prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Remove commented out code
### Description
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-sturdy/blob/78f51a7a74ebe8adfd055bdbaedfddc05632566f/smart-contracts/GeneralVault.sol#L144-L148 | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: `boostedValue` should be added to `permanentTotalSupply` for permanently locked tokens
### Description
Unlocking tokens from the permanent locking can be DoSed.
### Proof of Concept
In the `VotingEscrowUpgradeableV2._processLockChange` function, `boostedValue` is added to the token's locked amount at L465... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Phantom transactions artificially pollute Escrow contract state
### Description
The `createTransaction()` function in the `Escrow` contract allows the creation of transactions with zero and uncapped amounts, zero addresses for `receiver` and `serverOwner`, and empty `challengeIds`. These phantom and invalid tr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Incorrectly named return variable `AutoRedemption::calculateUSDsToTargetPrice`
### Description
`AutoRedemption::calculateUSDsToTargetPrice` has the following signature:
```solidity
function calculateUSDsToTargetPrice() private view returns (uint256 _usdc)
```
However, the named return variable is semanticall... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Offsets should only be calculated once per loop
### Description
`i * 2` is calculated twice per loop, wasting gas
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-cally/blob/1849f9ee12434038aa80753266ce6a2f2b082c59/contracts/src/CallyNft.sol#L244-L247 | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: `MIPS` - Incorrect implementation of SRAV instruction
### Description
Incorrect dispute game resolution - it will make `True` root claim to be `False`.
### Proof of Concept
[MIPS-ISA](https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/academic/class/15740-f97/public/doc/mips-isa.pdf): Page 153(A-141)
`SRAV` instruction does ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: `Funding.initialize()`: should use memory instead of storage variable
### Description
See `@audit` tag: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Missing validation in contract initialization function
### Description
The `initialize` function in the `AdharmaSmartWalletImplementation` contract is missing address validation for the key parameter, as highlighted in Figure 5.1.
```
// Keep the initializer function on the contract in case a smart wallet has... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Remove ternary operator in order to use unchecked and `>=` instead of `<`
### Description
Estimated saving:
| Method call or Contract deployment | Before | After | After - Before | (After - Before) / Before |
| :- | :-: | :-: | :-: | :-: |
| `LiquidityMiningPath` | 1540432 | 1535906 | -4526 | -0.29% |
There i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Savings: Inefficient Method of Validating Ethereum Addresses
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `ac18a664e0f1e3a09d9fdfc7221c6a30fcc69701`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Fixed, thanks!
The recommendation was applied.
**File(s) affected:**`TokenVestin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: standard compliance.
### Description
This section details the compliance with the ERC20 Standard [1] and adds any additional ERC20-related notes. Non-compliance with the ERC20 standard does not pose any security risk; however, it may cause issues with third-party applications which expect the standard.
The **... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Solidity compiler optimizations can be problematic
### Description
The GSquared Protocol contracts have enabled optional compiler optimizations in Solidity. There have been several optimization bugs with security implications. Moreover, optimizations are actively being developed. Solidity compiler optimization... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Adversary can permanently break reward distribution for percentage tier bounties by funding bounty then refunding after competition closes
### Description
When closeCompetition is called for TieredPercentageBountyV1 it takes a snapshot of the current token balance. Afterwards it uses this number to calculate ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: State variable “hash” could have a better name
### Description
It is customary for a mapping’s name to describe the *value\_s associated to its keys. In the case of the `hash` state variable defined in line 15, the name describes the mapping’s \_keys* instead. Since the purpose is to map hashes to the amount o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Remove commented code
### Description
Commented code just adds clutter for the reader and creates unncessary confusion. Remove [the commented `allocateBountyAndEcosystemTokens` function](https://github.com/ArcadeCity/ac-token/blob/dd4207e1538f96eb3cbbf9e714eb38015bfe7c5a/contracts/ARCToken.sol#L296-L308). (edi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Incorrect transfer of ERC-20 tokens to non-compatible contract
### Description
- https://gitlab.ubertech.dev/blockchainlaboratory/eywa-dao/-/blob/29465033f28c8d3f09cbc6722e08e44f443bd3b2/contracts/EscrowVoteManagerV1.sol#L136
It was discovered that the `s_emissionManager` contract does not handle ERC20 token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Redundant Instruction Attributes in `Initialize` and `Vest` Instructions
### Description
**Description:** In `xbelo` program's `Initialize` and `Vest` account structs, `#[instruction()]` and `#[instruction(amount: u64, vest_duration: i64)]` attributes are provided respectively.
This attribute declares instruct... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Vaults can avoid liquidations by not letting their vault account be settled
### Description
Vault liquidations will leave un-matured accounts with cash holdings which are then used to offset account debt during vault account settlements. As it stands, any excess cash received via interest accrual will be tran... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Unborrowed Nfts and Bids Have No Expiry Time
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> This is interesting proposal. We default to indefinite because expiration will be another parameter, want to start with a simple protocol for users f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Potential Locked Funds in Case of an Absent `CYAN_ROLE`
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client.
The client provided the following explanation: "Acknowledged the finding, but decided not to add a function to reject BNPL from the user side since the protocol should be responsible in c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Implement SSL Pinning
### Description
## Security Vulnerability: Lack of SSL Pinning
The application does not implement SSL pinning, leaving it vulnerable to certain types of network routing manipulation, such as BGP hijacking.
With SSL pinning, the client (e.g., a mobile app) is configured to trust only a s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Spelling errors and incorrect NatSpec
### Description
The following spelling errors and incorrect NatSpec were identified:
* `cancelOrder` is [documented](https://github.com/crispymangoes/uniswap-v3-limit-orders/blob/83f5db9cb90926c11ee6ce872dc165b7f600f3d8/src/LimitOrderRegistry.sol#L657) to send all swap fee... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Validation When Updating Maximum Failed Execution Tries
### Description
The [`L2ScrollMessenger contract`](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/blob/3bc8a3f5c6ac816ddffadca41024331dcf4d3064/contracts/src/L2/L2ScrollMessenger.sol) provides a mechanism to limit the number of failed execution tries that ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Token fees are not accounted for
### Description
In [`Escrow.sol`](https://github.com/swapnet-protocol/swapnet-lite/blob/66ce8f3e529410a5272b7a57c8391fcb80a375fd/packages/contracts/contracts/Escrow.sol), within the [`deposit`](https://github.com/swapnet-protocol/swapnet-lite/blob/66ce8f3e529410a5272b7a57c8391f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Using `block.number` instead of `block.timestamp` as an expiration check to execute signature
### Description
Description:
On `TransactionRelayer::executeByInvestorWithBlockLimit()`, the 3rd value in the `params` array is compared against the `block.number`, the purpose is to prevent executing old signatures. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Anti-Debugging Mechanisms
### Description
The absence of anti-debugging mechanisms in an application represents a significant security vulnerability. Anti-debugging techniques are employed to detect or prevent the use of debugging tools, such as Frida, GDB, LLDB, or other dynamic analysis tools, by att... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | true | false | ## High: Wrong accounting enables attackers to prevent users from withdrawing their funds
### Description
One of the key features of Opal is liquidity rebalancing, which enables Opal's funds to be distributed among several Aura pools based on a set of preconfigured weights for each pool. When depositing into Opal, the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Adversary can game the liquidation flow by transfering a dust amount of the payment token to ClearingHouse contract to settle the auction if no one buy the auctioned NFT
### Description
The function ClearingHouse#safeTransferFrom is meant to settle the auction but the function severely lack of access contro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Avoid hardcoding data in BridgedERC1155
### Description
[Link](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-taiko/blob/f58384f44dbf4c6535264a472322322705133b11/packages/protocol/contracts/tokenvault/BridgedERC1155.sol#L52)
Instead of hardcoding the data, place it in a constant variable and assign the variables here ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | access-control | true | false | ## Severity
**Impact:** High
**Likelihood:** High
## Description
`Burve::uniswapV3MintCallback` is an external function with no access control. This function takes three parameters: `amount0Owed`, `amount1Owed`, and `data`. It then decodes `data` to get an address and transfers tokens from that address to the liqui... | Pashov Audit Group | 3.5 | Burve_2025-01-29 |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Users Will Not Be Able To Vote On The Epoch Time Itself
### Description
When `vote()` in VotingDistributor.sol is called, the function checks the current epoch time and calls `veToken.getPastTokenSupply()`.
On the current epoch time itself, if a user calls `vote()`, the function will revert with the `ERC5805F... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: WithdrawFacet's `withdraw` calls native `payable.transfer`, which can be unusable for DiamondStorage owner contract
### Description
_Submitted by hyh, also found by Dravee, JMukesh, Jujic, peritoflores, shw, sorrynotsorry, and wuwe1_
When `withdraw` function is used with native token it is being handled wi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Silent Error Handling in `clean_generic` Introduces Multiple Risks
### Description
**Description:** The `clean_generic()` function in `ClientPrimaryState` implements silent error handling for account parsing using `if let Ok(header)`, which introduces three potential issues that can lead to incorrect state ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: `convertedBtcAmountToBeSwappedToEth` value setting allowed
### Description
In the `Gateway` contract, the owner has the ability to set the amount of converted BTC that will be swapped to `wETH` via the `Gateway::setConvertedBtcToBeSwappedToEth` function. The swapped `wETH` is then sent to the recipient. The `a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | false | false | ## Medium: Front run `distributeRewards()` can steal the newly added rewards
### Description
A surge of pointsPerShare on each `distributeRewards()` call can be used by the attacker to steal part of the newly added rewards.
### Impact
While the existence of the `MIN_LOCK_DURATION` prevented the usage of flashloan, it... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Slippage Higher than Expected in `CurveAdapter.executeSwapExactInput()` and `FeeDistributionBranch._performMultiDexSwap()` Multi-Hop Swaps
### Description
Multi-hop swaps in `CurveAdapter.executeSwapExactInput()` and `FeeDistributionBranch._performMultiDexSwap()` may result in higher than expected slippage ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: It is possible to go beyond the boundaries of the array
### Description
At the line https://github.com/iearn-finance/yoracle.link/blob/faf1309cbe7a05f70b338351315039eb8e5b9c09/contracts/Keep3rV1Oracle.sol#L685 the `sample` function does not check for a valid `observations[pair]` array element number.
On lin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Miscellaneous General Comments
### Description
This section details miscellaneous findings discovered by the testing team that do not have direct security implications:
1. **Relay configuration input validation.**
The `Eth2NearRelay::init()` function accepts a `Config` struct containing several user-speci... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Misleading variable names
### Description
There are some instances where possibly code has been duplicated without proper renaming.
For example, in GMXAdapter, _getMaxPrice() is implemented as:
Another example is the function`_getPendingIncreaseCollateralDelta()` which actually returns
the **amountIn** vari... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Additional Fields For Events In Oracle
### Description
Whenever a value in `OracleParams` changes, the `OracleParamChangeEvent` event emits. However, the event fails to specify the coin name for which it changes the parameters.
Add the `coin_name` as a field in `OracleParamChangeEvent` to specify the coin fo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: MasterAccounts are not able to buy vaults.
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
When `NodeSale.sol` is deployed 2 calls to `createMasterAccount` are executed within the contract constructor. These calls creates 2 accounts without the need of a referred. The addre... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Compatibility issues with `transferFrom()` in ERC20
### Description
_Resolved_
The `Marketplace` contract uses the `transferFrom` method to handle payments in the `acceptedCurrency`:
While the project currently states that only `USDC` is used, the implementation does not account for potential compatibility ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: `_decrementWeightUntilFree()` has a possible infinite loop
### Description
### Proof of Concept
In the loop of the `_decrementWeightUntilFree()` method, the position of `i++` is wrong, which may lead to an infinite loop.
In the above code, when `userGaugeWeight == 0`, `i` is not incremented, resulting in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: There is a large precision error in sqrt calculation of lp
### Description
Compared with div, there is a larger precision error in calculating lp through sqrt, so there should be a way to check whether there are excess tokens left when adding liquidity.
### Proof of Concept
When reserve\[0] is larger rel... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: AddEngine Accepts Zero Address For Engine
### Description
## ClearingHouse Contract Issue
In the `ClearingHouse` contract, `addEngine` is not checking that the given engine address is not a zero address.
## Code Snippet
## Issue Description
Since adding a new engine is blocked by the condition of ‘current... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Optimization issue
### Description
The codebase is huge, and there are still a lot of places where these complications and gas efficiency can be improved.
### Recommendation
Optimize and simplify the code. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Denial of Service Attacks on Router Permit Functions
### Description
The functions in `Router.sol` are the two `depositWithPermit2()` functions and the `repayWithPermit2()` function. These functions with the exception of one `depositWithPermit2()` proceeds in 2 steps:
1. Transferring the user-specified amo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Business Logic | true | true | ## Severity: Medium Risk
## Context
`PublicVault.sol#L143`
## Description
`redeemFutureEpoch` transfers the vault shares from the `msg.sender` to the vault instead of from the owner.
## Recommendation
The 1st parameter passed to the `ERC20(address(this)).safeTransferFrom` needs to be the owner:
```solidity
- ERC20(... | Spearbit | 5 | Astaria |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inaccurate value representation by the `locked` function after the `owner` revocation
### Description
https://github.com/banteg/yearn-vesting-escrow/blob/945b5ca09d8bb2d2ad9132df7368cb4992496f6a/contracts/VestingEscrowSimple.vy#L127
A vulnerability was discovered in the internal `_locked` function. If the `own... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `INTERVAL_TIME` is Off By 1 Second
### Description
The interval time is set to 5 minutes but it can only be called after 5 minutes and 1 second to set the next interval. This issue only exists if the interval is called between 5min - 10min.
At 10 mins, the protocol calculates 2 intervals but at 5 minute, the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Short-duration logic can be manipulated by miners.
### Description
**Severity** : Informational
**Status** : Resolved
**Description** :
block.timestamp is utilized in several crucial operations, notably in the calculatePenalty and calculatePenaltyFee functions, which determine the penalty amount based on th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Missing check for successful transfer in ApeMexMargin autoOpen function
### Description
**Description**
In contract Apex MexMargin, function autoOpen, at line 462, there is no check to see if the transfer have been done successfully, there are some implementations of popular rc20 tokens that are using no req... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Validation for the Zero Address
### Description
Historically, some wallets and applications default to using the `0x0` address if an address parameter is omitted when interacting with smart contracts. This has led to cases of inadvertent fund transfers to the `0x0` address. One mitigation strategy (tha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Interfaces missing certain functions
### Description
Some interfaces are missing function declarations for functions/variables that exist in the actual implementation. The list of missing function declarations is:
### Recommendation
Add the missing function declarations to these interfaces. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: Borrowers can brick the commitment group pool
### Description
Borrowers can [setRepaymentListenerForBid](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-04-teller-finance/blob/main/teller-protocol-v2-audit-2024/packages/contracts/contracts/TellerV2.sol#L1248) after directly borrowing from `TellerV2`. Upon repayment, `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | true | ## Low: `pUSDeVault::maxDeposit` doesn't account for deposit pausing, in violation of EIP-4626 which can break protocols integrating with `pUSDeVault`
### Description
[EIP-4626](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4626) states on `maxDeposit`:
> MUST factor in both global and user-specific limits, like if deposits are ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Bounty manager can set `maxRewardPerVote` to 1 after votes are locked, stealing free votes
### Description
When the amount to pay for a `claim` is calculated, we use the minimum value of `bias * rewardPerVote` and `bias * maxRewardPerVote`.
Since `maxRewardPerVote` is a value that managers can edit at any... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Return value of low-level .call() not checked
### Description
The low-level primitive `.call()` doesn't revert in the caller's context when the callee reverts. If its return value is not checked, it can lead the caller to falsely believe that the call was successful. The `Receiver.sol` contract uses `.call()`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing getDeviceInfo command in TypeScript interface
### Description
The TypeScript library includes the `getAppInfo` command but not the `getDeviceInfo` command. Because these commands appear in the generic Rust interface, developers may expect both of them to be included in the TypeScript library.
```types... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Variables shadowing functions with the same name in MiningCalculation.sol
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In the library MiningCalculation.sol there are multiple cases of function shadowing because of variables with the same name.
The shadowing cases can be f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: Incorrect index handling in checkpoint creation leads to incorrect initial checkpoint retrieval and potential DoS
### Description
In the current implementation of [`ProtectedListings::_createCheckpoint()`](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-08-flayer/blob/main/flayer/src/contracts/ProtectedListings.sol#L5... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: RocketMinipoolStatus - DAO Membership changes can result in votes getting stuck ✓ Fixed
### Description
Changes in the DAO’s trusted node members are reflected in the `RocketDAONodeTrusted.getMemberCount()` function. When compared with the vote on consensus threshold, a DAO-driven decision is made, e.g., wh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Remove deprecated `SubmissionDataV2::dataParentHash` and `SupportingSubmissionDataV2::dataParentHash` from `ILineaRollup.sol`
### Description
**Description:** Remove deprecated `SubmissionDataV2::dataParentHash` and `SupportingSubmissionDataV2::dataParentHash` from `ILineaRollup.sol`.
These are hangovers from... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Deleveraging can result in a zero borrowed amount while maintaining the leveraged position
### Description
Positions borrow the leverage amount from the pool and pay a borrowing fee for doing so. If the token price changes between the leverage update requests, an account can end up having leverage without any... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Treasury receives staking rewards due to fees being taken in form of beHYPE
### Description
_Acknowledged_
During instant withdrawals, the withdrawal fee is collected in beHYPE tokens and transferred to the protocol treasury. Since beHYPE tokens are share tokens that accrue staking rewards through an increasi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: ERC20 approve is vulnerable to the front-running
### Description
## Handle
pauliax
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
function approve is vulnerable to the front-running. This issue is described here: https://blog.smartdec.net/erc20-approve-issue-in-simple-words-a41aaf47bca6 A malicious delegate can scout ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Max integer
### Description
**Description**
contracts/Cohort.sol:48
Easy to make a mistake with the number of ‘f’. Also not readable.
**Recommendation**:
Use type(uin256).max | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Centralization can lead to unfair changes without user’s notice
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Location**: Airdrop.sol and AirdropFactory.sol
**Description**
It is possible that the admin makes critical state changes to the code such as the `setFeeAmount()` function can ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: eth_getRestorationProof API exposure possible DoS vector
### Description
The `eth_getRestorationProof` API can be computationally intensive. There is no way to prevent queries that set the `TargetEpoch` to 0, as this may be valid in some settings. The longer the chain is around, the more work responding to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Incompatibility risk for EVM versions in different chains
### Description
From Solidity versions `0.8.20` through `0.8.24`, the default target EVM version is set to `Shanghai`, which results in the generation of bytecode that includes `PUSH0` opcodes. Starting with version `0.8.25`, the default EVM version shi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Residual ETH not sent back when `batchBalanceAndTradeAction` executed
### Description
Residual ETH was not sent back when `batchBalanceAndTradeAction` function was executed, resulting in a loss of assets.
### Impact
Loss of assets as the residual ETH is not sent to the users.
### Recommendation
If the under... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: HatsSignerGate + MultiHatsSignerGate: more than maxSignatures can be claimed which leads to DOS in reconcileSignerCount
### Description
The `HatsSignerGate.claimSigner` and `MultiHatsSignerGate.claimSigner` functions allow users to become signers.
It is important that both functions do not allow that there e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: An attacker can front-run `deployVault` to deploy at the same address
### Description
Vaults are created from the factory via `CREATE1`. An attacker can front-run `deployVault` to deploy at the same address, but with different config. If the deployed chain reorg, a different vault might also be deployed at ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Min and maxAnswer never checked for oracle price feed
### Description
Chainlink aggregators have a built-in circuit breaker if the price of an asset goes outside of a predetermined price band. The result is that if an asset experiences a huge drop in value (i.e. LUNA crash) the price of the oracle will cont... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Adversary can brick bounty payouts by calling fundBountyToken but funding it with an ERC721 token instead
### Description
recieveFunds is only meant to be called with an ERC20 token but _receiveERC20 is generic enough to work with an ERC721 token. An adversary could call this with an ERC721 token to add it as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Factory.sol - lack of checks in setAuctionDecrement will cause reverts in Auction::settleAuction()
### Description
## Handle
GalloDaSballo
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
`setAuctionDecrement` doesn't check for a min nor a max amount
This means we can change `auctionDecrement` which would allow `owne... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: `ratiosX96Value` rounds in favor of user and not vault
### Description
`ratiosX96Value` is rounded down instead of up, causing withdrawals to favor users. This can slowly decrease the value in our vault, potentially leading to insolvency.
### Impact
The vault may become insolvent or lose small amounts of f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | false | false | ## High: Incorrect Computation of NEGATIVE_ONE Constant in fq.rs
### Description
In the `fq.rs` file, the constant [`NEGATIVE_ONE`](https://github.com/matter-labs/zksync-crypto/blob/3b518637a3a36a0e9e7a294e308b5675f85b15cd/crates/pairing/src/bn256/fq.rs#L200), which is supposed to represent (−((2256)mod q)mod q)(-((... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Agents with Healing Opportunity Will Be Terminated Directly if The `escape` Reduces activeAgents to the Number of `NUMBER_OF_SECONDARY_PRIZE_POOL_WINNERS` or Fewer
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-10-looksrare-judging/issues/43
## Found by
Krace, SilentDefendersOfDeFi, detec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect updateGlobalExchangeRate implementation
### Description
## Handle
xYrYuYx
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
UpdateGlobalExchangeRate has incorrect implementation when `totalGlobalShares` is zero.
If any user didn't start stake, `totalGlobalShares` is 0, and every stake it will increase.
but ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: API keys exposure in client-side code enables API abuse
### Description
The API keys are exposed in client-side code, allowing malicious users to extract and abuse them. The API keys are used to create a Pimlico client for bundling transactions and to get on-chain information using Alchemy. However, the API k... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | true | ## Low: Remove Test inheritance
### Description
SolverBase inherits from Test contract:
```solidity
contract SolverBase is Test {
```
This increases the contract size and may expose any unsafe functionality.
### Recommendation
Remove Test inheritance. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: In OracleLess.createOrder() feeBips value validation is missing
### Description
The max value of `feeBips` should be *** 10000 will revert in `execute()` method. A malicious user can create 100s of such orders which never execute even if the price conditions are met. It can use `USDC` as tokenIn and blackli... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: JalaPair potential permanent DoS due to overflow
### Description
In the `JalaPair::_update` function, overflow is intentionally desired in the calculations for `timeElapsed` and `priceCumulative`. This is forked from the UniswapV2 source code, and it’s meant and known to overflow. UniswapV2 was developed us... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: Dust limit attack on `forceUpdateNodes` allows DoS of rebalancing and potential vault insolvency
### Description
**Description:** An attacker can exploit the `forceUpdateNodes()` function with minimal `limitStake` values to force all validator nodes into a pending update state. By exploiting precision loss in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Relayed event is emitted before the action is executed
### Description
The `relay` function of the `Marmo` contract [emits a](https://github.com/ripio/marmo-contracts/blob/d3fb5922a4f01e47d585343d08cccfad659b3584/contracts/Marmo.sol#L112) [Relayed](https://github.com/ripio/marmo-contracts/blob/d3fb5922a4f01e47... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: Identifying publications using its ID makes the protocol vulnerable to blockchain re-orgs
### Description
In the protocol, publications are uniquely identified through the publisher's profile ID and the publication's ID. For example, when a user calls `act()`, the publication being acted on is determined by... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `RuniverseLand.sol#mint()` can be bricked
### Description
[contracts/RuniverseLand.sol#L77](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-forgotten-runiverse/blob/dcad1802bf258bf294900a08a03ca0d26d2304f4/contracts/RuniverseLand.sol#L77)
[contracts/RuniverseLand.sol#L101](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-forgot... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: The creation of the incentive with zero rewards blocks the pool's incentive system
### Description
It's possible to create an incentive with 0 rewards using `AlgebraEternalFarming.createEternalFarming()`:
https://github.com/cryptoalgebra/Algebra/blob/7290fad656bfa89db3743c52af631154f6a8a2d5/src/tokenomics/con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Simplify `_end` function
### Description
Also in OpenEdition.sol we can remove unnecessary struct cache in `finalize()` function.
`test_Cancel() (gas: -304 (-0.135%))`
In FixedPrice.sol refactor `_end` function save 21 gas.
`test_Cancel() (gas: -21 (-0.008%))` | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Cache array length outside of loops and consider unchecked loop incrementing
### Description
**Description:** Cache array length outside of loops and consider using `unchecked {++i;}` if not compiling with `solc --ir-optimized --optimize`:
File: `DepositManager.sol`
File: `NodeOperatorRegistry.sol`
File: ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: The withdrawal of Multi strategies vault could be DoSed while asset deposits remain unaffected
### Description
### Finding description and impact
The `MultiStrategy# _deallocateAssets()` function will be DoSed if `IStrategy# undeploy(0)` is called.
### Proof of Concept
When withdrawing user assets from a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Users can send PAX to supplyController
### Description
While there are checks to ensure a user cannot transfer PAX to a frozen or 0x0 address, there is no check to ensure a user cannot send PAX to the `supplyController`.
```solidity
function transfer(address _to, uint256 _value) public whenNotPaused returns (... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: hard to clear balance
### Description
_Submitted by jonah1005_
The contract does not allow users to transfer by share. Therefore, It is hard for users to clear out all the shares.
There will be users using this token with Metamask and it is likely the `pricePerShare` would increase after the user sends tra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Recipient Data Type in the `redeem()` Function
### Description
The `redeem()` function in the `BeraBitcoin` contract incorrectly defines the recipient parameter as a string type when it should logically be an address type. This design flaw exists despite the parameter name clearly indicating it shoul... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: Malicious user can prevent other users from unbonding due to missing input validation
### Description
One of the staking-api-service's responsibilities lies in receiving and handling unbonding requests via the API. Any user may send such a request if they want to unbond a previously submitted staking transact... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Event fields are missing `indexed` attribute
### Description
Indexed event fields make the data more quickly accessible to off-chain tools that parse events, and adds them to a special data structure known as [“topics”](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.8.24/abi-spec.html#abi-events) instead of the data part... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessarily complex `ProxyAdmin` ownership setup
### Description
The `ProxyAdmin` contract is created in the `MembershipFactory` constructor:
```solidity
constructor(address _currencyManager, address _owpWallet, string memory _baseURI, address _membershipImplementation) {
// ...
proxyAdmin = new Pro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Sandwich Attack | false | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-03-olympus-judging/issues/1
## Found by
0x52
## Summary
BLVaultLido added a mechanism to siphon off all wstETH obtained from mismatched pool and oracle prices. This was implemented to fix the problem that the vault could be manipulated to the attackers gain. This miti... | Sherlock | 5 | Olympus Update |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | true | ## Medium: Chainlink price feed is `deprecated`, not sufficiently validated and can return `stale` prices.
### Description
The function `_createActionInfo()` uses Chainlink's deprecated latestAnswer function, this function also does not guarantee that the price returned by the Chainlink price feed is not stale and the... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.