thread_id
stringlengths 37
43
| source_file
stringlengths 35
37
| subject
stringlengths 0
231
⌀ | messages
stringlengths 88
34.9k
| message_count
int64 1
42
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031204.txt_12908
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031204.txt
|
JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN
|
[{"sender": "steven hoffenber", "recipients": ["Gary H. Baisc", "Alan Fraadc"], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 6:26:21 AM EDT", "subject": "JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "SIR\n\nPRESIDENT TRUMP WILL KNOW THAT GARY BAISE IS WORKING ON THE NEEDED FOOD POLICY POINTS OF FACT WITH THE FOOD INDUSTRY LEADERS .\n\nPRESIDENT TRUMP UNDERSTANDS THAT THE FOOD INDUSTRY IS VITAL TO THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE POLICY .\n\nWHAT IS NEEDED IN THE PRESENTATION TO PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WILL BE DONE BY OUR TEAM THAT NOW HAS THE KEY JOB AT THE STEVEN HOFFENBERG TRUMP SUPER PAC IN BUYING OVER $ 1 BILLION DOLLARS IN ADS & THE HIRING OF THE BUS PROJECT TO GET OUT THE VOTE IN EVERY POOR AREA IN THE USA.\n\nTHE POOR VOTER OVER 120 MILLION VOTERS THAT WERE DEMS ARE NOW VOTING FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP ON NOV 8 2016.\n\nT V EXPERTS DONT REPORT THE ABOVE DEMS POOR FOLKS THAT ARE VOTING FOR PR\n\nTHE POOR VOTER WILL PUT PRESIDENT IN THE WHITE HOUSE IN THE 2016 RACE.\n\nOUR BUS PROJECT IS VITAL TO THE PRESIDENT TRUMP GET OUT THE VOTE IN NOVEM\nJUDGE SWEET PLAYS THE KEY PART NOW IN THE TOWERS VICTIMS SUIT AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN !!!!\n\nJEFF EPSTEIN HAS THE PICTURES OF BILL CLINTON HAVING SEX WITH THE UNDERAGE GIRLS UI!!!\n\nBILL CLINTON & JEFF EPSTEIN BOTH HAD SEX WITH THE UNDERAGE GIRLS THAT ARE"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025875.txt_12910
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025875.txt
|
fact checking questions for New York Magazine story
|
[{"sender": "Yablon, Alex", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 31 2015 03:23 PM", "subject": "fact checking questions for New York Magazine story", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nSorry for the phone tag. In case it's easier to respond by email, I have put my questions below. I'm at my desk and should be \nhere until 5, and should be free on my cell phone after 6:30. \nBest, \nAlex \noffice: \ncell:• \n-what is the square footage of your Manhattan home? \n-do you work on a laptop from your dining room, with a large white board for notes and several pairs of reading glasses close at \nhand? Is the dining room windowless? \n-do paparazzi often camp outside your home? \n-did Michael once visit on the same day as a head of state who'd had a police escort? \n-did you tell Michael about a dinner you'd hosted for six tech entrepreneurs who had a combined worth of several hundred \nbillion dollars? When was this meal? \n-Do you believe that there are now more people who possess Roosevelt or Carnegie-levels of wealth, the sort that can rival \ngovernments in influence? That these people face unusual challenges when entering philanthropy due to the sheer size of \ntheir fortunes? That the rich may know the business that made them rich, but not money itself? \n-are you interested in what will happen to the $4.2 trillion possessed by the super-rich in 40-odd years once they have mostly \ndied? \n-Do you believe no superrich people want to give their entire fortunes to their children for fear of how it might affect them? \n-do you advise the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on how to convince other billionaires to join their initiatives? \n-did you volunteer to invest $20 million dollars in Michael's attempt to buy New York Magazine in 2004? \n-do you believe the recent claims about Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew in relation to you are \"ludicrous\" ? \n-When you met Michael for lunch in the West Village, was it the first time in 10 years you'd gone to lunch at a restaurant? \n-Do you have a support staff of young women in their 20s and 30s? Have some of them worked for you for many years, through \ntheir own marriages and as they raise families? Have any of these employees been romantically involved with you? When \nMichael came to your home, had one of these women recently gone on an around the world honeymoon, which you \narranged? Do they often travel with you to your other homes — in New Mexico, Paris, Palm Beach, and in the Caribbean? Do \nyou maintain there is no quid-pro-quo in the relationships with these women? Do these women often socialize with the policy \nmakers and businessmen with whom you often meet? \n-Is your current girlfriend a dental student you met four years ago at a dinner party in New York? \n-Did you date Eva Andersson Dubin? Have you known her for 30 years? Did you pay for her to go to medical school? \n-when you take meetings in your Manhattan dining room, do you take your guests out to a Sabrett hot dog cart? Will the \nwomen who work for you accompany you? \n-Did you invite Michael to sit in on a presentation by a group of quants? Are you looking for a group of quants who have \ndeveloped promising investing algorithms, and do you plan to invest $5 million with each? \n-during U.N. Week in late September, did you host a Sunday night discussion with Bill Gates, Mort Zuckerman, and Peter Thiel? \nWas anyone else in attendance? Were you discussing a possible Gates Foundation donor advised fund? \n-Did you host Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim and several others from Qatar? Do you know if the Sheikh has a home across the street \nfrom you in Manhattan? Did they talk to you about bribery compromising their bid for the World Cup? When was this? Did \nthey bring a gift of chocolate made with pistachios grown on the Sheikh's farm? \n-The morning after the Qataris came over, did you have a 9 AM breakfast with the attorney Reid Weingarten? Did you discuss \nhis defense of CT governor John Rowland, the Qatari visit, and who controls ISIS? Did Weingarten believe Turkey was using ISIS \nas a proxy against the Kurds? \n-After this, did you meet with Brock Pierce to discuss bitcoin? Did Larry Summers join this meeting? \n-That evening, did you host Australian PM Kevin Rudd and Thorborn Jagland for a cocktail party? Did Jagland critique US \nforeign policy? Did you offer to fly him back to Europe on your jet? \n-The following morning, did Ehud Barack come over for breakfast? Did he have an omelet? Did he defend both Putin and \nObama? \n-Was this followed by a senior White House official, whose name you don't want mentioned? \n-Did you then meet with Elisa New to discuss supporting a poetry series and other sources of funding? Did you forcefully \ncritique her proposed budget? \n-After meeting with New, did you meet with the following: Hardeep Purie, Kairat Kelimbetov, Nathan Myhrvold, Martin \nNowak, Richard Axel, Ron Baron, Josh Harris? Have you funded Nowak's program at Harvard with $30 million? \n-did Michael join a lunch at your home with Bill Richardson? \n-do you believe powerful people seek your advice because you're not affiliated with any institution, so you have no ulterior \nmotives when giving them advice? \n-is your Paris home a 10,000 sq ft apartment on Avenue Foch? Does it have a stuffed baby elephant in its living room? Is it \nmeant as a reminder that elephants have 23 copies of tumor suppressor genes? \n-Is the only book on your bedside table Lolita? Are you a fan of Nabokov? \n-Did you tell Michael that he should make a particular $100k investment in early September? What was it? \n-Were you born on 1953 in Coney Island? Was your father a Parks dept employee? Was your mother a housewife? \n-were you the captain of the math team at Lafayette High School? \n-did you study at Cooper Union for two years before beginning classes at NYU's Courant classes? After this, did you teach math \nat Dalton? Was this your first exposure to wealthy people? Did this teach you the rich had just as many problems as the \nworking class, only theirs were caused by too much money rather than too little? \n-Did Punch Sulzberger try to convince you to join the NYT from Dalton? Did you once drive with Sulzberger to his country \nestate in a wood paneled station wagon, while he talked on a phone to his chaffeur? \n-did you meet Ace Greenberg through his children at Dalton? \n-Did he say that given your reputation for intelligence and Jewish heritage, you should be working at Bear Stearns? Was this in \nthe late 70s? \n-Did you soon move to a penthouse at 66th St. and 2nd Avenue? \n-During this time did you regularly attend Studio 54? \n-Have you ever drank or taken drugs? \n-Do you believe that in the 50's, finance was governed by personal relationships, but in the 70's, with the rise of derivatives \ntrading, math began to dominate the field? \n-Did you never want to get married to maintain your freedom? \n-Did you become close to Jimmy Cayne? \n-Did you leave Bear Stearns in 1982? Why? Did you take clients including Marvin Davis and Herb Siegel? \n-Were you then dating Morgan Fairchild? \n-During the 80s, did you frequently go to England where you befriended Robin Reach and attended country shooting parties \nand black tie dinners? \n-Were you mainly interested in meeting smart people rather than amassing a personal fortune? \n-do you think that billionaire-level worth creates worries that millionaires don't face? Does traditional wealth management \nnot work for billionaires? \n-Did you help governments that came after corrupt dictators reclaim stolen assets? Which governments? \n-Did you begin advising and representing wealthy people and families regarding philanthropy during this period? \n-Did you advise Steven Hoffenberg? \n-Did you attend the 1994 Serpentine Gallery gala? Did you socialize with Princess Diana at that event? \n-Did you meet Bill Clinton after he left the White House? Did this change the arc of your life? \n-did you buy your Manhattan home from Les Wexner? \n-Did you meet with Larry Page and Sergey Brin during your 2002 trip to the TED conference? Did they describe a plan to market \nGoogle bras with the o's as cups? Did they believe Google was a good company name because men would be drawn to the oo? \n-Soon after this, did you have an assistant schedule a meeting with Michael for advice about the media as both Vanity Fair and \nNew York Magazine were profiling you? Did you also ask Graydon Carter for advice, expressing doubts about increased public \nprofile, to which Carter said you should have moved to a Queens 2 bedroom if you wanted to avoid publicity? \n-Have you had a daily massage for several years? When you got your daily massage in Palm Beach, did the masseuses often \ncome from parlors your termed \"Jack Shacks\" ? Did they sometimes have \"happy endings\" ? Would there be many different \nmasseuses, recommended by word of mouth? \n-After Palm Beach police started investigating you, did you ask Alan Dershowitz to come to Florida to provide you with legal \nhelp?"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033277.txt_12915
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033277.txt
|
Dershowitz On Special Counsel: The Investigation Should End « CBS Dallas / Fort Worth
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/30/2018 5:50:50 PM", "subject": "Dershowitz On Special Counsel: The Investigation Should End « CBS Dallas / Fort Worth", "body": "Importance: High \nhttp://dfw.cbslocal.com/2018/03/29/dershowitz-trump-special-counsel-investigation-should-end-soviet-union/"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030671.txt_12927
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030671.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number ?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed in san fran...at the airport...let's talk when | get settled..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Notice the date of the email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And?"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013460.txt_12929
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013460.txt
|
FW: World Bank Nominee
|
[{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/23/2012 7:10:58 PM", "subject": "FW: World Bank Nominee", "body": "The Atlantic Home \nFriday, March 23, 2012 \n• Politics \nAlk \nMassoud Hayoun - Massoud Hayoun writes for and produces The Atlantic's International channel. \nHow Jim Yong Kim, Obama's World Bank Pick, \nChanged Global Health Aid \nBy Massoud Hayoun \nMar 23 2012, 2:04 PM ET \nThe international public health work that made Kim, now the president's nominee for World Bank head, such a \nrespected figure. \nPresident Obama introduces Jim Yong Kim as his nominee to be the next president of the World Bank /Reuters \nPresident Obama announced today that he will nominate Dartmouth College President Jim Yong Kim to head \nthe World Bank. Although Kim is a physician by training, officials have observed that Kim's role as a key \nplayer in global health and development, notably with his role in the organization Partners in Health (PIH), \nmakes him a key candidate to change the attitudes of developing-world nations. \nThe following excerpts from Tracy Kidder's Mountains Beyond Mountains, a biography of anthropologist and \nphysician Paul Farmer, detail Kim's bold efforts to combat international HIV and tuberculosis epidemics with \nPIH: \nSome months after the official founding of PIH, [co-founder] Paul Farmer expanded the group, adding a fellow \nHarvard anthropology and medical student, a Korean American named Jim Yong Kim... Farmer offered what \nfor Jim Kim was a convincing vision of the new organization. The reality was less impressive -- a charity with a \nboard of advisers and no hired staff... \nThey talked about issues such as political correctness, which Jim Kim defined as follows: \"It's a very well-\ncrafted tool to distract us. A very self-centered activity. Clean up your own vocabulary so you can show \neverybody you have the social capital of having been in circles where these things are talked about on a regular \nbasis.\" (What was an example of political correctness? Some academic types would say to Jim and Paul, \"Why \ndo you call your patients poor people? They don't call themselves poor people.\" Jim would reply: \"Okay, how \nabout soon-dead people?\") \nThey talked about the insignificance of \"cultural barriers\" when it came to the Haitian peasant's acceptance of \nmodern Western medicine: \"There's nothing like a cure for a disease to change people's cultural values\"... \nBy now Peru was taxing PIH's resources severely. On average, the drugs to treat just one patient cost between \nfifteen and twenty thousand dollars. And the number of patients kept growing. Already there were about fifty \nCarabayllanos in treatment. Their average age was twenty-nine. They were students, unemployed youths, \nhousewives, street vendors, bus drivers, health workers. The actual numbers seemed small, but those fifty MDR \n[a form of tuberculosis that does not respond to standard treatment] cases represented about 10 percent of all \nactive cases of TB in the slum, about ten times more than might have been expected. No telling how many \nothers they had been infecting as they'd traveled around Lima, coughing. No telling either how many people in \nother parts of the city already had MDR, but [there were] reports of hundreds in other neighborhoods. In \nCarabayllo itself, the Socios workers found entire families sick and dying with what turned out to be genetically \nrelated strains of the disease--a phenomenon common enough that the health workers gave it a name, familias \ntebeceanas, tuberculosis families. \nKim's organization confronted Peru's MDR-form tuberculosis epidemic with what some have called unorthodox \npractices -- borrowing and cajoling its way into medicine for its patients. \nHoward Hiatt, a friend of Jim Yong Kim's and a former dean at the Harvard School of Public Health, said he \nwas concerned about how PIH was getting medicine to combat the epidemic: \n\"Sure enough. Paul and Jim would stop at the [Harvard-affiliated] Brigham pharmacy before they left for Peru \nand fill their briefcases with drugs. They had sweet-talked various people into letting them walk away with the \ndrugs.\" [Hiatt] was amused, all in all. \"That's their Robin Hood attitude.\" In fact, they'd only borrowed the \ndrugs... \nThen one day the president of the Brigham stopped Hiatt in a corridor. \"Your friends Farmer and Kim are in \ntrouble with me. They owe this hospital ninety-two thousand dollars.\" Hiatt looked into the matter. \"Sure \nenough. Paul and Jim would stop at the Brigham pharmacy before they left for Peru and fill their briefcases with \ndrugs. They had sweet-talked various people into letting them walk away with the drugs.\" He was amused, all in \nall. \"That's their Robin Hood attitude.\" \nTo many seasoned managers of public health projects, what Farmer and Kim were doing would have looked \nquite reckless--like a stunt, as some would later insinuate. They didn't have a guaranteed supply of drugs, only \nthe determination to obtain the drugs and the charm to get away with borrowing. They were borrowing their \nlaboratory services, too, from Massachusetts. They lacked proper institutional support. The weight of expert \nopinion stood against them. Their organization was small and it had other projects, in Haiti and Boston and \nelsewhere, and Peru put a strain on everyone. Jim had to travel to Carabayllo at least once a month. Farmer had \nto go there slightly more often. \nKim's audacious 'Robin Hood attitude' won him and PIH acclaim for their role in changing global health and \ndevelopment. \nIn June 2002 ... the WHO adopted new prescriptions for dealing with MDR-TB, virtually the same as PIH had \nused in Carabayllo. For Jim Kim this marked the end of a long campaign. \"The world changed yesterday,\" he \nwrote from Geneva to all of PIH. The prices of second-line antibiotics continued to decline, and the drugs now \nflowed fairly smoothly through the Green Light Committee to, among other places, Peru, where about 1,000 \nchronic patients were either cured or in treatment. About 250 were receiving the drugs in Tomsk, and, largely \nbecause of the efforts of WHO, the Russian Ministry of Health had finally agreed to the terms of the World \nBank's TB loan--150 million dollars to begin to fight the epidemic throughout the country. \nThe twin pandemics of AIDS and tuberculosis raged on, of course, magnifying each other, in Africa and Asia, \nEastern Europe and Latin America. Mathematical models predicted widening global catastrophe--100 million \nHIV infections in the world by the year 2010. Some prominent voices, some in the U.S. government, still \nargued that AIDS could not be treated in desperately impoverished places. But this view seemed to be fading. \nThe prices of antiretrovirals were falling, even more dramatically than the prices of second-line TB drugs. \nThis was thanks to a growing worldwide campaign for treating AIDS wherever it occurred. Jim Kim had often \nsaid that the world's response to AIDS and TB would define the moral standing of his generation. In 2003, a \nnew director general took over at WHO, and he asked Jim to serve as his senior adviser. Meanwhile, the \nexample of Zanmi Lasante [PIH's Haiti-based project] was growing, and Cange had become a favorite \ndestination for global health policy makers and American politicians."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032066.txt_12932
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032066.txt
|
Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number y | and I’m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\n\nReuters News\n\nThomson Reuters"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:25:55 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Attachments: katie johnson v trump complaint.pdf"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032616.txt_12933
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032616.txt
|
Re: msg from touchline
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now Ii"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 12:26 AM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "hi habebey i m in new york .. the sooner we meet the faster i go back to be with my son on his first week in a new school.. if you bussy dont worry i can wait until thursday thnx again"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 4:07 AM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "Wed at 2?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 6:46:36 PM", "subject": "Re: msg from touchline", "body": "We have media platform in the region called philanthropy age with gates foundation. The guys who are working with us is Kofi Rashid Gates foundation advisor who report dirctly to bill This is the link http://www.philanthropyage.org Please ask him not to focus on philanthropy age ... As its is one aspect of the over all deliverables thnx"}]
| 19
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011277.txt_12934
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011277.txt
|
RE: Financials: buy XLF call spreads
|
[{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 22, 2016 2:15 PM", "subject": "Financials: buy XLF call spreads", "body": "Underweight positioning, buybacks resuming, positive momentum and strong fundamentals all indicate that there is still further upside potential in financials (more details below). Our financials sector specialist thinks XLF could have another 20-25% upside given the many levers to the Trump Trade: less regulation, higher interest rates, higher vol, economic growth, loan growth, etc. The asset sensitive regional banks are more of a pure play on a rates move but we view the larger cap banks as having multi-pronged upside given the aforementioned points.\n\nThat said, given the velocity and magnitude of the recent move and uncertainty around the impact and timing of Trump's policies, we believe options offer better risk-reward than being outright long financials stocks here. With flat call skew, \"appearing\" call spreads with upside knock-ins price well.\n\nBuy a 1 year XLF call spread for 2.6% premium\n• Buy a 110% call\n• Sell a 117.5% call with an at-expiry knock-in at 125% (call is not active unless XLF is 125% or higher at expiry)\no Total premium is 2.6%\no Gross max payoff if knock-in is triggered: 2.9x (7.5%/2.6%)\no Gross max payoff if knock-in is not triggered: 5.7x (14.9%/2.6%) — you have upside up to 124.9%\n\nPost Election Flow Skews - Buyers of Health Care (via ETFs) and Financials (mainly ETFs)\n• US Buyback Flows\n• Cons Disc, Technology and Financials are the largest 3 sectors for US buybacks (over 70% of execution). We are seeing a seasonal increase in buybacks as we come out of the low seasonal month of the year (October) and should see increased buyback executions until year-end, another source of upside for the Cons Disc, Technology and Financials sectors.\n\nGlobal Positioning, Nigel Tupper, 11/14. Large long-only funds are more underweight Financials than any other sector and are UW this sector in all regions.\n\nFuture of Financials conference hosted 90 public and private companies at our Future of Financials conference. We are raising our price objectives across most of our names. Three primary reasons why we think there is upside remaining after the recent rally: 1) an improved outlook on both activity levels and interest rates, driving revenue upside; 2) potentially lower regulatory burden, particularly as new supervisory leadership can come with the new administration; and 3) relatively lighter positioning in US financials vs. other sectors. (Erika Najarian)\n\nTrades Gaining Momentum: Finance-Related Assets vs. S&P 500\nIn the period since the US presidential election, the three top-performing S&P sectors and industry groups have all been finance-related (Banks, Financials, Diversified Financials)\n\nSource: Kensho Technologies\n\nThe Flow Show, Michael Hartnett, 11/18. Violent rotation: record equity ETF inflow, record financials inflow, biggest bond outflow in 3.5 yrs, record EM debt outflow."}, {"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "12/9/2016 3:46:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Financials: buy XLF call spreads", "body": "We continue to see further upside in financials.\n• Erika Najarian, BAML financials research analyst, just returned from a marketing trip. Bottom line: North American investors are very bullish the banks (long only AND hedge funds AND macro funds), but then conclude \"I don't own enough\". Note that high touch flows have slowed down significantly since Thanksgiving and where the buying has been concentrated in XLF (every client sector we have has been a better buyer of XLF).\n• Client focus:\n1) Regulation: Excitement, with the base case that it's not getting worse.\n2) Sentiment on rates: Cautiously bullish\n3) Sentiment on growth: Also bullish\n4) Sentiment on corporate tax rate cuts: buyside more bullish than sellside. In 1986, bank stocks exploded upward (outperforming the S&P) after Reagan's tax reform bill passed the Senate; and 2) in 2003, the last time we saw personal tax cuts, loan growth industry wide accelerated in 2003 and 2004.\n• Biggest Pushback on owning sector at current levels: Too far too fast: BKX +18.00% post election: Valuation coming into question and 04 has typically been a seasonally weak qtr. Bulls defend valuation on '18ests with potential upside to 2018 [PS from —25-40% and stocks still cheap vs. discretionary.\n• Price action and sentiment keeps us constructive, we like the long and would expect US financials to benefit from any beta chase into year end.\n• How to play it? We still like \"appearing\" call spreads on XLF\no Buy a 6 month 105% call with a short 110% call that knock in if XLF trades above 115% during the life of the trade for 1.75% premium cost\n• Gross max payoff if knock-in is triggered: 2.8x (5.0%/1.75%)\n• Gross max payoff if knock-in is not triggered: 5.6x (9.9%/1.75%) — you have upside up to 114.9%"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033508.txt_12936
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033508.txt
|
Jane Doe
|
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad — \nIn your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a \nDepartment of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records \nwithout a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have \nJane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form. \nAlso, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS?? \nPlease let me know."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:47 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this... \nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo 01 going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition \nwill follow. Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 6:55:54 PM", "subject": "FW: Jane Doe", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]
| 13
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030238.txt_12938
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030238.txt
|
Fwd: Public work vs private AMAZING
|
[{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "8/14/2012 1:05:43 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Public work vs private AMAZING", "body": "This is crazy please read it and pass it on!!!"}, {"sender": "John Connolly", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 4, 2012 3:54 PM GMT+02", "subject": "Fwd: Public work vs private AMAZING", "body": ""}, {"sender": "ed thompson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, August 03, 2012 6:03 PM", "subject": "Fw: Public work vs private AMAZING", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020443.txt_12940
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020443.txt
|
Fw: The ‘Deplorables’ Called Into Battle Again - WSJ
|
[{"sender": "Alexandra Preate <alexandrapreate@example.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:37:29 -0400", "subject": "The ‘Deplorables’ Called Into Battle Again - WSJ", "body": "https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-deplorables-called-into-battle-again-1535376353?mod=mh\n\nThe ‘Deplorables’ Called Into Battle Again\n\nAs midterms near, President Trump’s former political guru Steve Bannon rallies the\ntroops\n\nGerald F. SeibAug. 27, 2018 9:25 a.m. ET\n\nBy\nGerald F. Seib\n\nSteve Bannon doesn’t do subtle. So it’s no surprise that there’s nothing subtle about the new movie President Trump’s\n\nonetime political guru has produced to energize the Trump base for this year’s midterm elections.\n\nIt’s entitled “Trump at War,” and it’s an hour and 15 minutes of pure Trumpian adrenaline. It opens with a series of shots\nof Trump supporters being attacked by angry opponents, shifts to outtakes of Trump supporters proudly accepting the\n“deplorables” label bestowed by Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign, runs through a long series of\nangry ripostes at Trump detractors and praise of administration policy moves, and closes with dire warnings of the need to\n\nvote for Republicans in 2018 to head off efforts by liberals to impeach the president.\n\nMr. Bannon previewed the film for some Republican supporters in Dallas recently, but the big premiere is scheduled for\nSept. 9—chosen because it is the second anniversary of the speech in which Mrs. Clinton used the “basket of deplorables”\nphrase. The location? The very club in Manhattan where Mrs. Clinton made the speech, which has been rented for the\n\noccasion.\n\nAside from what they say about Mr. Bannon as a political provocateur, the film and its unveiling also reveal a lot about\nhow people in the president’s circle increasingly see this year’s midterm election: Its importance is growing every day;\nRepublican success starts with turning out core Trump supporters; and the best way to motivate them is by brandishing the\n\nfear of impeachment proceedings if Democrats win control of Congress."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2018 6:11:26 PM", "subject": "Fw: The ‘Deplorables’ Called Into Battle Again - WSJ", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014803.txt_12949
|
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014803.txt
|
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
[{"sender": "Ross Gow <ross@acuityreputation.com>", "recipients": ["Rossacuity Gow <ross@acuityreputation.com>", "martin.robinson@mailonline.co.uk", "P.Peachey@independent.co.uk", "nick.sommerlad@mirror.co.uk", "david.brown@thetimes.co.uk", "nick.alway@bbc.co.uk", "jo-anne.pugh@bbc.co.uk"], "timestamp": "2 January 2015 at 20:38", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "To Whom It May Concern,\nPlease find attached a quotable statement on behalf of Ms Maxwell.\n\nNo further communication will be provided by her on this matter.\nThanks for your understanding.\n\nBest\n\nRoss\n\nRoss Gow\nACUITY Reputation"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025878.txt_12950
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025878.txt
|
Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak
|
[{"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 1:34:41 PM", "subject": "Fwd: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak", "body": "Hi Jeff\nBill Clinton 1994.\nFood for thought.\nEB\nhttp://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000369298"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030895.txt_12969
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030895.txt
|
Fwd: Statement in the Daily Beast?
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 9:31:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you..\nhope all is well."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and\nthere was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or\nconsequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very\nstrongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the\ntime to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were\nunderage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such\ncircumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of\nhim... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his\nlife in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for\nsomething that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I\nfully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with\nJeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peoplel\nknow and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of.. I know it is not politically correct to say that,\nbecause in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031553.txt_12972
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031553.txt
|
[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "", "body": "megann and memasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:05 AM", "subject": "", "body": "And...2??? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "", "body": "megann feels if he stays he risks indicment"}]
| 3
|
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033252.txt_12979
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033252.txt
|
Radical Breakthroughs - Kuhn
|
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/25/2017 7:06:34 AM", "subject": "Radical Breakthroughs - Kuhn", "body": "Dear Jeffrey: \nTrust all is well. We are in full pre-production of our \"Radical Breakthroughs\" series/season for Closer To \nTruth. We expect to have a complete production plan, with contributors, locations and schedule, by mid/late \nNovember - when (coincidentally) I will be back in NY. \nMy next email will add detail, including first (rough) outlines of the first two episodes. I'll be copying the \nproducer/director of Closer To Truth, as I will from now on with all reports/communications related to the \ncontent of the series. Whenever we want to communicate privately, about the series/grant or anything else, \nplease use a separate email (or respond to this one). \nI am in Santa Monica for two weeks, then Beijing for the big Party Congress. I may need to stay until after \nTrump's (supposed) visit. Attached are my two recent BBC commentaries on China (N.Korea bomb and \nMyanmar refugees). \nAlways available to Skype. \nI am truly excited about the series - nothing like it, could have impact - and I deeply appreciate your \ngenerosity/support, confidence and trust. \nTake care and warm regards, \nRobert"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026381.txt_12980
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026381.txt
|
Re: bad
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Mar 30, 2016, at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/us/politics/donald-trump-abortion.html?ribbon-ad-idx=3&rref=homepage&module=Ribbon&version=origin®ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Home%20Page&pgtype=article"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:27 AM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "Agreed. Trump appears to be losing momentum in polls even before that crazy comment. Think it may be beginning of the end of him...\nhttp://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "3/31/2016 10:23:07 AM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "im told people think it is done on purpose so he does not win"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033246.txt_12985
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033246.txt
|
WoW
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/6/2017 5:08:21 AM", "subject": "WoW", "body": "Jeffrey look at you. how great you are \nhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/5991532ae4b0dOef9f1c129d \nPrivate Donor Helps Fund Scientists After \nTrump's Proposed \"Anti-Science\" Budget \nCuts \nwww.huffingtonpost.com \nThe famous American Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson, \nonce said, \"The good thing about science is that it's true, \nwhether or not you believe in ... \ngreetings from mexico city...its so trashy, i wanna leave :/"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032158.txt_12988
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032158.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siega"], "timestamp": "7/1/2011 11:18:25 AM", "subject": null, "body": "should you point out to Ariana Huff, that the same type of person, same as strauss Kahn i s Andrews accuser, \n,long criminal record. total liar. Ariana should champion the dangers of false allegations. send a reporter or \nreporters to investigate,., the palace would love it, the girl in the photo , was nothing more than a telephone \nanswerer„ she was never 15, according to her version she worked for trump , first at that age, at MAra lago. ITs \nridiculous. but the press like strauss kahn is afraid to question women."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031221.txt_12990
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031221.txt
|
Re: Program & Attendee list
|
[{"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/21/2012 9:12:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "She is the one! Now SALSS 4 days...will get back to you next week...\n\nKram BE."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barbro C. Ehnbom"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:32 pm", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "who is your wife choice this year?"}, {"sender": "Barbro C. Ehnbom", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nI am sorry I did not call back Yesterday-I was exhausted from a crazy week and fell asleep as soon as I came home! Anyway, here is the full program and attendee list attached, this is the Globalization Summit I invited Bill Clinton to when I met him in Stockholm last Summer- But he is a bit busy I gather!\n\nAnyway, hope SMM got hold of you re search service? Also, I did see your mail about possibly coming here end of September-however, I am supposedly arranging a fund- raiser for Congress Woman Diana deGette of Colorado on Sept 27 in NYC; she is the only one with a scientific agenda and she is just super-if anything I am hoping on your involvement?\n\nHow about going to Stockholm mid or end november..albeit a bit dark and maybe cold..?\n\nLet me know what you think!\n\nAlso, I just heard from my friend Jeff Kriendler in Miami and guess who was just walking in there -our friend Goldsamt! First prize for perseverance! Also, Sofia and the prince is on every magazine here, I think it is wonderful! Marcus has two big concerts in Stockholm this coming week. Me - SALSS!"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030659.txt_12994
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030659.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number ?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed in san fran...at the airport...let's talk when | get settled..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Notice the date of the email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you so"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/2/2017 5:36:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is going to fire mueller and republicans on hill won't do a thing"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030881.txt_12999
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030881.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "SS", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/22/2013 2:08:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bruno Le Maire criticizes the French PM for failing to present efficient solutions to the crisis in Syria. Instead the PM has been merely following the course of Obama, who, according to Bruno, does not know what he wants. Such an approach has weakened the influence of France on the international arena and has undermined its sovereignty.\n\nAlso watched some other videos of him - Bruno attacks Hollande for his tax policy and excuses him for \"not knowing what he is doing\"."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://video.lefigaro.fr/figaro/video/echange-muscle-entre-le-maire-et-fabius/2664796316001/"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031547.txt_13001
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031547.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "megann and memasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And...2???? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "megann feels if he stays he risks indicment"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/16/2018 5:37:47 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Stevie boy should obviously take the fifth in response to the grand jury subpoena....and | be he doesn’t"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022695.txt_13002
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022695.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/31/2015 2:46:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Well, I think, but not because of me. The existential crisis thing is not a PMS or menopausal pose."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 30, 2015 9:16 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how did musk call go?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 30, 2015 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Did you see this? Privileged - Redacted\nL."}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026123.txt_13009
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026123.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You can come earlier if you like?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can you call my cell"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At wake now. Is AM ok - what is #"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Nick , Donald has recently said that I betrayed him 15 years ago , he said there was a lawsuit that he asked me to get involved and help and I refused . Do you have any insight ??"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What's ur #1 will call u"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/3/2017 12:39:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "U know he lies only when his month is moving!"}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029972.txt_13010
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029972.txt
|
[{"sender": "RNA", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/13/2015 6:48:37 PM", "subject": "", "body": "below from\n\nHi Lesley,\n\nI'm helping a friend at the doctors and should be available between 5 and 630p if we can talk then. Or anytime\ntomorrow before 5pm. Going to Trump speech tomorrow night - think he's going to get the nomination...."}]
| 1
|
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033103.txt_13018
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033103.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my email is full with similar comments . wow"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will call later. What number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 5:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018 at 8:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just tried u. Am at"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just tried"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018 at 8:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just tried back. Now here"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "7/18/2018 2:58:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "november now a toss up"}]
| 7
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031616.txt_13032
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031616.txt
|
Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News) <david.ingram@thomsonreuters.com>", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty, \nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and \nanother man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, \nand we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on \nthis behalf?\nMy number i ______________ and I'm available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\nThank you in advance."}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Reporter said 1994 claim fed ct California \nWill go to press in several hrs"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "here we go"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Well, I guess if there's anybody who can wave thus away, it's Donald. Let me know if there's anything I can \ndo."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 7:03:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "no , obviously somoene who is deranged, but lets see, it will be released by reuters this \nafternoon supposedly"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012620.txt_13035
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012620.txt
|
Re: Epstein agreement as reviewed by the U.S. Attorney
|
[{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)", "Martin Weinberg", "Lourie, Andrew"], "timestamp": "Monday, September 24, 2007 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Epstein agreement as reviewed by the U.S. Attorney", "body": "Marie - Here are what I hope are final edits to the agreement. I will call in 15 min.\nthanks -- Jay"}, {"sender": "Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "09/24/2007 10:13 AM", "subject": "Epstein agreement as reviewed by the U.S. Attorney", "body": "Hi Jay — Here is the agreement with Alex's edits. Thank you."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030508.txt_13038
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030508.txt
|
Re: Quick question
|
[{"sender": "Uncle F Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "He couldn't for a few months , too hot"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 3, 2010, at 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "Maybe in May?"}, {"sender": "Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 3 2010 02:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Quick question", "body": "I will ask after he is officially gone\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025105.txt_13050
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025105.txt
|
Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams
|
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Pardon the formality below - I want to approach your very legitimate questions / concerns in a serious manner.\n\nAttached and below the same.\n\nDear Jeffrey:\n\nAs requested, the following addresses your two questions / concerns about our proposed Closer To Truth TV series \"The Science of Sleep and Dreams\":\n\n(i) Have there been sufficient breakthroughs in Sleep and Dreams (significantly beyond traditional understandings) to justify a major TV series?\n(ii) Even if 'yes' to (i), is now the proper time for such a foundational series, or are more years needed for corroborative studies and further research to solidify the breakthroughs?\n\nIn preparing this response, my primary source is Professor Patrick McNamara, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, with whom CTT Producer/Director Peter Getzels and I spoke with at length today. Patrick is one of the leading sleep and dream researchers (he himself more dreams). More importantly, he is perhaps the leading chronicler of the field, with many publications (including 26 entries in related encyclopedias). He is co-editor-in-chief of the \"Encyclopedia of Sleep and Dreams\" (2012) and the sole author of the forthcoming \"An Introduction to the Neuroscience of Sleep and Dreams\" (Cambridge University Press, 2018), which intends to present the latest science and to become a main textbook for graduate courses/seminars. Patrick is a CTT contributor and colleague.\n\nWhen we asked Patrick, his first response — \"This is the ideal time to tell the sleep-and-dreams story\" — and he cited (in essence) your two questions, in that (i) the multiple breakthroughs are now sufficiently well corroborated by numerous independent labs such that a substantial foundation for the new, deeper understanding of sleep and dreams is now for the first time (over the past few years) confirmed and established, and (ii) there are now interesting application and critical clinical questions to pose, explore and pursue, such as for the treatment of various mental-related illnesses that have known sleep-related syndromes (e.g., PTSD and Depression).\n\nTo understand the significance of recent breakthroughs, a defining characteristic of sleep and dreams is that there are two distinct kinds of sleep — REM (rapid-eye-movement) Sleep and NREM (non-rapid-eye-movement) Sleep. Most dreams are associated with REM sleep (though complex). The eye movement gives the eponymous name, but a more important designation defines the two stages in terms of brain waves (electroencephalograph — EEG): REM is Fast-Wave Sleep (similar to the waking state) and NREM Sleep is Slow-Wave Sleep (very different from the waking state). This difference between REM and NREM sleep has been known since 1953 (different EEGs since 1937), but its deep significance has only been discovered and confirmed in very recent years (as explained below).\n\nFollowing are the key areas of breakthrough in sleep and dreams (from Patrick). Patrick states that these are now reproducible, non-controversial, and well-accepted among experts, although still not appreciated by the public - hence the high value of our CTT TV series. The organizing idea is why and how are sleep and dreams essential for normal memory consolidation and bodily health / well-being.\n\nMemory Consolidation. There is a fundamental difference between REM and NREM Sleep for memory consolidation: REM is for emotional memories, whereas NREM is for declarative and procedural memories. Hence, understanding and dealing with REM emotional memories can lead to treatment for the many neuropsychiatric illnesses that have sleep/dream-related disorders or syndromes (Parkinson's Disease, Anxiety, Substance Abuse, many sleep disorders such as Nightmare Disorder, etc., in addition to PTSD and Depression). Research shows bi-directional causality between neuropsychiatric disorders and sleep disorders. This is a superb example of how fundamental science breakthroughs lead to clinical breakthroughs. This fact that REM is associated with emotional memories is nicely consistent with the apparent psychotic nature of dreams, because in REM Sleep the frontal cortex is 'down-regulated' (and the frontal cortex is associated with rational planning, reflection, controlling impulses), while in REM Sleep the limbic system is 'up-regulated\" (and the limbic system is associated with emotions and feelings) — see Neuroimaging below. This is why dream states flood the ego with emotional fantasies without rational control. However, it is also true that the limbic system enables creative ideas, thus grounding in science the long-suspected idea that sleep and dreams can enhance creativity.\n\nAs Dr. Robert Stickgold, our other advisor"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "is it a charity that received the funding?"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "501 (c) (3) - private operating foundation - The Kuhn Foundation, which I set up in 1999 to support Closer To Truth. IRS letter attached.\n\nThank you."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Hi: Just returned from a month in China. Attached is my summary of recent politics (in South China Morning Post), and pics of moderating (at request of govts of China and Israel) the PM's discussion with leading Chinese technologist (Baidu CEO, dominant Chinese search engine). The PM was in China for 25th anniversary of diplomatic relations\n\nBack to CTT, my 'true love'... Love to discuss Science of Sleep & Dreams project. I'm in LA for week and then NY April 8-18.\n\nWarm regards, Robert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Mar 23, 2017, at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Look forward to seeing you"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn <rkuhn@...>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4/8/2017 6:28:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Just arrived NY, here for —10 days.\nNow with the Trump-Xi Summit over (utterly overwhelmed by Syria strike), back to Closer To Truth.\n\nWhen good to meet?\n\nRobert"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030856.txt_13062
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030856.txt
|
Fw: EOD Commodities Note - 8 Jan [C]
|
[{"sender": "Daniel Sabba", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 1:53:22 AM", "subject": "Fw: EOD Commodities Note - 8 Jan [C]", "body": "Vol in crude continues to collapse"}, {"sender": "Prateek Jain", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "01/08/2015 09:15 PM GMT", "subject": "EOD Commodities Note - 8 Jan", "body": "Oil\n\nA relatively quiet day in Crude today. We hovered around unchanged for most of the day before selling off in the\nafternoon and testing 50S BRE again. However, we failed to break it and rallied towards unchanged for the close,\nperhaps off the back of some index buying. Newswise, Feb Azeri BTC loadings will be up a whopping 11% m/o/m to\n821kbd. Interestingly, there is apparently some floating storage interest happening as well, as some major phys trading\nfirms have booked long term tankers for this as long term charter rates are cheaper and thus make the economics of\nstorage look good. The window was again weak with ekofisk and brent offered down a bit. In other news, RTRS cites GCC\n“sources” saying that there is no chance of OPEC cut even though oil has dipped to 50S...Stateside, we learned yesterday\nthat the Seaway Twin is moving 100% heavy crude. Furthermore, USGC diffs weakened again, with LLS now trading 1S\nabove WTI. In the morning WTI spreads were quite bid, but that abated towards the end of the day. The arb did\nhowever stay bid throughout the day, as the fact that LLS/WTI is tight at 15 means that there is more room BRE to\ndiscount vs LLS so as to place those Jan and Feb overhang cargoes in the US. In politics land, the Senate committee voted\n13-9 to have Keystone “bypass” presidential approval. So if the Senate passes this bill (which it should as it has 60 co\nsponsors), Obama may have to veto it. It is not clear that the Senate has 67 votes needed to overturn the veto, so this\nshould be interesting to follow...In products land, distillate bounced back a bit after yesterday’s post stats ugly showing,\nperhaps off the realization that the stats didn’t add up along with the extremely cold weather giving NG a (rare) bid as\nwell...\n\nOil Vols\n\nAnother day of carnage in oil vols today. Early morning NY vols were down 0.4-0.5 through the curve, but a one way\nselling streak started just before the open and all the bids out there started getting hit. As an example Dec5 atm\nstraddles started the day 1465/1505, were 1405/1450 at 9am, and were 1350/1390 later in the day. Within 2 hours of\nopen, vols were down about 3 vols across the curve..and stayed there for most of the day till about 1:30pm when\nfutures took a quick leg lower.. prompt vols traded 1.5% higher than close at that time and Jun5 was up 2% from the\nlows. However, with a quick rally back vols started fading again and ended 1.5-2.5 lower.\n\nWings got smashed again and put skew collapsed quickly. 8000 lots of S4Q0puts in WTI Mar15 were sold on the screen,\nwhich is quite an impressive volume outside floor trading..\n\nWTI (/change) BRE (/change)\nG15 50.40% -1.60% 44.00% -2.60%\nH15 45.50% -2.40% 43.70% -1.10%\nM15 41.40% -2.10% 38.20% -2.60%\nZ15 35.15% -1.60% 33.10% -2.15%\n216 28.60% -2.00% 28.50% -1.80%\n\nIndex\nNo rhyme or reason to flat price action today."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026342.txt_13082
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026342.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/23/2019 12:24:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Where are you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why had no one interviewed some of trump classmates at wharton ? Deutsh bank papers very bery bad"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033291.txt_13087
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033291.txt
|
Well...
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/29/2016 4:41:30 PM", "subject": "Well...", "body": "Hardly a whimper. Must be nice to be Donald Trump."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023022.txt_13088
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023022.txt
|
Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial and the witness list which names ee . other young women who allege they were underage victims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their claims.\n\nMsi further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and instructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of entertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:38:16 PM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/18/2013 11:25:53 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025893.txt_13090
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025893.txt
|
Re: Fwd: Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2015 7:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Only go to Greece if you feel well , I just had to send my plane to bring another lefty friend back from Athens to see a Jew doctor in New York."}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2015 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bad news. We decided not to go. I was invited to talk at the Parliament, but what can one say? That aside, they've got plenty of people giving them bad advice."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2015 10:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "bad for them , good for you. no need to have only one currency, its old fashioned. . you are of course welcome to use apt in new york with your new leisure time, or visit new Mexico again. ants find the shortest route to food, by trying many and discarding what doesn't work, no algorithm. , no input or output, only a goal. . sounds closer to our probem"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "There were plenty of warnings about one currency. Not heeded, unfortunately. Appreciate the invitation, but leisure time? Is that an English phrase? OK for ants, but don't see how it helps us."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 07, 2015 12:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "ants and evolution work by trying things and finding the best solution. math and physics works by algorithms. Im suggesting that maybe just as a child sends out many connections and then discards the unused might be a better template for biological thinking."}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "What you suggest is very much the model that has been current in the behavioral sciences for many years. It has a record of colossal failure, and for good reasons, I think. It's disproven, but keeps coming back, most recently with Big Data illusions. A child doesn't grow arms and legs rather than wings, or a mammalian vs insect visual system, the way an ant searches for food. Rather, the path of development is sharply restricted (and evolution follows constraints too). Acquisition of language (and other cognitive achievements) seems very much like physical growth. Highly contentious in the field, but in my opinion that's a comment on the failures of the field."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 07, 2015 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "the mathematical model. is quite beautiful, though the basic rules are simple , once they have run over and over again, and produced a result you cannot tease them out by any form of reductionism. or algorithm, just like the series 7- 21 -37... cannot be found by alogrithm, it is simply the difference of cubes, . Have you written about the iran deal?"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:57 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Neat indeed. I'm writing about the Iran deal. So far have only sent a form paragraph in response to requests. Below. On Iran, as usual, I'm a gloomy contrarian. I'm glad the treaty was signed, and it's kind of fun to watch the Republican lunatics shrieking hysterically as they try to kill it (as they may). And Israeli hypocrisy has gone well beyond being comical. But in fact the whole thing is farcical, in my opinon. In the US, Iran is \"the greatest threat to world peace\", intoned constantly from on high, in the media, everywhere. There is also such a thing as world opinion, as measured by such ultra-radicals as Gallup. It turns out that the greatest threat to world peace is the US, by a very wide margin, no one else even close, and Iran barely mentioned. The American population is protected from these unwanted facts by the Free Press: not reported. There is an organization called US intelligence. They brief Congress regularly on the international security situation, all quite public. On Iran, they point out that it has very limited military power, even by regional standards (a small fraction of Saudi Arabia, for example). Its strategic doctrine is defensive. If— a big If— it has plans for nuclear weapons, that would be part of its deterrent strategy. Now who would be opposed to Iran having a deterrent strategy? Answer is clear: the rogue states that rampage violently in the region and don't want any impediment: the US and Israel, also lesser ones like UK and France. One simple way to reduce the threat of nuclear weapons would be to establish a nuclear-weapons free zone in the region, as has been done elsewhere (over US objections). That's been advocated by the Arab states for 20 years, with very wide global support, including Iran. It comes up regularly at the 5-year review meetings of the Nonproliferation Treaty, at the UN, again a few months ago, when, again, it was blocked by the US to protect its Israeli client, which has a huge nuclear weapons arsenal and wants to keep it. Again, the population is protected from such facts by the Free Press (though in this case there are some fringe exceptions, and of course the Arms Control literature). Same with the rest of the litany. Reading the US and UK press is like living in some lunatic asylum. I'm wondering whether to write about it — again; have done so repeatedly. It's like talking to a wall. Iran has an awful government, though by the standards of such US allies as Saudi Arabia, it's practically heaven. Nevertheless, better to have the treaty than not to, given the nature of the asylum."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ehud Barak"], "timestamp": "Aug 8, 2015, at 22:05", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re: ", "body": "thought you might find amusing"}, {"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Aug 10, 2015, at 01:51", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re: ", "body": "Hi Jeff I really find it amusing. I don't agree with everything he says. But it is fascinating. BB is making \"historic mistakes\"(as he likes to blame others) both vis-a-vis Obama as well as in regard to the American Jewry. And causes a direct damage to IL. Noam is so sharp and focused. Really impressive. I did not fully understand how the fallacy he sees in the attitude to the Ants example is related to Big Data illusions. An area (deep learning) I spent some time recently trying to better penetrate. Btw, the series of cubic differences should look 7,19,37,61 (not 21). We greatly enjoyed staying in 62nd. We plan to be back in the last week of Aug. for several weeks (having some speeches to make) will you still be in NM? If positive we might come over for few days. PI let us know. Best From Nil as well. Regards"}, {"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/9/2015 10:54:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: Re: ", "body": "Hi Jeff 66th I meant. Thx again. It was really great. Best"}]
| 11
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032547.txt_13091
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032547.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jun 11, 2017, at 10:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I assume you do not want to represent. Hamad bin jassim? Qatar. Hired Ashcroft. ? Silly, Anyone you would like to suggest for him?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why does he need counsel?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 10:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Navigate wash views on intl law and sanctions"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 10:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "We're you on tv today?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jun 12, 2017, at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun? When are you in New York this week"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All week. How do you know if you have appendicitis?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jun 12, 2017 at 8:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lower right side excrutiating"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "6/13/2017 1:25", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Maybe Trump wants to get impeached. Going after Mueller is declaring holy war."}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023036.txt_13093
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023036.txt
|
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
[{"sender": "Annette Witheridge", "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032553.txt_13097
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032553.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is truly stupid."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 21, 2017, at 7:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "call me if you get the chance."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "7/21/2017 12:06:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just tried you"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026356.txt_13100
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026356.txt
|
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
|
[{"sender": "Miles Alexander", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg, Esq."], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:21 PM", "subject": "Miles and Cathy Alexander and Little St James island", "body": "To: Martin Weinberg, Esq.\n\nDear Mr. Weinberg:\n\nI understand that you are looking for information regarding whether former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore and his then wife, Tipper, ever visited Little St. James. I was the Island's manager from 1999 through 2007 and lived on the Island with my wife during that entire period. Regarding President Clinton, I will sign a sworn affidavit that I never met the man. As far as I know President Clinton was never on the Island. He was never there while I was present on the Island. If he had come to the Island while I was on holiday, my staff would have told me that President Clinton was on the Island while I was away. While I worked on Little St. James, I had been called back from holiday many times to help when any guests visited the Island. So, if President Clinton had come to the Island while I was away, I would have been called back to the Island for such a visit, and I never was. The same is true for Vice President Gore and his wife Tipper. I never met them and as far as I am aware were never on Little St. James during the entire period that I was the Island manager.\n\nSincerely,\n\nMiles Alexander"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:31 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, 4/23/15", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 7:44:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027048.txt_13105
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027048.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2012 3:16:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Don't believe it"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 23, 2012 07:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dershowiz tells me obama called him to ask him what was going on in israel. ? we should discuss."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033285.txt_13106
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033285.txt
|
Hillary could lose to Trump in Democratic New York I New York Post
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/29/2016 4:35:11 PM", "subject": "Hillary could lose to Trump in Democratic New York I New York Post", "body": "Importance: High \nhttp://nypost.com/2016/02/28/hillary-could-lose-to-trump-in-democratic-new-york/"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032825.txt_13107
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032825.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 27, 2018 7:06 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "news?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 8:53 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You go first"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 27, 2018 8:57 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "mbs? girl? call"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/27/2018 1:40:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Just called...on my way to atlantic city...my nj client developer bought trump's casino there and there is a big\nevent tonight...my tablemates are fat chris christie, Bo dietl and pitbull...I will have some stories...feels like I \nhave not had contact with you for a long time"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026430.txt_13111
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026430.txt
|
so there is no misunderstanding
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie SpineIla"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 12:27:23 AM", "subject": "so there is no misunderstanding", "body": "I have told the brads and barry,- I am done. its not a negotiation, out!! - fyi given my carlyn joslin castrucci, admonishments,- though my involvement in those - in one instance only gave a name - in another only given an dictated choice btween two 250k preparers. and for castrucci, I actually sent emails that i take no responsiblity for his being hired. - however you felt strongly that I should be saddled with their outcomes .even with brad wechsler, i again said two months in, Leon, he doesnt get it. I tell you this so that you will understand that I will not interview, recommend or vet any new hire. A story - In 1993 trump and I had a friend that kept telling his pilots how to fly, and when to fly, he couldnt help himself from hiring morons as co pilots, and maintenance people based on cheapest rates. Donald and I tried and tried to talk some sense into him, to no avail. Donald and I were in aspen, sitting at little nells. when the friends plane crashed into the side of aspen mountain , klliing him and all on board,- Trump looked at me and said without a blink , I guess NOW he wishes he would have listened to us.- a metaphor for your office. . . had we not waited to the very last hour having had a six month window and tens of unasnwered text and emails re decisions needed including the 1031. you would have saved way more than you often feel obliged to argue about. . silly but i reallize you are stressed. Barry will need to sit with brad for months, to absorb all the co's , structures. cash flow, financial statments etc. I will present barry my thoughts on the overall redo , it will be the exact same email that i presented to you and brad two years.ago . accurate numbers first. and foremost. . ( last week gaming report stil funky). IT etc I pointed out some of the more glaring errors to barry to give him a flavor of what is to come. Tuesday if you like we should discuss Giacometti , and pesner . difficult to finesse him if they are filing documents that you won't. these ridiculous conversations with tons of people on the phone , removes any claim you might have to not be considered a WILLFUL NON-FILER. ( after youve been told by attnys and pwc that you should file in writing , you have NO choice ) .. worst possible result - including serious penalties up the kazoo."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016553.txt_13114
|
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016553.txt
|
Items for August 11 Town Council Meeting.
|
[{"sender": "CN=Anne Boyles/O=PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Cheryl Kleen"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:51:14 AM", "subject": "Items for August 11 Town Council Meeting.", "body": "FYI"}, {"sender": "Kathleen Ruderman/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Anne Boyles/PalmBeach@PalmBeach"], "timestamp": "07/24/2008 11:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Items for August 11 Town Council Meeting.", "body": "Anne,\nI have approved SPR 14-2007 and 5-2008. The Larkin item is OK. The appeal by Brindell re 144 Wells Road should not be on the agenda. The sod/seed item is an item that Tim Frank is working on but I don't think it's an agenda item. We need to check with Peter on that one. The infrastructure of large homes is not an agenda item. Neither is the Trump appeal for 515 North County Road.\n\nTwo things that will be added though are: EAR Amendments and Zoning Study Items."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025139.txt_13116
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025139.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/24/2018 6:11:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Jeffrey \nfinally landed \nvery unpleasant journey \nyou had nothing to do with how Chapman acted and i apologise for suggesting it might be otherwise \nit was entirely against me, partly motivated by a spiteful ex-friend \nconsulted two lawyers that Gordon recommended but they were very discouraging \nthe basic problem is simple—i am going against a strong national trend—well-known man after well-known man is being brought low for alleged his \nmisbehaviour toward women—in some case well-deserved prison time (Cosby and perhaps Weinstein) in many other cases, simply being run out of \ninstitutions—exactly my fate \nfurthermore in he say/she say confrontations the evidence has shifted—in University settings at least—from 'beyond a reasonable doubt' to a \n'preponderance of evidence' to 'more positive than negative' \nthe loss is huge, on the order of a half million to a million dollars, meant to keep me alive (they were going to offer a five-year contract) while i let \nmy 'inheritance' be spent on children and grandchildren while also growing \ni have no choice but to work \ni will get my revised Wild Life to an agent later this week—have added 5 new chapters and a few sections—much stronger for the inclusion of my \nmajor scientific work-1. social theory based on natural selection and 2. selfish genetic elements selected within organisms \nthen i have Honour Killings set to roll, as well as another one \nhope you are thriving—and also hope Trump will stop this international trade nonsense—a lose/lose war—especially as it affects the stock market or \nso it seems to me \nbest wishes \nbob"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022656.txt_13118
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022656.txt
|
Re: off the record
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Landon. the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \" he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 6:17:14 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Lets have a chat -- you do need to fight back some how. Present evidence that she is lying AND show the world that you are no longer that guy. You have made changes -- and that this is the past. My sense is that its TV type thing where you just talk honestly about this/present evidence that its not true/ and focus on what you have been doing for past five years. Charlie Rose? But you cant just sit there taking punches like this -- especially wen the British tabs are driving this. Maybe you go on British TV.... Call me any time."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023548.txt_13121
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023548.txt
|
Fwd: INVITE NY OBSERVER 25TH ANNIVERSARY
|
[{"sender": "Peggy", "recipients": ["Mr. Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "March 7, 2013 7:31:14 AM EST", "subject": "INVITE NY OBSERVER 25TH ANNIVERSARY", "body": "Dear Mr. Jeffrey Epstein\n\nJared Kushner, New York's youngest powerhouse publisher, is celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the New York Observer on Thursday, March 14th.\n\nMayor Michael Bloomberg will be by his side to toast you all.\n\nThe Observer is honoring those who have defined and shaped New York since 1987. They are celebrating the cities best, brightest and most influential in culture,media and finance. The salmon pink pages are revered among New York's elite as the preeminent voice on power.\n\nThe celebration is going to be one of those quintessential New York nights. We are looking forward to seeing you.\n\nX0X0,\n\nPeggy\n\nJared Kushner, Publisher Joseph Meyer, CEO\nCory Booker Arthur Carter Georgina Chapman Katie Couric Lauren Santo Domingo\nLarry Gagosian Mariska Hargitay Carolina Herrera Katie Holmes Woody Johnson\nPeter Kaplan Comm. Ray Kelly Ken Kurson Matt Lauer Blake Lively Terry Lundgren\nPeter Martins Cynthia McFadden Sean Parker Ron 0. Perelman Stephen Schwarzman\nLara Spencer Steve Tisch Donald Trump Ivanka Trump Harvey Weinstein George C. Wolfe\n\ncordially invite you to join them at\n\nTHE NEW YORK OBSERVER\n25TH ANNIVERSARY\nThursday March 14th, 2013\n6:30-9:30pm\nCocktails & Light Supper\nThe Four Season Restaurant\n99 East 52nd Street\nNew York City\ncocktail attire"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/7/2013 5:32:30 PM", "subject": "Fwd: INVITE NY OBSERVER 25TH ANNIVERSARY", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032372.txt_13130
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032372.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 9:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 9:53 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no intel but lots of profits"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 9:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you agree with my thesis?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 9:56 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no, they dont have many loyal people that have gravitas. . it will be somewhat random but he is being advised to do as you suggest but he doesnt like advice in general. he has no loyalty ZERO tossed christie after being his best friend, in four seconds flat"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 2:59:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "yeah, but that was a smart move -- made him look presidential. everything he has done so far suggests to me he is going to do what you told me months ago: appoint competent people beneath him who he trusts AND who will not fuck things up. Christie was not one of those people."}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021808.txt_13131
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021808.txt
|
Re: we'll see
|
[{"sender": "G Maxwell", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Yes, let's do it. I like most of it. Would like less personal attacks and more reasons why allegations are ridiculous.. Love the fact checking story. Just a few days ago, I toyed with the idea of posting a photo of me doing a preflight inspection and saying I wished other professions would have that requirement before putting innocent people's lives at risk."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \" sex slave \" . obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization, which in my opinion could only have been made by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to me . These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger place and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at the beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would have been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as allegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the Caribean Island, How he arrived. ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a 21st century tale of power, sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe , fabricated on purpose to gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former president. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little different than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her mother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and asked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. I am currenty a professional pilot with a spotless record. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify that things are what they are supposed to be, checking her story which the presss has refused to do would serve the public well. In this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the truth,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Apparently.. They are now asking how my parents bought a building in town...implying it was all the money they got for selling me Getting ugly.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Definitely not gonna talk to the reporters. It doesn't feel right. Xoxoxo They called my friend today and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't fall for it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now."}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028675.txt_13136
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028675.txt
|
as you asked
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/15/2013 12:42:34 AM", "subject": "as you asked", "body": "rticle 1.\n\nThe Washington Post\n\nIn State of the Union\n\naddress, Obama lays out\nhis second-term agenda\n\nEditorial\n\nFebruary 13, 2013 -- TWO DOMESTIC\nconcerns towered above all others as\nPresident Obama addressed a joint session\nof Congress on Tuesday night on the state\nof the union. One was stubbornly slow\neconomic growth. The other was the long-\nterm threat to prosperity posed by the\nstructural mismatch between the federal\ngovernment’s projected revenue and its\nspending commitments. A successful\nsecond term for Mr. Obama will require\nboth credible proposals for overcoming\n\nthose related challenges and the\n\ndetermination to carry them through.\n\nThe president addressed the deficit and\ndebt first, and at some length. This was\nfitting, giving that the most pressing piece\nof business facing Washington is what to\ndo about the impending $85 billion across-\nthe-board spending cut. He was forthright\n\nspecia Holy Land tour\n\nJoin our Holy Land tour\n\nSpecial prices individual & groups\nwww.veredgo.com\n\nMan Cheats Credit Score\n\n1 simple trick & my credit score\njumped 217 pts. Banks hate this!\n\nwww.thecreditsolutionprogram.com"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032414.txt_13137
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032414.txt
|
Re: Presidential inauguration
|
[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/6/2017 11:28:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "Do you think it will be possible to shake hand with trump"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "Jan 6, 2017, at 3:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "very many people going. it will be very crowded. but if you can meet some before or after in either wash or ny, it might be worth it. . but unlikely"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Presidential inauguration", "body": "Should I accept the invitation sent by Tom barrack"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032264.txt_13138
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032264.txt
|
The book on you...
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Lando iii Ti iii", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 3:25:15 PM", "subject": "The book on you...", "body": "Keep getting calls from that guy doing a book on you -- John Connolly. He seems very interested in\nyour relationship with the news media. I told him you were a hell of a guy:) One oddity: he said he had\nbeen told that that quote from Trump about you in the original NY Mag story had been manufactured.\nie, that I did not actually speak to Donald. Which is bull shit of course. I am sure that is what Trump\ntold him as they have been getting a lot of questions from reporters about you.\n\nHe actually seemed to be a sensible guy/solid reporter -- just from the few conversations I had with\nhim. I think he is close to finishing up.\n\nDid you ever speak to him?"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031779.txt_13142
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031779.txt
|
IMPORTANT
|
[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/29/2019 11:28:13 PM", "subject": "IMPORTANT", "body": "Sarah Silverman on Al Franken, Louis C.K., Losing Her Hulu Show and More\n\nIn the premiere episode of ‘The Last Laugh’ podcast, Sarah Silverman speaks out for the first time about her Hulu show’s cancelation and goes to bat for her friend Al Franken.\n\nMatt Wilstein\n\n03.26.19 4:12 AM ET\n\nSubscribe to The Last Laugh on Apple Podcasts"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025827.txt_13143
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025827.txt
|
Re: Fwd:
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "how much and who pays now?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20 2014 12:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I have so much more info to tell you on Sunday."}]
| 10
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032366.txt_13153
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032366.txt
|
Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate
|
[{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 1:13:43 PM", "subject": "Deepak Chopra shared a link: The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate", "body": "The Real Cause - and Cure - of Trump Anguish - SFGate from Deepak Chopra's Tweet\nDownload the Twitter app"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033078.txt_13156
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033078.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 6:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not confidence inspiring"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 12:26:50 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "but -accurate"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018045.txt_13157
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018045.txt
|
Re: List of Events from Siegel
|
[{"sender": "Margaux Rogers", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Friday, September 10, 2010 11:53 AM", "subject": "RE: List for JE only from now till Sept 23111111", "body": "Calendar of Major Events, Openings, and Fundraisers\nSaturday, September 11, 2010\n[... long list of events continues ...]\nWednesday, September 22, 2010\n[...]\nThursday, September 23, 2010\nVanidades Magazine\n50th Anniversary Gala. 7:00 pm. Cocktails, dinner, entertainment and dancing. Honoring Oscar de la Renta,Carolina Herrera,Narciso\nRodriguez. Trump SoHo Hotel. New York. [...]\n***********************************************************"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:54 AM", "subject": "Re: List of Events from Siegel", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "9/10/2010 4:01:03 PM", "subject": "Re: List of Events from Siegel", "body": "I only wanted what peggy was hositng"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025199.txt_13161
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025199.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jonathan Farkas (a)"], "timestamp": "3/2/2018 12:47:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "funn /. its a wild time"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:58 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey do you think this is Smoot Hawley 2 which topped us into the depression Bloomberg just quoted\ntrump trade wars are good and easy to win thanks jf Somers is going to mar a lago lunch Saturday fund raiser\n\nfor djt"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029231.txt_13163
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029231.txt
|
Fwd: Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/19/2015 9:43:40 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": "lo eaarrerarennrever eran to enero REY reTe TT"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Po"], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 19, 2015", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033050.txt_13164
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033050.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["schwartman", "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump in your neighborhood today. Looks like he is going to 740 Park for a fundraiser."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "12/2/2017 5:13:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.txt_13168
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.txt
|
RE: FW: Jane Doe
|
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 7:00:05 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031751.txt_13172
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031751.txt
|
Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke [dkiesq@aol.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "5/3/2018 9:44:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreply@google.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 3, 2018 at 4:38:01 PM EDT", "subject": "Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Jeffrey Epstein\n\nNEWS\n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031751"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030006.txt_13183
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030006.txt
|
Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011
|
[{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients:"], "timestamp": "6/14/2011 11:54:12 AM", "subject": "Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011", "body": "Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011 (attached PDF is easier to read)\n\nMarket update: for better or worse, this is the kind of year we were expecting. We were surprised at the market’s unbridled optimism in April*, since the tug-of-war between private sector profits and public sector problems has a long way to go. We chose the charts on the front page of our 2011 Outlook carefully; they were designed to show that equity markets were priced inexpensively, but were likely to stay that way, given too much stimulus in the East, and ineffective stimulus in the West **. We expect a modest second half recovery, based primarily on US capital spending increases, easy credit conditions everywhere, and a pick-up in industrial production in Japan. But the world’s structural problems are weighing on the private sector, and our portfolios are positioned for a single-digit year in credit, equities and hedge funds.\n\n* The Osama Bin Laden episode marked the equity market peak. Some commentators saw this event as a basis for further optimism, but unsurprisingly, the positive glow lasted for only around 2.5 hours the subsequent Monday. According to the Congressional Research Service, over the last decade, the US has spent at least $1.1 trillion in war funding operations, surpassing the constant-dollar cost of the Korean and Vietnam Wars combined. This highlights the disproportionately large pain that small, non-sovereign entities can inflict in the modern era.\n\n** So far, the large growth and employment multipliers from deficit spending estimated by Christina Romer (former Chair of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers) have not materialized. John Taylor and John Cogan from Stanford have been closer to the mark: an initial boost, but then a rapidly fading benefit\n\nSomething different this week. I was on the road seeing clients last week, and was asked “what should be done about job growth”. We are investors and not politicians, so my ideas [a] are not relevant. However, it seems to me that anyone involved in the jobs debate should be required to read the article below, written after the prior deep US recession (1990-1991). It’s from George McGovern, one of the most liberal politicians [b] ever to hold office and run for President. His epiphanies after leaving office and running the Stratford Inn are worth considering as legislators contemplate additional job creation measures, and the broader regulatory environment in which the private sector operates.\n\n“A Politician's Dream Is a Businessman's Nightmare”, by George McGovern, June 1992 [c]\n\nWisdom too often never comes, and so one ought not to reject it merely because it comes late. (Justice Felix Frankfurter). It's been 11 years since I left the U.S. Senate, after serving 24 years in high public office. After leaving a career in politics, I devoted much of my time to public lectures that took me into every state in the union and much of Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America.\n\nIn 1988, I invested most of the earnings from this lecture circuit acquiring the leasehold on Connecticut's Stratford Inn. Hotels, inns and restaurants have always held a special fascination for me. The Stratford Inn promised the realization of a longtime dream to own a combination hotel, restaurant and public conference facility--complete with an experienced manager and staff. In retrospect, I wish I had known more about the hazards and difficulties of such a business, especially during a recession of the kind that hit New England just as I was acquiring the inn's 43-year leasehold. I also wish that during the years I was in public office, I had had this firsthand experience about the difficulties business people face every day. That knowledge would have made me a better U.S. senator and a more understanding presidential contender.\n\nToday we are much closer to a general acknowledgment that government must encourage business to expand and grow. Bill Clinton, Paul Tsongas, Bob Kerrey and others have, I believe, changed the debate of our party [d]. We intuitively know that to create job opportunities we need entrepreneurs who will risk their capital against an expected payoff. Too often, however, public policy does not consider whether we are choking off those opportunities."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031399.txt_13185
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031399.txt
|
[{"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Herald"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:08:12 PM", "subject": "", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\n[Article content about the reassignment of the Jeffrey Epstein victims' rights case to Atlanta, details on the plea agreement, victims' lawsuits, and related developments]"}, {"sender": "Lilly Ann Sanchez", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "", "body": "The LS Law Firm"}]
| 2
|
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032428.txt_13186
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032428.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to negotiate with developer on your behalf . or just give your talking points. allowances . commisions fees. free maintence etc"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What if I get it and can't resell?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i understand the fear. thats why we will condition the close on how the others sell"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got hired by Apple this week to do a patent trial."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "nice"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 2:52:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When I go to Dubai on Emirates, do I need to go first or is business class good enough given that I only care about slepeping?"}]
| 7
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026829.txt_13191
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026829.txt
|
Fwd: Alert: FIRPTA and REIT Reform Provisions in the New Tax Law Open Door to Increased Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Property Interests
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2015 12:52:15 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Alert: FIRPTA and REIT Reform Provisions in the New Tax Law Open Door to Increased Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Property Interests", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Sadis & Goldberg Tax Group", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "December 23, 2015 at 3:02:13 PM EST", "subject": "Alert: FIRPTA and REIT Reform Provisions in the New Tax Law Open Door to Increased Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Property Interests", "body": "TAX ALERT\nDECEMBER 23, 2015\nFIRPTA and REIT Reform Provisions in\nNew Tax Law Open Door to Increased\nForeign Investment in U.S. Real\nProperty Interests\n\nOn December 18, 2015, President Obama signed into law a bill that significantly reforms the provisions\nof the Internal Revenue Code that were originally added 35 years ago by the Foreign Investment in\nReal Property Tax Act of 1980 (FIRPTA). The Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (the\n\"PATH Act\") also includes extensions of a number of tax relief provisions that expired at the end of\n2015. The PATH Act makes foreign capital investment in U.S. real estate, energy and infrastructure\nassets more attractive by expanding certain exemptions from FIRPTA and clarifying the application of\ncertain FIRPTA provisions to REITs and their shareholders.\n\nI. FOREIGN PENSION FUNDS EXEMPTED FROM FIRPTA TAXATION\nOne of the most significant provisions of the PATH Act is the addition of a complete exemption from\nFIRPTA for \"qualified foreign pension funds\" and \"entities\" wholly owned by such funds, effective on\nthe date of enactment. A foreign pension fund is \"qualified\" if it is subject to government regulation\nand certain reporting requirements in its home jurisdiction, is established to provide retirement or\npension benefits to participants or beneficiaries that are current or former employees, has no greater\nthan 5 percent beneficiaries, and enjoys tax benefits on either contributions or investment income in\nits home jurisdiction. The new exemption applies to direct investments and investments made\nthrough partnerships (including private equity funds). The PATH Act provides for certain details to be\naddressed by Treasury Regulations. It appears that the \"entities\" eligible for the FIRPTA exemption\ncould include a U.S. or foreign \"blocker\" corporation that is wholly owned by a qualifying foreign\npension fund. This exemption will, for the first time, permit foreign pension funds, including some\ngovernmental funds, to hold control positions in REITs without losing their FIRPTA exemption.\nNote that the regular rules of the Internal Revenue Code other than FIRPTA still would apply to the\nforeign pension fund. Therefore, a foreign pension fund that invested in a partnership that was\nengaged in a U.S. business (real estate or non-real estate) would still be subject to U.S. federal income\ntax on its share of the partnership's \"effectively connected\" U.S. business income in the same manner\nas other non-U.S. persons making an investment in a U.S. business partnership.\nHere are some examples of what can be done in light of the changes made by the PATH Act:\n\nA. Raw Land Investment. A qualifying foreign pension fund invests in a partnership that buys raw land\nin the United States. (This could be a vacant lot, timberland, oil and gas or mineral property, or other\nproperty interests that qualify for treatment as real property for federal income tax purposes.) The\ninvestment is a capital asset, as the partnership is not engaged in business. The partnership later sells\nthe property to a developer, or the pension fund sells its partnership interest. Under prior law, the\nforeign pension fund's non-business capital gain would automatically be subject to US federal income\ntax because of FIRPTA. Under the new law, the foreign pension fund's long-term or short-term capital\ngain is exempt from U.S. income tax and FIRPTA withholding because FIRPTA does not apply.\n\nB. Equity Kicker Mortgage Loan Investment. A foreign pension fund acquires an ownership interest\nin a mortgage loan secured by U.S. real property. The loan includes stated interest plus an equity\nkicker (e.g., additional interest equal to a share of gain realized on sale of the property). Such an\nequity kicker loan is treated as a U.S. real property interest under FIRPTA. Under prior law, gain\nrealized by the foreign pension fund upon sale of the loan would automatically be subject to U.S.\nincome tax under FIRPTA. Under new law, the gain realized on the sale of the mortgage loan would\nbe exempt from U.S. income tax. (This conclusion is based on the assumption that the foreign pension\nfund is a mere investor and not engaged in an active lending business in the U.S.)\n\nC. U.S. Blocker Corp. Investment. A foreign pension fund wants to make an equity investment in a\nU.S. real estate business that is organized as a partnership. The foreign pension fund forms a U.S.\ncorporation to acquire the partnership interest and the corporation is capitalized with a mix of equity\nand debt held by the shareholder. The corporation is subject to U.S. income tax on its net income, but\ngets to deduct interest paid or accrued on the debt held by the shareholder. The foreign corporation\nlater sells the stock of the corporation. Under prior law, the gain on sale of the stock would be subject\nto U.S. income tax because the corporation was a \"U.S. real property holding corporation\" under\nFIRPTA. Under new law, FIRPTA does not apply to the foreign pension fund, so the capital gain on sale\nof the stock is exempt from U.S. income tax. Note that the U.S.-source interest paid to the foreign\nshareholder could be subject to U.S. withholding tax under the regular rules of the Code, but if the\npension fund is organized in a jurisdiction that has a tax treaty with the U.S. (e.g., UK, Germany,\nFrance, China, Japan, etc.), these interest payments could be exempt from U.S. withholding under such\ntax treaty.\n\n2. FIRPTA EXEMPTION FOR INVESTMENTS IN PUBLICLY TRADED REIT STOCK INCREASED FROM 5\nPERCENT to 10 PERCENT\nFor publicly traded REITs, the PATH Act opens the door to increased investment by expanding the\ncurrent statutory exemption from FIRPTA for small portfolio investments by non-U.S. persons. The Act\nprovides all foreign investors (not just pension funds) can now own up to 10 percent of the stock of a\npublicly traded REIT without triggering FIRPTA tax. Under prior law, FIRPTA tax would apply upon the\nforeign investor's sale of stock of the publicly traded REIT or the receipt of certain distributions from\nsuch REIT if the foreign investor holds more than 5 percent of the REIT's stock.\n\n3. CLARIFICATION OF THE EXEMPTION FOR INVESTMENTS IN DOMESTICALLY CONTROLLED REITS\nThe PATH Act includes important clarifying presumptions that will allow publicly traded REITs and their\nshareholders to rely with greater confidence on the current law FIRPTA exemption for gains realized\non sales of stock in \"domestically controlled\" REITS. In determining whether a REIT is domestically\ncontrolled, the REIT is now permitted to presume that any owner of less than 5 percent of any publicly\ntraded shares of the REIT is a U.S. person, unless the REIT has actual knowledge to the contrary.\n\n4. REVENUE RAISING PROVISIONS RELATING TO FIRPTA AND REITs\nThe PATH Act includes certain revenue raising provisions to offset, in part, the tax revenue loss\nanticipated to result of the above-described tax reform provisions of the Act. Such revenue raisers\ninclude (among other technical changes) the following provisions:\n\nA. Increase in FIRPTA Withholding Rate. The purchaser of a U.S. real property interest from a non-\nU.S. person was previously required to withhold 10 percent of the purchase price under FIRPTA. The\nPATH Act increases this rate to 15 percent for dispositions occurring after the 60th day following\nenactment, but maintains the 10 percent rate for sales of residential property for between $300,000\nand $1,000,000. This provision is not a tax increase but is designed to ensure that FIRPTA withholding\ncollects a sufficient portion of the taxes owed.\n\nB. Restriction on REIT Spin-offs. In recent years, it has become increasingly common for large\ncorporate taxpayers to reduce their tax bills by contributing real estate used in their businesses to a\nsubsidiary, spinning off the subsidiary in a tax free transaction under Code section 355, and then\nhaving the spun-out corporation making a REIT election. The PATH Act curtails such activity by (i)\nproviding that neither the distributing corporation nor the spun-out corporation can make a REIT\nelection for ten years after that corporation was involved in a Section 355 transaction and (ii) denying\ntax-free treatment to spin-offs in which the distributing corporation or spun-out corporation (but not\nboth) is a REIT.\n\n5. CONCLUSION\nThe revisions to the FIRPTA and REIT rules discussed above represent a potentially large expansion of\nthe incentives for foreign investment in U.S. real property interests, especially for foreign pension\nfunds. Sponsors of U.S. real property investment funds and foreign investors with interests in U.S. real\nestate assets should review the new provisions to determine whether such persons could benefit from\nsuch U.S. tax law changes."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032792.txt_13204
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032792.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["JEFF EPSTEIN [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/24/2018 7:57:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Let's keep our friendship and talk politics, you are after free information and I NO longer provide free\n\ninformation.\n\nV-BR\nAlireza ITTIHADIEH"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "24 July 2018 21:54", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if you can, send me the spec on the bbj, with calendar dates for next few checks.\n\nnow said he wants a deal with iran. nuts\n\nas you can see trump"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029225.txt_13206
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029225.txt
|
time to publish this instead of the trite.
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Mortimer Zuckernan"], "timestamp": "2/10/2015 5:22:52 PM", "subject": "time to publish this instead of the trite.", "body": "ore\n\n15 of 141,013\n\nFwd: Statement for Press"}, {"sender": "Carolyn Cohen", "recipients": ["Aln Deshowit7"], "timestamp": "February 10, 2015 at 10:40:57 AM EST", "subject": "Statement for Press", "body": "Alan Dershowitz’s Statement: We can now prove that Jane Doe #3 has no credibility and lied about Clinton, the Gores and Dershowitz.\n\nDershowitz’s lawyers have filed a detailed reply to Jane Doe #3 false charges. In it they definitively respond to all of the alleged evidence presented by Jane Doe #3 and her lawyers. Since that filing Mr. Dershowitz’s lawyers have uncovered additional evidence that Jane Doe #3 has lied about her alleged contacts with former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore and the then Mrs. Gore. In her first affidavit to the court she repeats the claim that she had earlier sold to a British tabloid: namely that “former President Bill Clinton was present on the island [Jeffrey Epstein’s private island] at a time when [Jane Doe #3] was also present on the Island.”\n\nThis statement, sworn under oath, summarizes a far more elaborate fantasy that she sold to a British tabloid which has since been repeated by the international media. In neither statement, does she provide any specific dates or times, but she does weave an imaginative fantasy about her fictional meeting with former President Clinton. She “describes” how Mr. Clinton’s Secret Service detail allowed Ghislaine Maxwell, then a novice helicopter pilot, to fly the former President to Epstein’s private island on a large black helicopter —an obvious lie. She then purports to “describe” specific seating locations at a fictional dinner party that included her, Mr. Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein and two other underage “olive-skinned brunettes” whose identities she could not provide:\n\n“I flew to the Caribbean with Jeffrey and then Ghislaine Maxwell went to pick up Bill in a huge black helicopter that Jeffrey had bought her. She’d always wanted to fly and Jeffrey paid for her to take lessons, and I remember she was very excited because she got her licence around the first year we met. I used to get frightened flying with her but Bill had the Secret Service with him and I remember him talking about what a good job she did. I only ever met Bill twice but Jeffrey had told me that they were good friends. I asked, “How come?” and he laughed and said, “He owes me some favours.” Maybe he was just joking but it constantly surprised me that people with as much to lose as Bill and [Prince] Andrew weren't more careful. She said that when dining that night, Maxwell sat at"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033044.txt_13208
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033044.txt
|
Re: SIT
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "9/30/2017 9:46:50 PM", "subject": "Re: SIT", "body": "no hes going to pr only maybe pence on fri"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 1:43 PM", "subject": "Re: SIT", "body": "Jeffrey \nI hear Pres Trump arrives in St Thomas on Tuesday FYI \nThx \nLarry"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026447.txt_13210
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026447.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Leon Bick"], "timestamp": "6/7/2017 12:03:23 PM", "subject": null, "body": "\"Blackstone anticipates that the program will have $40 billion in total equity commitments in a permanent\ncapital vehicle, including $20 billion to be raised from other investors,\" Blackstone said in a statement\nannouncing the planned launch of the investment fund. \"The MOU is non-binding and the parties will continue\n\ntheir negotiation to agree definitive documentation.\"\n\nBrookings Institution Senior Fellow Bruce Riedel was even less charitable. \"There is no deal. It's fake news,\" he\nwrote in a scathing piece on the Brookings website. \"I've spoken to contacts in the defense business and on the\nHill, and all of them say the same thing: there are a bunch of letters of interest or intent, but not contracts. Many\n\nare offers that the defense industry thinks the Saudis will be interested in someday.\"\n\nIt could be years before anyone knows for sure whether the preliminary agreements announced in Saudi Arabia\nhave become real deals worth hundreds of billions, or whether the announcements were the kind of hyperbole\n\nTrump perfected during his time in the business world."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032779.txt_13218
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032779.txt
|
Fwd: RE: Barrack is not
|
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribs [aa", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/9/2018 7:48:10 PM", "subject": "Fwd: RE: Barrack is not", "body": "For ur info\n\nhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesdigitalcovers/2018/07/09/disastrous-deal-staggers-trump-ally-thomas-barrack/"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033301.txt_13227
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033301.txt
|
FW: Trump Force One Vs. Air Force One
|
[{"sender": "Barry Josephson [barry@josephsonent.com]", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/27/2016 3:20:09 PM", "subject": "FW: Trump Force One Vs. Air Force One", "body": "Funny!\nBest,\nBarry J"}, {"sender": "Niall McCarthy | Statista", "recipients": ["Barry Josephson"], "timestamp": "Monday, June 27, 2016 at 7:34 AM", "subject": "Trump Force One Vs. Air Force One", "body": "Dear Barry,\n\nWhen it comes to describing Donald Trump’s private jet, the word “impressive” would be an understatement. The presumptive Republican Party nominee bought the Boeing 757-200 from Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen and he spared no expense kitting it out. Dubbed “Trump Force One,” the luxurious jet is equipped with a shower, gold-plated seatbelt buckles and a 52-inch flatscreen with a library of 1,000 movies. Built in 1991, the 757 is estimated to have cost approximately $100 million. If Trump reaches the White House in November, he'll have to exchange his personal jet for the presidential fleet, two highly modified Boeing 747-200Bs. The aircraft used by the president were built in 1986 and operate with the Air Force One callsign when the president is onboard. Will switching jets prove one of Trump’s few regrets if he becomes president?\n\nEven though it cannot boast gold-plated accessories, Air Force One is a larger aircraft, seating 70 passengers in comfort compared to Trump Force"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026768.txt_13229
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026768.txt
|
Re: Sexual harassment and Lawrence Krauss
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Sam Harris", "Travis Pangburn", "Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 5:47:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Sexual harassment and Lawrence Krauss", "body": "I was planning on writing both of you today or tomorrow if buzzfeed decided to go ahead with their story after I wrote to them, but since they sent this to you here is what I was planning to forward.. namely my response to their email and their original email. I hope it helps. They have clearly decided in advance to try to smear me, and potentially other atheists (I found the remarks in their ‘miscellaneous facts’ telling in this regard), and I felt a detailed response to the false claims was important. If you want to discuss this further I am happy to. Iam currently on a plane heading to phoenix.\n\nThanks for forwarding.\n\nLMK"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Peter Aldhous"], "timestamp": "December 11, 2017 at 10:18:30 AM MST", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your email. I am currently on a plane until noon pacific time, and then heading to a meeting right after landing, till about 2 pm or so. While Iam running the risk that you will report my comments, if you do, either out of context, or incompletely, I am responding with an effort to be complete, as I always try and do with reporters. If you decide to go ahead with a story, which, after reading my responses, I hope you decide is inappropriate, I would like you to quote my responses fully in order not to distort them.\n\nIt is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements. I treat people I interact withwith respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public, and this is supported by the institutions of which Iam a part. I do not sexually harass people. Ifthe purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of unfounded outside complaints and allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have remained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that their experience validates a trust in my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and continue to be invited to their last 3 meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally appreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your ‘miscellaneous facts’, as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than allegations and innuendo by people whose motives I cannot judge. I also try and judge the facts in context. The"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025313.txt_13236
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025313.txt
|
Will Hunter Biden jeopardize his father's campaign?
|
[{"sender": "editorialstaff@flipboard.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/3/2019 9:01:27 PM", "subject": "Will Hunter Biden jeopardize his father's campaign?", "body": "Interesting stories worth your time.\n\nWill Hunter Biden Jeopardize His Father’s Campaign?\nnewyorker.com / Adam Entous Joe Biden's son is under scrutiny for his business dealings and tumultuous personal life. In today's political culture, people running for President may… read more\n\nRuthless. Relentless. Victorious.\nnytimes.com / RORY SMITH LYON, France — Alex Morgan had the ball at her feet, Carli Lloyd at her side, and a great green expanse opening up in front of her eyes. England had… read more\n\nLowe: Why the collapse of the Warriors feels so abrupt\nespn.com / Zach Lowe Zach Lowe (@ZachLowe_NBA) is a senior writer for ESPN Digital and Print. Kevin Durant was never supposed to be on the Golden State Warriors. It was an… read more\n\nFor Emma Gee, being the only out LGBTQ athlete at BYU is complicated\nusatoday.com / Scott Gleeson Clarification: This story has been updated after BYU officials clarified the school's policies as it pertains to the honor code. Emma Gee sits casually… read more\n\nThe Forgotten Trans History of the Wild West\natlasobscura.com / SABRINA IMBLER From 1900 to 1922, Harry Allen was one of the most notorious men in the Pacific Northwest. The West was still wide and wild then, a place where … read more\n\n\"I Really Feel Most Comfortable in Prison\": A Hedge Fund Ex-Con Finds It's Hard Coming Home to Greenwich\nvanityfair.com / CHRIS POMORSKI Chip Skowron pleaded guilty to securities fraud, lost his freedom, and found religion. But, as it turns out, federal prison is more forgiving than… read more\n\nIn the Energy Drink Market, Advertising and Science Collide\nundark.org / Sara Talpos Energy drinks are wildly popular among teens, despite being loaded with stimulants. How did that happen, and is it a concern? Earlier this year, a … read more\n\nA Brief History of the S'more, America's Favorite Campfire Snack\ntime.com / Jeffrey Miller, Colorado State University / The Conversation This summer, millions of marshmallows will be toasted over fires across America. Many will be used as an ingredient in the quintessential summer snack:… read more\n\nHow Vegetarian Travel Is Possible Without Losing Your Mind\nbonappetit.com / Sarah Jampel My greatest shame—and biggest secret—as a nearly lifelong vegetarian is that once every two months or so, I eat fish. And most often, it's because I'm… read more\n\n32 Architects Reveal Budget Breakdowns For Projects Ranging From $1.5K to $910K\ndwell.com / Samantha Daly Have you ever wanted a behind-the-scenes look at what a renovation or new build actually costs? Dwell's Budget Breakdown series reveals the true cost of… read more\n\nCheck out The Daily Edition for the biggest stories in news, business, tech, sports and entertainment."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026321.txt_13238
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026321.txt
|
Fwd: This morning
|
[{"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "September 11, 2018 at 10:20 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Yes, we can expect more extremists to run under RCV. But also more centrists (e.g., Bloomberg). Since the centrists are closer to the median voter, they will defeat the extremists.\n\nThe evidence I have seen suggests that RCV increases turn-out. [But it’s important that voters be given the choice to rank as many or few candidates as they like, so that a voter always has the option of voting for a single candidate (in effect, he would be ranking all other candidates as tied for second). In practice, most voters choose to rank two or three candidates, but a significant fraction just rank one]"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Maskin, Eric <maskin@harvard.edu>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 11, 2018 10:23 PM", "subject": "Re: This morning", "body": "Are there empirical studies on turnout."}, {"sender": "Maskin, Eric", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "September 11, 2018 at 10:24:21 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: This morning", "body": "I believe there are, but don’t know how careful they are. I will try to get you references."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "9/12/2018 3:01:20 AM", "subject": "Fwd: This morning", "body": "More than u may want to know"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033315.txt_13246
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033315.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|er", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:29:07 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Your boy should distance himself from Trump. Quick."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670.txt_13250
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670.txt
|
Re: How are you holding up?
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned , or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere. each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and rememberg{J_ She never saw anything that claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained , not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship , I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. (no sex _).. they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, ..8. answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "I think the big issue is separating yourself from Andrew. I mean I can see why a statement might help in some way -- but its Andrew (not clinton and the rest) that is keeping the story alive. Until you are able to come fgrward and address that the story lives on. I mean in the end he had consensual sex with Andffworked for you. The rest is atmospherics. You have moved on! People don't know that and cant accept that unless you say as much.\n\nDoes franc drama worry you? Am writing on it now..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:52 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "it is the begining world currencies are out of balance. brazil, etc"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 16, 2015 7:56 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "that is old news -- buy dollar and take a nap? Kind of like buying Apple?"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023208.txt_13258
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023208.txt
|
Detailed constructive list.
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:37 PM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "gain at 20 % not 28. . so total , 35.8%. tax rate. same for boat. and plane each around 10 m so total 7 m savings if both sold"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:35 AM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "Deciisions needed asap 1 phaidon. topco etc. .( cash needs) many wires needed !! 2 new trustee or not. - new decantings 3 art in art partnership.??! overdue ?!4 grats? window - 5 artspace. .6 regan arts. .7 plane simplify re strucuture re finance. re purpose . 8 .boat restrucutre , sister, 9 re fresh estate plan. to consider modifications Alex Victoria equal does not mean same. 10. tra review , sale. , 11 brh, doc review, 12. sale of stock or art ? tax, rent sale 13. gifts of art. 14. charity current and future pledges , gifts, 15 cash flow. . 16 . new IT and new personnel. 17. operational re-do ( bill pay etc). 18 debra and children ? current and future involvement . notifications etc. . new dynasty trust ? 19. tax plan and dislosures gaming. foreign apollo and phaidon related . 20. investments rationalize incl trading accouints .21. bank loans . rates? ? terms etc. consolidate. plane boat houses. disclosures? 22 . consolidate and review and reduce the number of all bank accounts and legal entities. decanting liquidating etc. . 23 all outside consultants? valuations etc. 24 review legal bills carefullly. 25. third party responsibilty Bens house , alex films . etc."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "Deciisions needed asap 1 phaidon. topco etc. .( cash needs) many wires needed !! 2 new trustee or not. - new decantings 3 art in art partnership.??! overdue ?!4 grats? window - 5 art space. .6 regan arts. .7 plane simplify re strucuture re finance. re purpose . 8 .boat restrucutre , sister, 9 re fresh estate plan. to consider modifications Alex Victoria equal does not mean same. 10. tra review , sale. , 11 brh, doc review, 12. sale of stock or art ? tax, rent sale 13. gifts of art. 14. charity current and future pledges , gifts, 15 cash flow. . 16 . new IT and new personnel. 17. operational re-do ( bill pay etc). 18 debra and children ? current and future involvement . notifications etc. . new dynasty trust ? 19. tax plan and dislosures gaming. foreign apollo and phaidon related . 20. investments rationalize incl trading accouints .21. bank loans . rates ? ? terms etc. consolidate. plane boat houses. disclosures? 22 . consolidate and review and reduce the number of all bank accounts and legal entities. decanting liquidating etc. . 23 all outside consultants? valuations etc. 24 review legal bills carefullly. 25. third party responsibilty Bens house , alex films . etc."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:56 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Detailed constructive list.", "body": "please print two copes . re formattted so leon can go line by line ie . headings question, gift answer. blank whoresponsible. timeframe. fee paid when?"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026168.txt_13264
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026168.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/20/2017 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/20/2017 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/21/2017 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thnx jeff i m praying"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/21/2017 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/21/2017 7:23:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hey shiek i will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night.. if you bussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032745.txt_13265
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032745.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i have to leave at 830 for the airpot thats why sorry"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 9:14:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "How about Monday morning? Easier for me...how did today go?"}]
| 8
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023038.txt_13266
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023038.txt
|
Fw: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
|
[{"sender": "Gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:56 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "The Duke", "recipients": ["Gmax"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 11:46:49 2011", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Hey there! What's all this? I don't know anything about this! You must SAY so please. This has NOTHING to do with me. \nI can't take any more of this."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:31:26 2011", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmaxl@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "Annette Witheridge", "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe, \nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince \nAndrew and others this weekend. \nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers \nare or \nAnnette Witheridge \nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday \n1. says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led \nupstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was naked on massage table. \nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein and directec to copy \nher. \nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint. \n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant and Mr Epstein. \n3. Ms Maxwell kept sex toys and costumes in the Palm Beach mansion and dressed prior to sex sessions with Mr Epstein. S \nMaxwell herself wore black vinyl during sex sessions with Mr Epstein. \n4. was paid between US $200 and $ 5000 US sex, depending on whether it involved travel and other men. \n5, was required to have sex with friends of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, including Glenn Dubin, Les Wexner, Ehud Barak, \nformer Senator George Mitchell and Stephen Kosslyn. \n6. Ms Maxwell introduced to Prince Andrew in 2001 at Ms Maxwell's London house where ad sex with him. \nsubsequently was directed to meet him at Mr Epstein's New York house where Ms Maxwell directe to sit on Andrew's knee \nwiti Andrew groped both girls. Ms Maxwell directed after this to have sex with Andrew. \nMs Maxwell and Mr Epstein subsequently travelled with to Little St James where she was directed to stage an orgy for Andrew \nand Mr Epstein during which she performed oral sex on \nthem. \n7. vas paid extra by Mr Epstein or his employees for these sexual encounters. \n8. Ms Maxwell knew age and laughed about it when she introduced her to Andrew. \n9. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein tried to persuade to bear his child. \n10. After sexual encounters with male friends of Mr Epstein and/or Ms Maxwell, Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein would ask \nexplicit questions about what went on. \n11. Mr Epstein's residences in Florida and New York had surveillance cameras that taped the sex sessions and taped Wven in the \nbathroom. \n12. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein arranged for Ehud Barak to have sex with several girls, often at Mr Epstein's Palm Beach house. \n13. Ms Maxwell piloted President Bill Clinton in a helicopter to a dinner on Little St James where two brunettes Ms Maxwell, \nand Mr Epstein were at the table. \n14. Mr Epstein bought Ms Maxwell the helicopter, homes in New York and London and a Mercedes."}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.txt_13267
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.txt
|
Re: Your Special Day
|
[{"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "At 10:13 PM 01/19/17, you wrote:\n\nall good.A A thx.A A areas of interest,A A A A distribuitionsA in nature..A AAA 2\ndeception.A 3.A sleep.4.A power. 5 money.A 6 music and the brain. 7 , signal intellignece in the\nbiologocal systems\n\nExcellent alignment with some of my interests or those of people I like and think are smart!\nThe rest of the truncated message has been sent.\n\n1. What's been stimulating as a source of good questions for the \"distributions in nature” issue?\n\n7. \"Signal intelligence in biol. systems\" seems to cover all of neurophysiology: Jonathan Victor, whom you\nmet a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding. Are there\nspecific examples that have stimulated you to better questions or turned your thinking around?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "1. is probability a force rather than a markter. if you look at a bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it\nunder a force pushing things towards the center. 1 think gravity might be just that. 2. all signals in\nnature need to be envvyrpted so that the enemy cannot read. this includes inner signals that if you are\naware of , can give you up to your predator. so signals from the nose , my conjecture is that each person\nhas its own enxruption de encyption algorithm builtin. fyi having dinnner with Jin Watson."}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Probability as a force rather than a what?\n\nDidn't suss out the next word...\n\nWatson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk ~4 years\nago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion.\nKnow him well?\n\nDz"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "pretty well ."}, {"sender": "David Grosof", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Cool. And the former question, of clarification?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 12:14:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers. _centrifigal force is a pseudo\nforce but not distinguishable in the right frame. . like gravity. lets assume that there is a force pushing heads\nand tails towards a 50 50 distribution. . not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would . could\nbe a force similar to the EM one."}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023220.txt_13268
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023220.txt
|
RE: Fw: sched
|
[{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen [mal@iiiittt.com]", "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 10, 2015 05:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Fw: sched", "body": "and jeffrey to have a higher level conversation some time next week; either way you'll have access to everything, obviously.\n\nI wouldn’t mind attending a meeting or portion of a meeting with JE. If he is the mastermind, and you want to move quickly, it might get a lot of questions resolved quickly."}, {"sender": "Brad Wechsler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 10, 2015 5:37 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fw: sched", "body": "On different subject: general time frame is: docs (notes and purchase and sale agreement to you tomorrow end of biz); incorporate your comments monday and get docs to trust attorney tuesday; contemporaneously meet in person with you tuesday or wednesday and do a dry run. On these days ada will also take the trustees through outline of docs they will receive thursday. Docs to trustees, leon et al on thursday and signatures gathered by friday for first close 12/22. Tight but doable. Ada, alan agree?\n\nPS: ada, you shld begin to think abt where people are (jh, rr, bc, Idb) next week."}, {"sender": "Heather Gray", "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 10, 2015 05:24 PM", "subject": "RE: Fw:", "body": "No, I’m meeting with him at 9:30 am tomorrow."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:49 AM", "subject": "fee", "body": "elegant solution ;re fee. , 30 million paid now. with purchase of noel kalb, paid with funds from the drawdown. you should use and keep open the line for the full 30m and leave it outstanding until its expiration. in four months. legit biz reason, very nice , - the balance of the fee - paid in kind either low basis art . or interest in either milenium ,lone cascade ,or king street."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:53 PM", "subject": "RE: Fw: sched", "body": "saved you 500k at the last minute, . brad has had the same chart since march 16th, its his job to review NOT MINE .appears he is one of those living in the dark leiwe. I found 8 million dollars today, missed deductions. . not yet in the numbers, .?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Fw: sched", "body": ""}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030722.txt_13270
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030722.txt
|
Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon I N ieuwsuur
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/8/2018 12:53:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon I N ieuwsuur", "body": "This drives me Ping crazy. \nSimple question for your boy: Did Donald Trump actively promote the theory that Barak Obama was not born \nin the US and was therefore not a legitimate President? \nAnswer: Yes. \nHe should not defend that shit. He can defend populist/nationalism all he wants, but when he bullies people \ndefending obvious Trump lies, he loses credibility."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Jul 7, 2018, at 10:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Het hele interview met Steve Bannon I N ieuwsuur", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 1:21 PM", "subject": "Het hele interview met Steve Bannon 1Nieuwsuur", "body": "https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/video/2240261-het-hele-interview-met-steve-bannon.html"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026626.txt_13274
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026626.txt
|
US Presidential Election Update
|
[{"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/25/2016 9:07:53 AM", "subject": "US Presidential Election Update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\nPlease find attached report of InsightsPod generated after third US Presidential debate. Trump's popularity has\nincreased after third debate.\n\nRegards,\nZubair"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028852.txt_13277
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028852.txt
|
Reminder Ed Boyden.
|
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2014 11:55:40 AM", "subject": "Reminder Ed Boyden.", "body": "Reminder: Would you like me to set up a call for you with Ed Boyden?\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Ed Boyden", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff", "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "July 14, 2014, 4:50:47 AM EDT", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Sorry again for that last minute cancellation in the Spring -- alas,\nthe perils of running a new center, that I no longer control my\nschedule like in the good old days. But the Obama BRAIN Initiative is\nrunning strong, and MIT has a good bid for a seat at the table, so\nthat is good. Want to revisit a time for a chat? My schedule is now\nmuch more free, thanks to these BRAIN initiative activities\nlaunching...\n\nBest,\nEd"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Neil Gershenfeld"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:08 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Good morning Neil...I am afraid Jeffrey must cancel his trip up today...he is sick in bed and not well. Iam so\nvery sorry to do this last minute. Hopefully we can circle back to this soon.\n\nThank you,\nLesley\nAssistant to Jeffrey Epstein"}, {"sender": "Neil Gershenfeld", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2013, at 12:32 AM", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Confirming lunch noon Friday at my office, E15-401. Sunglasses and beach balls optional, hopefully this will\nbe a warm-up for meeting in more entertaining venues."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026754.txt_13281
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026754.txt
|
Barrack
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Owen Blicksilver"], "timestamp": "8/23/2017 6:31:58 PM", "subject": "Barrack", "body": "Hi Owen -- you probably saw this, but wanted to pass on just the same. Still very\ninterested in doing a story on Tom.\n\nThanks.\n\nLandon\n\nhttp: //www.politico.com/story/2017/08/22/trump-arizona-phoenix-rally-24192\n\nAt dinners at Trump’s Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club, billionaire investor Tom Barrack\nand New York real estate tycoon Richard LeFrak both talked about his potential to have\nmore support, administration officials and advisers said. Barrack, in particular, homed in\non the president’s sagging poll numbers and encouraged him to govern past his political\nbase, according to one person briefed on the conversation."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031792.txt_13283
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031792.txt
|
RE: Jane Doe
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 04, 2009 5:11 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031792"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2009 9:58 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Thank you for the email, however, in briefly reviewing LM’s responses, she mentions a Dr. Rishard. I have previously asked your office to provide Dr. Rishard’s contact information. I have looked for an “Office of Palm Beach Doctors” and a “Dr. Rishard” and have been unable to locate either. Please provide me with contact information so that I may obtain records. Thank you."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:54 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Sorry — I was unaware of this. I will try and get this information as soon as possible. Also, please advise whether you are available for a hearing on 8/20 UMC."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "A hearing for what??\nWe have a depositon set that morning so I need to know what it is for??"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022658.txt_13285
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022658.txt
|
Re: off the record
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon rr"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Landon. QM the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon rr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:17 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "Lets have a chat -- you do need to fight back some how. Present evidence that she is lying AND show the world that you are no longer that guy. You have made changes -- and that this is the past. My sense is that its TV type thing where you just talk honestly about this/present evidence that its not true/ and focus on what you have been doing for past five years. Charlie Rose?\n\nBut you cant just sit there taking punches like this -- especially wen the British tabs are driving this. Maybe you go on British TV....\nCall me any time."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 6:24:30 PM", "subject": "Re: off the record", "body": "on phone now -- will call when i am done"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025600.txt_13286
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025600.txt
|
Re: $25K from ASU
|
[{"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Hey Jeffrey.\n\nHow are things?\n\nJust to let you know. We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU.\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 28, 2019 at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "No problem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, March 4, 2019 at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry . it seems im a symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types . im your boy . at least for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, March 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I’m good. Good luck!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 18, 2019 at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 18, 2019 at 8:23 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Nice."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6, 2019 at 06:48", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. how are you ?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6, 2019 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "That would be great. I’ve been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars."}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033329.txt_13290
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033329.txt
|
Fwd: China’s dangerous test
|
[{"sender": "HS", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "hscffico"], "timestamp": "11/21/2018 10:29:49 PM", "subject": "Fwd: China’s dangerous test", "body": "See story on Chinese economists"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030498.txt_13291
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030498.txt
|
Re: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikoic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem.\nlam meeting him as he has some questions. | do not need anything from him.\n\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "You would get sick of yesterday harvard party. Average age was 60. Non stop boring talks. Run away so quickly!!!\nWill be in nyc the following week feb 5 to 8th. Are you there?\nboris"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031786.txt_13292
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031786.txt
|
Mueller drew up obstruction indictment against Trump, Michael Wolff book claims
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/28/2019 3:18:36 PM", "subject": "Mueller drew up obstruction indictment against Trump, Michael Wolff book claims", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/28/mueller-trump-obstruction-charge-michael-wolff-book-\nsiege-under-fire-news"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026998.txt_13293
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026998.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "JONATHAN FARKAS", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/25/2019 10:23:28 PM", "subject": null, "body": "HN seeing me for lunch early July I hate you for introducing me to her can’t get her out of my mind\nwhat do you think will happen between trump and xi have a great f 35 story but not for e mail and it’s\nno state secret"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029501.txt_13295
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029501.txt
|
Fwd: media inquiry - FoxNews.com
|
[{"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["Martin G Weinberg I Gerald B. Lefcourt", "Jeffrey Epstein", "Deeyacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/30/2016 2:45:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: media inquiry - FoxNews.com", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Zimmerman, Malia McLaughlin", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "media inquiry - FoxNews.com", "body": "Hi Alan \nI was reading through the files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, including the original criminal case where \nyou defended Mr. Epstein, and saw a letter both you and Gerald Lefcourt co-authored on his behalf dated July \n6, 2007. \nThe letter said \"Mr. Epstein was part of the original group that conceived the Clinton Global Initiative, which is \ndescribed as a project 'bringing together a community of global leaders to devise and implement innovative \nsolutions to some of the world's most pressing challenges.' Focuses of this initiative include poverty, climate \nchange, global health, and religious and ethnic conflicts.\" \nI just wanted to clarify if Mr. Epstein was on the board of directors or listed as a founder anywhere or on any \npaperwork associated with the foundation and if so, in what capacity. Also wanted to clarify what you \nspecifically mean by being part of the original group. \nI attached a screen shot of the exact passage I am referring to. \nThanks, \nMalia"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026632.txt_13297
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026632.txt
|
Fwd: contacts
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "contacts", "body": "edelman, set martin, tata, susskind, strominger, rynolds. kosslyn, krause, gardner. bill thiel. hoffman, sinofsky, nathan feigenbaum, ramachandrain , demsaio, christakis, dennet, sheldrake, fewick, gellman, west kaufman, seligman, kurzweill ben goertzel, gould, saks mandelbrot, hopkins, mitchell kerry, clinton , richardosn, mapp , leahy, spitzer, shcumer, pruseven waheed mandelson, ehud, lang churkin, sergey, . jagland, andrew, woody blaine, boris, larry summers. \n\ndersh reummler, marty, roy, ken, jay, lilly jack, rhinehart. chet tonja, lefcourt, moscowitz. raafat, sultan hamad jabor . karim, outarra, mohmaaed. , pastrana, cas gtro, \n\nsmell menatlal fit, , lipd crestor, dick prostatis, back prptein , diet excersicse \n\nAK chad pinto lsj, bbj, ana brice, \\\n\n loen terjge rothschild \n\n bradk"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "11/1/2016 6:45:15 PM", "subject": "Fwd: contacts", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022205.txt_13299
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022205.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Al Secke"], "timestamp": "Sat, December 11, 2010 12:31:16 PM", "subject": null, "body": "the google page is not good.. after sept when you told me you thought it would take approx twenty thousand to clean up. and hopefully in time for nov 1. then another ten thsousand , and another ten thousand. and your emails about how you are all about results ,, then an emergency 2500 dollars to keep servers active , then you told me micahel didn't want to give his bank details.. your quote was he'd explode, that was after he was sent forty thousand dollars directly to his bank.. I have yet to have a complete breakdown of payments. and the results , are what they are,,."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028846.txt_13300
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028846.txt
|
NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune
|
[{"sender": "ito as", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2014 10:54:13 AM", "subject": "NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "President Obamalfs response to the Ukraine crisis, while derided by critics as slow and weak, has\nreinvigorated a 15-year global hunt for the Russian leaderifs hidden wealth.\n\nhttp://www. nytimes.com/2014/04/27/world/sanctions-revive-search-for-secret-putin-\nfortune. html ?smid=nytnow-share&smprod=nytnow"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033087.txt_13302
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033087.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump likely to hire dershowitz, no kidding"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "chat? #?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 2:36:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.