prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Missing `disableinitializers()` in constructor can lead to malicious takeover of the implementation contract
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Location**: Airdrop.sol
**Description**
An uninitialized contract can be taken over by an attacker. This applies to both a proxy and it... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | false | false | ## Low: Missing flash loan initiator check
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In the FlashloanLiquidator contract, the liquidate and liquidateFor functions are intended for liquidating the maximum possible amount of collateral. The _liquidateImpl function calls the flashLoanSimp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: When users sign a credit loan for bidding on an item, they are forever committed to the loan even if the NFT value drops massively
### Description
In ParaSpace marketplace, taker may pass maker's signature and fulfil their bid with taker's NFT. The maker can use credit loan to purchase the NFT provided the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: WithdrawApproval Event Emitted Regardless of Account Approval
### Description
The _withdrawApproval() function, called within the removeX functions, always emits the `WithdrawApproval` event, regardless of the status of the delegate to be removed. For example, this event will be emitted by the DelegateApproval... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Improper control over the versions of distributions' metadata may lead to repeated claims of rewards
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
[BribeVault.sol#L317-L324](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-redacted-cartel/blob/92c4d5810df7b9de15eae55dc7641c8b36cd799d/contracts/BribeVault.sol#L317-L324)
I... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | true | ## Low: Rounding in withdrawal fee calculations can be abused to avoid fees
### Description
The `previewWithdraw()` and `withdraw()` functions in the UsualX vault use floor rounding when calculating withdrawal fees. This allows users to minimize or completely avoid fees by splitting withdrawals into many smaller trans... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Allow Token Authority To Modify The Position
### Description
## Token Authorization Review
The function `is_authorized_for_token` treats only `token_account.owner` as an user authorized for the token. However, according to the comment above that function and our understanding, it should also include `token_ac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Reentrancy potential issue for contracts building on top RFQOrderMixin
### Description
#### Resolution
Remediated as per the 1inch team in [1inch/[email protected]`d3957fe`](https://github.com/1inch/limit-order-protocol/commit/d3957fe5dba79128ce8a43c7c37318c7065d2985) by forwarding a limited amount of gas t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Design of BufferBinaryPool allows LPs to game option expiry
### Description
When an option is created, enough collateral is locked in BufferBinaryPool to cover a payout should it close ITM. As long as an LP isn't locked (trivially 10 minutes) and there is sufficient liquidity they can cash out their shares fo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Centralized Control Over Delegator Assignments
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status** : Acknowledged
**Description**:
The `VotingEscrowSidechain` contract allows for the assignment of delegators through the `setDelegatorFor` function, which is only callable by the owner. This centralization grants th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: The name of the function does not correspond to the logic of work
### Description
##### Description:
At the line https://github.com/yearn/yearn-vaults/tree/e390c2a6b2ba6e2ecc8f3a72a1ea4adfabd17544/contracts/Registry.vy#L316 in method `setBanksy()` should probably emit an event `SetBanksy`.
Line 316 has a funct... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Anyone can deploy FiatTokenProxy and MintForwarder contracts
### Description
The `TokenFactory.deployToken` and `MintForwarderFactory.deployMintForwarder` functions are publicly accessible. This means any user can deploy new `FiatTokenProxy` and `MintForwarder` contracts at their discretion.
Since the cbBTC p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Assets, sent to earning, can’t be withdrawn.
### Description
**Description**
PutPhyVaultV1.sol
There is no interface for withdrawing asset from earning in the vault. Once, asset is sent to
Earning with functions sendBaseCollatToVault() or sendQuoteCollatToVault(), the user is not
able to withdraw them, and f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | true | ## High: AxiomV2GnosisHashiAmbHeaderVerifier does not whitelist yaru.adapters()
### Description
The `_checkL1Broadcaster()` function within the `onlyFromL1Broadcaster()` modifier intends to check that the cross-chain call to `updateLatestPmmr()` originated from the L1 broadcaster. It does so by throwing the `NotBroadc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: New market borrow or supply cap may block borrowing or minting
### Description
If market borrow balance or supply already exceeds new cap when setting it may block borrowing or minting for market
https://github.com/CreamFi/compound-protocol/blob/23a4ae93adc70334553f5a83429a4e967c1eefaa/contracts/Comptroller.so... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Duplicated locked splits can be discarded
### Description
_Submitted by zzzitron_
The function of the protocol could be impacted. This [proof of concept](https://gist.github.com/zzzitron/a8c6067923a87af8e001c05442258370#file-2022-07-juiceboxv2-t-sol-L117-L163) demonstrates the discarding of one of the du... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Selfdestruct | true | true | _Submitted by JohnSmith, also found by ayeslick, reassor, rokinot, and scaraven_
To block an address it must pass the `isContract(address)` check:<br>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-fiatdao/blob/main/contracts/features/Blocklist.sol#L25>
contracts/features/Blocklist.sol
25: require(_isContract... | Code4rena | 4 | FIAT DAO |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Users may be forced into long lock times to be able to undelegate back to themselves
### Description
Due to a check requiring users only be able to delegate to others or themselves with longer lock times and verwa's restrictions of all changes increasing lock times by 5 years users may be forced to remain del... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: A malicious amm can rewrite another AMM's market account
### Description
In `setAMMIdToAcc`, there is no check to make sure the AMM address provided by the master admin comes from a group of verified AMM addresses. If a rogue AMM address is accidentally provided to this endpoint, it can return any values when ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Validation | true | false | ## Severity: High Risk
## Context
- BridgeFacet.sol#L337-L369
- BridgeFacet.sol#L659-L750
- AssetLogic.sol#L150-L182
- AssetLogic.sol#L229-L262
- SwapUtils.sol#L798-L826
## Description
As reported by the Connext team, the internal stable swap checks if `msg.sender` has sufficient funds in `onexecute()`. This `msg.sen... | Spearbit | 5 | Connext |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: [04] Parity reserve calculation in `calcReserveAtRatioSwap` could lead to suboptimal pricing in some edge cases
### Description
The `calcReserveAtRatioSwap` function uses a simplified calculation for the parity reserve (`lpTokenSupply / 2`). This assumption may not hold true for stableswap pools, especially wh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | true | ## Low: Under�low in _computeRewardsPerUnitStaked might cause DoS during liquidation
### Description
The rounding feedback mechanism of the `_computeRewardsPerUnitStaked` function might cause an underflow, leading the liquidation process to revert. The reversion could prevent certain liquidatable troves from being liq... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: Risk of Centralisation
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Unresolved
**Description**
The current implementation grants significant control to the owner through multiple functions that can alter the contract's state and behavior. This centralization places considerable trust in a single enti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Considerations Related to Unstaking Fees
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> We will use `setNormalUnstakeFee` function to set fee rate in time.
**File(s) affected:**`PumpStaking.sol`
**Description:** The protocol team is responsible for con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Starting timestamp can be bypassed by calling `settle`
### Description
The starting timestamp set or still unset by the owner through the `start_auction` function can be bypassed by calling `settle`, which sends the first token to the fallback and then starts the auction for subsequent tokenIds.
### Impact... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: User role `hasTokenSafePullRole` can withdraw `wrappedToken`
### Description
The `safePullERC20()` function is designed to allow the withdrawal of tokens from the contract by authorized users:
However, this function also allows the withdrawal of `wrappedTokens` (e.g., `wTAO` or `wCOMAI`), which should remain... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Constant is not declared explicitly
### Description
The [`ATTESTATION_SIZE_BYTES` constant](https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/blob/b61a9b27eb18eab5ec6bb612244d58c33f2321f2/contracts/disputes/DisputeManager.sol#L56) is defined in the `DisputeManager` contract to be `161`. Literal values in the codebase... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Attackers Can Profit by Creating Repeated Long or Short Positions Using Known Oracle Prices
### Description
**Update**
The team clarified that they have tried the solution of ensuring an incremental timestamp, but it causes too many UX issues due to the risk of reverting transactions or using an unintention... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: [G-06]
### Description
[G-06] keccak256() should only need to be called on a specific string literal once
It should be saved to an immutable variable, and the variable used instead. If the hash is being used as a part of a function selector, the cast to bytes4 should also only be done once
There are 6 insta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: DOS attack to `SwapAction.transferAndSwap()` when using an ERC20 permit `transferFrom`
### Description
`SwapAction.transferAndSwap()` will perform a `_transferFrom` to transfer the input tokens to the user proxy and then perform a swap via a router. When it uses an ERC20 permit `transferFrom`, an attacker ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Short-circuit rules can be used to optimize some gas usage
### Description
Some conditions may be reordered to save an SLOAD (2100 gas), as we avoid reading state variables when the first part of the condition fails (with &&), or succeeds (with ||). For instance, consider a scenario where you have a `stateVari... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Safemath unnecessary computation cost being incurred
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
VaultManager.sol - i++ does not need to be safely computed.
Also there is totalRewards -= _amount; despite it is asserted before that totalRewards >= _amount.
In Tranch... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Unexpected deployer privileges
### Description
The deployer address of the `Store` contract is [recorded as a protocol member](https://github.com/neptune-mutual-blue/protocol/blob/73fc82fbe0d1388867b7df669983fe42760daeb1/contracts/core/store/StoreBase.sol#L30), which allows it to update the storage arbitrar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Avoid setting time variables manually
### Description
Use solidity [Time Units](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.8.17/units-and-global-variables.html#time-units) to avoid mistakes in defining time variables. In [VRFNFTRandomDraw.sol#L28-L33](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-forgeries/blob/main/src/VRFN... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: RCTreasury: AccessControl diagram contains Leaderboard, but it has no role
### Description
## Handle
hickuphh3
## Vulnerability details
### Impact
From this diagram, one might expect the existence of a `LEADERBOARD` role, but there is no such role. It should be removed from the diagram.
### Recommended ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Missing Price Staleness Checks For SD/ETH Oracle
### Description
`convertETHToSD()` and `convertSDToETH()` use the StaderOracle to grab the SD/ETH price. However, there are no price staleness checks performed. If the oracle was to halt, such as in the case where not enough trusted nodes submit a price, an outd... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of External Documentation
### Description
The [`solana-fusion-protocol`](https://github.com/1inch/solana-fusion-protocol/tree/8743d383dab69dfa033c9e6c7d7c2d9f0a49e431) repository is missing fundamental project information, including a `README.md` file, project description, and any form of documentation di... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Investor can prevent themselves from being removed by making `removeInvestor` revert
### Description
The `removeInvestor` function in `RegistryService.sol` contains a flaw that allows any investor to permanently prevent their removal from the system. The function requires that `investors[_id].walletCount == 0`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Events related findings
### Description
## Code Review Summary
## Context
- **DahliaRegistry.sol:**
- [L17](https://github.com/example/repo/blob/main/DahliaRegistry.sol#L17)
- [L33](https://github.com/example/repo/blob/main/DahliaRegistry.sol#L33)
- [L56](https://github.com/example/repo/blob/main/D... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: Transaction processing doesn’t reject malleable signatures
### Description
Signatures with high S values were restricted in EIP-2 (i.e. the Homestead upgrade):
All transaction signatures whose s-value is greater than `secp256k1n/2` are now considered invalid. The ECDSA recover precompiled contract remains un... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Code Duplication
### Description
There are several cases of code duplication which make the codebase harder to read. In addition, they also make it more error\-prone, harder to fix, and complicate maintainability and upgradeability. Most notably:
* In the `_liquidateLOCCollateral` function of the `LetterOfCr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: TWAP Oracle inflexible _updatePeriod
### Description
## Handle
elprofesor
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Update periods in TWAP oracles reflect risk of an asset. Updating more frequently accurately prices an asset but increases capabilities of manipulation (which should be harder with more stable a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | overflow | true | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-gogopool/blob/aec9928d8bdce8a5a4efe45f54c39d4fc7313731/contracts/contract/tokens/TokenggAVAX.sol#L215-L223
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-gogopool/blob/aec9928d8bdce8a5a4efe45f54c39d4fc7313731/contracts/contract/tokens/TokenggAVAX.sol#L205-L213
## Vulnera... | Code4rena | 5 | GoGoPool |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent and unsafe pragma statements used
### Description
It is a best practice to use a stable pragma statement so you can lock the compiler version and get the same bytecode in each compilation deterministically. Also it is recommended to use the same Solidity version throughout the codebase, but this i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: [1] Multiple `address` mappings can be combined into a single `mapping` of an `address` to a `struct`, where appropriate
### Description
Saves a storage slot for the mapping. Depending on the circumstances and sizes of types, can avoid a Gsset (**20000 gas**) per mapping combined. Reads and subsequent writes c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: numTokens state variable can be replaced with a getter function
### Description
In the `MemeFactory` contract, the `numTokens` state variable is always set to the length of the `memeTokens` array:
```solidity
// Number of meme tokens
uint256 public numTokens;
// Push token into the global list of tokens
meme... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Don’t compare boolean expressions to boolean literals
### Description
[G-13] Don’t compare boolean expressions to boolean literals
if (<x> == true) => if (<x>), if (<x> == false) => if (!<x>)
There is 1 instance of this issue:
File: contracts/gateway/L1GraphTokenGateway.sol
214:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing sanity check for address validity in `PorticoBase::unpadAddress`
### Description
**Description:** `PorticoBase::unpadAddress` is a re-implementation of [`Utils::fromWormholeFormat`](https://github.com/wormhole-foundation/wormhole-solidity-sdk/blob/main/src/Utils.sol#L10-L15) from the Wormhole Solidity ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: During an L1Transaction preparation in `Bootloader.yul` all the gas that's used in `l1TxPreparation` is not accounted for and some of it is not paid at the end of the execution
### Description
## Vulnerabity Details
The function `Bootloader.yul::l1TxPreparation` returns a value `gasUsedOnPreparation` which is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Ambiguity In Withdrawl Frequency Checks
### Description
## Protocol Validation Explanation
The `protocol::create` function only ensures that `withdrawal_frequency` is above 30 but does not validate that `withdrawal_frequency` is greater than or equal to `contract.period`, unlike the `update` function.
## Sou... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | cross-chain | true | false | ## Gas: `abi.encode()` is less efficient than `abi.encodePacked()`
### Description
In terms of efficiency, `abi.encodePacked()` is generally considered to be more gas-efficient than `abi.encode()` because it skips the step of adding function signatures and other metadata to the encoded data. However, this comes at the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Admin balances don't account for potential token rebases
### Description
Admin fees (stored in an array https://github.com/curvefi/stableswap-ng/blob/8c78731ed43c22e6bcdcb5d39b0a7d02f8cb0386/contracts/main/CurveStableSwapMetaNG.vy#L208) don't account for potential slashings. If admin fees are withdrawn firs... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: A user can lose more value than he specifies in the spread when he enters a `PowerFarm`
### Description
When a user enters or exits a `PowerFarm`, he specifies an allowed spread. The spread specifies the minimum value of the position allowed at the end of the transaction.
E.g. a spread of 105% on a positio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `Voter.updateForRange` could revert if `end` value is invalid
### Description
Inside `updateForRange`, the provided `end` value is used to loop over the `pools` without checking whether it exceeds the valid `pools` range`.
This could result in a revert. Consider checking the `end` value, and if it exceeds th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: There is no functionality to change the `fee rate model` in the `MagicLP`
### Description
When creating `MagicLP` using the `create` function in the `factory`, we insert `maintainerFeeRateModel` as the `fee rate model`.
This model will be used to calculate the `maintainer fee` in the `MagicLP`.
https://github... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: A broken hook can block user funds
### Description
For closing position, a user should call the `burn` function which uses hooks to external contract https://github.com/cryptoalgebra/Algebra/blob/6c22b64977e0b0266aec89470480df74977eb606/src/core/contracts/AlgebraPool.sol#L137. If a hook were broken, then us... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | logic-error | true | false | ## Low: Single step redemption and two step redemption not equivalent logic
### Description
The `RedemptionManager::executeSingleStepRedemption` has multiple issues when used with `CollateralLiquidityProvider`
1. Fee calculated on requested amount, not actual amount:
```solidity
// Apply fee if it exists, tr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Stale Price Exploitation Due to Manipulable validTime
### Description
**Severity** : Low
**Status** : Resolved
**Description** :
The `VaultPriceFeed` contract fetches asset prices from the Pyth Oracle for financial operations within a DeFi platform. A critical vulnerability exists due to the mutable `validT... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: `get_fee_growth_inside` in `tick.rs` should allow for `underflow`/`overflow` but doesn't
### Description
When operations need to calculate the `Superposition` position's fee growth, it uses a similar function implemented by [uniswap v3](https://github.com/Uniswap/v3-periphery/blob/main/contracts/libraries/Pos... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: No slippage protection when interacting with `ValidatorShares`
### Description
**Description:** In the `PolygonVault.sol` contract, the `buyVoucherPOL` and `sellVoucherPOL` functions do not set a slippage limit.
Currently, there is no active slashing in `ValidatorShares`, therefore loss of funds cannot occur... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Malicious EDITION_MANAGER_ROLE can front-run victims to increase royalty
### Description
Malicious EDITION_MANAGER_ROLE can front-run victims to increase royalty, leading to a loss of assets for the victim.
### Impact
Loss of assets for the victim, as shown in the above scenario
### Recommendation
Ensure ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | false | false | ## High: Queued LP tokens cannot be withdrawn due to subtraction underflow
### Description
**Description**
CashVaultV1.sol: withdraw()
In case user has queued LP tokens to be withdrawn later(this happens if ‘expiry’ is not equal
0), he is not able to withdraw his funds due to underflow in function withdraw() (line 75... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Potential Drainage of payoutToken in claimFees Function
### Description
The `claimFees` function in the `BribeCollector` contract does not currently prevent the `payoutToken` from being included in the `_feeTokens` array. This oversight could allow an attacker to drain any remaining `payoutToken` balance by re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | initialization | true | false |
[contracts/smart-contract-wallet/SmartAccount.sol#L166](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-biconomy/blob/53c8c3823175aeb26dee5529eeefa81240a406ba/scw-contracts/contracts/smart-contract-wallet/SmartAccount.sol#L166)<br>
[contracts/smart-contract-wallet/SmartAccount.sol#L192](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-bic... | Code4rena | 5 | Biconomy |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: No message in “require” statements.
### Description
**Description**
StakingB_1.sol Line 546
StakingB.sol Lines 80, 95, 97, 99, 102, 103, 115, 117
To hold the exception error messages must be added.
**Recommendation**:
Add an error message to each exception. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unreachable code path in `RoyaltyEngine::_getRoyaltyAndSpec` | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Cross-Site Scripting
### Description
## Vulnerability Report: XSS in `/tokens/:mint/logo` Endpoint
The `/tokens/:mint/logo` endpoint is vulnerable to XSS as it replicates the HTTP headers from the original token logo request in the API response.
If the `logo_uri` is malicious, the original response could... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: Multi-block MEV may still be possible with ensureNoMEV
### Description
## VeloOracle Solidity Code Review
## Context:
`VeloOracle.sol#L43-L50`
## Description:
The `VeloOracle.ensureNoMEV` function takes a lookback amount of observations to look at and reverts if the tick change between individual observati... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: RocketMinipoolDelegate - Missing event in prepareVacancy ✓ Fixed
### Description
The function `prepareVacancy` updates multiple contract state variables and should therefore emit an event.
### Recommendation
Fixed in by emitting a new event `MinipoolVacancyPrepared`.
>
> Agreed. Added event per recommenda... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent CVI value handling during the deposit in `MegaThetaVault` contract
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The `depositForOwner` function in the `MegaThetaVault` contract takes the `_realTimeCVIValue` as a parameter and assigns it to balanceCVIValue. The fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: Usage of ERC777 token can block liquidation
### Description
Malicious user can use ERC777 token callbacks for blocking liquidation:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/credit/CreditManager.sol#L433
### Recommendation
We recommend not... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Attacker can at anytime dramatically lower `ERC721Power::totalPower` close to 0
### Description
**Description:** Attacker can at anytime dramatically lower `ERC721Power::totalPower` close to 0 using a permission-less attack contract by taking advantage of being able to call `ERC721Power::recalculateNftPower()... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Anyone can take a loan out on behalf of any collateral holder at any terms
### Description
In the `_validateCommitment()` function, the initial checks are intended to ensure that the caller who is requesting the lien is someone who should have access to the collateral that it's being taken out against. The ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Unbounded reward denoms in rewards plans can be exploited to permissionlessly halt chain
### Description
Rewards plans can have arbitrarily long lists of denoms, which are iterated over unboundedly during reward allocation (`AllocateRewards`) and reward plan termination (`TerminateEndedRewardsPlans`) in unmet... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary check
### Description
This check is unnecessary if price is fetched from oracle:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/credit/CreditFilter.sol#L156
### Recommendation
We recommend removing this check. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Lack of Access Control in RequestBandPrice Function
### Description
This function is intended to request price data from the Band Oracle, but it appears to lack sufficient access control measures. This oversight could potentially allow unauthorized entities to manipulate oracle requests, leading to inaccurate... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Lack of on-chain deviation check for LST can lead to loss of assets
### Description
-
### Impact
Loss of assets, as mentioned in the scenario above.
### Recommendation
Some on-chain deviation validation must be implemented for ETH0 to guard against this risk. As mentioned earlier, monitoring the price off... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | true | true | ## Low: Admin could use `CentralToken::transferFrom` after approval to break 1:1 invariant in child token
### Description
Function `transfer` contains `_checkAllowedAdmin(to)` which prevents an admin (accidentally or otherwise) sending a `CentralToken` to a `ChildToken` directly.
```solidity
function transfer(add... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: An Agent can be upgraded even if there is no new implementation ✓ Fixed
### Description
Agents can be upgraded to a new implementation, and only the Agent’s owner can call the upgrade function:
**code/src/Agent/AgentFactory.sol:L51-L72**
```
function upgradeAgent(
address agent
) external returns (addr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Permanent Loss Of Expired Rewards
### Description
## Reward Claim Policy
Currently, if rewards are not claimed within a 14-day period, they become inaccessible and may not be retrieved or re-utilized. The `claim_rewards` function contains a check that ensures rewards may only be claimed if they are within a 1... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: Mismatch between proposer selection algorithm
### Description
The function `isNextProposer` attempts to determine whether the local node is the next proposer for the upcoming block in a CometBFT consensus system. However, there is a fundamental issue with the logic: it incorrectly applies a simple round-robin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | logic | false | false | ## High: `IndexLogic`: An attacker can mint tokens for himself using assets deposited by other users
### Description
_Submitted by cccz, also found by hyh, Kenshin, pedroais, and TrungOre_
In the mint function of the IndexLogic contract, users are required to transfer assets to vToken in advance, and then call the mi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `mandatoryBisectionHeight()` not return expected results
### Description
### Expected Result
The documentation states: `Returns the highest power of 2 in the differing lower bits of start and end.` This means the function should identify the highest power of 2 in the bits where start and end differ.
### Actua... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: `StrategyManager` Inherits Pausable But Lacks Pause/Unpause Functionality
### Description
The `StrategyManager` contract inherits from OpenZeppelin's `Pausable` contract, but does not expose any mechanism to trigger the pause or unpause states. Specifically, there are no external or public functions that call ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Stability pool does not consider RToken balance increase when DEToken is withdrawn
### Description
RToken is interest baring token and its balance increases overtime. DEToken does not accrue interest and its balance is fixed. However protocol exchanges RToken and DEToken 1:1.
This inconsistency will lead to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: Unoptimized subset matches counting implementation will exceed tx gas limit on base chain
### Description
### Finding description and impact
During a drawing settlement, there is a very expensive calculation that counts all subset matches:
The stacktrace is displayed here:
[File: 2025-11-megapot/contracts/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Bug in `claim` allows users who are disqualified to claim their previously earned emissions
### Description
In `ChefIncentivesController.sol`:
The function calls `isEligibleForRewards` without calling `refresh`; hence, things like disqualification resulting from a change in price will not be accounted for... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | token | true | true | ## Medium: Burning ALL PropertyTokens of a frozen holder results in the holder losing the payouts distribution while he was frozen
### Description
Burning PropertyTokens from frozen holders has an edge case when all the tokens owned by a frozen holder get burned. This is how burning PropertyTokens impacts the payouts ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Potential Gas Manipulation via Bytecode Compression
### Description
Malicious operators could exploit this issue to overcharge users by artificially increasing the length of the dictionary without any benefit to the encoding process. As a result, users may end up paying higher gas costs for message publicat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Nullifier Trees can be Cleared
### Description
## Elusiv Framework and Subaccounts
In order to store large amounts of related data in Solana accounts, Elusiv uses the concept of a subaccount. In the Elusiv framework, a subaccount is a data-only account pointed to by a parent tracker account.
## Nullifier Tr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Assembly Block Diverges from Solidity's Memory Model
### Description
[One of the assembly blocks](https://github.com/1inch/solidity-utils/blob/5fdd4c2c02525855e9f64d9a43d779013c6444ea/contracts/libraries/SafeERC20.sol#L423-L430) marked as memory safe contains [operations](https://github.com/1inch/solidity-util... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Liquidation transactions can potentially fail for all markets
### Description
As an example, when calling `BigBang.liquidate()` the tx potentially fails, because the subsequent call to `Market.updateExchangeRate` (BigBang.sol line 316) can face a revert condition on line 344 in Market.sol.
In `Market.updateE... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unused function parameter can cause user confusion
### Description
The `optOutOfCampaign` function takes two parameters: `uint256 campaignId` and `uint256 index`. This gives the user the impression that the campaign they will be opted out of is the one provided in the `campaignId` parameter. However, the funct... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | true | ## Low: Rounding Of slashingFactor Can Result In Complete Loss Of Withdrawable Shares
### Description
Due to rounding, it is possible for the `slashingFactor` to be rounded down to zero, even when both `operatorMaxMagnitude` and `beaconChainSlashingFactor` are non-zero. This can result in incorrect `withdrawableShares... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect protocol fee is taken when changing NFTs
### Description
Incorrect protocol fee is taken when changing NFTs which results in profit loss for the Caviar protocol.
### Proof of Concept
The protocol fee in changeFeeQuote is calculated as a percentage of the feeAmount which is based on the input amo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: `remainingBalanceOwner` should be set by the protocol owner
### Description
**Description:** The `remainingBalanceOwner` parameter, passed during the invocation of the `addNode` function, is intended to represent the P-Chain owner address that will receive any leftover `$AVAX` from a validator's balance when t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Observation Cardinality Insufficient for Uniswap SwETH Oracle
### Description
The [`SwEthSpotOracle` contract](https://github.com/Ion-Protocol/ion-protocol/blob/98e282514ac5827196b49f688938e1e44709505a/src/oracles/spot/SwEthSpotOracle.sol#L11) uses a Uniswap v3 TWAP oracle to get the price of the swETH token.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Ambiguous PubdataPricingMode Configuration
### Description
The [`setValidiumMode` function](https://github.com/matter-labs/era-contracts/blob/d5c5d7a7c3a458f131e5de72c6c134a172e6763d/l1-contracts/contracts/state-transition/chain-deps/facets/Admin.sol#L89) of the `Admin` facet allows the admin role to toggle... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | signature | true | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-optimism-judging/issues/87
## Found by
HE1M
## Summary
A malicious user can make users lose their fund during finalizing their withdrawal. This is possible due to presence of reentrancy guard on the function `relayMessage`.
## Vulnerability Detail
- Bob (a malicio... | Sherlock | 5 | Optimism |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `proRataRedeem()` lacks a check to verify if `msg.sender` is the operator
### Description
The operator has the authority to manage all funds. If msg.sender is the operator, they can perform the redeem operation without requiring any allowance.
Recommendation:
if (msg.sender != from) {
if (!isOperator[from][msg... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.