prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Array length validation is not necessary
### Description
[`RiskOracle::publishBulkRiskParameterUpdates`](https://github.com/ChaosLabsInc/risk-oracle/blob/9449219174e3ee7da9a13a5db7fb566836fb4986/src/RiskOracle.sol#L117-L142) currently validates that the lengths of all input arrays are equal.
```solidity
fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | EIP-1271 | false | false | ## Severity
Medium
## Description
In the FactCheckExchange.sol contract,the settleMatchedOrders() function attempts to
validate orders using signatures by distinguishing EOAs from contracts. It uses the following logic:
-If the address has code (isContract returns true), it calls isValidSignature() via ERC-1271.
-I... | Kann | 5 | FactcheckDotFun |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Event is missing `indexed` fields
### Description
Each `event` should use three `indexed` fields if there are three or more fields
1. File: contracts/HolyPaladinToken.sol (line [151](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-paladin/blob/9c26ec8556298fb1dc3cf71f471aadad3a5c74a0/contracts/HolyPaladinToken.sol#L15... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: `safeTransferFrom` is not safe
### Description
ERC721 `safeTransferFrom` requires the receiver to implement the `onERC721Received` function if the receiver is a contract https://github.com/p2p-org/eth-staking-fee-distributor-contracts/blob/30a7ff78e8285f2eae4ae552efb390aa4453a083/contracts/assetRecovering/Toke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: SRP (Single-responsibility principle) . Smart contract CryptoBearWatchClub contains sale & auction logic that is use only during sale.
### Description
CryptoBearWatchClub.sol
**Recommendation**:
It is good practice to isolate sales & auction logic outside of Tokens Smart contracts as they
can be fixed, redep... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: BridgedGovernor.lzReceive can be executed with different msg.value than intended
### Description
The `lzReceive` logic in `BridgedGovernor.sol` does not check the address of the executor.
```solidity
// BridgedGovernor.sol
function lzReceive(
Origin calldata origin,
bytes32, /* guid */
bytes calldata... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | timing | true | false | ## Low: Optimisation of elapsed epoch calculation
### Description
In the `UptimeTracker::computeValidatorUptime` function, there is an opportunity to optimize how the number of elapsed epochs is calculated.
```solidity
Currently, the code redundantly retrieves both epoch indices and their corresponding start timestam... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | true | ## Medium: `ReserveLogic::_updateIndexes()` assumes the utilization rate was constant the whole time when calculating the new borrows
### Description
`ReserveLogic::_updateIndexes()` is as [follows](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2025-02-yieldoor/blob/main/yieldoor/src/libraries/ReserveLogic.sol#L155-L156):
```soli... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `SecurityCouncilNomineeElectionGovernor` might have to wait for more than 6 months to create election again
### Description
According to the document (), security council election can be created every 6 months. Contract `SecurityCouncilNomineeElectionGovernor` implements this by these codes:
If `electionI... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Privileged Roles and Ownership
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Mitigated" by the client. Addressed in: `406bb842e13d91b443a42981ff19dd64f87c1597`. The client provided the following explanation:
> An upper cap on the fee of each pool is implemented, but the other features will be retained to allow us fle... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Missing ownership checks for vaults
### Description
## Dex V4 Program Processor
## File: `create_market.rs`
### Line: 88-89
### Additional Checks
Additional checks for `base_vault` and `quote_vault` accounts should be included here.
### Patch
Fixed in #51. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: USDT is not supported
### Description
When approving USDT, the allowance value needs to be set to 0 first before it can be used correctly. However, the 4.9.5 version of OpenZeppelin does not internally call `forceApprove`.
### Impact
The contract may not work properly
### Recommendation
It is recommended ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `internal` functions only called once can be inlined to save gas
### Description
Not inlining costs **20 to 40 gas** because of two extra `JUMP` instructions and additional stack operations needed for function calls.
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/rabbitholegg/quest-protocol/blob/8c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Attacker can fill `Gauge` array with whitelisted tokens
### Description
In Gauge/GaugeV2, notifyRewardAmount adds the token to the array of reward tokens, if it was not added yet. There is no other validation, except that the token must be whitelisted in the Voter contract.
If there are more than 16 whitelist... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Variable can be marked as constant.
### Description
**Description**
Line 14. Variable MAX_POOL_COUNT is never changed.
**Recommendation**:
Make the variable MAX_POOL_COUNT constant. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Overlapping Authorization Checks
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `5198188c01af22698f2a2a865138f29cbf553bb1`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Modified as recommended. Removed ERC20 Approve-related functions from GMX V1 and GMX V2. If ERC20 Approve and... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `x += y` costs more gas than `x = x + y` for state variables
### Description
`x += y` costs more than `x = x + y`
same as `x -= y`
*Instances include:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/7bbb55fca61e6bae29e57133c1e45806cbb17aa4/contracts/vote-escrow/VoteEscrowCore.sol#L499
### Mitigation
Repla... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Lack of access control in `CLGauge` creation allows unauthorized `Pools`
### Description
The `CLGaugeFactory.createGauge` function can be called by anyone, which creates a front-running vulnerability. An attacker can monitor the mempool for legitimate `Voter.createCLGauge` transactions and front-run them, cal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Inaccurate or Unclear Documentation
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `d24f6a9ccec581b9da825bae4667474edad841b6`.
`_reward` and `_fixedRewardSource` are no longer being set to `Escrow V2 Contract` and `EBREEDV2` in the documentation.
**Description:** As of now, the exa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [18] `require()` or `revert()` statements that check input arguments should be at the top of the function (Also restructured some "if's")
### Description
### Proof of concept
*There are 45 instances of this issue.*
### Mitigation
Checks that involve constants should come before checks that involve state v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Missing comment about counterintuitive quote amount in swap
### Description
The `MainnetController` includes a function called `swapUSDSToUSDC`, which allows swapping an amount of USDS to USDC. This function takes the USDC amount, which is denominated in 6 decimals, and then normalizes it to 18 decimals (the d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Front-Running | false | false | ## Severity: Medium Risk
## Context
SpokeConnector.sol#L330-L376
## Description
Messages can be delivered out of order on the spoke. Anyone can call the permissionless `prove-AndProcess` to process the messages in any order they want. A malicious user can force the spoke to process messages in a way that is beneficia... | Spearbit | 5 | Connext |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | DOS | true | true | ## Handle
shw
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
It is possible for an attacker to intendedly create a fake `Join` corresponding to a specific token beforehand to make `Wand` unable to deploy the actual `Join`, causing a DoS attack.
## Proof of Concept
The address of `Join` corresponding to an underlying `asset`... | Code4rena | 5 | Yield |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: Attacker can turn on Exodus Mode
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** High. Protocol stops operating.
**Likelihood:** High. Nothing stops from performing this attack.
**Description**
Attacker can reenter Nume when `Witdrawal_Stake` is returned on settlement notarization, and in `fallback()` call `chal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Precision loss in `accRewardPerToken` leads to zero rewards
### Description
The updateRewardPerToken function in the `ResolvStakingCheckpoints` library suffers from a precision loss that can lead to zero rewards being accrued, particularly for tokens with low decimals (e.g., 6 decimals like USDT).
In the cal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: USE I++ INSTEAD OF ++I IN LOOPS FOR GAS OPTIMIZATION
### Description
In the `setERC20Permits` function, within the loop, the variable `i` is incremented using `i++`. It is known that, in loops, using `++i` costs less gas per iteration than `i++`. This also affects variables incremented inside the loop code blo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inaccuracy in `Voter` contract reward distribution mechanism
### Description
The reward distribution mechanism in the `voter` contract may become inaccurate and out of sync due to its reliance on dynamic weights derived from the `IVotingEscrow(_ve).balanceOfNFT(_tokenId)`. This can lead to discrepancies in rew... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: (Re-Audit) Delta-Neutral Strategy Is Not Delta-Neutral
### Description
**Update**
The documentation has been updated to say "Delta-hedged" instead of "Delta-neutral".
**Description:** A delta-neutral strategy would imply that the position is immune to fluctuations in the price of assets. The delta-neutral pos... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Refactor the function `sellExternalCurvesToken` to avoid making unnecessary state loads (SLOADS) (Saves 304 Gas on average)
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-01-curves/blob/516aedb7b9a8d341d0d2666c23780d2bd8a9a600/contracts/Curves.sol#L504-L509
| | Min | Max | Avg |
| ------ | --- | -----... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Numeric values having to do with time should use time units for readability
### Description
Suffixes like seconds, minutes, hours, days and weeks after literal numbers can be used to specify units of time where seconds are the base unit and units are considered naively in the following way:
`1 == 1 seconds`
`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: KintoWalletFactory.deployContract() wrong payable deploy
### Description
`KintoWalletFactory` has the `deployContract()` function:
```
function deployContract(
uint amount,
bytes memory bytecode,
bytes32 salt
) external override returns (address) {
require(kintoID.isKYC(msg.sender), 'KYC require... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: First Instance of Auction May Be DoS'd If `StartTimestamp` is Extremely Close to `Block.timestamp`
### Description
In `Auction.sol`, users can call `deposit()` and deposit dragonX and get Vyper back.
When `deposit()` is first called, `_updateAuction()` will be called which sets `dailyStats[daySinceStart].vype... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Changing `nftMultiplier` address by executing a proposal that calls `GovPool::setNftMultiplierAddress()` can deny existing users from claiming pending nft multiplier rewards
### Description
**Description:** [`GovPool::setNftMultiplierAddress()`](https://github.com/dexe-network/DeXe-Protocol/tree/f2fe12eeac0... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Bonus Tokens Can Be Claimed Even After The Specified Period Ends
### Description
The `claimToken()` function can be executed after the `bonusToken` valid period has passed and the user will still be able to claim successfully.
### Recommendation
Consider implementing the following check that will ensure th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: FeeManager's admin cannot grant or revoke any role
### Description
The `FeeManager` contract lacks an interface for the admin to grant or revoke roles.
### Impact
The admin cannot grant or revoke any roles. This limitation cannot be changed since the contract is not upgradable. A new role can only be grant... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Event Emission in `buyPortalEnergy()` Function
### Description
The `buyPortalEnergy()` function in the codebase has a discrepancy in event emission. The event emission within the function is not consistent with the original declaration of the event. Specifically, the event emission utilizes `msg.send... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Locked User Funds Due to Incorrect Rebalancing Threshold Implementation
### Description
The liquidity calculation logic within GeniusVaultCore's rebalancing mechanism can lead to user withdrawals being permanently blocked when maximum rebalancing occurs.
The issue stems from how `minLiquidity()` is cal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Minters can mint double the max allowance in an interval
### Description
Callers can mint more tokens than `maxAllowance` in an interval. Let's say the interval is 1 hour and `maxAllowance` is 60 cbBTC. At `t = 0`, the caller's allowance is 60 cbBTC. Consider this scenario (more scenarios can be crafted):
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Add explicit check to prevent underflow revert in `PredictionMarketV3_4::calcSellAmount`
### Description
**Description:** In [`PredictionMarketV3_4::calcSellAmount`](https://github.com/Polkamarkets/polkamarkets-js/blob/24f1394be94d27433d2e3a7370442126e1c1e5ba/contracts/PredictionMarketV3_4.sol#L434) following ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: SafeMath usage can be omitted.
### Description
**Description**
Contracts set utilizes Solidity 0.8.x, which has built in support of overflow and underflow
warnings, thus SafeMath library can be omitted for gas savings and code simplification.
**Recommendation**:
Remove SafeMath library. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Optional Reward Vault Inconsistency
### Description
## OtterSec Findings on Vault Reward Token B Info
OtterSec found that in the farm program, `vault_reward_token_b_info` is required inconsistently inside different instructions:
- `process_initialize` requires `reward_vault_b_info` and always sets `stake_pol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: receive() msg.value is hard to return
### Description
`NumeP2P` has the default `receive()` function, which does not have any code.
Received Native token there will not be accounted in the storage, and there are no functions to handle this received value.
This value will be hard to remove - either introducing... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Missing toUserOpPolicyId() conversion
### Description
In the `_enforcePolicies()` function, the following code is used to check the userOp policies for the permission being used:
```javascript
vd = $userOpPolicies.check({
userOp: userOp,
permissionId: permissionId,
callOnIPolicy: abi.encodeCall(IUserOpP... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use calldata instead of memory for function arguments that do not get mutated
### Description
Mark data types as `calldata` instead of `memory` where possible. This makes it so that the data is not automatically loaded into memory. If the data passed into the function does not need to be changed (like updating... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Insufficient support for fee-on-transfer ERC20 tokens
### Description
The Well does not rely on the `balanceOf()` function from ERC20 to retrieve current reserve balances.
This is a good design choice.
Reserves values stored in the protocol should be equal to or less than the actual balance.
The current im... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: TRANSFER_PROXY is not queried in a consistent fashion.
### Description
Different usages of `TRANSFER_PROXY` and how it is queried:
- **AstariaRouter**: Used in `pullToken(...)` to move tokens from the `msg.sender` to another address.
- **CollateralToken**: Used in `validateOrder(...)` where Seaport has callbac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Price Manipulation of `sell_threshold`
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In the contract GenericERC20Token.sol, the `sell_threshold` can be gamified. Because `sell_threshold` is public data, bots can be set up to extract value from the pool when the threshold i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Possible Revert In _depositToCoreLendingPool
### Description
Within the [`_depositToCoreLendingPool` function](https://github.com/radiant-capital/riz/blob/65ca7bb55550d30388e2b2277fefe5686ab7e4e8/src/RevenueManagement.sol#L302), the [call to `lendingPool.deposit`](https://github.com/radiant-capital/riz/blob... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect or Inconsistent Error Types
### Description
Throughout the codebase, some instances were found where the custom error used to reflect the reason behind a revert was incorrect or inconsistent with the rest of the codebase. Some examples include:
* The [`addReward`](https://github.com/radiant-capital... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Refunds can be inaccurate
### Description
## ERC20Paymaster and ERC20SponsorPaymaster Context
**Context:**
`ERC20Paymaster.sol#L158`, `ERC20SponsorPaymaster.sol#L208`
**Description:**
In zkSync, transaction refunds are based on two components:
1. The amount of gas that is still unused after the transacti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Rewards are not guaranteed to be deposited
### Description
The `MasterChef` contract allows users to stake rewards, and based on their stake, the time they have been staking and the `XCN` rewards per second they are supposed to receive some amount of rewards. However there is no mechanism that guarantees that ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Liquidations will revert if a position has been blacklisted for USDC
### Description
Liquidations will revert if a position has been blacklisted for USDC
### Impact
Liquidations will revert if a position has been blacklisted for USDC. Likelihood - low, impact - high
### Recommendation
Fix is not trivial b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Use nonReentract modifier for claimRewards method
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In NarwhalReferrals contract, add nonReentract modifier to the claimRewards method, just as added for signUp() and changeReferralLink() methods, as it transfer tokens and makes external c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Hardcoded cluster size in `withdrawValidator` can cause losses to operators or protocol for strategies with larger cluster sizes
### Description
**Description:** `CasimirManager::withdrawValidator` calculates the owed balance on withdrawal, ie. shortfall from the initial 32 ether. It then tries to recover the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Inaccuracy in rounding
### Description
- https://github.com/ConicFinance/protocol/blob/7a66d26ef84f93059a811a189655e17c11d95f5c/contracts/adapters/CurveAdapter.sol#L103
```
underlyingAmount =
usdAmount.convertScale(18, decimals).divDown(underlyingPrice);
```
In the `computePoolValueInUnderlying` method, i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Attacker can freeze chain and steal challenge deposits using fake `prevStateRoot`
### Description
Because the `prevStateRoot` is not validated until a batch is finalized, a committed batch with a malicious `prevStateRoot` can be used to both (a) win challenges against honest challengers and (b) halt the chain... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Non-exploitable re-entrancies
### Description
Code should follow the best-practice of [check-effects-interaction](https://blockchain-academy.hs-mittweida.de/courses/solidity-coding-beginners-to-intermediate/lessons/solidity-11-coding-patterns/topic/checks-effects-interactions/)
See [original submission](https... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: SEEDSALE ADDRESS RECEIVES GREATER AMOUNT THAN INTENDED
### Description
Several amounts are minted to the accounts, added as arguments in the constructor. Different amounts are minted twice in the \_`seedsale` account, making this account 15 million instead of 8.75 million.
Code Location
-------------
### Rec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: The user overpays the USDA amount for downside protection while withdrawing
### Description
The protocol provides >= 20% downside protection on the collateral depending on the volatility of collateral. However, users should pay USDA amount for downside protection, while withdrawing and protocol doesn't cover ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: Auction created by ERC777 Tokens with tax can be stolen by re-entrancy attack
### Description
The createAuction function lacks the check of re-entrancy. An attacker can use an ERC777 token with tax as the base token to create auctions. By registering ERC777TokensSender interface implementer in the ERC1820Re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | logic | false | false | ## Medium: Non-explicit multiplier computation checks
### Description
This warning is about potentially faulty implicit checks in `getMultiplier`
function in here: https://github.com/tosdis/TosDisFinance/tree/be50dbf8a52a8f919694498bf30394d328d88fbb/StakeMaster/contracts/StakingPool.sol#L66.
This function seems to su... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Incorrect calculation of loanBorrowbalance
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://testnet.snowtrace.io/address/0xf8E94c5Da5f5F23b39399F6679b2eAb29FE3071e
Impacts:
* Direct theft of any user funds, whether at-rest or in-motion, other than unclaimed yield
## Description
## Vulnerabili... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Faulty Accounting when Claiming Rewards for Mutiple Epochs
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `fc1aef13ebdb852f69425438ae183c8077b77a5c`.
**File(s) affected:**`RewardsMath.sol`
**Description:** Liquidity Providers accumulate rewards across epochs. Rewards are recalcu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `RubiconMarket.sol#isClosed()` always returns false, making the market can not be stopped as designed
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug, also found by Ruhum, Chom, Dravee, Hawkeye, MaratCerby, minhquanym, csanuragjain, and fatherOfBlocks_
> After close, no new buys are allowed.
Based on context and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Keepers can be forced to waste gas with long revert messages
### Description
Most actions done on behalf of users have a callback triggered on an address provided by the position's account holder. In order to ensure that these callbacks don't affect order execution, they're wrapped in a try-catch block, and t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: User not refunded for failed Zeta gas payment in cross chain transaction
### Description
### Vulnerability details
When observed CCTX (cross chain transaction) gathers enough votes in VoteOnObservedInboundTx, it is being processed immediately. In case that the transaction is reverted for whatever reason, i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Pausing assets only affects future price updates, not previous malicious updates
### Description
NFTFloorOracle retrieves ERC721 prices for ParaSpace. It is pausable by admin on a per asset level using setPause(asset, flag).
setPrice will not be callable when asset is paused:
function setPrice(address _a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [08] `_callConduitUsingOffsets` depends on compiler behaviour for inter-assembly-block cleanup
### Description
The function `_callConduitUsingOffsets` depends on the compiler not to use the scratch space between assembly blocks. it also performs some Solidity function calls between the two blocks.
A compiler ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: addresses rely on single-step process
### Description
The addresses for the seller and arbiter are set once upon contract creation. If a mistake is made in the address of either the seller or the arbiters, all funds could be lost.
### Impact
**Low**. The severity of this is high because the entire contract b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Spelling mistakes
### Description
passedƒ -> passed
https://github.com/DivergenceProtocol/diver-contracts/blob/e5286f94a7ccb9d6279fae51ea66a8833672628a/src/core/Battle.sol#L163
### Recommendation
We recommended fixing spelling mistakes. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: The result of function calls should be cached rather than re-calling the function
### Description
The instances below point to the second+ call of the function within a single function. _Every_ external call made to a contract incurs at least **100 gas** of overhead.
*There are 2 instances of this issue.* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Remove max open interest check when liquidating in `LiquidationBranch::liquidateAccounts`
### Description
In `LiquidationBranch::liquidateAccounts` there is no point calling `PerpMarket::checkOpenInterestLimits` since:
* the liquidation will always be decreasing the open interest so the liquidation can't cause... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Unrestricted vestFor
### Description
_Submitted by pauliax, also found by hack3r-0m_
#### Impact
Anyone can call function `vestFor` and block any user with a tiny amount of Vader. This function has no auth checks so a malicious actor can front-run legit `vestFor` calls with insignificant amounts. This funct... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing `checkWalletsForList` in `issueTokensWithNoCompliance`
### Description
**Description:** The `issueTokensWithNoCompliance` function in `DSToken.sol` fails to call `checkWalletsForList(address(0), _to)` after token issuance, unlike all other issuance functions. This prevents wallets from being added to t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | critical | token | true | true | ## Critical: Implicit assumption of sequentially filling of vaults in `CommunityVCS::getDepositChange` causes direct losses to stakers
### Description
The `getDepositChange` function in the CommunityVCS contract can lead to significant underreporting of the total balance in the protocol. The function is designed with ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Tiers can be maintained active to give unfair advantage to user through DoS
### Description
Tiers can be maintained active by claiming a single prize of the last tier at a loss. The protocol will close tiers of the next draw based on the [largest tier claimed](https://github.com/GenerationSoftware/pt-v5-pri... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing getter
### Description
**Update:** *Fixed in [pull request #55](https://github.com/endaoment/endaoment-contracts/pull/55).*
The [`_newPotentialOwner` private state variable](https://github.com/endaoment/endaoment-contracts/blob/f60aa253d3d869ad6460877f23e6092acb313add/contracts/EndaomentAdmin.sol#L21... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing zero address check
### Description
**Description**
LGEWhitelisted.sol, line 97, modifyLGEWhitelist function
Missing checking addresses from “addresses” array parameter.
**Recommendation**:
Add “require” statement in for-loop and check every address in the array. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | rounding | true | true | **Description:** An attacker can bypass the token sale `maxAllocationPerUser` restriction to buy out the entire tier by doing multiple small buys under this limit.
**Impact:** Permanent grief for other users who are unable to buy any of the exploited tier's tokens. Depending on the total supply a buyer could take cont... | Cyfrin | 4 | Dexe |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: TRST-H-1 Linear vesting users may not receive vested amount
### Description
**Description:**
TokenTransmuter supports two types of transmutations, linear and instant. In linear,
allocated amount is released across time until fully vested, while in instant the entire
amount is released immediately. **transmu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Subaccount can be console account
### Description
Suppose someone sets up a pseudo subaccount safe by directly calling `createProxyWithNonce()`, with the same parameters that would be used to create a subAccount. Then he uses this pseudo subaccount safe to call `registerWallet()`. This will be possible beca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Panic Due To Overflow
### Description
## BulletproofGens Capacity Overview
In the `BulletproofGens` structure, the `gens_capacity` field represents the maximum number of usable generators. However, if `gens_capacity` becomes too large, i.e., it holds `usize::MAX`, it may result in an overflow issue due to the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Imprecise validation of deposit amounts
### Description
All the minting operations `buyGovernanceTokenERC20DAO()`, `buyGovernanceTokenERC721DAO()`, and `crossChainMint()` have a check to validate that the deposited tokens are below a certain limit representing the total amount raised:
```solidity
// For ERC2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: A malicious DAO can prevent/deter token holders from executing/joining a fork by including arbitrary addresses in erc20TokensToIncludeInFork
### Description
As motivated in the fork spec, forking is a minority protection mechanism that should always allow a group of minority token holders to exit together i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inefficient Access of Array Lengths
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Location**: WalletAccount.sol
**Explanation**:
In the given Solidity code, the lengths of the arrays dest, value, and func are accessed multiple times within the executeBatch function. Specifically, de... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Vesting period may not be accurate due to non-constant block time on Berachain
### Description
The vesting duration is defined as `vestingDuration` blocks. Note that on Berachain, block time is not a constant as it depends on the network congestion. For more information, refer to the following documentation... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Use of `safeApprove()` Can Allow Dos Attacks
### Description
**Update**
**Quantstamp:** The Sperax team changed all instances of the `safeApprove()` function to `forceApprove()`.
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `cba249ca90d40cf3468a8c919a76d350cffd99e9`. The client provided the foll... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Update to state var should only happen once in a function
### Description
The assignment of `totalWeight` can be optimized by summing the old and new weights
*There is 1 instance of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Users can select higher-value NFTs by delaying prize claims
### Description
**Description:** When a user wins, the contract only tracks that they have won a specific `prizeID` in [`Spin::_fulfillRandomness`](https://github.com/Consensys/linea-hub/blob/295344925ec4321265f7cbac174fcf903b529a4e/contracts/src/Spin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: It is possible to "uninitialize" `ERC20Facet` contract
### Description
_Submitted by Czar102_
#### Impact
The initialization status is defined by the [name and symbol](https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-amun/blob/main/contracts/basket/contracts/facets/ERC20/ERC20Facet.sol#L25-L28). It is possible it se... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Sandwiching removeLiquidity can steal profits from LP
### Description
During the removal of liquidity, an LP specifies a slippage parameter called `_minOutput`. This slippage parameter is used for the `baseProceeds`, proceeds that are released immediately. Unfortunately, no slippage parameter is defined for... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: NFT of NFT collection or NFT drop collection can be locked when calling _mint or mintCountTo function to mint it to a contract that does not support ERC721 protocol
### Description
_Submitted by rbserver, also found by 0xc0ffEE, 0xsolstars, berndartmueller, Bnke0x0, brgltd, cccz, CodingNameKiki, Deivitto, D... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | false | false | ## Gas: Splitting
### Description
[G-12] Splitting require() statements that use && saves gas
See this issue which describes the fact that there is a larger deployment gas cost, but with enough runtime calls, the change ends up being cheaper by 3 gas
There are 3 instances of this issue:
File: contracts/gatewa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Interest rate will not be updated when setting a new interest fee
### Description
The interest rate is computed based on the utilization of the vault. Consequently, a new interest rate should be targeted whenever asset balances or debt amounts change. This behavior is described in the EVK whitepaper, as well a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Floating Pragma
### Description
Pragma directives should be fixed to clearly identify the Solidity version with which the contracts will be compiled.
Throughout the codebase, multiple instances of floating pragma directives were identified:
* `ILineaToken.sol` has the [`solidity ^0.8.30`](https://github.com/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: DoS: Blacklisted user may prevent withdrawExcessRewards()
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-factorydao/blob/db415804c06143d8af6880bc4cda7222e5463c0e/contracts/PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory.sol#L242-L256
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-factorydao/blob/db415804c06143... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary `_initialWeights` sum check
### Description
**Description:** When first initializing a `QuantAMMWeightedPool` the pool creator provides the initial weights. These initial weights should sum up to 1 (`1e18`). The issue is however that this is verified both in [`QuantAMMWeightedPool::_setRule`](https... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: optimizations - using external over public
### Description
The following methods could be external instead of public ([see issue #60](https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-05-yield-findings/issues/60))
**[albertocuestacanada (Yield) confirmed](https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-05-yield-findings/issues/60)** | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: The logic in `elapsedTime` is flawed
### Description
**Impact:**
High, as the method is used to calculate the price of the auction but will give out wrong results
**Likelihood:**
High, as the problems are present almost all of the time during an auction
**Description**
There are multiple flaws with the `el... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Re-using MINTER_ROLE for transferToCustody Authorization Violates the Principle of Least Priv- ilege
### Description
The `transferToCustody` function moves arbitrary assets from the EthenaMinting contract into a target custodian address. Authorization to call this function is based on whether the caller posses... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.