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. Nixon. (The Supreme Court did not resolve the question.) No department opinion or filing has ever contradicted that position.\n\nThe fact that it is permissible to name a sitting president as unindicted co-conspirator, moreover, tends significantly to undermine the only argument against indicting a sitting president.\n\n(I should note that the U.S. Attorney's manual cautions against naming persons as unindicted co-conspirators \"[in the absence of some significant justification.\" Here, of course, the \"significant justification\" would exist if a sitting president is the only individual in the country who is immune from indictment. Thus, for that individual alone, the usual better course of indictment would not be available.)"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032877.txt_6393
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032877.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon JagIan"], "timestamp": "6/28/2016 8:44:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can settle even if john kerry wins :) /"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 4:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, terrible times. If Trump wins in US I'll settle on your island. Before that, I'll be in NY in September. Lot of things to talk about."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "tirsdag 28. juni 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you must be a very busy man \nhope to seee you soon"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033179.txt_6395
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033179.txt
|
Now could be the time
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/29/2016 12:21:03 PM", "subject": "Now could be the time", "body": "There's an opportunity to come forward this week and talk about Trump in such a way that could garner you\ngreat sympathy and help finish him. Interested?"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026510.txt_6397
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026510.txt
|
This morning
|
[{"sender": "Lis <a", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 4:16 PM", "subject": "This morning", "body": "It was fun and interesting.\n\nI admire your friends determination.\n\nAre you serious about working on this?\n\nHas anyone done a full analysis of this and polarization.\n\nSeems like on one hand it might encourage Ralph Nader cuz he d get more first round votes and not elect George bush. This might be bad."}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2018, at 6:05 PM", "subject": "This morning", "body": "Hi Larry,\n\nThank you very much for taking the meeting this morning. I’m glad you found it worthwhile, and I agree with you that Adam Friedman’s commitment to the project is impressive.\n\nI AM serious about working on this---it’s a nice opportunity to make important practical use of some interesting theory. Voting rules may seem nerdy and dry, but they can make an enormous difference to actual politics\n\nThe formal argument that RCV promotes centrism better than the current system (plurality rule) is straightforward. Suppose that most voters vote ideologically in the sense that the closer a candidate is to their own position on the left-right spectrum, the more like they are to vote for him. Then under majority rule (my favorite voting system)---in which voters rank candidates and the winner is the candidate who beats all other in pairwise comparisons----the winner will be the median voter’s favorite candidate ----- in other words, the most centrist candidate gets elected (this assumes that there are enough candidates running so that there is one who is reasonably close to the median voter). Now observe that RCV is in between majority rule and plurality rule, and so will promote centrism better than plurality rule.\n\nBest wishes, Eric"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026304.txt_6413
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026304.txt
|
Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, 'lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly I TheHill
|
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 3, 2018 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, 'lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly TheHill", "body": "http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/400188-exclusive-bannon-blasts-con-artist-kochs-lame-duck-ryan-diminished"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 3, 2018 08:13:37 -0400", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, 'lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly TheHill", "body": "loved , not donors - but marks"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, 'lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly TheHill", "body": "Buried lede"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 3, 2018, at 8:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, 'lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly TheHill", "body": "keep close ! This much we know - the Fall elections are shaping up to be a referendum on the most divisive American President in memory. The battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh's nomination this fall will only amplify the polarity of the political debate that is already deeply overwrought on both sides. The rising tide of pressure on Donald Trump from the Mueller investigation shows no sign of ebbing. Unless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these unprecedented events will still leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield of the 2016 Presidential election. Watching these unrelenting, compounding events since our discussion in May, I am guessing we are all asking the same question: now what? For the 48 percent of Americans who believe Donald Trump should not be in the White House, perhaps we too want our own \"chaos\" candidate in 2020? Should Trump run again, this could be a \"break glass\" moment for the majority of Americans who don't support him. Do we want to break the genteel precedents of two parties running their ceremonious and seemingly illogical nominating process to select a candidate? (Why do Iowa and New Hampshire play such outsized roles? What kind of small-d democratic process relies on superdelegates?) The system failed in 2016, with both parties producing terribly flawed candidates in a race to the bottom. We need to build a back-up plan in the event the system fails again. It's possible, of course, that we won't need a third-party candidate. Trump could decide not to run for whatever reason. The Democrats could nominate a winning 2020 candidate. I am not willing to take those bets. The ideal candidate for a new third party is someone who is widely perceived to be that rare combination of both good and great. We are looking for a proven leader of men and women, someone with clear, democratic — and moral — values that reflect the best of America, not our worst. We know people like this on the national stage now. As a thought experiment, consider the possibilities of a ticket outside the partisan lanes and imagine the chemistry of radical combinations: Biden/Romney? Bill Gates/Hogan? Bloomberg/Haley? Howard Schultz/Bob Corker? Sandberg/Kasich? As we have discussed narrow path to electing the first president outside the two major party primary system in 168 years is more navigable than most think. Heading into 2020, converging trends in American's demands for a third party (a historic high of 61%), disapproval of Donald Trump holding steady above 50%, and the increasingly leftward drift of the Democratic Party suggest that electorate may be susceptible to merits of a new centrist party. Cynics will say that the structural impediments of ballot and presidential debate access, the overwhelming advantages of legacy parties' fundraising and voter turn-out operations preordain failure, but they're wrong; the legal and logistical hurdles are amenable to a combination of lawyering and resources. The bigger, more consequential factors come in terms of candidate quality and policy. I believe a candidate with five specific characteristics including a unique — and purposefully non-specific - policy agenda could limbo a win. • This is what I think a successful third-party candidate looks like; a dream third party ticket would start off with enough name ID to be an instant contender. Building the name ID to run nationally is just too long and expensive of a process to accomplish in the 28 months until the next presidential election. We can't beat a celebrity without some celebrity of our own, whether from politics, sports, business, or entertainment. Instantaneous name ID is so crucial because the candidate must start out in striking distance in any three-way poll against Trump and a fill-in-the-blank Democratic flavor-of-the day candidate. The media and political class will predetermine irrelevance otherwise. • A Democrat-leaning candidate would have to top the ideal third-party ticket. We need someone with a shot at snaking a plurality of the vote in the blue states Hillary Clinton won (227 electoral votes), but moderate enough to win a plurality in some combination of Trump states like Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan (another 119 votes). The right candidate may even to put North Carolina, Ohio, Indiana in play for a centrist bi-partisan ticket as well (totaling an electoral sweep of 464 elector votes). A right leaning candidate would meet the same fate as a primary challenger to Trump — for all intents and purposes we need to assume that 36% of voters won't be cleaved from Trump under any circumstances and run to win around them. The deep red states would be off the table entirely. • With the Trump reality show airing daily, voters are now expecting to take their politics with a side of entertainment. Heretofore, ratings will matter no matter how dry the policy topic. Surely Stephen Colbert would gladly sacrifice his executive producer Chris Licht to produce a daily comedic segment of this dream candidate interviewing Americans in truck stops and McDonald's across the country. A few of the \"Saturday Night Live\" script writers could certainly be enticed to disguise serious debates as informative amusement. Any candidate must be committed to a near daily cadence of high quality, compelling video production. It will be especially crucial to keep the voters' attention during what will be a raucous Democratic primary season. Rules governing access to the general election debate stage dictate that a candidate enjoy support of at least 15% of voters in the months leading up to the general election. • This dream candidate would pledge to serve only four years and address all of the U.S.'s ticking time bombs like Social Security, Medicare, health care reform, climate change, money in politics, gerrymandering, and infrastructure investment in a single term. This one-and-done term decouples our candidate from the usual politics and gives them the power of promise and deliver decisive action. A four-year term pledge ensures governance independent of campaign finance concerns and narrow special interests inherent to winning re-election. This \"fix-it\" ticket would promise to force decisions on all the underlying structural policy matters damaging America's long-term prospects and distorting our democracy. No more kicking the can down the road. • This candidate should also pledge to push for laws passed that reflect the will of simple majorities in Congress. Congress now only allows bills to move forward when a \"majority of a majority\" supports the policy and on many levels seems fundamentally broken. This third-party president could force votes based on a transparent reading of where the votes lie via coalition building. The Senate filibuster power will present a high hurdle, but a third-party candidate would be a de facto disruptor of the two-party system. Party discipline could well break down, and moderates in both parties could form a powerful, decisive block willing to work with the new President. The policies passed into law may not be ideal for either Democrats or Republicans, but for the major agenda items that must be addressed for America's long-term health, an imperfect fix that corrects course is better than those that now have us hurtling toward national bankruptcy. And if no candidate secures 270 electoral votes in 2020? The House of Representatives would choose the next president. In 2016, reports suggested Michael Bloomberg declined to run on a third-party ticket for fear of splitting support from Hillary Clinton and throwing the election to a GOP-controlled House of Representatives who would then vote to select the president. The fear was the GOP controlled House would have just elected Trump. Would Democratic control of the House mean that the House would pick an alternative to Trump as president? Each state delegation has a single vote in selecting a president and it is the incoming Congress - the class elected in 2020 that would decide the election. But no matter which party has the speaker's chair, the GOP would almost certainly have the upper hand in the majority of state delegations controlled. Would the state delegations pick a president based on party majority control of the delegation, the winner of the popular vote in each state or their own calculations as to who is best for America? Precedent suggests that delegations use secret ballots, which means individual lawmakers may vote their consciences. If we recruit this ideal candidate; threading the needle of name ID, a center-left bent, a TV- savvy campaign team and a pledge to serve only four years with an apartisan agenda, money and campaign expertise would certainly follow. And 50 state ballot access is a function of time (starting in the fall of 2019 would be prudential) and hard work as we have discussed and many of you have exhaustively war-gamed. Part and parcel of this effort would be motivating the often politically lackadaisical middle to vote. The raft of new technologies in data targeting and biometric mobile voting technology could transform the electorate in the next few, amping voter participation and injecting the voices of moderates (both in political views and level of political interest) into the process. And any third-party effort must incorporate advocacy for accelerated adaption of these all but inevitable voter verification tools. I believe Silicon Valley could be game-changing allies in this effort. I am sure none of us doubt that chaos could potentially be unleashed by jamming three viable candidates into a two-party system. An election that ends up in the House of Representatives is an uncontrollable, murky and ancient process. But might that be a less scary prospect than relying on the Democrats to nominate a candidate who can beat Trump in 2020?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, August 3 2018 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist' Kochs, 'lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly I TheHill", "body": "Where is this from???"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022189.txt_6422
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022189.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, November 11, 2016 2:06 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I saw that, amazing. \nI also think it's shocking she is 35 in the recent picture (if she was 13 in '94). She looks 20 years older."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016 5:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025180.txt_6425
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025180.txt
|
Re: Your Special Day
|
[{"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:07 AM", "subject": "Your Special Day", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nCongratulations on another spin around the sun.\n\nI would like to offer you a birthday present: my best efforts for a few hours on something where I might be able to contribute either to making something good happen for you or help you prevent the bad.\n\nWe haven't talked much at all for quite some time, so I'm not sure of the nature of your current interests but here are some of mine, where I feel I either have some special capability or can get access to those who have such.\n\n* open science -- open access publishing, data publishing, and open culture institutions considered as a network with largely consistent and mutually reinforcing values: Public Library of Science (PLoS), Wikipedia, Internet Archive, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Creative Commons, along with allied US, UK, European governmental and NGO funding sources and other institutions.\n\n* early-stage life science-based ventures, especially those with one or more of these technologies: optics, wearable-sensors, brain-computer interface, behavioral engineering that goes beyond robo-noodging. I am not up to speed on synthetic bio and CRISPR, but I have a good friend who is.\n\n* cybersecurity for you and your life. I have carefully monitored the web for articles about you and I have reason to think that those will persist indefinitely. I would be remiss as your friend if I did not encourage you to be as diligent and smart as possible in using tools like Signal, two-factor/multi-factor authentication, taking webmail archives off the web onto your own secure privately maintained archive or deleted (unlike Podesta), and other measures.\n\n* publicity for your cool-ass creative and important philanthropy in support of really good and adventuresome, high-risk basic science research. Most obvious benefit: it would be nice to know you hung out with the bright"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "1. is probability a force rather than a markter. if you look at a bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. i think gravity might be just that. 2. all signals in nature need to be envvyrpted so that the enemy cannot read. this includes inner signals that if you are aware of, can give you up to your predator. so signals from the nose , my conjecture is that each person has its own enxruption de encyption algorithm built in. fyi having dinnner with Jin Watson."}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Probability as a force rather than a what?\nDidn't suss out the next word...\n\nWatson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk —4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well?\n\nD."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "pretty well"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Cool. And the former question, of clarification?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers. centrifigal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. . like gravity, lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. . not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would. could be a force similar to the EM one."}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "http://xkcd.com/123/ can't resist!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "yes , now assume that there i a balancing force. and gravity is merely the result of paticles being pushed together . etc"}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Is there something for central tendency that is like an inertial reference frame, from which a different abstract understanding of probability develops, one that's better for showing the kloodgey, apparent force nature to which you point?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 1:03:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "god s reference frame :)"}]
| 10
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033192.txt_6428
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033192.txt
|
aapl
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 3:04:29 PM", "subject": "aapl", "body": "http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/14/apple-iphones-could-be-hit-if-trump-imposes-a-45-percent-tariff-on-china-exports-beijing-warns.html"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022837.txt_6430
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022837.txt
|
Re: How are you holding up?
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 16, 2015 7:35 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned, or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers She never saw anything that claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained, not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship, I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. ( no sex J. . they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, . . 8. answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <______________________>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "Landon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\nhttp://topics.nytinnes.conn/top/reference/tinnestopics/people/t/landon jr thonnas/index."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029962.txt_6431
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029962.txt
|
Re: I beat Bush
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/3/2016 1:22:56 PM", "subject": "Re: I beat Bush", "body": "Great"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 3 February 2016", "subject": "Re: I beat Bush", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nI got more votes than Jeb Bush got in Iowa, and I only had one congressional district, he had four!! It's so \nfunny (to me — totally embarrassing to him)!!! Still like Trump CD and might be a delegate to the republican \nconvention. \nWas in St. Thomas for a couple of days — did call this island, but never heard back. Went scuba diving off St. \nJeff and it was beautiful. Would be totally funny (to me at least) if you put a big fake shark or statute under the \nwater where the divers go.... \nLove ya,"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029976.txt_6437
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029976.txt
|
Bobby Slayton
|
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Francis Derby"], "timestamp": "9/10/2012 5:01:27 PM", "subject": "Bobby Slayton", "body": "Bobby slayton will be in LA on sept. 18th (he said if you are hosting obama in NY though, he could make \nthe effort to attend) \nBelow from Bobby re the dinner he would like to have: \n> AND Tuesday the 16th is perfect for dinner with David And Lewis And if woody makes it GREAT, if not, \nalways fun to hang with 3E111 David Brenner said he would try to change his flight if only Monday works!! \nBut the boys are definately in for Tuesday!!! \nMay I tell Bobby the 16th is good for dinner AND invite Woody? \nLyn & Jojo are back to work on Oct. 16th (they are home on 15th) \nLinda stone will be in NY and staying in an apt Oct. 13-17"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032888.txt_6438
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032888.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no place else to invest for alpha, your children are rich"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "If you knew Trump was going to win, how would you position your portfolio?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:52:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "give me a number ill call"}]
| 8
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032650.txt_6443
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032650.txt
|
Marilyn
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "at the moment we will go to lsh on sunday the 26th early then to new york where i will stay the week, larry , it will be assayay and I, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017 at 6:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Will you want to bring back Marilyn or Carluz/Arline for the week you are in NY?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 6:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "marilyn"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/17/2017 11:48:52 AM", "subject": "Marilyn", "body": "Reminder: Jojo and Merwin both requested off Nov. 25 and 26 to be with family in town and celebrate Brianna's 16th Birthday. We will need to bring Marilyn to NY to help prepare for your arrival. We should have Sonam and Leo to help as well. Shall we get a flight for Marilyn early Sat. Nov. 25th morning?"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031529.txt_6445
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031529.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Marc.Kensington", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/27/2016 8:41:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Too bad. I was excited to have a"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2016-11-27 17:54 GMT+00:00", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will not come this week, too many trump issues. . anything new. exciting.\nhas mr kiss come to reality?"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030637.txt_6450
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030637.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "bring me up to speed."}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 9:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Moving (small places in Raleigh and Bellevue), wrapping up taxes, wrapping up fire claim, trying to figure out if technologies that soothe the nervous system (that offer the positive effects that meditation or massage might offer) are worth working on....\n\nAnd wondering if the fact that so many people are on anti-depressant, adhd, and other drugs, is what makes trump appealing and his flaws invisible...\n\nWill you have a cabinet position?\nHow are you?\nCo-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Linda Stone"], "timestamp": "Sep 25, 2016, at 12:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he can win?"}, {"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/25/2016 7:46:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "“Psychically” and that puts me way out on the edge, that’s what it looks like. People are blinded by him. He has a hypnotic effect.\n\nYou asked about power a long time ago. And - he seems to have an effect on masses (that troubles me) that hypnotizes. Add to this that Clinton is charisma-compromised.\n\nI don’t want him to win. I find this troubling."}]
| 4
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033228.txt_6464
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033228.txt
|
The article
|
[{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Fred Haddad", "Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "3/14/2017 12:31:06 PM", "subject": "The article", "body": "http://www.floridabulldog.org/2017/03/trump-on-witness-list-lawsuit-pedophile/"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033200.txt_6473
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033200.txt
|
NYTimes: Trump's Economic Cabinet Picks Signal Embrace of Wall St. Elite
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "12/1/2016 3:46:53 AM", "subject": "NYTimes: Trump's Economic Cabinet Picks Signal Embrace of Wall St. Elite", "body": "Wow. This is truly moronic. \nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/30/business/dealbook/trumps-economic-cabinet-picks-signal-embrace-of-wall-st-elite.html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share \nSteven mnuchin, the financier who has been tapped to run Treasury, joins other wealthy investors chosen by Mr. Trump, a sign of possible tax cuts and deregulation ahead."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033566.txt_6475
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033566.txt
|
NY Post: Vanessa Trump files for divorce from Donald Trump Jr.
|
[{"sender": "Dangene and Jennie Enterprise", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/15/2018 9:54:45 PM", "subject": "NY Post: Vanessa Trump files for divorce from Donald Trump Jr.", "body": "I thought you'd be interested in this story: \nVanessa Trump files for divorce from Donald Trump Jr. \nEXCLUSIVE \nhttps://pagesix.com/2018/03/15/vanessa-trump-files-for-divorce-from-donald-trump-jr/?utm_campaign=iosapp&utm_source=mail_app"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031501.txt_6483
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031501.txt
|
Re: Saudi money
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon [landonjr@nytimes.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 1:47:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed . and im not seeing much in the secondary market. . blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor ."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even intech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a tribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco... _ but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years, social media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in. with the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. _it is the americans that are demanding women drive. not the saudis"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been effecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of their cash from the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas. Maybe some people to talk to? I would think its more than cutting down on yachts and private planes or selling real estate in Paris, Istanbul, London. Any thoughts? PS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033214.txt_6508
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033214.txt
|
your boy trump
|
[{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 10:35:55 PM", "subject": "your boy trump", "body": "I saw this post about Trump's difficulty in getting entertainers and cracked up:\nIt is rumored also that comrades Boris and Natasha and Fearless Leader have also offered performance at\ntremendous inauguration of Moose and Squirrel."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032637.txt_6514
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032637.txt
|
Re: Kuhn - CNN - Xi and New Politburo Standing Committee - 10.26.17.pdf
|
[{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/6/2017 1:19:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You nailed it! (before —1/2 of family). \nStill in China - from Party Congress through Trump \"State+ Visit\". Many interviews/commentaries (CNN/BBC \nattached). \nMore important (from some ultimate reference frame): Radical Breakthroughs. Preproduction going well; \nexpect to send by end of month complete preproduction document, with 3-4 pages on each of the 13 episodes - \nrefined versions of the prototypes (first two episodes) I sent you in late Sept. Excited. Looking forward to \ndiscussing content. \nI'll be in NY from —Nov. 21/22 through early January. When to meet? Breakthroughs and of course politics / \ngeopolitics (so much). \nRobert"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032599.txt_6532
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032599.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "qa", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "iE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "qa", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now’"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 5:26:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you inshalla &"}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031228.txt_6533
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031228.txt
|
Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN
|
[{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 4:45:18 AM PDT", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "Steven J. Hoffenberg\nNew York Post Publishing INC.\nCEO\n\nWHAM INC THE PUBLIC COMPANY OWNS THE BELOW OPERATIONS\n\nTOWERSINVESTORS.COM\nCEO\n\nSEE\nWWwW.POST PUBLISHING.BUZZ THE JESUS CHRIST ON LINE GODs WORD NEWSPAPER\n\nMR HOFFENBERG ONLINE NEWSPAPER\nPUBLICSPEAKINGWALLSTREET.COM"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Gary H. Baise", "Alan Fraade"], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 6:26:21 AM EDT", "subject": "JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "SIR\n\nPRESIDENT TRUMP WILL KNOW THAT GARY BAISE IS WORKING ON THE NEEDED FOOD\nPOLICY POINTS OF FACT WITH THE FOOD INDUSTRY LEADERS .\n\nPRESIDENT TRUMP UNDERSTANDS THAT THE FOOD INDUSTRY IS VITAL TO THE TRUMP\nWHITE HOUSE POLICY .\n\nWHAT IS NEEDED IN THE PRESENTATION TO PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WILL BE DON\nE BY OUR TEAM THAT NOW HAS THE KEY JOB AT THE STEVEN\n\nHOFFENBERG TRUMP SUPER PAC IN BUYING OVER $ 1 BILLION DOLLARS IN ADS & T\n\nHE HIRING OF THE BUS PROJECT TO GET OUT THE VOTE IN EVERY POOR AREA IN THE\nUSA.\n\nTHE POOR VOTER OVER 120 MILLION VOTERS THAT WERE DEMS ARE NOW VOTING FO\nR PRESIDENT TRUMP ON NOV 8 2016.\n\nT V EXPERTS DONT REPORT THE ABOVE DEMS POOR FOLKS THAT ARE VOTING FOR PR"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031192.txt_6553
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031192.txt
|
Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo
|
[{"sender": "Florence Anthony", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015 at 11:08:55 AM EST", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": "Hot Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Crime Covered Up By President Obama\n\nBy Steven Hoffenberg\nPublisher/CEO\n\nLisa Twardeau died at the dirty hands of billionaire Jeffrey Epstein's lies about the crimes he committed while working atTowersinvestors.com.\n\nJeffrey Epstein looted Towers Investors of billions of dollars in ponzi crimes at the time Lisa became the wife of Steven Hoffenberg, who was Epstein's boss at Towers Investors.\n\nEpstein defrauded the Towers Investors with a cover-up after taking $2 billion from Towers and depositing it into the Epstein Hedge Fund Financial Trust Corp.\n\nLisa Twardeau died when she was going to expose the fact that Jeffrey Epstein looted billions from Towers Investors by ponzi crimes.\n\nNow, from the grave, Lisa Twardeau slams arrogant ponzi crimes King Epstein in the tell-all book she wrote that reveals everything about Epstein and the Feds' cover-up with President Obama.\n\nThe Feds are bad. They are covering up the Epstein ponzi crimes. The Lisa Twardeau book states that the FBI is violating the law with this cover-up.\n\nThe book says President Obama told the Attorney General that Jeffrey Epstein was cooperating in an overseas banking crime, but the FBI can't arrest Epstein. These are all lies by the President of the United States.\n\nThe book says that President Obama lied to cover up his relationship with Larry Summers who is on Jeffrey Epstein's payroll.\n\nThe book could give reasons for the president to be impeached for obstruction of justice whereby the U.S. Attorney General will learn everything that is in the Twardeau book.\n\nReaders, stay with this hot story that reveals that a cover-up in America is taking place.\n\nThe Richard Nixon story all over again is in the Lisa Twardeau book coming soon........"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Gary H. BaisallillW"], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015 at 11:44:20 AM EST", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": ""}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015 11:11 AM", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015 at 12:02:02 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2015 5:04:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": ""}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029905.txt_6554
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029905.txt
|
Fwd: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'
|
[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/7/2019 4:27:09 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ann Coulter", "recipients": ["Friend <r-ysmIlbbqqlsnfcqqgvnrswzfrrbsfrffsqzpggvggfvzccqwtsb@humaneventsmail.com>"], "timestamp": "March 6, 2019 at 5:01:34 PM PST", "subject": "Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'", "body": "Media Magic: How a Democrat Pedophile Became a 'Trump Scandal'\nStrangely, the media have suddenly taken an intense interest in the case of pedophile and major Democratic donor Jeffrey Epstein.\nIn 2005, the Palm Beach police were told by the mother of a young girl in West Palm Beach that her daughter had been brought to the Democratic donor's mansion and asked to have sex with him for money. This kicked off an intensive, one-year undercover investigation.\nThe police sifted through Epstein's garbage and interviewed 17 witnesses, including the housemen, who told of sex toys and dildos left behind after the underage girls left. One of Epstein's procurers, a 20-year-old local woman named Haley Robson, who was paid $200 for every teenaged girl she brought to Jeffrey, was cooperating with police, telling them she was like \"Heidi Fleiss.\" They obtained statements from five of Epstein's young victims, who said they'd been paid $200 to $300 to engage in various sex acts with ...\nContinue reading..."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014312.txt_6559
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014312.txt
|
Financials trade for Monday
|
[{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 11, 2016 4:04 PM", "subject": "Financials trade for Monday", "body": "It's not too late to buy financials as a medium term trade. They've run up a lot this week but we're getting endless calls from generalists asking which banks to buy — there is still more upside to the sector. Banks also provide some offset to your bonds if interest rates continue to move. Our financials sector specialist thinks XLF could have another 20-25% upside given its many levers to the Trump trade: less regulation, higher interest rates/steeper yield curve, higher vol, economic growth, etc. The regional banks are asset sensitive and more of a pure play on a rates move but we view the larger cap banks as having even more upside to the Trump Trade given the above points.\n\nBuy an XLF 17March2017 call spread:\n• Buy the 105% call / sell a 110% call with a 115% at-expiry knock-in\n• Total premium: 1.75%\n\nAll eyes are on Sunday's 60 Minutes interview with Trump. Market is pricing that all regulations will be rolled back (very optimistic). Any hint that this is not true could lead to pullback on Monday.\n\nNote on tech: we're seeing FANG used as a source of funds with the rotation from growth into value. There's also the tax read-through: tech is already relatively tax advantaged @ 22%; Industrials are at 30%, Financials at 29%. Next year, tech could benefit from a repatriation tax holiday but that is viewed as more of a Q1/Q2 trade.\n\nMore thoughts on financials:\nWith respect to the economy, the market is certainly indicating that there will be a large fiscal stimulus which may send US growth higher and that's a good thing for financials for a wide variety of reasons, from employment to wages to loan growth and credit quality (even if somewhat offset by higher rates). It does remain to be seen exactly how much of this expected policy actually gets done, but at the moment, investors are willing to take a certain amount of growth on faith.\nSo those are positives for financials before we even discuss regulation. The move in the financials since the election would seem to indicate that investors have concluded that nearly every piece of financial regulation will get put into a shredder on day one of the new administration. The incoming administration has fueled that with comments about rolling back pieces (or more) of Dodd-Frank in particular. I can see making the case for that to the American public by saying that banks need less regulation in order to get more capital flowing into the economy to drive growth. Not only does that mean that the E is likely too low (meaning that the P/E is not as high as it seems) but it could help improve ROE's as well which could increase the multiple of that higher E investors are willing to pay. Note that while ROEs could go higher, it's unlikely that they can get back to the peaks..."}, {"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E.", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 14, 2016 12:05 PM", "subject": "RE: Financials trade for Monday", "body": "We continue to see buyers of XLF today. Funds are underweight financials in all regions, valuations are reasonable, earnings are improving and financials tend to outperform when bond yields rise.\n\nVol is higher today — refreshed pricing below.\n\nBuy an XLF 17March2017 call spread:\n• Buy the 105% call / sell a 110% call with a 115% at-expiry knock-in\n• Total premium: 1.86%\n\nGlobal Positioning in Stocks: Nigel Tupper notes the 4000 funds in our \"Positioning in Stocks\" analysis are more underweight Financials, on average, than any other sector and are underweight this sector in all regions of the world. If earnings continue to improve and yield rise, which is often the case in an upturn in our Global Wave, then the unloved Financials sector has the potential to continue to outperform.\n\nGlobal Quant Panorama: \"Bearish on Bonds\" stocks (which tend to move in the opposite direction to bond yields) tend to outperform our \"Bullish On Bonds\" when bond yields rise. The sectors that tend to perform best as bond yields rise are Energy, Tech, Materials, Banks, and Diversified Financials. Of these sectors, the laggards this year have been Banks and Diversified Financials. With a PE of 15.9x and a PB of 2.0x, Global valuations are reasonable. Also, Risk is near all-time lows in terms of PE in most regions. Now that macro and earnings data have triggered the beginning of a rotation, Value becomes very relevant."}, {"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "11/17/2016 6:05:47 PM", "subject": "Financials trade for Monday", "body": "Financials: buy XLF Mar17 $22 call with $26 KO for $0.87 with full premium rebate on KO\n\nOur Financials Conference was this week and client attendance was up by 66% from last year. Yes, banks/financials might pull back at some point after this run-up but we would be buyers on any pullbacks and we continue to see further upside from multiple expansion and earnings growth. Our analyst raised her price targets by —11% across the board. The long term rotation from bonds and div stocks into sectors like financials is only beginning.\n\nVol is higher on the week; what prices well now:\nBuy the XLF March 2017 $22 call with $26 Knock-Out (continuous) for $0.87, with a full premium rebate if knock-out occurs.\n\nThis prices attractively given flat call skew and if XLF breaches $26 and this knocks out, at least you get your premium back.\n\nPlease find our Financials report attached.\n\nFuture of Financials conference hosted 90 public and private companies at our Future of Financials conference. We are raising our price objectives across most of our names. Three primary reasons why we think there is upside remaining after the recent rally: 1) an improved outlook on both activity levels and interest rates, driving revenue upside; 2) potentially lower regulatory burden, particularly as new supervisory leadership can come with the new administration; and 3) relatively lighter positioning in US financials vs. other sectors. (Erika Najarian)"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033515.txt_6568
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033515.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 1, 2019 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/446491-trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-emmet-flood"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Why is this interesting?...Donny duetsch now has a show....should I go on and talk about \"the jeffrey I know\"...?....i am in london when you are in paris...we should try to make progress then"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, June 3, 2019 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Future"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Huh?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "6/3/2019 1:20:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Nobt"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033273.txt_6570
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033273.txt
|
Bombshell report emerges of alleged Trump affair with Playboy model I New York Post
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/16/2018 12:56:55 PM", "subject": "Bombshell report emerges of alleged Trump affair with Playboy model I New York Post", "body": "Importance: High \nhttps://nypost.com/2018/02/16/ronan-farrow-details-alleged-trump-affair-with-playboy-model-in-new-yorker-piece/"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033267.txt_6580
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033267.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 2:02:30 PM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "Trump estimate arrival Jan 12 evening \nPOTUS arrival — Friday, January 12th, time TBD (likely PM) \nPOTUS departure — Monday, January 15th, time TBD (likely PM) \nAdvance teams arrive tomorrow — hope to learn more specific times for these movements and will update you. \nRumors of a visit the following week are surfacing — January 10-21 st."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029087.txt_6582
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029087.txt
|
Greetings from Japan
|
[{"sender": "Jeremy Rubin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/1/2017 5:18:08 AM", "subject": "Greetings from Japan", "body": "Hey Jeffrey,\nThought I'd check in and see what's up on your end.\n- I've been watching closely Trump's appointees and there, he might be putting Balaji (a big bitcoiner)\nas FDA head, and Allison seems to be somewhat in favor of something like Bitcoin. And of course,\nThiel has said that Bitcoin is what Paypal should have been... Curious to hear where your head is at\non this matter.\n- Last week, I presented my research at Stanford's BPASE, it was well received. The most interesting\nthing I came up with for that is an inverse-input contract; i.e., funds that are \"locked\" to be spent only\nin the case where there are other funds that are not used in a specific way. An example of something\nthat could be built with this: a matching donation contract, where you agree to donate your money to\ncharity if someone else donates to charity, and you would not be able to release your funds from that\nagreement until they use their funds not for charity.\n- I'm in Japan this week, teaching a class to 100 Japanese Engineers to get the up to speed on\nbitcoin (with DG). It's very interesting to see the trepidation first hand that they have with respect to\nthe technology, despite their debit-based society being more geared for it in any case (DG felt that\neven putting Bitcoin in the course name would scare away students). One of my friends (a hedge\nfund manager) told me that female japanese engineers are very good, and drastically under-valued. I\nmade sure to get a few invited to the class, we'll see if he's right. On the whole, it will be interesting to\nsee the caliber of engineer Japan has to offer on this front.\nBest,\nJeremy"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031566.txt_6594
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031566.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is it a coincidence that the russian that bought the house in palm beach and knows all , is the same guy that\nsold a painting last year to mbs for 450 million dollars. that was only worth 1. 5m?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So MBS was paying him off? Why? Ideas?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reminder trump overuled congress on yemen ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 9:37:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Starting to smell sweet, the way you put it!"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033122.txt_6601
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033122.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack LANG"], "timestamp": "9/26/2018 5:14:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tom pritzker has asked if you have ideas re the Pritzker Prize"}, {"sender": "Jack LANG", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dear Jerffrey,\n\nHave you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?\nOur recent conversation on Trump was exciting.\n\nOnce again you are right.\n\nSee you soon,\n\nWith my friendship,\n\nJack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jack- tom - tom jacques"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030693.txt_6602
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030693.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great. Im thrilled for you. At the moment he’s coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off sat to europe mid east etc. return around the 30"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "don't forget I want to go with you to the mid east sometime..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why dont we also ask harvey weinstein to join to make sure we dont get any press :)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:20:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ha! On another note, this Woody thing is going south very quickly. Planning to speak to them this morning."}]
| 7
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013482.txt_6604
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013482.txt
|
Report on Stem Cells future
|
[{"sender": "Steven Victor MD", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/23/2012 1:06:38 PM", "subject": "Report on Stem Cells future", "body": "PUBLISHED: 22 NOVEMBER 2012\nThe view from the US: Stem cell therapy steps up a gear with first\napproval and improved political climate\nSpecial Report\nPeter Winter\nPositive clinical data, increases in federal funding and the first regulatory approval of a manufactured stem\ncell product mean momentum is building in the US. With the re-election of President Obama, this is likely to\nconf nue\nShare on twitterShare on linkedinShare on facebookShare on email\nImage: Bigstock\nWhen US President Barack Obama came into office he made good on his promise to overturn President George W. Bush's executive\norder that - with the exception of a handful of existing stem cell lines - prohibited federal funding of human embryonic stem cell (hESC)\nresearch.\nSpecial Report - Stem Cell Research under Horizon 2020\nStem Cell Research in Horizon 2020: Experts debate what Europe must do to maintain its lead in regenerative medicine\nThe view from the US: Stem cell therapy steps up a gear with first approval and improved political climate\nView from Europe: Delivering on the vision of regenerative medicine and stem cells\nTalking to the experts: Why the EU should support human embryonic stem cell research in Horizon 2020\nOVERVIEW: Regenerate the future - human embryonic stem cell research is crucial to deliver health and growth\nThis easing of restrictions on hESC research was expected to engender enough confidence to attract investors into the space and\nencourage pharmaceutical and biotech companies to build robust product pipelines based on stem cell therapies. However, a tougher\nregulatory climate for biopharmaceuticals in general and a protracted legal challenge to the relaxing of rules on hESCs has served to\nkeep both big pharma companies and venture capitalists on the sidelines to date.\nNevertheless, there has been progress, particularly at the research end of the development spectrum. Three and a half years on stem\ncells are no longer high on the political agenda as they once were. This speaks to the generally positive public acceptance of stem cell\nresearch in the US. A Research!America poll of likely voters in the presidential election, conducted in August 2012, found that 61 per\ncent of prospective voters were in favor of expanding funding for hESC research.\nInvestor interest\nLooking back over his first term in office Obama can point to some major gains. These include funding increases for the National\nInstitutes of Health's (NIH) stem cell initiatives, and greater investor interest in the wider field of regenerative medicine including the use\nof adult stem cells and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.\nHowever, it hasn't all been smooth sailing. Although after protracted forethought, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave the\ngreen light for the Californian biotech Geron to begin the very first human clinical trial of a human embryonic stem cell-derived therapy\nin January 2009, the trial has not been without its problems.\nThe Phase I trial, treating patients with acute spinal cord injury, was hit with an FDA clinical hold causing significant delays to its\ninitiation in 2010. A year later, after 15 years' effort, the Geron washed its hands of the programme, blaming its withdrawal from the\nstem cell space on capital scarcity and uncertain economic conditions. The decision wiped out a leading player in hESC translation and\ncommercialisation. However, the regenerative medicine sector has been able to recover and is beginning to blossom. (See Public\nMarkets section below). The prime movers in the Geron trial are now attempting to revive it.\nResearch funding robust\nFederal funding for all forms of stem cell research has increased over the past four years. However, the NIH funding component for\nhESC has been dogged by litigation for the past three years. In Sherley v. Sebelius, researchers James Sherley and Theresa Deisher,\nwho worked with adult stem cells, claimed the NIH guidelines violated the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, which prohibits the use of federal\nfunds for research in which human embryos are destroyed or discarded. This overhang was not finally removed until August 2012 when\na three-judge panel from the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously upheld the NIH 2009 guidelines that\npermit funding of hESC research.\nThrough its Common Fund the NIH has established the Center for Regenerative Medicine (NIH CRM), to support this field, with the\ngoal of accelerating the translation of stem cell-based clinical therapies.\nState funding filling the void\nWith stem cell research in general not attracting a significant amount of venture funding, the California Institute of Regenerative\nMedicine (CIRM), which was established in 2004 with $3 billion for stem cell research at California universities and research institutions,\nhas begun to fill the void left by traditional venture capital firms. To date CIRM has allocated $150 million in funding to help move\npromising stem cell-based therapies from the bench into clinical trials.\n'We are a lot closer to having promising therapies ready for clinical trials, so it makes sense that we step up our engagement with\nindustry to help fund those trials and move those therapies closer to approval by the FDA,\" said Duane Roth, vice chair of the governing\nboard of CIRM.\nCIRM's funding for translational research is good news for biotech companies, providing them with a source of funds in a field where it\nremains challenging to raise private capital.\nThree biotech companies have been funded so far under CIRM's Strategic Partnership Awards initiative. A grant of $10.1 million was\nawarded to ViaCyte Inc. to continue preclinical research and initiate clinical testing of an embryonic stem cell-based therapy for patients\nwith insulin-dependent diabetes.\nMeanwhile, Bluebird Bio Inc. will use a $9.3 million grant to support a Phase I/II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LentiGlobin,\nthe company's programme for the treatment of the inherited blood disorder beta-thalassemia, which will be initiated in the US in 2013.\nStemCells Inc. has been awarded up to $20 million to fund preclinical development of its product consisting of purified human neural\nstem cells for treating Alzheimer's disease, with the goal of filing for permission to carry out a clinical trial in that time. In July, CIRM\napproved a separate award to the company for up to $20 million to fund preclinical development of a cell therapy for spinal cord injury.\nPublic Markets\nIt has been a good year for stem cell companies on the public markets, with the thirteen publicly-listed stem cell companies showing an\naverage increase in share price of 11.6 percent in the year-to-date.\nThis boost came from a regulatory approval and positive clinical trials results. It was a big breakthrough for the field as a whole when\nthe Canadian regulator Health Canada approved Prochymal, Osiris Therapeutics Inc.'s allogeneic stem cell treatment for graft-vs.-host\ndisease (GvHD) in children.\nThe decision marked the world's first regulatory approval of a manufactured stem cell product and the first therapy approved for GvHD\n— a devastating complication of bone marrow transplantation that kills up to 80 percent of children affected, many within just weeks of\ndiagnosis. The company's stock value has almost doubled in the course of this year.\nMeanwhile, Newark, California-based StemCells, Inc. has seen its shares rise 148 per cent in the year to date. In addition to its CIRM\ngrants, the company recently reported clinical and preclinical data demonstrating the therapeutic potential of a cell therapy for treating\nmyelination disorders.\nPluristem Therapeutics Inc.'s stock value also has jumped 44 per cent, on the strength of reporting a single case study in wh ich a\npatient with aplastic bone marrow who received an intramuscular injection of its PLacental eXpanded cells under compassionate use\nsaw an improvement. The company was also able to successfully complete a public offering which netted about US$30 million.\nPositive clinical trials will begin to encourage investment\nWhile still in their early stages of development - and with clinical trials having only involved a limited number of patients - reports to date\nhave been very promising, and provide further validation for encouraging investment in stem cell therapeutics. For example, data from a\nhuman embryonic stem cell trial conducted by Advanced Cell Technology and published in medical journal The Lancet, showed that\ntwo patients with Stargardt's disease, a degenerative eye condition, had regained some vision.\nIn addition, positive early data from a spinal cord injury trial involving StemCells' neural stem cells indicated that two patients with no\nfeeling below the site of injury were able to regain sensation, while in another study from the company, patients with a rare myelination\ndisorder were able to create myelin, an advance that holds promise for treating multiple sclerosis and cerebral palsy.\nThis scientific progress has helped breath a new sense of optimism into the US stem cell sector. The Fiscal Cliff apart, it seems likely\nthis momentum will continue now Obama has secured a second term.\nPeter Winter is a writer, editor and analyst on the global biotechnology industry. He is currently editor of BioWorld Insight."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027041.txt_6617
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027041.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "does the 23 work in cambridge"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Absolutely. 23rd is great. I teach my seminar that day at 1 but could tape in the morning or after class--in my office (very private), or at the Harvardx studios (less) or in the Woodberry poetry room (the nicest place). . If Woody wanted, we could bring some students into the taping or just do the two of us... \nWoody is absolutely welcome to come to the seminar, of course\nJohn McCain, Tony Kushner, Al Gore have all signed on the last 2 days... crazy"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Or we could do the taping at my house. That would be totally delightful too"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Oct 5, 2013, at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how much time should i allocate?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 10:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey, \nFor taping in Cambridge? For breakfast and taping at my house. Depends on what woody is up for. My ideal would be a 1/2 hour-40 minute conversation, but we could do a quick taping in 15 minutes ...my team can be ready\nAnd , just to remind,could also come to do taping in ny on 24th because I'm coming to New York the evening of 23rd for a YIVO event--to which you would both be most welcome I'm sure (YIVO is the largest collection of materials from Jewish Eastern Europe)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Oct 6, 2013, at 6:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ill check „ what time do you have to be in ny on the 23 rd? ?."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/6/2013 12:57:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "This event is at the apartment of the chairman of the YIVO board. My plan had been to take the 4 or 5 shuttle and cab right here"}]
| 7
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031637.txt_6633
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031637.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["iaborY."], "timestamp": "11/5/2016 1:38:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thank you for being understanding, I hate canceling, but i will explain when i see you. . the states will be in \nturmoil for awhile no matter who wins, its also possible that there will be court battles to decide . like bush \ngore. . one thing is for sure, women are angry, they have more power, and race relations are sensitve."}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "No worries. I understand your situation. I will leave on the 9th will be back on 13th. Again leave on the 16 \nand back on 18th. I had fixed an appoint for you on Monday with Shk. Hamad. Which I shall cancel and fix \nlater. Let me know when you plan again your trip to Doha."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, November 5, 2016", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "unfortunatlely, too much work around the election. I will need to cancel doha before the 9th, it is \ns0000 crazy. many stories to tell when i see you. when do you leave.? I feel badly about changes at the \nlast minute , but i hope you understand."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033298.txt_6637
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033298.txt
|
Trump Wall Street
|
[{"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/22/2016 4:15:25 PM", "subject": "Trump Wall Street", "body": "Any big finance names out there supporting trump that we have not heard about? We are trying to get an angle on who is supporting and who is not."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032838.txt_6640
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032838.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Merwin Dela cruz", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "5/14/2019 10:16:30 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Thank you for the heads up sir."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, May 14, 2019, 5:46 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "presidnet trump is going to be at our neighbors on thurs, so dont be surprsised if secret service check in"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025124.txt_6645
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025124.txt
|
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press.\nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster.\nThis is a staggering shit show."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 27, 2017 6:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "saudi?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Was there. Spoke well. Spent time w Softbank deputy Najeev or some such PIF guy too.\nFlying back.\nHow is life among the lucrative and louche?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "anyone stand out. . ? when we meet I will endeavor to mesmerize you with stories of D.C. so wild. !!!."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 3:10:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Softbank deputy guy i liked and seemed aware and honest re Son.\nLots of slathering to saudis. I yipped about inclusion.\nI observed that half the IQ In world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent\nof population....\nMnuchin plumbs new depths.\nWar seems more likely than I used to think\nDjT is world s luckiest guy in terms of opposition, economy etc. still think his world will collapse.\nI'm trying to figure why American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be\nirrelevant to your admission to Harvard, but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can't work at a network or\nthink tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031599.txt_6649
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031599.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas | EE"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:53:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl\n\nlauren petrella <a"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr. [iE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon I", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\n\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it --\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die."}]
| 4
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.