prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Checks Against Cliff Period May Lead to DoS
### Description
**File(s) affected:**`SnapshotterState.sol`
**Description:** The function `configureLegacyNodes()` does not validate that the value of `legacyNodeVestingDays` is greater than that of `legacyNodeCliff`. In case the values the opposite is true ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | reentrancy | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-telcoin-judging/issues/67
## Found by
hyh
## Summary
StakingModule's plugin that turned rogue can deny any attempts of its removal and can effectively stop the contract, disturbing the whole range of StakingModule operations.
I.e. if any plugin turns malicious due... | Sherlock | 5 | Telcoin Update |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Don't call `_tickDistance` twice in `StrategyPassiveManagerUniswap::_setMainTick`
### Description
`StrategyPassiveManagerUniswap::_setMainTick` calls `_tickDistance` twice even though there is no need since the exact same value will be returned; replace the second call with the `distance` variable which caches... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Check in harvestBase() can be split to revert with correct errors
### Description
The current check `if (bgtBalance <= minted)` in the `harvestBase` function is incorrect. The intended logic should be to ensure that there is always more BGT than iBGT, allowing equality (`bgtBalance == minted`) but preventing m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: (HAL-01) Decimal mismatch in reward calculations
### Description
When computing rewards, the `PotPool` contract uses the pool’s **LP token decimals** (set via `_setupDecimals`) in `rewardPerToken(...)` and then divides by `10^(rewardToken.decimals())` in the `earned(...)` function. In other words:
* `rewar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: A code path is missing asset existence check
### Description
The `assetTransferOnLoanAction` method in `AssetManager` goes through different code paths based on the `action` argument it received. If `action == AssetActionType.Lend` then it calls `_assetAction`, which has the `assetExists` modifier. The problem... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Paused Token Contract Does Not Pause Allowance Changes
### Description
The `AukiToken` contract can be [paused and unpaused](https://github.com/aukilabs/auki-contracts/blob/841aa7df56619dcec2af75efcb5ec7faeeaa955c/src/AukiToken.sol#L50-L56) by an address that has been granted the `PAUSER_ROLE`. Through the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: CreateVaultZap.createVault sets the caller to manager may compromise later users.
### Description
The `CreateVaultZap.createVault` function is responsible for creating the Vault and calls `setVaultFeatures` and `setFees` to initialize the settings. At the end of the function, it assigns the caller as the manag... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Improper Exchange Rate Calculation Validation
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `b3ed14b99e47ec1aaed3a0a2efd60300dd48e1be`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Added the suggested validation to the exchange rate method.
**NOTE** : Only first validation app... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | initialization | true | true | **Proof of Concept**
If a protocol integrates with Zerem it needs to deploy different instances of `Zerem.sol` for each `underlyingToken`. In the constructor there are some configurations being set but the inputs are not validated at all. Now if the deployer did not configure them correctly, or fat-fingered the deploy... | Pashov Audit Group | 4 | Zerem |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Replay Attack | true | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-rolla/blob/efe4a3c1af8d77c5dfb5ba110c3507e67a061bdd/quant-protocol/contracts/utils/EIP712MetaTransaction.sol#L86
## Vulnerability details
Any transactions that fail based on some conditions that may change in the future are not safe to be executed again later (... | Code4rena | 5 | Rolla |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Delayed Reward Cut Parameter Updates (Two-Cycle Enforcement Lag)
### Description
The [`RewardAccumulator::updateRCParams()`](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2025-08-usg-tangent/blob/main/tangent-contracts/src/USG/Utilities/RewardAccumulator.sol#L620) function exhibits unexpected behavior where new reward ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Contracts used as dependencies do not track upstream changes
### Description
Several third-party contracts have been copied and pasted into the Frax Finance repository, including into files such as Address, ERC20, Babylonian, Governance, and Uniswap interfaces. The code documentation does not specify the exact... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Markets and vaults will not update their state until market fee is received, any deposits before market fee will not be reflected
### Description
When calculating accumulated vault values, the change is not acknowledged if previous value is zero. This will prevent some important vaules from getting updated.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Temporary DoS is possible in case orders are using tokens with blacklists
### Description
In the process of settling orders, `_transferFungibleTokens` is being called a maximum of 4 times. If one of these calls fails, the entire transaction fails. It can only fail when an ERC20 token is used for the trade, but... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use of memory Instead of calldata in Function Variable
### Description
The `configureAssets` function in the `AaveDistributionManager` contract declares the parameter `assetsConfigInput` as `memory`. However, since this parameter is read-only during the function execution, using `calldata` instead of `memory` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: USD stablecoins are incorrectly assumed to always be at peg
### Description
**Description:** [`SmartVaultV4::yieldVaultCollateral`](https://github.com/the-standard/smart-vault/blob/c6837d4a296fe8a6e4bb5e0280a66d6eb8a40361/contracts/SmartVaultV4.sol#L79-L103) returns the value of collateral held in yield posit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Approved user can't merge tokens (not approved for all)
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/VotingEscrow.sol
Impacts:
- Contract fails to deliver promised returns, but doesn't lose value
## Description
## Brief/Intro
To merge... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Fairswap: inconsistent checks on _executionOrder() ✓ Fixed
### Description
The `_executionOrder()` function should only be called under specific conditions. However, these conditions are not always consistently defined.
### Recommendation
Comment from Lien Protocol:
>
> Fairswap- Integrate if statements ab... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Duplicated Code
### Description
There are instances of duplicated code within the codebase, which can lead to issues later on in the development lifecycle. Errors can inadvertently be introduced when functionality changes are not replicated across all instances of code that should be identical. Some examples a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: State variables only set in the constructor should be declared `immutable`
### Description
Avoids a Gsset (**20000 gas**) in the constructor, and replaces the first access in each transaction (Gcoldsload - **2100 gas**) and each access thereafter (Gwarmacces - **100 gas**) with a `PUSH32` (**3 gas**).
While ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Polygon bridger does not enforce chainId requirements
### Description
The [`PolygonTokenBridger`](https://github.com/across-protocol/across-smart-contracts-v2/blob/bf03255cbd1db3045cd2fbf1580f24081f46b43a/contracts/PolygonTokenBridger.sol#L30) contract’s primary functions are only intended to be called either ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Attacker Can Reset the Unbonding Period for Vaults in `globalState.curUnbondedVaultGroup`, Preventing User Withdrawals
### Description
StakeLink offers an advantage over direct Chainlink staking by providing readily available tokens for withdrawals. This is achieved by keeping one of five vault groups unbonded... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing sanity check for address validity in `PorticoBase::unpadAddress`
### Description
`PorticoBase::unpadAddress` is a re-implementation of [`Utils::fromWormholeFormat`](https://github.com/wormhole-foundation/wormhole-solidity-sdk/blob/main/src/Utils.sol#L10-L15) from the Wormhole Solidity SDK, but is missi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Improper timing of WETH deposit operation
### Description
This issue has been identified within the [_placeOrder](https://github.com/longgammalabs/hanji-contracts/blob/70b15ec4d9e7578248141604503843716a67d875/src/HanjiLOB.sol#L998) function of the `HanjiLOB` contract.
The function processes WETH deposits bas... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | false | false | ## Medium: Delegators Can Abuse Gas for Their Own Purposes Acknowledged
### Description
When a delegation is redeemed, delegators can abuse gas for their own purposes. This could happen in the following ways:
1. For contract delegators, their `isValidSignature` function is called during redemption. Since this is a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Protocol DoS via `EscrowVoteManagerV1.poke()`
### Description
Any user can call `EscrowVoteManagerV1.poke()` with a **tokenId** they do not own. This allows for disruption of the protocol by locking not-yet-minted tokens in a voting state. This causes the `EscrowManager` contract to fail during operations tha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: optimization for the `rootPows` function in `FairSideFormula`
### Description
Gas optimization is possible for the current `rootPows` implementation.
The original implementation of `rootPows` requires 4 `mul` and 2 `sqrt`:
However, the calculation process can be simplified to be more gas-efficient than the o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: MISSING ZERO ADDRESS CHECKS
### Description
Safety Module contracts have address fields in multiple functions. These functions are missing address validations. Each address should be validated and checked to be non-zero. This is also considered as a best practice.
During testing, it has been found that some o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Token approvals to ERC-4626 vaults are never revoked
### Description
The BunniHub contract can approve an arbitrary ERC-4626 vault to handle its tokens when calling the deposit function of the vault; however, these approvals are never revoked. The BunniHub contract can give approvals to spend a certain amount ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Length of `_encoded` is calculated twice in `validateL1ToL2Transaction` in `TransactionValidator.sol`.
### Description
Calculating length is gas-costly operation. It's better to calculate it once and store it in local variable.
[File: ethereum/contracts/zksync/libraries/TransactionValidator.sol](https://githu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Swap | false | true |
It is possible that an attacker can prevent any user from calling the functions `withdraw`, `redeem`, or `depositGmx` in contract `AutoPxGmx` by just manipulating the balance of token `gmxBaseReward`, so that during the function `compound` the swap will be reverted.
### Proof of Concept
Whenever a user calls the fun... | Code4rena | 5 | Redacted Cartel |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unusable constants and parameters
### Description
Constants and parameters from the list below are unused and can be removed:
https://github.com/curvefi/stableswap-ng/blob/8c78731ed43c22e6bcdcb5d39b0a7d02f8cb0386/contracts/main/CurveStableSwapFactoryNG.vy#L76
https://github.com/curvefi/stableswap-ng/blob/8c787... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Assets in a Safe can be lost
### Description
The `Guard.sol` contract is enabled on Safe's and uses the [`_checkTransaction`](https://github.com/re-nft/smart-contracts/blob/3ddd32455a849c3c6dc3c3aad7a33a6c9b44c291/src/policies/Guard.sol#L195-L293) function to ensure that transactions that the Safe executes ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | true | ## Medium: Missing check for the minprice /maxprice price in the bptoracle.sol contract
### Description
## Context
(No context files were provided by the reviewer)
## Issues in `BPTOracle.getUSDPrice`
### 1. Lack of Check for Negative or Zero Price
There is no check for negative or zero price returned by `priceFee... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Enforce minimum withdrawal amount policy
### Description
The current implementation has an implicit check for non-zero minimum withdrawal amounts in the `withdraw` function, but this policy is not explicitly enforced or clearly defined in the `insert_token` function. This creates inconsistencies in the enforce... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: No validation of input address
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In Sender.sol - setExecutor(address) does not validate the input to ensure it is non-zero.
**Recommendation**
add require statement to ensure input address is not equal to address(0).
**Fix**:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: The number of loop iterations should be limited
### Description
In https://github.com/iearn-finance/yoracle.link/blob/faf1309cbe7a05f70b338351315039eb8e5b9c09/contracts/Keep3rV1Oracle.sol there are internal arrays `_pairs` for addresses and an `observations` map for structures `Observation[]`. The number of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Malicious orders can approve existing orders on behalf of any signer
### Description
An order execution can send an `init` message to any other order contract to approve it on behalf of any signer. This can be used to execute any order maliciously by hiding the `init` message as an action in another order.
T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: At the second time the nft is used as collateral to take a loan, the debt repayment via auction fund can be failed when liquidation
### Description
When a user transfer an NFT to `CollateralToken` contract, it will toggle the function `CollateralToken.onERC721Received()`. In this function if there didn't exis... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Account contract does not gracefully handle panics in called contracts
### Description
The [`DualVmToken`](https://github.com/kkrt-labs/kakarot/blob/7411a5520e8a00be6f5243a50c160e66ad285563/solidity_contracts/src/CairoPrecompiles/DualVmToken.sol) is a utility EVM contract allowing Kakarot EVM accounts to op... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: function payInterestToFunders does not have a re-entrancy modifier
### Description
## Handle
paulius.eth
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
function payInterestToFunders does not have a re-entrancy modifier. I expect to see this modifier because similar functions (including sponsored version) have it.
## ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [Fixed] String is used as hash key
### Description
The [`AddressBook` contract](https://github.com/opynfinance/GammaProtocol/blob/d151621b33134789b29dc78eb89dad2b557b25b9/contracts/AddressBook.sol#L13) keeps a record of all the current contracts in the Protocol so other contracts can make use of them.
The `A... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Assignment of variables not needed
### Description
_Submitted by s1m0_
Variables on `TransactionManager.sol` [L571](https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-07-connext/blob/main/contracts/TransactionManager.sol#L571) and [L572](https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-07-connext/blob/main/contracts/TransactionManager.sol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Explicitly mark visibility of state
### Description
**Description**
StableXPair.sol The variables do not specify the visibility of the state. lines 34-42, 45, 46.
**Recommendation**:
Explicitly mark visibility of state. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: NatSpec documentation inconsistent with function/event signatures
### Description
Inline NatSpec documentation does not reflect the actual signatures in multiple cases:
1. Missing definition for the `recipientNttManagerAddress` in the `ITransceiver::sendMessage` [NatSpec](https://github.com/wormhole-foundatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: | Chain Incompatibility
### Description
**Description**
The `withdrawTo` function is used on WETH in the `_transferAsETH` function. This function is supported on Arbitrum, however it is not supported on the Avalanche C-chain or other networks that GMX may deploy on.
**Recommendation**
Do not use the `wit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `0 address` check for ` asset `
### Description
Also check of the address to protect the code from 0x0 address problem just in case. This is best practice or instead of suggesting that they verify address != 0x0, you could add some good NatSpec comments explaining what is valid and what is invalid and what ar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Insufficient Pre-Mint Limit Check in SHEEP Contract
### Description
In the `SHEEP` contract's `mintForFee` function, the check:
```solidity
require(preMinted < maxPreMint, "No more sheep in the market");
```
fails to adequately enforce the maximum pre-mint supply cap, allowing the total supply of SHEEP tokens ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Large multiples of ten should use scientific notation (e.g. `1e6`) rather than decimal literals (e.g. `1000000`), for readability
### Description
*There are 2 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/e5efa8f9d6dda92a90b8b2c4902320acf0c26816/contracts/rewards/RewardDistributor... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Cache identical storage reads
### Description
As reading from storage is expensive, it is more gas-efficient to cache values and read them from the cache if the storage has not changed. Cache identical storage reads:
`PreDepositPhaser.sol`:
```solidity
// use PreDepositPhase.YieldPhase instead
19: emit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: A malicious user can reduce other users' rewards due to incorrect accounting of stake balances
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `639134848b30d20ec3293c78c5e99c21ece6c096`.
**File(s) affected:**`contracts-v3/LibTokenizedVaultStaking.sol`
**Description:** In the functi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `airdropBoost` is not checked to be above ONE
### Description
`claimAirdropBoost()` in `CNCLocker` only checks that `amount` is not above 3.5e18
- https://github.com/ConicFinance/protocol/blob/7a66d26ef84f93059a811a189655e17c11d95f5c/contracts/tokenomics/CNCLockerV2.sol#L372-L380
But it is also important that... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Lack of check for Lock.end in merge LockerToken && LockerLp
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/zerolend/governance
Impacts:
- Manipulation of governance voting result deviating from voted outcome and resulting in a direct change from intended effect of original results... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Lack of multicall support for `FeeOverrideHooklet::setFeeOverride`
### Description
**Description:** `FeeOverrideHooklet::setFeeOverride` relies on `msg.sender` when validating ownership of the corresponding `BunniToken`; however, this will be incorrect when invoked through a multicaller contract and cause vali... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Use of uninitialized value and unclear/unused logic
### Description
## Handle
0xRajeev
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
vaultIndexes is uninitialized and it's unclear what 10000 signifies here. investDelta return value is also ignored at call site. If this is an indication of missed/incorrect logic, the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Non-library files should use fixed compiler versions
### Description
Contracts should be compiled using a fixed compiler version. Locking the pragma helps ensure that contracts do not accidentally get deployed using a different compiler version with which they have been tested the most.
### Proof of Concept
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Permanent DoS in `claimExtraRewards` from wrong array input type
### Description
_Resolved_
The `StakeDaoVaultV2Market` aims to collect rewards, just as any other market. The problem here is the wrong function arguments used for calling `StakeDaoVaultV2::claim()` function. As can be seen in the implementatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | false | false | ## Medium: XVS Bridges May Accept Messages from Compromised Remotes
### Description
**Update**
The `BaseXVSProxyOFT` contract now overrides `_nonblockingLzReceive()` and includes logic that validates that `_srcAddress` is the trusted remote for the given `_srcChainId`. Further, the `removeTrustedRemote()` function was... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Small executor grace periods will prevent payload execution
### Description
The grace period of an executor config is how long, in seconds, the payload can be executed for. When executor configs are changed, there is a test to ensure that the grace period is not zero. However, there are other values that would... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Potential Arbitrary Calls in `updateClient()`
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `9c6b1c8bd1824f55082ebdfbf6e6762cc5b3614a`.
**File(s) affected:**`IBCClient.sol`
**Description:** In `IBCClient.updateClient()`, there is the possibilitiy for a light client supporting arbi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Incorrect storage of user rewards during staking in MyStaking.
### Description
**Description**
MyStaking.sol: function_stake(). During staking, the rewards are calculated with function claimableAmount(). This function calculates current accrued rewards and adds "userInfo[user].unclaimedAmount" to the claimab... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Win all relayer rewards
### Description
_Submitted by nascent_
"Large Validator Sets/Rapid Validator Set Updates May Freeze the Bridge or Relayer" can affect just the relayers & not affect the oracle in certain circumstances. This could result in valid attestations, but prevent any of the other relayers fr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `_velvettFeeRecipient` and `_feePercentage` Could Be Not Set Prior to Mint
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `b28e3f9963bee7230c19887dbdb04fd3b54c5bc4`. Appropriate validation is added in the intialize() function.
**File(s) affected:**`UnikuraMothership.sol`, `UnikuraPh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use `immutable`s variables directly, instead of caching them in stack
### Description
Caching `immutable`s variable in stack is not necessary, and it will cost more gas.
2 issue instances in 1 file:
[599](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-pooltogether/blob/main/pt-v5-vault/src/PrizeVault.sol#L599) | [82... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: `getUsdPrice` WILL NOT WORK WITH COMPLEX/LARGE PATHS
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
The intended behavior of the `getUsdPrice()` function in `UsdOracle.sol` is to return the amount in USDT, given a token, a token amount, and a period.
The current implement... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Missing nonReentrant modifier
### Description
In the `MultiMessaging` and `SingleMessaging` contract, the function "Receive" involves an external call to the target packets.
While the contract's current implementation presents no obvious vulnerability due to the fact that the external call is made by the exec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Sellers face fee volatility without safeguard in `MarketPlace.buy()`
### Description
_Resolved_
In the `MarketPlace.buy()` function, a percentage fee is deducted from the request price for each purchase. However, the `fees` percentage can change between when the listing is added and when it is fulfilled via t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
The contract does not perform validation checks on all user inputs. Making sure that all parameters values fit into the expected value range ensures secure execution under normal operating conditions. Invalid inputs could often lead to unexpected results like lost funds... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: `DebtToken::burn`'s Return Values are wrong
### Description
The return values in `DebtToken::burn` are in incorrect order compared to the natspec, causing `LendingPool::_repay` & `LendingPool::finalizeLiquidation` to transfer incorrect token amounts when users repay their debt.
### Impact
Users are forced to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: _getNextValidatorsFromActiveOperators can be tweaked to find an operator with a better validator pool
### Description
Assume for an operator:
(A, B) = (funded - stopped, limit - funded)
The current algorithm finds the first index in the cached operators array with the minimum value for A and tries to ga... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Presale can be opened earlier than initially assigned date ✓ Fixed
### Description
There are 2 ways how presale opening date can be assigned. Either it’s defined on initialization or the presale will start when `open()` function is executed.
**code/apps/presale/contracts/Presale.sol:L144-L146**
```
if (... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: BUYING NFTS AS A DELEGATE
### Description
Both `BuyNft` and `BuyEdition` instruction handlers expect the transaction sender to provide the `buyer_nft_fant_ata` FANT token account to charge and `buyer_wallet_account` to authorize the transfer.
If it is successful, the NFT's authority is transferred to `buyer_wa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Changes in `dittoShorterRate` affect retroactively to accrued Ditto yield shares
### Description
The calculation of the Ditto rewards earned by shorters does not take into account that the changes in the Ditto shorter rate will impact retroactively, inflating or deflating the new Ditto rewards of the users.
#... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing zero address validation
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**File**: src/Forwarder.sol
**Line**: #17
**Details**:
The constructor accepts an argument "rule" but doesn't validate it to be a non-zero address. There's also no way to change this address later (it's immuta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: `SolidlyV2Pair::setPoolFee` fails to adequately consider fee setters defined by `SolidlyV2Factory`
### Description
**Description:** If a new `feeSetter` is registered by the owner of `SolidlyV2Factory`, then it is possible for the pool fee to be set below the minimum specified by the factory. This breaks the i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Simultaneous Minting of Tokens Cross Chain
### Description
**Update**
**Acknowledged** with the following explanation: Will be managed on the Petaverse backend.
**File(s) affected:**`Pet.sol`
**Description:** It is possible for the same TokenId to be minted simultaneously cross-chain. Preventing the withdraw... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: [03] Use the safe variant and `ERC721.mint`
### Description
`.mint` won't check if the recipient is able to receive the NFT. If an incorrect address is passed, it will result in a silent failure and loss of asset.
OpenZeppelin [recommendation](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/maste... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Check invariants and add unit tests for wExp(x)
### Description
## Context: MathLib.sol#L23-L46
## Description/Recommendation
### Check invariants and add unit tests for `wExp(x)`:
- [ ] Add unit test to ensure that `wExp(q * LN2_INT) == WAD_INT = 0`.
- [ ] Check whether \( \max(0, WAD + x) \leq wExp(x) \) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | true | false | ## Gas: Cache `erc20VotingToken.totalSupply()` to save gas
### Description
The value of the call `erc20VotingToken.totalSupply()` is used on Line 230 and Line 233. This can save an unnecessary totalSupply() call on the erc20VotingToken if cached. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `SecuritizeAmmNavProvider` missing `whenNotPaused` modifier on important state-changing functions
### Description
**Description:** `SecuritizeAmmNavProvider` inherits from `BaseContract` which inherits from `PausableUpgradeable`, but does not have the `whenNotPaused` modifier on important state-changing fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Dead-code
### Description
Functions that are not used.
There are 1 instances of this issue: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Owner can call `applyCover` multiple times in `PoolTemplate.sol`
### Description
_Submitted by camden_
The owner could potentially extend the insurance period indefinitely in the `applyCover` function without ever allowing the market to resume. This is because there is no check in `applyCover` to ensure th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: No tests.
### Description
**Description**
Absent test coverage. Formal logic is not checked, so currently it cannot guarantee the
correctness of contracts functionality.
**Recommendation**:
Provide the initial test coverage for the formal logic of the contracts | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary `require` checks for token transfers
### Description
The issue is identified within the contract `Prestaking`. There are two calls to ERC20 token functions: [first](https://github.com/diadata-org/prestaking-contracts/blob/6ee4beee6cbcdb3b7e7ea1feb9a8b1192bc8c8ba/prestaking/src/Prestaking.sol#L132) ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Exemption Of Users From Covering Rounding Errors
### Description
## Rounding Errors in Withdrawal Process
The `router::request_withdraw` handles rounding errors that may occur during the unstaking process. However, instead of charging the user for the rounding error, the protocol currently pays for it by burn... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | First Depositor Issue | false | true | _Submitted by cmichel, also found by danb_
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-hubble/blob/8c157f519bc32e552f8cc832ecc75dc381faa91e/contracts/InsuranceFund.sol#L44-L54><br>
The `InsuranceFund.deposit` function mints initial `shares` equal to the deposited amount.<br>
The deposit / withdraw functions also use the V... | Code4rena | 3 | Hubble |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Users are getting back their `soc-loss-funds` while selling their market seat
### Description
Inside `sell-market-seat` when [soc-loss-funds](https://github.com/deriverse/protocol-v1/blob/30b06d2da69e956c000120cdc15907b5f33088d7/src/program/processor/sell_market_seat.rs#L122) are negative, which means user ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: The vault can be drained
### Description
The funds of vault can be drained by admin
### Impact
1. Loss of funds
2. Incorrect accounting
3. Potential insolvency
### Recommendation
I think the vault's ownership of requested tokenId should be checked .
Require `stakingNFT.ownerOf(_requestTokenId) == address(th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Unused BankInfo Field
### Description
## BankInfo Structure and Functionality
The `is_listed` field in the `BankInfo` struct determines whether borrowing is allowed from the bank.
## BankInfo Structure
However, the current bank module provides no way to change it from the default value of `true` set in `in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `2**<n> - 1` should be re-written as `type(uint<n>).max`
### Description
Earlier versions of solidity can use `uint(-1)` instead. Expressions not including the `- 1` can often be re-written to accomodate the change (e.g. by using a `>` rather than a `>=`, which will also save some gas) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Poor detection of disputed trees allows claiming tokens from a disputed tree
### Description
Users can claim rewards from a Merkle tree that's being disputed. This can potentially lead to loss of funds since a malicious trusted EOA can claim funds from a malicious tree while it's being disputed.
### Proof of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: `executeCallback` call causes that ownership cannot be updated on the base chain
### Description
When `Beacon.triggerOwnershipUpdate()` is called, the new owners of the tokens are read from the target chain, and `Beacon._updateOwnership()` is executed on the source chain to update the ownership.
When this is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | true | false | ## High: Transfer operations may silently fail due to the lack of contract existence checks
### Description
The pool fails to check that a contract exists before performing transfers. As a result, the pool may assume that failed transactions involving destroyed tokens or tokens that have not yet been deployed were suc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: DOS risk due to frozen `token_escrow`
### Description
In the `init_oft` instruction, the `token_mint` is set without validation, allowing the initialization of a `token_mint` with a `freeze_authority`. SPL tokens with a freeze authority can have their accounts frozen by the token issuer or an authorized entity... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: lpPoolCap can be bypassed
### Description
It seems that `lpPoolCap` can be bypassed due to incorrect logic.
### Recommendation
Since risk percentage can change for existing LP, this would be tricky.
1. On each new LP deposit, we can call a function that iterates through all active LPs and aggregates the risk ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: AuraSpell#closePositionFarm requires users to swap all reward tokens through same router
### Description
AuraSpell#closePositionFarm requires users to swap all reward tokens through same router. This is problematic as it is very unlikely that a UniswapV2 router will have good liquidity sources for all token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Cache calculations instead of re-calculating. Saves 3 checked subtractions.
### Description
### Instance 1
Cache `block.timestamp - lastRateUpdate` to save 1 checked subtraction.
[V3Vault.sol#L1188-L1190](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-revert-lend/blob/main/src/V3Vault.sol#L1188-L1190)
### Recommend... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of events emitted on state changes
### Description
**Description:** Both [`ProtocolFee::setProtocolFee`](https://github.com/euler-xyz/euler-swap/blob/1022c0bb3c034d905005f4c5aee0932a66adf4f8/src/utils/ProtocolFee.sol#L14-L19) and [`ProtocolFee::setProtocolFeeRecipient`](https://github.com/euler-xyz/euler-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Missing Proper Access Control ✓ Fixed
### Description
Some functions do not have proper access control and are `public`, meaning that anyone can call them. This will result in system take over depending on how critical those functionalities are.
### Recommendation
Comment from Lien Protocol:
>
> remove co... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.