prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [07] No code size limit check in function `put_sidevm_code`
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-phala-network/blob/a01ffbe992560d8d0f17deadfb9b9a2bed38377e/phala-blockchain/crates/pink/runtime/src/runtime/pallet_pink.rs#L134-L146
**[__ 141345 __ (lookout) commented](https://github.com/code-4... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Deposited Funds Can Be Drained by a Compromised Owner
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `be0a09b5ed68ae45b2cf3f231d86dd1606fabe46`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Separated the HinkalHelperManager Role from the Owner Role
Due to the protocol design... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: TRST-H-5 The attacker can use larger dust when opening a position to perform griefing attacks
### Description
**Description:**
When opening a position, unused assets are sent to **dustVault** as dust, but since these dust
are not subtracted from **inputAmt**, they are included in the calculation of
**positi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: GiantLP with a transferHookProcessor cant be burned, usersβ funds will be stuck in the Giant Pool
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/main/contracts/liquid-staking/GiantLP.sol#L39-L47
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/main/contracts/liqui... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Block Removal Of Job When The Aggregator Is Locked
### Description
## Validator for Job Addition and Removal in Aggregator
When the `valueaggregator.is_locked` is set to true, the aggregator should not allow job addition and removal. The `aggregator_remove_job_action::validate` should check if the aggregator ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lack of Practical Upper Threshold for Commission Percentage
### Description
The function `setCommissionPercent()` currently allows the admin to set `commissionPercent` to any value up to `10000` (representing 100%).
While technically valid, setting a very high commission (e.g., 80β100%) would result in **sig... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | input-validation | true | true | ## Medium: Historical reward loss due to `NodeId` reuse in `AvalancheL1Middleware`
### Description
The `AvalancheL1Middleware` contract is vulnerable to misattributing stake to a former operator (Operator A) if a new, colluding or coordinated operator (Operator B) intentionally re-registers a node using the *exact sam... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: Permanent freezing of unclaimed ALCX yield when merging veALCX positions
### Description
There are 2 ways of burning a `veALCX` position (the NFT that is minted in *VotingEscrow.sol* and accrues rewards):
- When withdrawing a position
- When merging two positions
veALCX holders accrue rewards in "`FLUX`" (... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: Wrong usage of transaction originator address instead of caller address
### Description
### Impact
The `from_address` parameter in the events emitted when sending a cross-chain message from Starknet is set to the transaction origin (`tx.origin`) instead of the actual caller (`msg.sender`). This causes inco... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [2] Inconsistent variable naming convention
### Description
Most state variables use the `state_` prefix in their variable name. There are some that don't. Use the prefix everywhere, and manually add public getters where necessary | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: | Typo
### Description
**Description**
On line 120, βbuyβ is misspelled as βbyβ.
**Recommendation**
Replace βbyβ with βbuyβ in the comment.
**Resolution**
NFTR Team:
- The suggested changes were implemented. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | EIP-4626 | false | true |
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-y2k-finance/blob/ac3e86f07bc2f1f51148d2265cc897e8b494adf7/src/Vault.sol#L244-L252>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-y2k-finance/blob/ac3e86f07bc2f1f51148d2265cc897e8b494adf7/src/SemiFungibleVault.sol#L205-L213>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-y2k-finance/blob/ac3e8... | Code4rena | 5 | Y2k Finance |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Wallet creation transactions can be made to fail β Method 1
### Description
An attacker can cause all honest usersβ wallet-creation transactions to fail. The honest user will still end up with a functioning wallet that they control, but their wallet software (i.e., MetaMask) will display an error saying that t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: VaultImplementation.init(...) silently initialised when the allowlist parameters are not throughly
### Description
In `VaultImplementation.init(...)`, if `params.allowListEnabled` is false but `params.allowList` is not empty, `s.allowList` does not get populated.
### Recommendation
It might be best to check t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Library is not used in the project
### Description
**Description**
Library DateTimePool.sol is not used in the project. Review the logic or remove the library.
**Recommendation**:
Remove unused library. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Accruing Debt in Deprecated Bucket
### Description
**Update**
The team fixed the issue in the commit `711d76e`. An extra `position.bucket.isActive()` check occurs in the `PositionLibrary.decreaseDeposit()` function.
We have verified that currently, all places calling `Bucket.increaseDebt()` have the valida... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Weak Address Salt in VaultFactory::createVault Enables DoS and Hijacking of the Curator + Allocator Roles
### Description
The `VaultFactory::createVault` function is missing access controls, allowing anyone to call it. This vulnerability can be abused to DDoS and/or hijack legitimate vault creation attempts... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Inheriting `Initializable` and disabling initializers
### Description
All adapter contracts and `HoneyLocker` contract are proxies and should inherit an `Initializable` contract. Their `initialize()` functions should have an `initializer` modifier. Also inside the `constructor` of these contracts `_disableInit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Emitting storage values instead of the memory one.
### Description
Here, the values emitted shouldnβt be read from storage. The existing memory values should be used instead:
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-forgeries/blob/fc271cf20c05ce857d967728edfb368c58881d85/src/VRFNFTRandomDraw.sol#L75-L138
### Sa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Code logic repeated can be replaced by function
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
dpnm_sc.sol - in init(...), the logic of creating a new user is already implemented in private function createUser(address,address).
**Recommendation**
use :
createUser(treeRoo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Centrifuge only partially supports fee-on-transfer tokens
### Description
There have been some changes made to the deposit flow with the intention of supporting fee-on-transfer tokens. While deposit requests record the correct `transferredAmount` when moving funds into the escrow contract and notifying the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Avoiding calling balanceOf(user) multiple times can reduce deployment gas cost
### Description
### Target codebase
[HolyPaladinToken.sol#L558-L560](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-paladin/blob/9c26ec8556298fb1dc3cf71f471aadad3a5c74a0/contracts/HolyPaladinToken.sol#L558-L560)
[HolyPaladinToken.sol#L570-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | false | false | ## High: `migrateRewardPool` Fails Due to Incompatible Storage Design in `CurveConvexLib`
### Description
The [`migrateRewardPool`](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2025-06-notional-exponent/blob/main/notional-v4/src/rewards/AbstractRewardManager.sol#L44-L65) function in the `AbstractRewardManager` contract is design... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: 10] A new operator could replace another operator with less staking amount
### Description
**Severity:** Low
**Path:** SlashingRegistryCoordinator.sol:_setOperatorSetParams
**Description:** The function `_setOperatorSetParams` sets the configuration for a quorumNumber for the `SlashingRegistryCoordinator`.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: Owner or Managers can rug Aave rewards
### Description
_Submitted by IllIllI, also found by GimelSec_
A malicious owner or manager can steal all Aave rewards that are meant for PoolTogether users.
Even if the user is benevolent the fact that there is a rug vector available may [negatively impact the proto... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | initialization | true | true | ## Description
In `StabilityPool::liquidateBorrower` the function checks for `crvUSDToken.balanceOf(address(this))` but since the contract during is lifecycle never receives `crvUSD` any attempt to liquidate a borrower will fail with `InsufficientBalance()`.
## Vulnerable Code
`StabilityPool::liquidateBorrower`:
... | Codehawks | 5 | Core Contracts |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Overflows in Fee Computation
### Description
The bootloader changes in scope involve a few formulas as part of the fee model, and there were a few instances where calculations were performed on user or operator-provided inputs. Unchecked arithmetic (without overflow protection) using these values is general... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Unable to transfer fee reserve assets to treasury
### Description
Transferring fee reserve assets to the treasury manager contract will result in a revert, leading to a loss of rewards for NOTE stakers.
### Impact
The fee collected by Notional is stored in the Fee Reserve. The fee reserve assets will be tran... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: USELESS FUNCTIONS
### Description
The `deduct_tax` and `deduct_tax_new` functions in **krp-market-contracts/moneymarket/packages** do not perform any kind of tax deduction or operation over the input amount. These functions can be removed.
Code Location
-------------
Code of the `deduct_tax` and `deduct_tax_... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: All migrated silo users will receive less stalk accounted to their account during silo reseed
### Description
All migrated silo users will have less stalk accounted to their account during silo reseed because the `s.sys.silo.assetSettings[siloDeposit.token].stalkIssuedPerBdv` will not be set
### Impact
High,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: No explicit checks for `mint` and `swap` calls on uninitialized Pool
### Description
https://github.com/cryptoalgebra/Algebra/blob/6c22b64977e0b0266aec89470480df74977eb606/src/core/contracts/AlgebraPool.sol#L66 https://github.com/cryptoalgebra/Algebra/blob/6c22b64977e0b0266aec89470480df74977eb606/src/core/con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: lastFeeOperationTime is not modified correctly in function _updateLastFeeOpTime(), resulting a much slower decay model for borrowing base rate
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-02-ethos/blob/73687f32b934c9d697b97745356cdf8a1f264955/Ethos-Core/contracts/TroveManager.sol#L15... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unhandled Newlines
### Description
## Attacker-controlled Remote Procedure Call Parameter Injection
Attacker-controlled remote procedure call parameters are combined with snap dialog texts. This behavior allows attackers to inject newlines into those parameters, manipulating the dialog text.
## Code Snippet
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Unsafe practice of managing a user's ERC20 approve
### Description
As it is stated above in the description of the Critical.1 finding, a user's ERC20 tokens can be spent without the user's confirmation. This bad practice reduces the overall project's security by amplifying the impact of other issues. For ex... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Bonding mechanism allows malicious user to DOS auctions
### Description
_Submitted by kenzo_.
A malicious user can listen to the mempool and immediately bond when an auction starts, without aim of settling the auction. As no one can cancel his bond in less than 24h, this will freeze user funds and auction se... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: New staking positions still gets the full reward amount as with old stakings, diluting rewards for old stakers
### Description
New staking positions still gets the full reward amount as with old stakings, diluting rewards for old stakers. Furthermore, due to the way multipliers are calculated, extremely sho... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing return value check can lead to incorrect event emission
### Description
The return value of the `EnumerableSet.add` function is not validated. As a result, having duplicates within `_allowedActions` or `_allowedAssets` does not result in a revert. Instead, the call will succeed and emit the `StrategyCr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Use latest version ofΒ Solidity
### Description
Current code is written for old versions of solc. While this is not a security problem, itβs recommended to use latest version of Solidity for any new contract. Using old versions of Solidity also has some consequences that bring potential security problems. Fo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Sdk.finishTransfer - missing validation
### Description
`Sdk.finishTransfer` should validate that the router that locks liquidity in the receiving chain, should be the same router the user had committed to in the sending chain. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Transaction token fees may be locked forever in ERC865Token contract
### Description
The [`ERC865Token`](https://github.com/propsproject/props-token-distribution/blob/eaf0c6fddd320a258a9d7531d72d07a830fae58a/contracts/token/ERC865Token.sol) contract allows the owner of tokens to execute token transfers and app... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Use of assert will be removed when the bytecode is optimized
### Description
The deposit tool uses `assert` to make sure the input for the tool is correct; however, such code will be removed when the bytecode is compiled with optimizations enabled. The deposit tool contains several places where important veri... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: No restrictions on stage transitions
### Description
The contracts do not guarantee that stages follow the same order. E.g. cards can be reverted from public to presale stage.
Recommendations:
- Prevent reverting from the public to the presale stage
- Add proper stage transition validation | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Race condition with `initiatingAdminSettleDebt()` could under-compensate participants
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** Medium, participants will incur loss on withdrawal as admin underpaid for debt settlement. But admin (trusted) can make up the loss by refunding them the difference separately.
**... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Allowing `refreshReward()` to fail during minting or buring esLBR could result in gain or loss previously earned reward
### Description
### Lines of code
### Impact
The esLBR balance of users plays the most important role in staking reward calculation. Using a try-catch statement over `refreshReward()`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `081d898c91ae2458b9fa02f1886cb83400f44ebc`. The client provided the following explanation:
> 1. Data validation has been introduced in the code. The owner of the contract is not allowed to be changed during an ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Non-strict inequalities (>=) are cheaper than strict ones (>).
### Description
Non-strict inequalities (>=) are cheaper than strict ones (>).
Some checks from resolveDispute in Escrow.sol could be optimized as follows:
```diff
- if (buyerAward > 0) {
+ if (buyerAward >= 1) {
i_tokenContract.safeTransfer(i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: No slippage checks when removing leverage
### Description
When removing leverage in the `LeverageManager`, it swaps the pod token for the borrow token:
```solidity
_podAmtRemaining = _swapPodForBorrowToken(_pod, _borrowToken, _podAmtReceived, _borrowAmtNeededToSwap);
```
This is an exact output swap, and `a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | upgrade | true | false | ## Medium: Updating `operatorRewardPercentage` incorrectly redistributes already accrued rewards
### Description
The `operatorRewardPercentage` in L1Strategy determines how rewards are split between operators and other recipients. When this percentage is changed, previously generated but undistributed rewards are calc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: `Factory.create`: Predictability of pool address creates multiple issues.
### Description
The `Factory.create` function is responsible for creating new `PrivatePool`s. It does this using the `LibClone.cloneDeterministic` function.
The address of the new PrivatePool depends solely upon the `_salt` paramete... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Business Logic | true | true | _Submitted by zishansami, also found by 0x52, 0xsanson, auditor0517, berndartmueller, csanuragjain, and zzzitron_
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-putty/blob/3b6b844bc39e897bd0bbb69897f2deff12dc3893/contracts/src/PuttyV2.sol#L495-L503>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-putty/blob/3b6b844bc39e897bd0bbb69897... | Code4rena | 5 | Putty |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Ensure No Fee On Transfer Tokens
### Description
**Description**
The fiat token is supposed to be a token pegged to the US dollar. There are certain tokens which incurs a fee on transfer. This means that everytime x amount of a fee on transfer tokenis transferred to an address, that address receives an amount... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `TroveManager``_calcBorrowingRate` always returns `borrowingFeeFloor`
### Description
**Impact**
`_calcBorrowingRate` is using `min(X + Y, X)` meaning it will always return `X` in this case `borrowingFeeFloor`
**Mitigation**
Change
To | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Using `bool`s for storage incurs overhead
### Description
Use `uint256(1)` and `uint256(2)` for true/false
*There are 18 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `BuyTheDipGeometricDistribution` parameter encoding documentation is inconsistent
### Description
The `BuyTheDipGeometricDistribution` [parameter encoding documentation](https://docs.bunni.xyz/docs/v2/technical/ldf/params/#parameter-encoding-5) specified an unused byte between alpha values; however, this is in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: FULL_RESTRICTED_STAKER_ROLE blacklist can be bypassed using approvals
### Description
In `StakedlvlUSD`, when users are blacklisted with `FULL_RESTRICTED_STAKER_ROLE`, they should not be able to withdraw their `slvlUSD` for `lvlUSD`.
In EIP-4626, when calling `withdraw()` and `redeem()`, the caller can sp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | oracle | true | false | ## Gas: Use a `do while` loop instead of a `for` loop
### Description
A `do while` loop will cost less gas since the condition is not being checked for the first iteration.
**Note: Other optimizations, such as caching length, precrementing, and using unchecked blocks are not included in the Diff since they are includ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Permission to mint swETH could remain with swNFT owner
### Description
After migration is complete, the `SWNFTv3` contract will still retain the ability to call `swETH.migrateMint()`. While the owner of `SWNFTv3` will be a trusted role, it may nevertheless be more secure to remove this ability once the migrati... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: Frontrunning in vault enabling process
### Description
_Acknowledged_
When a curator sets a new cap on a forcefully removed vault (funds not withdrawn), or adds a vault with pre-existing funds, the total assets of the system are increased directly through _setCap() without minting new shares. This can be expl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: grantFunds will revert after a DAO upgrade.
### Description
## Handle
gpersoon
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
When the DAO is upgraded via moveDao, it also updates the DAO address in BASE.
However it doesn't update the DAO address in the Reserve.sol contract.
This could be done with the function set... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [15] The function `execute.rs#depositforlongtermrental()` doesn't check if the deposit amount is enough for the reserved period
### Description
In the long-term rental functions, the user will call `execute.rs#setreservationforlongterm()` to reserve the period first. He needs to trigger `execute.rs#depositforl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused input to commit blocks
### Description
In theΒ `ExecutorFacet`Β contract, theΒ [`_commitOneBlock`Β function](https://github.com/matter-labs/zksync-2-dev/blob/c05b49d7e303996f60a0e35f18ef224e45ee19f5/contracts/ethereum/contracts/zksync/facets/Executor.sol#L19)Β does not make use of the inputΒ `_newBlock.priori... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: "TWAP" used is an observation-weighted-average-price, not a time-weighted one
### Description
_Submitted by IllIllI_
While users are incentivized to call the heartbeat, the incentive may be removed later, or it may be more profitable to use old prices, so users may not call the heartbeat during unfavorable... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Function parameter is not described in the JSDoc
### Description
**Description**
File: migration.ts
Function: createLedger MigrationBundle
Parameters: migrationAddress, callback
Details:
The given parameters are present in the function, however, they are not described in the JSDoc
**Recommendation**
Describ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Level 5 Users Will Be Obligated to Pay Commissions to Lower Level Users Under Certain Conditions
### Description
There is a slight chance of a Level 5 user having a Level 0 parent, which will lead to the Level 5 user paying commissions to lower-level users. Right now, the `BondDealer::_getHigherLevelParents` f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Don't update state | true | false | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/4b6828e9c807f2f7c569e6d721ca1289f7cf7112/contracts/liquid-staking/GiantMevAndFeesPool.sol#L82
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/4b6828e9c807f2f7c569e6d721ca1289f7cf7112/contracts/liquid-staking/GiantMevAndFeesPool.sol#L91
## V... | Code4rena | 4 | Stakehouse Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Naming issues hinder code understanding and readability
### Description
To favor explicitness and readability, several parts of the contracts may benefit from better naming. We noted the following general issues:
* The terminology around the `asset` in the vault is not as clear as it should be. It is sometim... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Uniformed Variable Typing
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
Throughout the codebase many variables are initialized as uint256 and uint. Under the hood, all `uint` is initialized as uint256. However, to remain consistent throughout the codebase it is better prac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: InsuοΏ½cient protection of sensitive information
### Description
Sensitive information, such as API keys, is stored in process environments. This method of storage could make it easier for an attacker to compromise the information; compromise of the Alchemy key, for example, could enable an attacker to use the k... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Pack Bid Struct
### Description
The Bid struct can be packed tighter
[Link to code](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-tessera/blob/f37a11407da2af844bbfe868e1422e3665a5f8e4/src/lib/MinPriorityQueue.sol#L4-L9)
to | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Unverified Staking Possible
### Description
## Staking and Unstaking NFTs
It is possible to stake and unstake NFTs even after `solvent-admin` disables staking. The function `set_staking_enabled` has been implemented in order to control whether or not staking and unstaking are possible. It stores the boolea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use explicit unsigned integer sizing instead of `uint`
### Description
**Description:** In Solidity `uint` automatically maps to `uint256` but it is considered good practice to specify the exact size when declaring variables:
**Strata:**
Fixed in commit [506c4c](https://github.com/Strata-Money/contracts-tran... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `BetFactory::createBet` should revert in a number of scenarios to prevent abuse and ensure bets can be resolved
### Description
**Description:** `BetFactory::createBet` should revert if:
* `treasury` is `address(0)`
* `msg.sender` and `taker` are the same
* `judge` is the same as `msg.sender` or `taker`
All o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Missing fees allow cheap griefing attacks that lead to DoS
### Description
The protocol has chosen a design pattern which does not allow two users at the same time to interact with the system as every time a user deposits or withdraws funds a 2-step process begins which interacts with GMX and only after thi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: The `BURNER` cannot burn tokens from accounts not KYC verified due to the check in `_beforeTokenTransfer`.
### Description
### Impact
The `BURNER_ROLE` cannot burn tokens if the target `account` has been removed from the KYC list.
### Proof of Concept
When the `BURNER_ROLE` burns tokens of `_account`, it... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing zero address checks for `_from` and `_to` in `_transfer` function of UniMexStaking.sol
### Description
**Description**
In contract UniMexStaking.sol in function_transfer at lines 185-201, there are no checks for the_from and_to address parameters.
**Recommendation**
Add require checks to ensure thos... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: GuardianSetChanged Event is Unused
### Description
## GuardianSetChanged Event
The `GuardianSetChanged` event is defined in the wormhole state module:
It would make sense to emit this event during `state::update_guardian_set_index`, however, this is currently unimplemented.
## Remediation
Emit the event d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: Collateral can be withdrawn without repaying USDS loan
### Description
Users could bypass collateralization checks and reclaim their collateral assets without repaying their USDS loans. The `withdrawCollateralAndClaim` function withdraws WBTC/WETH collateral assets and sends any pending rewards to the caller.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Initialization | false | true |
When new holographable tokens are created, they typically set a state variable that holds the address of the holograph contract. When creation is done through the `HolographFactory`, the holograph contract is [passed in as a parameter](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-holograph/blob/f8c2eae866280a1acfdc8a8352401e... | Code4rena | 4 | Holograph |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | true | false | ## High: Storage root assignment missing in tree finalization
### Description
The `handleTree` function in the challengerβs child chain processing fails to assign the merkle tree root hash to the storage root return value, causing the output handling logic to never execute.
### Impact
Severity: High
The bug prevents... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: All funds can be stolen from the SAM contract
### Description
The `create()` function doesn't validate that new editions added to the SAM contracts are, in fact, editions.
A malicious contract can be added that always passes the `onlyEditionOwnerOrAdmin` and `onlyBeforeMintConcluded` checks, which allows the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of freeze authority check for collateral tokens on create trading pool
### Description
SPL tokens are used as collateral in the protocol. On borrow, there is a transfer from the borrower into a PDA (position account). On repay, the other way around.
However, SPL token could have a freeze authority. Th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: User will loose funds
### Description
_Submitted by csanuragjain, also found by 0x1f8b_
User will lose funds if user accidentally pass route with only 1 value which is route\[0]=X WETH while calling swapForETH or swapWithETH/swapEntireBalance/swap function.
### Proof of Concept
1. User calls swapForETH ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `getsmNFTPastVotes` incorrectly checks for Voting Power leading to some NFTs incorrectly being eligible to vote
### Description
The `getsmNFTPastVotes` function checks what was the voting power of the some account at specific point in time.
We can see in the snippet above that if specific token is not smN... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Modification of Epoch Length After Claiming Begins
### Description
The `changeEpochLength` function in the Pepper contract allows the owner to modify the `EPOCH_LENGTH` at any time, even after the claiming process has begun. This unrestricted ability to change the epoch length can lead to significant issues in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Denial-Of-Service | false | false |
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-size/blob/706a77e585d0852eae6ba0dca73dc73eb37f8fb6/src/SizeSealed.sol#L258-L263><br>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-size/blob/706a77e585d0852eae6ba0dca73dc73eb37f8fb6/src/SizeSealed.sol#L157-L159><br>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-size/blob/706a77e585d0852eae6ba0... | Code4rena | 5 | SIZE |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Funding rate update calculations drop snapshots and do not compute a full TWAP
### Description
The `tuples()` method groups items into tuples but drops items to make them fit. For example:
```rust
use itertools::Itertools;
let mut v: Vec = Vec::new();
for x in (1..6).tuples::() {
v.push(x);
}
assert_eq!(v,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: PrincipalToken is not ERC-5095 compliant
### Description
Protocols that try to integrate with Spectra, expecting `PrincipalToken` to be ERC-5095 compliant, will face an array of issues that may damage Spectra's brand and limit Spectra's growth in the market.
### Proof of Concept
All official ERC-5095 requ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Dangerous use of the `burn` function
### Description
The function `burn` is used by users to burn an option position by minting the required liquidity and unlocking the collateral.
As how the function is designed right now in order to do that, the user needs to send his shares to the contract balance.
This is ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Miscellaneous BLSWallet General Comments
### Description
This section details miscellaneous findings discovered by the testing team that do not have direct security implications:
1. **BLSwallet.sol**
- (a) Replace the magic number `604800` with `1 weeks` for readability on line [72], line [82], and line [91... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unused Branch In \_sellTokenFor()
### Description
The `_sellTokenFor()` function implemented in Babburuzu contract supports three types of swaps:
* swapping ETH for tokens,
* tokens for ETH,
* tokens for other tokens.
```
function _sellTokenFor(
address tokenIn,
uint256 amount,
address tokenOut
) inter... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Liquidation bonus scales exponentially instead of linearly.
### Description
Liquidation bonus scales exponentially instead of linearly.
### Impact
Loss of funds
### Recommendation
make liquidation bonus simply a % of totalBorrowed | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | access-control | true | false | ## Gas: Functions guaranteed to revert when called by normal users can be marked `payable`
### Description
If a function modifier such as `onlyOwner` is used, the function will revert if a normal user tries to pay the function. Marking the function as `payable` will lower the gas cost for legitimate callers because th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Untracked Transfer Recipient
### Description
## Vulnerability Analysis: sbt_soul_transfer Behavior
The issue pertains to `sbt_soul_transfer`βs behavior during the resumption of an ongoing Soulbound Token transfer process when a different recipient is specified.
`sbt_soul_transfer` calls `transfer_continu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Missing Referrer Validation
### Description
## Ticket Buying Process
The `buy_ticket` function checks if a referrer account (`referrer_acc`) exists. If it does, the function ensures that the authority of the referrer is not the same as the buyerβs authority.
Additionally, if the user has already utilized a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Multiple accesses of a mapping/array should use a storage pointer
### Description
Caching a mapping's value in a storage pointer when the value is accessed multiple times saves ~40 gas per access due to not having to perform the same offset calculation every time. Help the Optimizer by saving a storage variabl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing zero address check
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The following functions are missing zero address checks and this may result in making unexpected behaviors to zero address.
Bullseye.sol : setTreasury() function
Setup.sol : setTreasury() function
Treasury.s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: MISSING ZERO ADDRESS CHECK
### Description
There is no validation of the addresses in the `mint()` and access control functions. Addresses should be validated and checked that are different from zero when necessary. This issue is present in all the smart contracts, in the constructors and functions that use ad... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Impossible to open a position with a large `marginTo`
### Description
`marginTo/From` is a way to both cover your position and increase your premium when opening a position. There is however a unintended limit on how much `marginTo` you can provide when opening a position.
When doing the swap to increase l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | upgrade | true | true | ## Medium: Onchain governance integration breaks due to inconsistent implementation of voting power
### Description
OpenZeppelin's [GovernorVotesUpgradeable](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts-upgradeable/blob/e3ba7f6a236c55e3fb7e569ecd6043b11d567c3d/contracts/governance/extensions/GovernorVotesUpg... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Wrong if statement in the function `setMintFee`
### Description
The function `setMintFee` in CashManager.sol is used by the admin to change the mint fee.
By the dev comment above the function, the maximum fee that can be set is `10_000` bps, or 100%.
As the value of the BPS_DENOMINATOR is set as `10_000` and c... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.