Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033314.txt_10742	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033314.txt	null	[{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/28/2018 12:27:50 AM", "subject": null, "body": "i think we have divergent views on Trump and trade for obvious reasons \nthe best economists say all-out trade war will cost the WORLD 2-3% of its GDP \nthis can hardly help the stock market \nbut the \"perturbations\" are meat for you—if you can see what to buy and sell ahead of time—or very quickly—\nin response to the latest tariffs you can beat the system \nTIA-CRF can not \nin good times, it does better than average—here it does distinctly worse—each hit is taken hard, each recovery \nis feeble—precisely because it does not change its portfolio or only slowly"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029692.txt_10760	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029692.txt	null	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/14/2013 8:47:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": ""}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031552.txt_10767	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031552.txt		[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "", "body": "mcgann and mcmasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:05 AM", "subject": "", "body": "And...???? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "mcgann feels if he stays he risks indicment"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Number ? Funny story"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I told him to join me and Wolff for my birthday lunch. He said yes. He is just checking on a tea party conference schedule"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 16, 2018 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "After"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/16/2018 9:10:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He shouldn't laugh off the grand jury"}]	7
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031824.txt_10783	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031824.txt	From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims	[{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/15/2019 12:20:06 AM", "subject": "From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims", "body": "Hope you are Satisfied with the outcome all things considered.\n\nRidiculous article. All of sudden the NPA in EB’s case goes from no\njurisdiction even to prosecute to you avoiding a possible life\nsentence. Moronic.\n\nMan I sure would like to see you getting some in the W column though and\nsome press that at least presents the true facts that some of the girls have\nadmitted under oath. Still a story no one ever has heard and they are\ncompelling facts.\n\nGood Shabbos.\n\nThe numerous young women who say they were sexually abused by\nwealthy, Clinton-linked financier Jeffrey Epstein no longer appear set to\ntestify after a last-minute settlement was reached in a closely-watched civil\nlawsuit against the registered sex offender.\n\nhttps://www.foxnews.com/us/jeffrey-epstein-a-registered-sex-offender-settles-\ncivil-lawsuit-and-avoids-testimony-from-alleged-victims"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032585.txt_10788	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032585.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food()"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 3:40:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}]	9
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026273.txt_10789	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026273.txt	Fwd: Re:	[{"sender": "Steve Bannon [as]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/23/2018 12:44:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Big deal"}, {"sender": "Rivkin, David", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Here it is.\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Grossman, Andrew M", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mueller’s Fruit of the Poisonous Tree\n\nIt makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation is tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016.\n\nBy\n\nDavid B. Rivkin Jr. and\n\nElizabeth Price Foley\n\nJune 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028765.txt_10790	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028765.txt	RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey	[{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:27:53 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Please call me at \nMy number is blocked and it does not go through when I am calling you"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 4:27 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "call me now"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I go it (they even now approved you - they \nneeded to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) \nfor two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell \nindividual seats). \nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped. \nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all \nparty access. \nI have the same ones (through Bill). \nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help. \nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is \nhard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap. \nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\nBoris"}, {"sender": "Kevin Frost", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Boris: \nHere is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena \nSchuster on the email below. They've already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner \nwhich happens right before the ball. I hope you guys are all planning to attend the dinner as well. You can tell \nyour friend Jeffrey that he should buy the Mini car for me as a thank you. =) \nI'm getting in to Vienna on Friday afternoon. Let's get together on Friday night. \nSee you soon,"}, {"sender": "Magdalena Schuster", "recipients": ["Kevin Frost"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:04 PM", "subject": "AW: AW: NY plane", "body": "Hi Kevin, \nattached please find an information sheet about the AIDS Solidarity Gala — I am sure Jeffrey will very much \nenjoy the Gala. \nI've also included the auction items at the Gala for your and Jeffrey's information. \nLet me know how I can be of further assistance. \nAll the best,\nLena"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031220.txt_10795	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031220.txt	January 20, 2017	[{"sender": "Barbro Ehnbom", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 10:55:49 PM", "subject": "January 20, 2017", "body": "Dearest Jeffrey, \nHAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY!!! \nAND, YOUR BIRTHDAY PRESENT IS.....PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP!! HA HA! \nLOVE & KISSES \nBE for your BBB!"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032591.txt_10796	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032591.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are we meeting in new york?\n000"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, 4:35:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now Ii"}]	13
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026267.txt_10797	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026267.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 23, 2018, at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "<IMG-7184.jpg>"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is that Steve Bannon?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes We have become friends you will like him"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump doesn’t like him"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dont belive thepress"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 1:25:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}]	6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017581.txt_10799	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017581.txt	Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)	[{"sender": "Auren Hoffman", "recipients": ["Lisa Randall", "Fouad"], "timestamp": "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:05:58 -0800", "subject": "Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "Dear Fouad, \nDear Lisa — \nYou are invited to join us at Dialog 2014 -- a two-day bipartisan retreat discussing how to change the world. \nThere will be no speeches ... just many moderated break-out discussions of 6-15 people on various topics. And \nwe design the agenda around your ideas and needs. \nPlease let us know if you would like to join us, \n/- Peter Thiel and Auren Hoffman/ \np.s. and yes, we know Dialog 2014 is 16 months away, but we are giving you a chance to sign up now \nDETAILS: \nYou're invited to join us at the Dialog Retreat ... 150 people to change the world ... a participatory and \nentrepreneurial conversation on changing the world. \nThe Dialog//participants aren't modest. We want to change the world. \nBut we don't want to spend our time being in a large audience listening to winded speeches. There are no \nspeakers. No panels. All attendees participate in break-out facilitated discussions. And we limit the discussion \nto only 150 global leaderswho can have an impact now and emerging leaders who can help implement the \nplans we develop. \nDates:March 13-15, 2014 \nLocation:* Sundance Resort, Utah (40 minutes from the Salt Lake City airport) \n/We've rented out the entire resort/ \nRegister at: \nhttp://dialog2014.eventbrite.com \npassword: dialog2014 \nYou qualify for a significant discount on the retreat fee. On the registration page, click on the link that says \n'Enter promotional code' and enter: \nAcademicDialoger \n/note: the invite is only for Lisa Randall and is not transferable as we are limited to only 150 participants. \nThere are no sponsors. We increase the retreat fee weekly to reward the people that sign up early. And this \nretreat is 100% off-the-record. / \nWe hope you can join us."}, {"sender": "Lisa Randall", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "Is this worthwhile?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa Randall"], "timestamp": "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:28:51 -0500", "subject": "Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "sundance is nice „ go"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/28/2012 5:28:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "So let me understand. You are suggesting tourism?"}]	4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033247.txt_10802	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033247.txt	Fwd: Disney CEO Bob Iger Calls DACA Decision 'Cruel' and 'Misguided'	[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/6/2017 9:18:52 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Disney CEO Bob Iger Calls DACA Decision 'Cruel' and 'Misguided'", "body": "Hello Jeffrey\nI understood very well that it is in the Congress's hands now;\nBut there are a lot of reactions"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031830.txt_10805	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031830.txt	Re: You should see this movie/documentary	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2/6/2011 1:27:43 PM", "subject": "Re: You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "it is very unfair, and misrepresents tons of inf"}, {"sender": "+", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:26 AM", "subject": "Re: You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "Inside Job (2010)\n\nNYT Critics' Pick; This movie has been designated a Critic's Pick by the film reviewers of The New York Times.\n\nSony Pictures Classics\n\nHenry Paulson, Ben Bernanke and Timothy Geithner in the documentary “Inside Job.”\n\nWho Maimed the Economy, and How\n\nBy A. O. SCOTT\n“Inside Job,” a sleek, briskly paced film whose title suggests a heist movie, is the story of a crime without\npunishment, of an outrage that has so far largely escaped legal sanction and societal stigma. The betrayal\nof public trust and collective values that Mr. Ferguson chronicles was far more brazen and damaging than\n\nthe adultery in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel, which treated Hester more as scapegoat than villain.\n\nThe gist of this movie, which begins in a mood of calm reflection and grows angrier and more incredulous\nas it goes on, is unmistakably punitive. The density of information and the complexity of the subject\nmatter make “Inside Job” feel like a classroom lecture at times, but by the end Mr. Ferguson has\nsummoned the scourging moral force of a pulpit-shaking sermon. That he delivers it with rigor, restraint\n\nand good humor makes his case all the more devastating."}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533.txt_10813	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533.txt	Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'	[{"sender": "Thomas D. Williams", "recipients": ["Raheem Kassam", "Oliver Lane", "Alexander Marlow", "Frances Martel", "Adrienne Ross"], "timestamp": "March 11, 2018 at 5:13:03 PM GMT+1", "subject": "Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'\n\nby THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D.11 Mar 2018\n\nAs Steve Bannon continues his tour of Europe, energizing the anti-establishment populist base, the mainstream media cannot help but admit their admiration for his abilities, despite their dislike of his aims. In this week's issue, the left-wing German weekly Stern articulates the greatest fear of the European establishment: that Bannon \"could give the fragmented right in Europe a common ideology and rhetoric.\"\n\nMany thought that the reign of the \"Dark Lord\" had ended, writes Gernot Kramper, when Steve Bannon left first the White House and then his role as executive chairman of Breitbart News. It turns out, however, that Bannon's adversaries had underestimated him, because he is \"as dangerous as ever,\" he confesses.\n\nKramper cannot conceal his respect for Bannon's ability to move a crowd. He was greeted by \"frenetic applause\" in his recent address before France's National Front party, Kramper writes, demonstrating his \"impressive potential,\" which the writer describes as \"dangerous.\"\n\nIn the mind of his audience, Bannon is something of a miracle-worker, Stamper notes, having \"done the impossible\" by bringing Donald Trump into the White House.\n\nThe reason Bannon is dangerous, Kramper continues, is because he \"lays out the political program of a worldwide right: He has already conquered the USA; now Europe and then the whole world will follow.\"\n\n\"You are part of a worldwide movement that is bigger than France, bigger than Italy, bigger than Hungary, bigger than all that,\" Bannon told French populists.\n\nBannon showed that he \"dominates the mood against the 'elites,' the 'establishment' and the 'perverse system' of greedy corporations and banks, and of course also against the press, which is led around 'like a dog on the Leash,\" Stamper writes.\n\nAnd now he Mr. Bannon setting himself up as an instigator, if not an outright shepherd, of a movement that crosses borders, languages and parties.\n\n\"Bannon is a master of apocalyptic rhetoric,\" Stamper continues, effortlessly weaving together nationalist interests with an international populist movement.\n\nThe American strategist showed his \"true caliber\" by expounding modern methods of political freedom through blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies, Stamper said, leaving many of his hearers behind.\n\nBannon has demonstrated that if the right wants to rule the future, \"it must dominate modern themes and rhetorically position them,\" he added.\n\nAspiring to be far more than an uncle who tells stories to his nephews of how he won the fight for the White House, Stamper writes, \"Bannon wants to become the super godfather of the international right.\"\n\nAlthough Bannon often looks a bit disheveled, \"he should not be underestimated,\" the writer warns. Past business partners attribute impressive \"strategic foresight\" to the eccentric tactician, saying he was often \"three or four steps ahead\" of his opponents in business. Because of his phenomenal memory, his nickname is \"the encyclopedia,\" Stamper notes with a certain reverence, and in his speeches he will spontaneously cite \"forgotten thinkers, known only to a handful of specialists.\"\n\n\"Bannon brings with him exclusive knowledge of power from the very heart of power,\" Stamper writes, which he will bring to bear on Europe's fragmented populist populism.\n\nAccording to Stamper, Bannon has established his \"European headquarters\" in Italy, from where he intends to galvanize European populists.\n\nThe Italian political situation is completely to his liking, Stamper declares, with a political landscape \"dominated by populists, right-wing ideologues and the political puppeteer Berlusconi.\"\n\nFollow Thomas D. Williams on Twitter\nRead More Stories About:\nBig Government, Breitbart London, National Security, Europe, Germany, Nationalism, Populism, Stephen K. Bannon, Stern"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Germans get it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 11, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "luv it"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Pretty powerful"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 11, 2018, at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Unfortunately I just spoke to one of the country leaders that we discussed. I will fly there tomorrow night now and then to new york wednesday night. sorry. will be in new york thurs and friday. we should lay out a strategy plan. how much fun... travel safe."}, {"sender": "Sean Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/11/2018 8:08:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Roger that. Thanks for having us today."}]	6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030880.txt_10824	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030880.txt	FYI	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/11/2019 8:08:25 PM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "This is what I'm now going with—what do you think? \nIn the White House, the President, to general surprise, announced that he would not accompany his family to \nMar-a-Lago over the holidays—a confounding, even alarming, turn for anyone who knew how much he valued \na golf-and-warm-weather opportunity over any presidential business. Melania certainly had no intention of \nstaying behind. Among other issues, friends suggested that she was still furious about his fireside Christmas Eve \nchat with a seven-year-old boy, during which Trump asked the boy if he still believed in Santa. \"Melania didn't \nthink that was funny,\" said one aide. Trump was \"clearly a guy who had never dealt with a seven-year-old.\" \nIn an empty White House, Trump's personal secretary, 28-year-old Madeleine Westerhout, brought his \npapers and call sheets from the West Wing up to the residence, finding him, she told friends, in his underwear. \nAnd herein, suddenly, was another subplot. \nWesterhout had been the elevator girl in Trump Tower during the transition. The comely young woman ferrying \ndignitaries and job-seekers up to the President-elect soon became something of a meme herself Bannon recalled \nnoting that Trump took a particular interest in her. A leering Trump kept repeating, \"She's got a way about her,\" \nhis signature, and creepy, stamp of approval for young women. \nNow the president was telling friends that he wasn't staying at the White House because of the shutdown—he \nwas staying because he was \"banging\" Madeleine. \nShutdown bravado? Locker room talk? Or all part of a new alternative reality that only he seemed to be living \nin?"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033509.txt_10830	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033509.txt	RE: Jane Doe	[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this...\nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo off going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition will follow. Mr. Trump’s deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030670.txt_10834	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030670.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Notice the date of the email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Just landed in san fran...at the airport...let's talk when I get settled..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "And?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "told you so"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 1:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "opinon or knowledge"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Would put us in a different place...may even rouse you into action"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how would he do it. rosenstein?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 6:07:15 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Don't snicker, make fun or call me a liberal douchebag...we are approaching public good vs evil in a fundamental way"}]	13
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029447.txt_10842	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029447.txt	null	[{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/9/2018 1:35:43 AM", "subject": "Three short pieces that might amuse you (still working on Obama)", "body": "Three short pieces that might amuse you (still working on Obama)"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031818.txt_10853	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031818.txt	RE: AVGO	[{"sender": "Paul Barrett [paul@alphagroupcapital.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 6:57:15 PM", "subject": "RE: AVGO", "body": "We own 8000 shares on the thesis that their growing exposure to data center capex spend would be a big positive for the stock.\n\nRecommendation: Keep the stock and buy Aug $200 puts on the 8000 shares costing $6.50 or $52,000. Nothing has changed regarding their core business. Data center spending is not going to change based off this M&A transaction. However if I am wrong and the market further penalizes the stock at least our losses are contained. The stock has dropped $40 and I think we could easily recoup our premium if the market buys into the CEO's reason for the merger.\n\nIf I never had a position I would absolutely buy the stock using options. I would be selling October $185 puts and buying Oct $220 calls costing 50c/share.\n\nPaul"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 2:18 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Again?? How many puts ? What are the alternatives. The fact that you own the stock at a higher price is affecting your decision. Sorry. This is just ridiculous!!! Would you buy the stock here . ???? If you would would you also buy puts ??? My patience is at its end"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:13 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "My initial recommendation this morning was to buy the $200 Aug puts. I still think that is the best idea. The stock is now down 16% on a deal that no one fully understands. The CEO has a good track record regarding mergers. So I think it makes sense to keep the stock and own protection for the next 35 days until we hopefully get more clarity from management.\n\nPaul Barrett"}]	3
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026612.txt_10858	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026612.txt	Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should	[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/29/2015 2:22:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Norman D. Rau"], "timestamp": "3/28/2015 5:59:43 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Elizabeth Sample <elizabeth.sample@samplepowers.com>", "recipients": ["Norman D. Rau"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 28, 2015 5:24 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fitz Corr <fitz.corr@example.com>", "recipients": ["Fitz Corr"], "timestamp": "March 27 4 PM EDT", "subject": "Do you know this Guy? You should", "body": ""}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022260.txt_10879	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022260.txt	Oil options	[{"sender": "Nay Gupta", "recipients": ["njeevacation@gmail.com <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Tazia Smith", "Paul Morris/db/ Vinit Sahni/db/"], "timestamp": "03/12/2014 09:35 PM GDT", "subject": "Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey \nJust got off the phone with Vinit. \nDB stopped marketmaking OTC oil options - for short dated Pd go for exch traded - better liquidity and lower transaction costs in and \nout. \nMy central scenario - Kerry Lavrov meeting Friday will be a bust and the Crimea referendum this weekend will result in \"yes\" given \nthe 59pct ethic Russian makeup. Sunday/ Monday sanction rhetoric from ranging from g8 expulsion to Iran-style bank embargo is \nraised a notch. Russia follows with more threats of counter-sanctions. My sense is the Obama 5m of 696m SPR release is to show \nMerkel and co he will step in. He needs to because there are 8 small European and Baltic countries that rec 70%+ of their gas from \nRussia. Germany gets 30%. \nCross asset correlations outside of the US are increasing past few days - eg copper and the Turkish lira hourly charts are on top of each \nother past 4 days. I'm worried there is a 30-40pct(?) chance of a hard risk off move in markets in first half of next week - more focused \non European equities, copper, EM FX (Turkey, ZAR, Ruble etc) than SPX. In that scenario oil is way up. \nExchange WTI calls - there are 2 options (as of 3pm est): \n5day expiry 17march 2014 underlying clj4 97.92 \nand \n35d expiry 16apri12014 underlying clk4 97.59 \n The 5 day options are a bit short - one possibility is sell a 3usd out of the money put (95.5 strike) for 20cents and buy a 2usd OTM \n100 call for 25. Net pay Scents. But 5d is a bit short for me. \nFor 35d expiry You could look at selling 91.50 (6usd OTM put) for 56cents and buying 103c (5.5usd OTM) for 58cents or the 102c \n(4.5usd OTM) for 76cents. \nCL1 <comdty> OMON on Bloomberg has live strikes and bid/ask. \nIf 5d is too short and 35d is too long / not enough gamma, Tazia may be able to source liquidity from the street. Am Cc'ing her for any \nlive pricing or additional comment \nBest \nNay"}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "03/13/2014 09:47 PM EDT", "subject": "Fw: Oil options", "body": "Jeffrey - apologise if this long to execute next time well be much quicker. \nNay Gupta"}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/14/2014 2:24:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Oil options", "body": "I am on a plane to and from tokyo tomorrow next 2-3 days, if u need something otherwise available 24/7 on +447703720599."}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031159.txt_10887	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031159.txt	Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011	[{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "7/25/2011 4:33:45 PM", "subject": "Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011", "body": "Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011 (the attached PDF document is much easier to read)\nTopics: US debt ceiling negotiations, a more ambitious European bailout plan (finally), and how large cap growth\nstocks and rising corporate profits are patiently waiting for both of them to end\n\nWhite Castle. Twenty five years ago, I had a friend with a peculiar way of responding to seeing things he didn’t like on\nTV: he would throw White Castle hamburgers at the screen. I always thought this was a bad way to waste a good\nhamburger, but I had one of those moments the other night when watching news reports on debt ceiling\n\ndiscussions. Media outlets have referred to President Reagan’s scolding of Congressional Republicans for delaying debt\nceiling increases, and the 18 increases that took place during his Presidency. The implication: reservations about raising\nthe debt ceiling are as irresponsible now as they were then. This is a disingenuous argument; in the 1980’s, the debt\nceiling being debated was 50% of GDP, and had no bearing on the solvency of the United States. Today, the\nproposed increase raises the debt limit twice as high, measured relative to GDP or government revenues. While a default\nis a very bad idea (deserving of a White Castle hurling of its own), unconstrained debt growth with no plan to slow it is\nbad as well. Some suggest we not worry about debt growth, since demand from foreign central banks and the Federal\nReserve would keep yields in check. That logic is irresponsible at best. Debt limit legislation is a rocky but healthy way\nfor a democracy to decide whether mega-deficits are in the long-term public interest.\n\nOver the last few days, the Gang of Six plan, the Reid-McConnell plan and the Obama-Boehner plan have all been\nraised up the flagpole and then lowered. By the end of the process, we’re still looking for deficit reduction of $3\ntrillion+ over 10 years (relative to the CBO Alternative case in which there is no deficit reduction at all). However,\nCongress is running short on time, and may have to do a smaller debt ceiling increase/deficit reduction first. For now,\nwe wait to see the balance of spending cuts and revenue increases will be agreed to. Last week’s Profiles in Courage\npiece walked through the history and dynamics of this process, so we won’t repeat that here. Here’s our take on what\nhas been proposed so far, with the caveat that many plans are not crystal clear what baseline they are using, or what\nsteps they recommend to get to that baseline first. For example: the Gang of Six state that they used the President’s\nbudget as a baseline (scored by CBO in March 2011), reduced deficits by $3.7 trillion, and ended up with a 71%\ndebt/GDP ratio; but they do not explain how they get to the President’s baseline in the first place."}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031591.txt_10890	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031591.txt	Re: High Profile	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "1/6/2015 1:15:19 AM", "subject": "Re: High Profile", "body": "thanks, what is david doing?"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:12 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jamie Rosenwald", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:07 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nYour name popped up again in the Press and I thought it was time to congratulate you on your wonderful\nfinancial successes since your days as my Physics prof at Dalton!! The young, bright options trader, who\nunderstood Black Sholes and how to use it, at Bear, made good!!\n\nUnless your PR advisor is Donald Trump, I am not sure that current press provides you with much benefit.\nPerhaps I am wrong? Not the first time!!\n\nAnyway, middle age has brought its own unique set of challenges. Aging certainly ain't for sissy's.\n\nRegards,\n\nJamie Rosenwald\n\nPs. David Asch and I toasted to you during our Thanksgiving weekend in Amagansett in November."}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032220.txt_10891	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032220.txt	Please	[{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/12/2015 5:22:10 AM", "subject": "Please", "body": "Please tell me Trump will not win the election... \n xo \n co-authored with i Phone auto-correct"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032336.txt_10900	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032336.txt	Re: speak. JE	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["chbarak x"], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:35 PM", "subject": "Re: speak. JE", "body": "Sure. Speak. When? #?\n\nBest\nEB"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ehbarak"], "timestamp": "5 Nov 2016, at 8:52", "subject": "Re: speak. JE", "body": "speak?"}, {"sender": "ehbarak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/7/2016 3:54:57 AM", "subject": "Re: speak. JE", "body": "Hi Jeff\nThe Trump momentum,\nI believe was stopped.\n\nHillary might be on her way to Win. But with much lower margin, and probably still GOP controlled Senate.\n\nBest\nEB"}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032546.txt_10903	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032546.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 11:56:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was good...judge is new and afraid to go outside the box...maybe I should rep your buddy here...agreed to \nmeet pence one-on-one Thursday in dc"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, May 30, 2017 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how did today go . . https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/29/close-friend-trump-thomas-barrack-\nalleged-tax-evasion-italy-sardinia?CMP=share btn fb"}]	2
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024384.txt_10910	IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024384.txt	Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview	[{"sender": "Bill Siege!", "recipients": ["Charlotte Abrams iy"], "timestamp": "2/8/2013 7:40:43 PM", "subject": "Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Bill Siegel hopes this might be of interest to you: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jamie-glazov/the-control-factor-our-struggle-to-see-the-true-threat/"}]	1
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026835.txt_10911	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026835.txt	FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade	[{"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake <vinodabasnayake@...>", "recipients": ["elisabeth feliho", "Bob Crowe", "Cheikh Tidianc Sy", "Mohamed Seydou Diagne", "El Hadji Amadou Sall"], "timestamp": "02/03/2016 16:20 (GMT+00:00)", "subject": "RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "We have had some positive feedback from the article. Now the issue certainly has more visibility in Washington. Bob is in the process of setting up the meeting with Tom at the State Dept regarding the Human Rights Report for 2016. Will send more as we get more details."}, {"sender": "abuulabass", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "elisabeth feliho", "Bob Crowe", "Mohamed Seydou Diagne", "El Hadji Amadou Sall"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 02, 2016 12:31 PM", "subject": "RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Congratulations Vinoda ! The French version of the paper was published today in the Senegalese major newspapers. You can see it also in Seneweb.com .\n\nMany thanks for the good work with my best regards.\n\nTidiane"}, {"sender": "Bob Crowe", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/11/2016 12:24:18 PM", "subject": "FW: RE : RE: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": ""}]	3
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025975.txt_10913	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025975.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you!\n\nDid you really like it?\nHow did you like furniture?\nWhat would you change it?\n\nB"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:01:22 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i think it was terrific , the only thing i would think about is having only one lit sculpture ata time . put onein storage or covered , but you want to call attention to one at atime."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:06:27 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great! Happy to hear it.\nTrust your advice and taste - this is why \| am asking!\n\nB"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:06:27 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What \| do not like that it came out more as a Trump gold that an old gold.\n\nand maybe have the large colums black instead of gold, as the gold paint is not as good as the gold metal objects."}]	4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033284.txt_10915	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033284.txt	null	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn [rs", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/10/2016 11:04:38 PM", "subject": null, "body": "looks like donald and mort are not to friendly..\n\nhttp://www.marketwatch.com/story/ny-daily-news-calls-voters-mindless-zombies-after-donald-trump-wins-\nnew-hampshire-2016-02-10/print"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032552.txt_10923	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032552.txt	null	[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/21/2017 12:03:20 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Trump is truly stupid."}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032444.txt_10924	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032444.txt	Re: Kuhn	[{"sender": "Robert L. Kuhn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Jan 11, 2017, at 2:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Dear Jeffrey:\n\nAttached, as promised, is our proposal for Closer To Truth to produce the definitive television series on “The Science of Sleep and Dreams” - 13 episodes, a full season, on ~200 PBS stations, plus extensive web videos. Contemporary advances in sleep/dream research makes timing propitious.\n\nThree documents:\n\n1) Proposal (12 pages)\n\n2) Budget (line item)\n\n3) Schedule (weekly)\n\nPlease confirm receipt.\n\nI'll be in New York from January 19 until about February 8. Love to meet - on Sleep/Dreams and all sorts of fun stuff to cheer our 2017."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn RR", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Just got to New York - love to meet, brainstorm.\n\nFrom Washington, my inauguration-day commentary and conversation with Chinese experts on Sino-US relations under Trump - https://youtu.be/OGdul pmeVNM?list=PLt-M801W_GdSZbSuplmsSS5JZzlhIWpGb\n\nEarlier interview on BBC “What Chinese think of Trump” - two minute excerpt - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04m9jj4\n\nLooking forward, Robert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 22, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Robert a Ottis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/22/2017 9:49:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "I’m flexible after Tuesday. (Doing CNBC on Trump-China Tues morning)\n\nI forgot to congratulate you on winning your loooooong-odds bet on Trump with Woody. Everyone I know, including me, would have bet against you. Quite extraordinary."}]	4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031165.txt_10939	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031165.txt	Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011	[{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients:"], "timestamp": "6/14/2011 11:54:12 AM", "subject": "Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011", "body": "Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011 (attached PDF is easier to read)\n\nMarket update: for better or worse, this is the kind of year we were expecting. We were surprised at the market’s unbridled optimism in April, since the tug-of-war between private sector profits and public sector problems has a long way to go. We chose the charts on the front page of our 2011 Outlook carefully; they were designed to show that equity markets were priced inexpensively, but were likely to stay that way, given too much stimulus in the East, and ineffective stimulus in the West . We expect a modest second half recovery, based primarily on US capital spending increases, easy credit conditions everywhere, and a pick-up in industrial production in Japan. But the world’s structural problems are weighing on the private sector, and our portfolios are positioned for a single-digit year in credit, equities and hedge funds.\n\n The Osama Bin Laden episode marked the equity market peak. Some commentators saw this event as a basis for further optimism, but unsurprisingly, the positive glow lasted for only around 2.5 hours the subsequent Monday. According to the Congressional Research Service, over the last decade, the US has spent at least $1.1 trillion in war funding operations, surpassing the constant-dollar cost of the Korean and Vietnam Wars combined. This highlights the disproportionately large pain that small, non-sovereign entities can inflict in the modern era.\n\n** So far, the large growth and employment multipliers from deficit spending estimated by Christina Romer (former Chair of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers) have not materialized. John Taylor and John Cogan from Stanford have been closer to the mark: an initial boost, but then a rapidly fading benefit\n\nSomething different this week. I was on the road seeing clients last week, and was asked “what should be done about job growth”. We are investors and not politicians, so my ideas [a] are not relevant. However, it seems to me that anyone involved in the jobs debate should be required to read the article below, written after the prior deep US recession (1990-1991). It’s from George McGovern, one of the most liberal politicians [b] ever to hold office and run for President. His epiphanies after leaving office and running the Stratford Inn are worth considering as legislators contemplate additional job creation measures, and the broader regulatory environment in which the private sector operates.\n\n“A Politician's Dream Is a Businessman's Nightmare”, by George McGovern, June 1992 [c]\n\nWisdom too often never comes, and so one ought not to reject it merely because it comes late. (Justice Felix Frankfurter). It's been 11 years since I left the U.S. Senate, after serving 24 years in high public office. After leaving a career in politics, I devoted much of my time to public lectures that took me into every state in the union and much of Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America.\n\nIn 1988, I invested most of the earnings from this lecture circuit acquiring the leasehold on Connecticut's Stratford Inn. Hotels, inns and restaurants have always held a special fascination for me. The Stratford Inn promised the realization of a longtime dream to own a combination hotel, restaurant and public conference facility--complete with an experienced manager and staff. In retrospect, I wish I had known more about the hazards and difficulties of such a business, especially during a recession of the kind that hit New England just as I was acquiring the inn's 43-year leasehold. I also wish that during the years I was in public office, I had had this firsthand experience about the difficulties business people face every day. That knowledge would have made me a better U.S. senator and a more understanding presidential contender.\n\nToday we are much closer to a general acknowledgment that government must encourage business to expand and grow. Bill Clinton, Paul Tsongas, Bob Kerrey and others have, I believe, changed the debate of our party [d]. We intuitively know that to create job opportunities we need entrepreneurs who will risk their capital against an expected payoff. Too often, however, public policy does not consider whether we are choking off those opportunities."}]	1
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012045.txt_10944	IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012045.txt	Financials: buy XLF call spreads	[{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E.", "Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 22, 2016 2:15 PM", "subject": "Financials: buy XLF call spreads", "body": "Underweight positioning, buybacks resuming, positive momentum and strong fundamentals all indicate that there is still further upside potential in financials (more details below). Our financials sector specialist thinks XLF could have another 20-25% upside given the many levers to the Trump Trade: less regulation, higher interest rates, higher vol, economic growth, loan growth, etc. The asset sensitive regional banks are more of a pure play on a rates move but we view the larger cap banks as having multi-pronged upside given the aforementioned points.\n\nThat said, given the velocity and magnitude of the recent move and uncertainty around the impact and timing of Trump’s policies, we believe options offer better risk-reward than being outright long financials stocks here. With flat call skew, “appearing” call spreads with upside knock-ins price well.\n\nBuy a 1 year XLF call spread for 2.6% premium\n\ne Buyaii0% call\n\ne = Sell a 117.5% call with an at-expiry knock-in at 125% (call is not active unless XLF is 125% or higher at expiry)\no Total premium is 2.6%\n\no Gross max payoff if knock-in is triggered: 2.9x (7.5%/2.6%)\n\no Gross max payoff if knock-in is not triggered: 5.7x (14.9%/2.6%) — you have upside up to 124.9%\n\nPost Election Flow Skews - Buyers of Health Care (via ETFs) and Financials (mainly ETFs)\ne US Buyback Flows\n\ne Cons Disc, Technology and Financials are the largest 3 sectors for US buybacks (over 70% of execution). We are seeing a seasonal increase in buybacks as we come out of the low seasonal month of the year (October) and should see increased buyback executions until year-end, another source of upside for the Cons Disc, Technology and Financials sectors.\n\nGlobal Positioning, Nigel Tupper, 11/14. Large long-only funds are more underweight Financials than any other sector and are UW this sector in all regions.\n\nFuture of Financials conference hosted 90 public and private companies at our Future of Financials conference. We are raising our price objectives across most of our names. Three primary reasons why we think there is upside remaining after the recent rally: 1) an improved outlook on both activity levels and interest rates, driving revenue upside; 2) potentially lower regulatory burden, particularly as new supervisory leadership can come with the new administration; and 3) relatively lighter positioning in US financials vs. other sectors. (Erika Najarian)\n\nTrades Gaining Momentum: Finance-Related Assets vs. S&P 500"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030154.txt_10947	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030154.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Daniel Sick a"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule?"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad ee", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you call me\n\nI am with tigrane he would like to meet you he is here with me in Ibiza with 8 top girls he said he would like to\nbuild some thing with you\n\ncan you come to Ibiza we have a huge house or how can we orgnise this meeting even Jean Luc could doo a\ngreat biz also\n\nhe has the most amizing top models on stand by I told him not to do any deals with anybody before he meet\nwith you.\n\nhe stoped working with IMG and Trump wi here please call me and let me know what is your plans\n\nwarmest regards\nDaniel"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad (qq", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the other girl name is Anastasia kuznetsova"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Daniel Sick a"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 24 2010 04:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will be in paris tomooorw night"}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028942.txt_10949	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028942.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Oct 25, 2015, at 7:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "another idea for obama. not as good as bio signal intelligence. . the cinese are willing to build a new \ncollider. they will put up the money and build it , but need american tech. if he were to call it the obama xi \ncollider. his legazy would be great in scinece and the project takes 15 -30 years."}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/25/2015 1:02:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Good idea. It didn't seem like Obama was that interested in hard sciences though... What's your read?"}]	2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026298.txt_10952	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026298.txt	Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts	[{"sender": "Juleanna Glover FO", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 3 2018 03:49 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts", "body": "Flagging for you. This went out to that circle of third party thinkers. Hope all is well, Jeffrey.!"}, {"sender": "Juleanna Glover", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 2, 2018 at 2:45:08 PM CDT", "subject": "Our May conversation - more thoughts", "body": "Hi all —\n\nI spent some time mulling additional aspects of a third choice presidential run and wanted to run five\n\nspecific attributes for a candidate by you as a group.\n\nThis much we know - the Fall elections are shaping up to be a referendum on the most divisive\nAmerican President in memory. The battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh’s\nnomination this fall will only amplify the polarity of the political debate that is already deeply\noverwrought on both sides. The rising tide of pressure on Donald Trump from the Mueller investigation\n\nshows no sign of ebbing.\n\nUnless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these unprecedented events will\nstill leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield of the 2016 Presidential election.\nWatching these unrelenting, compounding events since our discussion in May, I am guessing we are all\nasking the same question: now what? For the 48 percent of Americans who believe Donald Trump\n\nshould not be in the White House, perhaps we too want our own “chaos” candidate in 2020?\n\nShould Trump run again, this could be a “break glass” moment for the majority of Americans who don’t"}]	2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025949.txt_10959	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025949.txt	Re: Mechanisms for learning	[{"sender": "Joscha 82h", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2016 7:02:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:\n\nno worry, if I understand correctly you are suggesting there are layers 1 through N. Lets call them L1 - Ln. There are times T1-Tn and then conjecture that changing the time correlations (by genetic switch or other method), you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer development and changing the time for other layers. Like telomeres for the cell, are there equivalents for the layers. As you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get different (kill yourself if you are not being used instructions).\n\nExactly. I looked up the statistics, black kids in the US have slower cognitive development (and never catch up), which the study of course attributed to social factors without any evidence, and they had faster motor development! I suspect this means their brains are slower at learning high-level concepts, because the low-level structures are optimized for a shorter time. But they will keep the lead in motor development, because it is easier to learn, and they have more time and attention to practice once they get the structures in place.\n\nIt could also be that they have an additional set of learning directives in place that adapts them better to a more hunting/running style of life, whereas the Europeans had to adapt for identifying long-term seasonal patterns, delayed gratification for agriculture etc.\n\nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communication. Are gender differences also a matter of time, and structure of interactions.\n\nI suspect gender differences are mostly motivational, i.e. we have a reward system for all the different social and cognitive needs, which makes us receive different kinds of pleasure and pain, thereby pay attention and learn. You cannot learn what does not attract your attention. Women tend to find abstract systems, conflicts and mechanisms intrinsically boring. Most women in computer science do not write programs because they enjoy solving puzzles, but because they want to help people, get approval etc. There are almost no women in math, because it does not help people or yield social attention.\n\nMen tend to find elaborate social relations boring. If there is no pleasure in observing and empathizing with people, one will not have good social cognition.\n\nIQ is not the only meaningful difference. Chinese pay an inordinate amount of attention to authority. I suspect historically, the authorities tended to kill them a lot if they did not. Jews tend be intellectually independent and anti-authoritarian, which might make them creative and inventive in ways that are hard to find in Asia.\n\nAt the moment, I think speed/quality of brain development plus motivational system are the key to understanding both mind and individual differences. Important part of human language might be the result in a motivational need to discover/invent grammatical structure, which as a side effect makes us interested in music. It would mean that Chomsky’s life long hypothesis, that people have a special circuit for grammatical language, is wrong. They might be GENERAL learners, just like Gorillas, but with a strong motivational urge to build"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030509.txt_10963	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030509.txt	Re: Quick question	[{"sender": "[in", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Quick question", "body": "Hey Unc,\n\nQuick Question...do u think Larry Summers would come to Trinity to speak about Obama, the economy, the\ngovernment in general, etc?"}, {"sender": "Uncle F Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Do you want more free city for chanukH?"}, {"sender": "x", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Noy 3, 2010, at 3:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Hmm perhaps. But I was thinking that I maybe wanted a speaker system for my room and bathroom..?!?"}, {"sender": "Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 3 2010 03:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "2: aa\n\nAs always , whatever you want!!\n\nSorry for all the typos ."}]	4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032818.txt_10968	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032818.txt	RE: Re:	[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [ia", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/4/2018 3:32:39 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "But isn’t the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and important?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Had a gut that's where you would come out"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "fred gave him 15k as a3 year old only . however ( written 200k in \"todays dollars\" ) then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on estates and gigts are taxed on the value of what was transferred not the underlying thing. ex if you own 10 percent of a partnership interest ina 1 million builidng that cannot be sold for 20 years. what is the value of your interest. not 10 percent of 1 million as you only own a ltd partnership right. maybe 2 percent. its all legal"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Anything surprise you?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Florida"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish \| was with you right now...so where are you?"}]	7