prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect usage of safeTransferFrom traps fees in Papr Controller
### Description
Because the Papr Controller never gives approval for ERC20 transfers, calls to `safeTransferFrom` on the Papr token will revert with insufficient approval. This will trap proceeds from auctions in the contract and prevent the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: The owner can renounce ownership
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The Ownable contracts includes a function named renounceOwnership() which can be used to remove the ownership of the contract.
If this function is called on the FlashDuelsMarketplace and FlashDuels contr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Arithmetic rounding might lead to trapped tokens
### Description
An arithmetic rounding issue in the delivery cost can lead to trapped tokens. The number of trapped tokens is low and does not present a significant loss.
Every time a user requests a delivery, part of its cost is transferred as fees for the res... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: `PendleAdapter` provides zero slippage
### Description
When the vault triggers `_adapter_deposit` and delegates the call to `PendleAdapter.deposit`, it will deposit the provided `_asset_amount` into the configured Pendle market.
```python
@external
@nonpayable
def deposit(asset_amount: uint256, pregen_info... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Arguments to contract’s parameters not encoded
### Description
The parameters string is created based on unsanitized inputs to the `transferBalance` function. The source and destination values can contain arbitrary characters such as round brackets and double quotes. This can be used to perform an injection at... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Users Can Have Vote Weight Even When Their Position Expired
### Description
The voting weight mechanism allows users who have expired lock duration to have vote weight even when their position expired, this is because of the way the function `getVotingPowerOf()` calculates the voting power:
File: [src/veGUAN.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Token for Crowdsale must be Mintable
### Description
Crowdsale.sol states in [L36](https://github.com/CoinFabrik/ico/blob/142f43f3bec4afd0ffff3fce06946cf67cb0272f/contracts/Crowdsale.sol#L36) that the token contract must be `FractionalERC20` (even though this is not enforced at runtime). However, in `assignTok... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Side effects of underlying directly donated to the VaultV2 or adapters positions
### Description
This finding describes the potential side effects or issues arising from someone donating underlying tokens directly to the **VaultV2** contract or to the market used by one of the adapters currently in use by the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Initial cycle time is wrong when queuing several config updates
### Description
The initial cycle time will be wrong if there's already an upcoming config change that changes the cycle duration.
### Recommendation
Optimistically "apply" (just for the computation, not actually activate it) any pending confi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Wrong calculation on `_collectRentAction`
### Description
_Submitted by [a_dlamo](https://twitter.com/a_delamo)_
The method `_collectRentAction` contains the [following code](https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-06-realitycards-findings/issues/122#issue-922787380):
in case 6, it is doing:
instead of:
Thi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use `calldata` instead of `memory` for function parameters that don't change
### Description
When you specify a data location as `memory`, that value will be copied into memory. When you specify the location as `calldata`, the value will stay static within `calldata`. If the value is a large, complex type, usi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: [02] Potential for recursive calls/extreme inputs
### Description
`ln_helper()` may flip the exponent and compute `\(\ln(1 / argument)\)` for values below 1, re‐entering `ln(...)`.
If there’s a scenario where the flipped exponent does not converge or leads back to a similar condition, infinite recursion (or v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Call Depth Is Never Explicitly Reset
### Description
The Engine does not explicitly reset the call depth, which can lead to an off-by-one error in certain situations:
* If an arbitrary call to the Pre-hook is allowed from an unprotected method in an approved sender (a known client-reported edge case)
* In t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | flash-loan | true | true | ## High: receiptToken balance-tracking system could enable manipulation of reward calculations
### Description
The `AavePool` contract uses the `receiptToken` balance to determine the number of reward tokens to mint to a user. By taking out a flash loan, a user could arbitrarily increase that number.
The reward flow ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: approveBatchWithSignature() may revert due to malformed spendPermission
### Description
The `approveBatchWithSignature()` function is responsible for approving a batch of spend permissions. When any of the spend permissions within that batch is revoked, the function doesn’t revert but sets `allApproved` to fal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Inclusion of Lamports as Rent for Rollover Fee Calculation
### Description
## Account Compression Program Rollover Fee Issues
In the current implementation of the account-compression program, the lamports in the tree and queue are considered as rent for rollover fee calculations. This gives rise to several i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: setUp function visibility can be restricted
### Description
The `setUp` function in `OlasMech.sol` is currently marked as `public`, even though it is only intended to be called during contract initialization. Since the function includes a safeguard that prevents multiple executions by reverting with `AlreadyIn... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | true | ## High: Anyone can call repayLoan on the borrower and pull funds from their account to repay loan
### Description
The `repayLoan` function can be called by anyone to repay a loan. The issue with this function is that it pulls funds from the borrower's account irrespective of who is calling the `repayLoan` function. T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Wrong fee share calculations in `_takeFee()`
### Description
In the `HyperEvmVault` contract, the `_takeFee()` function is used to calculate and collect management fees from the vault. The function calculates the fee amount and mints corresponding shares to the `feeRecipient` to deduct the fee from **deposi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Code Refactoring
### Description
## Token Transfer and Delegation Guidelines
## 1. Transfer Instruction Behavior
In the transfer instruction, `clear_close_authority` is invoked even in cases where a token transfer is a self-transfer. Invoking `clear_close_authority` in a self-transfer scenario will cause the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Duplicate Check in `required_dvns` and `optional_dvns`
### Description
The `init_default_config` instruction lacks a check for duplicate entries in the `required_dvns` and `optional_dvns` vectors within the `UlnConfig`. This oversight could lead to redundant DVNs causing double voting on payload confir... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Locking Of Protocol Fee In Contract
### Description
## Documentation for Raises Contract
In `Raises.sol`, the `close` function is called by the project owner to close a raise and change its state to `RaiseState.Funded` if it has reached its goal amount. If a raise’s state is changed from `RaiseState.Active... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unequal Gas Consumption for Liquidity Providers Due to Conditional `_deltaSourceUpdate` Call
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> We plan to document the potential increase in gas consumption in our user documentation.
**File(s) a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Approximations may finish with inaccurate values
### Description
Within [the `SwapUtils` contract](https://github.com/saddle-finance/saddle-contract/blob/0b76f7fb519e34b878aa1d58cffc8d8dc0572c12/contracts/SwapUtils.sol), there are three spots where an iterative approximation is performed: [within `getYD`](h... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Insu�ficient enclave function tests
### Description
A MobileCoin enclave supports 19 functions. Only two of them are exercised by unit tests (`tx_is_well_formed` and `form_block`). Insufficient unit tests could mean that critical bugs are missed. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
The suggested input validation has been added. Fixed in commit `48e1725d1b0dcbf858df5064d8830d7e71003975`.
**File(s) affected:**`src/LightAccount.sol`
**Description:** It is important to validate inputs, even if they only come from trusted addresses, to avo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Deflationary Tokens Are Not Supported
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation: _It's like that on purpose for the current version. We also added info about it to our public docs: https://docs.31third.com/protocol/prohibition_
**File(s) a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Redundant Code in CPI Calls
### Description
## Code Review Observations
1. In `process_request_redemption` (shown below) and `process_create_purchase_order`, the `NftIssuanceVault::create_account_instruction` and `PurchaseOrder::create_account_instruction` CPI calls, respectively, do not require `nft_mint_acc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: | Market Used as Limit
### Description
**Description - [PoC](https://github.com/GuardianAudits/GMX/blob/af740b1972788f429219d1381183c68b244e00d8/test/guardianTestSuite/testPOCS.js#L220)**
A `MarketIncrease` order can mimic a limit order by specifying a `minOutputAmount` to fabricate a limit price. However, `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | flash-loan | true | false | ## High: Vault treats all tokens exactly the same that creates (huge) arbitrage opportunities.
### Description
_Submitted by jonah1005, also found by cmichel and itsmeSTYJ_
#### Impact
The v3 vault treats all valid tokens exactly the same. Depositing 1M DAI would get the same share as depositing 1M USDT. User can wit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: ERC721 utilization rate can be exploited to steal funds
### Description
As discussed in [H-02], the utilization rate for ERC721 markets can become extremely high if the `reserves` value becomes large.
If the interest market is ever set up with an 18 decimal token, an attacker can exploit this vulnerability t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: Doesn't Follow ERC1271 Standard
### Description
As Per [EIP-1271](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1271) standard `ERC1271_MAGIC_VAULE` should be `0x1626ba7e` instead of `0x20c13b0b` and function name should be `isValidSignature(bytes32,bytes)` instead of `isValidSignature(bytes,bytes)`. Due to this, sig... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Secrets appear in environment variables and command-line arguments
### Description
The Fortuna application expects the provider private key and master entropy seed to be passed through the command-line interface (CLI) arguments `--private-key` and `--secret`, or via the environment variables `PRIVATE_KEY` and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Event fields are redundant
### Description
`block.timestamp` and `block.number` are added to event information by default, explicitly adding them is a waste of gas.
### Proof of Concept
1 instance:
##### src/modules/Buyout.sol
### Recommended Mitigation Steps
Remove the event field emitting `block.timest... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: The limit for jars minted can be exceeded
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** High
**Likelihood:** High
**Description**
All `Beekeeper` external functions that mint jars perform some checks implemented in the internal `_canMintHoneyJar` function. Among other things, this function checks that the sum ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Enabling Modification Of Airdrop Epoch
### Description
## Airdrop Mechanism
Airdrop provides a mechanism for users to claim tokens in a controlled and trustless manner using Merkle proofs. It allows for a phased distribution with different claiming conditions for each epoch. The airdrop process is divided int... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Extending the duration of an expired position can break protocol accounting
### Description
An incorrect `dailyUnlockedAmounts` mapping key is used in the `_extendDuration` function. As a result, extending an expired position can break protocol accounting. The `L2Reward` contract allows users to extend the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Unclear initialization of inherited contracts
### Description
The [`StakeAwareUpgradeable` contract](https://github.com/forta-protocol/forta-token/blob/92d7a7ddd6672a7530a4bfc532d0d697e7f12744/contracts/components/utils/StakeAware.sol#L9) is inherited by a few contracts, such as the [`ScannerRegistryEnable`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: Missing implementation of the `quoteLayerZeroFee()` in StargateLbpHelper.sol
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact**: Low, because the user can still use `participate()` without this implementation.
**Likelihood**: High, because there is no implementation of this function.
**Description**
We use the `pa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Fee Handling During Withdrawals ✓ Fixed
### Description
As a way to generate fees, the contract deducts a portion of the user’s deposit or withdrawal during processing. This behavior is evident in the use of the `getFee()` function and subsequent `backingToken` transfers, such as `backingToken.safeT... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary parameter amount in withdraw function
### Description
**Severity:** Informational
**Description:** The function `withdraw()` has a parameter `amount` but we don't understand the necessity of this parameter.
At line L67, the amount is required to be the same to the whole deposit amount. This means ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Deposit double-counting miscalculation could incorrectly prevent user foreclosure
### Description
## Handle
0xRajeev
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
In the deposit function, the deposit _amount has already been added to the user's deposit on L303. The addition of _amount again to the deposit on L309 fo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Improper Collateral Amount Checks
### Description
## AddCollateral Instruction Vulnerability
Using the **AddCollateral** instruction, any user can add collateral to any borrow request. In the instruction, a check is not implemented to determine whether the `collateral_amount` is greater than 0.
If an amount... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: depositToken Accepts Zero Amount
### Description
**Description:**
In the depositToken function, there is no check for the \_amount parameter. If a user calls this function with 0 as the amount, the function will still execute, incrementing the transferCount and emitting a Deposit event with a zero amount. .
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use constants.
### Description
**Description**
StakingB.sol Lines 17, 18, 19
StakingB_1.sol Lines 518
If the value of the storage variable can’t be changed it can be set as constant in order to save
gas.
**Recommendation**:
Set offered storage as constant | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: TWAPS Exclude Hours Where Price is Zero
### Description
Description
The Time Weighted Average Price (TWAP) is a weighted average of the prices over the previous eight (8) hours,
with the most recent hour having a weighting of eight (8) and the oldest hour a weighting of one (1).
An hour is excluded from the ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: BuyAndBurn.swap() call can be sandwiched
### Description
The contract `BuyAndBurn` implements the function `swap()`:
This function swaps the different reward tokens received every 30 days by the `BuyAndB... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `decimalsMultiplier` should be immutable
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In the contract RWAHub.sol on the line 66 there is a state variable which value is assigned during in the constructor and not defined elsewhere in the code.
**Recommendation**:
add the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: A front-run risk
### Description
It is possible to buy NFTs cheaper before the price update.
https://github.com/FantiumAG/smart-contracts/blob/a2d126453c1105028f12277b8f342d2cdbf01a77/contracts/FantiumNFTV3.sol#L692
### Recommendation
We recommend using a private transactions pool for the price updating. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Frontrunners can exploit system by not allowing head of DLL to match in P2P
### Description
For a given asset **x**, liquidity is supplied on the pool since there are not enough borrowers.
- **suppliersOnPool head**: `0xawith` 1000 units of x
- Whenever there is a new transaction in the mempool to borro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | false | false | ## High: currentLoanOwner can manipulate loanInfo when any lenders try to buyout
### Description
_Submitted by rayn_
[NFTLoanFacilitator.sol#L205-L208](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-04-backed/blob/main/contracts/NFTLoanFacilitator.sol#L205-L208)
[NFTLoanFacilitator.sol#L215-L218](https://github.com/code-423n4/20... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Outdated arbitration policy used when tagging derivative IP assets
### Description
The purpose of the **DisputeModule** contract is to allow users to raise and resolve disputes related to IP assets. Disputes are handled through arbitration policies, which define the rules and procedures for dispute resoluti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Grieving attack by failing user’s transactions
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/with-backed/papr/blob/9528f2711ff0c1522076b9f93fba13f88d5bd5e6/src/PaprController.sol#L486
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
An attacker can apply grieving attack by preventing users from interacting wit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Not all tokens return a boolean value
### Description
The protocol will support stable tokens. some of them will not return a boolean value, e.g.USDT.
This will lead `depositAssets()` function in `OmoAgent.sol` contract to keep reverting due to the require check for every `transferFrom()` call. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Consider Paying Fees in the Native Sol Token when the `native_dst_asset` Flag Is Set
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `b617ee0538851bc1169f3153cf6fd7095066f5d9`, `cdc953b06aba4dc2da9c0a8da88da35b18bd0298`.
**File(s) affected:**`fusion-swap/src/lib.rs`
**Description... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Incorrect LevETH Redeem Rate Due to BondETH Market Rate and LevETH Rate Comparison, Leading to Trader Losses
### Description
Withdrawal of BondETH is depend on two rates.
1. `redeemRate` calculated in contract based on real time values.
2. `marketRate` created through taking the price from `BondOracleAdapter`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Implicit timing assumptions
### Description
To account for the coverage delay, some valid cxTokens [may be excluded](https://github.com/neptune-mutual-blue/protocol/blob/73fc82fbe0d1388867b7df669983fe42760daeb1/contracts/core/cxToken/cxToken.sol#L103) from making claims. Any coverage that will become active [w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Env Type Check Can Be Bypassed
### Description
In the `openzeppelin_pausable_macros` crate, the [`check_is_env` function](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/stellar-contracts/blob/01dbcb53d3992570dba5faf517a3d0502ebf1254/contracts/utils/pausable-macros/src/helper.rs#L41) verifies whether the first argument of a f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Insu�cient privilege separation between the front end and back end
### Description
The Subspace Desktop application’s JavaScript front end can perform many privileged operations, allowing it to elevate its privileges. For example, in Linux, a malicious front end could write to a user’s `.bashrc` file and ga... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Insufficient coverage
### Description
The test coverage rate of the project is 81%. Testing all functions is best practice in terms of security criteria.
Due to its capacity, test coverage is expected to be 100%. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Not using the named return variables when a function returns, wastes deployment gas
### Description
*There are 10 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | false | false | ## High: Arbitrary calls execution in `Executor` and `GenericCrossChainFacet`
### Description
The `Executor` contract allows the execution of arbitrary calls in the shared context using the `stargate` functionality or directly by calling the [`swapAndExecute`](https://github.com/Cryptorubic/multi-proxy-rubic/blob/8843... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Go Root function does not check for an empty Merkle expansion
### Description
The Go Root function does not check if the Merkle expansion is empty, but the Solidity counterpart does (Figure 1.1).
```go
// The root of the subtree. A collision free commitment to the contents of the tree.
// The root of a tre... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | true | false | ## Medium: Protocol fees can be skirted because of default 0 value
### Description
Sablier's protocol fees are tracked in the Comptroller contract on a per-asset basis, stored in the following mapping:
```solidity
mapping(IERC20 asset => UD60x18 fee) public override protocolFees;
```
When a new stream is created, th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Ownership Can Be Renounced
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> Expected behaviour
**Description:** If the owner renounces ownership, all ownable contracts will be left without an owner. Consequently, any function guarded by the `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Malicious user can stake an amount which causes zero curStakeAtRisk on a loss but equal rewardPoints to a fair user on a win
### Description
The [\_getStakingFactor()](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-02-ai-arena/blob/main/src/RankedBattle.sol#L530-L532) function rounds-up the `stakingFactor_` to one if its... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Calculated commission cut does not align with the expected percentages
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The `getComissionCut()` function within the `Treasury.sol` smart contract is used to calculate the commission that must be taken from the players. After some ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Don't compare boolean expressions to boolean literals
### Description
**Description:**
Comparing to a constant (true or false)is a bit more expensive than directly checking the returned boolean value.
**Recommendations:**
Use `require(!paused,"Mint Paused!")`instead of `require(paused == false,"Mint Pause... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: DAI-GOLD auction might not get started for last mint of gold tokens
### Description
**Description:** Usually minting gold happens when the available amount is bigger than 1e4, which will configure the minimum distribution amount of DaiGoldAuction. However when it reaches the max supply, the minting amount can ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Absence of Creation Fee in CreatePool Method Leading to Spamming Attacks
### Description
Upon review of the **CreatePool** method within the Keeper module, a notable gap has been identified: the method does not implement a creation fee for new pools. This absence can potentially lead to spamming attacks, as m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Users can withdraw liquidated collateral
### Description
If a user gets liquidated through `liquidationType2` they will still be able to withdraw their collateral and repay their debt as `depositDetail.liquidated` is not set to true. This is problematic as the collateral will have already been sent to Synthet... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Consider removing auto approval mechanism on price proposal
### Description
[Link to instance](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-05-munchables/blob/57dff486c3cd905f21b330c2157fe23da2a4807d/src/managers/LockManager.sol#L169)
Currently the proposer is denied from disapproving the price on their own proposal. T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: IMarginalV1LBFinalizeCallback.marginalV1LBFinalizeCallback() is not necessary
### Description
The `MarginalV1LBPool.finalize()` function is used to finalize pools. At the end, the function calls the `IMarginalV1LBFinalizeCallback.marginalV1LBFinalizeCallback()` callback on the caller address. However, the call... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Check-effects-interaction pattern is not followed
### Description
The `receive()` function within the smart contract allows users to transfer to forward the native asset to the designated `receiver` address and handling the transfer of the `fee` to the `feeReceiver`. Following these operations, the contract se... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Calls incorrectly allow non-zero `msg.value`
### Description
The comments below say that `msg.value` is "only applicable to" a subset of actions. All other actions should have a `require(!msg.value)`. Allowing it anyway is incorrect state handling | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Any Duplicate Item in the List of `vestingDeposits` Will Lead to Tokens Minted Twice to the Same Address
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Mitigated" by the client. Addressed in: `df4791d0ab33c3c47ead2565e4b2f04a26ed0a0f`. The client provided the following explanation:
> This issue is mitigated by chec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Provide a way for users to revoke all approvals
### Description
**Description:** `RockoFlashRefinance` is designed to move existing loan positions from one lending protocol to another. On behalf of the user the contract must be able to:
* close the loan from the previous lending provider
* open a new loan on t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inefficient Invariant Calculation
### Description
## Invariant Calculation Updates
The following functions:
- `calc_swap_fixed_in`
- `calc_swap_fixed_out`
- `calc_withdraw_fixed_amounts`
- `calc_deposit_fixed_amounts`
calculate the invariant using `calc_invariant` and then convert it to a fixed-point number... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: NFT WILL ALWAYS BE BURNED WHEN UNSTAKING
### Description
Testing revealed that NFTs will always be burned when unstaked due to an error in the `StakeNft.sol` contract, which burns the token when the variable `burn` is set to false. Users might not be aware of this when staking their NFT, thus resulting in the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect Total Assets Calculation in _harvestAndReport Leading to Share Value Manipulation and Irredeemable Assets
### Description
The `_harvestAndReport()` includes underlying assets (which can be directly transfer into the strategy (WETH)) in total assets calculation, leading to inflated profit reporti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Pool Configuration
### Description
## The Invert Field in PoolConfig Structure
The **Invert** field in the `PoolConfig` structure is used to indicate whether the base and quote currencies should be swapped when processing the pair. This is crucial for correctly interpreting the price data. If **Inv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Restrict visibility specifier to lowest necessary visibility
### Description
A number of functions have the public visibility whilst not having any associated internal references to the functions.
### Recommendation
Since they are unused internally, it would be ideal to restrict them to external and make their... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Rounding down in fee calculation causes protocol revenue loss over time
### Description
_Acknowledged_
In the `withdraw()` function for instant withdrawals, the protocol calculates the withdrawal fee as:
`
Because `mulDiv` defaults to rounding down, the calculated fee is always truncated in favor of the use... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use named imports
### Description
**Description:** The contracts mostly use named imports but strangely some import statements don't; use named imports everywhere:
`MTokenMessager`:
`MTokenMessagerLZ`:
`MTokenMessagerV2`:
**Matrixdock:** Fixed in commit [f3fbe97](https://github.com/Matrixdock-RWA/RWA-Co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Code asymmetry of `globalPositions.marginDepositedTotal`
### Description
Code asymmetry of `globalPositions.marginDepositedTotal` state variable could lead to an accounting error within the protocol, leading to the protocol being broken. It will also lead to a loss of assets for the LP.
### Impact
The `mar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Default strategies are not updated on strategy removal
### Description
When a strategy is removed using `removeAssetStrategy()`, the function removes the strategy from `assetToStrategy` mapping but fails to update the `defaultStrategies` array. This can lead to a situation where the default strategies list con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Zero `maxUnstakingPeriods` bypasses limit check in `setUnstakingPeriod`
### Description
_Resolved_
In `ElytraUnstakingVaultV1`, when the admin wants to enforce instant withdrawal completion, they set `unstakingPeriods[asset] = 0` :
There is also logic allowing the admin to set a cap (`maxUnstakingPeriods[as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Pre-estimating stakeEndBlock can lead to miscalculated rewards
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
On staking void token , user.stakeEndBlock is being estimated in the future according to this
But it is assumed that the blockTime is changeable (i.e. depending on the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: DexManagerFacet: batchRemoveDex() removes first dex only
### Description
_Submitted by hickuphh3, also found by 0xDjango, catchup, csanuragjain, hyh, shw, WatchPug, and ych18_
[DexManagerFacet.sol#L71-L73](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-lifinance/blob/main/src/Facets/DexManagerFacet.sol#L71-L73)
Th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Functions not used internally could be marked external
### Description
### Relevant GitHub Links
https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-07-foundry-defi-stablecoin/blob/main/src/DSCEngine.sol
## Summary
## Vulnerability Details
*Instances (3)*:
## Impact
## Tools Used
## Recommendations | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Re-use existing method
### Description
**Description**
contracts/CIP.sol#77, _beforeTransfer()
Function creditLimitLeftOf() can be utilized in order to remove code duplication and reduce
gas usage.
**Recommendation**:
Provide optimisation | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Function Comments
### Description
Most of the functions in the codebase do not have explanatory comments. Also, note that the `extractUserTypes` function is missing a `@param` statement for the [`fromPath` parameter](https://github.com/latticexyz/mud/blob/f6133591a86eb169a7b1b2b8d342733a887af610/packag... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Solidity compiler optimizations can be problematic Status: Resolved
### Description
The Perpetual Protocol V2 contracts have enabled optional compiler optimizations in Solidity.
There have been several optimization bugs with security implications. Moreover, optimizations are actively being developed. Solidit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Sponsors can force liquidation of insolvent positions
### Description
Liquidators specify a maximum [collateral-to-token ratio](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/e6eaa48124ae3f209fb117cf05eb18292cf26d21/core/contracts/financial-templates/implementation/Liquidatable.sol#L190) to ensure they do not a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Anyone could remove anyone from the blacklist
### Description
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Invalid
**Where**: token.move
**Details**:
the function "remove_addr_from_blacklist" doesn't contain any ownership checks, so anyone could call it by providing the current `DenyList` as well as any address in th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: could be set immutable.
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
`densityModule0`, `densityModule1`, `densityModule2`, `densityModule3`, `densityModule4`
variables are only set in the constructor.
**Recommendation**:
Set the variables immutable. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Use call instead of transfer for native token transfers
### Description
The current implementation uses the `transfer` function to send a native token from the Bridge.sol contract to an external address. The `transfer` function is limited to 2300 gas, which may not be enough for all contract interactions (if t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Minor Issues
### Description
1. **Inconsistent token validation**: The check `if (order.makerToken == order.takerToken) revert InvalidSender();` should revert with a token-pair specific error.
2. **Duplicate deadline checks**: The codebase has both `<=` and `<` deadline checks - one should be standardized.
##... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | timing | true | false | ## Low: Remove redundant timestamp check in `Bet::resolve`
### Description
`Bet::resolve` has this revert check:
```solidity
// Make sure the bet is active
if (_status(b) != IBet.Status.ACTIVE || block.timestamp > b.resolveBy) {
revert InvalidStatus();
}
```
But the call to `_status(b)` already checks `block.time... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Unable to reinvest if the reward token equals one of the pool tokens
### Description
If the reward token is the same as one of the pool tokens, the protocol would not be able to reinvest such a reward token. Thus leading to a loss of assets for the vault shareholders.
### Impact
The reinvestment of reward to... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.