prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Disabling collateral with `setCollateralToOracle()` blocks reward claims
### Description
Calling `setCollateralToOracle(collateral, address(0))` on `Middleware` disables the collateral by removing its associated oracle. It introduces a critical issue: **vaults that used this collateral prevent their operato... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Lack of checks in the `setMerkleTree` function of `NFTMintSaleWhitelistingMultiple`
### Description
The `setMerkleTree` function in the `NFTMintSaleWhitelistingMultiple` contract currently lacks checks to ensure that the `merkleRoot` values are set for all tiers. It allows the contract owner to accidentally... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Griefing attack to cause the rewards of a user to be locked and when users claim the reward after maturity date, user will suffer the penalty.
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/zerolend/governance
Impacts:
- Griefing (e.g. no profit motive for an attacker, but damage ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Immutable Execution Count for Scheduled Operations
### Description
Each scheduled proposal is initialized with a count parameter that determines how many times it may be executed. Once a proposal is created, you must either wait for it to decrement to zero through executions or cancel and recreate the proposal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Loss Of Flash Governance Tokens If They Are Not Withdrawn Before The Next Request
### Description
_Submitted by kirk-baird_
Users who have not called [withdrawGovernanceAsset()](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-01-behodler/blob/main/contracts/DAO/FlashGovernanceArbiter.sol#L142) after they have locked th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: [06] `dNFT` owners can liquidate themselves
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-04-dyad/blob/4a987e536576139793a1c04690336d06c93fca90/src/core/VaultManagerV2.sol#L214-L240
This function is used to liquidate a dNFT that's currently underwater, i.e. whose collateral ratio is less than `MIN_COLLA... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Contracts can be initialized with wrong parameters.
### Description
**Description**
MultiFee Distribution.sol: initialize().
TokenVesting.sol: initialize(), _notifyUnseenReward()
1. MultiFee Distribution.sol: No parameters are being validated in initialize(). This might be a serious problem as addresses "mf... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: No way to revoke Approval in `DelegateToken.approve` leads to unauthorized calling of `DelegateToken.transferFrom`
### Description
There is no way to revoke the approval which given via `DelegateToken.approve(address,delegateTokenId)`. They can able call the `DelegateToken.transferFrom` even the tokenHolder... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: A non-owner account might have the chance to access owner-only functions in ESynth
### Description
It is stated in **ESynth.sol** that only the owner of ESynth is allowed to manage minters' capacities by calling `ESynth#setCapacity()`. Several other functions should also be accessible only by the owner of ESyn... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `sharesToTokenAmount`: Division by zero
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel, also found by cccz and CertoraInc_
[LiquidityProviders.sol#L192](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-biconomy/blob/db8a1fdddd02e8cc209a4c73ffbb3de210e4a81a/contracts/hyphen/LiquidityProviders.sol#L192)
The public `sharesToTok... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Checks for `_pauseIntentValidityPeriodBlocks` and `_maxOperatorsPerUnvetting` Values
### Description
The issue is identified within the [`DepositSecurityModule` constructor](https://github.com/lidofinance/core/blob/fafa232a7b3522fdee5600c345b5186b4bcb7ada/contracts/0.8.9/DepositSecurityModule.sol#L108)... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Wrong Math | true | false | ## Audit Report
## Severity
**High Risk**
## Context
`MarketsManagerForAave.sol#L413-L418`
## Description
The reserve factor is taken on the entire P2P supply and borrow rates instead of just on the spread of the pool rates. It’s currently overcharging suppliers and borrowers and making it possible to earn a worse r... | Spearbit | 5 | Morpho |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Unverified Provider Reports
### Description
## Vulnerability Report
In `RelayPayment`, there is a call to `updateProviderPaymentStorageWithComplainerCU`, passing `relay.UnresponsiveProviders` as an argument. This function updates the provider payment storage with Consumer-Unit (CU) information from consume... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Hardcoded Chain Discriminator
### Description
**Update**
The following is the statement from the team:
**File(s) affected:**`libs/LibCollateral.sol`
**Description:** The function `LibCollateral.sol:generateTraderGroupKey` (L630-638) simply keep the "0" as the chain discriminator. According to the code docum... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused import.
### Description
**Description**
NftMimeTypes.sol: import of ERC165.sol.
Imported contract is neither inherited nor used as interface
**Recommendation**:
Remove unused imports | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `orderValidTo` assumes `stepDelay` is always 15 minutes
### Description
When the rebalance process is performed and incorporates `externalTrades`, it will set `orderValidTo` to 15 minutes since ` executeTokenSwap` is called by the token swap executor. This will set a deadline for the swap process to not exc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Inheriting Non-Upgradeable Contracts
### Description
**Update**
We flagged the issue as acknowledged since the contracts are deployed, as mentioned in the recommendation, it cannot be fixed at this moment. The team did add the code comments as recommended in the commit `5984883`.
**File(s) affected:**`LP/L1Li... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent use of equivalent function parameter and immutable variable in `SmartVaultYieldManager::_withdrawUSDsDeposit` is confusing
### Description
**Description:** When withdrawing collateral from the `USDs` Hypervisor in `SmartVaultYieldManager::_withdrawUSDsDeposit`, the `_hypervisor` parameter will alw... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | false | false | ## Low: LayerZero integration can be paused but CCIP integration can't be paused
### Description
`MTokenMessagerLZ` has a `bool lzPaused` storage slot and uses `onlyLZNotPaused` modifier to make LayerZero send/receive revert when paused.
In contrast `MTokenMessager` and `MTokenMessagerV2` have no similar pausing func... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: zBanc - DynamicLiquidTokenConverter introduces breaking changes to the underlying bancorprotocol base ✓ Fixed
### Description
Introducing major changes to the complex underlying smart contract system that zBanc was forked from(bancorprotocol) may result in unnecessary complexity to be added. Complexity usua... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Initialization of `projectDivsDistributorAddress` with unimplemented ProjectDivsDistributor.sol
### Description
**Description**
In contract UniMexStaking.sol at line 49, inside the constructor projectDivs DistributorAddress variable is initialized. The ProjectDivs Distributor.sol file has no implemented metho... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Permissions - return values not checked when sending ETH
### Description
_Submitted by ScopeLift, also found by nathaniel_
On lines 85 and 101, ETH is transferred using a `.call` to an address provided as an input, but there is no verification that the call call succeeded. This can result in a call to `eme... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | true | ## High: `LPDA` price can underflow the price due to bad settings and potentially brick the contract
### Description
The dutch auction in the `LPDA` contract is implemented by configuring a start price and price drop per second.
A bad set of settings can cause an issue where the elapsed duration of the sale multiplie... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Boolean comparisons
### Description
Comparing to a constant (`true` or `false`) is a bit more expensive than directly checking the returned boolean value.
I suggest using `if(directValue)` instead of `if(directValue == true)` here (same for require statements): | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Solvers can be unfairly forced into gas refunds
### Description
The **EscrowBits** library defines the circumstances when a solver is required to refund the bundler for gas costs. For example, the `SolverOutcome.BidNotPaid` flag is part of the `_FULL_REFUND` value, which means a solver needs to reimburse th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Hard-coded `9` decimals for xBELO mint can mismatch underlying BELO mint
### Description
During `initialize` the program creates the xBELO receipt token like this:
```rust
#[account(
init, payer = admin,
mint::decimals = 9, // ← hard-coded
mint::authority = state,
mint::freeze_autho... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Lack of two-step process for critical operations
### Description
Several critical operations are executed in one function call. This schema is error-prone and can lead to irrevocable mistakes. For example, the `owner_address` variable defines the address that can add/remove pools, set parameters in the system... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Insufficient slippage check due to precision loss of integer division
### Description
The calculation of the slippage of a trade can be underestimated due to the precision loss of the integer division as it rounds down. As a result, the slippage check may allow more slippage than intended. For example, assu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | true | ## Medium: Potential Economic Gain When Submitting False Proofs
### Description
An attacker would stand to gain by submitting a false ZK plus SGZ proof to contest a valid optimistic transition.
Say a prover submits a valid transition which has an optimistic proof. The prover pays the liveness bond plus 1,000 TKO as ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Infinite allowance usage.
### Description
**Description**
IStWSX.sol, INFINITE_ALLOWANCE, transferFrom()
By default, the contract allows user flows with an infinite allowance, which is, in general, bad practice. It creates a greater risk for users in case of protocol compromise or user misbehavior during inte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | reentrancy | true | true | ## Low: Misleading liquidity value returned when adding liquidity
### Description
When a user adds liquidity to a pool using either of the two hooks, the `addLiquidity()` function returns a value representing the amount of liquidity the user will receive in the `IncentivizedERC20` form; however, It can be seen in the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Simultaneously iterate over arrays which can be of different length
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
In contract "JohnInternal", in the "delegatePwIpor" function, "ipTokens" and "pwTokenAmounts" arrays are iterated simultaneously. If their lengths are different, an ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Function always returns the same value
### Description
**Description**
At contracts/Cohort.sol:192
The function requestClaim always returns true.
**Recommendation**:
Remove the return statement because they make no difference. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | upgrade | true | false | ## Low: To prevent duplicate ids in `_batchBurn`, enforce ascending order instead of nested `for` loops
### Description
In `_batchBurn` to prevent duplicate ids, instead of using nested `for` loops it is more efficient to [enforce ascending order of ids](https://x.com/DevDacian/status/1734885772829045205) using only 1... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent Pausable operations in DebtRegistry and DebtToken
### Description
The main functionality of [`DebtRegistry`](https://github.com/dharmaprotocol/charta/blob/b110959477cf37375bf7e9344d40eb85219c8575/contracts/DebtRegistry.sol) is correctly guarded with `whenNotPaused` modifiers to ensure they cannot ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Using `private` rather than `public` for `constants`, saves gas
### Description
If needed, the value can be read from the verified contract source code. Saves 3406-3606 gas in deployment gas due to the compiler not having to create non-payable getter functions for deployment calldata, not having to store the b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Staked tokens will get stuck after claim
### Description
The Andromeda protocol includes a vesting functionality allowing the owner to vest and stake tokens. However, if the owner attempts to claim vested tokens while still staked, the contract only transfers the unstaked amount, resetting the `batch.last_c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Composable delegate call may break storage layout assumptions
### Description
Inside `executeComposableDelegateCall`, which is expected to be called via delegate call, the caller of `Storage.writeStorage` is not `ComposableExecutionModule` but the smart account itself.
This affects how storage is managed in ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Variable is not correctly initialized in an upgradeable contract
### Description
The `isInMulticall_` variable has a initial value of **1** when declared in the **GmxStrategyStorage** contract. This is equivalent to setting this value in the constructor, and as such, will not work for upgradeable contracts,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Admin account has a lot of power in the protocol and multiple ways to deny/steal users' rewards
### Description
**Impact:**
High, as the admin can steal funds from users(players)
**Likelihood:**
Medium, as it requires a malicious or a compromised admin, but the incentives are high
**Description**
There are... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Update to `StratFeeManagerInitializable::beefyFeeConfig` retrospectively applies new fees to pending LP rewards yet to be claimed
### Description
The fee configuration `StratFeeManagerInitializable::beefyFeeConfig` can be updated via `StratFeeManagerInitializable::setBeefyFeeConfig` [L164-167](https://githu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: Truncation of the `nonce` value
### Description
In the [`invalidateOrder`](https://github.com/bebop-dex/bebop-smart-contracts/blob/f42cc5efe7a843bb015aec409aaa08e7643d0ca9/src/contracts/base/BebopSigning.sol#L167) function, a `uint256` value is cast to `uint64`, silently ignoring higher bits of the value. T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: [05] Precision loss in smNFT bonus calculation may result in zero bonus when updating to smNFT
### Description
### Finding description
The `calculate_sm_nft_bonus` function calculates a bonus amount for smNFT (Super Massive NFT) users based on a fixed bonus rate (`SMNFT_BONUS`) and a precision constant (`PREC... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Not using SafeMath and SafeCast
### Description
Throughout the codebase there are math operations that are not checked for overflow or underflow using the [`SafeMath` library](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/v3.2.0/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol). Examples can be found in the following... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Configurable Simple Oracle Updater
### Description
## Oracle Module Overview
The oracle module employs a straightforward oracle that saves the price of a coin in a resource. The price of a coin, frequently updated by a protocol bot, may be utilized as a backup in the event of a failure of the Pyth or Switchbo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Missing SPDX License Identifier
### Description
The `EACAggregatorProxy.sol` does not include an SPDX license identifier on the first line. The SPDX identifier is a recommended standard that specifies the software license governing the code, ensuring clarity and compliance with legal requirements.
```
pragma ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: ASSEMBLY CODES SPECIFIC - SHOULD HAVE COMMENTS
### Description
Since this is a low level language that is more difficult to parse by readers, include extensive documentation, comments on the rationale behind its use, clearly explaining what each assembly instruction does
This will make it easier for users to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Recovery function is not robust
### Description
Within the [`AcceleratingDistributor`](https://github.com/across-protocol/across-token/blob/42130387f81debf2a20d2f7b40d9f0ccc1dcd06a/contracts/AcceleratingDistributor.sol) contract, the [`recoverErc20`](https://github.com/across-protocol/across-token/blob/4213038... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: PartyGovernance: Can vote multiple times by transferring NFT in same block as proposal
### Description
_Submitted by Lambda, also found by Trust_
`PartyGovernanceNFT` uses the voting power at the time of proposal when calling `accept`. The problem with that is that a user can vote, transfer the NFT (and the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Price updates verification does not require a threshold of guardians
### Description
The `PriceUpdates::verify` function is used during the Pyth price feed update action to ensure that:
1. The update guardian set index corresponds to the admin configured index.
2. The update guardian set is not empty.
3. Ea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Collateral tokens with more than 18 decimals are not supported
### Description
Due to the existing decimals scaling logic within [`PriceCalculator::getTokenScaleDiff`](https://github.com/the-standard/smart-vault/blob/c6837d4a296fe8a6e4bb5e0280a66d6eb8a40361/contracts/PriceCalculator.sol#L15-L17), any collatera... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused logic
### Description
There is a lot of unused logic in the Manager contract.
https://github.com/FantiumAG/smart-contracts/blob/a2d126453c1105028f12277b8f342d2cdbf01a77/contracts/utils/FantiumUserManager.sol#L95-L140
https://github.com/FantiumAG/smart-contracts/blob/a2d126453c1105028f12277b8f342d2cdbf01... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [09] `rawCall` does permit calls to `MsgValueSimulator` with the `_isSystem` flag set to false (it will revert)
### Description
In [MsgValueSimulator, `fallback`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-zksync/blob/1fb4649b612fac7b4ee613df6f6b7d921ddd6b0d/code/system-contracts/contracts/MsgValueSimulator.sol#L35... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing checks for state variable assignments
### Description
There are some missing checks in these functions, and this could lead to unexpected scenarios. Consider always adding a sanity check for state variables.
*There are 23 instances of this issue.*
--- | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Prefer
### Description
[L-04] Prefer safeTransfer and safeTransferFrom for ERC20 token transfers
Consider using OpenZeppelin’s SafeERC20 library to handle edge cases in ERC20 token transfers. This prevents accidentally forgetting to check the return value, like the example in MerkleVesting#withdraw.
Potential ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `investedAssets()` Does Not Take Into Consideration The Performance Fee Charged On Strategy Withdrawals
### Description
_Submitted by leastwood, also found by danb_
The `investedAssets()` function is implemented by the vault's strategy contracts as a way to express a vault's investments in terms of the und... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Lend offer can be deleted multiple times
### Description
Lack of check in addFunds() function. This will cause one lend offer can be deleted twice.
### Impact
All lend orders cannot be deleted. This will cause that lend order cannot be cancelled or may not accept this lend offer if we want to use the whole... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Naming suggestions
### Description
* The **members\_** constructor parameter could be confused as the full set of members, and it is in fact al members but the contract creator. Consider calling it **otherMembers\_** or something like so, to avoid this confusion.
* The **grossTotalFees** uint256 variable [in r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Excessive indirection
### Description
[`LinkedList`](https://github.com/celo-org/celo-monorepo/blob/7be22605e172ca536c028e408b147aab83202e4a/packages/protocol/contracts/common/linkedlists/LinkedList.sol), [`SortedLinkedList`](https://github.com/celo-org/celo-monorepo/blob/7be22605e172ca536c028e408b147aab83202e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Violations of Solidity Style Guide Conventions - filename and contract name mismatch.
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**description**
There is an inconsistency between the filenames and the declared contract names within the
file, which can lead to confusion when maintainin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incomplete Docstrings
### Description
Although docstrings are present above the [`_countVoteNominal`](https://github.com/ScopeLift/flexible-voting/blob/ef950394f5e560ec438890d07e60d40ab399c81a/src/GovernorCountingFractional.sol#L124-L127) and [`_countVoteFractional`](https://github.com/ScopeLift/flexible-votin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: MosaicVault and MosaicHolding owner is controlled by a single private key
### Description
The MosaicVault and MosaicHolding contracts manage many critical functionalities, such as those for rescuing funds, managing liquidity, and claiming rewards. The owner of these contracts is a single externally owned acco... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | false | false | ## High: No money back.
### Description
**Description**
TokensFarm.sol / Perpetual TokensFarm, function deposit / makeDepositRequest
If the farm contracts allow commission via eth (isFlatFeeAllowed), and the user sends eth more than the required limit, the rest will not be returned to him.
**Recommendation**
Add t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Validation | false | false | ## Vulnerability Report
## Severity
**High Risk**
## Context
`SwapManagerUniV2.sol#L106`
## Description
The `consult` function wrongly assumes that the Morpho token is always the first token (`token0`) in the Morpho <> Reward token token pair. This could lead to inverted prices and a denial of service attack when cl... | Spearbit | 5 | Morpho |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Compound exchange rate can be manipulated to withdraw more underlying tokens from NotionalV3
### Description
Prime cash underlying values can be manipulated via donating the underlying to cToken contract to inflate the cToken price and then withdrawing from Notional for more.
### Impact
Although the above ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | liquidation | false | false |
No `minLoanSize` can destabilise the protocol.
### Vulnerability Details
According to protocol team, they plan to roll out the protocol with `minLoanSize = 0` and adjust that number if needs be. This can be a big issue because there will be no incentive for liquidators to liquidate small underwater positions given t... | Code4rena | 5 | Revert Lend |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Trader can evade loss when Stop order is not fulfilled in time
### Description
For Stop orders, inexact executions (`exactExecution == false`) could occur in certain scenarios, which will fulfill the orders based on market price instead of open/stop-loss price.
One of these scenarios is a price gap during ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: CC `WP-M5` from the WatchPug second report
### Description
There is [still no approval mechanism](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-07-loopfi/blob/57871f64bdea450c1f04c9a53dc1a78223719164/src/Flashlender.sol#L105) for when sending back the tokens to the flashlender, which could bubble up a revert. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Redundant ERC-20 Self-Approval in `delegatecall`-only Functions
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `3121e54fee93703f235f4c06a41438fb139dbc73`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Removed redundant self-approvals in functions that are only called via `delegat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Borrower in OpenTerm loan can stay delinquent effectively forever
### Description
Delinquency is flagged when vault reserves fall below `_calculateRequiredLiquidity()`, setting `delinquencyStartTime`. Late penalties only accrue after the grace period elapses. If the borrower briefly restores liquidity (e.g.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | false | false | ## High: Reentrancy Lets Relayer Withdraw More than Expected by Bond Withdrawal
### Description
**Update**
Addressed in: `b0faa8d93c7a7d91961db24753a322a3a8117ca0`.
**File(s) affected:**`BondManager.sol`
**Description:** The Relayer can plan a request to withdraw a given amount `A` of tokens from its bond by calling... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Add constructor initializers
### Description
As per [OpenZeppelin’s (OZ) recommendation](https://forum.openzeppelin.com/t/uupsupgradeable-vulnerability-post-mortem/15680/6), “The guidelines are now to make it impossible for *anyone* to run `initialize` on an implementation contract, by adding an empty construc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Virtual supply shares steal interest
### Description
The virtual supply shares, that are not owned by anyone, earn interest in *accrueInterest*. This interest is stolen from the actual suppliers which leads to loss of interest funds for users. Note that while the initial share price of 1e-6 might make it se... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Token Program Error Message in Airdrop Flow
### Description
The airdrop instruction correctly enforces that DRVS tokens must use the `Token‑2022` program, but the error message suggests the opposite. This inconsistency can mislead operators when diagnosing configuration mistakes.
```rust
if check_sp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Remove experimental ABIEncoderV2 pragma
### Description
ABIEncoderV2 is enabled by default in Solidity 0.8, so [two](https://github.com/BeanstalkFarms/Wells/blob/e5441fc78f0fd4b77a898812d0fd22cb43a0af55/src/interfaces/IWellFunction.sol#L4) [instances](https://github.com/BeanstalkFarms/Wells/blob/e5441fc78f0fd4... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: Repack struct by putting data types that fit together into one slot next to each other
### Description
This issue, in comparison to `# [5] Alter some struct's fields datatype to improve packing` is related to changing the order of fields in the struct (while `[5]` suggests changing the datatype of fields) - t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: The protocol doesnt support weird tokens like Tether Gold (that return false on every operation)
### Description
The protocol uses the `TransferHelper.safeTransferFrom(token, _currentTokenRequester, msg.sender, uint256(change));` for its token transfers. But this does not work if the token returns false for... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | integer-overflow | true | false | ## Low: Multiplication could overflow in `RebasingLibrary` for tokens with greater than 18 decimals
### Description
`RebasingLibrary` contains special handling for tokens with greater than 18 decimals:
```solidity
// convertTokensToShares
} else {
uint256 scale = 10**(_tokenDecimals - 18);
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: ExecutionEnvironment deployment can be incorrectly skipped
### Description
ExecutionEnvironment is deployed if and only if the address `executionEnvironment`, at which it's going to be deployed, has no code. This is checked by ensuring `executionEnvironment.codehash` is 0. However, someone can frontrun this t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Redundant Assignment of `idoSize` in finalize Function
### Description
**Severity** : Informational
**Status** : Resolved
**Description** :
In the finalize function of the IDOPoolAbstract contract, the `idoSize` variable is assigned the balance of `idoToken` held by the contract twice in succession without... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Missing `__Ownable_init()` call in `LenderCommitmentGroup_Smart::initialize()`
### Description
`__Ownable_init()` is not called in `LenderCommitmentGroup_Smart::initialize()`, which will make the contract not have any owner.
### Impact
Inability to [pause](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-04-teller-f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | token | true | false | ## High: `TradingAccountBranch::depositMargin` attempts to transfer greater amount than user deposited for tokens with less than 18 decimals
### Description
For collateral tokens with less than 18 decimals, `TradingAccountBranch::depositMargin` attempts to transfer a greater amount of tokens than what the user is actu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Contract name duplication leaves codebase error-prone Difficulty: Low
### Description
The codebase has multiple contracts that share the same name. This allows buidler-waffle to generate incorrect JSON artifacts, preventing third parties from using their tools. Buidler-waffle does not correctly support a codebas... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Dust Is Paid to Last Payee in the _payees Array
### Description
[Line 117](https://github.com/oceanprotocol/vw-cli/blob/0397c74da60ae50db5c6414307849120b899af6e/contracts/Splitter.sol#L117) sets the `payment` variable to the remaining balance for the last address in the `_payees` array. While this keeps the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Potential incorrect checks
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `f182407c7dbd24fd77ecb22d92f3ff1203892f28`.
The client confirmed that all items are working as intended.
**File(s) affected:**`contracts-v3/LibEntity.sol, contracts-v3/LibFeeRouter.sol, contracts-v3/LibMarket... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: No validation of the address parameter value in contract constructor
### Description
The variable is assigned the value of the constructor input parameter. But this parameter is not checked before this. If the value turns out to be zero, then it will be necessary redeploy the contract, since there is no oth... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: RizLeverager Could Fail During loop
### Description
In the `loop` function of `RizLeverager`, the [division by the `RATIO_DIVISOR`](https://github.com/radiant-capital/riz/blob/65ca7bb55550d30388e2b2277fefe5686ab7e4e8/src/leverager/RizLeverager.sol#L224) can return 0 in some cases. Due to the requirement that t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Incentive mechanism that encourages operators to respond quickly to exit requests might diminish under certain condition
### Description
**File:** `Operators.2.sol`
```solidity
153: /// @notice Retrieve all the active and fundable operators
154: /// @dev This method will return a memory array of length equal ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Use of named returns for local variables saves gas
### Description
You can have further advantages in terms of gas cost by simply using named return values as temporary local variables.
For instance, the code block below may be refactored as follows:
https://github.com/reserve-protocol/protocol/blob/9ee60f14... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Tokens with a `Fee-On-Transfer` Mechanism Could Break the Protocol
### Description
The current transferring implementation is incompatible with tokens that have a `fee-on-transfer` mechanism. Such tokens for example is `PAXG`, while `USDT` has a built-in fee-on-transfer mechanism that is currently switched ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing event emissions in `AlgebraCommunityVault`
### Description
Certain setters within the `AlgebraCommunityVault` contract do not emit events upon execution. Specific instances include:
https://github.com/cryptoalgebra/Algebra/blob/6c22b64977e0b0266aec89470480df74977eb606/src/core/contracts/AlgebraCommunit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Two-Step Ownership Transfer
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The contracts does not implement a two-step process for transferring ownership. In its current state, ownership can be transferred in a single step, which can be risky as it could lead to accidental or... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Missing Slippage Protection in Token Swap Execution Acknowledged
### Description
The `swapTokens` function performs a token swap via the `metaSwap` contract of Metamask and forwards the output tokens to a recipient. However, the function does not implement any slippage protection. Slippage protection is a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unused function parameters.
### Description
**Description**
NFTSVG.sol: generateSVG1(), generateSVG2(), generateSVG3(), lines 53, 72, 85: function parameter "params" is not used.
LockNFT: mintLiquidity LockNFT(), line 39: parameters "_tokenAddress", "_tokenAmount", "_tokenType", "_unlockDate" are not used.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | true | false | ## Medium: The buy function's mechanism enables users to acquire flash loans at a cheaper fee rate.
### Description
### Impact
The buy function's mechanism allows users to access flash loans at a lower fee cost, which could affect the pool owner's yield if users opt for it instead of flash loans.
### Proof of Concep... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Unable to Pay Wormhole Fee During `publishMessage()`
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `f1b72c81d9d026b834118e7994cff7172ef92958`. The client provided the following explanation: Instead of querying the fee on-chain, we query it off-chain and pass it over to the contract.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [17] Duplicated `require()`/`revert()` checks should be refactored to a modifier or function
### Description
Saves deployment costs
*There are 7 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-backd/blob/2a5664d35cde5b036074edef3c1369b984d10010/protocol/contracts/StakerVault.sol#L223
https:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: REUSE OF STATIC ENCRYPTION KEY
### Description
The use of a hardcoded static encryption key to encrypt a dynamically generated UUID, which is then used to encrypt the wallet password, has been detected.
### Recommendation
Avoid static keys when possible. Storing sensitive data like keys or passwords in sessi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing event logging
### Description
**Description:**
This contract does not emit any events to notify external actors of changes to its state,which makes it harder to monitor and detect potential exploits or attacks.
**Recommendations:**
Consider logging events and adding event emissions to functions. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Outdated compiler
### Description
The pragma version used is:
The minimum required version must be [0.8.16](https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/releases/tag/v0.8.16); otherwise, contracts will be affected by the following **important bug fixes**:
[0.8.16](https://blog.soliditylang.org/2022/08/08/solidity-0... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.