text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
western BNP shoreline. Road construction produced elevated structures with adjacent |
canal-like borrow ditches and levee structures which cross the western coast in many |
71 |
places. All these structures are barriers to flow, some affect groundwater, and all |
fragment the coastal environments into small disconnected parcels (Fig 5.1). This has a |
negative effect on the wetlands themselves and downstream consequences for those |
marine/bay ecosystems which depend on both quantity and quality of freshwater |
entering the estuary, groundwater flow and dynamics of seawater intrusion. |
Assessments of perceived impacts of canal and groundwater discharges to southern |
Biscayne Bay include those of Szmant (1987), Byrne and Meeder (1999), Lietz (1999), |
Langevin (2000) and Graves et al (2004, 2005). Findings suggest nitrogen-enriched |
groundwater enters Biscayne Bay through canals and underwater springs. Szmant |
(1987) reported a change in seagrass community composition near the mouth of C-102 |
and C-103 and found lower salinities and higher water column nutrient concentrations in |
the affected areas |
Habitat Fragmentation |
Habitat fragmentation has both physical and biotic impact. Most fragmentation |
occurs on the western coastal zone affecting the coastal wetlands and mangrove fringe. |
This compartmentalization of formerly connected wetlands includes urban areas, |
canals, roads, and other structures which impede water flow and isolate biota. |
Therefore habitat fragmentation is a current problem with fair documentation for the |
terrestrial environments, although its potential impacts on the Bay are only inferred. |
Dredging and filling for marinas and residential boat access as well as channels dug |
through shallow water and bridges/causeways are currently a minimal problem in |
Biscayne National Park, but affects the Bay to the north of the Park. |
Power Plants |
Electrical generating power plants, all run by Florida Power and Light, are located |
adjacent to Biscayne National Park. The principal plants are: (1) the Turkey Point |
Nuclear facility located just west of the Park’s SW corner and includes a fossil fuel |
peaker plant on site; (2) the Cutler Power Plant, located on the shore of Biscayne Bay |
northwest of the Park; and (3) one fossil fuel peaker plant which has been permitted |
south of the Princeton canal just west of the Park perimeter. Since 2007, the NPS has |
expressed concerns about the planned expansion, indicating those plans affect |
mangrove wetlands within protected areas, and the recharge area which maintains the |
72 |
saltwater barrier line, and would decrease any benefit the CERP Coastal Wetlands |
restoration could provide once implemented. NPS also pointed out the lands had been |
previously identified as providing wildlife connectivity, and are frequented by several |
endangered or threatened species including the Florida panther, indigo snake, wood |
stork and state listed wading birds. NPS also expressed concerns about the lack of |
supplies of water to meet the plants needs, disposal of same, archeological issues, and |
the threats from sea level rise which would leave the facility as an island at some future |
stage (NPS, 2007). |
WATER QUALITY |
Water quality issues of concern for Biscayne Bay and Biscayne National Park are |
primarily caused by their proximity to Miami Metropolitan area, home to more than 2.4 |
million people, and also to agricultural activities in the Homestead area, and even to |
agriculture south of Okeechobee Lake whose nutrients pesticides, and agro-chemicals |
may be transported along the canal network and brought south to the Biscayne Bay |
basin. All waters in Biscayne Bay are Class III, whose designated use is recreation and |
propagation and maintenance of a healthy, well-balanced population of fish and wildlife. |
Biscayne Bay is also a designated Outstanding Florida Water (OFW). Main water |
quality issues are: water turbidity); nutrient loading and enrichment, bacterial |
enrichment, chemical compounds derived from runoff, pesticides, and industrial and |
stormwater pollutants (Lietz and Meyer 2006; http://www.miamidade.gov). Canal inflow |
is the primary loading mechanism for pollutants to the bay followed by subsurface runoff |
from the shallow, highly permeable Biscayne Aquifer, which allows rapid movement of |
groundwater with direct subsurface connection to the bay and canals (Klein and Hull |
1978; Lietz 1999; Alleman et al. 1995). Caccia and Boyer (2007) identified atmospheric |
deposition as an important contributor to nutrient enrichment. |
Contaminated runoff and groundwater have been identified as major sources of |
pollutants (pathogens and toxicants) to the Dade County canal system (Long et al., |
1999, 2000, 2002, 2005), which finally reach the Bay. Polluted waters have been |
exposed to leachates from agricultural fields, landfills and municipal dumps, through |
73 |
atmospheric deposition of pollutants derived from combustion sources, agricultural |
applications, industrial discharges and vehicle emissions, and finally from direct |
disposal and point sources. Three groups of contaminants have been consistently |
targeted when environmental assessments of Biscayne Bay are conducted: trace |
metals, chlorinated pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polynuclear |
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). |
Early studies of pollution were focused on the impact of raw sewage from open |
sewers and septic tanks (Wakefield 1939; Moore et al. 1955; McNulty 1956). The |
Mowry Canal had elevated phenol levels (Cheesman 1989) and the bay north of |
Rickenbacker Causeway was more affected by chemical contamination and toxicity |
than to the south of the causeway (Long et al. 1999). Organophosphates have been |
detected in sediments at three sites including Military and North Canals (Cantillo and |
Lauenstein 2004), but sediments in open areas of the park have generally low toxicity. |
Lidz (2002) reported initial results of surface sediment samples analyzed for heavy |
metals and concluded that deformed benthic foraminifera were common near the landfill |
(Black Point area). |
NOAA conducted intensive regional surveys to describe the incidence, severity, |
and spatial extent of adverse biological effects associated with chemical contamination |
in Biscayne Bay in 1995. Results showed high levels of sediment contamination and |
severe toxicity in several peripheral canals and tributaries, notably the lower Miami |
River. The 1995 data also showed sporadic low-level occurrence of sediment toxicity in |
southern Biscayne Bay. From 1999 results it is apparent that contaminant plumes and |
associated toxicity do not appear to extend seaward of the mouth of the canals in an |
appreciable manner. Concentrations of contaminants in the sediments in open areas of |
Biscayne and Manatee Bays are generally low (Cantillo and Lauenstein 2004) |
Nutrient enrichment |
Nutrient loading in Biscayne Bay is correlated to population density (Caccia and |
Boyer 2007), agriculture and storm events (Briceño et al. 2010; Migliaccio and Castro |
2009). Additionally, climatic cycles and events seem to affect nutrient loading to the bay |
with increases in loading rates during wetter years (Caccia and Boyer 2007). Surface |
74 |
waters from the three most important land-cover types in Biscayne Bay watershed, |
agricultural, urban and wetland cover, have different chemical characteristics. NOx |
concentrations are higher in agricultural than in urban or wetland areas; concentrations |
of ammonia, TP, and Chla tend to be higher in urban areas than in wetland or |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.