thread_id
stringlengths 37
43
| source_file
stringlengths 35
37
| subject
stringlengths 0
231
⌀ | messages
stringlengths 88
34.9k
| message_count
int64 1
42
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030745.txt_2613
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030745.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [GMax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:18", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes,,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:31", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iam on the phone with other attny getting you an answer."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [GMax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 2:36:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ok"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032050.txt_2628
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032050.txt
|
The New York Times: Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business
|
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/22/2019 10:56:44 PM", "subject": "The New York Times: Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business", "body": "Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business\nThe New York Times\nPresident Trump's former lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, discussed possible irregularities at the Trump\nOrganization. He wants a reduced prison sentence. Read the full story\nShared from Apple News"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031329.txt_2630
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031329.txt
|
Middle East Update - May 25-31, 2011
|
[{"sender": "Middle East Update [middle.east.update@hotmail.com]", "recipients": ["Middle East Update [middle.east.update@hotmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2011 10:47:23 PM", "subject": "Middle East Update - May 25-31, 2011", "body": "Middle East Update\n\nMay 25-31, 2011\n\nSyria\nInternational pressure on Damascus is mounting. After the US imposed sanctions on the Syrian leadership earlier in May,\n\nthe EU foreign ministers agreed to impose travel bans and to freeze the assets of President Assad and nine other Syrian\nsenior officials. Within days of the EU announcement, Canada invoked similar travel and economic sanctions.\n\nWhile Russia blocked any reference in the G8 communiqué to the possibility of deferring the issue of Syria to the UN\nSecurity Council, the communiqué’s compromise language illustrates the international community's increased pressure on\nthe regime. The G8 leaders stated that they were “appalled” by the death of peaceful protesters and called on the Syrian\nleadership to immediately stop using force against its people or the G-8 countries would “consider taking further measures’.\n\nAt the same time, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallan—the leader of the Lebanese party Hizbullah—called on the Syrian people to\ngive the government time to effectuate reforms, arguing that President Assad believes in reforming the system and is\ndetermined to implement change. The Hizbullah leader denied that his party has dispatched fighters to assist the Syrian\nregime in quelling the protest movement. Anti-lran and -Hizbullah slogans were chanted in a number of Syrian cities in\nresponse to Nasrallah’s defense of the regime and his pictures were burned in Deir Ezzor in eastern Syria.\n\nSyrian protesters declared Friday “the day of the Guardians of the Homeland’—a reference to the Syrian armed forces—in\nan effort to encourage the army to join the uprising. Security and military forces appear, however, to be stepping up their\ncampaign in an attempt to end the protests. Tens of people were killed or wounded over the weekend and tanks have\nentered two suburbs of the city of Homs, Rastan, and Talbiseh. The heavy-handed repression by police and military officials\nmay lead demonstrators to consider a recourse to arms.\n\nThe government is cracking down on protesters’ use of social media, but, in contrast to what occurred in Egypt, it has\nrefrained from a general shut down of the internet. Security officials are forcing dissidents to turn over their Facebook\n\npasswords and have switched off 3G mobile networks in order to prevent the uploading of protestor videos to YouTube.\nThe electricity and phone service has been cut off in neighborhoods where discontent is mounting.\n\nFacebook and, in particular, its “Syrian Revolution 2011” page, has been a vital platform for activists to mobilize protests\nand to disseminate information. Syria has over 580,000 Facebook users. In response to government measures, protesters\nhave created multiple Facebook pages under different names and have given their Facebook passwords to friends in case\nthey are arrested or disappear and their comments opposing the Assad regime need to be quickly removed from personal\nwebpages.\n\nSyrian activists acknowledge their debt to the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions, further improvising and improving on their\ntactics on a daily basis in an effort to avoid retribution by the regime and to sustain the protest movement. Daytime\ndemonstrations have moved to the evening in order to make it more difficult for security forces to identify individual protesters\nand to single them out for arrest. After dark, protesters can disperse to unlit alleyways to escape arrest—a tactic Syrian\nactivists call “tayyara” or flying.\n\nYemen\n\nThe authority of President Saleh’s government continues to erode rapidly and Yemen appears to be edging closer towards\na civil war. Tribal fighters in the capital of Sanaa, have gained control of key ministries, including the Interior Ministry.\n\nBrigades from the Republican Guard—the President’s main forces—have surrendered to tribal fighters east and west of the\ncapital who have succeeded in blocking their deployment to Sanaa.\n\nAccording to well-informed sources, the Vice President, the Prime Minister, and the Speaker of the Yemeni Consultative\nCouncil have tried to convince President Saleh to sign the agreement mediated by the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) in"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030751.txt_2636
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030751.txt
|
more to follow
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "3/30/2015 1:52:00 AM", "subject": "more to follow", "body": "Pg 5 first par — reporter speaks about a “sex slave ring” and speaks in the plural “sex slaves” suggesting more\nthan one accusation\n\nPg 8 Ist par — reporter should clarify that the young women at your house (and later on your plane) are\ncomely but clearly not underage\n\nPg 20- might lead a reader to think you helped clients hide wealth raises flags)\n\nPg 21 — Hoffenberg mentioned — I assume from what everyone including J Sweet says he is nuts but not\nflattering and totally irrelevant to the story\n\nPg 25 — quoting you on massages — your adversaries will exploit this to show a lack of remorse, minimizing\nthe conduct ete -\n\nPg 25-26 — don’t help him with SG — he’s confusing SG and HR — whatever SGs age her website said she was\n18\n\nPg 26 — he loops back to your “description” which opens reporter up to tough depoto\n\nPg 28 — your quotes re NPA being Kafkaesque..... can be exploited to harm you\n\nPg 30 — he writes about VR — “new chapter” — sounds like he is quoting you — he can preface it with\n“according to court papers...” and not suggest you are narrating the description of the VR allegations\n\nPg 31 — he writes that you said this “this is all utterly false” re VR allegations should limit denial to Clinton,\nGore —\n\nPg 31 — he writes that VR is now suing you for 50M _ not true case over.\n\nPg 31-2 — close to end where he says in essence the only thing you regret is not being more circumspect re\nlegal advice — not wise ,"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022945.txt_2638
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022945.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients, he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife. boies is going to be in the fining line, from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG„ his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. -- ... phone only"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i am more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 2:55:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030989.txt_2640
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030989.txt
|
Wolff Book
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 10:28:52 PM", "subject": "Wolff Book", "body": "iam sure you read attached articles already on internet..\n\nhttps://www.rawstory.com/2019/05/new-book-paints-sordid-picture-of-trump-real-estate-deal-involving-russian-oligarch-and-jeffrey-epstein/"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032736.txt_2646
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032736.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 24, 2018, at 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown? ref=home"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 12:19:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He is scaring the shit out of me now. He could well tank global economy. Can Barrack talk sense to him anymore?\nMaybe it's time for you to jump in now. Given how he is throwing caution to wind in such epic fashion, why wouldn't he take your call?\nGive it a shot!"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.txt_2647
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"Sweetheart deal! \" So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and now-friend -- Jeffrey Epstein. The critique is profoundly misplaced, supported neither by the law or the facts, nor by the structure of our constitutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey was subjected to an unprecedented federal intrusion into a quintessentially local criminal matter in south Florida. His offense to the social order -- involving sex for hire -- was entirely a matter entrusted to laws of the several States, not the federal government. His conduct -- a classic state offense --was being treated exactly that way by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County, but the overweening federal government intruded where it did not belong. And now, over ten years after the fact, the current assault on federal decision-makers at the time, including now-Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta (then the United States Attorney in south Florida), condemns the federal authorities for not going far enough.\n\nThe critics are entirely wrong. Neither the facts nor the law support the misguided criticisms being leveled by journalists and politicians at federal officials from over a decade ago -- including the highest levels of the Justice Department in Washington, D.C. .\n\nHere are the key facts: Jeffrey Epstein, a successful self-made businessman with no prior criminal history whatever, engaged in illegal conduct that amounts to solicitation of prostitution. That was wrong, and it was reasonably viewed as a violation of Florida state law. Although no coercion, violence, alcohol, drugs and the like were involved, the unsavory facts were carefully assessed by experienced state prosecutors who aggressively enforce state criminal laws. No one turned a blind eye to potential offenses to the public order. To the contrary, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office conducted an extensive 15-month investigation, led by the chief of the Sex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then indicted by a state grand jury on a single felony count of solicitation of prostitution.\n\nDuring that intense investigation, the state prosecutors extensively gathered and analyzed the evidence, met face-to-face with many of the asserted victims, considered their credibility -- or lack thereof -- and considered"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thoughts."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/15/2018 5:03:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Seems very good. Is there reason or opportunity here to evoke JE's Clinton connection? He had been publicly connected to the former President and became a proxy for the considerable anger at high levels of the Federal government that still surrounded Clinton. Likewise now, one reason to revive the story is that it is a way to tara Trump administration official, who, in the normal course of his duties, happened to deal with the case."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033428.txt_2649
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033428.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/5/2019 5:44:43 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.vox.com/2019/2/5/18211600/trump-inauguration-investigation-subpoena-sdny"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030399.txt_2650
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030399.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie SpineIla"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 6:31:20 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/20 1 8/0 1 /michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029891.txt_2651
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029891.txt
|
RE: Jane Doe
|
[{"sender": "Jacquie Johnson [jacquie.johnson@domain]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell [jessica.cadwell@domain]", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson [jacquie.johnson@domain]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:47 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I didnt forget about this...\nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell [jessica.cadwell@domain]", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo PTT ; oir forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson [jacquie.johnson@domain]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030616.txt_2653
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030616.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 19 2009 11:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida money manager who once roamed in the same social circle as Bill Clinton, Prince \nAndrew and other high profile figures, is going to be released from prison early, a source tells \nRadarOnline.com. \nEpstein pleaded guilty last year to procuring teen girls for prostitution, ending his lifestyle with the rich and \nfamous in a Palm Beach, Florida scandal that reverberated through high-profile society. He received an 18-\nmonth sentence and was slated to be incarcerated until the end of this year. \nBut now, says the source, the jail door is about to swing open because Epstein has been secretly helping the feds \nunravel a suspected Ponzi scheme. He had inside knowledge of the scheme because he was one of its victims, \nlosing $67 million. \nThe source says it's all tied to the indictment of former managers of Bear Stearns Mortgage Investment Fund, and \nin that case Epstein is the person who is identified only as Victim # 1. \nMeanwhile, Epstein's life behind bars hasn't been too rough — in fact he's allowed to spend most days at his \nattorney's office. He was supposedly working on a charity venture but the source says he was actually busy \nhelping the feds with the Ponzi scheme. One source says that he's been guarded by men in suits with \nearphones. \nWell if those suits are going to follow him when he's freed they better pack bathing suits. Epstein owns Little St. \nJames Island in the Virgin Islands."}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Can you cut and paste and email to my blackberry...I can't open this up. Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Fri Jun 19 16:17:18 2009", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.radaronline.com/category/tags/jeffrey-epstein \nHELP ; a reporter for the ny times wants to write the following; Epsteins lawyers were contacted and they said they had no comment.. We \nhave checked with some of the worlds financial experts ,both in and out of govt , the consensus is that if Epstein is cooperating with the \nfeds the average intelligence of the u.s. government , just went up dramatically."}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022443.txt_2656
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022443.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis TS", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 2:28:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Jeffrey — | told u weeks ago that Davis would issue a report critical of Leon and board read article in Post business page\nre Davis Report and Caesars — and DJT will be President -- Nick"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026074.txt_2658
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026074.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "nathan myrhvold. suggested you use him as a refrence for masa. on another note. lots of investigations going slow as no one to lead , but when the justice dept staff gets filled. OY."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, April 21 2017 05:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Will give that a try. Bill Gates would carry more of a punch:) Saw Mnuchin/Cohn in DC --they are talking a big game but I don't know if they can deliver on tax reform. What do you think? I don't know why Trump does not reach out to Schumer -- two outer borough guys who know each other and can talk to each other. He has to move away from the right wing nutters back to the middle which is his natural space anyway."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032671.txt_2662
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032671.txt
|
RE:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, December 11, 2017 9:12 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-smear-c/"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 3:43:25 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Weird connections....i know glenn simpson very well....more to be said about that when | see you"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023314.txt_2664
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023314.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "josh's arrival cut short our needed conversation. I understand we have a difference of opinion. friends sometimes disagree, I shook on the 20 so you have no further obligation, none, I am willing to have brad karp hear both sides. as my view , you andi had an agreement. on phaidon /publishing, and then a long standing what you say is 28 , which is correct AFTer TAX. , 37 pre. . that was our numbers. I was clear what i thought the transactions were worth. far less than full. alanetc. , had you saidi will pay you only 20. i would have said ill pass. you never told me that 50-60 the number that i put on the table at the very beginning was not right. you asked that i lay out my plan step by step. and what i believe would have been the fair thing to do is say to me, I will pay you only 20if you do asiask, not tell me for the first time only after i laid it all out. had it not been you, 1 would have required payment in escrow. BEFORE fyithe reason I sent you an invoice so that if you decided that you wanted me to continue this year . it would be applied to last years income. I think today was a beginiing for you. Iam glad I will meet wendy the 23, rd, . separate and aprt from being your sounding board for personal issues, I do not see my involvment moving forward."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella PO"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:56 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "this was sent four months ago, nothing has changed sent oct 15. before big transaction.\n\nOffice, - adagoes. , hire heather a paralegal. Joslin goes or is closely managed by new cfo with tax experience. .castrucii goes asap.as he merely adds to mess.( too many people , ex 7 people or more to pay a bill ) eva goes. outsource as much as possible.. bookkeeping systems built from scratch, airplane restructure, boat . same, new grats. phaidon sale , decide on artspace survivability, regan, . do the kids really want these? , children accounting ie bens house.etc. re do estate for new facts. redo loans, trading accounts activity, . gaming -foreign- disclosures. . BRH TRA re thinks . household and construction architects. . redone. art partnership , choice of paintings. . re do structure of consultants. tax re family office. . decide if investments are a realistic option in the next three years.. insurance. operations. airplane , etc. . artfoundation , private. max charity contributions. financial reports. still waiting. ? on line banking, . tax planning, family office deductions ( profit center ). airplane certificate, redone jet aviation redo. . _— paper gigi ( E )trust to avoid gift tax. ."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:31 AM", "subject": "ask alan why he hasnt explained this to you since novmebr", "body": "Tenancy in common is a type of shared ownership of property, where each owner owns a share of the property. Unlike in a joint tenancy, these shares can be of unequal size, and can be freely transfered to other owners both during life and via a will. Even if owners own unequal shares, however, all owners have the right to occupy and use all of the property."}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033209.txt_2669
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033209.txt
|
Fwd: Cavett's guilt and horror..
|
[{"sender": "Lesley Groft", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/20/2016 10:33:15 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Cavett's guilt and horror..", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Dick Cavett <dickcavett@example.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley"], "timestamp": "December 20, 2016 at 5:26:17 PM EST", "subject": "Cavett's guilt and horror..", "body": "Dear Lesley,\n\nHORRORS!\n\nI have committed the (to me) unpardonable error of inflicting upon Jeffrie -- today on the phone - a false anagram. Please spare him the pain of passing it on in its erroneous form.\n\nHere is the correct version:\n\nThe letters in PRESIDENT TRUMP -- re-arranged -- spell: MR. PUTIN'S RED PET.\n\nThanks, Lesley. The chicken matter touches my heart. Dick C."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016671.txt_2672
|
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016671.txt
|
Fw: WPB/NYC Water Quality Data
|
[{"sender": "David Hanks/WESTPALM", "recipients": ["Eduardo Balbis/WESTPALM@WESTPALM"], "timestamp": "12/03/2008 10:33 AM", "subject": "WPB/NYC Water Quality Data", "body": "Please let know if you want any changes made. NCY produces 1.1 billion mgd per day.\n\nBelow is what they say about their treatment process:\n\nWater Treatment\n\nAll surface water and groundwater entering New York\nCity’s distribution system is treated with chlorine, fluoride,\nfood grade phosphoric acid and, in some cases, sodium\nhydroxide. New York City uses chlorine to meet the New\nYork State Sanitary Code and federal Safe Drinking Water\nAct (SDWA) disinfection requirements. Fluoride, at a\nconcentration of one part per million, is added to help\nprevent tooth decay and has been added since 1966 in\naccordance with the New York City Health Code. Phosphoric\nacid 1s added to create a protective film on pipes that\nreduces the release of metals such as lead from household\nplumbing. Sodium hydroxide is added to Catskill/Delaware\nwater to raise the pH and reduce corrosivity."}, {"sender": "EBalbis@wpb.org", "recipients": ["SHannah@TownofPalmBeach.com"], "timestamp": "12/03/2008 01:26 PM", "subject": "Fw: WPB/NYC Water Quality Data", "body": "Sarah,\n\nWe have obtained information about the water supply in NYC as requested. Note that the City of NY\nproduces about 33 times the amount of water than the City of West Palm Beach. We tried to compile\ndata that can be comparable. However, NYC act as their own State agency and track different\nparameters than the State of Florida. See below for additional information."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026229.txt_2676
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026229.txt
|
Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey —\n\nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I can send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:\nADDRESS LINE 1:\nADDRESS LINE 2:\n\nMany thanks.\n\nBest,\nSteven"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "just send to peggy. youherco. its better for her"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028972.txt_2677
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028972.txt
|
Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Jack Goldberger", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Alan M. Dershowitz", "Roy Black"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:59:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 28, 2016, at 12:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["a"], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["'Martin G. Weinberg'"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. we’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is PY and I’m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\nReuters News\n\nThomson Reuters"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026674.txt_2683
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026674.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/22/2017 5:46:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Plus: my senior Chinese friends tell me the top gave Trump the go ahead to take on North Korea.\nNo idea if it's real."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "22 Apr 2017, at 18:23", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When can I call you ?"}, {"sender": "David Stern <P>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When can I call you ?"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030602.txt_2693
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030602.txt
|
Re: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has some questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Thank you!\nI heard that he is not that fun but i trust your judgement. It would be blast that you are here. I was just flirting with 22 years old hot blond blue eyes mexican chick. It turns out she is with her husband. Did not have chance to check him out. But as we concluded, anything good is rented;)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "hes great fun"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Just had mtg with Andrew. He is great.\nJee - i think that i would trade davos for a good fashion week. Much more fun."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 02:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "i understand the ratio of run to leap is way too high"}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023328.txt_2707
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023328.txt
|
new info
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad S Ki clonic Spin! a", "leon"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:47 AM", "subject": "new info", "body": "brad, leon.\n\nAfter I spoke to you both, I excused myself from a dinner with some heads of state to walk into the bathroom to make some calls re 8865. I wondered whether any group that we could assert had control had filed in the past years. I called Fenn and he told me- yes.???!! he said that on friday , for the first time he learned that AGM was not delinquent at all. and had filed. !!| I asked why no one had ever told me or given me the purported justification for no filings in the past for the founders. and he said Well, sorry, it was discussed on fridays call. ? the calli was not on . not invited to ,the call wechsler didnt listen in and joslin didnt transmit ,ifitis true. Im also now told there is a note from Deloitte re 13 and 14 that says the founders DO NOT have to file. but fenn could not tell me who wrote it and said Deloitte says to ignore it. , that s why they are pushing now.\n\nsteps 1 8865 has many exemptions for filing. let see if we can find one . ( an elegant position might be josh and agm if he is panicked and leave us out ). The requirments are FACT specific , so without the facts we still have nothing. fenn said he has now put someone on it\n\n2 leon, I suggest need to focus on 1040 , 2015. , we may even consider filing the minimum 8865 , and wait until we are sure of our specific requirements, and file an amendment for 15 as well as past. no harm no foul"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinel: iii"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:34 PM", "subject": "new info", "body": "Leon, Iam on the verge of giving up. sorry. I cannot deal with the major incompetence of your family office. I have been vocal about change. you have made none. john castrucci, still involved ete. the bullshit corporate speak, of -our accounting dept , our bookeeping dept our finance dept, the comptroller . now gives me responses that --we have heard from Deloitte , I ask, who at Deloite?. -- dont know , the new team at Deloite says the old team was wrong ! what new team? what old team? -- dont know. . Pwe agrees who at"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032285.txt_2713
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032285.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:07:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032393.txt_2716
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032393.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Viet Lesley Croft is"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 15, 2016 11:16 am", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wont leave until 8 pm torow"}, {"sender": "Lvjet", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 4:29:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "message received,,, not before 8pm very good\n\nNOTE,.\n\nUPdated President Elect schedule:\n\nTrump Plane to arrive Orlando at 5pm friday for event,. then arrive Palm Beach estimate 10pm,. He usually runs late, so\n11pm could be realistic time for his PBI Arrival,.\n\n***the airport only shuts down for 20 min before and after his arrival,.\n\nI'll keep you posted if time changes,.\n\nthx\nLarry"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033235.txt_2725
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033235.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/9/2017 9:22:35 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.mansionglobal.com/articles/61984-trump-looking-to-unload-caribbean-beach-estate?link=TD_marketwatch home _page.83461b39d1bfc251&utm_source=marketwatch home _page.83461b39d1bfce251&utm campaign=circular&utm medium=MANSIONGLOBALS&locale="}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030584.txt_2726
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030584.txt
|
RE:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:28 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes- on-new-\nyorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell. html\n>\n\nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky- ward>\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“T’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been. You will\nnever think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at\nthe moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations\nthat he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have\nzeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his\nold pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused\non his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the\nchairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is\ncurrently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with\nwhom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that\nremains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on\nthe intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And\ntheir stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about\nEpstein and Maxwell. Whois he? And the British, especially, want to know: Whois she? At this point, Iam so bored\nof repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight\n—that I have decided to write about this myself."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 08:58 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "What is this??? When this will stop. This is crazy.\nAnd you are NOT 57;)\n\nAnd certainly you are NOT socially awkward.\nWho is that idiot.\n\nBoris"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025233.txt_2744
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025233.txt
|
Approach Summary
|
[{"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Picasso Overview_pdf.html", "Untitled attachment 63876.htm", "RepDef-Process-Deck_pdf.html", "Untitled attachment 63879.htm", "company-overview_pdf.html", "Untitled attachment 63882.htm"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 16 2011 06:41 PM", "subject": "Approach Summary", "body": "Attachments: \n1. Optimizing good information to push down the negative: using new content (blog, \nwebsites, press releases, public network profiles, google images, etc) and search engine \noptimization. Changing the Wikipedia profile. Notes Wikipedia below. \n2. Eliminating the bad information using prevalence and proprietary algorithms; redirecting \nthe way in which Google sequences your information (reassociating it with the positive \ncontent). This is called off-page optimization. \n3. Eliminating personal information (social sec, tel #'s, dob, addresses etc) from all public \nand private directories. \nCOMMENTS: \nStep 2 is critical otherwise one is just bailing water from an ongoing flood of negative press. By \nrealigning the algorithms (i.e. reinforcing positive associations with your name and weakening the \nnegative associations), one almost permanently seals up the water hole or at least closes it \nsignificantly. This allows for Step 1 to be a onetime project (which will take 2 to 4 months approx.), \nwith just tweaking here and there down the road with updated content. \nBEST PEOPLE TO USE: \nYou need people who eat, drink and sleep algorithms and search engine optimization. I've \nresearched several companies and the most skilled, discrete, award winning and comprehensive is \na company called, www.reputation.com based in Silicon Valley. See their attached docs for review. \nBelow are bulleted key points on them: \nLookup Page just creates web pages and will not solve your problem. \nI would serve as a liaison between you and Reputation. I would monitor their progress and provide \nthem with all positive content that they need. They would make sure that the content has maximum \nalgorithmic potential. You could keep your positive content simple (using you Edge.org summary \nwhich is good), or expand your content with updates on current science work and scientists. The \nbenefit of the former, is that it keeps you more anonymous. The benefit of the latter is that is \nalgorithmically associates you to a larger pool of known scientists, further pushing up positive \ncontent. My advice would be to combine the two: a simple repetitive bio summary of you but with a \nlarger list of scientists added on. But I would ask the Reputation team about this: saying that the \nmain goal is to enhance anonymity and algorithmic associations at the same time. \nWHY REPUTATION ftr no particular order) \n• Represents numerous fortune 500 companies \n• clients in more than 100 countries \n• based in Silicon Valley \n• Featured on CNN, WSJ, Forbes, NY Times etc \n• Undisputed world leader in online reputation management \n• Prevalence and proprietary algorithms to drive positive search results to the top. \n• Intimate knowledge of search engine optimization. \n• 200+ employees \n• Patented Internet technology \n• Partnered with: American Medical Assoc. Am Bar Assoc, Aol, etc \n• $67 million in venture capital to date. \n• CEO is Michael Fertik \nCEO and Founder \nMichael Fertik founded Reputation.com in 2006 \nwith the belief that people have the right to control \nand protect their online reputation and privacy. In \naddition to his work with Reputation.com, Michael \nholds a position on the advisory board of The Internet \nKeepsafe Coalition (iKeepSafe), a nonprofit that \nworks to protect the health and safety of youth online. \nMichael is regarded as one of the earliest pioneers of \nonline reputation management and a leading expert \non issues of online privacy. He co-authored the book \nWild West 2.0 and lectures internationally, appearing \nbefore professional and academic audiences. Michael \nalso advises school administrators and parent groups. \nPrior to founding Reputation.com, Michael clerked for \nChief Judge Danny J. Boggs of the Sixth Circuit Court \nof Appeals of the United States. He is a graduate of \nHarvard College and Harvard Law School, speaks \nseveral languages, and enjoys sailing, reading, and \nrunning. \nTIME FRAME & FEES \nTheir \"Picasso\" Tech services described in step 2, will take approx. 3 months to eliminate bad press from the \n1st and 2'd page. The whole process will take about a year to be solidified. Fees will be approx. $10k -$15k \nper month but depends on each case and costs can be kept down by providing content and selecting only \ntruly necessary services. \nWIKIPEDIA \nThis is a tough nut to crack. And I need to do more research on this. Wiki comes up first on the \nGoogle list due to its powerful domain and contains totally lopsided and damning content on you. \nBut we'll crack it. On the surface, Wiki is controlled by a morass of copyediting geeks who have \nnothing better to do than to discuss reference tags etc. It is also 'the people's' encyclopedia, \ndictated by the tyranny of the majority—so no objectivity at all. \nCurrent Strategy— 1. The Reputation group have a copyright team dedicated to balancing the \ncontent on Wikipedia and gradually sectioning the bad stuff down to sub categories in the profile. \nThey don't seem to be able to eliminate the bad though. 2. So, I think it's worth seeing how people \nlike Prince Andrew managed to create an absolutely stellar profile—or Bill Clinton for that matter. \nNo mention of his impeachment or lying to the Grand Jury. It barely touches on Lewinsky etc. 3. \nThere are also protected pages on Wiki but I need more time and research. \nWEBSITE \nYou need to update your website immediately by adding the bio on you from The Edge if you can \nand adding a longer summary of science and scientists that you are/have worked with."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031246.txt_2748
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031246.txt
|
Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
|
[{"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Dr. Krauss:\n\nAs you know, I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against you. As we've already discussed by email, I'd very much like to interview you about these allegations in detail.\n\nIn particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6 below). You claimed that \"both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and fabricated with malicious intent.\" We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious intent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it.\n\nThe story concerns your actions towards students while a professor of physics at Case Western Reserve University, as well as your conduct in non-academic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. I am reporting this story along with two of my colleagues on the science desk, Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia Hughes.\n\nOur story is about several allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006 to 2016 (see full details below). Our reporting also goes into how the various institutions you have been affiliated with — Case Western, Arizona State University, the Australian National University, the New College of the Humanities, and the Center for Inquiry, for which you serve as an honorary member of the board of directors — have handled complaints and concerns about your behavior during this time.\n\nOur story is corroborated by emails, university documents, official complaints, testimony from victims and eyewitnesses, and interviews with more than two dozen of your current and former academic colleagues, students, and peers in the skeptics movement.\n\nI wanted to offer you the opportunity to comment and/or respond to the main facts we plan to publish. If you wish to comment on any of the below findings, we need to hear from you as soon as possible. We are planning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time.\n\nBased on our reporting, this is what we plan to publish:\n\nIncident 1:\n• In November of 2006, at an event launching the new Center for Inquiry in Washington D.C., you met a volunteer for CFI D.C.\n• At the event, you asked for her business card. Later, you followed her as she was leaving and asked her if she was \"of age.\"\n• Later, you emailed her to invite her to dinner.\n• You planned to dine with her in the restaurant at the Washington D.C. hotel where you were staying.\n• You told her to come up to your room first because you needed to finish some work.\n• In your hotel room, you seemed in no rush to leave. You ordered a cheese plate, and later champagne, despite her suggestion that you go down to dinner.\n• You then made a comment about her eye makeup, getting very close to her face.\n• You then lifted her by her arms, and pushed her onto the bed beneath you, forcibly kissing her and trying to pull down the crotch of her tights.\n• She struggled to push you off her.\n• You said, \"When I was in college I could never get a girl that looked like you.\"\n• When you pulled out a condom, she got out from under you. She said \"I have to go,\" and rushed out of the room.\n\nIncident 2:\n• In an incident that occurred in fall of 2007 while you were a physics professor at Case Western Reserve University, a student tried to talk to you about her plans after graduation. You mentioned to her how tough it must be to have all the other physics majors asking her out on dates.\n• In a second incident in December of 2007, while you were still at Case Western, the same student visited your office to interview you for a student science journal. You closed the door behind her, and ignored the questions she had prepared. Then you made a casual comment about taking her out for dinner.\n• Later, in a regular column for the school paper, she described her experiences with you, without mentioning you by name. \"There was even one particular creep of a professor who once told me he thought differently of me compared to other students and asked me to dinner: a situation so disturbing that it left me upset for weeks afterward,\" she wrote.\n• She was then approached by a dean at the university, who suspected that she was referring to you, based on a previously reported incident with another student. He encouraged her to make a complaint, and she did.\n• University investigators interviewed both you and the student.\n• On September 4, 2008, Susan Nickel-Schindewolf, the university's associate vice president for student affairs, wrote to the student, telling her that the investigation was complete. She wrote that you had been told: \"This type of behavior could constitute sexual harassment in violation of the university's sexual harassment policy.\n• The letter also stated that you were prohibited from making contact with the student as long as she remained at Case.\n• The letter also stated that you are required to get approval from the dean or the chair of the physics department before setting foot on the campus again.\n• The letter also stated, \"Dr. Krauss expressed regret about having a negative impact on you, and also his willingness to use this complaint as an opportunity to reflect and improve on his future interactions with students.\"\n• By then, you had already left Case, taking up your current position at Arizona State University the month before.\n• \"The opportunities being offered at ASU are simply too great to turn down at this stage in my career,\" you told Case colleagues, in an email announcing your departure on April 16, 2008.\n\nIncident 3:\n• A former Case Western physics department administrator confirmed that she had reported a previous incident involving a student who had confided in her about your inappropriate behavior towards her.\n\nIncident 4:\n• You met a student from another university, an atheist activist, in March 2008 at the American Atheists Convention in Minneapolis. She wanted to expand the atheist group she ran at the midwestern university she was attending, and hoped to convince you to come and speak. You initially seemed enthusiastic.\n• During the convention, attendees including you and Richard Dawkins went for dinner with the student and volunteers for Dawkins' foundation.\n• Afterwards, the student invited you to join the volunteers for a drink.\n• You asked her to come get you in your hotel room. She was wary of your intentions, and so brought a male friend with her. Opening the door to find them both there, you informed her you had decided not to go.\n• You met this student again at the American Atheists Convention in Des Moines, Iowa, in April 2011.\n• You pulled over a chair for her in the bar, and then started running your hand up her leg under the table.\n• She tried to shift her body away from you, and you persisted in putting your hand on her leg. She crossed her legs, and you kept trying. Then she turned her entire body away.\n\nIncident 5:\n• This incident allegedly occurred on in May 2011 on a CFI cruise. We understand that CFI staff were informed that you had propositioned a female cruise-goer, who rejected an invitation to join you and your female companion for sex in your cabin.\n• At least two CFI staffers were sufficiently concerned about reports of your behavior that they urged CFI's president not to invite you on a 2014 cruise of the Galapagos Islands. You were invited on that cruise, however.\n\nIncident 6:\n• During a visit to Melbourne, Australia, in November 2016, you were accused of sexual misconduct once again.\n• The incident happened at a dinner held at the Melbourne Zoo as part of the Australian Skeptics National Convention, where you were a featured speaker.\n• With conference delegates chatting over drinks, a woman asked you for a celebrity selfie.\n• As the woman held out her phone to take the picture, you reached over her shoulder and grabbed her right breast.\n• She immediately reacted, bodychecking you and spinning around. \"Don't do that,\" she said.\n• BuzzFeed News has seen the complaint made by another woman to ASU, ANU, and the New College of the Humanities in London, including the selfie, her face obscured to conceal her identity. It shows your hand in motion as a blur in front of her shoulder, apparently moving toward her chest. Two other eyewitnesses have confirmed the complainant's account of what happened.\n• In April 2017, the complainant described the incident on her blog. After hearing more about your reputation for inappropriate behavior from blog readers, she decided to file a complaint about the Nov. 2016 incident.\n• On July 16, she filed formal complaints with Arizona State University, and with the Australian National University in Canberra and the New College of the Humanities in London, where you have visiting appointments.\n• Both Arizona State and the Australian National University told her they would look into the matter. But neither university found against you.\n• \"Based on the material available to the University, we do not have sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations,\" Kiaran Kirk, dean of the College of Science at the Australian National University, wrote to her.\n• Erin Ellison, who heads Arizona State's Office of Equity & Inclusion, wrote to her explaining that an inquiry \"did not find a violation of university policy.\"\n• In October, Arizona State denied a request from BuzzFeed News for documents relating to complaints of sexual harassment against you. However, Cynthia Jewett, the university's senior associate general counsel, noted that two individuals, neither affiliated with the university, had complained about you. \"The University did not find either communication to state a credible allegation,\" Jewett wrote.\n\nMiscellaneous facts:\n• In 2008, you founded the Origins Project at Arizona State University in Tempe, a multidisciplinary effort to understand the origins of the universe, life, and social systems. You have led that effort ever since.\n• Thanks to best-selling books like The Physics of Star Trek and A Universe From Nothing, frequent essays in publications including the New Yorker and the New York Times, and the documentary you made with biologist Richard Dawkins, called The Unbelievers, you are celebrated as one of America's leading public intellectuals.\n• You served on the science policy committee for Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign and are a vocal critic of President Donald Trump.\n• You also make regular public appearances across the world, often at gatherings of skeptics and atheists.\n• At CSICon in Las Vegas in October, a few dozen fans paid $500 per head to attend a VIP luncheon with you and Dawkins.\n• Many more lined up to get you to sign their copy of your latest book, The Greatest Story Ever Told — So Far.\n• Online, people can buy T-shirts emblazoned \"Lawrence Krauss for President.\"\n• In talks and interviews, you have argued that our universe arose without divine intervention, that religion drives xenophobia, and that our brains are hardwired to believe.\n• You have stated that science provides answers to many of life's biggest questions, and can even fix great societal injustices.\n• Earlier this year, at a Q&A event to promote your new book, the conversation came around to the dearth of women and minorities in science. \"Science itself overcomes misogyny and prejudice and bias,\" you said. \"It's built in: Questioning yourself, always questioning results, questioning others, relying on empirical evidence.\"\n• You have clashed with some skeptics over your defense of Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire financier who in 2008 was convicted for soliciting prostitution from underage girls, and spent 13 months in a Florida jail.\n• Through his private foundation, Epstein has funded the work of several prominent scientists. He has provided funding for your Origins Project, supporting lectureship and scholarship programs, most recently pledging $100,000 in 2014.\n• In April 2011, you told the Daily Beast: \"As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\"\n• In a blog comment about the Epstein controversy, you wrote: \"I remain skeptical, and I support a man whose character I believe I know.. .If you want to condemn me for that, so be it.\"\n• You were made an honorary member of CFI's board of directors in December 2011.\n• A blog post published in August 2013 described incidents #1 and #4, naming you. Another post, published at around the same time, described incident #5.\n• The first post was edited to remove your name after you had commented that the allegations of assault were \"potentially illegal.\" The second post was quickly taken down.\n\nAgain, if you wish to comment on or clarify any of these points, please get in touch with us as soon as possible. If I do not respond immediately it is because I am on another call, so please leave the best phone number to reach you.\n\nThanks,"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Nancy Portland"], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 9:53 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "First draft:\nIt is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. Needless to say, I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have remained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally appreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your 'miscellaneous facts', as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than allegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other organizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my contributions and my actions.\nYour specific allegations are false or distorted. Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and had respectful encounters afterwards. I cannot comment on item 3, which involves an anonymous 3rd party claim, because I know nothing about it, and it was not taken seriously enough to result in any university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn't want to go out to a bar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part is false. I don't do that. Re incident 5: The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is what I wrote in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down.\nIt is worthwhile responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,\nRe item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came to me or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation I DID tell her she was different than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school, but she was interested in science communication so I told her that she might want to take a different path. Since she was the only woman in her year, as I recall, I did ask her on one of these occasions if that made it difficult for her in any way. I asked, because as a faculty member I was interested, and also because as someone she had asked for career advice from I wanted to know if that made a difference to her. Re asking her for dinner.. I have gone back over emails from that period. I have numerous requests from her to go for coffee to talk, which I usually had to turn down because I was busy, including several occasions where she asked me to have coffee with her off campus to talk, and I politely declined. I did let her accompany me off campus one time to watch me do a BBC interview because she specifically requested it. I did and do have coffee and meals with students on campus, and I see nothing wrong with this. I was shocked when I later learned of her complaint, not least because there was no inappropriate interaction and also because well after the date on which she is said to have been offended, she continued to email me with joking questions or comments, and at a AAAS conference in 2008, for which she had asked, and for which I had written her a letter of recommendation to attend, my wife and I gave her a lift well out out of our way to drop her off at her hotel, and I note in an email response to her email about the conference, agin in 2008, I expressed that I would pass her regards along to my wife and vice versa. When the University informed me of the complaint I was shocked and concerned. When I spoke to the human resources person, including relating my concerns and providing the emails in question, I was told that no formal complaint of sexual harassment was deemed to be warranted in this case, and that the young woman in question had agreed to that. By that time I learned of the complaint I had already announced my intentions to leave Case to accept an offer at ASU—a very difficult decision for me because of my long-standing attachment to the University, and the excellent relations I had with my colleagues there, both among the faculty and among the administration. Because I was already in Arizona at the time I was asked not to have any further interaction with the student I agreed to that request because it was basically moot. I was also told that because it was being handled informally, that (a) it should remain confidential, which I, at least abided by, and (b) if no further complaints were lodged in that case, that the University would remove the allegation from my record after 5 years, which makes me surprised that someone violated that written agreement with you.\nRe item 6: You report on ASU's response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specifically stated there were never any allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and the outside complaints were in fact related specifically to your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that this complaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual who was allegedly harassed, who never lodged a complain, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged transgression. I was surprised and dismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both Universities that because of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated to the University would be investigated. The complaint was investigated throughly by both ASU and ANU and both came to the conclusion that it was not credible and no university policies had been violated. . In addition ANU's investigation, which took a full month found significant inconsistencies in the allegation, suggesting distortion and fabrication, I will quote from the ANU report. The initial complaint, which in fact resulted in a temporary suspension by ANU outlined the claim you made in the words you quoted in your note to me, along with the statement made in the complaint that \n\"It is the University's understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the time of the incident.\"\nAfter the investigation, the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistent with the original claim and apparent later claims as follows:\n\"The allegations were made by an observer to the incident.\n- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched in an unwelcome manner.\n- The conference attendee who took the selfie' photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers at the time of the incident (November 2016).\n- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference organisers at the time of the incident (November 2016).\nThe photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact.\n- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who took the selfie' photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was requested in the course of the investigation.\"\n(And for the record I often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as I specifically request selfies not to include flashes, so that I don't end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour)\nWhat makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. I am particularly proud of the way I attempt to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which is to acknowledge fans in a way that makes them feel appreciated. As I understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take selfies at the CFI conference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, I am proud of the interactions I have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff. I have had numerous female graduate students, postdocs, employees, and colleagues, and as ASU attested to you, none of these have ever complained of harassment. Quite the contrary in fact, as I have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and treat them with respect. I treat others as responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Nancy Portland"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 6:31:28 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Second Draft:\nI appreciate the opportunity to respond to your email. While I am running the risk that you will report my comments, if you do, either out of context, or incompletely, I am responding with an effort to be complete. It is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have remained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally appreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your 'miscellaneous facts', as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than allegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other organizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my contributions and my actions.\nThe items you list are false or distorted. Item 1 refers to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and there were respectful and platonic encounters afterwards. There is nothing to comment on in item 3, which involves an anonymous 3rd party claim because I know nothing about it, there are no details provided, and it clearly was not taken seriously enough to result in any university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn't want to go out to a bar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part did not happen. Re incident 5: The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is what I wrote at the time in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down.\nIt is worth responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,\nRe item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came to me or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation I DID tell her she was different than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school, but she was interested in science communication so I told her that she might want to take a different path. Since she was the only woman in her year, as I recall, I did ask her on one of these occasions if that made it difficult for her in any way. I asked, because as a faculty member I was interested in knowing what we could do, if necessary to encourage more women to go into physics, and also because as someone she had asked for career advice from I wanted to know if that made a difference to her. Re asking her for dinner.. I have gone back over emails from that period. I have numerous requests from her asking me to go for coffee to talk, which I usually had to turn down because I was busy, and on several occasions sh specifically asked me to have coffee with her off campus to talk, and I politely declined. I did let her accompany me off campus one time to watch me do a BBC interview because she specifically requested it. I did and do have coffee and meals with students on campus, and I see nothing wrong with this. I try to treat even students as respected colleagues if possible. I was shocked when I later learned of the complaint she was apparently asked to lodge to the University, not least because there was no inappropriate interaction and also because, well after the dates you listed on which she was apparently offended, she continued to email me with joking questions or comments. Also, at a later AAAS conference, again in 2008, for which she had asked, and for which I had written her a letter of recommendation to attend, my wife and I gave her a lift in our taxi well out of our way in order to drop her off at her hotel, and I note in an email response to her email about the conference, agin in 2008, I expressed that I would pass her regards along to my wife and vice versa. When the University later informed me of the complaint I was shocked and concerned. When I spoke to the human resources person, including relating my concerns and providing the emails in question, I was told that no formal complaint of sexual harassment was deemed at that time to be called for, and that the young woman in question had agreed to that. By that time I learned of the complaint I had already announced my intentions to leave Case to accept an offer at ASU—a very difficult decision for me because of my long-standing attachment to the University, and the excellent relations I had with my colleagues there, both among the faculty and among the administration. Because I was already in Arizona at the time I was asked not to have any further interaction with the student I agreed to that request, both to respect her sensitivities and also because it was basically moot because I was not on campus. I was also told that because it was being handled informally, that (a) it should remain confidential, which I, at least abided by, and (b) if no further complaints were lodged in that case, that the University would remove the complaint from my record after 5 years, which makes me surprised that someone violated that written agreement with you.\nRe item 6: You report on ASU's response to item #6 , without including the fact that the University specifically stated there were never any allegations of sexual misconduct or harassment by me at the University, and morever the outside complaints were in fact related specifically to your item #6. Further you neglect to mention that this complaint was by an anonymous third party, not the individual who was allegedly harassed, who never lodged a complain, and that no specific evidence was provided of the alleged transgression. I was surprised and dismayed that both ASU and ANU launched investigations on the basis of this but was told by both Universities that because of my high profile even such unsubstantiated third party complaints at private events unrelated to the University would be investigated. The complaint was investigated throughly by both ASU and ANU and both came to the conclusion that it was not credible and no university policies had been violated.. In addition ANU's investigation, which took a full month found significant inconsistencies in the allegation, suggesting distortion and fabrication, I will quote from the ANU report. The initial complaint, which in fact resulted in a temporary suspension of my position at ANU, until it was dismissed, outlined the claim you made in the words you quoted in your note to me, but it also stated \n\"It is the University's understanding that a complaint was lodged directly to the conference organisers at the time of the incident.\"\nAfter the month-long investigation, during which I was told I was not to interact with anyone on campus (again moot because I was a hemisphere removed) the final report absolved me of any wrongdoing, and indicated information inconsistent with the original claim and apparent later claims as follows in the report, from which I quote:\n\"The allegations were made by an observer to the incident.\n- The complaint did not identify, nor disclose the identity of the conference attendee who was allegedly touched in \nan unwelcome manner.\n- The conference attendee who took the `selfie' photo did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference \norganisers \nat the time of the incident (November 2016).\n- The conference attendee who witnessed the incident, did not lodge a formal complaint to the conference \norganisers \nat the time of the incident (November 2016).\nThe photo submitted as part of the complaint does not provide evidence of any physical contact.\n- The complainant alleged that a photo exists, showing your hand on the breast of the conference attendee who \ntook \nthe `selfie' photo. This photo was not made available to the Australian National University, although it was \nrequested \nin the course of the investigation.\"\n(And for the record I often put my hand up in front of a camera if there is a flash, as I specifically request selfies not to include flashes, so that I don't end up with a series bright spots in front of my eyes for the next half hour)\nWhat makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, and sometimes overly aggressive. I am particularly proud of the way I attempt to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated. Thus, this false claim strikes at the heart of what I am about, which is to acknowledge fans in a way that makes them feel appreciated. As I understand you had a reporter watching me sign books and take selfies at the CFI conference in Las Vegas this year, that behavior is what they will have witnessed. Moreover, I am proud of the interactions I have had at both Case and ASU, with students, colleagues and staff of all genders and ethnicities. I have worked hard to support them, mentor them, and treat them with respect. I treat others as responsible adults, and I expect to be treated equally.\n\nLawrence M. Krauss\nDirector, The Origins Project at ASU\nCo-Director, Cosmology Initiative\nFoundation Professor\nSchool of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department\nArizona State University,P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032387.txt_2750
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032387.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "first you father was afraid of trump and the us. _, now he shold probaby move here. :)"}, {"sender": "Lang, Caroline <a>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/2/2016 12:41:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Excellent !\nCaroline Lang"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031798.txt_2760
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031798.txt
|
Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal
|
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "11/29/2018 3:59:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal", "body": "yes, every outlet needs a sex story"}, {"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal", "body": "They try to keep this story going from every angle. Now dershowitz isn't involved; rather he is a high powered lawyer. I didn't know you also had lefkowitz. I met the guy once when a prospective client asked me to try a case with him. One meeting was enough for me to see clearly that that would not have worked out well; but he apparently is a successful lawyer. One thing for sure the article gets wrong - that the \"victims\" were silenced. Hope you are doing well."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032659.txt_2763
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032659.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/2/2017 4:52:49 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Trump in your neighborhood today. Looks like he is going to 740 Park for a fundraiser."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031773.txt_2773
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031773.txt
|
The New York Times: Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business
|
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/22/2019 10:56:44 PM", "subject": "The New York Times: Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business", "body": "Cohen Gave Prosecutors New Information on the Trump Family Business\nThe New York Times\nPresident Trump's former lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, discussed possible irregularities at the Trump\nOrganization. He wants a reduced prison sentence. Read the full story\nShared from Apple News"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031103.txt_2775
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031103.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [reid.weingarten@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/6/2019 12:50:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have a hysterical wynn-trump issue that will make you laugh"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 6, 2019 8:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dont know. __,. bannon for breakfast tomor. . everyone confused. markets strong."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 2:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Charged criminally in sdny...Lithuanian hottie...take it you don't know him...what's your headline?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 6, 2019 8:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Pb divorce? Fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 1:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "It is Todd kozel..."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 6, 2019 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I leave monday at 10 am breakfast?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Are you in nyc monday?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 6, 2019 3:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "where are you, im in ny on sunday."}]
| 8
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033164.txt_2778
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033164.txt
|
Eric Roth
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2015 8:00:21 PM", "subject": "Eric Roth", "body": "he appears to be looking for a response from me as i never replied to his email offering a 10,000 discount \nplease advise"}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "March 24, 2015 at 2:12:01 PM EDT", "subject": "10:00pm Tonight - CNBC Feature", "body": "Hi Richard, \nHope all is well. \nShould you be bored this evening, we will be featured on CNBC's \"Secret Lives of The Super Rich\" showcasing our S-76 \nhelicopter refurbishment for Donald Trump — thought you might enjoy getting a glimpse of what we do."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028924.txt_2782
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028924.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2015, at 7:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "• bad press in fulll swing . she also claims to have dinner on my island with clinton. lots of details where he was sitting etc however he was NEVER on the island NEVER, its silly, but she has lots of traction"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 11:45:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Interesting.. Heard Alan is not the type to give up."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022977.txt_2787
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022977.txt
|
| ONLY FORWARD THIS SO YO'RE AWARE OF ITS EXISTENCE--pk
|
[{"sender": "paul krassner [incomplete@domain]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/5/2017 3:19:21 PM", "subject": "| ONLY FORWARD THIS SO YO'RE AWARE OF ITS EXISTENCE--pk", "body": "i only forward this link so you’re aware of its existence..."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012023.txt_2788
|
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012023.txt
|
Jean Luc Brunel
|
[{"sender": "Dr. Royce Jalazo <dynamicbeh@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["joetitone708@comcast.net"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, December 23, 2014 2:40:59 PM", "subject": "Jean Luc Brunel", "body": "Mr. Titone,\n\nPlease accept this email as my formal notification that Mr. Jean Luc Brunel attending an\noutpatient individual psychotherapy session with me on 12/12/14.\n\nThank you,\n\nRoyce N. Jalazo, Psy.D.\nLicensed Psychologist"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021823.txt_2790
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021823.txt
|
Re: your statement?
|
[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:19 AM", "subject": "Re: your statement?", "body": "Ha, the sequel comment is great. But I don't think it's my place to discuss her accusations of other people...I know nothing about it and never met her or Clinton.\nThe points I can legitimately address are the nature of my involvement with you and some smoking gun allegations by the other girls. I will talk to a lawyer this week.\n\nIt could really be fun if I made a viral video that showed how easily people can be fooled, followed by a statement saying the stories are obviously false. If it's fun, tabloids may cover it...\n\nBtw, I was invited to go to Davos...does not seem like such a good idea at the moment :)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, January 19, 2015 7:13 PM", "subject": "your statement?", "body": "I have to hand it to MD I'm sure she deserves the pretty penny she has made for her effort\n\nShe has certainly caught the imagination of a public hungry for salacious fiction. To suggest her story is anything other than that, a fiction , is ludicrous. Presidents at dinner on caribean islands. (clinton was never ever there, easy to confirm ). Sharing a bath with a Prince ( bathtub too small even for one adult ). sex slave being paid thousands of dollars. (while at the exact same time, she was working as a hostess in a burger bar ). being lent out to a prime minister though this prime mininster, never out of sight of his massive security detail also never visited the island, , sex ona small airplane with a famous lawyer while the other passengers must have been all looking out the window during the event . I would have thought that her fabrications were readilly apparent , but now , being asked to deny what the press has termed her\" allegations \" is frankly silly. ok, to play along I deny each and every allegation. The only person she didn't suggest she was forced to have sex with , was Bilbo Baggins. , maybe its in the sequel."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012037.txt_2791
|
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012037.txt
|
Re: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruennler"], "timestamp": "8/15/2016 12:09:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win", "body": "Did you write this ?@"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016", "subject": "FW: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["#C-M EMIRATES NBD - LW_TEAM", "Cleaves, John"], "timestamp": "Monday, Aug 15, 2016, 12:57 AM", "subject": "FW: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win", "body": "AmLaw Daily story just posted. See below."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Dunlavey, Dean (OC)", "Mohebbi, Nima (A)", "Rucmmler, Kathy (DC)", "Seurcr, Steve (SF-BR)"], "timestamp": "Sunday, Aug 14, 2016, 9:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Press: AmLaw Litigation Daily on Emirates Bank win", "body": "See"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032378.txt_2798
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032378.txt
|
Trump
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/25/2016 10:28:28 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nTrump is still scheduled to depart Sunday between 4 and 6pm,,\nLet me know if we are firm for wheels up Saturday at 6pm still?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033170.txt_2802
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033170.txt
|
Donald Trump and the Looking-Glass War - SFGate
|
[{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/27/2016 12:32:41 AM", "subject": "Donald Trump and the Looking-Glass War - SFGate", "body": "http://m.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/article/Donald-Trump-and-the-Looking-Glass-War-9284330.php"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032436.txt_2807
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032436.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Alireza ITTIHADIEH", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/15/2017 1:49:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "People are just back and the activity really started this week. A lot of enquiries out of China and a lot of buyers\n\nin the US have resurfaced\n\nV-BR"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "15 Jan 2017, at 04:17", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is trading , now that trump has won. ?"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032246.txt_2809
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032246.txt
|
Re: Patterson
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <j eevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before.\n\nMeanwhile--\n\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how a press campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media controversy than they are of legal threats):\n\n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not publishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the questionable nature of the book;\n\n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. Connolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, has refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine;\n\n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the book, and that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe Patterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an extension of the Patterson franchise into nonfiction, as it has been used in fiction and children's book--effectively other authors writing under the Patterson name—presents a host of journalism ethical issues."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 18, 2016, at 11:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 3:57:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031659.txt_2817
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031659.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 9:53:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "recall ive told you ,, -- 1 have met some very bad people ,, none as bad as trump. not one decent cell in his body.. so yes- dangerous"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "It's ok.\n\nHe didn't wreck world and avoided scandal.\n\nWhat does Ruemmler say re his attitude towards women?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 7, 2017, at 1:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man of the people\nhttp://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/02/07/president-barack-obama-kiteboards-horses-around-richard-branson-epic-vacation/97592260/"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes. In NYC actually."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 6, 2017, at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "speak today"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017590.txt_2821
|
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017590.txt
|
Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Rich Beckler", "Ken Adams"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017, 12:06:29 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Do you remember when I'd asked you what your daughters did for a living? Especially last night Mr. Beckler, as most Friday nights, no?\n\nYes, they are the new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell; for you Richard Beckler, this originated from my being a former Stone Ridge classmate of his elder daughter Katie Beckler, and because he was on the Board of Stone Ridge during this period in time when my every family, friend, acquaintance and association was being contacted, bribed in one form or another, and turned against me (see below); as for Ken Adams, it stemmed from my having contacted him for representation in my 2011- filed case against IBM also during this period of time when my every communication were being tracked.\n\nYou both are interesting; you let us see what's to become of the Scalia 35 (see below; at bottom, Ghislaine Maxwell's Jeffrey Epstein in context.)\n\n*\n\nWe start from this following precept: (the repeating 9/11s)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Ainbanklaw Info", "Denyse Sabagh", "Michael Baxter", "Patrick M. Regan", "Robert Barnett", "Weingarten, Reid", "Ellen Kerns"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:49 PM", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "We know of course that Saturdays are reserved for Matthew Horton."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid Bo", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "7/4/2017 4:53:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026935.txt_2826
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026935.txt
|
Trump's ex-lawyer Michael Cohen will testify at House Oversight Committee before entering prison
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2019 8:23:40 PM", "subject": "Trump's ex-lawyer Michael Cohen will testify at House Oversight Committee before entering prison", "body": "Importance: High \nhttps://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/10/ex-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-to-testify-to-house-oversight-committee.html"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032520.txt_2828
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032520.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "3/22/2017 12:25:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry.. all SHOW.. he is a fucking showman.. a carnival huckster.. this, and the military budget and health care \nare all show... no substance.. just the 'biggest ever'., for a guy with small hands.."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 22, 2017, at 4:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All shoe. This is not supporting science. It is all about the size of the rocket for him. All this will do is give him \nglory and not contribute to science."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 22, 2017, at 5:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/03/21/trump-signs-nasa-bill-aimed-at-\nlanding-on-mars/?utm term=.64eb9bf54e09"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031291.txt_2829
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031291.txt
|
Duke Buchan III
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 4:38:21 PM", "subject": "Duke Buchan III", "body": "This guy apparently is constantly texting Trump/Trump. Have you heard of him?\nhttp://hginvestors.com/?page id= 1 0"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032350.txt_2830
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032350.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Deepak Chopra ay", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:14:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did she also drop civil case against you ?"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032534.txt_2836
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032534.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am seeing a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "careful she is nottrustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017, at 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "worse"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:30:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "We have not had sex"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032344.txt_2837
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032344.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "long dow , short yen euro and pound. long reits,"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:10:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "who is treasury secretary? Is Mnuchin a done deal? Seems too obvious."}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021096.txt_2838
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021096.txt
|
Re: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21
|
[{"sender": "Kia Kokalitcheva", "recipients": ["George Rose/Getty Images"], "timestamp": "February 21, 2018 at 7:32:17 AM PST", "subject": "Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "Pro Rata\nBy Kia Kokalitcheva •Feb 21, 2018\n\nView in browser\n\nWelcome back, readers. Once again, a reminder to send me your delicious scoops and tips at kia@axios.com or find me on Twitter at @pinkialikethecar.\n\nHot event alert: RSVP to our 2/26 event in NYC for interviews with NBA star Draymond Green, BBG Ventures' Susan Lyne, JPMorgan's Jennifer Piepszak, and Equinox CEO Harvey Spevak.\n\nTop of the Morning\nIllustration: Rebecca Zisser / Axios\n\nAT&T's proposed $85 billion purchase of Time Warner took another turn yesterday. A federal judge hearing the Justice Department's lawsuit to block the deal denied a request by the telecom giant to disclose communications between Justice Department officials, including Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and the White House about the deal.\n\n• Why it matters: The ruling is a blow to AT&T's attempt to show that the lawsuit to block the deal is politically motivated by President Trump's antipathy for CNN, which Time Warner owns. AT&T says it wasn't asked to offload any assets as part of the deal until after Trump took office.\n\n• What they're saying: \"We respect the judge's decision and look forward to the upcoming trial,\" said Dan Petrocelli, who is leading AT&T and Time Warner's defense in the case, in a statement.\n\n• At a hearing on Friday, a Justice Department lawyer said that AT&T's argument for the documents \"didn't make sense.\"\n\n• Go deeper: Our report from the courtroom on Friday, when DOJ and AT&T presented their arguments.\n\nFund scoop: Niv Dror, who joined AngelList through its acquisition of Product Hunt in 2016, is raising a small early-stage fund focused on consumer products, multiple sources tell Axios. Dror declined to comment.\n\n• The fund will raise at least $1 million, though one source says it could go up to $2-3 million.\n\n• Like Product Hunt colleague Ryan Hoover's own VC fund, Dror's will be managed on the back-end by AngelList.\n\nSame old story: Yesterday, I grabbed coffee with Day One Ventures founder Masha Drokova, and heard a familiar—and still disappointing—story: While raising her fund, she was told by prospective investors that she should get a male co-founder.\n\n• She initially considered the suggestion, she told me, before remembering it's rooted in sexism.\n\nSoftbank $$$: Softbank's Vision Fund is in early talks to raise additional funds from Bahrain's sovereign wealth fund, Mumtalakat, the latter's CEO told Reuters.\n\n• The Persian Gulf has been a major source of funds for the Vision Fund: Public Investment Fund, Saudi Arabia's main sovereign wealth fund, and Abu Dhabi's Mubadala, are already investors.\n\n• And it's not the only one visiting the region's investors—funds focused on tokens and cryptocurrencies have also been fundraising in the area, I'm told.\n\nUnicorn stampede: We're not even two months into 2018 and yet, seven startups have already seen their private valuations cross the $1 billion mark—earning \"unicorn\" status—according to Pitchbook. Last year: 53. The word \"overvalued\" comes to mind...\n\nThe BFD\nPhoto: George Rose/Getty Images\n\nBroadcom has adjusted its takeover offer for Qualcomm to $79 per share, down from the its \"best and final\" bid of $82. The move is a response to Qualcomm's announcement yesterday it would pay $127.50 a share for NXP, up from the $110 it had offered.\n\n• Why it's the BFD: Broadcom and Qualcomm's takeover dance has taken a dramatic turn for what should have been a boring transaction between two chip companies.\n\n• Bottom line: \"Broadcom has long said its acquisition of the San Diego-based chipmaker is contingent on Qualcomm buying NXP at the previously agreed price, saving a large amount of cash Broadcom could hypothetically use for its own purposes once the acquisition goes through... Qualcomm raised its NXP bid to secure support from activist investors who have piled into NXP and demanded a higher sale price.\" — Bloomberg.\n\nVenture Capital Deals\n• Moovit, an Israeli maker of a transportation app, has raised $50 million in Series D funding led by Intel Capital, with participation from Sequoia, BMW iVentures, NGP, Sound Ventures, BRM, Gemini, Vaizra, Vintage, and Hanaco. http://axioslink/fQSW\n\n• Vectra, a San Jose, Calif.-based cybersecurity startup, has raised $36 million in Series D funding led by Atlantic Bridge, with participation from the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund, Nissho Electronics Corp., Khosla Ventures, Accel Partners, IA Ventures, AME Cloud Ventures, DAG Ventures and Wipro Ventures. www.vectra.ai\n\n• FourKites, a Chicago-based make of supply chain management software, has raised $35 million in Series B funding. August Capital led the round, with participation from Bain Capital Ventures and Hyde Park Venture Partners. http://axioslink/7XWI\n\n• DecaWave, an Irish fabless semiconductor company, has raised $30 million in funding led by Atlantic Bridge Ventures, with participation from the China Ireland Growth Technology Fund, ACT Venture Capital, and ZZ Ventures.\n\n• Kidaptiv, a Mountain View, Calif.-based maker of adaptive learning software, has raised $19.1 million in Series C funding led by Formation 8 and Korean education company Woongjin ThinkBig. http://axioslink/Fuut\n\n• Prophesee, a Paris-based machine vision startup, has raised $19 million in Series B funding led by an undisclosed investor, with participation from 360 Capital Partners, Supernova Invest, iBionext, Intel Capital, Renault Group, and Robert Bosch Venture Capital, according to Tech.eu. http://axioslink/QAyn\n\n• Greenlight Financial Technology, an Atlanta-based maker of a smart debit card for kids, teens, and college students, has raised $16 million in Series A funding led by TTV Capital with participation from New Enterprise Associates, Relay Ventures, SunTrust Bank, Ally Financial, nbkc bank, Canapi, and the Amazon Alexa Fund. www.greenlightcard.com\n\n• Zagster, a Cambridge, Mass.-based bike-share service, has raised $15 million in new funding led by Edison Capital Partners. www.zagster.com\n\n• Morphisec, and Israel-based cybersecurity startup, has raised $12 million in Series B funding from Orange Digital Ventures, Jerusalem Venture Partners, General Electric, and Deutsche Telekom. www.morphisec.com\n\n• Tunity, a New York-based live audio service for television content, has raised $12 million in Series A funding. Investors include former Morgan Stanley CEO John Mack and WeWork CEO Adam Neumann. www.tunity.com\n\n• Fever Labs, a New York-based maker of an event discovery app, has raised $11.7 million in new funding, according to an SEC filing. www.feverup.com\n\n• Gabi, a San Francisco-based insurance shopping services, has raised $9.5 million in Series A funding led by Canvas Ventures, with participation from Correlation Ventures, Northwestern Mutual Future Ventures, Securian Ventures, A.Capital Ventures and Project A. www.gabi.com\n\n• Dover Microsystems, a Waltham, Mass.-based cybersecurity company, has raised $6 million in seed funding. Hyperplane Venture Capital led the round with participation from Draper, Qualcomm Ventures and the Hub Angels Investment Group. www.dovermicrosystems.com\n\n• Anyfin, a Stockholm-based loan refinancing startup, has raised $5.9 million (€4.8 million) in Series A funding led by Accel and Northzone, with participation from Global Founders Capital and angel investors. http://axioslink/IpTj\n\n• Thirdpresence, a Helsinkin-based A.I. programmatic video advertising company, has raised $2.4 million in seed funding from Inventure, Tesi, and existing investors. www.thirdpresence.com\n\nPrivate Equity Deals\n• Rhone Capital agreed to buy Fogo de Chao (NASDAQ: FOGO), a Dallas-based Brazilian steakhouse chain, in a deal valued at $560 million. Credit Suisse and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association provided financing. www.fogodechao.com\n\n• Behrman Capital has acquired Corfin Industries, a Salem, N.H.-based provider of microelectronic component preparation services. www.corfin.com\n\nWater Street Healthcare Partners and JLL Partners have agreed to acquire Dohmen Life Science Services, a Milwaukee-based provider of operations services to biopharma and medical device companies, from The Dohmen Company. www.dlss.com\n\n• PWP Growth Equity and RedHawk Investment have invested an undisclosed amount into 360Training, an Austin, Texas-based provider of online training courses for regulated industries. www.36otraining.com\n\n• Orient Hontai Capital, a Chinese private equity firm, has agreed to buy a 53.5% stake in Imagina Media Audiovisual, a Spanish media company, valuing the target company at an enterprise value of €1.9 billion (US$2.34 billion). http://axioslink/CN5I\n\n• Leeds Equity Partners is investing in Endeavor Schools, a Miami-based owner and operator of 37 private K-12 schools in the U.S. www.endeavorschools.com\n\n• Cathay Capital MidCap Fund is buying a majority of stake in E. WINKEMANN, a German auto supplier. Financial terms weren't announced. Equistone Partners Europe will retain a stake along with company management. www.winkemann.de\n\nPublic Offerings\n• Deutsche Bank (NYSE: DB) plans to debut an IPO of its asset-management arm, DWS, for Monday next week, according to Reuters. It could list on the Frankfurt exchange as early as March 19. Deutsche Bank is planning to offer 25% of existing DWS shares for an expected 1.5 billion to €2 billion ($1.85 billion to $2.47 billion). http://axioslink/KNnd\n\n• Opes Acquisition, a Mexico-based blank check company formed by Axis Capital Management to acquire a Mexican business, has filed for an $100 million IPO. It will offer 10 million units at a price of $10. At that price, Opes Acquisition would command a market value of $129 million. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant exercisable at $11.50. It plans to list on the Nasdaq under the symbol OPESU, with EarlyBirdCapital is the sole bookrunner on the deal. www.axiscapital.com.mx/eng\n\n• Tiberius Acquisition, a Metairie, La.-based blank check company formed to acquire a middle-market insurance business, filed for a $150 million IPO. It will offer 15 million units at a price of $10. At that price, Tiberius Acquisition would command a market value of $188 million. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of common stock. It plans to list on the Nasdaq under the symbol TIBRU, with Cantor Fitzgerald and Dowling & Partners are the joint bookrunners on the deal.\n\nLiquidity Events\n• Xerox Corp shareholders Carl Icahn and Darwin Deason said Tuesday that the company should sell itself to one of its rivals or a private equity firm, opposing a potential deal with Fujifilm, according to Reuters. http://axioslink/jtPN\n\nMore M&A\n• S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI), a provider or markets data and analytics, has agreed to set to acquire Panjiva, a New York-based provider of supply chain data. www.panjiva.com\n\n• The Adecco Group, a Swiss human resources services firm, has acquired Vettery, a New York-based recruiting startup, for just over $100 million, according to TechCrunch. http://axioslink/hBcz\n\n• Oracle has acquired Zenedge, an Aventura, Fla.-based cybersecurity solutions provider. www.zenedge.com\n\n• Bosch has acquired Splitting Fares, a Detroit-based startup that provides ride-sharing platforms. www.splt.io\n\nFundraising\n• EQT is seeking 10.75 billion euros ($13.2 billion) for a new buyout fund, according to the Financial Times.\n\n• TechOperators Venture Capital, an Atlanta-based venture capital firm, has raised $40.2 million toward a $100 million third venture fund, according to an SEC filing. www.techoperators.com\n\nIt's Personnel\n• Amy Errett has joined True Ventures as a venture partner. Erret will remain CEO of Madison Reed, a San Francisco-based hair color company. http://axioslink/r9h8\n\n• Jeff Schumacher is stepping down as CEO of BCG Digital Ventures and will become non-executive chairman of the firm. www.bcgdv.com\n\n• Nicholas Leiby has joined Weinberg Capital Group as director. He was previously vice president at Resilience Capital Partners. www.weinbergcap.com\n\nFinal Numbers\nReproduced from BP Energy Outlook 2018; Chart: Axios Visuals"}, {"sender": "Steven Sinofsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "Excerpt from below..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steven Sinofsky"], "timestamp": "2/21/2018 5:55:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21", "body": "Thx for taking the time"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025913.txt_2839
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025913.txt
|
FW: Gingrich view of Trump
|
[{"sender": "Brad Bowen [mail@impactoutdoor.com]", "recipients": ["Kevin McIntosh", "Ryan McIntosh <ryan@domain.com>", "A. Eckert", "Henry", "Terry Katka (cc)", "Coy E. Garrett (cc)", "Blake (cc)"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 2:16 PM", "subject": "FW: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Sis\npie"}, {"sender": "Kenny Shirley", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 12:11 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Realblondes", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 9, 2016 at 9:26:23 AM CST", "subject": "Fwd: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033584.txt_2848
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033584.txt
|
humor and trump and evolutionary logic
|
[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["REE jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "9/26/2016 8:59:46 PM", "subject": "humor and trump and evolutionary logic", "body": "was pleased that Robert Lynch's work and my own were cited in a Nation\narticle on the lack of humor of our Republican standard bearer\n\nhttps://www.thenation.com/article/have-you-ever-seen-donald-trump-laugh/\ncongratulations Robert\n\nJohn and Jeffrey, i will write you shortly"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031983.txt_2849
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031983.txt
|
Re: Fw:
|
[{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz [mailto:__", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: ", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe, \n\nI understand you have some questions about my client,\nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage \nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some \ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you \nsend me any facutal questions so that I can provide you \nwith accurate responses. \n\nI am also available to speak with you. My number is \n\nThank you, \n\nJay"}, {"sender": "Wolfe, Alexandra", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz, \n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on the \nphone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could \ntell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the information I already \nhave by you or him. \n\nThank you, \n\nAlexandra \n\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? \nCould he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference? \n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same \nclients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion? \n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising? \n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago? \n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell? \n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction? \n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why? \n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive? \n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "3/7/2011 7:12:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: ", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032422.txt_2852
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032422.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 2:02:04 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032252.txt_2854
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032252.txt
|
Re: bad
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 30, 2016, at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/us/politics/donald-trump-abortion.html?ribbon-ad-idx=3&rref=homepage&module=Ribbon&version=origin®ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Home%20Page&pgtype=article"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/31/2016 8:27:13 AM", "subject": "Re: bad", "body": "Agreed. Trump appears to be losing momentum in polls even before that crazy comment. Think it may be beginning of the end of him... http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026100.txt_2859
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026100.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/28/2017 12:14:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}]
| 8
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030762.txt_2864
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030762.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff <11.0111>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to Trump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747 \nAnd.. .1 have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:16:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im here today flying to nw york tomow. if he is up to it ild love to sit with him , house or on plane if we wants a ride"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023260.txt_2865
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023260.txt
|
agenda
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella as Cs"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:21 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "1 fees, amount and to what entities when and responsiblitis. 2. gagosian idea to save a minimum of 10 mill and maybe more. 3. i can walk you through carlyns screw up, 50 % would have made little difference and maybe made it worse . 4. we should have an all hands meeting with your family to talk about art distribution on death. . 5. phaidon, decantings ( already firmly in progress ) loans. (alan ) pent. ( with follow up ) all part of same elegant transaction, 6 asymetric risk worth at least 50- 60 no matter how you calculate. I can explain. 7 lets get the money issue out of the way once and for all. I have my team set to start."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella iii"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:52 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "1) pg 1 A\" unequal shares\". pg 23 \"removal of trustees \" absolute. dont be confused with abiltiy to set"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021758.txt_2870
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021758.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Sica! EE"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 19 2009 11:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida money manager who once roamed in the same social circle as Bill Clinton, Prince\nAndrew and other high profile figures, is going to be released from prison early, a source tells\nRadarOnline.com.\n\nEpstein pleaded guilty last year to procuring teen girls for prostitution, ending his lifestyle with the rich and\nfamous in a Palm Beach, Florida scandal that reverberated through high-profile society. He received an 18-\nmonth sentence and was slated to be incarcerated until the end of this year.\n\nBut now, says the source, the jail door is about to swing open because Epstein has been secretly helping the feds\nunravel a suspected Ponzi scheme. He had inside knowledge of the scheme because he was one of its victims,\n\nlosing $67 million.\n\nThe source says it’s all tied to the indictment of former managers of Bear Stearns Mortgage Investment Fund, and\nin that case Epstein is the person who is identified only as Victim # 1.\n\nMeanwhile, Epstein’s life behind bars hasn’t been too rough — in fact he’s allowed to spend most days at his\nattorney’s office. He was supposedly working on a charity venture but the source says he was actually busy\nhelping the feds with the Ponzi scheme. One source says that he’s been guarded by men in suits with\nearphones.\n\nWell if those suits are going to follow him when he’s freed they better pack bathing suits. Epstein owns Little St.\nJames Island in the Virgin Islands."}, {"sender": "Peggy Sicgal li", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you cut and paste and email to my blackberry...I can't open this up. Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Fri Jun 19 16:17:18 2009", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.radaronline.com/category/tags/jeffrey- epstein <http://www.radaronline.com/category/tags/jeffrey- epstein>\n\nHELP ; areporter for the ny times wants to write the following ; Epsteins lawyers were contacted and they said they had no comment.. We\nhave checked with some of the worlds financial experts ,both in and out of gov't , the consensus is that if Epstein is cooperating with the\nfeds the average intelligence of the u.s. government , just went up dramatically."}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022245.txt_2886
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022245.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun Sep 27 19:35:33 2009", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when does have to get back? [went to new york"}, {"sender": "Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No later than Wednesday probably.."}, {"sender": "J J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "On 9/28/09 6:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thanks,, where are you.. i loved your bono mick story,,"}, {"sender": "gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am in CA — that friend of yours whom I think lives in Paris was at the conference..she spoke to you last week..claims to be in charge of a hedge fund or something"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon Sep 28 19:16:28 2009", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do yu mean nicole junkerman"}, {"sender": "Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "That's her..I couldn't remember her name"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Gmax [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "9/28/2009 11:34:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "we just rea;lzied that the picture , in my kitchen is me clinton and ted. how funny"}]
| 7
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026672.txt_2891
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026672.txt
|
Did you see that Trump retweeted my story?
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/17/2017 4:29:23 PM", "subject": "Did you see that Trump retweeted my story?", "body": "I think my wife is going to change the lock on the door tonight. \nhttps://twitter.com/realDonaldTrumastatus/842739155230740481"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025898.txt_2893
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025898.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ehud Barak"], "timestamp": "Aug 8, 2015, at 22:05", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thought you might find amusing"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:57 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ehud Barak", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, August 9, 2015", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nI really find it amusing. I don't agree with everything he says. But it is fascinating. BB is making \"historic\nmistakes\"(as he likes to blame others) both vis-a-vis Obama as well as in regard to the American Jewry. And\ncauses a direct damage to IL.\n\nNoam is so sharp and focused. Really impressive.\n\nI did not fully understand how the fallacy he sees in the attitude to the Ants example is related to Big Data\nillusions. An area (deep learning) I spent some time recently trying to better penetrate.\n\nBtw, the series of cubic differences should look 7,19,37,61 (not 21).\n\nWe greatly enjoyed staying in 62nd.\n\nWe plan to be back in the last week of Aug. for several weeks (having some speeches to make)\n\nwill you still be in NM?\n\nIf positive we might come over for few days.\n\nPl let us know.\n\nBest\n\nFrom Nili as well.\n\nRegards\n\nEB"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ehud Barak"], "timestamp": "Aug 10, 2015, at 03:25", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Correct on cube . Do you know what date yet in August ?"}, {"sender": "Ehud Bark", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/10/2015 5:09:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeff\n\nAs of now we plan to be in NY around August 25. We plan to work on my biography with the editor. Probably\nstarting Sept 1st. But it's all flexible till Sept 11 and on, when I have my speeches and other events.\n\nBest\n\nEB"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033369.txt_2895
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033369.txt
|
Trump financial disclosure
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/13/2019 2:49:13 PM", "subject": "Trump financial disclosure", "body": "Catching up on some reading and finally read trumps 100 pages of nonsense. Some interesting findings:\n1) foundation is inactive\n\n2) ironic that starett city largest federal subsidized housing project which trump had 4 percent interest was\nfinally sold while he is president.\n\nhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bizjournals.com/newyork/news/2018/05/09/starrett-city-sells-giving-\n\ntrump-a-profit.amp.html\n\n3) other than doral and post office hotel no substantial income from any of his enties that he showed..\n4) 30 pages of stock purchases and sales all 5-15k.\n\n5) cash in his name 25mm or less\n\n6) still has money in revocable trust from his father at jpm 1-5mm\n\n7) claims to have as much as 125mm in trump revocable trust at cap one, professional bank, signature bank and\nbank United but can be as little as 40mm it mins were real numbers.\n\nDidn’t he once say he say he had billions of liquidity..\n\n8) valued planes from 56 to over 86mm. Down from 300mm on earlier disclosures..\n\n9) Bank used for last mortgage on ocean drive purchase is a coral gables bank that is opening in boca as well.\n\nhttps://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/05/16/read-president-donald-trumps-financial-disclosure-report.html\n\nhttps://myprobank.com/"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023274.txt_2900
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023274.txt
| null |
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:10 PM", "subject": null, "body": "emblematic of my frustration and ,in the end what I believe is a waste of our time energy money and resources. is the very simple question of bidco bank accounts. 4 months ago I asked the question , does it have a bank account and if so , who has authority, where is it located and what transacations ran through it. it is only one question out of hundreds that need to be answered. hundreds. . you asked that i not behave like Zeus and try to explain why I want need certain things. since i said to placate Brad's inquisitive ness and his desire to learn I said a filing might be required. instead of merely getting me the answer. he has talked to joslin paul weiss , you , you wanted to ask brad karp. ( maybe a filing that reopened things, )\n\nnone of this as a practical matter has any influence upon the ultimate action taken . I merely needed to know a simple answer. and today after asking at least every week since then do not have an answer. I have been trying not to add stress to your day. 1 try to explain things and take the time to do so gently, ( not my forte . this is one question out of hundreds. the fact that a 21 year old was in the office only xeroxing for a month, was obvious to everyone in the office. having a 26 year old xeroxing instead doesnt move us forward, answers first. copying old files. can wait."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:56 PM", "subject": "another flowery email.", "body": "I am sorry. I realize you are under tremendous stress, In Bedford you asked me for my help I could not have been more clear that thought it very unwise as in my words I did not want any financial arrangment between us, it risked conflict and tension what neither of us needed more of. and did not want to risk torturing our friendship into the likes of the kind you have with Mark nor Josh, : now,- I dont have anyone but you yelling at me , in my own house. no one. it is highly unpleasant but I am trying my best to be understanding . sorry. From the outset and as you told me you recall. 1 tsuggested that three years should be the period of engagment. as planning is not a one year excericse . you declined to commit to a number of alternatives presented to you for payment of the third year. I told you in nov that you should decide whether to now sign on for that very third year as the vast majority of my work ended on oct 15. you recently told me you thought i was kidding. -you hired brad patting him on the back that after months of inquiry he can now, finallly tell you which llc owns the cars??\n\nonce he has all the facts what next ??._ whether or not you refer to a portion of the third year as after care, or whatever term besides 'scoundrel you choose to use, I m not sure why you assume now it should be free.( 1 HATE THIS CONVERSATION < HATE , ) andi heard you when you said you told me what was | work still to be done you thought valuable enough to pay for. please tell me . and then we can decide the next steps ,,, if any. I consider my work rarefied art. I guess the value is in the eye of the beholder . IT reminds me of those people looking at a modern art piece and saying \" my child could do that\". hope you are feeling better."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:50 AM", "subject": null, "body": "ada and brad are respondbile for the loan ,. docs, at a minimum, leon he hasn't read the financial statements SINCE DEC. !!. impossible ,had he done so the silly numbers jump off the page . ( sent in another email ). it is a financial office., 190 million sitting unused in CASH , budget and planning person"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032711.txt_2906
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032711.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I didn’t offer him a time yet . As I need my marching orders;)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just his plan. Trump is going to go down--why doesn't use this opportunity to strike out on his own? Also,\ngently imply I have tapes. I wonder, btw, if he isn't interested in talking to you about in fact bringing down\n\nTrump. Can't wait to hear?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "212 772 9416"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 10:57:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Up?"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026114.txt_2907
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026114.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Wow I wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You can come earlier if you like?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Mon, May 29, 2017 at 8:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "can you call my cell"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "At wake now. Is AM ok - what is #"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Nick, Donald has recently said that I betrayed him 15 years ago , he said there was a lawsuit that he asked me to get involved and help and I refused. Do you have any insight ??"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/3/2017 12:19:29 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Or u can call me now"}]
| 14
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023044.txt_2914
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023044.txt
|
Fwd:
|
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 10:18:49 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "have fun"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 5:18 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "prostittion is a state crime, never before a man in his own house charged with soliciting. ! in Florida first offenders are required to take a sex ed class and get pre trial diversion, no criminal record. . . there is a felony solication for the THIRD offense. . A grand jury was held and they found me guilty of one count of felony solitciation. because there were many girls. . mandatory diversion. sentence. !!!! a grand jury . ususally only for capital murder cases. . Recarey and Reiter ( police chief). pulled my garbage for months, and surveilled the house . letting all the gilrs come and go ? ! called in the FBI. they did not like the grand jury result. and released to the press, the raw sewage of police interviews , ie, no girl was cross examined EVER. . Unheard of . - the girls retunred the house multiplie times. for 200 dollars for a rub and tug. . no sex. . some worked in the locak massage parlors, most in thier mid twenties.. There is only press stories told my strippers of me buying my girlfiedn from slovakia from her parents . girls under 15. . all made up to get press. . FBI / puts a task force together title\" operation leap year\" to investigate my personal massage activity ?! nuts. interviews my chiropractor ? medical info. . etc. worked at Mara Lago. Trump knew of it. and came to my house many times during that period. The testimony of the houseman John allessi confiremed it. He never got a massage. abe gosman a friend of mine. ran into financial difficulty with assited living homes. . His home was listed at 45 million dollars. with no takers for months on end . He and I agreed a price of 30m. ( His wife . ends up going to jail for lying to the bankrupty trustee about her jewelry. ) this is in the summer of 04. . I became the stalking horse bidder at 36 m. ie if someone bid higher I would receive a fee. trump buys the house at the telephone auction. only me trump andd his friend pulty the developer. He quickly puts it on the market for 125 million, serves the purpose of a justification for a high sale later . . and no one will touch it. it is is bough in the name of trump properties 11c.. no idea who owns it. or what else it\" owns \". Three years later 08 he sells it to Ryboloolev for approx 100 million. He should have had a 50 million plus capital gain. he tells people and press he spent 20-30 m to fix up. that would justifiy a reduction in captial gains, key question how did he report the sale , if he did at all on his 08 tax return. He has no money. when he buys the house. His biz model is putting his name on a real estate development and gets a fee for using his name. The hotel biz is just that. someone else buys the hotel. hoping to make a profit from its operation and eventual sale. Trump put his name on it, and get a 2 % fee and maybe a piece of the profit if any on sale. He touts the project as \" his \" . just as in his current financial statements on file as president he lists his \" income \" as the GROSS receipts of the clubs, with no expenses deducted. not his personal revenue. ie the doral golf club loses money every year. it pays out more than it takes in , but he lists the revenue as his income. AMAZING."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032739.txt_2918
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032739.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomorrow"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [reid.weingarten@wilmerhale.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 3:19:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Flying in from vancouver now...about to board...what works best for you tomorrow?"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031088.txt_2919
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031088.txt
|
RE:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 17, 2010 7:32 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "woody asked summer , so what do you do? 30 minutes later , she had not taken a breath. . either medicated, or\nmanic..,\n\nDe ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee a"}, {"sender": "Faith Kate Sis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/17/2010 1:13:39 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Neither very funny...always ask for the 3 minute version but most of the girls you Know haven't spoken for a total of 30\nminutes in all the time you knew them....she is a GREAT girl who is refreshing in this business totally focused and smart.\nJeffrey | brought her to a meeting with scientists a few months back she knew more than they did and totally embarrassed\nnot only the scientists but the client was totally unprepared for what she knew, she actually was able to tell them things\nthey were and weren't doing that they had no clue of and they changed there practices at p&g!!!! this is the kind of girl to\nmold she is the leader in her field of sustainability ny times wrote an article if you cant afford al gore hire summer rayne\nsays something.\n\nXOXO"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030986.txt_2923
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030986.txt
|
Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill
|
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "https://thehill.com/policy/finance/422577-trump-considering-firing-federal-reserve-chief-after-latest-interest-rate-hike"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018, at 9:22 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "In 1993, Powell began working as a managing director for Bankers Trust, but he quit in 1995 after the bank got into trouble when several customers suffered large losses due to derivatives. He then went back to work for Dillon, Read & Co.\nhe didnt understand the markets 25 years ago. obama appointed him to the board, what else do you guys need to know"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 3:31:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report I TheHill", "body": "LMAO\nPerfect mnuchin hit"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029569.txt_2931
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029569.txt
|
Re: invitation
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed. \nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to \nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next \ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar \nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a \nyoung girl. \nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \n\"bootleg\" episode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with \nme and you were so kind to make it happen. \nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey, \nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "serena , bill clinon shaque and,,,,, have all on pbs. ? read poetry for children. I would love to have you \ndo the same........blah blah blah do not say come on my show."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:39 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "this poem about childbirth and is not for children. \nIt's for adults and it raises awareness on the issues of discrimination against women athletes in sports \n,and, against women of color in childbirth. These are Serena's big issues now. \nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "sorry , that was meant as a filler what is important is that she is joining the others priority . and not \nappearing on your show. ! :) i invite you to appear is DOA"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:45 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "can you give me a little bit of phrasing you think is optimal? I'm not sure I know how to ask her to join this \ncompany without asking her to be \npart of poetry in america. It does also seem to me perhaps relevant that Serena thinks of herself as a poetry \nperson. \nFor people who think that way, maybe not nothing (hasn't been nothing to others) that a Harvard poetry \nprofessor seeks her wisdom on the art form? \nWould really appreciate your edit. \nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Elisa New"], "timestamp": "11/25/2018 11:55:13 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": ""}]
| 8
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031326.txt_2932
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031326.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "gmax1@ellmax.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/2/2011 7:09:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I have been thinking about that..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Gmax"], "timestamp": "Sat Apr 02 14:25:45 2011", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i want you to realize that that dog that hasn't barked is trump.. virignia spent hours at my house with him ,, he has never once been mentioned. police chief. etc. im 75 % there"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022624.txt_2935
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022624.txt
|
Re: Filing in Epstein case
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 27, 2014", "subject": "Re: Filing in Epstein case", "body": "Disgusting: Clinton Snared In Pedophile Ring\n\nWill having friends in high places exempt him from the rule of law?\n\nSr\n\nis Zane — March 27, 2014\n\nAccording to former child sex slave Virginia Roberts and a class action lawsuit against convicted billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, former President Bill Clinton was present during sex parties involving up to twenty underage girls at Epstein’s secluded island in the Caribbean. That flight records show Clinton was flown on numerous occasions to the island on Epstein’s private jet. Clinton had a close relationship with an employee of Epstein’s who compiled thousands of photos of nude young girls posed in lewd positions. And these photos were used as a catalog for Epstein to loan out his girls to powerful politicians and British royalty, including Bill Clinton.\n\nAccording to the lawsuit:\n\n..-Clinton was friends with an unnamed woman who “kept images of naked underage children on her computer, helped to recruit underage children for Epstein... and photographed underage females in sexually explicit poses.”\n\nWhile Epstein was indicted and jailed for his pedophilia, Bill Clinton oddly has remained unscathed, more than likely by having friends in high places.\n\nIf Bill Clinton is in fact a pedophile, will the American people demand that he be put away for a very long time so that he can’t hurt any more children? Or will having friends in high places exempt him from the rule of law?\n\nTime will tell."}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Martin G Weinberg"], "timestamp": "12/31/2014 11:43:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Filing in Epstein case", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021764.txt_2937
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021764.txt
|
Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles
|
[{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Joyce"], "timestamp": "08/12/2008 09:33PM", "subject": "Epstein News Articles", "body": "I am looking forward to meeting with you on Wednesday. Please find below (and attached as a PDF file),\nsome background information for your reference. Thanks for agreeing to have this discussion.\n\nRegards,\n\nMike"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:53 AM", "subject": "Fw: Epstein News Articles", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz fim Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 3:01:31 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein News Articles", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033341.txt_2942
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033341.txt
|
POTUS
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 8:12:28 PM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nJust heads up\nPresident Trump arrives PBI today and is scheduled to depart 9pm on Sunday,\nShould not effect our arrival at 11:30pm Sunday evening\n\nThx\nLarry"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347.txt_2947
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347.txt
|
Re: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 15, 2012 5:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "do i assume that you have no more option questions?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 15, 2012 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Dealing with the Jackson shitshow right now...options problems are a pimple in an elephant's ass in the case...when are you next in nyc"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 15, 2012 5:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "not sure, when is your opening? i am not referrring to either sheryl or c"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 15, 2012 11:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "What a funny dude you are two weeks from tomorrow...having dinner tonite with your buddy wild bill c...should I bring you up?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 15, 2012 04:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "richardson ?? of course or gates?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/16/2012 1:00:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Clinton"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033355.txt_2951
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033355.txt
|
The New York Times: Trump tax figures show over $1 billion in losses over 10 years
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2019 12:36:13 AM", "subject": "The New York Times: Trump tax figures show over $1 billion in losses over 10 years", "body": "Trump tax figures show over $1 billion in losses over 10 years\nThe Times obtained details from a decade of the president’s tax returns, revealing $1.17 billion in business\nlosses. Here’s what else the numbers show.\n\nRead in The New York Times: https://apple.news/AnDrX8 VebSwagqxfHkuKK85g\n\nShared from Apple News"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031332.txt_2959
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031332.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "gmax1@ellmax.com", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/2/2011 2:20:56 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Dear President Obama:\nI am writing today with a somewhat unusual request.\n\nFirst and foremost, I am asking that you return America to its August 20th, 1959 borders so that Hawaii is no longer a state and you are no longer a citizen.\nSincerely,\nPrime Minister\nBenjamin Netanyahu"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031454.txt_2960
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031454.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\n\nBecause of this.\n\nThat story will never die."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl\nlauren petrella"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <landon.thomas@nytimes.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am serious man -- for the good of the nation why not try to get some of this out there. I would not do it myself, but would pass on to a political reporter.\n\nhttp://www.buzzfeed.com/alexcampbell/court-papers-trump-ate-at-jeffrey-epsteins-house#.1toekLMRz6\n\nPlus: look at these lies!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "http://en.actu-cci.com/features/200-women-managers/8910-celina-midelfart-the-queen-of-glamour my 20 year old girlfriend in 93„ that after two years i gave to donald"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 10:18:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Amazing! When is last time you talked to him?"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026128.txt_2961
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026128.txt
|
Re: some questions...
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/8/2017 8:52:26 PM", "subject": "Re: some questions...", "body": "A bit tone deaf, but a reasonable basis for creating a brief. If there's any issues you'd like me to clarify with him or explore, lemme know. It's just a friendly lunch, with the prospect of some Trump info."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:48 PM", "subject": "Re: some questions...", "body": "Thoughts"}, {"sender": "Matthew Hiltzik", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:37 PM", "subject": "some questions...", "body": "Attached and below please find some initial questions for you... Looking forward to connecting over the next two days... 1. Please provide a brief overview of your professional background? 2. Who were your mentors? Do you keep in touch with any of them? 3. What are your 5 best professional achievements? 4. Who are some of your business partners? 5. Who are third-party validators who would speak on your behalf on the record? 6. Who are third-party validators who would speak on your behalf off the record? 7. What business projects are you currently working on? 8. What are your 5 best scientific achievements? 9. What are you currently working on in the science field? 10. What research institutions are you collaborating with? 11. What past philanthropic causes are you most proud of? 12. What philanthropic causes are you currently working on? 13. What organizations are you collaborating with philanthropically? 14. What upcoming events are you putting together or participating in? 15. What specific impacts have the accusations had on your career? 16. What specific impacts have the accusations had on your personal life? 17. What are the top 10-15 misrepresentations of what actually happened? 18. How are you specifically treated differently at home and abroad? 19. Are there any outstanding legal challenges that you are facing? 20. What are the other outstanding lawsuits that may draw publicity to your case? 21. Is there anything else upcoming that may draw interest to your case? 22. Have you agreed to any non-disclosures? Are there things you can't say about your case? 23. Did you ever write an op-ed? Would you ever write an op-ed?"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030992.txt_2964
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030992.txt
|
Fwd: FW: As Obama says "We've got problems"
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/14/2009 7:02:11 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: As Obama says \"We've got problems\"", "body": ""}, {"sender": "gmax <gmax@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:15 PM", "subject": "FW: As Obama says \"We've got problems\"", "body": "We are in trouble.... \nThe population of this America is 300 \nmillion. \n160 million are retired. \nThat leaves 140 million to do the work. \nThere are 85 million in school. \nWhich leaves 55 million to do the work. \nOf this there are 35 million employed by \nthe federal government. \nLeaving 20 million to do the work. \n2.8 million are in the armed forces \npreoccupied with killing Osama \nBin-Laden. \nWhich leaves 17.2 million to do the work. \nTake from that total the 15..8 million \npeople who work for state and city \nGovernments. And that leaves 1.4 million \nto do the work. \nAt any given time there are 188,000 people \nin hospitals. \nLeaving 1,212,000 to do the work. \nNow, there are 1,211,998 people in prisons. \nThat leaves just two people to do the work. \nYou and me. \nAnd there you are, \nSitting on your chair, \nAt your computer, reading jokes. \nNice. Real nice."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413.txt_2965
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413.txt
|
Re: Mechanisms for learning
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Cells seem to be mostly indistinguishable (except for XX), I thought?\nSize is different on average, but males with small brains are still male.\n\ngender differenece. unlikely motivational. every cell is different. size is didfferent. .\n\nthe more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human\" cell: the body the membrane, . the\norganizm the colletcions and interactions of brains. wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money\nused as signals. as is spoken language.. what does social behavior mean , it is the cooridination of indiv\nbrains. =\n\nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they\nare all math , then political correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of\nthoughts. its not emotinal for me.\n\nmost people have censorship built in at a deep level, social reasoning gets to different results than equivalent\nabstract reasoning"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 6:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Variation of all traits is higher for males, so there are more high IQ men (wider bell-curve). Given average\nbrain size difference, the small difference in average IQ is surprising, I think"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "Jul 24, 2016 00:20", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "the average is the only thing that matters"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 1:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Average humans are probably not fully able to learn how to program etc. Fraction of people that reshape the\nworld are at the right end of the Bell curves, so difference in variation means fewer women. We tend to be\nmore interested in the outliers. Have people explicitly evolved to be not to be too smart on average, or is\ngeneral intelligence so hard to get from human brains?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "7/24/2016 5:44:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "average humans is the wrong term. it is humans that are distributed think ant colony.( workers soldiers etc\n) not average ant. no such thing. in isolation"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029271.txt_2981
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029271.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wott [ia"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:09:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you want to be provacative .? trump shuttle. hawaiin tropic contests.. mortgage on mara\nlago. ? revenue of golf courses as income.??! , total debt of all cos .? people dont want to conribute money\nas he said he is worth over 10b , why should they? , calif already coming up short. . fatther bought chips in\nthe casino to stave off bankruptcy, chips because it was better than a first lien. under the gambling\nrules. matt his bag man? his loan from his brother in law ( JUdges husband) how much did his father\nleave. his brother robert etc.\n\notherwise you can just throw easys"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032218.txt_2985
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032218.txt
|
Tim Zagat
|
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/25/2018 8:15:47 PM", "subject": "Tim Zagat", "body": "Tim Zagat would like to take you to dinner some time soon! he says he is always in NY from Sunday night to WEd...and of course you are always invited to go see him in the country for dinner Thurs-Sunday...he says\n\nhe was in Paris for the past 2 weeks and had amazing dinners..He also wants to tell you about he dream he had about Trump!\n\nTim's office\nTim's Home:\n\nTim's cell:"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028850.txt_2986
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028850.txt
|
Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune
|
[{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2014 6:57:02 PM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "Calling you from a 310 #... \nPlease use my alternative address, \nto avoid email auto responder"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 27, 2014, at 04:41", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "if you havetime"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "President Obama's response to the Ukraine crisis, while derided by critics as slow and weak, has \nreinvigorated a 15-year global hunt for the Russian leader's hidden wealth. \nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/27/world/sanctions-revive-search-for-secret-putin-\nfortune.html?smid=nytnow-share&smprod=nytnow"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022817.txt_2998
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022817.txt
|
Fwd: Viceland
|
[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "8/13/2018 7:30:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Viceland", "body": "Fyi\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Matt Williams", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "August 13, 2018 at 3:15:32 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "Thank you Marty,\n\nThe questions we wanted to reach out to Mr Epstein for comment are listed below. Feel free to contact me on\na -: reviewing. Kind regards - Matt\n\nA former employee has told us that Donald Trump attended Mr Epstein's Palm Beach estate on at least two occasions. Does Mr\nEpstein recall hosting Donald Trump at that residence?\n\nOn one such occasion, it has been suggested to us that Mr Epstein and Donald Trump watched “young girls try on bikinis” while making\ncomments on the their bodies.” Does Mr Epstein have any comment?\n\nHow does Mr Epstein respond to claims that women - some under the legal age of sexual consent - were used as “sex slaves” at his\nproperties?\n\nA former employee of Mr Epstein has alleged to us that Mr Epstein sexually assaulted her on\nnumerous occasions. Does Mr Epstein have a comment?\n\nDid or does Mr Epstein have cameras inside rooms at his Palm Beach residence?\n\nDid Mr Epstein remove those cameras before police raided the property as part of the investigation into alleged crimes? Did Mr Epstein\never hand over any recordings from any cameras at his properties to the authorities as part of his non-prosecution agreement?\n\nDoes Mr Epstein have in his possession any video recordings of Donald Trump taken from inside his Palm Beach estate or any other\nresidence?\n\nDid Mr Epstein hold sex parties at his residences involving girls under the age of sexual consent? Was Donald Trump ever present at\nany of these parties?\n\nHas Mr Epstein upheld the conditions of his sentencing and registered as a sex offender in all jurisdictions in which he is due to do so?\n\nDoes Mr Epstein have any comment regarding allegations made by a woman named in the media as Virginia Giuffre/Roberts relating to\nher being sexually abused by Mr Epstein or used as a \"sex slave\"?\n\nENDS"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["Matt Williams"], "timestamp": "13 August 2018 at 14:52", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "If you still want, send the questions. | would talk with you off the record after reviewing them (reserving the right at my\noption to make an on the record statement), hope that works for you. Marty"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031705.txt_3003
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031705.txt
|
Fwd: Why not in Vegas?
|
[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/2/2012 5:57:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Why not in Vegas?", "body": "I'll make this quick. I have one question and one observation about Mitt Romney’s visit to Israel. The question\nis this: Since the whole trip was not about learning anything but about how to satisfy the political whims of the\nright-wing, super pro-Bibi Netanyahu, American Jewish casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, why didn’t they just\ndo the whole thing in Las Vegas? I mean, it was all about money anyway — how much Romney would abase\nhimself by saying whatever the Israeli right wanted to hear and how big a jackpot of donations Adelson would\nshower on the Romney campaign in return. Really, Vegas would have been so much more appropriate than\nJerusalem. They could have constructed a plastic Wailing Wall and saved so much on gas."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029503.txt_3006
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029503.txt
|
A hilarious attempt by TE-A-ME to "Purify" Trump | A TE-A-ME Intervention - YouTube
|
[{"sender": "Deepak Chopra", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2016 7:26:43 PM", "subject": "A hilarious attempt by TE-A-ME to \"Purify\" Trump | A TE-A-ME Intervention - YouTube", "body": "The Indians are getting involved https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=share&v=hY y7qy2AQeo"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029582.txt_3007
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029582.txt
|
Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/12/2018 6:28:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "sexy"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "How are you sneaky?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "Yup"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "Woow0"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033004.txt_3009
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033004.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 7:53:55 PM", "subject": null, "body": "how did today go . . https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/29/close-friend-trump-thomas-barrack-alleged-tax-evasion-italy-sardinia?CMP=share btn fb"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024930.txt_3020
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024930.txt
|
Fwd: Fw: shikh mohammed first media e session
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:06:58 -0400", "subject": "shikh mohammed first media e session", "body": "UAE Prime Minister \nFirst Media e-Session with the Prime Minister \nDear Friends in the Media: \nI write this in the spirit of good will to thank all of you for your interest in communicating with me through the \nofficial Prime Minister's Web site. \n\nThis is the second time that I have responded to your questions online; the first time was eight years ago, when \nInternet communications were still in the nascent stage -- although, I must say, Dubai and the United Arab \nEmirates had already made noteworthy progress in this field. During that initial online interview, my objective \nwas to stimulate the interest of the Emirati community in the Internet when the use of the online \ncommunications was relatively limited. \n\nToday the usage of the Internet across the UAE has come to be taken for granted; in fact, the Web has been \nadopted so extensively in both the public and private sectors that e-communications are the norm rather than the \nexception. We see that a large segment of our society, especially young people, believe that the Internet is the \nmost important source of information, education and entertainment. \n\nThe UAE continues to lead the Arab world in adoption of information and communication technology \naccording to the annual global infor mation technology report released before yesterday. \n\nLittle wonder, then, that I get inundated with questions from citizens and media alike. That's why I have chosen \nto meet with you via my Web site. I think hosting this encounter online will allow all of you to ask as many \nquestions as you wish. In the last few days alone, I have received hundreds of questions from several local and \nregional newspapers. Naturally, there was some overlapping of questions since they came from so many \ndifferent sources. Hence, I have tried to consolidate my answers in such a manner that I do not come across as \nrepetitious. \n\nThis \"interview,\" of course, relates to questions from the media, whose work I consider especially significant in \ntelling the story of how Dubai and the UAE are coping successfully with the global financial crisis, and how our \ndevelopment plans are being advanced with the resilience and determination that has always characterized \nEmirati society. \n\nI have also received many questions from everyday Emiratis, and these will be answered in a subsequent \ncommunication. \n\nIn the meantime, I hope my responses will generate positive discussion about the issues and values that Dubai \nand the UAE care about — the strengthening of a society that's anchored in unique Emirati traditions, and the \ncontinued building of a global city to which all are welcome, a city that is well integrated in the fast changing \nglobal commons that we all must share. Dubai is not only a catalyst of change; it is an exemplar of change. And \nI am proud of that, just as I am proud of the economic and social contributions that Emiratis and their well-\nwishers have made over these years to furthering the Dubai Vision."}, {"sender": "Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["Jeffery vacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:03 PM", "subject": "Fw: shikh mohammed first media e session", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 18 2009 07:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: shikh mohammed first media e session", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025873.txt_3029
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025873.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["David Sterr i"], "timestamp": "4 Jan 2015, at 08:23", "subject": "Re:", "body": "pa people could showcase the lack of her credibility as in the story she details a dinner with clinton on my island down to where he was sitting howver it never ever happened CLINTON was never on the island the story , heli is all a total fiction. it could help shred her story."}, {"sender": "David Sterr i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 8:31:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Understood"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032224.txt_3030
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032224.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is living proof of the adage that it is better to be lucky than smart."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill give you details when i see you, when are you in ny?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Going up to NY Friday morning. Think Iam going to drive. I will then stop to pee and get gas at a rest stop\non the New Jersey turnpike, will observe all of the people there who are at least 100 pounds overweight, will\nhave a mild panic attack as a result of the observation, and will then decide that I am not eating another bite of\nfood for the rest of my life out of fear that I will end up like one of these people."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015 at 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what time , I will come up"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 2:38:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will leave @ 9, so will be in ny @ 1 pm."}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032230.txt_3035
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032230.txt
|
Fw: Meet?
|
[{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg [martinweinberg@i...]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 12:18:58 AM", "subject": "Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mosk, Matthew", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 6:08 PM", "subject": "Meet?", "body": "Mr. Weinberg —\n\nI am a reporter with the ABC News investigative unit. We are gathering background research on the major candidates for President.\n\nSeeing that both former President Clinton and Mr. Trump have been mentioned in connection to the Jeffrey Epstein case, I am interested in better understanding the case, it’s current status, and any information that could help explain Mr. Epstein’s dealings and interactions with both men.\n\nI would very much appreciate the chance to meet and discuss this subject in an off the record conversation at your earliest convenience.\n\nPlease let me know if that would be possible, and if so, when and where we could meet.\nMany thanks,\n\nMatthew"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028621.txt_3038
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028621.txt
|
FW: Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013
|
[{"sender": "Boris Nikolic <n", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 26 2013 02:46 PM", "subject": "FW: Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013", "body": "See good article re balmer below.\nStill awaiting for call reply"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032936.txt_3048
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032936.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jean.huguen i: Lesley Gott"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 12:22:35 AM", "subject": null, "body": "can you delay your trip one week, . trump related issues occupying my time. say 13 14 instead"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030789.txt_3053
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030789.txt
|
Re: A few thoughts
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 10:36:12 AM", "subject": "Re: A few thoughts", "body": "yes, and hannity and he seemed jet lagged and sloppy . it had bit of air of desperation. ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:55 AM", "subject": "Re: A few thoughts", "body": "1) I saw SB in London yesterday and he seemed especially paranoid about any reporters seeing me with him. \nMy guess is that he is working hard on his relationship with Trump who he sees as newly ascendent and being \nseen with me might queer that. \n2) He went on Hannity last night and will be on Piers Morgan tomorrow and that seemed with an eye toward \nan audience of one. \n3) He was having a meeting yesterday with the French right wingers, including Le Pen's husband, about \nrefinancing the National Front Party because apparently a good part of their money comes from Russia. Two \nthoughts here, these guys seemed like idiots, pure Ruritania, and Bannon, surrounded by his own thuggish-\nlooking security people and whacky-bloggers advisors, thrives precisely because the world of populism is so \nunprofessional (if not farcical). \nmore later..."}]
| 2
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.