prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Error-prone approach to data validation
### Description
The system lacks robust data validation checks. The contracts call assertion functions to validate the results of external calls and assume that reentrancy checks will be performed in nested function calls rather than executing per-function reentrancy che... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Locked Ether
### Description
The `Collection` contract inherits from `ERC721A.sol`, which carries `payable` functions on its original implementation, influenced by [EIP-712](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721). Specifically, the functions are: `approve`, `transferFrom`, `safeTransferFrom(from, to, token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: A reverting fallback function will lock up all payouts ✓ Fixed
### Description
In BoxExchange.sol, the internal function `_transferEth()` reverts if the transfer does not succeed:
**code/Fairswap\_iDOLvsETH/contracts/BoxExchange.sol:L958-L963**
```
function \_transferETH(address \_recipient, uint256 \_amo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Liquidator gets more debt than usual
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://testnet.snowtrace.io/address/0xc1FBF54B25816B60ADF322d8A1eaCA37D9A50317
Impacts:
* Protocol insolvency
## Description
## Brief/Intro
Liquidator gets more borrow balance because of the liquidaton bonus.
## V... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: bitcoin-spv - unnecessary logic in BytesLib.toBytes32() ✓ Addressed
### Description
The heavily used library function `BytesLib.toBytes32()` unnecessarily casts `_source` to `bytes` (same type) and creates a copy of the dynamic byte array to check it’s length, while this can be done directly on the user-provid... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Multiple accesses of a mapping/array should use a local variable cache
### Description
Caching a mapping's value in a local storage or calldata variable when the value is accessed multiple times saves ~42 gas per access due to not having to perform the same offset calculation every time.
**Help the Optimizer b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Potential token transfer from unrelated account
### Description
The `CoverReassurance` contract [contains a mechanism](https://github.com/neptune-mutual-blue/protocol/blob/73fc82fbe0d1388867b7df669983fe42760daeb1/contracts/core/lifecycle/CoverReassurance.sol#L66) to retrieve funds from an arbitrary account,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Server-Side Validation Allows Tampering with Pool Exchange Rates in the Dapp
### Description
The backoffice endpoint `/backoffice/api/pools-exchange-rates` accepts POST requests that directly update exchange rate records for investment pools. The server does not validate the rate or `createdAt` paramet... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Challenge Ids can be overwritten
### Description
The `createTransaction()` function in the `Escrow` contract uses a `challenge_id` mapping to track transactions by their challenge identifier. However, there is no check to prevent duplicate `_challengeId` values. When a transaction is created with a `_challeng... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Missing docstrings [core and sample]
### Description
Many functions in the code base lack documentation. This hinders reviewers’ understanding of the code’s intention, which is fundamental to correctly assess not only security, but also correctness. Additionally, docstrings improve readability and ease mainten... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing initialization of PausableUpgradeable Contract
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In the contract Narwhal Trading Callbacks, the contracts inherits PausableUpgradeable
which has an init method __Pausable_init that needs to be called in the `initialize()`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Wrong totalWeight in Voter.sol
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/Voter.sol
Impacts:
- Manipulation of governance voting result deviating from voted outcome and resulting in a direct change from intended effect of original... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: setDebtInterestApr should accrue debt first
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-04-jpegd/blob/e72861a9ccb707ced9015166fbded5c97c6991b6/contracts/vaults/NFTVault.sol#L212
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The `setDebtInterestApr` changes the debt interest rate without fir... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: No Events for State Changes
### Description
Adding events to the `setEid` and `setNativeTokenRecipient` functions would provide better traceability of state changes.
### Recommendation
Consider defining and emit events for these functions.
```
event EidSet(uint32 indexed newEid);
event NativeTokenRecipientSe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Unvalidated constructor input allows a delay which can overflow for early selfdestruct.
### Description
The `selfDestructDelay` variable is set on line [52] in the constructor without validation. It is then used in the `require()` on line [52]. If `selfDestructDelay` is set to a value of the order `uint(0) - n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: The PythNode library process function implementation does not account for pythDataexpo being greater than PRECISION
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://testnet.snowtrace.io/address/0xA758c321DF6Cd949A8E074B22362a4366DB1b725
Impacts:
* Contract fails to deliver promised returns, but ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Partial fills don't recycle ETH
### Description
## Severity: Low Risk
**Context:** VeryFastRouter.sol#L211-L425
**Description:**
After several fixes are applied, the following code exists. If the sell can be filled completely, then ETH is recycled. However, when a partial fill is applied, then ETH is not... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `_execute()` in `SecurityCouncilNomineeElectionGovernor` is vulnerable to blockchain re-orgs
### Description
In `SecurityCouncilNomineeElectionGovernor`, when a user calls `execute()`, he only needs to provide the `proposalId` and current election index (in `callDatas`):
[SecurityCouncilNomineeElectionGoverno... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Fee-on-transfer/deflationary tokens will not be supported
### Description
**Description:** When creating a new order, `LimitOrderRegistry::newOrder` assumes that the amount of deposited tokens is equal to the
function parameter plus the balance before the deposit. For tokens which take a fee on every transfer,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Potential Re-Entrancy/Checks-Effects-Interactions Pattern Violations
### Description
**Update**
From the team :
**File(s) affected:**`packages/protocol/contracts/core/fintroller/Fintroller.sol`, `packages/protocol/contracts/oracles/ChainlinkOperator.sol`, `packages/proxy-target/contracts/HifiProxyTarget.s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | false | false | ## High: Multiple Cross-Chain borrows using same collateral
### Description
The failure to lock collateral in `borrowCrossChain` before sending cross-chain borrow requests via LayerZero V2 enables users to initiate multiple borrow requests on different chains (e.g., Chain B and Chain C) using the same collateral on Ch... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Floating Pragma
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Unresolved
**Description**
The smart contracts are using a floating pragma version (^0.8.0). Contracts should be deployed using the same compiler version and settings as were used during development and testing. Locking the pragma versi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect ownerOf() implementation makes veALCX non-ERC721 compliant, breaking composability
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/VotingEscrow.sol
Impacts:
- Contract fails to deliver promised returns, but doesn't lose value
#... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: vars.availableLiquidity is not capped by the reserve's total managed assets
### Description
The following formula assumes there is enough liquidity in the corresponding tranched reserve in the lending pool to cover the unused flow (which might not be the case).
```solidity
vars.availableLiquidity = IERC20(... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Vulnerable liquidity slippage calculation doesn’t ensure slippage protection due to unscaled assets sum
### Description
[/contracts/pool-manager/src/helpers.rs# L426](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-11-mantra-dex/blob/26714ea59dab7ecfafca9db1138d60adcf513588/contracts/pool-manager/src/helpers.rs# L426)
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | liquidation | true | false | ## Gas: IF's/require() statements that check input arguments should be at the top of the function
### Description
Checks that involve constants should come before checks that involve state variables, function calls, and calculations. By doing these checks first, the function is able to revert before wasting a Gcoldslo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | false | false | ## High: If operatorFlag == false , attacker can steal all NFTs within the contract.
### Description
## Attack Overview on ERC777-like Token
### Context:
Core.sol#L169
### Description:
For the attack, the attacker will need to first deploy an ERC777-like custom token and then a Velodrome pool with it. Let's say the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Implementation differences between RLP length calculation vs. decoding
### Description
There are two separate implementations of RLP decoding, one in the `RLPInput` hierarchy for doing a complete decoding, and another independent implementation in `RlpUtils` for decoding only the offsets and lengths of RLP ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incomplete NatSpec Documentation
### Description
The `B14G` project lacks comprehensive NatSpec comments for functions, state variables, and contracts. NatSpec is a widely adopted standard for documenting Solidity contracts, providing clear and structured explanations for developers, auditors, and end-users.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: `collateralizeWLp` can be bypassed even when collateralization is paused
### Description
Admin can pause collateralization for a specific mode to prevent users from providing more collateral either via `collateralize` or `collateralizeWLp`. However, due to not properly using internal accounting when trackin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: The depositContract variable does not have the optimal type
### Description
The `depositContract` variable is initialized only in the constructor and not changed any more.
https://github.com/p2p-org/p2p-eth2-depositor/blob/main/src/P2pEth2Depositor.sol#L15
The current variable type (mutable) is designed for v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Most of the event parameters are of the `uint256` data type, but `uint128` variables are used when emitting them
### Description
The `collateral_amount` of the `Mint` event are uint256 data type.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-11-ethena-labs/blob/main/contracts/ustb/IUStbMintingEvents.sol#L17
However `o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Hats can be overwritten
### Description
Child hats can be created under a non-existent admin. Creating the admin allows overwriting the properties of the child-hats, which goes against the immutability of hats.
### Recommendation
Check if admin exists, before minting by checking any of its properties again... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Liquidation | true | true |
The proceeds from the collateral auctions will not be used to fill the debt shortfall, but be transferred directly to the borrower.
### Proof of Concept
Assume N is an allowed NFT, B is a borrower, the vault V is `_vaultInfo[B][N]`:
1. B add two NFTs (N-1 and N-2) as collaterals to vault V.
2. B [increaseDebt()](... | Code4rena | 5 | Backed Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Last collateral check is not safe
### Description
Liquidation might work incorrectly.
### Proof of Concept
There is a function `purchaseLiquidationAuctionNFT()` to allow liquidators to purchase NFTs on auction.
In the line 273, the protocol checks if the current NFT is the last collateral using the `coll... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Borrowers could be able to borrow avoiding the borrowCap
### Description
Let's assume that the `borrowCap` has been configured with a value near `MAX_SANE_DEBT_AMOUNT` and that we are in a situation where `Cache.initVaultCache` has overflowed when the snapshot was taken.
`Cache.initVaultCache` overflows when... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: BassetStatus enum defines multiple unused states Won't Fix
### Description
The `BassetStatus` enum defines several values that do not seem to be assigned in the code:
* Default (different from “Normal”?)
* Blacklisted
* Liquidating
* Liquidated
* Failed
**code/contracts/masset/shared/MassetStructs.sol:L59... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing `referralClaimThreshold` validation
### Description
Users can claim their `referral rewards` accrued in the contract by calling the `GachaTickets::claimReferralFees` function :
However, the `documented behavior states` that `referrals should only be able to claim their rewards once they hit a referra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect `unlockTime` can DOS `withdrawGovernanceAsset`
### Description
_Submitted by csanuragjain_
`unlockTime` is set incorrectly.
#### Proof of Concept
1. Navigate to contract at
2. Observe the assertGovernanceApproved function
3. Assume assertGovernanceApproved is called with sender x and tar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | false | false | ## Medium: Initial Deposit to One Collateral Tracker Could Be Zero
### Description
When deploying a new Panoptic pool, the deployer is required to provide a small amount of full-range liquidity to the underlying AMM pool. The returned amounts, `amount0` and `amount1`, are then divided by `100` and deposited into both ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Position size validation uses pre-fee amounts
### Description
The protocol incorrectly validates position sizes using pre-fee amounts rather than the actual position size after fees are deducted (`totalPositionSizeFeeP`). This affects two key areas:
**1. Counter trade collateral return:**
The calculated `exc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Short Positions Are Not Limited, Leading to Potential Protocol Break
### Description
**Update**
Fixed. Global short position sizes can now be limited. However, it is up to the client to correctly set these limits.
**File(s) affected:**`Pool.sol`
**Description:** Although the maximum global long position siz... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: `trustedForwarder` can be used to impersonate any account or contract
### Description
There is an overriden `_msgSender()` function https://github.com/FantiumAG/smart-contracts/blob/a2d126453c1105028f12277b8f342d2cdbf01a77/contracts/FantiumNFTV3.sol#L993 which allows the `trustedForwarder` address owner to sp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Incomplete NatSpec Documentation and Test Coverage
### Description
At least all `public` and `external` functions that are not `view` or `pure` should have `NatSpec` comments. During the security review, it was observed that the multiple publicly-accessible functions did not have any `NatSpec` comments.
Moreo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Users can stake without an active subscription to the author
### Description
To stake, a subscriber must have an active subscription to the author.
However, in the `StakingVault::_deposit` function, the following checks are used to restrict staking:
```
require(author != address(0), "UI");
require(authorTok... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Any oracle member can censor almost quorum report variants by resetting its address
### Description
## Issue Report
**Severity:** Low Risk
**Context:** Oracle.1.sol#L189-L201
**Description:**
The admin or an oracle member can DoS or censor almost quorum reports by calling the `setMember` endpoint, whic... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: USE CALL INSTEAD OF SEND OR TRANSFER
### Description
The usage of send or transfer limits the amount of gas send in the transaction to 2300. This can be considered a safeguard to avoid reentrancy. However, given the current protections of the contracts, it does seem feasible to use call function without furthe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Unexpected Transaction Revert
### Description
## Issue in veFLUO's Deposit Function
This issue arises in veFLUO’s deposit, where the execution of a statement results in a revert for a specific case.
## Problem Description
If the user has already deposited some amount for vesting and calls deposit again w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Voting Logic Issue: Lack of Handling for Amendments without Reached Quorum
### Description
This issue has been identified in the `voteOnMetaVesTAmendment` function of the [MetaVesTController](https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/MetaVesT/blob/b614405e60bce8b852e46d06c03fd47b04d86dde/src/MetaVesTController.sol#L598... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | false | false | ## Gas: Use custom errors rather than
### Description
[G-16] Use custom errors rather than revert()/require() strings to save gas
Custom errors are available from solidity version 0.8.4. Custom errors save ~50 gas each time they’re hit by avoiding having to allocate and store the revert string. Not defining the strin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | false | false | ## High: The relayer is a single point of failure
### Description
Because the relayer is a centralized service that is responsible for critical functionalities, it constitutes a single point of failure within the Mosaic ecosystem. The relayer is responsible for the following tasks:
- Managing withdrawals across chain... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [01] Missing update of `prevAgentId` in `promptMulti`
### Description
The `promptMulti` function in `AgentInference.sol` is intended to optimize repeated calls to `agentNft.virtualInfo(agentId).tba` by caching the previous `agentId` and its corresponding TBA address. However, the variable `prevAgentId` is neve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Contracts do not check if enough tokens balance to transfer
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Unresolved
**Description**
Method unstake(...) and transferTotalReward(...) do not check if the contract has enough balance to transfer the cLFi tokens.
**Recommendation**: Add checks to ensu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Internal Functions Called Only Once can be Inlined
### Description
During the security assessment, it was observed that both the internal function `_checkCollateralRate()` within the `USDz` contract and the `_updateVestingAmount()` internal function within the `sUSDz` contract were only invoked once.
While mo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect event emission when removing fees via the `PolygonStrategy::updateFee`
### Description
Fee for a given index can be removed by passing `_feeBasisPoints = 0` for a given fee index.
Current logic is swapping the fee at the index with that of the last index in the `fees` array, and then popping the las... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | true | ## High: wrong calculation of amount of Ltokens to seize in liquidateCrossChain function
### Description
If a borrower cross borrows tokens in chainB while giving collateral in chainA.Then if he was undercollateralized then a liquidator can call liquidateCrossChain function in chain B to liquidate that borrower.
If we... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: PRBMATH `SD59x18.exp()` reverts on hugely negative numbers.
### Description
`ContinuousGDA.sol` inherits a version of `PRB Math` that contains a vulnerability in the `SD59x18.exp()` function, which can be reverted on hugely negative numbers. `SD59x18.exp()` is used for calculations in `ContinuousGDA.sol#pur... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: State Modification via Mutable Flag Value
### Description
## Potential State Inconsistency Issue in AddEmission and RemoveEmission
In `AddEmission` and `RemoveEmission`, there is a potential state inconsistency issue due to the dynamic and mutable nature of `hook.enabled`. Both `AddEmission` and `RemoveEmissi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Application data remains exposed after first unlock
### Description
The Data Protection entitlement is not enabled in the Xcode project for the App. As a result, the default Data Protection class is used for files which only encrypts data until the user unlocks their device for the first time since booting ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `maxTotalDeposits` is not checked properly inside `_beforeDeposit`.
### Description
Ebisu vault implements a `_beforeDeposit` check before users `deposit`/`mint` to ensure it does not exceed the configured `maxPerDeposit` and `maxTotalDeposits`.
```solidity
function deposit(uint256 assets, address receiv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: withdraw timelock can be circumvented
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
One can withdraw the entire `PrizePool` deposit by circumventing the timelock.
Assume the user has no credits for ease of computation:
- user calls `withdrawWithTimelockFrom(user, amount=userBalance)` with their entire balance. This... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: A single malicious observer can fill the block space with `MsgGasPriceVoter` messages without proper gas compensation resulting in griefing blocks
### Description
ZetaChain blocks can be griefed by a single observer, resulting in the block space being filled with `MsgGasPriceVoter` messages, preventing othe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Add a timelock to BaseStrategy:setPerfFeePct
### Description
## Handle
Dravee
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
To give more trust to users: functions that set key/critical variables should be put behind a timelock.
## Proof of Concept
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-01-sandclock/blob/main/sandcloc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Prysm incorrectly caches the result of `verify_data_column_sidecar_inclusion_proof` check
### Description
Consensus spec states that:
> In the verify_data_column_sidecar_inclusion_proof(sidecar) check, for all the sidecars of the same block, it verifies against the same set of kzg_commitments of the given bea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: Multiple `address` mappings can be combined into a single `mapping` of an `address` to a `struct`, where appropriate
### Description
Saves a storage slot for the mapping. Depending on the circumstances and sizes of types, can avoid a Gsset (20000 gas) per mapping combined. Reads and subsequent writes can also ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: User may lose funds if they call `BalancerRouter::joinBalancerAndPredeposit`
### Description
[`BalancerRouter::joinBalancerAndPredeposit`](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-12-plaza-finance/blob/main/plaza-evm/src/BalancerRouter.sol#L23C1-L40C6) calls [`Predeposit::deposit`](https://github.com/sherloc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect NatSpec in contract and constructor declarations
### Description
In the `MerkleDistributor.sol` contract, the NatSpec specifications are slightly wrong, considering they are referring to the contract `TokenLock.sol`, which belongs to another `NFTIfi's` contract set.
- contracts/MerkleDistributor.sol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: safer implementation of tokenExists
### Description
## Handle
gpersoon
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The function tokenExists does only limited checks on the existence of cards.
It doesn't doublecheck that tokenIds[_card] != 0
This is relevant because 0 is the default value of empty array elements. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Remove `resetICHIVaultApprovals`
### Description
In AegisVaultCore.sol, `resetICHIVaultApprovals` is now open to users, but is still in the IAegisVaultOwnerActions interface. Recommend moving it to `IAegisVaultActions` interface instead. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: SwapperCallbackValidation doesn't do anything, opens up users to having contracts drained
### Description
The `SwapperCallbackValidation` library that is intended to be used by contracts performing swaps does not provide any protection. As a result, all functions intended to be used only in a callback setti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: [01] State variables only set in the constructor should be declared immutable (2 instances)
### Description
Deployment. Gas Saved: **117 275**
Minimum Method Call. Gas Saved: **104**
Average Method Call. Gas Saved: **110**
Maximum Method Call. Gas Saved: **110**
Overall gas change: **-678 (-0.723%)**
Avoi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: `SecurityCouncilMemberElectionGovernor` Owner Can Change `votingPeriod` During an Active Election
### Description
### Impact
* In `SecurityCouncilMemberElectionGovernor` contract : `relay` function enables the contract owner from making calls to any contract address.
* And in `SecurityCouncilMemberElect... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: execGasPrice and dataGasPrice might be 0due to division errors
### Description
`execGasPrice` and `dataGasPrice` might be 0 due to division errors.
### Recommendation
Instead of checking whether `X.{gasPrice, toNativeRate}` are non-zero, it might be best to check whether `execGasPrice` and `dataGasPrice` are ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Index out of bounds error when properties length is more than attributes length breaks minting
### Description
_Submitted by dipp, also found by 0x1f8b, 0x52, 0xc0ffEE, 0xSky, bin2chen, datapunk, eierina, elad, hansfriese, hyh, izhuer, Jeiwan, Migue, R2, and scaraven_
[MetadataRenderer.sol#L188-L198](https... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: The removeServiceAddress() function fails with Overflow error
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In FulfillableRegistry.sol,the removeServiceAddress() function fails with an Underflow error. This is because _serviceCount is never incremented when adding the servic... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Potential gas savings by terminating early Acknowledged
### Description
If a function invocation is bound to revert, one should try to revert as soon as possible to save gas. In `ForgeValidator.validateRedemption` it is possible to terminate more early:
**code/contracts/masset/forge-validator/ForgeValidator... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `path` length not checked
### Description
`path` length is not checked:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/credit/LeverageActions.sol#L107
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d41... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Deprecated 'transfer usage.
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
TestStake::emergency WithdrawMatic()#2167.
EIP1884 [https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1884] increases the gas cost of certain opcodes, possibly making contracts go over the 2300 gas limit imposed by `transfer... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: `GiantMevAndFeesPool.previewAccumulatedETH` function: "accumulated" variable is not updated correctly in for loop leading to result that is too low
### Description
The `GiantMevAndFeesPool.previewAccumulatedETH` function () allows to view the ETH that is accumulated by an address.
However the formula is no... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Malicious proposer can DOS bridge withdrawals
### Description
### Finding description and impact
Anybody can create an L2 and its bridge. They set their own proposer and challenger to handle the output proposals. If the proposer sets the L2 block number of an output proposal to the max value of a `uint64`,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | cross-chain | false | false | ## Gas: memory can be changed to calldata to save gas
### Description
In Solidity, variables declared as `memory` are copied into memory during execution, which increases gas costs. When dealing with external function inputs, the `calldata` keyword is more gas-efficient since it avoids copying and operates directly on... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Incorrect formula used in function `Market.computeClosingFactor()`
### Description
Incorrect amount of assets that will be liquidated
### Proof of Concept
Function `BigBang._liquidateUser()` is used to liquidate an under-collateralization position in the market. This function calls `BigBang._updateBorrowAnd... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: It makes more sense to check `signatures.length > 0` than `signer != address(0)` for multisigs
### Description
In `SignatureValidator.recoverAddrImpl()` for `SignatureMode.Multisig`, it is checked that last `signer != address(0)` (`SignatureValidator.sol#L92`) after validating each signature in the array `sign... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: User paying too much interest won't get a refund
### Description
The `pay` method of `LoanManager` explicitly says in its NatSpec docs:
> /// @dev Does not refund when too much interest is paid.
This means that when a borrower repays more interest than what he owes, the excess value will be given to the lend... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | true | ## Low: AntePoolFactory does not validate create2 return addresses
### Description
The AntePoolFactory uses the `create2` instruction to deploy an AntePool and then initializes it with an already-deployed AnteTest address. However, the AntePoolFactory does not validate the address returned by `create2`, which will be ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Redundant Functionality
### Description
## UniswapOracle Token Price Functionality
In `UniswapOracle`, `getTokenPrice` utilizes `consult` to receive the time-weighted means of tick and liquidity for a given Uniswap V3 pool. This is a redundant functionality as it is already present in `OracleLibrary::consult`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: MED - Not using safeTransfer may cause sweep to fail for some tokens
### Description
## ModeStaking and IERC20
ModeStaking uses `IERC20` from `forge-std`:
## The Interface
The interface is defined as follows:
**Note:** This will fail for tokens that do not return a boolean (e.g., USDT).
## Recommenda... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: does not use correct verifyingContract address
### Description
ERC-7739 introduces a rehashing scheme designed to prevent signature replay across smart accounts that share signers. To accomplish this, the ERC-7739 logic wraps the hash provided to the ERC-1271 `isValidSignature()` function within a new EIP-712... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Role Transfer Not Following Two-Step Pattern
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue.
**File(s) affected:**`Leverage.sol`, `BaseLoan.sol`, `AddressManager.sol`, `AuctionLoanLiquidator.sol`
**Description:**`Solmate/Owned` allows the owner of the inheriting contracts to call `transferOwner... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Buffer total supply can be reset
### Description
The `addLiquidityToBuffer` function can be called multiple times in order to reset the total supply of the buffer.
The `addLiquidityToBuffer` function allows users to initialize a buffer or add liquidity for an already initialized buffer. If the `_bufferAssets... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Commented-out blacklist check allows restricted transfers
### Description
In [`PerpetualBond::_update`](https://github.com/YieldFiLabs/contracts/blob/40caad6c60625d750cc5c3a5a7df92b96a93a2fb/contracts/core/PerpetualBond.sol#L508-L510), the line intended to restrict transfers between non-blacklisted users is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | logic-error | false | false | ## Low: Missing check for `_feeBasisPoints > 0` in `PolygonStrategy::addFee`
### Description
`PolygonStrategy::addFee` does not check if `_feeBasisPoints > 0` when adding a new fee element to the `fees` array. This is inconsistent with the `PolygonStrategy::updateFee` logic where `_feeBasisPoints = 0` triggers a remov... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Short cooldown and short staking cycles increase validator churn
### Description
A 24-hour cooldown period and short staking cycles (e.g., seven days) make joining/exiting timing highly predictable and enable low-friction validator churn that undermines liveness and economic stickiness.
With a 24-hour cooldow... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: InsuranceFund depositors can be priced out & deposits can be stolen
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel, also found by danb_
The `InsuranceFund.deposit` function mints initial `shares` equal to the deposited amount.
The deposit / withdraw functions also use the VUSD contract balance for the shares computa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: A vault owner can frontrun a plugin call and change its implementation
### Description
_Submitted by 0xNineDec, also found by 0x1f8b, infosec_us_team, kenzo, pashov, and xiaoming90_
Each vault owner can manage freely the creation and deletion of plugins at any time if the vault was deployed by call... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: approve race conditions
### Description
Origin conforms to the ERC20 token standard, which contains an unavoidable race condition. This race condition is only exploitable by sophisticated attackers, but could result in loss of funds for Origin users.
The ERC20 standard requires two functions, `approve` and `t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `public` functions not called by the contract should be declared `external` instead
### Description
Contracts [are allowed](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/contracts.html#function-overriding) to override their parents' functions and change the visibility from `external` to `public`.
*There are 8 insta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `NounsDAOV3Proposals.cancel()` should allow to cancel the proposal of the Expired state
### Description
cancel() does not allow to cancel proposals in the final states Canceled/Defeated/Expired/Executed/Vetoed.
The Canceled/Executed/Vetoed states are final because they cannot be changed once they are set.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: LendingPool::getNormalizedIncome() returns stale liquidity index
### Description
In `LendingPool` the functions that rely on the indexes (liquidity index, usage index) update them before executing state changes, in order to ensure they are working with accurate data. \
\
On the other hand `LendingPool::getN... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Fee on transfer tokens will not behave as expected
### Description
### Impact
According to [Whitepaper 1.1 Permissionless](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-timeswap/blob/main/whitepaper.pdf):
"In Timeswap, liquidity providers can create pools for any ERC20 pair, without permission. It is designed to ... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.