prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inability To Withdraw Treasury Amount
### Description
## Treasury Balance Management in Instorage
The `Instorage.move` functions `increase_treasury_balance` and `update_state` collect the treasury amount by adding it to the `treasury_balance` of the coin’s `ReserveData` in Storage. However, no functionality e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Fee Accounting Rounding Favours Users Over Protocol
### Description
Rounding errors in `accrueFee()` may result in accrual of bad debt over time. Inside the `accrueFee()` function, fees are accrued by scaling both `totalUtilizedSD` and `utilizeSD` up by the `simpleFeeFactor`.
```c
/*
* Calculate the fee ac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [04] `distributeTokenToBuy()` can be called while paused/frozen
### Description
Due to the removal of `notPausedOrFrozen` from `Distributor.distribute()` it's now possible to execute `RevenueTrader.distributeTokenToBuy()` while paused or frozen.
This is relevant when `tokensToBuy` is sent directly to the reve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Redundant onlyRole Modifier
### Description
In the `RegistryManager` contract, the internal functions `_removeRemoteTokenToRegistry` and `_addRemoteTokenToRegistry` have the `onlyRole(REGISTRY_ADMIN)` modifier applied. This is redundant because these internal functions are typically called by external or publi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Insu�cient DCA existence check could result in an inconsistent state
### Description
After renouncing ownership of a DCA, a user can recreate the same DCA and lose access to the tasks associated with the previous DCA. This can break assumptions made by Gelato’s components and break other third-party integratio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use a single file for all system-wide constants
### Description
There are many addresses and constants used in the system. It is recommended to put the most used ones in one file (for example constants.sol, use inheritance to access these values):
This will help with readability and easier maintenance for f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Contract does not follow the Solidity style guide's suggested layout ordering
### Description
The [style guide](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.8.16/style-guide.html#order-of-layout) says that, within a contract, the ordering should be 1) Type declarations, 2) State variables, 3) Events, 4) Modifiers, and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: LPs are paying twice for governance fees when opening longs
### Description
The `_calculateOpenLong` function first computes fees on the bond amount that is paid out to the trader. The governance fee measured in bonds is removed from the bond reserves, then converted to a vault shares amount, and again remo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lack of two-step process for contract ownership changes
### Description
The `setOwner()` function is used to change the owner of the `PnLFixedRate` contract. Transferring ownership in one function call is error-prone and could result in irrevocable mistakes.
```solidity
function setOwner(address _owner) exter... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing initialization of PausableUpgradeable Contract
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
Contract PendleStaking.sol, Contract mPendleConverter.sol, Contract PendleMarketDepositHelper.sol and Contract MasterPenPie, these contracts inherits PausableUpgradeabl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Attackers can sandwich their own trades up to the price bands
### Description
Malicious users can sandwich their own SpotHedgeBaseMaker trades up to the price band cap
### Impact
For example, assume the actual exchange rate is $4,000/1WEth, and the attacker is able to skew it such that the exchange rate te... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Possible gas saving
### Description
In following function adding of return value can save some gas
https://github.com/CreamFi/compound-protocol/blob/23a4ae93adc70334553f5a83429a4e967c1eefaa/contracts/Comptroller.sol#L1303
### Recommendation
We recommend to change function as follows:
```solidity=
function _se... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Better Handling of Potentially Reverting Registered Vaults
### Description
**Update**
The client provided the following explanation:
> The method `_removeVaultAndRedeemInner` should normally be called only when transitioning from the Points phase to the Yield phase. This will occur when we and our partners ar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Players can call rebalanceBasket before rewards have been pushed to the game
### Description
It's possible to manipulate game.sol to a state where players can call rebalanceBasket before rewards have been settled. In some cases, it's possible for a malicious user to profit. In other cases, it's possible for... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Precision Loss in Partial Swaps
### Description
The protocol calculates the maker amount using division that can result in precision loss:
```solidity
uint256 amount = filledtakerAmount < order.takerAmount
? (order.makerAmount * filledtakerAmount) / order.takerAmount
: order.makerAmount;
```
https://githu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: REQUIRECOINDEPOSIT SHOULD BE CARRY TO OUT OF IF-CASE
### Description
**delegateCoin** function has been used for delegating coin to active agents. However, **requiredCoinDeposit** is only checked when the **newDeposit** equals to deposit. This implementation accepts that **newDeposit** will be zero and for the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | liquidation | true | true |
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2025-10-index-fun-order-book-contest-judging/issues/534
## Found by
PUSH0
### Summary
When matching an order using swapping (either by matching two users or matching a user versus a market maker), a trade fee is charged. This fee is taken from the collateral amount traded... | Sherlock | 5 | Index Fun Order Book |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Votes will continue to be automatically recast for deactivated gauges if prior voters do not reset
### Description
**Description:** The `test_calculateSpeeds_positiveVotesNoGauge()` function in `BenqiCoreModule.calculateSpeeds.t.sol` contains the assumption that such a scenario in which a non-existent gauge ha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Different Solidity Compiler Used For Proxy and Implementation Contracts
### Description
**Update**
The team clarified that they use a hardhat-deploy plugin that stores pre-compiled proxy contracts (see: [link](https://github.com/wighawag/hardhat-deploy/blob/cfb57948bcf0a852b3d03070ed899540f18cee7b/extendedArti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: INEFFICIENT SLIPPAGE CONTROL
### Description
Both the `ExecuteDeposit` and `ExecuteWithdraw` instructions ensure that the received amount falls within the slippage range defined by the expected amount and slippage percentage, verifying that there hasn't been a significant exchange rate change between the requ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: 4 Missing checks for zero address
### Description
If `openOffer = true`, the buyer's address should be zero:
https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/LeXscrow/blob/94ca277528bb25b8421dc127941c18915144eb29/src/EthLexscrowFactory.sol#L95.
### Recommendation
We recommend adding a check that the `buyer` address is zero if... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [FIXED] Redundant Imports
### Description
There are redundant imports in the mentioned locations.
### Recommendation
We recommend removing redundant imports to keep the codebase clean. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistency Due To Incomplete Price Data
### Description
## Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) Implementation
The current implementation of TWAP uses prices to retrieve the latest price data necessary for calculating the time-weighted average price. It computes the average from these data points. This appro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Hardcoded Router Address May Cause Token Lockup in Non-Standard Networks
### Description
This audit report provides an assessment of the contract containing the hardcoded router address for token swaps. The router address is set to "0xE592427A0AEce92De3Edee1F18E0157C05861564" and refers to a specific instance... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: In the functions withdraw(), addLiquidity(), adminWithdraw() there is no check if the requesting token is supported.
### Description
**Recommendation**:
Add checking if the token is supporting:
require(supportedTokens.contains(tokenAddress_), “Token is not supported”) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent jump-target validation
### Description
LDDW instructions are double the size of other instructions and require special handling logic in many places, such as loop iteration.
The current Solana RBPF implementation makes the assumption that the second half of an LDDW will have a special opcode of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Request delivery denial of service by front-running transactions
### Description
The delivery process has a function that can be front-run to produce a denial-of-service attack during the delivery process.
Users can purchase data by calling `requestDelivery`, with a unique hash identifier:
```python
def requ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Missing zero-address check in constructors and the setter functions
### Description
Missing checks for zero-addresses may lead to infunctional protocol, if the variable addresses are updated incorrectly.
### Proof of Concept
Navigate to the following all contract functions.
[UniV3LpVault.sol#L59](https://gi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Negative DSR causes unexpected reverts
### Description
[On line 66 of `DAIInterestRateModel.sol`](https://github.com/compound-finance/compound-protocol/blob/9ea64ddd166a78b264ba8006f688880085eeed13/contracts/DAIInterestRateModel.sol#L66), `1e27` is subtracted from `dsr`. If for any reason, `dsr` is less tha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Protect `LlamaPolicy.sol` NFT from copying in POW forks
### Description
Ethereum has performed the long-awaited "merge" that will dramatically reduce the environmental impact of the network
There may be forked versions of Ethereum, which could cause confusion and lead to scams as duplicated NFT assets enter ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: `TradingAccount::getAccountMarginRequirementUsdAndUnrealizedPnlUsd` uses incorrect price during order settlement
### Description
**Description:** During order settlement `SettlementBranch::_fillOrder` uses an off-chain price provided by the keeper:
All variables including `ctx.fillPrice` and `ctx.fundingF... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Constant redefined elsewhere
### Description
Consider defining in only one contract so that values cannot become out of sync when only one location is updated. A [cheap way](https://medium.com/coinmonks/gas-cost-of-solidity-library-functions-dbe0cedd4678) to store constants in a single location is to create an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | true | false | ## Low: Anyone could steal pool tokens’ earned interest
### Description
The whitepaper contains the following statement:
**Difficulty:** High
**Description:** Unexpected ERC20 token interest behavior might allow token interest to count toward the amount of tokens required for the `UniswapV3Pool.mint` and flash func... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: DoS of staking due to unguarded receiver lock period
### Description
The `BobStaking::stake()` and `BonusWrapper::stake()` allow users to stake in order to earn rewards and bonuses. These functions allow anyone to stake on behalf of the receiver, and if a stake contains a non-zero lock period, further stake... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | overflow | true | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-03-taurus-judging/issues/61
## Found by
roguereddwarf, spyrosonic10
## Summary
Liquidation fails when price fall by 99%.
## Vulnerability Detail
`_calcLiquidation()` method has logic related to liquidations. This method calculate total liquidation discount, collate... | Sherlock | 5 | Taurus |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Unexpected behaviour after re-adding of the deleted token
### Description
**Description**
The function forceRemoveRewards() calls for a struct that contains a mapping. Since the
mapping inside the structure cannot be deleted by such a move, reward token re-adding may
cause unexpected effect.
**Recommendat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | dos | true | true |
The `MergingPool::claimRewards` function loop through last claimed round ID to the latest round ID ( <https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-02-ai-arena/blob/main/src/MergingPool.sol#L139> ):
```solidity
function claimRewards(
string[] calldata modelURIs,
string[] calldata modelTypes,
uint256[2][] calldata cu... | Code4rena | 5 | AI Arena |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Public access
### Description
Next function can be internal:
https://github.com/1inch/cumulative-merkle-drop/blob/96fb63d0cbfea73603e7500961c71e8ab1fb8c10/contracts/CumulativeMerkleDrop.sol#L58
https://github.com/1inch/cumulative-merkle-drop/blob/96fb63d0cbfea73603e7500961c71e8ab1fb8c10/contracts/CumulativeMer... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Users can bypass fees by depositing in chunks
### Description
When users deposit tokens into the Staking contract, a fee is taken and minted to the `protocolFeeAddress`:
Users can exploit this calculation by making small, fragmented deposits, causing the fee to round down to zero. This issue is particularly ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | false | false | ## Medium: Possible flashloan attacks
### Description
In current contract some functions can be influenced by flashloan attacks.
- https://github.com/orbxball/stablecoins-3pool/blob/adeb776933c6cb3b8306239cc3357d4c6239a88d/contracts/StrategyDAI.sol#L71
- https://github.com/orbxball/stablecoins-3pool/blob/adeb776933c6c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [10] Unchecked withdrawal amount in vault module
### Description
The function is already restricted with `friend` access and the underlying `primary_fungible_store::withdraw` includes balance checks.
### Proof of concept
The `withdraw` function in `vault.move` allows withdrawing funds without checking if the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: POSSIBLE DOS DUE TO COLLATERALMANAGER.COLLATERALSUPPORT SIZE
### Description
The owner of the `CollateralManager.sol` contract can add new collateral tokens which will be supported by the protocol. When adding support for new collaterals, there is no limit for the current amount of collaterals supported, and a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Malicious Relayer Could Cause A Router To Provide More Liquidity Than It Should
### Description
_Submitted by xiaoming90_
Assume this is a fast-transfer path and the sequencer has a good reason (e.g. some sophisticated liquidity load balancing algorithm) to assign 3 routers to provide liquidity for a tran... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Constants in comparisons should appear on the left side
### Description
Doing so will prevent [typo bugs](https://www.moserware.com/2008/01/constants-on-left-are-better-but-this.html) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Potential flash loan attack vulnerability in `getPrice` function of CurveOracle
### Description
During a security review of the `getPrice` function in the CurveOracle, a potential flash loan attack vulnerability was identified.
### Impact
This vulnerability could potentially allow attackers to manipulate the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Insufficient Code Coverage
### Description
The [codebase](https://github.com/NethermindEth/forta-staking-vault/tree/ce87cffbf813e27cc83157933760b51fa44a1885/) exhibits insufficient code coverage for branches and functions (currently under 77%). This level of coverage may leave critical portions of the code unt... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: State changing function doesn 't emit events in executesetliquidationgraceperiod()
### Description
The state-changing function `executeSetLiquidationGracePeriod()` is used to set the `liquidationGracePeriodUntil` to the new timestamp. As the function changes the state, it should emit events for parameter chang... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: `ShortOrders` can be created with `ercAmount == minAskEth/2`, increasing the gas costs for matching large orders and disincentivizing liquidators from liquidating them
### Description
This issue makes use of two properties in the codebase.
1. A `ShortOrder` can be matched such that only `minAskEth/2` remai... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Centralization attack vector is present in `setEnabledState`
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:**
High, as an owner can block unwrapping of wrapped assets
**Likelihood:**
Low, as it requires a malicious or a compromised owner
**Description**
The `setEnabledState` method of `WrappedElon` allows the o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Create2 salt based on tx.origin alone
### Description
When deploying a proxy from the `PRBProxyRegistry` contract, the `tx.origin` is used together with an incremental nonce (tracked per `tx.origin`) to form the salt for the `CREATE2` when deploying the `PRBProxy` contract.
However, this means the proxy a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: USING ERC721A INSTEAD OF ERC721 FOR MINTING ONLY 1 NFT AT A TIME
### Description
The `StakingReward` contract uses the `ERC721A` standard to store the users' staking weight and the corresponding rewards. `ERC721A` is designed to allow multiple mints at the same time with so-called `batch transfers` (the more t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: `ChainlinkUtil::getPrice` doesn't check if L2 Sequencer is down
### Description
**Description:** When using Chainlink with L2 chains like Arbitrum, smart contracts must [check whether the L2 Sequencer is down](https://medium.com/zaros-labs/chainlink-oracle-defi-attacks-93b6cb6541bf#0faf) to avoid stale pric... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | oracle-manipulation | true | false | ## Low: Missing common Chainlink Oracle validations
### Description
The protocol is missing common [Chainlink Oracle validations](https://medium.com/contractlevel/chainlink-oracle-defi-attacks-93b6cb6541bf); it calls `AggregatorV3Interface::latestRoundData` without any validation of the result:
```solidity
function _g... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Floating Pragma
### Description
Pragma directives should be fixed to clearly identify the Solidity version with which the contracts will be compiled. Throughout the codebase, multiple instances of floating pragma directives (`^0.8.19`) being used were identified.
Consider using fixed pragma directives.
***Up... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: VaultRouterBranch::getVaultCreditCapacity does not take zero return into account
### Description
The function `getVaultCreditCapacity` computes `totalAssetsMinusVaultDebtX18` by addding `10^decimalOffset` and then subtracting `vaultDebtInAssetsX18`. The `vaultDebtInAssetsX18` can be negative value. So the outp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | timing | true | false | ## Low: Lack of minimum threshold for `maxQueryTimestampOffset` in `HubEvmSpokeAggregateProposer`
### Description
In the `HubEvmSpokeAggregateProposer` contract, the `setMaxQueryTimestampOffset` function allows the owner to set a new value for `maxQueryTimestampOffset` without enforcing a minimum threshold. The curren... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Bootloader Uses Incorrect Value for System Contract Upgrade Log Key
### Description
The [`SystemLogKey` enum](https://github.com/matter-labs/era-contracts/blob/abcbaf390a30c09eb53ae83d84bebab95a8003f7/l1-contracts/contracts/zksync/interfaces/IExecutor.sol#L8-L19) is employed by the L2 system contracts to di... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Configurability in MultiSigWallet
### Description
The `MultiSigWallet` contract has a few significant limitations in its current implementation:
1. **No way to change** `_numConfirmationsRequired`: The number of confirmations required to execute a transaction is set during contract construction but ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Accuracy loss during swapping GBT for Gumball NFTS.
### Description
**Description**
Gumball.sol: function swap(). During swap, the quantity of NFTs, which can be minted for provided amount of GBT, is calculated. Since one NFT is worth Y GBT (YeY8 in wei amount), in case the user provides an amount, which is ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: UNTRUSTED PLUGIN USAGE CAN CAUSE DOS
### Description
Installing or upgrading a plugin without prior validation can lead to the contract and DAO being nonfunctional. This is possible if a plugin does self-destruct during the installation or upgrade. Furthermore, not only caution should be taken during the in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Code Repetition
### Description
## Code Optimization in Rust Functions
In `switchboard::get_switchboard_price`, the code segment responsible for converting the price to decimal may be substituted with the utilization of the pre-existing `utils::price_to_decimal`, eliminating repetitive code. This same optimiz... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: [13] DEFINITIONS OF `UNSET_FLAG` AND `ALLOW_FLAG` ARE INCORRECT IN DOCUMENTATION
### Description
https://devs.aragon.org/docs/osx/how-it-works/core/permissions/#permissions shows that for `permissionsHashed`, "the `bytes32` keys are the permission hashes and the address values are either zero-address flags, su... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Function Selector Based Permissions May Break During Contract Upgrades
### Description
`PermissionController` uses function selectors to determine if a caller has permission to execute a specific function. This functionality may not be compatible with contract upgrades, as the function selector will change whe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: TRST-M-4 The swap when closing a position does not consider shareProfitAmts
### Description
**Description:**
When closing a position, token swap is performed to ensure that the closer can repay the
debt, for example, when **operation == EXACT_IN**, tokens of **borrowAmt** are required to be
excluded from ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Principal withdrawal may be blocked by insufficient rewards wallet balance in `DIAWhitelistedStaking`
### Description
The `unstake()` and `unstakePrincipal()` functions in `DIAWhitelistedStaking` require mandatory reward payments from the external `rewardsWallet` before allowing principal withdrawal. When `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: if the Virtual Account's owner is a Contract Account (multisig wallet), attackers can gain control of the Virtual Accounts by gaining control of the same owner's address in a different chain
### Description
Attackers can gain control of User's Virtual Accounts and steal all the assets in these accounts held i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: No Need to Use Namespaced Storage in Pools ✓ Fixed
### Description
The pool contract uses namespaced storage (cf. [ERC\-7201](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7201)) instead of the “normal” Solidity storage layout. The former is slightly harder to read, requires some boilerplate code, and most likely increas... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Destruction of the EnsoWallet implementation contract
### Description
An attacker can make a direct call (not via proxy) to [EnsoWallet.initialize()](https://github.com/EnsoFinance/shortcuts-contracts/blob/4902e55608f975f73772310955444110b1cfc4fc/contracts/EnsoWallet.sol#L24) and execute the SELFDESTRUCT opco... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: `IOracle.queryExchangeRate` returns incorrect `blockTimeMs`
### Description
The `IOracle.queryExchangeRate` offers the following lookup functionality, in analogy to other oracles like Chainlinks':
If we focus on the `blockTimeMs` returned value, this is meant to correspond to the time when the price was l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | overflow | false | false | ## Severity: High Risk
## Context
- Space.sol#L132
- Space.sol#L133
- Space.sol#L182
- Space.sol#L213
- Space.sol#L214
- Space.sol#L263
- Space.sol#L264
- Space.sol#L291
- Space.sol#L300
- Space.sol#L356
- Space.sol#L366
- Space.sol#L369
- Space.sol#L373
- Space.sol#L379
- Space.sol#L401
- Space.sol#L418
- Space.sol#L... | Spearbit | 5 | Sense |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Outdated solidity compiler versions are being used
### Description
The repository is using compiler versions that are less than 0.8.0 which is not recommended. Newer versions incorporate enhanced security features, addressing vulnerabilities present in older releases. In the specific case of pragma versions >=... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Code quality comments ✓ Fixed
### Description
#### Resolution
1. Fixed in [GammaStrategies/[email protected]`9a7a3dd`](https://github.com/GammaStrategies/hypervisor/commit/9a7a3dd88e8e8b106bf5d0e4c56e879442a72181) by removing the `from` parameter.
2. Fixed in [GammaStrategies/[email protected]`9a7a3dd`](http... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Price limit is used as the price range in internal swaps, causing swap TXs to revert
### Description
When initializing a swap on Uniswap V4, the user inputs a price limit that represents the sqrt price at which, if reached, the swap will stop executing, from [Uni V4 code](https://github.com/Uniswap/v4-core/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Base Is Incompatible With Chain Fork
### Description
In the event of a chain fork, EIP-721 approvals cease to function correctly.
### Impact
Loss of ability to validate signature approvals in the event of a chain split. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Multiple `address` mappings can be combined into a single `mapping` of an `address` to a `struct`, where appropriate
### Description
1. File: contracts/HolyPaladinToken.sol (lines [88-94](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-paladin/blob/9c26ec8556298fb1dc3cf71f471aadad3a5c74a0/contracts/HolyPaladinToken.sol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Borrower pays interest on their debt while liquidation is running
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** Medium, because the additional interest is limited by the auction cut off time.
**Likelihood:** Medium, only an issue if the user is fully liquidated.
**Description**
The LendingPool doesn't pause ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Vault.initialize lacks some sanity checks for its parameters
### Description
The parameters `swapFacility` and `token` are explicit, lacking zero-address validation. The `token` is implicitly checked; if it is not a valid or at least masquerading ERC20 contract, the function will revert.
However, the `swapFac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Incomplete Generalization [samples]
### Description
The `TokenPaymaster` refers to the [native asset](https://github.com/eth-infinitism/account-abstraction/blob/9879c931ce92f0bee1bca1d1b1352eeb98b9a120/contracts/samples/TokenPaymaster.sol#L56) and a [bridging asset](https://github.com/eth-infinitism/account-ab... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Old delegatee not deleted when delegating to new tokenId
### Description
[VoteEscrowDelegation.sol#L80](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/8f198624b97addbbe9602a451c908ea51bd3357c/contracts/vote-escrow/VoteEscrowDelegation.sol#L80)
In `delegate`, when a user delegates to a new tokenId, the toke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Reorg attack on user's Vault deployment and deposit may lead to theft of funds
### Description
`VaultDeployer` deploys instances of the `Vault` contract using `create`, where the address derivation depends on the sender's address (= `VaultDeployer`) and its nonce.
Although the system is intended to be depl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: 9] Maker and taker assets can be identical
### Description
**Severity:** Low
**Path:** programs/fusion-swap/src/lib.rs#L28-L104, programs/fusion-swap/src/lib.rs#L295-L446
**Description:** `fusion-swap` does not prevent the creation of orders with identical maker and taker assets. There is unclear economic ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Both reserves should be checked in `LibWell::getWellPriceFromTwaReserves`
### Description
**Description:**
Currently, `LibWell::getWellPriceFromTwaReserves` sets the price to zero if the time-weighted average reserves of the zeroth reserve (for Wells, Bean) is zero. Given the implementation of `LibWell::setT... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: New subcontractor can be set for a SCConfirmed task without current subcontractor consent
### Description
_Submitted by hyh, also found by hansfriese_
Malicious builder/contractor can change the subcontractor for any task even if all the terms was agreed upon and work was started/finished, but the task was... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Event is never used.
### Description
**Description**
MiddleFee Distribution.sol: MintersUpdated()
Mint method was removed from the contract but the corresponding event remains present.
**Recommendation**:
Remove unused event.
**Post-audit**:
Radiant team has removed unused event. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: The `refund` mechanism can be used by accounts with allowances
### Description
The `refund` method calls `_burn` which would allow burning a token if you have allowances for it. While this is a highly unlikely scenario to occur as it also requires the `msg.sender` to have `totalMinted` and `availableRefund` va... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: `ValidatorWithdrawalVault.settleFunds` doesn't check amount that user has inside `NodeELRewardVault` to pay for penalty
### Description
`ValidatorWithdrawalVault.settleFunds` doesn't check amount that user has inside `NodeELRewardVault` to pay for penalty. That value can increase operator's earned amount, w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: The fee values can distort the incentives for the borrowers and lenders
### Description
Arcade V3 contains nine fee settings. Six of these fees are to be paid by the lender, two are to be paid by the borrower, and the remaining fee is to be paid by the borrower if they decide to mint a new vault for their coll... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `lpEarnings` generated in emergency mode become stuck on the contract
### Description
### Finding description and impact
As stated in the contest README, emergency mode is an **unrecoverable** state. This means that the protocol does not intend to exit emergency mode once it is activated.
This means that ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: Using front-run or a reorg attack it is possible steal higher value deposits from the sender by shifting NFT ID
### Description
If a user performs at least two deposits and a transfer in the same block it can encourage the receiver to front-run or reorg if one of the deposits has a much higher value.
### Impa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Invalid NatSpec comment style
### Description
NatSpec [must](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/natspec-format.html#documentation-example) begin with `///`, or use the `/* ... */` syntax.
*There are 3 instances of this issue.*
--- | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Approvals not cleared when transferring profile
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
[ApprovalFollowModule.sol#L32](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-aave-lens/blob/aaf6c116345f3647e11a35010f28e3b90e7b4862/contracts/core/modules/follow/ApprovalFollowModule.sol#L32)
The `ApprovalFollowModule.approve`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: after shut, no pulled redistribution yang will be locked
### Description
In `caretaker.release()`, we can release the remaining yang:
As above, we can only release the yang that already exists in the trove: `shrine.get_deposit(*yang, trove_id);`.
When `shire.get_live() == false`, we can no longer perform... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [07]
### Description
If the `Governor` contract would ever contain ETH (e.g, after a `selfdestruct` of some other contract), it could not be retrieved, as the `execute` function can only forward the received ETH, but not use its own. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: **Misleading event**
### Description
**Description**
In `SecondaryPoolBWT.sol` file, there are two misleading events:
**Recommendation**:
Depending on requirements, switch tokens or events. For example, in case of tokens: set black on
line 429 and white on line 470. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Increased risks of unwanted share price manipulation by manipulating the pocket USDC balance
### Description
The `PSM3.sol` contract includes a pocket contract designed to store the USDC balance. By default, this pocket is set to the PSM address (`address(this)`), but it can be modified by invoking the `setPoc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing non-zero amount check for swap functions in SEuroOffering.
### Description
**Description**
SEuroOffering.sol body of swap(...) & swapETH(): input amount and msg.value are not required here to be non-zero leading to unnecessary computation.
**Recommendation**
Add checks to ensure input amount and msg... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent account tag serialization
### Description
## Inconsistent Serialization of Account Tags
Account tags are serialized to buffers with inconsistent sizing. In Aob, the `MarketState` tag is serialized as `u64`, while the `EventQueue` and `Slab` tags are serialized as `u8`. In Dex, the `DexState` and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Styling
### Description
There should be space between operands in mathematical computations
### PROOF OF CONCEPT
Instances include:
#### stableswap/BaseV1-periphery.sol
l134 routes.length+1
l139 amounts[i+1]
l366 routes[i+1].from, routes[i+1].to, routes[i+1].stable
### MITIGATION
Add spaces, e.g
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: [13] Operator can collude with DSS for stealing stakers' deposits
### Description
It is possible that an operator colludes with a DSS. Similar to the normal workflow, the operator would register with the DSS, deploy an vault, and stake such vault to such DSS. After stakers make enough deposits into the operato... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | false | false | ## Low: Flash fee is not taken from receiver
### Description
The Flashmint module allows users to mint a percentage of the total yin supply at once as long as they repay the yin at the end of the transaction. In addition, a user must also pay a fee for this flashmint, given by the `FLASH_FEE` constant. The Flashmint m... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.