prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Rounded Down Fees
### Description
## Fee Calculation in Helpers.computeFeeAmount
The `Helpers.computeFeeAmount` function calculates fees by multiplying the initial amount by the fee rate and dividing by `_BASIS_POINTS`. The division operation effectively divides the product by 10,000. Since this is an integer... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: WhitelistPeriodManager: Improper state handling of exclusion additions
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-biconomy/blob/main/contracts/hyphen/WhitelistPeriodManager.sol#L178-L184
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-biconomy/blob/main/contracts/hyphen/WhitelistPeriodMan... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Limitations/Validation To Set Variables in Tracer
### Description
Description
The owner of a Tracer is able to set a range of variables which effect user rewards and borrowing functionality.
The functions that do not contain any limitations or validations are:
•setFeeRate()
•setMaxLeverage()
•setFundin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Conversion Rate Discrepancy
### Description
## Discrepancy Between Assets and Shares
A discrepancy between assets and shares may occur due to potential changes in the conversion rate between the request time and processing time during `YieldToken::mint` or `YieldToken::withdraw`. This may result in the fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Update to latest OpenZeppelin version
### Description
The project uses version [1.1.0 of OpenZeppelin](https://github.com/decentraland/mana/blob/master/package.json#L10). [Version 1.2.0](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/zeppelin-solidity/releases/tag/v1.2.0) was released a few days ago, which fixes ERC20 compli... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Emergency withdraw might not be enough if the underlying pool is a nested pool
### Description
Emergency withdraw is can be called in various cases. The protocol team states that it can be called when a balancer pool enables "enableRecoveryMode" and maybe it can be called when the pool has an exploit and it... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | false | false | ## High: Arbitrary transactions possible due to insufficient signature validation
### Description
A hacker can create arbitrary transaction through the smart wallet by evading signature validation.
Major impacts:
1. Steal **all** funds from the smart wallet and destroy the proxy
2. Lock the wallet from EOAs by upd... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Voters who withdraw veLACX tokens risk losing gained bribes rewards
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/Voter.sol
Impacts:
- Permanent freezing of unclaimed yield
## Description
## Brief/Intro
Voters who withdraw their veLAC... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: CRTOKENS MAY BE MINTED/BURNED ARBITRARILY IF POLICY CENTER IS NOT SET
### Description
The modifier `onlyPolicyCenter` allows the execution of a function making use of this modifier without reverting the transaction when `policyCenter` is not set or equals to `0`. Since this modifier is used to verify the ac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Bulk Informational Issues relative to Release 0.4 PR
### Description
This issue includes a list of informational issues found and noted while reviewing the PR that would merge the Release 0.4 PR into the main branch. The issues are not sorted by type or files.
1. Inside `CdpManagerStorage.getICR`, `currentETH... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Calling `createBounty()` with invalid gauge will revert before returning 0
### Description
When `createBounty()` is called, the first check is to ensure that the `gauge` is valid on Curve's `gaugeController`:
However, there is no way for this function call to return a value less than 0. We can see this by fo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Check zeroParams and lpTokenParams Is Not Empty
### Description
## Security Analysis Report
## Severity
**High Risk**
## Context
`PoolManager.sol#L158-197`
## Situation
The function `addTarget()` checks that `targetParams` is not empty. However, `addSeries()` does not include a check for this, and both `ze... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | false | false | ## Medium: [M-03]
### Description
### Description of the problem
A comment in Syndicate.sol states that “Basically, under a rage quit or voluntary withdrawal from the beacon chain, the knot kick is auto-propagated to syndicate”. However, when a KNOT is inactive, the KNOT can still remain part of the syndicate and isn... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: The node contract could contain tokens that are not actively used
### Description
The node contract could contain tokens that are not actively used. This could be due to airdrops or shares from inactive components.
### Recommendation
Consider having a way to salvage tokens from the node contract. This could b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: All migrated withdrarwals that require more than 135,175 gas may be bricked
### Description
Migrated withdrawals are given an "outer" (Portal) gas limit of `calldata cost + 200,000`, and an "inner" (CrossDomainMessenger) gas limit of `0`. The assumption is that the CrossDomainMessenger is replayable, so there... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect error message
### Description
The [`Liquidatable` constructor](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/1631ef7ad29aaeba756ef3b9a01c667e1343df85/packages/core/contracts/financial-templates/expiring-multiparty/Liquidatable.sol#L189) and the [`PerpetualLiquidatable` constructor](https://github.com/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Avoid contract existence checks by using solidity version 0.8.10 or later
### Description
Prior to 0.8.10 the compiler inserted extra code, including `EXTCODESIZE` (**700 gas**), to check for contract existence for external calls. In more recent solidity versions, the compiler will not insert these checks if t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: [G-15]
### Description
[G-15] require() or revert() statements that check input arguments should be at the top of the function
Checks that involve constants should come before checks that involve state variables, function calls, and calculations. By doing these checks first, the function is able to revert b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: FLOATING PRAGMA
### Description
The `Truffles` contract uses the Solidity pragma **^0.8.9**. It's essential to deploy the contract with the exact compiler version and flags that have undergone thorough testing. Locking the pragma to a specific version helps to ensure that contracts are not accidentally deploye... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: `withdraw()` doesn't claim all rewards before burning token
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/VotingEscrow.sol
Impacts:
- Permanent freezing of unclaimed yield
## Description
## Brief/Intro
The `claim()` function in the `R... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Admin can not set the pool fee since it is only set in memory
### Description
The pool fee is only set in memory and not in storage so specific pool fees will not apply.
### Impact
Specific pool fees will not apply. Only the default fee will apply to swaps.
ref: [UniswapImplementation::getFee()](https://g... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Uninitialized Variable `marketWhitelist` in `RCTreasury.sol`
### Description
_Submitted by leastwood, also found by 0xsanson, gpersoon, hickuphh3 and JMukesh_
The variable, `marketWhitelist`, is never initialized in the contract `RCTreasury.sol`. As a result, the function `marketWhitelistCheck()` does not... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Impossible condition; unreachable code.
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
Stake::proposeAnd Vote Upgrade()#2187.
The check approvals [proposed Upgrade Contract] >= minSigRequired will constantly be equal to false, as 'approvals[proposed UpgradeContract] is ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistency In Size Calculation
### Description
## Inaccurate Size Calculations in Codebase
Several instances of incorrect size calculations exist within the codebase, resulting in inefficient space utilization and incorrect storage allocations.
## 1. InfinexAdminAuthority Account
In the `InfinexAdminAuth... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Code Refactoring
### Description
## Action Items
1. **Include a rent exemption check for the `fee_address` in `WithdrawFunds`** to prevent transaction failures due to insufficient balance when transferring small amounts of SOL (lamports) to the `fee_address`.
2. **In the current implementation, a majority of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Attacker Can DoS Queue with Low-Quality Subscriptions
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> The current implementation iterates through the entire subscription queue while buying a new subscription. We enforce a hard limit on the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Withdraw limits are not properly considered during balancing transactions and can lead to vault DOS
### Description
**Details**
When withdrawing from an adapter, current balance and max withdraw must be considered. If either is exceeded then the rebalance transaction will revert during execution and will r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | access-control | false | false | ## Gas: Functions guaranteed to revert when called by normal users can be marked `payable`
### Description
If a function modifier such as `onlyOwner` is used, the function will revert if a normal user tries to pay the function. Marking the function as `payable` will lower the gas cost for legitimate callers because th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: TimeLockUpgrade’s timeLockPeriod remains default post-deployment
### Description
Several contracts inherit functionality from the `TimeLockUpgrade` contract, which is deployed by `2_core.js` methods using the `timeLockUpgrade` modifier. However, the `setTimeLock` modifier is invokable at any time, and its fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `OperationExecuted` event is defined but never emitted
### Description
In the `OperatorProposal` contract the [`OperationExecuted`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-04-party/blob/440aafacb0f15d037594cebc85fd471729bcb6d9/contracts/proposals/OperatorProposal.sol#L20) event is defined but it is never emitted. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing event and or timelock for critical parameter change
### Description
Events help non-contract tools to track changes, and events prevent users from being surprised by changes
*There are 4 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Cheaper input valdiations should come before expensive operations
### Description
Check @audit comment for details
*There are 3 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/7bbb55fca61e6bae29e57133c1e45806cbb17aa4/contracts/vote-escrow/VoteEscrowCore.sol#L925 | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Docstrings
### Description
The [code under review](https://github.com/Consensys/linea-contracts-fix/tree/04d6677474421239c1f215c5a676223d09266ba4/contracts/verifiers) contains several functions with minimal or missing docstrings, which limits readability. This is compounded by the fact that many functi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Swivel.setFee() is implemented wrongly.
### Description
_Submitted by hansfriese, also found by jonatascm_
`Swivel.setFee()` is implemented wrongly.
Swivel.feenominators won't be set as expected.
### Proof of Concept
[This function](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-swivel/blob/fd36ce96b46943026cb2df... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `takeOwnership()` function checks can be simplified
### Description
Currently, the `takeOwnership()` function performs the following checks to determine whether a user is allowed to take ownership:
To summarize:
- the inputted `newOwner` must not be `address(0)`
- the inputted `newOwner` must equal `proposed... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Claim functions don't validate if the epoch is settled
### Description
Both claim functions fail to validate if the epoch for the request has been already settled, leading to loss of funds when claiming requests for the current epoch. The issue is worsened as `claimAndRequestDeposit()` can be used to claim a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: An admin authority initializing RebateInfo will make claim_rebate_fee unusable
### Description
A `ClaimRebateFee` constraint enforces that `rebate_info.authority == rebate_manager.authority`. This will always be false when an admin authority initialized the `rebate_info`, leading the `rebate_info.rebate_aut... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Malicious tickets can lead to the loss of all tokens
### Description
_Submitted by johnnycash, also found by WatchPug, csanuragjain, gpersoon, gzeon, harleythedog, kemmio, kenzo, leastwood, and pauliax_
#### Impact
It allows an attacker to retrieve all the tokens of each promotions.
#### Analysis
Anyone c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Malicious front-end can sneak intermediate ownership changes to perform unauthorized actions
### Description
LSSVMPair implements an `onlyOwner` multicall function to allow the owner to batch multiple calls. Natspec indicates that this is "Intended for withdrawing/altering pool pricing in one tx, only calla... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Simulation Mode in ApprovedCallsPolicy
### Description
In `ApprovedCallsPolicy`, the variable [IS\_EXECUTING\_SIMULATION\_SLOT](https://github.com/ironblocks/onchain-firewall/blob/8f4fcf861d53c835ed005db67b8af4037464e0ca/contracts/policies/ApprovedCallsPolicy.sol#L19) can be read in [`_is_executing_simulation(... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: Forcing the new POQo system to fail, preventing the network's ability to process transactions.
### Description
Report type: Blockchain/DLT
Target: https://github.com/shardeum/shardus-core/tree/dev
Impacts:
- Network not being able to confirm new transactions (total network shutdown)
## Description
## Intr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack Of Pause Functionality
### Description
## Claim Coin V2
`claim_coin_v2` handles the process of claiming SUI coins, ensuring that the claim is valid based on epoch and timestamp conditions. However, it does not utilize any pause flag to enable it to stop the claiming process. The absence of such a pausing... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Consider using struct instead of an array for the domestic and foreign child tokens
### Description
**Description:** The `CentralToken` code could probably be simplified by using the following data structure for child tokens.
This should lead to greater code clarity. Currently one has to remember that 0 = do... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Contract implements interface without extending the interface
### Description
Not extending the interface may lead to the wrong function signature being used, leading to unexpected behavior. If the interface is in fact being implemented, use the `override` keyword to indicate that fact
*There is 1 instance of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Open TODOs
### Description
Code architecture, incentives, and error handling/reporting questions/issues should be resolved before deployment
*There are 2 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Users' ability to nuke will be DoSed for three days after putting NFTs up for sale and canceling the sale
### Description
Users will not be able to nuke their NFTs for three days after canceling sale of their NFTs.
### Proof of Concept
When a user puts up their NFT for sale and cancels their NFT sale, the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Straddle Legs Are Not Risk-Partnered
### Description
In `PanopticHelper.sol`, the function `createStraddle` creates a call and a put leg with identical strike prices. Both the call and the put legs are expected to have each other assigned as risk partners, as described in this comment.
However, when creating... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Missing length check between array parameters of `createAirdropProject()` and `createChapters()` functions
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Location**: AirdropFactory.sol
**Description**
In the function `createAirdropProject()`, there is missing length check between length of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Lack of two-step process for contract ownership transfers
### Description
Many contracts use OpenZeppelin’s `OwnableUpgradeable` contract, whose `transferOwnership` function transfers contract ownership in a single step. If the owner of a contract were set to an address not controlled by the 88mph team, the co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Distribution Changes Can Be Delayed or Prevented
### Description
Within `YRizStrategy.sol`, the [`setFullPoolDistribution` function](https://github.com/radiant-capital/riz/blob/65ca7bb55550d30388e2b2277fefe5686ab7e4e8/src/vaults/YRizStrategy.sol#L133) allows a new set of "distributions" to be set up for the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: `1e10` fixed farming reward in `GaugeFactoryCL`
### Description
### Finding descriptions and impact
Below is the implementation of the `createEternalFarming` function in `GaugeFactoryCL.sol`:
This function is responsible for setting up initial incentives for Algebra concentrated liquidity farms, it uses ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect require
### Description
The following check is incorrect, because after this function actual borrowed amount of user would be = `borrowedAmount.add(timeDiscountedAmount)`:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/credit/CreditMan... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: In RSITrendingStrategy, _transfers and _seperators can be set only once
### Description
Within the [`RSITrendingStrategy` contract](https://github.com/mcdexio/mai-fund-protocol/blob/98af0d1d7e9872ba2b5e734e2a43c161ef635608/contracts/oracle/RSITrendingStrategy.sol), the values of [`_seperators`](https://github.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Overriding function is missing "override" specifier
### Description
The functions `mintingMaxLimitOf()`, `burningMaxLimitOf()`, `mintingCurrentLimitOf()`, and `burningCurrentLimitOf()` do not include the override specifier, even though they are inherited from the `IERC7281Min` interface. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: If `totalShares` for a token falls to zero while there is `pendingCredit` the contract will become stuck
### Description
_Submitted by AuditsAreUS_
[AlchemistV2.sol#L1290-L1300](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-alchemix/blob/de65c34c7b6e4e94662bf508e214dcbf327984f4/contracts-full/AlchemistV2.sol#L1290... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Business Logic | false | true | _Submitted by 0x52_
[Community.sol#L501-L506](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-rigor/blob/5ab7ea84a1516cb726421ef690af5bc41029f88f/contracts/Community.sol#L501-L506)<br>
[Project.sol#L108-L115](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-rigor/blob/5ab7ea84a1516cb726421ef690af5bc41029f88f/contracts/Project.sol#L108-L11... | Code4rena | 4 | Rigor Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Redundant check for non-zero reward amount in `_handleRewards` function
### Description
**Description:** In `InfraredBGTIsolationModeTokenVaultV1.sol`, the `_handleRewards` function includes a redundant check for positive reward amounts, as shown below:
This check is redundant because the getAllRewardsForUse... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Consider adding reentrancy protection for DelayedWithdrawalManager#withdraw
### Description
The function updates the state after making the external call to `withdraw`. If the receiver can re-enter the function when calling `adapter.adapter.withdraw`, the code is vulnerable to reentrancy:
```solidity
do {
R... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Unbounded recursion in hash calculation
### Description
The `namehash` function in the **BytesUtils** library relies on recursion to compute the hash of a DNS-encoded name. When provided with a name containing a large number of labels, the recursion depth can grow excessively, leading to potential stack overfl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Previous Owner Can Update Domain Configuration
### Description
**Update**
From discussions with the client, this design is intentional and is intended to allow an owner the flexibility to distribute their ownership. The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> Please note that w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Owner can mislead users by abusing changeSpotPrice() and changeDelta()
### Description
A malicious owner could set up a pair which promises to buy NFTs for high prices. As soon as someone tries to trade, the owner could frontrun the transaction by setting the `spotprice` to 0 and gets the NFT for free. Both... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: An allowed signer can sign mints with malicious parameters
### Description
An allowed signer (SeaDrop.sol#L318-L319) can sign mints that have either:
- `mintParams.feeBps` equal to 0.
- A custom `feeRecipient` with `mintParams.restrictFeeRecipients` equal to false to circumvent the check at SeaDrop.sol#L469.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Missing Receipt Token Balance Check
### Description
## Implementation Details
In the implementation of `set_service` instruction, there is a section of code that sets the service for the stake which was deposited before guest chain initialization without explicitly checking if the depositor’s `receipt_token_... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Unauthorized reallocation in `NudgeCampaign::handleReallocation` and reward disruption vulnerability in `NudgeCampaign::invalidateParticipations`
### Description
The `NudgeCampaign::handleReallocation` function allows any attacker to manipulate reward allocations through flash loans or repeated calls with r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `4868d3571a60ce6f58b2e69377c62a01d59106af`, `ed64881c1c2a3a93b7b414736f5fcac1a6465f8c`.
The client has fixed all the items except for point 3.2, where they provided the following explanation:
> 3.2 “the list of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Certain addresses are not compatible with _getDecimals
### Description
Oracles can use ERC-7535, ISO 4217, or other conventions to represent non-ERC20 assets as addresses. Indicated by the above comment, the asset could be an arbitrary address value and `_getDecimals` should be able to return 18 as a fallback ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Docker-based contract build process depends on moleculec in PATH
### Description
The contracts in the `ckb-miscellaneous-scripts` repository and the `ckb-anyone-can-pay` repository try to provide reproducible builds, but each depends on the binary `moleculec`, which is not managed in the build process. This co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Lack of minimum redemption causes spam for `ORDER_FILLER_ROLE`
### Description
_Resolved_
Currently in the `createRedeemOrder` function in `YuzuOrderBook`, there is a check to ensure that not more than `maxTokens` are being redeemed. But there is no such check for the minimum amount on withdrawals. Users are ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Deposit/Reward tokens | false | false | ## Security Report
## Severity
**Medium Risk**
## Context
`compound/MorphoGovernance.sol#L414`
## Description
The `claimToTreasury` function can send a market's underlying tokens that have been accumulated in the contract to the treasury. This is intended to be used for the reserve amounts that accumulate in the con... | Spearbit | 5 | Morpho |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `++i` costs less gas than `i++`, especially when it's used in `for`-loops (`--i`/`i--` too)
### Description
**Protocol:** Fixed in commit [5662786](https://github.com/SwapExchangeio/Contracts/commit/5662786421251a32444427d4ede74100a4c772f0).
**Cyfrin:** Verified. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Use `Ownable2Step` instead of Ownable
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**:
Ownableupgradeable.sol contract has been used across the codebase.It uses the `transferOwnership()` function in contract allows the current admin to transfer his privileges to another address. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Unstable Functionality
### Description
Each `SetToken` manager has the ability to [add new modules](https://github.com/SetProtocol/set-protocol-v2/blob/b8286f431547823ff3935a1343cd4cf4d77585a1/contracts/protocol/SetToken.sol#L350) to modify the functionality of the Set. They are restricted to modules that a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Approved spenders can request withdraw for more than entitled to
### Description
The current implementation of the `CommonPool` contract allows approved spenders to request withdrawals on behalf of the owner. However, the contract only checks if the requested amount is lower than the allowance for each individ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | First Depositor Issue | true | true |
The attack vector and impact is the same as [TOB-YEARN-003](https://github.com/yearn/yearn-security/blob/master/audits/20210719\_ToB_yearn_vaultsv2/ToB\_-\_Yearn_Vault_v\_2\_Smart_Contracts_Audit_Report.pdf), where users may not receive shares in exchange for their deposits if the total asset amount has been manipulat... | Code4rena | 5 | Caviar |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Farming Amount Limit
### Description
The `FarmAccounting` contract is used by the `Farm` contract to handle computation on Info. The `Farm` contract works closely with the `ERC20Farmable` contract to create a token system with farming capability.
The `startFarming()` function in the `FarmAccounting` contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | false | false | ## Medium: Rounding strategy in DSMath fixed-point multiplication/division may lead to errors
### Description
In specific cases where the precise result of a fixed-point multiplication or division is exactly halfway between the smallest degree of precision accounted for, DSMath will perform “round half up” rounding to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Ensuring token allowances are zero after depositing into the vault
### Description
The `deposit()` function of `SingleDepositorVault` allows the owner or an authorized party to deposit funds into the vault. Before calling `deposit()`, the vault should have enough allowance to transfer the tokens from the depos... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Potentially misleading platform token
### Description
Investment strategies maintain a [token mapping](https://github.com/OriginProtocol/origin-dollar/blob/757ad13fa07ecdff058e55d9beff3c98d5d186a2/contracts/contracts/utils/InitializableAbstractStrategy.sol#L40) that tracks the platform-specific investment toke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | logic-error | false | false | ## Low: Use `days` keyword for better readability
### Description
`TimeWeightedIncentiveLogic` currently declares the `MIN_INCREASE_DURATION` constant as `3 * 86400`. Instead, `3 days` should be used for better readability. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: `BaseDelegator` is not using upgradeable version of `ERC165`
### Description
The `BaseDelegator` contract currently inherits from the non-upgradeable version of ERC165. This could limit the contract's ability to adapt to future upgrades or modifications of the ERC165 interface, potentially impacting the contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent Solidity Pragma Versions
### Description
Apro contracts use multiple versions of the Solidity compiler pragma, specifically `0.7.6` and `^0.7.0`. This inconsistency can lead to compatibility issues, as different pragma versions may have varying behavior and features. The following files use `0.7.6... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect Hook Parameter
### Description
Any storage hook that implements the [`onBeforeSpliceDynamicData` function](https://github.com/latticexyz/mud/blob/12a9eb1afb18a7f7cb43d774cabb2d5af7c74e6b/packages/store/src/IStoreHook.sol#L104) should receive the state of the record before the update. However, it w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Curve Is Not Monotonically Decreasing
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `852c8d49bd21356bdda907ecd4a2a631857a70c9`.
If the calculated curve multiplier is less than the `minMultiplier`, the `minMultiplier` will be used.
**File(s) affected:**`RewardCurveLib.sol`
**Descr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: INCREMENT/DECREMENT FOR LOOP VARIABLE IN AN UNCHECKED BLOCK
### Description
i++ involves checked arithmetic, which is not required. This is because the value of i is always strictly less than `length <= 2**256 - 1`. Therefore, the theoretical maximum value of i to enter the for-loop body is `2**256 - 2`. This ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Wrong logic in `AUTO_COMPOUND` doesn't allow for swap to token1
### Description
Protocol functionality broken
### Proof of Concept
`AUTO_COMPOUND` action allows for compounding your gains into liquidity. It additionally allows for swaps in the middle. There is a faulty condition though, which is never eff... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Plugin timestamps data can be overwritten by a call to the `prepayTimepointsStorageSlot` function
### Description
There is an issue at the line https://github.com/cryptoalgebra/Algebra/blob/6f57b3e218630106a4d41aedefd38f9e83b41e2b/src/plugins/contracts/AlgebraBasePluginV1.sol#L67.
Plugin timestamps data can... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: [08] Widespread use of infinite token approvals
### Description
The protocol makes extensive use of infinite token approvals (`type(uint256).max`) across multiple contracts. While this is a common pattern in DeFi to save gas on repeated approvals, it can pose risks with certain token implementations. Examples ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: booster#buy fails to apply discount
### Description
**Details**
[Booster.sol#L92-L95](https://github.com/Buffer-Finance/Buffer-Protocol-v2_5/blob/84b6060b4447b2550de595202e8820c7f515988b/contracts/core/Booster.sol#L92-L95)
uint256 price = couponPrice - discount;
re[Title](command:workbench.action.addR... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: [FIXED] Blocking execution of `inflate` and `deflate` functions in `ConvexCurveStratBase`
### Description
In the `depositBooster` function of the `ConvexCurveStratBase` contract, the `allowance` is increased by an amount that may be insufficient for the subsequent call to `depositAll`. This issue arises durin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [Fixed] Unbalanced ETH operations
### Description
In `OptionsContract` contract, there is a [`payable` fallback function](https://github.com/opynfinance/Convexity-Protocol/blob/c34598565cba2bfcf824eb2da63d95c7f5dda4fa/contracts/OptionsContract.sol#L680) that allows ETH to be sent to the contract but there is n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: `MlumStaking::addToPosition` should assing the amount multiplier based on the new lock duration instead of initial lock duration.
### Description
There are two separate issues that make necessary to assign the multiplier based on the new lock duration:
1. First, when users add tokens to their position via `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Consider Using `rand::rndg::OsRng` for More Robustness
### Description
**Update**
The team fixed the issue as recommended in commit `8ec8a17`.
**File(s) affected:**`modules/remote-attestation/src/ias_utils.rs`
**Description:** The function `get_quote()` in `ias_utils.rs` uses `rand::thread_rng()` which provi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: User fund loss because function `purchaseLiquidationAuctionNFT()` takes extra liquidation penalty when user's last collateral is liquidated, (set wrong value for `maxDebtCached` when `isLastCollateral` is true)
### Description
Function `purchaseLiquidationAuctionNFT()` purchases a liquidation auction with t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Ownership Initialization and Transfer Safety on Owned.setOwner
### Description
Consider the following scenarios.
### Recommendation
Add a check for `address(0)` and `address(this)` in both the constructor and `setOwner`. For added safety, require the new owner to accept the ownership before ownership is trans... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: No Functionality To Withdraw Deposited Assets
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client.
**Description:** The protocol allows the deposit of a set of supported assets, or simply `SOL`, in exchange for `fragSol`. When users want to withdraw, they will get an amount of `SOL` that is equi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Debt Check in `CreditDelegationBranch::settleVaultsDebt` Function
### Description
## Summary:
The `CreditDelegationBranch::settleVaultsDebt` function incorrectly determines whether a vault is in debt or credit due to an inverted conditional check. This issue causes incorrect asset swaps, leading to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Oracles with a Deviation Threshold above the Base Redemption Fee are subject to redemption arbitrage due to Oracle Drift
### Description
**Impact**
This report aggregates the research I did around Oracle Drift Arbitrage
Anytime an oracle deviation threshold is higher than the Redemption Fees, arbitrage is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: User can bypass deployment restrictions
### Description
The `deployAccount` function is intended to allow users to deploy their own smart accounts with controlled initialization parameters. It accepts user-provided `initializer` data, which is expected to call the `initialize` function of the deployed `clav... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Simplify _midFromFeed()
### Description
The calculation in `_midFromFeed()` is more complicated than necessary because:
```
min(x,y) + max(x,y) == x + y
```
More importantly, the average operation `(bid + ask) / 2` can overflow and revert if `bid + ask >= 2**256`.
```solidity
function _midFromFeed(Oracle.Da... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: Updating a MarketConfig can break reserve accounting
### Description
In HMX, each position has a reserved maximum profit. For the purposes of tracking HLP utilization and borrowing fees, the sums of these reserved amounts are stored in `GlobalState.reserveValueE30` and `AssetClass.reserveValueE30`. Naturally,... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.