prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Missing Access Control on Token Release Function
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `ab75f15`.
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `2814cd4533d30b7bcf50721f34eb348edeb3b493`. The client provided the following explanation:
> The vulnerability wa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent Cohort Replacement Process in Security Council Manager
### Description
The contract `SecurityCouncilManager` in the Arbitrum DAO's security council system has an inconsistency in its cohort replacement process. This inconsistency could potentially lead to a situation where a member is present i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Extra validation on `CentralToken::addChildToken` will prevent adding incorrect `ChildToken`
### Description
**Description:** Currently, it is possible to:
- Create a `childToken0` which sets `centralToken0` as its parent
- For a different central call `centralToken1::addChildToken(centralToken0)`
**Recommend... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: No-mix staking wallets are not fully handled in the codebase
### Description
In the Lombard codebase, there are two types of staking wallets:
- The regular staking wallet
- The no-mix staking wallet
The problem is that the no-mix staking wallets are not handled in numerous parts of the codebase. In all of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Token miscalculation in `withdraw_admin_fees()` inflates shares
### Description
In the LT contract, the `withdraw_admin_fees` function is designed to mint Yield Basis tokens to the fee receiver. However, there's a calculation error that results in excessive token minting. The issue lies in the `to_mint` cal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Erroneous docstrings in codebase
### Description
A first instance of this issue can be found at the [inline documentation provided before the](https://github.com/propsproject/props-token-distribution/blob/eaf0c6fddd320a258a9d7531d72d07a830fae58a/contracts/token/PropsTimeBasedTransfers.sol#L7) [`PropsTimeBasedT... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: TOFT `triggerSendFrom` can be used to steal all the balance
### Description
[`triggerSendFrom`](https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/tapiocaz-audit/blob/master/contracts/tOFT/BaseTOFT.sol#L99) -> [`sendFromDestination`](https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/tapiocaz-audit/blob/master/contracts/tOFT/BaseTOFT.sol#L551) mess... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | other | true | true |
[VoteEscrowDelegation.sol#L213](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/e5efa8f9d6dda92a90b8b2c4902320acf0c26816/contracts/vote-escrow/VoteEscrowDelegation.sol#L213)<br>
A user who has delegated the vote of a veGolom token (that he/she owns) to another veGolom token cannot remove the delegation, so the deleg... | Code4rena | 5 | Golom |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | true | false | ## High: UNLIMITED MINTING BY REUSING FAILED HYPERLANE MESSAGES
### Description
It is possible to transfer `dPrime` tokens across chains using the `dPrimeConnectorHyperlane` contract. If minting the tokens on the destination chain fails, then the program stores the failed transaction in a mapping. It is possible to ma... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: ERC5095 redeem/withdraw does not update allowances
### Description
_Submitted by kenzo, also found by 0x29A, cccz, csanuragjain, GimelSec, kirk-baird, Lambda, sashik_eth, shenwilly, and StErMi_
ERC5095's `redeem`/`withdraw` allows an ERC20-approved account to redeem user's tokens, but does not update the all... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Contracts should have full test coverage
### Description
While 100% code coverage does not guarantee that there are no bugs, it often will catch easy-to-find bugs, and will ensure that there are fewer regressions when the code invariably has to be modified. Furthermore, in order to get full coverage, code auth... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: SuperVault's leverageSwap and emptyVaultOperation can become stuck
### Description
_Submitted by hyh, also found by cccz, berndartmueller, delfin454000, joestakey, robee, defsec, and 0xDjango_
leverageSwap and emptyVaultOperation can be run repeatedly for the same tokens. If these tokens happen to be an E... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Default fee schedule may be reset or changed by system admins
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation: Intended behaviour, this is by design.
**File(s) affected:**`contracts-v3/LibFeeRouter.sol`
**Description:** While function `LibFeeRo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use named imports
### Description
Use named imports consistently throughout the codebase. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: If any Splits Wallet sets up incentives on Warehouse, all funds can be stolen
### Description
There are two forms of incentives that can be added for distributions. On the `SplitsWarehouse`, incentives are added to the WithdrawConfig, and on the `SplitsWalletV2`, incentives are baked into the Split struct.
I... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: Unhealthy Position Locks Collateral That Is Not Recognizable by the Controller
### Description
The protocol connects compatible vaults through the Ethereum Vault Connector (EVC) and ensures that sensitive actions triggered by the user on any of the vaults are validated through both account and vault status ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Vaults for assets that can rebase negatively are prone to unexpectedly revert
### Description
Superform is designed to allow any external protocol to integrate their yield-generating vault into the system by wrapping it within a Form contract. As of the current audit, only ERC4626 vaults are supported.
Sup... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Missing docstrings
### Description
The [`GnosisSafeRegistry`](https://github.com/AugurProject/augur/blob/67c0fec95e65fca8d27751f28a6c06e5247978c6/packages/augur-core/source/contracts/GnosisSafeRegistry.sol), [`Affiliates`](https://github.com/AugurProject/augur/blob/67c0fec95e65fca8d27751f28a6c06e5247978c6/pack... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: MISLEADING CODE COMMENTS
### Description
While comments are useful for understanding true purpose and functionality of the code, misleading comments have been detected that do not match with the actual implementation in the code.
Code Location
-------------
In this instance, comments describe a `3%` slippage... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: A paused `RewardVault` shouldn't allow setting reward rate
### Description
The `RewardVault` contract has a `pause` mechanism, which allows the contract to do nothing when `distributeRewards` is called. The problem with this is that the `setDailyRewardRate` is still callable when the contract is paused, which ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Misleading Comments
### Description
Throughout the codebase, multiple instances of misleading comments were identified:
* This [comment](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/uniswap-hooks/blob/f051c147dbf296b2b854de92970905a880cd1d51/src/fee/BaseDynamicFee.sol#L35) along with this [comment](https://github.com/O... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Unnecessary stack variable in `Governance::encodeGeneralPurposeGovernanceMessage`
### Description
[`Governance::encodeGeneralPurposeGovernanceMessage`](https://github.com/wormhole-foundation/example-native-token-transfers/blob/f4e2277b358349dbfb8a654d19a925628d48a8af/evm/src/wormhole/Governance.sol#L126-L144) ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Sablier stream update in `CouncilMember.sol` can cause loss of funds if the streamed balance is not withdrawn.
### Description
The vulnerability in the `CouncilMember` contract pertains to the failure to withdraw streamed tokens during a contract stream update, potentially resulting in fund loss for both th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: `_validateSignature()` does not properly handle `address(0)`
### Description
The current implementation of `_validateSignature()` uses `ECDSA.recover()` to extract the signer address, which can return `address(0)` for invalid signatures:
```solidity
function _validateSignature(
UserOperation calldata use... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Attackers can prevent the pool manager from finishing liquidation
### Description
The `finishCollateralLiquidation` function requires that a liquidation is no longer active. However, an attacker can prevent the liquidation from finishing by sending a minimal amount of collateral token to the liquidator addre... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Faulty RToken issuance-cancellation process
### Description
Due to incorrect data validation in the issuance-cancellation process, users who wish to cancel some of their issuance requests may end up having all of their issuances canceled.
To cancel issuance requests, users call the `cancel` function in the RT... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Troves can be sorted incorrectly due to interest accrual
### Description
The `SortedTroves` contract is expected to keep troves sorted by descending nominal ICR. This is a crucial invariant for the system, as it determines the order in which troves are liquidated and redeemed. However, the interest accrual ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Unbounded iteration in CvxLocker.updateReward
### Description
## Handle
cmichel
## Vulnerability details
## Vulnerability Details
The `CvxLocker.updateReward` iterates over all `rewardTokens`.
## Impact
The transactions can fail if the arrays get too big and the transaction would consume more gas than the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: `DistributionProposal` 'for' voter rewards diluted by 'against' voters and missing rewards permanently stuck in `DistributionProposal` contract
### Description
**Description:** `DistributionProposal` [only pays rewards to users who voted "for" the proposal](https://github.com/dexe-network/DeXe-Protocol/tree/f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Using `calldata` instead of `memory` for read-only arguments in external functions saves gas
### Description
When a function with a `memory` array is called externally, the `abi.decode()` step has to use a for-loop to copy each index of the `calldata` to the `memory` index. Each iteration of this for-loop cost... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Protocol Does Not Support Non-Standard Tokens
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> _We support only standard ERC20 tokens at this point._
**Description:** Some ERC20 tokens can change the balance of accounts outside of transfer me... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: `TickIterator::_advanceToNextUp` sets uninitialized end tick as the current tick which causes `TickIterator::hasNext` to return true when this is not actually the case
### Description
**Description:** `TickIterator::hasNext` returns true if there are more ticks to iterate, inclusive if the end tick, while `Tic... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Tokens such as USDT will be unusable
### Description
Upon committing after a swap and depositing into a vault, we have this piece of code:
We are calling `approve()` on the token using the `IERC20` interface which expects a boolean return value. Tokens such as USDT do not return a boolean which will result i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Missing Signature Expiry Enables Perpetual Transaction Validity.
### Description
The protocol’s signature mechanism lacks an expiration, resulting in signatures that are valid indefinitely.\
This oversight could allow a signed transaction to be executed at any future time, potentially exposing the signer to un... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Unused code could cause problems in future
### Description
The three oracle contracts are not upgradeable, yet contain code meant for upgradeable contracts. This unnecessarily increases the attack surface and could cause problems in the future if any of this unused code causes a low-level bug.
```solidity
con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Magic Numbers in Use
### Description
In programming, `magic numbers` refers to the use of unexplained numerical or string values directly in code, without any clear indication of their purpose or origin. The use of magic numbers can lead to confusion and make your code more difficult to understand, maintain, a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: IRMSynth does not use the previous interest rate as stated in the whitepaper when the oracle returns 0
### Description
The IRMSynth interest rate model is a simple reactive rate model that adjusts the interest rate based on the trade value in relation to the `TARGET_QUOTE`. The model operates as follows:
- Wh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: In `transferVesting`, the `grantorVesting.releaseRate` is calculated incorrectly, which leads to the sender being able to unlock more tokens than were initially locked.
### Description
Users can sell their vestings on the marketplace. For this, the portion of the vesting that a user wants to sell is transferr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `MultiRewardDistributor::calculateNewIndex` parameter `_currentTimestamp` is confusing
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-07-moonwell/blob/main/src/core/MultiRewardDistributor/MultiRewardDistributor.sol#L906
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-07-moonwell/blob/main/src/core/MultiRewardDistribut... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Separation of concerns and consistency in vaults
### Description
The `FujiVaultFTM` contract contains multiple balance-changing functions. Most notably, `withdraw` is passed an `int256` denoted amount parameter. Negative values of this parameter are given to the `_internalWithdraw` function, where they trig... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Affiliate payment are skipped if incorrect or empty proof is accidentally submitted
### Description
When an NFT is minted, the user has the option to submit an `affiliate` and an `affiliate proof`.
The `_mintTo()` function performs the following logic to send the affiliate fee:
As we can see, if `t.affil... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: `alchemechNFT` holder will get too little FLUX because of double application of multipliers
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/FluxToken.sol
Impacts:
- Permanent freezing of unclaimed royalties
## Description
## Brief/Intro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused return values can be removed
### Description
`AmAmm::_updateAmAmmWrite` currently returns the manager of the top bid and its associated payload; however, in all invocations of this function the return values are never used. If they are not required, these unused return values should be removed. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Make the gas limit configurable
### Description
**Description:** The `SecuritizeBridge` contract currently uses a fixed (hardcoded) gas limit of 2,500,000 for all cross-chain message transactions through the Wormhole protocol. This value represents the maximum computational units (gas) allowed for the executio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: OperatorsRegistry.setOperatorName Possible front running attacks
### Description
1. `setOperatorName` reverts for an already used name, which means that a call to `setOperatorName` might be front-ran using the same name. The front-runner can launch the same attack again and again, thus causing a DoS for the or... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [01] Casting between types makes values negative for huge input values
### Description
Invariants to the VotingEscrow contract can be broken. While an enormous quantity is necessary, greater than the total supply of `$CANTO`, it’s worth mentioning due to the fact that invariants in the system can be broken, i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [25] Imports can be grouped together
### Description
Consider importing OZ first, then all interfaces, then all utils.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-tigris/blob/main/contracts/Trading.sol#L4-L12
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-tigris/blob/main/contracts/TradingExtension.sol#L4-L8 | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Docstrings
### Description
Although many functions in the [codebase](https://github.com/VenusProtocol/venus-protocol/blob/94bc2e414e33ebf6c05d35c1605dcbd48fa932f5/contracts/) are well-documented and the code is generally self-explanatory, the codebase could benefit from more complete [NatSpec comments]... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: The WondermanToken contract have a pragma version of ^0.8.0, that means it can be compiled with any compiler bigger then 0.8.0, however the openzeppelin contracts that it inherits also have ^0.8.0 expect the Address contract which have the pragma version of ^0.8.1, because the solidity compiler in the truffle.j... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: `_distributeProfit` will use the stale `globalIC.swingTraderCollateralDeficit()/swingTraderCollateralRatio()`, which will result in incorrect profit distribution
### Description
The `\_distributeProfit()` (called by handleProfit()) will use `globalIC.swingTraderCollateralDeficit()/swingTraderCollateralRatio()... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Various typographical errors should be fixed
### Description
The following is a list of typographical errors in both the code and documentation that should be fixed.
### Recommendation
* `FullRangeHook`:
```diff
contract FullRangeHook is BaseHook, ReentrancyGuard, ITokenizedHook {
...
-- /// @notice Eror... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Considerations on Claiming Rewards for Other Users for the VAI and XVS Vaults
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Mitigated" by the client. Addressed in: `78c97315c0850b9fe429e8475a66642ab04f2f4b`. The client provided the following explanation:
> The ability to claim for other users is intended as it simpli... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: getPriceFromChainlink() doesn't check If Arbitrum sequencer is down in Chainlink feeds
### Description
When utilizing Chainlink in L2 chains like Arbitrum, it's important to ensure that the prices provided are not falsely perceived as fresh, even when the sequencer is down. This vulnerability could potentia... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Lack Of Mint Account Verification
### Description
## Process Approve Account in Confidential Transfers
The `process_approve_account` function ensures that a given token account is configured correctly for confidential transfers by authorizing the account’s authority. However, it lacks a crucial check to va... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Deadline Set To `block.timestamp`
### Description
**Severity** - Medium
**Status** - Acknowledged
**Description**
Inside VaultkaV2GMXHandler’s afterWithdrawalExecution function the ExactInputParams is populated at L553 to perform the necessary swap but the deadline parameter is simply passed in currently... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Missing gas left check in for loops in Voting.sol.
### Description
**Description**
In contract Voting.sol, there are two for loops functions, one at line 207 and one at line 408, it is recommended that inside the loop functions to implement a break condition that will check the gasLeft() and will break the fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Missing minimum and maximum deposit checks for bridge contract interactions
### Description
Updated MIN check and new MAX check required in ```BridgeRouterFacet.sol::depositEth()```, which calls ```depositEth()``` in both of the bridge contracts; ```BridgeReth.sol``` and ```BridgeSteth.sol```. The staking prot... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Oracle service doesn't process dangerous case
### Description
Currently, the oracle service doesn't process the case when a different report was sent by a malicious user from the oracle address to the `OracleQuorum` contract. It is better to catch the situation when OracleQuorum already has non-zero hash for t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Duplicate contract names may lead to errors
### Description
The codebase contains multiple contracts with the same name. This pattern is error-prone and will make Truffle generate incorrect compilation artifacts, which could break third-party integrations.
The duplicates are:
- **IAmp**
- mocks/MockCollater... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: `BaseV2Minter` DAO reward shares are calculated wrong
### Description
In `BaseV2Minter`, when calculating the DAO shares out of the weekly emissions, the current implementation wrongly takes into consideration the extra `bHERMES` growth tokens (to the locked); thus, is allocating a larger value than intended.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: The Bridging Process will revert if the Collection is matched on the destination chain and not matched on the source chain
### Description
## Vulnerability Details
When Bridging Collections `L1L2`, we are checking if that NFT collection has a pair on the destination chain or not. and if it has an address on ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: `mergeTranches()`/`refinancePartial()` lack of `nonReentrant`
### Description
In `mergeTranches()`, the method's code implementation is as follows:
As shown above, this method lacks reentrancy protection, which could allow reentrancy attacks to manipulate the `_loans[]`.
Example: Suppose `_loans[1] = {NFT ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: Denial Of Slashing
### Description
## Vulnerability Report: verifyDoubleSigning
`verifyDoubleSigning` is vulnerable to gas griefing attacks, allowing a malicious operator to evade slashing. This vulnerability stems from the linear complexity \( O(N) \) of `verifyDoubleSigning`, where \( N \) denotes the leng... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Flawed logic in `_processPrivate()` method
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In Contract TokenSale.sol, the method `_processPrivate()` has the following logic:
Here, `sum = s.amount + _amount`, since `_amount > 0 => sum > 0`.
So the condition `sum > taxFreeAllOfUser` w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Length of `_bytecode` is calculated twice in `L2ContractHelper.sol`
### Description
Calculating length of bytes every time costs gas. The better solution would be to calculate the length once and save it in a local variable:
[File: ethereum/contracts/common/libraries/L2ContractHelper.sol](https://github.com/c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Wrong parameter in event AbortBidTaker()
### Description
Wrong parameter in `event AbortBidTaker()` could cause problems with offchain applications/Dapps, and **mislead the end user**.
### Impact
Off chain applications and Dapps relie on informations given by events, this could lead to several problems in app... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Arbitrary recipient could be a risk
### Description
The current implementation poses potential risks due to the following reasons:
1. **Lack of Recipient Validation**: The user does not validate or pre-approve the recipient. This means that the recipient can vary with each call made by the spender, thereby in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: | Shorten Revert Strings
### Description
**Description**
Throughout the contract, revert strings can be shortened to 32 bytes to decrease gas costs:
- WithdrawalHandler.sol::46
- IncreaseOrderUtils.sol::48
- OrderUtils.sol::264
- DecreasePositionUtils.sol::141
- WithdrawalUtils.sol::76,106,204
**Recommendati... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Manager Can Manipulate Swaps to Cause Losses to the Vault
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**:
The manager has the ability to perform token swaps on behalf of the vault using the ambientSwap() and executeSwap() functions. There are insufficient checks to ensure that s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [05] transferOwnership should be two step
### Description
The owner is the authorized user in the solidity contracts. Usually, an owner can be updated with transferOwnership function. However, the process is only completed with single transaction. If the address is updated incorrectly, an owner functionality w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Multiple swap lack slippage protection
### Description
The current protocol requires swapping tokens in multiple places, such as `weth -> ierc20A` or `ierc20A -> weth`.
Primarily, these swaps are executed using the `_swap()` method.
This method does not set `amountOutMinimum`.
And when call same miss set ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Issuance Value Recording
### Description
## Compliance Service Issuance Information Issue
The `compliance_service::create_issuance_information` function explicitly sets the value to zero instead of utilizing the `_value` parameter. This means that all recorded issuances will have a value of zero ra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Callers can frontrun the configureCaller call to gain additional allowance
### Description
The `RateLimit.configureCaller` function overwrites the existing allowance state of a caller. This can be misused by existing callers in case their allowance is about to be changed by the owner. Consider the following sc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing calls to base initializers in `rUSDY`
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-ondo/blob/main/contracts/usdy/rUSDY.sol#L120
The `__rUSDY_init()` function doesn't call the initializers for some of the base contracts:
- `Initializable`
- `ContextUpgradeable`
- `PausableUpgradeable`
- `Acce... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | access-control | true | false | ## Gas: Public constants needlessly pollute function selection
### Description
At the moment the Vault and TCAPV2 contracts expose public getter functions for constant variable values.
```solidity
bytes32 public constant POCKET_SETTER_ROLE = keccak256("POCKET_SETTER_ROLE");
bytes32 public constant FEE_SETTER_ROLE = k... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: | Burn-on-Transfer Tokens
### Description
**Description**
Deposits and withdrawals are not capable of handling certain deflationary tokens. A burn-on-transfer token, complying with the `IERC20` interface of `_lpToken`, would make the `position.amount` seem higher than the true amount for a given relic. As ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: UNUSED CODE
### Description
The `_applyRatioFloored` is never being used in the code. Furthermore, as the function name states, the result will be floored and the decimal precision lost. It is recommended to either remove the code or take extra precaution when using the function, as unexpected results may occu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Possible re-entrancy
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**File**: RailgunSmartWallet.sol
**Function**: transact
**Details**:
In the case there'll be an ERC20 token with the callback functionality within the transfer method or an ERC721 within the transferFrom method, it's possibl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Nick's Method for Deployments Is Error-Prone
### Description
The `TeleporterMessenger` contract will be deployed at the same address on any subnet that wishes to allow cross-chain messaging using the Teleporter protocol. It is intended to use [Nick's method](https://github.com/ava-labs/teleporter/blob/253b8... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Usage Of `slot0` To Get `sqrtPriceLimitX96` Is Extremely Prone To Manipulation
### Description
In the `_calculatePriceFromLiquidity()` function in the `EnigmaZapper.sol` contract and `getLiquidityForAmounts()` and `getAmountsForLiquidity()` in `EnigmaHelper` the UniswapV3.slot0 is used to get the value of `sq... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Optimization
### Description
## Gas Optimizations in FluoDistributor
The following gas optimizations may be performed in `FluoDistributor`, increasing the efficiency of the code:
1. In `emergencyWithdraw`, the code may be optimized by removing the `user_` variable from `msg.sender`.
2. In `_claimRewards`, a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Constants instead of magic numbers
### Description
It is best practice to use constant variables rather than literal values to make the code easier to understand and maintain.
### Proof of Concept
30 instances:
#### VaultTracker.sol
[yield = ((maturityRate \* 1e26) / vlt.exchangeRate) - 1e26](https://githu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Access Control | true | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/rabbitholegg/quest-protocol/blob/8c4c1f71221570b14a0479c216583342bd652d8d/contracts/Erc20Quest.sol#L102-L104
## Vulnerability details
The `withdrawFee` function present in the `Erc20Quest` contract can be used to withdraw protocol fees after a quest has ended, which are sent to t... | Code4rena | 5 | RabbitHole |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: Lack of deadline when swapping
### Description
The inclusion of a transaction expiration check provides a safeguard for users against swapping tokens at a price that is lower than the current market price, but there isn't a check for a deadline, so users can be sandwiched by a MEV bot.
This can happen when th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Attacker can burn `USDToken` from any user
### Description
**Description:** [USDToken::burn](https://github.com/zaros-labs/zaros-core-audit/blob/de09d030c780942b70f1bebcb2d245214144acd2/src/usd/USDToken.sol#L21-L24) has:
* no access control meaning anyone can call it
* arbitrary address parameter, not using `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `chainId` can replace the flag
### Description
The `_mainnet` can be replaced with `chainId()` https://github.com/p2p-org/eth-staking-fee-distributor-contracts/blob/30a7ff78e8285f2eae4ae552efb390aa4453a083/contracts/p2pEth2Depositor/P2pOrgUnlimitedEthDepositor.sol#L44-L46.
### Recommendation
We recommend usin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Uninitialized Implementation Contract
### Description
**Update**
The team fixed the issue as recommended in the commit `e9d04de`.
**File(s) affected:**`all upgradeable contracts`
**Description:** Leaving an implementation contract uninitialized poses a security risk. An uninitialized implementation contract ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Checking Existence Before Returning
### Description
## Raises.sol Function Overview
In **Raises.sol**, the `getTiers` function is used to retrieve the tiers list from a given `projectId` and `raiseId`. This function doesn’t throw an error if the project or raise does not exist.
## Remediation
It is recommen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Enforce initializer methods to be callable just once
### Description
The `setLoansOutstanding` method in `LoanVault` says in its NatSpec that "This is used for the initial deployment on Arbitrum." - the method should be callable only once. The same note is valid for the `initializeArbitrumBridging` method in t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: `initPool(...)` can reset any existing pools' `ceScaled` and `dtScaled` values to default values
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In Contract Core.sol, the method `initPool(...)` allows an account with the role `INIT_POOL` to add a new pool. However, the same meth... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Vulnerability to Excessive Gas Cost Refunds Potentially Draining Contract Funds
### Description
The potential vulnerability in the `_refundGas` function arises from its method of calculating the gas costs for refunding the administrators of the contract. This calculation uses the formula `gasUsed * tx.gasprice... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: in3-server - handleRecreation tries to recreate blockchain if no block is available to recreate it from ✓ Fixed
### Description
A node that wants to convict another node for false proof must update the `BlockhashRegistry` for signatures provided in blocks older than the most recent 256 blocks. Only when the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: For the borrow(), repay() & startAuction() functions in Lender.sol the public visibility modifiers should be changed to external, to help optimize gas usage
### Description
### Relevant GitHub Links
https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-07-beedle/blob/d9718f2ca6521756624c017c90f3d4d4e80da90c/src/Lender.sol#L232
http... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use OpenZeppelin’s StandardToken, Ownable and SafeMath contracts
### Description
Rewriting the same StandardToken contract for every project is prone to bringing [unexpected problems](https://medium.com/zeppelin-blog/hackergold-bug-analysis-68d893cad738). That’s the reason why we created [OpenZeppelin](https:/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Missing `balancedBooks` modifier could result in failed system insolvency detection
### Description
_Submitted by [0xRajeev](https://twitter.com/0xRajeev), also found by [gpersoon](https://twitter.com/gpersoon) and [paulius.eth](https://twitter.com/SolidityDev)_
The `balancedBooks` modifier is used to “che... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `emergencyClosePosition` can be blocked
### Description
The `emergencyClosePosition` function can be blocked as PartyA can change the position's status, which causes the transaction to revert when executed.
### Impact
During urgent situations where emergency mode is activated, the positions need to be prom... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Wrong constants for time delay
### Description
This protocol uses several constants for time dealy and some of them are incorrect.
### Impact
Admin settings would be updated within a short period of delay so that users wouldn't react properly.
### Recommendation
2 constants should be modified as mentioned... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | true | false | ## High: MembershipERC1155 proxy cannot be upgraded
### Description
`MembershipERC1155` proxy cannot be upgraded due to incorrect execution flow.
### Impact
MembershipERC1155 proxy cannot be upgraded. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: The `setPearTreasury()` Function Lacks the `notZeroAddress` Modifier
### Description
The protocol has a `notZeroAddress()` modifier, which has it on all setters functions on which the address changes.
However, this modifier is missing on the `setPearTreasury()` function in `PlatformLogic.sol`.
```solidity
fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: require statements with multiple conditions
### Description
The following instances of `require` statements with multiple conditions were identified:
* The `require` statement on [line 43](https://github.com/thesandboxgame/sandbox-smart-contracts/blob/8430ea5fdb0f4905b9678689ce0cbc2f74a704b6/src/solc_0.5/Lan... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.