prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Large vault share price updates can be captured by open/close short
### Description
When opening a short, the user deposits \( \frac{c}{c_0} \times dy - dz \times c \). When closing in the same transaction, they receive base proceeds which are also \( \frac{c'}{c_0} \times dy - dz \times c' \), where \( dz ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Refrain From Shadowing State Variables
### Description
## Severity: Low Risk
## Context
- Periphery.sol#L351
- CAdapter.sol#L133
- CAdapter.sol#L156
## Situation
Shadowing variables (factory and target), i.e. by having function parameters or other local variables declared with the same name, could lead to un... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Security and sanity check bypass in `MultiCallOptimizedSwapper`
### Description
As well as similar functions, [`execute`](https://github.com/yearn/hardhat-monorepo/blob/ecc0b5147992b34c315e08af170ceb4a5fe071ee/packages/yswaps/contracts/TradeFactory/TradeFactoryExecutor.sol#L126) performs several sanity and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Fund receiving address can be changed by owner for a brief period
### Description
The [`setMultisig`](https://github.com/CoinFabrik/ico/blob/142f43f3bec4afd0ffff3fce06946cf67cb0272f/contracts/Crowdsale.sol#L417) function allows the owner to change the address where funds are sent. It can be used for a brief... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Partial filled short does not reset liquidation flag after user gets fully liquidated, meaning healthy position will still be flagged if the rest of the order gets filled.
### Description
- The protocol allows a short order to be partially matched, generating a short record for the matched amount. The unmatche... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: Inverted use of boolean value in `L2NativeTokenVault.constructor` would cause revert or unnecessary deployment of `bridgedTokenBeacon`
### Description
The `L2GatewayUpgradeHelper._getForceDeploymentsData` function in `L2GatewayUpgradeHelper` provides the `ForceDeployment` struct used to deploy the `L2Native... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Users are able to create an unlimited amount of locks.
### Description
**Description**
LockedStaking.sol: function addLock().
There is no limitation on the amount of locks for each user. Each lock is added to the user's
array of locks. In case user has created too many locks, this can cause to revert when... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Reward distribution can be skipped when executed within the vote window buffer of a new epoch
### Description
**Description:** `DistributionManager::distribute` is validated to only be callable when voting is not active. This is achieved by calling `_validateCanDistribute()`; however, this fails to account for... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: Centralisation risk with `liquidationResolver` as it can steal 100% of locked funds
### Description
**Proof of Concept**
Currently the `liquidationResolver` has the power to steal 100% of locked funds in the following way:
1. Call `freezeFunds` for every user that has a locked balance
2. Wait some time un... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | false | false | ## Gas: Use a more recent version of solidity
### Description
- Use a solidity version of at least 0.8.0 to get overflow protection without `SafeMath`
- Use a solidity version of at least 0.8.2 to get simple compiler automatic inlining
- Use a solidity version of at least 0.8.3 to get better struct packing and cheaper... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Invalid Threshold range
### Description
## Multisig Implementation and Validation
The threshold represents the minimum number of signatures required for authenticating a transaction. The Aptos multisig implementation validates that the threshold is not zero.
## Code Reference
**File:** `aptos-core/crates/apt... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: DOS of market operations with malicious offers
### Description
The Rubicon market has two functions that are interesting: `buyAllAmount` and `sellAllAmount`. These functions are responsible for using up offers until the entire amount is bought or sold. The contract stores offers in a sorted linked list, each ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Parameters not validated for zero address
### Description
The methods:
- `createPoolInitial()` at https://github.com/clearpool-finance/permissionless-protocol/blob/f1f38c5ba83e2c3a68155042229b04678d9425ce/contracts/PoolFactory.sol#L225,
- `createPool()` at https://github.com/clearpool-finance/permissionless-p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Avoid Reading and writing to state if the value is zero
### Description
**Instance 1:**
Refactor `FeeManager.increaseIncentiveA()` to avoid reading or writing to state if `_value` is `0`.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-02-wise-lending/blob/main/contracts/FeeManager/FeeManager.sol#L220
In the `FeeManager... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `NFTPositionInfo` will not work properly in ZKSync
### Description
_Acknowledged_
It is expected that the contracts can be deployed on any network where UniswapV3 is deployed. In ZKSync, however, the `NFTPositionInfo` library will not work properly, as the version of `PoolAddress` it uses is [not compatible w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Violations of Solidity Style Guide Conventions - magic numbers.
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**description**
Hard-coded constants like:
are not self-explanatory or defined as named constants, making it difficult to understand
their meaning or how they were derived.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Non-Atomic packet ID May Result in Collisions
### Description
In the `PacketIdHandler` contract, the `endpoint.getPacketId` function is used to generate packet IDs, but it requires manual nonce increment via `endpoint.incrementNonce()`. If the developer forgets to call `incrementNonce`, or if the function fail... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Use of 3rd party library in Factory contract.
### Description
**Description**
In the Factory contract, all except init and update of the contract are using third-party lib, which is out of scope.
programs/nft_factory
**Recommendation**
We need verification from the Onemind team that out-of-scope libs can be... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Using DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE for multiple privileged actions across protocol contracts is a cen- tralization risk
### Description
Multiple protocol contracts grant the deployer the `DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE`, which is authorized to execute various privileged actions, including:
- Pausing/unpausing contracts
- Setting in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: No Validation on the feeWallet Address
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**:
The `_updateFeeWallet` function allows setting the `feeWallet` without any validation if it's a valid address or not. It's possible to set it to the zero address or another potentially harmful ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | true | ## High: Arbitrary call in `LendingPool.reBalance()` leads to asset theft
### Description
- https://github.com/Liquorice-HQ/contracts/blob/a5b4c6a56df589b8ea4f6c7b8cb028b1723ad479/src/contracts/LendingPool.sol#L229
The `reBalance()` function in the `LendingPool` contract improperly allows callers to execute any funct... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Missing slippage protection on buy and sell
### Description
### Finding description
The `sell` and `buy` functions in the `FRouter` contract lack a slippage check to ensure that the `amountOut` (the amount of tokens received after the trade) is not less than a certain percentage of the expected `amountOut`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Bad debt will not be socialised in certain edge case
### Description
At the end of the liquidation process, debt is socialized when the liquidatee has no liquidatable collateral but still has debt:
```solidity
function executeLiquidation(VaultCache memory vaultCache, LiquidationCache memory liqCache, uint256 ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | false | false | ## Medium: Precision loss in reward calculation leads to incorrect accounting for residual amounts
### Description
The precision loss in reward calculation leads to incorrect accounting for residual amounts.
### Recommendation
The calculation needs to be reconsidered with the amount lost to division in `leftover / re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: If the Variable Side Withdraws Before the Fixed Side Depositor, the Future Earnings of the Fixed Depositor Will Not Be Charged Fees
### Description
**Update**
The Saffron team has deemed this as acceptable behavior.
**File(s) affected:**`UniV3Vault.sol`
**Description:** The `UniV3Vault.withdraw()` function a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Missing Message Type Registrations in Regulation Module
### Description
Several message types defined in the regulation module are not properly registered in the RegisterInterfaces function. Specifically, the following message types are missing from the registration:
**- MsgProposeBlock**
**- MsgProposeAdd*... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: TWABDelegator: Consider renaming `_delegateCall()` to `_setDelegateeCall()`
### Description
`_delegateCall()` could easily be confused for the inbuilt `delegatecall()` method. I recommend renaming it to something more distinguishable like `_setDelegateeCall()`.
**[PierrickGT (PoolTogether) confirmed and comme... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | true | ## High: Error in totalvotes formula reflects wrong number of votes
### Description
In `_getTotal()`, `votesTotal` is calculated by the formula:
```
votesTotal += typeVoteChange * typeWeight;
```
and is assigned to `totalVotes[timestamp] = votesTotal;`. However, `typeVoteChange` only reflects the amount of change at th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | reentrancy | false | false | ## Gas: Not respecting the Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern that can be a place for bugs
### Description
**Potential Reentrancy Attack**: Even though the contract uses a reentrancy guard, it's crucial to ensure that all external calls are at the end of the function (the Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern). In the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: System Debt Is Not Handled When Insurance Pools Become Insolvent
### Description
_Submitted by leastwood_
If an incident has occurred where an insurance policy is to be redeemed. The market is put into the `MarketStatus.Payingout` mode where the `_insurance.insured` account is allowed to redeem their cover... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: First depositor inflation attack in StakedToken contract
### Description
The StakedToken contract inherits from the ERC4626 standard. This contract is susceptible to a well-known exploit referred to as the "first depositor inflation attack." This vulnerability occurs due to the lack of protective mechanisms... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: The PythOracle won't work with positive expparameter
### Description
The Pyth oracle is using an `expparameter` to determine the decimals that the price will be normalized to result in the actual price. The formula is:
```
price * 10^exp
```
We checked all the current feeds and the `expvalue` is between -5/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: Signature is replayable
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
WalletAccount.sol - Function `validateUserOp()` (i.e. in BaseAccount.sol) is susceptible to replay attacks. A rogue caller is able because of this vulnerability to reuse an already executed signature to auth... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: The `VoterUpgradeableV2.distributeFees()` function always reverts
### Description
The `VoterUpgradeableV2.distributeFees()` function distributes fees to a list of gauges. It calls the `gauges.claimFees()` function at L400.
The `gauges.claimFees()` function calls the `feeVault.claimFees()` function at L394.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: No zero address check
### Description
**Description**
RuleEngine.sol, line 37 - no check for zero addresses. It is mentioned as an issue, because
there is no visible deployment script, so there is a place for mistakes. It is also important, since
there is no interface for StakingContract changing.
**Recommen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Oracle price does not compound
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
[ScalingPriceOracle.sol#L136](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-volt/blob/f1210bf3151095e4d371c9e9d7682d9031860bbd/contracts/oracle/ScalingPriceOracle.sol#L136)
[ScalingPriceOracle.sol#L113](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-volt/b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: A Future Action Can Lead to a Vulnerability
### Description
In upgradeable contracts, every new version of the implementation contract needs to have all the state variables of the previous implementation in the same layout or else it can lead to a storage collision. Attackers can use this vulnerability to over... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Missing Initializer Calls in GeniusVaultCore's Initialization Function
### Description
The **GeniusVaultCore** contract inherits from `ReentrancyGuardUpgradeable` and `UUPSUpgradeable` but fails to call their respective initializer functions during initialization. This omission breaks the initialization cha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Introduction of approvals use case opens up attack surface w.r.t. long term allowances
### Description
PR 161 introduces the use of token approval/allowances for the proxy contract to create streams rather than use explicit Permit2 signatures. The intended use case is for Safe users to avoid having to let ever... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: VArray can remove `included` field to save gas
### Description
Currently, the `VerifiableArray` struct has the following elements:
Rather than using an additional storage slot to store `included`, this could be made more efficient by encoding whether or not the element is included within the `indexOf` field.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Reentrancy | true | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-12-arcadia-judging/issues/153
## Found by
0xadrii, zzykxx
## Summary
It is possible to drain a liquidity pool/creditor if the pool’s asset is an ERC777 token by triggering a reentrancy flow using flash actions.
## Vulnerability Detail
The following vulnerability descri... | Sherlock | 5 | Arcadia |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | false | false | ## High: Anyone can deposit and mint withdrawal proxy shares to capture distributed yield from borrower interests
### Description
Anyone can deposit and mint Withdrawal proxy shares by directly interacting with the base `ERC4626Cloned` contract's functions, allowing them to capture distributed yield from borrower inte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | oracle-manipulation | false | false | ## Low: Confusing field name `minimumLiveness` in `PriceData` struct
### Description
The [`PriceData`](https://github.com/ondoprotocol/rwa-internal/blob/a74d03f4a71bd9cac09e8223377b47f7d64ca8d4/contracts/globalMarkets/tokenManager/sanityCheckOracle/OndoSanityCheckOracle.sol#L37-L49) struct in `OndoSanityCheckOracle` i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary update
### Description
If `contractToAdapter[targetContract] == adapter` , update is unnecessary:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/credit/CreditFilter.sol#L192
### Recommendation
We recommend adding additional check. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inaccurate Execution Time Reporting in Proposal Execution Revert
### Description
The governance contract reverts with a `ProposalAlreadyExecuted` error when a proposal is attempted to be executed after it has already been processed. However, the error message reports the current block timestamp instead of the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: A Trusted Website Can Add Any Address to the Snaps Address Storage; No Control Over Added Addresses; Confirmation Is a Notification ✓ Fixed
### Description
Trusted websites can add addresses to the list of addresses the user wants to receive notifications for. However, the user has no control over the address... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: [9] Lack of setter function for the apwineAddr
### Description
On the Redemeer contract, there is not setter function on the apwineAddr address. This can cause misfunctionality on the redeemer contract.
### Proof of Concept
1. Navigate to contract: https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-illuminate/blob/main/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: account.holdsToken is never set
### Description
## Email address
mail@cmichel.io
## Handle
@cmichelio
## Eth address
0x6823636c2462cfdcD8d33fE53fBCD0EdbE2752ad
## Vulnerability details
The `addHolding` function does not update the `account.holdsToken` map.
This leads to a critical vulnerability wh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Borrowers are allowed to operatate after the maximum period has passed
### Description
The [`Holdefi` contract](https://github.com/holdefi/Holdefi/blob/f4df394d7cf6df347b1f1e9af8e2676c5933c2c9/contracts/Holdefi.sol) establishes a maximum period of time in which a borrower can be sure that his assets will not b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: The method `multiTransfer(...)` fails to transfer tokens to recipients
### Description
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In Contract DevvE.sol, the method multiTransfer(...) fails to transfer tokens to recipients due to the following line:
Here even if `msg.sender` has approved the D... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Insufficient verification and checks for FeeOnTop
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The FeeOnTop can be set arbitrarily to any value(lesser than itemPrice) by the caller. This can result in the caller/buyer bypassing the FeeOnTop entirely, or paying a value le... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Caching storage variables in memory to save gas
### Description
### PROBLEM
Anytime you are reading from storage more than once, it is cheaper in gas cost to cache the variable in memory: a SLOAD cost 100gas, while MLOAD and MSTORE cost 3 gas.
In particular, in `for` loops, when using the length of a storage... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use of non-named numeric constants
### Description
Constants should be defined instead of using magic numbers.
*There are 285 instances of this issue.*
--- | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Return fast in `TradingAccountBranch::getAccountLeverage` when margin balance is zero
### Description
Return fast in `TradingAccountBranch::getAccountLeverage` when margin balance is zero:
```solidity
function getAccountLeverage(uint128 tradingAccountId) external view returns (UD60x18) {
TradingAccount.Dat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: `LendingTerm` inconsistency between debt ceiling as calculated in `borrow()` and `debtCeiling()`
### Description
There is an inconsistency in the calculation of the `debtCeiling` between the [`borrow()`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-12-ethereumcreditguild/blob/main/src/loan/LendingTerm.sol#L394-L397) ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Successful redeem of aTokens may not pay assets in exchange
### Description
The [`redeem` function](https://gitlab.com/aave-tech/dlp/contracts/blob/1f8e5e65a99a887a5a13ad9af6486ebf93f57d02/contracts/tokenization/AToken.sol#L73) in the `AToken` contract allows holders of aTokens to redeem them for the underl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Suboptimal Code Structure with Two Separate For Loops
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Unresolved
**Location**: multiTransfer
**Description**
The function [`multiTransfer`] contains two separate for loops that iterate over similar data structures. Consolidating these loops into a sin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Re-initialization of the Balancer pool is potentially possible
### Description
Instead of creating a new Balancer pool for an auction every time, the same pool is getting re-used repeatedly.
When this happens, the old liquidity is withdrawn, and if there is enough FEI in the contract, the weights are shifted p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Improper Order Of Iterator Operations
### Description
## Application Filtering Issue
Within `get_applications` in `applications`, there is an issue concerning the order of the iterator methods applied to `application`. Specifically, the `filter` operation applies before the `take` operation.
> _assert statem... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Lack of contract existence check on transfer / transferFrom calls
### Description
The MesonHelpers contract uses the low-level call function to execute the transfer / transferFrom function of an ERC20 token. However, it does not first perform a contract existence check. Thus, if there is no contract at the to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Reducing the epoch length results in leaking value from advancement incentives
### Description
_Submitted by TomFrench_
Unintended advancement incentives being paid out to third party
#### Proof of Concept
`DAO.sol` incentives outside parties to advance the epoch by minting 100 MALT tokens for calling t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: Missing `lower<upper` check in `mint_position`
### Description
The current implementation does not perform a check for `lower upper`:** Unlike the previous case, when `lower > upper` it is possible to create a position with both liquidity and balance. However, the potential issue arises when calling the `get... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: SimpleInterestTermsContract will silently accept other tokens
### Description
The function [`registerRepayment`](https://github.com/dharmaprotocol/charta/blob/b110959477cf37375bf7e9344d40eb85219c8575/contracts/examples/SimpleInterestTermsContract.sol#L57) implemented in [`SimpleInterestTermsContract`](https... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Pending Deposits Cannot Be Withdrawn Until Converted to Shares, Forcing Exposure to Game Risk
### Description
Users cannot withdraw pending deposits until they are converted to shares after drawing settlement, forcing exposure to game risk before withdrawal is possible.
When users deposit during a drawing, th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Fixed execution gas amount might not work for all potential target chains
### Description
In [`_sendASD`(…)](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-canto/blob/1516028017a34ccfb4b0b19f5c5f17f5fa4cad42/contracts/asd/asdRouter.sol# L151-L152), when `asD` is transferred to another chain via LayerZero, a fixed gas a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Events for Critical Changes
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**:
Some critical state changes, like updateSwapEnabled or enableTrading, don't emit events. This makes it harder for external systems to track the contract's actions and state changes.
**Rec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Optimizer will misallocate when StakeDAO is above full boost
### Description
On Page 5 of the whitepaper, it says:
> We can assume that when this balance is reached for a given gauge, neither Convex nor Stake DAO have maximum boost, which enables us to get rid of the min formula.
The `min` in the formula ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: TRST-H-2 Users will be unable to claim emissions from veSatin tokens if they withdraw it or merge it
### Description
**Description:**
The function `_calculateClaim()` uses the variable **lockEndTime** when checking if a veSatin is
entitled to emissions for a particular week (code with mitigation from TRST-H-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Absence of inactivity leaks and slashing penalties allows inactive/malicious validators
### Description
Absence of inactivity leaks and slashing penalties currently in Berachain BeaconKit allows inactive/malicious validators to negatively impact the consensus mechanism.
### Recommendation
Consider introducing... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `BORG_SAFE` is not checked
### Description
Constructor: missing a `BORG_SAFE` zero check. https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/borg-core/blob/9074503d37cfa1d777ef16f6c88b84c98b4f54eb/src/libs/conditions/deadManSwitchCondition.sol#L27
### Recommendation
We recommend adding parameters checks from the description. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | token | true | true | ## High: Rewards can be stolen when `IncentivizedERC20` tokens are recursively provided as liquidity
### Description
By virtue of the composable nature of DeFi, it is common to have wrapped liquidity tokens that encapsulate some form of yield or other tokenized incentives in a manner similar to Valkyrie. With the ubiq... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Abort via Large Node Capacity Value
### Description
## Potential Flaw in Vote Calculations
There is a potential flaw in how the vote calculations are handled in `select_committee_and_calculate_votes`, particularly with the `node_capacity` parameter, which may result in an abort. The `node_capacity` refers ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [10] Missing function to calculate how much liquidity a user will get on `buy()` and tokens on `claim()`
### Description
[`buy()`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-06-vultisig/blob/main/src/ILOPool.sol#L126) operations involve some complex [calculations](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-06-vultisig/blob/ma... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Adversary can utilise approved to Magnetar `oTAP` and `tOLP` NFTs
### Description
The idea of Magnetar is to allow users to batch transactions towards certain contract within the Tapioca contracts, including `TapiocaOptionBroker` and `TapiocaOptionLiquidityProvision`. In order to do so, users will have to giv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Use Of Ownable Can Be Skipped
### Description
**Severity** - Informational
**Status** - Acknowledged
**Description**
The contract uses the ownable library and mint the initial total supply to the owner , but since there are no onlyOwner functions in this token contract , this can be skipped . We can simply ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Loan Extension Fails Due to Unused Time Calculation
### Description
The `extendLoan` function in `DebitaV3Loan::extendLoan` has redundant time calculation logic that causes transaction reversions when borrowers attempt to extend loans near their deadline.
### Impact
Borrowers cannot extend loans near their... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Due to the use of `msg.value` in for loop, anyone can drain all the funds from the `THORChain_Router` contract
### Description
### Vulnerability details
The functions [`transferOutAndCallV5()`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-06-thorchain/blob/e3fd3c75ff994dce50d6eb66eb290d467bd494f5/chain/ethereum/cont... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: DepositReceipt_Base.sol#L21 : HEARTBEAT_TIME gap is too huge
### Description
HEARTBEAT_TIME = 24 hours could not be safe. The oracle data still be stale one.
### Impact
Stale data used. Front runnable issue.
### Recommendation
Use 3 hours as hearbeat. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: NFT minting limit dependence on block gas limit
### Description
## Handle
0xRajeev
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The current block gas limit is 15M and not 12.5 as indicated in the comment for setNFTMintingLimit(60) in Factory’s constructor. So this could be changed accordingly but a safe threshold n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Approvals should be revoked when unstaking in HoneyLocker.sol
### Description
In `HoneyLocker.stake()`, the function will approve the staking contract with an arbitrary amount.
When unstaking, the approval is not nullified.
Set approvals to zero to prevent the staking contract from having lingering approva... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `abi.encodePacked()` should not be used with dynamic types when passing the result to a hash function such as `keccak256()`
### Description
**Description:** `abi.encodePacked()` should not be used with dynamic types when passing the result to a hash function such as `keccak256()`.
Use `abi.encode()` instead w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: At `MuteAmplifier.update()` skip updating if done in the same block
### Description
Gas saved: A few thousands
When `update()` is being called a second time in the same block both the `_totalWeight` and `_mostRecentValueCalcTime` don't really change. But the logic to update them still run and uses a few thous... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: A `topUp` call can be front-run
### Description
A `topUp` call can dramatically increase the exchange rate, so users that will front-run this call will "steal" some rewards https://github.com/TwoFiftySixLabs/mntEth/blob/bd15a96aee7df0fc0566d662df0cf50ff2619d31/src/Staking.sol#L523-L525.
### Recommendation
We ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | true | false | ## Gas: [G‑05] `++i`/`i++` should be `unchecked{++i}`/`unchecked{i++}` when it is not possible for them to overflow, as is the case when used in `for`- and `while`-loops
### Description
The `unchecked` keyword is new in solidity version 0.8.0, so this only applies to that version or higher, which these instances are.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | front-running | true | true | ## Medium: Attacker can corrupt `RewardsDistributor` internal accounting forcing LP token incentive deposits to revert for tokens like `cUSDCv3`
### Description
Some tokens like [cUSDCv3](https://etherscan.io/address/0x9e4dde024f7ea5cf13d5f09c51a1555305c99f0c#code#F1#L930) contains a special case for `amount == type(u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: If `FFactory::buyTax` and / or `FFactory::sellTax` is set to 0, buy / sell would revert
### Description
### Finding description
The [`FFactory::setTaxParams`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2025-04-virtuals-protocol/blob/28e93273daec5a9c73c438e216dde04c084be452/contracts/fun/FFactory.sol# L74) can be called... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: setUpdatePermissionStatus() andsetSponsorshipStatus() Erroneously Emit Events
### Description
Description
The setUpdatePermissionStatus() and setSponsorshipStatus() functions are both called by sponsor
accounts to enable the respective requester accounts to make beacon requests. However, if a requester
account... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Wrong calculation for the new `rewardRate[token]` can cause some of the late users can not get their rewards
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
In `Gauge.sol#notifyRewardAmount()`, the updated rewardRate for the token: `rewardRate[token]` is calculated based on the newly added amount of tokens (`amou... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Creating proposal is not trustless ✓ Fixed in Pull Pattern
### Description
Usually, if someone submits a proposal and transfers some amount of tribute tokens, these tokens are transferred back if the proposal is rejected. But if the proposal is not processed before the emergency processing, these tokens will ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Worker is removed from the active workers list too early
### Description
During `deregister` call we remove worker from the `activeWorkerIds` array right away, however `deregisteredAt` value is set to the next epoch
and according to the `isWorkerActive`,
worker is considered active if `deregisteredAt >= bl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: L03] Not following consistent code style
### Description
###### Low
Components: all
A consistent code style is essential to make the code base clear and readable and to make it possible to combine contributions from wildly diverse people, as is the case in open source projects.
Consider making every file... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: `VaultProxy` implementation can be initialized by anyone and self-destructed
### Description
When the `VaultFactory` contract is deployed and initialized, the `initialise` method on the newly created `VaultProxy` implementation contract is never called. As such, anyone can call that method and pass in whateve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: `increaseAllowances()` Can Not Be Called Again Until the Entire Allowance of `principalToken` Is Used
### Description
Possible DoS depending on the amount of portal tokens in existence (future risk). This is due to `increaseAllowances()` increasing the allowance of the principal token with `safeIncreaseAllowan... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | token | true | false | ## High: Pending payouts when resolving an investor are lost because there is no mechanism to claim the resolved payment
### Description
When resolving a user who loses access to their account, the `ChildToken::resolveUser` function migrates balances, locks, and frozen tokens to a new address, ensuring the investor re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: ERC721 max token per user limit can always be bypassed by one
### Description
Both `transferFrom()` and `safeTransferFrom()` functions in `ERC721DAO` have an off-by-one error when calculating the max amount of tokens a user can have:
```solidity
require(balanceOf(to) <= erc721DaoDetails.maxTokensPerUser);
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: RFTLib incompatible with fee-on-transfer tokens
### Description
When the RFT library requests tokens from a non-RFTPayer address (EOA or non-RFTPayer contract), it uses `safeTransferFrom` to pull the exact requested amount. However, with `fee-on-transfer` tokens, the actual received amount will be less than th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Per-block issuance limit can be bypassed
### Description
Because of a rounding error in a division operation, the per-block issuance limit can be bypassed.
The protocol imposes a delay on large RToken issuances to prevent rapid inflation of the RToken supply and to prevent attacks that can be executed when a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | false | false | ## Low: Flash minting and burning can reduce the paid fees when purchasing a membership or opening a cost-share request
### Description
## Handle
shw
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Users can pay fewer FSD tokens when purchasing a membership or opening a cost share request by flash minting and burning FSD toke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | true | true | ## Low: Consider explicitly denying `allowUser` assigning admin privileges to`ChildToken` contracts
### Description
The 1:1 invariant of a child token can be broken as follows:
Admin:
- calls `allowUser` on a child token contract
- calls `transfer` to directly send central token to the child token
This breaks the 1:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Blocklisted investors can still claim USDC in `TokenSale.sol`
### Description
A wrong argument is passed when checking if a user is blacklisted for claiming in [`TokenSale.claim()`](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-03-zap-protocol/blob/c2ad35aa844899fa24f6ed0cbfcf6c7e611b061a/zap-contracts-labs/contra... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.