prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: registerAsset misuse can permanently disable TransmuterBuffer and break the system
### Description
_Submitted by hyh_
TransmuterBuffer's refreshStrategies() is the only way to actualize \_yieldTokens array. The function requires registeredUnderlyings array to match current Alchemist's \_supportedUnderlying... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: DOS WITH BLOCK GAS LIMIT
### Description
The `setAllocations()` function is used to set the token allocations for each recipient included in the function call:
### Recommendation
\*\*SOLVED: \*\* The `Pangolin Team` solved this issue by implementing the above recommendation. The maximum number of recipients h... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Code Maturity
### Description
## Proposal Execution and Member Management
1. **Proposal Deletion and Vote Handling**:
The function `account::ExecuteProposal` calls `deleteProposalAndVotes(ctx, msg.ProposalId)`, removing the proposal and its associated votes from the collections. However, after deleting th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Don't cache calls/variables if using them once
### Description
### No need to cache `lrtConfig.getContract(LRTConstants.EIGEN_STRATEGY_MANAGER)`
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-11-kelp/blob/f751d7594051c0766c7ecd1e68daeb0661e43ee3/src/NodeDelegator.sol#L38-L46
The variable `eigenlayerStrategyManagerAddre... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Properties of the transaction Object Might Be Undefined
### Description
The Metamask Snaps API does not guarantee that the properties `from` and `method` of the `transaction` object are defined. Depending on the transaction type, it could happen that these properties are not defined. This would result in a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Total Amount Limit Can Be Bypassed During Allocations
### Description
The `allocateTokens` function in the `TreasuryVesting` contract contains a vulnerability that allows operators to allocate more tokens than the category's total amount limit. This occurs because the check that's meant to enforce the categ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: A single external protocol can DOS rebalancing process
### Description
A failure in an external money market can DOS the entire rebalance process in Notional.
### Impact
Notional would not be able to rebalance its underlying holding if one of the external money markets causes a revert. The probability of t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Missing validation for initialization calldata in `POLIsolationModeWrapperUpgradeableProxy` constructor
### Description
**Description:** The `POLIsolationModeWrapperUpgradeableProxy` constructor accepts initialization calldata without performing any validation on its content before executing it via `delegateca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Account may get blacklisted during the bridge process
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-ondo/blob/main/contracts/bridge/DestinationBridge.sol#L349
Accounts that bridge tokens may get blacklisted in the source chain after the bridging process had been initiated. This could lead to different... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: No validity check on chainlinkWrapper
### Description
In `_allocateValueCall()`, there is no check done that `chainlinkWrapper` is valid.
```solidity
function _allocateValueCall(address bidToken, uint256 bidAmount, bytes calldata data) internal virtual override {
address chainlinkWrapper = abi.decode(data,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | critical | access-control | true | true | ## Critical: Permissionless reward distribution can be abused to cause full denial of service and loss of funds for pools
### Description
The distribution of reward token incentives is a permissionless action, meaning that anyone can create a worthless token and mint a large amount to be distributed. Whenever a notifi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Users can evade the `yDUSD` vault's withdrawal timelock mechanism
### Description
The `yDUSD` vault's withdrawal timelock mechanism is vulnerable. An exploiter can withdraw the `DUSD` assets in their account by using another account's `proposedWithdraw` request info, breaking the vault's core invariant.
##... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Remove liquidity while paused
### Description
The function `removeLiquidity()` in `StableSwapFacet.sol` has a `whenNotPaused` modifier, while the comment indicates that liquidity can always be removed, even when the pool is paused. Conversely, the `removeLiquidity()` function in `StableSwap.sol` lacks this mod... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [24] `outgoing_messages` could be made more efficient
### Description
Take a look at [the `outgoing_messages` method in the `Client` struct](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-08-axelar-network/blob/69c4f2c3fcefb1b8eb2129af9c3685a44ae5b6fe/axelar-amplifier/contracts/axelarnet-gateway/src/client.rs#L47-L51):
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Require New Authority as Co-Signer for Authority Transmission
### Description
The current `TransferDelegateAuthority` function allows for the transfer of delegate authority without any validation or a two-step confirmation process. This lack of validation can lead to critical errors, such as mistakenly transfe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistency between PErc20 and PEther interfaces
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
The protocol distinguishes between two types of PTokens: PErc20 and PEther. Both types implement the same functionalities but present behaviors. For instance, the mint function in t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | false | false | ## High: Fee calculation in _sendDeposits is done for overall msg.value instead of bridged value
### Description
The **OmniXMultisender** contract implements a function `sendDeposits` to utilize Layerzero's native airdrop functionality to bridge gas tokens.
To offer such a service, **OmniX** charges a flat **1% fee*... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Excessive type repetition in returned tuples
### Description
Several functions return tuples that contain many fields of the same type adjacent to one another. Such a practice is error-prone, as callers could easily confuse the fields. An example appears in figure 7.1. The tuple returned by the `calculateUserA... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Rebalance will fail if a market has high utilization
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
The `AssetManager.rebalance` function iterates through the markets and withdraws **all** tokens in the `moneyMarkets[i].withdrawAll` call.
Note that in peer-to-peer lending protocols like Compound/Aave the borrower... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | oracle | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-optimism-judging/issues/75
## Found by
unforgiven, csanuragjain
## Summary
All withdrawals are finalized after a 7 days window (finalization period). After this duration transaction are confirmed and user can surely withdraw their balance.
But due to lack of check, ... | Sherlock | 4 | Optimism |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Sense PT redemptions do not allow for known loss scenarios
### Description
Sense PT redemptions do not allow for known loss scenarios, which will lead to principal losses
### Impact
_Permanent freezing of funds_
There may be a malicious series sponsor that purposely triggers a loss, either by DOSing Lido ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: Possibility to use incorrect mint to claim tokens
### Description
The `claimSolana` and `claimEvm` instructions enable users to claim their tokens based on their point score.
Although unlikely, it is possible to invoke both claim instructions with an incorrect mint account and the corresponding treasury and r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: Ethereum reimbursements sent to an incorrect address
### Description
#### Resolution
Remediated as per the 1inch team as of [1inch/[email protected]`6b1a3df`](https://github.com/1inch/solidity-utils/commit/6b1a3dfbe5410b37fa9d3558b606990d9fb32e43) by adding the correct recipient of the refund.
1inch tea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: CreditDelegationBranch Rebalancing Underflows When Debt Exceeds USDC Balance
### Description
The CreditDelegationBranch's rebalancing mechanism can underflow when attempting to settle debt that exceeds a vault's USDC balance, leading to potential vault corruption or system-wide issues.
### Impact
* Vault s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: C03] Inflation parameters are miscalculated
### Description
###### Critical
The [`computeVote`](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/blob/51b65c5c7af455391af2bc30d13d761566d8c236/contracts/inflation/CurrencyGovernance.sol#L226) [function](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/blob/51b65c5c7af455391af2b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Risk of DoS when stoping large rental orders due to block gas limit
### Description
When an order is created on Opensea the `Create::validateOrder()` policy method is used to ensure the order is configured correctly. Currently there is no maximum limit to the number of `offers` in the input `ZoneParameters`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Unreachable Code
### Description
## Robust Value Documentation
The `robust_value` function should always return a value. However, entering the `unreachable!()` code in this function is possible due to a potential overflow in `total += s` or by passing empty items.
## Code Snippet
## Remediation
Remove `ro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Events for Function Calls
### Description
Consider to add events for critical state-changing functions to improve traceability and debugging.
```
/**
* @notice Sets the recipient address for protocol fees.
* @dev Can only be called by the contract owner.
* @param feeRecipient_ The address to which proto... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lack of slippage protection on liquidity buffer increase
### Description
The lack of slippage protection when adding liquidity to a buffer may lead a buffer liquidity provider to receive fewer shares than expected.
When adding liquidity to a buffer through `addLiquidityToBuffer`, the amount of shares received... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Nudge check will break once limit is reached
### Description
## Severity: Medium Risk
## Context:
Minter.sol#L75
## Description:
Because you're checking both sides, once `oldRate` reaches the `MAX_RATE`, every new `nudge` call will revert. This means that if `_newRate` ever gets to `MAXIMUM_TAIL_RATE` o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary External Call
### Description
## Code Optimization Guidance
There is no need to make an unnecessary external call to the function `submitSlowModeTransaction` in the `depositCollateral` function. A simple internal function call is sufficient since `msg.sender` does not change.
## Remediation
Repl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Vault | true | true |
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-y2k-finance/blob/main/src/Controller.sol#L148-L192>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-y2k-finance/blob/main/src/Vault.sol#L350-L352>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-y2k-finance/blob/main/src/Vault.sol#L203-L234>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-y2k-finance/bl... | Code4rena | 5 | Y2k Finance |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: TypeScript Errors ✓ Fixed
### Description
* `toggleHelper`
`persistedData` should be checked for `null` and default to a sane initial config. `notifcount:Number` should be `notifcount:number`.
```
Type '{ addresses: Json; popuptoggle: Number; }' is not assignable to type 'Record'.
Property 'popuptoggle... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Liquidation should not be paused
### Description
The liquidate function is currently gated by a pause check via `self.pausable.assert_not_paused()`. While pausing protocol operations is essential during emergencies, applying this restriction to liquidation poses a critical risk to protocol solvency.
In the c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent Calculation Of Max Withdraw Value
### Description
## Withdraw Obligation Collateral
`withdraw_obligation_collateral` utilizes the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio from the `withdraw_reserves` configuration to calculate `max_withdraw_value`, which may not align with the user’s obligation if the obligatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Universal Router Does Not Forward Native Tokens to V4 Position Manager
### Description
The Universal Router has implemented logic to facilitate the migration of positions from the Uniswap [v3 Position Manager](https://github.com/Uniswap/universal-router/blob/4ce107d6387558b97816293fe2c0d4d7c4cadef4/contract... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Integer Overflow
### Description
## Integer Overflow in Fee Rate Calculation
An integer overflow may occur when specifying malformed fee rates in `payFees` and `borrow`. Specifically, if the sum of the fee rates exceeds 100%, an integer overflow may occur when calculating and transferring the loan amount afte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Missing RekeyTo on mint operations allows vault owner to withdraw all the Algo from the vault
### Description
The minting operation does not validate that its associated transaction has no `RekeyTo`. As a result, an attacker can rekey its vault and withdraw the Algo without paying back the wAlgo.
The minting... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Front-Running | false | true | ## SmartSession Vulnerability Overview
## Context
SmartSession.sol#L139-L213
## Description
SmartSession offers an enable mode for when a smart account wants to enable policies within the same call when the related actions get executed. In this case, it first enables the required policies during the validation phase ... | Cantina | 4 | Biconomy |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Voting Power Reporting in `veRAACToken.sol::getLockPosition` Function
### Description
The `veRAACToken.sol::getLockPosition()` function incorrectly reports a user's voting power by returning their raw veRAAC token balance instead of calculating the time-decayed voting power. This creates a discrepan... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Potential 99.5% loss in `emergencyWithdraw()` of two Yieldbox strategies
### Description
Slippage is incorrectly calculated where `minAmount` is intended to be 99.5%, however it's calculated to be only 0.5%, making the other 99.5% sandwichable. The usual correct `minAmount` slippage calculation in other Yield... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Misleading Documentation
### Description
There are several instances where the codebase's documentation could be improved:
* [This comment](https://github.com/Consensys/linea-contracts-fix/blob/04d6677474421239c1f215c5a676223d09266ba4/contracts/verifiers/PlonkVerifierFull.sol#L1070) references the Lagrange p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Non-informative LogWithdrawal event.
### Description
**Description**
LockToken.sol: the LogWithdrawal event only reports the destination address and transferred amount but does not carry information about the token address and token ID in the case of an NFT.
**Recommendation**
Extend this event and add an e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | true | ## High: Malicious user can overtake a prefunded auction and steal the deposited funds
### Description
In the auction house whenever a new auction (lot) is created, its details are recorded at the 0th index in the `lotRouting` mapping. This allows for an attacker to create an auction right after an honest user and tak... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: User to sell the last supply will make the exchange contribution forever stuck
### Description
[BancorExchangeProvider::_getScaledAmountOut()](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-10-mento-update/blob/main/mento-core/contracts/goodDollar/BancorExchangeProvider.sol#L345) decreases the amount out when the t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: Emitting storage values instead of the memory one. (Save ~200 gas)
### Description
Here, the values emitted shouldn’t be read from storage. The existing memory values should be used instead:
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-popcorn/blob/d95fc31449c260901811196d617366d6352258cd/src/vault/Vault.sol#L629-L6... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent Polynomial Encoding
### Description
The [`submitData` function](https://github.com/Consensys/linea-contracts-audit/blob/29e6798eb85074253145c4688acfa540f37a220f/contracts/LineaRollup.sol#L161) interprets the compressed data as polynomial coefficients. On the other hand, the [`submitBlobData` funct... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Manipulated sendParam in swapExactCollateralForDebtAndLZSend function allows unauthorized token minting
### Description
The `swapExactCollateralForDebtAndLZSend` function allows malicious users to mint arbitrary amounts of debt tokens by manipulating LayerZero send parameters, bypassing collateral requirement... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: [16] MISSING NATSPEC COMMENTS
### Description
NatSpec comments provide rich code documentation. The following functions miss NatSpec comments. Please consider adding NatSpec comments for these functions.
**[Dravee (judge) commented](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-03-polynomial-findings/issues/99#issuecom... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: setUnitPrice takes effect on pause branch
### Description
In `setUnitPrice`, if the vault is paused, the call to `_validatePriceUpdate` will revert. However, on the pause branch, this check is already passed, leading to mixed behavior where on the first such call, state changes take effect:
```solidity
functi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use of 'msg!' consumes additional computational budget
### Description
The usage of `msg!` is usually advisable during tests, and will incur in additional computational budget when the instruction is processed in Mainnet.
In both `resolve_batch_deposit` and `resolve_batch_withdraw` instructions, it was observ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: BalanceGteEnforcer: Lock Mechanism Insufficient
### Description
The current implementation of the `ERC20BalanceGteEnforcer` contains a potential flaw when handling several `Delegations` from the same `delegator`. Specifically, if the `delegator` creates several `Delegations` in the delegation chain that cal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary State Storage of `pyth` Address
### Description
The `pyth` address is stored as a regular state variable. If this address is never intended to change, making it effectively immutable could save gas on repeated reads.
The issue is classified as **low** severity because it focuses on optimization ra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `PerpetualBond.epoch` not updated after yield distribution
### Description
In [`PerpetualBond::distributeBondYield`](https://github.com/YieldFiLabs/contracts/blob/40caad6c60625d750cc5c3a5a7df92b96a93a2fb/contracts/core/PerpetualBond.sol#L215-L241) the caller is supposed to provide a `nonce` that matches [`epoc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: AssignmentHook Does Not Sign Over metaHash
### Description
The function `hashAssignment()` does not hash over `assignment.metaHash`, allowing it to be arbitrarily set by the proposer.
```solidity
function hashAssignment(
ProverAssignment memory assignment,
address taikoAddress,
bytes32 blobHash
)
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Payout not resolved for losing bet
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** Medium, affects core function resolvePayout, leading to delays in resolving bets, which in turn affects the efficient use of funds.
**Likelihood:** Medium, there's a common scenario where a sub-bet, not necessarily the first in th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Use safeTransfer/safeTransferFrom consistently instead of transfer/transferFrom
### Description
It is good to add a require() statement that checks the return value of token transfers or to use something like OpenZeppelin’s safeTransfer/safeTransferFrom unless one is sure the given token reverts in case of a f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Minting tokens is not restricted.
### Description
**Description**
Line 30, function mint(). Currently, anyone can call this function, thus minting as many tokens
as one wants.
**Recommendation**:
Consider adding restrictions to the mint() function(such as onlyOwner). | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Having no deposits in `StakedEXA` will lead to stuck rewards when harvesting
### Description
The provider in `StakedEXA` is free to distributed rewards as it pleases and there is an automated way to distribute via `StakedEXA::harvest()`. The harvest setup may be started but no actual deposits have been made... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Using `private` rather than `public` for constants, saves gas
### Description
If needed, the value can be read from the verified contract source code. Saves **3406-3606 gas** in deployment gas due to the compiler not having to create non-payable getter functions for deployment calldata, not having to store the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [10] Secondary market buyer may suffer a loss if the forging happens before the transfer
### Description
The parameter `forgePotential` is crucial as it determines the number of times an NFT can forge within a year.
```solidity
require(
forgePotential > 0 && forgingCounts[tokenId] <= forgePotential,
'En... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | other | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-bond-judging/issues/21
## Found by
hansfriese, xiaoming90
## Summary
The current implementation of the circuit breaker is not optimal. Thus, the market maker will lose an excessive amount of payout tokens if a quoted token suddenly loses a large amount of value, ev... | Sherlock | 3 | Bond Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: Unnecessary calculation when lenderData.current_debt == requiredAmount
### Description
If `lenderData.current_debt == requiredAmount`, the calculated `newDebt` will be 0, which is the initial value.
### Recommendation
Drop the equality case.
```diff
- if (lenderData.current_debt >= requiredAmount) {
+ if (len... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: `USDMPegRecovery` Risk of fund locked, due to discrepancy between curveLP token value against internal contract math
### Description
_Submitted by Alex the Entreprenerd, also found by gzeon, IllIllI, and leastwood_
[USDMPegRecovery.sol#L90](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-concur/blob/72b5216bfeaa7c5298... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Two Pyth prices can be used in the same transaction to attack the LP pools
### Description
Pyth oracles use a pull model, where the consumer of the price needs to provide a signed price from an offline provider. There are no guarantees that the price at the current time is the freshest price, which means an a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: A has mint caps that are not checked by ERC721SeaDrop
### Description
`ERC721SeaDrop` inherits from `ERC721A`, which packs `balance`, `numberMinted`, `numberBurned`, and an extra data chunk into one storage slot (64 bits per sub-storage) for every address. This creates an inherent cap of \( 2^{64} - 1 \) on... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Creating rewardTokens without streaming depositTokens
### Description
_Submitted by bitbopper_
#### Impact
`stake` and `withdraws` can generate rewardTokens without streaming depositTokens.
It does not matter whether the stream is a sale or not.
The following lines can increase the reward balance on a `wit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Iterative multiplication causing unnecessary computation
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
VaultMath.sol - method arraySum(int256[5] memory _array) is computationally inefficient since each element of _array is multiplied by 1e18.
**Recommendation**
Make th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: referralFeeBps may be greater than feeBps
### Description
`setFeeBps()` allows the owner to set `feeBps` to a value such that `referralFeeBps > feeBps`, which breaks the invariant that the referral fee is always `<= feeBps`.
### Recommendation
Add `require(referralFeeBps <= _feeBps)` check to `setFeeBps()`. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Hardcoded Aave V3 pool address may not match future upgrade
### Description
In the `ArbitrumStrategyManager` contract, the `_aaveV3Pool` variable is defined as an `immutable` address and is set to a hardcoded value of `0x794a61358D6845594F94dc1DB02A252b5b4814aD` during deployment.
However, hardcoding the Aav... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Unused variable
### Description
Following smart contract contains unused variable:
https://github.com/lidofinance/curve-merkle-oracle/blob/ae093b308999a564ed3f23d52c6c5dce946dbfa7/contracts/MerklePatriciaProofVerifier.sol#L37
### Recommendation
We recommend to remove unused variable. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Conviction scoring fails to initialize and bootstrap
### Description
Conviction scores for new addresses/users fail to initialize+bootstrap in `ERC20ConvictionScore`’s `_updateConvictionScore()` because a new user’s `numCheckpoints` will be zero and never gets initialized.
This effectively means that FairSid... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Unchecked return value
### Description
The function [`finalizeCrowdfund`](https://github.com/etherparty/FUEL-Contracts/blob/3717b751bb2fa57ae300776a93ee4d7d7beb2c07/contracts/FuelToken.sol#L202) is defined to return a boolean value indicating success. However, this return value is [ignored](https://github.c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Floating pragma used
### Description
Currently, the contract uses a floating pragma, allowing the contract to be compiled with any 0.8.x Solidity version higher than 0.8.18. It is a security best practice to set the pragma to a specific version to ensure the contract is not accidentally compiled to a version t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: [07] `IncrementGauge` can be called with `0` weight
### Description
There is no check whether the passed weight from `GUILD` holder is greater than `0`.
[ERC20Gauges.sol#L219-226](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-12-ethereumcreditguild/blob/2376d9af792584e3d15ec9c32578daa33bb56b43/src/tokens/ERC20Gauges.sol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Potential out-of-bounds in `removeCardBundlesFromPacketPool`
### Description
The `removeCardBundlesFromPacketPool` function in the `CardAllocationPool` contract has a critical flaw that could lead to `out-of-bounds` access errors.
When removing card bundles, the function **swaps the selected bundle with th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing `last_time` Update in `spot_lp` Causes Incorrect Daily Trade Statistics
### Description
**Description:** The `spot_lp` function uses `instr_state.header.last_time` to determine if a day has passed, but never updates this field.
In contrast, other trading functions (`swap, new_spot_order, spot_quotes_r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Using floats for financial calculations is dangerous
### Description
**Description**
There are a lot of calculations with floats.
It is dangerous practice for financial applications because of the way how floats are
implemented. They have unpredictable “small” error, which may give some magick like a-b+b !... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Zero Amount Transfer Vulnerability in Token Transfers
### Description
The contracts contain multiple instances call of `safeTransfer()` and `safeTransferFrom()` calls that do not check if the transfer amount is greater than zero. This issue is present in the following locations:
* In the init() function:
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Insufficient data Validation in resolve Function of L1Resolver Contract ✓ Fixed
### Description
In the `resolve` function of the `L1Resolver` contract, there is a lack of proper validation for the length of the `data` parameter. This function decodes the `data` parameter assuming it is sufficiently large to co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: `RevenueHandler` counts unclaimed tokens as new revenue
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/RevenueHandler.sol
Impacts:
- Theft of unclaimed yield
## Description
## Brief/Intro
The `RevenueHandler` contract has a `checkpoint... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: findNewOwner edgecase
### Description
## Handle
gpersoon
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
In the function findNewOwner of RCOrderbook, as loop is done which included the check _loopCounter 1.
### Impact
In the function findNewOwner of RCOrderbook, as loop is done which included the check _loopCounte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Modulo operator introduces bias during `oddsBPS ratio` selection
### Description
The `GachaTickets::getPayout` function uses `modulo` operation with the `recieved random number` to generate randomness for the lottery draw. But the `pyth documentation` states the following regarding the usage of modulo operatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Unnecessary require in `AmbireAccountFactory.deploySafe()`
### Description
`AmbireAccountFactory.deploySafe(code, salt)` returns the address where the bytecode "code" is deployed itself, deploying it first if it isn't already deployed. Therefore, it is meaningless to check that the fresh deployment is successf... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Erroneous docstrings and comments
### Description
Several docstrings and comments throughout the code base were found to be erroneous. In particular:
* [Line 209](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/e6eaa48124ae3f209fb117cf05eb18292cf26d21/core/contracts/financial-templates/implementation/FeePayer.s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | true | false | ## High: swapInternal() shouldn't use msg.sender
### Description
As reported by the Connext team, the internal stable swap checks if `msg.sender` has sufficient funds in `onexecute()`. This `msg.sender` is the relayer which normally wouldn't have these funds, so the swaps would fail. The local funds should come from t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: There is no way for the `admin` to sweep `rewards` lost due to precision
### Description
When Rewards are being distributed, Precision will take place, and when it does, those tokens will be stuck in that contract with no way of being recovered, since there is no function to get them back
### Impact
The fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | false | false | ## High: Unstrict Swap Invariant
### Description
## Handling Errors in Uncorrelated Curves
When dealing with an uncorrelated curve, the program introduced an error by reporting an incorrect swap if the `lp_value` after the swap is strictly smaller than the `lp_value` before the swap. The swap should be valid only whe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Protocol will leak value to users due to rounding in `SecuritizeSwap::buy`
### Description
Protocols should always round against users in favor of the protocol. The `buy` function in the `SecuritizeSwap.sol` is rounding the stable coin need it in favor of the user:
```solidity
function buy(uint256 _dsTokenAm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect Docstrings
### Description
Throughout the codebase, multiple instances of incorrect or incomplete docstrings were identified:
* In the `IPlonkVerifier.sol` interface, the [`Verify`](https://github.com/Consensys/linea-monorepo/blob/660f849d1757700df369ebf33964ed03862b8a8c/contracts/contracts/interfac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Extra attention must be paid to future contract upgrades that utilize new or otherwise modify existing low-level calls
### Description
Care must be taken when introducing new features to Beanstalk that leverage low-level calls to ensure that they cannot be manipulated to appear as if those to functions that us... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | other | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-notional-judging/issues/22
## Found by
usmannk
## Summary
New Curve pools have a different ABI than the one that the vaults attempt to use. Not differentiating between the two will lead to silent failures when vaults are deployed for new pools.
## Vulnerability De... | Sherlock | 5 | Notional Update #2 |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Erroneous Validation After Market Shutdown
### Description
When a market is [shutdown](https://github.com/radiant-capital/riz/blob/65ca7bb55550d30388e2b2277fefe5686ab7e4e8/src/riz-lending/RizLendingPoolConfigurator.sol#L491), the [`updateLendingPoolStatus` function](https://github.com/radiant-capital/riz/bl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing zero delta check in `increaseDebtShare` and `decreaseDebtShare`
### Description
The `Licredity::increaseDebtShare` and `Licredity::decreaseDebtShare` functions do not validate that the `delta` parameter is non-zero. A user can call these functions with `delta = 0`, which will result in an `amount` of 0... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Immutable | true | false | ## Severity: High Risk
**Context:**
- OmniBridgeFacet.sol#L34-L106
- AxelarFacet.sol#L18-L23
**Description:**
Most bridge facets call bridge contracts where the bridge address has been supplied as a parameter. This is inherently unsafe because any address could be called. Luckily, the called function signature is ... | Spearbit | 5 | LI.FI |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: Cheaper to not cache `calldata` array length
### Description
**Description:** When an array is passed as `calldata` it is [cheaper not to cache the length](https://x.com/DevDacian/status/1791490921881903468):
The same applies to:
* `PauseManager::__PauseManager_init`
* `LineaRollup::submitBlobs`
* `L2Message... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Incorrect assumption that PT rate is 1.0 post-expiry
### Description
PT rate will be hardcoded to 1.0 post-expiry, which is incorrect. The price returned from the Notional's `PendlePTOracle` contract will be inflated. As a result, the account's collateral will be overinflated, allowing malicious users to borr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Setter Functions Don’t Check for Value Changes
### Description
This issue results in unnecessary event emissions when setting values that are already at the desired value.
### Proof of Concept
The following setter functions do not check if the new value differs from the current value:
* [setLockedStatus](ht... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Additional optimization at CoiinToken.sol
### Description
**Description**
maxMintMonthly and minMintMonthly can be changed to constant as you don’t change them
further in the code:
/// @notice The daily allowed COIIN to be minted
uint256 public maxMintMonthly;
uint256 public minMintMonthly;
**Recommendation*... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect initialization of `powerThreshold` and lack of validation
### Description
The `Bridge::powerThreshold` should be 2/3 the sum of the validator power across current validators at any point; however, the [calculation](https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/contracts/blob/e0aff464865aa98c09450702d7fb36b1f... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.