text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
Because of this, nutrient loads for Total Phosphorous (TP), ammonium (NHx-N), |
nitrate-nitrite (NOx-N), and Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (DIN) were independently |
developed for all components of the water budget (step 2) based on various existing |
sources of information, including canals, overland flow (ungauged surface water), |
groundwater, and atmospheric contributions. With the exception of freshwater inflows |
61 |
and nutrient loads from canals, few direct data exist for estimating these nutrient loads. |
Indirect data and regression models were used to fill the data gaps. Nutrient loads |
across the boundaries of the model including the Atlantic Ocean were also estimated |
from existing data. |
Figure 4.1: Components of box-model used for mass-balance calculations |
Calculations of nutrient concentrations in Biscayne Bay based on the estimated |
loads extended an existing hydrology/salinity mass-balance model (step 3) that had |
been developed previously for the South Florida Water Management District. This |
model was used to investigate the linkage between freshwater inflows from the |
watershed and salinity patterns in the Bay. The model domain and the |
hydrology/salinity calculations were upgraded based on peer-review comments and the |
model was extended to incorporate mass-balance nutrient calculations. The model was |
then calibrated against measured salinity to estimate the water fluxes between each box |
and validated against an independent set of salinity observations. |
Evaporation |
Rainfall |
S, A |
d |
Net |
discharge, QO |
Evaporation Rainfall |
Exchange |
flux, QX |
Canal Discharge |
Runoff and Groundwater |
SO Ocean salinity, |
Net Freshwater Supply, QR |
A |
B |
QX |
QX |
QX |
QO |
QO |
QO |
Net Freshwater Supply, QR |
Schematic diagram showing |
the components of the water |
and salt mass balances for A) |
a single estuarine basin in |
connection with the coastal |
ocean and B) additional |
fluxes introduced by flow and |
exchange among sub-basins |
within an estuarine basin. |
Conditions in any estuarine |
basin or sub-basin are |
characterized by its volume |
(equal to the product of its |
area A and average water |
depth d) and average salinity |
S. In case A, salinity in the |
single basin is maintained |
through water exchange with |
the coastal ocean at salinity |
SO. In case B, salinity in a subbasin is maintained by water |
exchange with adjacent |
basins and the ocean |
62 |
Overall the hydrology/salinity model captured well the patterns of spatial and |
temporal variability in salinity in Biscayne Bay. Calibration and verification statistics |
show that the box model accounts for greater that 70 percent of the variability in |
measured salinity. Calculated values agree with measurements made within the same |
week with an error of between 2 to 3 psu. Errors are comparable between the |
calibration and verification time periods and are comparable to results achieved in the |
previous box model study. |
Fig 4.2: Spatial structure of the nutrient box-model. |
When the model was used for nutrient mass balance calculations (step 4), the |
results showed varied success at characterizing the link between nutrient loads and |
concentrations in the Bay. Average values for TP concentrations assuming no loss or |
SB1 |
SB2 |
2 |
4 6 5 |
7 |
8 |
SB1 |
SB1 |
SB1 |
S197 |
S26, S25, S25B |
G93, S22, |
S123 |
S21, S21A, |
S20G, S20F |
X18 |
X15 |
X0 |
X5 |
X17 |
Canal discharge |
Net discharge |
3 |
1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.