thread_id
stringlengths 37
43
| source_file
stringlengths 35
37
| subject
stringlengths 0
231
⌀ | messages
stringlengths 88
34.9k
| message_count
int64 1
42
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533.txt_4153
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533.txt
|
Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’
|
[{"sender": "Thomas D. Williams <thomasdwilliams@breitbart.com>", "recipients": ["Oliver Lane", "Raheem Kassam", "Alexander Marlow", "Frances Martel", "Adrienne Ross"], "timestamp": "March 11, 2018 at 5:13:03 PM GMT+1", "subject": "Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Germans get it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 11, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "luv it"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Pretty powerful"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 11, 2018, at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Unfortunately I just spoke to one of the country leaders that we discussed, , I will fly there tomorw night\n\nnow and then to new york wednesday night. sorry. will be in new york thurs and friday. we should lay\nouta strategy plan.. how much fun... travel safe."}, {"sender": "Sean Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/11/2018 8:08:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is ‘As Dangerous as Ever’", "body": "Roger that. Thanks for having us today."}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt_4154
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "<> or TS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are we meeting in new york?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<> or TS"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "<> or TS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now'\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<> or TS"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": "<>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<> or TS"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": "<> or TS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hi habebey .. i m in new york .. the sooner we meet the faster i go back to be with my son on his first week in a\nnew school ..\n\nif you bussy dont worry i can wait until thursday ..\n\nthnx again\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<> or TS"], "timestamp": "Sep 13, 2017, at 4:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wed at 2?"}, {"sender": "TS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 5:31:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in my car at your door .. can i ring or 2 sharp?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]
| 9
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032914.txt_4156
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032914.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in paris today, headed for new york. . trump gives many new things to do"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y. <____________________>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wish you a safe trip back. Congratulations on your new president. You are made to handle all uncertainties and meet new challenges. Wish you the best and assure you of all my possible support. I am in contact with the Sharia guys and hope to come back to you next week regarding the e-currency. Look forward to see you in Marrakech or in NY if nothing works out."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:19:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When marrahesh ? Is it definite"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019318.txt_4159
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019318.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Maria Luisa", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT", "subject": null, "body": ""}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029154.txt_4163
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029154.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Haig, David", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/19/2018 3:19:49 AM", "subject": null, "body": "dear men\ni am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene-culture co-evolutionist—without the genes\ni do so because four lines down i tell the \"Gruterites\"—Gordon Getty's echo chamber—that i have added you two to the list\nso here is your chance to say \"no way\" and i will delete that from the message and likewise not ask Gruter's assistant to add your names to the list\nhaving said that, i find Gordon's missives much less burdensome than those from EDGE and certainly without the egomaniacal nonsense that infects John Brockman—the key is to get the brightest minds in a room and have them tell each other what they think is most important—or some such nonsense\nneither David nor i can think of a single scientific advance achieved that way—most of what we do is simply concentrated sustained thought directed toward the foundations of a problem\ni doubt Jeffrey has made a huge amount of money via the EDGE program\nunless you say otherwise, i will shortly send you the key Getty missives in which he asserts, i believe correctly, that Trump is an archetypal narcissistic psychopath—or whatever the precise term is—and that he must be opposed with full force on that basis\nmeanwhile, David has heard plenty about you Jeffrey, a financial/mathematical mind of exceptional quality and you should know that David is one of the very top evolutionary geneticists still breathing and my teacher on every detail large and small\nin haste and all best\nbob"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026267.txt_4164
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026267.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 23, 2018, at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "<IMG-7184.jpg>"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is that Steve Bannon?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes We have become friends you will like him"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump doesn't like him"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dont belive thepress"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 1:25:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031338.txt_4173
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031338.txt
|
Fw: Google Alert - jeffrey epstein
|
[{"sender": "G Maxwell [GMax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["J Jep [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/28/2015 3:47:18 AM", "subject": "Fw: Google Alert - jeffrey epstein", "body": "Check out trump"}, {"sender": "Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreply@google.com>", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Friday, 27 February 2015 21:00", "subject": "Google Alert - jeffrey epstein", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029658.txt_4180
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029658.txt
|
Re: Keating Interview
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "10/28/2011 4:32:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Are you here\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031096.txt_4181
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031096.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:12", "subject": "Re:", "body": "inital respone, too many unanswerd question raised, realtionship with jeffrey/, ? you and clinton? her and andrew? whats the deal here? why is she there . this is who i am, this how i know jeffrey, employed from „ to.. . I was aware that jeffrey hired masag people, I sometine hired them, she was one of them. recolletion empllyed, firmative. . what. I am writing to writin to respond to the alleagtinoin that have been made whcich are categoricly untrue. . during hte time i met mr derhsowiz , in general inviting a subpeona. ? you will never answer questions to the press satisfaction they will not be persuaded."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:18", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes„"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:31", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i am on the phone with other attny getting you an answer."}, {"sender": "G Maxwell [gmax1@ellmax.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I need it written out in full."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [gmax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 3:31:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "that is the best advice can you call me now. i must get on the boat."}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032727.txt_4182
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032727.txt
|
Obama admin discussed how much to share about Russia with incoming Trump team - CNNPolitics
|
[{"sender": "Kathy", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/13/2018 2:16:57 PM", "subject": "Obama admin discussed how much to share about Russia with incoming Trump team - CNNPolitics", "body": "https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/12/politics/susan-rice-email-russia-investigation-trump-team/index.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032157.txt_4183
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032157.txt
|
Re: Huffington Post
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Fri Jul 01 07:18:25 2011", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "should you point out to Ariana Huff, that the same type of person, same as strauss Kahn 1s Andrews accuser, ,long criminal record.\ntotal liar. Ariana should champion the dangers of false allegations. send a reporter or reporters to investigate,... the palace would love\nit, the girl in the photo , was nothing more than a telephone answerer,, she was never 15, according to her version she worked for\ntrump , first at that age, at MAra lago. ITs ridiculous. but the press like strauss kahn 1s afraid to question women."}, {"sender": "Pegey Sicga!", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/1/2011 6:43:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "If you rewrite your last email in better grammar, (and so I have a better understanding) I can cut and paste and send it to Arianna\nHuffington from me.....\n\nDid you know why Prince Albert's Charlene fled to the airport with a one way ticket back to South Africa? Because she found out\nabout a third illegitimate child that is 3 months old...the palace officials followed her to the airport and propably made her an offer she\ncould not refuse...will get details from Jim Coleman when he comes home Sunday night.\n\nIn Southampton now. Peg"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029880.txt_4184
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029880.txt
|
FW: Jane Doe
|
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Robert D. Critton Jr."], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 6:55:54 PM", "subject": "FW: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030740.txt_4191
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030740.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/5/2018 7:35:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was thinking of opening with you and Bannon talking about Trump. Would let you sound smart and offer what\nI think would be a crowd-pleasing perspective, and make you seem like a credible player--former friend of\nTrump, advisor to world leaders, sought after person, etc--without having to too much rehash old stuff.\n\nDoesn't seem like they can win...but who knows. I'm meeting Bannon had 3 tomorrow and will stay with him\nuntil the end."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if the republicans pull this off, steve would deserve most of the credit. . he was way out in front on this way\nout. .. execution not to his liking but...... on another note , what were you thinking about me in the\n\nbook, with what moniker"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032733.txt_4206
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032733.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/20/2018 6:44:20 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i think this is a good point Jeffrey but i do think they are rarely sacrificed—certainly not Saddam or the sadistic \nAssads or Donald \nhave you heard that Genghis Khan—for all i know a gentle nomadic warrior—left 5 million Y chromosomes in \nhis wake, surviving today? \n45% of marriages in Iraq are with first cousins of the doubly paternal kind—father's brother's child and this has \nbeen said to lead to easy fracturing of the country which only a powerful dictator like Saddam could contain \nof course \"we\" destroyed the country and it lies in ruins now—one end to the other \nleave tomorrow for Ft Lauderdale and then Sunday on to California \nas always, if you have an hour or so i will be there \nall best"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i think you might be missing the benefit of the psycopath to the group. he is the defender easily \nsacrificed, but strkes fear in the heart of the other tribes, they are needed as best warriors"}, {"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["dear men"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "dear men \ni am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene-\nculture co-evolutionist—without the genes \ni do so because four lines down i tell the \"Gruterites\"—Gordon Getty's echo chamber—that i have added you \ntwo to the list \nso here is your chance to say \"no way\" and i will delete that from the message and likewise not ask Gruter's \nassistant to add your names to the list \nhaving said that, i find Gordon's missives much less burdensome than those from EDGE and certainly without \nthe egomaniacal nonsense that infects John Brockman—the key is to get the brightest minds in a room and \nhave them tell each other what they think is most important—or some such nonsense \nneither David nor i can think of a single scientific advance achieved that way—most of what we do is simply \nconcentrated sustained thought directed toward the foundations of a problem \ni doubt Jeffrey has made a huge amount of money via the EDGE program \nunless you say otherwise, i will shortly send you the key Getty missives in which he asserts, i believe \ncorrectly, that Trump is an archetypal narcissistic psychopath—or whatever the precise term is—and that he \nmust be opposed with full force on that basis \nmeanwhile, David has heard plenty about you Jeffrey, a financial/mathematical mind of exceptional quality \nand you should know that David is one of the very top evolutionary geneticists still breathing and my teacher \non every detail large and small \nin haste and all best \nbob"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029894.txt_4208
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029894.txt
|
RE: Jane Doe
|
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition will follow. Mr. Trump’s deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026298.txt_4214
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026298.txt
|
Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts
|
[{"sender": "Juleanna Glover", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 3 2018 03:49 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts", "body": "Flagging for you. This went out to that circle of third party thinkers. Hope all is well, Jeffrey.!"}, {"sender": "Juleanna Glover", "recipients": ["Juleanna Glover"], "timestamp": "August 2, 2018 at 2:45:08 PM CDT", "subject": "Our May conversation - more thoughts", "body": "Hi all — \nI spent some time mulling additional aspects of a third choice presidential run and wanted to run five \nspecific attributes for a candidate by you as a group. \nThis much we know - the Fall elections are shaping up to be a referendum on the most divisive \nAmerican President in memory. The battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh's \nnomination this fall will only amplify the polarity of the political debate that is already deeply \noverwrought on both sides. The rising tide of pressure on Donald Trump from the Mueller investigation \nshows no sign of ebbing. \nUnless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these unprecedented events will \nstill leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield of the 2016 Presidential election. \nWatching these unrelenting, compounding events since our discussion in May, I am guessing we are all \nasking the same question: now what? For the 48 percent of Americans who believe Donald Trump \nshould not be in the White House, perhaps we too want our own \"chaos\" candidate in 2020? \nShould Trump run again, this could be a \"break glass\" moment for the majority of Americans who don't \nsupport him. Do we want to break the genteel precedents of two parties running their ceremonious and \nseemingly illogical nominating process to select a candidate? (Why do Iowa and New Hampshire play \nsuch outsized roles? What kind of small-d democratic process relies on superdelegates?) The system \nfailed in 2016, with both parties producing terribly flawed candidates in a race to the bottom. We need to \nbuild a back-up plan in the event the system fails again. \nIt's possible, of course, that we won't need a third-party candidate. Trump could decide not to run for \nwhatever reason. The Democrats could nominate a winning 2020 candidate. I am not willing to take \nthose bets. \nThe ideal candidate for a new third party is someone who is widely perceived to be that rare combination \nof both good and great. We are looking for a proven leader of men and women, someone with clear, \ndemocratic — and moral — values that reflect the best of America, not our worst. We know people like this \non the national stage now. \nAs a thought experiment, consider the possibilities of a ticket outside the partisan lanes and imagine the \nchemistry of radical combinations: Biden/Romney? Bill Gates/Hogan? Bloomberg/Haley? Howard \nSchultz/Bob Corker? Sandberg/Kasich? \nAs we have discussed narrow path to electing the first president outside the two major party primary \nsystem in 168 years is more navigable than most think. Heading into 2020, converging trends in \nAmerican's demands for a third party (a historic high of 61%), disapproval of Donald Trump holding \nsteady above 50%, and the increasingly leftward drift of the Democratic Party suggest that electorate may \nbe susceptible to merits of a new centrist party. Cynics will say that the structural impediments of ballot \nand presidential debate access, the overwhelming advantages of legacy parties' fundraising and voter \nturn-out operations preordain failure, but they're wrong; the legal and logistical hurdles are amenable to a \ncombination of lawyering and resources. The bigger, more consequential factors come in terms of \ncandidate quality and policy. I believe a candidate with five specific characteristics including a unique — \nand purposefully non-specific - policy agenda could limbo a win. \n• This is what I think a successful third-party candidate looks like; a dream third party ticket would \nstart off with enough name ID to be an instant contender. Building the name ID to run nationally is \njust too long and expensive of a process to accomplish in the 28 months until the next presidential \nelection. We can't beat a celebrity without some celebrity of our own, whether from politics, \nsports, business, or entertainment. Instantaneous name ID is so crucial because the candidate must \nstart out in striking distance in any three-way poll against Trump and a fill-in-the-blank \nDemocratic flavor-of-the day candidate. The media and political class will predetermine \nirrelevance otherwise. \n• A Democrat-leaning candidate would have to top the ideal third-party ticket. We need someone \nwith a shot at snaking a plurality of the vote in the blue states Hillary Clinton won (227 electoral \nvotes), but moderate enough to win a plurality in some combination of Trump states like Florida, \nPennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan (another 119 votes). The right candidate may even to put \nNorth Carolina, Ohio, Indiana in play for a centrist bi-partisan ticket as well (totaling an electoral \nsweep of 464 elector votes). A right leaning candidate would meet the same fate as a primary \nchallenger to Trump — for all intents and purposes we need to assume that 36% of voters won't be \ncleaved from Trump under any circumstances and run to win around them. The deep red states \nwould be off the table entirely. \n• With the Trump reality show airing daily, voters are now expecting to take their politics with a side \nof entertainment. Heretofore, ratings will matter no matter how dry the policy topic. Surely \nStephen Colbert would gladly sacrifice his executive producer Chris Licht to produce a daily \ncomedic segment of this dream candidate interviewing Americans in truck stops and McDonald's \nacross the country. A few of the \"Saturday Night Live\" script writers could certainly be enticed to \ndisguise serious debates as informative amusement. Any candidate must be committed to a near \ndaily cadence of high quality, compelling video production. It will be especially crucial to keep \nthe voters' attention during what will be a raucous Democratic primary season. Rules governing \naccess to the general election debate stage dictate that a candidate enjoy support of at least 15% of \nvoters in the months leading up to the general election. \n• This dream candidate would pledge to serve only four years and address all of the U.S.'s ticking \ntime bombs like Social Security, Medicare, health care reform, climate change, money in politics, \ngerrymandering, and infrastructure investment in a single term. This one-and-done term decouples \nour candidate from the usual politics and gives them the power of promise and deliver decisive \naction. A four-year term pledge ensures governance independent of campaign finance concerns and \nnarrow special interests inherent to winning re-election. This \"fix-it\" ticket would promise to force \ndecisions on all the underlying structural policy matters damaging America's long-term prospects \nand distorting our democracy. No more kicking the can down the road. \n• This candidate should also pledge to push for laws passed that reflect the will of simple majorities \nin Congress. Congress now only allows bills to move forward when a \"majority of a majority\" \nsupports the policy and on many levels seems fundamentally broken. This third-party president \ncould force votes based on a transparent reading of where the votes lie via coalition building. The \nSenate filibuster power will present a high hurdle, but a third-party candidate would be a de facto \ndisruptor of the two-party system. Party discipline could well break down, and moderates in both \nparties could form a powerful, decisive block willing to work with the new President. The policies \npassed into law may not be ideal for either Democrats or Republicans, but for the major agenda \nitems that must be addressed for America's long-term health, an imperfect fix that corrects course \nis better than those that now have us hurtling toward national bankruptcy. \nAnd if no candidate secures 270 electoral votes in 2020? The House of Representatives would choose the \nnext president. In 2016, reports suggested Michael Bloomberg declined to run on a third-party ticket for \nfear of splitting support from Hillary Clinton and throwing the election to a GOP-controlled House of \nRepresentatives who would then vote to select the president. The fear was the GOP controlled House \nwould have just elected Trump. \nWould Democratic control of the House mean that the House would pick an alternative to Trump as \npresident? Each state delegation has a single vote in selecting a president and it is the incoming Congress \n- the class elected in 2020 that would decide the election. But no matter which party has the speaker's \nchair, the GOP would almost certainly have the upper hand in the majority of state delegations controlled. \nWould the state delegations pick a president based on party majority control of the delegation, the \nwinner of the popular vote in each state or their own calculations as to who is best for America? \nPrecedent suggests that delegations use secret ballots, which means individual lawmakers may vote their \nconsciences. \nIf we recruit this ideal candidate; threading the needle of name ID, a center-left bent, a TV- savvy \ncampaign team and a pledge to serve only four years with an apartisan agenda, money and campaign \nexpertise would certainly follow. And 50 state ballot access is a function of time (starting in the fall of \n2019 would be prudential) and hard work as we have discussed and many of you have exhaustively war-\ngamed. \nPart and parcel of this effort would be motivating the often politically lackadaisical middle to vote. The \nraft of new technologies in data targeting and biometric mobile voting technology could transform the \nelectorate in the next few, amping voter participation and injecting the voices of moderates (both in \npolitical views and level of political interest) into the process. And any third-party effort must \nincorporate advocacy for accelerated adaption of these all but inevitable voter verification tools. I believe \nSilicon Valley could be game-changing allies in this effort. \nI am sure none of us doubt that chaos could potentially be unleashed by jamming three viable candidates \ninto a two-party system. An election that ends up in the House of Representatives is an uncontrollable, \nmurky and ancient process. But might that be a less scary prospect than relying on the Democrats to \nnominate a candidate who can beat Trump in 2020? \nI look forward to talking more about all of our ideas on this hopeful project in coming weeks. Please feel \nfree to call me to discuss. Thank you for taking time to review this note."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025949.txt_4216
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025949.txt
|
Re: Mechanisms for learning
|
[{"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2016 7:02:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time: \nno worry, if i understand correctly you are suggsting there are layers 1 through N . lets cal them L 1 - \nLn. there are times T 1- Tn / and then conjecture that changing the time . correlations ( by genetic swtch or \nother method. , you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer \ndevelopment and changing the time for other layers. . ). like telemeres for the cell , are their equivalents for \nthe layers. . as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get \ndfferent ( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions ). \nExactly. I looked up the statistics, black kids in the US have slower cognitive development (and never catch \nup), which the study of course attributed to social factors without any evidence, and they had faster motor \ndevelopment! I suspect this means their brains are slower at learning high-level concepts, because the low-level \nstructures are optimized for a shorter time. But they will keep the lead in motor development, because it is \neasier to learn, and they have more time and attention to practice once they get the structures in place. \nIt could also be that they have an additional set of learning directives in place that adapts them better to a more \nhunting/running style of life, whereas the Europeans had to adapt for identifying long-term seasonal patterns, \ndelayed gratification for agriculture etc. \nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communicaiton. . are gender differences also a matter of time , and \nstructure of interactions. . \nI suspect gender differences are mostly motivational, i.e. we have a reward system for all the different social \nand cognitive needs, which makes us receive different kinds of pleasure and pain, thereby pay attention and \nlearn. You cannot learn what does not attract your attention. Women tend to find abstract systems, conflicts and \nmechanisms intrinsically boring. Most women in computer science do not write programs because they enjoy \nsolving puzzles, but because they want to help people, get approval etc. There are almost no women in math, \nbecause it does not help people or yield social attention. \nMen tend to find elaborate social relations boring. If there is no pleasure in observing and empathizing with \npeople, one will not have good social cognition. \nIQ is not the only meaningful difference. Chinese pay an inordinate amount of attention to authority. I suspect \nhistorically., the authorities tended to kill them a lot if they did not. Jews tend be intellectually independent and \nanti-authoritarian, which might make them creative and inventive in ways that are hard to find in Asia. \nAt the moment, I think speed/quality of brain development plus motivational system are the key to \nunderstanding both mind and individual differences. Important part of human language might be the result in a \nmotivational need to discover/invent grammatical structure, which as a side effect makes us interested in music. \nIt would mean that Chomsky's life long hypothesis, that people have a special circuit for grammatical language, \nis wrong. They might be GENERAL learners, just like Gorillas, but with a strong motivational urge to build \n \ngrammatical structure, which the brain simply invents (there are only a few ways in which a natural language \ncan work). That is much easier to wire into a brain than a specific circuit. \ni my self believe that african music, westrn music , chinese music are a window into the the structure of those \nlayers. . western rigid, african primitve , chinese nature based, . I belive that synphoic movments best \ndescribe your layering, they open with a basic simple melody„ after it is learned, it is repeated and\" \ndeveloped\" , inverted, distorted, related, etc. the development stage take a long time. then there is a \nrecapitlaltion of the whole. and its inter and intra actions. . african musci has lots of beats. and little \ndevelopment. - no accident, it mirrors their learning process. \nInteresting question if music is somehow indicative of genetically defined prefs, but I am not sure. It could be \npath effects, starting in culture. \nre taboo \n, maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation. . the earths forest fire. potentailly a \ngood thing for the species \nMaking having children expensive in terms of upbringing and missed opportunity (like in the west) is a more \nhumane way. Environmental stress while leaving near rock bottom tends to lead people to have more children, \nbecause there is no missed opportunity, and high mortality requires more attempts at procreation. Humans are a \nhardy species, outside of focused famine events and wars only small fractions of any given population die. \nI suspect that strong reductions in population will come from large-scale failure of agriculture. The climate \nchange itself with result in migration and wars, but most people will probably survive that. But who knows, I \nmight be wrong. \ntoo many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense \nis the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if \nthe brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent \nThe radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-organized organism is \nfascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could \npull it off in a sustainable way; and if it is aggressive and expansive, its efficiency makes it a virus that \neverybody will want to stomp out. Fascism makes romantic doo-gooders like me very uncomfortable (I visited \nKZ Buchenwald five times and it had a profound influence on me; we East Germans inoculated ourselves very \nthoroughly against fascism), and the general public will not be willing to consider it. \nI rather like the treatment Fascism gets in the Amazon Series \"The Man in the High Castle\", which explores \nwhat would have happened if the Germans and Japanese had won the war: A society that tries to function as a \nbrutal and ruthlessly efficient machine, eliminating all social and evolutionary slack. It is very dark, but not a \nflat caricature of pointless evil for its own sake. Heinlein's late book \"Starship Troopers\" explores fascism, too, \nbut unlike Philipp K Dick he does not see it as a form of insanity, but as the most desirable order. \nI find your \"political incorrectness\" very fascinating. In the beginning, I thought it is a form of costly signaling, \nbut now I think you are simply entirely unconstrained in your thoughts. How did you manage in your youth? \nDid you get in trouble, or did you keep your thoughts to yourself? I wonder what kind of person you want to \ntransform into. \nIt was interesting to notice that at the Forbidden Research conference, nobody managed to say anything \nremotely out-of line. One large discussion group wanted to address the question of whether \"democracy still \n \nworks\", and mostly expressed their disagreement with Trump. Ideology is like halitosis: easy to see in others, \nhard in oneself A speaker felt that the media \"stifle all criticism of Trump\", another wanted to remove \"men \nand Elon Musk from government\", and everybody strongly agreed that we need more diversity everywhere. \nI noticed some time ago that Joi has remarkable public communication skills. He picks controversial, insight-\nladen topics, but sanitizes them by carefully replacing the parts of content that would divide his audience with \nsymbolic messages that everybody can fill with their own content in a way that resonates with them. The non-\ncontroversial parts will still be insightful. He manages to come across as very subversive, while rarely offending \nanyone (except the hard scientists, that miss hard substance). \nHe also asks influential people and smart students or faculty to write parts of his essays and speeches for him. \nThis invests them in his success, especially because he is going to reward and acknowledge them. Very few of \nhis ideas are original, instead he is good at identifying and testing thoughts he reads or hears from others. \nI am still beset by the ruinous instinct that the goal of communication ought to be mutual understanding. Joi is \nright. Public communication is about reaching one's goals. \nBests, \nJoscha"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \n\nthank you for your support and encouragement, even where I fail. \n\nSorry for being such an embarrassment today. I will spell out today's argument a bit better and cohesive when I \nget to it. Also, I should have recognized that the main point I tried to make would trigger Noam (who was as \nalways very generous, patient, kind and humble on the personal level, even though he did not feel like \nconceding anything on the conceptual one). Almost all of Noam's work focused on the idea that humans have \nvery specific circuits or modules (even when most people in his field began to have other ideas), and his \nfrustration is that it is so hard to find or explain them. \n\nI found Noam's hypothesis very compelling in the past. I still think that the idea that language is somehow a \ncultural or social invention of our species is wrong. But I think that there is a chance (we don't know that, but it \nseems to most promising hypothesis IMHO) that the difference between humans and apes is not a very \nintricate special circuit, but genetically simple developmental switches. The bootstrapping of cognition works \nlayer by layer during the first 20 years of our life. Each layer takes between a few months and a few years to \ntrain in humans. While a layer is learned, there is not much going on in the higher layers yet, and after the low \nlevel learning is finished, it does not change very much. This leads to the characteristic bursts in child \ndevelopment, that have famously been described by Piaget. \n\nThe first few layers are simple perceptual stuff, the last ones learn social structure and self-in-society. The \nswitching works with something like a genetic clock, very slowly in humans, but much more quickly in other \napes, and very fast in small mammals. As a result, human children take nine months before their brains are \nmature enough to crawl, and more than a year before they can walk. Many African populations are quite a bit \nfaster. In the US, black children outperform white children in motor development, even in very poor and \n \nsocially disadvantaged households, but they lag behind (and never catch up) in cognitive development even \nafter controlling for family income. \n\nGorillas can crawl after 2 months, and build their own nests after 2.5 years. They leave their mothers at 3-4 \nyears. Human children are pretty much useless during the first 10-12 years, but during each phase, their brains \nhave the opportunity to encounter many times as much training data as a gorilla brain. Humans are literally \nsmarter on every level, and because the abilities of the higher levels depend on those of the lower levels, they \ncan perform abstractions that mature gorillas will never learn, no matter how much we try to train them. \n\nThe second set of mechanisms is in the motivational system. Motivation tells the brain what to pay attention to, \nby giving reward and punishment. If a brain does not get much reward for solving puzzles, the individual will \nfind mathematics very boring and won't learn much of it. If a brain gets lots of rewards for discovering other \npeople's intentions, it will learn a lot of social cognition. \n\nLanguage might be the result of three things that are different in humans: \n- extended training periods per layer (after the respective layer is done, it is difficult to learn a new set of \nphonemes or the first language) \n- more layers \n- different internal rewards. Perhaps the reward for learning grammatical structure is the same that makes us \nlike music. Our brains may enjoy learning compositional regular structure, and they enjoy making themselves \nunderstood, and everything else is something the universal cortical learning figures out on its own. \n\nThis is a hypothesis that is shared by a growing number of people these days. In humans, it is reflected for \ninstance by the fact that races with faster motor development have lower IQ. (In individuals of the same group, \nslower development often indicates defects, of course.) \n\nAnother support comes from machine learning: we find that the same learning functions can learn visual and \nauditory pattern recognition, and even end-to-end-learning. Google has built automatic image recognition into \ntheir current photo app: \nhttp://blogs.wsj . com/digits/2015/07/01/go ogle-mistakenly-tags-black-p eop le-as-gorillas-showing-limits-o f-\nalgorithms/ \n\nThe state of the art in research can do better than that: it can begin to \"imagine\" things. I.e. when the \nexperimenter asks the system to \"dream\" what a certain object looks like, the system can produce a somewhat \ncompelling image, which indicates that it is indeed learning visual structure. This stuff is something nobody \ncould do a few months ago: \nhttp://www.creativeai.net/posts/Mv4WG6rdzAerZF7ch/synthesizing-preferred-inputs-via-deep-generator-\nnetworks \n\nA machine learning program that can learn how to play an Atari game without any human supervision or hand-\ncrafted engineering (the feat that gave DeepMind 500M from Google) now just takes about 130 lines of Python \ncode. \n\nThese models do not have interesting motivational systems, and a relatively simple architecture. They currently \nseem to mimic some of the stuff that goes on in the first few layers of the cortex. They learn object features, \nvisual styles, lighting and rotation in 3d, and simple action policies. Almost everything else is missing. But \nthere is a lot of enthusiasm that the field might be on the right track, and that we can learn motor simulations \nand intuitive physics soon. (The majority of the people in Al do not work on this, however. They try to \nimprove the performance for the current benchmarks.) \n\nNoam's criticism of machine translation mostly applies to the Latent Semantic Analysis models that Google \nand others have been using for many years. These models map linguistic symbols to concepts, and relate \n \nconcepts to each other, but they do not relate the concepts to \"proper\" mental representations of what objects \nand processes look like and how they interact. Concepts are probably one of the top layers of the learning \nhierarchy, i.e. they are acquired *after* we learn to simulate a mental world, not before. Classical linguists \nignored the simulation of a mental world entirely. \n\nIt seems miraculous that purely conceptual machine translation works at all, but that is because concepts are \nshared between speakers, so the structure of the conceptual space can be inferred from the statistics of \nlanguage use. But the statistics of language use have too little information to infer what objects look like and \nhow they interact. \n\nMy own original ideas concern a few parts of the emerging understanding of what the brain does. The \n\"request-confirmation networks\" that I have introduced at a NIPS workshop in last the December are an \nattempt at modeling how the higher layers might self-organize into cognitive programs. \n\nCheers! \n\nJoscha"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031304.txt_4222
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031304.txt
|
Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!
|
[{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Steven J. Hoffenberg\nNew York Post Publishing INC.\nCEO\n\nWHAM INC THE PUBLIC COMPANY OWNS THE BELOW OPERATIONS\n\nTOWERSINVESTORS.COM\nCEO\n\nSEE\nWWwW.POST PUBLISHING.BUZZ THE JESUS CHRIST ON LINE GODs WORD NEWSPAPER\n\nMR HOFFENBERG ONLINE NEWSPAPER\nPUBLICSPEAKINGWALLSTREET.COM\n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031304"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031462.txt_4228
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031462.txt
|
Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Apr 28, 2016, at 12:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:46:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "ok...\nSO SOITY..."}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is a, and I’m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033405.txt_4232
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033405.txt
|
Re: Call from New Yorker.
|
[{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 11:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "?.."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 9:49 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "coming from you -- not mutually exclusive"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 9:01 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "It was latter. Why bad form. Supposed to be face to face?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "unclear if you meant you ve written notes to yourself re exit or a note you were thinking of sending - BAD FORM if latter. you both have still not agreed the rules of the game. so difficult to play . you have laid out - this is what i want. . but actually, how it would work, and what her freedoms are. could be . yours.. are essential to the plan. I think much of this is your uncertainty and not hers. sorry. and yours is infectious"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 8:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Ok. Best to make reversible errors I've written note for exit strategy 1. Not going to send for few days. Going to treat it all as a game till I maybe see her in Beijing and out of character ignore and look past her bad behavior. Best to stop obsessing."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "you can be both thoughtful and face to face"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 12:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "That is true. Interesting. I take a serious note from someone as a deed not words."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "last i looked ( sic), you do not have ovaries."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "I hear you."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Mar 17, 2019, at 4:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "where are you?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 4:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Home Boston. Will try to call"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "3/17/2019 10:18:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Call from New Yorker.", "body": "Helen fisher- anatomy of love - you might find amusing"}]
| 12
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030335.txt_4233
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030335.txt
|
Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke P"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 5:54:21 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\nBegin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "January 30, 2015, 12:00:34 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\n\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to\nwhich he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his\nresponse by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian\nKings Place\n90 York Way\nLondon\n\nN1 9GU"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "29 January 2015 at 16:49", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nI write further to an email sent to you earlier this month, concerning an article we are preparing for publication\nin which you may be mentioned."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033411.txt_4237
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033411.txt
|
Re: fun
|
[{"sender": "JONATHAN FARKAS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re: fun", "body": "Somers and I talked to trump and Melania last night He looked and seemed very tired but upbeat"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["JONATHAN FARKAS"], "timestamp": "4/21/2019 1:22:00 PM", "subject": "Re: fun", "body": "fun"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030321.txt_4238
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030321.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 2:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you in this week?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Today and tomorrow"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 2:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bfast?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 9, 2018 8:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, time?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 09, 2018 4:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yds 8"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/9/2018 9:11:24 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Trump’s handpicked sdnyusa just authorized a search warrant of trump’s private lawyer’s office looking for trump\ncommunications....had to justify it with crime-fraud exception....trump has to be shitting water"}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030768.txt_4242
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030768.txt
|
Re: How are u? Send this interview to Donald Trump pls. Its going to be everywhere
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "6/21/2017 2:34:14 PM", "subject": "Re: How are u? Send this interview to Donald Trump pls. Its going to be everywhere", "body": "ok"}, {"sender": "nnn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:33 AM", "subject": "Re: How are u? Send this interview to Donald Trump pls. Its going to be everywhere", "body": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIMzSfOVwEk&sns=em"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031310.txt_4245
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031310.txt
|
Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!
|
[{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM 2!!!", "body": "CHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FEDS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN\n\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS TAKING BACK THE NEW YORK POST NEWSPAPER OPERATIONS"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033377.txt_4247
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033377.txt
|
Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem
|
[{"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Thank you for the introduction. Do you have a better sense of what he needs? Also, what's his WhatsApp/mobile so I can confirm details for today? \nWhen's best on Friday for me to visit with you? \nBibi's speech was a bit of a dead letter on Europe."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 2, 2018, at 11:05", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "he is chairman of dubai world ports. african ports a new focus he built the palm islands. is totally trustworthy"}, {"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Unfortunately, bin Sulayem and I did not meet. I was stuck at the White House and he had a narrow window before heading to Cyprus. I just sent him the following note: \n\"Good Morning, I hope your travels to Cyprus were smooth. \nOkey Enelamah, Nigeria's trade minister, stopped by my home this evening as he was still in town after Buhari's visit with Trump. He mentioned his discussions with you at WEF and afterwards. Separately, I spoke earlier with the Vice President. \nWhenever we meet, I have some thoughts that may be helpful to you.\""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 3, 2018, at 3:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "No worry both problem and solution will still be there :-)"}, {"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Meetings here in PB are winding down. How's your day look tomorrow? \nSeparately, do you know Oleg Deripaska or Ivan Glasenberg?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 4, 2018, at 12:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Easy. Does 11 work"}, {"sender": "Jide Zeitlin", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/4/2018 4:40:15 AM", "subject": "Re: Sultan Bin Sulayem", "body": "Yes."}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032396.txt_4252
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032396.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 18, 2016, at 5:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "if trump fully supports jasta , does that make the consitutional challenge moot?"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 12:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hope Santa (swim trunks donned), reindeer and sleigh successfully made it southward. Yuletide hugs, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 25, 2016, at 12:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thx\nhope this year brings you true peace. you deserve it"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/25/2016 7:39:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "A prince art thou. Thank you.\n\nJust agreed to handle an appeal -- billion-dollar jury verdict in federal court against Johnson & Johnson. Get\nready: Representing the hip-replacement plaintiffs. Good friends on both sides.\n\nLove ya."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029499.txt_4253
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029499.txt
|
Anonymous after Trump
|
[{"sender": "Joichi", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 11:50:05 AM", "subject": "Anonymous after Trump", "body": "Are you tracking this?\n\nhttp://mic.com/articles/138244/anonymous-just-made-good-on-its-war-against-donald-trump-in-one-massive-cyberattack?utm_source=politicymicFB&utm_medium=main&utm_campaign=social#.arje8kIP9"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030149.txt_4254
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030149.txt
|
CONFIDENTIAL
|
[{"sender": "Kate Briquelet", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Reporter question", "body": "Hi Marty, \nHope all is well. Noticed this Guardian story about Michael Wolff s new book, which states Donald Trump \npurchased a Palm Beach property Mr. Epstein had planned to buy, behind Mr. Epstein's back. And that Mr. \nEpstein threatened to expose Trump's shady real estate deals. Do you know anything about this? Does Mr. \nEpstein have any knowledge of illegal or suspicious dealings by President Trump? \nhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/20 1 9/may/28/bannon-trump-organization-criminal-enterprise-\ncomments-michael-wolff-book \nAlso, we plan on running a story this Friday about the Crime Victims' Rights Act suit, and the Jane Does' \nproposed remedies. The alleged victims want the U.S. Attorney's Office to rescind the immunity provisions in \nthe NPA, and to pursue a prosecution against Mr. Epstein and his co-conspirators. Can you comment on this? \nThanks so much! \nKate"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:45 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Reporter question", "body": ""}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:48 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Reporter question", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 5:19:07 PM", "subject": "CONFIDENTIAL", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028787.txt_4256
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028787.txt
|
Re: B 727 thought
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 4:57:10 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "<T", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "you want me to call Tarek, instead? just to confirm."}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/12/2012 10:21:24 A.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Call\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2012, at 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: B 727 thought", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nthis may be a long shot to save the Boeing deal, or if you think its a dead deal, disregard this.\n\nI thought there was a connection between Tarek and myself, I do believe one concern was operation of Boeing with\nflight crew. I Know its his problem not ours, but may help make the sale happen,.\n\nI wrote this email for your review, if you think its worth sending, please critique, and let me know,. thank you:\n\nMr. Tarek El Sayed,\nI hope this email finds you well, and believe worth communicating my thoughts to you.\n\nI was surprised to hear that you decided against the purchase of our Super Boeing 727. I personally thought it was a great match\nfor your business needs in Qatar. If for any reason your decision was based on crew issues and charter needs in the Middle East,\nI'd like to share some information that might prove beneficial to making you reconsider this purchase.\n\nThe pilot candidates I have lined up for your interview along with the possibility of David Rodgers joining your flight department\nwere as follows:\n\n(at no time did I disclose location or persons to the following pilot candidates to protect your privacy.)\n\nRobert Breslin, who is the former Chief Pilot of Mr. Donald Trump, Mr. Breslin flew the Boeing 727 and Boeing 757 owned by Mr\nTrump. Mr Breslin is a fine man of 40 years of age estimate, with extensive VIP Boeing operations.\n\nJames Bartakowski, who has extensive flying experience in the Middle east, Africa and Europe régime. Mr. Bartakowski has also\nbeen involved in charter operations in Africa and Middle East and has contacted me on several recent occasions with charters for\nour Boeing 727, James has indicated there is the possibility of 40-60 hours per month charter operations for larger transport\ncategory aircraft in your area. I believe there is a growing need for charter in the business community in Qatar and neighboring\ncountries.\n\nBruce Jafahri, who is a current Boeing 727 captain who lived in Doha for two years, and familiar with international operations of\nBoeing 727 aircraft. Mr. Jafahri currently lives in California and ready for a new opportunity. Bruce is current in the Boeing 727 and\nalso flew Captain on the Boeing 747. Well qualified individual and personable.\n\nMr. El Sayed, as you have seen during our demo flight, our Boeing 727 is in impeccable condition, quite cabin and will provide\nmany years of charter and business flights your company. I believe the large business jet future in Qatar is growing and you will be\nleading its path, and your initial investment in this purchase will not come close with other aircraft options on the market as you\nmay have seen already.\n\nWe are currently completing the C2C check on the Boeing, and as we have done in the past, assure you it will be a fine aircraft\nwhen it leaves Flight Star Maintenance repair facility."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026210.txt_4257
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026210.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i got to ny today .. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday .. i m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If you think wise I could come to New York sunday evening and also leave tues"}, {"sender": "<3", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt understand what you mean? do you want me to stay? or you want to see my boss?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 1:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why are you up so early.? youneed rest. - !, I wanted you to know that If you think I should meet your boss in New York , where there is less pomp Icandoso. / are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "<i>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt get a good rest this month .. i think it is better to meet him in kuwait .. man do you love cuba that much© whenever you want .. november or before .. just send me an email and i will take care of your visit &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 1:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "perfect. Ill be in paris oct 6"}, {"sender": "<i>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy it sheik jeffrey & &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017 at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "get some rest. I need you healthy"}, {"sender": "es es", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/26/2017 7:28:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "women to drive in saudi .. bold move &"}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026659.txt_4259
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026659.txt
|
Fwd: Do a good deed today...
|
[{"sender": "From a <>", "recipients": ["Pres. Donald Trump"], "timestamp": "January 24, 2017 at 4:17:59 PM EST", "subject": "Do a good deed today...", "body": "Here's something simple we all can do today...\n\nDiana Chapman Walsh was president of Wellesley College 8 years ago. She recently emailed her former colleagues the\nfollowing idea:\n\nListen Up! The Republicans need to get the message from the majority of Americans that we value and need the benefits\nof Obamacare. Here’s how we do that.\n\nOn January 23rd, everyone who feels that way (our numbers are legion) sends a note to Donald Trump with a simple\nmessage:\n\n“Don’t make America sick again. Improve Obamacare. Don’t repeal it.\"\n\nOne envelope for every ACA supporter in your household...even if they are under 18 years old.\nJust that simple message. Put it in an envelope, and put a stamp on it.\n\nOn January 23rd, mail it to:\n\nPres. Donald Trump\n\n1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW,\nWashington, DC 20500"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Barbro Ennbom"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 24, 2017 4:45 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Do a good deed today...", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Barbro Ehnbor S|", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/24/2017 9:56:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Do a good deed today...", "body": "Easy enough! :-)\n\nAttachments: Don’t make America sick again.docx\n\nImportance: — High"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030581.txt_4262
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030581.txt
|
Fwd: <no subject>
|
[{"sender": "gmax <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\n\nhttp://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html\n\nby Vicky Ward\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“T’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. P’ve just been. You will never\nthink the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment\nas the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another\ninvestigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested\nthem when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s\nfriendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused on his\nmysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited\nBrands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail\nsentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had\nsexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how\nJeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing\nfinancial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-\nchilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he?\nAnd the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, Iam so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all,\nmy 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.\n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. | kept running into both of\nthem, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet\nbehind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He\nlaughed. “Not like vou, Vicky,” was his riposte.\n\nIremembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn’t studied math\n\nsince I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a\nbook: “Math for idiots.”"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 10:48 PM", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033230.txt_4263
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033230.txt
|
PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early
|
[{"sender": "Ani Anbar", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/30/2017 11:01:20 AM", "subject": "PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nInfo.\n\nBR,\nAnil"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032648.txt_4274
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032648.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski [ay", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nThx for the update,\nJust to confirm, LSJ trip is Next Sunday the 26th as you stated,,\n\nPOTUS schedule:\nArrival: Tuesday November 21\" @ 1800ish\nDeparture: Sunday November 26\" @ 1500ish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "at the moment we will go to Ish on sunday the 26th early then to new york where 1 will stay the week,\nlarry , it will be and I, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 6:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "scheudle us to leave sunday early to lsj, we will have to go through hoops to clear ?"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski [ay", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/16/2017 11:59:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Shouldn’t be to bad if we are leaving early and Trump is not scheduled to depart until 3pm on Sunday, the\nDeparture will be similar to a DCA Departure with Customs,\n\nTSA will have an office set up inside the FBO, you will enter the main lobby at Atlantic and be escorted to the\nplane after you meet with TSA officers.,\n\nI have to schedule all passengers names 24hours in advance, no additions within 24 Hours,\n\nThx\nLarry"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031789.txt_4276
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031789.txt
|
Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/15/trump-advisors-reportedly-seeking-a-pardon-for-junk-bond-king-milken.html \nTrump advisors reportedly seeking a \npardon for 'junk bond king' Milken \nTae Kim \n%taws. \nSeveral of President Donald Trump's advisors are pushing him to pardon Michael Milken, \nBloomberg News reported Friday. \nMichael Milken, 71, was known as the \"junk bond king\" in the 1980s and was convicted for \nsecurities fraud. \nBloomberg said former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci, \nTreasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, senior advisor Jared Kushner and attorney Rudy \nGiuliani support the pardon for Milken. \nMilken has a net worth of $3.7 billion, according to Forbes. The financier, who pioneered \nthe market for high-yield bonds while at Drexel Burnham Lambert, was sentenced to 10 \nyears in prison and permanently banned from the securities industry by the Securities and \nExchange Commission. His prison term was reduced to two years. \nThe White House and a spokesperson for the Milken Institute did not immediately respond \nto requests for comment. \nSee the full Bloomberg News report here."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 15, 2018, at 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken", "body": "Did we get bank appraisal ayh"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/15/2018 1:47:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken", "body": "i requested last week not yet received \ni will call again now.."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032280.txt_4285
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032280.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/15/2016 5:02:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Please find attached US Election Report."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031531.txt_4286
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031531.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2016-11-27 17:54 GMT+00:00", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will not come this week, too many trump issues. . anything new. exciting. has mr kiss come to reality?"}, {"sender": "Marc.Kensington", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/27/2016 8:44:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Too bad. I was excited to have a drink with you. Mr. Kiss is still alive and has his real market price. I have mine at 35, but to far away from both parts to have a chance to persuade both parties."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026059.txt_4292
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026059.txt
|
Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise
|
[{"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Dear Jeff, \n\nAs previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building and \nfinancing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record, history and \npresence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe's most recognized financial advisors to \nthe infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and sought secure, \nwell-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors. \n\nWe have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry, \nTIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure \ndebt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily \ninvolved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence, capital \nraising, legal & compliance functions as well as the sound governance and ESG management across all funds. \n\nPartnering with TIIC and BRIDGE has enabled Edmond de Rothschild to build a strong franchise within \ninfrastructure investments, complementing its overall Private Equity offering. Edmond de Rothschild has also \nacted as anchor investor for these funds, demonstrating its strong alignment of interest with these \ninvestment teams. With Ariane we strongly believe that we should absolutely find a way to collaborate \ntogether with you to think and initiate something to serve the future needs of the US in the infrastructure \nfield. \n\nPlease find attached further information on each manager. This would also be a chance for us to explore \noppportunities of working together in the future. \n\nPlease feel free to reach out to us if you require any further information. We look forward to hearing from \nyou soon.\n\nKind regards,\nJohnny"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8 fevr. 2017, at 12:59", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the \nsidelines, trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the \nrothschild name."}, {"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 12:01:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "I agree with your analysis. \nOn the debt side the yield will be low for sure. Nevertheless by leading the consortium and by being the Equity \nprovider of the PPP than the double digit return will be possible \n\nHappy to discuss further"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033224.txt_4307
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033224.txt
|
| love these Trump suck up guys....
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2017 3:43:10 PM", "subject": "| love these Trump suck up guys....", "body": "Do you think he gets what he wants?\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/02/business/dealbook/an-early-trump-backer-awaits-his-\nreward.html?_r=o\n\nInteresting piece on cognitive science/Trump. Right down your alley.\n\nhttp://www.bijaadvisorsllc.com/trumpfog.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026204.txt_4322
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026204.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "<q>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt get a good rest this month .. i think it is better to meet him in kuwait .. man do you love cuba that much\n\nwhenever you want .. november or before .. just send me an email and i will take care of your visit &"}, {"sender": "<i>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i got to ny today .. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday .. i m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If you think wise I could come to New York sunday evening and also leave tues"}, {"sender": "<{>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt understand what you mean? do you want me to stay? or you want to see my boss?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why are you up so early.? youneed rest. - !, I wanted you to know that If you think I should meet your boss in New York , where there is less pomp Icandoso. / are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "<x>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy it sheik jeffrey & &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "perfect. Ill be in paris oct 6"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "get some rest. I need you healthy"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2017 11:02:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very wellita"}]
| 9
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029342.txt_4338
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029342.txt
|
Fwd: Rising Star
|
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2013 5:55:30 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Rising Star", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Lisa Rossi <lisa.rossi@cp20.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "May 7, 2013 1:02:53 PM EDT", "subject": "Rising Star", "body": "Dear Jeffrey-\n\nWe are thrilled to announce that we are working with Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, one of the rising stars in \nthe New York Congressional delegation. Sometimes referred to as \"Brooklyn's Barack\", he is a staunch \nsupporter of President Obama and a progressive voice for the people of New York City. NY1 did a profile piece \nabout his work on the vitally important Budget and Judiciary committees in Washington. You can watch the \nvideo here or read the text below. \n\nHakeem is committed to electing a Democratic majority in 2014 and is encouraging his friends to participate in \nthe DCCC/DSCC fundraising dinner with President Obama this coming Monday night. Shoot us an email or \ngive us a call at (212) 531-2858 if you would like to get involved with the dinner, or would like to get an \nopportunity to get to know Hakeem better. He is an impressive guy and who will be a progressive voice in New \nYork politics for years to come. \n\nThanks, \nDarren Rigger, Lisa Rossi & Walter Swett \nDynamic SRG \n\nNY!: Hakeem Jeffries Positions Himself For Long Career In Washington \nApr 29, 2013 \nBy: Michael Scotto \nHakeem Jeffries is only about four months into his freshman year in Congress but he's already positioning \nhimself for a long career in Washington. NY 1 's Michael Scotto filed the following report."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023311.txt_4344
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023311.txt
|
Fwd:
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "PLEASE READ CAREFULLY ,\n\nIn the spirit in which it is sent. our friendship is intact and solid , though ,it has taken a hit.\n\nMark was here this morning , the proposed transactions are extremely complex . and would take a great\ndeal of my detailed time. I do not know how, and even, if ,to move forward - . After months of hearing that\nyou would have no problem paying a large fee if you could only ascertain value. The last transaction. a\ntransaction which you saved over 600 million in tax. declared bullet proof by your attnys, and even if you\nwant to disoccount for its future realization, creating a savings of over 300 million real dollars. For some\nreason you chose to ignore our agreements , verbal written and emailed -and at the very last minute , after the\ndeal was complete decided that it was only worth 8 million dollars to you and your family. . ( assuming\nphaidon -richard happens. there isa 24m savings not including artspace and debt write down\nbenefits- certain to come later .. IMPORTANT NOTE\n\nthe phaidon transaction as currently contemplated will not work . WILL NOT !! \n\nWhen we had our meeting in your home in Bedford. You asked me for my help. I told you multiple times\nthat i thought it was a very bad idea, in that I greatly preferred to have no financial interactions. I don't have\nmany friends and didn't want money in any way to interfere with our unique relationship. Reminder, For five\nyears you had the kind, but very goofy Eileen Alexandersson as the sole manager of your massive accounting ,\nlegal, investments. reporting, trusts etc. When I first told you in no uncertain terms that I firmly believed she\nwas incompetent you admonished me for \" speaking out of both sides of my mouth\". With regard Brad\nWechsler, there has never been a \" both sides. \". I have consistantly maintained since day one that he was\nhighly unsuited for the job. When you initially asked me to help convince him to take the role , promising him\na position to manage mirage investments I sent you a note saying that instead of hiring him you should pay up\nand get first class people. I have reiterated the same message for over a year now. . Brad , not me ,was tasked\nwith hiring new people , according to his biz school org chart.(nauseating ) and as you wanted him to take\nownership of the staff,he conducted many interviews alone. . you may recall that as late as may, you told him in\nmy presence that though six months had passed he had not hired anyone. since then I have rectified errors in\nsales tax, use tax, income tax, fbar reporting, 1031 reporting, 8 million of deductions missed errors of millions"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "all the transactions just completed . including Phaidon. - I was never told that this was out of range. in\nfact, alternative methods of payment .ie my plane, or an -in-kind payment were discussed (\n\nie including keeping the 30m portion of the fee outstanding till March ) ,I provided , only because you\nspecifically requested a detailed step by step execution plan and reviewed all documents that 1 was given\naccess to. ( Phaidon was never forthcoming ) in order to make my many corrections . ( as i said more needed\non phaidon ). Iwas then told that Alans involvement warranted a discount. Even in the best of light ,\nthough it is beyond question that not one time in the three years of his retainer has he ever proposed a\nunique idea. (including any way to deal with the use issue on debras death ,or even the most basic review of\nyour largest asset by far , the BRH agreement. ) O.K. - lets say he made a contribution to the plan and stretch\nreality beyond the pale and say it was 50 %. though no one could posit such a large amount unless they were\nwearing a clown suit. , the payment and our formula of 37 percent associated with the deal was known . It\nhad both sent in writing and spoken about on the phone numerous times , a detailed execution plan was\nprovided . then and only then, after the entire transaction was laid out for the group to follow You told\n\nme that after a number of conversations with brad karp that a total of only 20m would be paid , (and even that\nwas more than you originally contemplated ) for both transactions . Leon I feel It was remarkably unfair. Did\nbrad even knew of our prior agreements.? ?, I would ask that you I and Brad karp sit together if you think it\nwould be helpful. . I would like to send him this email, with your consent of course. Ifthe transactions were\nnever consummated , i would not be owed a dime, however , the expected fee was known up front. , the\ndetailed step by step plan was followed and overseen by me, the amount that I had requested before the\ntransaction had even begun, had already been heavily discounted, out of friendship, . I believe the decision re\nonly paying 20m has frankly , left me felling quite uneasy. and colors the view about the Athene or\nRothschild transaction."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022203.txt_4346
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022203.txt
|
Screen shot
|
[{"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2010 9:01:17 PM", "subject": "Screen shot", "body": "This is a screen shot of a google search on your name taken about one minute ago, and this is BEFORE the next big sweep. I UNDERSTAND your point about \"one thing kills me,\" but the daily beast article is gone, the other ones, including the powerful Huffington Post, are about to be pushed off. And, out stuff is on top."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Al seckel"], "timestamp": "Sat, December 11, 2010 12:31:16 PM", "subject": "Screen shot", "body": "the google page is not good.. after sept when you told me you thought it would take approx twenty thousand to clean up. and hopefully in time for nov 1. then another ten thsousand, and another ten thousand. and your emails about how you are all about results „ then an emergency 2500 dollars to keep servers active , then you told me micahel didn't want to give his bank details.. your quote was he'd explode, that was after he was sent forty thousand dollars directly to his bank.. I have yet to have a complete breakdown of payments. and the results , are what they are,"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032660.txt_4349
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032660.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017, at 2:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "at the moment 1 was flying to paris on the 8th. . I can leave eariler and get to paris by 830 . if you like to meet there. geneve difficult to fly out of at night. or lunch sat in paris. ,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 5, 2017 5:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can we have dinner in geneva on the 8th? i will be there on 7 and 8 dec and going back to kuwait on the 9th"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are welcome at my house always . And more private"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of courses"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "27?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "10pm should I bring special cake from New York"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "sorry that is 2512 for the gate &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2017, at 9:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2017 8:37:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i mat the door but i will wait for my time.. i dont want to come early to find trump in your housee@©Q"}]
| 9
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031519.txt_4356
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031519.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no, im out of it. donald brought out four women that said bill abused them. / they wilil feature in the hillary\nsays you should give the benefit of the doubt to victims. I laid this out for you over dinner, its\ndisgraceful, but. here we are"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Got it.\nNow remember\nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzker mon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:57:02 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028977.txt_4360
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028977.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:12:16 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Job is to get the hard ones in without being ejected from the room. What's the one question that pierces through?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you want to be provacative .? trump shuttle. hawaiin tropic contests.. mortgage on mara lago. ? revenue of golf courses as income.??! , total debt of all cos .? people dont want to conribute money as he said he is worth over 10b , why should they? , calif already coming up short. . fatther bought chips in the casino to stave off bankruptcy, chips because it was better than a first lien. under the gambling rules. matt his bag man? his loan from his brother in law ( JUdges husband) how much did his father leave. his brother robert etc. otherwise you can just throw easys"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016466.txt_4364
|
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016466.txt
|
Re: request
|
[{"sender": "Susan Edelman [sedelman@nypost.com]", "recipients": ["Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 5, 2018 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "Right, but the law allows for the redaction of victim names. Where does it say the whole document is denied?"}, {"sender": "Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>", "recipients": ["Sue"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "Hi Sue — the document was filed under seal. I cannot violate the seal and provide it to you.\n\n(off the record please) You may wish to petition the court, or have the Post’s lawyer send our lawyers something. We've reached the end of me being able to help — it’s sealed."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033218.txt_4365
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033218.txt
|
President PBI FYI
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/1/2017 1:24:27 AM", "subject": "President PBI FYI", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nTrump in PBI Fed 3rd thru 5th,. FYI,\n\nWhen PresTrump is visiting MarLago PBI there will be flight restrictions flying in and out of palm beach,, due to location of MarLago,,.\n\nThere will be Gate Way airports you have to depart from in order to land PBI,,\n\nTeterboro is a gateway departure airport, requires 24 hour notice just like our DCA program,\n\nWhen Trump is in MarLago, we will be unable to land in Palm Bch departing from LSJ,, we can land Fort Lauderdale Excutive airport, which isn't bad, they are offering $2.76 fuel price this weekend,,\n\nSame with departure from PBI, need 24 hour notice when President is in town,,\n\nSee message from PBI Port:\n\nImportant Message: All Palm Beach County Airport Users\n\nWe are getting word and expecting a President of the United States (POTUS) visit to PBI / Mar-a-Lago from Feb 3, 2017 (afternoon?) until Feb. 5, 2017. Times to be established.\n\nExpect the FAA’s Temporary Flight Restriction paperwork to be posted at least 72 hours prior to the POTUS arrival.\n\nThe following two airports are in the inner core, inside 1ONM TFR.\n\nPBI Airport; All General Aviation traffic into PBI must clear TSA designated “Gateways” for both arrival and departures into and out of PBI. Departure Gateways - We expect the Gateways to be established at the multiple locations at PBI with TSA operating from 0800-1700 and requires prior reservation (24hrs) with TSA. Arrival Gateways — Expect Ft. Lauderdale International Airport (FLL) and Orlando Int’] (MCO). Also expecting Teterboro, Dulles, and White Plains as additional gateways.\n\nLNA Airport; As initially established by the USSS, the Palm Beach County Park Airport (LNA) in Lantana, FL will be closed to all departures and flight training. Only arrivals into LNA that have gone through the TSA Gateway program at one of the designated airports (FLL/MCO) may fly into LNA during the TFR.\n\nThe 30NM outer core will also be in effect and measures will be posted in the FAA NOTAM/TFER release. Please share this advisory with all aviation users.\n\nRegards,\n\nPeter E. Labbe, Director\n\nOperations & Security\n\nDepartment of Airports\nPalm Beach International Airport"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032355.txt_4382
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032355.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "long dow , short yen euro and pound. long reits,"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "who is treasury secretary? Is Mnuchin a done deal? Seems too obvious."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas, Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:19:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "212 556 3821"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031294.txt_4383
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031294.txt
|
2017 IFP Gotham Awards
|
[{"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "November 16, 2017 at 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey — \n\nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I \ncan send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs. \n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable): \nCONTACT NAME: \nADDRESS LINE 1: \nADDRESS LINE 2: \n\nMany thanks.\n\nBest,\nSteven"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "November 17, 2017 at 11:38 AM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Dear Richard, \n\nThanks so much for providing this information. I'm offsite today at \nthe ceremony venue, but I will be sure to send everything over to \nyou via email on Monday. \n\nBest regards, \nSteven"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer"], "timestamp": "November 17, 2017 at 11:19 AM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "The foundation that will be making this contribution is: \nGratitude America Ltd. \n6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 \nSt Thomas, USVI 00802 \n\nplease send all correspondence including invoice to me via email \n\nthank you"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer"], "timestamp": "November 20, 2017 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "please send info tomorrow as i will be out the remainder of the week \n\nthank you"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "November 20, 2017 at 8:48:00 PM EST", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Richard - \n\nI certainly will. But perhaps you can clarify something for me before I put all this together for the donation. \n\nJeffrey Epstein had asked to submit the letter and invoice to Peggy Siegal instead, and she had supplied \ndifferent information than below. \n\nPlease advice how best to proceed. \n\nBest, \nSteven"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "11/21/2017 1:29:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "is gratitude paying for IFP or peggy? \n\nplease advise \n\nthank you"}]
| 7
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032525.txt_4384
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032525.txt
|
SIT Customs
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 3:57:41 PM", "subject": "SIT Customs", "body": "Due to Staffing issues, customs cannot use North Ramp, only PreClear in main building.\n\nTrump is suppose to depart 4pm, Latest 4:30pm\nFlight time: 2+25min\n\nDo you want PBI customs or PreClear STT?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032243.txt_4385
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032243.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Tom Barrack Privat", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/9/2016 5:28:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hope ur good. Let's catch up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 9, 2016, at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope you are well, photos look good. fyi I receive many calls a week about both Donald ( celina midelfart, \nmarla , beauty contest. mara lago etc) and clinton from reporters. less so recently with clinton , but my \nanswers are always i have nothing to say. or i try to ignore altogether. A few times i have been ambushed on \nthe street with questions . but am more careful now"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032433.txt_4386
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032433.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 11, 2017 11:52 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "if not florida do you have any plans to be in new york next week."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Going to florida...then end of the week nyc"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 12, 2017 10:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday new york? my brithday fri"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 3:19:45 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Craziest shit happening...trying to deliver el chapo to barack instead of trump....figuring out my schedule next week...will let you know"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032853.txt_4392
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032853.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wo!"], "timestamp": "2/19/2016 5:46:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Im here today, ehud barak at 1 , would you like to join at 2?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "NYT called me about you and Trump. Also, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider preempting."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031992.txt_4394
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031992.txt
|
hello from ibiza
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:38 PM", "subject": "hello from ibiza", "body": "what is your schedule?"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:28 PM", "subject": "Re: hello from ibiza", "body": "Can you call me\nI am with tigrane he would like to meet you he is here with me in Ibiza\nwith 8 top girls he said he would like to build some thing with you\ncan you come to Ibiza we have a huge house or how can we orgnise this\nmeeting even Jean Luc could doo a great biz also\nhe has the most amizing top models on stand by I told him not to do any\ndeals with anybody before he meet with you .\nhe stoped working with IMG and Trump wi here please call me and let me\nknow what is your plans\n\nwarmest regards\nDaniel"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat Jul 24 2010 at 9:32 AM", "subject": "Re: hello from ibiza", "body": "the other girl name is"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "7/24/10", "subject": "Re: hello from ibiza", "body": "i will be in paris tom000rw night"}, {"sender": "Daniel Siad", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/24/2010 5:10:54 PM", "subject": "hello from ibiza", "body": "can you come to Ibiza or you can send us the ticket to come with\nTigrane and five girls to Paris because they have there return ticket\nfrom Barcelona if they are living from here\nit will be great if you can arrenge for us tickets for Paris\nplease let me know so we can get orgnized"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031986.txt_4396
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031986.txt
|
Re: You should see this movie/documentary
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/6/2011 9:35:06 PM", "subject": "Re: You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "seems very one-sided and as if the makers didn't quite see the bigger picture \ni'm not sure the finance industry really had too much of a choice"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 6, 2011 5:27 am", "subject": "Re: You should see this movie/documentary", "body": "it is very unfair, and misrepresents tons of inf"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033581.txt_4397
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033581.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas EE", "recipients": ["jeffrey <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well | think you are going to have a windertul life from now on in your opinion how much is left in\nthis market it's been a trump triumph | gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yikes your birthday coming up next month"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:30:19 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "oy"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:31:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "well heaven can wait"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033149.txt_4403
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033149.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/31/2019 9:33:59 AM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/27/us/politics/trump-school-grades.html"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026924.txt_4407
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026924.txt
|
Fwd:
|
[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["Danny Goldberg", "Kevin Bright", "Caryl Ratner"], "timestamp": "12/20/2018 8:09:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032341.txt_4410
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032341.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:57:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032531.txt_4412
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032531.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:26:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 11:19:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is not trustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am seeing Ma little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commison it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017581.txt_4421
|
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017581.txt
|
Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)
|
[{"sender": "Auren Hoffman <§>", "recipients": ["<ai>"], "timestamp": "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:05:58 -0800", "subject": "Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "Dear Fouad,\nDear Lisa —\nYou are invited to join us at Dialog 2014 -- a two-day bipartisan retreat discussing how to change the world.\n\nThere will be no speeches ... just many moderated break-out discussions of 6-15 people on various topics. And\nwe design the agenda around your ideas and needs.\n\nPlease let us know if you would like to join us,\n\n/- Peter Thiel and Auren Hoffman/\n\np.s. and yes, we know Dialog 2014 is 16 months away, but we are giving you a chance to sign up now\n*DETAILS*:\n\nYou’re invited to join us at the Dialog Retreat ... 150 people to change the world ... a participatory and\nentrepreneurial conversation on changing the world.\n\nThe *Dialog//*participants aren’t modest. We want to change the world.\n\nBut we don’t want to spend our time being in a large audience listening to winded speeches. There are no\nspeakers. No panels. All attendees participate in break-out facilitated discussions. And we *limit the discussion"}, {"sender": "Lisa Randall", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:17 AM", "subject": "Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "Is this worthwhile?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa Randa] | aes"], "timestamp": "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:28:51 -0500", "subject": "Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "sundance is nice ,, go"}, {"sender": "es", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2012 5:28:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Invite to Dialog 2014 (16 months away)", "body": "So let me understand. You are suggesting tourism?"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028778.txt_4422
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028778.txt
|
Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade
|
[{"sender": "Vinoda Basnayake", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "States must get in front of this negative trend before spreads across Africa and it is too late. The U.S. should\ncall for President Sall to honor the request of the UN Working Group and release his political rival Mr. Wade\nand also keep his pledge of a 5 year presidential mandate. President Obama has said that Africa is more\nimportant than ever to security and prosperity in the U.S. We have worked very hard in implementing and\nprioritizing democracy and democratic succession in Africa. The Obama administration must not let our hard\nwork be compromised in Senegal, we have worked too hard and come too far."}, {"sender": "elisabeth feliho", "recipients": ["Vinoda Basnayake", "Bob Crowe"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, February 23, 2016 5:20 AM", "subject": "Revised letter. Arbitrary detention of Mr. Wade", "body": "Dear Vinoda and Bob,\n\nPlease see attached the last version of the revised draft letter. We have made some modifications and amendments\nwe submit to your proposal. You can finalize the letter as it suits you. We strongly recommend to wait Wednesday\nor Tuesday this week before sending the letter as Amnesty International will issue on Wednesday 24\" February\nits worldwide report on human right situation. It is highly probable that major statement will be made on Mr.\nWade case in the report on Senegal, which will give us more input for the letter.\n\nMany thanks and best regards.\n\nEF"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028921.txt_4424
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028921.txt
|
truly outrageous S.i am so sorry for you & alan-
|
[{"sender": "Lilly Ann Sanchez", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 2 2015 11:14 PM", "subject": "truly outrageous S.i am so sorry for you & alan-", "body": "Jeffrey - \nPlease let me know if I can help in any way-\nStory below-"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032369.txt_4425
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032369.txt
|
Trump
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 2:51:53 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032519.txt_4428
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032519.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 22, 2017, at 5:41 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/03/21/trump-signs-nasa-bill-aimed-at-landing-on-mars/?utm term=.64eb9bf54e09"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/22/2017 11:46:50 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "All shoe. This is not supporting science. It is all about the size of the rocket for him. All this will do is give him glory and not contribute to science."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031106.txt_4434
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031106.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "COLOM, Olivier", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 18, 2013 04:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "COLOM, Olivier", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 18, 2013 06:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have to do some stuff, like more \"political\", but might go to Ethiopia instead of NY early November"}, {"sender": "COLOM, Olivier", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, October 18, 2013 10:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have you got an idea for me? :)\n\nWe had fun with Ariane this week. She talked everyday about you and the advice you gave her last Sunday by the way.\nAnd her mum likes you as well"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["COLOM, Olivier"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 19, 2013 12:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you know Leah Pisar?\n\nno, I assume she she clever not cute"}, {"sender": "COLOM, Olivier", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 11:21:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "How come you're always right?\n\nShe is not awful looking though. Her father is Samuel and she worked with the spokesman of Clinton at the White\nHouse. She lives in Paris now. 40ish.\nShe teaches at University and also works at Huffington Post. Very much in the middle of US - France relations.\n\nFound out that Castelbajac has his showroom next door to my new apartment. Have already seen some models come\nand go - to your liking | think"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019873.txt_4441
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019873.txt
|
Fwd: Fire and Fury - Michael Wolff.pdf
|
[{"sender": "David Willis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Fire and Fury - Michael Wolff.pdf", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fire and Fury - Michael Wolff.pdf", "body": "girls, a very nice book about trump. just published. we are the first ones to read! i mean they do not sell it yet."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033175.txt_4443
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033175.txt
|
US Election Update
|
[{"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/13/2016 1:39:13 PM", "subject": "US Election Update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\nSince the start of 2nd US Presidential Election debate till now, we have processed 3.1 million tweets.\nHere is the performance of candidates:\n1. Donald Trump 11.80% (Positive), 15.66% (Neutral), 72.54% (Negative)\n2. Hillary Clinton 40.70% (Positive), 19.09% (Neutral), 40.21% (Negative)\nWinning Chances:\n1. Clinton 72%\n2. Trump 28%\nWinning chances in US States:\n1. Clinton: New York (84%), California (75%), North Carolina (64%), Florida (75%), Washington (52%), Ohio\n(96%), New Jersey (70%)\n2. Trump: Texas (66%)\nRegards,\nZubair Khan"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031112.txt_4446
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031112.txt
|
Fwd: Steve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms
|
[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayern", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2018 10:54:16 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Steve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\n\nBegin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Fareed Zakaria GPS", "recipients": ["Fareed Zakaria GPS"], "timestamp": "June 2, 2018 at 2:26:50 AM GMT+4", "subject": "Steve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms", "body": "Please scroll down or click here to read my latest Washington Post column.\n\nSteve Bannon’s clever idea to save the GOP from brutal midterms\nBy Fareed Zakaria, Friday, June 1, 2018\n\nROME -- The Republican Party faces dim prospects in the midterm elections. But it doesn’t have to be that way, says\nStephen K. Bannon, the chief ideologist of the populist wave that brought Donald Trump into the White House. “If the\nRepublicans continue on the path they are on,” Bannon told me Thursday, “they will lose 40 seats in the House and\nPresident Trump will be impeached.” He presented an alternative that strikes me as clever, and it’s a strategy that\nTrump himself seems to instinctively get.\n\nBannon was in Rome to learn from and provide support to the unusual coalition of populists and nationalists who\ntogether won half the vote in Italy’s recent elections and are now set to govern. Bannon sees that sort of coalition —\nmixing left and right, old and young — as his goal for the United States. “Europe is about a year ahead of the United\nStates. ... You see populist-nationalist movements with reform [here]. ... You could begin to see the elements of\nBernie Sanders coupled with the Trump movement that really becomes a dominant political force in American politics.”\n(This column draws on an on-air interview he did with me for CNN, as well as a subsequent conversation.)\n\nThe Republican Party’s strategy, for now, appears to be to make the midterm elections a series of local contests focusing\non the tax cut and the healthy economy. Bannon views this as fundamentally misguided. “You have to nationalize the\nelection,” he said. Bannon understands that voters are moved from the gut more than through a wonky analysis of\ntaxes. “This is going to be an emotional [election] — you’re either with [House Minority leader] Nancy Pelosi or you’re\nwith Donald Trump. ... Trump’s second presidential race will be on Nov. 6 of this year.”\n\nBannon is most focused on the issue of immigration because it hits both the heart and the head. “Immigration is about\nnot just sovereignty, it’s about jobs.” He believes that the Trump coalition can attract up to a third of Sanders supporters\nwho see trade and immigration as having created unfair competition for jobs, particularly for working-class blacks and\nHispanics. He advocates appealing directly to those voters, saying, “You’re not going to be able to take the Hispanic and\nblack community from the STEM system in grammar school to our best engineering schools . . . to the great jobs in\nSilicon Valley, unless you start to limit these H-1B visas and this unfair competition . . . from East Asia and South Asia.”\n\nNow this strikes me as entirely wrong. The reason that not enough Hispanic and black students end up in Silicon Valley\nhas much more to do with a broken education system, particularly for poorer kids, than the modest number of skilled\nAsian immigrants who get work visas. The most likely result of limiting these visas is that talented immigrants will simply\ngo elsewhere — Canada, Britain, Australia — and start successful companies there. And, in fact, there is lots of evidence\nthis is already happening."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030123.txt_4452
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030123.txt
|
Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 2:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "eric?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 12:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "You are on the move. I went out for some retail therapy."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "date certain? hamlet. ?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Mid-October, but there will be another run at him to reconsider."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "so is he the alternate in essence"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "It appears that way. I have advised that him staying through the end is the clearly preferable alternative."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "whose name is the apt in, does it have to be this one? or would another be ok."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "I signed the lease in my name for a year, so I think Iam pretty stuck. It is $11,000 a month and Latham reimburses me $8000 a month."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "furnished or un?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Furnished"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "see you at 1030? tomor?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "I won't get back to the city until @ 11:30, unfortunately."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "ok 1?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/21/2014 2:54:20 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "Yep. Will be there."}]
| 14
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021761.txt_4460
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021761.txt
|
Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable
|
[{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Margie"], "timestamp": "07/10/2008 02:36PM", "subject": "Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": "Margie,\n\n\" As you know, nothing too big or too small for us, especially in the summer\" Hmmmmm. I have to be\ndirect -- you or someone at your paper was very astute in checking the Clerk and Comptroller's computer\nand activity in the Epstein case two days before the hearing. As result, you sent me a text message on\nSaturday asking what the activity was about and I confirmed that the plea would take place. You were\nthe only member of the news media that I talked with. And yet, after the case is completely over, the\nPalm Beach Daily News' editorial staff remains silent on the topic.\n\nThanks,\nMike"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:58 AM", "subject": "Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 2:59:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033344.txt_4467
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033344.txt
|
POTUS
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2019 1:50:32 AM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Appears President Trump B757 is in Islip, we are parked right in front of it,\nit came here on Tuesday and is due to depart wednesday this week"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033422.txt_4469
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033422.txt
|
NY
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/14/2018 2:59:21 PM", "subject": "NY", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nDo you think NY on Monday is still possible?\n\nI guess It makes sense to leave the G550 in PBI until Wednesday then fly it to Boca, Since Trump arrival\nis Friday.,\n\nShould I leave plane in PBI until Wednesday?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031825.txt_4471
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031825.txt
|
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims
|
[{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/15/2019 12:21:00 AM", "subject": "From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims", "body": "I know it was an old piece but Fox is running it again today. \nThe numerous young women who say they were sexually abused by \nwealthy, Clinton-linked financier Jeffrey Epstein no longer appear set to \ntestify after a last-minute settlement was reached in a closely-watched civil \nlawsuit against the registered sex offender. \nhttps://www.foxnews.com/us/jeffrey-epstein-a-registered-sex-offender-settles-\ncivil-lawsuit-and-avoids-testimony-from-alleged-victims"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023041.txt_4472
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023041.txt
|
Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
|
[{"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmaxl@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "Annette Witheridge", "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. [redacted allegation]\n2. [redacted allegation]\n3. [redacted allegation]\n4. [redacted allegation]\n5. [redacted allegation]\n6. [redacted allegation]\n7. [redacted allegation]\n8. [redacted allegation]\n9. [redacted allegation]\n10. [redacted allegation]\n11. [redacted allegation]\n12. [redacted allegation]\n13. [redacted allegation]\n14. [redacted allegation]"}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmaxl@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 08:37:01 -0800", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 05:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023259.txt_4474
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023259.txt
|
moving forward
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:03 PM", "subject": "moving forward", "body": "I have mixed emotions about what transpired today. really, You saw first hand in nauseating detail what i have been saying to you for quite a while now. —_Joslins answers were totally incomprehensible."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:45 PM", "subject": "moving forward", "body": "okay, its time for you to decide how you would like to move forward. ( fyi get your money from the 1031 . the screw up is only one of many,) If you decide to move foward on decanting. phaidon, note basis estate update , each requires many carefully orchestrated detailed steps. and precision . there are hundreds of millions in saving if done correctly and a huge mess if not. Ifyou want me and my colleagues to do it , oversee it paper it and guide it, you should tell me. It is a big undertaking . If not , ok .. Brad and your crew can do it. I will have no real further involvement apart from confirming the outcome of my proposed structure, I will not risk the admonition of- they thought you said, they thought you meant, they understood it to be. but they said you said, (ie ,l asked at our meeting that accounting be done properly for bens house , what came back was ada thought that I meant that we needed to go back to the 97 trust and give him a full third party accounting of where his money had gone??!! I kid you not). I dont think brad should talk to jane heller without a fully fleshed out plan in place and even then it should be you."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:21 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "1 fees, amount and to what entities when and responsiblitis. 2. gagosian idea to save a minimum of 10 mill and maybe more. 3. ican walk you through carlyns screw up, 50 % would have made little difference and maybe made it worse . 4. we should have an all hands meeting with your family to talk about art distribution on death. . 5. phaidon, decantings ( already firmly in progress ) loans. (alan ) pent. ( with follow up ) all part of same elegant transaction, 6 asymetric risk worth at least 50- 60 no matter how you calculate. I can explain. 7 lets get the money issue out of the way once and for all. I have my team set to start."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella <3 ii >"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:07 AM", "subject": "Fwd: moving forward", "body": "I had forgotten that Alan was actually at the table when i explained my note deal to you. _—it was at the end of the meeting described below. . as you will recall , not once , not even a peep did alan suggest contemporaneously his hand in the crafting, in fact brad said it was an idea. that HE brad, HAD HAD , from the begiining . my emails between alan and I that you can read , further confirm authorship. Im sure you recall the obnoxious tooting when alan said he agreed with my plan. ."}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030983.txt_4480
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030983.txt
|
Fwd: Alex Acosta update I Power Line
|
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/6/2018 10:17:57 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Alex Acosta update I Power Line", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Robert Grusky", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "December 6, 2018 at 3:52:15 PM EST", "subject": "Alex Acosta update I Power Line", "body": "https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/12/alex-acosta-update.php \nAlex Acosta update \nEarlier this week, pedophile Jeffrey Epstein bought his way out of a lawsuit that would have \ngiven some of his victims the opportunity to testify about his predatory and criminal \nconduct. Victims never got that opportunity when Epstein faced criminal charges, because \nAlex Acosta___then the lead prosecutor, now the Secretary of Labor___let Epstein off with \na ridiculously lenient sentence. Despite having committed hideous sex offenses with dozens \nof minors, Epstein received a sentence of 13 months in jail, during which he was often free \nduring the day. \nEpstein's decision to buy his out of the civil lawsuit, one that he had the nerve to initiate, \nbenefits Acosta. The trial would have provided non-stop headlines, coupled with frequent \nreferences to the sweetheart deal Acosta gave him. As Randy Schultz puts it, the trial would \nhave been the occasion for a long overdue public shaming of Acosta. Now, he avoids this \nconsequence. \nBut this doesn't mean Acosta is out of the woods. He faces calls for his ouster from the \nTrump cabinet. \nSome calls are from the usual suspects. Michelle Goldberg of the New York Times has \nwritten a piece so obnoxious that it almost makes me want to see Acosta ride out the storm. \nBut some conservatives are also advocating Acosta's departure. Concerned Women for \nAmerica is a stalwart conservative organization. It describes itself, accurately, as \"focus[ed] \non seven core issues: the family, the sanctity of human life, religious liberty, education, \nsexual exploitation, national sovereignty, and support for Israel.\" (Emphasis added) \nIts leader, Penny Nance, has called for Acosta's resignation. Noting that labor trafficking, \nwhich the Labor Department combats, is often conjoined with sex trafficking, Nance says \nthat President Trump would not have nominated Acosta if reports fully describing Acosta's \nconduct in the Epstein case had emerged earlier. \nSen. Ben Sasse has also weighed in. He sent a letter to the Justice Department asking it to \ninvestigate its treatment of Epstein, including the fact that the plea deal ensured that victims \nof the pervert would be denied the ability to comment on or object to the leniency of his \nsentence. Sasse is chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Oversight, \nAgency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts. \nSen. Marco Rubio, a longtime supporter of Acosta, says it would be \"very troubling\" if \npolitical influence led to a light sentence for Epstein. In Rubio's view, and that of every \nrational person, Epstein \"should have been in jail for a long time.\" Rubio added, however, \nthat he will reserve judgment until he hears Acosta's side. \nThat's fair. But so far, Acosta has provided no real defense for letting Epstein off so lightly. \nIn public, at least, he is standing by his argument that the deal was a reasonable one and that \nthis is old news. \nPreviously, Acosta had a different defense. He cited \"a year-long assault on the prosecution \nand the prosecutors\" by \"an army of legal superstars\" who represented Epstein. This \nallegedly included \"defense counsel investigat[ing] individual prosecutors and their families, \nlooking for personal peccadilloes that may provide a basis for disqualification.\" In this \naccount, the deal was made to relieve the pressure, while still getting a conviction. \nAcosta could hardly assert this explanation____i.e., that he wimped out___while seeking a \ncabinet position with the expectation of being appointed to more exalted jobs in the future. \nNor is the explanation particularly plausible. Acosta isn't the first prosecutor to face a \nscorched earth defense. Ask Ken Starr about this. \nI don't doubt that Acosta regarded escaping the wrath of the defense team as a benefit of \nreaching the plea deal. But I don't believe this was incentive enough to cause him, in effect, \nto throw the case. \nWhat was the true incentive? As I wrote when this story broke, I think it was the same \nincentive that explains much of his conduct in public life___Acosta's desire to accommodate \npeople he thinks can help him down the road. \nWhich people? Probably the lawyers at Kirkland and Ellis, where Acosta had once worked. \nEpstein enlisted Ken Starr* and Jay Lefkowitz, both of Kirkland, for his defense team. \nAcosta reportedly worked out the terms of his surrender with Lefkowitz, a former colleague, \nat a meeting in a location far away from the prosecutor's office. \nThe location of the meeting is itself suspicious. Prosecutors and other law enforcement \nofficials normally demand that those seeking a deal come to them. \nThe fact that Acosta didn't is another sign___if one were needed___that this was a \ncapitulation. It also casts further doubt on the claim that Acosta was capitulating for the \npurpose of sparing the folks who worked with him in the prosecutor's office. \nThe key point, though, is that Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz were power players in \nWashington___men who might help Acosta down the road. \nReaders will be quite familiar with Starr's background. Lefkowitz was director of cabinet \naffairs and deputy executive secretary to the domestic policy council under President George \nH.W. Bush. Under President George W. Bush, Lefkowitz served as general counsel in the \nOffice of Management and Budget and later as deputy director of domestic policy at the \nWhite House. \nAccommodating such influential figures must have seemed like a good career move. Having \nStarr and Lefkowitz on his side might help Acosta get a judgeship, a cabinet appointment, or \na high-paying job back at Kirkland and Ellis. \nI'm speculating, of course. But my speculation finds support in Acosta's practice of \naccommodating the powerful. \nMuch of that accommodation is of Democrats. Indeed, at the time Acosta was working in \nMiami as a U.S. Attorney, he had alienated some Republicans by such accommodation \nwhile at the Department of Justice. Some say he was on the verge of being fired when \nAttorney General Alberto Gonzalez parachuted him to Miami. The Epstein settlement was a \nway for Acosta to shore up his standing with some influential Republicans. \nWill Acosta be able to survive the current scandal? I don't have a clear sense about this yet. \nBut President Trump, who isn't bashful about sacking cabinet members, may come to \nbelieve (if he doesn't now) that it's disadvantageous to have a cabinet member who sold out \nteenage victims of sexual abuse, especially when the sell-out benefited an ultra-wealthy \nserial offender. \n* Some on the left are trying to make something or the fact that Starr, who had investigated \nBill Clinton in connection with sexual misconduct, later defended Epstein, a pervert. This is \nsilly. \nIn both instances, Starr was doing his job as a lawyer. Perverts are entitled to a defense and \nthere is nothing hypocritical about investigating Bill Clinton's misconduct when that was \nStarr's job and later joining the team that was defending Jeffrey Epstein. \nAcosta, by contrast, was on the team seeking justice for Epstein and for his victims. He gave \nup this quest for reasons that can't be defended."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031445.txt_4481
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031445.txt
|
Re: Today...
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/29/2015 4:22:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "Ok. Talk at 5:00."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, March 29, 2015", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "ok, i need to run by lawyers, your sentene appears to read i nevefr met clinton or gore?? harsh about women, i thought we modified that."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "In NYC or otherwise? Why don't we plan on talking then at about 5:00."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "be back on land around 4"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Today...", "body": "Have you read? When's good to talk?"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030997.txt_4484
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030997.txt
|
Re: Fw: (no subject)
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/29/2009 3:04:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: (no subject)", "body": "call back"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031451.txt_4487
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031451.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\n\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it --\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:50:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032728.txt_4498
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032728.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Jonathan ‘areca", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/2/2018 10:58:", "subject": null, "body": "Hi Jeffrey do you think this is Smoot Hawley 2 which topped us into the depression Bloomberg just quoted\ntrump trade wars are good and easy to win thanks jf Somers is going to mar a lago lunch Saturday fund\nraiser for djt"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031099.txt_4499
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031099.txt
|
Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Rush, George", "recipients": ["Howard Rubenstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 08", "subject": "Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Howard:\n\nWe’re working on a story for our Sunday column about Jeffrey Epstein. I thought I might send\nmy questions to you tonight, so you’d have them first thing tomorrow."}, {"sender": "Howard Rubenstein", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "October 9, 2009 7:26:54 AM PDT", "subject": "FW: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Darren:\n\nI hope you are well.\n\nSince we are no longer working for Jeffrey, I’m forwarding this Daily News request to you so you can handle it as you see\nfit.\n\nMany thanks,\n\nHoward"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael J. Pike"], "timestamp": "10/9/2009 5:24:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026893.txt_4513
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026893.txt
|
Fwd: The Unsteady Undertow Commands the Seas (Temporarily)
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/15/2018 6:56:57 PM", "subject": "Fwd: The Unsteady Undertow Commands the Seas (Temporarily)", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Judie Taylor", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 15, 2018 at 2:36:30 PM EDT", "subject": "The Unsteady Undertow Commands the Seas (Temporarily)", "body": "Sunday Night Insight\nOctober 14, 2018\nThe Unsteady Undertow Commands the Seas (Temporarily)\nSharmin Mossavar-Rahmani\nBrett Nelson\nMaziar Minovi\nAndrew Dubinsky\nMichael Murdoch\nMary Rich\nChief Investment Officer\nHead of Tactical Asset Allocation\nManaging Director\nVice President\nVice President\nVice President\nThe 7.8% intraday peak-to-trough decline in US equities between September 21st and October 11th has rattled investor confidence. Numerous headlines of stock market \"carnage\" have further eroded their confidence. As a result, some of our clients have asked whether this drop signifies the beginning of the end of a nearly 10-year bull market.\nWe do not think so. So far, this pullback is actually smaller than the two prior downdrafts we experienced in late January and in mid-March, neither of which derailed the US economy nor the bull market. The steady factors we highlighted in our annual Outlook—such as economic growth, benign inflation, robust earnings, and low probability of recession—have not dissipated. Furthermore, while the investor focus has shifted to the risks around the unsteady undertow, most of these factors are, on balance, less concerning today than they were at the beginning of 2018.\nOf course, that is not the case across all geopolitical concerns. While trade tensions with Mexico and Canada have abated, those with China have certainly deteriorated and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. But, in aggregate, there has been more improvement than deterioration, in our view.\nIn this Sunday Night Insight, we will provide a brief update on the steady factors and unsteady undertow. We then conclude with our view that the steady factors will likely continue to win this tug-of-war between the two.\nSteady Factors\nWhile the headlines warn of equity market carnage, the facts do not support such alarming headlines. The S&P 500 is still up 5.1% on a year-to-date total return basis and financial conditions remain at easier levels today than they did when the Federal Reserve began this tightening cycle in 2015, despite the recent decline in equities and 0.76 percentage point increase in 10-year Treasury yields year-to-date. Most importantly, as highlighted by Federal Reserve Chairman, Jerome Powell, we are in \"extraordinary times\" of steady growth and low inflation.\nEconomic Growth\nEconomic growth remains firm in the US. Both the Institute for Supply Management leading indexes for manufacturing and non-manufacturing remain at very strong levels. Current activity indicators of real GDP growth average about 3.5% for the third quarter and closer to 4% for the fourth quarter. Forecasts for third quarter real GDP average 3.8% and fourth quarter forecasts are about 2.8%. While growth is slowing from the 4.2% estimate of the second quarter, it is still forecast to be above trend and we believe a modest slowdown is certainly preferable to continued growth at a pace that was likely unsustainable and possibly even inflationary.\nIn aggregate, the economic data since the intraday peak of US equities on September 21st does not point to any worrisome slowdown in GDP growth or the pace of employment. In fact, while the recent 134K increase in non-farm payrolls was less than expectations, revisions to earlier months offset the modest headline miss and the unemployment rate still fell to 3.7%. Furthermore, this 134k increase is above the estimated sustainable level of employment growth based on population growth and changes in labor force participation, which our colleagues in Goldman Investment Research estimate is around 96k. Importantly, a modest slowdown in the 3-month average of non-farm payrolls, which currently stands at a very robust 190k jobs, is more likely to keep inflation in check.\nRobust Earnings and Buybacks\nContinued above-trend economic growth is supporting solid corporate fundamentals. While many are quick to dismiss this strength to US tax reform, it is only half the story. Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) expanded by a very healthy 12% in the first half of this year and are expected to grow by double-digits again in the third quarter. This robust organic profit growth is also fueling sizable corporate buybacks—a key source of equity market support. Our colleagues on the corporate buyback desk expect the highest dollar amount for buybacks on record in 2018, with $1tn in authorizations and $850bn in executed buybacks.\nEven so, such robust earnings growth has begun to foster concern that we have reached a peak in EPS growth. While we do expect the pace of growth to slow next year, a local peak in earnings growth has not signified an imminent peak in the S&P 500 historically. In fact, about 3/4ths of market peaks occurred more than two years after the peak in the growth rate of earnings. Moreover, stock market returns have remained healthy during this period, with high odds of a positive outcome over the subsequent 6-24 months (see Exhibit 1). In short, the market ultimately follows the path of earnings and while their growth rate may be slowing, their absolute level is still rising.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\nInflation and Interest Rates\nInflation data has remained at relatively low levels for all of 2018, as shown in Exhibits 2 and 3. In fact, some of the most recent data released in October have ticked slightly lower. Average hourly earnings dropped to 2.8% from the prior month's level of 2.9%. Headline CPI dropped to 2.3% from 2.7% and Core CPI ex-food and energy remain at a low 2.2%, unchanged from the prior month. The Federal Reserve's preferred inflation indicator, Core PCE, also remains low at 2.0% which is in line with the Federal Reserve's target, and unchanged from the prior month.\nWhile 10-year Treasury yields have risen by 0.76% (or 76 basis points) over the course of 2018, we do not think the resulting 3.2% yield is enough to derail US economic growth. Keep in mind that most of the recent increase since late August was due to stronger real growth rather than runaway inflation expectations. We expect interest rates to range between 3.0% and 3.5% in 2019 with a midpoint of 3.25%, barring any major geopolitical conflicts such as one between US and China and or escalating conflicts in the Middle East.\nNote: Average hourly earnings is available for the private sector starting in 2006 and is released in the monthly employment report. The BLS hourly earnings data for production and nonsupervisory employees, -80% of the private sector, is available back to 1964.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Haver.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Haver.\nOf course, the recent backup in interest rates is providing equity investors with another source of angst. Yet our work suggests there are several reasons why rates could continue to rise before becoming a material headwind for stocks. First, the 4% trend growth rate of nominal US GDP—reflecting 2% real growth and 2% inflation—remains comfortably above the 10-year Treasury yield of 3.2% (i.e. the cost of borrowing). Stocks typically struggle when the cost of borrowing exceeds the nominal growth of the economy (see Exhibit 4). Second, the recent backup in interest rates was driven primarily by improving real growth expectations, not higher inflation. This distinction is critical, because higher rates in response to improving real growth tend to benefit earnings sufficiently to overcome the downward pressure they place on valuation multiples. Finally, it will take a number of years before higher rates meaningfully impact aggregate S&P 500 interest expense, considering 91% of S&P 500 debt is fixed-rate and only 13% matures over the next two years.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group. Bloomberg.\nLow Probability of Recession\nWe continue to maintain a low, 10%, probability of recession driven by:\n• The positive trend of leading economic indicators\n• Low levels of inflation\n• The continued slow but steady pace of Federal Reserve interest rate hikes. We believe that Federal Reserve Chairman Powell's recent commentary indicates that the FOMC will continue to be driven by data and financial market conditions. Their stated goal is to extend this expansion \"indefinitely.\" While the Federal Reserve dots point towards four more interest rate hikes by the end of 2019, we do not think that such hikes materially increase the odds of a recession in an economy that continues to grow at levels that are generally regarded as above trend growth in the US.\nRecent steepening of the yield curve. We have highlighted two measures of the yield curve as sign-posts we watch as an early harbinger of a recession. Both have steepened since their lows, as shown in Exhibits 5 and 6.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\n*\"Near-Term Forward Spread\" is the implied 3-month forward yield 18-months from now.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\nUnsteady Undertow\nAs market observers attempt to explain the recent drop in US equities, the risks of geopolitical factors have garnered considerable attention. Potential US retaliation over the recent disappearance of a Saudi journalist has only added fuel to the fire of worries given the risk that oil exports could be used as a political weapon in a world with tighter oil supply thanks to impending US sanctions on Iran.\nAs we review the geopolitical developments of 2018, it is clear that some of the risks have abated while others have increased. With the exception of a significant spike in oil prices due to the impact of sanctions on Iran or any escalation in US-Saudi tensions, we believe that the net impact of these shifts is not material enough to derail the US economic expansion or bull market.\nRisks that have abated\nMexico: the election of the left-of-center populist president (Andres Manuel Lopes Obrador referred to as AMLO) has reduced fear of a reversal of recent reforms. While concerns about fiscal profligacy and reverting to a nationalist energy policy that reduces oil production may reappear, AMLO does not take office until the end of the year.\nBrazil: The strong showing of Jair Bolsonaro, a law-and-order former army captain, in the first round of elections and the latest data that points to a 75% probability of Bolsonaro becoming the next president of Brazil has provided a boost to the Brazilian real. His current standing has substantially reduced the election of another left-wing worker's party candidate who would keep the status quo in Brazil.\nNAFTA: The agreement on a revised NAFTA deal between the US, Canada, and Mexico on September 30th meaningfully reduced the risk of the US withdrawal from NAFTA. While the new agreement, US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), has not been ratified by the Mexican and Canadian national parliaments nor by the US congress, and a divided congress after the mid-term elections may lead to some uncertainty, we believe it is likely to be ratified.\nUS-EU Trade Friction: Tension between the US and European Union eased significantly after a July 2018 deal between European Commission President Juncker and President Trump to \"work together toward zero tariffs, zero non-tariff barriers and zero subsidies on non-auto industrial goods\". The coast is not totally clear given the threat of auto tariffs, but we do not anticipate any significant increase in trade rhetoric in the near future.\nRisks that have increased\nChina: The trade war with China continues to escalate and as we have stated before, we believe that it cannot be resolved simply by China importing more US goods. The issues range from:\n• A large and growing trade deficit with China\n• Industrial policies & unfair trade practices that reduce competition, such as subsidies and \"dumping good at below-market prices\"\n• \"Made in China 2025\" policies which \"harm US companies\"\n• Uneven tariff rates and the banning of some US goods\n• Intellectual property theft\n• Forced technology transfer\n• Strategic US technology acquisitions\n• Outright cyber theft\n• Foreign ownership restrictions\nRecent headlines that the trade war may be escalating to a cold war are not without merit, as we believe that US-China relations are changing on a more structural basis and will have a longer-term impact. On a short-term basis, however, US exposure to China is limited with merchandise exports, corporate profits and foreign claims at about 1% of GDP. As seen in Exhibit 7, the Chinese equity markets have also deteriorated much more significantly than US markets in 2018.\nOf course, specific stocks with greater exposure to China through higher sales have underperformed the S&P 500 by about 6% since the latest tariffs were imposed on $200bn of Chinese products, as shown in Exhibit 8.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\nNote: High China sales basket is aggregated and defined by Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\nItaly: Concerns about Italy have risen to peak levels since the election of a populist government in May and credit default swaps have increased to reflect these higher risks. The government's expansive fiscal plan, with a proposed budget deficit of 2.4% of GDP, may be rejected by the European Union commission and result in rating downgrades. While the EU is likely to manage this situation in its usual incremental and reactive way, the possibility of new elections in late 2019 reigniting euro viability questions will keep Italy on our radar screens.\nBREXIT: It is hard to know whether Brexit risks are unchanged, higher or lower given the minute by minute headlines out of the UK. Our base case remains that while the internal politics of the Conservative party will keep uncertainty at elevated levels and the European Union will not compromise on its key tenants of free movement of goods, services, and people, the two sides will agree to a deal that defers the difficult choices on the shape of a final agreement with the EU until late 2020.\nThe Middle East: Risks in the Middle East have not changed substantially with respect to Iraq, Syria, or even the impositions of sanctions on Iran. However, the disappearance of the Saudi journalist who entered the Saudi Embassy in Turkey on October 2nd has the potential to raise risks to global oil supply. While there has been a global uproar, it is not yet clear whether the US will impose serious sanctions or Saudi Arabia would retaliate by reducing oil exports if the US finds sufficient evidence regarding the alleged killing of the Saudi journalist. The recession in 1973-74 was partly due to the quadrupling of oil prices due to the Arab Oil Embargo. Later in that decade, the Iranian Revolution and the Iran-Iraq War also led to a 2.5 times spike in oil prices that, along with Federal Reserve tightening by then Chairman Paul Volcker, led to a US recession. While we think it is unlikely that Saudi Arabia would react so aggressively in the face of serious US reprisals, we note that it remains a real risk.\nSome Notable Observations\nUS Equities Have Been Shunned All Along\nIn both our 2018 Outlook and mid-year update, we highlighted the surprising absence of inflows into US equities based on flows into mutual funds and Exchange-Traded Funds. As shown in Exhibit 9, flows into US equities were negative in 2018, even before the recent downdraft. In fact, US equities have seen outflows of $81 billion through August 2018 (based on the most recent comprehensive data), while non-US developed equities and emerging market equities have had inflows of $72 billion and $20 billion respectively. This is further evidence of our view that while sentiment and short term positioning among speculators and hedge fund managers shifts frequently, more stable investors have shunned US equities during this long bull market in favor of other developed and emerging market equities and global bonds.\nThis steady outflow of assets from US equities has been offset by record levels of stock buybacks by US companies given high levels of profitability and incremental cash from repatriation of overseas earnings, as mentioned above.\nNote: Based on ICI weekly estimates through August 30,2018. Flows exclude reinvested dividends.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, ICI.\nSome Headwinds Facing the FANG MAN Stocks Will Persist\nThe basket of FANGMAN (i.e. Facebook, Apple, Netflix, Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Nvidia) stocks have dropped across the board from their respective peak price levels, with Facebook's 29% decline the largest and Apple's 4% decline the smallest among the group. Even so, each of the stocks, with the exception of Facebook, still have positive year-to-date returns and have outperformed the S&P 500, as shown in Exhibit 10.\nThis is not a recommendation to buy or sell individual securities but rather an assertion that these stocks represent a small portion of S&P 500 earnings. Anyone looking to buy or sell single name equities should consult Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\nNevertheless, we believe that some of the headwinds that have plagued this sector will continue. These include:\n• Data privacy issues impacting a broad range of companies, including Facebook, Google, Twitter, Alipay and Tencent.\n• High likelihood of greater regulatory scrutiny in the US2 and Europe as policy makers increasingly believe that these companies will not address \"the privacy and security issues of social media users\"3 on their own.\n• Increased focus by ESG investors (Environment, Social, and Governance) that many of the technology and social media companies are falling short on social and governance issues.\nWhile this basket of stocks may or may not lead the market in the future, it is important to note that they represent only 10% of S&P 500 earnings.\nInvestment Implications\nThe recent market downdraft has understandably rekindled fears that the longest bull market in history is coming to an end. While there are no certainties in investing, we do not think the odds support that conclusion based on our read of the steady and unsteady factors discussed above. Keep in mind that about 75% of historical US bear markets—defined here as equity market declines of 20% or more—have occurred during economic recessions. In fact, US equity returns have remained favorable until about five to six months prior to the onset of recession, highlighting the penalty for prematurely exiting the market (see Exhibit 11). With only 10% odds of recession over the next year, we think the economic backdrop remains favorable for stocks.\nSource: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg.\nOf course, none of the supportive factors discussed above precludes further bouts of equity volatility. As we highlighted at the beginning of the year, the historical probability of a 5% or greater correction from current valuation levels was 96%. Yet these statistics alone do not justify underweighting equities, since such pullbacks often occur after sizable equity rallies, as this year reminds us. Moreover, such pullbacks are quite normal historically. After all, stocks have suffered a median of two pullbacks of at least 5% and one of at least 10% per calendar year in the post-WWII period, leaving both the frequency and magnitude of this year's dips in line with past experience. Most importantly, years that experienced a similar number of pullbacks as 2018 nonetheless ended with a median gain of 6% and had 77% odds of a positive return.\nConclusion\nAlthough we have painted a less alarmist view of recent market weakness, we are by no means Pollyannaish. While bull markets do not die of old age, they do become more susceptible to ailments over time. Yet as we survey the tug of war between the steady factors and the unsteady undertow, we do not think the balance of risks is strong enough to topple the ongoing US expansion and the continued growth of corporate earnings it supports.\nThat said, this viewpoint does not preclude further market volatility and the market may still make new lows if the current downdraft persists. But history suggests the bull market is likely to continue until about 5-6 months prior to the end of this economic expansion. Thus, it will take a significant increase in the odds of an imminent recession to provide the trigger—that has been lacking thus far—to tactically underweight equities. In the interim, we continue to recommend that clients maintain their strategic allocation to US equities.\nSources: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg, Datastream, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Haver.\nEndnotes:\n(1) Kate Davidson and Sarah Chaney, \"Fed Chair Powell Sees 'Remarkably Positive Set of Economic Circumstances,- The Wall Street Journal, October 3, 2018.\n(2) Statement by the Acting Director of FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection Regarding Reported Concerns about Facebook Privacy Practices, March 26, 2018.\n(3)\nSenator Mark. R Warner, Press Release, September 28, 2018\nInvestment Strategy Group. The Investment Strategy Group (ISG) is part of the Investment Management Division of Goldman Sachs."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029578.txt_4516
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029578.txt
|
Re: invitation
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed. \nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to \nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next \ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar \nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young \ngirl. \nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \n\"bootleg\" episode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me \nand you were so kind to make it happen. \nLisa"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey, \nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:06 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "okay.... let me revise with I and me in mind before I talk to you. \nCan I call you tomorrow am?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:32 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "better?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Elisa New"], "timestamp": "11/26/2018 3:26:46 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "can you call me"}]
| 7
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032486.txt_4517
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032486.txt
|
Fwd: TR: TR: update
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 fevrier 2017 12:32", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "going to artists studio s much more appropriate , i think"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Gentlemen\nI hope you are having a great week.\nIn LA hoping to begin acquiring pieces: are we on?\nIf not yet, when please"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach.\nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or anything of the kind.\nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their studio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already friendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home).\nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great artists when they need it.\nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go directly to the source.\nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet, they dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in person.\nThe spirit is to have an impact on young, talented folks, and absolutely to stay at the source.\nOnce again, not sure was drifted away from this in communication"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 fevrier 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Feb 14, 2017, at 8:18 PM", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in fact, it has started)\nall the best\ne"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant"], "timestamp": "mercredi 15 fevrier 2017 13:00:07", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": "There is $1mm in the bank account. We can prepare checks or wires for you to sign upon request. This way book keeping gets done at same time. Just send back up with each request. How does that sound?"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "mercredi 15 fevrier 2017 18:15", "subject": "RE: TR: update", "body": "Thanks Darren\nGood news!\nI'm under the impression that checks will be exceptional (they are more cumbersome to handle), and we will use mostly wires.\nConsidering the time difference, my heavy travel and my own propension to do things at night and on week-ends I would much prefer having an internet code and be able to organize everything online when I need to.\nWhen I use Interaudi (my US bank), they can do that, store the recurring beneficiaries, and do wires in multiple currencies, but I am not familiar with DB.\nOf course, you could also have the same access and help me when needed.\nAlso, your point about bookkeeping is mitigated by the fact that, in any case, I will also need to have someone keeping track of the receipts and inventory, before shipping proofs to you. In any case there will be need for some work on my side before final filing is done.\nOn the other hand, if there is a \"checks and balances\" control issue, there could be a cap to my wiring powers (like the 10 K we discussed), that would be absolutely fine for me if this is the intent.\nPlease do let me know.\nWe can also talk about it (in Hawai now, free after 2 PM your time)\nIn any case, this is good and happy news. I'll review the first list of payments over the week-end.\nEtienne"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant <etienne.binant@...>", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 16, 2017 at 9:29:08 PM EST", "subject": "TR: TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nI hope all is well\ncan you let me know if the below modus operandi works for you?\nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/17/2017 2:34:42 AM", "subject": "Fwd: TR: TR: update", "body": ""}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025651.txt_4523
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025651.txt
|
Re: an article you may both hate. or like.
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:02 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "Ps. My piece argued against fanaticism."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 18, 2015, at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "you can invite depp to visit us when you are in the caribean"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:26 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "When I was with him yesterday I told him we were going to caribbean and he asked where.. He has an island in bahamas, making you two the only people I know who own islands.. :) will ask him if he is free then. He is remarkable in new movie, though the film itself is not fantastic.. he is also a pretty good guitarist.. his show with alice cooper and joe perry in la was great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "9/18/2015 6:30:01 PM", "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "or we can visit him on his"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026358.txt_4529
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026358.txt
|
Miles and Cathy Alexander and Little St James island
|
[{"sender": "Cathy Alexander", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg, Esq."], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 23, 2015, 2:21 PM", "subject": "Miles and Cathy Alexander and Little St James island", "body": "Dear Mr. Weinberg:\n\nI understand that you are looking for information regarding whether former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore and his then wife, Tipper, ever visited Little St. James. I was the Island’s manager from 1999 through 2007 and lived on the Island with my wife during that entire period. Regarding President Clinton, I will sign a sworn affidavit that I never met the man. As far as I know President Clinton was never on the Island. He was never there while I was present on the Island. If he had come to the Island while I was on holiday, my staff would have told me that President Clinton was on the Island while I was away. While I worked on Little St. James, I had been called back from holiday many times to help when any guests visited the Island. So, if President Clinton had come to the Island while I was away, I would have been called back to the Island for such a visit, and I never was.\n\nThe same is true for Vice President Gore and his wife Tipper. I never met them and as far as I am aware were never on Little St. James during the entire period that I was the Island manager.\n\nSincerely,"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026663.txt_4531
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026663.txt
|
Fwd: Alert - TIC Form SHC Deadline Approaching
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 7:04:23 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Alert - TIC Form SHC Deadline Approaching", "body": "not sure if this applies to Leon\nThe reporting threshold for Schedule 2 is $200 million in total fair value of all foreign securities owned by the SHC Reporter and not held with a U.S.-resident custodian"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030767.txt_4538
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030767.txt
|
Re: crown prince
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/27/2017 12:57:44 PM", "subject": "Re: crown prince", "body": "yes great"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:56 AM", "subject": "Re: crown prince", "body": "Was with Bannon last night who was saying how much Trump liked deputy crown prince: \"Real guy's guy, he loved him. Thinks they can do stuff together.\""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023265.txt_4541
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023265.txt
| null |
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "am concerned re brad taking barrys place re XXXX. In the beginning Barry will need to find and learn ACCURATE .. org charts. books , balance sheets . trust valuations. are all a part. Barry will need 2 months to just get his arm around what is there , this is before any needed modifications.,\n\na way overdue re- fresh of your estate plan. . clats , trust. partnerships. grats. Ilcs. bank accounts , filing requirements. etc. the long awaited review of the brh tra and shareholders agreement to see how they fit into new plan. . \"XXXXX\" planning. art partnership engagement .. , airplane re-do. , buying another. .? boat sale , Miami sale. . TRADING ACCOUNTS. . three years overdue. . an accounting system. fire john .. joslin stays for a year. or so. so does tom and . except for heather everyone should be replaced withnew. . Sell Artspace and shut down regan arts. . rationalize. cash flow reporting. cash mgmt. stock sales. sec irs. gaming. foreign reporting. the 8865 mess will take months to review now. . you CANNOT file unreviewed audited documents. .CANNOT!!! _ this will be very detailed work. . a self inflicted wound - all avoidable if professionals had been in place to limit . or contain it. . . you will need 3 new hires .as there is no one in your office that is truly an A player. I have great hope in Barry as you know. He will need to be trained. note\n\n; One year is my guesstimate After 4 years of telling you , that you could do better than Halperin, : im glad that you now are willing to follow barrys advice . I take no offense , in fact I take comfort in the fact that after only one conversation with Barry you are now convinced to make that change . will take a year or more.\n\nI expect as a friend you will understand that\n\nI will no longer , not even for one day , work on your affairs . without the compensation that is long overdue. . your unilateral idea of after care , not imposed on any other professional , except me, not paul weiss ,( caesars alone , a direct screw up on their part ) tom, akin, ,no one. needs toend.. you and I had previously agreed no more of that , and this after you decided not to pay me per our agreement. to be fair I can not say im surprised as you have email after email , stating that , if you save a great deal of money, you wont want to pay , so limit it to 40m per year. - water under the bridge\n\nIf I can find the time to work , on your project , which is not by any means certain as I have said, I hope you understand that it now will have to be under my standard terms and conditions. and well documented so as to avoid any more of the he said she said. I never want to have any more uncomfortable money moments with you , I find it very distasteful. . so to be clear , my terms are as follows. I will only work for the usual 40 million per year. It needs to be paid, 25 million upon signing an agreement . 5 million every 2 months thereafter for 6 months ie march may june . this can begin if 1 am able in January. I will immediately stop work , if the payment is not received. If you want me to work this year until Jan 15, it will be 10 million. paid upfront. after one year you will be left with a new estate plan a running office. staffed with professionals overseen by Barry. (hallelujah ) a tax plan . and an investment that returns more than any painting you could possible own. _. no agreement - no work. however - I of course will talk to Barry for the hour that i promised , and take your guidance as to what I should say.\n\nher the last two places. ?\n\nTo: Melanie Spinella i\n\nLeon please read the attached proposed response to the IRS_, see if you can understand it !!!._ Ive asked for are-do. and given prelimiary directions to Alan to have it edited over the weekend\n\nIf you are quarterbacking ,ok with me. just please let everyone know. you must deal with the outrageous incompetence in your family office .. Alans words \" but I was told that.. , but I was told by the office (sic) that ...., BUT 1 was told by joslin,. , but I was told by . \" why is leon blaming me for ..\""}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032700.txt_4546
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032700.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023271.txt_4548
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023271.txt
|
previously sent
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinlla (i i i Zi >)"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:52 PM", "subject": "previously sent", "body": "I heard you when you said you believed 1 had already been paid for the work that is now required. The art partnership has fully answered all your concerns and discharged all my obligations and more so. . ( FYI Carlyn's art partnership that you referenced is similar in only its title. ) You will also recall that you required that my payments be at the end of my work not at the beginning as everyone else's .( my work was never to include hours upon hours of training your staff). I eventually agreed, this of course should make clear that the 2014 tax year that will close Oct 2015 is not covered by our past agreement at all. I pointed this very fact out to you when I initially proposed a multi year agreement right out of the box. you said you preferred not. As you said ,I have produced results to date, far in excess of even my own exalted opinion of my projections. I have devoted a monumental amount of my limited amount of time-- way, way in excess of our agreement. I will be fair, I am willing to roll in the amount still outstanding from last year if that helps .. However, As my best student , and my only one, you are now capable of doing most, if not all, of the required work yourself. I can put my whiteboard away when you come to eat and just have fun, trade stories,. share moments ideas etc.. I am of course always available to guide you as a friend if you choose that route . always . It will take a great deal of your time , but you will not have to spend any more money on mine. Weare scheduled to meet fri at 430 , I leave at 5 am sat morning.So there are no surprises 50m for the year. . or 30m for until 7/15. you can roll the balance for last year as a concession. half up front. no more all at the end. ive spoken to brad every day. more questions than answers. joslyn cannot be left unsupervised. his answers are knee jerk . eillenn told me this , that the other"}, {"sender": "leon", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinlla (i i i Zi >)"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "previously sent", "body": "you were at 30 30/ meat 6040. ./ proposal 50/25 and in additon I would be allowed to recommend 15 from directly from your own foundation. All payments to be made in addtion to currently owed. so $40 on april 25 , $30 june 15 ,and the alreadly owed $10 as planned on oct 15. I would direct the 15 charity in the next 12 months, and the last 25 to be paid on conclusion."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spina i iii"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:07 AM", "subject": "previously sent", "body": "you need to build an entire office from scratch. no question that was never my obigation, - systems , personel. finance tax, bookeeping, ,office. complinace. investment. monitoring, banking loans coming due , review. gs jpm gs, .. plane boat houses construction , new will,. phaidon sale. you are no further"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032714.txt_4550
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032714.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 3, 2018, at 9:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fur\nbook-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Sr CU", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im traveling to see terry and antonio in dubai and bahrain .. wish you were here .. weather is greatbid"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 8, 2018, at 2:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Me too"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2018 7:29:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2018-01-10/saudis-alarm-their-friends-more-than-foes-in-mideast-\npower-plays"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030773.txt_4553
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030773.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/glenn-simpsons-fusion-gps-ran-donald-trump-\nsmear-c/"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Looks like I can't get away. But will be back in NYC on Sunday. Let me know when you're back too. I \nhave a bad feeling about this new Woody round. It could pull him into the general Harvey pool of the \ndespsied and shunned. Clearly what Ronan and company are hoping for. I think Bannon may be right. This \nis not going to end until Trump goes down."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Strange time I have two more friends up to bat"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "And they won't be the last. My buddy, Lorin Stein, who runs the Paris Review--the Paris Review for god's \nsake!--just went down. The 80-year-old father of my friend Rachel Horovitz--the playright Israel Horovitz--\nwhacked. Big names on the horizon: Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, and still my favorite, Arthur \nSulzberger."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you and i are old news? :) ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Cross your fingers."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 7:54:19 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "beleive you me , i do"}]
| 7
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030015.txt_4557
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030015.txt
|
Bill Clinton Encouraged Donald Trump to Run
|
[{"sender": "Peter Attia", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/6/2015 12:41:53 AM", "subject": "Bill Clinton Encouraged Donald Trump to Run", "body": "Funny article\nBill Clinton reportedly had an intriguing phone call with Donald Trump weeks before his campaign launch\nRudolph W. Giuliani, Donald Trump, and Bill Clinton attend the 2008 Joe Torre Safe at Home Foundation Golf Classic at Trump National Golf Club on July 14, 2008, in Briarcliff Manor, New York.\nFormer President Bill Clinton and real-estate magnate Donald Trump reportedly had a phone conversation in May, only weeks before Trump launched his campaign.\nAccording to a new report from The Washington Post, Clinton called Trump in May and \"encouraged Trump's efforts\" to become more influential within the GOP, according to four \"Trump allies\" and one Clinton associate \"familiar with the exchange.\"\nFrom The Washington Post's Robert Costa and Anne Gearan:\n\"Four Trump allies and one Clinton associate familiar with the exchange said that Clinton encouraged Trump's efforts to play a larger role in the Republican Party and offered his own views of the political landscape.\"\n\"The tone of the call was informal and Clinton never urged Trump to run, the four people said. Rather, they said, Clinton sounded curious about Trump's moves toward a presidential bid and told Trump that he was striking a chord with frustrated conservatives and was a rising force on the right.\"\nHillary Clinton, Bill's wife, is the front-runner for the Democratic nomination for president in 2016.\nThe Clintons have long had ties with the real-estate magnate. As The Post notes, Hillary Clinton attended Trump's wedding in 2005, and the reality-television personality donated money to her past Senate campaigns, though he has also donated to several of his own Republican presidential rivals. He has said those donations were transactional.\nThe former president has spoken positively of Trump in the past.\nIn a 2012 interview with CNN, Clinton said he liked Trump, despite the real-estate mogul's controversial campaign to get President Barack Obama to release his birth certificate.\n\"Donald Trump has been uncommonly nice to Hillary and me. We're all New Yorkers,\" Clinton said. \"I like him. And I love playing golf with him.\"\nAides to both Bill Clinton and Trump did not comment on record to The Post.\nHillary Clinton's campaign also didn't respond to a request for comment.\nBill Clinton has occasionally doled out advice to Republican presidential candidates.\nIn 2012, Clinton reportedly gave former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) some tips before his successful debate with President Barack Obama, telling the governor how to appear in command onstage."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026677.txt_4558
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026677.txt
|
Funny dog video of a dog gnawing at Donald Trump's hair.
|
[{"sender": "Soon-Yi Previn", "recipients": ["Soon-Yi Previn"], "timestamp": "6/30/2017 2:23:16 AM", "subject": "Funny dog video of a dog gnawing at Donald Trump's hair.", "body": ""}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028882.txt_4560
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028882.txt
|
writing up proposal
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/27/2014 1:48:05 PM", "subject": "writing up proposal", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nLarry has told me that you and a friend would like to contribute to my project (hallelujah and thank you a \nmillion times, Jeffrey) and that I ought to write up a proposal asking for 500,000. This is wonderful. If this \ncomes to pass, the best way for that money to come, I think, is as a gift to Poetry in America, an initiative at \nEdLabs at Harvard University. This will give me discretion over its disbursement to HarvardX and WGBH, but \nthis will be absolutely be a Harvard gift that will count as Campaign success and from which Harvard will take \nsome (but not as much)overhead. . So far the best finance people I've met are at EdLabs and they are happy to \nmanage these funds for me. There are other ways to give me this money that leave Harvard out, but my \nunderstanding is that your friend would like this to be a Harvard gift. \nHere's a draft of what I'd like to do with that money. \nI'd like 500,000 to do post-production and distribution of a whole historical period of American poetry (1914-\n1945 is what I'm thinking—Modernism) and including three episodes of tv. \nThe raw materials for that period include interviews with Bill Clinton (including footage not yet used by \nWGBH), Peter Gallison, Walter Isaacson, Lena Dunham, Woody Allen (whose lawyers didn't like our release a \nwhile ago, but we're hoping will soften over time), Harrison Ford (still a maybe), Robert Polito, Sarah Kay, Al \nFilreis, Rafael Campo, Susan Howe, kids from Nantucket High School, kids from Brookline High \nSchool, Alfre Woodard, Jane Pickering, Jay Parini, Ray Dalio, Leon Wieseltier, Richard Dawkins and others; \nand footage shot in Harlem, Greenwich Village, midtown, Chicago, London (if I have the money to hire a crew \nthere; don't now ), at museums including the Fogg, Harvard Museum of Natural History, Frost's house in Ripton \nVermont and more. \nThis allows the donor to give to a big Harvard Campaign priority, Teaching and Learning , by supporting Poetry \nin America, allowing me to produce the crucial segment of the online course with the highest (TV quality) \nproduction values and so also supplying higher quality video to WGBH as a way also to cut their costs. \nCurrently, HarvardX skimps (on lighting, for instance--see the Bill Clinton interview) and while WGBH ladles \nmoney raised by others into everything. I have been pounding away at my friends at WGBH and I know that \nWGBH producer will work with HarvardX if they can give him footage of the right quality. . That is, we'll use \nHarvardX as the backlot for WGBH so as to squeeze three episodes out for 250. \nThis proposal does not include experiments in schools or the curricular development into courses for teachers \nthat you've seen in other (million dollar ) proposals. But the courses for teachers can't happen before the \nfootage is developed, and these courses will have as their centerpiece the WGBH episodes, and so this funding \nwill make all the rest possible. \nI can polish this narrative and or edit it, if there are things you think I have wrong. \nAnd I can attach a draft budget based on real Harvard numbers (what my Harvard video editor, producer, media \nmanager cost) as well as a draft WGBH budget I'll now go an negotiate with them. Or we can do that at a \nsecond stage. \nLet me know what you think? And when are we reading Whitman together. Why don't we set a date for Feb \nwhen Poetry in America 3: Whitman is running online and we could screen a little video and then have a \ndiscussion around your table with you and some friends? \nLisa"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021749.txt_4563
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021749.txt
|
Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case | Miami Herald
|
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke [a@...]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "3/14/2019 5:28:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case | Miami Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Darren indyke <_i— as"], "timestamp": "March 14, 2019 at 1:27:47 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case | Miami Herald", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.