prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Stakers need to reselect their vote delegate and farms after liquidation
### Description
When a liquidation auction is kicked off, the urn unselects the current vote delegate and farm.
### Recommendation
If the liquidation was a partial auction or an auction with leftover collateral, the user needs to remembe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Validators can front run calls to addIncentive to drain the entire incentive allocation in return for validating a single block
### Description
Severity: High Risk
Context: BerachainRewardsVault.sol#L312
Description: addIncentive is a function that allows anyone to allocate any amount of whitelisted incentive... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Updating `withdrawalCredentials` is flawed
### Description
The `setContract` method in `PirexEthValidators` updates the `withdrawalCredentials` state variable when the `RewardRecipient` contract address is updated. If there already are validators in the `_initializedValidators` array, they would have been conf... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Canonical assets should be keyed on the hash of domain and id
### Description
A canonical asset is a tuple of a (domain, id) pair. TokenRegistry’s owner has the power to register new tokens in the system (See `TokenRegistry.ensureLocalToken()` and `TokenRegistry.enrollCustom()`). A canonical asset is regist... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Potential Validation Inconsistencies Leading to Paymaster Ban
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> We will document that pausing and signer updates are possible, but they will be done through communicated maintenance.
**File(s) af... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: The Libraries `FullMath`, `RoundingInt256`, and `RoundingUint256` Can Revert Due to Overflows
### Description
**Update**
Mitigated by using OpenZeppelin's Math library instead of FullMath. Points 2 and 3 were not addressed. Addressed in: `3746b0fd60cb87f57bdc24e94fa5917bd2ba0068`.
**File(s) affected:**`FullMa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Fee-On-Transfer Tokens Not Supported
### Description
This issue has been identified in the contract’s token-handling logic (for example, in the `mint`, `swap`, and `redeem` functions). The contract assumes standard ERC20 transfers without accounting for fee-on-transfer tokens (e.g., USDT and USDC, which curren... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: `TroveManager::redeemCollateral` can return less collateral tokens than expected due to rounding down to zero precision loss
### Description
**Description:** When a user calls `TroveManager::redeemCollateral` with a large enough debt amount such that the:
* first trove is completely exhausted and closed
* rema... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lack of input validation for destination chain id may allow for requests to invalid chains
### Description
The `_sigReq` function, utilized by external functions `zrSignHash`, `zrSignData`, and `zrSignTx`, handles hashing and signing data operations. This function is accessible to any user via the mentioned ex... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | TWAP | true | true | _Submitted by cmichel_
The vader price in `LiquidityBasedTWAP.getVaderPrice` is computed using the `pastLiquidityWeights` and `pastTotalLiquidityWeight` return values of the `syncVaderPrice`.
The `syncVaderPrice` function does not initialize all weights and the total liquidity weight does not equal the sum of the ind... | Code4rena | 3.5 | Vader Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Hero Owner With Mythical Weapon Can Never Receive Weapon Shard Rewards
### Description
The vulnerability exists in the weapon shard reward calculation within the `_calculateBonusRewards()` function. The contract uses a packed constant `WEAPON_SHARD_TABLE (0xD282321E140A)` to store weapon shard probability val... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: claimReceipts() market Parameter is Unchecked
### Description
Description
InAccount.claimReceipts() the parameter market isn’t verified against the receipt.tracer . This allows
a user to claim receipts based on orders that originate from other (malicious) tracer markets.
This vulnerability is classified as hi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Users Can Escape Paying for the TX Gas
### Description
The current implementation of Paymaster is not taking the amount of gas paid by the paymaster for the tx execution within the same user tx, or before it. It is collected after the execution of the tx.
- `GasTankPaymaster::_validatePaymasterUserOp()` is c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | reentrancy | true | false | ## Gas: Check `amount` for `zero` before mint/burn (Missed by bot)
### Description
**Note: Bot only covers check 0 value transfers in tranfser and transferFrom but not covered when minting and burning 0 amounts.**
0 amount burning and minting doesn't have any effect but just wastes gas when 0 value passed by mistake ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | true | false | ## High: Gauge stakers won't get any reward due to round-down in user weight calculation
### Description
GaugeController has weight precision of 4, however BaseGauge calculates weight precision in 18. Due to this, user's earned amount will be zero at all times.
### Impact
Since user's weight is always calculated as z... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Emergency resolver targets wrong epoch
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2025-10-index-fun-order-book-contest-judging/issues/47
## Found by
0xeix, 0xnija, 8olidity, DemiGods, Edoscoba, Icarus, Idealz, KrisRenZo, RajeshKotaru, Sir\_Shades, Ziusz, blockace, jo13, neeloy, ubl4nk, x15... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
Throughout the [codebase](https://github.com/euler-xyz/euler-vault-kit/blob/83ea1ad97b7c561d6601b220d23ec85d67ceb297/src), there are multiple instances of missing input validation:
* Missing zero address check for the [`admin_`](https://github.com/euler-xyz/euler-vaul... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Grace period is hardcoded
### Description
The [`grace_period`](https://github.com/celo-org/celo-monorepo/blob/6b5143a142f4715a9b8bc428b1cf391eec414ec8/packages/protocol/contracts/governance/Validators.sol#L406) variable of the `calculateEpochScore` function in the `Validators` contract is hardcoded and it’s no... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: CLAVE_STORAGE_SLOT should be subtracted by one
### Description
The ClaveStorage library maintains the contract's `Layout` struct in the storage slot equal to `keccak256('clave.contracts.ClaveStorage')`. This is similar to how EIP-1967 storage slots are maintained, except that there is an offset of -1 missing i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `++i` costs less gas than `i++`, especially when it's used in `for`-loops (`--i`/`i--` too)
### Description
Saves 6 gas *PER LOOP*
*There are 24 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Execution of `LibLegacyTokenSilo:: balanceOfGrownStalkUpToStemsDeployment` can end earlier when `lastUpdate == stemStartSeason`
### Description
Currently, `LibLegacyTokenSilo:: balanceOfGrownStalkUpToStemsDeployment` [returns zero](https://github.com/BeanstalkFarms/Beanstalk/blob/c7a20e56a0a6659c09314a877b4401... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Governance should not be able to change the vault's name and symbol
### Description
The current implementation of the Governance contract allows the governor to update the name and symbol of the deployed EVault at any point and with any value, including an empty one. These values are later used in `Token.name`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Lending pool reserve liquidity can be incorrectly accounted due to transferring accrued dust
### Description
Lending pool reserve liquidity can be incorrectly accounted due to transferring accrued dust.
### Impact
`reserve.totalLiquidity` is used to calculate utilization rate, incorrect utilizatio rate lea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Loss of funds due to address mappings are not cleaned up after domain expiry
### Description
### Finding description and impact
The `register_domain` function doesn’t properly clean up old mappings `(name_to_addr and addr_to_name)` when a new user registers an expired domain. While it removes the old `name... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Threshold of signatures used in fastConfirmer is overly inflexible
### Description
The fast confirmer committee is implemented using a Gnosis Safe that uses the maximum threshold, making it very inflexible if changes are needed.
```solidity
function perform(IRollupAdmin rollup, address[] calldata fastConfirmCom... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | true | ## Medium: Remove Liquidity has missing reserve1 DUST check, which can make reserve1 to be less than DUST
### Description
The function `Pools::removeLiquidity()` checks that the `reserve0` and `reserve1` amounts for a pool are always above or at DUST amount. If after the liquidity is removed, and the `reserve0` or `re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Fees Charged for Invalid Setup
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> Related to [SSV-4](https://certificate.quantstamp.com/full/ssv-network/6682a4e0-872e-4cec-8b8d-4cd489a20b66/index.html#findings-qs4)
**File(s) affected:**`SSVNetwork.sol`
**D... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of a gas refund in the current design can lead to the overcharging of users and misaligned relayer incentives that can choke message execution
### Description
**Description:** To understand gas handling, it is important to highlight a few key aspects of the current design:
1. On the target chain, Tran... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Attacker can use `MagnetarAction.OFT` action of the Magnet to perform operations as any user including directly stealing user tokens
### Description
This issue requires the combination of two vulnerabilities to achieve the impact described in the title. The first vulnerability is that the `Magnetar._processOF... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Invalid range inputs for deposit store pruner
### Description
While running the kurtosis cluster and testnet, some errors from the deposit store pruner were observed:
```
2024-11-26T09:12:01Z ERRR error pruning index service=deposit-store-pruner
error=range start greater than end
```
The root cause is unknow... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Integer overflow occurs in library functions under certain edge cases
### Description
The `boundedSub()` and `boundedAdd()` functions revert when `b = type(int).min`. For example, `boundedSub(0, type(int).min, 0, type(uint).max)` should return `type(int).max + 1`, while calculating `-b` causes an integer overfl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: `Accounting::setMinimumJrtSrtRatio` sets `reserveBps` instead of `minimumJrtSrtRatio` making ratio configuration impossible
### Description
**Description:** The `Accounting::setMinimumJrtSrtRatio` function contains a an implementation error where it modifies the wrong state variable. Instead of setting `minimu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: [10] Lack of event emit
### Description
The `Market.pauseBorrows`, `Market.setLiquidationFeeBps`, `Market.setLiquidationIncentiveBps`, `Market.setReplenismentIncentiveBps`, `Market.setLiquidationFactorBps`, `Market.setCollateralFactorBps`, `Market.setBorrowController`, `Market.setOracle` methods do not emit an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Potential overpayment due to rounding imprecision Won't Fix
### Description
Inside the `InifintyPool` the `pay` function might accept unaccounted files. Imagine a situation where an Agent is trying to repay only the fees portion of the debt. In that case, the following branch will be executed:
**code/src/Po... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | true | ## Medium: Vouchers and vouchees indices become corrupted by UserManager's cancelVouch
### Description
UserManager's cancelVouch() doesn't update `voucherIndexes` and `voucheeIndexes` entries for the last `vouchers` and `vouchees` arrays element that was moved to the position of the deleted element, keeping the non-ex... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Adding Rewards Doesn't Always Update Reward Data
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `187e7a03e9d2368005cc11f3d142ee1335c57e1a`. The client provided the following explanation:
> As per the audit review comment, the farm's reward data was not getting updated because Reward... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: 6] Funds can get stuck, because of block header recommitting
### Description
**Severity:** Medium
**Path:** FuelChainState:commit()
**Description:**
When committing a block header, the `COMMITTER_ROLE` invokes the `commit()` function, which writes the `blockHash` and `timestamp` to storage. To access mes... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Mixed use of `uint` and `uint256` in `MembershipERC1155`
### Description
**Description:** The state declarations in `MembershipERC1155` use both `uint` and `uint256`:
This is inconsistent and confusing. Consider using `uint256` everywhere as this is more expressive.
**One World Project:** Updated in [`09b6f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Security Report
## Severity
**Medium Risk**
## Context
Locke.sol#L166
## Description
In cases where the deposit token decimal is too low (4 or less) or when the remaining stream duration is too long, checking `streamAmt > 0` may affect regular users. They could be temporarily blocked by the contract, meaning they... | Spearbit | 5 | Locke |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect MOMP calculation in neutral price calculation
### Description
When calculating MOMP to find the neutral price of a borrower, borrower's accrued debt is divided by the total number of loans in the pool, but it's total pool's debt that should be divided. The mistake will result in lower neutral pric... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Non-standard ERC20 Tokens Are Not Supported And Locked in the Contract
### Description
Non-ERC20 compliant tokens might not be supported by the contract. Specifically, this is true when the `transfer()` function does not correctly implement to the `IERC20` interface. One prominent example for such tokens is t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Inaccurate collateral factor calculation due to missing collateral asset
### Description
The function `collateralFactor()` in the smart contract calculates the collateral factor for the protocol but fails to account for the removal of certain collateral assets. As a result, the total value of the removed co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | logic | true | false | ## Medium: PAUSED GATEWAYS DO NOT PREVENT USERS FROM ADDING GAS FEES
### Description
`addGasFee` function in **CCMPSendMessageFacet** contract allows users to add gas fee `even if a gateway is paused`, which would go against the business logic of the protocol.
As a consequence, users could lose their recently deposit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect function name
### Description
Incorrect function of Uniswap-V2 pool is called:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/adapters/UniswapV2.sol#L387
### Recommendation
We recommend changing the function name. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Metadata Deserialization
### Description
## Address Lookup Table Deserialization
Under `AddressLookupTable::deserialize`, all account data are treated as serialized metadata when `bincode::deserialize` is invoked. This will treat the address data as serialized metadata, which could potentially take up more sp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: PyInstaller binaries should be distributed with signatures
### Description
The deposit tool is distributed as binary files compiled using PyInstaller, but without any way for users to verify their authenticity. The deposit tool is compiled to a single binary using PyInstaller to be released on GitHub.
yVault users participating in the farm have to trust that:
* ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: All `public` functions can be changed to `external`
### Description
Since a function is not called from within a contract, using `external` instead of `public` will save gas as all the function arguments will be in `calldata` instead of copied to memory | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | oracle-manipulation | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect assumption that Chainlink price feeds will always have the same decimals
### Description
There are several instances [[1](https://github.com/Benqi-fi/ignite-contracts/blob/bbca0ddb399225f378c1d774fb70a7486e655eea/src/Ignite.sol#L227), [2](https://github.com/Benqi-fi/ignite-contracts/blob/bbca0ddb3992... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | signature | false | true |
As Per [EIP-1271](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1271) standard `ERC1271_MAGIC_VAULE` should be `0x1626ba7e` instead of `0x20c13b0b` and function name should be `isValidSignature(bytes32,bytes)` instead of `isValidSignature(bytes,bytes)`. Due to this, signature verifier contract go fallback function and return un... | Code4rena | 5 | Biconomy |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Locked-In Licenses Can Be Transferred
### Description
Possession of an [`FNode`](https://github.com/0xFFoundation/fchain-contracts/blob/11ffd45bc95747b8d2432a2e8bb120d4a1dc19a2/src/FNodes.sol) license is a [requirement to become a validator](https://github.com/0xFFoundation/fchain-contracts/blob/11ffd45bc9574... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Precalculate constants in `Config.sol`.
### Description
While constants have known value, to save more gas, calculate their values before compile-time.
[File: ethereum/contracts/zksync/Config.sol](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-zksync/blob/main/code/contracts/ethereum/contracts/zksync/Config.sol) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: NEthStaked Event Using _time param . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
### Description
## NftEth Contract - stakeN Function
In the `NftEth` contract, the `stakeN` function emits the `NEthStaked` event with the `(user, amount, time)` for staking.
## Contracts/NftEth.sol (SOLIDITY)
Since the `_time` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | true | false | ## Medium: Flashloan end result isn't controlled
### Description
FlashLoan logic do not control the end result of transferring tokens out and back in. Given that protocol aims to support arbitrary non-rebasing / without fee on transfer / decimals in `[1, 18]` fungible tokens to be quote and collateral of a pool, this ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Depositing to EigenLayer can revert due to round downs in converting shares<->assets
### Description
When the underlying tokens deposited from depositPool to EigenLayer strategy, there are bunch of converting operations done which rounds down the solution at some point and the require check reverts hence, t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | other | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-carapace-judging/issues/292
## Found by
XKET, ctf\_sec, monrel, bin2chen, mahdikarimi, libratus, rvierdiiev, csanuragjain, chaduke, ast3ros, jprod15, peanuts, 0x52, clems4ever, Allarious, carrot, Bauer, HonorLt, 0Kage, mert\_eren, KingNFT, Jeiwan, Ruhum, unforgiven, ... | Sherlock | 5 | Carapace |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `InstanceDeployer` - Could use constant for Flag Previous Owner
### Description
Could use CONSTANT instead of `1`
https://github.com/solidity-labs-io/kleidi/blob/1a06ac16bc99d0b4081281329d03064c3737f5e4/src/InstanceDeployer.sol#L294-L302 | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: DAO admin in LiquidStakingManager.sol can rug the registered node operator by stealing their fund in the smart wallet via arbitrary execution.
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/4b6828e9c807f2f7c569e6d721ca1289f7cf7112/contracts/liquid-staking/LiquidStaki... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Fail fast in `PerpMarket::checkOpenInterestLimits`
### Description
In `PerpMarket::checkOpenInterestLimits` there is no point in calculating `newSkew` if the transaction is going to revert because `newOpenInterest > maxOpenInterest`.
### Recommendation
Only calculate `newSkew` if the revert doesn't happen:
``... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | true | false | ## Medium: First depositor can be frontrun to lose funds from inflated shares
### Description
The attack vector and impact is a variant of a commonly reported vulnerability **TOB-YEARN-003**, where users may not fairly receive shares in exchange for their deposits through some form of manipulation.
The deposit price i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | oracle-manipulation | true | false | ## Low: Cache storage variables in memory when read multiple times without being changed
### Description
As reading from storage is considerably more expensive than reading from memory, cache storage variables in memory when read multiple times without being changed:
File: `NodeOperatorRegistry.sol`
```solidity
// @a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: If There Is No Existing Child, the Function addPathInfo Will Use the Previous compressedKey
### Description
In the [`addPathInfo`](https://github.com/ava-labs/avalanchego/blob/73c4c0ff9817cb13fdb8b205939596af0c416f1f/x/merkledb/proof.go#L795-L854) function, the verifier adds each node in the proof path to a ne... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Unsigned Callback Data
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `a05d5e8223351b0a3466bd1bcde507493fde0f24`.
The callback data in all cases is now always required to be signed by the borrower if the borrower is not `msg.sender`.
**File(s) affected:**`Leverage.sol`, `MultiSour... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Domain separator is missing security fields
### Description
EIP-712 defines multiple fields for the domain separator: `name`, `version`, `chainId`, `verifyingContract`, and `salt`. While `chainId` and `verifyingContract` are present, the rest are not. Although the EIP recommends including only the fields that m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | reentrancy | true | false | ## Gas: claimRewards(address) contains duplicate code and could be simplified
### Description
## Context
`fatBERA.sol#L384-L409`
## Description/Recommendation
Since `claimRewards(address)` does the same thing as `claimRewards(address,address)` just for every token and the token-specific function is already public, dup... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: A new malicious adapter can access users' tokens ✓ Fixed
### Description
The purpose of the `MetaSwap` contract is to save users gas costs when dealing with a number of different aggregators. They can just `approve()` their tokens to be spent by `MetaSwap` (or in a later architecture, the `Spender` contract... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | flash-loan | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-telcoin-judging/issues/36
## Found by
hyh
## Summary
stakedByAt() is vulnerable to producing manipulated readings when staking was performed more than once in the same block.
For example, if there were two stake() calls in one block, then stakedByAt() will report ... | Sherlock | 5 | Telcoin Update |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Document that math in OrchidDirectory assumes a maximum number of tokens ✓ Fixed
### Description
`OrchidDirectory` relies on mathematical operations being unable to overflow due to the particular ERC20 token being used being capped at less than `2**128`.
### Recommendation
This is fixed in [OrchidProtocol/[em... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Avoid contract existence checks by using solidity version 0.8.10 or later
### Description
Prior to 0.8.10 the compiler inserted extra code, including EXTCODESIZE (100 gas), to check for contract existence for external calls. In more recent solidity versions, the compiler will not insert these checks if the ext... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Centralization Risks in Protocol's Access Control Design
### Description
The protocol implementation grants excessive privileges to administrative roles, enabling fund extraction through multiple vectors. This centralization manifests in three critical functions across the protocol's contracts:
1. In **Ge... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: Bypassing KYC in KintoWallet
### Description
* https://github.com/KintoXYZ/kinto-core/blob/f7dd98f66b9dfba1f73758703b808051196e740b/src/wallet/KintoWallet.sol#L204
A KintoWallet can have from one to three owners and have different signer policies. `_validateSignature()` and `resetSigners()` check KintoID onl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: griefing/theft is possible on unsafe external call
### Description
`return` data `(bool success,)` has to be stored due to EVM architecture, if in a usage like below, 'out' and 'outsize' values are given (0,0) . Thus, this storage disappears and may come from external contracts a possible Gas griefing/theft pr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | true | ## Low: Missing `address(0)` checks when assigning values to address state variables
### Description
Missing `address(0)` checks when assigning values to address state variables.
### Impact
Address state variables may be unexpectedly set to `address(0)`.
### Proof of Concept
```solidity
File: gov/GovPool.sol
344: ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Inability to liquidate at high utilization
### Description
The liquidation function reverts if there aren’t enough funds in the pool to perform the transfer:
```solidity
function _liquidation
...
(uint256 withdrawnLockedAmount, uint256 lockedAmountToTransfer,) =
_withdrawAsset(
_withdrawal[i].asset,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Management Fee for a vault is charged even when there is no assets under management and subject to manipulation.
### Description
### Vulnerability details
`managementFee` is calculated by `accruedManagementFee` function:
\- managementFee x (totalAssets x (block.timestamp - feesUpdatedAt))/SECONDS_PER_YEAR ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: `wrapETH2LD` permissioning is over-extended
### Description
Undesired use of ENS wrapper.
### Proof of Concept
[NameWrapper.sol#L219-L223](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-ens/blob/ff6e59b9415d0ead7daf31c2ed06e86d9061ae22/contracts/wrapper/NameWrapper.sol#L219-L223)
Current permissioning for wrapETH... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: Failure in endpoint can cause minting more than one NFT with the same token id in different chains
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-tigris/blob/588c84b7bb354d20cbca6034544c4faa46e6a80e/contracts/GovNFT.sol#L168
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
In the contract `Go... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | liquidation | false | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-surge-judging/issues/109
## Found by
usmannk
## Summary
Certain parameter choices make it feasible to block updates to the collateralization ratio. Collaterization ratio updates are calculated as `uint change = timeDelta * _maxCollateralRatioMantissa / _collateral... | Sherlock | 4 | Surge |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Uncounted fees in USDT
### Description
Contract can have less than `amountIn` because of fees in transferFrom function in USDT:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/credit/LeverageActions.sol#L232
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gear... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Usage of transfer
### Description
## Handle
cmichel
## Vulnerability details
## Vulnerability Details
`Withdrawable.withdraw`: The `address.transfer` function is used to send ETH to an account. It is restricted to a low amount of GAS and might fail if GAS costs change in the future or if a smart contract's... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Bad comment for hash generation
### Description
It is impossible to check constant hash via following comment:
https://github.com/lidofinance/curve-merkle-oracle/blob/ae093b308999a564ed3f23d52c6c5dce946dbfa7/contracts/StableSwapStateOracle.sol#L95
### Recommendation
We recommend to add more detailed comment. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: PanopticFactory.sol#deployNewPool mint full range logic is incorrect for duplicate UniV4 PoolKey deployments
### Description
When deploying a PanopticPool, the first deployer needs to mint the full-range liquidity in the Uniswap pool. This is noted in the code comments: _Mints the full-range initial deposit, w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [13] SOLIDITY VERSION `0.8.19` CAN BE USED
### Description
Using the more updated version of Solidity can enhance security. As described in https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/releases, Version `0.8.19` is the latest version of Solidity, which "contains a fix for a long-standing bug that can result in code th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Users Have to Pay Interest on the Borrowing Fee
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> The proportion of borrow fees is negligible.
**File(s) affected:**`BorrowerOperations.sol`
**Description:** Users are charged a borrowing fee... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Wrong fee calculation after totalSupply was 0
### Description
## Handle
kenzo
## Vulnerability details
`handleFees` does not update `lastFee` if `startSupply == 0`.
This means that wrongly, extra fee tokens would be minted once the basket is resupplied and `handleFees` is called again.
## Impact
Loss of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Silent truncation on u128 to u64 cast in liquidity token amount calculator
### Description
The `utils::token_calculator::calculate_liquidity_token_amount` function computes the output in `u128` and returns it with a plain `as u64` cast:
```rust
let result = /* u128 math */;
Ok(result as u64)
```
If `result` fi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Avoid contract existence checks by using low level calls
### Description
Prior to 0.8.10 the compiler inserted extra code, including `EXTCODESIZE` (**100 gas**), to check for contract existence for external function calls. In more recent solidity versions, the compiler will not insert these checks if the exter... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect handling of metadata traits in the attributes of `MetadataFacet::uri`
### Description
For fully on-chain metadata, external clients expect the URI of a token to contain a base64 encoded JSON object that contains the metadata and base64 encoded SVG image. As raised previously, if these attributes are ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | false | false | ## Gas: Add `unchecked {}` for subtractions where the operands cannot underflow because of a previous `require()` or `if` statement
### Description
`require(a require(a if(a <= b); unchecked { x = b - a }`
This will stop the check for overflow and underflow so it will save gas.
This is checked in the if statement ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: First depositor can break minting of shares
### Description
_Submitted by MiloTruck, also found by cccz, oyc_109, VAD37, PP1004, SmartSek, minhquanym, unforgiven, berndartmueller, WatchPug, CertoraInc, and sorrynotsorry_
The attack vector and impact is the same as [TOB-YEARN-003](https://github.com/yearn/yea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Missing zero address check in Governable can lead to loss of Ownership
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**:
In Governable.sol’s transferGovernor() function, there is missing zero address check. This can lead to accidentally losing ownership if a zero address is passed ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Possible to Renounce Ownership of Contracts
### Description
**Update**
Native team has indicated that all of their contract owners are multi-signature addresses, similar to most DeFi protocols. There is an implicit understanding among the signers that ownership should not be renounced because doing so would ma... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Liquidators Can Manipulate Pool’s Profit or Loss Values
### Description
Liquidators can manipulate the protocol’s profit and loss accounting in `CreditFacade.liquidateCreditAccount()`, which can lead to theft of funds from the pool.
The call to `_multicall()` is done after `totalValue` is calculated. Hence,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: `require()`/`revert()` strings longer than 32 bytes cost extra gas
### Description
Each extra memory word of bytes past the original 32 [incurs an MSTORE](https://gist.github.com/hrkrshnn/ee8fabd532058307229d65dcd5836ddc#consider-having-short-revert-strings) which costs **3 gas**
*There are 6 instances of thi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Using a fixed `slippage` variable for all pools
### Description
Different pools have different liquidity depths, so using the same `slippage` parameter when performing swaps is not optimal. For example, pools with deeper liquidity will have less price impact, but arbitrageurs can sandwich to steal up to the ma... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Exposed signatures can be lead to unanticipated permissions
### Description
To call `swapCollateral`, a user must provide signatures for allowing the contract permission to move the user's funds on Comet. Exposing this signature means that a front-runner can call Comet's `allowBySig` with the signature ahead o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Potential Errors with NFT Type Checking
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `91d57d92a2a85a8624d103386a7ad649219d814c`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Modified is721Type() function as it was recommended.
**File(s) affected:**`MarketTools`, `NFTMarketSim... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Use named return variables where this can refactor away local variables
### Description
**Description:** Use named return variables where this can refactor away local variables:
* `CountryValidator::getCountry`
* `PublicStockOnRamp::calculateDsTokenAmount` - read result of `navProvider.quoteBuyBase` directly i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary contract name specified
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Unresolved
**File**: RailgunLogic.sol
**Function**: transferTokenIn
**Details**:
While calling the getFee function on the line#258 the third argument is specified as: RailgunLogic.shieldFee. We double-checked the c... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.