Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030129.txt_12383	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030129.txt	Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library	[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20, 2014", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "http://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the No mination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General \nSent from my iPad"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 9:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Number?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 10:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Boy are you focused , I meant what number to call you on"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:03 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Oh, sorry."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 12:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "You are on the move. I went out for some retail therapy."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 2:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "eric?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Date?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "date certain? hamlet. ?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Mid-October, but there will be another run at him to reconsider."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "so is he the alternate in essence"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "It appears that way. I have advised that him staying through the end is the clearly preferable alternative."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "whose name is the apt in, does it have to be this one? or would another be ok."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "I signed the lease in my name for a year, so I think I am pretty stuck. It is $11,000 a month and Latham \nreimburses me $8000 a month."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "furnished or un?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Furnished"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "see you at 1030? tomor?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "I won't get back to the city until @ 11:30, unfortunately."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "ok 1?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/21/2014 4:55:16 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Will be there at 1."}]	20
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026270.txt_12386	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026270.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Steve Bannon Feb 24 (1 day ago)\n\nhttps://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-\n\nmichael-flynn-trump-423437\n\ndo you think Bill Clinton would like to join you me ehud and steve.? could be very funny, all off the record."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-)\n\nAre you feeling better today?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "but maybe with the right amount of shoes his lawyer might change her mind :)"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 10:05:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ":-)"}]	4
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021113.txt_12393	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021113.txt	Fwd: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners	[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz SG", "Viartin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "4/23/2019 12:58:06 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": ""}, {"sender": "The Sidney Hillman Foundation <r rc LU>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:45 PM", "subject": "Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Congratulations to the 2019 Hillman Prize recipients!"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032628.txt_12395	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032628.txt	Re:	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/20/2017 9:57:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today .. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new\n\nyork including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524.txt_12398	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524.txt	Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'	[{"sender": "Thomas D. Williams", "recipients": ["Raheem Kassam", "Oliver Lane", "Alexander Marlow", "Frances Martel", "Adrienne Ross"], "timestamp": "March 11, 2018 at 5:13:03 PM GMT+1", "subject": "Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever' by THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D.11 Mar 2018 As Steve Bannon continues his tour of Europe, energizing the anti-establishment populist base, the mainstream media cannot help but admit their admiration for his abilities, despite their dislike of his aims. In this week's issue, the left-wing German weekly Stern articulates the greatest fear of the European establishment: that Bannon \"could give the fragmented right in Europe a common ideology and rhetoric.\" Many thought that the reign of the \"Dark Lord\" had ended, writes Gernot Kramper, when Steve Bannon left first the White House and then his role as executive chairman of Breitbart News. It turns out, however, that Bannon's adversaries had underestimated him, because he is \"as dangerous as ever,\" he confesses. Kramper cannot conceal his respect for Bannon's ability to move a crowd. He was greeted by \"frenetic applause\" in his recent address before France's National Front party, Kramper writes, demonstrating his \"impressive potential,\" which the writer describes as \"dangerous.\" In the mind of his audience, Bannon is something of a miracle-worker, Stamper notes, having \"done the impossible\" by bringing Donald Trump into the White House. The reason Bannon is dangerous, Kramper continues, is because he \"lays out the political program of a worldwide right: He has already conquered the USA; now Europe and then the whole world will follow.\" \"You are part of a worldwide movement that is bigger than France, bigger than Italy, bigger than Hungary, bigger than all that,\" Bannon told French populists. Bannon showed that he \"dominates the mood against the 'elites,' the 'establishment' and the 'perverse system' of greedy corporations and banks, and of course also against the press, which is led around 'like a dog on the Leash,\" Stamper writes. And now he Mr. Bannon setting himself up as an instigator, if not an outright shepherd, of a movement that crosses borders, languages and parties. \"Bannon is a master of apocalyptic rhetoric,\" Stamper continues, effortlessly weaving together nationalist interests with an international populist movement. The American strategist showed his \"true caliber\" by expounding modern methods of political freedom through blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies, Stamper said, leaving many of his hearers behind. Bannon has demonstrated that if the right wants to rule the future, \"it must dominate modern themes and rhetorically position them,\" he added. Aspiring to be far more than an uncle who tells stories to his nephews of how he won the fight for the White House, Stamper writes, \"Bannon wants to become the super godfather of the international right.\" Although Bannon often looks a bit disheveled, \"he should not be underestimated,\" the writer warns. Past business partners attribute impressive \"strategic foresight\" to the eccentric tactician, saying he was often \"three or four steps ahead\" of his opponents in business. Because of his phenomenal memory, his nickname is \"the encyclopedia,\" Stamper notes with a certain reverence, and in his speeches he will spontaneously cite \"forgotten thinkers, known only to a handful of specialists.\" \"Bannon brings with him exclusive knowledge of power from the very heart of power,\" Stamper writes, which he will bring to bear on Europe's fragmented populist populism. According to Stamper, Bannon has established his \"European headquarters\" in Italy, from where he intends to galvanize European populists. The Italian political situation is completely to his liking, Stamper declares, with a political landscape \"dominated by populists, right-wing ideologues and the political puppeteer Berlusconi.\""}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Germans get it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 11, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "luv it"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Pretty powerful"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 11 Mar 2018 21:03:53 +0100", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": "Unfortunately I just spoke to one of the country leaders that we discussed I will fly there tomorw night now and then to new york wednesday night. sorry. will be in new york thurs and friday. we should lay out a strategy plan. . how much fun... travel safe."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Sean Bannon"], "timestamp": "3/12/2018 1:04:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'", "body": ""}]	6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026005.txt_12408	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026005.txt	RE: Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 11, 2016 8:16 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "your girl won"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 12, 2016 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "August 11, 2016 \nA federal jury decided Thursday that one of the Middle East's most prominent banks did not commit fraud and \nsteal technology from an Irvine firm that sued it for half a billion dollars in damages after their partnership \ncollapsed. \nOrange County company InfoSpan had alleged that Emirates NBD ended a partnership for a mobile payment \nsystem because it didn't want to share revenue and stole InfoSpan's technology to launch its own service. \nThe Dubai-based bank, in turn, denied it stole or ever used InfoSpan's technology. It argued that it cancelled the \npartnership because InfoSpan couldn't produce a working product and misled it into thinking it was an \nestablished company, not one with little to no track record. \nAfter deliberating for a day, the jury unanimously decided that InfoSpan did not prove its case of fraud and theft \nof trade secrets. \nInfoSpan had asked for $540 million in damages. An attorney for InfoSpan declined to comment on the \npossibility of an appeal. \nThe verdict capped a two-week trial that involved dueling accusations of fraud levied by high-profile attorneys \non both sides, including the former White House counsel to President Obama. \nAt the center of the high-stakes battle was San Juan Capistrano resident and entrepreneur Farooq Bajwa and a \nmobile payment system that he said would allow migrant workers in the Middle East to send remittances back \nhome through text messages. \nBajwa contended that InfoSpan, with support from outside investors, spent $87 million developing the business \nand technology. \nTo launch the system, known as SpanCash, Bajwa partnered in 2007 with Emirates Bank, which is controlled \nby the United Arab Emirates' sovereign wealth fund. \nIt seemed the ideal collaboration for the Pakistani immigrant, who earned millions operating another Irvine \ncompany that manufactured computer components in the 1980s and 1990s \nThe Gulf States rely heavily on migrants to work construction and other low-wage jobs, offering a ready-made \nmarket for SpanCash. InfoSpan aimed to allow migrants to transfer money back home far more cheaply than \nWestern Union or hawala, a traditional Middle Eastern broker-to-broker money transfer system. \nA study from McKinsey & Co., cited in court records, projected annual revenue of $3.5 billion by the deal's \nfifth year, with InfoSpan receiving more than $2.8 billion in fees. \nBut the relationship between InfoSpan and Emirates Bank soured and the bank cancelled the deal in 2009. \nA few days later, Emirates filed a criminal complaint in Dubai against Bajwa and a partner alleging that they \ndefrauded the bank and misrepresented InfoSpan as an established business with a working technology. \nTwo years later, InfoSpan sued in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana and alleged that its technology was working \nand that it delivered its source code to the bank on servers. Emirates ended the deal, InfoSpan said, to launch its \nown mobile payment system after stealing InfoSpan's technology. \nIn court, an attorney for InfoSpan argued that Emirates torpedoed the InfoSpan relationship because it abhorred \nhow much money it would have to share with the Irvine firm. \n\"They wanted SpanCash and they wanted the money,\" attorney William A. Isaacson said in his closing \narguments Wednesday. \nIsaacson — a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator David \nBoies — argued that the bank resorted to \"pure extortion\" in an attempt to get its way. \nAs a result of the bank's criminal complaint, InfoSpan alleged Bajwa's partner, Larry Scudder, was detained at \nthe Dubai International Airport and taken to a cell where he was locked in with 30 other men for 19 hours until \nhe secured his release by turning over his passport. \nAccording to the lawsuit, Bajwa tried to resolve the situation but was told Scudder's passport would be released \nand he could leave the country only if InfoSpan gave up ownership and control of SpanCash to the bank. \nSix months later, the bank withdrew the fraud accusations and Scudder got his passport back, but SpanCash's \nreputation was tarnished and it collapsed, Bajwa previously told The Times. \nThe bank disputed that it acquired InfoSpan's source code or used it at any time. \nFormer White House counsel and an attorney for the bank, Kathryn Ruemmler, said that Emirates never would \nhave acquired source code in a joint-partnership deal like the one reached with InfoSpan. She said such \ntechnology would instead be held by a third-party escrow company for the length of the partnership. \nIn her closing arguments, the partner with global firm Latham & Watkins told the jury that Bajwa and InfoSpan \nsold the bank a \"bill of goods,\" arguing that despite promises to Emirates, the technology never worked and \nInfoSpan wasn't as big a company as it claimed. \nThe bank cancelled the deal and filed a criminal complaint, not as a form of extortion but simply to regain the \nbank's money after it was misled and doubts grew about the character of InfoSpan's employees, Ruemmler told \nthe jury. \n\"They concluded, definitively, that they had been defrauded,\" she said. \nLubna Qassim, group general counsel for Emirates Bank, said in a statement after the verdict that \"Emirates \nBank is gratified by today's decision and the opportunity to receive a fair trial in U.S. courts.\" \nBajwa said the trial has taken a toll on him and he doesn't know his next steps. \n\"I am just beat up,\" he said. \nPhil Hirschkorn contributed to this report."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Hope she is pleased/happy/satisfied/proud"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/12/2016 1:58:39 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "This is a big deal"}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029336.txt_12409	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029336.txt	google search	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/25/2013 7:47:22 PM", "subject": "google search", "body": "just did a jee google and thought it looked very good..."}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033278.txt_12420	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033278.txt	Trump tariffs are in ‘Stop, or I’ll shoot myself in the foot’ category: Ex-Treasury chief Summers	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/6/2018 9:20:51 PM", "subject": "Trump tariffs are in ‘Stop, or I’ll shoot myself in the foot’ category: Ex-Treasury chief Summers", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/06/trump-tariff-threats-harming-us-ex-treasury-chief-larry-summers.html"}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026258.txt_12431	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026258.txt	Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO	[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 1:23:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "I think I have the most solid guy on the right--tied into the 'swiss' guys\n\nNamed jeffrey wernick--going thru due diligence now ---ive known him a while as I've studied this--he can\nwalk u thru the deal"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon iii"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:20:46 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "do you have coin guys. brocks people . or should we find? some of the lefty crpto guys , might find it\ndifficult to join, but they said bringing tech to discourse is on a higher plane"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "On it"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:13:08 -0500", "subject": "Re: Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned' about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "coin issues. : receive coins. distribute coins, pay in coins. coin cooperative. prohibitions foreign donor.? 1\nneed to understand flow of funds.. donor to campiagn c?s. does it have to go to campaign first. . does it\n\nhave to go there at all etc."}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030101.txt_12433	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030101.txt	Re: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur	[{"sender": "Frank Pizzurro, Frank (LA)", "recipients": ["Dunlavey, Dean (OC)", "Schecter, Daniel (CC)", "Mohebbi, Nima (LA)", "Ruemmler, Kathy (DC)", "Wine, Jamie (NY)", "Bruno, Nicole (NY)", "Harris, Nicole (CH)", "Greenberg, Jeffrey (LA-NY)", "Bauer, Steve (SF-BR)", "Moore, Wendy (OC)", "Jennings, Alex (LA)", "Robins, Greg (LA)"], "timestamp": "Thursday, Aug 11, 2016, 7:41 PM", "subject": "Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "The LA Times appears to be the first media to report on the verdict. Latham references are highlighted:\n\n[Article content excluded as forwarded press release]"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <kathy.ruemmler@lw.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, 11 August 2016", "subject": "Re: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 11, 2016", "subject": "Re: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "Cool"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 12, 2016, at 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "Awake?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/12/2016 12:38:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur", "body": "Yes"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026777.txt_12440	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026777.txt	Michael Wolff: My Insane Year Inside Trump's White House	[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 3:19:23 PM", "subject": "Michael Wolff: My Insane Year Inside Trump's White House", "body": "Read this\nhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hollywoodreporter.com/amp/news/michael-wolff-my-insane-year-inside-trumps-white-house-1071504"}]	1
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026605.txt_12443	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026605.txt	Fwd: Story on you	[{"sender": "Kathy Rue ler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/24/2014 6:25:22 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Story on you", "body": ""}, {"sender": "\"Pickler, Nedra\"", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 24, 2014 2:23 PM", "subject": "Story on you", "body": "WASHINGTON (AP) — Former White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler has told President Barack Obama she doesn't want to be nominated for attorney general, after he asked her to consider succeeding Eric Holder, people familiar with the discussions told The Associated Press on Friday.\n\nRuemmler was concerned that her experience as a close adviser to the president would have led to a difficult confirmation process in the current highly charged partisan environment, the sources said, speaking on a condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss private discussions. They say Ruemmler, a top official at the Justice Department before moving to the White House, was also concerned that could ignite political attacks against Obama.\n\nRuemmler's withdrawal, in a phone call to the president Wednesday, leaves no obvious front-runner to replace Holder, who announced a month ago that he would step down once a replacement was confirmed. Ruemmler brought the law enforcement bonafides of a former prosecutor in the Bush administration who won convictions against Enron's executives and the national security expertise of a top White House official.\n\nOther candidates that administration officials have said have been considered include Solicitor General Don Verrilli; Labor Secretary Tom Perez; Loretta Lynch, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York; Preet Bharara, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York; Jenny Durkan, who resigned as U.S. attorney in Washington state last month; former Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano; Tony West, who recently resigned as the No. 3 official at the Justice Department and has taken a job at Pepsico; and Deputy Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.\n\nRuemmler, now a partner at Latham & Watkins specializing in government investigations, had the closest relationship of the attorney general candidates to the president after serving as his legal gatekeeper at the White House. But that relationship also would have brought tough scrutiny, with Republicans likely to question her handling of controversies involving the IRS, Benghazi and the investigation of a White House volunteer in a prostitution scandal."}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033129.txt_12470	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033129.txt	Re: Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "where?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish I was with you right now...so where are you?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:45 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Florida"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:21 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Anything surprise you?\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "fred gave him 15k as a 3 year old only. however ( written 200k in \"todays dollars\" ) then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on estates and gigts are taxed on the value of what was transferred not the underlying thing. ex if you own 10 percent of a partnership interest in a 1 million builidng that cannot be sold for 20 years. what is the value of your interest. not 10 percent of 1 million as you only own a ltd partnership right. maybe 2 percent. its all legal"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Had a gut that's where you would come out\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "But isn't the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and important?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Maybe"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Finally read the nytimes piece closely....with all due respect I am guessing you are wrong in dismissing/trivializing it....seems there are some hard facts that are very difficult for the big guy to explain"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "10/5/2018 1:49:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "help yes no question FRAUD show me an inkling. ?"}]	11
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032827.txt_12472	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032827.txt	RE:	[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 6, 2018 1:51 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Are you enjoying la? I liked your trump exaggerations not lies"}, {"sender": "Peter Thiel", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/7/2018 12:34:34 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Can’t complain thus far..."}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025295.txt_12477	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025295.txt	Fwd: Game On paper from Dr. Laffer	[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 5:32:04 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Game On paper from Dr. Laffer", "body": "These old school supply siders supposedly have DT's ear. Your old pal Larry Kudlow/Laffer/Steve Moore. I think they basically wrote his tax plan. Steve Forbes for Treasury Secretary??:):)"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Drinkwater", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas, Jr."], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:38 AM", "subject": "Game On paper from Dr. Laffer", "body": "Dear Landon, \nPlease see the attached paper from Dr. Laffer. \nBest, \nNick"}]	2
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026836.txt_12478	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026836.txt	Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade	[{"sender": "elisabeth feliho [elisabeth.feliho@...]", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake"], "timestamp": "Monday, February 29, 2016 6:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Congratulations!!! Can we share this with the press here?\nBest regards.\n\nEF"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake <i...>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2016-02-26 13:04 GMT+00:00", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Great news, the piece was published in The Hill this morning-\n\nhttp://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/international/270878-senegals-democratic-backslide\n\nWe can share this w Congress and State.\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "elisabeth fcliho", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 26, 2016, at 6:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Excellent!!!"}, {"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2016-02-24 20:13 GMT+00:00", "subject": "Re: Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "We are working on getting the following article placed in the Hill or the Politico within the next week. As of now it looks like former Chairman of Armed Services, Congressman Ron Dellums, will be the author. Please keep highly confidential. Will keep you posted on if, when and where it gets published. Once it is published we can all circulate it highly. We believe that this article sets the tone for the advocacy we will be doing and having someone very prominent like Congressman Dellums will also be a great way to launch this campaign.\n\nCongressman Ronald Dellums is a thirteen term Member of the U.S. House of Representatives (D-CA) who served from 1971-1998. He also served as the 48th Mayor of Oakland from 2007-2011. Dellums served as the Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and the House Committee on the District of Columbia. He also served on the Foreign Affairs Committee, the Post Office and Civil Service Committee, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and co-founded the Congressional Black Caucus."}]	4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033287.txt_12483	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033287.txt	Trump	[{"sender": "Stephen Alexander EEE", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/7/2016 10:05:34 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "A pal from Trump's military school days came out in his defense. What the author failed to mention was Peter Ticktin’s law license has been suspended twice since 2009 for unethical practice of law. Makes him the perfect \"character witness\" for The Donald, eh?\n\nMan Who Lived With Trump 50 Years Ago Drops Bombshell TRUTH... \"\| Was Aghast\"\n\nMan Who Lived With Trump 50 Years Ago Drops Bo mbshe..."}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032551.txt_12490	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032551.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/10/2017 7:29:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In Norway. Next time, tell me well in advance, would be interesting to learn more more about Trump. I am totally confused."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8. jul. 2017 kl. 15.22", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am in paris you?"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026788.txt_12495	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026788.txt	Weekly Update	[{"sender": "Carolyn Rangel", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/13/2018 4:21:17 PM", "subject": "Weekly Update", "body": "To Raise the Greater Consciousness \nJOIN DEEPAK AND FRIENDS AT \nRestore \nMarch 23-25, 2018 \nNew York City \nOPRAH & DEEPAK \n\nRECRUITMENT NOW OPEN. \nBack by popular demand. \nStarting for free on March 19, you can be a part of \n21 Day Meditation Experience, Shedding the Weight: Mind, Body and Spirit \nLearn to meditate and discover what truly nourishes your entire being."}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033293.txt_12499	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033293.txt	Fw: media inquiry - Fox News	[{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/6/2016 7:52:09 PM", "subject": "Fw: media inquiry - Fox News", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, May 06, 2016 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Just following up again in hopes of arranging a phone interview or email exchange.\n\nThanks for your consideration."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 27, 2016 12:47 PM", "subject": "media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Mr. Weinberg\n\nI was referred to you by Alan Dershowitz, who told me you're Jeffrey Epstein's attorney.\n\nIf this is the case, I was hoping to reach him through you to see if he'd be willing to speak on the record about\nhis ties - or previous ties - to both the Clintons and Donald Trump?\n\nWould you be able to arrange a call or email exchange this week?\n\nThanks for your consideration.\n\nInvestigative Reporter,\n\nFoxNews.com\n\nLos Angeles, CA"}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030522.txt_12500	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030522.txt	Re: Looking for someone who made the early bet that Middle East would implode...	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Pl"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 08:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Looking for someone who made the early bet that Middle East would implode...", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html>\n\nby Vicky Ward <http:/www.vanitvfair.com/contributors/vicky-_ ward>\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“T’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. ’ve just been. You will never\nthink the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment\nas the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another\ninvestigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested\nthem when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s\nfriendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused on his\nmysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited\nBrands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail\nsentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had\nsexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how\nJeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing\nfinancial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-\nchilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he?\nAnd the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, Iam so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all,\nmy 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.\n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running into both of\nthem, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet\nbehind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He\nlaughed. “Not like vou, Vicky,” was his riposte.\n\nIremembered that when we’d once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn’t studied math\nsince I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a\nbook: “Math for idiots.”\n\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn’t drink or smoke, and hates restaurants.\n\n“Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,” newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was certainly\npreaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few moments in his company and\nyou know this to be true.\n\nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that “Andy”—as Jeffrey\ncalls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. Because if one thing’s\nfor sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he’s talking about far more than “Andy” does. Which is\nwhy Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him."}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032223.txt_12506	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032223.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Trump is living proof of the adage that it is better to be lucky than smart."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ill give you details when i see you, when are you in ny?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 2:18:39 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Going up to NY Friday morning. Think I am going to drive. I will then stop to pee and get gas at a rest stop on \nthe New Jersey turnpike, will observe all of the people there who are at least 100 pounds overweight, will have \na mild panic attack as a result of the observation, and will then decide that I am not eating another bite of food \nfor the rest of my life out of fear that I will end up like one of these people."}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032453.txt_12507	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032453.txt	Re: Kuhn	[{"sender": "Robert L. Kuhn PO", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Jan 11, 2017, at 2:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Dear Jeffrey:\n\nAttached, as promised, is our proposal for Closer To Truth to produce the definitive television series on “The\nScience of Sleep and Dreams” - 13 episodes, a full season, on ~200 PBS stations, plus extensive web videos.\nContemporary advances in sleep/dream research makes timing propitious.\n\nThree documents:\n\n1) Proposal (12 pages)\n\n2) Budget (line item)\n\n3) Schedule (weekly)\n\nPlease confirm receipt."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn RR", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Just got to New York - love to meet, brainstorm.\n\nFrom Washington, my inauguration-day commentary and conversation with Chinese experts on Sino-US\nrelations under Trump - https://youtu.be/OGdulpmeVNM?list=PLt-M801W_GdSZbSuplmsSS5JZzlhIWpGb\n\nEarlier interview on BBC “What Chinese think of Trump” - two minute excerpt\n- http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04m9jj4\n\nLooking forward, Robert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "On Jan 22, 2017, at 4:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn SE", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "When to meet? Weekend OK."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Feb 3, 2017, at 6:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "im in on the 9 th and 10th"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2017 3:37:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Thanks; looking forward."}]	6
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031172.txt_12512	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031172.txt	Re: Front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!	[{"sender": "Cecile de Jongh <a", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": "FYI\n\nhttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/29/obama- bundler-works-as-virgin-islands-tax-adviser/\n\nWith warm regards\n\nCecile"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Cecile de Jongh <a"], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 1 2012 01:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": "whoops"}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033115.txt_12517	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033115.txt	Re: Smart analysis on big tech -- Apple section highlighted	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/17/2018 7:12:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Smart analysis on big tech -- Apple section highlighted", "body": "its the leader for the next years ."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Smart analysis on big tech -- Apple section highlighted", "body": "China's big tech stocks have fallen into a bear market at the same time that regulatory threats against U.S. big tech companies are gaining momentum. Can U.S. big tech stocks soldier on alone or is this a harbinger that the group as a whole is losing its tremendous leadership position? Sep 13, 2018 Technology & Security • Tech Backlash • Save Article • Download PDF • big-tech-backlash In recent months, China's BAT collapse has demonstrated how costly the expectation of invincibility can be—Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent are all down more than 24% from their year-to-date closing highs. Citigroup's head of Asia strategy, Mohammed Apabhai, told CNN an apt analogy about the investor sentiment that led to BAT's collapse, likening \"the exuberance for tech stocks to the Looney Tunes cartoons in which Wile E. Coyote chases Road Runner over a cliff.\" Given they've more or less moved in tandem for years, will FAANG follow the same path as BAT? ' EtSFILir., Source: Stockcharts.com The BAT collapse was triggered by subpar earnings and a shifting regulatory environment in China. Facebook's miss in 2Q18—which drove a $120 billion single-day market cap loss, the biggest ever for a U.S. company—showed how decisive a turn could be if more U.S. tech darlings stumble this quarter. There are mounting fundamental reasons to question the 3Q18 earnings prospects of FAANG, from the accelerating user backlash against Facebook to Apple's trade war exposure to Amazon's rapidly-intensifying workforce revolt that could see the e- commerce giant left with no option but to raise wages and improve workplace conditions for its warehouse and Whole Foods employees. However, as Apabhai suggests, the message BAT is sending is less about earnings, and more about the cost of exuberance. And FAANG exuberance faces threats that go beyond fundamentals. A flurry of regulatory announcements last week signaled the political tide has turned in the U.S. Across every branch of government, the message was consistent: the U.S. no longer trusts tech giants to self- police. And the public agrees—according to a Gallup poll last month, 79% of Americans now believe \"tech companies should be regulated the same way the news media is.\" Regardless of political will, threats may not turn to action in the near term. Nonetheless, FAANG appears increasingly vulnerable to a decisive sentiment shift. At some point, the relentless barrage of bad news will force investors to begin pricing in regulatory risks. Any sustained stumble by FAANG's leadership could cripple exuberance, and cause an unraveling of passive and algorithmic strategies that are heavily overweight tech (see W/LTWApril 7, 2018 for more). We will continue to watch closely to estimate timing, but given SAT's collapse, today more than ever, acute scrutiny of tech giant leadership is required. Through August 28, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft had accounted for greater than 35% of the S&P 500's total return this year, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices data. It took Amazon just 165 trading days to grow its market value from $600 billion in January to $1 trillion. The combined market cap of FAAMG (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google) now sits over $4 trillion, or roughly equal to the combined market cap of the 283 smallest S&P 500 members. Tech's continued market leadership means investors have largely discounted the mounting risks tech giants face. We have been warning about the downsides of tech giant monopolism for more than two years in these pages, from surveillance/data security concerns to anticompetitive behavior and their role in escalating inequality. For the political establishment, for the media, for the public, this year has seen a broad awakening—the Cambridge Analytica scandal, the backlash against Jeff Bezos' astonishing wealth, and tech's ever-skyrocketing market caps were all warning signs. The past month signals a new phase has begun: from a distant rumbling of change to preparation for action. The number of significant tech-related regulatory developments that have emerged from the U.S. and the E.U. in recent weeks is nothing short of staggering. Here is an abbreviated list: • President Trump attacked Google for liberal bias, and claimed Google, Facebook, and Amazon represent \"a very antitrust situation\". • Attorney General Jeff Sessions convened a meeting of Republican state attorneys general to discuss whether tech giants \"may be hurting competition and intentionally stifling the free exchange of ideas on their platforms.\" • Facebook, Twitter, and Google were called to testify in front of the House and Senate about election interference, political bias, etc. Google declined to attend. • The FTC has begun a series of hearings on Digital Age antitrust, the first such hearings since the 1990s. • The FTC revealed the hiring of Lina Kahn—heralded for authoring a groundbreaking antitrust argument against Amazon—as an advisor. (See section 5 for more.) • Republican Senator Orrin Hatch asked the FTC to reopen a 2013 antitrust case against Google. • Democratic Senator Mark Warner released a six-point policy proposal on regulating the tech industry. • Democratic Senator Bernie Sanders proposed the \"BEZOS Act\", which would tax corporations one dollar for every dollar low-wage workers receive in government health- care benefits or food stamps. • The E.U. Parliament voted 438 to 226 to back a draft proposal of copyright reformsthat will impose unprecedented liability on information platforms. • France is pushing to have \"Right to be Forgotten\" laws applied globally, which Google is now fighting in court. • Reports emerged that the E.U. is considering investigating Google's location- tracking practices on data privacy grounds. We will continue to watch each development in the U.S. and E.U. closely to understand if and when debate turns to action. For now, we agree with the analysis of NYU Stern professor Scott Galloway, who told CNBC last week after the congressional hearings: I don't see anything meaningful coming out of this panel, much less Washington...D.C. lacks the domain expertise or the will to go after big tech. Where you may see it is, one, out of Brussels and, two, out of [the FTC, the DOJ, or] a red state whose attorney general sees the brightest path between the AG's mansion and the governor's mansion is a populist argument against big tech. Evidence of fundamental weakness could exacerbate the investor reaction to escalating regulatory news. By all accounts, Facebook has continued to bleed users. According to Pew Research poll results released earlier this month, more than a quarter of U.S. Facebook users claim to have deleted the app from their phones over the past year: Then there's Apple. The trade war combined with China's slowing economy present a significant short-term threat to the company's profits. As we note in section 1, smartphone handset sales in China in August were reported at 32.6 million units, a decline of 20.9% year-over-year and 11.8% month-on- month. Moreover, no firm could suffer more if China decides to target tech supply chains in retaliation to Trump's tariffs. Yet, the risks extend beyond Asia. On Wednesday, Apple announced its newest generation of iPhones. It is following the same strategy as last year, releasing ever-more expensive phones as it tries to keep profit growth on pace despite a largely-matured smartphone market. As The Wall Street Journal reported this week, projections suggest last year's $1,000 iPhone X underperformed previous launches: \"Even for Apple and its devoted fans, the art of the upsell appears to have some limits...Analysts believe the iPhone X has accounted for about 30% of iPhone unit sales in the recent nine-month period...That is below the share the company's newest models typically get in a given cycle.\" Will a $1,200 iPhone cross the limits of what the market will tolerate? We have roughly a month until 3Q18 earnings season begins. For years, big tech's remarkable profit trajectory has generated an air of invincibility. BAT's earnings miss combined with Facebook's earnings miss has cracked that expectation. As news reports of regulatory threats continue to flood in and as tech giant profit doubts mount, the weeks to come could see that crack turn to a fissure."}]	2
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022397.txt_12520	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022397.txt	Fwd: Wednesday's Headlines: Labor pick cut deal with billionaire accused of having sex with minors	[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/22/2017 2:35:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Wednesday's Headlines: Labor pick cut deal with billionaire accused of having sex with minors", "body": "JEFFREY—\n\nAS A FRIEND I'M SAYING MY ATHEIST PRAYERS FOR YOU.\n\nDON’T LET THE BASTARDS FRAME YOU.\n\n—PAUL"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028955.txt_12521	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028955.txt	and....another bit of advice ...? on WA	[{"sender": "Lisa Ne", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/7/2015 7:01:10 PM", "subject": "and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nAs you probably know, Woody Allen's legal team said that we couldn't use the film we shot of him: online, for \nbroadcast, anywhere. \nIt was a fantastic experience taping with him and so, even if I can't ever use the footage, I'm still grateful to you \nfor making the day possible. But of course I'd like to use the footage. I decided when--way back-- we got this \nvery negative answer back from his lawyers that I should just take my time about asking --since it would take \nus 2 years to be ready to edit the footage anyway (The online course is chronological. When I taped Woody we \nwere still back in 1730. Now we've gotten to the 1920s) \nWell, we've now arrived at the season when we'll be editing materials on William Carlos Williams for our \ncourse on Modernism and, as we discussed on Saturday, on poetry and other arts, The Poetry of Art, Sport, \nand Play \nI would also, of course, love to make a tv episode out of the conversation, but the threshold question is whether \nhe'll let us use it for anything at all. In case it would matter, \nOther performers who have already taped with me include \nJohn Lithgow, \nDiane Paulus \nJulie Taymor \nNas \nEve Ensler \nDamian Woetzel \nKate Burton \nLil Buck Riley \nAlfre Woodard \nHerbie Hancock \nTony Kushner \nNatalia Zukerman \nand those who have agreed to tape with me include \nSally Field \nLena Dunham \nYo Yo Ma \nAnna Deveare Smith \nand more. \nThose in other fields include journalists, senators, president clinton etc etc. You've read my pitch before (many \ntimes) \nHis is one of only two releases that we haven't gotten. What do you think of my chances? \nLisa"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031614.txt_12524	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031614.txt	Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:37:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "here we go"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Reporter said 1994 claim fed ct California\nWill go to press in several hrs"}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is BS, 2nd 1m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\n\nReuters News\n\nThomson Reuters"}]	3
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025792.txt_12527	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025792.txt	Is Denmark going bankrupt?	[{"sender": "Quora Digest [digest-noreply@quora.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/14/2019 7:03:52 PM", "subject": "Is Denmark going bankrupt?", "body": "Jeffrey's Digest\nTOP STORIES FOR YOU\n\nIs Denmark going bankrupt?\n\nae\n\nErik Callaway, lives in Denmark (2014-present)\n\nIf you watch Fox News? Yup. . . Choked under the weight of burdensome taxes, over-regulation,\nand society’s leaches, Denmark is primed to implode.\n\nIf you look at any quality...\n\nRead More »\n\nWhen my father was 32 I was 9. Now he is twice as old as me. How old am I?\n\na\n\nParth Parulekar, Software Engineering Intern at Avalara\n\nYou are 23 years old.\n\nTo answer this question, you must form the equation below:"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032309.txt_12540	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032309.txt	Re: Since you are super well connected...	[{"sender": "Gianni Serazzi", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 6:14:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Since you are super well connected...", "body": "Thanks for answering, your opinion on many life aspects means a lot to me\nG"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 8:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Since you are super well connected...", "body": "agreed"}, {"sender": "Gianni Serazzi", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 1:53 AM", "subject": "Re: Since you are super well connected...", "body": "A small point on the election that maybe you think might have some value for HC\n\n1-In Europe a LOT of citizens start becoming very angry and voting for populist parties\n\n2-A major reason is that the interconnected world shows them every minute on their smartphones how rich\npeople are living and envy sets in (especially with raising inequality that is perfectly normal when financial\nreturns of rich people are exponential and work returns are linear)\n\n3-They want change and risk electing completely wrong people (Italy 5stelle, France LePen might be next,\nHungary, Greece already lost, Brexit and anti-trade another example)\n\n4-US election is over, Trump has destroyed himself as expected (I was in Wharton with Donald Jr, 3.95GPA\nvs. 2.5 GPA but he thought he was a god... what a family)\n\nthe message:\n\n5-Maybe HC can use the last debates to create weapons for change. She could acknowledge that she\nunderstands that people want change, and ask for a clear majority in the senate thinking abou that instead of\npresidential elections. Then if she does bad in 4 years she is out, but she could make the public understand\nthat senate is key to show what a president can do.\n\nBut again, I know 0.001% of what you or them understands about politics, I am however worried that europe\nis just 5 or 10 years ahead on this trend compared to the US in anti-establishment feelings and I have seen\nwith friends how irrational and influenceable masses can become in voting when they are frustrated (Hitler\nwas elected after all...)\n\nHope to see you soon!!!"}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032579.txt_12542	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032579.txt	Re:	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food()"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 9:48:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}]	6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030868.txt_12546	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030868.txt	hey hey	[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/10/2017 3:43:30 PM", "subject": "hey hey", "body": "Attachments: default.gif\n\nTop of Form\nSearch ...\nBottom of Form"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023035.txt_12554	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023035.txt	Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:31:26 2011", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "The Duke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:45:53 2011", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "just got it two minutes ago.. I ye asked g lawyers to send a letter. Not sure„ it is so salcisous and ridiculous, im \nnot sure how to respond„ the only person she didn't have sex with was Elvis"}, {"sender": "The Duke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Please make sure that every statement or legal letter states clearly that I am NOT involved and that I knew and know NOTHING about any \nof these allegations. \nI can't take any more of this my end."}]	4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033456.txt_12555	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033456.txt	Re: Great seeing you	[{"sender": "Steve Hanson <steve@...>", "recipients": ["Joel"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 8:47 am", "subject": "Great seeing you", "body": "1/5/10\nJoel,\n\nIt was great seeing you. Hope to see you on my next trip which is every other week. Let me know when Andrew Lucasi is coming to town.\n\nStephen Hanson"}, {"sender": "g <g@...>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "Let me know when you are coming back to Palm Beach so I can take you for golf at Trump. Also coordinate with Andy re: his trip here from California.\n\nJeffrey mentioned to me you are looking to pick up an interest in a Hawker 800 XP. I recently exchanged my fractional interest for a jet pass card but I may know some other people who might want to sell their interests at a bargain price. Also, Jeffrey's and my friend, Benny Shabtai is looking to partner with someone to pick up a plane in today's depressed market, but he is looking for someone to pick up a 50% interest.\n\nLook forward to hearing from you.\n\nJoel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pe"], "timestamp": "1/6/2010 1:03:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Great seeing you", "body": "joel,, jack goldberger is my local attny, i would love him to play the trump course.. jerry you.. i will pick up all costs. thanks.,"}]	3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032990.txt_12558	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032990.txt	Re: Small biz and Trump	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "3/9/2017 3:30:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Small biz and Trump", "body": "foot off the brake"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon i.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Small biz and Trump", "body": "It’s getting better\nAn index of small-business optimism jumped to 105.8 in December. Indexed to 100 in 1986\n110\n\n100\n\n90\n\n80 ;\n86 2000 16\nSource: NFIB Note: Data are seasonally adjusted. CNBC\n\nI was in Toledo Ohio yesterday drilling down on small business animal spirits: amazing how bullish\nthey are there -- for all of DJT's craziness, his ability to present himself as a small biz owner pissed\noff about regulations/health care/anti-business sentiment in White House was a brilliant stroke.\nThey really dig him down there....\n\nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032748.txt_12561	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032748.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i have to leave at 830 for the airpot thats why sorry"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "How about Monday morning? Easier for me...how did today go?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 5:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Steve is coming to meet you breakfast"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 9:30:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lam there"}]	8
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026310.txt_12569	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026310.txt	Bannon on How 2008 Planted the Seed for the Trump Presidency	[{"sender": "Steve Bannon PF", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/11/2018 2:23:22 AM", "subject": "Bannon on How 2008 Planted the Seed for the Trump Presidency", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/steve-bannon-on-how-2008-p1lanted-the-seed-for-the-trump-presidency.html"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032296.txt_12573	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032296.txt	Re:	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/17/2016 11:51:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We already have plans on Sunday as \| didn't hear from you. I don't think I can change them."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 17, 2016, at 6:50 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trumps guys changing their plans . all at the trump hotel right down the street from the white house. its a\n\nbad movie. president trump. down the street from trump hotel.\n\nmoved krause to tonight. .\n\ndeepak chopra , again, sunday , I know you"}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030495.txt_12598	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030495.txt	Re: Re:	[{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030495"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends ,"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem.\nlam meeting him as he has some questions. \| do not need anything from him.\n\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Thank you!\n\n\| heard that he is not that fun but i trust your judgement. It would be blast that you are here. \| was just flirting with 22 years old\nhot blond blue eyes mexican chick. It turns out she is with her husband. Did not have chance to check him out. Butas we\nconcluded, anything good is rented ;)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "hes great fun,"}]	6
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026304.txt_12602	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026304.txt	Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist’ Kochs, ‘lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly \| TheHill	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 3, 2018, at 8:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist’ Kochs, ‘lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly \| TheHill", "body": "keep close !\n\nThis much we know - the Fall elections are shaping up to be a referendum on the most divisive\nAmerican President in memory. The battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh’s\nnomination this fall will only amplify the polarity of the political debate that is already deeply\noverwrought on both sides. The rising tide of pressure on Donald Trump from the Mueller investigation\n\nshows no sign of ebbing.\n\nUnless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these unprecedented events will\nstill leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield of the 2016 Presidential election.\nWatching these unrelenting, compounding events since our discussion in May, I am guessing we are all\nasking the same question: now what? For the 48 percent of Americans who believe Donald Trump\n\nshould not be in the White House, perhaps we too want our own “chaos” candidate in 2020?\n\nShould Trump run again, this could be a “break glass” moment for the majority of Americans who don’t\nsupport him. Do we want to break the genteel precedents of two parties running their ceremonious and\nseemingly illogical nominating process to select a candidate? (Why do Iowa and New Hampshire play\nsuch outsized roles? What kind of small-d democratic process relies on superdelegates?) The system\nfailed in 2016, with both parties producing terribly flawed candidates in a race to the bottom. We need to\n\nbuild a back-up plan in the event the system fails again.\n\nIt's possible, of course, that we won’t need a third-party candidate. Trump could decide not to run for"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 3 2018 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Exclusive: Bannon blasts 'con artist’ Kochs, ‘lame duck' Ryan, 'diminished' Kelly \| TheHill", "body": "Where is this from???"}]	2