owner stringclasses 14
values | repo stringclasses 14
values | id int64 116k 4.61B | issue_number int32 1 181k | author stringlengths 1 39 | body stringlengths 1 262k | created_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:16:18 | updated_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:22:56 | reactions unknown | author_association stringclasses 5
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
swiftlang | swift | 4,435,690,118 | 88,775 | compnerd | Please test with following PRs:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/197237
@swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-12T23:36:40 | 2026-05-12T23:36:40 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,435,733,084 | 89,016 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-12T23:45:42 | 2026-05-12T23:45:42 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,440,465,908 | 89,039 | egorzhdan | > Is it possible for some of these headers to be missing on some of the distros that we support?
Yes, some of the old versions of libstdc++ won't have all of these headers available – this is why these headers are not directly listed in the modulemap file, but rather in the automatic modulemap generator that checks ... | 2026-05-13T11:29:49 | 2026-05-13T11:29:49 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,441,173,835 | 89,074 | egorzhdan | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-13T12:52:32 | 2026-05-13T12:52:32 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,442,042,279 | 88,868 | charles-zablit | It looks like `symstore.exe` is not installed on the bots. | 2026-05-13T14:29:20 | 2026-05-13T14:29:20 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,433,594,906 | 89,054 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-12T18:34:23 | 2026-05-12T18:34:23 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,436,913,140 | 88,775 | compnerd | Please test with following PRs:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/197237
@swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-13T03:33:18 | 2026-05-13T03:33:18 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,438,479,979 | 88,883 | cvogelbusch | I worked with Patrick on changing the code so it compiles normal again. If you want to see the but you need to use the older version 2.62. | 2026-05-13T07:33:10 | 2026-05-13T07:33:10 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,443,273,816 | 88,547 | tbkka | @swift-ci Please test Windows | 2026-05-13T16:41:28 | 2026-05-13T16:41:28 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,433,613,275 | 88,041 | compnerd | @shahmishal - feel free to re-open and merge if you want to get diagnostics on failures in CI. | 2026-05-12T18:36:47 | 2026-05-12T18:36:47 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,433,815,079 | 89,056 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-12T19:04:41 | 2026-05-12T19:04:41 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,435,074,522 | 89,061 | xedin | @swift-ci please build toolchain macOS | 2026-05-12T21:43:05 | 2026-05-12T21:43:05 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,435,182,561 | 89,057 | nkcsgexi | @swift-ci please smoke test https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/12952 | 2026-05-12T22:03:04 | 2026-05-12T22:03:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,435,953,291 | 88,909 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-13T00:29:31 | 2026-05-13T00:29:31 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,436,113,151 | 89,025 | ktoso |
17:41:44 Swift(macosx-x86_64) :: SILOptimizer/ownership_liveness_unit.sil | 2026-05-13T00:59:49 | 2026-05-13T00:59:49 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,441,338,131 | 88,918 | kovdan01 | @eeckstein I would appreciate if you as the code owner can take a quick look at this to ensure that nothing tremendously bad is introduced in this patch.
The PR is relatively simple and anyway AutoDiff-specific. I just wanted to ensure that you do not have concerns and objections for merging this (and if you have - ... | 2026-05-13T13:11:14 | 2026-05-13T13:11:14 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,441,381,597 | 89,075 | al45tair | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-13T13:16:28 | 2026-05-13T13:16:28 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,442,753,967 | 83,616 | Xazax-hun | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-13T15:44:58 | 2026-05-13T15:44:58 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,433,388,489 | 89,051 | artemcm | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-12T18:11:53 | 2026-05-12T18:11:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,435,155,796 | 89,062 | jakepetroules | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-12T21:58:21 | 2026-05-12T21:58:21 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,435,733,096 | 89,065 | glessard | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-12T23:45:42 | 2026-05-12T23:45:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,435,896,333 | 89,057 | nkcsgexi | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/12952
@swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-13T00:19:55 | 2026-05-13T00:19:55 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,438,088,814 | 89,069 | drexin | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-13T06:40:14 | 2026-05-13T06:40:14 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,438,851,170 | 89,049 | artemcm | @swift-ci smoke test Windows platform | 2026-05-13T08:18:57 | 2026-05-13T08:18:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,441,240,500 | 89,073 | hamishknight | Duplicate of #86438 | 2026-05-13T13:00:09 | 2026-05-13T13:00:09 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,442,952,975 | 89,061 | xedin | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-13T16:06:43 | 2026-05-13T16:06:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,433,312,559 | 89,048 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-12T18:00:52 | 2026-05-12T18:00:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,436,114,025 | 89,025 | ktoso | @swift-ci please test macOS | 2026-05-13T00:59:56 | 2026-05-13T00:59:56 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,433,093,741 | 89,015 | xedin | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-12T17:30:07 | 2026-05-12T17:30:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,436,022,819 | 89,053 | atrick | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-13T00:42:53 | 2026-05-13T00:42:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,436,701,580 | 89,050 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test Windows | 2026-05-13T02:45:54 | 2026-05-13T02:45:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,439,056,346 | 89,068 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci build toolchain | 2026-05-13T08:47:05 | 2026-05-13T08:47:05 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,441,517,304 | 89,053 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-13T13:31:25 | 2026-05-13T13:31:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,442,553,417 | 89,039 | egorzhdan | Ugh:
```
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/coroutine:334:2: error: "the coroutine header requires -fcoroutines"
``` | 2026-05-13T15:21:38 | 2026-05-13T15:21:38 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,411,730,002 | 88,983 | atrick | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-09T06:31:42 | 2026-05-09T06:31:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,412,534,434 | 88,944 | xedin | @swift-ci please smoke test macOS platform | 2026-05-09T12:36:11 | 2026-05-09T12:36:11 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,413,091,312 | 88,907 | natecook1000 | @swift-ci Please build toolchain macOS platform | 2026-05-09T17:15:58 | 2026-05-09T17:15:58 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,413,149,632 | 68,296 | cobbal | Could this be the same issue as https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-corelibs-foundation/issues/4214 and that cyclic data isn't supported on non-objc platforms? | 2026-05-09T17:36:56 | 2026-05-09T17:36:56 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,422,061,453 | 88,248 | elsakeirouz | @swift-ci apple silicon benchmark | 2026-05-11T15:20:25 | 2026-05-11T15:20:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,412,890,608 | 87,638 | NachoSoto | @DougGregor van somebody triage this? 🙏 | 2026-05-09T15:38:29 | 2026-05-09T15:38:29 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,416,529,063 | 74,395 | NotTheNHK | @ktoso I was just browsing so far, so maybe I misunderstood what this [piece of code](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/blob/33ae6060115a5a596ecace49c70e8848d3d92ea5/stdlib/public/Concurrency/TaskSleepDuration.swift#L121) does. Now I’m curious and will test it.
Edit: The reproducer is still falling and continues to c... | 2026-05-10T22:38:14 | 2026-05-10T22:59:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,417,749,102 | 88,753 | 12ya | > I think the new lines were added purposely for markdown fomatting purposes
now it's better formatted and follows line max char limit convention closer | 2026-05-11T05:08:28 | 2026-05-11T05:08:28 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,422,140,438 | 89,008 | egorzhdan | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-11T15:29:32 | 2026-05-11T15:29:32 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,422,605,666 | 88,480 | slavapestov | @swift-ci Please smoke test macOS | 2026-05-11T16:23:36 | 2026-05-11T16:23:36 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,423,149,125 | 89,007 | mikeash | `swift_slowAlloc` includes the `NULL` check and will give you consistent error handling there, so I'd suggest switching to that. | 2026-05-11T17:26:19 | 2026-05-11T17:26:19 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,423,169,117 | 88,885 | gottesmm | Swift Testing fix has landed. Retesting! | 2026-05-11T17:29:15 | 2026-05-11T17:29:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,423,236,982 | 88,870 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-11T17:38:06 | 2026-05-11T17:38:06 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,422,592,812 | 89,006 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-11T16:22:04 | 2026-05-11T16:22:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,413,408,267 | 88,775 | compnerd | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-09T18:47:33 | 2026-05-09T18:47:33 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,416,259,019 | 88,488 | al45tair | @swift-ci Please smoke test | 2026-05-10T20:22:23 | 2026-05-10T20:22:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,416,511,678 | 83,446 | tothambrus11 | Related: https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-package-manager/issues/10041
For the time being, I made a simple GitHub action to bundle required DLLs besides the executable when linking dynamically: https://github.com/hylo-lang/swift-windows-dll-bundler/ | 2026-05-10T22:29:21 | 2026-05-10T22:41:17 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,417,725,480 | 88,979 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-11T05:01:42 | 2026-05-11T05:01:42 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,419,849,240 | 88,838 | Snowy1803 | > Should we have a verifier step that checks whether an alloc_stack has fragments? If SROA is the only pass adding these, it's probably ok to ignore this idea
The next PR in line, #88845, completely removes support for having a DIExpr within alloc_stacks | 2026-05-11T10:38:33 | 2026-05-11T10:38:33 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,422,059,860 | 88,248 | elsakeirouz | @swift-ci please test source compatibility release | 2026-05-11T15:20:14 | 2026-05-11T15:20:14 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,423,030,923 | 88,780 | susmonteiro | @swift-ci please test windows | 2026-05-11T17:11:40 | 2026-05-11T17:11:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,413,986,563 | 88,990 | Azoy | @swift-ci please test Windows | 2026-05-09T23:55:00 | 2026-05-09T23:55:00 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,416,560,710 | 88,854 | patrykstefanski | @swift-ci please smoke test macOS Platform | 2026-05-10T22:55:48 | 2026-05-10T22:55:48 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,418,346,008 | 88,838 | felipepiovezan | @swift-ci smoke test macOS platform | 2026-05-11T07:15:16 | 2026-05-11T07:15:16 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,418,604,738 | 87,871 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-11T07:55:51 | 2026-05-11T07:55:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,419,429,989 | 88,998 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-11T09:50:35 | 2026-05-11T09:50:35 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,420,645,673 | 89,002 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test source compatibility | 2026-05-11T12:24:46 | 2026-05-11T12:24:46 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,421,126,878 | 88,780 | susmonteiro | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-11T13:26:53 | 2026-05-11T13:26:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,422,528,842 | 88,962 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-11T16:14:40 | 2026-05-11T16:14:40 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,414,192,745 | 60,115 | Catfish-Man | @swift-ci please apple silicon benchmark | 2026-05-10T01:59:37 | 2026-05-10T01:59:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,414,234,808 | 88,826 | Jiaxu-Li | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-10T02:22:41 | 2026-05-10T02:22:41 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,415,607,080 | 88,981 | augusto2112 | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-10T15:07:39 | 2026-05-10T15:07:39 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,420,438,763 | 88,413 | tothambrus11 | There is a related issue in https://github.com/SwiftyLab/setup-swift/issues/457 that doesn't see a signature at the place it usually expected and always emits a warning on Windows. Should the signature verification logic be changed? Do you know where signatures are expected to be published? | 2026-05-11T11:55:30 | 2026-05-11T11:56:03 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,420,873,252 | 88,890 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test macOS
| 2026-05-11T12:55:17 | 2026-05-11T12:55:17 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,422,058,698 | 88,248 | elsakeirouz | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-11T15:20:07 | 2026-05-11T15:20:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,411,790,449 | 60,115 | Catfish-Man | @swift-ci please apple silicon benchmark | 2026-05-09T06:57:21 | 2026-05-09T06:57:21 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,412,913,913 | 88,987 | airspeedswift | Looks like this doesn't happen in 6.3, likely caused by the recent pack specialization pass. | 2026-05-09T15:49:14 | 2026-05-09T15:49:14 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,413,243,834 | 88,990 | Azoy | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-09T18:03:58 | 2026-05-09T18:03:58 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,419,888,728 | 88,996 | finagolfin | @swift-ci test windows | 2026-05-11T10:42:50 | 2026-05-11T10:42:50 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,420,096,618 | 88,683 | egorzhdan | @swift-ci please test macOS arm64 | 2026-05-11T11:08:01 | 2026-05-11T11:08:01 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,412,642,840 | 88,810 | Catfish-Man | @swift-ci please smoke test Windows platform | 2026-05-09T13:34:42 | 2026-05-09T13:34:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,412,888,704 | 88,826 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test source compatibility | 2026-05-09T15:37:39 | 2026-05-09T15:37:39 | {
"laugh": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,414,611,290 | 88,993 | xedin | Indeed the problem here is related to the fact that closure in this expression `MyOperation(migrationWork: { })` is `@MainActor` isolated and a recent bug fix exposed a latent bug in OptimizeHopToExecutor pass where hop backs are incorrectly eliminated in this case. We are working on a fix. | 2026-05-10T06:20:35 | 2026-05-10T06:21:25 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,415,644,510 | 83,446 | tothambrus11 | Hi, are there any updates on static linking on Windows? Is there any way I could help?
Edit: I found this thread: https://forums.swift.org/t/towards-static-stdlib-support-on-windows/77728
And the following example: https://github.com/compnerd/vigil/blob/main/.github/workflows/release.yml
I'll try this, thanks for all... | 2026-05-10T15:25:42 | 2026-05-10T16:11:28 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,416,560,991 | 88,854 | patrykstefanski | @swift-ci please smoke test Windows Platform | 2026-05-10T22:55:57 | 2026-05-10T22:55:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,411,718,548 | 88,980 | atrick | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-09T06:26:54 | 2026-05-09T06:26:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,411,803,742 | 88,973 | Catfish-Man | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-09T07:02:34 | 2026-05-09T07:02:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,412,790,562 | 88,828 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-09T14:49:37 | 2026-05-09T14:49:37 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,413,072,198 | 88,900 | xavgru12 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-09T17:06:21 | 2026-05-09T17:06:21 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,416,500,949 | 74,395 | ktoso | I wouldn't expect sleep to be fixed, no. Have you confirmed otherwise? | 2026-05-10T22:23:26 | 2026-05-10T22:23:26 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,421,325,398 | 88,993 | jamieQ | Here's a slight variation with similar structure that doesn't use an intermediary storage type:
```swift
actor MyActor {}
extension Actor {
nonisolated func perform(_ work: (isolated Self) async -> Void) async {
await work(self)
}
}
func bug(
_ a: isolated some Actor,
_ c: nonisolated(nonsend... | 2026-05-11T13:50:31 | 2026-05-11T13:50:31 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,411,179,253 | 88,931 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-09T02:45:24 | 2026-05-09T02:45:24 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,412,057,024 | 88,964 | Xazax-hun | @swift-ci please smoke test Windows | 2026-05-09T08:37:24 | 2026-05-09T08:37:24 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,413,015,149 | 81,772 | atifdev10 | See my [answer](https://forums.swift.org/t/how-to-use-implements-in-a-get-only-property/67158/4) on this. | 2026-05-09T16:38:22 | 2026-05-09T16:38:22 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,414,907,152 | 88,474 | mlvea | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-10T09:05:56 | 2026-05-10T09:05:56 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,416,497,580 | 74,395 | NotTheNHK | @ktoso IIUC, this was fixed in Swift 6.2? We now enqueue on the Task’s current executor and only use the global enqueue as a fallback. | 2026-05-10T22:21:41 | 2026-05-10T22:21:41 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,416,663,324 | 88,979 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-10T23:50:17 | 2026-05-10T23:50:17 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,417,445,614 | 88,455 | finagolfin | I can reproduce with the latest May 7 trunk snapshot toolchain on macOS:
```
error: compile command failed due to signal 6 (use -v to see invocation)
Assertion failed: ((AccessKind == SGFAccessKind::BorrowedObjectRead || AccessKind == SGFAccessKind::BorrowedAddressRead) && "non-borrow component requires an address base... | 2026-05-11T03:43:56 | 2026-05-11T03:43:56 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,418,347,842 | 88,838 | felipepiovezan | @swift-ci test macos platform | 2026-05-11T07:15:34 | 2026-05-11T07:15:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,422,101,146 | 89,007 | broken-circle | The claimed overflow isn't reachable, since the source and destination sizes are the same expression on consecutive lines: `malloc(name.size())` then `memcpy(_, _, name.size())`. | 2026-05-11T15:24:53 | 2026-05-11T15:24:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,412,461,497 | 60,115 | Catfish-Man | Looks like xmalloc improved this from ~5x slower to ~2x slower. I should try 1.625x growth again I guess, though iirc there were code size issues there. | 2026-05-09T11:56:49 | 2026-05-09T11:56:49 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,413,359,798 | 87,638 | xedin | I will take a look on Monday, thank you! | 2026-05-09T18:31:56 | 2026-05-09T18:31:56 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,420,107,542 | 89,001 | al45tair | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-11T11:09:15 | 2026-05-11T11:09:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,420,715,623 | 88,923 | artemcm | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-syntax/pull/3327
@swift-ci test | 2026-05-11T12:33:50 | 2026-05-11T12:33:50 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,421,120,485 | 89,004 | artemcm | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-11T13:26:08 | 2026-05-11T13:26:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,423,169,781 | 88,885 | gottesmm | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-11T17:29:21 | 2026-05-11T17:29:21 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.