prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Users interacting with untrusted schemas may lose funds to their malicious resolvers
### Description
EAS, by design, allows permissionless registering of schemas optionally with associated resolver contracts. While these resolvers are required to adhere to the `ISchemaResolver` interface, they are allowed to i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Input parameters are not validated
### Description
The current implementation of the Factory contract doesn't properly validate input parameters for the `add_pool` function https://github.com/curvefi/stableswap-ng/blob/8c78731ed43c22e6bcdcb5d39b0a7d02f8cb0386/contracts/main/CurveStableSwapFactoryNG.vy#L719-L72... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Tap - Controller should not be updateable ✓ Fixed
### Description
Similar to the [issue 6.11](/diligence/audits/2019/11/aragonblack-fundraising/#tap-reserve-can-be-updated-in-tap-but-not-in-marketmaker-or-controller), `Tap` allows updating the `Controller` contract it is using. The permission is currently n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Stricter Account Validation
### Description
The margin core program currently has two ways to create a MarginAccount:
**InitAccount** and **CreateAccount** which use slightly different techniques. Current **CreateAccount** is used internally by the Jet simulation framework. For consistency, consider removing... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | timing | true | false | ## Low: Cache storage variables when same values read multiple times
### Description
Cache storage variables when same values read multiple times:
File: `dao/AirdropDistributor.sol`
```solidity
// function `setMerkleRoot`
// should cache `block.timestamp + CLAIM_DURATION` into memory,
// write that to `canClaimUntil`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: ADDING UNCHECKED DIRECTIVE CAN SAVE GAS
### Description
For the arithmetic operations that will never over/underflow, using the **unchecked** directive (Solidity v0.8 has default overflow/underflow checks) can save some gas from the unnecessary internal over/underflow checks.
Code Location
-------------
[Sta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect Fee Calculation Due to Outdated `ZKUSDAmounts` Value
### Description
**Severity** : Medium
**Status** : Acknowledged
**Description**
The ZKLP is engineered to rebalance using a dynamic fee structure (source: https://docs.zkdx.io/litepaper/usdzklp#usdzklp-rebalance ) . However, in the `VaultUtil... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: [01] liquidation functions not work in the case of ERC20 with the Pausability feature
### Description
ERC20 with the Pausability feature is in scope.
In case any `underlyingAsset` gets paused the liquidations functions will not work (e.g., [`IsolateLiquidation.sol#isolateAuction(`)](https://github.com/code-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: `StakedCitadelLocker.sol`: state variables can be tightly packed to save 1 storage slot
### Description
From (see `@audit` tags):
to: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | false | false | ## Medium: Misleading Documentation
### Description
Throughout the codebase, there are multiple instances of misleading documentation:
* In the [`loadField`](https://github.com/latticexyz/mud/blob/12a9eb1afb18a7f7cb43d774cabb2d5af7c74e6b/packages/store/src/Storage.sol#L271) function of the `Storage` library, the doc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use `msg.value` directly, instead of assigning it to variable
### Description
**File:** `ContractDeployer.sol`
[File: code/system-contracts/contracts/ContractDeployer.sol](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-zksync/blob/main/code/system-contracts/contracts/ContractDeployer.sol#L329) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Centralization Risk Due to Overpowered Owner
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The Devve smart contracts grant significant control to the contract owners through several `onlyOwner` functions. This centralization poses a substantial risk, as it places considerable ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Disable initializer
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
Contract AmanaVaultV1 and Contract Rewards do not disable initializer as recommended by OpenZeppelin by adding the code as follows:
**Recommendation**:
Disable intializers by adding the above code. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Address Collusion
### Description
Address collusion may occur with create2 with low probability. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Potential out of gas
### Description
The `massUpdateFarms` function iterates over all farms and updates them. This presents a potential risk of reverting due to out-of-gas errors if the number of farms becomes very large. If the function reverts when `collectFees` is set to false, key functionalities such as `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Inaccurate estimation of validation rewards from function ExpectedRewardAVA in MiniPoolManager.sol
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-gogopool/blob/aec9928d8bdce8a5a4efe45f54c39d4fc7313731/contracts/contract/MinipoolManager.sol#L560
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Never used imports in multiple contacts.
### Description
**Description**
Disqualifier.sol:
ILendingPool, Locked Balance, IUniswapV2Router02, IUniswapV2Factory, IUniswapV2Pair,
IChainlinkAggregator, IAToken.
PriceProvider.sol: IERC20, SafeERC20.
Contracts are imported in files, however they are never used.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Users incur losses when selling seats
### Description
**Description:** Whenever a user buys or sells a seat, we calculate the seat price at that moment using the difference between `get_reserve` from the new/current position and the old position.
The `get_reserve` function returns an i64, whose maximum val... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Missing HTTP request timeouts across modules in widgets
### Description
Several hooks and helpers in `src/pages/bridge/data/` spin up ky clients without ever specifying a timeout. Any unresponsive or maliciously redirected endpoint can cause those requests to hang indefinitely (or until Ky’s internal default,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: Reward distribution can be tricked by front-running notify calls
### Description
The `notify` function in StakedCap can be front-run, allowing attackers to deposit large amounts of CAP tokens immediately before a notification event to receive an unfair portion of rewards. This allows sophisticated users to cap... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Avoid name reuse
### Description
The `constructor` and `founderSwitchRequest` function in PromissoryToken.sol use the name `_founderHash`, for two different semantic meanings. Using the same name for two different things is confusing and can bring unintended behaviors. Consider changing the function parameter ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: | DoS Dividends
### Description
**Description**
Due to the unbounded `for` loop in `distributeDividends`, there is a risk of a DoS attack. Anytime a new address deposits to pool 0, they are added to the `usersBridges` list. A malicious party can keep generating new addresses and deposit miniscule amounts o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of Timeout leads Resource Exhaustion in API Client
### Description
The absence of timeout settings in the HTTP client poses the following risks:
1. Resource Exhaustion:
- Connections may hang indefinitely, leading to goroutine leaks and memory overconsumption.
- Over time, this can cause the appli... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Missing range constraint on remainder check in `div` opcode implementation
### Description
When calculating the remainder of the `div` instruction, the circuit needs to verify that the remainder is less than the divisor. It does this by subtracting the divisor from the remainder and enforcing that the borrow ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Expressions for constant values such as a call to `keccak256()`, should use `immutable` rather than `constant`
### Description
While it **doesn't save any gas** because the compiler knows that developers often make this mistake, it's still best to use the right tool for the task at hand. There is a difference ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Stylus’s 63/64th gas forwarding di�ers from go-ethereum
### Description
The Stylus VM deviates from the Ethereum specification and the behavior of the reference implementation in its application of the 63/64th gas forwarding rule, defined in EIP-150. EIP-150 states that “if a call asks for more gas than all bu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Double assignment in `InitDiamond` should be removed to avoid confusion
### Description
When initializing the "Weather" cases in `InitDiamond` there is a double assignment which should be removed to avoid confusion: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: `_computeMaturityDate` `uint32` timestamp limits protocol lifespan
### Description
The `_computeMaturityDate` function in `PositionParams.sol` casts maturity timestamps to `uint32` before returning them:
This imposes a hard limit on the maximum representable timestamp. A `uint32` can only represent Unix time... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Potential underflow error
### Description
In the [`AcceleratingDistributor`](https://github.com/across-protocol/across-token/blob/dde7aedc766bf69f1cb0eb791b60259c705baa26/contracts/AcceleratingDistributor.sol#L19) contract, there is no lower bound on the `maxMultiplier` for a staked token. If a value lower tha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Access Control | true | true |
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/5f853d055d7aa1bebe9e24fd0e863ef58c004339/contracts/liquid-staking/GiantSavETHVaultPool.sol#L50><br>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/5f853d055d7aa1bebe9e24fd0e863ef58c004339/contracts/liquid-staking/GiantMevAndFeesPool.sol#L44>
An attacker c... | Code4rena | 4 | Stakehouse Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Missing `_disableInitializers()` call in implementations' constructor
### Description
The following smart contracts, which are implementations that the proxies will point to, should call `_disableInitializers()` in their `constructor` but they are not doing it : `StakingManager.sol`, `KHYPE.sol`, `PauserRegist... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | true | false | ## High: Slot and block number proofs not required for verification of withdrawal (multiple withdrawals possible)
### Description
Since this is a vulnerability that involves multiple in-scope contracts and leads to more than one impact, let's start with a bug description from bottom to top.
### Library `Merkle`
The ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: Use a more recent version of solidity
### Description
Use a solidity version of at least 0.8.10 to have external calls skip contract existence checks if the external call has a return value
1. File: royalty-vault/contracts/RoyaltyVault.sol (line [2](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-joyn/blob/c9297ccd925... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Traders May Lose Entire Position if Asset Was Removed From Bucket
### Description
**Update**
The health function, found in `PositionLibrary.health()` in commit [`7d350f7`](https://github.com/primex-finance/primex_contracts/commit/7d350f73cad51a0651d1286514fcbee28dab72e6), returns the health value regardless o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing reqId Deletion in `cancelGame()`
### Description
The `cancelGame()` function does not delete `reqId` in the randomness provider (RP). This may lead to leftover request IDs, potentially causing inconsistencies.
` | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: ELF segment virtual address can be set to an arbitrary address
### Description
**Severity:** Medium
**Path:** binfmt/src/elf.rs
**Description:**
The function load_elf() loads and checks the ELF sections and checks that the file size and each segment’s size are not bigger than MAX_MEM (2^28 by default). H... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: Multiple Missing Field Validations
### Description
In the current implementation of the project, data structures used throughout the system are supposed to undergo validation checks as defined in `validator.go` to ensure they are well-formed before processing. This validation is crucial to maintaining the i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: [7] Multiple accesses of a mapping should use a local variable cache
### Description
The instances below point to the second+ access of a value inside a mapping, within a function. Caching a mapping's value in a local `storage` variable when the value is accessed [multiple times](https://gist.github.com/IllIll... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Irrecoverable dust amounts can accumulate in InfraredDistributor due to precision loss
### Description
`InfraredDistributor.notifyRewardAmount()` handles incoming reward amounts of IBGT tokens by increasing `amountsCumulative`. This facilitates further distribution of the rewards among Infrared validators.
``... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: `recoverToken` function should restrict which tokens are allowed to be recovered
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-05-xeth/blob/main/src/CVXStaker.sol#L101-L109
The CVXStaker contract manages different tokens as part of its natural intended behavior. Notably, these are the Curve LP tokens, Co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: _burnInternal always returns 0 for fy tokens returned
### Description
## Handle
pauliax
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Function _burnInternal always returns 0 as a third parameter. It should return tokensBurnt, tokenOut, fyTokenOut.
## Recommended Mitigation Steps
return (tokensBurned, tokenOut, fyTok... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused constant
### Description
**Description**
File: migration.ts
Constant: PERMANODE
Details:
The given constant was used in the removed code parts.
**Recommendation**
Remove the constant declaration
**Re-audit comment**
Resolved | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [Fixed] Operations are not explicitly casted
### Description
The current lack of explicit casting when handling unsigned integer variables in the codebase, considering the various different types of unsigned integers in use (e.g. uint256, uint64 and uint32), hinders the code’s readability, making it more error... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Lack of a double step transfer ownership pattern in the Admin contract
### Description
The current ownership transfer process for all the contracts inheriting from `Admin` involves the current admin calling the `setAdmin()` function:
```
function setAdmin(address adminAddress) public onlyAdmin {
assembly {
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [05] Contracts without receive/fallback function may not be able to receive leftovers from `swapAndMint`, `swapAndIncreaseLiquidity` functions
### Description
If a non-zero amount of ETH is sent during `swapAndMint` or `swapAndIncreaseLiquidity` calls, the protocol will unwrap leftover WETH tokens and send the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Violations of ERC7540 specs
### Description
**Description:** Several deviations from the ERC7540 specs have been noticed for `AccountableAsyncRedeemVault`
1. According to [ERC-7540](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7540) specification:
> Redeem Request approval of shares for a msg.sender NOT equal to owner... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | reentrancy | false | false | ## Gas: Redundant locked modifier
### Description
The locked modifier is redundant for `settle()` because it first requires the `_preimage` to match the `hashlock`, which can only be the case if there is a prior route set, which then implies the counterparty is not null.
### Recommendation
- Update the `settle` functi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary and potentially risky Multicall functionality in V1LBRouter
### Description
The `V1LBRouter` contract inherits from `Multicall`, which provides a multicall function allowing multiple function calls in a single transaction. The presence of Multicall functionality introduces unnecessary complexity an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect fees calculation in `ChangeFee`.
### Description
**Description**
'ChangeFee' functionality does not have validation of passed values. Actually, the 'house_fee_basis_points' variable could have the value much more than '10000', which means that the changed fee could be up to 655% ('u16::MAX').
progra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: minPrice and maxPrice should reflect the allowed regions for the funds to be transferred from the bidder to the ask recipient
### Description
1. When a maker or taker sets a `minPrice` for an ask, the protocol should guarantee the funds they receive is at minimum the `minPrice` amount (currently not enforced).... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | false | false | ## Low: DAI-GOLD auction might not get started for last mint of gold tokens
### Description
Usually minting gold happens when the available amount is bigger than 1e4, which will configure the minimum distribution amount of DaiGoldAuction. However when it reaches the max supply, the minting amount can be smaller than m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use latest version of Solidity
### Description
[Fundraiser.sol](https://github.com/cosmos/fundraiser-lib/blob/693cf3f32e9fd679216372876dda86fa57a3277e/src/truffle/contracts/Fundraiser.sol#L6) is written for an old version of solc (0.4.7). We recommend changing the solidity version pragma for the [latest versio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Price feed in `MCAGRateFeed#getRate` is not sufficiently validated and can return stale price
### Description
`MCAGRateFeed#getRate` may return stale data.
### Proof of Concept
(, int256 answer,,,) = oracle.latestRoundData();
getRate only uses answer but never checks the freshness of the data, which ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: MultiFacetProxyLib.setFunctions should not be externally accessible
### Description
The `setFunctions` function is used internally to add, remove, and replace functions implemented in facets. In addition, it is accessible externally in the `NordUpgradeFacet` contract. We think it should be encapsulated to redu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | oracle | true | true |
To protect the fund of vault, the protocol has a security mechanism which limits:
Maximum PnL is +500%.
source: <https://docs.tigris.trade/protocol/trading-and-fees#limitations>
But the implementation is missing to check this limitation while `addToPosition()`, an attacker can exploit it to get more profit tha... | Code4rena | 5 | Tigris Trade |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Aave `swapBorrowRateMode` is deprecated
### Description
**Description:** In the `Aave_Module` there is a call [`aave_swapBorrowRateMode`](https://github.com/d2sd2s/d2-contracts/blob/c2fc257605ebc725525028a5c17f30c74202010b/contracts/modules/Aave.sol#L67-L69):
The call `swapBorrowRateMode` is however [deprecat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: accrue interest function is likely failed to accrue interest for token with low decimal
### Description
Loss of precision is too high when accruing interest
### Proof of Concept
When interest accrues, [we are calling](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-11-betafinance/blob/0f1bb077afe8e8e03093c8f26dc0b7a29... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Improper Fee Configuration
### Description
## Vulnerability Overview
The vulnerability pertains to the possible configuration of negative fees within the market, presenting risks to the clearing house. It subtracts fees from a user’s collateral. Thus, if either the `maker_fee` or `taker_fee` is negative, the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Usage of an incorrect version of Ownable library can potentially malfunction all onlyOwner functions
### Description
Title: Usage of an incorrect version of Ownbale library can potentially malfunction all onlyOwner functions
Severity: High Risk | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: MinipoolManager: recordStakingError function does not decrease minipoolCount leading to too high GGP rewards for staker
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-gogopool/blob/aec9928d8bdce8a5a4efe45f54c39d4fc7313731/contracts/contract/MinipoolManager.sol#L484-L515
https://gith... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use type(uint16).max instead of 65535
### Description
In the `distributeAndSwap()` and `processInsideBento()` functions, the value `65535` is used when calculating the amount distributed to each call to `swap()`:
```solidity
uint256 amount = (amountTotal * share) / 65535;
```
This is equivalent to the maximu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `afc7dc5e607f4da7d0dc5586515a9bf3dd01c110`. The client provided the following explanation: Input validations were added
However, recommended validations for the following functions are still missing:
1. `disbu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Vulnerability in Reward Distribution Mechanism Allowing Fund Theft in SubnetActorManagerFacet.sol
### Description
**Severity**: Critical
**Status**: Resolved
**Location**: SubnetActorManagerFacet.sol contract, distributeRewardToRelayers function
**Description**
A critical vulnerability exists in the IPC ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Calls to untrusted contracts on Blast are incentivized to steal gas from users
### Description
On Blast, every contract can claim the gas fees paid by the users executing their code. When calling out to untrusted contracts (e.g., callbacks to receiver and sender, but also the `transferFrom` calls on the und... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: DOMAIN_SEPARATOR in UniswapV2ERC20 will be invalid after chain forks
### Description
The current implementation of `DOMAIN_SEPARATOR` in the `UniswapV2ERC20.sol` contract is computed once during contract deployment and stored as an immutable value using the following code:
```solidity
DOMAIN_SEPARATOR = ke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Initializer Can Be Front-Run to Gain Control of the Program
### Description
**Description:** The `initialize` function from the `xbelo` program, and the `initialize_farm` function from the `clmm_lp_farm` program can be called by anyone after deployment. Considering these functions sets the admins for programs ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Adversary can utilize a large number of their own loans to cheat other lenders out of interest
### Description
The minimal interest paid by a loan is scaled by the number of provisions that make up the loan. By inflating the number of provisions with their own provisions then can cause legitimate lenders to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Attacker can Inflate `effectiveCollateralValue`
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://testnet.snowtrace.io/address/0x2cAa1315bd676FbecABFC3195000c642f503f1C9
Impacts:
- Protocol insolvency
- Direct theft of any user funds, whether at-rest or in-motion, other than unclaimed yield
## D... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Unbounded Fee Parameters Allow Abusive Fees and Redemption DoS
### Description
`PawnShop` charges a fee (in basis points) on top of the borrowed principal when a borrower redeems their NFT via `redeem(...)` (context).
However, `setFees(...)` allows `MANAGER_ROLE` to set `fee7Days` and `fee30Days` to any `uint... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [03] Solidity version
### Description
All contracts are using 0.8.13. Consider updating to the latest version 0.8.19 to ensure the compiler contains the latest security fixes.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-05-venus/blob/main/contracts/Pool/PoolRegistry.sol#L2 | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: There is no slippage check for the eth deposits processing in the `LibDepositing.processDeposits`
### Description
The `LibDepositing.depositEtherToL2` function is called by the TaikoL1.depositEtherToL2 to deposit ether to the `L2 chain`. The maximum number of `unprocessed eth deposits` are capped at `_confi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Transfer result value ignored in John.sol
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In contract John.sol, in function unstake(address, uint256) at line 194 the transfer call performed has an ignored result value. This can lead to undefined behavior in case the transfer cal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: Don’t initialize variables with default value
### Description
[G-06] Don’t initialize variables with default value
Instances (2):
File: src/lib/MinPriorityQueue.sol
98: for (uint256 i = 0; i < curUserBids.length; i++) {
Link to code
File: src/seaport/modules/OptimisticListingSeaport.sol
390: for (uint25... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Users can lower the interest rate by dividing a loan into multiple smaller loans
### Description
The `LenderCommitmentGroup_Smart.getMinInterestRate()` function calculates the minimum APR for borrowing. However, this APR is determined based on the utilization ratio, which includes the newly borrowed amount.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Truncation in integer division
### Description
The profit sharing mechanism uses [integer division](https://github.com/fiinu/smart-contract/blob/7589b9d137bbf902e142e4f0476b06976e390bdb/FiinuCoin.sol#L240) to distribute profits proportionally to token holdings: `balances[addr].mul(msg.value).div(totalSupply)`.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Reward Claim Post Expiry Of Locked Stake
### Description
## Staking Rewards and Expiry
It is possible to still qualify for the staking rewards after the locked stake expires. `claim_stakes` does not check if the locked stake has expired before processing rewards for resolved rounds. When processing resolved ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Liquidations can be made to revert by an attacker through various means, causing losses to liquidators and bad debt to accrue in the vault
### Description
**Description:** Coordination between two malicious accounts combined with various other attack vectors fully documented in separate findings can be levera... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Inaccessible pause and unpause functions
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** Medium
**Likelihood:** Medium
**Description**
The `Game` contract inherits from `PausableUpgradeable`, a feature designed to allow the pausing and unpausing of contract functionalities in emergency situations or for mainte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: cEther might fail when repaying a borrow
### Description
The [`repayBorrow` function](https://github.com/equilibria-xyz/compound-protocol/blob/rfp12-ctoken-cleanup/contracts/CEther.sol#L85) of the `CEther` contract calls internally the `repayBorrowInternal` function and the [`repayBorrowFresh` function](https:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Uninitialized country for valid investor wallets allows bypassing US compliance lockup period
### Description
**Description:** One way that wallets can be registered in the protocol is via `RegistryService.sol::addWallet`, meanwhile the country field for the registered wallet can be set separately using a sepa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `BetFactory::createBet` should revert in a number of scenarios to prevent abuse and ensure bets can be resolved
### Description
`BetFactory::createBet` should revert if:
* `treasury` is `address(0)`
* `msg.sender` and `taker` are the same
* `judge` is the same as `msg.sender` or `taker`
All of the scenarios r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Potential division by zero
### Description
In the `enableFarm` function, the `params.allocPoints` is validated to be less than `MAX_ALLOCATION_POINTS`, but there's no check to ensure `totalAllocPoints` remains above zero after adding a new farm. This could theoretically lead to a division by zero error in the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: Signature can be reused
### Description
An authenticated address (say A) can join multiple times due to a signature replay attack. The nonce used here also comes as an argument, hence can be reused. This has two issues:
- It blocks other authenticated addresses from participating.
- A can enter into the pot ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Postman Can Incorrectly Deliver a Message While Still Collecting the Fees
### Description
The message service allows cross chain message delivery, where the user can define the parameters of the message as:
**from**: Sender of the message
**\_to**: Receiver of the message
**\_fee**: The fees, the sender wan... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | initialization | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-hats-judging/issues/35
## Found by
obront, unforgiven, roguereddwarf, cducrest-brainbot
## Summary
When a tophat is unlinked from its admin, it is intended to regain its status as a tophat that is fully self-sovereign. However, because the `linkedTreeRequests` valu... | Sherlock | 5 | Hats |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: Orders from other market makers can be invalidated
### Description
The `checkOrder()` function performs verification of pre-signed orders. This function allows anyone to set the status of an order as used by storing the nonce contained in the order. Orders and their respective nonce can only be used once.
##... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Check that none of the `authorities` is zero address
### Description
The [`PartyFactory.createParty`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-04-party/blob/440aafacb0f15d037594cebc85fd471729bcb6d9/contracts/party/PartyFactory.sol#L18-L45) function should check that the `authorities` array contains addresses that ar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: It costs more gas to initialize non-constant/non-immutable variables to zero than to let the default of zero be applied
### Description
Not overwriting the default for [stack variables](https://gist.github.com/IllIllI000/e075d189c1b23dce256cd166e28f3397) saves 8 gas. Storage and memory variables have larger sa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Use of name to identify a token
### Description
The function `startBridgeTokensViaCelerIM()` utilizes the token name to identify the cfUSDC token. However, another token with the same name can bypass this check. An attacker could create a fraudulent token named "cfUSDC" that includes a function `canonical()... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | true | ## Low: Taker orders are not EIP-712 signatures
### Description
When takers attempt to match order proposals, they are presented with an obscure blob of data. In contrast, makers are presented with a formatted data structure that makes it easier to validate transactions.
```solidity
struct TakerOrder {
bool isOrder... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Missing `initializer` modifier on constructor
### Description
OpenZeppelin [recommends](https://forum.openzeppelin.com/t/uupsupgradeable-vulnerability-post-mortem/15680/5) that the `initializer` modifier be applied to constructors in order to avoid potential griefs, [social engineering](https://forum.openzeppe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Inconsistency in view functions can lead to users believing they’re due for more BKD rewards
### Description
_Submitted by SmartSek_
### Impact
The view functions used for a user to check their claimable rewards vary in their implementation. This can cause users to believe they are due X amount but will ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Non-blacklisted addresses can't burn `UStb` tokens in a `FULLY_ENABLED` transfer state if `address(0)` is blaklisted
### Description
From the [Main invariants](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-11-ethena-labs/blob/main/README.md):
> ### Main invariants
> - Only non-blacklisted addresses can send/receive/burn ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: `keccak256()` should only need to be called on a specific string literal once
### Description
It should be saved to an immutable variable, and the variable used instead. If the hash is being used as a part of a function selector, the cast to `bytes4` should also only be done once
*There is 1 instance of this ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Lack of events is error-prone
### Description
Several critical operations do not trigger events. As a result, it will be difficult to review the correct behavior of the contracts once deployed. Critical operations that would benefit from triggering events include:
- `PoolProxy.set_admins` (PoolProxy.vy#L40)
-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Risk of Passing Incorrect Context to Firewall Policies
### Description
The on\-chain firewall system is designed to support meta\-transactions. The [FirewallConsumerBase](https://github.com/ironblocks/onchain-firewall/blob/8f4fcf861d53c835ed005db67b8af4037464e0ca/contracts/FirewallConsumerBase.sol#L20) contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | input-validation | true | true | ## Low: Potentially dangerous out-of-bounds memory access in `BytesParsing::sliceUnchecked`
### Description
[`BytesParsing::sliceUnchecked`](https://github.com/wormhole-foundation/wormhole-circle-integration/blob/f7df33b159a71b163b8b5c7e7381c0d8f193da99/evm/src/libraries/BytesParsing.sol#L16-L57) currently[ bails earl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | false | false | ## Gas: Using access lists can save gas due to EIP-2930 post-Berlin hard fork
### Description
_Submitted by 0xRajeev_
EIP-2929 in Berlin fork increased the gas costs of SLOADs and CALL* family opcodes, increasing them for not-accessed slots/addresses and decreasing them for accessed slots. EIP-2930 optionally support... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: might not be supported in all chains
### Description
Solc compiler `version 0.8.20` switches the default target EVM version to Shanghai. The generated bytecode will include **PUSH0** opcodes. The recently released Solc compiler `version 0.8.25` [switches the default target EVM version to Cancun](https://solidi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Use safe math
### Description
There are many unchecked math operations in the code. We couldn’t find any related attack vectors on the DSTContract, but it’s always better to be safe and perform checked operations. Consider [using a safe math library](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/zeppelin-solidity/blob/ma... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.