owner stringclasses 14
values | repo stringclasses 14
values | id int64 116k 4.61B | issue_number int32 1 181k | author stringlengths 1 39 | body stringlengths 1 262k | created_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:16:18 | updated_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:22:56 | reactions unknown | author_association stringclasses 5
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
swiftlang | swift | 4,521,123,534 | 87,985 | finagolfin | @swift-ci build toolchain windows | 2026-05-22T17:22:50 | 2026-05-22T17:22:50 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,512,634,509 | 89,336 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-21T20:46:44 | 2026-05-21T20:46:44 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,514,934,946 | 89,347 | ktoso | Nice idea, thanks! | 2026-05-22T04:19:33 | 2026-05-22T04:19:33 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,515,241,878 | 87,985 | finagolfin | The next NDK 30 beta will include this updated header, so hack it into the first beta now just for a CI run.
@swift-ci build toolchain windows | 2026-05-22T05:21:24 | 2026-05-22T05:21:24 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,519,964,830 | 89,359 | al45tair | **Explanation**: In the repl, there isn't a main module configured, so the code that tries to set up Swift Concurrency crashes while trying to look for the executors to use.
**Risk**: Low. Only affects `swift repl` use.
**Original PR**: #89357
**Reviewed by**: TBC
**Resolves**: rdar://177393479
**Tests**: We don't... | 2026-05-22T15:17:56 | 2026-05-22T15:17:56 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,519,977,513 | 89,360 | eeckstein | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-22T15:19:51 | 2026-05-22T15:19:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,520,866,798 | 89,364 | edymtt | @swift-ci please build toolchain Windows | 2026-05-22T16:56:08 | 2026-05-22T16:56:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,521,099,340 | 89,277 | gottesmm | As an example, we have downgraded isolated conformance related errors to be warnings until Future. | 2026-05-22T17:20:20 | 2026-05-22T17:20:20 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,512,720,198 | 89,337 | cachemeifyoucan | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T20:58:52 | 2026-05-21T20:58:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,514,138,309 | 89,327 | rjmansfield | @swift-ci Please smoke test Windows platform | 2026-05-22T01:22:37 | 2026-05-22T01:22:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,515,480,374 | 89,325 | rintaro | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-syntax/pull/3339
@swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-22T05:48:26 | 2026-05-22T05:48:26 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,519,054,763 | 89,355 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-22T13:22:44 | 2026-05-22T13:22:44 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,520,436,100 | 89,353 | carlpeto | > No; I think that this is the wrong direction. I don't want to end up with option soup. We've been working to remove the options. We should do this by just entirely dropping DocC.
@compnerd That makes sense, given it's not working fantastically well. Who would need to be involved in the decision do you think? | 2026-05-22T16:11:27 | 2026-05-22T16:11:27 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,513,814,963 | 88,355 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test linux platform | 2026-05-22T00:13:04 | 2026-05-22T00:13:04 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,514,938,502 | 89,348 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-22T04:20:36 | 2026-05-22T04:20:36 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,516,386,882 | 89,344 | ktoso | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-22T07:28:16 | 2026-05-22T07:28:16 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,519,951,258 | 89,358 | al45tair | **Explanation**: In the repl, there isn't a main module configured, so the code that tries to set up Swift Concurrency crashes while trying to look for the executors to use.
**Risk**: Low. Only affects `swift repl` use.
**Original PR**: #89357
**Reviewed by**: TBC
**Resolves**: rdar://177393479
**Tests**: We don't... | 2026-05-22T15:15:59 | 2026-05-22T15:15:59 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,520,824,892 | 89,362 | edymtt | @swift-ci please build toolchain Windows | 2026-05-22T16:52:02 | 2026-05-22T16:52:02 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,520,850,223 | 89,362 | edymtt | @swift-ci please test Android | 2026-05-22T16:54:30 | 2026-05-22T16:54:30 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,521,144,361 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-22T17:24:58 | 2026-05-22T17:24:58 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,513,021,537 | 89,148 | Azoy | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T21:43:40 | 2026-05-21T21:43:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,513,348,086 | 89,339 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T22:43:14 | 2026-05-21T22:43:14 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,513,453,420 | 89,340 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T23:02:23 | 2026-05-21T23:02:23 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,514,930,081 | 89,347 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-22T04:18:13 | 2026-05-22T04:18:13 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,519,652,509 | 81,376 | bkhouri | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-package-manager/pull/10092
@swift-ci Build toolchain Ubuntu 24.04 | 2026-05-22T14:37:29 | 2026-05-22T14:37:29 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,519,963,609 | 89,359 | al45tair | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-22T15:17:45 | 2026-05-22T15:17:45 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,520,460,201 | 89,353 | compnerd | > > No; I think that this is the wrong direction. I don't want to end up with option soup. We've been working to remove the options. We should do this by just entirely dropping DocC.
>
> @compnerd That makes sense, given it's not working fantastically well. Who would need to be involved in the decision do you think?... | 2026-05-22T16:13:48 | 2026-05-22T16:13:48 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,520,818,863 | 89,362 | edymtt | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-22T16:51:25 | 2026-05-22T16:51:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,513,100,016 | 89,148 | Azoy | @swift-ci apple silicon benchmark | 2026-05-21T21:56:59 | 2026-05-21T21:56:59 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,515,274,186 | 87,985 | finagolfin | Completely unrelated Android CI run, checking if adding other pulls works
swiftlang/swift-testing#1381
@swift-ci test android | 2026-05-22T05:25:36 | 2026-05-22T05:25:36 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,517,780,216 | 88,447 | hamishknight | Source compat failures unrelated 🚢 | 2026-05-22T10:15:13 | 2026-05-22T10:15:13 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,520,329,303 | 89,354 | adrian-prantl | @swift-ci test source compatibility | 2026-05-22T16:01:42 | 2026-05-22T16:01:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,520,436,250 | 88,775 | compnerd | Please test with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13046
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/524
@swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-22T16:11:28 | 2026-05-22T16:11:28 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,520,903,860 | 89,285 | mikeash | @swift-ci please test macos platform | 2026-05-22T17:00:03 | 2026-05-22T17:00:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,542,597,280 | 87,593 | finagolfin | > I don't see how those instructions would build what I call a toolchain - a tar file you can extract into ~/Library/Developer/Toolchains using preset buildbot_osx_package.
They do the same thing as a preset, though only building the minimal set of toolchain components needed to produce a toolchain that will build S... | 2026-05-26T09:08:14 | 2026-05-26T09:08:14 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,678,986 | 89,328 | elsakeirouz | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T10:57:21 | 2026-05-26T10:57:21 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,916,296 | 88,017 | ktoso | I'll review this soon | 2026-05-26T11:55:28 | 2026-05-26T11:55:28 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,274,579 | 89,362 | edymtt | @swift-ci please test Android | 2026-05-26T14:52:36 | 2026-05-26T14:52:36 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,546,333,577 | 89,408 | patrykstefanski | @swift-ci please test windows platform | 2026-05-26T16:41:43 | 2026-05-26T16:41:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,798,275 | 89,413 | AnthonyLatsis | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13059
@swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T14:03:08 | 2026-05-26T14:03:08 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,849,771 | 89,418 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T14:08:07 | 2026-05-26T14:08:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,703,464 | 89,354 | Snowy1803 | Source compatibility test failures look unrelated, as they are package resolution failures, and previous runs on other PRs have the same failure | 2026-05-26T11:00:37 | 2026-05-26T11:00:37 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,713,280 | 89,354 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T11:02:28 | 2026-05-26T11:02:28 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,272,129 | 89,362 | edymtt | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T14:52:23 | 2026-05-26T14:52:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,080,132 | 89,433 | AnthonyLatsis | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13062
@swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T17:48:25 | 2026-05-26T17:48:25 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,498,987 | 89,438 | nkcsgexi | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T18:42:31 | 2026-05-26T18:42:31 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,883,561 | 89,440 | mikeash | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T19:27:28 | 2026-05-26T19:27:28 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,548,102,750 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T19:50:42 | 2026-05-26T19:50:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,727,619 | 89,409 | al45tair | @swift-ci Please smoke test | 2026-05-26T11:06:13 | 2026-05-26T11:06:13 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,414,617 | 74,290 | JessyCatterwaul | This has been fixed. | 2026-05-26T13:22:56 | 2026-05-26T13:22:56 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,766,146 | 89,417 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T14:00:16 | 2026-05-26T14:00:16 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,407,832 | 89,354 | Snowy1803 | Note that #89422 adds additional checks, so tests will need to be re-run when one is merged. | 2026-05-26T15:04:44 | 2026-05-26T15:04:44 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,546,338,158 | 89,046 | broken-circle | @tshortli Rebased on top of 143a7cb and removed the `@diagnose(DeprecatedDeclaration)` for #89045 since this migration resolves it. Kept the one for #89361.
@phausler Would appreciate a review when you have a moment. | 2026-05-26T16:42:11 | 2026-05-26T16:42:11 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,887,227 | 89,420 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T14:11:44 | 2026-05-26T14:11:44 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,877,453 | 89,423 | AnthonyLatsis | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T15:55:19 | 2026-05-26T15:55:19 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,546,080,322 | 89,147 | broken-circle | @xedin Could you re-trigger CI? One macOS test timed out (looks unrelated, `TestSwiftBridgedStringFormatters.py`), and the macOS smoke test has been stuck for about 25 hours. | 2026-05-26T16:16:16 | 2026-05-26T16:16:16 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,546,480,713 | 89,427 | carlpeto | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T16:54:20 | 2026-05-26T16:54:20 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,546,869,799 | 89,430 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T17:26:31 | 2026-05-26T17:26:31 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,379,640 | 89,382 | tshortli | This is now based on top of https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89430, which separately implements improvements to the test suite without any compilation behavior modifications. | 2026-05-26T18:28:34 | 2026-05-26T18:28:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,800,456 | 89,213 | glessard | Rebased to solve the merge conflict. | 2026-05-26T19:19:07 | 2026-05-26T19:19:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,802,943 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke benchmark | 2026-05-26T11:26:34 | 2026-05-26T11:26:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,000,203 | 89,407 | rjmansfield | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T12:17:43 | 2026-05-26T12:17:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,974,708 | 84,168 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-26T14:21:01 | 2026-05-26T14:21:01 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,150,358 | 89,421 | rjmansfield | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T14:39:15 | 2026-05-26T14:39:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,546,755,157 | 89,429 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T17:17:03 | 2026-05-26T17:17:03 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,068,989 | 89,307 | qiongsiwu | Gentle ping for reviews. | 2026-05-26T17:47:09 | 2026-05-26T17:47:09 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,757,623 | 89,339 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please smoke test Windows | 2026-05-26T19:13:54 | 2026-05-26T19:13:54 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,862,976 | 89,198 | ahoppen | Thanks for opening the PR.
@rintaro and @hamishknight would be the points of contact here. | 2026-05-26T11:40:41 | 2026-05-26T11:40:41 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,012,869 | 89,406 | rjmansfield | @swift-ci smoke test
| 2026-05-26T12:20:54 | 2026-05-26T12:20:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,483,269 | 89,406 | rjmansfield | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T13:30:30 | 2026-05-26T13:30:30 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,197,080 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci apple silicon benchmark | 2026-05-26T14:44:26 | 2026-05-26T14:44:26 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,808,790 | 88,920 | kovdan01 | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-26T11:27:52 | 2026-05-26T11:27:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,546,488,158 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-26T16:55:04 | 2026-05-26T16:55:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,164,127 | 89,404 | bkhouri | @finagolfin : Thanks for publishing PR to the various repositories. | 2026-05-26T17:59:53 | 2026-05-26T17:59:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,353,809 | 89,400 | Azoy | The point of my patch was because an existential with inverse requirements doesn't actually work on older runtimes using the existing entrypoint. The following code crashes at runtime on 6.2 but succeeds on 6.2.4:
```swift
let x: Any = (any ~Copyable).self
```
This is an inverse only existential yet it still cr... | 2026-05-26T18:25:25 | 2026-05-26T18:25:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,634,705 | 89,395 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test macos platform | 2026-05-26T18:58:39 | 2026-05-26T18:58:39 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,838,271 | 89,213 | glessard | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T19:22:32 | 2026-05-26T19:22:32 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,514,484 | 89,390 | aidan-hall | Thanks for picking this up quickly. | 2026-05-26T10:38:54 | 2026-05-26T10:38:54 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,611,701 | 89,355 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci smoke test macOS platform | 2026-05-26T10:49:31 | 2026-05-26T10:49:31 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,115,149 | 89,416 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T12:44:57 | 2026-05-26T12:44:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,896,078 | 89,418 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test android | 2026-05-26T14:12:40 | 2026-05-26T14:12:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,351,205 | 89,422 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-26T14:59:27 | 2026-05-26T14:59:27 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,546,584,728 | 89,046 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T17:02:55 | 2026-05-26T17:02:55 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,092,319 | 89,433 | AnthonyLatsis | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13062
@swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T17:50:00 | 2026-05-26T17:50:00 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,775,843 | 89,441 | meg-gupta | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-26T19:16:22 | 2026-05-26T19:16:22 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,548,149,564 | 89,442 | AnthonyLatsis | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13063
@swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T19:54:18 | 2026-05-26T19:54:18 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,776,786 | 88,017 | NotTheNHK | @ktoso do you think we could proceed with this sometime this week or next week?
| 2026-05-26T11:19:26 | 2026-05-26T11:19:26 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,997,094 | 89,406 | rjmansfield | Device testing failed on
`[2026-05-26T01:43:33.506Z] Swift(watchos-armv7k) :: ClangImporter/InternalBridgingHeader/dump-hidden-type-layouts.swift`
but this is addressed separately in https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89407 | 2026-05-26T12:16:53 | 2026-05-26T12:16:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,914,132 | 89,395 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T15:59:33 | 2026-05-26T15:59:33 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,546,211,765 | 89,425 | cachemeifyoucan | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T16:29:14 | 2026-05-26T16:29:14 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,156,714 | 88,612 | mikeash | Thanks for spotting these little things. PR to address them here: https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89434 | 2026-05-26T17:58:52 | 2026-05-26T17:58:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,548,338,464 | 88,984 | Kartikayy007 | Please guide if in doing something wrong @xedin | 2026-05-26T20:08:38 | 2026-05-26T20:08:38 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,684,520 | 89,410 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T10:58:03 | 2026-05-26T10:58:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,725,985 | 89,359 | al45tair | @swift-ci Please test Windows platform | 2026-05-26T11:05:46 | 2026-05-26T11:05:46 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,330,239 | 89,303 | 3405691582 | @swift-ci please test. | 2026-05-26T14:57:38 | 2026-05-26T14:57:38 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,888,323 | 89,424 | a-viv-a | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-26T15:56:32 | 2026-05-26T15:56:32 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,939,712 | 88,612 | mikeash | > Should it be cherry picked to 6.4?
I don't think it's needed, since the odds of hitting this bug in practice are extremely low. (I discovered this issue by inspection, not by encountering a case where it went wrong.) I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise though. | 2026-05-26T16:02:22 | 2026-05-26T16:02:22 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,546,996,475 | 89,432 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T17:39:52 | 2026-05-26T17:39:52 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,380,671 | 89,382 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T18:28:42 | 2026-05-26T18:28:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,548,340,342 | 89,404 | bkhouri | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-build/pull/1428
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-package-manager/pull/10121
@swift-ci test | 2026-05-26T20:08:47 | 2026-05-26T20:08:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.