prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Lack of minimum threshold check on fee withdrawal
### Description
In the `withdraw_fee` function, while there is a check to ensure that the withdrawn amount doesn't exceed the available fee balance, no minimum threshold is enforced.
[oft/src/instructions/withdraw_fee.rs:L36](https://github.com/LayerZero-Labs... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: SendValueWithFallbackWithdraw: withdrawFor function may fail to withdraw ether recorded in pendingWithdrawals
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-foundation/blob/main/contracts/mixins/SendValueWithFallbackWithdraw.sol#L37-L77
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The NFTM... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent Timestamp Comparisons Exclude Exact Unlock Time
### Description
The `CoreVault` contract uses strict less than (`<`) comparisons when checking if unbond records are ready for withdrawal or unlocked. This means users cannot withdraw or see their funds as unlocked exactly at the unlock time, which i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Withdrawals are stuck Forever if Staking is done at a time sufficiently before endTime
### Description
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In contract `StakingManager.sol`, if a user stakes at a time such that the `stake.timestamp + poolDuration > EndTime`, then the users funds will be ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: OwnershipNFTs.sol holds payable functions but have no way to rescue
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-08-superposition/blob/4528c9d2dbe1550d2660dac903a8246076044905/pkg/sol/OwnershipNFTs.sol#L118-L162
### Impact
A number of functions in OwnershipNFTs.sol are marked as payable, meaning they c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Asset token price deviates from the price curve of the pool
### Description
The asset token price deviates from the price curve of the pool with each swap operation because of the price adjustment performed in the swap function. On each swap, the `_swapExactIn` function computes new virtual reserves of a pool ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent use of `override` keyword
### Description
**Description:** We found that `override` keyword is being used inconsistently in several places.
It is recommended to use the `override` keyword consistently and reasonably.
**Securitize:** Fixed in commit [b09460](https://bitbucket.org/securitize_dev/s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Silent overflow could alter computation when calculating the `vaultPortion` in the `PrizePool` contract
### Description
If an overflow happens, the computed value of the vault portion will be a totally different value than what should really be; which would end up causing the rewards to disperse and be lowe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Lack of complete documentation on the known HyVM/EVM divergences
### Description
The HyVM does not strictly follow the EVM specification. The known divergences are not clearly documented, which increases the likelihood that users will make mistakes while using the HyVM. The following are some of the HyVM’s beha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect import of protobuf
### Description
As per the [docs](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/release/v0.47.x/UPGRADING.md#protobuf);
> The SDK has migrated from gogo/protobuf (which is currently unmaintained), to our own maintained fork, cosmos/gogoproto.
>
> This means you should replace all imp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Token Change Can Be Frontrun, Blocking Token
### Description
_Submitted by philogy, also found by berndartmueller and Lambda_
### Impact
This vulnerability allows malicious actors to block other users from changing tokens of their projects. Furthermore if ownership over the token contract is transferred to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Pausing Does Not Accrue Interest as Intended
### Description
The [`pauseSafeActions` function](https://github.com/Ion-Protocol/ion-protocol/blob/98e282514ac5827196b49f688938e1e44709505a/src/IonPool.sol#L332) of the `IonPool` contract is intended to accrue interest when the contract is paused. Within this fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: The LpWrapper::OPERATOR role is not revoked in VeloDeployFactoryHelper.createLpWrapper function
### Description
The `LpWrapper` contract inherits `DefaultAccessControl`. When the `VeloDeployFactoryHelper` deploys a new `LpWrapper`, the `OPERATOR` role is granted automatically to the `VeloDeployFactoryHelper`. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: DAO name can be stolen by front-running calls to `MembershipFactory::createNewDAOMembership`
### Description
When `MembershipFactory::createNewDAOMembership` is called, the newly created `MembershipERC1155` instance it is [associated](https://github.com/OneWpOrg/audit-2024-10-oneworld/blob/416630e46ea6f0e9b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Deposits don't work with fee-on transfer tokens
### Description
_Submitted by [cmichel](https://twitter.com/cmichelio)_
There are ERC20 tokens that may make certain customizations to their ERC20 contracts.
One type of these tokens is deflationary tokens that charge a certain fee for every `transfer()` or `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Insufficient Delay forRocketNodeStaking.withdrawRPL()
### Description
At present, `withdrawRPL()` only checks the cooldown based on the last block in which the node had increased their stake.
The `require` on line [165] checks that a node hasn’t staked recently:
```solidity
require ( block.number.sub(getNo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: No zero check for lockupPeriod
### Description
In the Staking contract, the `stake()` function can either be called with `_lockupPeriod == 0` (meaning the withdrawal will later be subject to the `withdrawalPeriod`) or with `_lockupPeriod == lockupPeriod` (meaning the withdrawal can only occur after `lockupPeri... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Missing checks for whether a position is still an ADL candidate
### Description
There are no checks for whether a position is still an ADL candidate or not
### Impact
Between the time when the ADL keeper chooses its list of ADL candidates and when the transaction gets confirmed (e.g. if the keeper has a su... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of spec on the modules
### Description
The spec file intends to outline the common structure for specifications within this directory. The **masterchef/estaking** module is missing spec. This documentation is segmented into developer-focused messages and end-user-facing messages. These messages may be sho... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Imprecise Domain Size
### Description
The larger domain size [is identified by a simple calculation](https://github.com/Consensys/gnark/blob/e2040836eb41a40df04a4a3648764b07a0fa12a2/backend/plonk/bn254/prove.go#L250), but is then [manually separated into two cases](https://github.com/Consensys/gnark/blob/e2040... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Oracle Lookup Optimization
### Description
## Function Analysis: checkBarriers and calculateKnockInRatio
Within the functions `checkBarriers` and `calculateKnockInRatio`, the number of oracle lookups is equal to the number of option barriers present in the vault. However, the number of lookups may be reduced ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | logic-error | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect calculation of unmigrated BDVs for use in `InitBipSeedGauge::init`
### Description
The current values for the [constants](https://github.com/BeanstalkFarms/Beanstalk/blob/dfb418d185cd93eef08168ccaffe9de86bc1f062/protocol/contracts/beanstalk/init/InitBipSeedGauge.sol#L35-L39) in `InitBipSeedGauge::... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: getsAmountsIn in GMXOracle hardcoded 15e14(15bps) for amountsIn would gives wrong amountsIn since GMX market has dynamic impact fee
### Description
getsAmountsIn in GMXOracle hardcoded 15e14(15bps) for amountsIn would gives wrong amountsIn since GMX market has dynamic impact fee.
With Reference to GMXv2, the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Checks for Service Addresses
### Description
The issue is identified within the `CSModule` contract. Specifically, there is a potential concern if the `rewardAddress` or `managerAddress` address of a Node Operator is one of the service addresses (`CSAccounting` for example). This could result in the us... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Protocol team can preferentially refuse to liquidate traders via centralized liquidators
### Description
The protocol team can preferentially refuse to liquidate traders since:
* only liquidators can liquidate traders subject to liquidation
* the protocol team control which addresses can be liquidators
### Im... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: Save gas with the use of the import statement
### Description
While the following two critical fee values are assigned in the constructor, there is no zero value control. This means that if both state variables are started with a possible value of ``0``, the contract must be deployed again. This possibility me... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: The method `recommend` can be optimized
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In Contract AFiStorage.sol, the method recommend() can be updated as follows.
**Recommendation**:
Update the `recommend()` method as above.
**Fix**: The issue has been fixed as recom... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: CUDA memory can leak private inputs from data trace
### Description
**Severity:** Low
**Path:** risc0/zkvm/src/host/server/prove/prover_impl.rs
**Description:**
Risc0 implements GPU acceleration for proving calculations, such as field operations, NTT/INTT, and Poseidon/SHA hashes functions. The prover supp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Flash loan price manipulation in `purchasePyroFlan()`
### Description
_Submitted by sirhashalot_
The comment on [line 54](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-01-behodler/blob/cedb81273f6daf2ee39ec765eef5ba74f21b2c6e/contracts/FlanBackstop.sol#L54) of FlanBackstop.sol states "the opportunity for price manipula... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: No check of the address parameter for zero
### Description
At line https://github.com/lidofinance/1inch-rewards-manager/blob/c2cd9665666deda9452fa9e3461fbf3537413945/contracts/RewardsManager.vy#L66, the `owner` variable is assigned the value of the `_to` parameter.
But, if by chance the value of the parame... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Typo errors
### Description
* [`reightful` → `rightful`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-biconomy/blob/main/contracts/hyphen/LiquidityFarming.sol#L178)
* [`Claculate` → `Calculate`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-biconomy/blob/main/contracts/hyphen/LiquidityProviders.sol#L357)
* [`sushi` → `rew... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: `QuantAMMBaseAdministration::onlyExecutor` modifier does not enforce a time lock on actions
### Description
In `QuantAMMBaseAdministration`, certain functions are restricted using the [`onlyExecutor`](https://github.com/QuantAMMProtocol/QuantAMM-V1/blob/7213401491f6a8fd1fcc1cf4763b15b5da355f1c/pkg/pool-quan... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Immediately start getting rewards belonging to others after staking
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-06-tokemak-judging/issues/603
## Found by
0x73696d616f, 0xGoodess, 0xJuda, 0xTheC0der, 0xdeadbeef, 0xvj, Ch\_301, Kalyan-Singh, MrjoryStewartBaxter, VAD37, berndartmueller, bin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: Missing Chain ID Validation
### Description
## Chain Id and Transaction Validation
In order to uniquely identify a network, a chain id is assigned.
## Rust Code
Transactions can be replayed from one chain to another if this field isn’t properly validated. In the context of a multisig, the transaction ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | integer-overflow | true | false | ## Low: Transfers are noop when `lamports_diff` is zero
### Description
The codebase contains multiple instances where lamports transfers are performed for rellocating space and size without checking if the transfer amount `lamports_diff` is greater than zero. To evaluate `lamports_diff` we are using `saturating_sub`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Evasion Of Validation Check On Early Stop
### Description
## Vulnerability Details
The vulnerability originates from the early stopping mechanism in `store::validateIterator`. Early stopping occurs when the iteration loop encounters a specific key (`earlyStopKey`). However, in `validateIterator`, early stopp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Secondary markets for LP tokens are problematic
### Description
Unlike other AMM implementations, where fees are accrued in the LP token, Solidly V2 implements an accrual system where the fees are tracked in `feeGrowthGlobal0`/`1` per LP token. Each liquidity provider can call `SolidlyV2Pair::claimFees` to col... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Multiple stakes may block the claim due to block gas limit reached
### Description
The different staking contracts implement the function `stake()`:
Every time that this function is called and the `u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: Attackers can bypass `tokensPerMint` and mint lots of tokens in a transaction
### Description
Attackers can bypass `tokensPerMint`, allowing them to mint over `tokensPerMint` per transaction.
### Impact
Attackers can re-enter `mint()` function again and again to bypass the check of `tokensPerMint`, and min... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Oracle assumes asset has 18 decimals
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-ondo/blob/main/contracts/rwaOracles/RWADynamicOracle.sol#L282
The `roundUpTo8()` implementation assumes the asset has 18 decimals, as the rounding is done using `1e10` (since `18 - 8 = 10`). It is recommended to use a c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Malicious actor and zero emissions cause DoS in `distributeAll()`
### Description
_Resolved_
In the `Voter` contract, there are several functions responsible for distributing `KITTEN` rewards to registered gauges for the current period:
- `distributeAll()`: collects fees and distributes rewards to all regist... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: CErc20InterestMarket collateral can be directly used to pay interest and bypass health check
### Description
**Severity:** Critical
**Path:** CErc20InterestMarket.sol:payInterestInternal#L67-L101
**Description:** A CErc20InterestMarket is a CERC20 token that can be used to pay interest for a CERC721 loan. T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: No need to evaluate all expressions to know if one of them is true
### Description
When we have a code `expressionA || expressionB` if `expressionA` is true then `expressionB` will not be evaluated and gas saved;
*Instances include:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/7bbb55fca61e6bae29e57133c1e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: `ZCTokens` May Use More Decimals than Is Supported by Third-Party Applications
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `f533c161fa2ad8e1e120ae77ff4d8b8406e2087e`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Fixed together with [SF-2](https://certificate.quantstamp.com/fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: AUTOIRRIGATECALL WILL ALWAYS REVERT WITH OVERFLOW IF IT'S CALLED WITH THE FULL REWARDAMOUNT
### Description
In the `WaterTowerUpgradeable` contract, the function `autoIrrigate()` is used to auto-compound the user rewards:
### Recommendation
**RISK ACCEPTED:** The `Irrigation Protocol team` accepted this risk,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Denial Of Service On Trading Functionalities
### Description
## Vulnerability Analysis
The vulnerability arises due to the lack of a critical validation check in certain trading functionalities within `lib.rs`. The functions `trade`, `trade_x_chain`, and `trade_x_chain_and_send` expect a signed quote as an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | access-control | true | true |
`GovernanceHYBR.sol` [# L370](https://github.com/code-423n4/2025-10-hybra-finance/blob/74c2b93e8a4796c1d41e1fbaa07e40b426944c44/ve33/contracts/GovernanceHYBR.sol# L370)
### Details
When the operator [claims rewards](https://github.com/code-423n4/2025-10-hybra-finance/blob/74c2b93e8a4796c1d41e1fbaa07e40b426944c44/ve... | Code4rena | 5 | Hybra Finance |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Users Can Make A Safe Bet In UpDown Game And Increase Their Chances Of Winning
### Description
**Severity** - Low
**Status** - Resolved
**Description**
The users in the up down game need to bet if the price would go up or down which is calculated with respect to the starting price which is set after stopPre... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unused import
### Description
The following import is not used and can be removed:
```solidity
import {Transaction} from '@matterlabs/zksync-contracts/l2/system-contracts/libraries/TransactionHelper.sol';
```
### Recommendation
Remove the import. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Market creators can avoid paying 20% cut of affiliate fees to traders
### Description
The [`recordMarketCreatorFees`](https://github.com/AugurProject/augur/blob/67c0fec95e65fca8d27751f28a6c06e5247978c6/packages/augur-core/source/contracts/reporting/Market.sol#L337) function of the `Market` contract determines... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: When stake eth in earningreinvest, the reduction of maxearning may not work
### Description
In order to incentivize users to stake the ETH earnings in `earningReinvest`, `maxEarning` is reduced to keep the financial stability.
### Recommendation
The fix will be to reduce `maxEarning` after withdraw: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Add require Statement For USDC Transfers
### Description
**Severity** - Medium
**Status** - Resolved
**Description**
When joining a duel the USDC token transfer has been wrapped inside a require statement , this is to ensure that the transfer didn’t fail . But this require check is missing in →
L619 Fla... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Signature Malleability in ecrecover Precompile Usage
### Description
The protocol's current use of the `ecrecover` precompile introduces a security concern due to signature malleability. Specifically, the vulnerability arises from the possibility of altering the `s` and `v` components of a signature, thereby g... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Insecure calls to `safeTransferFrom` leads to users tokens steal by attacker
### Description
The function `safeTransferFrom()` is used to transfer tokens from user to the protocol contract. This function is used in `modifyOrder` and `createOrder` with the recipent address as the `owner` form who the tokens wi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [05] Redundant named returns
### Description
When a function has unused named returns and used return statements, these named returns become redundant. To improve readability and maintainability, these variables for the named returns can be removed while keeping the return statements for the functions associat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Tokens Sharing an Address on L1 and L2 Can Be Set Up to Steal User Funds
### Description
When new tokens are bridged, the token metadata [is fetched](https://github.com/Consensys/linea-contracts/blob/f08c1906855198e2dc0413a47dcb38291b7087e5/contracts/tokenBridge/TokenBridge.sol#L160) and then sent via the `Me... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: Migration Module: Re-enter `commit` using custom token
### Description
_Submitted by zzzitron, also found by 0x29A_
HIGH - Assets can be compromised directly.
One can drain eth out from migration module to buyout module using custom made FERC1155 token.
### Proof of Concept
* [Proof of Concept: `testComm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Don't update state | false | false | ## Security Report
## Severity
**Medium Risk**
## Context
- LPToken.sol#L16
- OwnerPausableUpgradeable.sol#L16
- StableSwap.sol#L39
- Merkle.sol#L37
- ProposedOwnable.sol#L193
## Description
All `__GAP` variables have the same size, while the different contracts have a different number of storage variables. If the `... | Spearbit | 5 | Connext |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: [N-02]
### Description
Since solidity v0.8.0 SafeMath library is used by default in arithmetic operations. Using external SafeMath libraries is unnecessary.
Affected code: [AaveV3YieldSource.sol#L361](https://github.com/pooltogether/aave-v3-yield-source/blob/e63d1b0e396a5bce89f093630c282ca1c6627e44/contracts/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: No validation on verifyingSigner in Constructor
### Description
The `verifyingSigner` is fully trusted by the contract, but there is no verification of the address used in the constructor. The contract could be deployed with `address(0)`, preventing it from functioning. Worse, the same address that deploys the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Calling twice safeApprove or approve methods and passing first time 0 and second time amount of tokens does not solve potential double spending problem as they should be executed as separate transactions and after first transaction mined to block, user has to verify that spender did not spend any tokens approv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | true | ## High: _getStartOfNextHalfYear does not update year correctly for the second half of the year
### Description
The `year` is not incremented for the second half of the year when calculating the `startOfNextHalfYear`:
```solidity
(uint256 year, uint256 month, ) = DTL.timestampToDate(timestamp);
startOfNextHalfYear = ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: TRST-M-2 Anybody can forfeit partner fees if there are no partners
### Description
**Description:**
The protocol accumulates fees for partners whenever a `swap()` happens and there’s at least
one partner account. The fees can later be claimed for every partner by calling
`claimPartnerFee()` which distribu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Incorrect calculation of the received swap amount allows guardians to bypass the daily loss limit
### Description
Guardians may bypass the daily loss limit and extract funds from the vaults. The root cause is that the `_handleAfterExactOutputSingle()` function assumes that `actualAmountOut` calculated above i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Duplicate calculations and storage reads can be cached
### Description
The following calculation and variable are computed/loaded multiple times; caching them would help reduce gas consumption:
- `(index + 1) * _proofLength`
- `_proofLength`
### Recommendation
```solidity
uint32 proofLength = _proofLength;
u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Simplify `LSSVMPair::_calculateBuyInfoAndUpdatePoolParams` and `LSSVMPair::_calculateSellInfoAndUpdatePoolParams` conditionals
### Description
Per the comment "Consolidate writes to save gas" in `LSSVMPair::_calculateBuyInfoAndUpdatePoolParams`, further optimizations can be made by reducing the logic to two if... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Code Maturity
### Description
## Loader System Account
In `loader::load_system_account`, it may be appropriate to relax the constraints on the miner account ownership, changing from being strictly a system account to potentially being owned by the protocol. However, it should be noted that it should not be a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: | Shorten Revert Strings
### Description
**Description**
Throughout the contract revert strings that are longer than 32 bytes are used.
**Recommendation**
Shorten revert strings to less than 32 bytes to save on gas.
**Resolution**
NFTR Team:
- Acknowledged, but left as is for simplicity. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use assembly in place of abi.decode to extract calldata values more efficiently
### Description
Instead of using abi.decode, we can use assembly to decode our desired calldata values directly. This will allow us to avoid decoding calldata values that we will not use.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-08-goo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Redundant Conditions
### Description
In the `P2pYieldProxy.initialize`, the [conditions](https://github.com/p2p-org/p2p-lending-proxy/blob/677cac6d572df8600d0538df40b1e34cc41025f9/src/p2pYieldProxy/P2pYieldProxy.sol#L146-L153) `_clientBasisPointsOfDeposit >= 0` and `_clientBasisPointsOfProfit >= 0` are redunda... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: `sortVaultsByDelta` doesn't work as expected
### Description
_Submitted by gpersoon, also found by shw_
The function `sortVaultsByDelta` doesn't always work as expected.
Suppose all the delta's are positive, and delta1 >= delta2 >= delta3 > 0. Then `maxIndex = 0`. And `(delta Confirmed and Fix has been imp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Storage cheaper than memory
### Description
Reference types cached in memory cost more gas than using storage, as new memory is allocated for these variables, copying data from storage to memory for each field of the struct or array: this means every field of the struct/array is read.
### Proof of Concept
18... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Extra safety checks in _removeAssetId()
### Description
The function `_removeAssetId()` deletes assets but it doesn't check if the passed parameters are a consistent set. This allows for mistakes where the wrong values are accidentally deleted.
```solidity
function _removeAssetId(bytes32 _key, address _adopte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | logic-error | true | false | ## Medium: Calculation of available liquidity in `CollateralLiquidityProvider::availableLiquidity` assumes 1:1 ratio between collateral asset and liquidity tokens
### Description
The `CollateralLiquidityProvider::availableLiquidity` function incorrectly returns the balance of the collateral asset held by the collatera... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Liens cannot be bought out once we've reached the maximum number of active liens on one collateral
### Description
The `buyoutLien` function is intended to transfer ownership of a lien from one user to another. In practice, it creates a new lien by calling `_createLien` and then calls `_replaceStackAtPositi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Double-Counting ETH From Consolidations After Electra Upgrade
### Description
EIP-7251 consolidations, when implemented, open the EigenPod to a potential attack vector where ETH from a consolidated validator can be double-counted when verifying withdrawal credentials.
EIP-7251, included in the upcoming Electr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of verification for config functions input values
### Description
The `ZrSign` contract’s `chainIdConfig` function allows the ADMIN to set the chain ID for specific wallet types, similar to `walletTypeIdConfig` which configures support for specific wallet types based on their purpose and coin type.
Howev... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Affiliate’s fees can be withdrawn in an invalid, finalized Market
### Description
The `Market` contract implements the [`recordMarketCreatorFees`](https://github.com/AugurProject/augur/blob/9a33c3269e812d0cb66d49b61a72db58e32e4749/packages/augur-core/source/contracts/reporting/Market.sol#L295) [function](http... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: isTransferable() will succeed and return false for non-existent streams
### Description
All the public view functions in `SablierFlowBase.sol` use the `notNull` modifier to ensure that they revert when called for a non-existent stream. For example:
```solidity
function isPaused(uint256 streamId) external v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Test Coverage Improvements
### Description
## Handle
leastwood
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Adequate test coverage and regular reporting is an essential process in ensuring the codebase works as intended. Insufficient code coverage may lead to unexpected issues and regressions arising due to changes ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: Lack of chainID validation allows reuse of signatures across forks
### Description
The EQLC stablecoin token contracts and Blacksmith contracts implement EIP 2612 to provide EIP 712-signed approvals through a permit function. A domain separator and the chainID are included in the signature schema. However, th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Token transfer hooks should be invoked at the end of execution to prevent the hooklet executing over intermediate state
### Description
**Description:** `ERC20Referrer::transfer` invokes the `_afterTokenTransfer()` hook before the unlocker callback (assuming the recipient is locked):
However, this should be ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | true | false | ## Medium: The `Market.migrate()` function has no effect and does not migrate `PositionStorageGlobal` to the new storage layout, breaking the migration assumption.
### Description
One of the key requirements during the migration from version 2.2 to 2.3 is to consolidate global and local position storage layouts from 2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Lack of checked arithmetic operations throughout the codebase
### Description
The current implementation frequently uses unchecked arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division) on numeric types. This practice can lead to silent overflows or underflows, potentially causing unexpect... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: FIXME and TODO comments
### Description
There are several [FIXME](https://github.com/BeanstalkFarms/Wells/blob/e5441fc78f0fd4b77a898812d0fd22cb43a0af55/src/interfaces/IWell.sol#L351) and [TODO](https://github.com/BeanstalkFarms/Wells/blob/e5441fc78f0fd4b77a898812d0fd22cb43a0af55/src/libraries/LibMath.sol#L33) ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Inconsistencies in stored data may lead to incorrect median price
### Description
The `DelFiPrice` contract has a [public `prices` mapping](https://github.com/compound-finance/open-oracle/blob/e7a928334e5e454a88eec38e4ee1be5ee3b13f08/contracts/DelFiPrice.sol#L28) intended to store the median price for each as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use of `override` is unnecessary
### Description
Starting with Solidity version [0.8.8](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/contracts.html#function-overriding), using the override keyword when the function solely overrides an interface function, and the function doesn't exist in multiple base contracts, is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Missing input validation for various functions
### Description
**Description:**
The functions above do not explicitly check whether the inputted address is a zero address or a malicious address. This can allow an attacker to set an arbitrary address as the token address, potentially leading to funds being ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | token | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-ajna-judging/issues/75
## Found by
hyh
## Summary
It's impossible for borrower or kicker to transfer their otherwise withdraw-able funds to another address. If for some reason borrower or kicker got blacklisted by collateral or quote token contract (correspondingly... | Sherlock | 5 | Ajna |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Setter `setThresholdGasPrice` in ApeMexMargin does not emit an event
### Description
**Description**
In contract ApeMexMargin, the function setThreshold GasPrice, it's a setter that does not emit an event, it would be part of best practices to add events for all your setters to be able to track the change of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Interest collected before being paid leads to problematic accounting for Interest Markets
### Description
Because additional interest is not accrued on the `interestAccrued` value of ERC721 markets, the incentive is for users to avoid repaying for as long as possible. The more the interest market CToken appre... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Multiple centralization vulnerabilities can break the protocol
### Description
**Description**
Multiple methods in `TopiaLpStaking` are centralization vulnerabilities and some can be used to break the protocol for users:
- `setRewardsToken` can be used to update the `rewardsToken` address to a random one,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [01] `CHALLENGE_PERIOD_LENGTH`, `DISTRIBUTION_PERIOD_LENGTH`, `FUNDING_PERIOD_LENGTH`, AND `MAX_EFM_PROPOSAL_LENGTH` ARE HARDCODED BASED ON 7200 BLOCKS PER DAY
### Description
The following `CHALLENGE_PERIOD_LENGTH`, `DISTRIBUTION_PERIOD_LENGTH`, `FUNDING_PERIOD_LENGTH`, and `MAX_EFM_PROPOSAL_LENGTH` are hardc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect use of `_addTribute` instead of `_addGovernanceTribute`
### Description
As part of the `purchaseMembership()` function, the `addRegistrationTributeGovernance()` function is called by the FSD network to update tribute when 7.5% is contributed towards governance. However, this function incorrectly c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | false | false | ## High: Large stablecoin amounts may get stuck
### Description
Within the flow of executing or cancelling a proposal to sell a stablecoin for CELO, the [`getSellTokenAndSellAmount`](https://github.com/celo-org/celo-monorepo/blob/d06617c7f4e59f643a0a0120e5501bcf762f1a7d/packages/protocol/contracts/liquidity/GrandaMent... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: `UniV3Vault.sol#collectEarnings()` can be front run
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
For `UniV3Vault`, it seems that lp fees are collected through `collectEarnings()` callable by the `strategy` and reinvested (rebalanced).
However, in the current implementation, unharvested yields are not included in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Timing | false | true | **Severity:** Medium
**Description:** The `PriorityPool` contract relies on the distribution oracle for accounting and the accounting calculation is done off-chain.
According to the communication with the protocol team, the correct workflow for queued deposits can be described as below:
- Whenever there is a new room... | Cyfrin | 5 | Stake Link |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing Checkpoint Reset in `veRAACToken::emergencyWithdraw` Function
### Description
In the `veRAACToken::emergencyWithdraw` function, while user locks and voting power points are cleared during an emergency withdrawal, the user’s voting power checkpoint is not reset. This omission results in outdated checkpo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: ChainlinkAdapterOracle use BTC/USD chainlink oracle to price WBTC which is problematic if WBTC depegs
### Description
The chainlink BTC/USD oracle is used to price WBTC ([docs](https://docs.blueberry.garden/lending-protocol/price-oracle#price-feed-alternative)). WBTC is basically a bridged asset and if the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Privileged Roles
### Description
**Update**
The client updated the code documentation to reflect the correct privileged permissions of admin or privileged users in `b745623f6bb95b978b8bd3c62fac6fcff5ac277d` and `456ad851313494ffa716c49a8a0cc851c09b9130`.
**File(s) affected:**`Unitroller.sol`, `Diamond.sol`, `... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.