Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015584.txt_1659	IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015584.txt	Re: Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Document: Complaint (File #: 20150013)	[{"sender": "Mary E. Pirrotta", "recipients": ["Lindsay.Isaac@turner.com", "Joan Williams"], "timestamp": "January 22, 2015 9:38 AM", "subject": "Re: Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Document: Complaint (File #: 20150013)", "body": "Attached is a copy of the Complaint in Case No. CACE 15-000072 and also a copy of Mr. Scarola’s letter to The Duke of York per your request."}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031694.txt_1662	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031694.txt	Fw: from Jesse Kornbluth	[{"sender": "Jesse Kornbluth", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Sat Apr 30 15:38:06 2011", "subject": "from Jesse Kornbluth", "body": "Peg As you've seen, I'm doing a piece for the Times. \nYou're briefly in it. \nPd like 3 minutes of your time, if possible. \nTurning it in late Sunday.... \nWe could do this by email. \nOr phone. \nI'm at \nIf I'm out, my cell i \nTHANKS"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jesse Kornbluth"], "timestamp": "Apr 30, 2011, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re: from Jesse Kornbluth", "body": "Would love to talk to you. What is piece about? Peg"}, {"sender": "Jesse Kornbluth", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Sat Apr 30 16:29:18 2011", "subject": "Re: from Jesse Kornbluth", "body": "Peg --\nObviously, I'm sharing what follows on the assumption that everything here is just between us. \nThe thesis of the Times piece is that the rich and their corporations have SO much power \nthat we no longer live in a democracy. \nCan \"we the people\" make change? Not really. \nWho can? The rich and powerful. \nHuh? All they want is the status quo. Or more. \nBut they could --- okay, its not likely, but they could --- turn on the bad actors at their social/economic level. \nFor example: Wall Street CEOs, donors to the Tea Party, etc. \nThat's the topic. Shaming. Shunning. \nOne of the people I deal with --- there are several others. --- is Jeffrey Epstein. \nReading the clips, I don't see that Jeffrey as been shunned. \nIn this piece --- http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-\nsociety-friends-close-ranks/ ---\nI read: \nThe crowd at the events top publicist Peggy Siegal has organized for Epstein proves the point, at least behind closed doors. \"I and \nmany others that know him describe him as brilliant,\" says Siegal. \n\"His unique mind is what attracts the world's smartest people to his home.\" Last September, with Siegal's help, Epstein hosted a Break \nFast after Yom Kippur. A group of 120 friends brought their children over for a buffet dinner\nThis was just a few months after he finished his prison obligations in Florida. \nAnd here he is, entertaining --- with children present. \nThis Break Fast is one of a number of social events involving post-prison Jeffrey that attracted celebrated, powerful people. \nOf course I have zero idea who said, \"NO WAY\" and didn't cross his doorway. \nMy questions are: \n1) I You have known him for decades, were/are friends, etc. \nWhy was your reaction to his crimes to continue being his friend --- and not in a covert way? \n2) What would he have had to do for you to shun him --- to cut him out of your life? \nYou're the ultimate professional; you may not want to respond. \nEspecially because I'm NOT reaching out to anyone else who's named in the piece. \nI don't care about them. \nBut it ain't me to blindside you. \nJK"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:59:25 -0400", "subject": "Fw: from Jesse Kornbluth", "body": "Jesse Kornbluth could never make a dime. He is an angry loser who was married to Annette Tapert years ago.(She now is married to \nJoe Allen and they live near you in PB) Annette left him because there was no bread on the table and he is nasty. \nWhat should I do? Call him or not? Peg"}]	4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032125.txt_1663	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032125.txt	ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More	[{"sender": "asmallworld@travel.asmallworld.net", "recipients": ["jeeproject@yahoo.com"], "timestamp": "7/27/2011 2:09:40 PM", "subject": "ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More", "body": "Active Escapes, Quiet Getaways and More\n\nWednesday, July 27, 2011\n\nSome people do yoga on vacation; others go for the occasional run. This week we're thinking a little more... adventurously, from active escapes at Travaasa Hana in Maui to racecar driving in Baja and hiking Moab with the experts at Austin-Lehman Adventures. And after all that action, chill out with stays at the new Dream South Beach, the gorgeous Pavilions Phuket and other luxe resorts worldwide. (Image: The Pavilions Phuket - on sale Fri, July 31.)\n\nSales this week\n\nStarting Tuesday at Noon BST\nDream South Beach\nTravaasa Hana - Hawaii\nEsencia Estate - Riviera Maya\n\nStarting Tuesday at 8pm BST\nAVIA Hotel - Long Beach, CA\nHotel Las Palmas - Mexico\n\nStarting Wednesday at Noon BST\nLast-Minute London and NYC\n\nStarting Wednesday at 8pm BST\nFairmont Turnberry Isle Resort\n\nStarting Thursday at Noon BST\nSofitel - Philadelphia\n\nStarting Thursday at 8pm BST\nHotel Derek - Houston\nArches to Moab\nSpirit Ridge, British Columbia\n\nStarting Friday at Noon BST\nHotel Allegro - Chicago\n\nStarting Friday at 8pm BST\nVidago Palace - Portugal\nThe Manor On Golden Pond - NH\nCandia Maris Resort - Crete\n\nStarting Saturday at Noon BST\nRound Hill - Jamaica\nFairmont Royal Pavilion\nExperience Baja, Two Ways\nMaca Bana - Grenada\n\nStarting Sunday at Noon BST\nAlila Sothea - Cambodia\n\nStarting Sunday at 8pm BST\nThe Pavilions - Phuket\nSiam Kempinski Hotel Bangkok\nAnantara Bophut - Koh Samui\n\nStarting Monday at 8pm BST\nThe Madison - D.C.\nGrand Hyatt Atlanta\nHotel Bellevue - Washington\nThe Adolphus - Dallas"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032643.txt_1667	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032643.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 30, 2017, at 6:18 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "good proposal. everyone there still dealing with remnants of investor conference. . hope your are well"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:48 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i m going to germany next week for two days to see terry. any plans to visit gcc soon?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 2, 2017, at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im really looking forward to it. . however today sick with flu"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "keep close eye on what is going on in saudi right now"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 5, 2017, at 1:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "the missile or the anti corruption"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http s ://www. al-monitor. com/pulse/en/originals/2017/11/s audi-arab ia-crown-prince-remove-opp onents-\nnational-guard.html"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 6, 2017, at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "wowo"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/6/2017 9:07:51 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "this was just tweeted by famous saudi opposition @mujtahidd.. almost 2 million followers.. \n#Trump MBS scandal involving President @realDonaldTrump and Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman... \nFollowing @realDonaldTrump's visit to SA, US stance on Saudi affairs changed especially on competition \nbetween MBS & MBN and Qatar siege. \nMBS = Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman (de facto King) \nMBN = Mohammad bin Nayef (deposed Saudi Crown Prince and Interior Minister) \nPrior to @realDonaldTrump, US institutions stood firmly with MBN throughout Obama's presidency. This was \nreaffirmed in a letter to the King. \nAfter @realDonaldTrump's Riyadh visit, he changed the US stance on the MBS v MBN power struggle and \nforced the establishment to back MBS. \nPast US administrations were keen on avoiding strife within GCC: This is because American interests cannot be \nupheld without a harmonic GCC. \nThat was until @realDonaldTrump's return from Saudi upon which Qatar siege began and he openly supported \nit contradicting Defence&State Dept \nThat was until @realDonaldTrump's return from Saudi upon which Qatar siege began and he openly supported \nit contradicting Defence&State Dept \nMore bizarrely; MBS has a secure direct line to Trump like no other leader has - not even Israeli Netanyahu & \nBritish May... \nThe following story explains MBS's 'special' influence over @realDonaldTrump - even if it means \ncompromising America's national interests... \nDuring @realDonaldTrump's Riyadh visit in May 2017 a private yacht discreetly arrived at Jeddah Port; heavily \nguarded and identity hidden. \nEven the Port's authorities were not allowed near it. Only a number of individuals reached it - delivering several \nboxes of cash ($1bn USD). \nAfter loading the boxes, the yacht disappeared. The operation lasted hours & was kept secret as was yacht's \nidentity, origin and destination \nIt transpired from MBS's inner circles that the $ lbn was from MBS himself & the yacht belonged indirectly to \n@Trump Organisation. #Trump MBS"}]	8
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033195.txt_1671	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033195.txt	Trump University agrees to settle lawsuit for $25 million:	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 8:37:36 PM", "subject": "Trump University agrees to settle lawsuit for $25 million:", "body": "Importance: — High\n\nhttp://www. cnbe.com/2016/11/18/president-elect-donald-trump-nearing-settlement-in-trump-university-case-\nsource. html"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030624.txt_1672	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030624.txt	Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial\nand the witness list which names Virginia Roberts and other young women who allege they were underage\n\nvictims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their\nclaims.\n\nMs Roberts further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and\ninstructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of\nentertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact\ninformation is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is lpm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher\n\nThe Mail on Sunday (New York office)"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/18/2013 10:38:16 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.\nSent from my iPhone"}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030630.txt_1677	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030630.txt	News	[{"sender": "—SSCC", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/8/2016 8:10:26 PM", "subject": "News", "body": "Hi Jeffrey!\n\nHere is a short video of me sailing under Golden Gate Bridge with my Stanford friends. Real] retty_:\nI can't express how happy I am to be here. Totally over the moon every day going to\nand exploring the area.\n\nNow I'm on the way to Tuscon to visit HMMwhose info I sent you for assistant position. She\nwould love to pass interviews with you. She is smart and easy, her mum produced ne movie so\nknows a lot in film industry too besides other assets.\n\nwhat happens with Zubair's project ? Do you believe it can be used in H.Clinton's campaign or the Trump's\none to help her/ him win elections ? His goal is to propose it to them to find out in which states, what\nkind of people should be targeted to collect votes. He says that his algorithms can figure reasons why a\ncategory of people vote against a candidate and to help candidate to adapt the campaign to the people's\npreferences...well, to win elections at the end!"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022824.txt_1680	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022824.txt	off the record	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 6:08 PM", "subject": "off the record", "body": "Landon. the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \" he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz, andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032657.txt_1685	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032657.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/17/2017 6:34:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031680.txt_1694	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031680.txt	null	[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "12/13/2018 10:02:38 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Federal prosecutors are investigating whether U.S. President Donald Trump's inaugural \ncommittee misspent some of the funds it raised, the Wall Street Journal reported on \nThursday, citing people familiar with the matter. \nThe probe opened by the Manhattan U.S. attorney's office is examining whether some of the \ncommittee's donors gave money in exchange for policy concessions, influencing \nadministration positions or access to the incoming administration, the Journal said. \nRead Newsmax: WSJ: Federal Prosecutors Probing Trump Inauguration Spending \nUrgent: Do you approve of Pres. Trump's job performance? Vote Here Now! --"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033207.txt_1700	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033207.txt	Trump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation - The Wall Street Journal.	[{"sender": "David Fiszel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 8:37:33 AM", "subject": "Trump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation - The Wall Street Journal.", "body": "This is pretty cool, Palantir was the only private company invited to yesterday's tech summit. That seems like a huge change post election and bigger oppty. Let's hang in PB.\nI thought you would be interested in the following story from The Wall Street Journal.\nTrump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation\nhttp://www.wsj.com/articles/top-tech-execs-to-meet-trump-to-talk-jobs-regulations-1481724004\nDownload the Wall Street Journal app here: WSJ."}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030618.txt_1707	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030618.txt	Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": ["Sirs"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial\nand the witness list which — other young women who allege they were underage\n\nvictims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their\nclaims.\n\nMs BE tucine: has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and\ninstructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of\nentertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Fred Haddad"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 12:27:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]	4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033561.txt_1720	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033561.txt	Fwd: Why Palm Beach, Florida Is The 'New Greenwich' For Wall Streeters	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/21/2014 10:51:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Why Palm Beach, Florida Is The 'New Greenwich' For Wall Streeters", "body": ""}, {"sender": "BRYAN SUBOTNICK", "recipients": ["Subotnick Stuart", "Prosperi Paul"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 21, 2014 4:35 pm", "subject": "Why Palm Beach, Florida Is The 'New Greenwich' For Wall Streeters", "body": ""}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029959.txt_1722	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029959.txt	Hello	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2016 2:42:38 PM", "subject": "Hello", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nHope all is well with you. Enjoying this political climate 7 I moved from the Trump campaign to Kasich as there was a \nfabulous opportunity to be on his Advisory Committee for Elder Issues. Now, I'm going to try to get on with Trump as an \nadvisor. He's going to have big problems with Trump University and the charge of Senior Financial Abuse in CA and FL. \nAlso, starting a new company helping Seniors age successfully, especially individuals with dementia - the earlier we catch \nit the better. I've been working with a memory center and individuals in DC and it's remarkable the results I've been \nable to achieve over the last year. Of course, only want to work with people/families/guardians that are SERIOUS about \ngetting the best care. I stress 'serious' because I don't want to get into a situation like as last summer. \nHow is Fred? It's just sad sad sad that instead of letting me help him, Joe had me fixing his watch and finding a school \nfor his son... I think of where Fred could be today, and instead he's probably locked up in his apartment with no help that \nhas dementia training — he probably thinks he's crazy by now. Know you like Joe, but it was sad sad sad that he didn't \nlet me do my job. Was it an intentional con? Very few things he said were the truth (but, hey, people liked Bernie \nMadoff too).... \nAnyway — the past. I'm charging in the range of $1000 — 1500 per day plus expenses and it's all highly confidential. A \ncustomized 'mind-body' enhancement to achieve the most out of one's life! And, training for the family to help \ntransition to the 'new reality' with their loved one with later stage dementia. \nI'm in NYC Friday for the annual meeting of the Circumnavigator's Club, and will stay over the weekend. Love to see you \nif you're in town! Would also like to have lunch with Fred - enjoyed his company - but Joe probably won't let that \nhappen 0. \nLove you! And wishing you Love and Happiness,"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033575.txt_1727	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033575.txt	null	[{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein peeyacation@mail.com", "Darren Indyke", "Debbie Fein"], "timestamp": "5/13/2013 10:28:30 PM", "subject": "Farmer Jaffe is suing Donald Trump!", "body": "Farmer Jaffe is suing Donald Trump!\nhttp://www.mypalmbeachpost.cominews/businessilawsuit-lobbed-against-trumps-ownership-of-former-\n/nXjjQ/?icmp=pbp_internallink_invitationbox_apr2013_pbpstubtomypbp_launch"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033213.txt_1739	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033213.txt	Peter Thiel, Trump's Tech Pal, Explains Himself - NYTimes.com	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/11/2017 11:38:08 PM", "subject": "Peter Thiel, Trump's Tech Pal, Explains Himself - NYTimes.com", "body": "https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/11/fashion/peter-thiel-donald-trump-silicon-valley-technology-\ngawker.html?referer=http://www.drudgereport.com/"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016203.txt_1742	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016203.txt	11 questions for Mueller	[{"sender": "editorialstaff@flipboard.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/13/2019 9:06:05 PM", "subject": "11 questions for Mueller", "body": "Interesting stories worth your time.\n\nPlus, the psychology of layoffs and inside JFK Jr.'s final days."}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031657.txt_1744	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031657.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Feb 6, 2017, at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "speak today"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 6, 2017 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes. In NYC actually."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 7, 2017, at 1:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "your man of the people\nhttp://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/02/07/president-barack-obama-kiteboards-horses-around-richard-branson-epic-vacation/97592260/"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 8, 2017 at 12:03 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "It's ok.\nHe didn't wreck world and avoided scandal.\nWhat does Ruemmler say re his attitude towards women?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 5:24:07 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Obama or trump or yours"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027035.txt_1749	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027035.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "does the 23 work in cambridge"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/5/2013 5:59:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Absolutely. 23rd is great. I teach my seminar that day at 1 but could tape in the morning or after class--in my office (very private), or at the Harvardx studios (less) or in the Woodberry poetry room (the nicest place). . If Woody wanted, we could bring some students into the taping or just do the two of us... Woody is absolutely welcome to come to the seminar, of course John McCain, Tony Kushner, Al Gore have all signed on the last 2 days...crazy"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033156.txt_1764	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033156.txt	B727	[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Rich Kahn ne", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "5/27/2011 4:34:44 PM", "subject": "B727", "body": "Trump's B727 sold for 2.7M,.\nSean very discussed with me this company was interested, unless he call you,.\n\nFrom Sean:\n\nThis buyer did have specs on your aircraft. They were looking at a 3.0 million budget but did not make\nan offer and it was too low. we did discuss it"}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026176.txt_1766	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026176.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "9/22/2017 3:15:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait ..\nwill write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if iam here"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017 at 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night ."}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy ®"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in florida ,"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hey shiek .. 1 will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night .. if you\nbussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnx jeff ..im prayingpiabid"}]	9
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032858.txt_1767	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032858.txt	Re: Patterson	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about: \nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be \nable to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a \nsense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have \nsome thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience. \nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal \nopportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting \nyou frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you \ndecidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is \nabout your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and \ntechnical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something \nalong the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and \nperhaps some social media efforts. \nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and \ninterests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, \nexpensive effort. \nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and \nConnolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that \nPatterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely \nbe unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp \nup the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered \nbefore. \nMeanwhile--\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how a \npress campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media controversy \nthan they are of legal threats): \n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not \npublishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the \nquestionable nature of the book; \n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. \nConnolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity \nFair, has refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine; \n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the book, \nand that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe \nPatterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an \nextension of the Patterson franchise into nonfiction, as it has been used in fiction and children's book--\neffectively other authors writing under the Patterson name—presents a host of journalism ethical issues."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 18, 2016, at 11:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 18 March 2016", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": "On the shuttle back to NYC. About to take off"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 4:18:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": "Nuts"}]	4
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026162.txt_1771	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026162.txt	Re: look forward to hearing from you	[{"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 2:56 AM", "subject": "Re: look forward to hearing from you", "body": "What nice coverage in the Huffington Post.\n\nLiving in Europe, I was not aware that Trump's proposed cuts will be so devastating to the scientific community.\n\nYou asked me if I would be in New York September 18. Did you have something in mind?\n\nI am 77 and do not travel so well. I have cut back on my plans to travel. I can consider coming to New York, September has anything to do specifically with the vagus nerve - and if it cannot be done with a conference call on Skype.\n\nI will be able to stop in NYC on a future trip.\nLinda Stone was the person who I met with years ago. It was Linda who suggested that I contact you.\nbest wishes,\n\nStanley"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 25, 2017 3:22 AM", "subject": "Re: look forward to hearing from you", "body": "http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/private-donor-helps-fund-scientists-after-trumps-proposed us 599f532ae4bO0d0ef9f1c129d"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Stanley Rosenberg"], "timestamp": "On 25 Aug 2017, at 09.49", "subject": "Re: look forward to hearing from you", "body": "I recall. Let's skype or phone"}, {"sender": "Stanley Rosenberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/25/2017 10:13:23 AM", "subject": "Re: look forward to hearing from you", "body": "I am free today after 8 o'clock a. m. EST until 3 p.m."}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019871.txt_1772	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019871.txt	Fwd: radical breakthrough	[{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 7:47:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: radical breakthrough", "body": "kashoggi, bunker hunt. george mitchell . wayne owens. prince andrew. princess mette . princes sophie, princess alexandra princess melusine. . bill richardson. bill clinton. hamad bun jasem. donalad trup. gov mapp. governoe young. governoe king. . woody allen . morgain fairchild. mike ovitz. . marvin davis, herb segal. jimmy cyane, jes staleyk , rothchild. agnelli. . karim. prince mbs, mbr, sultan. anas. . jabor, general clarke. , watson minsky church , hillis. . ramascharn, golenbrg, hauser, kosslym, dan gilbert. larry summers. henry rosvsky, steven j gould, . murray gemman, gerffrey west. . haley berry, joan severane. , tom pritzker, leon balck, m.. woody allen, jacuwe lang. , miro."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: radical breakthrough", "body": "1 beards and long hair , are meant to catch and hold smells. ? \n\n2. visiual system cohernant image. . fft . equivament. . for sound. making a coherentt sound. . ? does it make a coeherent concept.? \n\n3. a mental object ie mobject. . action on mental objects. . ? \n\n 4. hope opposite of despair. . bias internal system . accesing reserves. . \n\n5. writing is unnatural. assymentrc speed. . not good for eveeryone. linear. slow. rule based. .\n 6. nose test. telepathy. . \n\n. 7 skin as part of brain? . memebrane. ? \n\n8. ideas or brain connections as knots. slices. tangles links loops. is space knottted. and the speed of light simply mean one time around . obviously a constant. \n\n9 . . intelltignce on surface , needs larger surface area. hence replication. . \n\n10. does the eye tranmsit information. \n\n11/ fear is pain in the future. . \n\n12. music is horizontal and vertical inforamtion ? melody prosgy harmony , all amials. can it be looked at to reengineer the brain. harmony FFT. symphonic learning.\n \n13 individulal vs the group ? ? \n\n14. all senses act in a narrow band. survival. fitness. . \n\n15. drive motivation. goal? \n\n16. deception and its role in biollogy. \n\n17 power. financail. physical mental. . \n\n18. power lawws and probabality. gravity.? \n\n19. plants. communication. surface area. similairy tohumnas. . do we get plant diseases. ?\n 20. biolgy , np complete? \n\n 21 sense calculation matrix. , sound receiver and transionni . gesture. . . tounch . temp.pressure. location. . sight. frequnecey. ( temp_. location. movement. , smell. transmit. recieve. . volatile. amplitude. . disgust? is location a sense. near food? direction. to food. ?\n22 . derivation of the power llaws. \n\n 23 power of words . \n\n24. questions = AI to the minus 1 \n\n25. belief , survival. meachinsim for some. . placebo. \n\n. 26. taste? food? kissing? \n\n27 . mortaltiy tables. why. points on the distribution. wittegenstein. . . \n26. money. agreements. debt . pwer. value wealth. cost.\n27 dreaming all day long \n28 only 6 senses? \n\n29. micro bioome anti biotics. recall smell. ? psyche. memory etc. \n30 / eye transmission \n\n31. numbers , not good for many things\n32. luck what is it . mortality tables\n33 signal processing. . noise. excription\n\ngromov deepak. church. martin. hopkins.danny, joscha watson, chomsky. . . thiel.hoffman, sinofsky . . terje. ehud. bannon. barrak. ruemmler. reid. karp. . woody, blaine. cavett. sultan jabor raafat. anas . joi, reid. wolf. lang. . \\ deepakbarnaby ben masha. , melz eva mosc. bernie. rony , merill. attia, chen, farkas leon . \n\nmembrane computing. FFT. energy to deconstruct. . harmony. . . knots. . the explainer. ( survival ) . matrix algebra, - senses. face /image recogniton. / focus, accupnutre presure massage. pain. placebo illusions, visula aurel. . honest signals. \n\nevolution. resource. rate of loss. . payoff matrix. . cooperation. stochastic games."}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031125.txt_1775	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031125.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Faith Kate", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 11:49:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "She should be so lucky people are nuts"}]	2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032694.txt_1776	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032694.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I know -- have been reading it. Good old MW. You still talk to him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "YuP"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "No doubt he and DT know each other well too. Have to say, he is looking/sounding increasingly unhinged -- are you tempted to take any money off the table in the markets?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no. but no questions donalds statement is goofy. . early dementia?"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 7:17:38 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You be judge -- wasn't here a time when he at least completed sentences?\nhttps://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2o18/oVtrump-cog-decline/548759/"}]	6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026459.txt_1777	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026459.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "11/16/2017 11:47:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will you want to bring back or for the week you are in NY?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "at the moment we will go to lsh on sunday the 26th early then to new york where i will stay the week,\nlarry , it will be and I, trump is in town that week,"}]	3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033142.txt_1783	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033142.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "2/9/2019 10:00:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sasse was told im a witness against trump. ? others were told I m a witness against clinton. . so my\ncredibilitiy needs destroying, . unlikely. :)"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom [qq@...]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 4:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are news!\n\nlam quiet.\n\nHave called for a Chairman’s dinner on Feb 26 to discuss trade. Have mix of biz und govt\nbigfoots. Will need to get someone to staff me. Her job will be push and organize. May\nposition her in DC. As the Zen Master said ‘let’s see’.\n\nOff to Asia mid week.\ntjp"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Saturday, February 9, 2019 2:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "News?"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025636.txt_1794	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025636.txt	Re: an article you may both hate. or like.	[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nLawrence\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total.\n\nOn confronting dogma, I of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are much more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find dismantling myths of \"American exceptionalism\" or \"Israeli self-defense\" or Obama's mass murder campaign, etc., offensive — so be it.\n\nBut I don't see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while recognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their beliefs are confronted with evidence. I also don't see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as I don't think we should ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with argument and evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular dogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For example, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that the US, unlike other countries, has a \"transcendental purpose,\" and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to its purpose doesn't matter because the facts are just \"abuse of history\" while real history is \"the evidence of history as our minds reflect it,\" then it's hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There's no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR profession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters.\n\nOn Davis, I frankly think that's a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment require (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sep 10, 2015, at 12:02 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "I think religion plays a major positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss <111>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Ps. My piece argued against fanaticism."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Sep 18, 2015, at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "you can invite depp to visit us when you are in the caribean"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/18/2015 6:26:27 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "When I was with him yesterday I told him we were going to caribbean and he asked where.. He has an island in bahamas, making you two the only people I know who own islands..:) will ask him if he is free then. He is remarkable in new movie, though the film itself is not fantastic.. he is also a pretty good guitarist., his show with alice cooper and joe perry in la was great."}]	6
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032512.txt_1802	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032512.txt	Re: TSA	[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: TSA", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nTSA called me,. They inform closing TSA inspection at 3pm,,\nAsked if we could depart 2:30pm,?\n\nIs 2:30pm ok for departure,,\n\nOtherwise it would be after Trump's departure between 4 and 5pm\n\nIs 2:30pm inspection / departure ok?\n\nThx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "Mar 5, 2017, at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: TSA", "body": "are you at the plane already?"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/5/2017 4:21:06 PM", "subject": "Re: TSA", "body": "Not yet,. I'll be there at 12:30pm"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026317.txt_1806	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026317.txt	Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs	[{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 11:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "Jeffrey: \nHow's all in our crazy world? \nI'm in NY until August 31 (then again, after Beijing, Sept. 25 — Oct. 14). If you are in town, meet? \nWhen convenient, I'd like you to meet Peter Getzels, Closer To Truth producer/director (I've worked with \nPeter for 12 years); he would very much like to meet you in person, describe the Radical Breakthroughs \nprocess in detail, get your feedback. He would come up from DC. We can always do Skype, of course, but \nPeter would appreciate to meet in person early in the process. Breakthroughs is a Big Project, big opportunity \nfor impact. All are truly excited. \nBelow are highlights of Breakthroughs progress. \nAttached is latest CNN on trade war and below are links (caution: a few weeks old is ancient history in Trump \ntime). \nThe US trade war against China: The view from Beijing \nhttps://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d514f3551544f78457a6333566d54/share_p.html \nHow should China handle the trade war? \nhttps://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d774d3449544d79457a6333566d54/share_p.html \nLove to discuss stuff \nRobert \nRadical Breakthrough Development Work \n• Research on each of the 13 episodes is ongoing and we are moving towards creating a short list of the top \ncontributors per episode (with some contributors in multiple episodes). \n• We are aggregating the top contributors around 4 to 5 central locations, such as SF Bay Area, LA, Chicago, \nBoston, New York, Santa Fe, London, Oxford, and Cambridge for the main shoots. \n• We are creating a short list of locations for the secondary shoot - i.e. the more observational shoots on \nspecific labs and research facilities, such as the Music Lab at McGill, the Sleep Lab at Harvard. \n• We are planning a recce in the autumn to assess locations and meet some of the key contributors. \n• We've brought on a production manager / line producer as we develop detailed research, contributors, \nlocations, budgets. \n• Our team is working toward interviewing and hiring a top science-literate associate producer / dedicated \nresearch producer. We've been coordinating with colleagues at HHMI (Howard Hughes Medical Association) \nas well as National Geographic for staffing referrals, and now have a strong short list. This is a critical, long-\nterm position. \n• We are assessing graphics and animation companies and researching styles and graphic ideas that we might \nuse to communicate some of the more complex ideas. \n• Our digital team is researching a web extension for the www.closertotruth.com website, developing ideas for \na dedicated site neighborhood for \"Radical Breakthroughs.\" We are in discussions with several website \ndesign companies, including the company that designed and built our original CTT site, for ideas and bids on \ncreating the expanded site. \n• By mid-October, we expect to begin to schedule the shoots."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Aug 19, 2018, at 7:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "I might return , to ny this week not sure yet"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Aug 19, 2018, at 10:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "If return, let me know; if not, I'm back Sept 25 - Oct. 14."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/23/2018 6:28:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Radical Breakthroughs", "body": "Two short commentaries on our favorite Trade War - CNBC yesterday, Fox Business today. \nCNBC - August 22, 2018 \nhttps://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/08/22/us-and-china-have-self-\nfulfilling-prophecies-on-both-sides-for-trade-says-expert.html \nFox Business - August 23, 2018 \nhttp://video.foxbusiness.com/v/5825805484001/?plavlist id=3166411 \n554001#sp=show-clips"}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030575.txt_1812	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030575.txt	RE: <no subject>	[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 11:17 PM", "subject": "RE: <no subject>", "body": "I think this is a great article I think= was clearly very nice.. .1 remember when I got the call when she was thinking about her \nwriting the article 8 years ago...she was spot on here this is the article that citrick should work off of... \nHome all night"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:48 PM", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}, {"sender": "gmax <gmaxl@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.comionline/daily/2on/o3/notes- on-new-\nyorks- o ddest-couple-j effrey- epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html \nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky- ward> \nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM \n\n\"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. You will \nnever think the same way about anything again.\" \n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at \nthe moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. \nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes —and now there is talk of \nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations \nthat he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have \nzeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his \nold pal. \nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that focused \non his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the \nchairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is \ncurrently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million. \nThe piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with \nwhom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the issue that \nremains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. \nThis is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on \nthe intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And \ntheir stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about \nEpstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, I am so bored \nof repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight \n—that I have decided to write about this myself. \nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running \ninto both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with \nhim who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember asking him once, nodding \nat his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you,Vicky,\" was his riposte. \nI remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't \nstudied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home \nvia messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\" \nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. \n\"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was \ncertainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few moments \nin his company and you know this to be true. \nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that \"Andy\" \n—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. \nBecause if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he's talking about far \nmore than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him. \nAnd Ghislaine? \nFull disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. \nShe is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours talking \nto her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is curious. She has \nspent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent me a DVD of the fish \nthere. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even Rupert Murdochs'. She is \nvery well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill Clinton with whom she is close \nfriends. \nYet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-Platero, \n(known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When it comes \ndown to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. \nAnd that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. \n\"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck; inconsolable. \nAnd then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\" \nIn many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect replacement \nfor her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his sexual pecadillos, but \nthen Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving a massive \"black hole\" he'd \nfraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that strange. \nIn fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful people \nin the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues, and moved \ncountries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don't tend to get to the top \nby being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn't quite manage a normal life \n—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he has been open about. \nSo what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her loyalty \nto friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look at Waksal \nand Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for all sorts of \nblemishes."}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032864.txt_1814	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032864.txt	trump delegate? fun	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "5/10/2016 8:17:34 PM", "subject": "trump delegate? fun", "body": "trump delegate? fun"}]	1
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026517.txt_1834	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026517.txt	FW: shortest books of all time	[{"sender": "Joel Dunn", "recipients": ["Nicholas Gahhos", "John Stepck", "Ed Hammer", "Bob & Sandy", "Joe Bridges"], "timestamp": "Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:35:50 -0700 (PDT)", "subject": "shortest books of all time", "body": "The Shortest Books of All Time\nMY BLACK GIRLFRIENDS\n\nBy Tiger Woods\n\nTHINGS I LOVE ABOUT MY COUNTRY\nBy Jane Fonda and Cindy Sheehan\nIllustrated by Michael Moore\n\nForward by George Soros\n\nMY CHRISTIAN ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND HOW I HELPED AFTER KATRINA"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["terry@impactoutdoor.com"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 19, 2013 12:25 PM", "subject": "Re: shortest books of all time", "body": "Now that is really funny!!!"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Mark L. Epstein", "Jeffery Edwards [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Warren Eisenstein"], "timestamp": "8/19/2013 8:34:18 PM", "subject": "FW: shortest books of all time", "body": ""}]	3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032506.txt_1855	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032506.txt	Masa	[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Lando", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/3/2017 2:57:50 PM", "subject": "Masa", "body": "Have you met Masa yet? Seems to me he is a person you should know and you are a person he should\nknow.\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/03/business/dealbook/masayoshi-son-sprint-and-a-bet-on-the-\n\ntrump-economy.html?hp&action=click type=Homepage&clickSource=story-\n\nheading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028620.txt_1864	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028620.txt	null	[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/23/2018 2:04:15 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Looks like Mick Mulvaney is out before he starts - knew it after his comments about DJT came public-"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032441.txt_1865	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032441.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "15 Jan 2017, at 04:17", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is trading , now that trump has won. ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 05:51", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what about real trades? what number?"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "People are just back and the activity really started this week. A lot of enquiries out of China and a lot of \nbuyers in the US have resurfaced"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 06:22", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i stepped away from the royal jet. if you want to go after the bbj"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/15/2017 2:27:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why? \nV-BR \nAlireza ITTIHADIEH"}]	5
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032231.txt_1867	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032231.txt	Re: Fw: Meet?	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 2:06:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Meet?", "body": "ABC doesn't really have an \"investigative unit\" so unless you want to hand it to them they won't pursue, so ignore. But, nevertheless, the more Trump looks real, or perish the thought, inevitable, the more reporters are going to focus on this, so, as you will not be surprised, you need a strategy."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mosk, Matthew", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 6:08 PM", "subject": "Meet?", "body": "Mr. Weinberg —\n\nI am a reporter with the ABC News investigative unit. We are gathering background research on the major candidates for President.\n\nSeeing that both former President Clinton and Mr. Trump have been mentioned in connection to the Jeffrey Epstein case, I am interested in better understanding the case, it’s current status, and any information that could help explain Mr. Epstein’s dealings and interactions with both men.\n\nI would very much appreciate the chance to meet and discuss this subject in an off the record conversation at your earliest convenience.\n\nPlease let me know if that would be possible, and if so, when and where we could meet.\n\nMany thanks,\n\nMatthew"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030950.txt_1869	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030950.txt	Re: Jawbone/Mort	[{"sender": "Ian Osborne", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Jawbone/Mort", "body": "Are you back now in NY? \nI'm in London but staying up to watch the Obama speech. Hosain's really keen to close this out by Monday.... \nIt would help me a lot if we can finish this for once and for all. \nI'm in Munich Saturday, then St. Petersburg and Moscow with Eike Sunday-Tuesday (we've got some terrific \nmeetings lined up), London Wednesday-Thursday (including Mubadala board meeting Wed.) and then heading \nto SF next Friday 14th.... you will arrive on the 16th? Shall we do Peter Thiel for drinks then? \nBest wishes, \nIan"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Ian Osborne"], "timestamp": "6 Sep 2012, at 11:52", "subject": "Re: Jawbone/Mort", "body": "Ill review all in detail , when i land tonight, in ny for the next week, you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Ian Osborne"], "timestamp": "7 Sep 2012, at 03:20", "subject": "Re: Jawbone/Mort", "body": "yes, who else , ? im meeting with sinofsky„ i think he wants to do different things. chinese may be \ndifficult becuase of us secuirty cleraence"}, {"sender": "Ian Osborne", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/7/2012 2:40:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Jawbone/Mort", "body": "What else are you interested in? Peter is best for currency; maybe Reid Hoffman (fatty at LinkedIn) or Dave \nMorin (Path) or Drew Houston (Dropbox). \nI do believe China offers the best opportunities for Sinofsky. Problem is after Windows, pretty much everything \nelse in the US is a step down. No-one else is building an OS. Alibaba or Xiaomi in China are. But if he wants to \nstay in the US, then probably the best options are Facebook (who may one day do their own OS), Palantir (Peter \nThiel's), Yahoo (where Marissa is aggressively seeking out senior talent). Then of course, there is Apple and \nGoogle - but I assume he doesn't want to be a traitor to Microsoft?"}, {"sender": "Craig Jacoby", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "September 5, 2012 7:27:21 PM EDT", "subject": "Jawbone/Mort", "body": "Hi Darren, \nJust checking back in on the Jawbone investment. Thanks for sending across your comments. If possible, we \nwould like to avoid a situation where we recirculate the investment agreements in place with Jawbone's \nother investors, and our hope is that we can accommodate as many of your comments as possible short of \ntaking that step. \nWe think that the best way to address your comments would be to have Jawbone enter into a new purchase \nagreement covering both the preferred and the common stock being sold to Mort. Jawbone would make its \nrepresentations and warranties anew upon the closing of the purchase agreement, so Mort would not be \nrelying on the reps made back in June 2011, nor on the schedule of exceptions prepared in connection with \nthe initial closing. The new purchase agreement would have the same closing conditions that applied to the \ninitial closing of the JP Morgan investment. \nGiven the affiliation between Mort, Hedosophia and Apoletto and their collective investment in preferred \nand common stock, we also want to propose that Mort (along with the other two parties) be treated as a \n\"Major Investor\" under the Investor Rights Agreement so long as their collective holdings of preferred and \ncommon stock remains at least equal to 2,000,000 shares. We intend to do this with a side letter that would \nnot require the signature of the other parties to those documents. You have already seen the draft \namendment that would expand the definition of \"Registrable Securities\" in the investor rights agreement to \ninclude the common stock being purchased by Mort, and we do anticipate that our principal investors will \nquickly sign that document once we circulate it. \nYou had indicated a desire to have JP Morgan approve the sale of Series 5 Preferred outside of the existing \npurchase agreement. As I indicated to you on the phone, we do not think that this is necessary, but we are \nwilling to obtain from them an acknowledgement to that effect prior to the closing of Mort's investment. \nWe do believe, however, that various of your other requests for change in the investor documents would \nrequire a broader amendment and restatement of the applicable documents, and some of them concern \nbusiness points that were the subject of specific negotiation with JP Morgan and others of our investors in \nprior rounds. These points include your comments to the drag along rights, the registration rights, the \ninformation rights and the venue provisions. We would like those terms to remain as we had negotiated \nthem with JP Morgan. \nIf you are comfortable with the approach outlined in this email, we can get you draft documents, including a \ndraft updated Schedule of Exceptions, tomorrow for your review and approval. Please let me know. \nBest regards, \nCraig D. Jacoby"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031496.txt_1871	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031496.txt	Re: Saudi money	[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have been called in to help on a big NYT investigation into how low oil prices have been effecting the personal finances of royal family in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they called in much of their cash from the likes of BlackRock and others but I thought you might have some ideas. Maybe some people to talk to? I would think its more than cutting down on yachts and private planes or selling real estate in Paris, Istanbul, London. Any thoughts? PS: does my story on Abraaj get me a meeting with Gates next time he is in town:)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a tribe, called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local costco.. but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20 years, social media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in. with the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. it is the americans that are demanding women drive, not the saudis"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 1:41:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?"}]	3