text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
McIvor et al. (1994) summarize the effects of freshwater flow on mangroves and |
note that moderate salinities produce the optimum conditions within the |
mangrove community and maximize primary productivity. |
Tidal Marshes |
Located landward of the mangrove zone are various transitional zones. The |
vegetation makeup of these transitional zones depends upon local topography, |
historical rates of sea level rise, frequency of fire, surface water flows and surface |
and subsurface soil salinities. Historically, there were greater surface and |
subsurface freshwater flows near the coast, and thus descriptions of the coastal |
vegetation of the Bay describe freshwater marshes composed of herbaceous |
vegetation located immediately behind a narrow fringe of mangroves. Ross et al. |
(2000) describes changes to this “white zone” in the “Southeast Saline |
Everglades” 50 years after the original description by Engler (1952), and |
Valued Ecosystem Components |
Freshwater Flow and Ecological Relationships in Biscayne Bay 4-2 |
describes four marsh types starting with the coastal prairie behind a mangrove |
fringe, then the Rhizophora scrub, Cladium-Eleocharis-Rhizophora marsh, and finally |
the Cladium marsh located farthest from the coast. A total of 29 species of plants |
are documented to occur in these zones. |
Ross et al. (2002) further documents the characteristics of the “white zone” and |
adds details about the microflora, specifically the distribution of 154 diatom |
species along a salinity gradient from coast to inland saline marsh. |
Grossenbacker (pers. comm.) has indicated that for most of Biscayne Bay proper, |
less than 70 acres of true tidal marsh may still exist based upon the “Advanced |
Identification of Possible Future Disposal Sites…” (ADID) study conducted in |
1994 jointly by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of |
Engineers and Dade County (U.S. E.P.A. 1994). |
Tidal marshes perform similar functions to mangroves, and often have lower |
salinities than mangrove areas, thus overlapping the important oligohaline |
habitat type where water flows are sufficient to reduce salinities to 5 psu or less. |
In other parts of Florida, the oligohaline salt or tidal marsh is often a critical |
nursery habitat for commercially and recreationally important fish and shellfish |
including snook (Centropomus undecimalis), tarpon (Megalops atlanticus), redfish |
(Scieanops ocellatus), and blue crab. In addition, these habitats support the forage |
fish food base (Fundulus spp., Cyprinodon variegatus, Lucania parva, Floridichthys |
carpio, Peocilia latipinna) for many other species (Lewis et al. 1985) (Durako et al. |
1985). Documentation of this functional role in salt marshes of Biscayne Bay is |
only well documented for the forage fish food base (Lorenz 1999, 2000, Lorenz et |
al. 2002). |
Seagrass Meadows and Macroalgae |
Seven species of seagrass occur in the Bay: turtlegrass (Thalassia testudinum), |
shoal grass (Halodule wrightii), manatee grass (Syringodium filiforme), paddlegrass |
(Halophila decipiens), stargrass (Halophila englemanii), Johnson’s seagrass (Halophila |
johnsonii), and wigeon grass (Ruppia maritima). |
Macroalgae occur mixed with seagrass meadows, and as dominant macrophytes |
where sediment thickness is too shallow to support seagrass (< 15 cm), or water |
depths too great to support seagrass which typically require more light (i.e., 25% |
of the light striking the water’s surface), or too turbid to transmit the required |
levels of light. Generally, macroalgae fall into three categories as to life-form: |
epiphytic on other plants, drift and attached. Epiphytic algae on mangrove prop |
roots and pneumatophores include Bostrychia montagnei. Drift algae include |
Hypnea spp., Laurencia spp. and Gracilaria spp. Attached green algae are very |
Valued Ecosystem Components |
Freshwater Flow and Ecological Relationships in Biscayne Bay 4-3 |
common mixed with seagrasses, or as stand-alone communities in hardbottom |
areas mixed with sponges and soft corals and include Halimeda spp., Penicillus |
spp., and Caulerpa spp. |
Seagrass distribution consists of few meadows around the mouth of the Oleta |
River, large areas of shoal grass and manatee grass in the northern portion of the |
Bay transitioning to predominantly turtlegrass in the southern three sub-regions. |
A band of shoal grass occurs along the western shore of the central and southcentral portions of the Bay. Recent work indicates that some wigeon grass occurs |
where the lowest salinities occur (D. Mir-Gonzalez, pers. comm.). It appears that |
Johnson’s seagrass, a species designated as “threatened” by the federal |
government, does not occur south of Virginia Key (NMFS, 2002), but the reasons |
for this pattern of spatial distribution are not known. |
As noted by Alleman et al. (1995), many species of small shrimp (both caridian |
shrimp and juvenile penaeid shrimp), crabs, polycheate worms, clams, snails, |
echinoderms and fish (both adult and juvenile) are found in this habitat. The |
commercially and recreationally important fish and shellfish species, pink |
shrimp (Farfantepenaeus duorarum), stone crabs (Menippe mercenaria), spiny lobster |
(Panulirus argus) and spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) are important |
components of the fauna of seagrass meadows. |
Oyster Bars |
The American oyster, Crassostrea virginica, is a common component of the |
estuarine fauna from the Gulf of St. Lawrence down the Atlantic Coast, into the |
Gulf of Mexico and around to the Yucatan peninsula (Galtsoff 1964). The bar or |
bioherm formation is typical and provides a physical structure supporting |
dozens of resident species including polycheate worms, amphipods, crabs and |
small fish (Bahr 1981). |
As a habitat component of Biscayne Bay, oysters were historically very common. |
Smith (1896) states “…There is a luxuriant growth of oysters in parts of Biscayne |
Bay.” Meeder et al. (1997) report that “North Bay supported an active oyster |
fishery until the 1920’s when Haulover Cut was constructed and reduced North |
Bay renewal time…” |
In contrast Alleman et al. (1995) only mention in passing that “Historical |
freshwater inflows (both ground and surface water) were large and well |
distributed spatially and seasonally, which presumably supported a richer |
estuarine fish fauna than we find today…”, and mentions that Smith (1896) |
“reported black drum (Pogamias cromis) as common near oyster beds in the bay |
and red drum (Sciaenops occelatus) abundant in all seasons. These estuarine fish |
Valued Ecosystem Components |
Freshwater Flow and Ecological Relationships in Biscayne Bay 4-4 |
are no longer common in Biscayne Bay…” presumably because of the lack of this |
habitat feature (both dynamic and static components, Browder and Moore 1981). |
The Unit Management Plan for Oleta River State Park (FDEP, 2002) reports the |
existence of a live oyster reef (bioherm) at the mouth of the Oleta River. No |
further details are given. |
Meeder et al. (1997) characterize three submerged plant communities along five |
transects located from Dinner Key to the Mowry Canal and notes that only fossil |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.