thread_id
stringlengths
37
43
source_file
stringlengths
35
37
subject
stringlengths
0
231
messages
stringlengths
88
34.9k
message_count
int64
1
42
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024251.txt_3629
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024251.txt
Republicans gird for the Donald Trump debate
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/22/2015 5:29:11 PM", "subject": "Republicans gird for the Donald Trump debate", "body": "as you predicted..\n\nhttp://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/07/republicans-gird-for-the-donald-trump-debate-211033.html?ml=tl_5_b#\n\nDebate Schedule\n\nAugust 6, 2015\n\n9pm ET - Republican Primary Debate\n\nAired On: Fox News Channel\n\nLocation: Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, OH\n\nSponsors: Fox News, facebook\n\nModerators: Bret Baier, Megyn Kelly and Chris Wallace\n\nRules: Top 10 candidates in an average of 5 national polls\n\nCandidates: To be determined\n\nNotes: Fox News has added a candidate forum at 1pm ET the same day for candidates who don't make the debate cut\n\nSeptember 16, 2015\nReagan Library Republican Debate (Press Release)\n\nAired On: CNN and Salem Radio\n\nLocation: Reagan Library in Simi Valley, CA\n\nSponsors: Reagan Library Foundation, CNN, Salem Media Group\nModerators: Jake Tapper, Hugh Hewitt,\n\nRules: Split field into Segment B (top 10 candidates) and Segment A (remaining candidates getting at least 1% in polls) (Details)\n\nCandidates: To be determined\n\nOctober 28, 2015\n\nCNBC Republican Debate\n\nAired On: CNBC\n\nLocation: University of Colorado in Boulder (Press Release)\nSponsors: CNBC (Press Release)\n\nCandidates: To be determined\n\nNovember, 2015*\n\nRepublican Primary Debate\n\nAired On: Fox Business Network\nLocation: Wisconsin\n\nSponsors: Fox Business Network\nCandidates: To be determined\n\nDecember 15, 2015\nRepublican Primary Debate\nAired On: CNN\n\nLocation: Las Vegas, Nevada"}]
1
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023258.txt_3646
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023258.txt
Detailed constructive list.
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella", "Brad Wechsler FP"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Detailed constructive list.", "body": "known . It had both sent in writing and spoken about on the phone numerous times ,_a detailed\nexecution plan was provided . then and only then after all was laid out for the group I was told that after a\number of conversations with brad karp that only 20m would be paid , (and even that was more than\noriginally contemplated ) for both transactions . I feel It was remarkably unfair. Did brad even know of\nour prior agreement.? I called him and he said he was never told.?, I would ask that you I and Brad karp\nsit together if you think it would be helpful. . I would like to send him this email, with your consent of\ncourse. Ifthe transactions were never consummated , 1 would not be owed a dime, however , the price\nwas known up front. , the detailed step by step plan was followed and overseen by me, the price that had\nbeen requested before the transaction was begun, and had Iready heavily discounted, out of friendship,\nfrom our agreement . I believe the decision re paying only 20 m has frankly left me felling quite uneasy.\n\nsince you asked since last nov. ifound 11 million dollars in dormant accounts. 4 million dollars in\neileens drawer. . went through cash flows for phaidon shwoing that john murphy is not an accountant.\nredid your gagosian contract ,. organized structure in case of divorce. set up gift trust. stopped ada from\nincluding multiple times things not in your interest. dealt with bad sales tax use tax income tax . created\n8 millino in deductions ,500k in mistakes , found bank of scotland fbar problems, . . reorg bad art\npurchases , funds taken, , charibale decustions , helped with fincnacil sttment gamoing commions fling. .\nboat deductions, rescued stock from grats.. may 1 after months of brad not finding anyone i sent an\nemail saying you would have to pay more. . on april 15. I sent an email detailing payments owed if i could\nfigure out the basis issue, please see attached, .\n\nquestions you might ask your team ask them to provide a balance sheet or p&1 for REgan arts.\n\ndoesnt exist\n\nask . either wechsler or haperin to tell you what brh is, or how the tra works. .. ? as bronstein to tell you\nwhy the proposed phaidon transaction DOES not work. . as them to give you a plan for the plane. ? ask\nthem to show you the cash mgmt for over 100 million dollars. . ask them to show you the IT system\nprogress after one year. . the approval process for payables. . the cash flow projections? assumptions? ask\nfor a comparative review of investments. ask haperin to describle to you in any detail BRH , the major\nasset of his two biggest clients. tax basis, disposiotion in the estate. . etc. ask brad to show you the\nliquidation of the inteveing art space cos? .\n\nLast year you asked , for my help I told you I preferred not as we would be better off having no financial\nintereactions. the risk was not worth it. You told me that as my friend i had to do it I agreed., here\nwe are in what I find to be an awkward situation. the transactions that i decvised were used _, our\nagreement was ignored. and im not sure how to respond.\n\nDeciisions needed asap 1 phaidon. topco etc. .( cash needs) many wires needed !! 2 new trustee or\nnot. - new decantings 3 art in art partnership.??! overdue ?!4 grats? window - 5 artspace. .6\nregan arts. .7 plane simplify re strucuture re finance. re purpose . 8 .boat restrucutre , sister, 9 re\nfresh estate plan. to consider modifications Alex Victoria equal does not mean same. 10. tra review ,\n\nsale. , 11 brh, doc review, 12. sale of stock or art ? tax, rent sale 13. gifts of art. 14. charity current\nand future pledges , gifts, 15 cash flow. . 16 . new IT and new personnel. 17. operational re-do ( bill pay"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033423.txt_3649
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033423.txt
Re: NY
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski PF", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:59 AM", "subject": "Re: NY", "body": "Jeffrey\nDo you think NY on Monday is still possible?\n\nI guess It makes sense to leave the G550 in PBI until Wednesday then fly it to Boca, Since Trump arrival is\n\nFriday.,\nShould I leave plane in PBI until Wednesday?\n\nThx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 14, 2018, at 10:06 AM", "subject": "Re: NY", "body": "i iwll stay here until wed thrus at earliest"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski PF", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/14/2018 3:12:21 PM", "subject": "Re: NY", "body": "Ok,, Pll make parking arrangements for Thur in Boca if needed,, this way, 550 is in PBI for you if needed"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031824.txt_3650
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031824.txt
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims
[{"sender": "DAVID SCHOEN", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/15/2019 12:20:06 AM", "subject": "From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender, settles civil lawsuit and avoids testimony from alleged victims", "body": "Hope you are satisfied with the outcome all things considered. \nRidiculous article. All of sudden the NPA in 's case goes from no \njurisdiction even to prosecute to you avoiding a possible life \nsentence. Moronic. \nMan I sure would like to see you getting some in the W column though and \nsome press that at least presents the true facts that some of the girls have \nadmitted under oath. Still a story no one ever has heard and they are \ncompelling facts. \nGood Shabbos."}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033174.txt_3656
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033174.txt
Isn't it great that...
[{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/8/2016 3:45:09 PM", "subject": "Isn't it great that...", "body": "Trump is owning the headlines this weekend??\nCo-authored with i Phone auto-correct"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031661.txt_3670
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031661.txt
Re: Trump
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 12:21:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "i was pointing out that that alleged rape was reported to be at my house with donald and I raping her."}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 1, 2017, at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "the allegation was not at a pedophile party, it was at my house with me.\n\nto what wording would you suggest I change that?"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032518.txt_3671
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032518.txt
Small biz and Trump
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/9/2017 3:29:54 PM", "subject": "Small biz and Trump", "body": "Ifs getting better\nAn index of small-business optimism jumped to 105.8 in December. Indexed to 100 in 1986\n110\n100\n90\n80 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11IllIllIllIll\n86 2000\nSource: NFIB Note: Data are seasonally adjusted.\nAy,\n16\nCNBC\nI was in Toledo Ohio yesterday drilling down on small business animal spirits: amazing how bullish\nthey are there -- for all of DJT's craziness, his ability to present himself as a small biz owner pissed off\nabout regulations/health care/anti-business sentiment in White House was a brilliant stroke. They\nreally dig him down there...."}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033148.txt_3685
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033148.txt
null
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 12:32:45 PM", "subject": null, "body": "read the times interview. I would think about pointing to the stormy daniels. denial by trump his staff and aides. would it have made sense to go back to them? no would they admit no did they admit no , did they obfuscate yes. did they deny , yes so checking with the subject when you have to goods only confuses the reader ?"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032426.txt_3689
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032426.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 6:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to negotiate with developer on your behalf. . or just give your talking points. allowances\n. commisions fees. free maintence etc"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What if I get it and can't resell?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jan 12, 2017, at 9:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iunderstand the fear. thats why we will condition the close on how the others sell"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 2:21:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got hired by Apple this week to do a patent trial."}]
5
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032256.txt_3692
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032256.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Gerald Barton", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/17/2016 1:53:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "My Extraordinarily Talented, Outrageous Friend, \nThank you for asking how I am doing. The short answer is very well. I hope that you are in good health and \ncontinue to use your special talents to make the world a better place and for your somewhat unique \namusements. \nThe longer answer to your question is that at the end of 2014 I closed down the office of Landmark, transferred \nall of the assets to pay all of the major creditors, except me, and found myself as broke as I was when you first \ncalled me that Friday after Thanksgiving, with my only remaining assets, a large capital loss, my reputation, and \nmy energy. \nSince then, our luck has been better than even an optimist like me would expect. Being free of the $500,000 a \nday I was fined by the OTS, after several years they abandoned this fine, which was initiated strictly to ensure \nthat I had no opportunity to finance any new developments, I became involved with an extraordinary, large, \nimportant real estate development in Oklahoma City and two others in the D.C. area. \nThe bad news is that my dear friend and good partner, Aubrey McClendon, was killed in a single car accident \non March 2nd of this year and the development with great potential is now either delayed or abandoned. The \ngood news is that our involvement in a 1,000 acre development on Deep Creek Lake in western Maryland is in \nthe process of being financed and should be underway sometime this summer. Our second project is a 405 acre \ndevelopment in Harper's Ferry, West Virginia, that is probably the prettiest piece of property I know of in the \nU.S. that is zoned and developable. Its business plan is now underway and we should be in the financing mode \nthis fall. My impression is that there is a tremendous amount of money on the sidelines, but the top 5% or 10% \nthat control it are terribly frightened of losing money they don't need, while the 90% to 95% of the citizens are \ncontinuing their daily labors somewhat frightened that they are not certain where next month's or next year's \nmortgage payment is coming from. \nOn a lighter note, Donald Trump recently bought our development in Ireland, Doonbeg Golf Club. It has been \nrated the first or second best resort in Europe. To-date, to my surprise, he is managing it reasonably well, \nprobably because he is presently devoted to an endeavor that amuses him. \nJeffrey, I want you to understand that I am extremely pleased and not at all melancholy about my present \ncircumstances. Whenever I get an opportunity, I always visit those assets I helped create and almost without \nexception, I wish I had been smarter, but generally satisfied that I made a positive contribution and one much \nhigher than normally done by my competitors, because I am fortunate that the labor focus of my life has not \nattracted the best and the brightest. \nWhen good fortune brings you to the D.C. area, please let me know. I always enjoy understanding your \nactivities and do so with amazement and amusement. \nJerry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how are you"}, {"sender": "Gerald Barton", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jeffrey, \nI am certainly glad that you have thick skin and care little about what the press says. I am sorry that you have \nto appear tolerant against intolerance. \nFrom all appearances, you fulfill the challenge of Kipling when he said: \n\"If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, \nOr walk with Kings - nor lose the common touch, \nIf neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you, \nIf all men count with you, but none too much.\"\nIn spite of outward appearances, I know very few know how you really feel and I can only hope that that \nfeeling is shown best in the naming of your airplane. \nJerru"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025592.txt_3693
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025592.txt
Re: Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha's Vineyard
[{"sender": "Shaher", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/3/2013 9:37:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha's Vineyard", "body": "Such an estate dear cousin many would like to own „ if at the price I may be willing"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 3, 2013, at 1:46", "subject": "Re: Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha's Vineyard", "body": "BORING"}, {"sender": "Shaher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:59 PM", "subject": "Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha's Vineyard", "body": "Caroline Kennedy Selling 93 Acres on Martha's Vineyard\nCaroline Kennedy, the only surviving child of the late President John F. Kennedy, listed for sale about 90 acres\nof land in Martha's Vineyard, a resort island off the Massachusetts coast.\nTwo waterfront parcels in the town of Aquinnah are on the market -- a 39.5-acre (16-hectare) property\navailable for $20 million, and a 53.5-acre piece for $25 million, according to the listings for 6 Red Gate Farm\nand 8 Red Gate Farm.\n\"An exclusive waterfront property with incredible views of Squibnocket Pond, with further views over\ntowering sand dunes to the Atlantic Ocean,\" the listing for 6 Red Gate Farm reads. \"Plenty of privacy with\nvaried topography and easy pond access. Yours to create a marvelous estate.\"\nThe land is part of a 366-acre stretch that has been private since Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis bought it in 1978,\nsaid John O'Connell, broker and owner of Vineyard Realty Group in Edgartown, Massachusetts.\nThe property is \"a piece of the island that very few people have seen,\" said O'Connell, who isn't involved in\nthe sale.\nCorporate records for Red Gate Farm LLC, which owns the land, lists Edwin A. Schlossberg as the person\nresponsible for the parcels. He is the husband of Caroline Kennedy, who is expected to be Obama's choice as\nthe next U.S. ambassador to Japan."}]
3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033580.txt_3694
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033580.txt
Trump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation - The Wall Street Journal.
[{"sender": "David Fisze", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 8:37:33 AM", "subject": "Trump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation - The Wall Street Journal.", "body": "This is pretty cool, Palantir was the only private company invited to yesterday's tech summit. That seems like a huge change post election and bigger oppty. Let's hang in PB.\n\nI thought you would be interested in the following story from The Wall Street Journal.\nTrump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation\n\nhttp://www.wsj.com/articles/top-tech-execs-to-meet-trump-to-talk-jobs-regulations-148 1724004\n\nDownload the Wall Street Journal app here: WSJ."}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032846.txt_3695
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032846.txt
Fwd: Fw: Meet?
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/21/2016 1:54:27 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "iy"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:18 PM", "subject": "Fw: Meet?", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mosk, Matthew", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016 6:08 PM", "subject": "Meet?", "body": "Mr. Weinberg —\n\nI am a reporter with the ABC News investigative unit. We are gathering background research on the major\n\ncandidates for President.\n\nSeeing that both former President Clinton and Mr. Trump have been mentioned in connection to the Jeffrey\nEpstein case, I am interested in better understanding the case, it’s current status, and any information that\n\ncould help explain Mr. Epstein’s dealings and interactions with both men.\n\nI would very much appreciate the chance to meet and discuss this subject in an off the record conversation at\n\nyour earliest convenience.\n\nPlease let me know if that would be possible, and if so, when and where we could meet.\n\nMany thanks,\n\nMatthew\n\nMatthew Mosk\nProducer, ABC News"}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031649.txt_3700
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031649.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Larry Summers <_ RR wr otc", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:45 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Got it.\nNow remember\n\nPress is so revolted by trump that I'd expect they will not be for benefit of doubt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ehud in on sun pritzkermon. you around? dinner woody sunday. or have you gone dark"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "On Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Times bad. R u around Tuesday?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "On Nov 11, 2016, at 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No , -phone today?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers <9", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can call circa 11"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 9:26:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "was that circa 11?"}]
6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031281.txt_3705
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031281.txt
Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!
[{"sender": "steven hoffenberg <hoffenberg.steven@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Players2 <players02@hotmail.com>"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "C E 0 STEVEN HOFFENBERG / TRUMP SUPER PAC / GET OUR JOBS BACK INC\nTO ROGER STONE\nCHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FEDS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN BOOK RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 !!!!!\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE JAMES PATTERSON BOOK WRITING TEAM.\nWIN PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!!!!!!!!!!!\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS TAKING BACK THE NEW YORK POST NEWSPAPER OPERATIONS !!!!!"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg <hoffenberg.steven@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["dkiesq@aol.com"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke <dkiesq@aol.com>", "recipients": ["Michael, Charles <cmichael@Steptoe.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM!!!!", "body": "Thanks,\nRegards,\nDarren"}, {"sender": "\"Michael, Charles\" <cmichael@Steptoe.com>", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke <dkiesq@aol.com>"], "timestamp": "August 16, 2016 at 10:42:56 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "Darren:\nBest,\nCharles"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke <dkiesq@aol.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:27 AM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2016, at 11:50 AM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "i"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/17/2016 4:01:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": ""}]
7
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032530.txt_3706
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032530.txt
null
[{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 2:43:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "am seeing a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall \nenough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The white House \nFellowship commison it came through woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032340.txt_3709
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032340.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:40:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What was behind this, do you know? Or just nutters?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032524.txt_3713
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032524.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 00:46", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you playing a part in the xi trump. fun"}, {"sender": "Joshua Cooper Ramo", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "4/10/2017 9:29:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In Europe. You well?"}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033594.txt_3726
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033594.txt
Michael Boccio
[{"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/7/2011 4:01:33 PM", "subject": "Michael Boccio", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nRecently while refurbishing Donald Trump’s 757 | worked closely with his Director of Business Development /\nSpecial Counsel, Michael Boccio.\n\nAlthough | have worked with some very intelligent and creative individuals, Michael is a real stand out — he is\nimpressive on many levels.\n\nSomeone (or organization) is going to be excited to have someone with Michael’s capabilities working for them\nand thought that you may need someone like Michael on your team or have a friend who may be in search of a\ndynamic individual with his background and talent.\n\nPlease take a moment to read the attached documents to see if Michael is someone you are looking for. If not,\n| ask that you forward this e-mail to someone you believe would greatly benefit by having Michael work for\nthem.\n\n| Know that | always appreciate when a friend refers someone who can be of great help to me — personally or in\nbusiness.\n\nIf you have any questions about working with Michael, please do not hesitate to call me.\n\nThank you.\n\nAttached: Cover letter\nResume\nTrump Letter of Recommendation"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032242.txt_3734
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032242.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/24/2016 3:14:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yeah, you're the Trump bullet."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Lots of reporters"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031518.txt_3737
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031518.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Zubair Khan"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 4:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not so good"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:21:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI. \nIn the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in which Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance from \nFBI. However Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data before starting time of \nelection, monthly data and entire data which we have gathered for months. Based on this we predicted on our \nFacebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US. \nOur model works but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how much historic data \nmust be analyzed to make the right decision. This could have been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I \nbelieve its a great tool to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French elections next year or \nelections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is \nexpensive and the start up is running out of money. \nI am going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea.\nRegards,\nZubair Khan"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026064.txt_3739
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026064.txt
Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise
[{"sender": "EL HACHEM Johnny", "recipients": ["Jeff"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "Dear Jeff, \n\nAs previously discussed between you and Ariane, Edmond de Rothschild is deeply involved in the building and \nfinancing of the infrastructure in Europe. Edmond de Rothschild has an outstanding track record, history and \npresence in European infrastructure, as well as being one of Europe's most recognized financial advisors to \nthe infrastructure market. We have developed deep expertise in the infrastructure sector and sought secure, \nwell-managed assets, generating stable, long-term returns for investors. \n\nWe have done so by initiating and backing two experienced and highly-respected managers in the industry, \nTIIC and BRIDGE. TIIC is an equity investor in transport and social infrastructure. BRIDGE is an infrastructure \ndebt provider. Both managers are covered in more detail below. Edmond de Rothschild has been heavily \ninvolved in the launch of the below funds, providing crucial support in fund structuring, due diligence, capital \nraising, legal & compliance functions as well as the sound governance and ESG management across all funds. \n\nPartnering with TIIC and BRIDGE has enabled Edmond de Rothschild to build a strong franchise within \ninfrastructure investments, complementing its overall Private Equity offering. Edmond de Rothschild has also \nacted as anchor investor for these funds, demonstrating its strong alignment of interest with these \ninvestment teams. With Ariane we strongly believe that we should absolutely find a way to collaborate \ntogether with you to think and initiate something to serve the future needs of the US in the infrastructure \nfield. \n\nPlease find attached further information on each manager. This would also be a chance for us to explore \nopportunities of working together in the future. \n\nPlease feel free to reach out to us if you require any further information. We look forward to hearing from \nyou soon.\n\nKind regards,\n\nJohnny"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8 Feb 2017, at 12:59", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "thanks, the issue will be returns on investment. . there is a HUGE amount of cash sitting on the \nsidelines, trump will want to do private public partnerships on most things. . donald loves the \nrothschild name."}, {"sender": "Ariane de Rothschild", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 10:20:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Expertise", "body": "If it s a debt fund , they were thinking of building it around senior and mezzanine debt which would yield 8 to \n10% per yr with a kicker"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030606.txt_3740
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030606.txt
Re: Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has \nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "You would get sick of yesterday harvard party. Average age was 60. Non stop boring talks. Run away so quickly!!! \nWill be in nyc the following week feb 5 to 8th. Are you there?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "possibly"}]
7
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023304.txt_3745
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023304.txt
null
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella PO"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:55 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Leon, I decided last week that there was little or no upside in disturbing your well earned holiday especiaily as you seemed so peaceful happy and smiley ,getting yourself in shape and truly enjoying your family time. etc. however the situation in your family office is unresolved. I am aware that brad starts monday howver, two last days of the year madness. timber.deal not complete no jpm,acct activity no partnership docs, old stock sales not complete , no bank doc redo. no phaidon note restructure, ., no boat expense review. airplane same ,topco midco.ete still not finished ( trustee ), projections mixed with fiction. , legal exp out of control. no care for admin, silly ( audit). tom conversation with joslin. notes. debra, trustee notes. trustees hiring . bens audit. interest payable made hoopjumping last day of year. after weeks and months. of lectures , gifts to discuss- staff. -houseproject mgmt. . I will continue to try , I had offered ajoint call with eileen before you left. asisaid before , joslin takes instructions from eileen. he said it was made clear to him that he doesn't work for me but works for you. . I tried."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 7:26 AM", "subject": "Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.", "body": "Transaction complete ! . this - in spite of your collection of Elysium misfits. !!! With Brad out of the office and unable to run his usual interference , the level of his utter incompetence was brought front and center, he may be a step up from Eileen, but ifhe is, then it is not certainly not by much, . Though you and I have spent many many hours discussing the importance of details and mechanics. I was not shown one document re phaidon,- not one.. Brad wanted to keep it private between he and his so called\" advisors \" however as he was out of the office during the most important transaction of the year, I did get to spend time with joslin Joe and john, - the situation in your office is wholly ludicrous - to summarize - the list I provided to Brad last December - things I thought were a priority to get done after consulting with your office still remains virtually undone."}]
2
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014516.txt_3748
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014516.txt
Fwd: 2016 Election: Tax Changes Expected
[{"sender": "Ens, Amanda <amanda.ens@baml.com>", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "December 15, 2016 at 9:51:37 AM EST", "subject": "2016 Election: Tax Changes Expected", "body": "Rich, following up on your question from a while back about this topic. Please find a white paper attached.\n\nRegards,\nAmanda\n\nThe election of Donald Trump as President is expected to lead to significant tax law changes. The tax changes may come in two parts: from the repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) and its related taxes and from comprehensive tax reform. Since Republicans will also have majorities in both the House and Senate, such changes could be undertaken without bipartisan support. Although it is not yet known exactly what the changes will be or when they would be effective, we are issuing this Tax Alert to inform you of changes that are anticipated, based on proposals made during the campaign by both President-elect Trump and the House Republicans. We also discuss how these changes may impact your planning, both currently and in the future."}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 5:40:04 PM", "subject": "Fwd: 2016 Election: Tax Changes Expected", "body": ""}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022202.txt_3749
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022202.txt
your statement?
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:14 AM", "subject": "your statement?", "body": "I have to hand it to I'm sure she deserves the pretty penny she has made for her effort. She has certainly caught the imagination of a public hungry for salacious fiction. To suggest her story is anything other than that, a fiction, is ludicrous. Presidents at dinner on caribean islands. ( clinton was never ever there, easy to confirm ). Sharing a bath with a Prince ( bathtub too small even for one adult ). sex slave being paid thousands of dollars. ( while at the exact same time, she was working as a hostess in a burger bar ). being lent out to a prime minister though this prime mininster, never out of sight of his massive security detail also never visited the island„ sex on a small airplane with a famous lawyer while the other passengers must have been all looking out the window during the event . I would have thought that her fabrications were readilly apparent, but now , being asked to deny what the press has termed her\" allegations \" is frankly silly. ok, to play along I deny each and every allegation. The only person she didn't suggest she was forced to have sex with, was Bilbo Baggins. , maybe its in the sequel."}]
1
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016467.txt_3757
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016467.txt
request
[{"sender": "Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>", "recipients": ["Susan Edelman <sedelman@nypost.com>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 5, 2018 2:55 PM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "Hi Sue — we do not have a court order; rather, we are bound by the Civil Rights statute cited on the cover page. Thanks."}, {"sender": "Susan Edelman <sedelman@nypost.com>", "recipients": ["Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 5, 2018 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: request", "body": "Hi Dan,\n\nSo it was a unilateral decision by the DA to seal the document?\nThere was no hearing or opportunity to object?\n\nThank you,\n\nSue"}, {"sender": "Frost, Danny <frostd@dany.nyc.gov>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "request", "body": "Hi Sue - this is prescribed by Civil Rights Law § 50-b."}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029431.txt_3759
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029431.txt
thank you to friends of Poetry in America
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/17/2017 7:18:33 PM", "subject": "thank you to friends of Poetry in America", "body": "Dear Jeffrey: (and please see personal P.S. under my signature!) \nI am writing now, as I have for the last several years, to update you on the work that Poetry in America and Verse Video Education have done in the \nlast year. Below, I detail the accomplishments of 2017 and, below that, some projects I hope to complete in 2018. But first: my deepest thanks to you \nwho have contributed financially, intellectually, creatively, and in so many other ways to Poetry in America's work. \nSome of you receiving this letter have generously supported Verse Video Education, the independent non-profit production company (a 501c3) I \nfounded in 2015. Verse Video Education now partners with WGBH television as well as with Harvard University (and others) to make the highest \nquality educational media for broad audiences. Whether you supported me by sharing your own interpretive talents on camera or by helping me to \nland elusive talent; whether you provided me funding, or equipment, or business wisdom, or organizational advice, \nor a space in which to film, or just plain interest in the work-- I am immensely grateful. Making media-- and especially television-- is complex, and \nexpensive, and I could not have navigated the road from professor to professor/producer/director without you. \nOthers of you have supported my humanities work at Harvard, and, in particular, Harvard's efforts to provide distance education of all kinds. Now \n(along with partners at the Bok Center, HarvardX, the Graduate School of Education, and the Extension School), I produce educational content for a \nwide global community of learners. Increasingly, Poetry in America not only distributes state-of-the-art humanities content within and beyond \nHarvard's gates, but we also train, mentor, and support a growing number of Harvard undergraduates and graduate students with interests in \neducation, media, and the public humanities. These students now comprise a vibrant community of young Harvard humanists gaining experience in \nonline teaching, curriculum design, educational policy, international education, video production, video editing, and more. By supporting Poetry in \nAmerica, you \nalso support forward-looking humanities education at Harvard. (Update: those of you who are alumni of Harvard College are now eligible to receive \nclass credit for your donations to Poetry in America projects.) \nIt's thrilling for me to report that our two largest efforts of the last few years are both coming to fruition. \nPoetry in America's 13-episode television series, along with its parallel PBS LeamingMedia Collection for educators, will air on PBS stations \nnationwide beginning in April 2018. Click here for a sneak peek at our 90-second series trailer (password: Poetry90). Featuring such guest \ninterpreters as those in the trailer-- and dozens of others-- each half-hour episode of the series offers a deep dive into one important American poem. \nDiscussions on a second season have begun! \nMeanwhile, our Harvard partners at the Extension School and the Graduate School of Education have agreed, for a limited time, to make the full \nsuite of Poetry in America online courses accessible to learners all over the world, offering a steep reduction in course fees. Students and teachers \nworldwide can now take any Poetry in America course-- at any credit level-- for $200. (Take a look at our 2018 offerings here.) Those of you who \nsupport individual schools or school networks: please note that through 2018 groups of five teachers or students can take any Poetry in America \ncourse for $1000 and receive graduate, undergraduate, or professional development credit-- and, that group's facilitator can receive free tuition. \nPlease feel free to distribute our offerings to educators whose work you support anywhere in the world. \nHarvard's highly unusual decision to slash tuition for the next year follows the great success of Poetry in America's first course for educators--\nPoetry in America for Teachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop. In recognition of this course, David Coleman (president of the College Board) \nhas offered support to allow us to continue developing and providing access to the highest quality educational and professional development \nhumanities content. In 2018, as I lay out below, we seek to expand the scope of our offerings, and to work with our many partners to broaden access \nto all learners. \nThank you for your support for this work, and warmest best to you all in this holiday season. \nSincerely, \nLisa \nP.S. and thank you so much, Jeffrey, for your amazing support, without which much of what I've managed in the last few years would never have \nhappened. My next course for teachers„ as you'll notice, has shifted from art to environment--not because of any less passion on my part for arts \ncontent but really because of greater enthusiasm among others for poetry/science for the classroom. I would like to hear more from you about what \nyou think kids/schools need in this area. Larry tells me you have views; as I move out of my central areas, I will need advice xxoolisa"}]
1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028976.txt_3762
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028976.txt
woody and deadline
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/4/2016 6:25:26 PM", "subject": "woody and deadline", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nWoody has received from his lawyer some questions I asked in in response to the agreement Irwin Tenenbaum\nsent me....I found that that agreement generous and reasonable (!), and I'm excited to go forward, but I do need\nthose clarifications. We can absolutely agree that we will not give Woody larger or more important billing than\nBill Clinton or Joe Biden, and that I'd like to come to him to renew our agreement after five years.\n\nThe Harvard week of content in which Woody will appear, if we can sign this, needs to be edited in the next\nweek-10 days. We are out of time, which is why I'm writing\n\nThe television show has been picked up by American Public Television, they will distribute nationally, and\nthey've asked for another 5 episodes. I so want Woody to be one of those.\n\nI'd like to see the haiku written by computer. Haiku is not that hard. I'd like to see an elegy written by\ncomputer.\n\nLisa"}]
1
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022768.txt_3768
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022768.txt
inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "James Hill", "recipients": ["James E. Esq."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, April 21, 2015", "subject": "inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "I write to you regarding Jeffrey Epstein - and your representation of him in the CVRA case in which he is an intervener.\n\nABC News has recently conducted an on-camera interview with Doe #3), portions of which are very likely to be airing on Good Morning America and other ABC programs this week.\n\nwe would like to offer you an opportunity to respond to the allegations she has raised about Mr. Epstein.\n\nShould you wish to make a statement or respond in any other manner - I will need it by close-of-business wednesday.\n\nCan you tell me who among you I should be in contact with?\n\nThanks kindly,\nJames Hill\nJames of ABC News."}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["James E. Hill"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "James, just confirming that you are sending me the bulletpoints from the interview you are asking about, thanks\nMarty"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "2015, 4:36 PM", "subject": "Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Greetings.\n\nNews re Jeffrey Epstein\n\ninterview with Doe #3), portions of which\n\nShe says that Epstein liked her to dress up in outfits, including bondage and schoolgirl outfits:\nShe says she met Bill Clinton on n’s island in the USVI. She does not specify a date but says she is 100% sure it was Clinton and it was on the island.\nClinton but alleges nothing further regarding Clinton. -\nShe says one person - who she wouldn’t name - that Epstein loaned her out to -\nShe says she ate dinner with Epstein and cally assaulted and raped her. She says this happened on Epstein’s island, and that she had been sent by Epstein - alone -to meet this person screamed but no one came to her aid.\nfor her life.\nalleged beating and rape afterwards and she said he didn’t\nShe says she\nShe says she told Epstein about the\nShe says Epstein and Maxwell asked her to have a child for them and to sign a document signing away the rights to the child in the event that she and Epstein falling out. She says she refused this request. -\nShe says Epstein has a sick problem, is a pedophile, a dangerous man who should not be walking"}]
3
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023310.txt_3776
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023310.txt
Fwd:
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:44 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "PLEASE READ CAREFULLY ,\nMark was here this morning , the proposed transactions are extremely complex . and would take a great deal\nof detailed time. I do not know how, and if ,to move forward - our last transaction. a transaction which you\nsaved 600 million in tax. even if as you say it could be 20 years away , ( i hope longer) discounted to today is\na savings of 300 million . for some reason you chose to ignore our agreements , verbal written and emailed -\nand decided that it was only worth 8 million dollars to you. . ( assuming phaidon -richard happens. the\ncalculation that you can see isa 24m savings not including artspace and debt benefits- certain to come later\n. IMPORTANT NOTE\n\nthe phaidon transaction as currently contemplated will not work . NOT CLOSE\n\nWhen we had our meeting in your home in Bedford. You asked me for my help. I told you multiple times\nthat i thought it was a very bad idea, in that I greatly preferred to have no financial interactions. I don't have\nmany friends and didn't want money in any way to interfere with our unique relationship. Reminder, For five\nyears you had the kind, but very goofy Eileen Alexandersson as the sole manager of your massive accounting ,\nlegal, investments. reporting, trusts etc. When I first told you in no uncertain terms that I firmly believed she\nwas incompetent you admonished me for \" speaking out of both sides of my mouth\". With regard Brad\nWechsler, there has never been a \" both sides. \". I have consistantly maintained since day one that he was\nhighly unsuited for the job. When you initially asked me to help convince him to take the role , promising him\na position to manage mirage investments I sent you a note saying that instead of hiring him you should pay up\nand get first class people. I have reiterated the same message for over a year now. . Brad , not me ,was tasked\nwith hiring new people , according to his biz school org chart.(nauseating ) and as you wanted him to take\nownership of the staff,he conducted many interviews alone. . you may recall that as late as may, you told him in\nmy presence that though six months had passed he had not hired anyone. since then I have rectified errors in\nsales tax, use tax, income tax, fbar reporting, 1031 reporting, 8 million of deductions missed errors of millions\non the returns. a cashflow that is misleading helped prepare financial statements ( april ) Oversight on new\ngrats- first at 22 and then at 19 that were done without my consultation and were \"resolved\" soley as a result\nof my last minute intervention. . 600 million in after tax savings was just accomplished. (BTW- for some\nreason you left the 30 million outstanding that I had said should only be done\" if” that was my additional\nfee. and not used for non biz purposes and not art.\n\nSorry but .,\n\nin June and then again Sept, we both agreed to a 50% of phaidon payout first projected at 20 . but less when\nartspace and debt taken out, - then only after weeks, when you delayed any detailed discussion of money\nwanting to give the issue a thoughtful response ( which I fully understand ) . you unilaterally changed our\nagreement.. 5m would be reserved for the future ? . and out of the remaining 15m ,? 1 would receive only a\nthird. (note: I'm confident that both the debt , and the art space investment will also lead to a write- off of\nanother 30 m. plus ) In my dining room ,you were surprised when I said that i require most people to pay\ntheir advisory fee up front so that I am assured that I will be properly compensated for my work when\nstrategies are implemented . you may recall that you appeared offended and said \" are you suggesting that 1\nwould go back on my word\" I said no , of course not ! you are my closest of friends ,but my experience is\nthat when amounts get large, people tend to get unhappy when it actually comes time for them to pay.\n\nI include below the email i sent to you on April 15, the day i was examining your returns It laid out my\nunderstanding of the compensation agreed for a transaction of the magnitude to the penny of the one just\ncompleted.ic 600m When it appeared that the transcation would and could go foward I was the first to point\nout that our agreement would cost you too much money, therefore\n\nFrom day one I proposed to discount our agreement toa 50-60 million range. An extremely fair price for"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022216.txt_3778
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022216.txt
Results
[{"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2010 5:36:27 PM", "subject": "Results", "body": "Jeffrey, \n\nThe bats did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. \nYou have only one negative article left on front page of google, which is \nthe Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to \nmove, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads \nmassive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from out \nside readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the \ntop. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the \norg site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk), \nwe would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE \ndid manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far \nremoved, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent. \nToxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you \ntyped in your name are also now removed. \nWikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the \nsearch engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicted sex \noffender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, \nPromotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, \nand that was a major effor. Your wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad \nstuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing \nand wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace \nthe mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and \ncaption. This was a big success. \nWe pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was \npreviously buried on page 5 of google search. \nWe have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also \nfilled with your material. \nAnd, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still \nnew, and subject to volitility, especially if new original content is not \nadded on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add new \ncontent to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and \ntherefore, as a result our rating slipped down (still on the first page, \nbut would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push \nHuffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images \nthat come of you on a google search are not of your mug shot, etc. \nYour daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites \nagainst you in the same way that we try to depromote you. \nAs far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not \nknow what you wish to do. Clearly, you have no interest in my continuing. \nAnd, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the \nlatter, and you stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, \nand it will return to the old form. The major work has been done, but it \nneeds to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have \nconstant input and supervision, and that means generating proper content, \nnot just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers need to know what to \nwrite. THe philanthrophy site is at the bottom of the page precisely \nbecause you have not allowed us to add any content to it, and as a result \nit suffers. \nYou paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his \nreplacement servers, but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want \nto continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, \nand if you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients \nand devote his time there. \nThis needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search \non your name, which had nine/10 very toxic prominent stories, and toxic \nWiki article and headline.\n\nSearch Results\n1. Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia \n9 visits - Dec 2 \nJeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953 in Coney Island, New York) is a Jewish-American \nfinancier and philanthropist. Epstein was raised in Coney ... \nPhilanthrophic Work - The Epstein Foundation Promotion of Scientists \nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein - Cached - Similar \n2. Images for jeffrey epstein \n- \n3. \n,1111 \nlif Alea 1 \nJeffrey Epstein I Profiles in Science \nJeffrey Epstein presents some of the greatest minds and finest scientists working today. \nwww.jeffreyepsteinscience.com/ - Cached \n4. Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Mystery \nHe's pals with a passel of Nobel Prize—winning scientists, CEOs like Leslie Wexner of the Limited, \nsocialite Ghislaine Maxwell, even Donald Trump. \nnymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/ - Cached - Similar \n5. Edge: JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJEFFREY E. EPSTEIN is a money manager and science philanthropist who currently serves as the \nChairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Financial Trust ... \nwww.edde.ord/3rd culture/bios/epstein.html - Cached - Similar \n6. The Plastic Surgeon: Jeffrey Epstein I Full of Crop \nDec 9, 2010 ... Dr. Jeffrey Epstein is an internationally known reconstructive surgeon, known for \nexhibiting the highest standards in the medical field. \nfullofcrop.com/2010/12/09/the-plastic-surgeon-jeffrey-epstein/ - Cached \n7. Jeffrey Epstein, MD, FACS, Miami, New York Hair Transplant Surgeon \nDr. Epstein and the hair transplant surgeons at the Foundation for Hair Restoration are experts in the \nfield of hair restoration. Dr. Epstein is one of the ... \nwww.foundhair.com/pages/about.shtml - Cached - SimiIr \n8. Jeffrey Epstein, Convicted Pedophile And Former Hedge Fund Titan ... \nJul 21, 2010 ... Jeffrey Epstein, the former hedge fund manager who pleaded guilty to soliciting an \nunderage girl for prostitution, is now free of the ... \nwww.huffingtonpost.com/.../jeffrey-epstein-disgraced_n_654674.html - Cached \n9. Dr. Jeffrey Epstein, MD, FACS I Board Certified Plastic Surgeon ... \nDr. Jeffrey Epstein has been in solo private practice in Miami since 1994, and New York City since \n2005, and is a Clinical Professor at the University of ... \nwww.justformenplasticsurgery.com/AboutDrEpstein.asp - Cached - Similar \n10. Jeffrey Epstein on Sports \nAn old school look at today's sport's world focusing on professional basketball and football byJeffrey \nEpstein. \nwww.jeffreyepsteinsports.com/ - Cached \n11. Jeffrey Epstein I Philanthropy \nJeffrey Epstein has three main philanthropic and charitable organizations he uses to fund arts, \nsciences, research and other causes. \nwww.jeffreyepstein.org/ - Cached"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030612.txt_3783
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030612.txt
Re: Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Different kind of fun.\nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings!\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has \nsome questions re microsoft.\nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "No problem.\nI am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some coctail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}]
5
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023338.txt_3790
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023338.txt
agenda
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:32 PM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "Mark was here this morning , the proposed transactions are extremely complex . and would take a great deal of detailed time. I do not know how, and if ,to move forward - our last transaction. a transaction which you saved 600 million in tax. even if 20 years away ,( ihope longer) even discounted is a 300 million savings . for that you ignored our agreements , verbal written and emailed -and decided that it was only"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella ii"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:21 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "1 fees, amount and to what entities when and responsiblitis. 2. gagosian idea to save a minimum of 10 mill and maybe more. 3. ican walk you through carlyns screw up, 50 % would have made little difference and maybe made it worse . 4. we should have an all hands meeting with your family to talk about art distribution on death. . 5. phaidon, decantings ( already firmly in progress ) loans. (alan ) pent. ( with follow up ) all part of same elegant transaction, 6 asymetric risk worth at least 50- 60 no matter how you calculate. Ican explain. 7 lets get the money issue out of the way once and for all. I have my team set to start."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:52 AM", "subject": "agenda", "body": "1) pg 1 A” unequal shares\". pg 23 \"removal of trustees \" absolute. dont be confused with abiltiy to set up seperate trusts, , 2) I am reachable this afternoon in europe. on cell. 3. on another note . -our financial agreement ended months ago . seperate from the art partnership (which 1 was told yesterday to my amazement is still not funded) . 1am obligated to complete ? the time 1 have dedicated since oct/ dec has been spent mainly as your friend. tom, brad though i am fully cognizant of my responsiblities. I will try to help find people. Iam not good at human resources. howevr If I don;t think they are good enough for you. I will continue to say so , and you obviously decide. but I will reiterrate even in the face of your \"nobody is good enough argument.\" keeping foremost in my mind that you and I have only beeen shown a very tiny handful of people. 4. I find the friction over fees , counterproductive. in an attempt to avoid it I had suggested a multi year deal early on. you rejected it. I then suggested, and urged you to have an option at a fixed fee , you also rejected that .you wanted the fee payment only at the end I argued but ,conceded. I suggested a structure that tom didn't like. you rejected it. 5 I suggest you make a fair proposal.- that 1 can either accept or reject. some payment up front this time is a requirement. I am willing to modify any outstanding obligations. - there are creative ways to assure you of your desired characterization of those payments. 6 you should open accts at Deutsh . and goldman. I am told that eilleen has set up over one hundred bank acccts for you???!!. few relevant 7 you should immediatly demand a list of all her acct authorites , exec poistions . director etc. bank authorizsations. etc. talk later or over the weekend if you like"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "agenda", "body": "that needs to be done youandI will hire new people , and it will be self running. ( it was may in my house when you told brad it had been 5 months and you were getting fed up ) I will set up a parallel . office , somenoe like wendy dolman or her quality is paramount. two accountants two bookeepers and two office admins. . alan and zoe will handle trusts and grats. heatehr diana george will be incolved in art partnership. if you want brad, analysts etc. and kids to do investments I have little to add in that regard ,except to be able to account for things properly. I suggest that the kids must have skin in any deal. Alternatively , we can continue to focus on fun and let someone else do the things that you want done. and you and I can kibbitz about it all. structures outcomes risk, museums. charity, ( joslins answer by the way was I had asked how much charity was leon planining to give this year , (the 2m) he didnt include your foundation or the payment to me, or from debra and you??!!"}]
4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032885.txt_3791
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032885.txt
Re: Trump
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:38:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no place else to invest for alpha, your children are rich"}]
6
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032383.txt_3808
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032383.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 12:52:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Interesting\n\nGrey is at least reasonably smart."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 28, 2016, at 7:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2016/05/01/trump-touts-henry-kravis-as-treasury-secretary-again-and-\nagain-declines.html"}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033225.txt_3817
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033225.txt
I don’t know if they’ll publish this: "Comedian made an art...," Obituary, Feb. 10
[{"sender": "paul krassner <paulkrassner@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["DANNY GOLDBERG", "Sam/Walli Lett", "Michael Simmons"], "timestamp": "2/12/2017 12:25:16 AM", "subject": "I don’t know if they’ll publish this:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["letters@latimes.com"], "timestamp": "February 11, 2017 at 12:56:37 PM PST", "subject": "Re: \"Comedian made an art...,\" Obituary, Feb. 10", "body": "The obituary of unique comedian Irwin Corey stated, “Over a career that spanned more than 70 years, Corey performed in vaudeville, radio, television, films, Broadway, nightclubs and Las Vegas showrooms.”\n\nIn 1983, I was fortunate to be booked as the opening act for Corey in a four-day run at the Julia Morgan Theater in Berkeley. He revealed his dark side in a room backstage, where we smoked a joint, and he told me how he used to read Nazi hate literature to get him in the mood to perform. And there was a certain sense of continuity on his deathbed. The night before he died, he said to a close friend, James Drougas, “Trump will be assassinated soon.”\n\n“Professor” Corey also had a humanitarian streak. In 1996, in my magazine, The Realist, I published a photo of him, from a video by his son Richard, presenting Fidel Castro a bag of California-grown pistachio nuts (Castro said, “California, hmmmm, good climate there for nuts”), a book on the Rosenberg controversy, and a credit-card-size calculator (Castro said, “I’ll have to use my little pinky to push the buttons”). Dave Channon reported that Corey was on a diplomatic mission to lift the embargo on health supplies to Cuba, and he visited a hospital that was providing sophisticated treatment for the survivors of Chernobyl. Cuban health care provided for more radiation victims than did the U.S.\n\nPaul Krassner\nDesert Hot Springs"}]
2
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022998.txt_3818
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022998.txt
Fwd: Press Inquiry: Miami Herald expose and protective order
[{"sender": "CNS Adam Klasfeld", "recipients": ["Mr. Link"], "timestamp": "November 28, 2018 at 6:34:54 PM EST", "subject": "Press Inquiry: Miami Herald expose and protective order", "body": "Dear Mr. Link:\n\nA transcript made public today show how Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team fought for and ultimately won a broad protective order in the lawsuit filed by accuser Sarah Ransome against your client Jeffrey Epstein. It also shows the Maxwell legal team's concern about the media coverage, especially from the Miami Herald, weeks before it published today's bombshell investigation today.\n\nMy questions are:\n\nWhat is your response to the Miami Herald story published today?\n\nHow would you respond to the series’ allegations that there has been a more than decade-long cover-up of Epstein and his powerful associates, including by Trump's current secretary of labor Alexander Acosta?\n\nPlease reply ASAP as I am on deadline."}, {"sender": "Scott J. Link", "recipients": ["E. jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2018 11:50:16 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Press Inquiry: Miami Herald expose and protective order", "body": ""}]
2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028786.txt_3837
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028786.txt
null
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/23/2012 2:54:42 PM", "subject": null, "body": "dershowiz tells me obama called him to ask him what was going on in israel. ? we should discuss."}]
1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029498.txt_3839
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029498.txt
Trump set to dine with law professor Alan Dershowitz
[{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Gordon Getty", "Norman Finkelstein"], "timestamp": "4/11/2018 2:18:04 AM", "subject": "Trump set to dine with law professor Alan Dershowitz", "body": "My God\n\nthat Jewish Nazi is joining to join our Narcissistic Psychopath for dinner—how appropriate\n\nhttps://www.cnn.com/2018/04/10/politics/donald-trump-alan-dershowitz/index.html"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032891.txt_3852
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032891.txt
Re: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "10/1/2016 3:05:32 AM", "subject": "Re: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg", "body": "tuesday"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:56 AM", "subject": "Re: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg", "body": "http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-30/this-chart-\nwill-win-unless-the-s-p-\nrallies-in-october"}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031788.txt_3854
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031788.txt
Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/15/2018 1:06:12 PM", "subject": "Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/15/trump-advisors-reportedly-seeking-a-pardon-for-junk-bond-king-milken.html \n\nTrump advisors reportedly seeking a \npardon for 'junk bond king' Milken \nTae Kim \n'74-14130r. \nSeveral of President Donald Trump's advisors are pushing him to pardon Michael Milken, \nBloomberg News reported Friday. \nMichael Milken, 71, was known as the \"junk bond king\" in the 1980s and was convicted for \nsecurities fraud. \nBloomberg said former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci, \nTreasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, senior advisor Jared Kushner and attorney Rudy \nGiuliani support the pardon for Milken. \nMilken has a net worth of $3.7 billion, according to Forbes. The financier, who pioneered \nthe market for high-yield bonds while at Drexel Burnham Lambert, was sentenced to 10 \nyears in prison and permanently banned from the securities industry by the Securities and \nExchange Commission. His prison term was reduced to two years. \nThe White House and a spokesperson for the Milken Institute did not immediately respond \nto requests for comment. \nSee the full Bloomberg News report here."}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031477.txt_3860
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031477.txt
null
[{"sender": "Keough, Michael", "recipients": ["Will Bohlen", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlfold", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remi Gulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz", "David Marin", "Silings", "rake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:10 PM", "subject": null, "body": ""}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033410.txt_3866
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033410.txt
Re: Off the record trump
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "4/13/2019 10:44:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "WOW"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 13, 2019 at 6:39:25 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "Thanks. I appreciate it. I was just reporting what I heard."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 13, 2019, at 6:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "I never told anyone that. I know nothing about that. I have no idea what you are talking about."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 1:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Off the record trump", "body": "Just heard you were telling people that you heard I asked Trump for a million dollars. Totally false. Please check every false allegation with me before repeating to others."}]
4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029671.txt_3869
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029671.txt
Re: After Words
[{"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Oct 31, 2011 4:21 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "Dear Friends,\n\nwanted to share with you the forward to my father's new book ‘After Words’. He truly is\nan inspiration and so is his writing. The book, which is a compilation of his speeches, was\nlaunched yesterday in Sydney. will be sure to send you a copy, it's a brilliant read.\n\ntrust this email finds you well.\n\nKindest regards\n\nKatherine X\n\nCreativity is central to our endeavours"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "Oct 31, 2011 6:50 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "where are you?"}, {"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Oct 31, 2011 10:42 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "In NY. You?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "10/31/2011 3:08:38 PM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "Send me your phone number\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}]
4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029117.txt_3870
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029117.txt
Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/29/2017 10:03:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Agree! ‘Get It Right’ is singular priority - we think alike. This is the Role and Importance of pre-production.\nFunds adequate.\n\nClarity critical, as is charisma. However, given intimacy of TV interviews, it’s not always apparent upfront who\ncommunicates well. Usually by not always. Sometimes someone who is a great lecturer to 500 students falls flat\nor off puts as arrogant. Sometimes a mousey introvert with intense eye and facial expressions sparkles and\n\nradiates. There is no substitute, however, for clarity.\n\nLooking forward to discussion."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "it need to be about the topic and the person. some of these people are not engaging at all. Im happy to pay\nfor more preprduction to get it right."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn iii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Terrific; looking forward.\n\nExcited to go through math candidates on the list, others too.\n\nEqually important, discuss edits/modifications to the 13 episodes (cutting blahs), expanding math episodes -\nsee below. Assuming we expand math episodes, we will need more mathematicians.\n\nHow’s late afternoon after 5:30 pm / early evening today? - or weekend, day/times? (Family issues today -\nmother 102 in May.)\n\nRADICAL BREAKTHROUGHS - Initial Revisions (working model for discussion, red is new)\n\nExpand and Modify Mathematical Breakthrough episodes\n1. Mathematics and Truth / Overview / Show Excitement/Importance\n2. Mathematical Fields / Diverse New Kinds and Categories\n\n3. How Math Works in Disparate Areas of Knowledge (from fundamental physics to chemistry,\nbiology [molecular and evolutionary|, psychology, sociology, economics, etc.)\n\n4. Power Laws\n\n5. Mathematical Biology"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032068.txt_3871
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032068.txt
Re: Gps GTX Smart Shoe
[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Gps GTX Smart Shoe", "body": "• About GTX \n• Products & Services \n• Platform \n• News \n• Contact Us \n• Investors \n• Press \n• Blog \n• \n• \n• \nVideos \n0 \nWatch Video \no GTX Corp on YouTube \no Locimobile"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "9/22/2011 10:19:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Gps GTX Smart Shoe", "body": "we will have dinnner at 8 „ you can bring your maldives friend or anyone else. ( no women ). we should \nspend an hour together just the two of us. today tomorrow:?"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029196.txt_3872
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029196.txt
Re: October 19, Heidelberg
[{"sender": "Michael Braun", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 6, 2018, at 2:15 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Dear Lawrence Kraus,\n\nmy name is Michael Braun and I am working on the DAI Heidelberg's fall program brochure.\nMay I ask you if you settled on a topic for your Heidelberg talk?\nIf so, could you send me title and a short abstract for me to include in the brochure and on our website?\n\nBest\nMichael"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 06.06.2018 um 19:13", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. I hadn't thought of it. I don't know what Jakob would prefer. I could give a science talk.. on, say: Journey to the Beginning of Time.. or I could speak about \nScience in the Trump Era.. am cc'ing him here.. Jakob, which would you prefer?\nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 7, 2018, at 1:04 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence,\n\nI think we take Journey to the Beginning of Time.\nCould you write two sentences for my colleague to \nmake clear where your talk will go for..\nThis may well lay the groundwork for next year's major focus \non ORIGINES.\nI do look forward to having you here again!\n\nAs ever Jakob\n\nP.S cc Michael!"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 07.06.2018 um 17:40", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Will do."}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Jun 19, 2018, at 5:52 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Dear Lawrence\nmy colleague is waiting for two sentences on your planned topic...\nCould you save him?...\nJakob"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 17.08.2018 um 16:37", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Jakob \nThere has been a complication. The Gottingen event had to be cancelled so that means I now do not have an air ticket to Germany. I \nam going to check whether I can arrange anything in the Uk which might cover part of the cost for a new ticket. In the meantime I \nthought I should let you know and ask whether it is possible to cover part or all of the cost for a ticket. \nLawrence."}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Aug 17, 2018, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence \nyour mail meets me on the way out to a week abroad. \nI need my financial colleague to decide. So, I shall be \nback at the end of this month. \n\nWhat would our share be?\nBest Jakob"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "On Aug 17, 2018, at 9:34 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Well it depends on UK.. if they can't do it, then alas, it would be the whole thing.. I could check for a \ndiscount ticket of course.. and maybe even economy class... There is also a small chance that I might do the \nevent in UK with Noam Chomsky, and I am wondering whether, if I could convince him to join me in a \ndialogue at your place whether that might change the dynamics of the event for you, and free up some more \nmoney perhaps..\nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jakob Kollhofer"], "timestamp": "Am 26.08.2018 um 22:04", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. update.. noam cannot do anything anyway.. nor UK that week.. So, I have been able confirm I can get the \nticket for the discounted amount of 4500 Euros.. Are you game with my proposal? I have until end of Sept to \nbuy out the old ticket before they cancel it. \nLawrence"}, {"sender": "Jakob Kollhofer", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "August 29, 2018 at 4:49:53 AM PDT", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi Lawrence,\n\njust back from a long tour ,,on origins\".\nAs promised you will get my message promptly.\nAs you may understand, before we start recruiting for the Festival our budget \nimplies more freedom. Now I simply do not have the flexibility to decide so easily \non amounts in „kilos\". (especially as a prominent Nobel laureate shortly before \ndeadline agreed to come and implied a pretty large sum).\nWhat I can offer you is 5k as a lump sum. This is the ultimate at the moment.\nI deeply regret these limitations but I cannot ignore redlines.\nSo please let me know if you can or cannot come.\n\nAs ever Jakob"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "On Aug 29, 2018, at 11:06 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Hi.. so, here is the event I am still invited to give in Germany. It is Oct 19th. I was previously invited to give \na major lecture in Heidelberg Oct 14 but they had to cancel it after the university determination re australia \nwas publicized by the bitch. That air ticket, which they had paid fo, was about 5250 euros. There is a $900 \ncancellation fee, and they have agreed to let me keep the ticket if I pay them 4500 euros. I offered that to the \nother place but they only have $5K USD total, which includes the $4K fee they originally offered me. I am \ngoing to check other tickets now, but wanted to know if you might be flying to europe around then and could \ntake a hitchhiker. :)"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:29 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "actually I found I can buy an economy (YUK) ticket for only $1300.. so maybe I can buy that and try to \nupgrade it using miles.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Aug 29, 2018, at 11:56 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "What was Justin bill ? nd total to date?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "please call me asap"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "On Aug 29, 2018, at 12:19 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "3 hrs"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 11:01:49 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Talk in 40?"}]
16
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025974.txt_3876
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025974.txt
RE:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:42:23 -0400", "subject": "RE:", "body": "congragulations"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you!\nDid you really like it?\nHow did you like furniture?\nWhat would you change it?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:01:22 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i think it was terrific , the only thing i would think about is having only one lit sculpture at a \ntime . put one in storage or covered , but you want to call attention to one at a time."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great! Happy to hear it.\nTrust your advice and taste -this is why I am asking!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:06:27 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and maybe have the large colums black instead of gold, as the gold paint is not as good as the \ngold metal objects."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was thinking of black.\nIt is not a gold pain but a gold leafing. It took them 2 months to do it.\nWhat I do not like that it came out more as a Trump gold that an old gold."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:16:43 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "exactly"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just a quick question - do you have any name for a potential LP for my fund. I am planning a final close \nend of September /October.\nPlease let me know"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:18:55 -0400", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Are you around this Friday and weekend.\nI am - and leaving on Sunday at 5pm for Greece until August 15th/.\nIf you around would love to see you.\ni will see one maybe today. . i am off until aug 29"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 28 2016 05:44 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "please find attached an updated deck.\nPlease let me know if you have any candidate!\nSo far all LPs are AAA+ and there is a pipeline of 8 companies converted at the cost."}]
10
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025960.txt_3879
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025960.txt
Re: Mechanisms for learning
[{"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nthank you for your support and encouragement, even where I fail.\n\nSorry for being such an embarrassment today. I will spell out today's argument a bit better and cohesive when I get to it. Also, I should have recognized that the main point I tried to make would trigger Noam (who was as always very generous, patient, kind and humble on the personal level, even though he did not feel like conceding anything on the conceptual one).\n\nAlmost all of Noam's work focused on the idea that humans have very specific circuits or modules (even when most people in his field began to have other ideas), and his frustration is that it is so hard to find or explain them.\n\nI found Noam's hypothesis very compelling in the past. I still think that the idea that language is somehow a cultural or social invention of our species is wrong. But I think that there is a chance (we don't know that, but it seems to most promising hypothesis IMHO) that the difference between humans and apes is not a very intricate special circuit, but genetically simple developmental switches. The bootstrapping of cognition works layer by layer during the first 20 years of our life. Each layer takes between a few months and a few years to train in humans. While a layer is learned, there is not much going on in the higher layers yet, and after the low level learning is finished, it does not change very much. This leads to the characteristic bursts in child development, that have famously been described by Piaget.\n\nThe first few layers are simple perceptual stuff, the last ones learn social structure and self-in-society. The switching works with something like a genetic clock, very slowly in humans, but much more quickly in other apes, and very fast in small mammals. As a result, human children take nine months before their brains are mature enough to crawl, and more than a year before they can walk. Many African populations are quite a bit faster. In the US, black children outperform white children in motor development, even in very poor and socially disadvantaged households, but they lag behind (and never catch up) in cognitive development even after controlling for family income.\n\nGorillas can crawl after 2 months, and build their own nests after 2.5 years. They leave their mothers at 3-4 years. Human children are pretty much useless during the first 10-12 years, but during each phase, their brains have the opportunity to encounter many times as much training data as a gorilla brain. Humans are literally smarter on every level, and because the abilities of the higher levels depend on those of the lower levels, they can perform abstractions that mature gorillas will never learn, no matter how much we try to train them.\n\nThe second set of mechanisms is in the motivational system. Motivation tells the brain what to pay attention to, by giving reward and punishment. If a brain does not get much reward for solving puzzles, the individual will find mathematics very boring and won't learn much of it. If a brain gets lots of rewards for discovering other people's intentions, it will learn a lot of social cognition.\n\nLanguage might be the result of three things that are different in humans:\n- extended training periods per layer (after the respective layer is done, it is difficult to learn a new set of phonemes or the first language)\n- more layers\n- different internal rewards. Perhaps the reward for learning grammatical structure is the same that makes us like music. Our brains may enjoy learning compositional regular structure, and they enjoy making themselves understood, and everything else is something the universal cortical learning figures out on its own.\n\nThis is a hypothesis that is shared by a growing number of people these days. In humans, it is reflected for instance by the fact that races with faster motor development have lower IQ. (In individuals of the same group, slower development often indicates defects, of course.)\n\nAnother support comes from machine learning: we find that the same learning functions can learn visual and auditory pattern recognition, and even end-to-end-learning. Google has built automatic image recognition into their current photo app:\nhttp://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2015/07/01/google-mistakenly-tags-black-people-as-gorillas-showing-limits-of-algorithms/\n\nThe state of the art in research can do better than that: it can begin to \"imagine\" things. I.e. when the experimenter asks the system to \"dream\" what a certain object looks like, the system can produce a somewhat compelling image, which indicates that it is indeed learning visual structure. This stuff is something nobody could do a few months ago:\nhttp://www.creativeai.net/posts/Mv4WG6rdzAerZF7ch/synthesizing-preferred-inputs-via-deep-generator-networks\n\nA machine learning program that can learn how to play an Atari game without any human supervision or hand-crafted engineering (the feat that gave DeepMind 500M from Google) now just takes about 130 lines of Python code.\n\nThese models do not have interesting motivational systems, and a relatively simple architecture. They currently seem to mimic some of the stuff that goes on in the first few layers of the cortex. They learn object features, visual styles, lighting and rotation in 3d, and simple action policies. Almost everything else is missing. But there is a lot of enthusiasm that the field might be on the right track, and that we can learn motor simulations and intuitive physics soon. (The majority of the people in AI do not work on this, however. They try to improve the performance for the current benchmarks.)\n\nNoam's criticism of machine translation mostly applies to the Latent Semantic Analysis models that Google and others have been using for many years. These models map linguistic symbols to concepts, and relate concepts to each other, but they do not relate the concepts to \"proper\" mental representations of what objects and processes look like and how they interact. Concepts are probably one of the top layers of the learning hierarchy, i.e. they are acquired *after* we learn to simulate a mental world, not before. Classical linguists ignored the simulation of a mental world entirely.\n\nIt seems miraculous that purely conceptual machine translation works at all, but that is because concepts are shared between speakers, so the structure of the conceptual space can be inferred from the statistics of language use. But the statistics of language use have too little information to infer what objects look like and how they interact.\n\nMy own original ideas concern a few parts of the emerging understanding of what the brain does. The \"request-confirmation networks\" that I have introduced at a NIPS workshop in last the December are an attempt at modeling how the higher layers might self-organize into cognitive programs.\n\nCheers!\n\nJoscha"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:\n\nno worry, if i understand correctly you are suggsting there are layers 1 through N. lets cal them L 1 - Ln. there are times T 1- Tn / and then conjecture that changing the time . correlations ( by genetic swtch or other method. , you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer development and changing the time for other layers. . ). like telemeres for the cell , are their equivalents for the layers. . as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get dfferent ( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions ).\n\nExactly. I looked up the statistics, black kids in the US have slower cognitive development (and never catch up), which the study of course attributed to social factors without any evidence, and they had faster motor development! I suspect this means their brains are slower at learning high-level concepts, because the low-level structures are optimized for a shorter time. But they will keep the lead in motor development, because it is easier to learn, and they have more time and attention to practice once they get the structures in place.\n\nIt could also be that they have an additional set of learning directives in place that adapts them better to a more hunting/running style of life, whereas the Europeans had to adapt for identifying long-term seasonal patterns, delayed gratification for agriculture etc.\n\nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communicaiton. . are gender differences also a matter of time, and structure of interactions. .\n\nI suspect gender differences are mostly motivational, i.e. we have a reward system for all the different social and cognitive needs, which makes us receive different kinds of pleasure and pain, thereby pay attention and learn. You cannot learn what does not attract your attention. Women tend to find abstract systems, conflicts and mechanisms intrinsically boring. Most women in computer science do not write programs because they enjoy solving puzzles, but because they want to help people, get approval etc. There are almost no women in math, because it does not help people or yield social attention.\n\nMen tend to find elaborate social relations boring. If there is no pleasure in observing and empathizing with people, one will not have good social cognition.\n\nIQ is not the only meaningful difference. Chinese pay an inordinate amount of attention to authority. I suspect historically., the authorities tended to kill them a lot if they did not. Jews tend be intellectually independent and anti-authoritarian, which might make them creative and inventive in ways that are hard to find in Asia.\n\nAt the moment, I think speed/quality of brain development plus motivational system are the key to understanding both mind and individual differences. Important part of human language might be the result in a motivational need to discover/invent grammatical structure, which as a side effect makes us interested in music.\n\nIt would mean that Chomsky's life long hypothesis, that people have a special circuit for grammatical language, is wrong. They might be GENERAL learners, just like Gorillas, but with a strong motivational urge to build grammatical structure, which the brain simply invents (there are only a few ways in which a natural language can work). That is much easier to wire into a brain than a specific circuit.\n\ni my self believe that african music, westrn music , chinese music are a window into the the structure of those layers. . western rigid, african primitve , chinese nature based, . I belive that synphoic movments best describe your layering, they open with a basic simple melody„ after it is learned, it is repeated and\" developed\" , inverted, distorted, related, etc. the development stage take a long time. then there is a recapitlaltion of the whole. and its inter and intra actions. . african musci has lots of beats. and little development. - no accident, it mirrors their learning process.\n\nInteresting question if music is somehow indicative of genetically defined prefs, but I am not sure. It could be path effects, starting in culture.\n\nre taboo\n, maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation. . the earths forest fire. potentailly a good thing for the species\n\nMaking having children expensive in terms of upbringing and missed opportunity (like in the west) is a more humane way. Environmental stress while leaving near rock bottom tends to lead people to have more children, because there is no missed opportunity, and high mortality requires more attempts at procreation. Humans are a hardy species, outside of focused famine events and wars only small fractions of any given population die.\n\nI suspect that strong reductions in population will come from large-scale failure of agriculture. The climate change itself with result in migration and wars, but most people will probably survive that. But who knows, I might be wrong.\n\ntoo many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense\n\nis the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if the brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent\n\nThe radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-organized organism is fascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could pull it off in a sustainable way; and if it is aggressive and expansive, its efficiency makes it a virus that everybody will want to stomp out. Fascism makes romantic doo-gooders like me very uncomfortable (I visited KZ Buchenwald five times and it had a profound influence on me; we East Germans inoculated ourselves very thoroughly against fascism), and the general public will not be willing to consider it.\n\nI rather like the treatment Fascism gets in the Amazon Series \"The Man in the High Castle\", which explores what would have happened if the Germans and Japanese had won the war: A society that tries to function as a brutal and ruthlessly efficient machine, eliminating all social and evolutionary slack. It is very dark, but not a flat caricature of pointless evil for its own sake. Heinlein's late book \"Starship Troopers\" explores fascism, too, but unlike Philipp K Dick he does not see it as a form of insanity, but as the most desirable order.\n\nI find your \"political incorrectness\" very fascinating. In the beginning, I thought it is a form of costly signaling, but now I think you are simply entirely unconstrained in your thoughts. How did you manage in your youth? Did you get in trouble, or did you keep your thoughts to yourself? I wonder what kind of person you want to transform into.\n\nIt was interesting to notice that at the Forbidden Research conference, nobody managed to say anything remotely out-of line. One large discussion group wanted to address the question of whether \"democracy still works\", and mostly expressed their disagreement with Trump. Ideology is like halitosis: easy to see in others, hard in oneself A speaker felt that the media \"stifle all criticism of Trump\", another wanted to remove \"men and Elon Musk from government\", and everybody strongly agreed that we need more diversity everywhere.\n\nI noticed some time ago that Joi has remarkable public communication skills. He picks controversial, insight-laden topics, but sanitizes them by carefully replacing the parts of content that would divide his audience with symbolic messages that everybody can fill with their own content in a way that resonates with them. The non-controversial parts will still be insightful. He manages to come across as very subversive, while rarely offending anyone (except the hard scientists, that miss hard substance).\n\nHe also asks influential people and smart students or faculty to write parts of his essays and speeches for him. This invests them in his success, especially because he is going to reward and acknowledge them. Very few of his ideas are original, instead he is good at identifying and testing thoughts he reads or hears from others.\n\nI am still beset by the ruinous instinct that the goal of communication ought to be mutual understanding. Joi is right. Public communication is about reaching one's goals.\n\nBests,\n\nJoscha"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 4:41", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Cells seem to be mostly indistinguishable (except for )04 I thought? Size is different on average, but males with small brains are still male. Variation of all traits is higher for males, so there are more high IQ men (wider bell-curve). Given average brain size difference, the small difference in average IQ is surprising, I think gender differenece. unlikely motivational, every cell is different. size is didfferent. . the more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human\" cell: the body the membrane, the organizm the colletcions and interactions of brains, wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money used as signals. as is spoken language. . what does social behavior mean, it is the cooridination of indiv brains. =\n\nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they are all math , then poliiical correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of thoughts. its not emotinal for me.\n\nmost people have censorship built in at a deep level, social reasoning gets to different results than equivalent abstract reasoning"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 6:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "the average is the only thing that matters"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 24, 2016 00:20", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/24/2016 5:23:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Average humans are probably not fully able to learn how to program etc. Fraction of people that reshape the world are at the right end of the Bell curves, so difference in variation means fewer women. We tend to be more interested in the outliers. Have people explicitly evolved to be not to be too smart on average, or is general intelligence so hard to get from human brains?"}]
6
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031305.txt_3880
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031305.txt
JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!
[{"sender": "steven hoffenberg <hoffenberg.steven@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Players2 . <playersO2@hotmail.com>"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!!", "body": "C EO STEVEN HOFFENBERG / TRUMP SUPER PAC/ GET OUR JOBS BACK INC\n\nTO ROGER STONE\n\nCHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FE DS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN BO"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033362.txt_3885
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033362.txt
Fwd: Apple, Inc.: Addressing The Top 5 Investor Questions
[{"sender": "\"Morgan Stanley\" <ms-wmir@morganstanley.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 29, 2019 at 6:35:01 PM EDT", "subject": "Apple, Inc.: Addressing The Top 5 Investor Questions", "body": "Katy L. Huberty, CFA — Morgan Stanley\nMay 29, 2019 10:28 PM GMT\n\nGiven the risk of further restrictive trade measures, we answer investors' top questions. We expect\nshares to remain choppy, with a near-term floor around $160. Our estimates are unchanged but\npeer multiple contraction drives our SoTP-driven PT to $231 (from $240).\n\nWhat is the latest view on iPhone demand in China? On Apple's April 30th earnings call, CEO Tim\nCook noted that the November-December period was likely to be the trough in iPhone demand in\nChina, following an improvement in performance during the March quarter helped by iPhone price\ncuts, VAT tax rollbacks, increased financing options and better consumer confidence. Data from\npush-messaging service provider Jigaung shows that the improvement in iPhone demand likely\npersisted through April, where Apple gained over 175bps of Chinese smartphone installed base\nshare Y/Y (1). However, the increasingly tough trade rhetoric and actions recently taken by US and\nChinese authorities make it less likely this trend will continue into May/June. Late last week,\nfollowing the Huawei blacklist, President Trump commented that \"it's possible that Huawei would be\n________included in a trade deal\", suggesting recent actions could be bargaining chips to use in trade\nnegotiations that can be worked out by/around the G20 Summit in late June, but with Apple guiding\nJune quarter revenue down 8% Q/Q (vs. trailing 3 year seasonality of -14% Q/Q), the risk remains\nthat weaker near-term demand in China increases the risk of a revenue shortfall. For reference, we\nmodel 37M iPhone shipments in the June quarter (-10% Y/Y), in-line with iPhone builds, which\nimplies a 5th consecutive quarter of double digit iPhone shipment declines in China. If we assume\nChinese demand significantly weakens in the last 6 weeks of the quarter and iPhone shipments\ninstead fall 50% Y/Y (a 10 point further deceleration from March Q declines), then we'd expect 2.3M\nlower iPhone units (-6% vs. our current model), $1.6B lower revenue (-2.9%) and a $0.05 hit to EPS\n(-2"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 3:19:40 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Apple, Inc.: Addressing The Top 5 Investor Questions", "body": ""}]
2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029895.txt_3896
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029895.txt
RE: Jane Doe
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this...\n\nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of | going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "After Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032732.txt_3898
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032732.txt
Re: Wheels up 3 to New York Wednesday
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2018 2:00:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Wheels up 3 to New York Wednesday", "body": "Thx 3pm Wednesday to Teterboro confirmed\nFriday Trump arrives in PBI, I'll confirm time,\nThx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 18, 2018, at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Wheels up 3 to New York Wednesday", "body": ""}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030755.txt_3903
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030755.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 24 June 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Where are you? Not answering your cell\nWhat the f... Does going to open 1k down not good... Trump is saying its a great thing really???\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 24, 2016, at 6:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "5616557625"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is this the right # says its disconnected\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "6/24/2016 10:51:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "7626"}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022941.txt_3906
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022941.txt
Fwd: Fw: inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Matthew Hiltzik"], "timestamp": "5/24/2017 11:04:43 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:53 PM", "subject": "Fw: inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:33 PM", "subject": "inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement", "body": "Good afternoon, Marty: \nThis is James Hill at ABC News. \nDo you have any statement you wish to share on behalf of Mr. Epstein regarding the settlement reached in \nthe defamation suit filed by Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell? \nI know from the court filings and hearing transcripts, that Mr. Epstein was deposed in this action, but was not \nexpected to be called as a live trial witness. \nAccording to the transcripts - it was represented by plaintiff's counsel during pre-trial hearings, that Mr. \nEpstein invoked his 5th amendment rights and declined to answer substantive questions during the \ndeposition. It also appears that Judge Sweet had not yet made a final determination as to whether Mr. \nEpstein's depo, or selected portions thereof, would be admitted at trial (which is obviously a moot point, \nnow). \nIf you believe any of that to be in error, and/or if you wish to provide a statement about the settlement or in \nresponse to Giuffre's allegations about your client, please give me a call or reply to this email. \nIf you have no comment, I'd appreciate you letting me know that. \nThanks \nJames \nJames Hill \nSr. Producer \nABC News \n190 N. State St. \nChicago IL 60601 \n(cell) \n(cell) \n(ofc) \njames.e.hill@abc.com \n©jameshillabc \nVirus-free. www.avast.com"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025790.txt_3909
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025790.txt
National Enquirer Comment Request Re: Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "jeevacation@gmail.com", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "1/29/2015 8:33:35 PM", "subject": "FW: National Enquirer Comment Request Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Gonzalez, Patricia", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 29, 2015 3:29 PM", "subject": "National Enquirer Comment Request Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Tonja--\n\nThe National ENQUIRER is preparing to publish a story that Bill Clinton used a private \"orgy\" jet to travel to \nBrunei for an extraordinary dinner with a royal accused of duping American women into \"white slavery.\" \nThe ENQUIRER will report that Bill was accompanied by the 727's owner, billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, \nwhen he landed in the tiny South-East Asian country on May 25, 2002. His entourage also included two \nwomen who allegedly worked as \"madams\" for Epstein, luring teenaged girls into sex trysts with the tycoon \nand his powerful and famous friends. \n\nAccording to The ENQUIRER's investigation, Bill spent the day playing golf at a seven-star hotel -- and then was \ninvited to dine with Brunei's sultan, Hassanal Bolkiah .....who was charged with holding a deeply-religious \nChristian beauty queen as a \"human chattel.\" Far from being embarrassed by the ruler's tawdry \nreputation, moreover, records for Bill's nonprofit foundation reveal that Brunei made a donation towards his \nClinton Presidential Library that year of between $1. million and $5 million. \n\nPlease kindly attempt to provide any comment by 4 pm ET tomorrow, Friday January 30th to Lachlan \nCartwright, Executive Editor, at [Office] or \n\nThank You, \nPatricia Gonzalez \nThe National Enquirer"}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032054.txt_3910
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032054.txt
RE: Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:14 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/alexander-acosta-trump-jeffrey-epstein-plea-235096"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I know...I just saw that and almost threw up....also have to decide today whether or not to take flynn"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 11:51:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Would be conflicted out of everything to come"}]
4
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018946.txt_3911
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018946.txt
Re: 31E-MM-108062, 10/17/2006
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": "10/17/2006", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 10/17/2006", "body": "the subpoena, she would be required to appear at the United\nStates District Courthouse located at 701 Clematis Street, West\nPalm Beach, Florida.\n\nAt this time, no further action will be taken by the\nin this matter. Lead is covered."}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031339.txt_3922
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031339.txt
Fwd: Obama team nixed fundraiser by attorney for sex offender pal of Bill Clinton, emails show
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/12/2016 1:28:18 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Obama team nixed fundraiser by attorney for sex offender pal of Bill Clinton, emails show", "body": "This guy black might be your lawyer and even a friend; but i have to say it seems to me he is much more about\nhimself than his clients.\n\nHe made a comment in a newspaper about a case of mine not long ago and he had no idea what he was talking\nabout; he should have been embarrassed. When i asked a reporter from one if the leading newspapers why the\nother paper had run his opinion about my casr when he knows nothing about it, she said his p.r. people email\nand others regularly with comments on all sorts if cases just hoping to get black's name in the paper in some\npseudo authoritative role. Pretty weak.\n\nGood luck, David"}, {"sender": "David Schocn <j>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, August 12, 2016", "subject": "Obama team nixed fundraiser by attorney for sex offender pal of Bill Clinton, emails show", "body": "I thought you might be interested in this article:\n\nOne of America’s top defense attorneys was deemed too controversial to host an event for President Obama,\naccording to newly surfaced emails, mainly because of one particular client — a jet-setting billionaire accused of\ntrafficking underage girls, who also happens to be close friends with Bill Clinton.\n\nhttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/12/obama-team-nixed-fundraiser-by-attorney-for-sex-offender-pal-\nbill-clinton-emails-show.html"}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030999.txt_3925
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030999.txt
Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "Rush, George", "recipients": ["Howard Rubenstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 08, 2009 11:08 PM", "subject": "Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Howard:\n\nWe’re working on a story for our Sunday column about Jeffrey Epstein. I thought I might send my questions to you tonight, so you’d have them first thing tomorrow."}, {"sender": "Howard Rubenstein", "recipients": ["Darren"], "timestamp": "October 9, 2009 7:26:54 AM PDT", "subject": "FW: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Darren:\nI hope you are well.\n\nSince we are no longer working for Jeffrey, I’m forwarding this Daily News request to you so you can handle it as you see fit.\n\nMany thanks,\n\nHoward"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger", "Robert D. Critton Jr."], "timestamp": "10/9/2009 4:43:25 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
4
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026499.txt_3929
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026499.txt
Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["BS Stern"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 9 2018 10:47 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts", "body": "Hi all —\n\nI spent some time mulling additional aspects of a third choice presidential run and wanted to run five\n\nspecific attributes for a candidate by you as a group.\n\nThis much we know - the Fall elections are shaping up to be a referendum on the most divisive\nAmerican President in memory. The battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh’s\nnomination this fall will only amplify the polarity of the political debate that is already deeply\noverwrought on both sides. The rising tide of pressure on Donald Trump from the Mueller investigation\n\nshows no sign of ebbing.\n\nUnless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these unprecedented events will\nstill leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield of the 2016 Presidential election.\nWatching these unrelenting, compounding events since our discussion in May, I am guessing we are all\nasking the same question: now what? For the 48 percent of Americans who believe Donald Trump\n\nshould not be in the White House, perhaps we too want our own “chaos” candidate in 2020?\n\nShould Trump run again, this could be a “break glass” moment for the majority of Americans who don’t\nsupport him. Do we want to break the genteel precedents of two parties running their ceremonious and\nseemingly illogical nominating process to select a candidate? (Why do Iowa and New Hampshire play\nsuch outsized roles? What kind of small-d democratic process relies on superdelegates?) The system\nfailed in 2016, with both parties producing terribly flawed candidates in a race to the bottom. We need to\n\nbuild a back-up plan in the event the system fails again."}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030741.txt_3932
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030741.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "8 Nov 2018, at 19:39", "subject": "Re:", "body": "when are you arriving. traffic will be crazy . do to celebratons and trump"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/8/2018 7:17:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes completely forgot about it\nI m flying in Friday night\nWould Saturday 11:00 be good for you?\n\nAriane de Rothschild"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030389.txt_3934
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030389.txt
Re: What is going on with your man Jes?
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 10:17 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "'Thanks for sharing the foxhole'"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "i know, everyone gets their turn in the barrel"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 10:22 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "Other stuff I am sympathetic --but to answer a random gmail email, that is not smart! How are you Trump contacts responding to Comey?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 11 2017 08:30 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "i tired to call you , not for email"}]
4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029881.txt_3938
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029881.txt
RE: Jane Doe
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this...\nStill working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of GT going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition will follow. Mr. Trump’s deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}]
5
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032915.txt_3945
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032915.txt
Re: Trump
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 2:53:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no intel but lots of profits"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030972.txt_3949
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030972.txt
Re: FYI
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wo! [aaa"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 4:11:28 PM", "subject": "Re: FYI", "body": "Needs edit but... ic 36! M_ Ryboloev not known in 05, Talk later"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 11:07 AM", "subject": "Re: FYI", "body": "Books and newspaper accounts of Trump’s 45 years in business were full of his shady dealings, and the presidency had only helped to highlight them and to surface even juicier ones. Real estate was the world's favorite money laundering currency and Trump's B-level real estate business was quite explicitly designed to appeal to money launderers. What’s more, Trump’s own financial woes, and desperate efforts to maintain billionaire lifestyle, cache, and market viability, forced him into constant and unsubtle schemes. Practically speaking, you couldn’t miss him, as the Mueller investigation appeared to be finding.\n\nIn November 2004, for instance, Jeffrey Epstein, the financier later caught in a scandal involving under-age prostitutes, agreed to buy out of bankruptcy a house in Palm Beach, Florida for $30 million—a house that had been on the market for two years. Epstein and Trump had been close friends—playboys in arms, as it were—for more than a decade, with Epstein often counseling Trump on his chaotic financial affairs. Epstein took Trump to see the Palm Beach house to advise him on construction issues involved with moving a swimming pool. As he prepared to finalize his deal for the house, an incredulous Epstein Saw a severely cash-constrained Trump bid $41 million for the property, buying it through an entity called Trump Properties LLC, financed by Deutsche Bank. Trump, Epstein knew, had been renting his name, telling Epstein he ought to do the same—that is, for an ample fee, Trump was willing to serve as a front man to disguise the actual ownership in a real estate transaction. (This was, in effect, just another variation of Trump’s basic business model of licensing his name for commercial properties owned by someone else.) A furious Epstein, suspecting that the real owner was a Russian oligarch, who Trump knew, Dmitry Rybolovlev—part of the close Putin circle of government-aligned industrialists in Russia—threatened to expose the deal, then getting extensive scrutiny in Florida papers. The fight became all the more bitter when, two months later, the house was put on the market for $125 million. Well known to Trump, who often saw Epstein at his current Palm Beach house, Epstein was visited almost every day, and had been for many years, by girls who he paid for massages with happy endings—girls recruited from local restaurants, strip clubs, and, also, Trump’s Mar-a-Lago. Just as the threats and enmity of the two friends increased over the house sale, Epstein found himself under investigation by local Palm Beach police. Epstein’s legal problems vastly escalated as the house, with only minor improvements, was bought for $96 million by Dmitry Rybolovlev. That is, Trump had either miraculously earned $55 million, without putting up a dime, or Rybolovlev, or someone such as Rybolovlev, paid Trump Properties, LLC—actual owner unknown—$96 million, thereby providing a clean payment of $55"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022766.txt_3950
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022766.txt
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "4/22/2015 7:03:52 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "As just received."}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 1:57 PM", "subject": "FW: inquiry from '1111111.MI.ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Marty: With the understanding that we have not yet made determinations about what will or will not be included in our broadcast, here are the bullet points of the principal allegations Ms. 11111.11111•11111111111 raised in the ABC interview regarding Mr. Epstein. I'm available on cell if you wish to discuss.\nWe'd ask for your response as soon as possible - best if by close of business Friday. Thanks. And I'm always available to talk to you if you wish to communicate with us.\nShe says in summer of 1999 when she was 15 - Ghislaine Maxwell approached and asked her if she was interested in a job as a masseuse.\nShe says she was later (that same day) driven by her father to Epstein's Palm Beach residence, where she massaged Epstein with Maxwell's guidance, and then she says she was made to have sex, to include intercourse, with Epstein. At conclusion she says was paid $200 and driven home by a butler..\nShe says she quit her job and went to work for Epstein within a couple of weeks encounter.\nShe says Epstein always knew how old she was andliiiiiiiiiifically that she, Epstein and celebrated 16th b-day together.\nShe says Epstein paid her for the encounters and for her apartment and car•\nShe says she would be expected to have sexual relations with Epstein up to several day•\nShe says there was an number of other girls young as 12.\nshe says she was given money by Epstein to go out and recruit other young girls for him.•\nshe says that while she was free to come and go - she felt like she was under his control and she didn't want to disappoint Epstein..\nShe says Epstein required her, and paid her, to have sex with many of his friends. •\nShe says these people included politicians, royalty, educators.\nShe says she had sex -or sexual activities - with Prince Andrew on three occasions - at the instruction of Epstein •\nShe says Epstein paid her $15,000 after the 1st of the three alleged encounters with Prince Andrew.\nShe says that Epstein showed her a video room in his NY home which had monitors showing cameras in many locations in the home.\nShe suggests Epstein made videos of underage girls with other people for purposes of potential blackmail •\nShe says that Epstein liked her to dress up in outfits, including bondage and schoolgirl outfits.\nShe says she met Bill Clinton on Epstein's island in the USVI. She does not specify a date but says she is 100% sure it was Clinton and it was on the island. She says she ate dinner with Epstein and Clinton but alleges nothing further regarding Clinton..\nShe says one person - who she wouldn't name - that Epstein loaned her out to - physically assaulted and raped her. She says this happened on Epstein's island, and that she had been sent by Epstein - alone -to meet this person . She says she screamed but no one came to her aid. She says she feared for her life. She says she told Epstein about the alleged beating and rape afterwards and she said he didn't care..\nShe says Epstein and Maxwell asked her to have a child for them and to sign a document signing away the rights to the child in the event that she and Epstein had a falling out. She says she refused this request..\nShe says Epstein has a sick problem, is a pedophile, a dangerous man who should not be walking free"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Hill, James E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "James, just confirming that you are sending me the bulletpoints from the interview you are asking about, thanks"}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, April 21, 2015, 4:36 PM", "subject": "inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Greetings.\nThis is James Hill of ABC News. I write to you regarding Jeffrey Epstein - and your representation of him in the CVRA case in which he is an intervener. ABC News has recently conducted an on-camera interview with (formerly known as Jane Doe #3), portions of which are very likely to be airing on Good Morning America and other ABC programs this week. We would like to offer you an opportunity to respond to the allegations she has raised about Mr. Epstein. Can you tell me who among you I should be in contact with? Should you wish to make a statement or respond in any other manner - I will need it by close-of-business Wednesday. Thanks kindly,"}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026266.txt_3959
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026266.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 23, 2018, at 9:14 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "<IMG-7184.jpg>"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem <MI>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:36 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Is that Steve Bannon?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 3:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes We have become friends you will like him"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 11:42:49 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Trump doesn't like him"}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030410.txt_3966
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030410.txt
whoopsie
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Brad S Karp"], "timestamp": "10/2/2018 11:26:53 PM", "subject": "whoopsie", "body": "https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-york-launches-tax-investigation-into-trump-after-ny-times-report-2018-10-02"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026272.txt_3967
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026272.txt
Re: SB
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/23/2018 1:57:50 PM", "subject": "Re: SB", "body": "I think his FT performance yesterday was quite a hit (btw, he reiterated that my book was all true--helpful!). \nCuriously, the liberals maybe more fascinated by him than the Trump base is."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:51 AM", "subject": "Re: SB", "body": "i passsed on your newsweek message yesterday. i think he is a bit lost no wins and donald off the rails"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:01 AM", "subject": "Re: SB", "body": "I reached out and I'm seeing him at 6:00 today."}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030966.txt_3979
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030966.txt
Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "-firing-federal-reserve-chief-after-latest-interest-"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 1:59:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "should have been done months ago too old!!!!"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026514.txt_3985
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026514.txt
Re: Home
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Home", "body": "Why had no one interviewed some of trump classmates at wharton ? Deutsh bank papers very bery bad"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Home", "body": "Where are you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/23/2019 12:53:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Home", "body": ""}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030376.txt_3987
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030376.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie SpineIla"], "timestamp": "10/15/2014 1:06:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-14/ruemmler-said-to-emerge-as-obama-favorite-for-justice-job.html"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033027.txt_3991
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033027.txt
Re: Interview with Futurism
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Jeffrey, https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25M unique readers)\nwould like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy.\n\nWould you be open to talk to them?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, 11:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes happy to do in person"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "great. when is good?\nare you coming to New York next week?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, 11:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:30 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Scheduled. Would you have 30 min - 1 h before/after. Will tell you some more ideas about your interviews and\nscience support"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/12/2017 5:07:38 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Yes"}]
7
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031040.txt_4006
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031040.txt
Re: A few questions just in case please?
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/15/2013 12:59:34 PM", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "Call"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, December 15, 2013", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "Thank you! Was amazing! The best family dinner ever. Louis said they LOVED me! Thu both texted him afterwards saying that:)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, December 14, 2013", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": "how will our future differ from your lives? if i was going to do your job what three things would i have to know. ? is obama good for the country, . ? israel?. if you could live one day of your lives over again, what would it be?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 7:04 PM", "subject": "Re: A few questions just in case please?", "body": ""}]
4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028590.txt_4009
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028590.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "So....remarkably...in the middle of dealing with thiss the Steptoe numbercrunchers advise me Jeffrey has paid\nabout 450 and owes about 300 and seems disinclined to make Steptoe whole.....hAhhhhmmmm....first reaction is\ndéja vu.... How the fuck are we back here after the unspeakably awful evan barr debacle.... More to the point just\ntell me where you are on this....did miller fuck up? Something else? As you know | am the 800 pound gorilla\nhere, Steptoe is not going to chase you down for the money but there are 500 lawyers here, processes, etc......"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "i suggest we wait until face to face yes he fucked up. but ,,,"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 11:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Ok....but give me an idea what follows the but....otherwise | will imagine the worst...."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "im not sheyl, frankly i havent been involved in this at all except for the ridiculousness . we will resolve\nit by end of month. ."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 25, 2019 10:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Rajeev misra....softbank vision fund...any special jeffrey insights here?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 25, 2019 7:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If he wants you to rep him. YES"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 26, 2019 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Cal me if you get a chance....212 506 3914"}]
8
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029856.txt_4010
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029856.txt
Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 8:41:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid iii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "Parker, Ashley", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 3:19 PM", "subject": "WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Hi Reid,\n\nAshley Parker here at the Washington Post. I cover the White House and am emailing because my colleague,\nBob Costa, and I getting ready to post a story about President Trump’s decision to move ahead with retaining\noutside counsel, and we understand you’re one of the finalists for the role, and have already spoken with senior\nWhite House officials. I just wanted to let you know that we plan to mention your name (and of course see if\nyou want to comment), and I also wanted to check and see if you were open to chatting totally off the record,\njust in case there is any nuance or guidance you’d like to provide. I’m at] or my desk is I\n\nThanks,\nAshley\n\nAshley Parker\n\nDesk:\n\nTwitter: @AshleyRParker"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033389.txt_4012
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033389.txt
Re: Friday POTUS
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "1/9/2018 1:22:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Friday POTUS", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Friday POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey\nBoston / Bedford are not gateway airports to PBI.\nOnly airports that are gateway into Palm Beach are:\nWhite Plains\nTeterboro\nOrlando\nDulles\nOrlando\nFortlauderdale\nMost operators are using Boca for arrivals when Trump is in town. Parking reservation at Boca are required\nsince the ramp fill up. Other options is Fort Lauderdale when Boca is full.\nPOTUS arrival — Friday, January 12th, time TBD (likely PM)\nPOTUS departure — Monday, January 15th, time TBD (likely PM)\nShould I request parking at Boca?\nThx\nLarry"}]
2
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027036.txt_4019
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027036.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "does the 23 work in cambridge"}, {"sender": "Lisa New <_EE>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Absolutely. 23rd is great. I teach my seminar that day at 1 but could tape in the morning or after class--in my office (very private), or at the Harvardx studios (less) or in the Woodberry poetry room (the nicest place). . If Woody wanted, we could bring some students into the taping or just do the two of us...\n\nWoody is absolutely welcome to come to the seminar, of course\nJohn McCain, Tony Kushner, Al Gore have all signed on the last 2 days...crazy"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/5/2013 7:26:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Or we could do the taping at my house. That would be totally delightful too"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031732.txt_4032
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031732.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Went to opening of war paint last night was sitting next to john Connolly at after party he is on to his next book about Ef Hutton murders apparently was going to put me in your book because I was in your visitors list but somers and Margo nederlander asked him not to which pisses me off I have never been in a big book before and I think it would have been great and they never even asked me I told him about how you called Apple best jonathan"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:06:20 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to meet him"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:11 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you want me to arrange it? be careful jf"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 8:21:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why dont you suggest to him that the real money making book is getting to the truth of the claims. unvierstiy of virgina. no penalty for fals accusations. . hockey team no penalty for accusations. . trump 13 yeara old rape accusation no penaltiy etc. mine is ripe with same"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 12:28:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i asked him about trump and russians he said maybe some truth there,If you want to meet him just give me the wordjf"}]
5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028505.txt_4041
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028505.txt
null
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/16/2017 12:23:00 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Saw Matt C with DTF at golf tournament I know why he was there"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033033.txt_4047
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033033.txt
Fwd: Re:
[{"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now’"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 13, 2017, at 12:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hi habebey .. i m in new york .. the sooner we meet the faster i go back to be with my son on his first week in a\nnew school ..\n\nif you bussy dont worry 1 can wait until thursday ..\n\nthnx again"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["anasalrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 13, 2017, at 4:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wed at 2?"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "perfect & &"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "9/13/2017 1:29:54 AM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}]
8
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021416.txt_4056
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021416.txt
Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 3:22:48 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Thanks.. I need to get this or something to them quickly. I do feel the need to respond to each of their claims otherwise they would say I don’t deny them.. Will include a short preamble. I am going to cc the letter to the Buzzfeed lawyers. I figure I will see whether the buzzfeed story gets any traction at all, or appears before putting on my web site, or tweeting and facebooking it.\n\nLMK"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 11, 2017, at 4:18 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "normaly thier strategy will be to take back your defense to the accusers. and attack each one. if they find you are right they will leave out. and only go with the conflicted. I think you should include short concise cover letter. that you would like published in it entirety. it can refence your attacjment that you will put on your web site? . that goes into more details but in general , these are false. they were either investigated and found lacking or ignored. etc. often they throw out the near publishing date merely to get you to ansser."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "a few more minor changes.. one in first line of second paragraph and one misspelling corrected..so you can read this one:"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 10:31 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Second Draft:\n\n| appreciate the opportunity to respond to your email. While | am running the risk that you will report my comments, if you do, either out of context, or incompletely, | am responding with an effort to be complete. It is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. | treat people | interact with with respect, and | work hard"}]
4
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019330.txt_4089
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019330.txt
Re: Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/19/2016 3:01:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America", "body": "from barnaby -\n\nshe could apply, but she should know that there are only a few grants in each round; most projects proposed\ndon't get funding. It is like rolling the dice. what people don't understand is that many grants are not funded not\nbecause they are defective in any way, but simply because there is not enough funding to cover even a part of\nwhat comes in (there are thousands of applications and hundreds of millions of dollars of requests that go all\nthrough different kinds of review; it is hard to know what will make it through because different people make\nthe priority decisions at different stages of review; and it depends what other applications are in the pool ina\ngiven cycle). There is no \"direct\" route anymore."}, {"sender": "Lisa New <Q>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America", "body": "Dear\nJeffrey\n(and please see note at bottom),\n\nThis end-of-the-year letter is to catch you up on developments and to report progress made in 2016\nby Poetry in America, by its associated non-profit production company, Verse Video Education, and\nby (and with) our new Harvard partner, the Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning. Whether\nyou are a longstanding adviser and supporter of Poetry in America, or you’ve more recently joined\nour circle of proponents, your contributions, thought partnership and enthusiasm have made this\nyear’s successes possible.\n\nLast fall, | knew this would be a crucial year. Goals for 2016 included moving our co-produced\ntelevision series, Poetry in America, toward a concrete release date (now entering post-production,\nwe launch nationwide in April 2018), converting our six HarvardX MOOC modules into for-credit\ncourses (now complete and being offered by Harvard’s Division of Continuing Education), and\ngetting the word out on our first course developed especially for K-12 educators, Poetry in America\nfor Teachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop. With a mission of creating and distributing the\nhighest-quality humanities content for a wide variety of learners, our projects now rely on a salaried\nproduction staff of five, a rotating corps of part timers and contractors, and a growing cohort of\nHarvard graduate students, undergraduates and interns whom we train in the public-facing\nhumanities. Growing fast, in 2016 we more firmly established Verse Video Education as a nimble\nand stable producer of humanities-based content (now including an archive of over 120 separate\ninterviews with distinguished discussants), while also defining a forward-looking partnership and\ngrowth strategy with Harvard. As 2016 draws to a close, | have much progress to report.\n\nVerse Video Education: Independent 501c3\n\nIn April 2016, Verse Video Education, the fledgling production company |’d founded in 2014,\nreceived IRS approval and became a 501c3. Now capable of accepting philanthropic contributions,\nVerse Video Education has also begun to generate revenue by producing high-quality educational\nmedia for other institutions. Clients within our first year included Greenwich Country Day School,\nYIVO Institute for Jewish Research, Schlesinger Library, Harvard Institute for Global Health, and\nProject Zero. While philanthropic donations remain essential, work for clients allows us to amplify the\nimpact of philanthropic donations, not only permitting additional investment in our flagship\npartnerships with WGBH and Harvard, but also fostering development of new partnerships and"}]
2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028591.txt_4091
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028591.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Crim"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Still have to figure out what my role is in all this shit..."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you seemed to imply that your new guy could only shoot blanks? ifthats so. its an easy decision. , if not. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not my new guy...not repping him"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think he has the goods?"}]
7
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026006.txt_4092
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026006.txt
null
[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:23 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Hope she is pleased/happy/satisfied/proud"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 11, 2016 8:16 PM", "subject": null, "body": "your girl won"}]
2
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019324.txt_4094
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019324.txt
null
[{"sender": "Maria Luisa", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon", "Preate Alexandra"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT", "subject": null, "body": ""}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031489.txt_4097
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031489.txt
Fwd: Breaking News: Donald Trump brags in vulgar terms about groping women in a 2005 recording, saying, "When you're a star they let you do it"
[{"sender": "Stephen Hanson", "recipients": ["Jeffrey / E / Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri 10/7/2016 10:30:45 PM (UTC)", "subject": "Fwd: Breaking News: Donald Trump brags in vulgar terms about groping women in a 2005 recording, saying, \"When you're a star they let you do it\"", "body": "Ouch\n\nSent from my iPad"}, {"sender": "NYTimes.com News Alert <nytdirect@nytimes.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 7, 2016 at 5:40:40 PM EDT", "subject": "Breaking News: Donald Trump brags in vulgar terms about groping women in a 2005 recording, saying, \"When you're a star they let you do it\"", "body": "Donald Trump brags in vulgar terms about groping women in a 2005 recording, saying, “When you re a star they let you do it”\n\nDonald J. Trump was caught on tape bragging in vulgar terms about making sexual"}]
2
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021403.txt_4102
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021403.txt
Fwd: Fw:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Mike Sitrick aaaaaaaaammmeemes"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 1:10:38 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Darren <>", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:11 AM", "subject": "Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "\"Wolfe, Alexandra\"", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on the phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the information I already have by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? Could he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same clients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising?\n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n\n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n\n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n\n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030797.txt_4110
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030797.txt
Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:17:38 -0400", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "AHHHH thats more like it, , we need to find you the exorcist hat. ! . do you think you might want to\ncome to europe?"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 9:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "https://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article2 16997195 .html"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Aug 19, 2018, at 10:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "yes . no worry, november too important to risk diversion. mission first"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "Yes\n\nbut let's discuss--their is a crazed jihad against u--ive never seen anything like it--and I've seen a lot"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 10:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "Exactly\n\nBut somebody big has u in the gunsights"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "8/20/2018 2:34:11 AM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon says GOP must rally behind Trump to survive | News & Observer", "body": "any ideas ?"}]
6
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033388.txt_4123
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033388.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "4/16/2017 3:12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I'll be better I feel terrible having to cut your stay short. There is much going on . Many investigations will begin"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Hope you recover quickly. We have had wonderful days. Tell me when you are coming to Paris so that we can talk. I really don't understand Trump. Today I have to deal with the referendum in Turkey. Endogan is another difficult to understand"}]
2
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012711.txt_4124
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012711.txt
RE: Events this week
[{"sender": "Stephanie", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Lesley Grof"], "timestamp": "6/14/2011 4:54:35 PM", "subject": "RE: Events this week", "body": "Other events that are not listed below (they were sent over from Marshall Heyman at the WSJ) Let me know if you are interested.\n\nTonight: Red Rooster for Halle Berry, Simon & Schuster party for publication of the new James Bond Novel & the opening of Spiderman w/ an after party at bowlmore.\n\nWednesday: Self Magazine & Zooey Deschanel Party\n\nThursday: Worldwide Orphans w/ Amy Poehler"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026273.txt_4129
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026273.txt
Fwd: Re:
[{"sender": "Rivkin, David", "recipients": ["Grossman, Andrew M"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 22, 2018 at 7:50 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Can you please send me WSJ op Ed. Tx"}, {"sender": "Grossman, Andrew M", "recipients": ["Rivkin, David"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mueller's Fruit of the Poisonous Tree\n\nIt makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation is tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016.\n\nBy\nDavid B. Rivkin Jr. and\nElizabeth Price Foley\nJune 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET"}, {"sender": "Rivkin, David", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Here it is."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/23/2018 12:44:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Big deal"}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030411.txt_4131
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030411.txt
null
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/31/2019 10:47:52 PM", "subject": null, "body": "_____________ worked at mara lago. . she was the one that accused prince andrew. . trump said he asked \nme to resign, never a member ever. . of course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030377.txt_4136
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030377.txt
Re: Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "David Pegg <dpegg@theguardian.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "5 January 2015 at 11:14", "subject": "Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Swiss Accounts Survey\n\nDear Mr Epstein,\n\nWe are writing because a US media organisation, in concert with ourselves at the Guardian newspaper in London, is currently conducting a detailed survey of Swiss bank accounts, past and present.\n\nIt is not illegal to have Swiss accounts. But as you may know, it is a topic of considerable public debate, and several governments have been investigating the owners of such accounts.\n\nThere are a number of ways such accounts and also offshore trusts have been used to avoid inheritance tax, UK domestic tax, or tax imposed by other countries. Such accounts have also been used to launder money.\n\nWe have seen records held in the US identifying you among those who have held accounts. These accounts contained assets of up to USD 3.5m, and include:\nHSBC (Suisse) SA\nFAMILY INTEREST L.P.\n22079\nBESSIE\nJEFFREY EPSTEIN\n\n1) You may therefore have been a person evading or avoiding tax, or laundering money.\nWe will be particularly concerned with these questions:\n2) Why you had Swiss accounts.\n3) How much back tax you have settled with the tax authorities following their investigation of your affairs.\n\nAdditionally, from public records and from material we have seen we note that:\n4) In 2008 you pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution and procuring minors for prostitution. You were sentenced to 18 months in prison.\n5) Your above accounts were also linked with Mr Leslie Wexner.\n6) You are known to be or have previously been closely associated with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Kevin Spacey.\n7) You have made substantial contributions to the Clintons' philanthropic causes. Tax reform campaigners have previously been critical of those who engage in public life or the political process while avoiding or evading tax. Hilary Clinton herself, speaking in 2012, noted the importance of elites paying a substantial share of tax: \"One of the issues that I have been preaching about around the world is collecting taxes in an equitable manner — especially from the elites in every country.\"\n\nIt is intended shortly to publish the results of our survey in both the US and the UK.\n\nAs responsible journalists acting in the public interest, we would first like to give you the opportunity to comment.\n\nIf we do not hear from you by 18:00 on Monday 12th January 2015 (preferably by email to [redacted]), we shall proceed on the basis that you do not wish to comment on or amend our information.\n\nBut we have approached you in a straightforward fashion and hope you will take this opportunity to respond if you wish. Your substantive responses to each of our numbered points will be carefully considered and published if appropriate.\n\n(For the avoidance of doubt, we do not normally regard any generalised assertion of \"inaccuracies\" as a substantive response; nor any generalised statement that the holders acted on advice. Neither will we regard as substantive any comment that only refers to the present state of affairs and not to the past.)\n\nWe are, of course, happy to discuss directly any concerns you may have.\n\nWe would be most grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this letter. This will save us from chasing.\n\nYours faithfully,\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey@jeffreyepstein.org"], "timestamp": "29 January 2015 at 16:49", "subject": "Re: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Epstein,\n\nI write further to an email sent to you earlier this month, concerning an article we are preparing for publication in which you may be mentioned.\n\nWe have not received a response from you. If you wish to respond, please do so as soon as possible and no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nFor your convenience, please see the original letter below.\n\nYours faithfully,\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 12:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\n\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\n\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\n\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to which he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his response by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:03 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 7:04:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031069.txt_4137
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031069.txt
Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
[{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do with his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, Krauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a thoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who have been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\nwhy are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against Epstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or rational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is possible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with underage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you want to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were underage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such circumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage of him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine his life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for something that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I fully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with Jeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI know and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, because in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of the young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, and I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very strongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. and there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution or consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from you.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?\n\nLawrence Krauss\nFoundation Professor\nSchool of Earth and Space Exploration and Physics Dept.\nCo-director, Cosmology Initiative\nand Director, Origins initiative\nArizona State University"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:58:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "people are now throwing out my books, according to her blog.. more nonsense.."}]
12
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026515.txt_4139
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026515.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Why had no one interviewed some of trump classmates at wharton ? Deutsh bank papers very bery bad"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Where are you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Free afternoon"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Lunch tomorrow? Or after? I have 4:00 appt. anytime before works."}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/23/2019 1:11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Great"}]
5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022773.txt_4143
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022773.txt
Help!
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016 6:39 PM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Because you were not available to meet me in person last year and at this point I don't need to be seen. I can not have press, media, private investigators, film companies, etc. contacting me or my parents and sisters at home or on cell/texts and or by mail. I realize you don't have much control over this, but you can at least help me to move. I can't just get up and go like you. I left the city to escape, make a better life and I am devastated these people found me and brought to light an association of that I would rather them never to know. People think I was involved with something really bad and I lost a boyfriend of great potential over this shit. I am still in debt over all these years, been working my ass off trying to get ahead, which you could never understand I was even surviving off the pay I was getting. Well, its not any better. I dropped out of college because of you (and GM's) advice. Started working for a company you wanted me to and basically my life has has become hell since then. I have been your supporter for 16 years, the media explosion with Clinton, Trump and Cosby is affecting me. I'm not prepared for this."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate it. I should be back feb 14,"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Appreciate what? I'm not sure you do. Be back for what? Where? I don't need to be photographed. I am trying to avoid that, hence the reason why I moved out here. I don't need people coming here looking for me to give them information about you or the \"people\" I was documented with... It's not my property. I don't think you get it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate your support is what i meant. has anyting happened recently? it is my birthday today"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:19 AM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Happy birthday, I remember the few I had spent with you, good memories! The problem is that you may appreciate my support but that doesn't help me. Yes, I told you I can't have people coming here to ask about you and ex pals.... My landlord may shoot them. He is pissed. I need your help. Out of all the people you should be helping is someone who actually genuinely cared about you.i realize you're living the good life and I'm not your concern, but if you really appreciated my support then you'd help me otherwise I don't know what I'll do."}]
5
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030967.txt_4145
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030967.txt
Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon [nas"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 2:17:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "powells statment at his press conference were inane. . suffers from , this is what was done in the past.\n!!! BEFORE the internet. . the numbers they look at are not reflective of todays economy, . AT ALL."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 8:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump has discussed firing Fed chief after latest interest rate hike: report | TheHill", "body": "https://thehill.com/policy/finance/422577-trump-considering-firing-federal-reserve-chief-after-latest-interest-rate-hike"}]
2