prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unfair Token Distribution Due to Discount Mechanism
### Description
When some users contribute with discounts, they get a higher `effectiveValue` for their contribution, which increases the `totalEffectiveRaised`. This dilutes the token allocation for users who contributed without discounts, as the token distr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Lack Of Chain ID Validation
### Description
## DelegationKey
`DelegationKey` and `CuTrackerKey` utilize a space character (`" "`) as a delimiter to split the composite key into its constituent parts. However, the `spec.Index` (which is the chainID used for delegation key) is used in these functions without... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `calcMint` always return poolId=0 and idx=0
### Description
_Submitted by gzeon_
#### Impact
`calcMint` in Zap.sol always return poolId=0 and idx=0, while the docstring specified it should return the most optimal route instead. This will lead to suboptimal zap.
#### Proof of Concept
-[`Zap.sol` L156](http... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Inverted slippage protection approach can lead to problems
### Description
**Likelihood:**
Low, because it needs more than one special condition simultaneously
**Impact:**
Medium, because it can lead to limited amount of funds lost from the protocol
**Description**
Both the `leaveETH` and `leave` methods... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Fees never deducted in `AccountableOpenTerm` loan
### Description
In `AccountableOpenTerm`, `interestData()` returns non-zero `performanceFee` and `establishmentFee`, but no path ever charges these fees. `_accrueInterest()` only updates `_scaleFactor` for base interest and none of `supply` or `repay` calls ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `syncFeeCheckpoint()` does not modify the highWaterMark correctly, sometimes it might even decrease its value, resulting in charging more performance fees than it should
### Description
`syncFeeCheckpoint()` does not modify the `highWaterMark` correctly, sometimes it might even decrease its value, resultin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: A malicious transaction object can trigger a Node DoS
### Description
Berachain uses forked versions of various SSZ libraries including [this one](https://github.com/itsdevbear/ssz), which is forked from [karalabe/ssz](https://github.com/karalabe/ssz). This library implements `HashStaticBytes()`:
```go
func ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Non-transferable `GameItems` can be transferred with `GameItems::safeBatchTransferFrom(...)`
### Description
The `GamesItems` contract fails to appropriately override and include essential checks within the `safeBatchTransferFrom` function, enabling the transfer of non-transferrable Game Items.
### Impact
W... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Unused Timestamp Field in `sendDirect()`
### Description
The `CCIPMessage` struct stores a `timestamp` field that records when each cross-chain message is sent, but this timestamp is never used anywhere in the contract. This creates multiple issues: inability to detect and handle stale messages, no time-based ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Interface definition error
### Description
_Submitted by bin2chen, also found by 0x52, 0xDjango, 0xSky, auditor0517, Picodes, rokinot, ronnyx2017, and scaraven_
### Impact
`MarketPlace.authRedeem()` call interface `ISwivel.authRedeem()` but Swivel contract does not have this method only method "authRed... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Owner Can Renounce Ownership
### Description
It was identified that the `CoreVault` and `MergeMarketplaceStrategy` contracts indirectly inherit from `Ownable2Step` through `OnwnableWithPausable`. In the `Ownable2Step` contract, the `renounceOwnership()` function is used to renounce the `Owner` permission. Reno... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `NodeData.nodeType` is used as an existence check and nothing else
### Description
The only thing `nodeType` is used for in the system is to check if a node exists. This can be done with a simple boolean or if you actually need a "type" then use an enum where the first value is `NON_EXISTENT` for example. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Overflow/Underflow | true | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-thegraph/blob/309a188f7215fa42c745b136357702400f91b4ff/contracts/l2/gateway/L2GraphTokenGateway.sol#L70
## Vulnerability details
## Description
L2GraphTokenGateway uses the onlyL1Counterpart modifier to make sure finalizeInboundTransfer is only called from L1G... | Code4rena | 4 | The Graph |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: A new `buyer` address is not assigned if the previous one was rejected
### Description
There is an issue at the [following line](https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/LeXscrow/blob/94ca277528bb25b8421dc127941c18915144eb29/src/EthLexscrow.sol#L326). It resets the `buyer` address, but the `deposited` variable value r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent Price Calculation for Fee in Spot LP Trading
### Description
**Description:** The fee calculation in the `spot_lp` instruction uses `last_px` directly without applying the same price constraints (`best_bid, best_ask`) and unit conversion (`RDF`) that are used when adding liquidity. This inconsiste... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [10] Getting the code still leads to a panic that could crash the node
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-11-nibiru/blob/8ed91a036f664b421182e183f19f6cef1a4e28ea/x/evm/keeper/statedb.go#L39-L45
This function is used to retrieve the bytecode of a smart contract. However, it panics if the code ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: COSMOS address recording method not recommended
### Description
[As mentioned in these notes](https://gist.github.com/mappum/428dc46afba73b2bf8c38f65272704d2#notes), COSMOS address recording mechanism uses pay-to-pubkey-hash outputs, which can be seen in [lines 102 to 104 of bitcoin.js of fundraiser-lib](https... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Nexus `checkERC7739Support()` checks `DEFAULT_VALIDATOR` even if unused
### Description
The `checkERC7739Support` function in the `Nexus` contract checks for support of `ERC-7739` by iterating through installed validators and additionally checking the `_DEFAULT_VALIDATOR`. However, this default validator may n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Splitting `require()` statements that use `&&` saves gas
### Description
See [this issue](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-01-xdefi-findings/issues/128) which describes the fact that there is a larger deployment gas cost, but with enough runtime calls, the change ends up being cheaper.
*There are 7 instance... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: `whChainId` should not be stored as immutable constant
### Description
**Description:** The `SecuritizeBridge` contract's use of an immutable `whChainId` constant, set during deployment, creates a critical vulnerability during chain forks. If the stored whChainId no longer matches the actual `chain ID`(block.c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Collateral removal not possible
### Description
If an approved collateral has later started say taking fees on transfer then protocol has no way to remove such collateral. The current deposit logic cannot handle fee on transfer token and would give more funds to user then actually obtained by contract
### ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Use of Revert Strings Instead of Custom Error
### Description
In Solidity smart contract development, replacing hard-coded revert message strings with the `Error()` syntax is an optimization strategy that can significantly reduce gas costs. Hard-coded strings, stored on the blockchain, increase the size and co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: The signatures are replayable
### Description
### Impact
User signed orders can be replayed
### Proof of Concept
All orders managed by the Krystal team are signed by the user, executed by the operator and the signature is verified on-chain:
However, there is no nonce field in the [StructHash.Order](htt... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: If a collateral's liquidation auction on Seaport ends without a winning bid, the call to liquidatorNFTClaim does not clear the related data on LienToken 's side and also for payee s that are public vaults
### Description
If/when a liquidation auction ends without being fulfilled/matched on Seaport, and afterw... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Failure to reset unspent approval to the target address will lead to the wiping of the smart contract balance
### Description
The contract gives arbitrary approval to untrusted contracts when filling orders, these approvals don't need to be fully utilized, and in situations where the approvals are not fully u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: Incorrect 4-bytes function identifier in ERC865Token contract
### Description
According to [its docstrings](https://github.com/propsproject/props-token-distribution/blob/eaf0c6fddd320a258a9d7531d72d07a830fae58a/contracts/token/ERC865Token.sol#L223), the [function](https://github.com/propsproject/props-token-d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Incomplete Validation of Chainlink Price Data
### Description
The [`ChainlinkV3Adapter`](https://github.com/radiant-capital/v2-core/blob/e8f21f103e17736907b62809d1ad902febc53714/contracts/radiant/oracles/ChainlinkV3Adapter.sol) and [`WSTETHOracle`](https://github.com/radiant-capital/v2-core/blob/e8f21f103e1... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Missing Commitment in Challenge Computation
### Description
When following the non-interactive version of [PLONK](https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/953.pdf) using Fiat-Shamir, the challenges are assumed to be derived from the transcript, defined as "the concatenation of the common preprocessed input, and public ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Karma can be gamed
### Description
Any entity operating a mech can create simple requests and set the mech they are operating as the priority mech, allowing it to deliver right away and thus increase its `mapMechKarma`. On the other hand, `mapRequesterMechKarma` for a specific requester would be harder to mani... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | critical | oracle-manipulation | true | false | ## Critical: Front-run withdrawValidator by submitting proofs can permanently DOS validator unstaking on EigenLayer
### Description
An attacker can observe the mempool and front-run the `CasimirManager::withdrawValidator` transaction by submitting the same proofs directly on Eigen Layer.
Since the proof is already ve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Buoy3Pool.safetyCheck is not precise and has some assumptions
### Description
## Handle
cmichel
## Vulnerability details
## Vulnerability Details
The `safetyCheck` function has several issues that impact how precise the checks are:
1. only checks if the `a/b` and `a/c` ratios are within `BASIS_POINTS`.
B... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Possible withdraw unavailiability
### Description
The amount of transferred out tokens are not accounted at the vault state while processing user withdrawals. This will cause attempt to withdraw incorrect (too large) amount and probable almost any withdrawals attempts will be reverted.
### Recommendation
It ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: CreatorFeeManagerWithRebates.viewCreatorFeeInfo reversion is dependent on the order of itemIds
### Description
Assume there is an itemId `x` where `collection.royaltyInfo(x, price)` returns `(0, _)` and another itemId `y` where `collection.royaltyInfo(y, price)` returns `(a, _)` where `a ≠ 0`.
Then if the `i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Extension voting threshold check needs to rerun on each transfer
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
The `Extension` contract correctly reduces votes from the `from` address of a transfer and adds it to the `to` address of the transfer (in case both of them voted on it before), but it does not rerun the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Math issues in SafeInt256.sol
### Description
There are a number of issues in [`SafeInt256.sol`](https://github.com/swapnet-protocol/swapnet-lite/blob/66ce8f3e529410a5272b7a57c8391fcb80a375fd/packages/contracts/contracts/lib/SafeInt256.sol), whereby the functions do not return the expected result for a give... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: Seller’s signature not required
### Description
In this protocol, listing an asset is simply having the operator sign either a [`BidInput`](https://github.com/freeverseio/crypto-payments/blob/956a98e53ef540f7b2b40f3b923d0b0e3e5d32ef/contracts/auction/base/ISignableStructsAuction.sol#L19) or a [`BuyNowInput`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent and incomplete exchange status checks
### Description
Drift Protocol’s representation of the exchange’s status has several problems:
- The exchange’s status is represented using an `enum`, which does not allow more than one individual operation to be paused (figures 12.1 and 12.2). As a result... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Rounding Error During Execution Of Code
### Description
In `controller.move`, the formula currently utilized in `apply_discount_code` and `apply_referral_code` may produce incorrect values if the `original_fee` is not a multiple of one hundred. This may result in an inaccurate calculation of the new rate.
##... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: sha2 ,hash160 andhash256 ofTypedMemView.sha2 do not clear the memory after calculating the hash
### Description
When a call to the precompile contract at `address(2)` (or at `address(3)`) is made, the returned value is placed at the slot pointed by the free memory pointer and then placed on the stack. The free... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [04] Inaccurate timestamp handling in `_farmPlots` function leading to potential inaccurate Schnibbles calculation
### Description
First of all, I'd like to note that this issue is considered out of scope BUT the sponsors said they will accept alternative solutions to mitigate this issue as it is clearly state... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Dependency: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
### Description
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Unresolved
**Dependency**: github.com/dvsekhvalnov/jose2go:v1.5.0
**CWE**: 400
**CVE**: 2023-50658
**Details**:
The `jose2go` component prior 1.6.0 for Go allows attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU cons... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Lack of robust safeguards for pools with an empty token in WeightedPool
### Description
The `WeightedPool` has several corner cases that could either enable a user to receive tokens for free or trap the liquidity if one of the pools has an empty balance. It might not be possible for a user to empty a pool’s u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | true | ## Medium: `LiquidInfrastructureERC20.sol` disapproved holders keep part of the supply, diluting approved holders revenue.
### Description
### Lines of code
### Impact
When `LiquidInfrastructureERC20` owner disapproves a holder, it prevents the holder from receiving any revenue from the contract. However, the disap... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Double spending
### Description
A maker can borrow funds against their existing `CollateralToken` and then transfer their entire `CollateralToken` balance to an arbitrary address, from which they could perform a `withdraw()` in the LendingPool.
### Recommendation
We recommend restricting transfers of `Collat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Pod: Re-entrancy during deposit or withdrawal can lead to stealing funds
### Description
During the deposit, the token transfer is made after the Pod shares are minted:
**code/pods-v3-contracts/contracts/Pod.sol:L274-L281**
```
uint256 shares = \_deposit(to, tokenAmount);
// Transfer Token Transfer Messa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: stake() missing set lastEpochClaimed when userBalance equal 0
### Description
because `stake()` don't set ` lastEpochClaimed[user] = last epoch` if `userBalance` equal 0
So all new stake user must loop from 0 to `last epoch` for `_claimRewards()`
As the epoch gets bigger and bigger it will waste a lot of G... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Sanctioned accounts can pay for pool interactions of verified users
### Description
Severity: Low Risk
Context: (No context files were provided by the reviewer)
Description: Both UniversalRouter (used for swaps) and VerifiedPoolsPositionManager (used for modifying
liquidity) can use their contract balance to s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Operation residual is lost for the user of BBLeverage's and SGLLeverage's `sellCollateral()`
### Description
`sellCollateral()` sells the specified amount of collateral, then repays the debt. The proceedings can cover the debt with some excess amount. Moreover, as the market swaps are involved and the actua... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Missions Can only Be Tracked if Their Rewards Are in ETH
### Description
**Update**
The `Mission` has been removed totally as a design decision.
**Description:** The contract allows users to claim rewards in either ETH or an ERC20 token. When initiating a mission through the `createMission()` function, the am... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | true | ## High: The Amount of The Pending Referrer Fee is Overwritten in `_applyPlatformFeeETHGmx()`
### Description
The `_applyPlatformFeeETHGmx()` function is an internal function that calculates and applies platform fees in ETH for a given transaction. This function is called by `GmxFactory` and also considers staked fee ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | logic-error | false | false | ## Low: `OpNetVaultAutoDeployLogic::getVetoSlasherParams` is never used
### Description
`OpNetVaultAutoDeployLogic::getVetoSlasherParams` is dead code that is never used. It is also worth noting that `OpNetVaultAutoDeploy` is designed only for `InstantSlasher` and has no mechanism to utilize `VetoSlasher` functionalit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Precision loss in fee calculation due to order of operations
### Description
In the `_calculateFeesUSD` function of `OperationalTreasury.sol`, the fee calculation is performed in a way that may lead to precision loss due to **Division Before Multiply**. The current implementation:
The issue arises because th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Owner of strategies that inherit from BaseStrategyChainlinkMultiplePriceFeeds can add malicious price feeds after they have been added to LooksRareProtocol
### Description
The owner of strategies that inherit from `BaseStrategyChainlinkMultiplePriceFeeds` can add malicious price feeds for new collections after... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use Custom Errors Severity: Quality Assurance
### Description
**Description:**
So[urce Inst](https://blog.soliditylang.org/2021/04/21/custom-errors/)ead of using error strings, to reduce deployment and runtime cost, you should use Custom Errors. This would save both deployment and runtime cost.
**Recommenda... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Token Accounting Mismatch Between tick() and mintRewards() in RAACMinter
### Description
The `RAACMinter` contract implements a dynamic emissions schedule for minting and distributing RAAC tokens. However, a critical flaw exists in its reward distribution mechanism: there is a mismatch between where excess ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use a struct to encapsulate multiple function parameters
### Description
If a function has too many parameters, replacing them with a struct can improve code readability and maintainability, increase reusability, and reduce the likelihood of errors when passing the parameters.
*There are 42 instances of this ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: Gauge rewards are not transferred to gauge when distributeRewards() is called
### Description
Gauge rewards are not transferred to gauge when `distributeRewards()` is called.
### Impact
DOS | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Block Number Dependency
### Description
The [`AntiSandwhichHook`](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/uniswap-hooks/blob/087974776fb7285ec844ca090eab860bd8430a11/src/general/AntiSandwichHook.sol) and [`LiquidityPenaltyHook`](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/uniswap-hooks/blob/087974776fb7285ec844ca090eab860bd843... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Denial Of Service Due To Unbounded Allocation Delay
### Description
The `setAllocationDelay()` function does not enforce a maximum delay value, allowing operators to set an extremely long delay that prevents any allocations from being set.
### Recommendation
The EigenLayer team has acknowledged this issue wit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: LendingAssetVault incorrectly updates vaultUtilization if CBR for a single FraxlendPair decreases.
### Description
LendingAssetVault incorrectly updates vaultUtilization if CBR for a single FraxlendPair decreases.
### Impact
Users would receive less assets.
### Recommendation
Use the correct formula: `PRE... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Documentation and Code Inconsistencies
### Description
Several inconsistencies between documentation and implementation, as well as unused or misleading code, were identified:
* `contracts/dao/GaugeController.vy`: The `NewGaugeWeight` event is declared but never emitted anywhere in the contract, so it is effe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Multiple calls to bypass maxMintPerTx
### Description
`maxMintPerTx` name and comments suggest that the variable should limit the amount purchased per transaction.
In fact, it is a limitation per call. As a result, the simplest strategy to bypass the limit is just calling multiple times per transaction.
Ens... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: previous approvals not revoked
### Description
When constructing the contract max approval is set for the router for the Comet reward token:
However, compound governance can change the reward token on `Comet`:
And `owner` can change the `router` on `BrrETH`:
If any of these are changed the previous appro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Miscellaneous Minor Points Affecting Several Contracts
### Description
#### A. `public` functions that are not used internally should be `external` instead.
Exception: When a `public` function is overridden, it has to remain `public`, even if it’s not used internally.
#### B. There is no consistent pattern... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Casting between types without overflow checks
### Description
In our prior audit of the Notional system, we raised an issue about unsafe casting between types. During their initial response to the prior audit, they partially addressed our concerns. The few persistent instances of the issue were to be removed p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Completed proposals can be voted on and executed again
### Description
A proposal that is completed has its state reset, including the votes.
Users can just vote on it again and it can be executed again.
Completed proposals should most likely not be allowed to be voted on / executed again.
This could also ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary admin of proxy
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**File**: src/ERC1967Factory.sol
**Details**:
While the original ERC1967Factory implementation uses admin to control the access to some functions in the contract itself, there is no need for this in your modified implementati... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Inefficient Role Checking
### Description
The `hasRole` function in the `AccessControlManager` contract currently relies on fetching the `rolesVersion` externally from the storage and then checking if the role is set using `_storage.getBool`. This results in two external calls to the storage: one to retrieve t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Maximizing Royalties by Frontrunning Token Minting
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `1a872e055aed4d28b0795347d1a2b688ff0e19de`.
**File(s) affected:**`RoyaltyModule.sol`, `IpNFT.sol`
**Description:** Any token can have up to 8 parent tokens, whose owners receive a s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Using Vulnerable Solidity Version
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> We are using AccessControlledV8, from the @venusprotocol/governance-contracts package, that is using solidity 0.8.13. We will upgrade to solidity 0.8.20 in a co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Strategists are paid 10x the vault fee because of a math error
### Description
Strategists set their vault fee in BPS (x / 10,000), but are paid out as x / 1,000. The result is that strategists will always earn 10x whatever vault fee they set.
### Impact
Strategists will be paid 10x the agreed upon rate for ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Accounts can be sold on secondary markets while liquidations are ongoing
### Description
Accounts can be transferred via the `safeTransferFrom` function which calls the `transferOwnership` on the account. This `transferOwnership` does not have the `notDuringAuction` modifier, and can thus carry out transfers w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | true | ## Medium: Users can join and exit pools even where there are no tokens
### Description
Incorrect access control in the `joinPool` and `exitPool` functions allow calls to them to succeed even when there are no binded tokens, producing unexpected results.
On one hand, if a user calls `joinPool` when `_tokens.length` i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Use of unlicensed contracts
### Description
The absence of a license is denoted by the `// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED` declaration. This indicates that the project's code is not licensed for use, distribution, or modification by others.
Operating without a license poses several security and legal ris... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Sequence numbers are not enforced to be sequential
### Description
In both card contracts, the `ctx_seqno` variable is used as a nonce-like, ever-increasing sequence number to ensure that old transactions cannot be replayed once they are executed. A similar variable, `limits_seqno`, is used for the limits dict... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Improve function visibility
### Description
The following methods are not called internally in the token contract and visibility can, therefore, be restricted to `external` rather than `public`. This is more gas efficient because less code is emitted and data does not need to be copied into memory. It also mak... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect rounding direction in SuperVault.convertToAssets()
### Description
According to the EIP-4626 specification, the `convertToAssets()` function should round down. Specifically, it states that `convertToAssets` **MUST** round down towards 0.
However, the implementation in `SuperVault.convertToAssets... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | false | false | ## Gas: Add
### Description
[G-03] Add unchecked {} for subtractions where the operands cannot underflow because of a previous require() or if statement
require(a <= b); x = b - a => require(a <= b); unchecked { x = b - a }:br
if(a <= b); x = b - a => if(a <= b); unchecked { x = b - a }:br
This will ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `ReraiseETHCrowdfund#claimMultiple` can be used to grief large depositors
### Description
User can be grieved by being force minted a large number of NFTs with low voting power instead of one with high voting power.
### Proof of Concept
[ReraiseETHCrowdfund.sol#L354-L377](https://github.com/code-423n4/202... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Native assets deposited to pools with no native currencies are lost
### Description
Native assets deposited to pools with no native currencies are lost. The deposit function of the BunniHub contract is payable since it needs to handle native assets if one of the tokens of the pool is a native token, as shown i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Redundant calls to getAddressPrefixInternal()
### Description
In the `EthereumVaultConnector.sol` contract, the `isAccountOperatorAuthorizedInternal()` function first calls the `getAccountOwnerInternal()` function to retrieve the owner's address, and then calls the `getAddressPrefixInternal()` function to obta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Missing Validations
### Description
## Issues and Remediation in SDK.Coin Objects
1. When the code constructs new `sdk.Coin` objects, it does not raise an error if it utilizes invalid token denominations (such as those that are empty, shorter than three letters, or contain invalid characters) due to missing v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: The attacker can steal rewards from AutoCompoundingPodLP because in _processRewardsToPodLp, the rewards from TokenRewards are not distributed
### Description
Since the rewards from TokenRewards are not distributed in `_processRewardsToPodLp`, an attacker can deposit into AutoCompoundingPodLp in a single tra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Malicious users can provide liquidity on behalf of others to keep others in the liquidity cooldown
### Description
In the AlgebraPool contract, when the user provides liquidity via the mint function, the lastLiquidityAddTimestamp is updated to the current time.
(_position.liquidity, _position.lastLiquidity... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | input-validation | true | false | ## Medium: Missing zero address validation in initialize function
### Description
The `initialize` function in `DSTokenClassSwap` contract does not validate that the input addresses `_sourceDSToken` and `_targetDSToken` are non-zero addresses.
```solidity
DSTokenClassSwap.sol
40: function initialize(address _sour... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `WildcatMarketWithdrawals.queueWithdrawal()` function can be optimized
### Description
By moving condition checks up in the execution flow, we save on computational steps and improve the gas efficiency of the `queueWithdrawal()` function.
Overall gas change: `-9258 (-0.011%)` | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Front-Running redeem Can Prevent Indexers From Receiving Rewards for Allocations
### Description
The [`redeem`](https://github.com/semiotic-ai/timeline-aggregation-protocol-contracts/blob/d8795c747d44da90f7717b3db9a08698e64a9b2f/src/Escrow.sol#L366) function in `Escrow.sol` enables Indexers to receive query r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: `<array>.length` should not be looked up in every loop of a `for`-loop
### Description
The overheads outlined below are _PER LOOP_, excluding the first loop
* storage arrays incur a Gwarmaccess (**100 gas**)
* memory arrays use `MLOAD` (**3 gas**)
* calldata arrays use `CALLDATALOAD` (**3 gas**)
Caching the l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Potentially Stuck ETH in GasSwap
### Description
In the [`GasSwap` contract](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/blob/2eb458cf4224d82fc56254e91e297a9ed261cefb/contracts/src/L1/gateways/L1ERC20Gateway.sol#L130), the [`swap` function](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/blob/2eb458cf4224d82fc56254e91e297a9ed... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Rewards are withdrawn even if protocol is not su�ciently collateralized
### Description
The treasury allows any excess base token amount beyond what is considered collateral to be distributed by calling the `harvest` function. Some of this token amount is sent to the rebalance pool as rewards. Since the rebala... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: LvlUSD from rewards might be permanently stuck in the StakedlvlUSD contract
### Description
In the StakedlvlUSD contract, `lvlUSD` transferred in as rewards vest over a period of 8 hours:
```solidity
function getUnvestedAmount() public view returns (uint256) {
uint256 timeSinceLastDistribution = block.times... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Negative rebase can tap into other user's tokens when a user unlocks
### Description
[Link to instance](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-05-munchables/blob/57dff486c3cd905f21b330c2157fe23da2a4807d/src/managers/LockManager.sol#L416)
If the configured token contract being used is a rebasing token that negativ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Misleading Rate Limit Condition
### Description
**Update**
The team fixed the issue as recommended.
**File(s) affected:**`libs/LibCollateral.sol`
**Description:** The `LibCollateral.sol:commitWithdrawalAllowance` function (L251-275) has the condition of `rateLimitRemaining != uint128(-1)` in L269. However, i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `redeemDepositsAndInternalBalances` should mow before adding migrated deposits
### Description
`redeemDepositsAndInternalBalances` should mow before adding migrated deposits
### Impact
Loss of funds | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Creation of `MajorityAmendmentProposal` is Possible for a Non-existent `setName`
### Description
The issue is identified within the [`proposeMajorityMetaVesTAmendment`](https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/MetaVesT/blob/b614405e60bce8b852e46d06c03fd47b04d86dde/src/MetaVesTController.sol#L567) function of the `MetaV... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Aave rewards incentives lost as there is no way to claim them
### Description
**Description:** When a bet uses an Aave pool, funds are supplied to Aave and can accrue [incentive rewards](https://aave.com/docs/aave-v3/aptos/smart-contracts/incentives), but the contracts provide no way to claim or forward these ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Local network connections use Basic Authentication
### Description
Local network connections between the wallet and daemons use HTTP Basic Authentication. Basic Authentication is generally considered an insufficient form of authentication for modern security applications. As this is a local connection, the ris... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Unnecessary administrator privileges
### Description
The `BridgePool` contract [inherits from `ExpandedERC20`](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/f24ad501c8e813cf685f72217e7f13c8f3c366df/packages/core/contracts/insured-bridge/BridgePool.sol#L34) so that it can issue LP tokens to liquidity provider... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | SafeTransfer | true | false | _Submitted by [axic](https://twitter.com/alexberegszaszi), also found by [gpersoon](https://twitter.com/gpersoon), [pauliax](https://twitter.com/SolidityDev), [Jmukesh](https://twitter.com/MukeshJ_eth), [a_delamo](https://twitter.com/a_delamo), [s1m0](https://twitter.com/_smonica_), [cmichel](https://twitter.com/cmiche... | Code4rena | 5 | Reality Cards |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Missing call to harvestVault() in getRewardForUser() leads to missed rewards
### Description
Infrared vaults allow stakers to claim rewards either via `getReward()` or via `getRewardForUser(address _user)`. While `getReward()` calls `harvestVault()` in the `onReward()` hook to harvest any BGT rewards from t... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.