prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Usage / Loop Concerns
### Description
**Update**
Acknowledged by the developers with:
> In [TAL-5](https://certificate.quantstamp.com/full/talentir-token-marketplace/08aae35f-7537-45ef-ae98-0dc5c0e1abe1/index.html#findings-qs5) we added the ability for the owner() to remove orders. In case of too many orders,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Missing scaling factor in `recordKeyPurchase`?
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
The `Unlock.recordKeyPurchase` function computes the `maxTokens` as:
Note that `grossNetworkProduct` was already increased by `valueInETH` in the code before.
Meaning, the `(2 + 2 * valueInETH / grossNetworkProduct)` pa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | upgrade | false | false | ## Low: Remove obsolete `onlyTokenOwner` from `_transferToNftReceiver`
### Description
Since `_transferToNftReceiver` calls `ERC721Upgradeable::safeTransferFrom`, the `onlyTokenOwner` modifier is obsolete and inefficient as:
* `safeTransferFrom` [calls](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts-upgradeabl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Improperly Validated Lender Account
### Description
## AcceptBorrowRequest Instruction Vulnerability
In the **AcceptBorrowRequest** instruction, the lender passes in an external token account which the borrower pays into. If the lender closes said account after accepting the borrow request, the borrower will... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: First depositor can break minting of shares
### Description
_Submitted by GreyArt, also found by 0xDjango, CertoraInc, cmichel, rayn, TomFrenchBlockchain, and WatchPug_
[Collateral.sol#L82-L91](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-prepo/blob/main/contracts/core/Collateral.sol#L82-L91)
The attack vector and... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: User may not get IL protection if certain functions are called directly in Pools.sol
### Description
## Handle
0xRajeev
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Functions removeLiquidity() and removeLiquidityDirectly() when called directly, do not provide the the user with IL protection unlike when calling t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Code Refactoring
### Description
## Code Review Summary
## Recommendations
1. **Include a sanity check in the `buy_token` instruction**
Ensure that the minted amount of wrapped tokens matches the requested buy amount. This check should be similar to the one implemented in the `sell_token` instruction. Do... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Frontrun attack possible.
### Description
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Resolved
**description**
1. AirPuffHandlerM._curveSimpleSwap(), _curve RouterSwapWithPaths()
`_curveSimpleSwap` function uses the 'exchange function to make the swap. One of the arguments that is required for swap is responsible for t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: _killWoundedAgents
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-10-looksrare-judging/issues/21
## Found by
ast3ros, cergyk, klaus, mstpr-brainbot
If an agent healed is wounded again, the agent will die from the previous wound that was healed. The user spends LOOKS tokens to heal and succ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: SOLC 0.8.4 COMPILER VERSION CONTAINS MULTIPLE BUGS
### Description
Solidity compiler version 0.8.9 fixed important bugs in the compiler. The version 0.8.4 is missing this fix:
* [0.8.9](https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/releases/tag/v0.8.9)
### Recommendation
**ACKNOWLEDGED:**The `0xNodes team` acknowledg... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: DSC Mint will either return true or revert, thus checking `minted` status in `mintDcs` is unnecessary
### Description
DSC Mint will either return true or revert, thus checking `minted` status in `mintDcs` is unnecessary
### Impact
Will save a bit of deployment gas, and cleanup unreachable code | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: OVERPRIVILEGED ROLE ON THE BREAK GLASS GUARDIAN
### Description
In the contract GovernorAlpha, the breakGlassGuardian has the authority to call the following functions to update the timelock admin:
* GovernorAlpha.\_\_acceptAdminOnTimelock() : The breakGlassGuardian can accept address to be a timelock
ad... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Some ERC20 tokens would revert on zero value fee transfers.
### Description
Functions like `repay` would fail if the fees calculated using `_calculateInterest` within these functions return a 0 value.
### Impact
If the fee returned is 0, then a function like repay would fail when they try to send a 0 value... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | cross-chain | false | false | ## Gas: Refactor `SecuritizeBridge::validateLockedTokens` to take `dsServiceConsumer` as input parameter
### Description
**Description:** `SecuritizeBridge::bridgeDSTokens` at L77 reads `dsServiceConsumer` from storage then at L83 calls `validateLockedTokens`.
The internal function `validateLockedTokens` itself re-re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Protocol can collect less or more fees than expected due to constant `claimFee` per transaction regardless of how many boxes are claimed
### Description
**Description:** `DropBox::claimDropBoxes` allows users to pass an array of `boxIds` to claim per transaction while charging a constant `claimFee` per transac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Anyone making use of the MagicLP's TWAP to determine token prices will be exploitable.
### Description
MagicLP provides a TWAP value which can be accessed via `_BASE_PRICE_CUMULATIVE_LAST_`
It is updated in the function below:
function _twapUpdate() internal {
uint32 blockTimestamp = uint32(block.timest... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Parameter constraint is rewritten with empty values in some cases
### Description
There is an issue at [the following line](https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/borg-core/blob/b89ff5b7796047bbb6123c97192cfcff33e6b7f5/src/borgCore.sol#L424). If there are such `minValue` and `maxValue` which lead to the check fail... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: `++i` costs less gas compared to `i++` or `i += 1`
### Description
`++i` costs less gas compared to `i++` or `i += 1` for unsigned integer, as pre-increment is cheaper (about 5 gas per iteration). This statement is true even with the optimizer enabled.
`i++` increments `i` and returns the initial value of `i`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Multiple instances of unchecked errors
### Description
There are multiple instances of unchecked errors in the l2geth codebase, which could lead to undefined behavior when errors are raised. One such unhandled error is shown in Figure 2.1. A comprehensive list of unchecked errors is provided in Appendix C.
``... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Use safeTransfer/safeTransferFrom consistently instead of transfer/transferFrom
### Description
_Submitted by cccz, also found by 0x1f8b, bobi, byterocket, Dravee, hack3r-0m, sirhashalot, TomFrenchBlockchain, UncleGrandpa925, and WatchPug_
It is good to add a require() statement that checks the return valu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: Non-Standard Transaction Hash
### Description
The [`BootloaderUtilities` contract](https://github.com/matter-labs/system-contracts/blob/4ad1f26ae205d5a973216d141833e0ac37d72ec8/contracts/BootloaderUtilities.sol) generates transaction hashes for different types based on the transaction data, including the sign... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary validation in `Bera_Module::bera_infrared_stake` should follow standard pattern
### Description
In [`Bera_Module::bera_infrared_stake`](https://github.com/d2sd2s/d2-contracts/blob/c2fc257605ebc725525028a5c17f30c74202010b/contracts/modules/Bera.sol#L78-L82), there is a call to `validateToken(vault)`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Users can avoid paying vault fees
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
The `LPIssuer.deposit/withdraw` function charges protocol\&management\&performance fees through inflating the LP supply in the `_chargeFees` function.
However, this LP fees minting is skipped if the elapsed time is less than the `mana... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Importing interfaces from the `forge-std/interfaces` for production is not recommended
### Description
The `DecimalAdjustor` contract directly imports the `IERC20.sol` from the `forge-std/interfaces` as per the natspec comment given.
`forge-std` is a collection of helpful utilities and contracts for use with... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: Using bools for storage incurs overhead
### Description
// Booleans are more expensive than uint256 or any type that takes up a full
// word because each write operation emits an extra SLOAD to first read the
// slot's contents, replace the bits taken up by the boolean, and then write
// back. This is th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Typo in enum state
### Description
In the `Escrow` contract, there is a typo in the `Status` enum, where the word ***Paid*** is misspelled as ***Paided.***
While these typo do not affect the functionality of the code, it can make the codebase harder to read and understand.
### Recommendation
Correct the typo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Malicious revert reasons with faked lengths can disrupt order execution
### Description
Malicious revert reasons with faked lengths can be used in the various order callbacks to disrupt order execution
### Impact
A malicious user can use this attack in many different places, but they all stem from the bug in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: MISSING A CAP FOR EUSD GAS COMPENSATION
### Description
The owner of the `CollateralManager.sol` contract, when setting the `EUSD_GAS_COMPENSATION` protocol parameter within `setGasCompensation()` function, there are no checks regarding the quantity being set.
Code Location
-------------
### Recommendation
*... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: User supplied owner address which is meant to be token owner is never the token owner
### Description
In the function `mint()`, owner is a parameter which is accepted by the function and is meant to be set into the `TokenInfo` struct's owner field during the mint. But the issue is that the `TokenInfo` struc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Consider splitting complex checks into multiple steps
### Description
Assign the expression's parts to intermediate local variables, and check against those instead.
*There are 23 instances of this issue.*
--- | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: ShortLongSpell#openPosition can cause user unexpected liquidation when increasing position size
### Description
When increasing a position, all collateral is sent to the user rather than being kept in the position. This can cause serious issues because this collateral keeps the user from being liquidated. It ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: The value in the `idInList` mapping can be wrong.
### Description
**Description**
TokensFarm.sol: function finalise Deposit(), line 1103.
TokensFarmSDK.sol: function finalise Deposit(), line 1061. Perpetual Tokens FarmSDK.sol: function finalise Deposit(), line 1114. Perpetual TokensFarm.sol: function finalis... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `AprPairFeed::getRoundData` can return data for a different round than the specified
### Description
**Description:** When updating round data on the `AprPairFeed`, the data is saved in the `rounds` mapping, which is accessed via the calculated `roundIdx`. The way in which the `roundIdx` is derived causes it t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Fee calculation occurs twice
### Description
`SecuritizeOnRamp::subscribe, swap` calls `calculateDsTokenAmount` which performs an external call to calculate the fee:
```solidity
function calculateDsTokenAmount(uint256 _liquidityAmount) public view returns (uint256 dsTokenAmount, uint256 rate, uint256 fee) {
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Duplicated transfer of ownership
### Description
In the [`initialize` function](https://github.com/celo-org/celo-monorepo/blob/af49272ef57a077ee6e704aad76d506c039798d3/packages/protocol/contracts/common/MetaTransactionWallet.sol#L66) of the [`MetaTransactionWallet` contract](https://github.com/celo-org/celo-mo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | integer-overflow | true | true | ## Medium: Lowest tier (highest index) membership cannot be upgraded
### Description
For `SPONSORED` DAOs, members are permitted to upgrade from a lower tier membership to a higher tier by burning two tokens within a call to [`MembershipFactory::upgradeTier`](https://github.com/OneWpOrg/smart-contracts-blockchain-1wp/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: InflationaryVest.vy: Missing update of self.claimed allows infinite multiple claims by the recipient
### Description
The missing update of self.claimed will cause infinite reward extraction for the recipient as an attacker will repeatedly call claim() and receive the same allocation multiple times.
Affected... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: External PT redeem functions can be reentered to double count the received underlying funds
### Description
There are two versions of external PT redeem() functions in Redeemer: multi-PT one and Sense. Both calculated underlying funds returned from redeem as a balance difference, both can be reentered, and Se... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Unused Payer Account
### Description
## Payer Account Usage in Instruction Contexts
In all instruction contexts, the payer account is specified. However, this is not always used. The instruction contexts in which the payer account was not used are as follows:
1. CollectProtocolFees
2. Pause
3. SetAdmin
4. Se... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Guardian proof that is never fully approved by minGuardians is never deleted
### Description
A guardian proof hashs is only deleted if it has been approved by min number of guardians in the approval bits. In case it is not, the approval for the hash remains and is not deleted. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Mismatched Constant Usage
### Description
## Permission Management
In `permission.move`, `get_admin_permission` and `get_coin_permission` use a default policy name `RESERVED_DEFAULT_PERMISSION_NAME`, while `init_default_policy` uses the constant `DEFAULT_POLICY_NAME`. This will cause issues if the values of t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Wrong implementation of EIP712MetaTransaction
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-rolla/blob/efe4a3c1af8d77c5dfb5ba110c3507e67a061bdd/quant-protocol/contracts/utils/EIP712MetaTransaction.sol#L102-L114
## Vulnerability details
1. `EIP712MetaTransaction` is a utils contrac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Lack of segregation between users' assets and collected fees resulting in loss of funds for the users
### Description
The users' assets are wrongly sent to the owner due to a lack of segregation between users' assets and collected fees, which might result in an irreversible loss of assets for the victims.
##... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Fees are improperly calculated in sDaiStrategy.sol and thus subsequent depositors cannot withdraw their full deposits
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** Medium, some users may not get their full deposit back.
**Likelihood:** High, will happen everytime `_withdraw()` is called.
**Description**
The ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Test arguments and actual contract arguments are incompatible
### Description
`FixedPrice.sol.constructor()` test file is `test/FixedPrice.t.sol.setUp()` but used arguments is different.
Expected value of arguments should be same. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: TRST-L-4 tokenDecimalDivider implementation causes limited functionality
### Description
**Description:**
tokenDecimalDivider stores the decimals difference between input token and output token.
However, this value assumes input decimals is always larger or equal to output decimals. As
a result, the contract... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Insufficient staleness check for `bendNFTOracle`/`bendTokenOracle`
### Description
- src/PriceOracle.sol
- Instances(2)
Simply checking the timestamp !=0, doesn't prevent stale price. PriceOracle's checking that latestTimestamp !=0 is insufficient.
Note that in 07 audit, an insufficient staleness check was r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Price calculation can be manipulated by intentionally reverting some of price feeds.
### Description
Price calculation module iterates through available price feeds for the requested asset, gather prices of non-revert price feeds and then apply strategy on available prices to calculate final asset price.
By... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Some contracts might not be able to handle `WERC721` tokens
### Description
The `ERC721` standard added the `safeTransferFrom` functionality because there can be smart contract accounts that do not expect to receive such tokens and can't handle (move) them. The same problem exists for `WERC721`, as a smart con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: No max for advanceIncentive
### Description
_Submitted by gpersoon, also found by 0x1f8b_
The function setAdvanceIncentive of DAO.sol doesn't check for a maximum value of incentive.
If incentivewould be very large, then advanceIncentive would be very large and the function advance() would mint a large amo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Nobody can buy the `TaxTokenReceipt` NFT from auction
### Description
Nobody can buy the `TaxTokenReceipt` NFT from auction due to the overrided `transferFrom` function. The `transferFrom` function is overrided with the following checks:
```javascript
function transferFrom(
address from,
address to,
uin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Unused ERC20 tokens are not refunded
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
Based on the context and comments in the code, we assume that it's possible that there will be some leftover sell tokens, not only when users are selling unwrapped ETH but also for ERC20 tokens.
However, in the current implementa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Upgrade Initialization Logic Will Never Execute Due to Incorrect Initializer Usage in CommunityVCS
### Description
The CommunityVCS contract contains upgrade initialization logic within its initialize function that's guarded by the OpenZeppelin initializer modifier. Due to how this modifier works, the upgrade ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `WebAuthn::contains()` optimization
### Description
**Description:** In the `WebAuthn::contains()` function, the current implementation checks for out-of-bounds conditions inside the loop on each iteration. This is inefficient as the same check is performed repeatedly.
**Recommended Mitigation:** Consider pe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Certain ERC20 tokens do not return bool from approve which breaks the core logic
### Description
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The BrightPoolLenger and UniswapExchange contracts attempt to approve the ask or bid token for other contracts and require the approve function to return... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: `slash()` can be frontrunned to avoid the penalty imposed on them
### Description
I believe `slash()` is used to take funds away from a user when they misbehave. However, a malicious user can frontrun this operation or the `pause()` function and call `fullClaimAndExit()` to fully exit before the penalty can... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [41] `0.8.20` is vulnerable to some bugs and compiler version should be updated to be on the safe side
### Description
### Proof of Concept
See https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/blob/afda6984723fca99e82ebf34d0aec1804f1f3ce6/docs/bugs_by_version.json#L1865-L1871
we can see that this compiler version is vuln... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: The SelectTopNWorkerNonces function lacks a sorting algorithm internally.
### Description
The SelectTopNWorkerNonces function lacks a sorting algorithm internally and only selects N workers from the array.
### Impact
It does not select the top N latest worker nonces as intended. Moreover, selecting workers... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Checks
### Description
## Action Items
1. **Restrict Maximum Treasury Fee**
- Add a check to restrict the maximum value to ensure that the `treasury_fee_bps` value does not exceed a maximum allowed value (`MAX_BPS`) when updating the global configuration.
2. **Modify Farm Configuration Update**
-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Missing address check for instructions LH and LHU
### Description
According to [this](), page 99, Section Restrictions, the address must be naturally aligned. If the least-significant bit of the address is non-zero, an Address Error exception occurs. However, in the contract, the address is not checked.
##... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Max oracle members amount is actually lower
### Description
Max members are 255 instead of 256 which may affect the quorum:
https://github.com/lidofinance/lido-dao/blob/801d3e854efb33ff33a59fe51187e187047a6be2/contracts/0.4.24/oracle/LidoOracle.sol#L432
### Recommendation
The check needs to be corrected. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Temporary denial-of-service when in-flight messages are not executed before a deprecated Wormhole Guardian set expires
### Description
**Description:** Wormhole exposes a governance action in [`Governance::submitNewGuardianSet`](https://github.com/wormhole-foundation/wormhole/blob/eee4641f55954d2d0db47831688a2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Protocol fees are mistakenly configured by protocol pools rather than being imposed
### Description
[/contracts/pool-manager/src/manager/commands.rs# L81](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-11-mantra-dex/blob/26714ea59dab7ecfafca9db1138d60adcf513588/contracts/pool-manager/src/manager/commands.rs# L81)
### ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: The `CouncilMember` contract DoS due to the `_retrieve` function revert
### Description
The `_retrieve`function is called before any significant state changes. This function executes the withdrawal from the `_target`, which might be a Sablier stream or another protocol. `SablierV2Lockup` reverts if withdraw... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Constants should be defined rather than using magic numbers
### Description
It is bad practice to use numbers directly in code without explanation
VotingEscrow.sol::309 => for (uint256 i = 0; i < 255; i++) { | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: USDA Timed Rate Limit
### Description
## USDA Timed Limit Reset
USDA `usda_timed_limit` resets discretely after a period of `usda_timed_duration` seconds.
## Code Snippet
## Remediation
This isn’t particularly impactful and can likely be mitigated by adjusting the limits such that double the rate limit is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Off-by-one cap prevents setting max allowed liquidation fee in `Collateral`
### Description
_Resolved_
The `Collateral` base contract enforces an upper bound on `liquidationFee`, but the bound uses a strict less-than check that prevents setting the fee to the intended maximum (15%):
As a result, governance ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: `call()` Should Be Used Instead of `transfer()` on an `address payable`
### Description
The `transfer()` and `send()` functions forward a fixed amount of 2300 gas. Historically, it has often been recommended to use these functions for value transfers to guard against reentrancy attacks. However, the gas cost o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: `currentStore.principal` is not subtracted after it was withdrawn, allowing users to claim it again infinitely
### Description
In the `DIAWhitelistedStaking` contract, when a user withdraws their principal through the `unstake` function, the `currentStore.principal` value is not zeroed out or decremented afte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Virtual borrow shares accrue interest and lead to bad debt
### Description
The virtual borrow shares, that are not owned by anyone, earn interest in *accrueInterest*. This interest keeps compounding and cannot be repaid as the virtual borrow shares are not owned by anyone. As the withdrawable funds are comp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: Leak Of Metamask Nonce
### Description
## Metamask Wallet Import and API Caching Vulnerability
The application allows users to import a Metamask wallet through [easy.connect.me](https://easy.connect.me). However, the API responsible for this process, `/api/auth/warrant`, may cache the nonce value via clien... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: No response check after function call to transfer tokens
### Description
According to the ERC-20 standard, the token transfer functions return a boolean variable.
It is necessary to process the function response after the token transfer.
But now there is no such functionality on the following lines:
- https... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [01] Missing boundary check in EVM transaction decoding
### Description
With the `account_contract.cairo`'s `execute_from_outside` function, callers submit a `calldata` blob of `calldata_len` length, out of which the transaction data is extracted by selecting `[call_array].data_len` bytes starting from positio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Risk-prone Accounting in GaugeExtraRewarder
### Description
The `GaugeExtraRewarder` contract tracks shares by updating internal tracking whenever the [`onReward` function](https://github.com/ThenafiBNB/THENA-Contracts/blob/2bb84cf6bb429e9bac8ac8464f4546da855ef4ca/contracts/GaugeExtraRewarder.sol#L71-L83) i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: A liquidated position possibly cannot be closed
### Description
The `Compound V2` protocol is a lending protocol that allows users to supply collaterals in order to borrow other assets (possibly the collateral itself). If a user's position gets undercollateralized, the user will get liquidated (i.e. a liqui... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Changing hat toggle address can lead to unexpected changes in status
### Description
Changing the toggle address should not change the current status unless intended to. However, in the event that a contract's toggle status hasn't been synced to local state, this change can accidentally toggle the hat back ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Arbitrary Update Of Last Epoch Mixed
### Description
## Overview of `suifrens.move` and `capy_labs.move`
In `suifrens.move`, `suifren_update_last_epoch_mixed` sets the new epoch of mixed, which is intended to prevent users from frequently mixing their SuiFrens without following a countdown period. However, s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Redundancies
### Description
The referenced lines are defined variables but are unused.
### Recommendation
Remove the redundancies. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: tradeTokenMinSupply must not be zero
### Description
When creating a new token, the creator needs to set the initial supply and the minimum supply. Take note that the minimum supply cannot be zero, otherwise the AMM calculation will not work (divide by zero) and all the ETH that is spent on buying the token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Rewards supplied to a gauge, prior to its first depositor will be permanently lost.
### Description
Rewards supplied to a gauge, prior to its first depositor will be permanently lost.
### Impact
Loss of funds
### Recommendation
Revert in case current supply is 0. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: The pause mechanism does not check for correct opcodes
### Description
The protocol’s pause mechanism relies on the `if_active_process` function to block user-initiated operations when the system is paused. The function checks if the operation code handles TON or Jettons, and returns the correct asset to th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | initialization | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-08-flayer-judging/issues/214
## Found by
Ruhum, h2134, kuprum, novaman33, rndquu, zzykxx
### Summary
According to the [README](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-08-flayer/blob/main/README.md#moongate-4):
> The Bridged721 should be strictly compliant with EIP-721... | Sherlock | 5 | Flayer |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Price Emission In Batch Mint
### Description
In `_mintCardWithId()`, the CardMinted event emits `msg.value` for each token, even though the value corresponds to the entire batch. This makes event logs misleading, as every card appears to have been purchased for the full batch price.
### Impact
Analy... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing `maxExposureFactor` in `Errors.ExceededMaxExposure`
### Description
A `maxExposureFactor` was added to adjust the max exposure during the slippage check. However, the `maxExposureFactor` value is not present in the custom error `Errors.ExceededMaxExposure`, which will not emit the correct parameters wh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Loop backwards in `MysteryBox::_determineTier()` to avoid multiple variables and simplify code
### Description
[Loop backwards](https://github.com/Earnft/smart-contracts/blob/43d3a8305dd6c7325339ed35d188fe82070ee5c9/contracts/MysteryBox.sol#L380-L383) in `MysteryBox::_determineTier()` to avoid multiple variabl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Withdrawal Amount Validation May Lead to Unexpected Outcomes
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `44e6d94df2ac1f251591a0d0f64d265946687815``b40613bb1c4df691d479c296ab7860411af3eea9`, and `3e3145c7f8f3210ffb35d4d4dbff04004be49299`.
**Description:** In `batchELExit(... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Pause modifier in bridge receiver functions causes receiver failures for in-flight messages
### Description
The `USDCBridge::receivePayloadAndUSDC` and `SecuritizeBridge::receiveWormholeMessages` functions are protected by the `whenNotPaused` modifier, which causes these functions to revert when the respect... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Non Compliance With Approveforall()
### Description
The `ContributorNFTStaking` contract's `stakeNFT` function currently only checks for individual NFT approval via `getApproved` and does not account for global approval set through `setApprovalForAll`. This oversight renders the contract non-compliant with sce... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Handling Incompatibility with Fee-on-Transfer, Deflationary, and Rebasing Tokens in `GatewayManagerFacet`
### Description
**Severity** - High
**Status** - Acknowledged
**Overview**
The GatewayManagerFacet contract facilitates token funding operations across subnets through its `fundWithToken` function. Thi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: The totalFt and accretingPrincipal are updated incorrectly in withdrawAssets
### Description
The _totalFt and _accretingPrincipal values were being decremented twice when asset-Balance >= amount, leading to incorrect accounting of total assets.
### Recommendation
```solidity
function withdrawAssets(IERC20 as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Code-in-Address Does Not Guarantee Compatibility
### Description
In a few cases, the protocol checks if an address possesses code as a validation before proceeding with the assignment. However, this does not guarantee that it could be another contract implementing a totally different logic. In particular:
* ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: UniswapV3 sqrtRatioLimit doesn't provide slippage protection and will result in partial swaps
### Description
The sqrtRatioLimit for UniV3 doesn't cause the swap to revert upon reaching that value. Instead it just cause the swap to partially fill. This is a [known issue](https://github.com/Uniswap/v3-core/blo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: A temporary issue shows in the staking functionality which leads to the users receiving less minted tokens
### Description
### Derivative Reth prices
A quick explanation of the issue causing it, the problem is based on the function "ethPerDerivative" in the Reth derivative.
As you can see two statements can... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Double-Counting Partial Withdrawals After Electra Upgrade
### Description
Due to EIP-7251 and EIP-7002, partial withdrawals can occur below the MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE after the Electra upgrade. Hence, it is possible for ETH from partial withdrawals to be double-counted. A pod owner can choose the `beaconTimesta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: The voting thresholds in Ajna's Extraordinary Funding Mechanism can be manipulated to execute proposals below the expected threshold
### Description
This vulnerability presents a significant risk to the Ajna treasury. A malicious actor who owns a substantial amount of tokens could manipulate the voting mech... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Passwords are accessible via shell history
### Description
The Deposit CLI tool allows passwords to be supplied as command-line arguments, enabling password leakage through operating systems such as terminal shell history and execution of `ps` or similar commands.
Figure 6.1 shows how the tool allows speci... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `OmoAgent.setPositionManager` change results in loss of deposited positions
### Description
The `setPositionManager()` function allows the manager to update the `positionManager` address, however, changing the position manager without proper handling will result in all previously deposited positions being l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: MISSING ZERO ADDRESS CHECKS
### Description
In the `TreasuryVester` and `Airdrop` contracts, the constructors are missing address validation. On the other hand, in some functions it is also critical to perform this validation. For example, in the `TreasuryVester.setRecipients()` function, if a 0 address recipi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | false | false | ## High: Stealing Tokens While Swapping
### Description
## Vulnerability in `mayan_flash_swap_finish` Instruction
In the `mayan_flash_swap_finish` instruction, the `spl_transfer` function transfers the tokens from `from_acc` to `to_acc` to complete the swap. Here, the `spl_transfer` function uses the `mayan_invoke` f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Negative rebase of stETH could prevent a round from ending
### Description
When a round ends, the amount of underlying assets currently in the vault is [subtracted](https://github.com/pods-finance/yield-contracts/blob/c4b401ce674c24798de5f9d02c82e466ee0a2600/contracts/vaults/STETHVault.sol#L97) from the amo... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.