thread_id
stringlengths 37
43
| source_file
stringlengths 35
37
| subject
stringlengths 0
231
⌀ | messages
stringlengths 88
34.9k
| message_count
int64 1
42
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033508.txt_10246
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033508.txt
|
FW: Jane Doe
|
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Robert D. Critton Jr."], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 6:55:54 PM", "subject": "FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275.txt_10250
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275.txt
|
Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler f"], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:50 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors", "body": "Here's a story from The New York Times that I thought you'd find interesting: \nThe principled case for impeachment is clear. What's missing is the courage. \nRead More... \nGet The New York Times on your mobile device"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 23, 2018, at 11:03 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors", "body": "I think he makes the argument that it was his , trumps money , making it not illegal. though he also said he \nonly found out afterwards? and the fact according to the indicment was billed as services rendered and \ngrossed up. im sure his acct has flipped anyway. . I did talk in detail to starr yesterday re indicments how \ntrump can make a deal ( special counsel) . clintons trash can yes starr gave me more. YECHHHH! ."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <kathyruemmler@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:13 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors", "body": "It makes no difference whether it was his money. Issue is failure to disclose. Plus, fact that he has lied his \nass off about it makes clear that he knew it was illegal."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 23, 2018, at 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors", "body": "id, Morris concedes that American Dharma could be an uncomfortable experience for those still wrestling with \nthe realities of [stpithe Trump era in America: \"It's a kind of horror movie,\" says Morris. \"I don't know how \nbetter to describe it.\""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <kathyruemmler@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:55 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors", "body": "Rich person problem"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler f"], "timestamp": "8/23/2018 4:01:11 PM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors", "body": "ill call you from new york"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032616.txt_10251
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032616.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "ix", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now’"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ix"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["yy"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ix"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": "ix", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hi habebey .. i m in new york .. the sooner we meet the faster 1 go back to be with my son on his first week in a\nnew school ..\n\nif you bussy dont worry 1 can wait until thursday ..\n\nthnx again"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ix"], "timestamp": "Sep 13, 2017, at 4:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wed at 2?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 6:46:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "msg from touchline\nWe have media platform in the region called philanthropy age with gates foundation.\n\nThe guys who are working with us is\nKofi Rashid Gates foundation advisor who report dirctly to bill\nThis is the link\n\nhttp://www.philanthropyage.org\n\nPlease ask him not to focus on philanthropy age ... As its is one aspect of the over all deliverables\nthnx"}]
| 8
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031819.txt_10256
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031819.txt
|
Re: AVGO
|
[{"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 9:42 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nI understand your frustrations and appreciate your willingness to figure out a solution. I have some ideas which I will\nsend you over the weekend if that is OK.\n\nRe Broadcom: the stock is up $1.20 at $211.50. After the initial shock reaction of yesterday, there has been a lot of\nfocus on the cost synergies etc. but very little conviction in revenue opportunities. However until we hear from\nmanagement as to the overall intentions of the deal, uncertainty will linger."}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Any thoughts on the AVGO Aug puts? Stock trading at 204.50.\nAug puts now $6.50"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 1:55 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Ive had enough!!!! Which puts ???"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 1:55 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Ive had enough!!!! Which puts ???"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026607.txt_10260
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026607.txt
|
Fwd: Breaking News: Obama to Nominate Loretta Lynch as U.S. Attorney General
|
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/8/2014 1:20:15 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Breaking News: Obama to Nominate Loretta Lynch as U.S. Attorney General", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "NYTimes.com News Alert <nytdirect@nytimes.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "November 7, 2014 at 6:06:16 PM EST", "subject": "Breaking News: Obama to Nominate Loretta Lynch as U.S. Attorney General", "body": "BREAKING NEWS Friday, November 7, 2014 6:04 PM EST\n\nObama to Nominate Loretta Lynch as U.S. Attorney General\n\nPresident Obama will nominate Loretta E. Lynch, the top federal prosecutor in Brooklyn, to succeed Eric H. Holder Jr. as attorney general, people close to the process said Friday.\n\nIf confirmed, she would be the first African-American woman to serve as the nation’s top law enforcement official.\n\nShe would also be a rare instance of Mr. Obama’s reaching outside his inner circle to fill a crucial post.\n\nREAD MORE »\n\nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/08/us/politics/loretta-lynch-eric-holder-attorney-general.html?emc=edit_na_20141107"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029446.txt_10267
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029446.txt
|
Trump Calls Non-White Countries "S**tholes": The Daily Show
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/13/2018 11:29:05 PM", "subject": "Trump Calls Non-White Countries \"S**tholes\": The Daily Show", "body": "https : //youtu . be/oQkf032z\\INo"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028980.txt_10270
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028980.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Jul 28, 2016, at 3:01 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I'm available after 2 PM tomorrow if you have time ability and desire for a cup of coffee\nI can drop by if you are in town\nI have galleys of new book\nBest"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 28, 2016, at 10:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "How long New York"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016, at 8:00 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am in florida. palm beach. . we can skype. today tomrow? you should plan on a visit to my \nisland. you might want to consider taking some benedryl to resest your clock after jet lag. one hour \nbefore bedtime you you missed an interesting session up at harvard. perception„ language. , \nunderstanding. human and robot interaction"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016 at 8:05 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I can Skype this afternoon or tomorrow afternoon\nLet me know what works with you\nI took Benadryl at 6 PM and woke up at 3 PM\nI will check my Skype no\nHave not used it for sometime\nGood to know re Harvard program\nAmazing what we can do with technology even without understanding how perception occurs\nAll love"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016, at 8:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "my skype is jeevacation . or we can facetime if you prefer. does 12pm or 1 work for you. ? you \nare also welcome on my ranch in august in santa fe. anytime you like"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "FaceTime may be easier\nWhat no\nMine is\nI can do 2PM - have meetings before then\nI will take you up on your offers re visiting one of your places - when you are there\nI can also do 12 noon or any other time tomorrow\nBtw - do you know Marla Maples ?\nAnything we share is between us\nI share nothing with anyone but trust you"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016, at 8:19 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "2 pm, fine, . yes , in fact when she told donald she was pregnant. I lost a 10k dollar bet with him, and \nsent him a truck of baby food. in payment. but i have not spoken to her in many years since then. she can \ntell you the story of her friend who was caught having sex with her shoes. yes -shoes."}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016 at 8:22 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Let's connect 2PM\nFaceTime is easier as I will be out\nI've known Marla since those days\nHaving lunch with her\nShe seems v troubled right now"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016, at 8:29 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no - i mean her friend was stealing her high heels cutting the backs of the shoes open and fucking the shoe..\nits a funny story."}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016 at 8:33 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Fascinating !"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2016, at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http ://articles. chicagotribune.com/1992-07-16/news/9203 040348 l_pairs-of-maples-shoes-marla-maples-\ntrumparc"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/29/2016 1:12:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Roman poet whose name I forget - \" Nothing human is foreign to me. \""}]
| 12
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033246.txt_10280
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033246.txt
|
WoW
|
[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/6/2017 5:08:21 AM", "subject": "WoW", "body": "Jeffrey look at you. how great you are\n\nhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/599f532ae4b0d0ef9f1c129d\n\nPrivate Donor Helps Fund Scientists After\nTrump's Proposed “Anti-Science” Budget\nCuts\n\nwww.huffingtonpost.com\n\nThe famous American Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson,\nonce said, “The good thing about science is that it's true,\nwhether or not you believe in ...\n\ngreetings from mexico city...its so trashy, i wanna leave :/"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026985.txt_10282
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026985.txt
|
The Battle for Turkey / Day of the Jackal's Frederick Forsyth / New Yorker essayist Daniel Mendelsohn / superstar tenor Ian Bostridge
|
[{"sender": "How To Academy", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/25/2019 8:15:05 AM", "subject": "The Battle for Turkey / Day of the Jackal's Frederick Forsyth / New Yorker essayist Daniel Mendelsohn / superstar tenor Ian Bostridge", "body": "View in browser\nNewsletter June 2019\nwww.howtoacademy.com\n\n10.09.2019\nErdogan Rising: The Battle for the Soul of Turkey\nMore than 15 years before Trump ascended to the presidency, Turkey was the crucible for the new, authoritarian populism shaking the globe. Now, as elections in Istanbul suggest support for Erdogan's regime may be crumbling, Times correspondents Hannah Lucinda Smith and Antony Loyd turn to the future of Turkey's ailing democracy - and consider the lessons for the rest of the world.\nREAD MORE\n\n22.08.2019\nHow To Read the Classics: from the Greeks to Game of Thrones\nThe mythic paradigms of ancient Greece still course through the veins of contemporary art and culture. Join renowned cultural critic and bestselling author Daniel Mendelsohn and legendary tenor Ian Bostridge as they explore how.\nREAD MORE\n\n12.09.2019\nLegends Live: Frederick Forsyth in Conversation with Matthew Stadlen\nRAF officer, MI6 spy, BBC war correspondent: the life and career of Frederick Forsyth is as thrilling as any bestseller. Join LBC Presenter Matthew Stadlen as he explores the real-life adventures that inspired The Day of the Jackal, The Odessa File and dozens of other award-winning classic tales of geopolitical intrigue.\nREAD MORE\n\nhow to: HIGHLIGHTS\n\n02.07.2019\nJoseph Stiglitz on the Future of Capitalism\nJoseph E. Stiglitz & Jonathan Freedland\nIn our turbulent times, join us for an evening of insight and analysis from the world's pre-eminent economist — Nobel laureate and former Chief Economist of the World Bank, Joseph Stiglitz.\nREAD MORE\n\n10.07.2019\nAdam Phillips In Conversation\nAll of Us Can Achieve Extraordinary Things\nwith Anders Ericsson\nA masterclass in how all of us can achieve extraordinary things from the man whose research inspired Malcolm Gladwell's famous 10,000 hours rule.\nREAD MORE\n\nwith Adam Phillips\nAn evening of luminous insight from Adam Phillips, one of Britain's foremost psychoanalysts and an essayist 'whom it is a pleasure simply to hear think' (Sunday Telegraph).\nREAD MORE\n\n23.10.2019\nMichael Palin on North Korea\nwith Michael Palin\nJoin Michael Palin — Monty Python stalwart and intrepid globetrotter — for a glimpse of life inside the notoriously secretive Democratic People's Republic of Korea.\nREAD MORE\n\nhow to: NEW AUTUMN EVENTS\n\n11.09.2019\nMax Hastings: The Dambusters Story 1943\nwith Max Hastings\nThe raid of the Dambusters is one of the most exhilarating episodes in British history. In his new book CHASTISE The Dambusters Story 1943, our most brilliant military historian, Sir Max Hastings, uncovers the truth behind the legend.\nREAD MORE\n\n05.09.2019\nHow to Predict the Next Financial Crisis\nwith Robert J. Shiller & Matthew d'Ancona\nNobel laureate and Yale Professor Robert Shiller predicts bubbles, busts and other financial crises years before anyone else. Find out how — and be the first to discover his most powerful idea yet.\nREAD MORE\n\nhow to: FESTIVAL\n\n14.09.2019\nChange Your Life 2019\nwith various speakers\n\"If we could change ourselves, the tendencies in the world would also change... We need not wait to see what others do.\" Gandhi\nTrapped in the rat race. Bombarded by bad news. Exhausted by society's insistence that we give, give, give and get nothing back. Is it any wonder that stress and depression are global health emergencies?\nAt How To: Academy, we believe it's time to fight back against the rising tide of anxiety and despair. That's why we've partnered with The New York Times to create a new kind of festival — one dedicated to the philosophy of being the change you want to see.\nWe've brought together a spectacular line-up from across the globe to share insights for shaking up lives, careers, and society as a whole.\nREAD MORE\n\nShare\nTweet\nForward"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028770.txt_10283
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028770.txt
|
Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:27:07 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "call me now"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I go it (they even now approved you - they needed to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) for two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell individual seats). Guy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped. The nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all party access. I have the same ones (through Bill). I also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help. The price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is hard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap. The plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Kevin Frost", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Here is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena Schuster on the email below. They've already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner which happens right before the ball. I hope you guys are all planning to attend the dinner as well. You can tell your friend Jeffrey that he should buy the Mini car for me as a thank you. =)\nI'm getting in to Vienna on Friday afternoon. Let's get together on Friday night.\nSee you soon,"}, {"sender": "Magdalena Schuster", "recipients": ["Kevin Frost"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:04 PM", "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "attached please find an information sheet about the AIDS Solidarity Gala — I am sure Jeffrey will very much enjoy the Gala.\nI've also included the auction items at the Gala for your and Jeffrey's information.\nLet me know how I can be of further assistance.\nAll the best,\nLena"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026266.txt_10285
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026266.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 23, 2018, at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "<IMG-7184.jpg>"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem <q", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is that Steve Bannon?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes We have become friends you will like him"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 11:42:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump doesn’t like him\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031221.txt_10286
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031221.txt
|
Re: Program & Attendee list
|
[{"sender": "Cecilia Schött", "recipients": ["Barbro Ehnbom"], "timestamp": "August 18, 2012 8:44:29 AM GMT+02:00", "subject": "Program & Attendee list", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 18, 2012 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nI am sorry I did not call back Yesterday-I was exhausted from a crazy week and fell asleep\nas soon as I came home! Anyway, here is the full program and attendee list attached, this\nis the Globalization Summit I invited Bill Clinton to when I met him in Stockholm last Summer-\nBut he is a bit busy I gather!\nAnyway, hope got hold of you re search service? Also, I did see your mail\nabout possibly coming here end of September-however, I am supposedly arranging a fund-\nraiser for Congress Woman Diana deGette of Colorado on Sept 27 in NYC; she is the only one with a scientific agenda and she is just super-if anything I am hoping on your involvement?\nHow about going to Stockholm mid or end november..albeit a bit dark and maybe cold..?\nLet me know what you think!\nAlso, I just heard from my friend Jeff Kriendler in Miami and guess who was just walking in there -our friend Goldsamt! First prize for perseverance!\nAlso, Sofia and the prince is on every magazine here, I think it is wonderfull\nMarcus has two big concerts in Stockholm this coming week. Me - SALSS!\n\nKRAM\nBE"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barbro C Ehnbom"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:32 pm", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "who is you r wife choice this year?"}, {"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/21/2012 9:12:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "She is the one! Now SALSS 4 days...will get back to you next week...\nKram BE."}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030881.txt_10290
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030881.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/22/2013 2:08:00 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bruno Le Maire criticizes the French PM for failing to present efficient solutions to the crisis in Syria. Instead the PM has been merely following the course of Obama, who, according to Bruno, does not know what he wants. Such an approach has weakened the influence of France on the international arena and has undermined its sovereignty. Also watched some other videos of him - Bruno attacks Hollande for his tax policy and excuses him for \"not knowing what he is doing\".."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://video.lefigaro.fr/figaro/video/echange-muscle-entre-le-maire-et-fabius/2664796316001/"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031547.txt_10292
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031547.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "mcgann and mcmasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And...???? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "mcgann feels if he stays he risks indicment"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/16/2018 5:37:47 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Stevie boy should obviously take the fifth in response to the grand jury subpoena....and I be he doesn't"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030659.txt_10295
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030659.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number ?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you so"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 5:36:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012571.txt_10296
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012571.txt
|
Service of Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas
|
[{"sender": "FBI (SA Jason Richards)", "recipients": ["William Riley"], "timestamp": "06/20/2007", "subject": "Service of Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas", "body": "FBI FACSIMILE COVER SHEET\n\nTwo subpoenas: 1) William Riley and 2) Custodian of Records, Riley Kiraly."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021740.txt_10316
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021740.txt
|
Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald
|
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/14/2019 4:30:53 PM", "subject": "Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald", "body": "https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article226765309.html\n\nJeffrey Epstein prosecutor was previously rebuked for handling of a child sex case\nJulie K. Brown\n\nNine months before cutting a covert plea deal with sex trafficking suspect Jeffrey Epstein, Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta was notified that the lead prosecutor in Epstein's case had concealed victim information in another underage sex crimes case, the Miami Herald has learned.\n\nThe prosecutor, A. Marie Villafaña, was harshly rebuked by a federal judge in January 2007 for what he called her \"intentional and/or serious lapse in judgment\" when she failed to explicitly inform him that the defendant, a Texas man who traveled to Florida to have sex with a 14-year-old girl, had a prior history of predatory behavior with minors, court records show.\n\nAcosta, her boss at the time, not only knew about Villafaña's breach — records show that he subsequently defended it. Acosta assigned another prosecutor in his office to write a treatise for the judge in an unsuccessful attempt to persuade him to soften the stinging language in his order.\n\nSenior U.S. District Court Judge William J. Zloch copied Acosta on his order, noting, \"The court is at a total loss as to why the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, as well as the Assistant United States Attorney assigned to the above-styled cause, found it appropriate to intentionally withhold ... information from the court.\"\n\nA. Marie Villafaña was the lead federal prosecutor in the Jeffrey Epstein sex case. The U.S. attorney's office's handling of the prosecution, which led to a plea to minor charges in state court, has been harshly criticized.\n\nLater that year, Acosta and Villafaña put together a plea bargain for Epstein, a multimillionaire money manager who sexually abused nearly three dozen teenage girls at his mansion in Palm Beach. The deal, a federal judge ruled last month, was intentionally kept from his victims in violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act.\n\nWhile the two cases are unrelated, it shows that both Acosta and Villafaña had been warned about the importance of victim disclosure in sex crimes cases before the Epstein agreement. They nevertheless forged ahead with a pact with Epstein that violated the law.\n\nU.S. District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra wrote: \"When the Government gives information to victims, it cannot be misleading. While the Government spent untold hours negotiating the terms and implications of the [agreement] with Epstein's attorneys, scant information was shared with victims.\"\n\nThis comes as Acosta, who is now the U.S. secretary of labor, is facing mounting scrutiny for his oversight of the Epstein case. On Monday, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders declined to say whether President Trump has full confidence in Acosta, noting that Acosta's involvement in the Epstein case is currently under review.\n\nThe Justice Department launched a probe in January into whether Acosta, Villafaña and other prosecutors committed professional misconduct.\n\nFrancey Hakes, who worked in the Justice Department's Crimes Against Children unit, said Zloch's comments were so brutal that it should have deterred Acosta and Villafaña from keeping the deal secret.\n\n\"It is highly unusual for a court to allege an assistant U.S. attorney has intentionally withheld information. That allegation is like dropping a bomb in the legal community,\" she said.\n\nThe story behind a Palm Beach sex offender's remarkable deal\nPalm Beach multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein is a free man, despite sexually abusing dozens of underage girls according to police and prosecutors. His victims have never had a voice, until now.\n\n\"It seems to show that they are not taking these cases very seriously, they are not advocating for strong punishment for sexual predators, and not advocating for victims in a meaningful way.\"\n\nVillafaña, a well-regarded 18-year veteran federal prosecutor, would not comment for this story. But her lawyer, Jonathan Biran, said she has worked tirelessly on behalf of crime victims. She received the 2011 National Crime Victims' Rights Service Award as well as the Attorney General's Project Safe Childhood Award.\n\nHe also pointed out that the parents of the victim in the Texas man's case wrote a letter thanking Villafaña at the conclusion of the case.\n\n\"AUSA Villafaña has spent her 18-year career advocating tirelessly on behalf of victims of some of the most serious crimes in Florida, and has received numerous awards for her successful prosecution of major cases,\" Biran said, adding that Villafaña has \"made South Florida a safer place for children and adults alike.\"\n\nEnticing a minor\nBy all accounts, Adam McDaniel was an awkward and shy Texas teenager who spent countless hours on his computer, socializing with girls on the internet.\n\nIn 2005, McDaniel, then 19, traveled from Texas to Fort Lauderdale, where he hopped into a taxi and headed to Boca Raton to meet up with a 14-year-old girl he had been talking to online for about a year. He picked up the ninth grader at a high school basketball game, and drove her to a Marriott hotel where they spent the night, court records show.\n\nWhen she failed to come home that evening, her parents called Boca Raton police. Officers tracked the pair down at the hotel the next day, where they found them in bed, clad in little more than their underwear, according to court records.\n\nMcDaniel was arrested on federal sex charges, and pleaded guilty on Oct. 6, 2006, to enticing a minor into sexual conduct by means of interstate commerce, which carried a sentence of from five years up to 30 years in federal prison.\n\nU.S. District Judge William Zloch\nAt sentencing, McDaniel's public defender, Patrick Hunt, argued for a reduced sentence, blaming his client's immaturity for the crime. McDaniel had been a good student at Texas Tech and had a family that supported him, Hunt told Zloch.\n\nFamily and acquaintances, including a former Fort Worth police lieutenant, submitted letters to the court vouching for McDaniel's character.\n\nThere were other issues, however, presented to the judge. While McDaniel was being held in federal lockup awaiting sentencing, he had corresponded with his victim, despite being ordered not to contact her, the court record shows.\n\nStill, Hunt argued that a sentence of five years was overly harsh.\n\nVillafaña disagreed, but conceded that McDaniel would benefit from psychological treatment. She advocated for a sentence of five to six years, which was at the low end of the guideline.\n\nIt was then that the judge heard from the victim's mother.\n\nIn a statement, the mother decried the emotional and mental trauma her daughter suffered and the long road to recovery she had ahead of her. The mother mentioned she was further upset that McDaniel continued contact with her daughter after his arrest and she said she believed that McDaniel was still trying to manipulate her daughter by blaming her for his arrest.\n\nThe mother pointed out that prior to their sexual encounter, McDaniel had directed her daughter to watch sexually explicit movies and had described for her sex activities he had had with another underage girl.\n\nAt that point, the judge interrupted.\n\n\"...There has been some reference to another incident with a minor girl. What do you know about that, if anything?\" Zloch asked Villafaña.\n\nFormer U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta never told sexual-abuse victims of a lenient plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein.\nGetty Images\nOnly then did Zloch learn that McDaniel had preyed on other girls over the internet, including a 16-year-old California girl whom he brought to Texas and impregnated. He was also having another relationship with a 15-year-old girl at the time of his arrest, Villafaña admitted in court.\n\nThe judge promptly sentenced McDaniel to 10 years — twice what Villafaña recommended.\n\nThree months later, in January 2007, after reviewing the entire case, Zloch issued an order excoriating Villafaña for failing to tell him about McDaniel's prior history.\n\n\"The serial nature of defendant's seduction of minor girls was revealed for the first time to the court upon the Government's response to the Court's inquiry,\" Zloch wrote, explaining that the defendant's past was evidence of predatory behavior that warranted a harsher sentence because he may pose a danger to the community.\n\nAssistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie was assigned to try to correct the record and persuade the judge to strike a portion of his comments. They argued that since McDaniel had never before been charged with a crime, the history was not relevant at sentencing. The defendant's prior relationship with a 16-year-old was not illegal in Texas or in California, they said, and the girl classified her relationship as a friendship.\n\nAll the relevant information was provided to the probation department and at McDaniel's detention hearing, they added, making the point that it was in the record and therefore, not intentionally withheld by the government.\n\nWhile Zloch conceded that the information was part of the probation and bond hearing record, he said it was nevertheless the U.S. Attorney's Office's duty to present the defendant's prior history with minors at sentencing. He refused to strike the most critical portions of his order.\n\n\"Lack of candor to the court is a serious charge, and the judge has quite reasonably expressed dismay that the assistant U.S. attorney apparently intended that he never be given a full picture of the defendant's conduct,\" Hakes said.\n\nBut nine months later, in September 2007, Villafaña was in the throes of thorny negotiations with Epstein's lawyers. While an FBI investigation was ongoing, Villafaña discussed ways to quietly resolve the case, emails show.\n\nA Miami Herald investigation, \"Perversion of Justice,\" published in November, revealed how federal prosecutors, including Acosta and Villafaña, tried to keep the full scope of Epstein's crimes out of the public eye. At one point, they discussed charging Epstein in Miami, instead of Palm Beach where the crimes happened, noting there would be less media coverage.\n\nEmails also show that prosecutors repeatedly abided by Epstein's lawyers' demands that his victims not be told that an agreement had been reached until after he was sentenced. That meant that the girls could not appear at the hearing to derail the deal. Prosecutors had drafted a 53-page federal indictment on sex trafficking charges, but Acosta instead allowed Epstein to plead guilty to two prostitution charges in state court. In exchange, Epstein and his co-conspirators were given federal immunity.\n\nVillafaña wrote Epstein's lawyer, Jay Lefkowitz, to discuss the wording of the sentencing agreement for the judge:\n\n\"I will include all our standard language regarding resolving all criminal liability and I will mention co-conspirators, but I would prefer not to highlight for the judge all of the other crimes and all the other persons we could charge,\" Villafaña wrote.\n\nAt Epstein's sentencing, assistant Palm Beach prosecutor Lanna Belohlavek was questioned by the judge about whether all of Epstein's victims were told about the deal, as required by law.\n\n\"Are there more than one victim?\" Circuit Court Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo asked Belohlavek at the June 30, 2008 sentencing.\n\n\"There's several,\" Belohlavek replied.\n\n\"Are all the victims in both these cases in agreement with the terms of the plea?\" the judge asked.\n\n\"Yes,\" Belohlavek said.\n\nCoincidentally, the lawyer representing one of the victims was in the courtroom that day. He told the Herald that neither he, nor his client, was told about the agreement.\n\nAcosta has not responded to the Herald's repeated requests for comment. A spokesman at the Labor Department told the Washington Post last month: \"The office's decisions were approved by departmental leadership and followed departmental procedures.\"\n\nIn the past, Acosta has said that he believed the deal was the best chance prosecutors had of ensuring that Epstein spent some time behind bars and was required to register as a sex offender. Epstein served 13 months in the Palm Beach County jail — but he was allowed to leave for up to 12 hours a day as part of a work release program not normally offered to convicted sex offenders.\n\nEpstein's victims, now in their late 20s and 30s, are fighting to have his deal overturned and Epstein sent to prison.\n\nBradley Edwards, who represents several of Epstein's victims, defended Villafaña, saying he believed that she was directed to settle the case and not inform Epstein's victims about the deal.\n\n\"In my conversations with her, I came to believe that she was in a difficult position. She never came out and said this, but I suspected that someone above her directed her to do what she did,\" Edwards said."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030895.txt_10317
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030895.txt
|
Fwd: Statement in the Daily Beast?
|
[{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, Krauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\nwhy are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against Epstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or rational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is possible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with underage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you want to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 9:31:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you..\nhope all is well.."}]
| 8
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026272.txt_10323
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026272.txt
|
Re: SB
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/23/2018 1:57:50 PM", "subject": "Re: SB", "body": "I think his FT performance yesterday was quite a hit (btw, he reiterated that my book was all true--helpful!).\nCuriously, the liberals maybe more fascinated by him than the Trump base is."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:51 AM", "subject": "Re: SB", "body": "i passsed on your newsweek message yesterday. i think he is a bit lost no wins and donald off the rails"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:01 AM", "subject": "Re: SB", "body": "I reached out and I'm seeing him at 6:00 today."}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023429.txt_10327
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023429.txt
|
Re: Highlight
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments\n\nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my boyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or , getting creamed on my producer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be someone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there . When do we do Whitman's \"Song of Myself” 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready .\n\nA few other follow ups :\n\nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget . No writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance , no actors , no travel beyond the one location , certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or david brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said , I think If were hiring the crew id do it for less -- probably 1, 250,000 all in . But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David has . That has value too. As does Wgbh . But I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to be much more prepared for templeton, so thank you .\n\nT really liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff , but in googling him I noticed that we have the same birthday! May I have his email?\n\nYou are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? I'll improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep reading ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 23, 2014, at 7:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "clinton woody kagan , do not add one penny to budget"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2014 12:25:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "Jeffrey , if you are conceding any bit of the other things , with all due respect, that's exciting, as its new for me to be right about anything in the area of budgets .\n\nAs it happens,and as of today , there is huge dissatisfaction in public television world with the lower budget Clinton footage versus the Herbie Hancock footage. David g was there for Herbie and not for Clinton. I can see the difference .the pilot was made for 100, 000 , with savings on the Clinton but it does show"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031825.txt_10329
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031825.txt
|
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims
|
[{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/15/2019 12:21:00 AM", "subject": "From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims", "body": "I know it was an old piece but Fox is running it again today.\n\nThe numerous young women who say they were sexually abused by\nwealthy, Clinton-linked financier Jeffrey Epstein no longer appear set to\ntestify after a last-minute settlement was reached in a closely-watched civil\nlawsuit against the registered sex offender.\n\nhttps://www.foxnews.com/us/jeffrey-epstein-a-registered-sex-offender-settles-\ncivil-lawsuit-and-avoids-testimony-from-alleged-victims"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033252.txt_10332
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033252.txt
|
Radical Breakthroughs - Kuhn
|
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/25/2017 7:06:34 AM", "subject": "Radical Breakthroughs - Kuhn", "body": "Dear Jeffrey:\n\nTrust all is well. We are in full pre-production of our “Radical Breakthroughs” series/season for Closer To Truth. We expect to have a complete production plan, with contributors, locations and schedule, by mid/late November - when (coincidentally) I will be back in NY.\n\nMy next email will add detail, including first (rough) outlines of the first two episodes. I’ll be copying the producer/director of Closer To Truth, as | will from now on with all reports/communications related to the content of the series. Whenever we want to communicate privately, about the series/grant or anything else, please use a separate email (or respond to this one).\n\nIam in Santa Monica for two weeks, then Beijing for the big Party Congress. I may need to stay until after Trump’s (supposed) visit. Attached are my two recent BBC commentaries on China (N.Korea bomb and Myanmar refugees).\n\nAlways available to Skype.\n\nI am truly excited about the series - nothing like it, could have impact - and I deeply appreciate your generosity/support, confidence and trust.\n\nTake care and warm regards,\n\nRobert"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029174.txt_10339
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029174.txt
|
Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs
|
[{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/19/2018 3:53:57 AM", "subject": "Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "Jeffrey:\n\nHow’s all in our crazy world?\n\nI’m in NY until August 31 (then again, after Beijing, Sept. 25 — Oct. 14). If you are in town, meet?\n\nWhen convenient, I’d like you to meet Peter Getzels, Closer To Truth producer/director (I’ve worked with Peter\nfor 12 years); he would very much like to meet you in person, describe the Radical Breakthroughs process in\ndetail, get your feedback. He would come up from DC. We can always do Skype, of course, but Peter would\nappreciate to meet in person early in the process. Breakthroughs is a Big Project, big opportunity for impact.\nAll are truly excited.\n\nBelow are highlights of Breakthroughs progress.\n\nAttached is latest CNN on trade war and below are links (caution: a few weeks old is ancient history in Trump\ntime).\n\nThe US trade war against China: The view from Beijing\nhttps://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d514f3551544f78457a6333566d54/share_p.html\n\nHow should China handle the trade war?\nhttps://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d774d3449544d79457a6333566d54/share_p.html\n\nLove to discuss stuff.\n\nRobert\n\nRadical Breakthrough Development Work\n\n* Research on each of the 13 episodes is ongoing and we are moving towards creating a short list of the top\ncontributors per episode (with some contributors in multiple episodes).\n\n* We are aggregating the top contributors around 4 to 5 central locations, such as SF Bay Area, LA, Chicago,\nBoston, New York, Santa Fe, London, Oxford, and Cambridge for the main shoots.\n\n* We are creating a short list of locations for the secondary shoot - i.e. the more observational shoots on specific\nlabs and research facilities, such as the Music Lab at McGill, the Sleep Lab at Harvard.\n\n* We are planning a recce in the autumn to assess locations and meet some of the key contributors.\n\n* We've brought on a production manager / line producer as we develop detailed research, contributors,\nlocations, budgets."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033315.txt_10340
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033315.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:29:07 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Your boy should distance himself from Trump. Quick."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030343.txt_10342
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030343.txt
|
Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 12:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\n\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to\nwhich he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his\nresponse by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian\nKings Place\n90 York Way\nLondon\n\nN21 9GU"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 8:20:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022197.txt_10343
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022197.txt
|
Re: we'll see
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "It was a first draft"}, {"sender": "iS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 2:18 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Normally it's the copilots job to call out JJ, in this instance I'm calling her out)):"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I'm a pilot...| prefer sex slave to copilot ;)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "it was only meant as a pun on | |"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 4:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "| know, cute,, just a joke about people's unique sensitivities. You must have heard many this week. How are You doing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "sexy cute"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025592.txt_10353
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025592.txt
|
Re: Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha’s Vineyard
|
[{"sender": "Shaher", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/3/2013 9:37:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha’s Vineyard", "body": "Such an estate dear cousin many would like to own ,, if at the price I may be willing"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 3, 2013, at 1:46", "subject": "Re: Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha’s Vineyard", "body": "BORING"}, {"sender": "Shaher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:59 PM", "subject": "Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha’s Vineyard", "body": "Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha’s Vineyard\n\nCaroline Kennedy, the only surviving child of the late President John F. Kennedy, listed for sale about 90 acres\nof land in Martha’s Vineyard, a resort island off the Massachusetts coast.\n\nTwo waterfront parcels in the town of Aquinnah are on the market -- a 39.5-acre (16-hectare) property\navailable for $20 million, and a 53.5-acre piece for $25 million, according to the listings for 6 Red Gate Farm\nand 8 Red Gate Farm.\n\n“An exclusive waterfront property with incredible views of Squibnocket Pond, with further views over\ntowering sand dunes to the Atlantic Ocean,” the listing for 6 Red Gate Farm reads. “Plenty of privacy with\nvaried topography and easy pond access. Yours to create a marvelous estate.”\n\nThe land is part of a 366-acre stretch that has been private since Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis bought it in 1978,\nsaid John O’Connell, broker and owner of Vineyard Realty Group in Edgartown, Massachusetts.\n\nThe property is “a piece of the island that very few people have seen,” said O’Connell, who isn’t involved in\nthe sale.\n\nCorporate records for Red Gate Farm LLC, which owns the land, lists Edwin A. Schlossberg as the person\nresponsible for the parcels. He is the husband of Caroline Kennedy, who is expected to be Obama’s choice as\nthe next U.S. ambassador to Japan."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032779.txt_10367
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032779.txt
|
Fwd: RE: Barrack is not
|
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/9/2018 7:48:10 PM", "subject": "Fwd: RE: Barrack is not", "body": "For ur info\nhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesdigitalcoyers/2018/07/09/disastrous-deal-staggers-trump-ally-thomas-barrack/"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029606.txt_10369
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029606.txt
|
Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070
|
[{"sender": "iS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump -", "body": "Woowt\nMichael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump -\n\nhttps://www.npr.org/676040070"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump -", "body": "Yup"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump -", "body": "How are you sneaky?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump -", "body": "Sexy"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/12/2018 7:50:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": ""}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033301.txt_10375
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033301.txt
|
FW: Trump Force One Vs. Air Force One
|
[{"sender": "Barry Josephson", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/27/2016 3:20:09 PM", "subject": "FW: Trump Force One Vs. Air Force One", "body": "Funny!\nBest,\nBarry J"}, {"sender": "Niall McCarthy | Statista", "recipients": ["Barry Josephson"], "timestamp": "Monday, June 27, 2016 at 7:34 AM", "subject": "Trump Force One Vs. Air Force One", "body": "Dear Barry,\n\nWhen it comes to describing Donald Trump's private jet, the word\n\"impressive\" would be an understatement. The presumptive Republican Party\nnominee bought the Boeing 757-200 from Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen\nand he spared no expense kitting it out. Dubbed \"Trump Force One,\" the\nluxurious jet is equipped with a shower, gold-plated seatbelt buckles and a\n52-inch flatscreen with a library of 1,000 movies. Built in 1991, the 757 is\nestimated to have cost approximately $100 million. If Trump reaches the\nWhite House in November, he'll have to exchange his personal jet for the\npresidential fleet, two highly modified Boeing 747-200Bs. The aircraft used by\nthe president were built in 1986 and operate with the Air Force One callsign\nwhen the president is onboard. Will switching jets prove one of Trump's few\nregrets if he becomes president?\n\nEven though it cannot boast gold-plated accessories, Air Force One is a\nlarger aircraft, seating 70 passengers in comfort compared to Trump Force\nOne's 43. The presidential jet is also slightly faster with a range of about\n6,800 nautical miles compared to 4,100 for a 757. A VC-25A can also be\nrefuelled in mid-air by a tanker, extending its range even further.\n\nThe two presidential planes cost $325 million each and their cost of operation\ncomes to $179,750 per hour. The hourly cost of operation for a standard 757\nis just over $8,000 by comparison, though the taxpayer will pick up the higher\nbill for Air Force One. All that bling certainly inflated the cost of Trump Force\nOne but Air Force One is expensive because it's packed with equipment and\nfacilities to keep the president and his or her entourage safe at all times.\nThere is a hospital onboard, electronic countermeasures and heavy shielding\nto afford protection in the event of an electromagnetic pulse during a nuclear\nattack. All in all, if Trump does end up travelling regularly on Air Force One,\nhe probably won't regret trading in his gold seatbelt buckle for the presidential\nsuite on one of the most sophisticated airliners in the world.\n\nhttps://www.statista.com/chart/5110/trump-force-one-vs-air-force-one/"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030431.txt_10376
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030431.txt
|
My datebook
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wo!", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 1:37:40 AM", "subject": "My datebook", "body": "Three hours with SB who believes DJT won’t last to the mid terms. Also saw Brad Karp who is super menchy\nand offering much help on next book."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033329.txt_10385
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033329.txt
|
Fwd: China's dangerous test
|
[{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "11/21/2018 10:29:49 PM", "subject": "Fwd: China's dangerous test", "body": "See story on Chinese economists"}, {"sender": "Bloomberg <noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "November 21, 2018 at 4:46:50 PM EST", "subject": "China's dangerous test", "body": "Beijing plans to give its 22 million residents behavioral report cards as China moves toward higher-intensity monitoring of its entire population. This strategy, similar to those of other Chinese cities, has been made easier by mobile technology and existing state restrictions on electronic anonymity. Getting an \"F\" on this test doesn't mean staying after school, though. The consequences can last a lifetime. —David E. Rove/la\n\nHere are today's top stories\nIf there's one thing Americans do well, it's spend. The expectation this holiday shopping season is that they will burn through $1 trillion. But save a kind thought for one former king of Christmas: This is usually the most wonderful time of the year for gadget maker Apple. Not anymore.\nApple's helpers aren't feeling joyous, either. Foxconn Technology Group, the biggest assembler of iPhones, aims to cut $2.9 billion from expenses in 2019 as it faces \" a very difficult and competitive year.\"\n\nIn an extraordinary statement for a U.S. Supreme Court chief justice, John Roberts, an appointee of Republican President George W. Bush, criticized the Republican currently in the White House for implying a federal judge appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama was partisan. U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar this week blocked Donald Trump's latest effort to restrict immigration.\n\nU.S. fossil fuel producers say they expect to fix distribution issues tied to the Permian Basin next year, adding three pipelines and as many as 2 million barrels of oil a day. For OPEC, it's a very bad dream come true.\n\nDepressed about that money you just lost in your 401(k)? Don't feel too terrible, as it could have been much worse—just ask these guys. Besides, the bleeding finally stopped today as most equity benchmarks rose.\n\nDuring his time Running Nissan, Carlos Ghosn earned a lot more than his Japanese peers, but not nearly as much as other global auto leaders.\n\nWhat is Joe Weisenthal thinking about? The Fed. The Bloomberg news director has bad tidings for those of you who think the market's recent calamitous behavior might slow planned rate hikes.\n\nWhat you'll need to know tomorrow\n• China warns economists on predictions that don't toe the Party's line.\n• Dolce & Gabbana faces China boycott for \"racist\" videos.\n• The EU extended a stiff-arm to the U.K. over Sunday Brexit talks.\n• General Electric could be a $41 billion problem for these banks.\n• Scared investors will force Trump to deal on trade, TIAA Bank says.\n• A Boeing 737 narrowly avoided disaster on takeoff from Belfast.\n• George Papadopoulos? Robert Mueller says lock 'em up.\n\nSponsored Content by The Points Guy\nWith perks like 5x points on airfare and hotels, up to $200 in annual Uber credits, access to a network of airport lounges and more this premium card is worth the annual fee. Get access to exclusive lounges with this card.\n\nWhat you'll want to read tonight\nHow Do You Get a Millennial to Watch Golf?\nWhen AT&T acquired the rights to a pay-per-view duel between legends Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson, it suddenly faced a challenge: How do you create a golf event that appeals to both retirement age-traditionalists and a more lucrative, younger demographic? Less whispers, more wagers.\n\nHave you started strategizing for 2019? We have. Don't miss the annual Bloomberg Businessweek special report, The Year Ahead, on the major trends, disruptions, breakthrough products, innovations and movements to watch in the coming year. Get Bloomberg All Access in time to receive this issue in print and much more.\n\nThere's a new way to get the latest business news and analysis from Bloomberg. We're now on WhatsApp. Sign up here to get on-the-ground updates from reporters, breaking markets news, and more.\nDownload the Bloomberg app: It's available for iOS and Android.\n\nFOLLOW\nSEND TO A FRIEND\nYou received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Evening Briefing newsletter."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030498.txt_10386
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030498.txt
|
Re: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has \nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends ,"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "You would get sick of yesterday harvard party. Average age was 60. Non stop boring talks. Run away so quickly!!! \nWill be in nyc the following week feb 5 to 8th. Are you there?\nboris"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031428.txt_10393
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031428.txt
|
Fwd: Herald
|
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["a Weingarten, Reid", "Lilly Ann Sanchez", "Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:19:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Herald", "body": "Mccain cee mtn mn mr me a mmm Ni a mmm A mm em A NR ea RE NR ER RT ere TN"}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nPlay Video\n\nDurationA 3:51\nAG nominee Barr pledges to look into handling of Epstein case\n\nSen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case on January 15,\n2019, getting the nominee to commit to having the Department of Justice look into the handling of that case if\nconfirmed. C-SPAN Meta Viers\n\nBY JULIE K. BROWN\n\njbrown@miamiherald.com\n\nO00CO0O\n\nJust days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department has reassigned the Jeffrey Epstein victims' rights\ncase to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta, the attorneys representing Epstein's victims' attorneys said\n\nTuesday.\n\nMiami federal prosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims's lawyers on Monday, said they had recused\n\nthemselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein's victims."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033087.txt_10396
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033087.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 2:36:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "fe"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "chat? #?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump likely to hire dershowitz , no kidding"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030736.txt_10397
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030736.txt
|
Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer
|
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/20/2018 1:41:12 AM", "subject": "Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "https://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article216997195.html"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032989.txt_10403
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032989.txt
|
Re: Masa...
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "3/9/2017 3:22:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Masa...", "body": "tell him to ask nathan mhyrvold. . or bin salman"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Masa...", "body": "Trying to get you in with Masa crowd. Some resistance though, due to all the headlines/controversy - \n- as you might expect. I tell them about your relationship with Saudis/Gates/Trump crowd, but still \ndoubts. Working on it!"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028524.txt_10407
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028524.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/24/2014 7:06:50 AM", "subject": null, "body": "When I was 8 years old, I watched my trial-lawyer father play Horace Vandergelder in the Livingston, N.J.,\ncommunity-theater production of “Hello, Dolly!” He entered wearing an enormous marching-band bass drum\n(the character is in a parade), and he roared to his sobbing niece, “Dammit! How am I supposed to play\n“Yonkers My Yonkers’ with all that bellowing in my ears!” It was the most exciting thing I had ever seen.\n\nI was a melancholic child. Worried, anxious. I never felt as if I belonged anywhere, as if I were a foreign\nexchange student living among the other kids, who seemed predestined to love sports. Add to that alienation the\nfact that my parents were going through a divorce, and I was truly treading water. But in that junior high school\nauditorium, I felt like ’'d discovered a secret I didn’t even know was being whispered. There was a place where\nI might belong: It was the Theater, and I was sold.\n\nA few years later, at Stagedoor Manor in Loch Sheldrake, N.Y., I joined an intensive theater boot camp for kids\njust like me. The second I stepped off the bus, I felt like baby Simba when he’s lifted into the air in “The Lion\nKing” and all the animals sing. Everyone was affectionate; everyone hugged; no was called “gay” for doing\nanything that wasn’t masculine. (My insecurity about this had shamefully kept me from doing theater in\nschool.) It was utopia, and I never wanted to leave.\n\nFrom left, Helene Yorke, Zach Braff and Lenny Wolpe in the musical “Bullets Over Broadway.” Credit Sara\nKrulwich/The New York Times\n\nIt was there I met Michael Larsen, the musical director of the camp. He told me that I wasn’t just a camper\nhaving fun, but that I also had talent. And he was tough — sometimes he’d scream at me — but I knew it was\nbecause he thought I had a shot. (Michael was the first of many gay men instrumental in guiding me to where I\nam now, which is why I try to speak on behalf of gay rights whenever I can. But I suppose that’s a different\nessay.)\n\nAt 18, I was cast as Woody Allen and Diane Keaton’s son in the film “Manhattan Murder Mystery,” my first\nmovie role. And now, after studying film and theater at Northwestern University, playing J. D. on “Scrubs” on\nTV for nine years and directing two films, I’m working with Woody Allen again. I’m typing these words in my\ndressing room at the St. James Theater, where on April 10 Pll open in “Bullets Over Broadway,” a musical\nadaptation of his hit film. I play David Shayne, a struggling writer in 1929 New York who agrees to cast a\nmobster’s ditsy girlfriend in one of his plays in order to get it produced.\n\nThe St. James is where Yul Brynner opened in “The King and I” in 1951; where hits like “Oklahoma!,” “The\nPajama Game,” “Gypsy,” “The Who’s Tommy,” and “The Producers” played, and where, in 1964, by the most\nsurreal of coincidences, Carol Channing first descended an endless staircase in “Hello, Dolly!” I sit in Dressing\nRoom 201, where many of the great luminaries of the Broadway stage — Patti LuPone, Nathan Lane, Mandy\nPatinkin — have paced waiting for the intercom to chime, “Places for Act I, please.” This is the sanctuary that a\nlittle invisible boy in New Jersey dreamed he’d one day find.\n\nZach Braff in a 1988 production of \"Godspell\" at Stagedoor Manor. Credit Stagedoor Manor\n\nIt’s my first time on Broadway, but not my first time onstage. My first job straight out of college was in George\nC. Wolfe’s production of “Macbeth” at the Public Theater, starring Alec Baldwin, Liev Schreiber, Angela\nBassett and Michael C. Hall, and I’ve since appeared Off Broadway in shows at the Delacorte and Second Stage\nTheater."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032745.txt_10411
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032745.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today...."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i have to leave at 830 for the airpot thats why sorry"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 9:14:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "How about Monday morning? Easier for me...how did today go?"}]
| 10
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030722.txt_10414
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030722.txt
|
Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 7, 2018, at 10:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/8/2018 12:53:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon | Nieuwsuur", "body": "This drives me f*ing crazy.\n\nSimple question for your boy: Did Donald Trump actively promote the theory that Barak Obama was not born\n\nin the US and was therefore not a legitimate President?\n\nAnswer: Yes.\n\nHe should not defend that shit. He can defend populist/nationalism all he wants, but when he bullies people\n\ndefending obvious Trump lies, he loses credibility."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022936.txt_10417
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022936.txt
|
Re: Help!
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate it. I should be back feb 14,"}, {"sender": "<111=1M>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Appreciate what? I'm not sure you do. Be back for what? Where? I don't need to be photographed. I am trying to avoid that, hence the reason why I moved out here. I don't need people coming here looking for me to give them information about you or the \"people\" I was documented with... It's not my property. I don't think you get it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 10:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate your support is what i meant. has anyting happened recently? it is my birthday today"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032023.txt_10422
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032023.txt
|
AICE Update: Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?
|
[{"sender": "Mitchell Bard", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/1/2019 12:46:20 PM", "subject": "AICE Update: Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?", "body": "Did the British promise the Arabs independence in Palestine?\nIn July 1915, Hussein ibn 'Ali, the Sherif of Mecca, sent a letter to Sir Henry MacMahon, the High Commissioner for Egypt, informing him of the terms for Arab participation in the war against the Turks. The letters between Hussein and Mac-Mahon that followed outlined the areas that Britain was prepared to cede to the Arabs in exchange for their help."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030467.txt_10428
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030467.txt
|
RE:
|
[{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 8:58:30 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "What is this??? When this will stop. This is crazy. \nAnd you are NOT 57;) \nAnd certainly you are NOT socially awkward. \nWho is that idiot. \nBoris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:28 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance \n<http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2on/o3/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> \nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfaincom/contributors/vicky-ward> \nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM \n\n\"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. \nYou will never think the same way about anything again.\" \n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up \neverywhere at the moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. \nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of \nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with \nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British \nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to \npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal. \n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that \nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les \nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude \nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of \n$450 million. \n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women \nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the \nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. \n\nThis is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I \nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same \nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one \ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who \nis she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory \nthat really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself. \n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept \nrunning into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of \nyoung women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember \nasking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you,Vicky,\" was his riposte. \n\nI remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't \nstudied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at \nhome via messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\" \n\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. \n\n\"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He \nwas certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few \nmoments in his company and you know this to be true. \n\nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that \n\"Andy\"—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his \nstrange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what \nhe's talking about far more than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other \nfinanciers hang out with him. \n\nAnd Ghislaine? \n\nFull disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. \n\nShe is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours \ntalking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is \ncurious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent \nme a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even \nRupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill \nClinton with whom she is close friends. \n\nYet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-\nPlatero, (known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When \nit comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. \nAnd that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. \n\n\"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck; \ninconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\" \n\nIn many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect \nreplacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his \nsexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving \na massive \"black hole\" he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that \nstrange. \n\nIn fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful \npeople in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl \nissues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You \ndon't tend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett \ndidn't quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he \nhas been open about. \n\nSo what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her \nloyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look \nat Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for \nall sorts of blemishes."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033078.txt_10439
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033078.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <ee>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not confidence inspiring"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 12:26:50 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "but -accurate"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030315.txt_10459
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030315.txt
|
Re: Darren Indyke
|
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ken ,would take a stab at the article for the law journal. ? thx"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Here goes:\n\n\"Sweetheart deal! \" So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and now-friend -- Jeffrey Epstein. The critique is profoundly misplaced, supported neither by the law or the facts, nor by the structure of our constitutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey was subjected to an unprecedented federal intrusion into a quintessentially local criminal matter in south Florida. His offense to the social order -- involving sex for hire -- was entirely a matter entrusted to laws of the several States, not the federal government. His conduct -- a classic state offense --was being treated exactly that way by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County, but the overweening federal government intruded where it did not belong. And now, over ten years after the fact, the current assault on federal decision-makers at the time, including now-Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta (then the United States Attorney in south Florida), condemns the federal authorities for not going far enough.\n\nThe critics are entirely wrong. Neither the facts nor the law support the misguided criticisms being leveled by journalists and politicians at federal officials from over a decade ago -- including the highest levels of the Justice Department in Washington, D.C..\n\nHere are the key facts: Jeffrey Epstein, a successful self-made businessman with no prior criminal history whatever, engaged in illegal conduct that amounts to solicitation of prostitution. That was wrong, and it was reasonably viewed as a violation of Florida state law. Although no coercion, violence, alcohol, drugs and the like were involved, the unsavory facts were carefully assessed by experienced state prosecutors who aggressively enforce state criminal laws. No one turned a blind eye to potential offenses to the public order. To the contrary, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office conducted an extensive 15-month investigation, led by the chief of the Sex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then indicted by a state grand jury on a single felony count of solicitation of prostitution.\n\nDuring that intense investigation, the state prosecutors extensively gathered and analyzed the evidence, met face-to-face with many of the asserted victims, considered their credibility -- or lack thereof -- and considered the extent of exculpatory evidence. Then, after months of elaborate negotiations, the state prosecutors believed they had reached a reasoned resolution of the matter that vindicated the public interest -- a resolution entirely consistent with that of cases involving other similarly-situated defendants.\n\nThen, in came the feds. The United States Attorney's Office tried, to no avail, to fit Mr. Epstein's situation into its vision of what it viewed as a commercial trafficking ring targeting minors. This was anything but. At long last, the federal authorities acknowledged that stark reality and grudgingly agreed to defer prosecution to the state. But there was a huge catch. In the face of our arguments sharply condemning their overreach, the federal prosecutors insisted on many unorthodox requirements that tugged at fundamental values of due process. For example, the agreement required Mr. Epstein to pay an undisclosed list of asserted victims $150,000 each. Even more, the feds insisted that Jeffrey pay for an attorney to represent such unidentified victims if any chose to filed civil litigation against him. When asked what possible legal authority supported this extravagant exercise of national power, the feds lamely cited a wildly inapposite case from Alaska involving cocaine and forced on-the-street prostitution. Apples and oranges.\n\nUnder the federally-forced deal, Jeffrey was sentenced to jail. That would not have been the case under the agreed-upon state disposition of this non-violent, consensual commercial arrangement. Jeffrey complied, served that sentence, and in the process was treated exactly the same as other state-incarcerated individuals. His conduct was exemplary, and so characterized by the state custodial authorities. He continued his work, including his many philanthropic efforts.\n\nOur friend Jeffrey Epstein has paid his debt to society. He has also paid out millions of dollars to the asserted victims and their highly-creative lawyers. For over ten years, he has lived an exemplary life, including carrying on his wide-ranging philanthropies. Those of us who represented him in the Florida proceedings -- for customary professional fees -- now count him as a trusted friend.\n\nOur nation faces vitally important challenges, many involving the treatment of women and basic human dignity. Voices are rightly being raised speaking truth to power, especially about women in the workplace. But Jeffrey, an exemplary employer, has long since been called to account by the criminal justice system for his misdeeds of yesteryear. In the spirit of the bedrock American belief in second chances, that unhappy chapter in Jeffrey's otherwise-magnificent life should be allowed to close once and for all."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thoughts."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 15, 2018, at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Seems very good. Is there reason or opportunity here to evoke JE's Clinton connection? He had been publicly connected to the former President and became a proxy for the considerable anger at high levels of the Federal government that still surrounded Clinton. Likewise now, one reason to revive the story is that it is a way to tar a Trump administration official, who, in the normal course of his duties, happened to deal with the case."}, {"sender": "Matthew Hiltzik", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/15/2018 6:40:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Darren Indyke", "body": "Darren Indyke\nAlso think there should be a line in there somewhere which clearly confirms that JE understands and recognizes\nthat he did something wrong"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030394.txt_10460
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030394.txt
|
RE: The fool doth think he is wise
|
[{"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 22:58", "subject": "RE: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "Over crests and furrowed field\nWirey talons arching back\nEmpty roosts the plagued aspise\nRevel in their bloodied eyes\n\nWe fight on.\n\nThanks for sharing the foxhole.\n\nBest\n\nJes"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas, Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "RE: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020660.txt_10476
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020660.txt
|
Missing message
|
[{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 8:21:20 PM", "subject": "Missing message", "body": "no evidence you got the latest so i have sent you just the key message itself—rather long so i have put in bold \nthe only references to Enhanced Learning Foundation—references had to do with paying Amy Jacobson 30 \ngrand for a year of work on Honour killings—my own expenses covered by myself \n\nof course i know little or nothing about stocks but i do feel like Trump is nothing but bad news for them, which \nfrightens me, given that he has 2 more years—it has cost me >$100,000 recently not for obvious economic \nreasons but because it looks like we have no one sensible in charge of the whole country \n\nDecember 16 \nam good so far \nhad a very productive two days with my research assistant Amy Jacobson in New Jersey \nwe now have 60+ papers on honour killings in Jersey and another 20 in Jamaica \nespecially important areas are Pakistan, Turkey (Kurds), Saudi Arabia and India \nlots of variation in mating system, form of homicide, reasons given, frequency of multiple victims and/or \nmultiple perpetrators, degree of retribution and so on \nam working out the logical details on inheritance—females seem invariably to count for 1/2 of what a male does \nin Islam \nparallel-cousin marriages—father's brother—occur in the desserts of Saudi Arabia—it radiated out from there \nwith Islam—such systems are selected in competition with each other, as in Iraq—two paternal lineages bind \nagainst others similarly binding \ndeserts in other primates are often associated with more intense male-male between group fighting, e.g. \nhamadryas vs regular baboons—that we were doing more than riding the camels in the dessert is suggested by \nthe fact that a lactose-tolerant gene arose in that area related to the lactose of camels, so we were apparently \nmilking our camels ! \ni believe you have heard of the Enhanced Learning Foundation; it got me to where i am today on this \nsubject, and perhaps it may wish to go further \ni intend to do a year of intense work and then summarise. i was never mentally as fast as you and i am certainly \nnot getting faster with age (76 this February) but i do have a good eye for fundamental logic and i believe this \nwill be the last serious project in my life--i will not let go until i have wrapped this whole thing up, especially \nwith the help of Amy, who is now putting together a master Excel file on all this \ni plan a book on all of this of course, it will be co-authored by Dr Jacobson \nif the ELF wanted a formal proposal, i am happy to do so \n\nBTW resistance already making itself known—Texas A&M biology showed interest in hiring me but faculty \nwere critical of my honour killing work—particularly (as usual) my claim that victims were often beautiful—\nwhere was my \"metric\" for beauty?—without which i was not allowed to speculate--and wasn't i disrespecting \nthe dead by saying they were often beautiful while still alive !! \ni have thought through trans-sexuality in humans to my satisfaction—i will get back to you shortly on that \n\nall best \none final anecdote on Trans \nmet a very attractive 42 year old woman in New Orleans, married, 4 children, thoroughly heterosexual—no \nlesbian relationship—but she had a fantasy of being f—kid by a male -> female trans because she preferred a \ncock in her but also liked a female figure, hips, ass, soft skin etc—hadn't seen that anywhere on the internet! \n\nall best, in haste \nbob"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029122.txt_10479
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029122.txt
|
Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)
|
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Hi: When are you back in NY?\nAttached is the complete Preproduction Book for Radical Breakthroughs - now including Misha Gromov!\nLove your feedback, suggestions.\nAlso attached is the budget and timing of funding, as presented originally, now updated for the completion of preproduction (phase I). We are ready to go into production (phase II). See Budget, p. 4. Committed and excited.\nWhen to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2017, at 7:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "great work , but needs some editing, did not like multi verse and sensience. seems more blahblah"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "`Blahblahs' forbidden in 'Radical Breakthroughs'. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science and Rare Sentience).\nInitial ideas:\n* Expand the first episode \"Mathematics and Truth\" into two or likely three episodes. I'm intrigued by this because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner's 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)', astrophysics, cosmology, biology, general systems theory. I've felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think three episodes could work - if you agree, I'll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3 parts. Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277 episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the series.\n* Integrated Information Theory - quantifying and explaining consciousness (Giulio Tononi, Un of Wisconsin-Madison), plus supporters and critics. New controversial, science-based radical theory.\n* Evolutionary Dynamics - your program at Harvard - mathematical models. This is not an area of my expertise, but it could well fit Closer To Truth in general and Radical Breakthroughs in particular. But you need to tell me if you would like to include this.\n* Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and especially psychological research - the scandal in recent years. See links and attachments.\n* Other possibile areas you suggest\nWe would like to set a mutually agreed schedule so we can confirm and reserve the Closer To Truth 'season' of 13 episodes for 'Radical Breakthroughs', which we need to plan well in advance - especially as we begin 2018.\nSee you Jan. 5 - Looking forward to brainstorming.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 6:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "lets talk today. I went through the candidates in math. . we should talk, I have great hopes for this and am sure you woudl want to get it right though some of the math people write well , their speakinn style and presence is less than A , and probaby closer to a C +/ . Im around today or hte weekend if you would like to chat."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Terrific; looking forward.\nExcited to go through math candidates on the list, others too.\nEqually important, discuss edits/modifications to the 13 episodes (cutting blahs), expanding math episodes -\nsee below. Assuming we expand math episodes, we will need more mathematicians.\nHow's late afternoon after 5:30 pm / early evening today? - or weekend, day/times? (Family issues today -\nmother 102 in May.)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 1:04:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019346.txt_10495
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019346.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Maria Luisa", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon", "Preate Alexandra"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT", "subject": null, "body": ""}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021230.txt_10496
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021230.txt
|
Re: July 22
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "6/27/2009 11:22:50 AM", "subject": "Re: July 22", "body": "now is fine"}, {"sender": "Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Sat Jun 27 07:04:52 2009", "subject": "Re: July 22", "body": "Call me this afternoon\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal <1111.111.1111>", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Jun 26, 2009, at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: July 22", "body": "So I go to a designer's cocktail party last night and Jonanthan and Kimberly Farkus are there telling me about your coming home \ncelebration and there might be on seat left on his cousin's plane... .do you know about this? \nI mentioned that you said there was no \"release\" party.... \nI am coming if there is one- if you don't a \"surprise\" event- you might want to get into this. \nYour friends are counting the days to freedom... \nWent to Heyward Isham's funeral today... father of Ralph and Chris...very sad. Old wasp diplomat who was our Ambassador to \nHaiti in 60's- sounds like CIA... is CIA \nGoing to dinner with Amy Irving, her husband and Mario Platero, a brilliant Italian (Jewish) journalist- very chic- wife in \nEngand- he travels with Obama...runs big news agency here- very funny- you will love him- will introduce in your new life.. \nCannes Diary finally went to press... \nWas in LA for 3 days of meetings with every studio.. working hard for the business.. its there, but it'a like begging to get them \nto spend so we spend our days getting underwriting.. thank God I have a guy in the office that does this... \nPoured all day in Hamptons- sun just came out... \nMiss you... \nxoxo Peg"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032792.txt_10498
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032792.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "24 July 2018 21:54", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if you can, send me the spec on the bbj, with calendar dates for next few checks. . as you can see trump now said he wants a deal with iran. nuts"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["JEFF EPSTEIN [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/24/2018 7:57:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Let's keep our friendship and talk politics, you are after free information and I NO longer provide free information.\nV-BR\nAlireza ITTIHADIEH"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026064.txt_10499
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026064.txt
|
Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise
|
[{"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny Po", "recipients": ["Jeff"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nAs previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building and financing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record, history and presence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe’s most recognized financial advisors to the infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and sought secure, well-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors.\n\nWe have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry, TIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure debt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily involved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence, capital raising, legal & compliance functions as well as the sound governance and ESG management across all funds. Partnering with TIIC and BRIDGE has enabled Edmond de Rothschild to build a strong franchise within infrastructure investments, complementing its overall Private Equity offering. Edmond de Rothschild has also acted as anchor investor for these funds, demonstrating its strong alignment of interest with these investment teams. With Ariane we strongly believe that we should absolutely find a way to collaborate together with you to think and initiate something to serve the future needs of the US in the infrastructure field.\n\nPlease find attached further information on each manager. This would also be a chance for us to explore opportunities of working together in the future.\n\nPlease feel free to reach out to us if you require any further information. We look forward to hearing from you soon."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["EL HACHEM Johnny Po"], "timestamp": "8 Feb 2017, at 12:59", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the sidelines. trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the rothschild name."}, {"sender": "Ariane de Rothschild", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 10:20:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "If it s a debt fund , they were thinking of building it around senior and mezzanine debt which would yield 8 to 10% per yr with a kicker"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029835.txt_10500
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029835.txt
|
Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is 0UUCOY and I’m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Roy Black", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Alan M. Dershowitz", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:47:41 PM", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033044.txt_10501
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033044.txt
|
Re: STT
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "9/30/2017 9:46:50 PM", "subject": "Re: STT", "body": "no hes going to pr only maybe pence on fri"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski <P", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 1:43 PM", "subject": "Re: STT", "body": "Jeffrey\nI hear Pres Trump arrives in St Thomas on Tuesday FYI\n\nThx\nLarry"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023427.txt_10503
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023427.txt
|
Re: Highlight
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments \nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my \nboyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or, getting creamed on my \nproducer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be \nsomeone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there. \nWhen do we do Whitman's \"Song of Myself\" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready. \nA few other follow ups: \nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget. \nNo writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance , no \nactors, no travel beyond the one location, certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or david \n brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said , I think If were hiring the crew id do it for less --\nprobably 1, 250,000 all in. But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David has . That has value too. As does Wgbh. \nBut I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to be much more prepared for templeton, so \nthank you. \nI really liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff, but in googling him I noticed that we have the \nsame birthday! May I have his email? \nYou are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? I'll improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep \nreading ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 23, 2014", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "clinton woody kagan, do not add one penny to budget"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2014 12:06:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "Fab! And tomorrow?"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023433.txt_10512
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023433.txt
|
Re: Highlight
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New <1111>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments \nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my \nboyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or, getting creamed on \nmy producer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be \nsomeone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there. \nWhen do we do Whitman's \"Song of Myself\" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready. \nA few other follow ups: \nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget. \nNo writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance, \nno actors, no travel beyond the one location, certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or \ndavid brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said, I think If were hiring the crew id do it \nfor less -- probably 1, 250,000 all in . But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David has . That has value too. As \ndoes Wgbh . But I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to be much more prepared for \ntempleton, so thank you. \nI really liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff, but in googling him I noticed that we have the \nsame birthday! May I have his email? \nYou are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? I'll improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep \nreading ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 23, 2014", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "clinton woody kagan, do not add one penny to budget"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <1.111>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "What time????"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "thurs 1"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/25/2014 1:47:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Highlight", "body": "See you at 1:00...."}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033050.txt_10514
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033050.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "12/2/2017 5:13:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "schwartman"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn [unknown]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump in your neighborhood today. Looks like he is going to 740 Park for a fundraiser."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021475.txt_10524
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021475.txt
|
Re: 31E-MM-108062, 08/17/2007
|
[{"sender": "FBI Miami", "recipients": ["New York"], "timestamp": "08/17/2007", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 08/17/2007", "body": "FBI Miami requests travel concurrence from FBI New York to conduct witness interviews and serve target letters on subjects."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.txt_10530
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.txt
|
Jane Doe
|
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad — \nIn your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a \nDepartment of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records \nwithout a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have \nJane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form. \nAlso, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS?? \nPlease let me know."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:47 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this... \nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition \nwill follow. Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 7:00:05 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]
| 14
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031751.txt_10537
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031751.txt
|
Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Darren lndyke [dkiesg@aol.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/3/2018 9:44:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreply@google.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 3, 2018 at 4:38:01 PM EDT", "subject": "Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Jeffrey Epstein\nAs-it-happens update • May 3, 2018\nTom Arnold is gonna find the pee tape\nAV Club\n... Trump and Charles Kushner with \"young Russian hookers\" in Florida; a tape involving\nbillionaire and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein; what Arnold has called Trump's \"version\nof the Ray Rice elevator tape;\" assorted \"Howard Stern tapes;\" and, most obviously \"The Pee Pee\nTape,\" essentially the ... \nas irrelevant\nSee more results Edit this alert\nYou have received this email because you have subscribed to Google Alerts.\nUnsubscribe I View all your alerts\nReceive this alert as RSS feed\nSend Feedback"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031399.txt_10540
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031399.txt
|
Herald
|
[{"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:08:12 PM", "subject": "Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nPlay Video\n\nDurationA 3:51\nAG nominee Barr pledges to look into handling of Epstein case\n\nSen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case on January 15,\n2019, getting the nominee to commit to having the Department of Justice look into the handling of that case if\nconfirmed. C-SPAN Meta Viers\n\nBY JULIE K. BROWN\n\njbrown@miamiherald.com\n\nOOO00C0O\n\nJust days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department has reassigned the Jeffrey Epstein victims’ rights case to\n\nthe U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta, the attorneys representing Epstein’s victims’ attorneys said Tuesday.\n\nMiami federal prosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims’s lawyers on Monday, said they had recused\n\nthemselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein’s victims.\n\nThe reassignment means that the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, Byung J. “BJay” Pak, will\noversee the case for the government. Pak, a former Georgia lawmaker, was appointed Atlanta’s chief federal\n\nprosecutor by President Trump in October 2017.\n\nThe Justice Department is still under a Friday deadline for prosecutors to confer with the victims’ attorneys in an\neffort to settle the case. On Feb. 22, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra in Palm Beach ruled that federal\n\nprosecutors, under former Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, broke the law when they concealed a plea"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027041.txt_10541
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027041.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Absolutely. 23rd is great. I teach my seminar that day at 1 but could tape in the morning or after class--in my office (very private), or at the Harvardx studios (less) or in the Woodberry poetry room (the nicest place). If Woody wanted, we could bring some students into the taping or just do the two of us... Woody is absolutely welcome to come to the seminar, of course"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Or we could do the taping at my house. That would be totally delightful too"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 5, 2013, at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how much time should 1 allocate?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 10:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nFor taping in Cambridge? For breakfast and taping at my house. Depends on what woody is up for. My ideal would be a 1/2 hour-40 minute conversation, but we could do a quick taping in 15 minutes ...my team can be ready\n\nAnd , just to remind,could also come to do taping in ny on 24th because I'm coming to New York the evening of 23rd fora YIVO event--to which you would both be most welcome I'm sure (YTVO is the largest collection of materials from Jewish Eastern Europe)\nLisa"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 6, 2013, at 6:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill check ,, what time do you have to be in ny on the 23 rd? ?."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/6/2013 12:57:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "This event is at the apartment of the chairman of the YIVO board. My plan had been to take the 4 or 5 shuttle and cab right here"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030328.txt_10549
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030328.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 26, 2016 5:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "happy chanukah. . - has anyone in the past made a linguistic model that used fields instead of definitions, similar to a magnet field. to some degree. there is no one vector that describes the word but a field of them. home surrounded by a field of definitions. not based on 3 d space but based on context . one could integrate over the field. see smoothness. strength, change. . not sure it is useful. but having fun"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 26, 2016 9:59 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "For word meanings, the closest I can think of to something like this is an array of meaning postulates, in Carnap's sense, something that Jerry Fodor for one has toyed with. Multidimensional, but not a field. I don't see how to work it out, or to extend it to the interpretations of longer units."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 26, 2016 12:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "one of donalds closet people said that remember, he has written three books. few people in the world that has written more books than he has read which makes him one of the"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/26/2016 6:56:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I read what his ghost-writer said about him. Pretty scary. Reminds me of something I was told by Jon Snow, one of England's most sensible newsmen. He was with the press entourage accompanying Tony Blair on his visit to Saudi Arabia, and walking around one of the palaces one day, he saw Blair sitting in a room with a book in his lap, which greatly surprised him -- until he came over to talk. It was the New Testament. And then Blair started telling about how delighted he and Cheri were with the gold door handles,.... I notice that your prediction was right about Trump's avoiding the White House as far too primitive. Must be driving the Secret Service up the wall. I'll keep in mind what you say about Trump's tweets, but they are hard to ignore. Whatever he may think, others here and abroad can't help considering the meaning of the words, and take action accordingly. About meaning, It's not clear to me how to distinguish the meaning of \"New York\" (however it is correctly specified) from the concept. Still don't see how to work out field models.\nNoam"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029679.txt_10551
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029679.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "10/24/2012 4:58:47 PM", "subject": null, "body": "have one of your cronys ask to see the mortgage to mara lago cash from electricinas union„ ( his driver MAtt \nwas the bag man, later made an exec at the public co. ) and the 30 milllion dollar loan from the casino to donald \ntrump. backdated,"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031036.txt_10553
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031036.txt
|
Re: Check ou1- Sok p5 Google
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "5/16/2011 8:28:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Check ou1- Sok p5 Google", "body": "Yes\nSorry for all the typos"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 16, 2011, at 5:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Check ou1- Sok p5 Google", "body": "confirming that donation is to Stockholm School of Economics for 25k"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 14, 2011 at 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Check ou1- Sok p5 Google", "body": "25k from enhanced ed"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Check out", "body": "- Sok pa Google"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2011-05-14 12:18:45 Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: Check ou1- Sok p5 Google", "body": "she has been in my house. I will give you the 25k that you need."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, May 14, 2011 at 5:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Check ou1- Sok p5 Google", "body": "Click here:________________________- Sok pa Goodie I met this terrific girl in a church in Gotland, godmother to my friend Angelina Johns baby girl..she was so beautiful I thought - and she is obviously! And nice! Wants to do more good for Africa than she already does..thought of you but she may not be the Swedish girl we look for.... I am packing last minute - did not hear back from you...its ok I understand if it was much to ask for...but you did it last year so now when things are tough you spoilt me..! I will meet your friend Bill Clinton in Stockholm this Thursday - at the royal opera!! - next year SALSS - if I survive this year...will have a focus on Globalization and I thought I ask him to come....?! Anyway, off we go, me and Lalla...to start with to interview 10 candidates for FEOY 2011...Much love BE"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027126.txt_10583
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027126.txt
|
Re: Summers withdraws from Fed race
|
[{"sender": "FT Breaking News <FTgemailbriefings.ft.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "September 15 2013 23:50:52 GMT+03:00", "subject": "Summers withdraws from Fed race", "body": "Sunday September 15 2013\nBREAKING NEWS\nSummers withdraws from Fed race\nLawrence Summers has taken himself out of the running to be the next chair of the Federal Reserve, withdrawing his name after opposition from key Democratic senators indicated they would oppose his nomination.\nMr Summers, a former Treasury Secretary and senior economic adviser to Barack Obama in his first term, galvanised opposition among left-of-centre Democrats who painted him as symbol of the wrongs of financial deregulation."}, {"sender": "ehud barak", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Summers withdraws from Fed race", "body": "A major blow to a friend. Lest BO takes him to replace JL.\nNow he'll probably be free in the next few days. EB"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ehud barak"], "timestamp": "9/16/2013 11:15:03 AM", "subject": "Re: Summers withdraws from Fed race", "body": "yes the good side is now he is free to have fun and a life. LIsa the wife is very happy as she did not want to live in two cities. tell you more when i see you"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027054.txt_10592
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027054.txt
|
Tix for Jeffrey
|
[{"sender": "Kevin Frost [kevin.frost@amfar.org]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Boris:\n\nHere is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena Schuster on the email below. They’ve already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner which happens right before the ball. I hope you guys are all planning to attend the dinner as well. You can tell your friend Jeffrey that he should buy the Mini car for me as a thank you. =)\n\nI’m getting in to Vienna on Friday afternoon. Let’s get together on Friday night.\nSee you soon,\n\nKevin"}, {"sender": "Magdalena Schuster", "recipients": ["Kevin Frost"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:04 PM", "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "Hi Kevin,\n\nattached please find an information sheet about the AIDS Solidarity Gala — I am sure Jeffrey will very much enjoy the Gala.\n\nI’ve also included the auction items at the Gala for your and Jeffrey’s information.\n\nLet me know how I can be of further assistance."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033045.txt_10601
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033045.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["?", "larry"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "at the moment we will go to Ish on sunday the 26th early then to new york where 1 will stay the week,\nlarry , it will be assayay andI, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 4:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We have a ticket for [J to go back to Paris on Nov 24. What date shall I change this to since she will be\ntraveling with you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "11/16/2017 9:52:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "27"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023426.txt_10602
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023426.txt
|
Highlight
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/23/2014 10:17:55 PM", "subject": "Highlight", "body": "That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments \nDon't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my \nboyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or , getting creamed on \nmy producer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may \nbe someone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table \nthere . when do we do Whitman's \"song of Myself\" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready . \nA few other follow ups : \nDavid and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low \nbudget . No writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright \nclearance , no actors , no travel beyond the one location , certainly no clinton or woody allen or \njustice elena kagan or david brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said , I think if were \nhiring the crew id do it for less -- probably 1, 250,000 all in . But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David \nhas . That has value too. As does wgbh . But I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to \nbe much more prepared for templeton, so thank you . \nreally liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff , but in googling him I noticed that we have \nthe same birthday! May I have his email? \nYou are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep \nreading ?"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031022.txt_10606
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031022.txt
|
Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
|
[{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-\nepsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do \nwith his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with \nbeautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I \nalways judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've \nnever seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would \nbelieve him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, \nKrauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a \nthoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who \nhave been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\nwhy are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against \nEpstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or \nrational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is \npossible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with \nunderage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you \nwant to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were \nunderage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such \ncircumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage \nof him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine \nhis life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for \nsomething that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I \nfully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with \nJeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI \nknow and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, \nbecause in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of \nthe young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, \nand I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very \nstrongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the \ntime to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and \nthere was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or \nconsequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from \nyou.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:15:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}]
| 9
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032793.txt_10607
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032793.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "24 July 2018 21:54", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "if you can, send me the spec on the bbj, with calendar dates for next few checks. . as you can see trump now said he wants a deal with iran. nuts"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Let's keep our friendship and talk politics, you are after free information and I NO longer provide free information."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "On 24 Jul 2018, at 22:10", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i thought you were selling it"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/24/2018 8:13:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I'm not being funny, We got an Offer a few hours ago and we're going to accept it."}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021231.txt_10610
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021231.txt
|
Re: World economy growth interesting reading
|
[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 9:15 PM", "subject": "Re: World economy growth interesting reading", "body": "* 11 Places With a Worse Economy Than USA \nBy Rick Newman — Fri Jul 10, 11:50 am ET \n*How to tell when a real recovery begins.? \nBy Rick Newman \n*Obama says stimulus plan to kick in later this year. \nReuters \n11 Places With a Worse Economy Than USA \nBy Rick Newman — Fri Jul 10, 11:50 am ET \nWhen times are tough, one thing that tends to raise the spirits is knowing that somebody else has it worse. And as wretched as the \nU.S. economy seems, its not as bad as in other regions. \nThe International Monetary Fund's latest tally of world economic conditions forecasts a 2.6 decline in U.S. economic output for all of \n2009, and anemic growth of 0.8 percent in 2010. That's more optimistic than the IMF's prediction from three months ago, but those \nare still lousy numbers. A weak economy throughout 2010 would mean a bleak employment picture, an agonizingly slow housing \nrecovery, and another year or two likely to feel like a recession, whether its technically labeled that or not. \nWe should count ourselves lucky, though. The IMF expects at least 11 major parts of the world to have more severe economic \ncontractions than the United State this year, including most of western Europe, Japan, Russia, and Mexico. Europe will still be \nstumbling along behind the United States next year, as well. Here are the IMF's projections for economic growth in various parts of \nthe world: \n2009. 2010 \nChina. \t7.5. \t8.5 \nIndia. \t5.4 \t6.5 \nMiddle East 2.0 \t3.7 \nAfrica. 1.8 4.7 \nBrazil. -1.3 2.5 \nWorld total -1.4 2.5 \nCanada. \t-2.3 \t1.6 \nU.S. \t-2.6 \t0.8 \nFrance. \t-3.0 \t0.4 \nSpain. \t-4.0 \t-0.8 \nU.K. \t-4.2 \t0.2 \nE U. \t-4.7 \t-0.1 \nE Europe. -5.0 1.0 \nItaly. \t-5.1 \t-0.1 \nJapan. \t-6.0 \t1.7 \nGermany. \t-6.2 \t-0.6 \nRussia. \t-6.5 \t1.5 \nMexico. \t-7.3 \t3.0 \nIf these projections come true, it means the United States, despite its overspent consumers, wrecked banks, and insolvent auto \nmakers, will be leading the world economy out of recession. Somehow. The developing world will help, but those high growth \nprojections in China and India can be deceiving. \nChina in particular has government policies that practically mandate high growth, and 8.5 percent in 2010 would be just about the \nbare minimum to keep employment at tolerable levels. And neither China nor India is a major buyer of American-made goods and \nservices; for the most part, its the other way around. With much of the developed world trailing the United States, it will take \nAmerican consumers to ratchet up demand for the world's products. Scary thought. \nHow to tell when a real recovery begins.? \n4 Ways to Tell When a Real Recovery Has Begun \nYou could conclude just about anything from the daily cavalcade of economic statistics. Some suggest an imminent recovery. Others \nseem to foretell years of gloom. The bent of the expert interpreting the latest news—bull, bear, Obama-basher, Wall Street-hater—\nhas as much to do with the outlook as the numbers themselves. \nFor the foreseeable future, there will be an aggressive hunt for two economic recoveries. One is the technical improvement in \neconomic indicators that signals the economy is growing again. That's the one economists care about, which is why they scour the \nnumbers on retail sales, business inventories, purchasing manager sentiment, subatomic inflation, the mood in Shanghai, and \nanything else that could help pinpoint the exact inflection point for a turnaround. \nThe other recovery, the one that most consumers are waiting for, is the one in which companies stop firing and start hiring, banks \nreturn to normal lending, and families stop worrying about jobs and income. And that turnaround—the consumer recovery—is likely \nto take much longer to materialize than the technical recovery. \nThe danger of hyping a technical recovery is that it will arrive, with much fanfare—but fail to make ordinary consumers feel better \noff. Many economists, for example, are predicting that the recession will officially end by this summer or fall. The only problem is \nthat when a technical recovery begins, a lot of companies fail to get the memo. They don't play along; they keep payrolls lean and \nmaybe even continuing to lay off workers. So to guard against false optimism, here's how to tell when a real recovery is finally \nkicking into gear: \nUnemployment improves. The single best indicator of the health of the economy is the job market. People who have lost their job, or \nworry that they might, obviously hoard their money and don't spend. That spells doom for an economy driven by consumer spending, \nas ours is. But once its clear that jobs are coming back, consumers are more likely to relax and open their wallets. \nProjections about unemployment should make anybody queasy about the prospects for a recovery this year. The unemployment rate \nis currently 9.4 percent, a steep rise from one year ago, when it was an unremarkable 5.5 percent. And by most accounts, its going to \nget worse. The International Monetary Fund expects the U.S. unemployment rate to be 10.1 percent in 2010. Economist Gary \nShilling thinks unemployment will hit 11.4 percent and not peak until late next year. \nIts hard to imagine a \"recovery\" in which jobs are even more scarce than they are now. When the unemployment rate finally starts to \ngo in the other direction, we can start to think about putting the umbrellas away. Until then, no number of upticks or volume of \noptimistic talk will persuade Americans worried about their jobs that they should part with precious cash. \nHousing prices stabilize. This has become a mantra by now: For the economy to get healthy, housing prices must stop falling. \nProblem is, the houses haven't been listening. \nHousing matters for two reasons: It represents a big chunk of the economy, and its the largest single repository of Americans' \nhousehold wealth. With prices falling, buyers are scarce, since nobody wants to buy an expensive good today if its going to be worth \nless tomorrow. With few buyers, all the other economic activity that swirls around real estate—remodeling, appliance and furniture \nsales, relocation services—is depressed. Homeowners are worse off, too, because the value of one of their vital assets is eroding. \nHouse prices have already fallen by 32 percent nationwide from the 2006 peak. And they have further to go. The latest readings on \nthe S&P/Case-Schiller home price index, one prominent measure, showed another record decline in May. At some point, the declines \nwill moderate and stop being records. But prices need to stop falling altogether, and probably rise, for a real recovery to happen. The \nFederal Reserve thinks home prices could stop falling in 2010, after a total decline of 41 to 48 percent. Other metrics, like housing \nstarts and new-home sales, might point upward before then. Those will be signs of signs of a turnaround, not the real thing. \nHousehold wealth increases. The housing bust and the volatile stock market have hammered the traditional investment tools that \nmost Americans use, causing epic declines in the wealth of Americans. Since 2006, household net worth has declined by about $12 \ntrillion, which equates to about $107,000 of lost wealth for each of America's 112 million households. That's partly because of the 40 \npercent plunge in the stock market since October 2007 and partly because of the steep declines in real estate values. \nAmericans simply own less, too. Home equity for the typical homeowner is just 41.1 percent, a record low. In 2002, it was 58.4 \npercent. Owning less means we owe more and will have to rebuild savings before we can spend like we used to. \"This will be a drag \non all discretionary purchases,\" says Dirk van Dijk, an analyst at Zacks Investment Research who thinks the tightfistedness will cut \ninto the earnings of firms ranging from hotel chains to furniture makers to motorcycle manufacturers. Those are the same kinds of \ncompanies that need to start hiring again for a real recovery to develop. But they won't if sales stay sluggish. A turnaround will \nrequire sustained stock market gains and an end to the housing bust. \nPresident Obama stops fudging on the economy. There's still a lot that could go wrong, and Obama knows it. Yet part of the \npresident's job is to reassure skittish Americans, even as his economic lieutenants are fighting battles in the war room. That's why \nObama has been making half-hearted pronouncements, like saying that the economy shows \"some return to normalcy\" and that \"we \nexpect there'll be some stabilization of the economy.\" Virtually all of Obama's remarks on the economy contain modifiers and future \ntense and a not-quite-there-yet quality, since hell blow his own credibility if he tries to convince Americans that they're better off \nthan they actually are. When Obama starts hedging less, be happy. That will signal better days. Finally. \nThe IMF does offer a bit of more heartening news: The global wipe out finally seems to be receding. \"The world economy is \nstabilizing,\" the IMF reports. Its global economic growth projection of 2.5 percent in 2010 is 0.6 points higher than predicted in \nApril. But the global economy isn't expected to gain its footing in earnest until the second half of 2010. Maybe by then American \nspenders will have come out of hiding. \nObama says stimulus plan to kick in later this year Reuters \nObama says stimulus plan to kick in later this year \nBy Tom Doggett — Sat Jul 11, 3:13 pm ET \nWASHINGTON (Reuters) — President Barack Obama said Saturday more time was needed for his $787 billion stimulus package to \nwork, predicting the spending would have a bigger impact on the economy later this year. \nIn an advanced text of his weekly radio speech, Obama said the stimulus plan approved by Congress and signed into law in mid-\nFebruary \"was not designed to work in four months -- it was designed to work over two years.\" \nU.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said it was too soon to decide whether the U.S. economy needed the help of a second-\nround of government stimulus to recover from recession. \n\"I don't think that's a judgment we need to make now, can't really make it now prudently, responsibly,\" he said in a taped interview \nwith CNN that will air Sunday. \nAccording to a transcript provided by CNN, Geithner said the \"biggest thrust\" of the stimulus package signed into law earlier this \nyear would take effect in the second half of the year. \nObama's comments follow government data showing the unemployment rate soared to 9.5 percent in June, the highest level since \n1983 and above the 8 percent peak predicted by the White House when it worked with Congress to pass the package. Republicans \nsay the stimulus plan is not working. \nObama now warns unemployment likely will top 10 percent in the coming months. \n\"We must let (the stimulus plan) work the way its supposed to, with the understanding that in any recession, unemployment tends to \nrecover more slowly than other measures of economic activity,\" Obama said. \nHe said the benefits of the plan would \"accelerate greatly throughout the summer and the fall.\" \nThe continuing recession and further steep job losses are wearing away the patience of Americans and raising doubts about Obama's \nhandling of the economy. \nThe share of Americans who believe the stimulus package will restore the economy slipped to 52 percent in late June, down from 59 \npercent two months earlier, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll. \nVice President Joe Biden said the administration had \"misread\" how bad the economy was when it took office but that the stimulus \npackage would help the economy recovery and create jobs. \nSenate Republican Leader Mich McConnell Friday called the stimulus plan a failure. \nObama said it takes time for the plan's money \"to get out the door\" to pay for roads, bridges and other infrastructure projects that will \ncreate jobs \"because we are committed to spending it in a way that is effective and transparent.\""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "7/12/2009 11:37:00 AM", "subject": "Re: World economy growth interesting reading", "body": "mandelson is in london"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030904.txt_10615
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030904.txt
|
Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
|
[{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "haven't heard from"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt...\n\nyou.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Apr 6, 2011, at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:58:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "people are now throwing out my books, according to her blog.. more nonsense.."}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023616.txt_10616
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023616.txt
|
Re: Larry Summers
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2014, at 12:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "you will get a call from either jermain, or cecile ( the governors wife and my asst )"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Ann brought us the car. It's wonderful, thank you so much.\n\nWe are so grateful for your generosity..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 1:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "glad to help"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Mr. Epstein:\n\nMany, many thanks for your overwhelming generosity. MB 2c | flew home today with Mr.\nFarkas and his family. They took very good care of us and they couldn't have been nicer. Andrew and\nare still stuck in St. Thomas, enjoying the use of your car.\n\nWe are extremely grateful for everything you have done for us.\n\nHappy New Year and hope to see you next time you are at Harvard.\n\nFondly,\nKelly Friendly"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 6, 2014, at 5:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "glad it worked out. if you husband woudl like to see the island this week i will arrange it."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friend", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 6 2014 12:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Andrew and Caroline would love to come see the island! I've cced him to work out the details....\nHappy New Year!"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032963.txt_10623
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032963.txt
|
Re: P.S.
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 12:37:31 AM", "subject": "Re: P.S.", "body": "he can only be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors. not oath breaking. . impeachment not likely \n, but eventual resignation, a possiblitiy - maybe after a period of time. not for a while. . \nmoney - its a privlege to help"}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re: P.S.", "body": "I neglected to mention the importance of ACLU attorneys who have been receiving donations of many millions \nto aid their actions such as impeaching Trump based on breaking his oath of the affirmation of the \nconstitution..."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019409.txt_10630
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019409.txt
|
Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek
|
[{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Michael S. Sitrick", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 4:41:04 PM", "subject": "Fw: Alexandra Wolfe called from Newsweek", "body": "----- Original Message -----\nFrom: Kristin Andersen\nSent: 03/08/2011 11:09 AM EST\nTo: Jay Lefkowitz\n\n----- Forwarded by Kristin Andersen/New\nYork/Kirkland-Ellis on 03/08/2011 11:05 AM -----\n\n\"wolfe,\nAlexandra\n\nTo\n\"Jay Lefkowitz\"\n\ncc\n03/07/201 Subject\n1 02:09 RE:\nPM\n\nDear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein.\nwould he be available to answer any of these on the\nphone or by email? People have told me some of his\nthoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could\ntell me or email me anything directly I could use on\nthe record. Also I'd like to run the information I\nalready have by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-what is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending\nmore time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation?\nCould he talk about his interest in science and the\n2011 grants/conference?\n\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new\ndirection he's taking it? Does he still have the same\nclients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that\narranged? with whom was he working/advising?\n\n-where is he spending his time now? How has his social\nlife changed from three years ago?\n\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n\n-what were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions\nto his conviction?\n\n-what does he think about the sentence he got- was it"}, {"sender": "Kristin Andersen", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/08/2011 11:09 AM EST", "subject": "RE:", "body": "\"wolfe,\nAlexandra\n\nTo\n\"Jay Lefkowitz\"\n\ncc\n03/07/2011 02:09 PM\n\nDear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein.\nwould he be available to answer any of these on the\nphone or by email? People have told me some of his\nthoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could\ntell me or email me anything directly I could use on\nthe record. Also I'd like to run the information I\nalready have by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-what is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending\nmore time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation?\nCould he talk about his interest in science and the\n2011 grants/conference?\n\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new\ndirection he's taking it? Does he still have the same\nclients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that\narranged? with whom was he working/advising?\n\n-where is he spending his time now? How has his social\nlife changed from three years ago?\n\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n\n-what were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions\nto his conviction?\n\n-what does he think about the sentence he got- was it"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026210.txt_10631
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026210.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<_____________________>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017 at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thnx jeff.. i m praying"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017 at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hey shiek.. i will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night.. if you bussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017 at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "in florida,"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017 at 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night."}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017 at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if i am here"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait.. will write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017 at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i got to ny today.. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday i m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "If you think wise I could come to New York sunday evening and also leave tues"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i didnt understand what you mean? do you want me to stay? or you want to see my boss?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< -"], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 1:22 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "why are you up so early.? you need rest. - ! , I wanted you to know that If you think I should meet your boss in New York , where there is less pomp I can do so. / are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "< -", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:31 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "00 i didnt get a good rest this month.. i think it is better to meet him in kuwait .. man do you love cuba that much° whenever you want .. november or before .. just send me an email and i will take care of your visit"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<_____________________>"], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 1:32 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "perfect. I 11 be in paris oct 6"}, {"sender": "<_____________________>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "enjoy it sheik jeffreyi"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "get some rest. I need you healthy"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/26/2017 7:28:46 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "women to drive in saudi .. bold move"}]
| 21
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030472.txt_10633
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030472.txt
|
Re: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 9:34:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:40:36 -0800", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance \n<http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> \nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward> \nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM \n\n\"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. \nYou will never think the same way about anything again.\" \n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up \neverywhere at the moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. \nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of \nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with \nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British \nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to \npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal. \n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that \nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les \nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude \nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of \n$450 million. \n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women \nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the \nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. \n\nThis is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I \nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same \nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one \ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who \nis she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fair story \nthat really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself. \n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept \nrunning into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of \nyoung women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember \nasking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you, Vicky,\" was his riposte. \n\nI remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't \nstudied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at \nhome via messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\" \n\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. \n\n\"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He \nwas certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few \nmoments in his company and you know this to be true. \n\nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that \n\"Andy\"—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his \nstrange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what \nhe's talking about far more than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other \nfinanciers hang out with him. \n\nAnd Ghislaine? \n\nFull disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. \n\nShe is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours \ntalking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is \ncurious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent \nme a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even \nRupert Murdoch's. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill \nClinton with whom she is close friends. \n\nYet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-\nPlatero, (known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When \nit comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. \nAnd that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. \n\n\"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck; \ninconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\" \n\nIn many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect \nreplacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his \nsexual peccadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving \na massive \"black hole\" he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that \nstrange. \n\nIn fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about the very rich, that most successful \npeople in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl \nissues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You \ndon't tend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett \ndidn't quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he \nhas been open about. \n\nSo what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her \nloyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look \nat Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for \nall sorts of blemishes."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024407.txt_10639
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024407.txt
|
Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview
|
[{"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 14:58:01 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Bill Siegel hopes this might be of interest to you: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jamie-glazovithe-control-factor-our-struggle-to-see-the-true-threat/"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "You ok? I became friendly with shirley maclaine last year and went to her ranch in sante fe. I may go back and remembered you own half the ranch land there or something. Do you still like it there?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:16:44 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "great. place.. when will you go.. did you get married? i m between alber and santa fe„ zorrro ranch, you can google earth it."}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/8/2013 8:48:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "I will let you know when I go back. Do you know her?"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026204.txt_10648
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026204.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thnx jeff i m praying"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hey shiek i will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night.. if you bussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "in florida,"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night. ."}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if i am here"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait will write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i got to ny today.. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday i m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "If you think wise I could come to New York sunday evening and also leave tues"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:20 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i didnt understand what you mean? do you want me to stay? or you want to see my boss?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:22 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "why are you up so early.? you need rest. - ! , I wanted you to know that If you think I should meet your boss in New York , where there is less pomp I can do so. / are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:31 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "00 i didnt get a good rest this month.. i think it is better to meet him in kuwait .. man do you love cuba that much° whenever you want .. november or before .. just send me an email and i will take care of your visit"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:32 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "perfect. I 11 be in paris oct 6"}, {"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "enjoy it sheik jeffreyi"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "get some rest. I need you healthy"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2017 11:02:00 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very wellci4"}]
| 21
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029137.txt_10649
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029137.txt
|
Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs
|
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Hi: When are you back in NY?\nAttached is the complete Preproduction Book for Radical Breakthroughs - now including Misha Gromov!\nLove your feedback, suggestions.\nAlso attached is the budget and timing of funding, as presented originally, now updated for the completion of preproduction (phase I). We are ready to go into production (phase II). See Budget, p. 4. Committed and excited.\nWhen to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2017, at 7:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "great work , but needs some editing, did not like multi verse and sensience. seems more blahblah"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "`Blahblahs' forbidden in 'Radical Breakthroughs'. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science and Rare Sentience).\nInitial ideas:\n* Expand the first episode \"Mathematics and Truth\" into two or likely three episodes. I'm intrigued by this because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner's 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)', astrophysics, cosmology, biology, general systems theory. I've felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think three episodes could work - if you agree, I'll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3 parts. Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277 episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the series.\n* Integrated Information Theory - quantifying and explaining consciousness (Giulio Tononi, Un of Wisconsin-Madison), plus supporters and critics. New controversial, science-based radical theory.\n* Evolutionary Dynamics - your program at Harvard - mathematical models. This is not an area of my expertise, but it could well fit Closer To Truth in general and Radical Breakthroughs in particular. But you need to tell me if you would like to include this.\n* Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and especially psychological research - the scandal in recent years. See links and attachments.\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication crisis\nhttps://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248\nhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716\n\"Replicability vs. Reproducibility\" - http://www.replicability.tau.ac.il/index.php/replicability-in-science/replicability-vs-reproducibility.html\nFive Ways to Fix Statistics - Nature [attached].\n* Other possibile areas you suggest\nWe would like to set a mutually agreed schedule so we can confirm and reserve the Closer To Truth 'season' of 13 episodes for 'Radical Breakthroughs', which we need to plan well in advance - especially as we begin 2018.\nSee you Jan. 5 - Looking forward to brainstorming.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "weekend easy"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Tomorrow Sunday after 1:00 pm? Flexible. Anytime.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 30, 2017, at 8:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "guest s here until 4. after good"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 8:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "After 4 good.\nSkype? FaceTime? Phone?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 5:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "either"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 4:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "Ready when you are - let me know and I can call.\nSkype\nFaceTime = email."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "5 min"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/31/2017 9:32:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Math, Breakthroughs", "body": "OK"}]
| 11
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029889.txt_10654
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029889.txt
|
Jane Doe
|
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Robert D. Critton Jr. [Deeyacation@gmail.com]", "Connie Zaguirre"], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 7:16:00 PM", "subject": "FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Trump has been moved to Sept. 24."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:00 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please let me know when u do."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition will follow. Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this... Still working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:47 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad —\nIn your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a Department of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records without a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have Jane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form.\nAlso, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS??\nPlease let me know.\nJess —"}]
| 15
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026059.txt_10656
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026059.txt
|
Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise
|
[{"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nAs previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building and financing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record, history and presence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe’s most recognized financial advisors to the infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and sought secure, well-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors.\n\nWe have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry, TIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure debt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily involved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence, capital raising, legal & compliance functions as well as the sound governance and ESG management across all funds. Partnering with TIIC and BRIDGE has enabled Edmond de Rothschild to build a strong franchise within infrastructure investments, complementing its overall Private Equity offering. Edmond de Rothschild has also acted as anchor investor for these funds, demonstrating its strong alignment of interest with these investment teams. With Ariane we strongly believe that we should absolutely find a way to collaborate together with you to think and initiate something to serve the future needs of the US in the infrastructure field.\n\nPlease find attached further information on each manager. This would also be a chance for us to explore opportunities of working together in the future."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["EL HACHEM Johnny"], "timestamp": "8 févr. 2017, at 12:59", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the sidelines. trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the rothschild name."}, {"sender": "EL HACHEM Johny", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 12:01:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "I agree with your analysis.\n\nOn the debt side the yield will be low for sure. Nevertheless by leading the consortium and by being the Equity provider of the PPP than the double digit return will be possible\n\nHappy to discuss further"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030381.txt_10657
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030381.txt
|
draft
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella x 8 rad Wechsler [nn"], "timestamp": "10/26/2015 6:08:48 PM", "subject": "draft", "body": "phaidon and art space. combined basis 96 million , ( reviewed with brad and joe.) . add ten for\nrestructuring . basis 106. mi. subtract total sale price. for both, lets say approx $8-15m ._ leaving loss\nof between 90 and 98 million long term loss. . AMT rate 28% obama. tax 3.8%. city and state\n\n12% total aprox 43%. tax rate. savings 38.7-44m"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030910.txt_10663
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030910.txt
|
Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss iii"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peoplel know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of.. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": ""}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033079.txt_10667
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033079.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm ler"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmlecr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not confidence inspiring"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "but -accurate"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler Sa", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I blame the plutocracy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemm ler"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 12:59:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty of blame. mostly the feminists"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033092.txt_10671
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033092.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence H. Summers"], "timestamp": "5/9/2018 10:33:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/08/a-putin-friendly-oligarchs-top-us-executive-donated-285000-to-"}, {"sender": "LHS qa", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lam now."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 8, 2018, at 8:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-07/d-e-shaw-fired-fund-manager-michalow-for-gross-violations STAY AWAY!"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030723.txt_10672
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030723.txt
|
A few thoughts
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff [is", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 7:55:54 AM", "subject": "A few thoughts", "body": "Importance: — High\n\n1) Isaw SB in London yesterday and he seemed especially paranoid about any reporters seeing me with him.\nMy guess is that he is working hard on his relationship with Trump who he sees as newly ascendent and being\nseen with me might queer that.\n\n2) He went on Hannity last night and will be on Piers Morgan tomorrow and that seemed with an eye toward an\naudience of one.\n\n3) He was having a meeting yesterday with the French right wingers, including Le Pen's husband, about\nrefinancing the National Front Party because apparently a good part of their money comes from Russia. Two\nthoughts here, these guys seemed like idiots, pure Ruritania, and Bannon, surrounded by his own thuggish-\nlooking security people and whacky-bloggers advisors, thrives precisely because the world of populism is so\nunprofessional (if not farcical).\n\nmore later..."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032744.txt_10675
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032744.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "LH", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 6:40:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Opinions"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027097.txt_10688
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027097.txt
|
Re: B 727 thought
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 4:57:10 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "you want me to call Tarek, instead? just to confirm."}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 10:21:24 A.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this.\n\nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with\nflight crew. I Know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,.\n\nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you:\n\nMr. Tarek El Sayed,\nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you.\n\nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match\nfor your business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East,\nI'd like to share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase.\n\nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department\nwere as follows:\n\n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.)\n\nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr\nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations.\n\nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe régime. Mr. Bartakowski has also\nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for\nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40-60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport\ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring\ncountries.\n\nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of\nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and\nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable.\n\nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide\nmany years of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be\nleading its path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you\nmay have seen already.\n\nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft\nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility."}]
| 4
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033328.txt_10692
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033328.txt
|
Top Republicans slam Trump for indicating no strong action over Khashoggi killing - CNNPolitics
|
[{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/21/2018 7:26:45 AM", "subject": "Top Republicans slam Trump for indicating no strong action over Khashoggi killing - CNNPolitics", "body": "Does the statement will help?\nhttps://www.cnn.com/2018/11/20/politics/top-republicans-slam-trump-saudi-arabia-khashoggi/index.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019384.txt_10701
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019384.txt
|
Re: 31E-MM-108062, 09/13/2006
|
[{"sender": "Miami", "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": "09/13/2006", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 09/13/2006", "body": "Please contact sat ed at\n[sd] should any further Information be needed."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032988.txt_10703
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032988.txt
|
Re: TSA
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "3/5/2017 3:53:26 PM", "subject": "Re: TSA", "body": "ok"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: TSA", "body": "TSA called me,. They inform closing TSA inspection at 3pm\nAsked if we could depart 2:30pm,?\nIs 2:30pm ok for departure\nOtherwise it would be after Trump's departure between 4 and 5pm\nIs 2:30pm inspection / departure ok?\nThx\nLarry"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028531.txt_10704
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028531.txt
|
Fwd: Summers withdraws from Fed race
|
[{"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2013 11:12:33 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Summers withdraws from Fed race", "body": "A major blow to a friend. Lest BO takes him to replace JL.\nNow he'll probably be free in the next few days. EB"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030737.txt_10708
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030737.txt
|
Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer
|
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/20/2018 2:21:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "Yes\n\nbut let's discuss--their is a crazed jihad against u--ive never seen anything like it--and I've seen a lot"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:17:38 -0400", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "AHHHH thats more like it, , we need to find you the exorcist hat. ! . do you think you might want to\ncome to europe?"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032778.txt_10716
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032778.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 3:17:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So...a couple of times a year somebody can cull the Internet and write an article about you that recycles every other article. That's a reason to try to create a new story. But, on the other hand, by not offering new news the old seems just ho-hum."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-did-trump-and-clinton-pal-jeffrey-epstein-escape-metoo"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030356.txt_10721
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030356.txt
|
RE: The fool doth think he is wise
|
[{"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 22:58", "subject": "RE: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "Over crests and furrowed field\nWirey talons arching back\nEmpty roosts the plagued aspise\nRevel in their bloodied eyes\n\nWe fight on.\n\nThanks for sharing the foxhole.\n\nBest\n\nJes"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033466.txt_10722
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033466.txt
|
Re: B 727 thought
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 3:22:33 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "this may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this.\nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with\nflight crew. I know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,.\nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you:"}, {"sender": "Lawrance Visoski", "recipients": ["Mr. Tarek El Sayed"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Mr. Tarek El Sayed,\nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you.\nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match for\nyour business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East, I'd like\nto share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase.\nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department\nwere as follows:\n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.)\nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr\nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations.\nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe regime. Mr. Bartakowski has also\nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for\nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40 — 60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport\ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring\ncountries.\nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of\nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and\nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable.\nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide many\nyears of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be leading\nits path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you may have\nseen already.\nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft\nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility.\nSincerely,\nLawrance Visoski\nChief Pilot, JEGE Inc."}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030430.txt_10734
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030430.txt
|
sorry | missed your call
|
[{"sender": "John Brockman", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/6/2017 8:34:19 PM", "subject": "sorry | missed your call", "body": "JE,\n\n--Last week was misery...On Tuesday, Katinka's' younger brother, Jonathan Matson, was planning on flying\nin from Boston and having dinner with her. After several emails back and forth in the morning, he wrote\nto say he was packed and ready to leave the house but he had been fighting a stomach bug, so he had\ndecided it was best to postpone and go to bed. He was fine at 6pm when his wife (a Mass General health\nprofessional) came home. She brought him a coke, went downstairs to make dinner. Half an hour later she\nwent upstairs to check on him. He had died. we got the news at 9pm on a phone call from someone we hadn’t\ntalked to in 20 years\" “Jonathan Matson has died” was impossible to process. Katinka is still was\ndistraught and, just coming out of shock.\n\n--And...this, from my older brother Philip C\"Distinguished NASA Physcist\" awardee), who had prostate\nsurgery about 25 years, and got lucky be living in Raliegh-Durham, near Duke Medical Center which is\ntops. They've kept him alive and it's finally caught up to him:\n\n\"IT have run out of standard treatments. Chemo is getting less effective with increasing side effects.\nThere is a new drug Keytruda it has been approved for some cancers but is still experimental for prostate\ncancer.\n\nhttps: //prostatecancernewstoday.com/pembrolizumab-immune-therapy-help-men-prostate-cancer/. I have been\napproved to get Keytruda and will start on Thursday.\"\n\n--Finally, did I ever tell you about the Biosphere crowd? Absolutely nutty cult I represented in the\nearly 90s. (Although individually the people were sometimes fun). My friend Roy walford, the doctor\ninside the Biosphere, eventually died because of a condition he developed while inside. I kept sending\nwriters down there to work with them and they would inevitably sneak away in the dead of night. I had to\nsell their book three times, each time for a fractions of the previous advance which started in 7\nfigures. Turns out Bannon took over as CEO of the place in 1993 so we may have overlapped. See:\n\nSteve Bannon Was Once Hired to Manage an Artificial world of People Living Under Glass (Before the Trump\nCampaign) -\n\nhttp://slate.me/2keSDUn\n\nIn the office this afternoon and after 10:30am tomorrow."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033300.txt_10735
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033300.txt
|
Watching
|
[{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/27/2016 2:03:17 AM", "subject": "Watching", "body": "chomsky's requiem for the American Dream. Fascinating. Brilliant guy. \nSeparately, trump is not a force for a civil society. EVERY taxi/uber driver I've encountered is FOR him. \nreally don't get it. \nHow are you? \n xo \nco-authored with iPhone auto-correct"}]
| 1
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.