text stringlengths 0 205 |
|---|
Now, it seems like you |
couldn't do that. |
But, in fact, the US did that. |
In the 1970s, we ran what was |
called the negative income tax |
experiment where we literally |
assigned people different wage |
rates through taxing them |
by different amounts. |
And that was part of what gave |
us this very convincing |
evidence from 40 years ago |
of these responses. |
So where we get this is from |
a real experiment we |
ran 40 years ago. |
The problem is that's a pretty |
hard experiment to run. |
It's pretty expensive, and |
there's some ethical issues. |
So what do you do today |
to estimate that? |
What you can do today is say, |
well, we can't run the |
experiment. |
But the government runs |
it for us every time |
they change tax rates. |
Because if you take two people |
that are identical-- |
so let's say you and you |
were identical-- |
and I change your tax rate |
because you live in |
Massachusetts. |
I don't change your tax rate |
because you live in New York. |
I can see what happens to |
you relative to you. |
Because I've now essentially |
run this experiment by the |
government changing |
someone's tax rate |
and not someone else's. |
That's the way we do it if we |
can't run a true, randomized |
experiment. |
And that gives very, very |
similar answers. |
Let me stop there. |
And we will come back. |
Next lecture we'll talk about |
applying this model. |
So I guess in section |
on Friday, we |
review for the exam. |
In section on Friday, we |
review for the exam. |
So show up to that. |
And the exam is next week. |
The exam will cover through |
my next lecture. |
align:start position:0% |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.