prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect inequality in `YieldBearingAssetFundsAllocator#_generate_balance_txs` can lead to withdrawal DOS
### Description
**Details**
[YieldBearingAssetFundsAllocator.vy#L273-L277](https://github.com/adapter-fi/AdapterVault/blob/a5172a63abedd4e19c9e1a17b06d579760b4aba6/contracts/YieldBearingAssetFundsAllo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: `earlyExitById()` and `exitLateById()` calls near the end of `lockPeriod` are vulnerable to attacks.
### Description
`earlyExitById()` and `exitLateById()` calls near the end of `lockPeriod` are vulnerable to attacks.
### Impact
Funds may be locked for longer than expected in `exitLateById()`
Penalty may b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: PositionManager will revert when trying to return back to user excess of the premium transferred from the user when minting position
### Description
`PositionManager.mint` calculates preliminary premium to be paid for buying the option and transfers it from the user. The actual premium paid may differ, and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Protocol vulnerable to cross-chain signature replay
### Description
As signatures do not include`chainId`, signature verification is vulnerable to [cross-chain replay](https://dacian.me/signature-replay-attacks#heading-cross-chain-replay).
### Impact
Although the protocol plans to deploy cross-chain in the fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | critical | token | true | false | ## Critical: Wrong decimals in the calculation of liquidity amount during redemption
### Description
The contract `SecuritizeRedemption` provides a public function `redeem()` so that investors can redeem their asset (DS Token) for liquidity token. (Stable Coin)
The parameter `_amount` represents the amount of asset to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | input-validation | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent validation while creating/updating a perp market
### Description
`GlobalConfigurationBranch::createPerpMarket` [reverts](https://github.com/zaros-labs/zaros-core-audit/blob/de09d030c780942b70f1bebcb2d245214144acd2/src/perpetuals/branches/GlobalConfigurationBranch.sol#L351-L353) if `maxFundingVeloc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Payer cannot withdraw accidental extra funds sent to the contract without canceling
### Description
If a different ERC20 is accidentally sent to the contract, the Payer can withdraw it using the `rescueERC20` function. However, if they accidentally send extra of the streaming token's funds to the contract, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: According to the style guide function arguments’ names should be in mixedCase.
### Description
**Recommendation**:
In the constructor of the ERC20 contract change the naming of the arguments from the
CapWords to mixedCase as follow:
constructor(string memory name, string memory symbol) {} | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `StakedCitadelVester.vest()`: Help the optimizer by saving a storage variable's reference instead of repeatedly fetching it (`vesting[recipient]`)
### Description
Just like in `StakedCitadelVester.claimableBalance()` above: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: A user can 'borrow' dMute balance for a single block to increase their amplifier APY
### Description
The amplifier's APY is calculated based on the user's dMute balance (delegation balance to be more accurate) - the more dMute the user holds the higher APY they get.
However, the contract only checks the us... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | logic | true | false | ## High: `burnSharesToWithdrawEarnings` burns before math, causing the share value to increase
### Description
The [burnSharesToWithdrawEarnings](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-04-teller-finance/blob/main/teller-protocol-v2-audit-2024/packages/contracts/contracts/LenderCommitmentForwarder/extensions/LenderComm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: No cap on protocol fee setting creates DoS risk
### Description
_Resolved_
The `setProtocolFeeBps()` function in `ElytraConfigV1` lacks validation to cap the protocol fee at reasonable levels, creating inconsistency with other protocol functions and potential DoS risk.
If you check the below 2 contracts
- **... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: There may exist a discordance between price units and a precision loss.
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
The whole protocol performs price down-escalations by dividing prices by `1e14`. These price variables are compared with prices directly from function par... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `MembershipFactory::tiers` will almost always return incorrect state
### Description
**Description:** [`MembershipFactory::tiers`](https://github.com/OneWpOrg/audit-2024-10-oneworld/blob/416630e46ea6f0e9bd9bdd0aea6a48119d0b515a/contracts/dao/MembershipFactory.sol#L45-L50) exposes the [`_tiers`](https://github.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unintuitive User-Experience when `feeBeneficiary` Is Not Set
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `f648eb0550afa68901f42918719cb88140223b23`.
Recommendation implemented.
**File(s) affected:**`xAUXO.sol`
**Description:** In `_chargeFee()`, the fee is first calculated and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Modifying the loan term setting can default existing loans
### Description
Protocol admins can modify the loan term settings. This action can inadvertently default existing loans created under different terms.
### Impact
Positions in the Particle LAMM protocol are created for a configurable period of time... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | true | ## High: `ReferralsUtils.updateStartReferrerFeeP()` implements wrong check
### Description
At L64 in the `updateStartReferrerFeeP` function comparing sign is wrongly set to ``, resulting in an inability to set `startReferrerFeeP` to value in the correct range:
```solidity
File: ReferralsUtils.sol
63: function update... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: It costs more gas to initialize variables with their default value than letting the default value be applied
### Description
If a variable is not set/initialized, it is assumed to have the default value (`0` for `uint`, `false` for `bool`, `address(0)` for address...). Explicitly initializing it with its defau... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: GradientBasedRules will not work for >=4 assets with vector lambdas
### Description
UpdateRules based on `GradientBasedRule`will revert/produce incorrect result when if `numAssets >= `4 and `lambda.length > 1`. It's due to a simple mistake in updating `intermediateGradientStates`.
### Impact
* All gradient ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Order of Functions
### Description
**Description**
The functions in contract TokenVesting and MultiSigWallet are not grouped according to their
visibility and order.
Functions should be grouped according to their visibility and ordered in the following way:
Constructor;
Receive function (if exists);
Fallback ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Account Abstraction | true | true |
[contracts/smart-contract-wallet/BaseSmartAccount.sol#L60-L68](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-biconomy/blob/main/scw-contracts/contracts/smart-contract-wallet/BaseSmartAccount.sol#L60-L68)<br>
[contracts/smart-contract-wallet/aa-4337/core/EntryPoint.sol#L319-L329](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-biconomy/... | Code4rena | 5 | Biconomy |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: ETH recipients can block receiving ETH
### Description
The function `executePayroll()` performs multiple ETH and/or token transfers. If one of the ETH recipients reverts (for example, if it's a contract that can't receive ETH), the entire function `executePayroll()` is reverted, necessitating a re-execution wi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Refactor the `PrincipalToken::getCurrentYieldOfUserInIBT` function to avoid one function call and one `Gcoldsload` when `oldIBTRate == 0`
### Description
When `oldIBTRate == 0` then calling `_getPTandIBTRates(false)` (at line 563 below) and reading `ptRateOfUser[_user]` (at line 565) is useless since their res... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Malicious User Can Increase the Gas Cost of Verification
### Description
The `ZkTrieVerifier` library verifies proofs that come from the Scroll L2 node which uses a sparse binary Trie as the data structure. For the verification process, the proofs have the necessary node hashes to reconstruct the root hash ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Crashing all Validators | Vulnerability in eth_getBlockByHash
### Description
Report type: Blockchain/DLT
Target: https://github.com/shardeum/shardus-core/tree/dev
Impacts:
- Network not being able to confirm new transactions (total network shutdown)
## Description
## Brief/Intro
In this report, we demons... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: `FREEZER_ROLE` Not Revoked From Previous `VaultRouter`
### Description
**Update**
Fixed in commit [e5aa988](https://github.com/blex-dex/contracts/commit/e5aa988) by removing the `FREEZER_ROLE` from the previous `vaultRouter`, as suggested.
**File(s) affected:**`./contracts/vault/CoreVault.sol`
**Description:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | false | false | ## Low: [FIXED] Missing `require` check in `FlashMintModule`
### Description
In the function `flashLoan` of the contract `FlashMintModule`, there is no validation that after the `settleSystemBadDebt` call, the current amount of the `stablecoin` in `BookKeeper` equals or is greater than the previous amount plus fees, w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Path Disclosure in Error Response(All Relayers/Servers URLs)
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status** : Resolved
**Description**:
The Hinkal Protocol's Relayer endpoint is revealing sensitive file path information in its error response when it encounters malformed JSON input. In the provided scenario, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Accepting new terms while loan is not funded leads to wrong principal transfers
### Description
For open-term loans, the requested principal is stored in the `principal` storage variable upon initialization (instead of an extra `principalRequested` variable like for fixed-term loans). This leads to issues when... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Mainnet oracles are incompatible with wstETH causing many popular yields strategies to be broken
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-07-blueberry-judging/issues/96
## Found by
0x52
Mainnet oracles are incompatible with wstETH causing many popular yields strategies to be broken... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Lack of SafeMath could lead to incorrect crowd loan bonuses
### Description
The Crowd Loan Bonus pallet defines a `claim` function through which users can attempt to claim a crowd loan bonus from the crowd loan pot. This function takes an `amount` value and computes the amount of the payout (the `to_payout` va... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Use safeIncreaseAllowance instead of safeApprove
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
While calling external contracts that consume your assets, try to avoid using `safeApprove` and use `safeIncreaseAllowance` instead. That will ensure you're not getting the 'SafeERC2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Centralization risk
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Location**: locking.sol, TokenDistributor.sol, TokenMigration.sol
**Description** :
The smart contracts employ modifiers (e.g. onlyOwner) in functions responsible for carrying out important actions (e.g. setEmergencyExit, addBulkA... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: TempleGold incompatibility with some chains
### Description
**Description:** Because of `PUSH0` not supported in 0.8.19 or lower versions of solidity compiler, TempleGold will be incompatible with chains like Linea where it only supports solidity compiler 0.8.19 or lower.
\clearpage | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Funds can be stuck due to wrong order of operations
### Description
The contract `ERC20Quest.sol` has two functions of interest here. The first is `withdrawFee()`, which is responsible for transferring out the fee amount from the contract once endTime has been passed, and the second is `withdrawRemainingTok... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: An unchecked timestamp
### Description
There are not enough timestamp checks.
https://github.com/FantiumAG/smart-contracts/blob/a2d126453c1105028f12277b8f342d2cdbf01a77/contracts/FantiumNFTV3.sol#L719
https://github.com/FantiumAG/smart-contracts/blob/a2d126453c1105028f12277b8f342d2cdbf01a77/contracts/FantiumNF... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: `FluidLocker::_getUnlockingPercentage()` incorrectly divides one of the components of the formula by `S`, leading to always having `80%` penalty
### Description
[FluidLocker::_getUnlockingPercentage()](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-11-superfluid-locking-contract/blob/main/fluid/packages/contracts/src... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Function setTrustedSigner should do sanity checks even if the caller is the owner, the owner can make mistakes too.
### Description
**Recommendation**:
Do a sanity check where you are checking if the new trusted signer has a different value from
the old one, to not set the same value twice and consume gas. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing checks for `address(0x0)` when assigning values to `address` state variables
### Description
*There are 6 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Zero Check of Milestone Award
### Description
This issue has been identified within the `validateAndCalculateMilestones` function of the `MetaVesTController` contract.
There is [no validation](https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/MetaVesT/blob/b614405e60bce8b852e46d06c03fd47b04d86dde/src/MetaVesTController.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [09] payable modifier on a function that shouldn't receive native tokens
### Description
The `claim()` function has a `payable` modifier despite it doesn't use `msg.value`, and the contract shouldn't receive native tokens. This may lead to user errors and lost ETH, as it can't be recovered.
https://github.co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [01] Previews misquote protocol fees by returning cumulative accrual in `LatentSwapLEX`
### Description
`quoteMint()` and `quoteRedeem()` return `protocolFees` as `currentState.accruedProtocolFee`, which is the total time-based fee accrued since the last update, not the incremental fee attributable to the sing... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Unprotected Vercel Preview URLs
### Description
Preview deployments are currently accessible to anyone who obtains the URL, creating unnecessary security exposure. Without deployment protection, preview URLs (e.g., my-preview-5678.vercel.app) are publicly accessible with no access controls or audit capabilitie... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Gateway can call any contract Acknowledged
### Description
The `Gateway` contract is used as a gateway for meta transactions and batched transactions. It can currently call any contract, while is only intended to call specific contracts in the system that implemented `GatewayRecipient` interface:
**code/src... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: TOKENS ACCIDENTALLY SENT TO THE CONTRACT CANNOT BE RECOVERED
### Description
It can't be recovered if the tokens accidentally arrive at the `V2Migrator` contract address. In line 65, it is noted that `BATH TOKENS V2` may get stuck, but no token recovery implementation is implemented if this happens. We recomme... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Receiver does not verify address from the originator chain
### Description
The Receiver contract is designed to receive the cross-chain call from the `libDiamond` address on the destination chain. However, it does not verify the source chain address. An attacker can build a malicious `_callData`. An attacke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Oracle | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-08-sentiment-judging/tree/main/133-M
## Found by
xiaoming90, IllIllI
## Summary
ERC4626 oracle is vulnerable to price manipulation. This allows an attacker to increase or decrease the price to carry out various attacks against the protocol.
## Vulnerability Detail
Th... | Sherlock | 5 | Sentiment |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: User incurs fee loss when using `BURN_UNLOCK_CODE` with a `NotSet` token status
### Description
A user's funds may get stuck when using `BURN_UNLOCK_CODE` for a `NotSet` token.
For example, consider the following scenario:
1. A user locks `1000e18` LP tokens on chain A and mints corresponding synthLp token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Dead code in some contracts
### Description
There are some occurrences of unused (`dead`) code in some contracts.
### Impact
As said before, removing unused code can keep the code clean and more readable. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: ZERO LEVERAGE POSITIONS CAN BE OPENED
### Description
It has been detected that positions with 0 leverage cycles can be opened. Although these kinds of positions make no sense in the context of these contracts, they still can be opened (i.e., because of user input error).
Opening a position like this will ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Commented-out and unimplemented conditional statements
### Description
The Composable Finance system does not define or document the expected behavior of certain conditional statements. It is difficult to assess the correctness or security of the code without an understanding of its expected behavior.
For exa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Users can cast their votes multiple times for the proposal by transferring their nfts and then voting again
### Description
### Finding description and impact
In the `BlackGovernor` contract users can cast their vote on the proposal. The requirements to cast the vote are that proposal has to be active, and... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: CRAFTS COOLDOWN TIME ARE ALWAYS ZERO
### Description
In the `CraftingSystem` contract, when a craft is completed, the `lastCompletionTime` in the `_accountData` mapping is not updated. This means that the `cooldown` value is never considered, so all crafts have no cooldown.
### Recommendation
**PARTIALLY S... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Users can avoid paying fees
### Description
The vulnerability exists in the `send` function, which is responsible for sending tokens across chains. This function requires the user to pay fees to the protocol in the local representation of the token, as demonstrated in the following code:
Although fees are pa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Resolve discrepancy between expected `randomNumber` in `DropBox::_assignTierAndMint` and `DropBoxFractalProtocol::_determineTier`
### Description
**Description:** `DropBox::_assignTierAndMint` generates `randomNumber` between 0 and 9999 and then calls `DropBoxFractalProtocol::_determineTier` passing this as i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Missed depositary check
### Description
In function `buy` defined at https://github.com/bondappetit/bondappetit-protocol/blob/88680691fe8d872c5fc26e9500d19cf7caaa9861/contracts/CollateralMarket.sol#L120 contract exchanges collateral tokens to stable tokens. But in case of wrong `depositary` that code will lea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Misleading Instruction Implementation
### Description
## BurnDustWithAuthority Instruction Overview
The **BurnDustWithAuthority** instruction is documented to only allow the burning of tokens in a vault if its amount is less than a specified `max_amount`. However, the implementation of the instruction may all... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: DOS any Staking contract with Arithmetic Overflow
### Description
### Impact
This allows attackers to disable any Staking contract deployed via the system, essentially locking up all funds within the Staking contract. It would lead to a significant loss of funds for all users and the protocol who have stak... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Inaccurate description of SwapSuccess event
### Description
The description of the `SwapSuccess` event in the `technical` pallet suggests that the event should have two arguments, an `initiator` and a `finaliser`, but the event takes only a single argument (Figure 13.1). This event is currently triggered only ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [18] UNDERSCORE CAN BE ADDED FOR `21000` IN `OptimismPortal.minimumGasLimit` FUNCTION
### Description
It is a common practice to separate each 3 digits in a number by an underscore to improve code readability. `21000` can be updated to `21_000` in the following `OptimismPortal.minimumGasLimit` function.
https... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [04] Import of protobuf
### Description
As per the [docs](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/release/v0.47.x/UPGRADING.md# protobuf);
> The SDK has migrated from gogo/protobuf (which is currently unmaintained), to our own maintained fork, cosmos/gogoproto.
>
> This means you should replace all imports ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Unchecked math operations
### Description
There are three unchecked math operations inside the migration function in lines [114](https://github.com/qiibee/qb-contracts/blob/d40368c9a7a536572a5bb03cb031d658ccb34f24/contracts/QiibeeToken.sol#L114)–[116](https://github.com/qiibee/qb-contracts/blob/d40368c9a7a5... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Rewarder Implementation Cannot Be Updated
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `7b881c496bbac9c75bb281673238ec80253e2f00`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Added a function in the RewarderFactory to update rewarderImplementation and added test cases.
**Fil... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Lack of check for zero address when adding destination
### Description
The `_addDestination()` function from the `InceptionBridge` contract has a check to verify that the `_bridgeAddressByChainId` mapping is properly set up and is not equivalent to `address(0`. However, it does not perform the same verificatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Events missing indexed parameters
### Description
**Description:** Events in Solidity can have up to three indexed parameters, which are stored as topics in the event log. Indexed parameters allow for efficient filtering and searching of events by off-chain services. Without indexed parameters, it becomes more... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Using `>` 0 costs more gas than `!=` 0 when used on a uint in a `require()` statement
### Description
This change saves 6 gas per instance. The optimization works until solidity version 0.8.13, where there is a regression in gas costs.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-05-maia/blob/main/src/erc-4626/ERC4626... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: 5] Compilation failed due to incompatible Solidity versions
### Description
**Severity:** Medium
**Path:** contracts/ZealousSwapPair.sol#L1
contracts/interfaces/IZealousSwapDiscountManager.sol#L1
**Description:** The contract `ZealousSwapPair` imports the interface `IZealousSwapDiscountManager`. Howev... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Documentation issues
### Description
• Remove irrelevant comment in `buildHatId()`:
• Correct comment in checkHatStatus():
• Remove comment in MultiHatsSignerGate's claimSigner():
• Change comment in approveLinkTopHatToTree() – can be approved by wearer or
admin | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Typo in `FertilizerFacet::getMintFertilizerOut` NatSpec
### Description
The NatSpec of [`FertilizerFacet::getMintFertilizerOut`](https://github.com/BeanstalkFarms/Beanstalk/blob/12c608a22535e3a1fe379db1153185fe43851ea7/protocol/contracts/beanstalk/barn/FertilizerFacet.sol#L108) currently refers to Fertilizer a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: External LST compromission leads to avs compromission due to a lack of operators ' staked amount cooldown
### Description
A compromised LST can instantly lead the attacker to break EigenDA and every other AVS that use this LST. The protocol relies on external LSTs, and some of these may be compromised throu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Signature malleability due to missing ECDSA checks
### Description
The `permit` function in FundingVault20 uses `ecrecover` to validate signatures without implementing checks for signature malleability. It has no validation that `s` is in the lower half of the curve's order.
While the nonce mechanism (`nonce... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Potentially Inconsistent Hashing of Leaf Nodes
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> The function that we use to create merkle tries offchain will always sort the leaf nodes so that it works with the verification function in the pro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Possible to liquidate past the debt outstanding above the min borrow without liquidating the entire debt outstanding
### Description
It is possible to liquidate past the debt outstanding above the min borrow without liquidating the entire debt outstanding. Thus, leaving accounts with small debt that are not p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Attacker can steal an high-value token due to lack of swap execution
### Description
Whenever [`withdrawToNativeChain`](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2025-05-dodo-cross-chain-dex/blob/d4834a468f7dad56b007b4450397289d4f767757/omni-chain-contracts/contracts/GatewayTransferNative.sol#L530) or[`onCall`](http... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Validation
### Description
Throughout the codebase, the following instances were identified where stronger validation can be applied:
* In the `Admin` facet, the [`setTokenMultiplier` function](https://github.com/matter-labs/era-contracts/blob/d5c5d7a7c3a458f131e5de72c6c134a172e6763d/l1-contracts/con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Code Maturity
### Description
## Code Review Summary
## 1. Code Readability Improvement
WormholeTunnel utilizes `wormhole.chainId()` despite having the public function `chainId()` which performs the same task. Replace all instances of `wormhole.chainId()` to `chainId()` for code readability.
## 2. CEI Patte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Add sanity check to revert if `messageHashesLength == 0` in `L2MessageManager::anchorL1L2MessageHashes`
### Description
Add sanity check to revert if `messageHashesLength == 0` in `L2MessageManager::anchorL1L2MessageHashes`. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | oracle-manipulation | false | false | ## Low: Missing zero address checks in `STBL_Register::setupAsset`
### Description
Several asset addresses are initialized without zero address checks in `STBL_Register::setupAsset` :
- `_contractAddr`
- `_issuanceAddr`
- `_distAddr`
- `_vaultAddr`
- `_oracle`
Notably, the same variables when set via their respectiv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Wrongly increased `participants` amount
### Description
At line https://github.com/tosdis/TosDisFinance/blob/be50dbf8a52a8f919694498bf30394d328d88fbb/StakeMaster/contracts/StakingPool.sol#L120 contract increases participants amount, that happens if `user.amount` is zero, however if user will provide zero `_am... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Universal Data Key Permissions May Be Abused During Ownership Transfers
### Description
### Lines of code
### Impact
In `LSP6KeyManager`, when fetching permissions. we are looking for universal permissions (independent from the owner). If a UP owner transfers ownership to a new owner that uses a key mana... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: initialize – Committee Members Array Can Contain Duplicates ✓ Fixed
### Description
The initial committee members are given as array argument to the pool’s `initialize` function. When the array is processed, there is no check for duplicates, and duplicates may also end up in the storage array `committeeArra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Minting cap can be bypassed by changing MintManager
### Description
The minting restrictions, which include a 2% cap and a timelock, are enforced in the `MintManager.sol` contract instead of within the `Tea.sol` token contract. Because the MintManager can be replaced via the upgrade function, the restrictions ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `Goldigovernor._getProposalState()` shouldn't use `totalSupply`
### Description
**Severity:** Medium
**Description:** In `_getProposalState()`, it uses `Goldiswap(goldiswap).totalSupply()` during the comparison.
As `totalSupply` is increasing in real time, a `Queued` proposal might be changed to `Defeate... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Missing Tick Step Validation
### Description
## Open Vault Vulnerability
In `open_vault` within the vault module, the `base_tick_step` and `limit_tick_step` values are user-provided inputs and are not validated. This means a malicious user may enter substantially high values for these steps. Inside `check_... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Any User Can Drain Ether That Is Left In The Contract
### Description
In the functions `FuroStream.createStream()` and `FuroVesting.createVesting()`, the amount of ETH used to create the stream or vest is determined by a parameter to the function, not by reference to `msg.value`. This approach is used to provi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Return unused fees
### Description
The `expectedMarketFeeBPS` argument to a bunch of functions is a user projection. The actual fee is a static value set by the admin, not a dynamic one, so the difference between the two values should be returned, as is done for some of the other token transfers in this contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | false | false | ## Medium: flashProof is not flash-proof
### Description
## Handle
@cmichelio
## Vulnerability details
## Vulnerability Details
The `flashProof` modifier is supposed to prevent flash-loan attacks by disallowing performing several sensitive functions in the same block.
However, it performs this check on `tx.orig... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incentive Misalignment in Maximum Pack Purchases.
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**description**
bpnmMain.sol: _buyLimitPack().
Currently, purchasing the maximum available limit pack seems less profitable than buying
smaller packs sequentially due to the lack of cumulat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: The contract owner has too many permissions
### Description
**Description**
The vesting functionality is built based on token allocation performed by the contract owner. It
means only token owners can send vested tokens to token holders. The potential token
holders don’t have any guarantees they receive these... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Anyone can call `StrategySupplyBase.harvest`, allowing users to avoid paying performance fees on interest
### Description
### Finding description and impact
Since `StrategySupplyBase.harvest` can be called by anyone, users can front-run the `rebalance` call or regularly call harvest to avoid paying protocol ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Incomplete Error Handling in retireStrategy
### Description
The function `retireStrategy` calls `_protocolWithdraw(balanceOfUnderlying(shares), 0)` without verifying that `balanceOfUnderlying` returns a valid value. This could potentially cause issues if `balanceOfUnderlying` does not return the expected value... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | front-running | true | true | ## High: `MembershipERC1155::sendProfit` can be front-run by calls to `MembershipFactory::joinDAO` to steal profit from existing DAO members
### Description
Profit is distributed to DAO members following a call to [`MembershipERC1155::sendProfit`](https://github.com/OneWpOrg/audit-2024-10-oneworld/blob/416630e46ea6f0e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | token | true | false | ## High: In `GovLocks`, it shouldn't use a `deposits` mapping
### Description
In `GovLocks`, it tracks every user's deposit amount using a `deposits` mapping.
As users can transfer `govLocks` freely, they might have fewer `deposits` than their `govLocks` balance and wouldn't be able to withdraw when they want.
```sol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Unchecked address used to instantiate contract
### Description
In [the `initialize` function](https://github.com/mcdexio/mai-fund-protocol/blob/98af0d1d7e9872ba2b5e734e2a43c161ef635608/contracts/fund/implement/AutoTradingFund.sol#L41-L55) of the `AutoTradingFund` contract, the [value of `strategyAddress` ad... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: | Uint Comparisons
### Description
**Description**
When dealing with unsigned integer types, comparisons with `!= 0` are cheaper than with `> 0`.
**Recommendation**
Replace the `assigners[msg.sender] > 0` check with `assigners[msg.sender] != 0`.
**Resolution**
NFTR Team:
- The suggested changes were impl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Owners can never be removed ✓ Fixed
### Description
The intention of `setOwners()` is to replace the current set of owners with a new set of owners. However, the `isOwner` mapping is never updated, which means any address that was ever considered an owner is permanently considered an owner for purposes of sig... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Value of `leaf` argument when calling `addReserve` is hardcoded incorrectly
### Description
**Impact:**
High, because liquidity won't be returned to the LiquidityTree
**Likelihood:**
High, because the incorrect value is hardcoded and can't be changed
**Description**
In `BetExpress::resolvePayout` we can se... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent used of named return params
### Description
Personally I prefer named return params, but it is a style preference. However in a project, it's nice to be consistent throughout with whichever style you prefer.
* [`SubprotocolRegister.getSubprotocol`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-canto-iden... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | true | false | ## Low: Flash loan rate lacks bounds and can be set arbitrarily
### Description
There are no lower or upper bounds on the flash loan rate implemented in the contract. The Blacksmith team could therefore set an arbitrarily high flash loan rate to secure higher fees. The Blacksmith team sets the _flashLoanRate when the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Potential Unnecessary Event Emission
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> Acknowledged
**File(s) affected:**`PortalToken.sol`
**Description:** When `permitedEnabled` is set to a particular value, calling `disablePermit()` with th... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.