text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
agricultural areas; and TON concentrations are higher in wetland and urban areas than |
in agricultural areas (Britt and Cheesman 1992; Lietz 1999; Haag et al. 1999; US DOI |
NPS. 2003; Caccia and Boyer 2007; Migliaccio et al. 2008). Given the oligotrophic |
nature of these waters the system responds very rapidly to small nutrient enrichment, |
especially to increases of phosphorous, the limiting nutrient (Brand 1988, 2001). |
Turbidity |
Most turbidity in Biscayne Bay is produced by re-suspension of bottom |
sediments, both naturally and anthropogenically generated. Natural agents of |
resuspension are water currents (tidal driven), wind-produced waves (climate related) |
and extreme events (storms and hurricanes). Anthropogenic re-suspension occurs |
when boats are grounded and from boat wakes, as well as from canal discharges. |
Storm induced turbidity is the principal mechanism for re-suspension along the reef |
tract. The area north of BNP adjacent to Key Biscayne is affected by high turbidity from |
the Miami River, caused by re-suspended flocculants (Harlem, 1979). Turbidity |
problems in Biscayne National Park are reasonably well understood with good data on |
the sources as well as the effects on organisms. As long as dredging projects are |
restricted and boat usage regulated, this problem will be minimized. Turbidity in |
northern sections of the Bay has been a long term problem and is likely to get worse as |
the downtown Miami area continues to grow and the seaport is expanded. |
Microbial contamination |
Miami-Dade County beaches are regularly tested and other sites are |
occasionally tested for microbial contamination. Typical microbial groups of concern |
include fecal coliforms, enterococci, Clostridium perfringens, and coliphage and known |
pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens, and human enterovirus. |
Endemic problems are largely confined to areas north of BNP and may not relate to |
75 |
conditions within the Park. High concentration of fecal coliform bacteria in the C-8 |
(Biscayne) Canal, the C-7 (Little River) Canal, the C-6 (Miami River), C-6 (Miami River) |
Lower Segment, and the C-6 (Miami) Canal, within the Biscayne Bay Basin, have |
rendered these waterbodies impaired. Threats posed by microbes are not only for |
humans but for biota in general. Four bacteria have been previously implicated in coral |
disease, Aurantimonas coralicida: white plague (type II) (Richardson et al. 1998), |
Serratia marcescens: white pox (Patterson et al. 2002), Vibrio shilonii: bleaching |
(Kushmaro et al. 1997), and Vibrio coralliilyticus: bleaching and necrosis (Ben-Haim and |
Rosenberg 2002), although the cause of such infections is not uniquely linked to a |
specific pathogen (Polson et al. 2008). Studies of pathogens attached to atmospheric |
particulates suggest that deposition of fungi and bacteria to the Park from outside by |
aerosol means is quite likely to occur. Some concerns have been raised for this to be a |
driving force for the coral declines seen in recent years but proof is inconclusive. |
Microbial contamination from terrestrial sources does occur and is a potential problem |
for Biscayne National Park. Given that data is sparse so the threat is inferential. |
Pesticides and herbicides |
Key et al. (2003) examined pesticides attributed to contaminated canal discharge |
levels in grass shrimp and found correlation between reduced levels of |
acetylcholinesterase enzyme and canal chemicals at Military and North Canals. Cantillo |
and Lauenstein (2004) analyzed samples from South Biscayne Bay and Manatee Bay |
for contaminated marine sediment. Eight types of pesticide were found in seawater |
samples including atrazine, metolachor, CEAT, CIAT (metabolized herbicides), |
chlorpyrifos, diazinon, malathion, and 4,4’DDE (DDT metabolite). The majority was |
found at highest levels at the upstream sites associated with the canal network, at the |
mouths of the canals. Metolachlor was present at all sites sampled. Two sites, Princeton |
Canal mouth and Florida City Canal mouth had high levels of ethoxylates which can be |
an endocrine disruptor. Carriger and Rand (2008) assessed the aquatic risk caused by |
atrazine, metolachlor, malathion, chlorpyrifos and endosulfan in south Biscayne Bay |
and found that atrazine was the most frequently detected pesticide but only at low |
levels. Harman-Fetcho et al. (2005) studied pesticides associated with agricultural |
76 |
runoff to the canal network and found that there were seasonal variations and that |
harvest season when endosulfan is commonly used had a higher hazard potential. |
Seba (1969) reported pesticides associated with surface microlayers in Biscayne Bay |
were related to atmospheric transport and deposition. |
Past and present use pesticides and herbicides have been consistently detected |
in canals and near-shore locations along the southern portions of the bay. For example, |
atrazine and some of its metabolites are present in almost all water samples collected in |
the freshwater environments at concentrations up to approximately 100 ng/L and also in |
coastal areas at lower levels 5-10 ng/L. A similar trend is also evident for the herbicide |
metolachlor. However, the water quality guidelines for these herbicides are several |
orders of magnitude above the environmental concentrations thus unlikely to produce |
detrimental effects. Legacy pesticides, mainly p,p’-DDE (metabolite of DDT) is often |
found in canal sediments and occasionally in areas immediately adjacent to canal |
discharge points (Princeton, Military, Mowry, North and Florida City canals and at Black |
Point Marina). Gardinali et al. (2008c) examined the levels of endosulfan in fish tissues |
from BNP and Everglades National Parks and reported that endosulfan sulfate is |
generally present in areas of Everglades National Park near the Homestead Agricultural |
Area but seldom detected in coastal areas of Biscayne Bay. |
Metals |
Judge and Curtiss (1977) examined sediment samples from the middle of |
Biscayne Bay (just north of the park) for heavy metal contamination and found little |
difference between most areas sampled except for lower values near Fisher Island and |
a sink for metals in sediments near the mouth of the Miami River. They expressed the |
concern that south Biscayne Bay may have been polluted by waters from Miami River |
flowing south under Rickenbacker Causeway. Schroeder and Thorhaug (1980) |
examined uptake of trace metals into seagrass blades finding higher levels in tissues |
than in the surrounding water. Miller (1984) analyzed the runoff from several different |
basins types in South Florida and found the highest lead runoff was from a commercial |
(shopping center) type basin. Cantillo and Lauenstein (2004) analyzed samples from |
South Biscayne Bay and Manatee Bay for contaminated marine sediment. The total |
77 |
trace metals (Cu, Zn, Ni, Pb, Cd, Hg, Ag) found in sediments at the mouths of five |
canals studied indicated toxic conditions were likely. Lidz (2002) reported initial results |
of surface sediment samples analyzed for heavy metals and concluded that Cu, Pb, and |
Zn were highest near marinas in the northern parts of the bay, that metal contamination |
decreased southward and seaward. Among the trace metals, Copper, Arsenic, and |
Lead have been reported in sediments of the bay at concentrations that are above the |
national median for the NOAA NS&T Mussel watch program and in some cases above |
the 85th percentile. However, all the values reported for south Biscayne Bay away from |
the influences of marinas are below the ―probable effects level‖ (PEL) or the sediment |
quality assessment guidelines (SQAGs) for coastal sediments used in Florida to assess |
sediment contamination. With regards to mercury levels in biota, Evans et al. (2008) |
reported mercury levels in fish samples from Florida Bay and Biscayne Bay with highest |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.