prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: SafeMath is recommended in OUSD._executeTransfer
### Description
`_executeTransfer`, after exchanging the corresponding amount of credits, updates the accounting state variables:
```solidity
} else if (isNonRebasingTo && isNonRebasingFrom) {
// Transfer between two non rebasing accounts. They may have
// diff... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: If block range it big and adl dosnt use currentblock in the order it will cause issues
### Description
if block range is a big range and since adl order uses` cache.minOracleBlockNumbers[0]` there can be an issue of the block not being in range because of the littlest block with max block being a lot bigger... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Global pause method will fail if a subcomponent is already paused
### Description
Internal pause methods, such as `_setUndelegatePaused`, will revert while attempting to set a pause flag to the current value (Figure 1.1). This could cause unintended reversions if the global pause method is called after a more ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Receipt-token + Zap incorrectly handled in liquidation
### Description
When a user requests liquidation with isReceiptOut = true and provides a zap route, the code transfers the vault receipt token (not LP token) to the zapper proxy. Instructs the zapper proxy to swap the LP token address (collatToken), but... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: User can pass in zero underlying token amount and non-zero reward amount to bypass the fee accumulation
### Description
If the strategy has token A as base underlying asset, and token B as reward token, the protocol wants to charge performance fee both on the yield part of the underlying asset and the rewar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: _isAuthorized can be declared as private
### Description
The `_isAuthorized` function in `AuthNoOwner.sol` is marked as internal. However, it is not overridden anywhere in the project, indicating that it could be marked as private to restrict its visibility and better align with its intended usage.
### Recomm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Edition owner can rug by inflating token quantity after mint begins
### Description
It appears that the intention is that, once an edition has begun minting, the maximum quantity cannot be increased. As we can see in the `setEditionMaxMintableRange()` function:
This restricts edition owners so that they c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: [13] Tokens with fee on transfer are not supported
### Description
There are ERC20 tokens that charge fee for every transfer() / transferFrom().
Vault.sol#addValue() assumes that the received amount is the same as the transfer amount, and uses it to calculate attributions, balance amounts, etc.
But, the actu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | false | false | ## High: Major Inconsistencies Between Public Documentation and Code
### Description
**Update**
The client provided the following explanation:
> We have updated the documentation to address the current development status, potential risks, and our approach to mitigating those risks. Additionally, we have included a ro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Missing `notEmptyURI` modifier during initialization
### Description
**Description:** Currently, there is no `notEmptyURI` modifier present in the `initialize()` function that checks for the empty URI and, if it's empty, reverts the transaction:
**Impact:** Insufficient validation, `projectURI` may not be se... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Coinflip game does not work with `fee-on-transfer` tokens
### Description
The `Flip.sol` contract of the `Coinflip game` has the core logic of the game play. In the `Flip.sol` contract the `acceptedTokens` mapping is used to whitelist a token for betting by the `owner`.
When an user plays the game he will cal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: DoS Through Exposed API Keys
### Description
**Update**
Fixed in commit `e87feb8b41f62fb76158dd706dfae5206ed6391f` but new keys need to be generated.
**Description:** The `hardhat.config.ts` file exposes the team's API keys for mainnet, Sepolia, and Goerli as well as the etherscan's API key.
The impact coul... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: CANCELLING THE INVESTMENT IN THE POINTER CAN LOCK THE FUNDS FROM OTHER USERS
### Description
The `Passage` contract allows users to create orders through the `order()` function and cancel them before they are matched through the `cancelInv()`. Once the orders reach a certain threshold, the `autoMatch()` funct... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Misconfiguration could lead to blocking bids
### Description
In the [`_processBid` function](https://github.com/freeverseio/crypto-payments/blob/956a98e53ef540f7b2b40f3b923d0b0e3e5d32ef/contracts/auction/base/AuctionBase.sol#L105) of the [`AuctionBase` contract](https://github.com/freeverseio/crypto-payment... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Precision Loss Issue in FeeCollector Contract
### Description
The `FeeCollector` contract has a precision loss issue in the `_calculatePendingRewards` function. This issue arises due to Solidity’s integer division, which truncates decimal values, leading to inaccurate reward distributions.
[\_calculatePending... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [04] No incentive for users to pay protocol fees in the `V3Utils.sol`
### Description
Users can specify the percentage of their tokens to be paid as fees to the protocol during the `execute` call.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-06-krystal-defi/blob/main/src/V3Utils.sol#L69-L70
https://github.com/code-423... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: The RequestManagerAdded and RequestManagerRemoved Events Can Be Wrongfully Emitted
### Description
The [`addRequestManager`](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/managed-oracle/blob/fc03083eca91c880efa8918c6d9532af9362f00d/src/optimistic-oracle-v2/implementation/ManagedOptimisticOracleV2.sol#L177C4-L180C6) and [`rem... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: borrow() maliciously let others to enter market
### Description
After `borrow()` is executed successfully, `borrower` will automatically enter the market.
This method performs a security check to determine if the `msg.sender` allowance is sufficient to avoid malicious operations.
But it doesn't limit the bo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Do not ignore staticcall 's return value
### Description
TypedMemView calls several precompiles through the `staticcall` opcode and never checks its return value, assuming it is a success. For instance:
```solidity
// use the identity precompile to copy
// guaranteed not to fail, so pop the success
pop(static... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Liquidations of short positions may fail because of insu�cient dust collection
### Description
Because the protocol does not collect the dust associated with short positions, attempts to fully close and then liquidate those positions will fail. One of the key requirements for the successful liquidation of a po... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Lender#buyLoan - Malicious user could take over a loan for free without having a pool because of wrong access control
### Description
### Relevant GitHub Links
https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-07-beedle/blob/658e046bda8b010a5b82d2d85e824f3823602d27/src/Lender.sol#L518-L522
## **Summary**
The **`buyLoan`** fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Avoid unnecessary computation in `dYToken::mintYToken` when `isNewYToken == false`
### Description
**Description:** In the new [`dYToken::mintYToken`](https://github.com/YieldFiLabs/contracts/blob/702a931df3adb2f6e48807203cdc7a92604ea249/contracts/core/tokens/dYTokenL1.sol#L67-L81), there is special logic for ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: The delay between the EMA and instant price can accumulate bad debt
### Description
The EMA does not follow the market instantly, resulting in a delay between the actual price and the oracle in Curve. Hypothetically, a situation could arise where the market price jumps so significantly that it becomes profitab... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: DoS Attack on User Rewards in StakingVault
### Description
The `depositWeth` function in the `StakingVault` contract contains a vulnerability that allows malicious actors to reset the reward accrual timestamp for any user. This can be exploited to prevent legitimate users from accruing their rewards, effectiv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Parameter name mismatch between interface and implementation may be misleading
### Description
**Description:** In `IHype_Module`, the parameter names differ from the implementation:
* `hyper_sendSpot(uint64 token, uint64 _wei)` vs implementation uses `asset` for the first `uint64`
* `hyper_addApiWallet(addre... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: ORACLE PRICE AFFECTS THE POSSIBILITY OF DEBT REPAYMENT
### Description
The `LineOfCredit` contract tracks unpaid interest valuated in USD by `interestUsd` parameter. This parameter is updated with addition in `_accrueInterest()` internal function and subtraction in `_repay()` internal function. The `_accrueIn... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Function parameters are inconsistent with the JSDoc
### Description
**Description**
File: migration.ts
Function: create Migration Bundle
Parameters: bundle
Details:
The given parameters are present in the function, however they are not described in the JSDoc, instead JSDoc contains the bundle Index parameter
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: StakeCounter Struct Declared but Never Utilized
### Description
**Description:** The `clmm_lp_farming` program has a struct `StakeCounter` that includes a field `count`. However this struct is not utilized anywhere in the program:
**Recommended Mitigation:** Consider removing `StakeCounter` struct with its `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Memory allocation
### Description
**Occurs**:
Basilisk-node/primitives/src/asset.rs:54
Basilisk-node/pallets/xyk/src/lib.rs:517
Basilisk-node/runtime/src/lib.rs:1032
Extending a vector can lead to reallocation of memory and influence performance.
**Recommendation**:
Use Vec::with_capacity() to create a vect... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Bypassing payment fees through various methods
### Description
SwapExecutor, a contract responsible for executing token swaps, is vulnerable to multiple methods of bypassing payment fees, allowing an attacker to perform swaps without paying the required fees.
The first method involves specifying a personal t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: Failed proposal can be committed again
### Description
_Submitted by 0x52, also found by hansfriese_
Failed proposal can be committed again and eth stolen from migration contract in combination with other vulnerabilities submitted.
### Proof of Concept
Commit can be called as long as it has been less than... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | true | ## Medium: Governance NFT holder, whose NFT was minted before `Trading._handleOpenFees` function is called, can lose deserved rewards after `Trading._handleOpenFees` function is called
### Description
### Impact
Calling the following `Trading._handleOpenFees` function does not approve the `GovNFT` contract for spendi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | false | false | ## High: Potential contract storage layout overlap in upgradable contracts
### Description
By default, ink! tries to store all storage struct fields under a single storage cell. This behavior causes an issue for upgradable contracts because both the proxy and the implementation write their Packed fields to the same st... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [03] Inconsistent Lock Durations
### Description
Locks for veRWA are set for 5 years, given no further actions on a lock are performed. This 5 year period is an important duration, because it also determines the calculations for the decay in voting power a lock has. In `**VotingEscrow.sol**`, the 5 year lock... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Single-Step Admin Transfer Risks Permanent Access Loss
### Description
In `CLGaugeFactory.setEmissionAdmin()` and `setNotifyAdmin()`, admin roles are transferred immediately without confirmation from the recipient. A mistyped address permanently locks access to critical functions. Loss of these roles requires ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use Assembly for efficient memory management in multiple external calls
### Description
When making multiple external calls in a Solidity contract, it may be more efficient to use inline assembly to reuse the memory space allocated for function arguments and return data. This can prevent unnecessary memory exp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: <a name="NC-3"></a>[NC-3] Event is missing `indexed` fields | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Contracts used as dependencies do not track upstream changes
### Description
Several third-party contracts or functions are copy-pasted into the TokenCard contracts, including: the strings library, Oraclize contracts (version 0.4.25), Ownable from OpenZeppelin, and several functions from Stack Overflow respons... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Small amounts are not displayed in Acala-dapp or are displayed in a scientific notation
### Description
The Acala-dapp presents small amounts of values in a scientific notation (Figures 9.1-2) and if a value is too small, e.g. 0.00000001, it may not be presented at all (Figure 9.2). This behavior may be confusi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary operation.
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
ERC20Distribution.sol - In the startDistribution there is a check to ensure that the contract balance of the distributed token and the _total_distribution_balance are the same. However, the next operation assigns ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Double check.
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
PROPCStakingV2.sol: unstake()
In function, there is a check for preventing cause when `stakeId` index is out of array. However, this function calls function `deleteStake`, which calls only ones in contract, and th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: VULNERABLE 3RD PARTY PACKAGES
### Description
There are a few 3rd party packages that are being used that contain vulnerabilities.
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l|p{3cm}|p{2cm}|l|}
\hline
\textbf{ID} & \textbf{Package} & \textbf{Rating} & \textbf{Description} \
\hline
\href{https://ossindex.sonatype.org/vul... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Boost activation delay vulnerability in `Staker` due to `setValidator` abuse
### Description
The `Staker` contract's `setValidator` function, intended to update the validator address, has an unintended side effect that can be abused by a malicious owner to delay or prevent boost activation. The vulnerability l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Users can DOS themselves by executing `prepareUnlock(0)` many times
### Description
There's no check on the amount, and every call add another entry to an array. When the user finally calls `executeUnlocks()` they'll run out of gas
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-ba... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect Error Message
### Description
In the [`validateTx` function of `light/txpool.go`](https://github.com/mantlenetworkio/op-geth/blob/4d05b2cd9a2b8096680eb9b2e87e473a44a43922/light/txpool.go#L350), if the sponsor does not contain sufficient funds in order to [pay for the `sponsorAmount`](https://github.c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect slippage check in the AMO2.rebalanceUp can be attacked by MEV
### Description
The `AMO2.rebalanceUp` uses `AMO2.bestRebalanceUpQuote` function to avoid MEV attack when removing liquidity with only one coin. But the `bestRebalanceUpQuote` does not calculate the slippage correctly in this case, whic... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Sprawling whitelist architecture
### Description
The protocol relies extensively on whitelisting:
* The `HomoraBank` contract maintains [three separate whitelist mappings](https://github.com/AlphaFinanceLab/homora-v2/blob/5efa332f2ecf8e9705c326cffda5305bc6f752f7/contracts/HomoraBank.sol#L81-L83); one for tok... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of incentivization of the battle settlement process
### Description
There is no specific incentivization of the [`settle()`](https://github.com/DivergenceProtocol/diver-contracts/blob/e5286f94a7ccb9d6279fae51ea66a8833672628a/src/core/Battle.sol#L424) function. Though most of the users are interested in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: InfinityExchange computes gas refunds in a way where the first order's buyer pays less than the later ones
### Description
_Submitted by Ruhum, also found by 0xf15ers, 0xsanson, antonttc, kenzo, and WatchPug_
### Impact
The way the gas refunds are computed in the InfinityExchange contract, the first orde... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Users may fail to claim rewards
### Description
In SXTDistributorWithDeadline, users can claim SXT token via the merkel proof. If users don't claim the rewards by the deadline, the owner will withdraw back the remaining SXT token in this contract.
The problem here is that there is some time conflict in functi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Using oracle method that could return 0
### Description
**Description**
In contract Boba Deposit Paymaster, function "getTokenValueOfEth" is translating a given value amount of ethereum into the underlying token amount, for that the business logic is using oracles to query for values and different token de... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: Remove duplicate reference to core contract
### Description
**28,517 gas can be saved.**
| Method | Before | After | Gas Saved | Test Passes? |
|------------|------------|-----------|-------|----------|
| `NextGenMinterContract:airDropTokens()` | 744940 | 742940 | 2000 | Yes |
| `NextGenCore:mint()` | 404474 ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Rebalance may occur due to wrong requirements check
### Description
Before a rebalance can occur, checks are implemented to ensure that **`delta`** and **`debtRatio`** remain within their specified limits. However, it's important to note that the check in **`GMXChecks::beforeRebalanceChecks`** ignores the scen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Don't update state | true | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/4b6828e9c807f2f7c569e6d721ca1289f7cf7112/contracts/liquid-staking/GiantSavETHVaultPool.sol#L133-L157
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/4b6828e9c807f2f7c569e6d721ca1289f7cf7112/contracts/liquid-staking/GiantPoolBase.sol#L24-L25
... | Code4rena | 5 | Stakehouse Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | true | false | ## High: Scaling factor of the wrapped token is incorrect
### Description
The scaling factor of the wrapped token within the Boosted3Token leverage vault is incorrect. Thus, all the computations within the leverage vault will be incorrect. This leads to an array of issues such as users being liquidated prematurely or ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Batched liquidations doesn't distribute bad debt on next batches in the list
### Description
LiquidationLibrary.batchLiquidateCdps is called from `CDPManager` in order to liquidate list of cdps.
Depending if system is currently in recovery mode liquidations will be done [inside `_getTotalFromBatchLiquidate_... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Missing parameter checks
### Description
In `checkTransaction()`: `operation` should be checked depending on whether `DELEGATECALL` is supported or not.
https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/borg-core/blob/9074503d37cfa1d777ef16f6c88b84c98b4f54eb/src/borgCore.sol#L129
### Recommendation
We recommend adding paramete... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Approved tokens not validated for address(0)
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
Method `approveTokens()` approves tokens in which sellers/buyers can deposit the tokens but it is not validated for `address(0)`.
If accidentally `address(0)` is approved, `createEscrow()` ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: A Potential Controller Update Issue.
### Description
We identified a potential issue in the code that is out of our current scope. In the `GeodeModuleLib`, there is a function that allows a controller of any ID to update the controller address:
**contracts/Portal/modules/GeodeModule/libs/GeodeModuleLib.sol:L... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Unsafe ABI Encoding
### Description
It is not an uncommon practice to use `abi.encodeWithSignature` or `abi.encodeWithSelector` to generate calldata for a low-level call. However, the first option is not typo-safe and the second option is not type-safe. The results in both of these methods being error-prone an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Misleading error name
### Description
The `_mustValidateAuthSignature` function reverts with the `UnauthorizedCaller` error if the `authAddress` recovered from the data and signature provided does not have the `MPC_ROLE`. However, the error name is misleading, as it assumes that the caller of the transaction i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Use Ownable2Step for access control
### Description
The `MarginalV1LBFactory` contract executes a single-step ownership change, which may be prone to accidental transfers of access control. The `Ownable2Step` variant of the `Ownable` contract can protect against such accidental transfers.
### Recommendation
I... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing underscore prefix for non-external functions
### Description
This convention is suggested for non-external functions (private or internal). [Documentation](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/style-guide.html#underscore-prefix-for-non-external-functions-and-variables)
*There are 104 instances of t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Unexpected gains&losses for pending withdrawals if WITHDRAWAL_STAKE is changed
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** High, potential funds stolen from other users and DoS
**Likelihood:** Low, as `Withdrawal_Stake` is not so likely to be changed, must be increased, and must have pending withdrawals
**D... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: L07] Maximum uint256 value calculated with underflow
### Description
###### Low
In [L261](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/blob/de81d9bad4195e03f07aedd2a6817f0cb04a8c8d/contracts/VDF/BigNumber.sol#L261) and [L370](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/blob/de81d9bad4195e03f07aedd2a6817f0cb04a8c8d/co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | input-validation | false | false | ## Low: Add a validation to check the message sender and the token value
### Description
The `SecuritizeBridge` contract has a potential concern in its token bridging functionality.
While the contract is designed to work with compliance-verified investors, there's a gap in the validation process:
In the current Imple... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Not compliant with the `EIP-191` standard
### Description
In function `_validateSxtFulfillUnstake`, we will generate the message hash according to the ERC-191. According to the https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-191, the proposed format is like as below:
In function `_validateSxtFulfillUnstake`, we use 36 as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: L11] Proxy delegation logic can be simplified
### Description
###### Low
Component: [`policy`](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/tree/af3428020545e3f3ae2f3567b94e1fbc5e5bdb4c/contracts/policy)
The [fallback](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/beam-bootstrap-chain/blob/96beab1c5cfd41310bfba733ab7216426caf... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Slippage Restrictions Cannot Be Updated
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> * It's an assumption that strategies like Aave and Compound always return the exact amount when liquidating the LP; however, strategies involving paired ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: An incorrect sequence of math operations
### Description
If rates[0] becomes less than 10**18, then `get_dy_underlying` will revert here:
https://github.com/curvefi/stableswap-ng/blob/8c78731ed43c22e6bcdcb5d39b0a7d02f8cb0386/contracts/main/CurveStableSwapNGViews.vy#L206.
### Recommendation
We recommend upd... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Enable verification of Android Security Provider
### Description
The Android client does not explicitly check whether it is running on a device that has an up-to-date Android Security Provider. The Security Provider is responsible for providing secure network communications, such as SSL/TLS. Running Magma W... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Rounding direction for deposits does not favor the protocol
### Description
When users mint `fToken` and `xToken`, they must transfer the amount of base token obtained by `maxMintableFToken` and `maxMintableXToken`, respectively, as collateral. Currently, these functions round the value of `_maxBaseIn`, the am... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: TRST-L-2 Autotrader can steal funds
### Description
**Description:**
The slippage attack described in TRST-H-1 can also be performed by the autotrader contract.
**Team Response:**
"See TRST-H-1 response."
**Mitigation review:**
The H-1 fix solves the problem. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Executive Summary
### Description
The module allows a registered chainlink upkeep to automatically re-lock aura locks
Funds cannot be stolen in any way
Due to the lax timing and lack of MEV, I cannot expect the upkeep to cause any particular issue
It's worth noting that in case you want to deprecate the mod... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: The guardian may not be able to blacklist a protocol
### Description
An attempt to blacklist a protocol may revert in some situations, not making it possible for the guardian to remove a malicious or a hacked protocol from the system. The protocol will keep receiving funds during rebalancing.
### Impact
Th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Front-Running | true | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/main/contracts/liquid-staking/LiquidStakingManager.sol#L356
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/main/contracts/liquid-staking/LiquidStakingManager.sol#L369
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
As the `rotateNodeRunnerOfSmartWalle... | Code4rena | 4 | Stakehouse Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: [Perennial Self Report] Fix non-requested commits after oracle grace period
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-07-perennial-judging/issues/177
## Found by
Protocol Team
Medium
When a requested version was unavailable, non-requested versions would be blocked from being to be c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: `safeApprove()` is deprecated
### Description
[Deprecated](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/bfff03c0d2a59bcd8e2ead1da9aed9edf0080d05/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#L38-L45) in favor of `safeIncreaseAllowance()` and `safeDecreaseAllowance()`. If only setting the initial all... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: Reentrancy Vector In depositEtherToL2()
### Description
The function `depositEtherToL2()` does not have the `nonReentrant` modifier. It is therefore possible to reenter into `depositEtherToL2()`. Both `proposeBlock()` and `depositEtherToL2()` read and write to the fields `state.ethDeposits` and `state.slotA... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: The deployment nonce limit may be too small
### Description
The `BunniHub` contract allows anyone to deploy new `BunniTokens`, but there is a limit on the number of times, up to `1,000,000` times (The `1,000,000` is the upper limit of UniswapV4’s fee).
The attacker can continuously create new `BunniTokens` t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Probably incorrect using of `safeApprove`
### Description
At line https://github.com/jmonteer/yearnV2-strat-SNX-staking/blob/91b839df4a350d80cb583795bccafe0836fdb732/contracts/Strategy.sol#L129 we see the single `safeApprove` without setting to zero.
### Recommendation
Set approvement to zero before new ap... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: User rewards can be permissionlessly erased
### Description
The public method `updateUserRewards()` of `ERC4626i` overwrites the previous value of the user's accumulated rewards:
```solidity
userData.accumulated = (balanceOf[user] * elapsed * _campaignData.rate) / WAD;
```
This function can be called on any... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Discrepancies with the whitepaper
### Description
There are some discrepancies between the code and the [whitepaper](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/whitepaper/blob/master/UMA-DVM-oracle-whitepaper.pdf). Some (and possibly all) of these are known and acknowledged by the UMA team but we list them for complete... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `Claim` event is missing parameters
### Description
The `NeoTokyoStaker.sol` contract has very important function; `Claim`
However, only amounts are published in emits, whereas msg.sender must be specified in every transaction, a contract or web page listening to events cannot react to users, emit does not s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | critical | input-validation | true | true | ## Critical: USDs stability can be compromised as collateral deposited to Gamma vaults is not considered during liquidation
### Description
Users of The Standard can take out `USDs` stablecoin loans against their collateral deposited into an instance of `SmartVaultV4`. If the collateral value of a Smart Vault falls be... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Partially Succeeded Batch Transfer
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `f47635e2bf36b215dfe6d2b1fce09c3074238318`. The client provided the following explanation: The intended behaviour was documented on the contracts
**File(s) affected:**`LP/L2LiquidityPool.sol`, `ERC1155... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: [08] Front-running is possible over the minting process
### Description
During the code review, it has been noticed that to bidding mechanism is vulnerable to front-running. The bidding mechanism can have EOA check on the contract.
### Proof of Concept
1. Navigate to the following contract.
2. The contract... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [8] `<array>.length` should not be looked up in every loop of a `for`-loop
### Description
The overheads outlined below are *PER LOOP*, excluding the first loop
* storage arrays incur a Gwarmaccess (**100 gas**)
* memory arrays use `MLOAD` (**3 gas**)
* calldata arrays use `CALLDATALOAD` (**3 gas**)
Cachi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Calling `generateFLNQuote` twice in every block prevents any migration
### Description
_Submitted by camden, also found by GeekyLumberjack, kirk-baird, and shw_
In the Uniswap helper, `generateFLNQuote` is public, so any user can generate the latest quote. If you call this twice in any block, then the two... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: MetaTX is using the incorrect Context
### Description
Throughout the codebase, the code uses `Context` for `_msgSender()`. The implementation chosen will resolve each `_msgSender()` to `msg.sender`, which is inconsistent with the goal of allowing MetaTX.
### Recommendation
Replace the import of `Context` w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Allowance | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-uxd-judging/issues/372
## Found by
HonorLt, 0x52, yixxas, Bahurum, rvierdiiev, GimelSec
## Summary
Throughout the entirety of the contract it grants approval to the vault before depositing either quote or asset. In this case there is no approval which means that th... | Sherlock | 4 | UXD Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Splits can’t be locked once the timestamp passes
### Description
[L-04] Splits can’t be locked once the timestamp passes type(uint48).max
This behavior isn’t documented anywhere, and a project will be confused by this behavior when that time comes (the original developers will be unable to explain it because t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | cross-chain | false | false | ## Gas: Remove unused return from `USDCBridgeV2:_sendUSDCWithPayloadToEvm`
### Description
**Description:** Function `USDCBridgeV2::_sendUSDCWithPayloadToEvm()` returns the sequence number from the `wormholeRelayer.sendToEvm` external call. However, this value is never utilized thereafter.
**Recommended Mitigation:**... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: External calls can be grouped together
### Description
The `RewardRouter` smart contract has the `handleRewards` function, which can be used in the place of `cycleRewardsETHandEsGMX` and `_cycleRewardsETH methods` - [code](https://arbiscan.io/address/0xA906F338CB21815cBc4Bc87ace9e68c87eF8d8F1#code) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: `getGlobalPnL` is wrongly accrued resulting on a critical computation.
### Description
**Severity**: Critical
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The function `getGlobalPnL()` within the `VaultFacet.sol` smart contract is used to calculate the profit and losses of the whole protocol:
However, Profit sh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Weak checks
### Description
There are weak checks at line https://github.com/curvefi/stableswap-ng/blob/8c78731ed43c22e6bcdcb5d39b0a7d02f8cb0386/contracts/main/CurveStableSwapNG.vy#L414 and https://github.com/curvefi/stableswap-ng/blob/8c78731ed43c22e6bcdcb5d39b0a7d02f8cb0386/contracts/main/CurveStableSwapMeta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `validatorMaxStake` can be bypassed by using `setValidatorAddress()`
### Description
`setValidatorAddress()` allows a validator to migrate to a new address of their choice. However, the current logic only stacks up the old address' stake to the new one, never checking `validatorMaxStake`.
### Impact
- Brea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: We recommend caching the variable
### Description
At the line https://github.com/iearn-finance/yoracle.link/blob/faf1309cbe7a05f70b338351315039eb8e5b9c09/contracts/Keep3rV1Oracle.sol#L411 in the `getAmountsIn` function, the length of the `path.length` array is calculated 3 times: on lines 412, 413, 415.
### R... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Hats.uri function can be DOSed by providing large details or imageURI string or cause large gas fees
### Description
The [`Hats.uri`](https://github.com/Hats-Protocol/hats-protocol/blob/fafcfdf046c0369c1f9e077eacd94a328f9d7af0/src/Hats.sol#L1221-L1223) function returns a JSON representation of a hat's prope... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | false | false | ## High: Several reentracy scenarios
### Description
The issue is identified within the `LOB` contract.
Some ERC-20 tokens implement extensions, such as the ERC-777 standard, that allow an account to gain execution control during token transfers. As the protocol is planned to be deployed on several networks and suppo... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.